Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Nat Protoc. 2019 Apr 26;14(6):1803–1819. doi: 10.1038/s41596-019-0162-6

Real-time microscopy and physical perturbation of bacterial pili using maleimide-conjugated molecules

Courtney K Ellison 1, Triana N Dalia 1, Ankur B Dalia 1, Yves V Brun 1,*
PMCID: PMC7461830  NIHMSID: NIHMS1590690  PMID: 31028374

Abstract

Bacteria use surface-exposed, proteinaceous fibers called pili for diverse behaviors including horizontal gene transfer, surface sensing, motility, and pathogenicity. Visualization of these nanomachines and their activity in live cells has proved challenging largely due to their small size. Here, we describe a broadly applicable method for labeling and imaging pili and other surface exposed nanomachines in live cells. This technique uses a combination of genetics and epifluorescence microscopy in which a cysteine substitution is made in the major pilin subunit for subsequent labeling with thiol-reactive maleimide dyes. Large maleimide-conjugated molecules can also be used to physically impede the dynamic activity of nanomachines. We describe parameters for selecting cysteine substitution positions, optimized labeling conditions for imaging pilus fibers, and methods for impeding pilus activity. Visualization of extracellular nanomachines using this approach can provide a more comprehensive understanding of the role played by these structures in distinct bacterial behaviors.

Introduction

Bacterial surface-exposed nanomachines including pili, secretion systems, and flagella play an essential role in several diverse processes across distantly related bacterial species. These structures have been difficult to fully characterize since the most common techniques for their visualization such as immunofluorescence or electron microscopy disrupt their activity or require cell fixation and cannot be used to interrogate their dynamic activity. Although valuable, these end-point assays provide only a limited snapshot view of nanomachine action. This limited perspective has been especially problematic in the study of type IV pili and how these small fibers participate in diverse behaviors since dynamic activity mediated by polymerization and depolymerization of pilin subunits is thought to be important for their function. Recent development of a technique involving cysteine substitution within the major structural subunit of surface-exposed nanomachines has allowed direct observation of dynamic activity in real time, thereby increasing our understanding of their function in diverse processes and the underlying mechanisms of their synthesis17. While this technique was originally applied to the labeling of flagella1, here we focus on our application of this technique to the type IV pili and discuss how it may be expanded to other surface-exposed nanomachines.

In this protocol, we describe methods for labeling exposed nanomachines (Fig. 1), starting with how to select residues for cysteine replacement (Fig. 2) and provide insight into optimizing labeling protocols for the greatest likelihood of success. We detail how to label pili in different systems and describe how to perturb their dynamic activities using a similar method.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Pili can be visualized by maleimide-reactive fluorescent dyes. A culture of a PilA-cysteine knock-in mutant (pil-cys) is grown to the proper growth phase and incubated with maleimide dye at room temperature. Excess, unbound maleimide dye is washed away, and the cells are imaged by epifluorescence microscopy. Pili with cysteine substitutions accessible to labeling will fluoresce. Green balls represent maleimide dye. Cys represents cysteine knock-ins in the pilins that comprise the pilus fiber.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Accessible residues are unique to each pilin gene. Structures were generated from individual, processed pilin sequences using Phyre2 software26. (a) Type IVa: type IV competence pilus of V. cholerae, (b) type IVb: TCP pilus of V. cholerae, and (c) type IVc: tad pilus of C. crescentus. Color of residues indicates whether cysteine replacement resulted in pili that could be labeled with AF488-mal dye: red – not labeled, yellow – very few filaments or weak labeling, green – labeled. Figures were generated using Chimera software27. Asterisk at S67 position is corrected annotation of the same position published previously as S814, renamed upon correction of misannotated translation start site. (d) Plots showing the % of mutations that resulted in bright, weak, or no pilus labeling based on the amino acid mutated (left) or the relative surface accessibility (RSA) value (right). Data is based on values reported in Table 1.

Applications

Cysteine substitutions coupled with labeling by maleimide-conjugated compounds have been used to visualize both flagella and pili in diverse bacterial species. They have been used to address several outstanding questions on how bacteria assemble external nanomachines and use them to interact with their environments. For example, labeling of flagella has bolstered our understanding of how bacteria regulate motility1, flagellar assembly6, and flagellar length3,7. Labeling of the type IVa competence pili in Vibrio cholerae has clarified how bacteria use pili to take up environmental DNA that can be used to acquire new genes including those encoding antibiotic resistance or virulence factors4. Labeling of the type IVc tad pili of Caulobacter crescentus has revealed that these structures exhibit both extension and retraction, despite lacking a pilus retraction ATPase PilT orthologue, and that this retraction is important for sensing surface contact2.

Mutating the pilus retraction ATPase PilT in systems that possess this component often results in hyperpiliation and disrupts normal extension and retraction dynamics, however these mutations have also been shown to alter transcription profiles of cells8. Blocking retraction through steric hindrance by bulky compounds as described below allows for temporal control of the disruption of pilus retraction in live cells and allows for direct assessment of the role for pilus retraction in bacterial behaviors in the context of genetically intact systems. Type IV pili are distantly related to other surface-exposed structures including type IV and type II secretion systems, competence pili of Gram-positive organisms and the archaellum (used for swimming motility) of archaea, which are all understudied due to limitations in methods to visualize their activities in real-time. Likewise, flagella are related to the type III secretion system involved in the secretion of virulence proteins9. Due to the homology between these systems, this labeling method could be applied to studying these and other surface-exposed nanomachines.

