Abstract
Dabieshan tick virus (DBV) belongs to Phlebovirus and its pathogenicity to human and animals is unknown. To investigate the presence of Dabieshan tick virus in Zhoushan, 353 ticks were collected from May 2018 to October 2019. The detection result showed that the average prevalence rate among these samples was 30.3% (107 positives out of 353 samples), which means DBVs are widely distributed in tick populations in Zhoushan of China. In a phylogenetic analysis based on the nucleotide sequences of the L and S segments of the virus (ZS-DBS-2018 tick virus) in the study, it clustered with Dabieshan tick virus (KM817666.1, KM817733.1) with a 97.1% and 99.6% nucleotide identity, respectively. Further studies involving virus isolation are required to characterize Dabieshan tick virus and to expand the geographical distribution of the sampled ticks.
Keywords: Dabieshan tick virus, phlebovirus, tick, Zhoushan
Ticks are important vectors for the transmission of pathogens including viruses with significant human and animal health impact [3]. The genus Phlebovirus including a large group of virus members are associated with ticks, which were usually named tick-borne phleboviruses (TBPVs), such as severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome virus (SFTSV), Heartland virus (HRTV), Hunter Island group virus (HIGV), Lihan tick virus, Yongjia tick virus 1 and Dabieshan tick virus [1, 4, 6, 8, 11, 13].
In recent years, more and more attention has been paid to newly emerging TBPVs, which can induce serious human diseases. From 2010 to 2016, there had been more than 10,000 SFTSV infected cases distributed in 23 provinces in China, with the average mortality of 5.3% [14]. Dabieshan tick virus is one of the novel pathogenic TBPVs and was first identified in China in 2015 [6]. So far, no infectious cases in humans have been reported to be associated with Dabieshan tick virus. However, it is very important to further study the isolation and epidemiological knowledge of Dabieshan tick virus.
From May 2018 to October 2019, tick sampling was carried out at 2 locations in Zhoushan (Fig. 1). At each site, the drag-flag method was performed to collect questing ticks and ticks infesting domesticated animals, mainly cattle, goats and dogs were collected using ophthalmic forceps at animal shelters. Each tick specimen was individually kept alive in a separate tube, transferred to the laboratory and identified morphologically using appropriate taxonomic criteria, and nested PCR assay objective to the tick 16S ribosomal RNA were conducted for the final identification [2, 7, 10]. All ticks were stored at −80°C until further testing.
Fig. 1.
Sampling locations of ticks in in Zhoushan of China. XSQD, Xishaqundao; ZSQD, Zhongshaqundao; NSQD, Nanshaqundao; DH, Dinghai; DJF, Dajianfeng; DAG, Daangang; YJV, Bianfuyan; DS, Daishan; LTS, Laitoushan; DGD, Dagangdun; MXG, Moxingang; GGD, Gaogangdun; SLWG, Shuangluanwanggang.
Ticks were thawed and homogenized using a glass grinder. The homogenates were centrifuged at 12,000 g for 10 min at 4°C but only the supernatant was kept. The supernatant of each sample was filtered through 0.22 µm Pellicon II filters (Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA). The viral RNA was extracted with Viral RNA Mini Kit (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany) following the manufacturer’s recommendations (QIAamp Viral RNA Mini Handbook Download: https://www.qiagen.com/cn/resources/resourcedetail?id=c80685c0-4103-49ea-aa72-8989420e3018&lang=en), RNA was eluted in 30 µl RNase-free H2O and stored at −80°C. Reverse transcription was carried out using the 1st cDNA synthesis kit (TaKaRa, Kusatsu, Japan), according to the manufacturer’s protocol.
For Dabieshan tick virus of phlebovirus detection, the L segment of virus was amplified by PCR using the DBSF-01 and DBSR-1,100 primers. Samples positive for the Dabieshan tick virus were also amplified for the full sequence amplification of L segment and S segment of the virus by PCR. The L and S segment primers, were designed according to the highly homologous gene sequences of Dabieshan (KM817733) tick virus using the Primer Premier 5 (Premier Biosoft, San Francisco, CA, USA). All PCR reactions (30 cycles of 98°C for 10 sec, 65°C for 15 sec, and 68°C for 1 min) were performed using 50 µl reaction mix containing 2 µl extracted cDNA,10 µl PCR Buffer, 20 pmol of each primer, 4 µl dNTP (2.5 mM) and 1 µl Taq DNA polymerase (PrimeSTAR GXL, TaKaRa). The primers used for PCR and subsequent nucleotide sequencing are listed in Table 1.
