Skip to main content
Orthopedic Reviews logoLink to Orthopedic Reviews
. 2020 Aug 6;12(2):8540. doi: 10.4081/or.2020.8540

Acute kidney failure after total knee arthroplasty revision with antibiotic-impregnated cement spacer

Daniele Mazza 1, Cosma Calderaro 1,, Raffaele Iorio 1, Piergiorgio Drogo 1, Valerio Andreozzi 1, Andrea Ferretti 1
PMCID: PMC7461639  PMID: 32922700

Abstract

Gentamicin-impregnated cement beads and spacers are frequently used in case of infective complications after Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA). A great number of studies in the literature demonstrated that the local administration of gentamicin produces high local antibiotic levels but low serum and urine gentamicin concentrations. Gentamicin-impregnated cement spacer can induce nephrotoxicity in patients presenting major renal impairment susceptibility. We report a case of acute renal failure using a gentamicin-impregnated block spacer. An 83-year-old woman underwent a gentamicinimpregnated bone–cement spacer implant because of an infected TKA removal. Three days later patient clinical status got worse reporting a decreased urine output and increasing C-reactive protein (CRP), Serum Creatinine (SCr) and Blood Urea Nitrogen (BUN). Because the symptoms could be related to the knee spacer lead us to the decision of gentamicin-impregnated cement spacer removal. The day following the removal procedure showed progressive improvement of general condition with evidence of SCr and BUN normalization. Gentamicin-impregnated cement spacer can induce nephrotoxicity in patients presenting major renal impairment susceptibility.

Key words: Knee, Knee arthroplasty, Gentamicin-impregnated bone–cement, Cement spacer, 2-stage revision, Acute renal failure

Introduction

Deep infection after Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) is a serious complication with a reported incidence of 1% to 4.4%.1,2Although different treatments have been described in the literature, 2-stage revision arthroplasty remains the most used and successful technique with a success rate averaging 92%.3-5

The major disadvantage of this method is the time between stages, which is often associated with pain, functional impairment and knee instability.6,7 Furthermore, reimplantation is often challenging because of scar formation, shortening of the extensor apparatus of the knee and retraction of the joint capsule and ligaments.

Gentamicin-impregnated cement beads and spacers are routinely used in 2-stages revision procedures because considered effective and safe from gentamicin-induced complication showing high local antibiotic levels and low serum and urine drug concentrations.8 We report here a rare case of acute renal failure after the implantation of a gentamicin-impregnated block spacer for the treatment of an infected TKA.

Case Report

An 83-year-old woman with a medical history of chronic atrial fibrillation, hypertension, and dyslipidemia, referred to our department for left knee osteoarthritis and she underwent a TKA surgery. From the clinical record the surgery, the hospitalization and the early rehabilitation period were uneventful. Three months later she was re-admitted in our department because of a painful left knee, joint swelling, and wound dehiscence. The microbiological analysis of the wound showed a multiresistant pseudomonas aeruginosa infection. Preoperative laboratory test showed serum creatinine (SCr) 1.2 mg/dL (reference range 0.5–1.5), blood urea nitrogen (BUN) 29 mg/dL (5–25), C-reactive protein (CRP) 10,70 mg/dL (normal <0.5), hemoglobin 12.1 g/dL (12–16) and WBC count 4,71 X 103/mm3 with a normal differential. The first attempt of treatment was a deep wound revision and joint washing associated with postoperative intravenous cefepime and oral ceftazidime administration as required by the infectious disease specialist.

Because there was not local and laboratory test improvement with relapsed symptoms after 2 weeks of hospitalization, the patient underwent a TKA removal and a molded gentamicin-impregnated cement spacer implantation (0.5g gentamicin per 40 g batch), Refobacin® Bone Cement R, BIOMET-INC. (Figure 1).

Surgery progressed without complica - tions. During the second postoperative day, hemoglobin dropped to 8.5 g/dL and 1 unit of packed red blood cells was administered. Knee and wound showed progressive improvement and stitches were removed fifteen days after surgery. C-reactive protein dropped to 3.8 mg/dL.