Strengths and limitations of existing protocols

The most common technique for visualizing pili is electron microscopy in one of its varying forms including transmission electron microscopy, scanning electron microscopy, and cryo-electron microscopy. While the use of traditional electron microscopy dates to the 1930’s and allows for visualization of small structures at the nanoscale, this technique requires harsh treatment of cells that often shears structures off the cell surface, hindering comprehensive analysis of their length and number while providing only a limited temporal view of pili in the context of bacterial behavior. Employment of cryo-electron microscopy largely mitigates the issue of cell surface shearing and provides high-resolution three-dimensional structural models of nanomachine complexes1012; however, this method still requires cell fixation by freezing and requires numerous images of structures averaged together to compile a model of the structure, providing no information about the dynamics of the machinery.

While some light microscopy techniques can be used to visualize pili, the most accessible method is immunofluorescence microscopy which uses bulky fluorescently conjugated antibodies that bind to extended pili and cause fiber aggregation in addition to impeding physical activity such as retraction1315. Fluorescence microscopy of dynamic pilus structures has been achieved using succinimidyl-ester dyes that bind to primary amines on exposed bacterial proteins. However, this approach often results in high fluorescence signal of the cell body relative to the pili and requires the use of total internal reflection fluorescence (TIRF) microscopy to allow for pilus fiber visualization16. The method outlined here allows for direct visualization of pilus extension and retraction in the context of live cells in real-time by epifluorescence microscopy, providing a more comprehensive view of the role pili play in bacterial behaviors.

Selection of residues for cysteine substitution

Type IV pilins exhibit a “lollipop” structure consisting of a conserved alpha helical N-terminal transmembrane domain and a C-terminal globular head-like domain (Fig. 2a, b, c). The transmembrane domain is important for insertion in the inner membrane17 and supports pilin-pilin interactions at the center of pilus fibers18. Parts of the globular domain are exposed to the extracellular environment, presenting an optimal target for making cysteine mutations that will be exposed to labeling by maleimide dyes. However, the globular head of many pilins also possesses conserved folds including a disulfide bond that is critical for maintaining protein structure and stable pilus formation. We found that mutating serine or threonine residues to cysteine was much more likely to result in labelable pili (Fig. 2d), likely because they share nucleophilic properties and are less likely to disrupt protein folding. The globular domain also exhibits variability between species, and structure prediction software based on homology is rarely sufficient for predicting exposed, non-deleterious sites for cysteine substitutions. To overcome this limitation, we use open source software NetSurfP19 which calculates relative surface accessibility (RSA) of individual amino acid residues. While we have found that some outliers with extremely low or high RSA scores are unexpectedly labelable or not labelable respectively, we find that the majority of residues with RSA scores above 0.4 are often at least semi-labelable (Fig. 2d, Table 1). Interestingly, there is considerable variation in the number of residues selected that resulted in labelable pili in our test cases (C. crescentus PilA 2/7, V. cholerae PilA 2/9, V. cholerae MshA 14/24, V. cholerae TcpA 5/7). For this reason, we generally select ten residues for cysteine substitution with the highest RSA scores.

Table 1.

Labeling efficiency and functionality of cysteine knock in mutants with different maleimide dyes.

Pilus class Species and pilus name Position mutated Relative surface accessibility (RSA) score Labeling efficiency with DyL405-mal Labeling efficiency with AF488-mal Labeling efficiency with AF594-mal Functionality
Type Iva V. cholerae MSHA None ND
P31 0.174 None None None ND
N35 0.519 None Weak None ND
G38 0.535 None None None ND
D39 0.449 None None None ND
G47 0.425 None None None ND
G50 0.422 None None None ND
K66 0.507 None None None ND
T70 0.422 None Bright Weak ND
T74 0.416 None Bright Weak ND
T77 0.427 Weak Bright Bright ND
T81 0.287 Weak Bright Weak ND
T84 0.443 None None None ND
T97 0.284 None None None ND
S102 0.369 Bright Bright Bright ND
T112 0.342 None None None ND
S116 0.557 None Weak None ND
S117 0.415 Weak Bright Weak ND
S124 0.450 None None None ND
S125 0.489 Weak Bright Bright ND
T126 0.534 Bright Bright Bright ND
G143 0.546 None Weak None ND
T155 0.461 Bright Bright Bright ND
S156 0.592 Bright Bright Bright ND
T171 0.518 Weak Bright Bright ND
Type Iva V. cholerae competence pilus None +++
Q34 0.253 None None None -
Q36 0.311 None None None -
N37 0.583 None None None -
K41 0.517 None None None -
T52 0.425 None None None +
T64 0.476 Weak Bright Weak ++
S67* 0.453 Bright Bright Bright +++
T71 0.35 None None None +
Type IVb V. cholerae TCP None +++
T47 0.093 Weak Bright Weak ++
S78 0.616 Weak Weak Weak -
T85 0.436 None None None -
T92 0.441 Bright Bright Bright +
S100 0.507 None None None -
S127 0.604 Bright Bright Bright -
T184 0.578 Bright Bright Bright +
Type IVc C. crescentus Tad None ++
T36 0.407 Bright Bright Bright ++
T37 0.377 Weak Weak Weak +
T40 0.58 None None None -
T44 0.578 None None None -
S54 0.61 None None None -
T55 0.643 None None None -
T59 0.868 None None None -

ND – not determined

*

Previously published as S81; correctly annotated position is S67

Functionality assessed by transformation frequency assays

Functionality assessed by aggregation assays

Functionality assessed by phage sensitivity assays using pilus-dependent phage ɸCbK

Labeling strategies

Labeling and visualization of dynamic nanomachine activity.

