Skip to main content
Molecular & Cellular Oncology logoLink to Molecular & Cellular Oncology
. 2020 Jul 25;7(5):1789418. doi: 10.1080/23723556.2020.1789418

Palmitic acid reduces the autophagic flux in hypothalamic neurons by impairing autophagosome-lysosome fusion and endolysosomal dynamics

María Paz Hernández-Cáceres a, Karina Cereceda b,c, Sergio Hernández c, Ying Li d, Carla Narro a, Patricia Rivera a, Patricio Silva e,f, Yenniffer Ávalos g, Claudia Jara c, Paulina Burgos a, Lilian Toledo-Valenzuela a, Pablo Lagos a, Flavia Cifuentes Araneda a, Claudio Perez-Leighton h, Cristina Bertocchi i, Deborah J Clegg j, Alfredo Criollo e,f, Cheril Tapia-Rojas c, Patricia V Burgos c,k, Eugenia Morselli a,
PMCID: PMC7469685  PMID: 32944643

ABSTRACT

High-fat diet (HFD)-induced obesity is associated with increased cancer risk. Long-term feeding with HFD increases the concentration of the saturated fatty acid palmitic acid (PA) in the hypothalamus. We previously showed that, in hypothalamic neuronal cells, exposure to PA inhibits the autophagic flux, which is the whole autophagic process from the synthesis of the autophagosomes, up to their lysosomal fusion and degradation. However, the mechanism by which PA impairs autophagy in hypothalamic neurons remains unknown. Here, we show that PA-mediated reduction of the autophagic flux is not caused by lysosomal dysfunction, as PA treatment does not impair lysosomal pH or the activity of cathepsin B.Instead, PA dysregulates autophagy by reducing autophagosome-lysosome fusion, which correlates with the swelling of endolysosomal compartments that show areduction in their dynamics. Finally, because lysosomes undergo constant dynamic regulation by the small Rab7 GTPase, we investigated the effect of PA treatment on its activity. Interestingly, we found PA treatment altered the activity of Rab7. Altogether, these results unveil the cellular process by which PA exposure impairs the autophagic flux. As impaired autophagy in hypothalamic neurons promotes obesity, and balanced autophagy is required to inhibit malignant transformation, this could affect tumor initiation, progression, and/or response to therapy of obesity-related cancers.

KEYWORDS: Palmitic acid, high-fat diet, lysosomes, central nervous system, hypothalamic neuronal cells, autophagy, electron microscopy, Rab7, obesity-associated cancers

Introduction

Obesity causes approximately 3.4 million annual deaths and ranks as the fifth cause of death worldwide.1 Obesity has been associated with several comorbidities such as cancer, type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease, hypertension and osteoarthritis, among others.1,2 A major factor promoting the obesity epidemic is the consumption of the so-called western-style high-fat diet (HFD), which is rich in saturated fatty acids (SatFAs). Palmitic acid (PA), one of the most concentrated SatFA contained in HFD, is significantly increased in the plasma of obese people3 and previous studies from our and other groups indicate PA accumulates in the brain of male mice following chronic HFD exposure, specifically in the hypothalamus, a brain region with a key role in the regulation of energy balance, food intake, insulin sensitivity and glucose homeostasis.47 Interestingly, previous research shows PA, and not other fatty acids, increases the risk of developing obesity-associated cancers (i.e. pancreatic, prostate, and breast cancer).810 Indeed, PA serves as energy sources for cancer growth, significantly promoting cancer cell invasiveness and metastatic potential11-13 and, consistently, increased levels of PA have been observed in the plasma of cancer patients.14

Autophagy is a lysosomal-dependent degradation process required for the maintenance of cellular and tissue homeostasis. Even if different types of autophagy exist (i.e. microautophagy, macroautophagy and chaperone-mediated autophagy), depending on the pathway of cargo delivery to lysosomes,15 this study only focuses on macroautophagy, hereafter referred to as autophagy. Autophagy derangement leads to different diseases such as metabolic, neurodegenerative and cardiovascular diseases as well as to cancer development, with different outcomes depending on type and cancer stage.16 During autophagy, portions of the cytoplasm (proteins, organelles and lipid droplets, among others) are enclosed in a double membrane structure called autophagosome. The formation of the autophagosome begins with the activation of the unc-51-like kinase 1 (ULK1) complex, which, once activated, will translocate to membranous sites where the autophagosome will generate thanks to the activity of different ATG (AuTophaGy-related) proteins.17 Once autophagosomes are formed they undergo a maturation process consisting of multiple fusion events with different types of vesicles. Autophagosomes can fuse with endosomes, to form amphisomes (which then will fuse with lysosomes), or they can directly fuse with lysosomes to form functional autolysosomes.1820 An efficient autolysosome formation requires highly dynamic lysosomes that move from a more immobile perinuclear pool, where most acidic lysosomes are mainly concentrated, to a highly dynamic pool in the cell periphery, where less acidic lysosomes are mainly concentrated.21 To achieve this, lysosomes undergo constant dynamic regulation by the small late endosome-/lysosome-associated Rab7 GTPase, which cycles between an active GTP-bound state into an inactive GDP-bound state upon GTP hydrolysis. This GTPase recruits motor proteins and tethering factors to target membranes and regulates the movement, the fusion and the maturation of autophagosomes with endolysosomal membranes.2224 Upon fusion of lysosomes with autophagosomes the process of autophagosomal cargo degradation begins, thanks to the activity of lysosomal enzymes,7,25 and the degraded autolysosome content is released back to the cytosol for being reused.26 The whole process from the synthesis of the autophagosomes, up to their lysosomal degradation is defined as autophagic flux,27 and its inhibition indicates a lack in autophagic cargo degradation.

We and others have shown chronic HFD consumption dysregulates autophagy in different tissues including liver, pancreas, adipose tissue and hypothalamus.2832 Inhibition of autophagy in hypothalamic anorexigenic proopiomelanocortin (POMC) neurons increases food intake, promoting obesity, type II diabetes and reduced glucose tolerance.32,33 Importantly, we demonstrated exposure to a concentration of PA similar to the one identified in the brain of mice chronically fed with an HFD inhibits the autophagic flux in hypothalamic neuronal cells (N43/5 cells, a model of POMC neurons),34 however, the mechanism by which this occurs is still largely unknown.

Here, we confirm that exposure to the SatFA PA inhibits the autophagic flux in hypothalamic neurons. Furthermore, we demonstrate that autophagy impairment is not the result of the reduction in lysosomal activity but it occurs by an alteration in endolysosomal dynamics that correlates with an increase in the activity of the Rab7 GTPase. Altogether, these results suggest that an increase in endolysosomal dynamics should be considered as a strategy to recover the impairment in autophagy caused by PA overload in hypothalamic neurons, thus reducing the risk of obesity and therefore the incidence of obesity-associated cancers.

Results

Palmitic acid inhibits the autophagic flux in hypothalamic neuronal cells

Considering that PA is significantly increased in the brain of mice chronically fed with an HFD,4,5,,35 we determined the effect of this SatFA on autophagic flux in the N43/5 hypothalamic neuronal cell line34 and we showed that exposure to PA inhibits the autophagic flux. Here, we validated this result in primary hypothalamic neurons, where we confirmed PA treatment increases the number of autophagic structures (Figure S1A, B), as well as the amount of SQSTM1 positive dots (Figure S1A, C), an autophagy receptor whose increase indicates autophagy inhibition. Treatment with BafA1, which targets the vacuolar-type H+-ATPase preventing lysosomal acidification,36 does not increase the amount of autophagic dots promoted by PA treatment, confirming that, also in primary hypothalamic neurons, PA inhibits the autophagic flux (Figure S1A-C). Importantly, as indicated in Figure S1D-G, the effect of PA on autophagy in hypothalamic neuronal cells is not specific for PA as treatment with the saturated fatty acid stearic acid (SA), similarly to PA, inhibits the autophagic flux following 1 and 6 hours of treatment, as indicated by LC3I →LC3II conversion and by the increase in SQSTM1 protein levels (Figure S1D-G).

Thus, to start elucidating how PA impairs autophagy, specifically to evaluate autophagosome maturation, we generated N43/5 cells expressing the dynamic autophagic flux sensor consisting of a tandem fluorescence construct of mCherry coupled to GFP-LC3.37,38 The GFP fluorescence of this construct is inactivated in acidic compartments, such as lysosomes,39 whereas mCherry maintains its fluorescence in the acidic environment of the autolysosome.37 To ensure the correct interpretation of the results, we used BafA1 and the MTORC1 inhibitor rapamycin, to block and induce the autophagic flux, respectively.3939 As expected, rapamycin increased the number of acidic autolysosomes (LC3 red dots; mCherry+/GFP-) compared to control treatment (Figure 1A, B), indicating the autophagic flux is enhanced (Figure 1C). Conversely, BafA1 treatment only increased the number of immature autophagic structures (LC3 yellow puncta; mCherry+/GFP+), indicating that acidic autolysosomes cannot form, confirming that BafA1 treatment blocks the autophagic flux (Figure 1A-C). Compared to control (BSA), cells exposed to PA show a significantly higher number of immature autophagic structures (LC3 yellow dots; mCherry+/GFP+), while the number of acidic autolysosomes (LC3 red dots; mCherry+/GFP-) is not affected. This data suggests that PA decreases the autophagic flux (Figure 1A-C). Based on this data we can suggest this could be the result of impaired autophagosome maturation into functional acidified autolysosomes. Interestingly, PA exposure also decreases the expression level of the anorexigenic propeptide Pomc (Figure S1H). Altogether, these data show PA impairs the autophagic flux and decreases Pomc levels in hypothalamic neurons.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Palmitic acid reduces the autophagic flux in N43/5 cells. (A) Representatives images of N43/5 cells expressing the tandem fluorescent-tagged LC3 (mCherry-GFP-LC3), treated with BSA, PA (100 μM) or BafA1 (100 nM) for 6 h, or with Rapamycin (Rapa) 1 µM for 3 h. Scale bar: 10 μm. Nuclei were stained with DAPI (blue). (B) Quantification of LC3 dots per cell. Red bars represent the number of mCherry positive dots (autolysosomes; mCherry+/GFP-) and yellow bars the number of mCherry and GFP dots that colocalize (immature autophagosomes; mCherry+/GFP+). (C) Autophagic flux was determined by quantifying the ratio between red and yellow-positive puncta per cell. Data are presented as mean ± SEM, **p < .01,***p < .001, ****p < .0001. n = 3.

Palmitic acid induces lysosomal swelling and reduces autophagosome-lysosome fusion in N43/5 cells

To elucidate the mechanism by which PA reduces the autophagic flux, we evaluated if the process of autophagosome-lysosome fusion was affected by examining the co-localization between autophagosomes (measured by staining for LC3) and lysosomes (measured by staining for LAMP1).38 As seen in Figure 2A, B, in control cells (BSA) lysosomes show the classic punctate appearance, whereas following PA and BafA1 exposure, as well as following PA and BafA1 co-treatment, they appear circular and large, a morphology defined as “lysosome swelling”,40 which is usually associated with altered lysosomal activity,41,42 and with autophagic flux inhibition.29 Additionally, cells were stained against LC3, and we observe PA and BafA1 treatment increases LC3 dots size compared to control (Figure 2A, C). The increase in vesicle size has been confirmed also by the analysis of LC3 yellow and red dots in N43/5 cells expressing the mCherry-GFP-LC3 construct (Figure S2), where we can observe that red and yellow dot size (autolysosomes and autophagosomes, respectively) are the biggest in PA-treated cells. Conversely to PA and BafA1, rapamycin only increases LC3 red dots size (Figure S2), suggesting only autophagic flux inhibitors, at least the ones that we analyzed here, increase autolysosomes size in our model. Additionally, when we compare the effect of BafA1 and PA, which both induce lysosomal swelling (Figure 2B) and inhibit the autophagic flux (Figure 1), we observe that the percentage of colocalization between LAMP1 and LC3 is significantly higher following BafA1 exposure (Mander’s coefficient: 0.25) than following PA treatment (Mander’s coefficient: 0.1) (Figure 2A, D). Consistently, while the colocalization between LAMP1 and LC3 is observed in cells exposed to BafA1, co-incubating cells with PA and BafA1 reduces the co-localization between both markers (Figure 2A, D), suggesting PA affects the fusion between autophagic structures and lysosomes.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Palmitic acid induces lysosomal swelling and reduces autophagosome-lysosome fusion in N43/5 cells. (A) Representative images of N43/5 cells treated with BSA or PA (100 μM) for 6 h in presence or absence of BafA1 (100 nM) or its vehicle (DMSO) and stained against LAMP1 and LC3. LAMP1 (B) and LC3 (C) average dots size. (D) % of co-localization between LAMP1 and LC3 according to Manders’ Coefficient Analysis. Scale bar: 10 μm. Data are presented as mean ± SEM, *p < .05, **p < .01, ***p < .001. n = 3.

Palmitic acid does not reduce lysosomal acidity or lysosomal activity in N43/5 cells

Our results show that PA induces lysosomal swelling after 6 hours of treatment in N43/5 cells (Figure 2A, B). Thus, we evaluated if PA treatment also affects lysosomal activity, as assessed by measuring lysosomal acidity and by evaluating the activity of lysosomal enzymes. We first assessed if PA affects the range of lysosomal pH, using the pH-sensitive lysosomal dye LysoTracker Red, which accumulates and emits red fluorescence in acidic compartments with pH <6.5.43 Then, we measured cathepsin B activity using the Magic Red assay in vitro in N43/5 cells and in vivo in the arcuate nucleus of the hypothalamus of mice fed for 16 weeks with an HFD,44 hypothalamic region where POMC neurons localize. As shown in Figure 3, experiments performed in N43/5 cells indicate PA does not decrease LysoTracker (Figure 3A, B) or Magic Red fluorescence intensity (Figure 3E, F), and instead, it promotes the formation of larger puncta, compared to controls (Figure 3D, H). Additionally, in accordance with the data showing the increased size of LAMP1 positive vesicles (Figure 2B), PA treatment increases the size and reduces the number of endo-lysosomal acidic compartments (Figure 3C, D, G, H). This effect is not specific to PA as treatment with SA also increases Magic Red fluorescence intensity and promotes the formation of larger puncta, compared to controls (Figure S3A-D). Interestingly, the number of Magic Red positive dots/cell is reduced following PA and SA treatment compared to control (Figure 3G and S3C). In contrast to the effects of PA, BafA1, as expected, increases endolysosomal pH and impairs cathepsin B activity, as shown by the reduced fluorescence of LysoTracker and Magic Red dye, respectively (Figure 3A, B, E, F). These data indicate that PA induces the accumulation of enlarged endolysosomal structures without reducing their acidity or hydrolytic activity. Importantly, we confirmed in vivo, in the arcuate nucleus of the hypothalamus, that consumption of HFD for 16 weeks, which increases body weight (Figure S3E) and promotes accumulation of PA in the hypothalamus,4,5 also increases the intensity of Magic Red staining, indicating HFD consumption does not impair cathepsin B activity in this brain region (Figure 3I, J).

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Palmitic acid does not reduce lysosomes acidity or lysosomal cathepsin B activity. (A) Representative confocal images of N43/5 cells treated with BSA, PA (100 μM), or BafA1 (100 nM) for 6 h and stained with LysoTracker. Nuclei were stained with DAPI (blue). Quantification of LysoTracker average fluorescence intensity in arbitrary units (a.u.), LysoTracker positive dots per cell and dots size are shown in (B), (C), (D), respectively. Scale bar: 10 μm. (E) Representative confocal images of N43/5 cells treated with BSA, PA (100 μM), or BafA1 (100 nM) for 6 h and stained with Magic Red, with its respective quantification of average fluorescence intensity in arbitrary units (a.u.) (F), number of positive dots per cell (G), and dots size (H). Nuclei were stained with Hoechst (blue). Scale bar: 10 μm. (I) Representative confocal images of the hypothalamic arcuate nucleus (ARC) from chow and HFD mice stained with Magic Red, with its respective quantification, in arbitrary units (a.u.) (J). Nuclei were stained with DAPI (blue). Scale bar: 10 μm. Data are presented as mean ± SEM, **p < .01, ***p < .001, ****p < .0001. n = 3.

Palmitic acid induces the accumulation of large cellular degradative compartments in N43/5 cells

Our results show that PA treatment enhances the size of autophagic structures as well as of endolysosomal membranes (Figure 2B, C). To gain further insights on the nature of these structures, we performed an electron microscopy (EM) analysis, which is considered as a gold standard to recognize autophagic vesicles,38 to evaluate the morphology of cytosolic structures of N43/5 cells treated with PA. EM images show that, in control cells, we found vesicular structures surrounded by a single membrane, filled with intraluminal vesicles, which are characteristic of multivesicular bodies. Both PA and BafA1 treatment increase the number of large single-membrane vesicles with an intra-luminal heterogeneous content (Figure 4A, B, C), which, in agreement with the nomenclature used by Mauthe M. et al., we defined as “cellular degradative compartments (DGCs)”.45 As indicated by the arrowheads, in the cargo of DGCs we can identify multilamellar bodies, composed of concentric membrane layers, intraluminal vesicles and vesicular structures surrounded by multiple membranes (Figure 4A), which is indicative of partially degraded cargo and which correlates with the observed impairment in the autophagic flux (Figure 1). To note, DGCs size of PA-treated cells is significantly higher than BafA1 treated cells (Figure 4C). These data show that the inhibition in the autophagic flux, caused by PA treatment increases the number and the size of single-membrane DGCs with an intra-luminal heterogeneous content.

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Palmitic acid induces the accumulation of large cellular degradative compartments (DGCs) in N43/5 cells. (A) Representative electronic microscopy images of N43/5 cells treated with BSA, PA (100 μM) or BafA1 for 6 h. Cellular degradative compartments (DGCs) are indicated by yellow arrowheads, yellow asterisks denote multilamellar bodies, red arrowheads show intraluminal vesicles, red asterisk indicates intraluminal vesicles surrounded by multiple membranes, yellow arrows denote multivesicular bodies. Inserts show a magnification of structures within the dashed square. DGCs number and size are shown in (B) and (C), respectively. Data are presented as mean ± SEM, *p < .05, ***p < .001, ****p < .0001. n = 3.

PA reduces the dynamics of endolysosomal structures and induces Rab7 hyper-activation in N43/5 cells

Previous studies have shown that an altered endolysosomal dynamics contributes to autophagic defects.46,47 Thus, we evaluated by live-cell imaging if PA affects the dynamics of endolysosomal structures in N43/5 cells (Videos S1 and S2). Our data show that exposure to PA significantly decreases the velocity (Figure 5A, B) and the traveled distance (Figure 5C) of large LysoTracker vesicles, indicating PA reduces the trafficking of endolysosomal vesicles.

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

Palmitic acid reduces endolysosomal motility and increases Rab7 activation in N43/5 cells. (A) Representative images and zoomed-in time-lapse confocal sequence images of N43/5 cells treated with BSA or PA (100 μM) for 6 h and stained with LysoTracker. Zoom-ed in inserts represent one cell magnification within the dashed square, showing the dynamic movement of LysoTracker positive vesicles. Arrowhead indicates one LysoTracker positive vesicle movement over time. Scale bar: 10 μm. Average velocity (µm/s) and average total displacement (µm) of positive LysoTracker vesicles are shown in (B) and (C), respectively. Scale bar: 10 μm. (D) Representative confocal images of N43/5 cells treated with BSA or PA (100 μM) for 6 h and then stained against Rab7. Inserts show a magnification of structures within the dashed square. Arrowheads indicate enlarged Rab7 positive vesicles. Quantification of Rab7 positive structures size is shown in (E). Scale bar: 10 μm in the original image and in the zoomed-in images. (F) Representative blot showing Rab7 protein bound to GTP and Rab7 total protein levels with its respective quantification (G) in N43/5 cells following 6 h of the aforementioned treatments. *p < .05, **p < .01, ***p < .001. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. n = 3.

In agreement with this, and with the hypothesis that the formation of big DGCs caused by PA exposure could be due to impaired endolysosomal dynamics; we evaluated the activation state of the small GTPase Rab7 following PA exposure. First, we examined by immunofluorescence whether PA alters the morphology of Rab7, and, as shown in Figure 5D, we observe that after 6 hours of treatment, PA induces the formation of enlarged Rab7 positive structures (Figure 5D, E), which have been associated with Rab7 hyper-activation.48 Next, using a pull-down assay, we evaluated the activation state of Rab7, and in agreement with the previous results, PA increases the protein levels of Rab7-GTP compared to control conditions (Figure 5F, G), indicating PA increases Rab7 activation state. Altogether, these results indicate PA reduces the dynamics of endolysosomal structures and induces Rab7 hyper-activation, which could impair the later phases of the autophagic process thus reducing the autophagic flux.

Discussion

Here, we demonstrate that exposure to the SatFA PA inhibits the autophagic flux in hypothalamic neurons (Figure 1, S1) and reduces the maturation of autophagic structures (Figure 2A, D). Furthermore, we show that PA exposure induces lysosomal swelling (Figure 2), without affecting the pH or impairing the activity of cathepsin B, a lysosomal enzyme, in N43/5 cells in vitro (Figure 3A-H). Consistently, we do not see a reduction in the activity of cathepsin B in the arcuate nucleus of the hypothalamus in mice chronically fed with an HFD (Figure 3I, J). Interestingly, we see PA promotes the formation and accumulation of large DGCs filled with partially degraded cargo in hypothalamic neuronal cells (Figure 4). Lastly, our data indicate that PA reduces intracellular endolysosomal dynamics, which correlates with increased Rab7 activation in hypothalamic neuronal cells (Figure 5).

Diet influences whole body and cell metabolism, finally affecting cancer cell survival and proliferation.49 Among different dietary patterns, consumption of pro-obesogenic HFDs, diets composed of at least 30% of the calories derived from lipids,50 is associated with increased cancer risk and with a higher risk of developing metastasis in different tumors.51 Indeed, uptake of dietary fatty acids from HFD, mainly PA, the most abundant SatFA in our body and in HFD,13 can be utilized by transformed cells to impede their elimination52,53 and to facilitate cancer metastasis.11,54 Among the different effects of HFD, its chronic consumption increases the levels of the long-chain SatFA PA in the hypothalamus.5 Here, in agreement with our previous study,34 we show PA overload reduces the autophagic flux. A similar effect of PA on autophagy has been shown on astrocytes, hepatocytes and kidney proximal tubular cells,5557 while PA has been reported to induce autophagy in cancer cell lines and cardiomyocytes,58,59 indicating its effects on autophagy are cell type-dependent. Interestingly, we also show PA exposure affects hypothalamic neuronal function, as indicated by the decrease in the production of Pomc (Figure S1 H), as well as the reduction in insulin sensitivity.34 N43/5 cells are a model of POMC anorexigenic neurons, they produce the pro-peptide POMC, which, once processed, generates different peptides, such as ɑ-MSH, involved in the regulation of energy balance.60 Our results showing PA reduces Pomc levels could suggest that, in an in vivo setting, PA might promote food intake and therefore obesity, predisposing to cancer development. Consistently, previous studies indicate autophagy modulates the levels of neuropeptides (i.e POMC, neuropeptide Y) and the secretion of proteins such as acyl-CoA-binding protein, that play a role in the regulation of food intake and in the onset of obesity-associated metabolic disorders.6163 Indeed, inhibition of autophagy in POMC neurons promotes obesity, and obesity-associated diseases.32,33 Importantly, our previous research indicates that PA, in addition to inhibiting autophagy, induces inflammation in hypothalamic neurons, impairing their function.35 Previous research shows neuronal inflammation could impair the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, thus contributing to the development of some types of cancers, such as breast cancer,64 as well as to the development and maintenance of anorexia and cachexia in cancer.65 As inhibition of autophagy promotes the release of proteins through the secretory autophagy,62 such as pro-inflammatory cytokines, it would be interesting, in future experiments, to evaluate if PA-mediated inhibition of conventional autophagy boosts secretory autophagy promoting the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines (i.e IL6) or other proteins leading to obesity and/or cancer development.

In a physiological setting, basal autophagy plays a key role in the maintenance of cellular homeostasis, by removing and recycling damaged, old and potentially toxic cytosolic components. Thus, autophagy functions as an intracellular quality control system and, as such, represents a barrier against malignant transformation.6668 Consistently, autophagy impairment, such as following PA exposure, favors malignant transformation in different models and by multiple mechanisms.67 Here, we further evaluated how PA impairs autophagy, to identify possible pharmacological targets that could revert the process. PA could inhibit autophagic flux by impairing the fusion of autophagic vacuoles with the lytic compartments, or by reducing the proteolytic activity of lysosomal hydrolases. Our results show that autophago-lysosomal fusion is reduced in PA-treated cells, as indicated by LAMP1 and LC3 colocalization, which could explain the inhibition of the autophagic flux (Figure 2). Importantly, we also observed a significant increase in the size of LAMP1 positive structures in PA-treated cells, a phenotype that has been associated with decreased autophago-lysosomal fusion,45 and which has previously been observed during oncogenic transformation.69 Accordingly to the hypothesis that PA reduces the autophagic flux by impairing endolysosomal dynamics, our results show that PA, conversely to BafA1, does not compromise the acidity or the hydrolytic activity of endolysosomal structures (Figure 3). Indeed, our data show an increase in the fluorescence intensity of both LysoTracker and Magic Red positive vesicles in PA-treated cells, compared to control (Figure 3A, B, E, F). In this context, Schulze et al. also observed the formation of large intracellular vacuoles with increased LysoTracker staining in podocytes when the PIKfyve complex is defective.70 PIKfyve is involved in the production of the lipid phosphatidylinositol 3,5-bisphosphate (PI(3,5)P2), which levels are carefully controlled to maintain the turnover of vacuolar membranes to less mature endocytic compartments, hence, regulating organelle’s size.71 PIKfyve complex deficiency or dysregulation of one of its components leads to the development or large intracellular vacuoles.72 Thus, it is possible that PA is affecting the levels of one or more proteins involved in the formation of PIKfyve complex thus regulating vacuoles size, a hypothesis that deserves future investigation.

Furthermore, we determined that LC3 positive structure and endolysosomal membranes of PA-treated cells are enlarged (Figure 2B, C), and we observed by electron microscopy that PA promotes the accumulation of large DGCs (Figure 4). Due to the result indicating that following PA treatment LAMP1 and LC3 do not colocalize (Figure 2D), we suggest these structures are not autolysosomes; however, future studies are required to characterize these vesicles.

Additionally, our data show that exposure to PA decreases endolysosomal movement, specifically of large endolysosomal structures (Figure 5A, B). The reduction in intracellular trafficking is accompanied by an increase in the activation state of the small GTPase Rab7 in PA-treated cells (Figure 5F, G). Rab7 on late endosomes/lysosomes recruits tethering factors, as pleckstrin homology and RUN domain containing M1 (PLEKHM1), and homotypic fusion and protein sorting complex (HOPS), to promote the assembly of trans-SNARE complexes for the fusion of autophagosomes and lysosomes.73,74 Rab7 controls the trafficking of cargos along microtubules, thus regulating the final step of autophagosome fusion with lysosomes and/or endosomes.75,73 Interestingly, it has been shown that Rab7 hyper-activation inhibits autophagic lysosomal reformation, leading to the accumulation of enlarged autolysosomes76 and swelling of endolysosomal structures, containing aberrant intraluminal content, which correlates with our observed phenotype (Figure 4). Thus, our data suggest PA inhibits the autophagic flux inducing the accumulation of large DGCs by affecting intracellular endolysosomal dynamics and Rab7 activity in N43/5 cells. Future research should confirm the causal role of Rab7 in PA-mediated autophagy inhibition and evaluate if PA, in addition to Rab7, affects other proteins involved in autophagosome-lysosome fusion, such as membrane-tethering complexes and soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor attachment protein receptors (SNAREs).

In summary, our findings provide strong support for a model in which PA inhibits the autophagic flux by reducing autophagosome-lysosome fusion. Our results suggest this could be due to altered endolysosomal dynamics caused by the formation of large DGCs and is associated with an increase in the activity of the small Rab7 GTPase. PA-mediated autophagy impairment in hypothalamic neurons affects neuronal function and promotes inflammation, which alters the levels of neuropeptides that regulate food intake, increasing feeding and promoting obesity, thus contributing to tumor initiation, progression, and response to therapy. Despite the obstacles that have been encountered for the implementation of autophagy modulators in the clinic,77 understanding the process by which PA impairs autophagy in hypothalamic neurons will help to obtain clinically relevant interventions for the treatment of obesity and obesity-related cancers.

Material and methods

Hypothalamic cell line N43/5 and treatments

N43/5 cells (Cellutions Biosystems) were cultured in Dulbecco’s modified eagle medium (DMEM) high glucose (11995–040, Gibco, USA) supplemented with 10% of fetal bovine serum (FBS) (10437028, Gibco), 100 U/ml penicillin streptomycin (15140122, Gibco) and maintained at 37°C with 5% CO2, as previously described.78,35 To evaluate the changes in the autophagic flux in response to PA, cells were incubated with DMEM high glucose supplemented with 2% of FBS 24 h before treatments and then exposed to 100 μM PA (P0500, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) conjugated to fatty acid-free (FFA) bovine serum albumin (BSA) (A8806-5 G, Sigma-Aldrich). BSA treatment was used as control.

Preparation of palmitic acid-BSA complex

Palmitic acid was conjugated to FFA-BSA (BSA) as previously described.36 A stock solution of 5 mM of PA-BSA was prepared. BSA (0.45 g) was dissolved in 0.9% NaCl (7.5 ml), adjusted to pH 7.4. PA (22.43 mg) was dissolved in 100% ethanol, and then titrated with 1 M NaOH to pH 10. Next, ethanol was evaporated in Speed-e-Vac, and the precipitate was dissolved in 0.9% NaCl (4.5 ml) in a thermoblock at 95°C for 15 min. Then, the BSA solution was added to the PA solution, and the final volume was adjusted to 15 ml with 0.9% NaCl. Finally, the PA-BSA solution was passed through a 0.45 µm syringe filter aliquoted and stored at −20°C. The PA-BSA complex was used at a final concentration of 100 µM.

Methods to evaluate autophagy and the autophagic flux

Autophagic flux was evaluated by immunofluorescence, by using the mCherry-GFP-LC3-N43/5 cell line (cell line which expresses the tandem fluorescent-tagged LC3 (mCherry-GFP-LC3)), which allows monitoring autophagosomes and autolysosomes formation based on the different pH stability of GFP and mCherry fluorescent proteins.37,38 As positive control for autophagy induction, we exposed cells for 3 h to 1 µM rapamycin (R0395, Sigma-Aldrich), an MTORC1 inhibitor.39 Fusion between autophagosomes and lysosomes was quantified by co-immunolocalization of the microtubule-associated protein 1A/1B-light chain 3 (LC3) and the lysosomal marker lysosomal-associated membrane protein 1 (LAMP1).38 Cells were incubated at the time points indicated in each experiment with the autophagic flux inhibitor Bafilomycin A1 (BafA1, 100 nM) (B1793, Sigma-Aldrich) or with its vehicle DMSO (BM-0660, Winkler).

Immunofluorescence and fluorescence microscopy

For fluorescence microscopy determinations in N43/5 cells, cells cultured on coverslips, were fixed with cold methanol (−20°C) for 10 min or with 4% (w:v) paraformaldehyde (PFA) for 20 min at room temperature. After PFA fixation, cells were permeabilized with triton 0.1% for 20 min at room temperature. Then, cells were blocked in 3% BSA in PBS for 1 h and incubated with the primary antibodies overnight at 4°C. The primary antibodies used were LAMP1 (1:500; 553792, BD Pharmingen, USA), LC3A/B (1:250; Cell Signaling Technology), p62/Sequestosome-1 (SQSTM1) (1:300; Abnova), and Rab7 (1:100; sc-376362, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.). Primary antibodies staining was followed by incubation with its respective secondary antibody (1:300; Alexa Fluor®, Life Technologies) for 1 h at room temperature. Nuclei were counterstained with DAPI (Vector Laboratories Inc., CA, USA). Confocal images were captured using an inverted fluorescence microscope Leica DMI600 or with an inverted confocal microscope LSM 880 Zeiss with Airyscan detection (Unidad de Microscopía Avanzada UC (UMA UC)). Images were quantified using ImageJ software (NIH, Bethesda, MD), and by using the Spot Detector plugin within the open-source software, ICY (Institut Pasteur and France BioImaging). Co-localization, fluorescence intensity analysis, and size measurement of LAMP1 and LC3 dots were made accordingly to Bustamante et al.79

Methods to evaluate lysosomal activity

To determine lysosomal function the following experiments were performed:

Analysis of lysosomal acidity

We evaluated, by confocal microscopy, the alteration of the pH of lysosomes of cells treated with PA, using 100 nM LysoTracker Red DND-99 probe (L7528, Invitrogen). This dye accumulates and, when excited at 577 nm, emits fluorescence in acidic compartments with a pH <6.5.80 Cells were incubated with this probe for the last 45 min of treatments, and then washed twice with PBS. Following, cells were fixed with 4% (w:v) PFA for 20 min at room temperature and nuclei were counterstained with DAPI. Images were taken using an inverted fluorescence microscope Leica DMI600, and quantified using ImageJ software.

Lysosomal enzyme activity

We measured using the Magic Red kit (Immunochemistry Technologies, LLC) the activity of cathepsin B, a lysosomal member of the papain-like family of cysteine proteases, as indicated by the manufacturer’s instructions. This kit uses a permeable cathepsin B substrate that, once hydrolyzed, liberates membrane-impermeable fluorescent cresyl violet within the organelles that contain a catalytically active cathepsin B.4042 Briefly, for N43/5 cell line, cells were plated on glass bottom dishes, treated with PA for 6 h or BafA1 for 2 h and then loaded with Magic Red probe for 20 min in DMEM medium in humidified 5% CO2 atmosphere at 37°C. They were washed 3 times with PBS and then loaded with Hoechst, to stain the nuclei, for 10 min and finally washed 3 additional times with PBS. Cells were maintained in DMEM medium with HEPES. Experiments have been performed following manufacturer’s instructions. Images were taken in an inverted fluorescence microscope Leica DMI600 and cells analyzed using the open-source softwareICY (http://icy.bioimageanalysis.org/).

Lysosomal movement

To label and track lysosomes, N43/5 cells were incubated with 100 nM LysoTracker Red DND-99, during the latest 45 min of PA (6 h, 100 µM) or BSA treatment, and then washed twice with PBS. Then, live cells were maintained in DMEM (supplemented with 2% FBS) at 37°C and 5% CO2 and visualized in an inverted confocal microscope LSM 880 Zeiss with Airyscan detection (UMA UC). Time-lapse images were collected every 3.39 s for 90 frames. Analysis of the live-cell imaging studies including tracking, velocity and displacement was performed with the ICY software (http://icy.bioimageanalysis.org/). The pseudobinary threshold was determined with the plugin for batch analysis. Then, we configured size, detector type and dimensional parameters using the spot detector plugin. Further, we established the movement of the signals detected configuring the tracking parameters with the spot tracking plugin. Finally, we obtained the speed and displacement of each channel with the track manager using the Track Processor Instant Speed plugin.

Electron microscopy

Cells were fixed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde (16210, EMS, PA, USA) in 0.2 M phosphate buffer (PB) pH 7.4 at room temperature for 16 h. Then, cells were washed 3 times with PB and post-fixed in 1% osmium tetroxide/1% ferrocyanide for 1 h at 4°C. Subsequently, cells were double-stained with 2% uranyl acetate overnight at 4°C. After dehydration in graded series of ethanol, cells were embedded in epoxy resin 812 and sectioned using a Leica ultramicrotome (Leica Microsystems, Vienna, Austria). Images were taken using a transmission electron microscopy Hitachi H-7650 (Tokyo, Japan).

Animals and body weight

Animal care and procedures were approved by the Ethical Committee of the Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile. Male C57BL/6 mice were housed in a temperature-controlled environment in groups of two to four at 22–24°C using a 12 h light/dark cycle. Mice were fed a standard chow (ProlabR RMH3000) or exposed to the HFD (40% kcal from fat, RD-D12079B Western Diet, Research Diet) starting at 8 weeks of age for 16 weeks. Water was provided ad libitum. Body weight was recorded once a week.

Brain slices preparation and staining

Brains were dissected from C57BL/6 mice were immediately frozen at −150°C. Frozen brains were mounted using Optimal cutting temperature compound (OCT compound) in a cryostat at −22°C; then, coronal 25-µm-thick slices of unfixed tissue were obtained. Slices containing the hypothalamic region were mounted on glass slides and incubated as previously described with Magic Red dye.44,81 First, slices were washed 3 times for 5 min in PBS and then incubated with Magic Red dye diluted in diH2O for 45 min at 37°C. After incubation, slices were washed three times for 5  min in PBS and mounted with fluorescent mounting media with DAPI. Images of the arcuate nucleus of the hypothalamus were acquired using the TCS SP8 laser-scanning confocal microscope (Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany).

Rab7-GTP pull-down assay

Rab7-GTP pulldown assay was performed as previously described.82,83 Briefly, cells were lysed in a buffer containing 25 mM HEPES (pH 7.4), 100 mM NaCl, 5 mM MgCl2, 1% NP 40, 10% glycerol, 1 mM dithiothreitol (DTT) and protease inhibitors (Pierce Complete, Mini Protease Inhibitor Cocktail). Extracts were incubated for 5 min on ice and clarified by centrifugation (10,000xg, 1 min, 4ºC). Postnuclear supernatants were used for pulldown assays with 30 μg of GSH beads precoated with GST-RILP fusion protein (Rab7GTP pulldown) per condition. Beads were incubated with supernatant for 15 min at 4ºC in a rotating shaker. Thereafter, beads were collected, washed with a lysis buffer containing 0.01% NP 40 and samples were analyzed by western blot.

Western blot analysis

Gels were transferred to nitrocellulose membranes and incubated with 5% BSA (BM-0150, Winkler, RM, Chile) – tris-buffered saline-0.1% Tween-20 (TBS-T) to block nonspecific binding. Membranes were incubated with the primary antibody anti Rab7 (1:1000; sc-376362, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.), at a dilution of 1:1000 in 5% BSA-TBS-T overnight on a rocking platform at 4ºC. Then, membranes were washed 3 times for 10 min in TBS-T and revealed with the appropriate horseradish peroxidase-labeled secondary antibody (Goat Anti-Mouse IgG (H + L)-HRP Conjugate, 1706516; Bio-Rad, CA, USA) and the chemiluminescent substrate. β-actin (1:10000; A1978, Sigma-Aldrich) was used as a loading control.

Results and statistical analysis

Results are shown as mean ± SEM from at least three independent experiments. Two groups were compared using two-tailed Student’s t tests. For more than two groups, one-way ANOVA was used followed by post hoc adjustment. All analyses were performed with GraphPad software (San Diego, CA, USA). P value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Supplementary Material

Supplemental Material

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the services provided by UC CINBIOT Animal Facility funded by PIA CONICYT*ECM-07*Program for Associative Research, of the Chilean National Council for Science and Technology. This work was supported by the Unidad de Microscopía Avanzada UC (UMA UC) of the Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile. The authors thank everyone in the Morselli lab for constructive discussions and criticisms.

Funding Statement

This work was founded by: grants from Fondo Nacional de Desarrollo Científico y Tecnológico, FONDECYT 1160820 to E.M., 1171649 to P.V.B, 1171075 to AC, 3180209 to Y.Á., 11170546 to CTR; by the CONICYT PAI 77170091 to CTR by the ANID/PIA/ACT172066 to E.M., P.V.B, and A.C.; by ANID/PIA/ACT192015 to C.B.; by CONICYT PhD fellowships 21151609 to M.P.H-C, by the CONICYT Basal Programme No. AFB-170005 to P.V.B.; by CONICYT PCI REDI170147 to Y.Á., by the International Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, ICGEB (CRP/CHL16-06 to E.M.).

Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest

No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.

Supplementary material

Supplemental data for this article can be accessed here.

References

  • 1.Smith KB, Smith MS.. Obesity Statistics. Prim Care. 2016;43(1):1–13. ix. doi: 10.1016/j.pop.2015.10.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Kopelman PG. Obesity as a medical problem. Nature. 2000;404(6778):635–643. doi: 10.1038/35007508. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Opie LH, Walfish PG.. Plasma free fatty acid concentrations in obesity. N Engl J Med. 1963;268(14):757–760. doi: 10.1056/NEJM196304042681404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Rodriguez-Navas C, Morselli E, Clegg DJ. Sexually dimorphic brain fatty acid composition in low and high fat diet-fed mice. Mol Metab. 2016;5(8):680–689. doi: 10.1016/j.molmet.2016.06.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Vagena E, Ryu JK, Baeza-Raja B, Walsh NM, Syme C, Day JP, Houslay MD, Baillie GS. A high-fat diet promotes depression-like behavior in mice by suppressing hypothalamic PKA signaling. Transl Psychiatry. 2019;9(1):141. doi: 10.1038/s41398-019-0470-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Valdearcos M, Robblee MM, Benjamin DI, Nomura DK, Xu AW, Koliwad SK. Microglia dictate the impact of saturated fat consumption on hypothalamic inflammation and neuronal function. Cell Rep. 2014;9(6):2124–2138. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2014.11.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Singh R, Cuervo AM. Autophagy in the cellular energetic balance. Cell Metab. 2011;13(5):495–504. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2011.04.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.McWilliams RR, Maisonneuve P, Bamlet WR, Petersen GM, Li D, Risch HA, Yu H, Fontham ETH, Luckett B, Bosetti C, et al. Risk factors for early-onset and very-early-onset pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a pancreatic cancer case-control consortium (PanC4) analysis. Pancreas. 2016;45(2):311–316. doi: 10.1097/MPA.0000000000000392. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Berger NA. Young adult cancer: influence of the obesity pandemic. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2018;26(4):641–650. doi: 10.1002/oby.22137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Koroukian SM, Dong W, Berger NA. Changes in age distribution of obesity-associated cancers. JAMA Netw Open. 2019;2(8):e199261. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.9261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Pascual G, Avgustinova A, Mejetta S, Martin M, Castellanos A, Attolini CS, Berenguer A, Prats N, Toll A, Hueto JA, et al. Targeting metastasis-initiating cells through the fatty acid receptor CD36. Nature. 2017;541(7635):41–45. doi: 10.1038/nature20791. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Pan J, Fan Z, Wang Z, Dai Q, Xiang Z, Yuan F, Yan M, Zhu Z, Liu B, Li C, et al. CD36 mediates palmitate acid-induced metastasis of gastric cancer via AKT/GSK-3beta/beta-catenin pathway. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2019;38(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s13046-019-1049-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Fatima S, Hu X, Gong RH, Huang C, Chen M, Wong HLX, Bian Z, Kwan HY. Palmitic acid is an intracellular signaling molecule involved in disease development. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2019;76(13):2547–2557. doi: 10.1007/s00018-019-03092-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Riccardi D, Das Neves RX, de Matos-neto EM, Camargo RG, Lima J, Radloff K, Alves MJ, Costa RGF, Tokeshi F, Otoch JP, et al. Plasma lipid profile and systemic inflammation in patients with cancer cachexia. Front Nutr. 2020;7:4. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2020.00004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Galluzzi L, Baehrecke EH, Ballabio A, Boya P, Bravo-San Pedro JM, Cecconi F, Choi AM, Chu CT, Codogno P, Colombo MI et al. Molecular definitions of autophagy and related processes. Embo J. 2017;36(13):1811–1836. doi: 10.15252/embj.201796697. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Santana-Codina N, Mancias JD, Kimmelman AC. The role of autophagy in cancer. Annu Rev Cancer Biol. 2017;1(1):19–39. doi: 10.1146/annurev-cancerbio-041816-122338. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Yu L, Chen Y, Tooze SA. Autophagy pathway: cellular and molecular mechanisms. Autophagy. 2018;14(2):207–215. doi: 10.1080/15548627.2017.1378838. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Eskelinen EL. Maturation of autophagic vacuoles in mammalian cells. Autophagy. 2005;1(1):1–10. doi: 10.4161/auto.1.1.1270. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Lamb CA, Yoshimori T, Tooze SA. The autophagosome: origins unknown, biogenesis complex. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2013;14(12):759–774. doi: 10.1038/nrm3696. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Zhao YG, Zhang H. Autophagosome maturation: an epic journey from the ER to lysosomes. J Cell Biol. 2019;218(3):757–770. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201810099. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Cabukusta B, Neefjes J. Mechanisms of lysosomal positioning and movement. Traffic. 2018;19(10):761–769. doi: 10.1111/tra.12587. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Cabrera M, Nordmann M, Perz A, Schmedt D, Gerondopoulos A, Barr F, Piehler J, Engelbrecht-Vandre S, Ungermann C. The Mon1-Ccz1 GEF activates the Rab7 GTPase Ypt7 via a longin-fold-Rab interface and association with PI3P-positive membranes. J Cell Sci. 2014;127(5):1043–1051. doi: 10.1242/jcs.140921. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Hegedus K, Takats S, Boda A, Jipa A, Nagy P, Varga K, Kovács AL, Juhász G. The Ccz1-Mon1-Rab7 module and Rab5 control distinct steps of autophagy. Mol Biol Cell. 2016;27(20):3132–3142. doi: 10.1091/mbc.e16-03-0205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Pankiv S, Alemu EA, Brech A, Bruun JA, Lamark T, Overvatn A, Bjørkøy G, Johansen T. FYCO1 is a Rab7 effector that binds to LC3 and PI3P to mediate microtubule plus end-directed vesicle transport. J Cell Biol. 2010;188(2):253–269. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200907015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Yu S, Melia TJ. The coordination of membrane fission and fusion at the end of autophagosome maturation. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2017;47:92–98. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2017.03.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Geronimo-Olvera C, Massieu L. Autophagy as a homeostatic mechanism in response to stress conditions in the central nervous system. Mol Neurobiol. 2019;56(9):6594–6608. doi: 10.1007/s12035-019-1546-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Lahiri V, Hawkins WD, Klionsky DJ. Watch what you (Self-) eat: autophagic mechanisms that modulate metabolism. Cell Metab. 2019;29(4):803–826. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2019.03.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Che Y, Wang ZP, Yuan Y, Zhang N, Jin YG, Wan CX, Tang Q-Z. Role of autophagy in a model of obesity: A longterm high fat diet induces cardiac dysfunction. Mol Med Rep. 2018;18(3):3251–3261. doi: 10.3892/mmr.2018.9301. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Yamamoto T, Takabatake Y, Takahashi A, Kimura T, Namba T, Matsuda J, Minami S, Kaimori J-Y, Matsui I, Matsusaka T, et al. High-fat diet-induced lysosomal dysfunction and impaired autophagic flux contribute to lipotoxicity in the kidney. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2017;28(5):1534–1551. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2016070731. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Morselli E, Criollo A, Rodriguez-Navas C, Clegg DJ. Chronic high fat diet consumption impairs metabolic health of male mice. Inflamm Cell Signal. 2014;1:e561. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Portovedo M, Ignacio-Souza LM, Bombassaro B, Coope A, Reginato A, Razolli DS, Torsoni MA, Torsoni AS, Leal RF, Velloso LA, et al. Saturated fatty acids modulate autophagy’s proteins in the hypothalamus. PLoS One. 2015;10(3):e0119850. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0119850. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Kaushik S, Arias E, Kwon H, Lopez NM, Athonvarangkul D, Sahu S, Schwartz GJ, Pessin JE, Singh R. Loss of autophagy in hypothalamic POMC neurons impairs lipolysis. EMBO Rep. 2012;13(3):258–265. doi: 10.1038/embor.2011.260. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Quan W, Kim HK, Moon EY, Kim SS, Choi CS, Komatsu M, Jeong YT, Lee M-K, Kim K-W, Kim M-S, et al. Role of hypothalamic proopiomelanocortin neuron autophagy in the control of appetite and leptin response. Endocrinology. 2012;153(4):1817–1826. doi: 10.1210/en.2011-1882. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Hernandez-Caceres MP, Toledo-Valenzuela L, Diaz-Castro F, Avalos Y, Burgos P, Narro C, Peña-Oyarzun D, Espinoza-Caicedo J, Cifuentes-Araneda F, Navarro-Aguad F, et al. Palmitic acid reduces the autophagic flux and insulin sensitivity through the activation of the free fatty acid receptor 1 (FFAR1) in the hypothalamic neuronal cell line N43/5. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2019;10:176. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2019.00176. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Morselli E, Fuente-Martin E, Finan B, Kim M, Frank A, Garcia-Caceres C, Navas C, Gordillo R, Neinast M, Kalainayakan S, et al. Hypothalamic PGC-1alpha protects against high-fat diet exposure by regulating ERalpha. Cell Rep. 2014;9(2):633–645. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2014.09.025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Mauvezin C, Neufeld TP . Bafilomycin A1 disrupts autophagic flux by inhibiting both V-ATPase-dependent acidification and Ca-P60A/SERCA-dependent autophagosome-lysosome fusion. Autophagy. 2015;11:1437–1438. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Kimura S, Noda T, Yoshimori T. Dissection of the autophagosome maturation process by a novel reporter protein, tandem fluorescent-tagged LC3. Autophagy. 2007;3(5):452–460. doi: 10.4161/auto.4451. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Klionsky DJ, Abdelmohsen K, Abe A, Abedin MJ, Abeliovich H, Acevedo Arozena A, Adachi H, Adams CM, Adams PD, Adeli K et al. Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (3rd edition). Autophagy. 2016;12:1–222. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Rubinsztein DC, Codogno P, Levine B. Autophagy modulation as a potential therapeutic target for diverse diseases. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2012;11(9):709–730. doi: 10.1038/nrd3802. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Choy CH, Saffi G, Gray MA, Wallace C, Dayam RM, Ou ZA, Lenk G, Puertollano R, Watkins SC, Botelho RJ . Lysosome enlargement during inhibition of the lipid kinase PIKfyve proceeds through lysosome coalescence. J Cell Sci. 2018;131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Creasy BM, Hartmann CB, White FK, McCoy KL. New assay using fluorogenic substrates and immunofluorescence staining to measure cysteine cathepsin activity in live cell subpopulations. Cytometry A. 2007;71(2):114–123. doi: 10.1002/cyto.a.20365. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Pryor PR. Analyzing lysosomes in live cells. Methods Enzymol. 2012;505:145–157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Duvvuri M, Gong Y, Chatterji D, Krise JP . Weak base permeability characteristics influence the intracellular sequestration site in the multidrug-resistant human leukemic cell line HL-60. J Biol Chem. Mol Biol Cell. 2004;279(31):32367–32372. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M400735200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Jara C, Aranguiz A, Cerpa W, Tapia-Rojas C, Quintanilla RA. Genetic ablation of tau improves mitochondrial function and cognitive abilities in the hippocampus. Redox Biol. 2018;18:279–294. doi: 10.1016/j.redox.2018.07.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Mauthe M, Orhon I, Rocchi C, Zhou X, Luhr M, Hijlkema K-J, Coppes RP, Engedal N, Mari M, Reggiori F, et al. Chloroquine inhibits autophagic flux by decreasing autophagosome-lysosome fusion. Autophagy. 2018;14(8):1435–1455. doi: 10.1080/15548627.2018.1474314. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.de Araujo MEG, Liebscher G, Hess MW, Huber LA. Lysosomal size matters. Traffic. 2020;21(1):60–75. doi: 10.1111/tra.12714. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Wang H, Lo WT, Haucke V. Phosphoinositide switches in endocytosis and in the endolysosomal system. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2019;59:50–57. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2019.03.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Bucci C, Thomsen P, Nicoziani P, McCarthy J, van Deurs B.. Rab7: a key to lysosome biogenesis. Mol Biol Cell. 2000;11(2):467–480. doi: 10.1091/mbc.11.2.467 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Levesque S, Pol JG, Ferrere G, Galluzzi L, Zitvogel L, Kroemer G. Trial watch: dietary interventions for cancer therapy. Oncoimmunology. 2019;8(7):1591878. doi: 10.1080/2162402X.2019.1591878. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Hariri N, Thibault L. High-fat diet-induced obesity in animal models. Nutr Res Rev. 2010;23(2):270–299. doi: 10.1017/S0954422410000168. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Lien EC, Vander Heiden MG. A framework for examining how diet impacts tumour metabolism. Nat Rev Cancer. 2019;19(11):651–661. doi: 10.1038/s41568-019-0198-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Sasaki A, Nagatake T, Egami R, Gu G, Takigawa I, Ikeda W, Nakatani T, Kunisawa J, Fujita Y. Obesity suppresses cell-competition-mediated apical elimination of RasV12-transformed cells from epithelial tissues. Cell Rep. 2018;23(4):974–982. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.03.104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Beloribi-Djefaflia S, Vasseur S, Guillaumond F. Lipid metabolic reprogramming in cancer cells. Oncogenesis. 2016;5(1):e189. doi: 10.1038/oncsis.2015.49. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Vishwakarma M, Piddini E. Outcompeting cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2020;20(3):187–198. doi: 10.1038/s41568-019-0231-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Ortiz-Rodriguez A, Acaz-Fonseca E, Boya P, Arevalo MA, Garcia-Segura LM. Lipotoxic effects of palmitic acid on astrocytes are associated with autophagy impairment. Mol Neurobiol. 2019;56(3):1665–1680. doi: 10.1007/s12035-018-1183-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Yamamoto T, Takabatake Y, Minami S, Sakai S, Fujimura R, Takahashi A, Namba-Hamano T, Matsuda J, Kimura T, Matsui I, et al. Eicosapentaenoic acid attenuates renal lipotoxicity by restoring autophagic flux. Autophagy. 2020:1–14. doi: 10.1080/15548627.2020.1782034 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Wu X, Nagy LE. MLKL contributes to Western diet-induced liver injury through inhibiting autophagy. Autophagy. 2020:. 16-7. doi:10.1080/15548627.2020.1760624 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Niso-Santano M, Malik SA, Pietrocola F, Bravo-San Pedro JM, Marino G, Cianfanelli V, Ben‐Younès A, Troncoso R, Markaki M, Sica V, et al. Unsaturated fatty acids induce non-canonical autophagy. Embo J. 2015;34(8):1025–1041. doi: 10.15252/embj.201489363. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Li S, Li H, Yang D, Yu X, Irwin DM, Niu G, Tan H. Excessive autophagy activation and increased apoptosis are associated with palmitic acid-induced cardiomyocyte insulin resistance. J Diabetes Res. 2017;2017:2376893. doi: 10.1155/2017/2376893. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Coll AP. Effects of pro-opiomelanocortin (POMC) on food intake and body weight: mechanisms and therapeutic potential? Clin Sci (Lond). 2007;113(4):171–182. doi: 10.1042/CS20070105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Bravo-San Pedro JM, Sica V, Martins I, Pol J, Loos F, Maiuri MC, Durand S, Bossut N, Aprahamian F, Anagnostopoulos G, et al. Acyl-CoA-binding protein is a lipogenic factor that triggers food intake and obesity. Cell Metab. 2019;30(6):1171. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2019.10.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Zahoor M, Farhan H. Crosstalk of autophagy and the secretory pathway and its role in diseases. Int Rev Cell Mol Biol. 2018;337:153–184. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Oh TS, Cho H, Cho JH, Yu SW, Kim EK. Hypothalamic AMPK-induced autophagy increases food intake by regulating NPY and POMC expression. Autophagy. 2016;12(11):2009–2025. doi: 10.1080/15548627.2016.1215382. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Antonova L, Aronson K, Mueller CR. Stress and breast cancer: from epidemiology to molecular biology. Breast Cancer Res. 2011;13(2):208. doi: 10.1186/bcr2836. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.van Norren K, Dwarkasing JT, Witkamp RF. The role of hypothalamic inflammation, the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis and serotonin in the cancer anorexia-cachexia syndrome. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2017;20(5):396–401. doi: 10.1097/MCO.0000000000000401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Anderson CM, Macleod KF. Autophagy and cancer cell metabolism. Int Rev Cell Mol Biol. 2019;347:145–190. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Galluzzi L, Pietrocola F, Bravo-San Pedro JM, Amaravadi RK, Baehrecke EH, Cecconi F, Codogno P, Debnath J, Gewirtz DA, Karantza V, et al. Autophagy in malignant transformation and cancer progression. Embo J. 2015;34(7):856–880. doi: 10.15252/embj.201490784. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Mizushima N, Levine B, Cuervo AM, Klionsky DJ. Autophagy fights disease through cellular self-digestion. Nature. 2008;451(7182):1069–1075. doi: 10.1038/nature06639. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Kallunki T, Olsen OD, Jaattela M. Cancer-associated lysosomal changes: friends or foes? Oncogene. 2013;32(16):1995–2004. doi: 10.1038/onc.2012.292. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Schulze U, Vollenbroker B, Kuhnl A, Granado D, Bayraktar S, Rescher U, Pavenstädt H, Weide T. Cellular vacuolization caused by overexpression of the PIKfyve-binding deficient Vac14 L156R is rescued by starvation and inhibition of vacuolar-ATPase. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Cell Res. 2017;1864(5):749–759. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2017.02.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Odorizzi G, Babst M, Emr SD. Fab1p PtdIns(3)P 5-kinase function essential for protein sorting in the multivesicular body. Cell. 1998;95(6):847–858. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81707-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Schulze U, Vollenbroker B, Braun DA, Van Le T, Granado D, Kremerskothen J, Fränzel B, Klosowski R, Barth J, Fufezan C, et al. The Vac14-interaction network is linked to regulators of the endolysosomal and autophagic pathway. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2014;13(6):1397–1411. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M113.034108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Guerra F, Bucci C. Multiple roles of the small GTPase Rab7. Cells. 2016;5(3):34. doi: 10.3390/cells5030034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Marwaha R, Arya SB, Jagga D, Kaur H, Tuli A, Sharma M. The Rab7 effector PLEKHM1 binds Arl8b to promote cargo traffic to lysosomes. J Cell Biol. 2017;216(4):1051–1070. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201607085. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Hyttinen JM, Niittykoski M, Salminen A, Kaarniranta K. Maturation of autophagosomes and endosomes: a key role for Rab7. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2013;1833(3):503–510. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2012.11.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Yu L, McPhee CK, Zheng L, Mardones GA, Rong Y, Peng J, Mi N, Zhao Y, Liu Z, Wan F, et al. Termination of autophagy and reformation of lysosomes regulated by mTOR. Nature. 2010;465(7300):942–946. doi: 10.1038/nature09076. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Galluzzi L, Bravo-San Pedro JM, Levine B, Green DR, Kroemer G. Pharmacological modulation of autophagy: therapeutic potential and persisting obstacles. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2017;16(7):487–511. doi: 10.1038/nrd.2017.22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Belsham DD, Cai F, Cui H, Smukler SR, Salapatek AM, Shkreta L. Generation of a phenotypic array of hypothalamic neuronal cell models to study complex neuroendocrine disorders. Endocrinology. 2004;145(1):393–400. doi: 10.1210/en.2003-0946. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Bustamante HA, Cereceda K, Gonzalez AE, Valenzuela GE, Cheuquemilla Y, Hernandez S, Arias-Muñoz E, Cerda-Troncoso C, Bandau S, Soza A, et al. The proteasomal deubiquitinating enzyme PSMD14 regulates macroautophagy by controlling golgi-to-ER retrograde transport. Cells. 2020;9(3):777. doi: 10.3390/cells9030777. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Duvvuri M, Gong Y, Chatterji D, Krise JP. Weak base permeability characteristics influence the intracellular sequestration site in the multidrug-resistant human leukemic cell line HL-60. J Biol Chem. 2004;279(31):32367–32372. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M400735200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Tapia-Rojas C, Torres AK, Quintanilla RA. Adolescence binge alcohol consumption induces hippocampal mitochondrial impairment that persists during the adulthood. Neuroscience. 2019;406:356–368. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2019.03.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Diaz J, Mendoza P, Ortiz R, Diaz N, Leyton L, Stupack D, Quest AFG, Torres VA. Rab5 is required in metastatic cancer cells for Caveolin-1-enhanced Rac1 activation, migration and invasion. J Cell Sci. 2014;127(11):2401–2406. doi: 10.1242/jcs.141689. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Torres VA, Mielgo A, Barila D, Anderson DH, Stupack D. Caspase 8 promotes peripheral localization and activation of Rab5. J Biol Chem. 2008;283(52):36280–36289. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M805878200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental Material

Articles from Molecular & Cellular Oncology are provided here courtesy of Taylor & Francis

RESOURCES