After the initial local and general improvement, three days later the patient’s clinical status got progressively worse: the patient started presenting shortness of breath, fatigue, confusion, nausea, weakness, irregular heartbeat. Hemoglobin value dropped again to 8.1 g/dL (needing of 1 more unit of packed red blood cells), urine output decreased to 700 mL/day, CRP increased to 10,80 mg/dL, SCr increased to 2,00 mg/dL (Figure 2) and BUN to 40 mg/dL (Figure 3). Heart, abdominal and vascular ultrasonography, thoracic CT-scan and brain MRI were performed and resulted negative for any other disease o medical condition that could explain the clinical worsening.

During the following 5 days, despite the administration of diuretics and modulation of an adequate fluid therapy as prescribed by the nephrologist, who performed daily consultation, serum creatinine continued to increase up to 6.4 mg/dL and BUN up to 67 mg/dL (Figure 2 and 3), then 3 cycles of hemodialysis were required. The serum level of gentamicin was investigated then resulted in a concentration of 0,5 mcg/mL. Despite the serum level of gentamicin was low, after a multispecialty audit, the clinical suspicion was nephrotoxicity caused by the gentamicin released from the knee spacer, and we decided to perform the removal of the spacer as a lifesaving procedure. The Gentamicinimpregnated spacer was removed the day after, and the knee was stabilized with an arthrodesis with an external fixator and the patient was admitted to the Intensive Care Unit for 7 days before her return in the orthopedic department, when the acute renal failure resolved.

SCr and BUN values showed a progressive decrease until normalizing in about 30 days after the spacer removal (Figures 2 and 3). After 1 year, at the X-rays evidence of knee bone fusion, the external fixator was removed. At the last follow-up, 3 years later, the patient continued to be asymptomatic for kidney failure and returned to her daily activity.

Discussion

The use of aminoglycoside-impregnated cement for the treatment of infected total hip and knee arthroplasties, in a two steps procedure, is a common practice. A cement spacer may be useful for tensioning the ligaments to facilitate the TKA revision after eradication of the infection. It allows high concentrations of antibiotics locally, avoiding systemic value increasing.9

It’s well known that aminoglycoside antibiotics, such as gentamicin and tobramycin, show reliable effectiveness in osteomyelitis and prosthetic infections so they are frequently used despite potential side effects such as otovestibular and nephrotoxicity. Effectiveness of aminoglycosides is concentrationdependent, 10 while their toxicity is time-related so once-daily administration of a high dose of aminoglycosides has been advocated as safe. To reach a high local concentration it’s possible to use gentamicinimpregnated cement as suggested by a lot of authors in literature with good and reproducible results.11 Only a small quantity of gentamicin cement is released in the blood (5%–8%) as demonstrated by many studies8 depending on diffusion that is related to the surface area. To enhance the local concentration of gentamicin it’s possible to use beads increasing diffusion area. This kind of local treatment produces high local antibiotic levels and low serum and urine gentamicin concentrations12 resulting to be safe and effective in the majority of arthroplasty infections and showing a low rate of adverse events.13 However, few reports indicated patients developing acute renal failure after the placement of aminoglycoside-laden spacers.14

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Postoperative X-ray after the implantation of the gentamicin-impregnated knee spacer.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Time related variance of serum creatinine (SCr) level before and after spacer removal.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Time related variance of blood urea nitrogen (BUN) level before and after spacer removal.

Menge et al15 showed a higher rate of acute renal dysfunction in a cohort of patients undergone antibioticimpregnated cement spacer implantation presenting medical comorbidities. Especially in old age, the relevance of non-clinical apparent kidney insufficiency in patients who undergo total joint replacement is well known. Many authors have shown that a chronic kidney disease (CKD), defined as an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <60 mL/min/1.73 m2, in patients undergoing TKA, can be a risk factor for greater hospitalization and post-operative morbidities, including a worsening of the renal function itself; a significant increase in these complications, is shown with eGFR values <45-50 mL/min/1.73 m2.16-18

Our patient at admission presented mild renal impairment, atrial fibrillation, dyslipidemia, and hypertension, however from the first hospitalization until the gentamicin-impregnated cement spacer implantation, despite the appearance of PJI, no alteration of renal function was detected: the acute renal failure could reasonably be traced back to the procedure.