For a comprehensive methodology on labeling of flagella filaments and visualizing their dynamic activity see Turner and Berg 201820. Here, we will focus on pili labeling. For assaying labeling efficiency of different cysteine-substituted pilus mutants, we use AlexaFluor 488 C5 maleimide dye (AF488-mal), as other maleimide dyes do not always label pili of the same cysteine knock-in strain as efficiently (Table 1). Using AF488-mal, we successfully labeled cysteine-knock in mutants for the three subclasses of type IV pili2: the type IVa competence pilus and mannose-sensitive hemagglutinin (MSHA) pili found in V. cholerae (Fig. 3a), the type IVb toxin co-regulated pilus (TCP) found in V. cholerae (Fig. 3b), and the type IVc tight adherence (Tad) pili found in Caulobacter crescentus (Fig. 3c). Using time-lapse microscopy, cycles of extension and retraction can be observed for labeled pili, although due to differences in extension and retraction rates, the optimal time-lapse interval may vary (average extension rates of ~90 nm/s for type IVa V. cholerae competence pili4 vs ~140 nm/s for type IVc tad pili2 of C. crescentus).

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Cysteine substitution and fluorescent maleimide labeling allows visualization of different classes of pili. (a) V. cholerae strain containing competence pilin PilAS67C (left) and V. cholerae strain containing MSHA pilin MshAS156C (right) labeled with AF488-mal. (b) V. cholerae strain containing TCP pilin TcpAT184C labeled with AF488-mal. (c) C. crescentus strain containing Tad pilin PilAT36C labeled with AF488-mal. Scale bar, 2 μm.

One interesting observation for labeling type IV pili is that labeling of pilin subunits results in cell body fluorescence2,4 (Fig. 3). Diffusion of fluorescently labeled cysteine-substituted pilins residing in the cytoplasmic membrane results in peripheral cell body fluorescence. In C. crescentus, AF488-mal is not permeable through the outer membrane, and thus cell body fluorescence is directly dependent on retraction of labeled pilins into the inner membrane2. However, in V. cholerae, maleimide dyes permeate the outer membrane and label pilins residing in the inner membrane independent of dynamic activity (unpublished data). Cell body fluorescence is a useful tool for determining whether a cysteine knock-in strain can be labeled (see protocol below), although it also underscores the importance of labeling a non-cysteine knock-in parent strain alongside any mutants as a negative control.

Disruption of dynamic nanomachine activity.

While physical perturbation of some pili is possible by genetic manipulation through deletion of the pili retraction ATPase genes or point mutations in minor pilins21, these mutations often have pleiotropic consequences on global transcription profiles as in Neisseria8. In addition, deletion of the pili retraction ATPase genes can affect the physical activity of other pili, such as in V. cholerae where multiple pili share a retraction ATPase4,22. Furthermore, many type IV pili do not possess orthologs of a retraction ATPase, including many type IVb and all type IVc pili, excluding genetic perturbation from the experimental repertoire of tools for assessing the role of dynamics in these systems2,23. To overcome these issues, adding maleimide-conjugated bulky compounds disrupts dynamic pilus activity in real-time. Two methods for obstructing retraction have been established2,4. The first method involves a single incubation step with a bulky polyethylene glycol maleimide conjugate (PEG5000-mal), while the second involves a two-step process: incubation with a biotin-maleimide conjugate (biotin-mal) followed by a wash step and incubation with a streptavidin derivative. Surprisingly, we found that type IVa pili could only be obstructed by the two-step biotin-mal/streptavidin method (Fig. 4a), while the one step PEG5000-mal incubation robustly blocked dynamic activity in the type IVc pili (Fig 4b). Because type IVa pilins are larger than type IVc pilins, they may form tighter connections with neighboring subunits, limiting accessibility of bulky conjugates to exposed cysteine residues. This may also explain discrepancies between labeling efficiencies of different positions with different maleimide dyes (Table 1), although this remains to be determined.

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Pilus retraction can be blocked using different maleimide conjugates. (a) Time-lapse images of V. cholerae strain containing competence pilin PilAS67C that has been labeled with a 1:1 ratio of AF488-mal:biotin-PEG11-maleimide followed by blocking with neutravidin (b) Time-lapse images of C. crescentus strain containing Tad pilin PilAT36C labeled with AF488-mal and +/− PEG5000-mal to block retraction. Scale bar, 2 μm. White arrows indicate tips of extended pili.

