Abstract
Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are neoplasms that arise from the wall of the gastrointestinal tract or, rarely, from other intra-abdominal tissues. They are the most common mesenchymal tumors of the gastrointestinal tract and they should be considered in the differential diagnosis of obscure gastrointestinal bleeding. Computed tomography angiogram (CTA) can be utilized as an alternative imaging study when endoscopic and colonoscopy results are non-diagnostic. We report a case of a 59-year-old woman who presented with recurrent episodes of obscure overt gastrointestinal bleeding secondary to a gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST).
Keywords: gastrointestinal stromal tumor (gist), obscure gastrointestinal bleeding, endoscopy
Introduction
Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) originate from gastrointestinal mesenchymal tissue, which predominantly consists of spindle cells, epithelioid cells, and polymorphic cells. Interstitial cells of Cajal (ICC) are recognized as the precursor cells of GISTs. ICCs are considered the pacemaker cells of the gastrointestinal tract and are immunostained by antibodies against CD117. Similarly, CD117 and CD34 are important histopathological biomarkers of GISTs. The most common presenting symptoms of GISTs are gastrointestinal bleeding, abdominal pain, distension, and discomfort due to possible tumor-induced mass effect. GISTs have no specific endoscopic findings, and diagnosis involves immunohistochemical analysis of KIT, CD34, or DOG1, essential for a definitive diagnosis [1]. Surgical resection is the first line of therapy for resectable GISTs without metastasis; whereas the primary approach for unresectable, metastatic, or recurrent GISTs is the use of tyrosine kinase inhibitors [2]. A GIST is considered to be a potentially malignant tumor, and these are not classified as either benign or malignant but are rather stratified using the widely used Fletcher’s risk classification by their clinical risk of malignancy: very low, low, intermediate, or high [3].
Case presentation
A 59-year-old woman with a history of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) presented to the emergency room with an one-month history of bright red blood per rectum and lower abdominal pain. She reported one episode of melanic stool. Surgical history was significant for cesarean section, appendectomy, and laparoscopic ovarian cyst excision. Physical examination was unremarkable. Laboratory findings revealed a hemoglobin of 9.4 g/dL and a positive fecal occult blood test. Immunological testing for fecal Helicobacter Pylori was positive. The day after admission, an esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) was nondiagnostic and a colonoscopy revealed fresh blood with clots at the terminal ileum (Figure 1), but no evident source of bleeding was identified. As the source of bleeding could not be accurately diagnosed, a computed tomography angiogram (CTA) was obtained. Abdominal CTA revealed a large exophytic, necrotic mass with hypervascularity to the right of the uterine fundus along with extensive vessels within the bowel wall along with multiple necrotic myometrial masses. Air-fluid levels were observed within the colon along with hyperdense material within the right lower quadrant of the bowel wall (Figure 2).
Figure 1. Colonoscopy revealing fresh blood and large blood clots (white arrow) coming from the ileocecal (IC) valve.
Figure 2. Computed tomography angiogram (CTA) showing a large pelvic, exophytic, necrotic mass with hypervascularity adjacent to the uterine fundus with invasion of the mass into small bowel. Hyperdense material (consistent with blood products) within the lumen of the bowel can be observed.
Subsequently, the patient underwent an exploratory laparotomy which demonstrated a mass adherent to the mid-jejunum and terminal ileum along with intimate attachment to the uterosacral ligament and the posterior aspect of the uterus. The mass, distal portion of the distal jejunum, and a portion of the terminal ileum were resected. A total abdominal hysterectomy and salpingo-oophorectomy were also performed. The resected necrotic tumor had a maximal diameter of 21 cm, and no lymph node metastasis was reported. Postoperative pathological examination revealed a high-grade spindle cell variant GIST. The mitotic index was > 5/5 mm2 in the high-power field. Immunohistochemical studies revealed CD117 (+), SMA (weak +), CD34 (+), Ki67 (50% strong), PR (weak +), desmin (−), NSE (−), S-100 (−), pankeratin (−), epithelial membrane antigen (−), and estrogen receptor (−). The patient had an uneventful postoperative course and was discharged from the hospital after 10 days. The patient was evaluated by an oncologist who deemed the patient a candidate for adjuvant chemotherapy with imatinib. The patient is doing well at a four-month follow-up with no evidence of recurrent disease.
Discussion
GISTs account for less than 1% of all gastrointestinal tumors with an incidence rate of 0.68 per 100,000 [4-5]. They are the most common mesenchymal tumors of the gastrointestinal tract [5-6]. GISTs appear to originate from the ICC which are located in the myenteric plexus of the gastrointestinal tract and are responsible for peristalsis [6]. GISTs are largely caused by oncogenic mutations in the tyrosine kinase receptor KIT and/or platelet-derived growth factor receptor-α (PDGFR-α) [7-9].
The anatomical locations of GISTs can vary and are commonly seen in the stomach (55.6%), small bowel (31.8%), colorectal (6%), esophagus (0.7%), and various other locations (5.5%). The median age of presentation is approximately 55-65 years, and they are particularly rare in children [10-11]. Tumor size and mitotic index have been shown to have prognostic value [12-13], and are the current criteria used to stratify risk in the United States National Institutes of Health (NIH) guidelines [14].
Patients with GISTs can often be asymptomatic leading to a missed initial diagnosis. When symptomatic, patients often present with bleeding, anemia, mucosal ulceration, or mass effect. Bleeding is the most common presenting symptom and is attributed to the erosion of the gastrointestinal tract lumen with tumor invasion, resulting in hematemesis, melena, or anemia. However, most patients present with vague symptoms, such as nausea, vomiting, abdominal discomfort, weight loss, or early satiety. At diagnosis, 70% of patients are symptomatic, while 20% are asymptomatic, and 10% are detected at autopsy or incidentally during surgery [15]. Approximately 50% of GISTs are found to be metastatic at the time of diagnosis.
This case offers a unique perspective of GIST’s diagnosis. In cases where a colonoscopy and EGD along with abdominal series are nondiagnostic and when capsule endoscopy/balloon enteroscopy is not available, CT angiography can be considered an alternative imaging procedure for the management of GISTs. In our case, CT angiography provided an exact tumor location preoperatively allowing for appropriate surgical resection.
Surgical intervention is the primary therapeutic option with the goal being complete resection for the nonmetastatic disease. Until recently, GISTs were known for being resistant to chemotherapy. The discovery of activating mutations in these tumors has stimulated the use and development of molecular-targeted therapy. The introduction of tyrosine kinase inhibitors has dramatically changed the management and outcomes of GIST treatment- prolonging recurrence-free survival after surgery and extending overall survival in metastatic or unresectable cases [16]. However, it is difficult to obtain a permanent cure using only tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Therefore, early diagnosis with early surgical resection offers the best clinical outcomes [17-18].
Conclusions
GISTs are potentially malignant and if left untreated, can be life-threatening. Both tumor size and mitotic index are the most commonly used prognostic criteria that can guide treatment decisions. The recent increase in the diagnosis of GISTs can be attributed to improved imaging techniques. CT angiography is an effective tool for the diagnosis of GISTs, especially in centers where balloon enteroscopy and/or capsule endoscopy are not readily available. Considerable progress has been made with new treatment modalities for the management of these rare tumors. Complete surgical resection of GISTs is the gold standard of primary treatment when possible, with or without the adjunct of molecular-targeted drug therapy.
The content published in Cureus is the result of clinical experience and/or research by independent individuals or organizations. Cureus is not responsible for the scientific accuracy or reliability of data or conclusions published herein. All content published within Cureus is intended only for educational, research and reference purposes. Additionally, articles published within Cureus should not be deemed a suitable substitute for the advice of a qualified health care professional. Do not disregard or avoid professional medical advice due to content published within Cureus.
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Human Ethics
Consent was obtained by all participants in this study
References
- 1.Gastrointestinal stromal tumor of the stomach: how to manage? Akahoshi K, Oya M. World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;2:271–277. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v2.i8.271. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Progression-free survival in gastrointestinal stromal tumours with high-dose imatinib: randomized trial. Verweij J, Casali PG, Zalcberg J, et al. Lancet. 2004;364:1127–1134. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17098-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Risk stratification of patients diagnosed with gastrointestinal stromal tumor. Joensuu H. Hum Pathol. 2008;39:1411–1419. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2008.06.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Gastrointestinal stromal tumours. Connolly EM, Gaffney E, Reynolds JV. Br J Surg. 2003;14:1178–1186. doi: 10.1002/bjs.4352. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.The epidemiology of malignant gastrointestinal stromal tumors: an analysis of 1,458 cases from 1992 to 2000. Tran T, Davila JA, El-Serag HB. Am J Gastroenterol. 2005;14:162–168. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2005.40709.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Gastrointestinal stromal tumour. Joensuu H, Hohenberger P, Corless CL. Lancet. 2013;382:973–983. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60106-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Gastrointestinal stromal tumors-definition, clinical, histological, immunohistochemical, and molecular genetic features and differential diagnosis. Miettinen M, Lasota J. Virchows Arch. 2001;438:1–12. doi: 10.1007/s004280000338. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Gain-of-function mutations of c-kit in human gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Hirota S, Isozaki K, Moriyama Y, et al. Science. 1998;279:577–580. doi: 10.1126/science.279.5350.577. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.PDGFRA activating mutations in gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Heinrich MC, Corless CL, Duensing A, et al. Science. 2003;299:708–710. doi: 10.1126/science.1079666. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Global epidemiology of gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GIST): a systematic review of population-based cohort studies. Søreide K, Sandvik OM, Søreide JA Giljaca V, Jureckova A, Bulusu VR. Cancer Epidemiol. 2016;40:39–46. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2015.10.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Incidence of gastrointestinal stromal tumours is underestimated: results of a nation-wide study. Goettsch WG, Bos SD, Breekveldt-Postma N, Casparie M, Herings RM, Hogendoorn PC. Eur J Cancer. 2005;41:2868–2872. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2005.09.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Histopathological features and clinical course of the gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Di Matteo G, Pescarmona E, Peparini N, et al. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12143190/ Hepatogastroenterology. 2002;49:1013–1016. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.High mitotic index associated with poor prognosis in gastrointestinal autonomic nerve tumour. Tornóczky T, Kálmán E, Hegedûs G, et al. Histopathology. 1999;35:121–128. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2559.1999.00685.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a consensus approach. Fletcher CD, Berman JJ, Corless C, et al. Hum Pathol. 2002;33:459–465. doi: 10.1053/hupa.2002.123545. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Gastrointestinal stromal tumors, intramural leiomyomas and leiomyosarcomas in the rectum and anus: a clinicopathologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular genetic study of 144 cases. Miettinen M, Furlong M, Sarlomo-Rikala M, Burke A, Sobin LH, Lasota J. Am J Surg Pathol. 2001;25:1121–1133. doi: 10.1097/00000478-200109000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Gastrointestinal stromal tumors: the incidence, prevalence, clinical course, and prognostication in the preimatinib mesylate era - a population-based study in western Sweden. Nilsson B, Bümming P, Meis-Kindblom JM, et al. Cancer. 2005;15:821–829. doi: 10.1002/cncr.20862. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.One vs three years of adjuvant imatinib for operable gastrointestinal stromal tumor: a randomized trial. Joensuu H, Eriksson M, Hall KS, et al. JAMA. 2012;307:1265–1272. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.347. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Gastrointestinal stromal tumor causing obscure gastrointestinal bleeding: an uncommon way of diagnosing an uncommon disease. Dziadkowiec KN, Satiya J, Katz A. Am J Gastroenterol. 2019;114:0. doi: 10.7759/cureus.9558. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]


