Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2020 Sep 2;15(9):e0238571. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0238571

Pathways through homelessness among women in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: A qualitative study

Kibrom Haile 1,*, Halima Umer 2, Tolesa Fanta 1, Addis Birhanu 1, Edao Fejo 1, Yirga Tilahun 2, Habtamu Derajew 1, Agitu Tadesse 1, Gebreselassie Zienawi 2, Asrat Chaka 1, Woynabeba Damene 1
Editor: Mellissa H Withers3
PMCID: PMC7467327  PMID: 32877455

Abstract

Background

There has been a paradigm shift in understanding homelessness. The shift is from the belief that homelessness results from lack of secure housing towards the view which explains homelessness in terms of the complex interactions of factors which determine the pathways into and out of homelessness. The evidence base for women’s homelessness is less robust than men’s homelessness. The effect of gender and its relationship with homelessness has been neglected. Addis Ababa, the capital city of Ethiopia, is estimated to be home for around 50,000 homeless people. This study aims to explore pathways through homelessness in women who were sheltered in a facility for the homeless in Addis Ababa.

Methods

In-depth interviews were conducted in 2019 with 14 women who were ‘roofless’, and were gathered for support in a temporary shelter in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. The shelter was one of the eight such facilities established in Addis Ababa few months earlier than the study. For data analysis the QDA Miner 5.0.30 software was used and data was analyzed using thematic analysis approach.

Results

The analysis revealed that determinant factors for pathways into homelessness among women occurred on the background of predisposing factors, such as poverty, being raised by caregivers other than biological parents, child marriage, unstable employment history. On top of the predisposing factors listed above the occurrence of precipitating factors such as problems with marriage, migration, death of parents, deception, became the immediate cause of homelessness. Despite mentions of positive experiences of homelessness such as mutual support and good social life within network of homeless people, the net effect of the interaction between negative and positive experiences of the homeless life, together with the effectiveness of coping strategies by the participants resulted in the participants’ decision of whether homelessness is tolerable. Finally, the presence of perpetuating factors such as lack of affordable house, feeling of shame to go back home, and unfavorable situation at home discouraged participants from exiting the homeless situation.

Conclusion

From the findings of the study we conclude that the predisposing factors and the precipitating factors resulted in the occurrence of onset of homelessness among the participants. Once homeless, the experiences of life as homeless, and the availability of the means to exit from it determined whether the participants would stay homeless or exit from it.

Background

Understanding homelessness

The term ‘homelessness’ does not give identical meaning across nations or across the research community [1]. Nowadays, it is becoming evident that a universal definition of homelessness is neither useful nor necessary. The understanding of homelessness may differ across high-income and low-income country contexts. Therefore, a universal standard definition would not serve the development of context-specific intervention and policy [2,3]. The definition of homelessness can be made to be wider to include bigger population groups, or narrower to prioritize scarce resources to the most needy. However, any definition of ‘homelessness’ must be based on certain key principles. One such principle assumes that homelessness should not be taken only as the absence of a permanent accommodation [1]. According to this principle the definition of homelessness includes the existence of deprivations across a number of dimensions. These dimensions may be physiological (such as lack of bodily comfort or warmth), emotional (such as lack of love or joy), territorial (such as lack of privacy), ontological (such as lack of rootedness in the world), or spiritual (such as lack of hope) [4]. For instance, for a woman who leaves house due to abuse, it seems that “housing is the problem for which homelessness could be the solution” [5].

Several authors give emphasis to multidimensional understanding of homelessness [610]. Accordingly, homelessness can be best understood in terms of the pathways which lead into and out of the situation [1,4]. This kind of understanding provides a complete picture of homelessness and offers the opportunity for better intervention measures. Homelessness pathway has been defined as ‘the route of an individual or household into homelessness, their experience of homelessness, and their route out of homelessness into secure housing’.[11].

The other principle that must be used in defining homelessness is the specific communities’ minimum standards for adequate accommodation [12]. The minimum standards for adequate accommodation may be different across countries and socio-economic situations [12]. The definition of homelessness developed by the European Federation of National Organizations working with the Homeless (FEANTSA) emphasized the importance of this principle. According to FEANTSA there are four different levels of homelessness including rooflessness (sleeping rough), houselessness (living in institutions or short-term ‘guest’ accommodation), insecure accommodation, and inferior (substandard) housing [2,3]. ‘Hidden homelessness’ is a good example for homelessness by way of ‘houselessness’ or ‘insecure accommodation.’ The hidden homeless population of women comprises those who double up with friends or family, or those staying at rooming houses or hotels [13]. Studies conducted in Ethiopia used the word ‘homelessness’ to refer to those who were ‘roofless’ or ‘street homeless’ [1416]. A previous study conducted in Addis Ababa used the definition of homeless as ‘those sleeping in designated shelters or public spaces’.[17].

Gender and homelessness

Women’s homelessness is associated with domestic violence at much higher rates than is the case for men [18]. In fact, gender-based violence was a strong feature of women’s homelessness [19]. The ugly truth, however, is that women may become homeless to escape domestic violence but homelessness is not likely to solve the problem. The truth is homeless women are more likely than homeless men to perceive and endure greater safety issues, including sexual victimization [20]. The other peculiar feature of women’s homelessness is that they are more likely to be in the situation of ‘hidden homelessness.’ Studies show that the majority of women and girls experiencing homelessness are members of the ‘hidden homeless’, concealing the alarming rate of women’s homelessness [19,21]. The occurrence of ‘hidden homelessness’ reveals that women tend to draw on informal resources to manage homelessness. Women are more likely than men to stay with friends, family and acquaintances at higher rates and probably for longer periods than men [18]. Because of their role in the family, women’s homelessness is traditionally categorized as either ‘family homelessness’ or ‘single homelessness’ [22]. It must be noted that, unlike the case of men, women’s homelessness is likely to take the form of ‘family homelessness’. In this regard, homeless mothers unaccompanied by their children are likely to be labeled as ‘undeserving’ or ‘bad’ mothers [22].

Causes of homelessness in women

Understanding the causes of homelessness in women is critical for implementing effective prevention measures. Delivery of need-based services to homeless women, and provision of effective support to help them achieve housing stability can be better accomplished if there is evidence about the cause of homelessness [23]. It must be noted, however, that causes of women’s homelessness are wider and more systemic than the individualized concept of reasons would lead us to believe [24]. A majority of women experienced multiple adversities and deprivations during childhood, including poverty, neglect, housing instability, difficult family situations, as well as discontinuity in their schooling [19]. Studies identified causes such as domestic violence, poverty, violence in the community, history of early-onset use of substances and drugs, loss of employment, loss of access to affordable housing or losing house through eviction, mental illness, and history of childhood violence [23,2527]. As high as 72% of homeless women had experienced violence and/or abuse during childhood, and two-third of them had experienced intimate partner violence [19]. Lack of affordable housing, poverty, exposure to violence and unsafe spaces are the most common reasons for women’s homelessness [28]. According to studies conducted in big cities in Ethiopia, the factors associated with state of women’s homelessness were migration, urbanization, poverty, abuse, escape from child marriage, unemployment, death of one or both parents, divorce of parents, pregnancy out of wedlock, poor educational status, and abandonment by spouse [14,15,29,30].

Challenges of homelessness in women

The challenges of homeless women extend beyond simply finding shelter [25]. They also are troubled with finding work and they suffered from feelings of sadness, vulnerability and stress more than homeless men [25]. Once homeless, hardship and challenges are daily realities for women. Sexual assault, mental illness and substance abuse were identified to be high [23,31]. Women reported being stigmatized, verbally and sexually assaulted and higher risks of violence and sexual abuse while sleeping rough [18]. Homeless women carry multiple stigmas and labels such as ‘bad mother’, ‘prostitute’, etc which makes it difficult for them to seek help; the stigma and labels also become a barrier for recovery from homelessness [32]. The conditions of sleeping rough meant that women concealed themselves or kept moving at night, including the need to conceal their gender by dressing as men [18]. Homeless women who worked as prostitute were exposed to intensive daily substance use, and to serving clients in public space [31]. In Ethiopia, homeless women were vulnerable to rape, physical abuse, emotional abuse, extreme poverty, hunger, physical safety concerns, lack of safe drinking water, poor sanitation and prevailing diseases [14,15,29,30]. Exposure to violence continues to be a common experience during homelessness, with 57% of women reported being a victim of violence [28].

The need to conduct the current study

Worldwide, the evidence base is less robust about women’s homelessness than men’s homelessness [3336]. Reports show that women are ignored in homelessness services due to the reason that homelessness is regarded as a problem of men [32]. In Ethiopia, likewise, the issue of female homelessness has been a neglected topic. The number of homeless girls and women in Ethiopia is growing [14]. In fact, from previous studies conducted in urban areas of Ethiopia, adult women accounted for one-third of the homeless population [37]. Despite the observable problem of homelessness among women in developing countries, there has been lack of studies conducted to determine pathways through homelessness in such countries. This qualitative explorative study was aimed to address this important issue among women in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. For the purpose of our study ‘homeless’ referred to those who slept in designated public spaces or shelters, or those who were ‘roofless.’

Method

A qualitative study was conducted in 2019 to explore homelessness pathways among female residents of a shelter facility in Addis Ababa. The second and sixth authors were volunteer workers of the shelter and they had established prior relationship with the participants; however, whenever those volunteer workers were involved in the research activities they said so to the participants and assured them that their participation in the research activities was fully voluntary, and without any negative or positive consequences upon the services they received in the shelter facility.

Setting

The study was conducted in Addis Ababa, which is the capital and largest city in Ethiopia. The current population size of Addis Ababa is estimated at 5–7 million. The city is the economic powerhouse of the country, with a major share of the country’s GDP generated from it. About 40% of Addis Ababa’s workforce is government employees, 31% private organization employees, 25% own-account workers, 2% employers, and another 2% unpaid family workers and others. Females account for 54.2% of the population of Addis Ababa, and one-quarter of the population is below the age of 15 years. One in four of the women in the city have no education [38]. According to the city administration estimates, there are around 50,000 homeless individuals in the city [16].

