Skip to main content
Oncology Letters logoLink to Oncology Letters
. 2020 Aug 20;20(5):141. doi: 10.3892/ol.2020.12001

Antitumor effects and molecular mechanisms of action of natural products in ovarian cancer

Yun-Bo Yan 1,*, Qing Tian 1,2,*, Ji-Fang Zhang 1,*, Ying Xiang 1,2,
PMCID: PMC7471673  PMID: 32934709

Abstract

Ovarian cancer is a common malignancy and the second leading cause of mortality among females with genital tract cancer. At present, postoperative platinum drugs and paclitaxel-based chemotherapy is the gold standard treatment for ovarian cancer. However, patients who receive this chemotherapy often develop cumulative toxic effects and are prone to chemotherapy resistance. Therefore, it is necessary to determine more effective treatment options that would be better tolerated by patients. Recent studies have reported the therapeutic effects of numerous natural products in patients with ovarian cancer. Notably, these natural ingredients do not induce adverse effects in healthy cells and tissues, suggesting that natural products may serve as a safe alternative treatment for ovarian cancer. The antitumor effects of natural products are attributed to suppression of cell proliferation and metastasis, stimulation of autophagy, improved chemotherapy sensitivity, and induction of apoptosis. The present review focused on the antitumor effects of several natural products, including curcumin, resveratrol, ginsenosides, (−)-epigallocatechin-3-gallate and quercetin, which are increasingly being investigated as therapeutic options in ovarian cancer, and discussed the molecular mechanisms involved in cell proliferation, apoptosis, autophagy, metastasis and sensitization.

Keywords: ovarian cancer, natural products, molecular mechanisms, antitumor

1. Introduction

Ovarian cancer ranks third after cervical and uterine corpus cancer among gynecologic cancers and is the second leading cause of mortality worldwide among females with reproductive tract malignancies (1). Histopathologically, the majority of ovarian cancers are classified as epithelial ovarian cancer and include serous, mucinous, endometrioid, transitional and clear cell carcinomas (2). Epithelial ovarian cancer may metastasize through intracavitary implantation and/or the hematogenous and lymphatic routes. Intraperitoneal metastasis is the most common route of dissemination (3,4). Patients are usually asymptomatic in the early stages of the disease and ~70% of patients with ovarian cancer are diagnosed at an advanced stage (5). At present, surgery followed by platinum drugs and paclitaxel-based chemotherapy is the gold standard treatment to inhibit disease progression. However, patients who receive this chemotherapy often develop cumulative toxic effects (including nephrotoxicity) and are prone to chemotherapy resistance (6,7). To date, ovarian cancer is associated with a poor prognosis (8); the 5-year survival rate of patients with this malignancy remains significantly low to be satisfactory in clinic. Therefore, newer drugs and novel treatment strategies are warranted to improve the prognosis of patients with ovarian cancer.

Owing to the high toxicity associated with conventional antitumor drugs, plant-derived natural products are being investigated as alternative or adjuvant treatments for a variety of cancer types (9). Conventionally, natural products are considered nutritional products and auxiliary medicine. Recent studies have proven the antitumor effects of natural products and demonstrated that they may reduce chemotherapy-induced toxicity. These phytochemicals primarily include curcumin, resveratrol, ginsenoside, quercetin, berberine and (−)-epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG) (10). This review discusses the antitumor effects of several natural products and the molecular mechanisms of action of these agents in patients with ovarian cancer, with regards to their roles in proliferation, apoptosis, autophagy, metastasis and sensitization. The antitumor effects of several natural products and the molecular mechanism in ovarian cancer are reviewed, which includes the aspects of proliferation, apoptosis, autophagy, metastasis and sensitization.

2. Curcumin

Turmeric, the root of the Curcuma longa plant, is widely used in Indian curries and South Asian dishes, and has been used as a traditional medicine for thousands of years in India and China (11). Curcumin and its two related curcuminoids (demethoxycurcumin and bisdemethoxycurcumin) constitute the main active ingredients of turmeric. Reportedly, curcumin and curcuminoids possess strong antitumor, antioxidant, and anti-inflammatory properties owing to their interactions with multiple molecular targets (12). The antitumor effect and mechanisms of action of curcumin in ovarian cancer are listed in Table I.

Table I.

The antitumor effect and mechanisms of action of curcumin in ovarian cancer.

First author, year Form of curcumin Dose Ovarian cancer model Findings (Refs.)
Yu et al, 2016 Curcumin 40 µM Cell line (SKOV3) Downregulated PIK3/AKT, increased caspase-3 and Bax, downregulated Bcl-2, promoted apoptosis, inhibited the proliferation, and induced G2/M cell cycle arrest. (15)
Watson et al, 2010 Curcumin Variable Cell lines (HEY, OVCA429, OCC1, SKOV3) Downregulated AKT phosphorylation and AKT protein, decreased the expression of Bcl-2 and survivin, and increased susceptibility to apoptosis. (16)
Saydmohammed et al, 2010 Curcumin Variable Cell line (HOSE 642, OVCA 420 and OVCA 429) Inhibited STAT-3 phosphorylation, inhibited the expression of IL-6 and SOCS-3, and repressed cell motility. (18)
Seo et al, 2010 Curcumin Cell lines (PA-1, OVCAR-3) Suppressed STAT-3 phosphorylation, suppressed IL-6 and IL-8 secretion, and inhibited ovarian cell motility. (19)
Seo et al, 2016 Curcumin 15 µM Cell lines (MDAH2774, SKOV3, PA-1) Inhibited SERCA activity, disrupted Ca2+ homeostasis, and promoted apoptosis. (21)
Du et al, 2017 Dimethoxy-curcumin Variable Cell lines (ES2, HO8640, HO8640PM, SKOV3) and ovarian cancer tissues. Upregulated miR-551a, promoted apoptosis and inhibited proliferation. (23)
Zhao et al, 2017 Dihydro-artemisinin and curcumin Cell line (SKOV3) Upregulated miR-124, decreased midkine, induced cell cycle arrest, and promoted apoptosis. (25)
Zhao et al, 2014 Curcumin 60 µM Cell line (SKOV3) Increased miR-9, decreased p-AKT and FOXO1, inhibited proliferation, and induced apoptosis. (27)
Liu et al, 2019 Curcumin Variable Cell lines (SKOV3, A2780 and HO8910) Decreased cell viability and induced apoptotic cell death. (30)
Qu et al, 2013 B19 5, 10, 15 µM Cell line (HO8910) Activated ER stress and autophagy. (31)
Choe et al, 2018; Lv et al, 2013 Curcumin Cell lines (SKOV3, OVCAR-3 and PA-1) Downregulated CD44, MMP-9 and Rab coupling protein-induced phosphorylation of FAK, and inhibited. invasion (34,35)
Pei et al, 2016 Bisdemethoxycurcumin 15 µM Cell line (SKOV3) Suppressed oxidative stress, inactivated NF-κB, downregu lated the expression of MMP-2, MMP-9 and VCAM-1, and inhibited metastasis. (36)
Yallapu et al, 2010 Curcumin 10 or 20 µM Cell lines (A2780 and A2780CP) Downregulated the expression of Bcl-xl and Mcl-1, suppressed β-catenin expression and transcriptional activity, increased apoptosis, and induced sensitization to cisplatin. (39)
Zhao et al, 2019 Curcumin Variable Cell lines (SKOV3 and SKOV3-TR30) and in vivo (mice) Upregulated p53, inhibited MDR-1, and reversed the resistance to paclitaxel. (40)
Zhang et al, 2017 Curcumin 1 µM Cell lines (OVCAR-3 and SKOV3) Upregulated LncRNA MEG3, downregulated miR-214, and decreased cisplatin resistance. (41)

PI3K, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase; AKT, protein kinase B; Bcl-2, B-cell lymphoma-2; STAT-3, signal transducer and activator of transcription-3; SOCS-3, suppressor of cytokine signaling 3; IL, interleukin; SERCA, sarcoplasmic/endoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ transporting ATPase; miR, miRNA; p-AKT, phosphorylated AKT; FOXO1, forkhead box O1; ER, endoplasmic reticulum; NF-κB, nuclear transcription factor-kappa B; MMP, matrix metalloproteinase; FAK, focal adhesion kinase; VCAM-1, vascular cell adhesion molecule-1; MDR-1, multidrug resistance protein 1; LncRNA, long non-coding RNA.

Anti-proliferative and pro-apoptotic activity

Excessive proliferation and inadequate apoptosis are the two significant characteristics of tumors, including ovarian cancer. The phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/protein kinase B (AKT) signaling pathway participates in multiple cellular process, and activation of this pathway increases cell proliferation, invasion, migration, survival and chemotherapy resistance in ovarian cancer (13). The B-cell lymphoma-2 (Bcl-2) family controls the release of cytochrome C from mitochondria into the cytosol, where it binds to apoptotic protease activating factor-1, promoting the activation of caspase-9 then caspase-3, which leads to the intrinsic apoptosis. The Bcl-2 family includes the pro-apoptotic proteins (including Bad and Bax) and anti-apoptotic proteins (including Bcl-2, and Bcl-xl) (14). Curcumin downregulated the expression of the Bcl-2, while upregulating the expression of Bax and caspase-3 by repressing the PI3K/AKT pathway, leading to cell cycle arrest in G2/M phase and increased apoptosis of ovarian cancer cells (15). Concordantly, Watson et al (16) reported that curcumin downregulated AKT phosphorylation, Bcl-2 and survivin, so that curcumin activated the extrinsic and intrinsic apoptotic pathways via activation of caspase-8, caspase-9 and caspase-3 (16). Signal transducer and activator of transcription-3 (STAT-3), is a transcription factor and signal transducer, and the phosphorylated STAT-3 promotes tumorigenesis by stimulating cell proliferation and preventing apoptosis (17). Saydmohammed et al (18), reported that curcumin inhibited STAT-3 phosphorylation, which suppressed ovarian cancer cell growth (18). Treatment with curcumin suppressed ovarian cell motility by inhibiting STAT-3 phosphorylation by increasing interleukin (IL)-6 and IL-8 secretion (19). In addition, Ca2+ homeostasis is necessary for cell survival, and sarcoplasmic/endoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ transporting ATPase (SERCA) regulates cellular Ca2+ flux from the cytosol to the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) for storage (20). Seo et al (21), reported that curcumin inhibited SERCA activity and then disrupted Ca2+ homeostasis in ovarian cancer cells. Subsequently, a high concentration of Ca2+ in the cytoplasm promoted cell apoptosis (21).

MiRNAs (miRs), a class of short non-coding RNAs, regulating gene expression post-transcriptionally via binding to the 3′-untranslated regions of target mRNAs, are essential in malignant phenotype and treatment response in ovarian cancer (22). Du et al (23), reported that treatment with dimethoxy-curcumin promoted the apoptosis and inhibited the proliferation of ovarian cancer cells through upregulating the levels of miR-551a. A luciferase assay confirmed that miR-551a targeted insulin receptor substrate 2 (23), which had been validated to serve an anti-apoptotic role (24). In addition, it was demonstrated that the combination of dihydroartemisinin and curcumin arrested the cell cycle and promoted the apoptosis of ovarian cancer cells by upregulation of miR-124 and downregulation of its target midkine (25), which is significantly overexpressed in various cancer types to promote tumorigenesis and progression (26). Furthermore, curcumin promoted the apoptosis and inhibited the proliferation of ovarian cancer cells by inducing the expression of miR-9 (27).

Induction of autophagy

In ovarian cancer, autophagy serves a dual role that it may serve as an adaptation to stress to avoid cell death in cancer progression, while excessive autophagy may lead to cell death. Increased autophagy is also associated with resistance to chemotherapy (28). Autophagy is a highly conserved process that involves the formation of autophagosomes that engulf cellular proteins and organelles, and delivers them to the lysosomes. The mammalian target of the rapamycin (mTOR) signaling pathway regulates cell proliferation, survival and autophagy. The p70 ribosomal S6 protein kinase (p70S6K) is a major effector of mTOR phosphorylation (29). Liu et al (30), reported that curcumin inhibited the AKT/mTOR/p70S6K pathway to induce apoptosis and protective autophagy in ovarian cancer SKOV3 and A2780 cells, and treatment with autophagy-specific inhibitors markedly enhanced curcumin-induced apoptosis (30). Qu et al (31), reported that B19, a novel monocarbonyl analogue of curcumin, induced autophagy and ER stress-mediated apoptosis in ovarian cancer cells, and inhibition of autophagy with 3-methyladenine increased ER stress-mediated apoptosis (31). ER stress is referred to as the accumulation of unfolded or misfolded proteins in the ER lumen due to physiological and pathological conditions, which interfered with ER homeostasis and proper protein folding (32).

Anti-metastatic activity

Ovarian cancer metastasizes to adjacent organs via direct extension or through the dissemination of cancer cells that detach from the primary tumor (3). A family of proteolytic enzymes, called matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), promote the metastasis of ovarian cancer by remodeling the tumor extracellular matrix (33). Two recent studies reported that curcumin markedly downregulated CD44 (the cell surface receptor of hyaluronic acid), MMP-9 and Rab coupling protein-induced phosphorylation of focal adhesion kinase (FAK; associated with the stabilization of actin and microtubule filaments, and regulating cancer cell motility), and eventually inhibited the invasion of SKOV3 cells (34,35). In addition, one study revealed that bisdemethoxycurcumin inactivated the nuclear transcription factor-kappa B (NF-κB) pathway by inhibiting oxidative stress, thereby reducing the expression of metastasis-associated proteins, including MMP-2, MMP-9 and vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1) in SKOV3 cells (36). The VCAM-1-integrin interaction was clarified to be involved in the regulation of ovarian cancer cell invasion and metastatic progression (37).

Sensitization

Resistance to chemotherapeutic agents is a major barrier to the effective treatment of advanced ovarian cancer. The molecular mechanisms associated with resistance to chemotherapy in ovarian cancer include increased activity of the drug efflux pump mediated by the multidrug resistance protein 1 (MDR-1, also known as P-gp), increased repair capacity of DNA damage, decreased drug intake, and decreased apoptosis, as well as drug-induced cell cycle arrest (38). Curcumin may increase the sensitivity of ovarian cancer cells to therapeutic drugs. Yallapu et al (39), reported that curcumin induced sensitization of cisplatin-resistant ovarian cancer cells (A2780CP) to cisplatin by increasing apoptosis. Curcumin treatment downregulated the expression of Mcl-1 and Bcl-xl, two anti-apoptotic proteins of the Bcl-2 family, and suppressed the activity of β-catenin, a transcription factor that promoted the expression of cell survival genes by interacting with the TCF transcription factor (39). Zhao et al (40), reported that co-administration of curcumin and paclitaxel exerted a good antitumor effect in multi-drug resistant ovarian cancer cells (SKOV3-TR30) and in ovarian tumor-bearing nude mice, since curcumin reversed the resistance to paclitaxel by inhibiting the drug efflux mediated by MDR-1 (40). Zhang et al (41) reported that curcumin may resume LncRNA MEG3 levels in extracellular vesicles from cisplatin-resistant ovarian cancer cells. Upregulation of MEG3 reduced the expression of miR-214 in cells and in extracellular vesicles, thereby reducing cisplatin resistance (41). MiR-214 was a well-known miRNA in drug resistance, which enhanced cell survival and induced cisplatin resistance in ovarian cancer cells by directly downregulating the expression of phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN), a negative regulatory molecule of the PI3K/AKT pathway (42).

3. Resveratrol

Resveratrol is a natural polyphenolic compound derived from plants, including grapes, peanuts and Polygonum cuspidatum (43). Resveratrol possesses anti-inflammatory and antitumor properties, and protects the heart, nerves and kidneys (44). The antitumor effect and mechanisms of action of resveratrol in ovarian cancer are listed in Table II.

Table II.

The antitumor effects and mechanisms of action of resveratrol in ovarian cancer.

First author, year Form of resveratrol Dose Ovarian cancer model Findings (Refs.)
Tan et al, 2016 Resveratrol 25, 50 µM Cell lines (A2780 and SKOV3) and in vivo (mice) Decreased the uptake of glucose, inhibited glycolytic response, and inhibited cell growth. (48)
Gwak et al, 2016 Resveratrol 50 µM Cell lines (PA-1, MDAH2774 and SKOV3) Interrupted protein glycosylation, induced ER stress, and increased apoptosis. (49)
Tino et al, 2016 Resveratrol and acetyl-resveratrol 30 µM Cell lines (SKOV3 and OVCAR-5) Decreased NF-κB protein and nuclear localization, decreased VEGF secretion, and decreased cell growth and metabolism. (51)
Vergara et al, 2012 Resveratrol >50 µM Cell lines (OVCAR-3 and SKOV3) Downregulated cyclin D1, AKT and GSK3β, decreased ERK phosphorylation, inhibited proliferation, and decreased drug resistance. (52)
Lang et al, 2015 Resveratrol 100 µM Cell lines (OVCAR-3 and Caov-3) Induced ROS generation, induced Atg5 expression and promoted cleavage from LC3-I to LC3-II, and triggered autophagy and apoptotic cell death. (53)
Zhong et al, 2016 Resveratrol 100 µM Cell lines (Caov-3 and OVCAR-3) Inhibited STAT-3 phosphorylation, upregulated beclin-1, promoted cleavage from LC3-I to LC3-II, and increased autophagy. (56)
Zhong et al, 2018; Ferraresi et al, 2017 Resveratrol 100 µM Cell lines (OVCAR-3, OC-Caov-3 and NIH-OVCAR-3) Upregulated ARHI, inactivated STAT-3, increased autophagy and apoptosis, caused growth arrest, and attenu ated the metastasis induced by IL-6. (58,59)
Ferraresi et al, 2017 Resveratrol 100 µM Cell line (NIH-OVCAR-3) Inhibited mTORC1 by inhibiting AKT and activating AMPK, inhibited protein synthesis and cell growth, and induced autophagy. (60)
Mikula-Pietrasi et al, 2014 Resveratrol Variable Cell lines (A2780 and SKOV3) Decreased α5β1 integrin, enhanced hyaluronic acid secretion, inhibited cell adhesion, and decreased metastasis. (61)
Park et al, 2007 Resveratrol Variable Cell line (ARPE-19) Inhibited HIF-1α and VEGF in a dose-dependent manner, blocked the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway, and prevented the migration. (62)
Nessa et al, 2012 Resveratrol Variable Cell lines (A2780, A2780cisR and A2780ZD0473R) Decreased the resistance to the platinum drugs via downregulating NF-κB. (65)
Engelke et al, 2016 Resveratrol 10 µM Cell line (A2780) Modulated the EGFR or VEGFR family of receptor tyrosine kinases, and prevented the development of cisplatin resistance. (66)

ER, endoplasmic reticulum; NF-κB, nuclear transcription factor-kappa B; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor; AKT, protein kinase B; GSK3β, glycogen synthase kinase-3β; ERK, extracellular signal-regulating kinase; ROS, reactive oxygen species; LC3, microtubule-associated protein 1 light chain 3; STAT-3, signal transducer and activator of transcription-3; ARHI, aplasia Ras homologue member I; IL, interleukin; PI3K, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase; mTOR, mammalian target of rapamycin; mTORC1, mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1; AMPK, AMP-activated protein kinase; HIF-1α, hypoxia-inducible factor-1α; EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; VEGFR, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor.

Anti-proliferative and pro-apoptotic activity

The Warburg effect describes that, under the condition of sufficient oxygen, tumor cells are active in aerobic glycolysis (45). Through aerobic glycolysis, a large number of metabolites may be generated and plentiful biosynthesis may occur, which may satisfy the rapid and unlimited growth of tumor cells (46). Suppression of the Warburg effect is an effective way to treat cancer (47). In the mouse model, resveratrol significantly reduced glucose uptake by tumor cells (48). In ovarian cancer cells, resveratrol inhibited the biosynthesis of hexosamine, and interrupted protein glycosylation through activating glycogen synthase kinase-3β (GSK3β), and eventually triggered ER stress-mediated apoptosis (49). GSK3β is a kinase that phosphorylated and inactivated glycogen synthase, the final enzyme in biosynthesis of glycogen, which is the main form of glucose storage (50). Tino et al (51) proved that the combination of resveratrol and acetyl resveratrol inhibited the growth and metabolism of ovarian cancer cells more efficiently, and this growth restriction was due to decreased NF-κB protein and nuclear localization, which was responsible for vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) secretion (51). Furthermore, resveratrol downregulated the phosphorylation of AKT and GSK3β in a dose-dependent manner in ovarian cancer cells, as well as decreasing the activity of extracellular signal-regulating kinase (ERK), which subsequently suppressed the expression of cyclin D1, which facilitated cyclin-dependent kinases CDK4 or CDK6 in promoting cell cycle progression (52).

Induction of autophagy

In ovarian cancer, a recent study reported that resveratrol promoted autophagy and subsequent apoptosis in ovarian cancer cells by triggering the production of reactive oxygen species (53). Furthermore, it also revealed that resveratrol induced autophagy through enhancing the expression of Atg5, a key molecule for the elongation of the autophagosome membrane, and promoting cleavage from microtubule-associated protein 1 light chain 3 (LC3)-I to LC3-II (53). LC3-II, located on the membrane of autophagosomes, is a specific marker protein for autophagic activity (54). Beclin-1 mediates the localization of autophagy-related proteins and regulates the formation and maturation of autophagosomes by interacting with various proteins. Beclin-1 may also interact with the anti-apoptotic proteins of the Bcl-2 family, exerting a crosstalk between apoptosis and autophagy (55). Zhong et al (56) demonstrated that resveratrol enhanced autophagy by promoting the expression of beclin-1 and LC3-II through inactivation of STAT-3, and significantly induced growth arrest and death of ovarian cancer cells (56). In addition, resveratrol promoted the expression of the tumor suppressor gene, aplasia Ras homologue member I (ARHI) (57), and inactivated the STAT-3 signal pathway in ovarian cancer cells. Subsequently, resveratrol induced cell apoptosis, increased autophagy activity, and induced growth arrest (58). Concordantly, Ferraresi et al (59) reported that resveratrol increased autophagy via upregulation of beclin-1 and LC3 through induced ARHI and inactivated STAT-3, thereby attenuating the metastasis induced by IL-6 in ovarian cancer cells (59). They also demonstrated that resveratrol inhibited mTOR complex 1 by repressing AKT and activating AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK), which inhibited protein synthesis and cell growth, and induced autophagy. When the mTOR pathway was inhibited by resveratrol, induced autophagy favored the survival of cells in the context of insufficient nutrition, likely leading to a dormant state (60).

Anti-metastatic activity

Ovarian cancer is known to directly metastasize to the peritoneal surface of adjacent organs (3). A previous study demonstrated that resveratrol decreased the level of cellular α5β1 integrin and enhanced hyaluronic acid secretion to the extracellular matrix, which inhibited the adhesion of ovarian cancer cells to the intestinal wall and decreased metastasis (61). Under hypoxic conditions, resveratrol may decrease the binding between ovarian cancer cells and mesothelial cells by downregulating the expression of VEGF, thereby preventing the migration of ovarian cancer cells induced by lysophosphatidic acid (62). The high expression of VEGF was associated with metastasis in advanced ovarian cancer (63).

Sensitization

A previous study has reported that resveratrol induces autophagy and promotes apoptosis in ovarian cancer cells (64). Therefore, resveratrol may improve chemosensitivity and prevent tumorigenesis under conditions of autophagy inhibitors (64). Aberrant activation of NF-κB may protect cancer cells against the apoptosis induced by pharmacological drugs, contributing toward drug resistance. Nessa et al (65) suggested that resveratrol sensitized ovarian cancer cells to the apoptosis induced by platinum drugs via downregulating NF-κB (65). In addition, Engelke et al (66) reported that resveratrol reversed the resistance of ovarian cancer cells to cisplatin by modulating molecular targets, including the EGFR or VEGFR family of receptor tyrosine kinases (66).

4. Ginsenosides

Ginsenosides constitute the major pharmacologically active ingredient in ginseng, and possess antitumor and antioxidant properties. In addition to enhancing immunity (67). Several ginsenoside compounds, including Rb1, Rg1, RG1, Rh1 and Rd, have been identified, and the majority of these, particularly ginsenoside Rg3 and Rb1 exhibit significant antitumor activity (68). The effect and mechanisms of action of ginsenosides in ovarian cancer are list in Table III.

Table III.

The antitumor effects and mechanisms of action of ginsenosides in ovarian cancer.

First author, year Form of ginsenosides Dose Ovarian cancer model Findings (Refs.)
Li et al, 2015 20(S)-Rg3 80,160 µg/ml Cell line (SKOV3) Downregulated p-STAT, decreased metabolic enzymes in glycolysis, inhibited the Warburg effect, and prevented cancer growth and metabolism. (69)
Zheng et al, 2018 20(S)-Rg3 40, 80 µg/ml Cell lines (SKOV3 and A2780) and in vivo (BALB/C nude mice) Blocked the competitive inhibition of H19 on miR-324-5p, increased the suppression of miR-324-5p on pyruvate kinase isozyme type M2, inhibit Warburg effect, and retarded cancer growth. (70)
Lu et al, 2019 20(S)-Rg3 40, 80 µg/ml Cell lines (SKOV3 and A2780) In vivo (BALB/C nude mice) Upregulated miR-603, reduced hexokinase-2, inhibited the Warburg effect, and suppressed cell growth and invasion. (71)
Zheng et al, 2017 20(S)-Rg3 80 µg/ml Cell line (SKOV3) Upregulated LC3-II, Atg5, and Atg7, enhanced autophagy, and inhibited metastasis and invasion. (73)
Liu et al, 2014 20(S)-Rg3 5 mg/kg Cell lines (SKOV3 and 3AO) Activated ubiquitin-proteasome pathway, decreased HIF-1α, inhibited EMT, upregulated E-cadherin, and decreased the invasion and metastasis of cancer cells. (75)
Liu et al, 2017 20(S)-Rg3 80,160 µg/ml Cell lines (SKOV3 and 3AO) Promoted HIF-1α ubiquitin proteasome degradation and inhibited the invasion and metastasis of ovarian cancer cells. (76)
Liu et al, 2017 Rb1 160 µg/ml Cell lines (SKOV3, 3AO) Inhibited miR-25/EP300/E-cadherin pathway, and inhibited EMT. (77)
Yun et al, 2013 Rp1, Rh2, Rg3 5,10 µM Cell lines (OVCAR-8) Redistributed MDR-1, attenuated MDR-1 expression, and induced drug sensitization. (79)
Deng et al, 2017 Rb1, compound K Variable; 50 mg/kg for compound K Cell lines (SKOV3 and HEYA8 CSCs), and in vivo (mice) Inhibited Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway, inhibited EMT, and decreased chemoresistance. (80)

p-STAT, phosphorylated signal transducer and activator of transcription; miR, miRNA; LC3, microtubule-associated protein 1 light chain 3; HIF-1α, hypoxia-inducible factor-1α; EMT, epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition; MDR-1, multidrug resistance protein 1.

Anti-proliferative and pro-apoptotic activity

The Warburg effect is essential for tumor growth and metabolism. Li et al (69) reported that ginsenoside 20(S)-Rg3 downregulated phospho-STAT-3 and two metabolic enzymes, hexokinase and pyruvate kinase, which inhibited the glycolysis of ovarian cancer cells, thereby inhibiting the Warburg effect and preventing tumor growth and metabolism (69). A previous study reported that 20(S)-Rg3 may block the inhibition of miR-324-5p by H19. Increased miR-324-5p by 20(S)-Rg3 treatment inhibited the activity of pyruvate kinase isozyme type M2, thereby inhibiting the Warburg effect (70). Furthermore, Lu et al (71) reported that ginsenoside 20(S)-Rg3 upregulated the expression of miR-603 in ovarian cancer cells by downregulating the DNA methylation mediated by DNA methyltransferase 3 alpha. Increased miR-603 directly targeted hexokinase-2 mRNA and decreased hexokinase-2 expression. Therefore, ginsenoside 20(S)-Rg3 inhibited the Warburg effect, which was primarily manifested as a decreased lactate production, glucose consumption and in vitro proliferation, and weakened cell invasion and migration (71).

Autophagy induction

The effect of ginsenosides on autophagy is controversial. Reportedly, ginsenoside 20(S)-Rg3 inhibited autophagic flux by suppression of late-stage autophagosome maturation or degradation, and eventually induced apoptosis in cervical cancer cells (72). However, in ovarian cancer, ginsenoside 20(S)-Rg3 enhanced autophagy by upregulating autophagy-related molecules, including LC3-II, Atg5 and Atg7, thereby inhibiting the invasion and metastasis of ovarian cancer cells (73).

Anti-metastatic activity

Hypoxia-inducible factor-1 (HIF-1), ubiquitous in human and mammalian cells, is stable only under hypoxic conditions, and the stabilization of HIF-1α mediates tumor cell invasion and metastasis (74). The epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) usually occurs prior to ovarian cancer metastasis, which decreases cell-cell adhesion. Liu et al (75) reported that ginsenoside 20(S)-Rg3 decreased the expression of HIF-1α by stimulating the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway, and inhibited EMT process, which was essential for metastasis (75). They also revealed that ginsenoside 20(S)-Rg3 upregulated prolyl hydroxylase domain protein 1 to cause degradation of HIF-1α under the conditions of normal oxygen (76). Furthermore, ginsenoside Rb1 inhibited hypoxia-induced EMT by downregulating miR-25 in ovarian cancer cells, which abrogated the suppression of miR-25 on the expression of EP300 (a transcriptional activator of E-cadherin) and E-cadherin (an essential molecule for adhesion between epithelial cells), thereby leading to an anti-metastatic effect (77). E-cadherin is involved in anchoring epithelial cells to each other by binding to the actin microfilaments through α- and β-catenin in the cytoplasm (78).

Sensitization

Drug resistance is a major clinical challenge that interferes with successful cancer therapy. The membrane transporter MDR-1 is located on the lipid rafts of the plasma membrane, and increased MDR-1 activity is an important contributor to multidrug resistance. Yun et al (79) reported that ginsenoside Rp1 repressed MDR-1 activity by redistributing lipid rafts, which reversed resistance to antitumor drugs, including doxorubicin (79). EMT is involved in drug resistance, as well as in metastasis. Deng et al (80) reported that the metabolite compound k of ginsenoside Rb1 specifically inhibited cell growth by inhibiting the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway and EMT process, and decreased the resistance of ovarian cancer stem cells to cisplatin and paclitaxel (80).

5. Quercetin

Quercetin is a natural polyphenolic compound abundantly present in fruits and vegetables; notably, red onions contain the highest levels of quercetin (81). Quercetin has a variety of pharmacological actions, including antitumor, antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activity, in addition to lowering blood pressure and blood lipid levels. Quercetin-induced cytotoxicity is rarely observed in healthy cells (82). The antitumor effects and mechanisms of action of quercetin in ovarian cancer are listed in Table IV.

Table IV.

The antitumor effects and mechanisms of action of quercetin in ovarian cancer.

First author, year Form of quercetin Dose Ovarian cancer model Findings (Refs.)
Ren et al, 2015 Quercetin Variable Cell line (SKOV-3) Inhibited proliferation, induced apoptosis, decreased survival, and inhibited cell cycle progression. (84)
Zhou et al, 2015 Quercetin 50 µM Cell lines (SKOV3, A2780) Upregulated miR-145 expression, activated caspase-3, −8 and −9, and induced apoptosis. (85)
Teekaraman et al, 2019 Quercetin Variable Cell line (PK-1) Decreased Bcl-2, Bcl-xL, increased Bid, Bax, Bad, cyto chrome C, increased caspase-3 and −9, and induced. apoptosis (86)
Yi et al, 2014 Quercetin 2 mg/kg Cell lines (SKOV-3, OVCAR-3, TOV-21G and HOSE) Activated caspase-3 and DR5, downregulated cell survival protein, induced apoptosis, increased TRAIL sensitization, and inhibited tumor growth. (92)
Yamauchi et al, 2017 3,4′,7-O-trimethylquercetin Cell lines (CRL-1978, CRL-11731 and SK-OV-3) Inhibited expression of uPA and MMP-2, and inhibited invasion and metastasis. (88)
Liu et al, 2017; Quercetin 80 mg/kg Cell lines (SKOV-3, OVCAR-8) Induced ER stress, induced apoptosis, suppressed STAT-3 (87,90)
Yang et al, 2015 twice a week and in vivo (nude mice) phosphorylation, downregulated Bcl-2, and induced autophagy.
Wang et al, 2015; Yang et al, 2015 Quercetin aglycone Cell lines (SKOV-3, OVCAR-8) Activated caspase-3, deactivated PARP, induced apop tosis, deactivated MAPK-ERK pathway, downregulated cyclin D1, upregulated p21, and increased sensitivity to cisplatin. (89,90)
Gong et al, 2018 Quercetin 100 µM Cell lines (OV2008 and A2780) Activated p53, induced ER stress, increased p21 and Bax, decreased Bcl-2, induced the aggravation of DNA damage, and induced radio-sensitization. (91)
Yi et al, 2014 Quercetin Variable Cell line (SKOV3) Promoted TRAIL-mediated apoptosis via upregulating the transcription of DR5. (92)

miR, miRNA; Bcl-2, B-cell lymphoma-2; DR5, death receptor 5; TRAIL, tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis inducing ligand; uPA, urokinase plasminogen activator; MMP, matrix metalloproteinase; ER, endoplasmic reticulum; STAT-3, signal transducer and activator of transcription-3; PARP, poly ADP-ribose polymerase; AMPK, AMP-activated protein kinase; ERK, extracellular signal-regulating kinase.

Anti-proliferative, pro-apoptotic and anti-metastatic activity

Quercetin exerts antitumor effects in vitro and in vivo (83). It was reported that quercetin inhibited the expression of survivin protein, and maintained the cell cycle at the G0/G1 stage, thereby inhibiting the proliferation and promoting the apoptosis of ovarian cancer cells (84). In addition, quercetin upregulated the expression of miR-145, and then activated caspase-8, caspase-9 and caspase-3, which induced the apoptosis of ovarian cancer cells (85). In line with this, Teekaraman et al (86) reported that quercetin induced the intrinsic apoptosis in ovarian cancer cells. This study revealed that quercetin decreased the expression of anti-apoptotic proteins, Bcl-2 and Bcl-xl, while increasing the expression of the pro-apoptotic proteins, Bax and Bad, leading to the activation of caspase-9 and caspase-3 (86). In addition, Liu et al (87) reported that quercetin induced apoptosis and protective autophagy through ER stress, and the phospho-STAT-3/Bcl-2 signaling pathway was involved in this pharmacologic action (87). With regards to the role of quercetin in anti-metastasis, one study revealed that 3,4′,7-O-trimethylquercetin inhibited the invasion and metastasis of ovarian cancer cells by decreasing the expression of MMP-2 and urokinase plasminogen activator (uPA) (88). MMP-2 was reported as an early regulator of metastasis, and uPA was reported to promote metastasis in ovarian cancer cells (88). However, the role of quercetin in autophagy in ovarian cancer remains unknown.

Sensitization

Several studies have investigated the combined treatment of quercetin and chemotherapy or radiotherapy in ovarian cancer, due to the sensitization function of quercetin. Wang et al (89), reported that quercetin aglycone induced caspase-3 activation and poly-ADP-ribose polymerase (PARP; a DNA repair enzyme) deactivation, which caused cell apoptosis and promoted the sensitivity of ovarian cancer cells to cisplatin. Furthermore, quercetin inactivated the pro-survival mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK)-ERK signal pathway, downregulated cyclin D1 expression, and upregulated p21 expression, thereby arresting cell cycle progression (89). Yang et al (90) reported that quercetin increased the sensitivity of ovarian cancer cells to cisplatin by inducing ER stress. Furthermore, this study reported that quercetin significantly inhibited STAT-3 phosphorylation, and then downregulated Bcl-2 expression, attenuating the anti-apoptotic effect of Bcl-2 (90). In line with this, Gong et al (91) reported that quercetin enhanced the sensitivity to radiotherapy by the aggravation of DNA damage and ER stress through activating p53, which led to increased p21 and Bax expression, and decreased Bcl-2 expression (91). In addition, Yi et al (92) verified that quercetin increased the sensitivity of SKOV3 cells to tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis inducing ligand (TRAIL)-mediated apoptosis by upregulating the transcription of death receptor 5 (DR5), the receptor of TRAIL (92). A high expression of DR5 was associated with a poor prognosis in patients with ovarian cancer (93).

6. Berberine

Berberine, an isoquinoline alkaloid, is the main bioactive ingredient of Coptis chinensis. Its pharmacological activity includes anti-inflammatory, antioxidant and antitumor effects (94). The antitumor effects and mechanisms of action of berberine in ovarian cancer are listed in Table V.

Table V.

The antitumor effects and mechanisms of action of berberine in ovarian cancer.

First author, year Form of berberine Dose Ovarian cancer model Findings (Refs.)
Marverti et al, 2013 Berberine 5, 10 µM Cell line (OV2008) Interfered the expression of dihydrofolate reductase and thymidylate synthase, and reversed cisplatin resistance. (103)
Liu et al, 2013 Berberine 10 µM Cell lines (SKOV3 and OVCAR3) Inhibited miR-21 expression, increased PDCD4 expression, and enhanced cisplatin sensitivity. (104)
Chen et al, 2015 Berberine 10 µM Cell line (A2780) Increased cisplatin sensitivity via miR-93/PTEN/Akt pathway, and induced G0/G1cell cycle arrest. (106)
Liu et al, 2019 Berberine 100 µM Cell line (OVCAR3) Induced necroptosis and apoptosis via upregulating caspase-3 and −8. (96)
Zhao et al, 2017 Berberine 5 µM Cell line (SKOV3) Suppressed calcium-independent phospholipase A2 and cyclooxygenase-2, decreased PGE2 synthesis, inhibited FAK phosphorylation, and inhibited chemotherapy-induced repopulation. (98)
Hou et al, 2017 Berberine 10 µM Cell lines (A2780, HEY, SKOV3, HO8910, HO8910PM and OVCAR3) Induced oxidative DNA damage, downregulated homologous recombination repair, and increased sensitivity to PARP inhibitors. (107)

PDCD4, programmed cell death-4; miR, miRNA; PTEN, phosphatase and tensin homolog; AKT, protein kinase B; PGE2, prostaglandin E2; FAK, focal adhesion kinase.

Anti-proliferative and pro-apoptotic activity

A previous study revealed that berberine inhibited the proliferation of tumor cells, and induced apoptosis and cell cycle arrest (95). Berberine alone or combined with cisplatin may induce ovarian cancer cells to arrest at the G0/G1 phase and enhance the activity of cell death-associated proteins, including caspase-8 and caspase-3, thereby promoting apoptosis and necrosis (96). Prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) is a bioactive lipid that promotes cell proliferation and tumor growth (97). The chemotherapy drug VP16 promoted the synthesis of PGE2 by increasing the free arachidonic acid in ovarian cancer, which led to the proliferation of surrounding non-apoptotic cells and tumor repopulation. However, berberine inhibited the two key enzymes (calcium-independent phospholipase A2 and cyclooxygenase-2) of PEG2 synthesis in the tumor microenvironment, which resulted in decreased synthesis of PEG2 and inhibited the phosphorylation of FAK, which inhibited the chemotherapy-induced repopulation (98). Furthermore, berberine served an antitumor role in ovarian cancer by inhibiting the expression of the human ether a-go-go-related potassium channel (hERG1). The hERG1 protein was considered to be a key factor in tumorigenesis, and its high expression level in ovarian cancer cells may be downregulated by berberine treatment (99).

Autophagy induction and anti-metastatic activity

To date, the role of berberine in autophagy induction and the inhibition of ovarian cancer metastasis remains unclear. However, with regards to other cancer types, berberine was reported to induce autophagy and exhibited anti-metastatic action. Berberine was demonstrated to inhibit the MAPK/mTOR/p70S6K and Akt pathways in gastric cancer cells, thereby inducing cytostatic autophagy and cancer cell cycle arrest (100). Berberine may inhibit cell migration by downregulating matrix metalloproteinase-3 (MMP-3) in gastric carcinoma cells, thereby exhibiting anti-metastatic activity (101). In addition, berberine inhibited the metastasis of endometrial cells by downregulating the expression of cyclooxygenase-2 (102).

Sensitization

Marverti et al (103) reported the effect of berberine on sensitization in ovarian cancer. Berberine inhibited the growth of cisplatin-resistant ovarian cancer cells through suppressing the expression of dihydrofolate reductase and thymidylate synthase, two enzymes that are essential for DNA biosynthesis and thus important targets for chemotherapy (103). In another study, berberine increased the expression of programmed cell death-4 (PDCD4) by inhibiting the expression of miR-21, a known molecule associated with ovarian cancer cisplatin resistance, thereby increasing apoptosis and enhancing cisplatin sensitivity (104). PDCD4, an important tumor suppressor, was revealed to be associated with the malignant phenotype of ovarian cancer (105). In addition, overexpression of miR-93 was involved in cisplatin resistance in ovarian cancer. Berberine increased the sensitivity of ovarian cancer cells to cisplatin through inhibiting the expression of miR-93, thereby upregulating the expression of its target gene, PTEN (106). Hou et al (107), demonstrated that berberine induced apoptosis through increased DNA damage and suppressed homologous recombination, thereby increasing the sensitivity of ovarian cancer cells to PARP inhibitors (107).

7. (−)-Epigallocatechin-3-gallate

EGCG, a major component of green tea polyphenols, exhibited marked anti-angiogenic, antioxidant, anti-inflammatory and antitumor effects, among other beneficial pharmacological actions. Bioinformatic analysis has demonstrated that EGCG may affect a variety of signaling proteins in the cell cycle, including Jun, NF-κB, Bcl-2 and MMPs, and also inhibits DNA replication (108). The antitumor effect and mechanisms of action of EGCG in ovarian cancer are listed in Table VI.

Table VI.

The antitumor effects and mechanisms of action of EGCG in ovarian cancer.

First author, year Form of EGCG Dose Ovarian cancer model Findings (Refs.)
Huh et al, 2004 EGCG Variable Cell lines (SKOV-3, OVCAR-3 and PA-1) Induced G1 or G1/S cell cycle arrest, and promoted apoptosis. (109)
Chen et al, 2013 EGCG Cell line (A2780) Induced G2/M cell cycle arrest and apoptosis, and increased cisplatin sensitivity. (110)
Yan et al, 2012 EGCG 40 µg/ml Cell line (SKOV3) Downregulated aquaporin 5 and NF-κB, induced apoptosis, and inhibited proliferation. (111)
Tian et al, 2019 EGCG Variable Cell line (OVCAR3) Inhibited c-Myb, downregulated NF-κB and STAT-3, activated p38 MAPK, decreased MMP-2, and inhibited proliferation and migration. (113)
Wang et al, 2015; Wang et al, 2015 EGCG 20 mg/kg Cell lines (OVCAR3 and SKOV3) Induced CTR1 expression, and increased cisplatin sensitivity. (115,116)
Chen et al, 2013 EGCG and sulforaphane 20, 10 µM Cell line (SKOV3) Downregulated hTERT and Bcl-2, promoted DNA damage response, induced apoptosis, and arrested cell cycle. (117)

EGCG, (−)-Epigallocatechin-3-gallate; NF-κB, nuclear transcription factor-kappa B; STAT-3, signal transducer and activator of transcription-3; MAPK, mitogen-activated protein kinase; MMP, matrix metalloproteinase; CTR1, copper transporter 1; hTERT, human telomerase reverse transcriptase; Bcl-2, B-cell lymphoma-2.

Effects on proliferation, apoptosis and autophagy

EGCG promoted the apoptosis of ovarian cancer cells by upregulating the levels of tumor suppressor gene, p53, and cell cycle inhibitor, p21WAF1. As a result, EGCG arrested ovarian cancer cells in the G1/S phase (109). Furthermore, EGCG induced the expression of p21 in cells, thereby promoting apoptosis and arresting these cells in the G2/M phase (110). EGCG downregulated the expression of aquaporin 5 and then downregulated NF-κB, which subsequently induced apoptosis, and inhibited the proliferation and metastasis of SKOV3 cells (111). However, the role of berberine in autophagy in ovarian cancer remains unclear. In hepatocellular carcinoma, EGCG directly interacted with LC3-I protein and promoted the synthesis of LC3-II through a series of reactions, thereby increasing the autophagy activity of HepG2 cells (112).

Anti-metastatic activity

Overexpression of c-Myb in ovarian cancer tissues often leads to a poor prognosis, since c-Myb activates NF-κB and the STAT-3 signaling pathway, which promotes tumor growth, invasion and chemotherapy resistance. Tian et al (113) evaluated numerous natural products and reported that EGCG significantly inhibited migration by downregulating the expression of c-Myb in ovarian cancer cells (113). Furthermore, EGCC inhibited the metastasis of ovarian cancer cells by inhibiting the phosphorylation of c-Jun and NF-κB, resulting in the decreased expression of VEGF and the secretion of MMP-2 and MMP-9. Consequently, the adhesion of cancer cells to extracellular matrix proteins was weakened, and the supply of nutrients required for cell proliferation was reduced (108).

Sensitization

Previous studies have revealed the effects of EGCG combined with conventional chemotherapeutic drugs in ovarian cancer. Chan et al (114) reported that EGCG increased the cytotoxicity of cisplatin and enhanced its efficacy by 3–6 fold. Specifically, EGCG increased the oxidative stress of cisplatin-induced ovarian cancer cells through the generation of more reactive oxygen species to induce cell apoptosis (114). Copper transporter 1 (CTR1) of tumor cells may increase the uptake of cisplatin. However, cisplatin treatment rapidly promotes CTR1 degradation, and decreased CTR1 is associated with cisplatin resistance. Wang et al (115,116) reported that EGCG maintained the concentration of CTR1 in ovarian cancer cells, thereby increasing the cisplatin sensitivity (115,116). Furthermore, in paclitaxel-resistant ovarian cancer cells, the combination of EGCG and sulforaphane treatment induced apoptosis and cell cycle arrest by damaging DNA and decreasing the expression of Bcl-2 and human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT), the major catalytic subunit of telomerase, which was involved in cancer cell survival. The study suggested that EGCG may overcome paclitaxel resistance (117).

8. Conclusions and perspectives

Although conventional chemotherapy is known to produce positive initial effects in the majority of patients with ovarian cancer, cumulative toxicities and drug resistance often lead to the failure of conventional chemotherapy. Previous studies have revealed that numerous natural products are less toxic to healthy cells and inhibit tumor growth and progression to prevent malignant tumors. The present review summarizes the antitumor effects of natural products, primarily their role in the stimulation of autophagy, induction of apoptosis and cell cycle arrest, and the inhibition of cell proliferation and metastasis. Therefore, the administration of natural products (alone or in combination with other drugs) may be considered a useful treatment strategy in patients with ovarian cancer.

However, the mechanisms of action of natural products as therapeutic agents for ovarian cancer are relatively complex. The majority of previous studies have focused only on activity at the cellular level, and only few animal models have been developed. Further research is warranted to investigate the potential therapeutic efficacy of natural products in experimental animal models and randomized clinical trials. Accurate knowledge of the pharmacokinetic profile of each natural product is essential to evaluate the in vivo effects of the natural product.

The following issues require greater attention in future studies: i) The exact mechanisms that contribute toward the activity of natural products in ovarian cancer require further detailed investigation; ii) experimental animal model studies and randomized clinical trials should be performed to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of natural products in ovarian cancer; iii) the effects of natural products combined with conventional chemotherapy, target therapy or immunotherapy need to be determined; and iv) novel methods should be developed to isolate and identify bioactive compounds from a variety of plants deemed suitable as anticancer agents.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Glossary

Abbreviations

EGCG

(−)-Epigallocatechin-3-gallate

PI3K

phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase

Akt

protein kinase B

Bcl-2

B-cell lymphoma-2

STAT-3

signal transducer and activator of transcription-3

IL

interleukin

SERCA

sarcoplasmic/endoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ transporting ATPase

miR

miRNA

LC3

microtubule-associated protein 1 light chain 3

mTOR

mammalian target of rapamycin

ER

endoplasmic reticulum

EMT

epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition

MMPs

matrix metalloproteinases

FAK

focal adhesion kinase

uPA

urokinase plasminogen activator

VCAM-1

vascular cell adhesion molecule-1

MDR-1

multidrug resistance protein 1

PTEN

phosphatase and tensin homolog

GSK3β

glycogen synthase kinase-3β

VEGF

vascular endothelial growth factor

ERK

extracellular signal-regulating kinase

ARHI

aplasia Ras homologue member I

AMPK

AMP-activated protein kinase

HIF-1α

hypoxia-inducible factor-1α

MAPK

mitogen-activated protein kinase

TRAIL

tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis inducing ligand

PGE2

prostaglandin E2

hERG1

human ether a-go-go related potassium channel

PDCD4

programmed cell death-4

CTR1

copper transporter 1

hTERT

human telomerase reverse transcriptase

PARP

poly ADP-ribose polymerase

Funding

The present study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 81602303), the College Students' Innovative and Entrepreneurial Training Program of Hubei Province (grant no. 2019378), and the National College Students' Innovative and Entrepreneurial Training Program (grant no. 201910489014).

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Authors' contributions

YBY conceived the topic and drafted the manuscript. YX revised the manuscript, and ensured that problems related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work were appropriately investigated and resolved. QT and JFZ collected the literature and revised the manuscript critically for important intellectual content. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Patient consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

  • 1.Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68:394–424. doi: 10.3322/caac.21492. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Duska LR, Kohn EC. The new classifications of ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal cancer and their clinical implications. Ann Oncol. 2017;28(Suppl_8):viii8–viii12. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdx445. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Weidle UH, Birzele F, Kollmorgen G, Rueger R. Mechanisms and targets involved in dissemination of ovarian cancer. Cancer Genomics Proteomics. 2016;13:407–423. doi: 10.21873/cgp.20004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Tan DS, Agarwal R, Kaye SB. Mechanisms of transcoelomic metastasis in ovarian cancer. Lancet Oncol. 2006;7:925–934. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(06)70939-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Cho KR, Shih Ie M. Ovarian cancer. Annu Rev Pathol. 2009;4:287–313. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pathol.4.110807.092246. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Piccart MJ, Lamb H, Vermorken JB. Current and future potential roles of the platinum drugs in the treatment of ovarian cancer. Ann Oncol. 2001;12:1195–1203. doi: 10.1023/A:1012259625746. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Zhang SF, Wang XY, Fu ZQ, Peng QH, Zhang JY, Ye F, Fu YF, Zhou CY, Lu WG, Cheng XD, et al. TXNDC17 promotes paclitaxel resistance via inducing autophagy in ovarian cancer. Autophagy. 2015;11:225–238. doi: 10.1080/15548627.2014.998931. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Yang MF, Lou YL, Liu SS, Wang SS, Yin CH, Cheng XH, Huang OP. Capn4 overexpression indicates poor prognosis of ovarian cancer patients. J Cancer. 2018;9:304–309. doi: 10.7150/jca.22004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.De A, De A, Papasian C, Hentges S, Banerjee S, Haque I, Banerjee SK. Emblica officinalis extract induces autophagy and inhibits human ovarian cancer cell proliferation, angiogenesis, growth of mouse xenograft tumors. PLoS One. 2013;8:e72748. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0072748. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Farzaei MH, Bahramsoltani R, Rahimi R. Phytochemicals as adjunctive with conventional anticancer therapies. Curr Pharm Des. 2016;22:4201–4218. doi: 10.2174/1381612822666160601100823. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Prasad S, Aggarwal BB. Turmeric, the Golden Spice: From traditional medicine to modern medicine. In: Benzie IFF, Wachtel-Galor S, editors. In Herbal Medicine: Biomolecular and Clinical Aspects. Boca Raton (FL): 2011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Zhou H, Beevers CS, Huang S. The targets of curcumin. Curr Drug Targets. 2011;12:332–347. doi: 10.2174/138945011794815356. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Dobbin ZC, Landen CN. The importance of the PI3K/AKT/MTOR pathway in the progression of ovarian cancer. Int J Mol Sci. 2013;14:8213–8227. doi: 10.3390/ijms14048213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Salakou S, Kardamakis D, Tsamandas AC, Zolota V, Apostolakis E, Tzelepi V, Papathanasopoulos P, Bonikos DS, Papapetropoulos T, Petsas T, et al. Increased Bax/Bcl-2 ratio up-regulates caspase-3 and increases apoptosis in the thymus of patients with myasthenia gravis. In Vivo. 2007;21:123–132. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Yu Z, Wan Y, Liu Y, Yang J, Li L, Zhang W. Curcumin induced apoptosis via PI3K/Akt-signalling pathways in SKOV3 cells. Pharma Biol. 2016;54:2026–2032. doi: 10.3109/13880209.2016.1139601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Watson JL, Greenshields A, Hill R, Hilchie A, Lee PW, Giacomantonio CA, Hoskin DW. Curcumin-induced apoptosis in ovarian carcinoma cells is p53-independent and involves p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase activation and downregulation of Bcl-2 and survivin expression and Akt signaling. Mol Carcinog. 2010;49:13–24. doi: 10.1002/mc.20571. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Bowman T, Garcia R, Turkson J, Jove R. STATs in oncogenesis. Oncogene. 2000;19:2474–2488. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1203527. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Saydmohammed M, Joseph D, Syed V. Curcumin suppresses constitutive activation of STAT-3 by up-regulating protein inhibitor of activated STAT-3 (PIAS-3) in ovarian and endometrial cancer cells. J Cell Biochem. 2010;110:447–456. doi: 10.1002/jcb.22558. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Seo JH, Jeong KJ, Oh WJ, Sul HJ, Sohn JS, Kim YK, Cho DY, Kang JK, Park CG, Lee HY. Lysophosphatidic acid induces STAT3 phosphorylation and ovarian cancer cell motility: Their inhibition by curcumin. Cancer Lett. 2010;288:50–56. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2009.06.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Capiod T. Cell proliferation, calcium influx and calcium channels. Biochimie. 2011;93:2075–2079. doi: 10.1016/j.biochi.2011.07.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Seo JA, Kim B, Dhanasekaran DN, Tsang BK, Song YS. Curcumin induces apoptosis by inhibiting Sarco/endoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ ATPase activity in ovarian cancer cells. Cancer Lett. 2016;371:30–37. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2015.11.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Kinose Y, Sawada K, Nakamura K, Kimura T. The role of microRNAs in ovarian cancer. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:249393. doi: 10.1155/2014/249393. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Du Z, Sha X. Demethoxycurcumin inhibited human epithelia ovarian cancer cells' growth via up-regulating miR-551a. Tumour Biol. 2017;39:1010428317694302. doi: 10.1177/1010428317694302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Meunier L, Puiffe ML, Le Page C, Filali-Mouhim A, Chevrette M, Tonin PN, Provencher DM, Mes-Masson AM. Effect of ovarian cancer ascites on cell migration and gene expression in an epithelial ovarian cancer in vitro model. Transl Oncol. 2010;3:230–238. doi: 10.1593/tlo.10103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Zhao J, Pan Y, Li X, Zhang X, Xue Y, Wang T, Zhao S, Hou Y. Dihydroartemisinin and curcumin synergistically induce apoptosis in SKOV3 cells via upregulation of MiR-124 targeting Midkine. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2017;43:589–601. doi: 10.1159/000480531. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Takei Y, Kadomatsu K, Matsuo S, Itoh H, Nakazawa K, Kubota S, Muramatsu T. Antisense oligodeoxynucleotide targeted to Midkine, a heparin-binding growth factor, suppresses tumorigenicity of mouse rectal carcinoma cells. Cancer Res. 2001;61:8486–8491. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Zhao SF, Zhang X, Zhang XJ, Shi XQ, Yu ZJ, Kan QC. Induction of microRNA-9 mediates cytotoxicity of curcumin against SKOV3 ovarian cancer cells. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2014;15:3363–3368. doi: 10.7314/APJCP.2014.15.8.3363. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Zhan L, Zhang Y, Wang W, Song E, Fan Y, Li J, Wei B. Autophagy as an emerging therapy target for ovarian carcinoma. Oncotarget. 2016;7:83476–83487. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.13080. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Boutouja F, Stiehm CM, Platta HW. mTOR: A cellular regulator interface in health and disease. Cells. 2019;8:18. doi: 10.3390/cells8010018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Liu LD, Pang YX, Zhao XR, Li R, Jin CJ, Xue J, Dong RY, Liu PS. Curcumin induces apoptotic cell death and protective autophagy by inhibiting AKT/mTOR/p70S6K pathway in human ovarian cancer cells. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2019;299:1627–1639. doi: 10.1007/s00404-019-05058-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Qu W, Xiao J, Zhang H, Chen Q, Wang Z, Shi H, Gong L, Chen J, Liu Y, Cao R, Lv J. B19, a novel monocarbonyl analogue of curcumin, induces human ovarian cancer cell apoptosis via activation of endoplasmic reticulum stress and the autophagy signaling pathway. Int J Biol Sci. 2013;9:766–777. doi: 10.7150/ijbs.5711. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Kim I, Xu W, Reed JC. Cell death and endoplasmic reticulum stress: Disease relevance and therapeutic opportunities. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2008;7:1013–1030. doi: 10.1038/nrd2755. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Al-Alem L, Curry TE., Jr Ovarian cancer: Involvement of the matrix metalloproteinases. Reproduction. 2015;150:R55–R64. doi: 10.1530/REP-14-0546. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Choe SR, Kim YN, Park CG, Cho KH, Cho DY, Lee HY. RCP induces FAK phosphorylation and ovarian cancer cell invasion with inhibition by curcumin. Exp Mol Med. 2018;50:52. doi: 10.1038/s12276-018-0078-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Lv J, Shao Q, Wang H, Shi H, Wang T, Gao W, Song B, Zheng G, Kong B, Qu X. Effects and mechanisms of curcumin and basil polysaccharide on the invasion of SKOV3 cells and dendritic cells. Mol Med Rep. 2013;8:1580–1586. doi: 10.3892/mmr.2013.1695. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Pei H, Yang Y, Cui L, Yang J, Li X, Yang Y, Duan H. Bisdemethoxycurcumin inhibits ovarian cancer via reducing oxidative stress mediated MMPs expressions. Sci Rep. 2016;6:28773. doi: 10.1038/srep28773. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Slack-Davis JK, Atkins KA, Harrer C, Hershey ED, Conaway M. Vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 is a regulator of ovarian cancer peritoneal metastasis. Cancer Res. 2009;69:1469–1476. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-2678. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Cornelison R, Llaneza DC, Landen CN. Emerging therapeutics to overcome chemoresistance in epithelial ovarian cancer: A Mini-review. Int J Mol Sci. 2017;18:2171. doi: 10.3390/ijms18102171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Yallapu MM, Maher DM, Sundram V, Bell MC, Jaggi M, Chauhan SC. Curcumin induces chemo/radio-sensitization in ovarian cancer cells and curcumin nanoparticles inhibit ovarian cancer cell growth. J Ovarian Res. 2010;3:11. doi: 10.1186/1757-2215-3-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Zhao MD, Li JQ, Chen FY, Dong W, Wen LJ, Fei WD, Zhang X, Yang PL, Zhang XM, Zheng CH. Co-Delivery of Curcumin and paclitaxel by ‘Core-Shell’ targeting Amphiphilic copolymer to reverse resistance in the treatment of ovarian cancer. Int J Nanomedicine. 2019;14:9453–9467. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S224579. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Zhang J, Liu J, Xu X, Li L. Curcumin suppresses cisplatin resistance development partly via modulating extracellular vesicle-mediated transfer of MEG3 and miR-214 in ovarian cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2017;79:479–487. doi: 10.1007/s00280-017-3238-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Yang H, Kong W, He L, Zhao JJ, O'Donnell JD, Wang J, Wenham RM, Coppola D, Kruk PA, Nicosia SV, Cheng JQ. MicroRNA expression profiling in human ovarian cancer: miR-214 induces cell survival and cisplatin resistance by targeting PTEN. Cancer Res. 2008;68:425–433. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-6426. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Daleprane JB, Abdalla DS. Emerging roles of propolis: Antioxidant, cardioprotective, and antiangiogenic actions. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2013;2013:175135. doi: 10.1155/2013/175135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Baur JA, Sinclair DA. Therapeutic potential of resveratrol: The in vivo evidence. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2006;5:493–506. doi: 10.1038/nrd2060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Liberti MV, Locasale JW. The Warburg effect: How does it benefit cancer cells? Trends Biochem Sci. 2016;41:211–218. doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2016.01.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Vander Heiden MG, Cantley LC, Thompson CB. Understanding the Warburg effect: The metabolic requirements of cell proliferation. Science. 2009;324:1029–1033. doi: 10.1126/science.1160809. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Pavlova NN, Thompson CB. The Emerging hallmarks of cancer metabolism. Cell Metab. 2016;23:27–47. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2015.12.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Tan L, Wang W, He G, Kuick RD, Gossner G, Kueck AS, Wahl H, Opipari AW, Liu JR. Resveratrol inhibits ovarian tumor growth in an in vivo mouse model. Cancer. 2016;122:722–729. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29793. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Gwak H, Kim S, Dhanasekaran DN, Song YS. Resveratrol triggers ER stress-mediated apoptosis by disrupting N-linked glycosylation of proteins in ovarian cancer cells. Cancer Lett. 2016;371:347–353. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2015.11.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Majewska E, Szeliga M. AKT/GSK3β signaling in Glioblastoma. Neurochem Res. 2017;42:918–924. doi: 10.1007/s11064-016-2044-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Tino AB, Chitcholtan K, Sykes PH, Garrill A. Resveratrol and acetyl-resveratrol modulate activity of VEGF and IL-8 in ovarian cancer cell aggregates via attenuation of the NF-κB protein. J Ovarian Res. 2016;9:84. doi: 10.1186/s13048-016-0293-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Vergara D, Simeone P, Toraldo D, Del Boccio P, Vergaro V, Leporatti S, Pieragostino D, Tinelli A, De Domenico S, Alberti S, et al. Resveratrol downregulates Akt/GSK and ERK signalling pathways in OVCAR-3 ovarian cancer cells. Mol Biosyst. 2012;8:1078–1087. doi: 10.1039/c2mb05486h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Lang F, Qin Z, Li F, Zhang H, Fang Z, Hao E. Apoptotic cell death induced by resveratrol is partially mediated by the autophagy pathway in human ovarian cancer cells. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0129196. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0129196. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Kroemer G, Marino G, Levine B. Autophagy and the integrated stress response. Mol Cell. 2010;40:280–293. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2010.09.023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Kang R, Zeh HJ, Lotze MT, Tang D. The Beclin 1 network regulates autophagy and apoptosis. Cell Death Differ. 2011;18:571–580. doi: 10.1038/cdd.2010.191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Zhong LX, Zhang Y, Wu ML, Liu YN, Zhang P, Chen XY, Kong QY, Liu J, Li H. Resveratrol and STAT inhibitor enhance autophagy in ovarian cancer cells. Cell Death Discov. 2016;2:15071. doi: 10.1038/cddiscovery.2015.71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Lu Z, Bast RC., Jr The tumor suppressor gene ARHI (DIRAS3) inhibits ovarian cancer cell migration through multiple mechanisms. Cell Adh Migr. 2013;7:232–236. doi: 10.4161/cam.23648. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Zhong LX, Nie JH, Liu J, Lin LZ. Correlation of ARHI upregulation with growth suppression and STAT3 inactivation in resveratrol-treated ovarian cancer cells. Cancer Biomark. 2018;21:787–795. doi: 10.3233/CBM-181354. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Ferraresi A, Phadngam S, Morani F, Galetto A, Alabiso O, Chiorino G, Isidoro C. Resveratrol inhibits IL-6-induced ovarian cancer cell migration through epigenetic up-regulation of autophagy. Mol Carcinog. 2017;56:1164–1181. doi: 10.1002/mc.22582. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Ferraresi A, Titone R, Follo C, Castiglioni A, Chiorino G, Dhanasekaran DN, Isidoro C. The protein restriction mimetic Resveratrol is an autophagy inducer stronger than amino acid starvation in ovarian cancer cells. Mol Carcinog. 2017;56:2681–2691. doi: 10.1002/mc.22711. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Mikula-Pietrasik J, Sosinska P, Ksiazek K. Resveratrol inhibits ovarian cancer cell adhesion to peritoneal mesothelium in vitro by modulating the production of alpha5β1 integrins and hyaluronic acid. Gynecol Oncol. 2014;134:624–630. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.06.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Park SY, Jeong KJ, Lee J, Yoon DS, Choi WS, Kim YK, Han JW, Kim YM, Kim BK, Lee HY. Hypoxia enhances LPA-induced HIF-1alpha and VEGF expression: Their inhibition by resveratrol. Cancer Lett. 2007;258:63–69. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2007.08.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Sopo M, Anttila M, Hamalainen K, Kivela A, Yla-Herttuala S, Kosma VM, Keski-Nisula L, Sallinen H. Expression profiles of VEGF-A, VEGF-D and VEGFR1 are higher in distant metastases than in matched primary high grade epithelial ovarian cancer. BMC Cancer. 2019;19:584. doi: 10.1186/s12885-019-5757-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Wang H, Peng Y, Wang J, Gu A, Li Q, Mao D, Guo L. Effect of autophagy on the resveratrol-induced apoptosis of ovarian cancer SKOV3 cells. J Cell Biochem. 2018 Nov 18; doi: 10.1002/jcb.28053. (Epub ahead of print) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Nessa MU, Beale P, Chan C, Yu JQ, Huq F. Combinations of resveratrol, cisplatin and oxaliplatin applied to human ovarian cancer cells. Anticancer Res. 2012;32:53–59. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Engelke LH, Hamacher A, Proksch P, Kassack MU. Ellagic acid and resveratrol prevent the development of cisplatin resistance in the epithelial ovarian cancer cell line A2780. J Cancer. 2016;7:353–363. doi: 10.7150/jca.13754. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Nag SA, Qin JJ, Wang W, Wang MH, Wang H, Zhang R. Ginsenosides as anticancer agents: In vitro and in vivo activities, Structure-activity relationships, and molecular mechanisms of action. Front Pharmacol. 2012;3:25. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2012.00025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Ahuja A, Kim JH, Kim JH, Yi YS, Cho JY. Functional role of ginseng-derived compounds in cancer. J Ginseng Res. 2018;42:248–254. doi: 10.1016/j.jgr.2017.04.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Li J, Liu T, Zhao L, Chen W, Hou H, Ye Z, Li X. Ginsenoside 20(S)Rg3 inhibits the Warburg effect through STAT3 pathways in ovarian cancer cells. Int J Oncol. 2015;46:775–781. doi: 10.3892/ijo.2014.2767. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Zheng X, Zhou Y, Chen W, Chen L, Lu J, He F, Li X, Zhao L. Ginsenoside 20(S)-Rg3 prevents PKM2-targeting miR-324-5p from H19 sponging to antagonize the Warburg effect in ovarian cancer cells. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2018;51:1340–1353. doi: 10.1159/000495552. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Lu J, Wang L, Chen W, Wang Y, Zhen S, Chen H, Cheng J, Zhou Y, Li X, Zhao L. miR-603 targeted hexokinase-2 to inhibit the malignancy of ovarian cancer cells. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2019;661:1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.abb.2018.10.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Bian S, Zhao Y, Li F, Lu S, Wang S, Bai X, Liu M, Zhao D, Wang J, Guo D. 20(S)-Ginsenoside Rg3 promotes HeLa cell apoptosis by regulating autophagy. Molecules. 2019;24:3655. doi: 10.3390/molecules24203655. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Zheng X, Chen W, Hou H, Li J, Li H, Sun X, Zhao L, Li X. Ginsenoside 20(S)-Rg3 induced autophagy to inhibit migration and invasion of ovarian cancer. Biomed Pharmacother. 2017;85:620–626. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2016.11.072. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Li J, Xi W, Li X, Sun H, Li Y. Advances in inhibition of protein-protein interactions targeting hypoxia-inducible factor-1 for cancer therapy. Bioorg Med Chem. 2019;27:1145–1158. doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2019.01.042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Liu T, Zhao L, Zhang Y, Chen W, Liu D, Hou H, Ding L, Li X. Ginsenoside 20(S)-Rg3 targets HIF-1α to block hypoxia-induced epithelial-mesenchymal transition in ovarian cancer cells. PLoS One. 2014;9:e103887. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0103887. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Liu T, Zhao L, Hou H, Ding L, Chen W, Li X. Ginsenoside 20(S)-Rg3 suppresses ovarian cancer migration via hypoxia-inducible factor 1 alpha and nuclear factor-kappa B signals. Tumour Biol. 2017;39:1010428317692225. doi: 10.1177/1010428317692225. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Liu D, Liu T, Teng Y, Chen W, Zhao L, Li X. Ginsenoside Rb1 inhibits hypoxia-induced epithelial-mesenchymal transition in ovarian cancer cells by regulating microRNA-25. Exp Ther Med. 2017;14:2895–2902. doi: 10.3892/etm.2017.4889. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Lengyel E. Ovarian cancer development and metastasis. Am J Pathol. 2010;177:1053–1064. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2010.100105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Yun UJ, Lee JH, Koo KH, Ye SK, Kim SY, Lee CH, Kim YN. Lipid raft modulation by Rp1 reverses multidrug resistance via inactivating MDR-1 and Src inhibition. Biochem Pharmacol. 2013;85:1441–1453. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2013.02.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Deng S, Wong CKC, Lai HC, Wong AST. Ginsenoside-Rb1 targets chemotherapy-resistant ovarian cancer stem cells via simultaneous inhibition of Wnt/β-catenin signaling and epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition. Oncotarget. 2017;8:25897–25914. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.13071. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Metodiewa D, Jaiswal AK, Cenas N, Dickancaite E, Segura-Aguilar J. Quercetin may act as a cytotoxic prooxidant after its metabolic activation to semiquinone and quinoidal product. Free Radic Biol Med. 1999;26:107–116. doi: 10.1016/S0891-5849(98)00167-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Vargas AJ, Burd R. Hormesis and synergy: Pathways and mechanisms of quercetin in cancer prevention and management. Nutr Rev. 2010;68:418–428. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-4887.2010.00301.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Hashemzaei M, Delarami Far A, Yari A, Heravi RE, Tabrizian K, Taghdisi SM, Sadegh SE, Tsarouhas K, Kouretas D, Tzanakakis G, et al. Anticancer and apoptosisinducing effects of quercetin in vitro and in vivo. Oncol Rep. 2017;38:819–828. doi: 10.3892/or.2017.5766. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Ren MX, Deng XH, Ai F, Yuan GY, Song HY. Effect of quercetin on the proliferation of the human ovarian cancer cell line SKOV-3 in vitro. Exp Ther Med. 2015;10:579–583. doi: 10.3892/etm.2015.2536. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Zhou J, Gong J, Ding C, Chen G. Quercetin induces the apoptosis of human ovarian carcinoma cells by upregulating the expression of microRNA-145. Mol Med Rep. 2015;12:3127–3131. doi: 10.3892/mmr.2015.3679. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Teekaraman D, Elayapillai SP, Viswanathan MP, Jagadeesan A. Quercetin inhibits human metastatic ovarian cancer cell growth and modulates components of the intrinsic apoptotic pathway in PA-1cell line. Chem Biol Interact. 2019;300:91–100. doi: 10.1016/j.cbi.2019.01.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Liu Y, Gong W, Yang ZY, Zhou XS, Gong C, Zhang TR, Wei X, Ma D, Ye F, Gao QL. Quercetin induces protective autophagy and apoptosis through ER stress via the p-STAT3/Bcl-2 axis in ovarian cancer. Apoptosis. 2017;22:544–557. doi: 10.1007/s10495-016-1334-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Yamauchi K, Afroze SH, Mitsunaga T, McCormick TC, Kuehl TJ, Zawieja DC, Uddin MN. 3,4′,7-O-trimethylquercetin inhibits invasion and migration of ovarian cancer cells. Anticancer Res. 2017;37:2823–2829. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.11633. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Wang Y, Han A, Chen E, Singh RK, Chichester CO, Moore RG, Singh AP, Vorsa N. The cranberry flavonoids PAC DP-9 and quercetin aglycone induce cytotoxicity and cell cycle arrest and increase cisplatin sensitivity in ovarian cancer cells. Int J Oncol. 2015;46:1924–1934. doi: 10.3892/ijo.2015.2931. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Yang Z, Liu Y, Liao J, Gong C, Sun C, Zhou X, Wei X, Zhang T, Gao Q, Ma D, Chen G. Quercetin induces endoplasmic reticulum stress to enhance cDDP cytotoxicity in ovarian cancer: Involvement of STAT3 signaling. FEBS J. 2015;282:1111–1125. doi: 10.1111/febs.13206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Gong C, Yang Z, Zhang L, Wang Y, Gong W, Liu Y. Quercetin suppresses DNA double-strand break repair and enhances the radiosensitivity of human ovarian cancer cells via p53-dependent endoplasmic reticulum stress pathway. Onco Targets Ther. 2018;11:17–27. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S147316. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Yi L, Zongyuan Y, Cheng G, Lingyun Z, Guilian Y, Wei G. Quercetin enhances apoptotic effect of tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) in ovarian cancer cells through reactive oxygen species (ROS) mediated CCAAT enhancer-binding protein homologous protein (CHOP)-death receptor 5 pathway. Cancer Sci. 2014;105:520–527. doi: 10.1111/cas.12395. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Ouellet V, Le Page C, Madore J, Guyot MC, Barres V, Lussier C, Tonin PN, Provencher DM, Mes-Masson AM. An apoptotic molecular network identified by microarray: On the TRAIL to new insights in epithelial ovarian cancer. Cancer. 2007;110:297–308. doi: 10.1002/cncr.22812. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Tillhon M, Guaman Ortiz LM, Lombardi P, Scovassi AI. Berberine: New perspectives for old remedies. Biochem Pharmacol. 2012;84:1260–1267. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2012.07.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Sun Y, Xun K, Wang Y, Chen X. A systematic review of the anticancer properties of berberine, a natural product from Chinese herbs. Anticancer Drugs. 2009;20:757–769. doi: 10.1097/CAD.0b013e328330d95b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Liu L, Fan J, Ai G, Liu J, Luo N, Li C, Cheng Z. Berberine in combination with cisplatin induces necroptosis and apoptosis in ovarian cancer cells. Biol Res. 2019;52:37. doi: 10.1186/s40659-019-0243-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Nakanishi M, Rosenberg DW. Multifaceted roles of PGE2 in inflammation and cancer. Semin Immunopathol. 2013;35:123–137. doi: 10.1007/s00281-012-0342-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Zhao Y, Cui L, Pan Y, Shao D, Zheng X, Zhang F, Zhang H, He K, Chen L. Berberine inhibits the chemotherapy-induced repopulation by suppressing the arachidonic acid metabolic pathway and phosphorylation of FAK in ovarian cancer. Cell Prolif. 2017;50:e12393. doi: 10.1111/cpr.12393. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Zhi D, Zhou K, Yu D, Fan X, Zhang J, Li X, Dong M. hERG1 is involved in the pathophysiological process and inhibited by berberine in SKOV3 cells. Oncol Lett. 2019;17:5653–5661. doi: 10.3892/ol.2019.10263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Zhang Q, Wang X, Cao S, Sun Y, He X, Jiang B, Yu Y, Duan J, Qiu F, Kang N. Berberine represses human gastric cancer cell growth in vitro and in vivo by inducing cytostatic autophagy via inhibition of MAPK/mTOR/p70S6K and Akt signaling pathways. Biomed Pharmacother. 2020;128:110245. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2020.110245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Hu Q, Li L, Zou X, Xu L, Yi P. Berberine attenuated proliferation, invasion and migration by targeting the AMPK/HNF4α/WNT5A pathway in gastric carcinoma. Front Pharmacol. 2018;9:1150. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2018.01150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Wang Y, Zhang S. Berberine suppresses growth and metastasis of endometrial cancer cells via miR-101/COX-2. Biomed Pharmacother. 2018;103:1287–1293. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2018.04.161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Marverti G, Ligabue A, Lombardi P, Ferrari S, Monti MG, Frassineti C, Costi MP. Modulation of the expression of folate cycle enzymes and polyamine metabolism by berberine in cisplatin-sensitive and -resistant human ovarian cancer cells. Int J Oncol. 2013;43:1269–1280. doi: 10.3892/ijo.2013.2045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Liu S, Fang Y, Shen H, Xu W, Li H. Berberine sensitizes ovarian cancer cells to cisplatin through miR-21/PDCD4 axis. Acta Biochim Biophys Sin (Shanghai) 2013;45:756–762. doi: 10.1093/abbs/gmt075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Wei ZT, Zhang X, Wang XY, Gao F, Zhou CJ, Zhu FL, Wang Q, Gao Q, Ma CH, Sun WS, et al. PDCD4 inhibits the malignant phenotype of ovarian cancer cells. Cancer Sci. 2009;100:1408–1413. doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2009.01210.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Chen Q, Qin R, Fang Y, Li H. Berberine sensitizes human ovarian cancer cells to cisplatin through miR-93/PTEN/Akt signaling pathway. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2015;36:956–965. doi: 10.1159/000430270. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Hou D, Xu G, Zhang C, Li B, Qin J, Hao X, Liu Q, Zhang X, Liu J, Wei J, et al. Berberine induces oxidative DNA damage and impairs homologous recombination repair in ovarian cancer cells to confer increased sensitivity to PARP inhibition. Cell Death Dis. 2017;8:e3070. doi: 10.1038/cddis.2017.471. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Xinqiang S, Mu Z, Lei C, Mun LY. Bioinformatics analysis on molecular mechanism of green tea compound epigallocatechin-3-gallate against ovarian cancer. Clin Transl Sci. 2017;10:302–307. doi: 10.1111/cts.12470. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Huh SW, Bae SM, Kim YW, Lee JM, Namkoong SE, Lee IP, Kim SH, Kim CK, Ahn WS. Anticancer effects of (−)-epigallocatechin-3-gallate on ovarian carcinoma cell lines. Gynecol Oncol. 2004;94:760–768. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2004.05.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Chen H, Landen CN, Li Y, Alvarez RD, Tollefsbol TO. Enhancement of Cisplatin-mediated apoptosis in ovarian cancer cells through potentiating G2/M Arrest and p21 upregulation by combinatorial epigallocatechin gallate and sulforaphane. J Oncol. 2013;2013:872957. doi: 10.1155/2013/872957. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Yan C, Yang J, Shen L, Chen X. Inhibitory effect of Epigallocatechin gallate on ovarian cancer cell proliferation associated with aquaporin 5 expression. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2012;285:459–467. doi: 10.1007/s00404-011-1942-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Zhao L, Liu S, Xu J, Li W, Duan G, Wang H, Yang H, Yang Z, Zhou R. A new molecular mechanism underlying the EGCG-mediated autophagic modulation of AFP in HepG2 cells. Cell Death Dis. 2017;8:e3160. doi: 10.1038/cddis.2017.563. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Tian M, Tian D, Qiao X, Li J, Zhang L. Modulation of Myb-induced NF-kB-STAT3 signaling and resulting cisplatin resistance in ovarian cancer by dietary factors. J Cell Physiol. 2019;234:21126–21134. doi: 10.1002/jcp.28715. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Chan MM, Soprano KJ, Weinstein K, Fong D. Epigallocatechin-3-gallate delivers hydrogen peroxide to induce death of ovarian cancer cells and enhances their cisplatin susceptibility. J Cell Physiol. 2006;207:389–396. doi: 10.1002/jcp.20569. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Wang X, Jiang P, Wang P, Yang CS, Wang X, Feng Q. EGCG enhances cisplatin sensitivity by regulating expression of the copper and cisplatin influx transporter CTR1 in ovary cancer. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0125402. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0125402. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Wang X, Jiang P, Wang P, Yang CS, Wang X, Feng Q. Correction: EGCG enhances cisplatin sensitivity by regulating expression of the copper and cisplatin influx transporter CTR1 in ovary cancer. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0132086. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0132086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Chen H, Landen CN, Li Y, Alvarez RD, Tollefsbol TO. Epigallocatechin gallate and sulforaphane combination treatment induce apoptosis in paclitaxel-resistant ovarian cancer cells through hTERT and Bcl-2 down-regulation. Exp Cell Res. 2013;319:697–706. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2012.12.026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.


Articles from Oncology Letters are provided here courtesy of Spandidos Publications

RESOURCES