Conclusions

According to the literature review and others few case reports, our case report want to suggest to be aware of the potential aminoglycoside-induced nephrotoxicity also in local treatment as the use of gentamicinimpregnated cement, block spacer and bread especially in patients presenting comorbidities and major risk factor of renal susceptibility, also without preoperative clinical signs of renal failure. In the patient with comorbidities and major risk factors, the serum gentamicin dosage cannot be used to discriminate patients that can benefit from implant removal.

Funding Statement

Funding: Self funding.

References

  • 1.Salvati EA, Robinson RP, Zeno SM, et al. Infection rates after 3175 total hip and total knee replacements performed with and without a horizontal unidirectional filtered air-flow system. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1982;64:525-35. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Johnson DP, Bannister GC. The outcome of infected arthroplasty of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1986;68:289-91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Lombardi AV, Karnes JM, Berend KR. A motion maintaining antibiotic delivery system. J Arthroplasty 2007;22:50-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Fehring TK, Odum S, Calton TF, Mason JB. Articulating versus static spacers in revision total knee arthroplasty for sepsis. The Ranawat Award. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2000:9-16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Emerson RH, Muncie M, Tarbox TR, Higgins LL. Comparison of a static with a mobile spacer in total knee infection. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2002;:132-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Goksan SB, Freeman MA. One stage reimplantation for infected total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1992;74: 78-82. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Hanssen AD, Rand JA, Osmon DR. Treatment of the infected total knee arthroplasty with insertion of another prosthesis. The effect of antibioticimpregnated bone cement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1994:44-55. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Bunetel L, Segui A, Cormier M, et al. Release of gentamicin from acrylic bone cement. Clin Pharmacokinet 1989; 17:291-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Curtis J, Sternhagen V, Batts D. Acute renal failure after placement of tobramycin-impregnated bone cement in an infected total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 005;25:876-80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Freeman CD, Nicolau DP, Belliveau PP, Nightingale CH. Once-daily dosing of amioglycosides: review and recommendations for clinical practice. J Antimicrob Chemother 1997;39:677-86. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Bucholz HW, Engelbrecht H. Depot effects of various antibiotics mixed with Palacos resins. Chirurg 1970;40:511. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Van Raaij TM, Visser LE, Vulto AG, Verhaar JA. Acute renal failure after local gentamicin treatment in an infected total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2002;17:948-50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Springer B, Lee G, Osmon D, et al. Systemic safety of high-dose antibioticloaded cementspacers after resection of an infected total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004:47-51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Patrick BN, Rivey MP, Allington DR. Acute renal failure associated with vancomycin- and tobramycin-laden cement in total hip arthroplasty. Ann Pharmacother 2006;40:2037-42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Menge TJ, Koethe JR, Jenkins CA, et al. Acute kidney injury after placementof an antibiotic-impregnated cement spacer during revision knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2012;27:1221-7.e1-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Kaiser C, Tillmann FP, Löchter J, Landgraeber S, Jäger M. The influence of chronic kidney disease on the duration of hospitalisation and transfusion rate after elective hip and knee arthroplasty. Int Urol Nephrol 2019;51:147-153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Inoue D, Yazdi H, Goswami K, et al. Comparison of Postoperative Complications and Survivorship of Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty in Dialysis and Renal Transplantation Patients. J Arthroplasty 2020;35:971-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Ackland GL, Moran N, Cone S, et al. Chronic kidney disease and postoperative morbidity after elective orthopedic surgery. Anesth Analg. 2011;112:1375-81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Orthopedic Reviews are provided here courtesy of Open Medical Publishing

RESOURCES