The participants of the study were recruited from a temporary shelter which was constructed in Addis Ababa about 4 months prior to the beginning of the study. The shelter was established to provide services to homeless adult women with their dependent children if they had any, and elderly men. The shelter was providing services for up to 250 people at the time of the study. Recruitment of the women to the shelter was from all sub-cities of Addis Ababa and on voluntary basis. The shelter was established and funded by the government and was run in collaboration with volunteer workers. Food, clothes and shelter was provided by the facility, as well as medical, mental and psychosocial services. The beneficiaries stayed at the shelter for maximum of 5 months including the 3 months allocated for vocational training which included hair-dressing, cleaning and tailoring.

Sampling strategy

A purposive sampling technique of typical case sampling was employed to include adult women participants who could provide rich data about their homeless life experience. A face-to-face in-depth interviewing technique was conducted to collect data from participants. Data analysis was made based on the life experiences of respondents, as well as their feelings, perceptions, understanding and expectations about their experiences. The meaning they gave to each of their experiences was also used for data analysis.

Data collection procedure

One-on-one in-depth interviews were conducted to collect data from participants until a point of theoretical saturation was achieved. Interview was conducted by two interviewers, who are the first two authors. One of the interviewers was a practicing psychiatrist; the other interviewer was a practicing mental health professional who had MSc degree in the profession of mental health. Both interviewers were practicing clinicians and researchers who were working at the only mental health hospital in Ethiopia. A total of 15 women were interviewed, but one of the interview data was not included in the analysis due to data quality issues. Interview was conducted by using open-ended interview guide questions. The average duration of the interviews was 25 minutes. All interviews were audio-recorded by using digital audio recorder application on a smart phone.

Data analysis

The data was analyzed using the qualitative data analysis software QDA Miner 5.0.30. The recorded audio was first transcribed into text written in the local language Amharic. The text was read line-by-line and then translated into the English language. The data for each respondent were made into a word document; documents for all respondents were imported into the software as ‘cases’. Some of the topics were identified in advance and included in the interview guide questions for further exploration, while others were derived from the data. Thematic analysis approach was used for analyzing data. A careful line-by-line reading of each document was done to identify major topics within the data; the topics were then labeled and entered into the ‘variables’ section of the software. The responses were coded and included under each relevant topic or ‘variable’ for further analysis.

During data analysis, themes were identified and those themes were grouped under the appropriate topic or ‘variable’; similar topics or themes were merged, and some new topics or themes were also created during data analysis as new themes emerged. Some of the themes overlapped for some participants; however, the factors were counted separately to make a complete list of possibilities.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethical clearance was obtained from the Institutional Review Board of St Amanuel Mental Specialized Hospital. The participant information sheet was read to each participant before they could give consent to participate. Permission was obtained from each participant to audio-record the interview. The interview was conducted after the participants gave signed consent to be interviewed. Interviews were conducted in private in an office room which was arranged for the purpose of the interview.

Results

Participants were adult women whose age range is from 18 to 37 years. The participants’ estimated total length of life as homeless varied from the shortest 1 year to the longest 19 years. One of the participants was born on the streets and had been homeless for all of the 19 years of her life. Four of the participants had no children, one of the participants was pregnant at the time of interview, and 9 of the participants had at least one child. Among those who had at least one child, two participants had 2 children, one participant had 3 children and the rest had 1 child each. The results of the qualitative data analysis are described below:

Predisposing factors to homelessness

Predisposing factors indicate how the respondent lived since childhood before she became homeless. Predisposition indicated the level of vulnerability of the respondent to becoming homeless upon the occurrence of contextual events. In the study, poverty was identified as a remarkable predisposing factor for homelessness. Some participants described how they lived under poverty before they became homeless as follows:

“……… my father’s land was confiscated and he started tilling rented land, which gradually became hard for him as his physical capacity deteriorated. I then started to feel the hardship of life due to economic scarcity; this made me collect and sell grass to support myself.”[11th participant]

“I lived with my both parents at the beginning; one time my father abandoned us and left to another place. Then there was no one to cultivate the land for us and we became poor. At the time when we hardly had food to eat and got starved …….”[8th participant]

Being raised by people other than biological parents was a factor reported by some participants. Such participants had been raised by either their siblings, or uncles or aunts, or other relatives. One of the participants said:

“I was born in Jimma Town. …………. my parents died; they died when I was so little I don’t remember when they died. I was raised by my brothers…..”[13th participant]

Related to the fact mentioned above, others were raised in a family where one of the parents was a step-parent. Some of the participants said they were uncomfortable with the step-parent’s behavior, while others said they had no problem with it. However, they had perceived some form of discrimination or isolation, or another form of harsh treatment by the step-parent. Participants said:

“I was a child when many relevant things happened; what I do remember is that I was raised by a stepmother till I was 7 years old. I don’t know my mother. When my stepmother’s son was going to school, I was not.”[1st participant]

“I was born in the rural part of Gojjam. I don’t know my mother; she died when I was a small baby. I am the 5th child to my family. My father was raising me after my mother’s death. I used to herd cattle and chased birds from the sorghum farm. With the push from his relatives, my father got married and I had a stepmother; but I wasn’t comfortable with my stepmother.”[9th participant]

Migration to urban areas was another predisposing factor. One participant described how she moved from rural to urban area with expectation of better life; however, what awaited her was not what she expected. She said:

“My sister, who lived in Addis, was not in favor of my marriage and she brought me to Addis Ababa with her. I expected to have a reasonably good life in my sister’s home; she also had given me promise that I would attend school.”[9th participant]

The other predisposing factor was child marriage. In some parts of Ethiopia, particularly in the rural areas of the north-west, there is this culture of marriage at the earliest possible age. It is called ‘madego’ marriage, meaning the child or girl gets married at early age and will grow up under the custody of the in-laws till she becomes ‘fit’ for sexual or marital responsibilities. Being subjected to ‘madego’ was identified among the participants prior to their becoming homeless. One of the participants described her situation as follows:

“I was born in the rural part of Gojjam; ………I was forced into the marriage arrangement called ‘madego’ at age of 5; but I was uncomfortable with the marriage. It was uncomfortable for me because, due to issues with dowry, both families were in dispute and I was in the middle of this dispute. I suffered from hatred, verbal and emotional abuse from both families.”[12th participant]

Some participants had experienced exploitative work conditions. Participants who migrated from outside of the city may not have had relatives inside of the city that they could rely on for support at times of difficulty. Such participants were likely to tolerate exploitation for sometime due to lack of options, but their situation makes them vulnerable to subsequent homelessness. One participant reported:

“….. One rich woman found me and took me with her. I started working in her hotel as cleaner; I do household chores in the evening. The work I started was so hectic I hardly had time to keep my personal hygiene; I was infested with lice. On top of this, I didn’t have formal salary. People were advising me to quit.”[13th participant]

Similarly, other participants reported unstable work history. Those respondents had had frequent change of working environment. One participant said:

“Especially, there was a demented old woman who is the mother of my madam. It was difficult for me to tolerate the behavior of the old woman and, after 3 months ……. I finally managed to find another household to work as housemaid; I worked for 7 months in that house and asked to visit my family back in Awaro.”[11th participant]

Commercial sex work was another factor which probably predisposed participants to homelessness. A participant described the following:

“……….My sister brought me to Addis to live with her; I was 10 years old that time. Later on I realized she was working as a commercial sex worker; I had no choice but to work the same as hers and I became a commercial sex worker.”[11th participant]

Some participants were raised up in a family in which there was domestic violence. One participant said:

“My father used to come home drunk and hit my mother; then she left us and migrated to Addis Ababa.”[7th participant]

The other factors identified as possible predisposing factors were HIV infection, non-supportive family, and difficulties and problems related to marriage.

Immediate reasons for becoming homeless

The ‘immediate reasons’ for becoming homeless topic refers to the triggering events which finally forced the participants into homelessness. The thematic areas which emerged under this topic are discussed below.

Problematic marriage was identified as immediate cause for homelessness. Such marital problems include a spouse who was involved in an extramarital affair or a spouse who was abusive. Participants said:

“While I was living with my husband and making a family, he loved another woman. Then I left him and started living on the streets.”[3rd participant]

“………. But the man who made me pregnant was alcoholic and had a wife; he was abusive and he assaulted me on daily basis. I tolerated till my youngest daughter was one year and 8 months old; but one day I got desperate, took my child and left him. Then I started living on the street.”[7th participant]

Hard and intolerable work conditions precipitated participants’ becoming homeless. One respondent said:

“…Despite all the hardship, I worked for 5 years. Finally, I lost all my hope in life. I became so angry and frustrated I finally abandoned everything and went out to the streets to live there.”[13th participant]

Peer pressure was another immediate cause for becoming homeless. One participant described her situation the following way:

“When I told my friends about how my sister punished me, they encouraged me to leave her house. They told me they had house; and I told them I would contribute some money to pay the house rent; we agreed with this idea. That day I didn’t go home to my sister; instead, I went with my friends to their place. At their place, I didn’t get what I expected; what they told me their ‘home’ was a place under an old bridge. They actually were living on the street. I say the main reason I ended up on streets was a pressure from a friend. Even if I was angry at my sister, had it not been for the pressure from my friend I wouldn’t be on the streets.” [9th participant]

Related to the peer pressure described above, some participants were actually deceived into street life. One of them explained her experience as follows:

“One day there was a girl of approximately my age………. She intentionally made acquaintance with me and asked me to go to her home and play with her. We went together to Debre Zeit. While we were at Debre Zeit, she stole money from local bajaj taxis inside the station. It was my first time to see such way of theft. Then she told me we should go to Addis Ababa. At the time I heard the word Addis Ababa, didn’t know where it was; I thought it was not far (and I was also eager) and agreed to her idea. Finally we entered one of the buses without being noticed by the driver assistant. We then managed to arrive at Addis Ababa. I was cheated and betrayed; but it was too late when I understood her intentions. I was only 8 years old and loved to play with kids of my age; that was why I agreed to travel with a girl I never knew before. To return to Dukem, I didn’t know how.”[5th participant]

Abuse and ill-treatment at home were precipitating events for homelessness among the participants. Here are what some of them said:

“While I was herding cattle one day my arm was broken (I was less than 7 years old as I remember). Life was bitter for me then and one day I disappeared from them.”[1st participant]

“I decided to live on streets than with my mother because my stepfather was abusive to me. Besides, my mother had hypertension and I didn’t want her die from the stress.”[3rd participant]

Related to dissatisfaction of life at home, the other related immediate reason was quarrel or conflict with family. For instance, quarrel or conflict of one of the participants with the head of the household resulted in her homelessness. She said:

“……….. I started living with my sister; I worked during the daytime and went to my sister’s home in the evening. However, after a while my sister started throwing intimidating and degrading abusive words at me which I couldn’t tolerate. Finally, I left her house to live on the streets.”[9th participant]

For some participants, migration was the immediate cause for homelessness. Some of them said:

“I came to Addis Ababa with the hope of getting job there; but I had no place to stay and started living on the streets thinking it would be for short time.”[8th participant]

“One of my friends, who knew Addis Ababa, told me about the work opportunities in the city. Hoping to get better paying job and better life, I decided to go to Addis. I took my youngest half-sister with me, and with the company of my friend, I travelled to Addis. The deal with my friend was that, we were travelling to get better job, but because I didn’t know the Amharic language, I had agreed to live on the streets till I was able to speak the language.”[10th participant]

Death of parents was another immediate reason for homelessness among the participants. Death of both parents, especially when the parents are the source of livelihood, resulted in disruption of all family and results in homelessness of children.

“I ended up on the streets because my parents died. I went into street life one year back when my father died; my mother had died earlier.”[10th participant]

The other immediate cause for homelessness among participants was illness stigma. Some forms of illness were cause for stigmatization in the communities of the participants. Mental and neurological illnesses, developmental retardation as well as epilepsy were some of the sources of stigmatization. One woman reported her experience like this:

“Two years after I was married I delivered a male child who is now 3 years old. After I was pregnant, my husband’s parents forced me to leave for fear that I would die inside their house from my illness; I had epilepsy. According to local myth, epilepsy would be dangerous during pregnancy. They forced me out of their home. Then I decided to go to urban area and get holy water treatment while I raise my baby. Then I went to a town and started living on street for 2 years now.”[4th participant]

One participant was actually born into homelessness; that participant found herself on the streets ever since she remembered. She explained her life history as follows:

“When I first became aware of my being, I found myself on the street. I don’t know my parents; I was raised by street youth who found me abandoned. I am now 19 years and I lived all my life on the streets. It is only recently that my friends (family) of the streets told me they first found me abandoned inside of a garbage container in the City of Adama; they said they went to the garbage container to look for thrown food items. They also told me they decided to raise me and prevented rich people who wanted to take and raise me; they said they told those rich people who requested to take me that I was daughter of their friend’s.”[6th participant]

Sexual assault, which includes attempted or actual rape, was another immediate cause for becoming homeless. One participant said:

“…………. When I was 6 years old, my aunt took me to Hawasa and raised me. My parents were still alive; the reason I came to my aunt’s place is that my aunt had children of my age and I was supposed to play and enjoy with them. …………… one day my aunt’s husband tried to rape me. Following this incident, after living 10 years with my aunt, I took all the money I had and escaped from her to come to Addis Ababa.”[15th participant]

Unwanted forced pregnancy was the other immediate cause. Some participants had lost their opportunity to working as housemaid or a waitress due to forced pregnancy. One of them described it this way:

“While I was working in the restaurant, I met the barista who is also son of the owners. He was alcoholic and one day he came drunk and raped me after which I became pregnant. Once my pregnancy status was known by the man and his family, they fired me; the man who made me pregnant refused to help me or his offspring. Later, I gave birth to a baby on the street.”[7th participant]

Some participants joined the homeless life because they wanted more freedom. Some of the participants thought that their parents or care givers were too controlling. Those participants assumed that they will achieve the freedom they wanted by living on the street. One participant described:

“One good man found me and took me to his home in Dukem and raised me like his own daughter. He sent me to school and I finished till grade 3. But his wife …; she was very controlling and I didn’t like that. I decided to go to Addis Ababa where I didn’t know what awaited me.”[8th participant]

Some participants became homeless due to incurable illness which resulted in loss of hope in them. One participant described it like this:

“My daughter was getting sick very frequently; finally, I was told she had HIV/AIDS. I also got tested and knew I was positive for HIV. Because of this I lost hope and started living on streets.”[12th participant]

Lack of access to affordable housing caused some participants to become homeless. One of them explained her experience as follows:

“Since the cost of rental house in Addis is too high for me, I even have tried to live in a smaller town near the outskirts of Addis; but I couldn’t afford that one either. ……… Finally I lost all my hope in the world; that is when I totally started living on the streets.”[12th participant]

Way of life for the homeless woman

The way the participants lived while they were homeless differed from one participant to another. The possibilities for how women would live once they become homeless were identified and summarized in this section.

Begging for money, for food, or for other things necessary to life was almost an inevitable experience for them. The participants admitted that the people of Addis Ababa are so generous; and the daily income respondents collected by begging could be to as high as 1000 ETB per day sometimes. That means, if they collect this kind of money regularly, their monthly income could actually be higher than the gross salary of the highest paid public servant in Ethiopia. The following responses were given by participants of the study:

“On the street I live by begging from people. When it gets hard to get money by begging, I get leftover food (“bulle”) from the hotels. I am grateful to the residents of Addis Ababa; they are kind people who give us money and other things generously.”[3rd participant]

“We started living below a bridge at the center of Addis Ababa. I beg on the streets to get money. We sometimes eat leftover food from the hotels (“bulle”), and other times we buy low cost food by the money we have.”[5th participant]

“By begging I get as high as 1000 Birr per day. I also have some savings.”[14th participant]

Some participants worked on temporary jobs while they were homeless. When the situation was not as favorable, they complemented their income by begging. The commonest reported job was working as waitress in small bars which sold alcohol, including culturally brewed drinks. Bed-making in hotels and cleaning hotel utensils was another employment opportunity for them. Some of the participants sold small items on the streets; similarly some sold psychoactive substances to other homeless people. Next were statements provided by participants:

“I occasionally worked in some jobs like rental bedrooms while living on the street. I also was engaged in the trade of ‘amag’ (‘amag’ is a code name given by street youth to a commercially available glue chemical used as inhalant substance by street people); I buy the merchandise from the shops and retail it to those who want it on the streets. I get a substantial amount of money from such trade.”[6th participant]

“Intermittently, we get temporary jobs of washing glasses in hotels; with the money, we buy food items and we cook food. Whenever we couldn’t find job and become short of money, we beg from people. I was able to secure a job as housemaid; but I was asked to leave my little sister on the streets since she couldn’t be hired together with me. This idea was unacceptable for me and I refused to accept the offer.”[10th participant]

“I do some paying work at times, and live by begging from people at other times.”[12th participant]

Some participants had no form of shelter throughout their life as homeless. Such participants slept on streets and moved around from one street to another during unfavorable weather or situation such as during the rainy season. Here is what a participant said:

“We live and sleep on the street and below the bridges of Addis. We don’t make any temporary shelters of canvas or plastic because the police would soon damage them.”[6th participant]

Other participants had some form of shelter. The shelters were make-shift small shelters made of canvas and plastic or textile. A participant reported the following:

“After we arrived at Addis, we started living on the streets by making a canvas shelter.”[10th participant]

Some participants had life which involved getting in and out of the homeless situation. For instance, some participants temporarily lived in rented house with the income they get by working or by begging. Others were temporarily married to men who provided them home as long as they stayed in the marriage. The following responses were given by participants:

“I met a man while I was working in the bar; he was a regular customer of ours and he was a long truck driver. I started to live with him like married couple for sometime; . I delivered a baby by him.”[9th participant]

“After I went out to live on the streets, I occasionally was able to rent a house for sometime duration.”[12th participant]

Some participants were involved in commercial sex work during their life as homeless. One of them said:

“When I was 19 years old I started to do prostitution, despite the fact that prostitution was the last thing I wanted to do.”[1st participant]

Some participants attended school while they were homeless. This was possible for them with the help of other homeless people. One woman said:

“The street guys caused me to attend evening school; I attended evening school till grade 4.”[1st participant]

Living in groups was a form of living arrangement for some participants. Such living arrangement helped them support each other at times of adversity. One woman reported:

“We live in groups; each group is like one family. Some of those who live with us are small children. We usually found them wandering around after they were lost from their parents; some of them didn’t even start to talk when we first found them and couldn’t tell who their parents were and where they lived. We mix them with us and raise them on the streets.”[6th participant]

In some cases participants opted to form partnership with homeless male. This kind of living arrangement helped them to get support from their male partner. One participant said:

“Five months later, I started a romantic relationship with a man; we still live together. When we were living on the streets we ate ‘bulle’ whenever we have no money.”[15th participant]

Positive and negative aspects of life for the homeless woman

Participants were able to identify positive experiences they had in their homeless life. Mutual support and social life within the community of homeless people was described most frequently by them. Homeless people supported each other with supplies, emotionally, and provided protection to one another. The following responses were given by the participants:

“The positive side of street life is that there is collaboration among street people; we share and eat together. There is love among those who live together on the streets. We care for each other and this gives me happiness. If one of us is attacked by anyone, we come together and defend. I must say, generally, I enjoyed living on the streets: we loved each other, we shared whatever we had among ourselves, and supported each other. For example, if one had no cloth, then he/she was likely to get from one of the friends in the group. One would not be disgusted by the other; for example, if one bled from injury, another would secure the bleeding with bare hand without worrying about HIV infection.”[5th participant]

“The positive side of living on the streets was that we loved each other, supported one another, and shared whatever we had. If, for instance, I had 2 Birr and one of my friends had none, I would give 1 birr to him/her.”[6th participant]

Some participants positively reported the presence of freedom in the homeless life. By freedom the participants meant that they don’t have to be controlled by their parents or relatives who provide them. Participants felt they could do their will when they are by themselves. Here is what one participant said:

“The only thing I can mention positively about street life is that there was freedom; it is not like living with parents. I felt I was free and could relax as I wished living on the streets than otherwise; for example, if I lived at home with my parents, I wouldn’t be able to use psychoactive substances.”[8th participant]

The participants acknowledged the charitable people of Addis Ababa. The existence of kind people who provided them with useful supplies was their positive experience. One participant said:

“I can’t perceive any positive aspects of street life; what I can witness positively is about the people of Addis Ababa, because even if they knew we were addicted they gave us money.”[9th participant]

The majority of responses, however, were about the negative aspects of the homeless life. Participants described that the negative experiences of homelessness outweighed the positive ones. Sexual assault was a part of life for them. Many of the participants reported they experienced sexual assault, including rape. Others reported witnessing sexual assault as it occurred to other homeless women. Most of them reported they lived a life always haunted by the possibility of being raped. Participants described that some homeless women collaborated with males to arrange sexual assault on fellow women who are also homeless. They did this in return for incentives such as supply of psychoactive substances. The following responses were given by participants:

“I was worried about the possibility of being raped; I particularly was worried that my daughter could be raped. Due to my fear of rape of my daughter and myself, I slept during the day and stayed awake during the night to protect my daughter and myself from rapists. ……When I lived on streets I was chased several times by men who wanted to rape me; in those incidents, I saved myself from being raped by shouting and calling for help. One day, however, I was overwhelmed by sleep and my daughter was raped; they also raped me after they covered my eye and packed my mouth. My daughter was only 5 years old.”[7th participant]

“I was usually unable to sleep because men tried to rape me; I had to stay all night awake to protect myself against rapists”[13th participant]

Abusive police officers were a source of negative experience to the participants. They chased them from the places where they slept, insulted them, beaten them severely, destroyed their shelter, and falsely accused them of wrongdoing. Participants explained as follows:

“The other challenge is that the police sometimes came and wake us from where we slept. The police at times accused us for theft even if we didn’t steal anything; I remember of an incident when we were beaten for wrongdoing which we actually didn’t commit.”[6th participant]

“The police come to where we sleep and hit us even without asking about our problems and the reasons why we were there. They once hit me together with my small baby daughter; they also insulted us in the most offensive derogatory words.”[9th participant]

The participants had other grievances and worries which affected them negatively. These included grief from memory and concern about their parents, children, and worries about their children being possibly stolen on the streets. Here are some of their responses:

“The memories of my mother and my son haunted me frequently, and made me suffer. Especially, the main worry I had was about my mother. I feared she could die from her hypertension. She got angry easily and her blood pressure increased.”[3rd participant]

“Another thing I was worried about was that my daughter could be stolen; I had heard children were stolen for their organs.”[7th participant]

Feeling of shame from the act of begging was another negative experience for the participants. They said:

“……. It is very shameful to stand before people asking for money.”[3rd participant]

“People despised me and sometimes spat on me which was intimidating and degrading.”[8th participant]

The participants suffered from harsh weather conditions while living on the streets. They described the experience as follows:

“The challenging or the difficult part was that there was rain and floods during the rainy season; this became a big challenge to us. During one of those rainy days, we could be forced to spend the night wandering in the city, and not be able to sleep.”[6th participant]

“I once was sick and unable to walk from the cold weather’s effect on my body. The street life had become horrible to me.”[13th participant]

Hunger and food shortage was a frequent experience for the participants. They described this negative experience as follows:

“Sometimes I would be forced to spend all day without eating for lack of food[5th participant]

“There were days when I had nothing to eat and went to bed empty stomach[13th participant]

Their belongings were stolen from them and this was painful for them. Participants said:

“Thieves also would come during the night while we were asleep[8th participant]

“My daughter’s clothes were stolen[12th participant]

Drunken people disturbed while participants slept on the streets at night. They described it as follows:

“There was also possibility that people who were drunk would come and disturb us. It was boring to live on the streets.”[8th participant]

“The hard and challenging aspect of street life outweighs….. The following events occurred almost on daily basis: A drunken person would come and disturb, or insult me.”[11th participant]

The personal feeling of being stigmatized due to becoming homeless was also a negative aspect of the homeless life. Participants mentioned the following:

“People saw us like crazy people and due to that they were afraid of us. Because of this I felt that I was different and felt isolated and lonely.”[9th participant]

“The challenges I had to bear during my life on the streets were: The people who had known me before I was on the streets despised me and intimidated me whenever they saw me on streets.”[12th participant]

Participants were economically exploited, especially by male partners. One of them described her negative experience as follows:

“Whatever I earned from commercial sex work, I gave it to my new boyfriend; he was so convincing when he spoke, I always trusted him. One day I told him that I hated working as prostitute and that I wanted to get out of it; he disagreed with this idea and even told me to stay away from him thereafter. Then it became clear to me that he was after the money that I earned from commercial sex work and didn’t love me.”[1st participant]

Sexual exploitation was also reported by participants. One of them said:

“I met someone on the streets who promised me we would live together and I agreed with his idea. Then we started living and having sex together on the streets; I became pregnant in the meantime. However, he abandoned me after he knew I was pregnant.”[13th participant]

Lack of supplies was a frequent impediment for hygiene among the homeless women and participants felt bad about it. One of them explained:

“We hardly could afford to buy even hygiene soap in most days.”[8th participant]

Some people from among the homeless people sometimes forced the participants to use psychoactive substances and this was usually painful to them. One participant gave the following narrative:

“Some people urged us to be substance users.”[12th participant]

Ways of coping with stress and adjusting to life as a homeless woman

The participants described their ways of coping and/or adjusting to homeless life. They used psychoactive substances to cope with their daily stressful experiences.

“I used psychoactive substances as pastime, and to cope with my feeling of loneliness.”[1st participant]

Some participants formed a sexual relationship with male partner in order to feel safe and protected. They explained:

“I also was able to have a boyfriend from among the street boys which was important for me to be protected from sexual violence on the streets from the street boys. ………Because I had a boyfriend from the street boys who is one of them, the other boys wouldn’t think of me sexually. Otherwise, if I were alone I would have the risk of being gang-raped by 4 or 5 of them at a time; this happened to other women on the street.”[1st participant]

“One time I decided to ‘get married’ on the streets and started a relationship with one of the street boys. The main reason for me to do that was to get protection from sexual assaults. I also intended to give birth as soon as possible; I made this decision because a woman on the streets, if she was in a relationship and/or had a baby, the men were unlikely to assault her and even tended to protect her. I got pregnant with such an intention now.”[6th participant]

Some participants tried to make their homeless life easier by forming good rapport and using good social skills with others.

“I was able to cope with street life because I was able to create and maintain rapport with anyone, particularly those who lived on the streets with me. I handled challenges politely; if I got irritable, those guys were likely to be more violent and abusive. If I became polite and gentle with them I knew I could live with them peacefully. I handled menacing tendencies and approaches of some of the street boys carefully, wisely avoiding them and without becoming confrontational.”[1st participant]

Participants tried to conform to the street culture so that they could be accepted by the others.

“To cope with the challenges from men, I tried to conform to the street culture and tried to be like them; I did what they did.”[3rd participant]

Some participants dressed and behaved like male in order to escape sexual assault.

“I was challenged by males who wanted to take advantage of me even after I changed living area. I then took a wise decision to cut my hair short and dress like a male, so that they would think I was male. This strategy worked well for me.”[5th participant]

Some participants lived close to churches to get protection, as well as to benefit from donations of money and items from people who come to worship.

“The reason why I was not raped was the fact that I spent day and night around the church.”[11th participant]

Reasons why homeless women stay homeless

Some factors kept the women homeless by making exit to secure housing difficult or impossible. Some of the factors are listed below.

Participants described that they were unable to find affordable house; because of this reason they were not able to exit homeless life. They explained:

“If I got the chance, I would like to get myself out of the streets. The main impediment for me not to get out of street life was that the cost of rental house was too high; otherwise I was confident that I could work and earn my living. The one thing I needed support for was getting affordable house. …….”[11th participant]

“If I got the opportunity, I wanted to get out of street life. The main obstacle I had was the cost of rental house. If someone supported me to get a shelter, I would see no problem in getting into some kind of work and support myself and my children.”[12th participant]

Some participants had the feeling of shame about going back to their families. They felt it would be an embarrassment to their family, as well as to themselves, to go back home after having had homeless life.

“The main reason why, at that point, I didn’t want to go to my parents was that I didn’t want them to see me in that condition carrying a child whose father was unknown, and addicted to substances.”[8th participant]

“What held me back from going to my place of origin where I had relatives was, in my community, it would be an embarrassment for myself and my family to have been an unmarried woman with children. People wouldn’t give me the peace of mind and I would suffer from rejection. My most disturbing worry was to not lose my children.”[12th participant]

For some participants there were unfavorable situations back home preventing their return. The very reasons which caused them to leave home to become homeless still existed.

“If I got the chance, I would have wanted to get out of street life. I would want to start working and support my mother and send my son to school. My mother would get old and weak from time to time; she had a coffee growing farm around Harar. However, I didn’t want to go to her because there was a stepfather; my father had been dead. Because of the presence of a stepfather at home, I didn’t want my mother to suffer by my presence in the house; my stepfather never had had good attitude towards me.”[3rd participant]

“I could not go to my place of origin because there was no one I could rely on. My father lived with support from charitable folks; there was no one who could support me.”[11th participant]

Some participants had no place to call home and they felt there was no place for them to go.

“One day, I was so bored by and hated street life I decided to be involved in crime so that they could take me to jail. I considered jail as an asylum from street life. Then I confessed for a theft which I didn’t commit; for that I was sent to prison for 3 months. I would have wanted to get out of street life if I got the chance; but there was no place I could go because I had no home.”[6th participant]

Some participants could not exit their homeless life because of addiction on psychoactive substances.

“Once I became a street girl, I couldn’t, and didn’t want to go back home because of my addiction. I felt it was hard for me to abandon the substances.”[9th participant]

Some participants reported that they simply had no transport money to pay for journey back to their home or native areas.

“If I get the chance, I would want to get out of street life because: I felt street life was boring; I wanted to work, and be self-sufficient. However, to go back to home at Wolaita, I didn’t have enough money for transportation.”[10th participant]

Discussion

This is a study conducted in a low-income country, where there are no regular shelter facilities or services meant for the homeless. The study was conducted in a country which had cultural norms which gave women a lower and submissive status and where child marriage was widely practiced. Our study differs from previous similar studies conducted in Ethiopia because it is more comprehensive. This study has tried to explore with much detail the life history of homeless women starting from early childhood, through events leading to homelessness, to the possibilities and the means of survival of the women, to the dynamics of positive and negative experiences they had, as well as their ways of coping with challenges.

The study identified that most of the causative factors for women’s homelessness among the participants were similar to findings of previous studies. In this regard, domestic violence, poverty, and lack of access to affordable housing which previous studies had found out were also identified in our study [8,18,23,25,27]. However, our study differs from previous studies in that it defined homelessness to include only those sleeping in designated public spaces or shelters, or those who were ‘roofless’; as such, the study included women under the extreme form of homelessness. This could mean that the factors causing homelessness in our participants were likely to be in their severest forms. In that case, the threshold of tolerance of our participants to socio-economic and psychological stress seems to be high. Findings of our study conform to those of studies conducted in big cities in Ethiopia. The factors associated with causation of homelessness among women in previous studies in Ethiopia were also identified in our study; those factors were migration, urbanization, poverty, abuse, escape from child marriage, unemployment, death of one or both parents, divorce of parents, pregnancy out of wedlock, and abandonment by spouse [14,15,29,30]. This shows the existence of factors which are similar throughout Ethiopian cities. We, however, identified more factors in the current study such as deception, family quarrels, search for more freedom and stigma from illness.

As can be seen from the analysis results, the early lives of the study participants were not satisfactory to them; for some participants, their early life experiences were even harsh and unacceptable. Therefore, it can be noticed that homelessness among the participant women was not determined only by the occurrence of triggering events which precipitated homelessness. Instead, there were situations in their lives which created fertile grounds for homelessness. Those fertile grounds indicated the predisposing factors. The cultural, social and legal disadvantages of women which existed in the cultures of the participants were identified as predisposing factors in our study. For instance, there was a cultural occurrence of child marriage in rural parts of Ethiopia. Some of our participants were given to such marital commitment as early as the age of 5 years. While such marital commitment was made between the parents on both sides of the married, due to issues related to dowry and other disagreements between the parents the life of the small girls became too difficult to bear leading to homelessness. The other culturally-sanctioned predisposing factor for homelessness in this study was history of commercial sex work. Since prostitution was extremely stigmatized in the culture of the society of the study participants, those who had the exposure were ashamed to stay with parents/families or their communities for fear that they or their families would be isolated and humiliated. Finally, they were forced into the homeless life. Difficult marriage was another important issue which we find worth discussing. In the culture of the participants, a woman in a difficult marriage was expected to tolerate hardship and maintain her marriage. For a woman in that kind of situation, especially if she was economically dependent, homelessness was likely to occur at some point; this is because going back to live with her family after separation with spouse was likely to result in humiliation to her and her family. Therefore, intervention measures that need to be taken at the societal level should address the above mentioned issues.

The life challenges which our study participants experienced were similar to the findings of previous studies. In our study homeless women experienced sexual assault, substance abuse, psychological distress, as well as labels and stigmatization; such experiences were also identified in previous studies [18,19,23,28,31,32]. Our findings also conform to similar studies conducted in Ethiopian cities. In previous studies homeless women were found to be vulnerable to rape, physical abuse, emotional abuse, extreme poverty, hunger, physical safety concerns, lack of safe drinking water, poor sanitation and prevailing diseases; our findings were in agreement with those findings from Ethiopian studies [14,15,29,30].

As a means of mitigating abuse and coping with street life, our respondents used various strategies. Using marriage as protection against sexual violence was identified in our study, a finding similar to a previous study conducted in Addis Ababa [14]. However, despite the use of forming partnerships with men on the streets, our study showed homeless women were economically and sexually exploited by their male partners resulting in psychological trauma to them. Using marriage for protection also resulted in the possibility of exposure to unwanted pregnancy. The likelihood of getting an unwanted pregnancy, either from rape or from marriage was considered high. A previous Ethiopian study showed that one-fourth of street children were born to street women, making the second generation on the streets [15]. This shows how women homelessness sustains and complicates the problem of homelessness as a whole by making homelessness intergenerational [20]. Much of the income of the homeless population in Addis Ababa came from begging on the streets, with casual work making another source of income [39], a finding similar to our study.

One prominent finding of our study showed that respondents benefited from charitable provision of money by the residents of Addis Ababa. However, this behavior of the residents of Addis Ababa could have been aggravating the situation by encouraging more women to become homeless. The painful truth identified from our study was that some of our participants earned income so remarkable, even the most hard-working professional people wouldn’t be able to match their daily income. This could be a factor perpetuating homelessness, making exit from the situation less likely. The other perpetuating factor identified in our study was the lack of organized and sustained support for homeless women to enable them to move to secure housing. In fact, recommendations which were based on the existing literature indicated the need to provide homeless women and girls with assistance in obtaining housing, feeling a sense of community, flexibility in housing programs, and having options and choice in housing selection [21].The lack of such assistance to the homeless should be taken seriously; in fact, institutions could help to make better use of the donations from the people who are willing to support the disadvantaged.

Several of the participants indicated that they could work and support themselves except for the fact that it was difficult for them to afford for a housing in the city. In fact, finding affordable housing had become a daunting task in many of the cities in Ethiopia. The current study has limitations within which the conclusions should be interpreted. One limitation the study is that the researchers’ previous understanding about the topic could have influenced the process of the research and the conclusions to some extent. However, as much participant narrations as possible were provided to give the reader better understanding. The sample of 14 was considered low and also not representative of all homeless women in Addis Ababa, but the aim of the study was in-depth understanding of the situation and generating ideas for further evaluation rather than representativeness. Therefore, the conclusions need to be understood in the context of these limitations.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the pathways through homelessness in the study participants could be formulated into an explanatory model. On the background, difficult or unsatisfactory living conditions of women in the community produced fertile ground for the occurrence of homelessness. On top of those predisposing factors, occurrence of additional triggering life events served as immediate cause of homelessness; such precipitating life events made the misery of the women surpass the threshold of tolerance, and made homelessness inevitable. Once homeless, there were positive and negative experiences and perceptions of the women, as well as the means of coping with the stress of the homeless life. The net effect of the interplay between the positive and the negative, as well as the effectiveness of efforts to cope with stress decided whether the woman would stay homeless or exit out of it. The existence of perpetuating factors finally affected the decision to stay homeless or move to secure housing. We recommend representative quantitative studies to be conducted.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the study participants for their willingness and their eagerness to provide valuable and genuine information. The authors acknowledge Mr Fasil Girma, and his staff, for the support provided during the process of data collection.

Abbreviations

AIDS

Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome

ETB

Ethiopian Birr

FEANTSA

European Federation of National Organizations working with the Homeless

HIV

Human Immune-deficiency Virus

GDP

Gross Domestic Product

Data Availability

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are not publicly available due to ethical restrictions and for protection of participant privacy. Because this is a qualitative study and the data includes sensitive life stories of the participants which, if publicly available, could result in the possibility of damage to the participants. The authors believe that even if anonymous, there is a possibility of the participants being identified from the other personal information included in the data which cannot be totally excluded lest could remove important information used during data analysis. The authors believe that they have the duty to protect the privacy and confidentiality of their study participants as required by all research ethics standards. The participants have been assured about data privacy and confidentiality before they gave consent to participate. Therefore, the reason for not publicly sharing the data is authors’ discretion and duty to protect participant privacy. However, the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of St Amanuel Mental Specialized Hospital also has the responsibility to monitor and follow the ethical undertaking of matters concerning the study. Contact information for the IRB is as follows: amsh_res@amsh.gov.et.

Funding Statement

The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.

References

  • 1.Mabhala Mzwandile A., Yohannes Asmait and Griffith Mariska. Social conditions of becoming homelessness: qualitative analysis of life stories of homeless peoples. International Journal for Equity in Health 2017; 16:150 10.1186/s12939-017-0646-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Tipple Graham, Speak Suzanne. Definitions of homelessness in developing countries. Habitat International 29, 2005; 337–352. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Daly M. The right to a home, the right to a future. Brussels: FEANTSA 1994. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Somerville P. “Homelessness and the Meaning of Home: Rooflessness or Rootlessness?” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 1992; 16 (4): 529–539. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Tomas A., and Dittmar H. “The Experience of Homeless Women: An Exploration of Housing Histories and the Meaning of Home.” Housing Studies 1995; 10 (4): 493–515. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Somerville Peter. Understanding Homelessness. Housing, Theory and Society 2013. 10.1080/14036096.2012.756096 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Craig T., Hodson S., Woodward S., and Richardson S. Off to a Bad Start: A Longitudinal Study of Homeless Young People in London. London: The Mental Health Foundation; 1996. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Lemos G. Homelessness and Loneliness. London: Crisis; 2000. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.McNaughton C. Transitions Through Homelessness: Lives on the Edge. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2008. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Ravenhill M. The Culture of Homelessness. Aldershot: Ashgate; 2008. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Anderson I., and Tulloch D. Pathways Through Homelessness: A Review of the Research Evidence. Edinburgh: Scottish Homes; 2000. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Guy Johnson and Chris Chamberlain. 'Homelessness and Substance Abuse: Which Comes First?' Australian Social Work 2008; 61(4): 342–356. 10.1080/03124070802428191 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Johnson Guy, Ribar David C., Zhu Anna. Women’s Homelessness: International Evidence on Causes, Consequences, Coping and Policies. IZA Institute of Labor Economics: Discussion Paper series; 2017; IZA DP No. 10614 [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Edwards Beverly, Patricia Guy-Walls George Jacinto & Franklin Robert. Findings of a Study Exploring Homeless Street Females in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: A Need for Community Based Programs. International Journal of Gender and Women’s Studies 2015; 3(1): 42–50. 10.15640/ijgws.v3n1p6 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Nathan Martha A. and Fratkin Elliot. The Lives of Street Women and Children in Hawassa, Ethiopia. African Studies Review 2018; 61(1): 158–184. 10.1017/asr.2017.135 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Fekadu Abebaw, Hanlon Charlotte, Emebet Gebre-Eyesus Melkamu Agedew, Solomon Haddis, Teferra Solomon, et al. Burden of mental disorders and unmet needs among street homeless people in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. BMC Medicine 2014; 12:138 10.1186/s12916-014-0138-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Ayano Getinet, Assefa Dawit, Haile Kibrom, Chaka Asrat, Solomon Haddish, Hagos Petros, et al. Mental, neurologic and substance use (MNS) disorders among street homeless people in Ethiopia. Ann Gen Psychiatry 2017; 16: 40 10.1186/s12991-017-0163-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Bretherton Joanne and Pleace Nicholas. Women and rough sleeping: A critical review of current research and methodology. University of York, Centre for Housing Policy; 2018. P-15,19 https://www.york.ac.uk/chp/ [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Mayock P. and Sheridan S. (2012) Women’s ‘Journeys’ to Homelessness: Key Findings from a Biographical Study of Homeless Women in Ireland. Women and Homelessness in Ireland, Research Paper 1, P-01. Dublin: School of Social Work and Social Policy and Children’s Research Centre, Trinity College Dublin. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Kay Patterson AO, Kathryn Proft and Joanna Maxwell Older Women’s Risk of Homelessness: Background Paper. Australian Human Rights Commission; 2019. P- 14 www.humanrights.gov.au/about/publications [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Amy Van Berkumand Abe Oudshoorn. Best Practice Guideline for Ending Women’s and Girl’s Homelessness. Western Health Sciences; 2015.P-1 [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Savage Méabh. Gendering women’s homelessness. Irish Journal of Applied Social Studies 2016; 16(2): 44–65 [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Thomas Chalmers McLaughlin. Women and Homelessness: Understanding Risk Factors and Strategies for Recovery. Preble Street Reports 2009. www.preblestreet.org
  • 24.Adkins Barbara, Barnett Karen, Jerome Kristine, Heffernan Maree and Minnery John. Women, housing and transitions out of homelessness: A report for the Commonwealth Office of the Status of Women. AHURI 2003. P-ii [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Andrade Rosi. Health and social well-being in chronically homeless women: Tucson and Southern Arizona’s current risks and future opportunities. Making Action Possible in Southern Arizona (MAP Dashboard) 2018; White Paper #8. www.mapazdashboard.arizona.edu [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Levin Rebekah, Mckean Lise, Raphael Jody. Pathways to and from homelessness: Women and children in chicago shelters. Homeless families 2004. www.impactresearch.org [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Duchesne A. Women and Homelessness in Canada: A brief review of the literature. OBM-McGill Center for Research on Children and Families 2015. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Tracy Flaherty-Willmott. Women’s experiences of housing instability & homelessness in St. Thomas-Elgin. Literature review and community survey results. YWCA 2019. P-1 [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Ali Mushir. Socio-Economic Analysis of Homeless Population in Urban Areas a Case Study of Northern Ethiopia. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications 2012; 2(8): 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Ali Mushir. Status of Homeless Population in Urban Ethiopia: A Case Study of Amhara Region. International Journal of Management and Social Sciences Research (IJMSSR) 2014; 3(1): 61–68. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Duff Putu, Deering Kathleen, Gibson Kate, Tyndall Mark and Shannon Kate. Homelessness among a cohort of women in street-based sex work: the need for safer environment interventions. BMC Public Health 2011; 11: 643 10.1186/1471-2458-11-643 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Fabian Dalma. Perspectives on Women’s Homelessness; editorial. Homelessness in Europe: The Magazine of FEANTSA 2016. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Bretherton Joanne. Reconsidering Gender in Homelessness. European Journal of Homelessness 2017; 11(1): 1–21 [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Mayock P., Bretherton J, and Baptista I. (2016) Women’s Homelessness and Domestic Violence–(In)visible Interactions, in: Mayock P. and Bretherton J. (Eds.) Women’s Homelessness in Europe, pp.127–154. (London: Palgrave Macmillian; ). [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Bretherton J. and Mayock P. (2016) Introduction, in: Mayock P. and Bretherton J. (Eds.) Women’s Homelessness in Europe, pp.1–12. (London: Palgrave Macmillian; ). [Google Scholar]
  • 36.The University of Queensland; Institute for Social Science Research. Older Women’s Pathways out of Homelessness in Australia: Report for the Mercy Foundation. Research, Analysis and Training for a Changing World 2014. www.issr.uq.edu.au [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Dube Dharmendra. “The Status, Challenges, and Expectations of Homeless People in Ethiopia: A Case Study of Bahir Dar.” European Academic Research 2014; 2 (2): 3027–44. [Google Scholar]
  • 38.UNHABITAT. Urban Inequities Report: Addis Ababa. Cities and Citizens Series 2003. [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Abebe Tatek. “Earning a Living on the Margins: Begging, Street Work, and the Socio-Spatial Experiences of Children in Addis Ababa.” Geografiska Annaler Series B. Human Geography 2008; 90 (3): 271–84. [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Mellissa H Withers

17 Jun 2020

PONE-D-20-15059

Pathways through homelessness among women in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: A qualitative study

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Haile,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Aug 01 2020 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Mellissa H Withers, PhD, MHS

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. We note that you have indicated that data from this study are available upon request. PLOS only allows data to be available upon request if there are legal or ethical restrictions on sharing data publicly. For more information on unacceptable data access restrictions, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-unacceptable-data-access-restrictions.

In your revised cover letter, please address the following prompts:

a) If there are ethical or legal restrictions on sharing a de-identified data set, please explain them in detail (e.g., data contain potentially sensitive information, data are owned by a third-party organization, etc.) and who has imposed them (e.g., an ethics committee). Please also provide contact information for a data access committee, ethics committee, or other institutional body to which data requests may be sent.

b) If there are no restrictions, please upload the minimal anonymized data set necessary to replicate your study findings as either Supporting Information files or to a stable, public repository and provide us with the relevant URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers. For a list of acceptable repositories, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-recommended-repositories.

We will update your Data Availability statement on your behalf to reflect the information you provide.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: N/A

Reviewer #2: N/A

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: Overall, this very interesting and important paper would benefit from an additional revision to streamline and correct errors in the writing, with attention paid to use of words and grammar. An example is a sentence in the Results section of the abstract: “Finally, the presence of perpetuating factors such as lack of affordable house, feeling of shame to go back home, unfavorable situation at home, etc discouraged participants from exiting the homeless situation.” There are several areas of this sentence that read awkwardly. This is the case with sentences throughout the manuscript, including missing words (such as ‘the’ and ‘a’) and extra words, and missing but needed pluralization. Often the word ‘house’ is used when ‘housing’ is the correct form. Consider tense – the background uses both the present and the past, sometimes in the same sentence. The authors’ presentation of their strong argument would be greatly improved with editing.

ABSTRACT

Methods should mention how analysis was conducted. Interviews were conducted ‘with’ 14 women, not ‘on’ 14 women.

Results: Use of etc. in the sentences is not necessary because it is not informative. Everything mentioned about homeless life is negative, however there is a sentence referring to the net effect of negative and positive experiences. It is intriguing because the next sentence refers to whether homelessness is tolerable, so the reader is left wondering about any of the positive experiences in the data. I recognize that this is the abstract and brevity is essential, however a reference to positive without examples such as is given for negative, is a problem.

Conclusion: There is always a danger of overstating the findings in a qualitative study. In this case, use of the word ‘determined’ in the first sentence does indicate overstatement. In the second sentence, however, the participants are referenced so they authors are not generalizing beyond this small study, which is appropriate.

MAIN TEXT

BACKGROUND:

This section is quite lengthy. It includes an excellent review of literature on the various relevant topics, however some of the studies overlap in their findings, and the points are therefore repeated. Also, there are so many topics covered, even within a single paragraph, with each sentence starting a new topic. Due to this, the section reads more like a page of disparate notes than the presentation of a seamless narrative about this important problem.

METHODS:

-Since the participants know some of the authors as volunteers, what was the procedure for ensuring they understood that in this case the authors were acting as researchers, not volunteers?

-Great to see that purposive sampling was used.

-For the sentence that includes “adult women respondents who had rich experience of the homeless life” it would be better to say they could provide rich data about their homeless life experience.

-Rather than respondent, as is used in a survey study, participant is more appropriate for qualitative research.

-The use of grounded theory and how phenomenology guided the study needs to be explained.

-The first paragraph actually includes information that is or should be in the subsequent subsections. For example, sampling has its own section below.

Setting and sampling strategy:

-It is unclear what ‘own-account’ workers are. Does this listing account for informal sector workers?

-Better to have setting as one subsection and sampling as another as they don’t really go together.

-Since the entire sample came from the one shelter, I’m curious to know more about the shelter in terms of what it provides to the women, if their stay there is time-limited, and what the accommodations and services are like.

Data collection:

-Rather than ‘data collector’, interviewer seems more fitting.

-Development of the interview question guide is missing. This is particularly important to discuss since grounded theory method starts from the very beginning, and iterative modification of the interview guide is an integral process. The one sentence saying that it was an open ended interview guide does not provide enough information. What were the topics? How were they decided upon? How did grounded theory and phenomenology inform development of the questions?

Data analysis:

-The paper needs an entirely different data analysis section. Grounded theory is a very specific type of qualitative research approach, and it’s clear that the authors did not use grounded theory. That’s fine – grounded theory is only one of many approaches. But they should not state that they’re using it if they are not. I suspect that the reason this term was chosen is that the authors did not have a stated theory underlining the study, and they used inductive coding without an a priori code book developed for the coding process. However, the authors should just describe exactly HOW they arrived at their analyses, themes and interpretation – and not be concerned with a label such as grounded theory, which just doesn’t fit their process.

-A theme cannot be identified in advance; themes emerge from analysis of the data. Topics are identified in advance and incorporated into the interview guide, which is what I assume the authors did. That themes were entered into the variables section of the software doesn’t tell the reader anything meaningful – what exactly does this mean for the analysis process? Did the themes emerge by carefully reading all the transcripts before coding? That is the only way that subsequent coding for themes could happen, but the authors do not describe this as their process. It could be that the terms themes and codes are being used erroneously or in a confusing way in this section, leading to the lack of clarity.

RESULTS

-What does it mean that during analysis major segments were identified?

-Themes are now called categories in this section – It seems that the authors are misunderstanding what themes are in qualitative analysis. Often there are topical categories that don’t quite make it to a theme designation, and that’s fine – just not alright to mix it all up. -The entire first paragraph of the results section is confusing; but in any case it is about analysis and not results so it can be deleted.

-Usually results sections begin with a description of the participants – this was in part included previously in the paper, and could be moved here.

Predisposing factors:

-Again, analysis process is included here though it belongs in the analysis section. Though the sentence is unclear in its meaning: “Under this category, the thematic areas were identified and grouped into codes to give the existence of the following factors.”

Positive and negative experiences:

-After briefly describing the positive experiences, the authors go back into the negative experiences, some of which were already described in previous sections. I realize the subsection is called positive and negative experiences – but these negative experiences should instead be woven into previous sections, or negative experiences should have its own subsection. I would say the issues regarding sexual assault should have their own subsection among the negative subsections. Also, given the situation with women having to stay awake at night to avoid being raped, it would be helpful to know if the women who described having a supportive street family are not the women who were worried about being raped, and if so the importance of the street family can be emphasized as being protective, besides being enjoyable.

General issues in the results sections:

-The quotes strongly demonstrate that the interviews generated rich data about these heartbreaking issues. The introduction to each section of quotes is important for setting up the reader’s awareness of what the quotes are meant to represent. The authors should review each of these paragraphs to ensure that enough information is provided, or that the sentences each provide additional information. For example, the following three sentences really all say the same thing so are not all necessary: ‘The other immediate cause for homelessness among participants was illness stigma. Some forms of illness were cause for stigmatization. Illness stigmatization may come from some types of illnesses.” Instead of repeating the same information, it would be helpful to know additional information such as what kinds of illnesses cause stigma. The quote is about epilepsy but the authors imply that there were a number of illnesses discussed in interviews that cause stigma. Another example where the two introducing sentences say the same thing is: “Some respondents joined the homeless life because they wanted more freedom. The participants who made such decision assumed that they will achieve the freedom they wanted by living on the street.” More information about the nature of the freedom they were looking for would be helpful. The quote can only describe one instance of this but the authors say “some respondents” so information about all the types of situations would better explain this theme. A necessary use of the intro paragraphs for each set of quotes is to summarize what is in the data on the topic, and then illustrate one or two significant elements of that.

-Some of the intro paragraphs give a good amount of information, such as the one on page 15 about working temporary jobs. This could be a model for the rest of the topic paragraphs.

-The following kind of sentence, which ends the paragraph I’m referring to, is not necessary: “Next are statements provided by participants:”

-Be certain that what the intro paragraph says isn’t just exactly repeated in the quote. Either put more into the intro paragraph, or simply don’t use the quote.

-An example is: “Other respondents had some form of shelter. The shelters were make-shift small shelters made of canvas and plastic or textile. A respondent reported the following:

“After we arrived at Addis, we started living on the streets by making a canvas shelter.”[10th participant]”

-Review the entire results section to ensure that the same topic does not appear more than once, even if it is describing more than one theme. Better to find a way to combine. An example is forming sexual relationships that appears several times under different subsections.

-Another theme that appears could be expanded is their initial trust in older sisters and subsequent negative experiences living with them), and their responsibility for younger sisters.

DISCUSSION

The authors include excellent points in the discussion. It is difficult, however, to follow the arguments due to the style of writing. This discussion is very long, and it would improve the paper to consider streamlining the recap of the findings so that not so many details are included, but the main points and comparison to the literature are highlighted. This section also requires editing for phrasing and grammar.

Reviewer #2: This paper gives a glimpse into a major social challenge common to many big cities. Particularly the result section is engaging like a good novel. But it is about hard realities!

The authors have used ground theory, not indicating any theoretical framework. They also refrain from defining “homelessness” and start off with a small selection of women sleeping in a “design public space”. To see what this implies of bias or strength I would appreciate some elaboration of what this shelter is, how long the women had been living there and how they were recruited.

There are some other points that I could like to see elaborated: Successful begging might have a specific cultural background? There are “peculiarities regarding gender role of women”, which? Much is said about networks and support among the homeless, but (at least some decades ago) there was also a unique network of elderly women who took care of young girls who came to Addis.

I liked the authors’ search for a “tipping point” that got the women to take to the streets. This is an approach that has proven fruitful in studies of health seeking behavior and defaulting from recommended treatment. Would it be possible to see links between specific risk factors and types of tipping point events?

When the authors end their conclusion by saying: “We recommend representative quantitative studies to be conducted.” I could not agree more. The present study gives very valuable understanding of the situation for the homeless women, but only quantitative data can move decision makers to take action. And I think the qualitative data here gives good basis for calling for goal directed quantitative studies.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes: Gunnar Bjune

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2020 Sep 2;15(9):e0238571. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0238571.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


23 Jul 2020

To editor:

Dear editor, thank you for the interest you showed in our work, and for the strong consideration. We, therefore, have relied as follows the issues you requested us to address. We also have given point-by-point response to reviewers’ comments in a separate file attached as ‘Response to Reviewers’. Besides, we have attached two other files with amendments to the manuscript after receiving the comments of reviewers and made corrections accordingly. Regards

a) About not being able to share data

The reason why we are not able to share data publicly is because doing so will compromise participant privacy, and violates the terms of consent of the participants made before the interviews.

We have also reviewed the PLOS guidelines about issues of data availability and unacceptable data access restrictions section and we assure you that our decision is in alignment with the criteria included in the Journal’s criteria. The specific issues of privacy concern are as follows:

• The data include life histories of the participants with repetitive mentions of physical address and places they have been at

• The data include information that, in combination, makes identification of the participants possible

• Data is collected from a small group of vulnerable population group

• Indirect identifiers such as sex, ethnicity, places or origin and previous places where they lived that may risk identification

• Most of the data includes sensitive information of this vulnerable population group.

We assure you that the reason we are not able to share data publicly does not qualify for any of the unacceptable data access restrictions listed in the Journal’s guideline.

Thank you again

To reviewers:

First of all, we the authors would like to appreciate the interest you have in the topic. Thank you also for the value you saw in this work and the hard work invested on it. We want you to really understand that we like the way you gave your comments; very specific and critical. Therefore, we provide our point-by-point responses to the comments you gave and the corrections we incorporated to the manuscript.

1. Abstract

• In the ‘methods’ section of the abstract ‘with’ was written instead of ‘on’ as you suggested. Shown also by track change.

• How data analysis was conducted has been included in the abstract section. This is shown by track changes in the revised manuscript.

• In the ‘results’ section the word ‘etc’ has been deleted as you suggested.

• Again in the ‘results’ section, a sentence stating positive experiences has been included to make better meaning. Finally it reads: “Despite mentions of positive experiences of homelessness such as mutual support and good social life within network of homeless people, the net effect of the interaction between negative and positive experiences of the homeless life----“ The amendments are also shown by track changes on the file named ‘manuscript with track changes’.

• In the ‘conclusion’ section the word ‘determined’ has been changed by ‘resulted in –the occurrence of homelessness—among the participants as shown by track changes.

2. Main text

• About the ‘background’ section, to be honest, we believe it has good flow and single concepts are discussed in each paragraph. Even if it looks lengthy, we believe it is not boring and provides a summary of the literature in one section. We prefer to keep this section intact.

• In the ‘methods’ section, the following corrections have been made:

� About the sentence stating some of the researchers were also volunteer workers in the shelter, the statement was qualified and re-written as follows: “The second and sixth authors were volunteer workers of the shelter and they had established prior relationship with the participants; however, whenever those volunteer workers were involved in the research activities they said so to the participants and assured them that their participation in the research activities was fully voluntary, and without any negative or positive consequences upon the services they received in the shelter facility.” Also indicated by track changes on the revised manuscript.

� The statement written as “adult women respondents who had rich experience-----“ was corrected and re-written as “ adult women participants who could provide rich data about-----“ as you suggested.

� About the use of ‘grounded theory’, this statement was included in the ‘method’ section to indicate that the analysis used techniques from those theories in that inductive method was used to suggest theoretical framework for the pathways to homelessness. This doesn’t mean that our techniques were fully loyal to this kind of approach, nor that we used the full approach of grounded theory in our study. Likewise, ‘phenomenology’ was mentioned to indicate that our study analysis included aspects of homelessness as experienced by the participants and themes emerged from those experiences. However, as you suggested, mentioning ‘grounded theory’ and ‘phenomenology’ may not be appropriate or it could actually be confusing because those specific approaches were not used in their full and real sense. Therefore, we have decided to delete those phrases from the manuscript and focus fully on what actually was done during data analysis in our study.

� ‘Setting’ and ‘sampling strategy’ have been separated and re-organized as you suggested. This is shown on the file ‘Revised manuscript with track changes’.

� The ‘setting’ section has been divided into two paragraphs and the following statements have been added at the end of the second paragraph: “Recruitment of the women to the shelter was from all sub-cities of Addis Ababa and on voluntary basis. The shelter was established and funded by the government and was run in collaboration with volunteer workers. Food, clothes and shelter was provided by the facility, as well as medical, mental and psychosocial services. The beneficiaries stayed at the shelter for maximum of 5 months including the 3 months allocated for vocational training which included hair-dressing, cleaning and tailoring.” This is shown by track changes in the revised manuscript

� In the ‘data collection’ section, the term ‘interviewer’ was used instead of the former word ‘data collector’ as you suggested and this amendment has been made to the manuscript.

� About development of the interview guide questions, we must indicate this is an explorative study and the questions prepared were general open-ended questions which would help guide the interview, and without limiting the ideas that are to be raised during the interview. We didn’t use the full approach of the ‘grounded theory’ as we replied to earlier comments. The interview guide questions were prepared considering the inclusion of the broad areas of the ‘homelessness pathways’ in the interview. The broad areas and possible ‘future themes’ were anticipated from our previous knowledge and literature review. The interview guide questions are listed below:

1. Please tell me about yourself (you may not mention your name) and your life before you came to the homelessness situation.

2. How did you end up becoming homeless?

3. How do you describe the life of a homeless person?

4. Can you tell me the challenges you face in your life as a homeless person?

5. How do you try to cope up with the daily challenges of living on the streets?

6. If you get the chance, do you want to get out of the homelessness situation?

7. Anything you want to add, you are welcome.

� About the generation of themes before data collection, some literature indicate that it is possible, and not an uncommon practice to identify possible themes in advance based one’s prior theoretical understanding, experience or literature review of whatever phenomenon one is studying. In fact, we included specific guiding questions in the interview guide questionnaire with those ‘themes’ in our mind. This doesn’t mean we had the themes before the interviews, but it means we had those possible ‘themes’ under consideration before the interviews based on our previous knowledge and used interview guide questions to make sure those important considerations are not missed. However, the themes and subthemes were identified after the interview. However, we also believe that the critic of the reviewers is legitimate; therefore, we have modified the statement by replacing ‘topics’ for ‘themes’ in that particular context. The data analysis section was re-written to address your concerns; please refer to the file ‘revised manuscript with track changes’.

� In the data analysis section, the word ‘theme’ was misused in some statements as you commented, especially the ‘major themes’ or ‘segments’ were inappropriately used. We have made corrections to it by using the word ‘topic or topics’ instead.

� The data analysis we used fits to thematic analysis and we have included a sentence to the ‘data analysis’ section to indicate this if you don’t mind.

• In the ‘results’ section

� The first paragraph has been re-written and moved to the ‘data analysis’ section as you suggested. This is shown by track changes in the revised manuscript.

� The beginning of the ‘results’ section the characteristics of the participants have been described as you suggested.

� In the ‘predisposing factors’ the sentence about categories and themes was removed.

� In the ‘results’ section the word ‘respondent’ has been replaced by ‘participant,’ and the intro statements have been elaborated a little more as shown by track changes in the revised manuscript.

� ‘Negative and positive experiences’ sub-section shows participants’ attributions of events and their perception of them as either ‘positive’ or ‘negative’. This sub-section shows aspects of positive and negative events and provides opportunity for comparison; as such we think there is no problem with leaving this sub-section as it is. Besides, the topic was identified and categorized during data analysis and it plays a particular role in explaining pathways through homelessness. Therefore, we have decided to keep it as it is.

� Sexual assault was not given its own sub-section because it is a negative experience and it doesn’t make sense to give it its own separate sub-section.

� The positive and negative experiences are opposing aspects of the participants’ experiences of homeless life which could happen to any of the participants at different times. The participants who had positive experiences do not see the homeless life as ‘all good’. In fact some of the participants described some experiences as ‘positive’ and other experiences as ‘negative’. Those who had supportive street family also had described ‘negative’ experiences due to other aspects of homeless life; they also worried about the possibility of sexual assault which could come from strangers due to their situation of homelessness. In fact, as was described in the manuscript, some of the participants acknowledged the protective aspects of street family (especially having a ‘husband’), but it doesn’t imply that homeless life is ‘enjoyable’ at all; participants were trying to see some ‘positive’ aspects of the life full of plight.

• The ‘discussion’ section has been edited for grammar and tense. Please check the file ‘Revised manuscript with track changes’ for all the editions. Thank you very much.

Decision Letter 1

Mellissa H Withers

10 Aug 2020

PONE-D-20-15059R1

Pathways through homelessness among women in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: A qualitative study

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Haile,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please address the comments of the first reviewer. While the paper is much improved, there are still several points that need further clarification or edits.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Sept 10, 2020. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Mellissa H Withers, PhD, MHS

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: N/A

Reviewer #2: N/A

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: The paper flow is much improved and clearer with the changes made by the authors. Following are minor points that should be addressed:

Sampling; insert the word ‘case’ after typical; include a reference for readers who are unfamiliar with qualitative sampling.

Ethics approval: Much of the contents of the consent information sheet is typical of consent forms and so not necessary to include in this paragraph.

Results: in the sentence starting: “On of the participants” the first word should be One. In the sentence “Among those who had at least one children,” it should be child.

Step-parent or step parent? Need consistency.

Since the shelter is described as being for adult women and elderly men – how is it that some of the women had children? Were the children living with them at this shelter? Is it therefore a shelter for adult women and their children as well as elderly men?

Revise the sentence “In some cases participants were opted to form partnership with homeless male.” To: In some cases, participants opted to form a partnership with a homeless male.

In the following sentence, I’m feeling like ‘intimidating’ is not exactly the word the authors meant to use: “Some participants had the feeling of shame about going back to their families. They felt it would be intimidating to their family, as well as to themselves, to go back home after having had homeless life.” Possibly intimidating is the expression for what the participants feel going home in terms of how their family would receive them and treat them, but is their presence actually intimidating to their families? If so, how? Might it be embarrassing to the families to have the woman home rather intimidating?

Discussion: First paragraph mentions cultural peculiarities – are they peculiarities actually? Every location has its own cultural norms – so what makes the study unique is not the cultural peculiarities regarding gender norms – but the study analysis is situated within the context of gender norms in Ethiopia. Or is it that with this sentence the authors are referring specifically to child marriage? Best to make this clear.

Sentence: “However, the data were presented as were described by participants without much interpretation.” This is not generally considered a good thing, as interpretation is the final step of qualitative analysis and therefore essential. I think that the authors did do interpretation as they categorized the factors affecting homelessness. Best to just remove this sentence. Another way to deal with the fact that some authors may have been predisposed to certain thoughts about the data is that the study and paper includes a number of authors, and discussion among the authors of the data as data were analyzed and the paper constructed would/could have mitigated bias of one or two authors.

This is a paper about an important topic, using rich qualitative data. Overall the paper reads much more smoothly than the original version read. However, to ensure that the authors’ arguments are expressed as clearly as possible for publication, there are still some syntax edits needed. Check the entire manuscript for tense to keep tenses consistent in past or present – at times both are used in the same sentence. Check sentences for missing words such as ‘a’ and ‘an’ and ‘the’ and ‘at’ and necessary ‘s’ for pluralization in some places. Note that in some sentences ‘was’ is used where the plural ‘were’ is needed. Typically contractions (e.g. couldn’t) are not used so best to check the paper for contractions and use the two words instead. Possibly the journal has an editing service to help with these issues.

Reviewer #2: The reason for not all underlying data are made available is explained by the authors, and their explanation is fully acceptable.

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes: Gunnar Aksel Bjune

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2020 Sep 2;15(9):e0238571. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0238571.r004

Author response to Decision Letter 1


18 Aug 2020

Response to reviewers

Please find herein the point-by-point responses to your comments:

1. Sampling: The word ‘case’ was inserted after ‘typical’ in the sampling strategy subsection as you commented. Check revised manuscript with track changes. About inserting a reference to help justify the method, we think this would not be very vital to this manuscript as our intention is not to teach about sampling methods in qualitative studies. Citations were inserted to provide credit to authorities whose ideas and strong arguments we used to justify our study. Providing a reference as you suggested, we believe, is not relevant here.

2. Setting: In the ‘setting’ sub-section paragraph 2 the statement describing about the shelter being for women and elderly men the following amendment has been made. ‘The shelter was established to provide services to homeless adult women and their dependent children if they had any, and elderly men’. The fact is the shelter took in homeless women together with their children and provided basic services to the children, as well as made it possible to attend school at KG and above.

3. Ethics approval: The unnecessary detailed description about the contents of the participant information sheet was deleted from the subsection ‘ethics approval and consent to participate’ as you suggested. Check revised manuscript with track changes.

4. Results: The following points were addressed:

• The spelling errors in the first paragraph are corrected. ‘on of the participants—‘ was mad ‘one of the ---,‘ ‘---- at least one children—‘ was changed to ‘---at least one child---,‘ ‘step-parent’ was consistently used. Please check manuscript with track changes.

• In the ‘predisposing factors’ sub-section the paragraph which started by the statement ‘some participants had experienced exploitative work conditions---‘ the second statement has been edited to make it better. Please check manuscript with track changes.

• The sentence ‘In some cases participants were opted---‘ has been replaced by ‘In some cases participants opted ---‘ as you commented. Shown by track changes.

• In the paragraph which starts by ‘Some participants had the feeling of shame----‘ the second sentence was changed to ‘They felt it would be an embarrassment to their family, as well as to themselves,----‘ (Shown by track changes)

• The term ‘respondent’ has been replaced by ‘participant’ in several paragraphs of the ‘results’ section. Please check manuscript with track changes.

• Missed words were inserted and grammatical corrections including tense, non-use of contraction and the correct use of plural were made in several parts of the ‘results’ section as shown by track changes.

5. Discussion: The following amendments were made:

• In the first paragraph of the ‘discussion’ section the second sentence was changed into ‘the study was conducted in a country which had cultural norms which gave women a lower and submissive status and child marriage was widely practiced,’ in order to avoid ambiguities.

• The sentence which started by ‘However, the data were presented as were----‘ was removed and replaced by the sentence ‘However, as much participant narrations as possible were provided to give the reader better understanding’. Please check track changes.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to reviewers.docx

Decision Letter 2

Mellissa H Withers

20 Aug 2020

Pathways through homelessness among women in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: A qualitative study

PONE-D-20-15059R2

Dear Dr. Haile,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Mellissa H Withers, PhD, MHS

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Acceptance letter

Mellissa H Withers

21 Aug 2020

PONE-D-20-15059R2

Pathways through homelessness among women in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: A qualitative study

Dear Dr. Haile:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Mellissa H Withers

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to reviewers.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are not publicly available due to ethical restrictions and for protection of participant privacy. Because this is a qualitative study and the data includes sensitive life stories of the participants which, if publicly available, could result in the possibility of damage to the participants. The authors believe that even if anonymous, there is a possibility of the participants being identified from the other personal information included in the data which cannot be totally excluded lest could remove important information used during data analysis. The authors believe that they have the duty to protect the privacy and confidentiality of their study participants as required by all research ethics standards. The participants have been assured about data privacy and confidentiality before they gave consent to participate. Therefore, the reason for not publicly sharing the data is authors’ discretion and duty to protect participant privacy. However, the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of St Amanuel Mental Specialized Hospital also has the responsibility to monitor and follow the ethical undertaking of matters concerning the study. Contact information for the IRB is as follows: amsh_res@amsh.gov.et.


    Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES