Abstract
The lack of treatment options for COVID-19 has raised many concerns among populations worldwide, which has led to many attempts to find alternative options to prevent the transmission of the disease or to alleviate the progression of the infection, including focusing more on preventive measures (to prevent transmission to other individuals) and the use of natural products and herbal extracts to increase immunity and decrease the probability of getting infected. This study explored the knowledge of the population of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA) about COVID-19 preventive measures and their belief about the consumption of herbal products for the prevention of COVID-19 infection. A total of 5,258 individuals participated in this study. Participants’ knowledge about the appropriate COVID-19 preventive measures in terms of handwashing procedures, self-quarantine and social distancing was moderate, with a mean score of 5.5 (SD: 1.7) out of 10 (representing around 55.0% of the total score). About 22.1% (n = 1,161) of the participants reported that they have used herbal products or nutritional supplements during the pandemic period, to protect themselves from the disease. Social media and the Internet (39.4%, n = 372) were the main motivators for the participants to try herbal products. Vitamin C was the most commonly used food supplement to increase immunity and reduces the chance of contracting COVID-19. Our study demonstrated that the general population in Saudi Arabia has a moderate level of knowledge about COVID-19 transmission and preventive measures. A considerable proportion of the population reported the use of herbal products or food supplements in order to protect themselves from the disease. Policymakers are suggested to provide further educational campaigns that increase population knowledge about the disease transmission routes and preventive measures. In addition, the use of herbal products should be evidence-based to ensure patient safety.
Keywords: COVID-19, Food supplements, Herbal products, Saudi Arabia
1. Introduction
On December 31, 2019, several patients were admitted to the local hospitals of Wuhan, China, with symptoms of pneumonia linked to a common infection in the wholesale market in Wuhan. Alarmingly, the investigation reports indicated a new strain of coronavirus with unknown aetiology that had spread globally, which forced the World Health Organization to declare it a pandemic in March 2020, which was named coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) (Bogoch et al., 2020, World Health Organization, 2020f, Zhao et al., 2020, Lu et al., 2020). Researchers have compared the current COVID-19 pandemic to the Spanish flu that occurred in 1918, which resulted in more than 50 million deaths around the world. In addition to that, the rapid transmission rate and the lack of vaccinations or any treatment option for the COVID-19 outbreak provoked the World Health Organisation (WHO) and the International Health Regulation (IHR) emergency committee to announce the case as a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC) on January 30, 2020 (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2019, Martini et al., 2019, Barry et al., 2020).
In March 2020, Saudi Arabia reported the first case of COVID-19, and the disease started to spread increasingly throughout the whole country. As a consequence, in order to prevent the rapid transmission of the infection, the Saudi government implemented multiple measures, including restrictions in the educational sectors and broad restrictions in the transportation sector (nationally and internationally). Subsequently, a general curfew was placed on the residents and citizens of Saudi Arabia in an attempt to curtail the spread of the virus (Saudi Ministry of Health, 2020, Saudi Center for Disease Prevention and Control, 2020). However, the transmission of the disease dramatically increased and reached more than 145,000 confirmed COVID-19 cases in the kingdom by the 18th of June (Saudi Ministry of Health, 2020).
The lack of treatment options for COVID-19 has raised many concerns among populations worldwide, which has led to many attempts to find alternative options to prevent the transmission of the disease or to alleviate the progression of the infection, including focusing more on preventive measures (to prevent transmission to other individuals) and the use of natural products and herbal extracts to increase immunity and decrease the probability of getting infected (Austin et al., 2007, Lake, 2020, World Health Organization, 2020a, World Health Organization, 2020c, Salathe et al., 2020).
Historically, the use of natural products was known to be the only treatment method against many infections and diseases. Also, natural products were used to enhance the immune system and are still widely used nowadays, mainly without the need for a prescription [19, 20]. Regardless of the benefits of using herbal products, there is a significant disadvantage, namely the herbal-drug interaction. Posadzki et al. (2013) reported the possible interactions between herbal medicinal products and drugs, which they classified as minor, moderate, and severe. Their study showed that, in some cases, the combination of herbal medicine and drugs resulted in life-threatening conditions (Posadzki et al., 2013). Unfortunately, a recent report showed that about 80% of developed countries' populations still rely on herbal medicines without any control (Pathak and Das, 2013). Regarding COVID-19, many studies have been conducted to investigate the ability of already-known antiviral herbal products to treat it. In addition, there has been a dramatic increase in the use of this kind of medicine among individuals who are afraid of contracting COVID-19, without taking into consideration the possible harmful effects of some products (Ekor, 2014). The objective of this study is to explore the knowledge of the population of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA) about COVID-19 preventive measures and their belief about the consumption of herbal products for the prevention of COVID-19 infection.
2. Methods
2.1. Study design and study population
A cross-sectional study using an online survey was conducted in Saudi Arabia between May 23rd and June 06th, 2020. The survey instrument was developed based on extensive literature reviews on the COVID-19 pandemic, including its transmission and preventive measures and the use of traditional medicine (World Health Organization, 2020e, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2020, Luo et al., 2020). The questionnaire tool was reviewed by three researchers to evaluate the appropriateness, relevancy, clarity, and adequacy of the questions. The survey instrument included thirty-three questions, including socio-demographic characteristics, history of chronic diseases, respondents’ adherence to the Ministry of Health (MOH) instructions on COVID-19 pandemic preventive measures and social distancing, and the use of herbal products and food supplements. The survey was divided into five major sections. The first section had eight questions on the respondents’ sociodemographic characteristics. The second section included two questions about having a history of chronic diseases and whether the participant is currently/previously infected with COVID-19 (a yes–no question). The third section contained five questions on participants’ knowledge about COVID-19 preventive measures (specifically handwashing and social distancing). Each question was given a score of two for each correct answer (a total of 10 for the whole knowledge section). The total possible score could range between 0 and 10, and can be interpreted based on the mid-point of the highest possible score of the scale (equal to 5). The higher the score, the better the knowledge about COVID-19 preventive measures.
The knowledge section was followed by a question asking the participants whether they consider themselves committed to Saudi Ministry of Health recommendations regarding COVID-19 prevention and transmission. The fourth section (17 questions) asked them about their beliefs about herbal products and food supplements in terms of: (1) usage, (2) the source of information about them and the source of supply, and (3) belief in the protective effects of herbal products and food supplements as effective protection against COVID-19.
2.2. Sampling strategy
A convenient sample of eligible participants was invited to participate in the study through social media (Facebook, Twitter, Snapchat, Instagram and WhatsApp). All participants voluntarily participated in the study and were thus considered exempt from written informed consent. The study aims and objectives were clearly explained at the beginning of the survey.
The inclusion criteria were: a) participants aged 18 years and above and currently living in Saudi Arabia. Participants were excluded if they were: a) below 18 years of age; and b) unable to understand the Arabic language.
2.3. Sample size
Using a confidence interval of 95%, a standard deviation of 0.5, and a margin of error of 5%, the required sample size was 385 participants.
2.4. Statistical analysis
Data were analysed using SPSS software, version 25 (IBM Corp, Armonk, NY, USA). Continuous variables were reported as mean (±standard deviation [SD]), while categorical variables were reported as frequencies and percentages. The Kolmogorov–Smirnov and Shapiro Wilk tests were used to check the normality of the data. Participants' knowledge scores were interpreted as a continuous scale based on the scale midpoint, where scores above the midpoint represented better knowledge about COVID-19 preventive measures. Student t-test and one-way ANOVA test were used to compare the mean knowledge scores between different demographic groups respectively. Tukey’s HSD post-hoc test was conducted to identify the source of significant variation within each group. Additionally, significant predictors of better knowledge were determined using multiple linear regression analysis. A confidence interval of 95% (p < 0.05) was applied to represent the statistical significance of the results, and the level of significance was predetermined as 5%.
2.5. Ethical considerations
This study was approved by the general directorate of health affairs – Al-Qassem Region, Ministry of Health, Saudi Arabia, registration No H-04-Q-001. As participation in the study was voluntary, the research ethics committee approved the consent waiver.
3. Results
3.1. Characteristics of study participants
A total of 5,258 individuals participated in this study. More than half (57.1%, n = 3,000) were females. Around 41.0% (n = 2,155) of the participants were aged 25–39 years. The majority were married (60.3%, n = 3,169), Saudi (96.5%, n = 5,076), and living in central provinces (58.0%, n = 3,048) of the Kingdom. More than half of them (60.0%, n = 3,155) were bachelor degree holders, 45.4% (n = 2,387) were employed, and 34.3% (n = 1,803) have a family member working in the healthcare provision sector. Around 14.5% (n = 760) of them reported that they have a history of chronic disease and 0.6% (n = 30) reported that they had been or were currently infected with COVID-19. When the participants were asked whether they consider themselves committed to the Ministry of Health instructions regarding the COVID-19 pandemic, 43.0% (n = 2,262) reported that they are completely committed and 32.0% (n = 1,685) reported that they are committed most of the time except in emergency cases, refer to (Table 1).
Table 1.
Characteristics | Frequency (%) |
---|---|
Gender | |
Female | 3,000 (57.1) |
Age categories (year) | |
18–24 | 1,161 (22.1) |
25–39 | 2,1559 (41.0) |
40–59 | 1,801 (34.3) |
60 and above | 141 (2.7) |
Marital status | |
Single | 1,885 (35.9) |
Married | 3,169 (60.3) |
Divorced | 135 (2.6) |
Widowed | 69 (1.3) |
Nationality | |
Saudi | 5,076 (96.5) |
Non-Saudi | 182 (3.5) |
Residence area | |
Central province | 3,048 (58.0) |
Eastern province | 625 (11.9) |
Western province | 607 (11.5) |
Northern province | 504 (9.6) |
Southern province | 474 (9.0) |
Education level | |
Completed primary education | 10 (0.2) |
Lower than secondary level | 233 (4.4) |
Secondary education or Diploma | 1,365 (26.0) |
Bachelor degree | 3,155 (60.0) |
Higher education | 495 (9.4) |
Employment status | |
Student | 976 (18.6) |
Healthcare-related career | 306 (5.8) |
Employee | 2,387 (45.4) |
Unemployed (retired or housewife) | 1,589 (30.1) |
Chronic disease history | |
Yes | 760 (14.5) |
Where infected/currently infected with COVID-19? | |
Yes | 30 (0.6) |
Level of commitment to MOH instructions regarding COVID-19 pandemic | |
Full commitment | 2,262 (43.0) |
Committed except in emergency cases | 1,685 (32.0) |
Committed to some extent | 1,262 (24.0) |
Not committed at all | 49 (0.9) |
3.2. Participants’ knowledge about COVID-19 preventive measures
Participants’ knowledge about the appropriate COVID-19 preventive measures in terms of handwashing procedures, self-quarantine and social distancing was moderate, with a mean score of 5.5 (SD: 1.7) out of 10 (representing around 55.0% of the total score).
The majority of the participants (90.1%, n = 4,736) agreed that washing hands with soap and water reduces the spread of coronavirus. Only 24.3% (n = 1,277) of the participants knew that handwashing should last at least 20 s, and 21.6% (n = 1,136) knew that there are five main steps in washing one’s hands correctly. The majority of the participants (95.9%, n = 5,044) reported that their commitment to staying at home and away from gatherings contributes to reducing COVID-19 transmission. However, only 40.1% (n = 2,107) of them were aware of the appropriate physical social distance (which is a minimum of one metre) required to prevent COVID-19 transmission.
3.2.1. Participants’ demographics and their knowledge about COVID-19 preventive measures
Table 2 presents the mean score for participants’ knowledge about COVID-19 preventive measures. Participants’ scores differed significantly by gender, age, education level, employment status and their level of commitment to MOH instructions regarding the COVID-19 pandemic. Females, individuals aged below 39 years, individuals with secondary school education or higher, university students, individuals who have reported that they are committed to MOH instructions regarding the COVID-19 pandemic, and users of herbal products and food supplements had a higher knowledge score compared to others (p < 0.05). The Tukey HSD test confirmed that those aged 60 years and above, those with higher education, employees, and those who reported that they are not committed at all were the main sources of significant variation between groups.
Table 2.
Demographic variable | Mean | SD | P-value |
---|---|---|---|
Gender | |||
Female | 5.7 | 1.7 | 0.000*** |
Male | 5.4 | 1.6 | |
Age category (Years) | |||
18–24 | 5.7 | 1.7 | 0.011* |
25–39 | 5.6 | 1.7 | |
40–59 | 5.5 | 1.7 | |
60 and above | 5.2 | 1.7 | |
Marital status | |||
Single | 5.6 | 1.7 | 0.342 |
Married | 5.5 | 6.0 | |
Divorced | 5.3 | 1.7 | |
Widowed | 5.5 | 1.9 | |
Nationality | |||
Saudi | 5.5 | 1.7 | 0.402 |
Non-Saudi | 5.7 | 1.7 | |
Residence area | |||
Central province | 5.5 | 1.6 | 0.778 |
Eastern province | 5.5 | 1.7 | |
Southern province | 5.5 | 1.6 | |
Western province | 5.6 | 1.7 | |
Northern province | 5.6 | 1.7 | |
Education level | |||
Completed primary education | 4.6 | 1.3 | 0.014* |
Under secondary level | 5.6 | 1.7 | |
Secondary/Diploma | 5.6 | 1.6 | |
Bachelor | 5.6 | 1.7 | |
Higher education (Master/PhD) | 5.4 | 1.6 | |
Employment status | |||
Student | 5.7 | 1.7 | 0.023* |
Health-related career employee | 5.5 | 1.6 | |
Employee | 5.5 | 1.7 | |
Unemployed (retired or housewife) | 5.5 | 1.6 | |
Chronic disease history | |||
Yes | 5.6 | 1.7 | 0.134 |
No | 5.5 | 1.6 | |
Where infected/currently infected with COVID-19? | |||
Yes | 5.3 | 2.0 | 0.401 |
No | 5.6 | 1.7 | |
Have family member working in the healthcare provision sector? | |||
Yes | 5.5 | 1.6 | 0.081 |
No | 5.6 | 1.7 | |
Level of commitment to MOH instructions regarding COVID-19 pandemic | |||
Full commitment | 5.6 | 1.6 | 0.000*** |
Committed except in emergency cases | 5.7 | 1.6 | |
Committed to some extent | 5.4 | 1.7 | |
Not committed at all | 4.2 | 2.3 | |
Do you use or have you ever used herbal products or nutritional supplements during the COVID-19 pandemic period with the intention of protecting you from the disease? | |||
Yes | 5.6 | 1.7 | 0.039* |
No | 5.5 | 1.6 |
*P < 0.05, *** P < 0.000.
Multiple linear regression analysis showed that being female, having secondary school education or lower, or higher education (PhD or a master’s degree) were important predictors of having a higher knowledge score about COVID-19 preventive measures (p < 0.05). On the other hand, being unemployed was an important predictor of having a relatively low knowledge score (p < 0.05), refer to (Table 3).
Table 3.
Model 1a |
Model 2b |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Variable | B | SE | ß | B | SE | ß |
Demographic data | ||||||
Age (years) | ||||||
25–39 | 0.005 | 0.092 | 0.001 | 0.007 | 0.092 | 0.002 |
40–59 | −0.068 | 0.107 | −0.019 | −0.056 | 0.108 | −0.016 |
60 and above | −0.247 | 0.182 | −0.024 | −0.214 | 0.185 | −0.020 |
Male | −0.373 | 0.052 | −0.111*** | −0.374 | 0.052 | −0.111*** |
Marital status | ||||||
Married | 0.069 | 0.073 | 0.021 | 0.069 | 0.073 | 0.021 |
Divorced | −0.279 | 0.162 | −0.027 | −0.274 | 0.162 | −0.026 |
Widowed | 0.062 | 0.222 | 0.004 | 0.067 | 0.222 | 0.005 |
Education level | ||||||
Under secondary level | 1.092 | 0.533 | 0.142* | 1.075 | 0.533 | 0.140* |
Secondary/Diploma | 1.074 | 0.524 | 0.293* | 1.062 | 0.524 | 0.290* |
Bachelor | 0.993 | 0.524 | 0.283 | 0.979 | 0.524 | 0.279 |
Higher education (Master/PhD) | 0.209 | 0.078 | 0.037** | 0.131 | 0.079 | 0.023 |
Employment status | ||||||
Health-related career employee | −0.109 | 0.133 | −0.015 | −0.108 | 0.133 | −0.014 |
Employee | −0.134 | 0.100 | −0.040 | −0.135 | 0.100 | −0.040 |
Unemployed (retired or housewife) | −0.235 | 0.097 | −0.066* | −0.233 | 0.097 | −0.065* |
Having chronic disease history | ||||||
Constant | 4.838 | 0.525 | 4.855 | 0.526 | ||
Adjusted R2 | 0.012 | 0.012 | ||||
P-value | 0.000 | 0.000 |
a: includes age, gender, marital status, educational level, and employment status.
b: includes age, gender, marital status, educational level, employment status, and having chronic disease history.
B: the average change in the dependent variable associated with a 1 unit change in the independent variable, statistically controlling for the other independent variables;
SE: it is the standard deviation of its sampling distribution or an estimate of that standard deviation; ß: a statistical measure that compares the strength of the effect of each individual independent variable to the dependent variable.
3.3. Beliefs about the use of herbal products and/or food supplements as a protective measure
Around 14.9% (n = 783) of the participants reported that they have used herbal products or nutritional supplements during the pandemic period, to protect themselves from the disease. In addition, 7.2% (n = 378) reported that they had used these products for a while and then stopped.
Social media and the Internet (39.4%, n = 372) were the main motivators for the participants to try herbal products, and 37.5% (n = 354) of the participants reported that they obtained the herbal products from their own home. When they were asked about the types of dietary supplements that they have used or were currently using, 94.4% (n = 521) reported taking vitamin C. In terms of participants’ beliefs about the use of herbal products and/or food supplements as a protective measure, 34.4% of the participants believe that eating garlic helps to increase immunity and reduces the chance of contracting COVID-19. This belief in herbal products was followed by vitamin C, which 29.3% of the participants’ believe has a role in treating or reducing the chances of contracting COVID-19. For further details about beliefs regarding the use of herbal products and/or food supplements as a protective measure, refer to (Table 4).
Table 4.
Variable | Frequency (%) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Do you use herbal products or supplements during the period of the pandemic in order to protect you from the disease? (n = 5,245) | ||||
Yes | 783 (14.9) | |||
No | 4,084 (77.9) | |||
I used it for a while and then stopped it | 378 (7.2) | |||
If yes, who suggested you take a nutritional/herbal supplement? (n = 944) | ||||
Dietician/physician/pharmacist/nurse/health practitioner | 223 (23.6) | |||
Social media and other websites | 372 (39.4) | |||
Recommendation from friend or relative | 349 (37.0) | |||
If yes, where did you get it? | ||||
Herbal product shop | 293 (31.0) | |||
Pharmacy | 226 (23.9) | |||
Home | 354 (37.5) | |||
Internet | 71 (0.07) | |||
What type of dietary supplement did you use before/use now during the pandemic? (You can choose more than one answer) (n = 552) | ||||
Vitamin C | 521 (94.4) | |||
Royal Jelly | 31 (5.6) | |||
Beliefs about the use of the herbal products and/or food supplements as protective measure | ||||
Yes | No | Maybe | I don’t know | |
Do you think that drinking turmeric tea helps increase immunity and reduce the chance of developing COVID-19? | 13.3% | 19.6% | 25.1% | 42.0% |
Do you think ginger tea helps to increase the immunity and reduce the chance of developing COVID-19? | 19.5% | 17.5% | 33.0% | 30.0% |
Do you think that eating garlic helps to increase the immunity and reduce the chance of developing COVID-19? | 34.4% | 14.8% | 32.6% | 18.3% |
Do you think that eating onions (or onion peel) helps to increase the immunity and reduce the chance of developing COVID-19? | 20.6% | 20.1% | 28.8% | 30.5% |
Do you think that eating fish oil known as omega-3 helps to increase the immunity and reduce the chance of developing COVID-19? | 9.5% | 19.8% | 25.6% | 45.1% |
Do you think that taking ginseng extract tablets help to increase the immunity and protect us from corona infection? | 3.4% | 20.9% | 16.5% | 59.2% |
Do you think that consumption of vitamin C found in citrus has a role in treating or reducing the chances of developing COVID-19? | 29.3% | 13.7% | 33.4% | 23.5% |
Do you think that vinegar plays a role in treating or protecting against the COVID-19? | 5.9% | 29.3% | 18.7% | 46.1% |
Do you think salted water plays a role in treating or protecting against the COVID-19? | 10.0% | 33.4% | 21.4% | 35.2% |
Do you think that applying sesame oil on the body protect from COVID-19? | 1.2% | 51.6% | 6.9% | 40.3% |
Do you think that consuming of nutritional and herbal supplements prevents the spread of COVID-19 more than social distance? | 15.7% | 23.6% | 32.2% | 28.5% |
Do you think that vitamins and herbal supplements treat/reduce the incidence of COVID-19? | 4.4% | 57.3% | 14.0% | 24.3% |
4. Discussion
This study explored beliefs about and the use of herbal products and food supplements among the general population of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. In addition, this study explored the population’s knowledge about COVID-19 preventive measures, specifically handwashing techniques and social distancing. Besides this, the level of knowledge about COVID-19 was assessed between users and non-users of herbal products and food supplements.
The findings of our study highlight the importance of educating the general population about COVID-19 transmission and the preventive measures that play a vital role in their protection from getting infected with the disease and which dramatically reduce the spread of the disease.
The explosive spread of COVID-19 has been a matter of international concern, including in the Middle Eastern countries. The SARS-CoV-2 high infectivity rate has been established regardless of the appearance of symptoms, which may extend to 14 days (Algaissi et al., 2020, Singhal, 2020). Current evidence indicates that the causative virus for COVID-19 is transmitted through respiratory droplets or when contaminated hands touch the mucosa of the mouth, nose, or eyes; the virus can also be transferred from one surface to another by contaminated hands, which facilitates indirect contact transmission. These facts, together with the lack of effective vaccines or treatments, have pushed the health authorities to consider many preventive measures to stem the spread of the pandemic (Nemati et al., 2020, Sen-Crowe et al., 2020). In the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, the Ministry of Health, based on its previous experience from the Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS) epidemic in 2012, has immediately established multiple campaigns, launched mobile health applications and call centres, and provided the public with information about COVID-19, as well as providing answers to related queries to enhance public awareness and engage the public in active learning and searching for information about related precautionary measures (Algaissi et al., 2020). These approaches have provided residents with information related to washing hands with soap in the correct way for the required amount of time, the benefits of staying at home, and related precautionary measures to prevent the spread of the COVID-19 virus (Aldarhami et al., 2020).
The majority of the participants (75.0%, n = 3,947) reported that they are committed (either all the time or except in some emergency circumstances) to the recommendations of the Saudi Ministry of Health regarding the COVID-19 pandemic, which could reflect the effectiveness of the timely organisation of plans (even before the pandemic reached KSA) by the Saudi MOH to raise awareness among the population about preventing the spread of COVID-19. This is probably due to the previous experience of the Saudi people in response to the Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS) epidemic in 2012 (Aldarhami et al., 2020). Nevertheless, the level of knowledge among the population about COVID-19 preventive measures was moderate (55.0%; 5.5 out of 10). This confirms the result of a recent study that was conducted among three Arabic countries (Saudi Arabia, Jordan and Kuwait), which reported that the overall population knowledge about COVID-19 was moderate (66.1%). Furthermore, and confirming the findings of our study, this study highlighted that the population knowledge is mainly defective as regards disease transmission routes (Naser et al., 2020). <25.0% of the participants knew the proper procedure of handwashing in terms of the time needed and the proper procedure itself. In addition, only 40.1% (n = 2,107) of them were aware of the appropriate physical social distance needed to protect from COVID-19 transmission. The World Health Organization has emphasised the importance of taking actions that optimise protection and control of disease transmission among the community (World Health Organization, 2020b). Our study identified that there is a significant gap in the knowledge among the general population about COVID-19. There is a need to improve individuals’ knowledge about COVID-19 preventive measures through continuous health education.
In our study, around 22.1% (n = 1,161) of the participants reported that they have used or are currently using herbal products or nutritional supplements during the COVID-19 pandemic to protect themselves from the disease. Herbal products and food supplements are used worldwide either to enhance health or to help with health-associated problems. The shortage of new and efficient pharmacological treatments to combat viral and drug-resistant infections has turned attention to medicinal plants as a potential source of effective treatment for disease. The rapid spread of the recently emerged COVID-19 pandemic, together with the absence of an effective vaccination or treatment for COVID-19, has elevated the fear, panic, and anger among the general public (Liu et al., 2020, World Health Organization, 2020a). As might be expected, individuals exposed to the dangers of such infections look for self-care measures and turn to unconventional remedies such as herbal products and food supplements to reduce the risk and make the situation more controllable (Saudi Ministry of Health, 2020, Saudi Center for Disease Prevention and Control, 2020, World Health Organization, 2020d). The shortage of new and efficient conventional drug treatments to combat drug-resistant infectious diseases (Zahn et al., 2019) and infections has turned attention towards medicinal plants as a potential source of novel drugs. The use of herbal products among patients has become popular, and much literature has reported its use in the case of threatening emerging infectious diseases such as SARS and MERS (Hwang et al., 2020). There are limited studies that explored the utilization of herbal products and supplements among the general population as preventive measures during COVID-19 pandemic in the Middle East region. A recent study in Morocco has reported the use of 23 different medicinal plant species belonging to 11 botanical families during the Covid-19 pandemic. The most important families were that of the Lamiaceae, Cupressaceae and Zingiberaceae. The most commonly used plants were garlic, olive, onion, and ginger (EL Alamlab et al., 2020). Our study confirmed the results of this study and reported the popularity of the use of ginger, onion and garlic among the general population and the belief in their ability to increase the immunity and reduce the chance of developing COVID-19. Previous studies reported that there is a common belief that herbal products are safer than prescription medications and of good quality (Barry, 2018, El Khoury et al., 2016). Dissatisfaction with conventional therapy, good experiences, with previously used herbal medicine, as well as family traditions and habits were commonly-reported reasons for the use of herbal products and supplements (Welz et al., 2018). Vitamin C is one of the most commonly used vitamin across different populations due to its ability to contributes to immune defense by supporting various cellular functions of both the innate and adaptive immune system (El Khoury et al., 2016, Barry, 2018, Carr and Maggini, 2017). In addition, vitamin C supports epithelial barrier function, promotes the oxidant scavenging activity, accumulates in phagocytic cells (such as neutrophils) and stimulate various defense mechanisms that contribute ultimately microbial killing (Carr and Maggini, 2017). Natural products supplement that contain garlic is also commonly used among the general population which is believed to be related to its contribution to the protection of human health through its antioxidant, antibacterial, and anti-inflammatory (Fredotović and Puizina, 2019).
Better knowledge about COVID-19 preventive measures was associated with being female, having secondary school education or higher education (PhD or a master’s degree). Unlike previous studies which showed no significant difference in knowledge about COVID-19 between males and females (Naser et al., 2020), our study found that females have better knowledge compared to males. This could be due to the difference in the assessment tool used, and the time of conducting the study as the knowledge level could increase with time during the pandemic due to continuous educational campaigns carried out by the governmental authorities. The results of previous studies were in line with ours regarding the higher level of knowledge among individuals with a higher level of education (Naser et al., 2020, Zhong et al., 2020b).
Overall, knowledge about COVID-19 transmission and preventive measures among our study population was moderate, which could lead to a higher probability of risky practices during the COVID-19 pandemic. This indicates that there are gaps in the knowledge of the general population and that there is a need to improve individuals’ awareness and knowledge via extensive health education strategies.
To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study in the Middle Eastern countries that investigated knowledge about COVID-19 preventive measures (specifically handwashing techniques and social distancing), and beliefs about and the use of herbal products and food supplements among the general population during the COVID-19 pandemic. A strength of our study is that a large sample of participants was recruited during this critical period. However, there are some limitations. The study design itself, a cross-sectional survey design, limited our ability to identify causality between study variables. There are limited studies that have evaluated individuals’ knowledge about the COVID-19 pandemic and the use of herbal products and food supplements worldwide and in the Middle East specifically, which limited our ability to compare our findings with Arabic-speaking countries of a similar socioeconomic level and culture. Additionally, the use of an online survey for data collection might have excluded some vulnerable populations who could not be reached and we may have missed some of the targeted population. Finally, we were not able to estimate the response rate for our questionnaire study.
5. Conclusion
The findings of our study demonstrated that the general population in Saudi Arabia has a moderate level of knowledge about COVID-19 transmission and preventive measures. A considerable proportion of the population reported the use of herbal products or food supplements in order to protect themselves from the disease. We suggest that policymakers provide further educational campaigns that increase population knowledge about the disease transmission routes and preventive measures. In addition, the use of herbal products should be evidence-based to ensure patient safety.
Declaration of Competing Interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to express their gratitude to the ministry of education and the deanship of scientific research-Najran University – Kingdom of Saudi Arabi for their financial and technical support under code number (NU/MID/18/007).
Footnotes
Peer review under responsibility of King Saud University.
Contributor Information
Hamad S. Alyami, Email: hsalmukalas@nu.edu.sa.
Mohamed A.A. Orabi, Email: maorabi@nu.edu.sa.
References
- Aldarhami A., Bazaid A.S., Althomali O.W., Binsaleh N.K. Public perceptions and commitment to social distancing during COVID-19 pandemic: a national survey in Saudi Arabia. Preprints. 2020 doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S269716. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Algaissi A.A., Alharbi N.K., Hassanain M., Hashem A.M. Preparedness and response to COVID-19 in Saudi Arabia: Building on MERS experience. J. Infect. Public Health. 2020;13:834–838. doi: 10.1016/j.jiph.2020.04.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Austin Z., Martin J.C., Gregory P.A. Pharmacy practice in times of civil crisis: The experience of SARS and the blackout in Ontario, Canada. Res. Social Adm. Pharm. 2007;3:320–335. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2006.09.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Barry A.R. Patients' perceptions and use of natural health products. Can. Pharm. J. (Ott) 2018;151:254–262. doi: 10.1177/1715163518779409. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Barry M., Al Amri M., Memish Z.A. COVID-19 in the shadows of MERS-CoV in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. J. Epidemiol. Glob. Health. 2020;10:1–3. doi: 10.2991/jegh.k.200218.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bogoch, II, A., Watts, A., Thomas-Bachli, C., Huber, M.U.G., Kraemer, Khan, K., 2020. Pneumonia of unknown aetiology in Wuhan, China: potential for international spread via commercial air travel. J. Travel Med., 27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Carr A.C., Maggini S. Vitamin C and Immune function. Nutrients. 2017;9 doi: 10.3390/nu9111211. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2019. '1918 Pandemic (H1N1 virus)', Accessed June 20, 2020. https://www.cdc.gov/flu/pandemic-resources/1918-pandemic-h1n1.html.
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2020. 'When and How to Wash Your Hands', Accessed June 20, 2020. https://www.cdc.gov/handwashing/when-how-handwashing.html.
- Ekor M. The growing use of herbal medicines: issues relating to adverse reactions and challenges in monitoring safety. Front. Pharmacol. 2014;4:177. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2013.00177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- EL Alamlab, A., Fattah, A., Chait, A., 2020. Medicinal plants used for the prevention purposes during the covid-19 pandemic in Morocco. J. Analytical Sci. Appl. Biotechnol., 2, 4–11.
- El Khoury G., Ramadan W., Zeeni N. Herbal products and dietary supplements: A cross-sectional survey of use, attitudes, and knowledge among the lebanese population. J. Community Health. 2016;41:566–573. doi: 10.1007/s10900-015-0131-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fredotović Ž., Puizina J. Edible Allium species: Chemical composition, biological activity and health effects. Ital. J. Food Sci. 2019;31:19–39. [Google Scholar]
- Hwang J.H., Cho H.J., Im H.B., Jung Y.S., Choi S.J., Han D. Complementary and alternative medicine use among outpatients during the 2015 MERS outbreak in South Korea: a cross-sectional study. BMC Complement. Med. Ther. 2020;20:147. doi: 10.1186/s12906-020-02945-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lake M.A. What we know so far: COVID-19 current clinical knowledge and research. Clin. Med. (Lond.) 2020;20:124–127. doi: 10.7861/clinmed.2019-coron. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liu J., Liao X., Qian S., Yuan J., Wang F., Liu Y., Wang Z., Wang F.S., Liu L., Zhang Z. Community transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, Shenzhen, China, 2020. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2020;26:1320–1323. doi: 10.3201/eid2606.200239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lu H., Stratton C.W., Tang Y.W. Outbreak of pneumonia of unknown etiology in Wuhan, China: The mystery and the miracle. J. Med. Virol. 2020;92:401–402. doi: 10.1002/jmv.25678. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Luo H., Tang Q.L., Shang Y.X., Liang S.B., Yang M., Robinson N., Liu J.P. Can Chinese medicine be used for prevention of corona virus disease 2019 (COVID-19)? A review of historical classics, research evidence and current prevention programs. Chin. J. Integr. Med. 2020;26:243–250. doi: 10.1007/s11655-020-3192-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Martini M., Gazzaniga V., Bragazzi N.L., Barberis I. The Spanish Influenza Pandemic: a lesson from history 100 years after 1918. J. Prev. Med. Hyg. 2019;60:E64–E67. doi: 10.15167/2421-4248/jpmh2019.60.1.1205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Naser, Abdallah Y., Eman Zmaily Dahmash, Hassan Alwafi, Zahra Khalil Alsairafi, Ahmed M. Al Rajeh, Yosra J. Alhartani, Fawaz Mohammad Turkistani, Alyami, Hamad S., 2020. Knowledge and practices towards COVID-19 during its outbreak: a multinational cross-sectional study. MedRxiv.
- Nemati Marzieh, Ebrahimi Bahareh, Nemati Fatemeh. 'Assessment of Iranian nurses’ knowledge and anxiety toward COVID-19 during the current outbreak in Iran'. Arch Clin Infect Dis. 2020;15 [Google Scholar]
- Pathak K., Das R.J. Herbal medicine- a rational approach in health care system. Int. J. Herbal Med. 2013;1:86–89. [Google Scholar]
- Posadzki P., Watson L., Ernst E. Herb-drug interactions: an overview of systematic reviews. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2013;75:603–618. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2012.04350.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Salathe M., Althaus C.L., Neher R., Stringhini S., Hodcroft E., Fellay J., Zwahlen M., Senti G., Battegay M., Wilder-Smith A., Eckerle I., Egger M., Low N. COVID-19 epidemic in Switzerland: on the importance of testing, contact tracing and isolation. Swiss. Med. Wkly. 2020;150 doi: 10.4414/smw.2020.20225. w20225. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Saudi Center for Disease Prevention and Control, 2020. Professionals & Health Workers. Accessed June 20, 2020. https://covid19.cdc.gov.sa/professionals-health-workers/.
- Saudi Ministry of Health, 2020. 'COVID-19', Accessed June 20, 2020. https://covid19.moh.gov.sa.
- Sen-Crowe B., McKenney M., Elkbuli A. Social distancing during the COVID-19 pandemic: Staying home save lives. Am. J. Emerg. Med. 2020 doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2020.03.063. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Singhal T. A review of coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) Indian J. Pediatr. 2020;87:281–286. doi: 10.1007/s12098-020-03263-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Welz A.N., Emberger-Klein A., Menrad K. Why people use herbal medicine: insights from a focus-group study in Germany. BMC Complement. Altern. Med. 2018;18:92. doi: 10.1186/s12906-018-2160-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- World Health Organization, 2020a. 'Modes of transmission of virus causing COVID-19: implications for IPC precaution recommendations', Accessed June 20, 2020. www.who.int/news-room/commentaries/detail/modes-of-transmission-of-virus-causing-covid-19-implications-for-ipc-precaution-recommendations.
- World Health Organization, 2020b. “Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC) Global research and innovation forum : towards a research roadmap.” In, 1–7.
- World Health Organization, 2020c. “Report of the WHO-China Joint Mission on Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) ” In.
- World Health Organization, 2020d. 'WHO Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Dashboard', Accessed June 20, 2020. https://covid19.who.int/.
- World Health Organization, 2020e. 'WHO supports scientifically-proven traditional medicine', Accessed June 20, 2020.
- World Health Organization, 2020f. 'WHO Timeline - COVID-19', Accessed June 20, 2020. https://www.who.int/news-room/detail/27-04-2020-who-timeline---covid-19.
- Zahn R., Perry N., Perry E., Mukaetova-Ladinska E.B. Use of herbal medicines: Pilot survey of UK users’ views. Complement. Therapies Med. 2019;44:83–90. doi: 10.1016/j.ctim.2019.02.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhao S., Lin Q., Ran J., Musa S.S., Yang G., Wang W., Lou Y., Gao D., Yang L., He D., Wang M.H. Preliminary estimation of the basic reproduction number of novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) in China, from 2019 to 2020: A data-driven analysis in the early phase of the outbreak. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2020;92:214–217. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.01.050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhong B.L., Luo W., Li H.M., Zhang Q.Q., Liu X.G., Li W.T., Li Y. Knowledge, attitudes, and practices towards COVID-19 among Chinese residents during the rapid rise period of the COVID-19 outbreak: a quick online cross-sectional survey. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 2020;16:1745–1752. doi: 10.7150/ijbs.45221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]