Table 1. Primer sequences used in this study.
| Targets | Primer names | Sequences (5′-3′) | Product sizes (bp) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dabieshan virus L segment | DBSF-01 | GCCAGCACTAGTTCCCTAG | 1,100 |
| DBSR-1100 | GCCCTCCGTAGTTGATGGCG | ||
| DBSF-802 | CTAGAGAAGCCAGATCTTA | 1,188 | |
| DBSR-1990 | GGCTCATCTCCCTCTTCTAC | ||
| DBSF-1805 | CTTCCACAAGTCGGGGAACT | 1,295 | |
| DBSR-3100 | TGGCTCTGAGGATGAAGGC | ||
| DBSF-2877 | GACCATAATGAAGCAGGTTTG | 1,323 | |
| DBSR-4200 | CTGTGGTGGCCCTTTCGTAA | ||
| DBSF-4015 | GAAAAGGAGGTGGCCAAAGAAG | 1,785 | |
| DBSR-5800 | CTGTGGGTTCAGTCTTCT | ||
| DBSF-5299 | CATGTTGGAATGGGGCC | 1,190 | |
| DBSR-end | GGAGCTGGTTCAATCTCTC | ||
| Dabieshan virus S segment | DBS-SF-01 | CACACAAAGACCCCTACCTT | 1,005 |
| DBS-SR-1005 | CCACCCCCAGCTTCTTG | ||
| DBS-SF-826 | GAGCAGGACACCCAGGACA | 929 | |
| DBS-SR-1755 | CACAAAGACCCCCTACC | ||
The PCR products were purified using the QIAquick Gel Extraction kit (QIAGEN, Venlo, Netherlands) and sequenced in both directions by an ABI 3730 DNA Analyzer (Invitrogen, Beijing, China). Viral nucleotide and deduced amino acid sequences were analyzed and assembled by the DNASTAR software package (Lasergene). Complete or partial nucleotide sequences of the L and S segments of phlebovirus were obtained from GenBank. MEGA7.0 software was used to construct the maximum-likelihood evolutionary tree [5].
In present study, a total of 353 ticks were collected. Of these, 138 samples belonged to the genus Rhipicephalus haemaphysaloides, and 215 ticks were identified as Haemaphysalis longicornis (Table 2). All samples were tested for Dabieshan tick virus (Supplementary Fig. 1).
Table 2. Collected tick species and positive rates for Dabieshan tick virus in Zhoushan, China.
| Strain | DH (DJF, DAG, BFY) | DS (LTS, DGD, MXG, GGD, SLWG) | Total (unfed ticks) | Total (fed ticks) | Total | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rhipicephalus haemaphysaloides | Haemaphysalis longicornis | R. haemaphysaloides | H. longicornis | ||||||||
| Unfed ticks | Fed ticks | Unfed ticks | Fed ticks | Unfed ticks | Fed ticks | Unfed ticks | Fed ticks | ||||
| Dabieshan tick virus | 1/16 | 9/40 | 4/23 | 23/57 | 5/17 | 16/65 | 5/36 | 44/99 | 15/92 | 92/261 | 107/353 |
DH, Dinghai; DJF, Dajianfeng; DAG, Daangang; YJV, Bianfuyan; DS, Daishan; LTS, Laitoushan; DGD, Dagangdun; MXG, Moxingang; GGD, Gaogangdun; SLWG, Shuangluanwanggang.
A 1,100 bp of the L segment gene of Dabieshan tick virus was successfully amplified from 107 out of 353 tick samples (30.3%). Dabieshan tick virus identified from tick species Haemaphysalis longicornis in the Daishan (designated ZS-DBS-2018 tick virus) was selected for further full-length genome sequencing (Table 1). The 6,398 bp L segment and 1,010 bp S segment gene of ZS-DBS-2018 tick virus were obtained. The nucleotide sequence of this 6,398 bp fragment showed 97.1% identity with that of Dabieshan tick virus (KM817666), 73.2% with that of Okutamatick virus (LC259521), and 71.9% with that of Lesvos virus (KX452150) (Table 3). The virus detected using phlebovirus genetic analysis in this study is hereafter referred to as Dabieshan tick virus. When compared with reference viruses (Yongjia, SFTS, and Bhanja viruses), the nucleotide sequence identity varied from 44.0 to 71.9%. The nucleotide sequence of the 1,010 bp S segment gene also showed 99.6 and 67.6% identity with the Dabieshan tick virus and Okutama tick virus, respectively (Table 4). The nucleotide sequences of ZS-DBS-2018 tick virus are deposited in GenBank under the accession numbers MN723842 and MN723843.
Table 3. Pairwise comparison (%) of nucleotide identity (upper diagonal) and amino acid identity (lower diagonal) for the L segment of Dabieshan tick virus in the study.
| Strains | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ZS-DBS-2018 (MN723842) | 97.1 | 73.2 | 71.9 | 64.4 | 44.0 | |
| DBV (KM817666) | 96.2 | 73.8 | 74.2 | 64.9 | 44.7 | |
| OKV (LC259521) | 79.1 | 79.9 | 74.5 | 75.8 | 44.6 | |
| LVV (KX452150) | 78.0 | 84.0 | 77.7 | 72.9 | 45.2 | |
| YJV (KM817704) | 65.0 | 65.7 | 84.2 | 78.0 | 44.2 | |
| SFTSV (KC505135) | 30.5 | 29.6 | 32.4 | 32.5 | 29.2 |
DBV, Dabieshan tick virus; LVV, Lesvos virus; SFTSV, Severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome virus; OKV, Okutama tick virus; YJV, Yongjia tick virus; ZS-DBS-2018, Dabieshan tick virus ZS-DBS-2018.
Table 4. Pairwise comparison (%) of nucleotide identity (upper diagonal) and amino acid identity (lower diagonal) for the S segment of Dabieshan tick virus in the study.
| Strains | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ZS-DBS2018 (MN723843) | 99.6 | 67.6 | 61.3 | 50.4 | |
| DBV (KM817733) | 100 | 68.3 | 50.4 | 50.8 | |
| OKV (LC259522) | 59.7 | 59.7 | 77.2 | 53.6 | |
| YJV (KM817764) | 54.9 | 54.9 | 71.1 | 49.7 | |
| AMD (KM 589348) | 29.3 | 29.3 | 36.5 | 29.8 |
AMD, American dog tick virus; DBV, Dabieshan tick virus; OKV, Okutama tick virus; YJV, Yongjia tick virus; ZS-DBS-2018, Dabieshan tick virus ZS-DBS-2018.
In order to explore the phylogenetic origin of ZS-DBS-2018 tick virus, the large-scale maximum likelihood (ML) phylogeny trees were constructed based on the 6,398 bp L segment sequence and 1,010 bp S segment gene of ZS-DBS-2018 tick virus, and the ML tree showed that ZS-DBS-2018 tick virus clustered with the Dabieshan tick virus, the Yongjia tick virus, and Okutama tick virus and was most closely related with Dabieshan tick virus, a previously reported sequence isolated from H. hystricis in China [6, 9] (Figs. 2 and 3). At the nucleotide level, the L/S segment of ZS-DBS-2018 tick virus shared 97.1 and 99.6% identities with the Dabieshan tick virus, respectively. The ZS-DBS-2018 tick virus was most distantly related to other viruses in the same cluster. The human health burdens posed by the Dabieshan, Yongjia tick viruses as well as Okutama tick virus remain to be elucidated.
Fig. 2.
Maximum likelihood phylogenetic trees based on a 6,398 bp nucleotide sequence of the L segment nucleotide sequence. The tests of nucleotide sequences based on the Tamura-Nei model. The numbers at the nodes represent bootstrap values of 1,000 replicates. Bootstrap probabilities above 50% are indicated near the branches. Sequences in the trees are indicated as GenBank accession number and strain name. Sequences of the present study are shown in bold. The triangles in the phylogenetic trees denote sequences derived in the study.
Fig. 3.
Maximum likelihood phylogenetic trees based on a 1,010 bp nucleotide sequence of the S segment nucleotide sequence. The tests of nucleotide sequences based on the Tamura-Nei model. The numbers at the nodes represent bootstrap values of 1,000 replicates. Bootstrap probabilities above 50% are indicated near the branches. Sequences in the trees are indicated as GenBank accession number and strain name. Sequences of the present study are shown in bold. The triangles in the phylogenetic trees denote sequences derived in the study.
Therefore, for further studies of Dabieshan tick virus, we will expand the geographical distribution of the sampled ticks, and isolate the viruses through Vero-E6 cell culture and new-borne mice inoculation [12]. The study of Dabieshan tick virus in Zhoushan may contribute to the classification of phleboviruses and elucidate the evolutionary relationships among phleboviruses.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
This study was funded by grants from Project supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (U1602223), General project of Jiangsu Health Committee (H2019015),Biosafety special project (17SAZ01), the National Major Infectious Diseases (2017ZX10303401-007),”333” project of Jiangsu Province (BRA 2018412).
REFERENCES
- 1.Bosco-Lauth A. M., Panella N. A., Root J. J., Gidlewski T., Lash R. R., Harmon J. R., Burkhalter K. L., Godsey M. S., Savage H. M., Nicholson W. L., Komar N., Brault A. C.2015. Serological investigation of heartland virus (Bunyaviridae: Phlebovirus) exposure in wild and domestic animals adjacent to human case sites in Missouri 2012-2013. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 92: 1163–1167. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.14-0702 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Chitimia L., Lin R. Q., Cosoroaba I., Braila P., Song H. Q., Zhu X. Q.2009. Molecular characterization of hard and soft ticks from Romania by sequences of the internal transcribed spacers of ribosomal DNA. Parasitol. Res. 105: 907–911. doi: 10.1007/s00436-009-1474-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Dantas-Torres F., Chomel B. B., Otranto D.2012. Ticks and tick-borne diseases: a One Health perspective. Trends Parasitol. 28: 437–446. doi: 10.1016/j.pt.2012.07.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Fill M. A., Compton M. L., McDonald E. C., Moncayo A. C., Dunn J. R., Schaffner W., Bhatnagar J., Zaki S. R., Jones T. F., Shieh W. J.2017. Novel clinical and pathologic findings in a heartland virusassociated death. Clin. Infect. Dis. 64: 510–512. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Hu D., Zhu C., Ai L., He T., Wang Y., Ye F., Yang L., Ding C., Zhu X., Lv R., Zhu J., Hassan B., Feng Y., Tan W., Wang C.2018. Genomic characterization and infectivity of a novel SARS-like coronavirus in Chinese bats. Emerg. Microbes Infect. 7: 154. doi: 10.1038/s41426-018-0155-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Li C. X., Shi M., Tian J. H., Lin X. D., Kang Y. J., Chen L. J., Qin X. C., Xu J., Holmes E. C., Zhang Y. Z.2015. Unprecedented genomic diversity of RNA viruses in arthropods reveals the ancestry of negative-sense RNA viruses. eLife 4: 1–26. doi: 10.7554/eLife.05378 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Lu X., Lin X. D., Wang J. B., Qin X. C., Tian J. H., Guo W. P., Fan F. N., Shao R., Xu J., Zhang Y. Z.2013. Molecular survey of hard ticks in endemic areas of tick-borne diseases in China. Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 4: 288–296. doi: 10.1016/j.ttbdis.2013.01.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Matsumoto N., Masuoka H., Hirayama K., Yamada A., Hotta K.2018. Detection and phylogenetic analysis of phlebovirus, including severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome virus, in ticks collected from Tokyo, Japan. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 80: 638–641. doi: 10.1292/jvms.17-0604 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Papa A., Kontana A., Tsioka K., Saratsis A., Sotiraki S.2017. Novel phlebovirus detected in Haemaphysalis parva ticks in a Greek island. Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 8: 157–160. doi: 10.1016/j.ttbdis.2016.10.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Qin X. C., Shi M., Tian J. H., Lin X. D., Gao D. Y., He J. R., Wang J. B., Li C. X., Kang Y. J., Yu B., Zhou D. J., Xu J., Plyusnin A., Holmes E. C., Zhang Y. Z.2014. A tick-borne segmented RNA virus contains genome segments derived from unsegmented viral ancestors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111: 6744–6749. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1324194111 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Shi J., Hu Z., Deng F., Shen S.2018. Tick-borne viruses. Virol. Sin. 33: 21–43. doi: 10.1007/s12250-018-0019-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Xu F., Yao P. P., Zhu H. P., Xie R. H.2009. Molecular cloning and nucleotide sequence analysis of the S-segment in Hantavirus isolated in Zhejiang province. Chin. J. Zoonoses 25: 665–668. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Yoo J. R., Heo S. T., Park D., Kim H., Fukuma A., Fukushi S., Shimojima M., Lee K. H.2016. Family cluster analysis of severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome virus infection in Korea. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 95: 1351–1357. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.16-0527 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Zhan J., Wang Q., Cheng J., Hu B., Li J., Zhan F., Song Y., Guo D.2017. Current status of severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome in China. Virol. Sin. 32: 51–62. doi: 10.1007/s12250-016-3931-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.