Limitations and optimization

While this labeling method has been applied and successfully used to visualize surface-exposed nanomachines in several diverse bacterial systems, some limitations exist and optimization at the biological level is essential for each system labeled (Table 2). In the MSHA pili, some positions resulted in only weakly labeled pili for some dyes and while other cysteine substitutions resulted in bright labeling along the length of the pilus fibers for all three dyes tested, demonstrating the importance of testing multiple residues for cysteine substitution (Fig. 5a, b). While generally at least one out of ten cysteine-substituted positions result in at least weak fiber labeling with maleimide dyes (Table 1), some bacterial species are not easily genetically altered, limiting the number of cysteine knock-in mutants that can be rapidly tested. Pili are also often expressed maximally under different conditions in different species. For example, the type IVc tad pili of C. crescentus are produced in a cell-cycle dependent manner, while the type IVc tad pili of Pseudomonas aeruginosa are produced maximally in stationary cultures24,25. Determining optimal conditions for maximal pilus expression may not be trivial depending on the bacterial system.

Table 2.

Troubleshooting Table

Step Problem Possible Reason Solution
11 No cell body fluorescence or labeled fibers Pilin cysteine residue is not exposed and is therefore not labeled Try longer labeling cells for longer time before imaging; if still no cell body fluorescence then likely not a labelable position
Maleimide dye solution has deteriorated Make new stock of maleimide dye or obtain fresh aliquot from freezer
Excess free thiols in labeling buffer competed with pilin cysteines for labeling Resuspend cells in thiol-free buffer prior to labeling
Growth conditions are not optimized for pilus expression/activity Perform optimization to assess the growth phase and conditions at which pilus-dependent activity is maximal
11 There is cell body fluorescence but no labeled fibers Not enough signal from fibers Increase exposure time or light intensity settings on microscope
Increase labeling time prior to imaging
Other surface-exposed cysteines may be present and labeled by dye Test parent strain lacking cysteine mutation for cell body fluorescence to compare to mutants
Inappropriate time interval for time-lapse microscopy Vary interval time, trying both shorter intervals of 1–3 s and longer intervals of 30 s
Cell body signal occludes pili signal Use TIRF microscopy
If still no fibers, cysteine position may result in labelable pilins but may prevent pilin-pilin interactions resulting in all pilins remaining in membrane Make an outer membrane secretin mutant to determine if maleimide dyes can pass through the outer membrane to label pilins in the absence of fiber formation
Note that this may not always work, but is true in at least some systems. For example, deletion of the gene encoding the outer membrane pilus secretin CpaC in C. crescentus results in no cell body fluorescence while deletion of the gene encoding the outer membrane secretin PilQ in V. cholerae still allows for cell body fluorescence
11 Labeled fibers but very weak labeling efficiency Not enough signal Increase exposure time or light intensity settings on the microscope
Increase labeling time prior to imaging
Reduce background fluorescence by using a different growth medium/buffer to make pads
Multiple pilins make up pilus fiber, resulting in a lower ratio of labeled pilins in the fiber Increase labeling time
Check genome for other pilins and make mutation to disrupt expression of other pilins if present
Make a cysteine knock-in mutation in other pilins and combine mutations in same genetic background
12 Labeled fibers but no dynamic activity Inappropriate time interval for time-lapse microscopy Vary imaging time interval, trying both shorter intervals of 1–3 s and longer intervals of 30 s
Pili are not dynamic Test multiple cysteine knock-in position mutants for similar phenotype
Check for cell body fluorescence: if no cell body fluorescence pili are not dynamic as fluorescently labeled pilins disseminate into the inner membrane after retraction; if cell body fluorescence, pili may be dynamic, but you will have to test if the dye permeates the outer membrane by making an outer membrane secretin mutant and looking for cell body fluorescence
*Note – if outer membrane secretin mutant exhibits cell body fluorescence, no conclusions can be drawn about dynamic activity; if mutant exhibits no cell body fluorescence, but the original cysteine knock-in strain does, retraction is most likely occurring
Phototoxicity is preventing visualization of dynamic activity Decrease exposure time or light intensity settings on microscope
Increase imaging interval time
Growth conditions are not optimal for pilus activity Grow cells under different conditions and in different media and test for increased activity; grow and image cells over a range of different temperatures
12 Blocked cells still exhibit dynamic activity of pilus fibers Blocking reagent has deteriorated Prepare fresh blocking reagents and attempt protocol again
Protocol tested does not work with cysteine knock-in strain Test alternative blocking protocol provided
Not all pili are blocked for retraction Incubate cells longer with blocking reagent
Increase concentration of blocking reagent
Add blocking reagent without dye and incubate for a few minutes prior to adding dye
If none of the above solutions work, test other cysteine knock-in positions for dynamic activity and blocking capability

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

Observation of pili is affected by multiple variables. (a) Bright labeling with all three maleimide dyes tested for V. cholerae strain containing MshAS156C. (b) Bright labeling with AF488-mal and weak labeling with Dylight405-mal and AF594-mal dyes for V. cholerae strain containing MshAT81C. (c) Labeling of V. cholerae strain containing PilAS67C with AF488-mal dye for 1 min, 10 min, or 30 min before washing. (d) Labeling of V. cholerae strain containing PilAS67C with AF488-mal dye for 30 min before washing and imaging under different types of pads. Pili are out of focus when no pad is present, and both LB and gelzan separately and together have higher background fluorescence than a pad made with instant ocean (IO) buffer and agarose. (e) A V. cholerae strain containing PilAS67C was labeled with AF488-mal and then subjected to time-lapse fluorescence microscopy (10 s intervals). Data indicate the percent of cells that make a pilus binned by minute (i.e. within the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, or 5th minute of the time-lapse). Because the three separate fields of view were imaged on the same pad sequentially (i.e. the time-lapse for location 2 was started after completing the 5 min time-lapse at location 1) and all locations exhibited the same decrease in pilus activity, we attributed this reduction in activity to phototoxicity and not an artifact of pad drying, etc. Number of total cells quantified for locations 1, 2, and 3 are n = 52, 59, and 70 respectively.

Technical challenges can also pose a problem and require optimization for the best results (Table 2). As surface exposed nanomachines are often fragile, shearing during wash steps necessary for labeling can be an issue20. Furthermore, the labeling time directly impacts the fluorescence signal of the fibers (Fig. 5c), and the imaging conditions may result in more background fluorescence that obscures spatial resolution. For example, when no imaging pad is used, fibers often drift out of the plane of focus due to the lack of spatial confinement and result in blurry or smeared images from motion driven by Brownian forces. In addition, the media used to make pads can affect background fluorescence of the sample (Fig. 5d). An additional limitation common to all live imaging applications includes the potential effects of light exposure and the resulting phototoxicity to cells, which can affect their extension and retraction dynamics. We observed in some systems such as the Vibrio cholerae type IVa competence pili that pilus dynamic activity decreases over time upon light exposure, limiting imaging experiments to small time windows to prevent light interference in measurements of pilus-dependent phenotypes (Fig. 5e). However, the benefits of this technique far exceed its limitations. The use of the cysteine knock-in method for imaging surface-exposed nanomachines allows the visualization of these structures in live cells in real time and should prove valuable for the elucidation of their roles in the broad processes to which they contribute.

Reagents

  • Growth medium appropriate for the growth of the bacteria under investigation such as Lysogeny broth (LB) medium sterilized by autoclaving (Fisher Scientific, cat. no. DF0446–17-3)

  • Solid growth medium appropriate for the growth of specific species of bacteria, such as pre-poured LB agar plates (Sigma-Aldrich, cat. no. L5542)

  • Instant Ocean (Aquarium Systems, cat. no. EAN3443981210100)

  • Phosphate buffered saline (PBS) (ThermoFisher Scientific, cat.no. 10010023)

  • Agarose (SeaKem LE agarose, Lonza, cat. no. 50004)

  • Gelzan CM (Sigma-Aldrich, cat. no. G1910)

  • High-quality anhydrous dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) (ThermoFisher Scientific, cat. no. D12345)
    • Caution – DMSO is inflammable, an irritant, and a permeator. Avoid contact with skin and eyes.
  • Alexa Fluor 488 C5 maleimide (AF488-mal) (ThermoFisher Scientific, cat. no. A10254)
    • Caution – maleimides are irritants. Avoid contact with skin and eyes. Harmful if swallowed.
  • DyLight 405 maleimide (DyL405-mal) (ThermoFisher Scientific, cat. no. 46600)
    • Caution – maleimides are irritants. Avoid contact with skin and eyes. Harmful if swallowed.
  • Alexa Fluor 594 C5 maleimide (AF594-mal) (ThermoFisher Scientific, cat. no. A10256)
    • Caution – maleimides are irritants. Avoid contact with skin and eyes. Harmful if swallowed.
  • EZ-Link Maleimide-PEG11-Biotin (biotin-mal) (ThermoFisher Scientific, cat. no. 21911)
    • Caution – maleimides are irritants. Avoid contact with skin and eyes. Harmful if swallowed.
  • Methoxypolyethylene glycol maleimide, 5,000 (PEG5000-mal) (Sigma-Aldrich, cat. no. 63187)
    • Caution – maleimides are irritants. Avoid contact with skin and eyes. Harmful if swallowed.
  • NeutrAvidin protein (ThermoFisher Scientific, cat. no. 31000)

Equipment

  • Eppendorf snap-cap centrifuge tubes, 1.5 ml (ThermoFisher Scientific, cat. no. 3439), sterilized by autoclaving

  • Tubes appropriate for the growth of the bacterial species under investigation such as Falcon™ Round-Bottom Polypropylene tubes (Fisher Scientific cat. no 352059)

  • Incubator, appropriate for the optimum growth of the species of bacteria under investigation

  • Microcentrifuge (ThermoFisher Scientific, cat. no. 75002451)

  • Vortex mixer (Thermofisher Scientific, cat. no 88880017TS)

  • A fluorescence microscope equipped with appropriate excitation/emission filters that cover the excitation/emission maxima of at least Alexa Fluor 488 C5 maleimide, ThermoFisher Scientific, cat. no A10254s

  • Glass slides (25 × 75 mm; VWR, cat. no. 48300–026)

  • 22 × 22 cm glass coverslips (VWR, cat. no. 48366–227)

  • Sterile cryogenic vials for bacterial freezer stocks (2 ml, polypropylene; VWR, cat. no. 66008–706)

  • Sterile inoculating loops (1 μl, VWR, cat. no. 89126–870)

  • Bunsen burner

  • Micropipettors P2-P1000 (Fisher Scientific, cat. no. 14–388-100)

  • Sterile pipette tips for P2 (Fisher Scientific, cat. no. 02–707-436), P20 and P200 (Fisher Scientific, cat. no. 02–707-409), and for P1000 (cat. no. 02–707-407)

Reagent Setup

  1. 7 g/L Instant Ocean medium
    1. Dissolve 7 g of Instant Ocean into 1 L of water before autoclaving to sterilize. Store at room temperature.
  2. DyLight 405 maleimide, Alexa Fluor 488 C5 maleimide, Alexa Fluor 594 C5 maleimide stocks
    1. Dissolve 1 mg of compound into 200 μL of anhydrous DMSO to make a 5 mg/mL stock and vortex to mix until compound is completely dissolved
      1. Critical step - stock solutions of maleimide conjugates should be stored at −20 °C and they are sensitive to both light and oxidation. The stocks can be kept at −20 °C for several months and should go through minimal cycles of freezing and thawing to prevent decomposition and loss of efficacy. It is therefore critical to aliquot into small fractions, for example 20 μL aliquots.
  3. PEG5000-mal
    1. Dissolve 50 mg of PEG5000-mal into 1 mL of water to make a 100 mM stock solution and vortex vigorously to mix until compound is completely dissolved
      1. Critical step - stock solutions of maleimide conjugates should be stored at −20 °C and they are sensitive to both light and oxidation. The stocks can be kept at −20 °C for several months and should go through minimal cycles of freezing and thawing to prevent decomposition and loss of efficacy. It is therefore critical to aliquot into small fractions, for example 50 μL aliquots.
  4. Biotin-mal
    1. Dissolve 500 μg of biotin-mal into 100 μL anhydrous DMSO to make a 5 mg/mL stock and vortex vigorously to mix until compound is completely dissolved
      1. Critical step - stock solutions of maleimide conjugates should be stored at −20 °C and they are sensitive to both light and oxidation. The stocks can be kept at −20 °C for several months and should go through minimal cycles of freezing and thawing to prevent decomposition and loss of efficacy. It is therefore critical to aliquot into small fractions, for example 20 μL aliquots.
  5. NeutrAvidin
    1. Dissolve 10 mg NeutrAvidin into 300 μL of water to make a 33 mg/ml stock and vortex vigorously to mix until compound is completely dissolved.
      1. Critical step - stock solutions of proteins should be stored at −80 °C and should go through minimal cycles of freezing and thawing to prevent denaturation and loss of efficacy. It is therefore critical to aliquot into small fractions, for example 10 μL aliquots.

Preparation before maleimide labeling

  1. Grow bacterial cultures (4–24 hours, depending on the strain).
    1. From a −80 °C bacterial culture freezer stock or a single colony on a Petri agar plate, inoculate cells into sterilized liquid medium and grow them in optimal, species-specific conditions until they reach optimal growth for specific pilus expression.
      1. Critical step – different pili are maximally expressed under different conditions; it is important to know the conditions of maximal pilus expression for each species before labeling
  2. Prepare desired stock solution(s) of maleimide conjugates as described in Reagent Setup (25 min)
    1. Critical step – stock solutions of maleimide conjugates should be stored at −20 °C and they are sensitive to both light and oxidation. The stocks can be kept at −20 °C for several months and should go through minimal cycles of freezing and thawing to prevent decomposition and loss of efficacy.
  3. Prepare agarose or Gelzan pad for imaging bacteria (25 min)
    1. Critical step – make no more than one hour prior to labeling as pads can dry out
      1. To make 1% agarose pad, dissolve 0.1 g of agarose into 10 ml of medium or buffer and microwave until boiling to melt agarose
        1. Note – 0.2% Gelzan pads can be made and used the same way by dissolving 0.02 g of Gelzan into 10 ml of PBS or 7 g/L Instant Ocean medium
        2. Caution – agarose solutions easily boil over and can cause burns if not handled properly
    2. Spot ~80 μl of melted agarose solution onto a glass slide and cover with a 22 × 22 cm glass coverslip and apply pressure until agarose is thinly spread between the two glass surfaces without creating excessive bubbles or holes in the agarose
      1. Critical step – applying too much pressure will result in tearing of the pad and difficulty imaging, applying insufficient pressure may result in an uneven pad and difficulty imaging
    3. Let pad solidify for at least 10 min at room temperature to dry appropriately
      1. Critical step – if pad does not dry sufficiently, bacteria will not be confined, and imaging will be difficult
    4. Remove glass coverslip by sliding it gently of the pad just prior to use
      1. Critical step – do not leave exposed to air for more than 5 min as pads will dry out, which may cause difficulty imaging

Labeling with maleimide dyes for observation of dynamic pilus activity (7–35 min)

  1. Pipette 100 μL of culture at appropriate growth phase into 1.5 ml Eppendorf centrifuge tube and centrifuge cells at appropriate speed and time for species of interest for 1 min (for example 5,000 × g for C. crescentus, 16,000 × g for V. cholerae) and resuspend in 100 μL of buffer lacking free thiols
    1. Critical step (only necessary for rich, complex media) – if there is excess free thiols in the culture medium, binding of the maleimide dye to the cysteines in the pili will be competed by its binding to the free thiols in the medium
  2. Pipette 0.5 μL of 5 mg/ml AF488-mal dye stock into tube containing cells for a final concentration of 25 μg/mL dye

  3. Incubate at room temp for 5 – 30 min
    1. Critical step – some pili may need longer labeling times for best results, optimize by testing various labeling times before imaging
  4. Centrifuge cells and discard supernatant

  5. Add 100 μL of fresh buffer or medium and centrifuge cells again
    1. Critical step - failure to wash cells may result in high background fluorescence that will make imaging surface structures difficult
  6. Discard supernatant and resuspend cells in appropriate volume for imaging
    1. Critical step – resuspension volume will vary depending on starting concentration of cells; ideally 1000 cells per field of view is optimal
  7. Image using wide-field fluorescence microscopy as specified below

Labeling with maleimide compounds for disruption of dynamic pilus activity (7–70 min)

  1. One-step blocking with PEG5000-mal
    1. Pipette 100 μL of culture at appropriate growth phase into 1.5 ml Eppendorf centrifuge tube and centrifuge cells at maximum speed for species of interest for 1 min (for example 5,000 × g for C. crescentus, 16,000 × g for V. cholerae) and resuspend in 100 μL of buffer lacking free thiols such as PBS or Instant Ocean
      1. Critical step (only necessary for rich, complex media such as LB medium) – if there are excess free thiols in the culture medium, binding of the maleimide dye to the cysteines in the pili will be competed by its binding to the free thiols in the medium
    2. Pipette 5 μL of 100 mM PEG5000-mal stock into tube containing cells for a final concentration of 500 μM PEG5000-mal. Quickly pipette 0.5 μL of 5 mg/ml AF488-mal dye stock into tube
      1. Critical step – PEG5000-mal must be added prior to AF488-mal dye because adding dye first will reduce the number of cysteines available for binding of the PEG5000-mal, possibly resulting in incomplete blocking
    3. Incubate for 5 – 30 min
      1. Critical step – some pili may need longer labeling times for best results, optimize by testing various labeling times before imaging
      2. Critical step – some species may have more active pili if incubated at different temperatures. For best results, optimize be testing labeling at different temperatures such as room temperature or 37 °C.
    4. Centrifuge cells and discard supernatant
    5. Add 100 μL of fresh buffer or medium and centrifuge cells again
      1. Critical step - failure to wash cells may result in high background fluorescence that will make imaging surface structures difficult
    6. Discard supernatant and resuspend cells in appropriate volume for imaging
      1. Critical step – resuspension volume will vary depending on starting concentration of cells; ideally 1000 cells per field of view is optimal
    7. Image using wide-field fluorescence microscopy as specified below
  2. Two-step blocking with biotin-mal/streptavidin derivative
    1. Pipette 100 μL of culture at appropriate growth phase into 1.5 ml Eppendorf centrifuge tube and centrifuge cells at maximum speed for species of interest for 1 min (for example 5,000 × g for C. crescentus, 16,000 × g for V. cholerae) and resuspend in 100 μL of buffer lacking free thiols
      1. Critical step (only necessary for rich, complex media) – if there are excess free thiols in the culture medium, binding of the maleimide dye to the cysteines in the pili will be competed by its binding to the free thiols in the medium
    2. Pipette 0.5 μL of 5 mg/mL biotin-mal stock into tube containing cells for a final concentration of 25 μg/mL. Quickly pipette 0.5 μL of 5 mg/ml AF488-mal dye stock into tube
      1. Critical step – Biotin-mal must be added prior to AF488-mal dye because adding dye first will reduce the number of cysteines available for binding of the biotin-mal, possibly resulting in incomplete blocking
    3. Incubate at room temp for 5 – 30 min
      1. Critical step – some pili may need longer labeling times for best results, optimize by testing various labeling times before imaging
    4. Centrifuge cells and discard supernatant
    5. Pipette 100 μL of fresh buffer or medium and centrifuge cells again
      1. Critical step - failure to wash cells may result in high background fluorescence that will make imaging surface structures difficult
      2. Critical step – failure to wash cells may result in NeutrAvidin binding to excess biotin-mal in the media resulting in incomplete blocking of dynamic pilus activity
    6. Discard supernatant and resuspend cells in appropriate volume for imaging
      1. Critical step – resuspension volume will vary depending on starting concentration of cells; ideally 1000 cells per field of view is optimal
    7. Pipette appropriate amount of NeutrAvidin stock to achieve 1.32 mg/mL final concentration in cells and incubate cells for additional 30 min at room temp
      1. Critical step – failure to add sufficient NeutrAvidin will result in incomplete blocking of dynamic pilus activity
      2. Critical step – failure to incubate with NeutrAvidin for sufficient length of time will result in incomplete blocking of dynamic pilus activity
      3. Note – 30 min incubation may not be necessary to achieve complete blocking of every system; optimize by testing different incubation times
    8. Image using wide-field fluorescence microscopy as specified below

Microscopy setup and imaging

  1. Wide-field fluorescence microscopy can be used to image pili labeled with maleimide dyes; for imaging cells labeled with AF488-mal, use a fluorescein isothiocyante (FITC) filter set; for DyL405-mal, use a 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) filter set; for AF594-mal, use a mCherry filter set
    1. Critical step – imaging with a low numerical aperture (NA) objective (such as non-oil objectives) may result in fluorescence signal that is too low for visualizing pili. Example microscopy set up that works well for imaging pilus fibers includes Plan Apo 60X oil objective with an EM CCD camera
    2. Troubleshooting – see Table 2 for trouble shooting issues with pilus imaging
  2. Take 1 μl of labeled, washed cells, and spot onto pads prepared for imaging
    1. Critical step – labeled pili will be difficult to see if cells are not confined under a pad, as the pad confines the cells and pili in the field of focus necessary for visualization
  3. Cover with 22 × 22 cm glass coverslip and image
    1. For time-lapse imaging, first focus on the bacterial cells, and try 10 s intervals for imaging pili for at least one minute; this interval should allow for visualization of dynamic fibers if present
      1. Note – Different microscopes will have different light intensities and may require optimization of exposure times

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank M.D. Koch, A.M. Randich, and M. Jacq for critical feedback on the manuscript. This work was supported by grant R35GM122556 from the National Institutes of Health to Y.V.B., by grant AI118863 from the National Institutes of Health to A.B.D., and by National Science Foundation fellowship 1342962 to C.K.E.

Footnotes

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Data availability

The data that support this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

References

  • 1.Blair KM, Turner L, Winkelman JT, Berg HC & Kearns DB A molecular clutch disables flagella in the Bacillus subtilis biofilm. Science 320, 1636–1638 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Ellison CK et al. Obstruction of pilus retraction stimulates bacterial surface sensing. Science (80-. ). 358, 535–538 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Paradis G et al. Variability in bacterial flagella re-growth patterns after breakage. Sci. Rep 7, 1282 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Ellison CK et al. Retraction of DNA-bound type IV competence pili initiates DNA uptake during natural transformation in Vibrio cholerae. Nat. Microbiol 3, 773–780 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Berne C et al. Feedback regulation of Caulobacter crescentus holdfast synthesis by flagellum assembly via the holdfast inhibitor HfiA. Mol. Microbiol 110, 219–238 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Cairns LS et al. FlgN is required for flagellum-based motility by Bacillus subtilis. J. Bacteriol 196, 2216–26 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Turner L, Stern AS & Berg HC Growth of Flagellar Filaments of Escherichia coli Is Independent of Filament Length. J. Bacteriol 194, 2437–2442 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Dietrich M, Mollenkopf H, So M & Friedrich A Pilin regulation in the pilT mutant of Neisseria gonorrhoeae strain MS11. FEMS Microbiol. Lett 296, 248–256 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Blocker A, Komoriya K & Aizawa S-I Type III secretion systems and bacterial flagella: insights into their function from structural similarities. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A 100, 3027–30 (2003). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Craig L et al. Type IV pilus structure by cryo-electron microscopy and crystallography: implications for pilus assembly and functions. Mol. Cell 23, 651–62 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Chang Y-W et al. Architecture of the type IVa pilus machine. Science 351, aad2001 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Wang F et al. Cryoelectron Microscopy Reconstructions of the Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Neisseria gonorrhoeae Type IV Pili at Sub-nanometer Resolution. Structure 25, 1423–1435.e4 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Mahmoud KK & Koval SF Characterization of type IV pili in the life cycle of the predator bacterium Bdellovibrio. Microbiology 156, 1040–1051 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Seitz P & Blokesch M DNA-uptake machinery of naturally competent Vibrio cholerae. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A 110, 17987–92 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Imhaus A-F & Duménil G The number of Neisseria meningitidis type IV pili determines host cell interaction. EMBO J. 33, 1767–83 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Skerker JM & Berg HC Direct observation of extension and retraction of type IV pili. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A 98, 6901–4 (2001). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Giltner CL, Nguyen Y & Burrows LL Type IV pilin proteins: versatile molecular modules. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev 76, 740–72 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Craig L, Pique ME & Tainer JA Type IV pilus structure and bacterial pathogenicity. Nat. Rev. Microbiol 2, 363–378 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Petersen B et al. A generic method for assignment of reliability scores applied to solvent accessibility predictions. BMC Struct. Biol 9, 51 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Turner L & Berg HC Labeling Bacterial Flagella with Fluorescent Dyes. in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) 1729, 71–76 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Ng D et al. The Vibrio cholerae Minor Pilin TcpB Initiates Assembly and Retraction of the Toxin-Coregulated Pilus. PLOS Pathog. 12, e1006109 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Jones CJ et al. C-di-GMP Regulates Motile to Sessile Transition by Modulating MshA Pili Biogenesis and Near-Surface Motility Behavior in Vibrio cholerae. PLOS Pathog. 11, e1005068 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Burrows LL Twitching Motility: Type IV Pili in Action. Annu. Rev. Microbiol 66, 493–520 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Skerker JM & Shapiro L Identification and cell cycle control of a novel pilus system in Caulobacter crescentus. EMBO J. 19, 3223–3234 (2000). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Bernard CS, Bordi C, Termine E, Filloux A & de Bentzmann S Organization and PprB-dependent control of the Pseudomonas aeruginosa tad Locus, involved in Flp pilus biology. J. Bacteriol 191, 1961–73 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Kelley LA, Mezulis S, Yates CM, Wass MN & Sternberg MJE The Phyre2 web portal for protein modeling, prediction and analysis. Nat. Protoc 10, 845–858 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Pettersen EF et al. UCSF Chimera--A visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J. Comput. Chem 25, 1605–1612 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES