Skip to main content
Burns & Trauma logoLink to Burns & Trauma
letter
. 2020 Aug 31;8:tkaa034. doi: 10.1093/burnst/tkaa034

Assessment of plasma 12(S)-Hydroxyeicosatetraenoic acid as a biomarker to predict mortality in adults with severe trauma

Liping Yang 1, Qian Cheng 2, Qi Huang 3, Huaping Liang 4,#, Yan Luo 5,#,
PMCID: PMC7459147  PMID: 32904748

To the Editor

Identification upon admission of a group of patients with severe traumatic injury presenting with a higher risk of death is crucial in designing personalized treatment strategies [1]. However, there are as yet limited biomarkers for the prediction of mortality in patients with traumatic injury. 12(S)-Hydroxyeicosatetraenoic acid (12(S)-HETE), as a classic metabolite of arachidonic acid, was suggested to be a potential biomarker in brain injury [2] or subarachnoid hemorrhage [3]. Here we report on a prospective observational analysis of the biomarker 12(S)-HETE in plasma samples collected from 76 adult patients with traumatic injury admitted to the emergency department (ED) (within the first 48 h post-trauma) and 25 healthy adults from two tertiary teaching hospitals in Chongqing between October 2018 and October 2019.

The baseline demographics and clinical characteristics of traumatic subjects (n = 76) were collected at admission and are presented in Table 1. The average age was 50.8 ± 15.8 years and the majority (73.7%) was male, with no significant differences compared with the control group (n = 25). For all trauma subjects, the interval from injury to blood extraction was 17 (11–29) h. The injury types were divided into isolated intracranial lesions (IL, 13.2%) or isolated extracranial lesions (EL, 50.0%) or a combination of both lesion types (IL + EL, 36.8%). Based on the injury severity score (ISS), traumatic patients were classified into two subgroups: mild trauma patients (ISS< 16, n = 23) and severe trauma patients (ISS ≥ 16, n = 53). Admission levels of plasma 12(S)-HETE were markedly elevated in the severe group compared with the mild group (severe vs. mild: 4.26 [1.27–7.40] vs. 1.54 [0.24–2.71] ng/ml, p = 0.005) or control group (severe vs. control: 4.26 [1.27–7.40] vs. 0.55 [0.13–1.13] ng/ml, p < 0.001) while there was no significant difference between the mild and control groups. The endpoint was defined as death. Patients who died at any point during their initial hospitalization were considered as meeting the mortality outcome. In our study, non-surviving patients (n = 8) showed significantly higher admission levels of plasma 12(S)-HETE than survivors (n = 68) (non-survivor vs. survivor: 11.17 [7.24–13.10] vs. 2.10 [0.71–5.40] ng/ml, p < 0.001). Spearman’s correlation analysis showed admission 12(S)-HETE levels were correlated with ISS (ρ = 0.419, p < 0.001), acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II (APACHE II) (ρ = 0.499, p < 0.001), revised trauma score (RTS) (ρ = −0.477, p < 0.001) and trauma and injury severity score (TRISS) (ρ = −0.508, p < 0.001). Multivariate linear regression revealed five factors independently related to admission 12(S)-HETE levels, including APACHE II scores at admission, hypoxia at admission, external abbreviated injury score (AIS), head and neck AIS and time from injury to first blood extraction (Table 2).

Table 1.

Basic demographics and clinical characteristics of traumatic patients

Variables Overall (n = 76) Subgroups Mild trauma vs.
Mild trauma (n = 23) Severe trauma (n = 53) Severe trauma
P value
Demographics
 Age, years 50.8 ± 15.8 49.1 ± 13.8 51.6 ± 16.7 p = 0.544
 Gender, male, n (%) 56(73.7) 13(56.5) 43(81.1) p = 0.025
 Time (h) 17(11–29) 16(12–23) 18(11–31) p = 0.353
Medical history, n (%)
 Hypertension 5(6.6) 1(4.3) 4(7.5) p = 1.000
 Diabetes 1(1.3) 1(4.3) 0(0) p = 0.303
Cause of injury, n (%)
 Traffic accidents 30(39.5) 12(52.2) 18(34.0)
 Falls 29(38.2) 6(26.1) 23(43.4) p = 0.278
 Other 17(22.4) 5(21.7) 12(22.6)
Injury types, n (%)
 IL 10(13.2) 0(0) 10(18.9)
 EL 38(50.0) 20(87) 18(34.0) p = 0.178
 IL + EL 28(36.8) 3(13) 25(47.2)
Systemic injury severity
 ISS 20.4 ± 10.2 8.6 ± 3.6 25.5 ± 7.6 p < 0.001
 APACHEII 9(5–14) 5(2.0–11.0) 9(6–16) p = 0.002
 RTS 7.84(6.73–7.84) 7.84(7.84–7.84) 7.11(5.97–7.84) p = 0.006
 TRISS 0.96(0.87–0.99) 0.99(0.97–1.00) 0.92(0.75–0.97) p< 0.001
Secondary insults, Present, n (%)
 Hypotension at admission 9(11.8) 2(8.7) 7(13.2) p = 0.715
 Hypoxia at admission 28(36.8) 2(8.7) 26(43.4) p = 0.001
Biomarkers
 12(S)-HETE (ng/ml) 2.59(0.87–6.46) 1.54(0.24–2.71) 4.26(1.27–7.40) p = 0.005
Clinical data
 Hospital length of stay (days) 26(11–51) 27(8–57) 26(13–44) p = 1.000
 ICU length of stay (days) 3(0–11) 0(0–3) 6(2–14) p < 0.001
Laboratory characteristics
 WBC (×109/L) 10.9 (8.5–14.1) 10.6(7.5–13.5) 11.5 (8.7–15.1) p = 0.212
 CRP (mg/L) 22.1(13.4–79.4) 23.8(13.8–80.8) 21.1(12.6–81.2) p = 0.935
 PCT (ng/ml) 0.63(0.28–2.20) 0.34(0.23–0.53) 0.97(0.29–2.75) p = 0.037

Data normally distributed were reported as mean ± SD, non-normally distributed were reported as median (IQR). Categorical variables are presented as numbers and percentages. Normal distribution was compared using the t-test for independent samples. Significance for intergroup differences of non-normal distribution variables was assessed by the Mann-Whitney U test. Chi-square tests or Fisher exact tests were used to compare categorical variables. The severity of Traumatic Injury was assessed by ISS: mild (ISS < 16) and severe (ISS ≥ 16). Time: time from injury to blood extraction. Hypotension was defined as the presence or absence of any episode of systolic blood pressure < 90 mmHg within the first 48 h after the trauma event. Hypoxemia was established as a PaO2 ≤ 60 mmHg or oxygenation index (PaO2/FiO2) <300. ISS injury severity score, IL isolated intracranial lesions, EL isolated extracranial lesions, IL + EL a combination of IL and EL, APACHE II acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II score, RTS revised trauma score, TRISS trauma and injury severity score, ICU intensive care unit, WBC white blood cell, CRP C-reactive protein, PCT procalcitonin, IQR interquartile range

Table 2.

Factors independently related to 12(S)-HETE levels (multivariate analysis, linear regression)

Parameters B SE Beta adjusted P value R 2 change Multicollinearity
Tolerance VIF
APACHE II at admission 0.229 0.055 0.434 0.000 0.351 0.714 1.401
Hypoxia at admission 3.103 0.843 0.367 0.001 0.076 0.777 1.288
External AIS 2.440 0.841 0.289 0.005 0.060 0.775 1.290
Head and neck AIS 0.588 0.213 0.281 0.008 0.047 0.749 1.336
Time (h) 0.067 0.029 0.209 0.024 0.042 0.954 1.048

AIS in six body regions (head and neck, face, thorax, abdomen, extremities and external) were collected at admission. ISS is equal to the sum of the squares of the three maximum AIS scores. Time: time from injury to blood extraction. R = 0.759; R2 = 0.575; R2 adjusted = 0.537, p < 0.001. AIS abbreviated injury score, SE standard error, VIF variance inflation factor, 12(S)-HETE 12(S)-Hydroxyeicosatetraenoic acid. “B” is regression coefficient in regression equation

To investigate whether 12(S)-HETE levels are useful in predicting mortality in traumatic patients, a binary logistic regression was conducted. Of note, elevated 12(S)-HETE predicted mortality even after adjustment for gender, age, injury severity, cause of injury and injury types. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were conducted (Figure 1) using 12(S)-HETE, APACHE II, RTS and TRISS, of which the last three are the common clinical predictors in severe trauma [4]. Mortality ROC for 12(S)-HETE revealed an area under the curve (AUC = 0.936; 95% CI: 0.878–0.993) for non-survivor detection that was higher than the AUC for APACHE II (AUC = 0.923; 95% CI: 0.842–1.000), RTS (AUC = 0.874; 95% CI: 0.780–0.968) or TRISS (AUC = 0.922; 95% CI:0.837–0.971). However, there is no significant statistical difference in the AUC among these four predictors. Moreover, 12(S)-HETE showed 100% sensitivity and 83.8% specificity for mortality prediction.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

ROC curves for biomarkers of intra-hospital mortality. The AUCs for 12(S)-HETE, APACHE II, RTS and TRISS were 0.936, 0.923, 0.874 and 0.922 respectively. For 12(S)-HETE concentrations, a cut-off value of 6.415 ng/ml showed 100% sensitivity and 83.8% specificity for mortality prediction. For APACHE II score, a cut-off value of 13.5 reached 87.5% sensitivity and 79.4% specificity, while the cutoff (4.09) of RTS discriminated mortality with a sensitivity of 62.5% and a specificity of 100%. For TRISS, J index identified the best cutoff at 0.91 (sensitivity: 100%, specificity: 75%). ROC receiver operating characteristic, AUCs area under curve, 12(S)-HETE 12(S)-Hydroxyeicosatetraenoic acid, APACHE II acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II score, RTS revised trauma score, TRISS trauma and injury severity score

A variety of risk prediction scores, including the RTS and the TRISS, have been used widely to predict mortality after traumatic injury. The APACHE II scoring system is widely used to determine disease severity and predict outcomes in critically ill patients [5] and showed good prognostic value in predicting outcomes in trauma patients [1, 4]. Nonetheless, these scores use so many biochemical variables that they become non-practical for rapid evaluation of the severity of disease in the ED. In our study, 12(S)-HETE showed good prognostic value in classifying mortality during hospitalization of trauma patients and it has the potential to become a prognostic biomarker in addition to the risk prediction scores used in the ED.

Echoing the studies of Westcott et al. [6] and Farias et al. [2] that elevated levels of 12(S)-HETE could be observed in human cerebrospinal fluid following severe brain injury, we found that the admission plasma 12(S)-HETE level was positively correlated with the degree of consciousness disorder at admission in our subgroup analysis. However, significantly elevated plasma 12(S)-HETE levels were also observed in patients with severe isolated extracranial trauma. We failed to find significant differences of 12(S)-HETE in injury types. Therefore, 12(S)-HETE is not a specific marker of craniocerebral injury, but rather a marker of systemic response.

Severe trauma can cause complex changes in human immune function at an early stage. This post-traumatic immune inflammatory response is a physiological process needed for tissue repair and healing. However, the release of a large number of inflammation-related mediators can induce a cascade of immune and inflammatory responses, leading to systemic inflammatory response syndrome. 12(S)-HETE is often considered a pro-inflammatory cytokine playing a role in various diseases, and was first reported as a potent chemoattractant for neutrophils in 1975 [7]. Not only that, 12(S)-HETE can also promote the generation of monocyte chemokine protein-1 and induce inflammatory cell infiltration [8]. Besides, it has been reported that 12(S)-HETE can also enhance the phagocytic function of macrophages and promote the secretion of inflammatory factors by macrophages, such as interleukin-6 (IL-6), tumor necrosis factor α, IL-1 and IL-12 [9, 10]. In this study, it was found that the plasma level of 12(S)-HETE was significantly increased in patients with severe trauma upon admission, which may be the result of the post-traumatic immune-inflammatory response initiated by the body in the early stage of severe trauma. As an intermediary mediator of the inflammatory response, 12(S)-HETE plays an important role in regulating inflammatory cells and inflammatory factors. The absence of significant changes of 12(S)-HETE in mild trauma patients may also be associated with a slight inflammatory response.

In conclusion, plasma 12(S)-HETE in the first 48 h was elevated in patients with severe trauma and correlated with the severity of systemic injury. Determining plasma 12(S)-HETE concentrations at the early stage of post-trauma was of great value in distinguishing severe trauma from mild trauma and predicting in-hospital mortality in adult patients with severe trauma. These findings encourage larger multicenter studies aimed at exploring the clinical value of circulating 12(S)-HETE to help early clinical decision-making in human trauma.

Abbreviations

12(S)-HETE: 12(S)-hydroxyeicosatetraenoic acid; AIS: abbreviated injury score; APACHE II: acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II; AUC: area under the curve; CI: confidence interval; CRP: C-reactive protein; EL: isolated extracranial lesions; IL: isolated intracranial lesions; IQR: interquartile range; ISS: injury severity score; PCT: procalcitonin; ROC: receiver operating characteristic; RTS: revised trauma score; SD: standard deviation; TRISS: trauma and injury severity score; VIF: variance inflation factor; WBC: white blood cell

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by Daping Hospital, Army Military Medical University and The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, China. The registration number is ChiCTR1800018496. Written informed consent obtained from all patients or their legal representatives where appropriate.

Availability of data and materials

All relevant datasets are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Authors’ contributions

HL and YL conceived and designed the study. LY was the primary author and editor of the manuscript, with QC as the lead clinical investigator. All authors contributed to the enrolment of patients and sample collection. QH provided statistical advice and analyzed the data. All authors critically reviewed and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by the National Nature Science Foundation of China (No. 81901956) and the Innovation Project in Military Medicine (NO.18CXZ002).

Competing interests

None declared.

Supplementary Material

supplementary_materials_tkaa034

Contributor Information

Liping Yang, Department of Laboratory Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.

Qian Cheng, Department of Laboratory Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.

Qi Huang, State Key Laboratory of Trauma, Burns and Combined Injury, Department of Wound Infection and Drug, Army Medical Center (Daping Hospital), Army Medical University, Chongqing, 400042, China.

Huaping Liang, State Key Laboratory of Trauma, Burns and Combined Injury, Department of Wound Infection and Drug, Army Medical Center (Daping Hospital), Army Medical University, Chongqing, 400042, China.

Yan Luo, Department of Laboratory Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.

References

  • 1. Polita JR, Gomez J, Friedman G, Ribeiro SP. Comparison of APACHE II and three abbreviated APACHE II scores for predicting outcome among emergency trauma patients. Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2014; 60: 381–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Farias SE, Heidenreich KA, Wohlauer MV, Murphy RC, Moore EE. Lipid mediators in cerebral spinal fluid of traumatic brain injured patients. J Trauma. 2011; 71: 1211–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Poloyac SM, Reynolds RB, Yonas H, Kerr ME. Identification and quantification of the hydroxyeicosatetraenoic acids, 20-HETE and 12-HETE, in the cerebrospinal fluid after subarachnoid hemorrhage. J Neurosci Methods. 2005; 144: 257–63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Hwang SY, Lee JH, Lee YH, Hong CK, Sung AJ, Choi YC. Comparison of the sequential organ failure assessment, acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II scoring system, and trauma and injury severity score method for predicting the outcomes of intensive care unit trauma patients. Am J Emerg Med. 2012; 30: 749–53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Huang J, Xuan D, Li X, Ma L, Zhou Y, Zou H. The value of APACHE II in predicting mortality after paraquat poisoning in Chinese and Korean population: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017; 96: e6838. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Westcott JY, Murphy RC, Stenmark K. Eicosanoids in human ventricular cerebrospinal fluid following severe brain injury. Prostaglandins. 1987; 34: 877–87. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Turner SR, Tainer JA, Lynn WS. Biogenesis of chemotactic molecules by the arachidonate lipoxygenase system of platelets. Nature. 1975; 257: 680–1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Wen Y, Gu J, Vandenhoff GE, Liu X, Nadler JL. Role of 12/15-lipoxygenase in the expression of MCP-1 in mouse macrophages. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2008; 294: H1933–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Bolick DT, Orr AW, Whetzel A, Srinivasan S, Hatley ME, Schwartz MA, et al. 12/15-Lipoxygenase regulates intercellular adhesion Molecule-1 expression and monocyte adhesion to endothelium through activation of RhoA and nuclear factor-κB. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2005; 25: 2301–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Wen Y, Gu J, Chakrabarti SK, Aylor K, Marshall J, Takahashi Y, et al. The role of 12 /15-lipoxygenase in the expression of interleukin-6 and tumor necrosis factor-alpha in macrophages. Endocrinology. 2007; 148: 1313–22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

supplementary_materials_tkaa034

Data Availability Statement

All relevant datasets are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.


Articles from Burns & Trauma are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES