Abstract
Digital technologies are rapidly changing how we understand and promote health. A robust and growing line of research has examined how digital health may enhance our understanding and treatment of addiction. This manuscript highlights innovations in the application of digital health approaches to addiction medicine, with a particular emphasis on advances in (1) real-time measurement of drug use events, (2) real-time measurement of the confluence of factors that surround drug use events, and (3) research examining how real-time measurement can inform responsive, in-the-moment interventions to prevent and treat substance use disorder. Although this manuscript focuses on addiction medicine as one exemplar of the striking impact of digital health, science-based digital health offers generalizable solutions to scaling-up unprecedented models of precision healthcare delivery across a broad spectrum of diseases across the globe.
Introduction
The Promise of Digital Health
Digital technology is transforming our world and promises to change how we understand and promote health. The explosion of digital devices and “big data” analytics allows for the unprecedented collection and interpretation of enormous amounts of granular data about everyday behaviors and the context in which they occur.
Digital health [1, 2]refers to the use of data captured via digital technology (sometimes referred to as “digital exhaust” data)[3] to both understand people’s health-related behavior and provide personalized health care resources. Smartphones and smartwatches enable passive, unobtrusive ecological sensing that provides continuous measurement of individuals’ behavior and physiology, such as sleep, social interactions, physical activity, electrodermal activity, and/or cardiac activity[4]. Individuals can provide consumer-generated data in response to queries on mobile devices (sometimes referred to as “ecological momentary assessment” or EMA) to reflect (timestamped) snapshots of their daily lives. Rich information can be gleaned via EMA about individual’s context, mood, behavior, social interactions, pain, sleep, stress levels among other factors (See Figure 1 for examples of EMA questions in a digital health app). And voluminous social media data allow for a rich understanding of individuals’ social networks, communications, and behavior. These data sources (separately or in combination) may provide new insights into digital (behavioral or biological) markers of health-related phenomena and their evolution over time[5]. Indeed, methods such as digital phenotyping[6] or reality mining allow for moment-by-moment quantification of individual-level information collected via personal digital devices as individuals live their daily lives.
Figure 1:
Sample EMA Questions- Types and Formats
In traditional medicine, clinical assessments are typically conducted by trained professionals using structured diagnostic instruments, medical devices, and clinically-validated assessments. Digital health data enhance these conventional sources of clinical data with ecologically-valid data captured in naturalistic contexts. And indeed, digitally-derived data are increasingly considered an essential part of an “evolving health data ecosystem[7, 8]” and promise to markedly impact both discovery science as well as translational science.
Digital Health and Addiction Medicine
One particularly vibrant area of research in digital health has been in the field of addiction medicine[9–13]. Research in addiction medicine is increasingly providing new insights into the neurobiology of addiction[14, 15], including the neurocircuitry underlying the reinforcing value of drugs as well as the molecular biology of the actions of drugs of abuse. This has informed a plethora of research focused on developing and evaluating various pharmacotherapeutic agents that target mechanistic processes underlying addiction as well behavioral treatments intended to disrupt processes that maintain addictive behavior and promote a new behavioral repertoire.
Along with these advances in the neurobiological understanding of addiction, a robust line of research has examined how digital health may enhance our understanding and treatment of addiction. Indeed, the very first “prescription digital therapeutic” given market authorization by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (reSET® followed by reSET-O®; Pear Therapeutics) is for the treatment of substance use disorders and was approved based on strong empirical support from rigorous research[16, 17]. This development pioneers a new domain in which FDA-sanctioned software is deemed safe and effective in the treatment of disease. This enables the delivery of evidence-based substance use disorder treatment anytime and anywhere. This is particularly important given the insufficient addiction medicine clinical workforce to meet the population-level need – a phenomenon that is particularly apparent in the current U.S. opioid crisis.
And research using wearable and mobile data is enabling the development of dynamic models of substance use behavior in real-time and in response to changing environmental, social, physiological, and intrapersonal factors. This manuscript highlights innovations in the application of digital health approaches to addiction medicine, with a particular emphasis on research innovations in the last 2 years and discusses promising new directions in this field. Consistent with the theme of this Special Issue on incorporating wearable and mobile data into systems biology research, we specifically focus on: advances in (1) real-time measurement of drug use events, (2) real-time measurement of the confluence of factors that surround drug use events, and (3) research examining how real-time measurement can inform responsive, in-the-moment interventions to prevent and treat substance use disorder. A summary of these studies is provided in Table 1.
Table 1.
Summary of Studies on Digital Health Applied to Addiction Medicine
Real-Time Measurement of Drug Use via Mobile Sensing | ||
Publication | Substance Measured | Data Source |
Leffingwell, T.R., et al., 2013 (Reference 22) | alcohol detection | electrochemical fuel cells measuring alcohol vapor released from skin |
Nomura, A., et al., 2019 (Reference 23) | cigarette smoking detection | exhaled carbon monoxide concentration levels |
Holtyn et al., 2019 (Reference 24) | cocaine detection | photoplethysmography (PPG) sensor measuring heart rate interbeat interval; accelerometer measuring physical activity; gyroscope measuring motion |
Simons et al., 2015 (Reference 25) | alcohol detection | electrochemical fuel cells measuring alcohol vapor released from skin |
Bae et al., 2017 (Reference 26) | alcohol detection | 56 sensor features related to time, movement patterns (e.g., accelerometry, rotation), communication (e.g., phone calls, texts), and psychomotor impairment (e.g., keystroke speed) |
Krishnan, N., et al., 2019 (Reference 27) | cigarette smoking detection | exhaled carbon monoxide concentration levels |
Real-time Measurement of the Confluence of Factors that Surround Drug Use Events | ||
Publication | Factors Measured | Data Source |
Preston, K.L., et al., 2018 (Reference 32) | craving, stress, drug use | ecological momentary assessment self-report |
Epstein, D.H., et al., 2009 (Reference 33) | exposure to drug cues, mood changes, drug use | ecological momentary assessment self-report |
Shiffman, S. et al., 2004 (Reference 34) | negative mood, smoking | ecological momentary assessment self-report |
Marsch et al., 2020 (Reference 11) | sleep, stress, pain, craving, withdrawal, context, mood, drug use, momentary self-regulation, medication adherence | ecological momentary assessment self-report; smartwatch and smartphone sensing (e.g., location, activity, sleep heart rate, phone usage); social media |
Linking Real-Time Measurement to Inform Responsive, In-the-Moment Substance Use Interventions | ||
Publication | Intervention | Data Source |
Hebert, E.T., et al., 2020 (Reference 39) | tailored messages responsive to imminent smoking risk | ecological momentary assessment self-report |
McClure, J.B., et al., 2016 (Reference 40) | tailored advice for managing nicotine withdrawal symptoms and medication side-effects | ecological momentary assessment self-report |
Hebert, E.T., et al., 2018 (Reference 41) | interventions tailored to stress, smoking urge, and cigarette availability | ecological momentary assessment self-report |
Real-Time Measurement of Drug Use.
Substance use is traditionally measured via self-report (which is subject to recall bias and error) or urine toxicology testing (which is intrusive[18]). Additionally, neither of these traditional methods provides temporal precision about when use events occurred and for what duration. Wearable mobile sensor technologies allow for the continuous measurement of physiological data in the natural environment. These data may provide a richer understanding of substance use patterns as well as more granular outcomes measurement in clinical trials evaluating therapeutics for the treatment of substance use disorders[19–21].
To date, mobile sensing devices have been developed to detect alcohol use transdermally (via electrochemical fuel cells that measure alcohol vapor released from the skin) and can provide near real time data to alcohol researchers[22]. Smoking can be measured via carbon monoxide smoke detectors linked to a smartphone[23]. And promising data are emerging demonstrating that cocaine use can be measured via the application of dynamical systems models to data collected via smartwatches measuring heart rate (e.g., interbeat intervals) and physical activity data[24]. Overall, research focused on real-time measurement of drug use has highlighted the intra-day dynamics of substance use across and within individuals (e.g., drinking speed and quantity [25, 26]) and underscored the feasibility of providing near real-time biomarker feedback to individuals (e.g., feedback on adherence to smoking cessation[27, 28]).
Real-time measurement of the confluence of factors that surround drug use events.
Behavior, including substance use behavior, occurs in a context. This may include, for example, situational demands (including both internal and external triggers for engaging in substance use), changing life circumstances over time, changing resources (e.g., social support) and opportunities to engage in risk behavior[29]. Digital health allows us to capture rich physiological, behavioral, intrapersonal and social data from individuals on a longitudinal basis and in many contexts. And, increasingly sophisticated data analytics can turn these rich data into meaningful insights about individual health via advanced analytic approaches such as machine learning and deep learning approaches to prediction as well as dynamic models that examine time-varying relationships among intensive longitudinal data[30].
A dynamic understanding of the confluence of factors impacting substance use behavior may allow us to markedly refine and advance theoretical models of addiction and offers great promise for transforming the field of addiction medicine. Indeed, the Director of the U.S. National Institute on Drug Abuse has called for addiction treatment models that are dynamic and personalized including a call to “develop algorithms to identify indicators of relapse risk and incorporating them into wearable devices and smartphones”[31].
As one example, a recent digital health EMA study helped elucidate the relationship between craving, stress, and drug use[32]. Specifically, EMA data from persons in treatment for opioid use disorder who were asked to respond to survey prompts or initiate surveys on mobile devices throughout the day revealed that stress increased before reported stressful events but not before drug use events. In contrast, craving increased hours before drug use as well as before stressful events and remained at high levels after such events. These results underscored a stronger link between craving and drug use than between stress and drug use – a result not well understood by structured clinical assessments captured on an infrequent, episodic basis. Other EMA research has demonstrated that drug triggers (e.g., exposure to drug cues or mood changes) increased for hours before cocaine use events but not before reports of cocaine craving. In contrast, drug triggers increased for hours before reports of heroin craving but not before heroin use events[33]. And lapses to smoking among smokers trying to quit were associated with increases in negative mood for many days (not hours) before a smoking lapse event[34]. These results provide new insights into how self-reported EMA data collected in real time can help us understand one’s risk profile for substance use events and how that may differ across various sub-populations of substance users.
In addition to using EMA to measure factors surrounding drug use events in real time, additional digital assessment tools may be of value. Indeed, understanding the separate and combined utility of EMA, passive sensing and social media data in predicting clinically meaningful events for persons with substance use disorders is an important and understudied area of scientific inquiry. One ongoing study is examining how rich data collected from EMA (e.g., inquiring about sleep, stress, pain, craving, withdrawal, context, mood, substance use, momentary self-regulation, and medication adherence), smartwatch sensing (of location and distance traveled, physical activity, sleep, and heart rate), smartphone sensing (of App usage, audio/conversation, call/text, GPS, screen on/off, phone lock/unlock, phone notification information, Wi-Fi & Bluetooth logs, sleep, ambient light, and proximity) and social media data may (separately and combined) aid in the understanding of the interplay of factors that may precipitate events of medication/treatment non-adherence and relapse among individuals in treatment for opioid use disorder[11]. This study may reveal what subset of digitally-derived data may be particularly useful to include as part of broader outcomes measurement in clinical intervention studies.
Linking real-time measurement to inform responsive, in-the-moment substance use interventions.
Digital health approaches can also be used to prompt the delivery of interventions in real-time. Such interventions, sometimes referred to as ecological momentary interventions (EMIs[35]) or Just-in-Time Adaptive Interventions (JITAIs[36]) are designed to be directly responsive to the health needs of an individual, such as when they are craving a substance of abuse. Such interventions are intended to capitalize on states of opportunity when an individual may be most receptive to an intervention and to deliver the right type and amount of therapeutic support at the right time[37].
A digital JITAI targeting substance use can learn about factors associated with risk of relapse event and measure ongoing relapse risk via the digital assessment methods described earlier and then provide in-the-moment interventions designed to promote protective factors and prevent relapse events[38]. Thus, JITAIs are not static interventions that always work the same way across individuals or even within an individual, but rather they can enable dynamic computational models to predict and respond to people’s changing needs, goals, and clinical trajectories over time.
Research on adaptive, in-the-moment interventions for substance use disorders is still nascent but is gaining momentum and producing promising results, particularly in the realm of smoking cessation. A recent pilot study [39]examined a JITAI that used EMA data to assess risk of imminent smoking lapse and then provided tailored messages that were responsive to an individual’s risk profile (e.g., advised to chew a piece of nicotine gum). Results suggested that tailored messages may hold promise for better engaging individuals and help them stop smoking compared to usual care. Another pilot study [40]found that a JITAI that adaptively tailored advice for managing nicotine withdrawal symptoms and medication side-effects was used more often and shown to be more acceptable among smokers seeking to quit compared to a non-adaptive psychoeducational intervention. Additionally, a study[41] conducted with patients in a smoking cessation clinic showed that a JITAI that measured risk for smoking lapse and provided responsive interventions tailored to stress, smoking urge, and cigarette availability resulted in greater reductions in those triggers of lapse compared to non-tailored interventions (although effect sizes were moderate).
Conclusions and Future Directions
Digital health is rapidly changing how we understand and treat addiction. The ecological sampling and precision assessment that digital health approaches afford is increasingly providing new insights into the nature of addiction. And digital therapeutics offer anytime/anywhere treatment to individuals seeking to change drug-taking behavior. Delivering interventions on digital platforms is scalable, personalizable, and can greatly extend the reach and impact of addiction medicine services. Given the high prevalence of addiction and the limited addiction treatment workforce, digital health enables the delivery of science-based therapeutic addiction resources to any corner of the globe.
Although this manuscript focused on the promise of digital health in the realm of addiction medicine, this highlights only one exemplar of the striking impact of digital health. Indeed, a robust body of scientific research has illuminated trans-diagnostic, dynamic processes of health behavior via digital data capture and has underscored the robust, replicable effects that digital treatments can have in treating a broad array of health conditions. Additionally, although precision medicine has largely embraced individuals’ genetic or molecular profiles when offering personalized health care, including individual’s digital profiles, that capture everyday behavior and physiology, promises to transform the field of precision medicine.
Digital health thus provides us with tremendous opportunity to transcend our siloed models of understanding and treating disease to embrace the full spectrum of health and wellness. Indeed, harnessing science-based digital health offers considerable promise for offering generalizable solutions to scaling-up a science-based understanding of health across a broad spectrum of diseases/disorders and informing unprecedented models of precision healthcare delivery accessible around the world.
Highlights.
The application of digital health to addiction medicine is a vibrant area of research.
Digital therapeutics provide science-based substance use disorder treatment anytime and anywhere.
Wearable and mobile data are enabling the development of dynamic models of substance use behavior in real-time and in response to changing environmental, social, physiological, and intrapersonal factors.
Digital health promises to transform precision medicine approaches to treatment.
Acknowledgments
Funding
Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health [Grant Number P30DA029926].
Footnotes
Declaration of Interests
The author is affiliated with Pear Therapeutics, Inc., HealthSim, LLC, and Square2 Systems, Inc. Conflicts of interest are extensively managed by her academic institution, Dartmouth College.
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
References
- 1.Bhavnani SP, Narula J, and Sengupta PP: Mobile technology and the digitization of healthcare. Eur Heart J, 2016. 37(18): p. 1428–38. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Agrawal R and Prabakaran S : Big data in digital healthcare: lessons learnt and recommendations for general practice. Heredity, 2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Boyd D and Crawford K : CRITICAL QUESTIONS FOR BIG DATA. Information, Communication & Society, 2012. 15(5): p. 662–679. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Trifan A, Oliveira M, and Oliveira JL: Passive Sensing of Health Outcomes Through Smartphones: Systematic Review of Current Solutions and Possible Limitations. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth, 2019. 7(8): p. e12649. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Fagherazzi G: Deep Digital Phenotyping and Digital Twins for Precision Health: Time to Dig Deeper. J Med Internet Res, 2020. 22(3): p. e16770. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Lydon-Staley DM, et al. : Digital phenotyping for psychiatry: Accommodating data and theory with network science methodologies. Curr Opin Biomed Eng, 2019. 9: p. 8–13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Vayena E, Dzenowagis J, and Langfeld M:The health data ecosystem and big data, 2016. Available from: https://www.who.int/ehealth/resources/ecosystem/en/. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Marsch LA: Opportunities and needs in digital phenotyping. Neuropsychopharmacology, 2018. 43(8): p. 1637–1638. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Marsch LA and Borodovsky JT: Digital health interventions for substance use disorders: The state of the science, in ASAM Principles of Addiction Medicine, 2018. Miller SC, et al. , Editors. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins: Philadelphia, PA. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Budney AJ, et al. : Chapter 5 - Technological Innovations in Addiction Treatment, in The Assessment and Treatment of Addiction, 2019. Danovitch I, and Mooney LJ, Editors. Elsevier; p. 75–90. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Marsch LA, et al. : The application of digital health to the assessment and treatment of substance use disorders: The past, current, and future role of the National Drug Abuse Treatment Clinical Trials Network. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, In Press.*This paper provides an overview of research applying digital health to the assessment and treatment of substance use disorders, including a study focused on digital phenotyping of patients in treatment for opioid use disorder.
- 12.Budney AJ, et al. : Workshop on the Development and Evaluation of Digital Therapeutics for Health Behavior Change: Science, Methods, and Projects. JMIR Ment Health, 2020. 7(2): p. e16751. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Carreiro S, et al. : mHealth for the Detection and Intervention in Adolescent and Young Adult Substance Use Disorder. Curr Addict Rep, 2018. 5(2): p. 110–119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Koob GF and Simon EJ: The Neurobiology of Addiction: Where We Have Been and Where We Are Going. J Drug Issues, 2009. 39(1): p. 115–132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Volkow ND, Michaelides M, and Baler R: The Neuroscience of Drug Reward and Addiction. Physiol Rev, 2019. 99(4): p. 2115–2140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Campbell AN, et al. : Internet-delivered treatment for substance abuse: a multisite randomized controlled trial. Am J Psychiatry, 2014. 171(6): p. 683–90. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Christensen DR, et al. : Adding an Internet-delivered treatment to an efficacious treatment package for opioid dependence. J Consult Clin Psychol, 2014. 82(6): p. 964–72. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Donovan DM, et al. : Primary outcome indices in illicit drug dependence treatment research: systematic approach to selection and measurement of drug use end-points in clinical trials. Addiction, 2012. 107(4): p. 694–708. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Mofsen AM, et al. : When All Else Fails, Listen to the Patient: A Viewpoint on the Use of Ecological Momentary Assessment in Clinical Trials. JMIR Ment Health, 2019. 6(5): p. e11845. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Nugent NR, et al. : Innovations in Technology and Mechanisms of Change in Behavioral Interventions. Behav Modif, 2019: p. 145445519845603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Lauvsnes ADF, et al. : Mobile Sensing in Substance Use Research: A Scoping Review. Telemed J E Health, 2020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Leffingwell TR, et al. : Continuous objective monitoring of alcohol use: twenty-first century measurement using transdermal sensors. Alcohol Clin Exp Res, 2013. 37(1): p. 16–22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Nomura A, et al. : A Novel Smoking Cessation Smartphone App Integrated With a Mobile Carbon Monoxide Checker for Smoking Cessation Treatment: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Res Protoc, 2019. 8(2): p. e12252. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Holtyn AF, et al. : Towards detecting cocaine use using smartwatches in the NIDA clinical trials network: Design, rationale, and methodology. Contemp Clin Trials Commun, 2019. 15: p. 100392. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Simons JS, et al. : Quantifying alcohol consumption: Self-report, transdermal assessment, and prediction of dependence symptoms. Addict Behav, 2015. 50: p. 205–12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Bae S, et al. : Mobile phone sensors and supervised machine learning to identify alcohol use events in young adults: Implications for just-in-time adaptive interventions . Addict Behav, 2017. 83: p. 42–47. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Krishnan N, et al. : COach2Quit: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial of a Personal Carbon Monoxide Monitor for Smoking Cessation. Nicotine Tob Res, 2019. 21(11): p. 1573–1577. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Bertz JW, Epstein DH, and Preston KL: Combining ecological momentary assessment with objective, ambulatory measures of behavior and physiology in substance-use research. Addict Behav, 2018. 83: p. 5–17.**This paper reviews recent research innovations combining ecological momentary assessment with objective measurement of behavior via mobile and wearable devices among persons with substance use disorders.
- 29.Roos CR and Witkiewitz K: A contextual model of self-regulation change mechanisms among individuals with addictive disorders. Clin Psychol Rev, 2017. 57: p. 117–128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Boruvka A, et al. : Assessing Time-Varying Causal Effect Moderation in Mobile Health. J Am Stat Assoc, 2018. 113(523): p. 1112–1121.*This paper proposes a novel method to examine time-varying causal effect moderation in mobile health.
- 31.Volkow ND: Personalizing the Treatment of Substance Use Disorders. Am J Psychiatry, 2020. 177(2): p. 113–116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Preston KL, et al. : Before and after: craving, mood, and background stress in the hours surrounding drug use and stressful events in patients with opioid-use disorder. Psychopharmacology (Berl), 2018. 235(9): p. 2713–2723.*This paper was the first research study to identify novel relationships between craving, stress, and drug use using digital health assessment.
- 33.Epstein DH, et al. : Real-time electronic diary reports of cue exposure and mood in the hours before cocaine and heroin craving and use. Arch Gen Psychiatry, 2009. 66(1): p. 88–94. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Shiffman S and Waters AJ: Negative affect and smoking lapses: a prospective analysis. J Consult Clin Psychol, 2004. 72(2): p. 192–201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Heron KE and Smyth JM: Ecological momentary interventions: incorporating mobile technology into psychosocial and health behaviour treatments. Br J Health Psychol, 2010. 15(Pt 1): p. 1–39. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Nahum-Shani I, et al. : Just-in-Time Adaptive Interventions (JITAIs) in Mobile Health: Key Components and Design Principles for Ongoing Health Behavior Support. Ann Behav Med, 2018. 52(6): p. 446–462.**This article presents a novel framework for developing digital health Just-in-Time Adaptive Interventions.
- 37.Liao P, et al. : Just-in-Time but Not Too Much: Determining Treatment Timing in Mobile Health. Proc ACM Interact Mob Wearable Ubiquitous Technol, 2018. 2(4). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Goldstein SP, et al. : Return of the JITAI: Applying a Just-in-Time Adaptive Intervention Framework to the Development of m-Health Solutions for Addictive Behaviors. Int J Behav Med, 2017. 24(5): p. 673–682. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Hebert ET, et al. : A Mobile Just-in-Time Adaptive Intervention for Smoking Cessation: Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial. J Med Internet Res, 2020. 22(3): p. e16907. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.McClure JB, et al. : Evaluating an Adaptive and Interactive mHealth Smoking Cessation and Medication Adherence Program: A Randomized Pilot Feasibility Study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth, 2016. 4(3): p. e94. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Hebert ET, et al. : An ecological momentary intervention for smoking cessation: The associations of just-in-time, tailored messages with lapse risk factors. Addict Behav, 2018. 78: p. 30–35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]