Abstract
Context:
Falls cause significant morbidity and mortality, constituting 38.9% of trauma visits to the emergency department (ED) in Lebanon. Elderly have increased risk of falls due to co-morbidities. Injury-related deaths are most common in developing countries, and few studies have examined falls internationally.
Aims:
Describe characteristics, injury patterns, and outcomes of elderly treated for fall injuries at a tertiary care center in Lebanon.
Settings and Design:
Retrospective observational chart review of elderly presenting after a fall to the ED.
Subjects and Methods:
Retrospective observational study of elderly (≥65 years) patients who presented to the ED at a tertiary care center in Lebanon with the chief complaint of “fall” over a 6-year period.
Statistical Analysis Used:
Descriptive analysis.
Results:
Two hundred and thirty-five patients were included; mean age was 78.1 (±7.2) years with female predominance (60.5%). Falls occurred at home (99.2%) and from ground level (96.4%). Patients presented by private transport (85.8%). The initial impact was to the head in 31.2% of patients with 47.8% on antiplatelet/anticoagulation therapy. Imaging includes extremity X-ray (46.6%) and head/cervical spine computed tomography (39.5%). Dispositions included home (58.9%), regular floor (23.3%), operating room (7.9%), and intensive care unit (5.9%). Pelvic/hip repair was the most common surgical procedure. Most injuries were nonlife-threatening. Overall mortality was 2%.
Conclusions:
Falls have a high impact on the elderly population in Lebanon, with most occurring at home, resulting in pelvic/hip injuries and a mortality of 2%. There is a need to implement multifaceted fall prevention programs to mitigate such injuries and improve patient safety and outcomes.
Keywords: Elderly, fall, injury
INTRODUCTION
Falls are among the leading causes of injuries in the United States.[1] They constitute 38.9% of emergency trauma visits in Lebanon.[2] Elderly have increased risk due to comorbidities, leading to depression and functional decline.[3] Treating fall injuries cost $19 billion US dollars annually.[4]
Few studies have examined falls internationally.[5] Although injury-related deaths are common in developing countries,[6] no studies have been conducted in Lebanon.
Understanding injury etiologies, gaps in prevention, and trauma systems help tailor interventions to improve outcomes. This study describes characteristics, injury patterns, and outcomes of the elderly treated for fall injuries at a tertiary care center in Lebanon.
SUBJECTS AND METHODS
Study design and setting
Retrospective observational chart review was done for elderly (≥65 years) patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) at a tertiary care center in Lebanon with the chief complaint of “fall” over a 6-year period (July 1, 2009– July 1, 2015). This is one of the largest tertiary care and trauma centers in Lebanon, a 420-bed university hospital serving a population of approximately 2.4 million and receiving the injured from the scene, transfers from other hospitals, and neighboring countries.[2]
The institutional review board of the same institution approved this study.
Study population
Elderly who presented to the ED at a tertiary care center in Lebanon were considered eligible, and all with a chief complaint of “fall” were included without sampling. Patients with missing charts were excluded from the study [Figure 1].
Figure 1.

Inclusion and exclusion flow chart
Data collection
Research fellows collected data from ED and inpatient electronic medical records. Variables include demographics, Emergency Severity Index (ESI) score, comorbidities, mode of arrival, event details, injury description, Injury Severity Score (ISS), Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), ED imaging, procedures, and dispositions.
Data analysis
Research Electronic Data Capture, an application for building and managing online surveys and databases, was adopted for data entry. Statistical Software “SPSS” version 24.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY) was used for cleaning, management, and analyses. A descriptive analysis was conducted. Categorical variables were tabulated and analyzed using frequency and percentage whereas continuous ones were summarized as mean ± standard deviation, median, and interquartile range.
RESULTS
A total of 253 patients were included in this study. The mean age was 78.1 (±7.2) years. They were female (60.5%), Lebanese (94.5%), and married (71.5%). Most had medium acuity ESI of 3 (72.7%). Hypertension was the most common comorbidity (72.7%). Almost half of the patients (47.8%) were on antiplatelet/anticoagulation therapy [Table 1].
Table 1.
Patient demographics and characteristics
| Continuous variables | Frequency | Mean±SD | Median (IQR) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age | 253 | 78.11±7.20 | 78 (83.50-72.00) |
| Categorical variables | Frequency (%) | ||
| Gender | |||
| Female | 153 (60.5) | ||
| Male | 100 (39.5) | ||
| Nationality | |||
| Lebanese | 239 (94.5) | ||
| Non-Lebanese | 14 (5.5) | ||
| Marital status | |||
| Married | 181 (71.5) | ||
| Widowed | 49 (19.4) | ||
| Single | 20 (7.9) | ||
| Divorced | 3 (1.2) | ||
| ESI | |||
| 1 | 2(0.8) | ||
| 2 | 17 (6.7) | ||
| 3 | 184 (72.7) | ||
| 4 | 50(19.8) | ||
| Smoking status | |||
| Nonsmoker | 188 (74.3) | ||
| Smoker | 37(14.6) | ||
| Ex-smoker | 28(11.1) | ||
| Chronic diseases* | |||
| Hypertension | 184 (72.7) | ||
| Dyslipidemia | 96(37.9) | ||
| Diabetes | 82(32.4) | ||
| CAD | 66(26.1) | ||
| Previous myocardial infarction | 31(12.3) | ||
| CHF | 20 (7.9) | ||
| Neurologic diseases | 6(2.4) | ||
| Atrial fibrillation | 14 (5.5) | ||
| Cancer | 13 (5.1) | ||
| Chronic kidney disease | 7(2.8) | ||
| Osteoporosis | 6(2.4) | ||
| Home medications | |||
| Anticoagulant | 22 (8.7) | ||
| Aspirin | 57(22.5) | ||
| Other anti-platelet | 42 (16.6) | ||
*Chronic disease prevalent in less than 5 patients was not included. CAD: Coronary artery disease, CHF: Congestive heart failure, ESI: Emergency severity index, SD: Standard deviation, IQR: Interquartile range
Only 3.6% fell from the above ground level. Most falls occurred at home (99.2%) and 85.8% of patients presented to the hospital through private transportation. Initially, the location of impact was the head (31.2%), followed by extremities [Table 2].
Table 2.
Injury descriptions
| Frequency (%) | |
|---|---|
| Fall from above ground level | |
| No | 244 (96.4) |
| Yes | 9 (3.6) |
| Place of injury | |
| Home/residence | 251 (99.2) |
| Nursing home | 1 (0.4) |
| Hospital | 1 (0.4) |
| Mode of transportation | |
| Private | 217 (85.8) |
| EMS | 36 (14.2) |
| Part of the body hit first | |
| Head | 79 (31.2) |
| Lower extremity | 74 (29.2) |
| Upper extremity | 49 (19.4) |
| Back | 19 (7.5) |
| Torso | 15 (5.9) |
| Pelvis | 15 (5.9) |
| Face | 1 (0.4) |
| Unknown | 1 (0.4) |
Injuries were nonlife-threatening with low ISS (96.4%), mild or no traumatic brain injury (GCS ≥13) (95.7%). Imaging includes extremity X-ray (46.6%) and head/cervical spine computed tomography (CT) (39.5%). Surgical procedures were mostly for injuries of the pelvis/hip and upper extremities. Few required endotracheal intubation (4.0%), central venous access (3.2%), tracheostomy (1.2%), and craniotomy for hematoma evacuation (0.4%) [Table 3].
Table 3.
Imaging and procedures
| Frequency (%) | |
|---|---|
| ISS | |
| Minor trauma (0-15) | 244 (96.4) |
| Major trauma (16-75) | 9 (3.6) |
| GCS | |
| Mild (13-15) | 242 (95.7) |
| Moderate (9-12) | 4 (1.6) |
| Severe (≤8) | 7 (2.8) |
| X-ray | |
| Extremity | 118 (46.6) |
| Chest | 90 (35.6) |
| Pelvis | 70 (27.7) |
| Thoracic and lumbar spine | 25 (9.9) |
| Cervical spine | 6 (2.4) |
| CT scans | |
| Head/neck | 100 (39.5) |
| Abdominal/pelvis | 18 (7.1) |
| Chest | 13 (5.1) |
| Other imaging† | 3 (1.2) |
| Hospital procedures | |
| Endotracheal intubation | 10 (4.0) |
| Central venous access | 8 (3.2) |
| Tracheostomy | 3 (1.2) |
| Tube thoracostomy | 2 (0.8) |
| Craniotomy | 1 (0.4) |
| Arterial line placement | 1 (0.4) |
| Gastrostomy | 1 (0.4) |
| Defibrillation | 1 (0.4) |
| Operative procedures | |
| Pelvis/hip | 29 (11.5) |
| Upper extremity | 9 (3.6) |
| Lower extremity | 7 (2.8) |
| Vertebra | 1 (0.4) |
†Other imaging includes MRI, MRA, and CT chest with angiography. CT: Computed tomography, GCS: Glasgow Coma Scale, ISS: Injury severity score
Dispositions include home (58.9%), regular floor admission (23.3%), operating room (7.9%), and intensive care unit (5.9%). Few left against medical advice (2.8%) or to another hospital (1.2%). Reported complications include pneumonia, sepsis, circulatory shock, cardiac arrest, urinary tract infection, and acute kidney failure. Overall mortality was 2% [Table 4].
Table 4.
Complications and outcomes
| Frequency (%) | |
|---|---|
| Complications | |
| Pneumonia | 6 (2.4) |
| Sepsis | 6 (2.4) |
| Circulatory shock | 5 (2.0) |
| Cardiac arrest | 5 (2.0) |
| Urinary tract infection | 4 (1.6) |
| Acute kidney failure | 4 (1.6) |
| Intracranial haemorrhage | 1 (0.4) |
| Re-bleed | 1 (0.4) |
| Ventricular tachycardia | 1 (0.4) |
| ED discharge disposition | |
| Home | 149 (58.9) |
| Admitted to floor | 59 (23.3) |
| Admitted to OR | 20 (7.9) |
| Admitted to ICU | 15 (5.9) |
| Left against medical advice | 7 (2.8) |
| Transferred to another hospital | 3 (1.2) |
| Hospital discharge disposition | |
| Home | 244 (96.4) |
| Dead | 5 (2.0) |
| Transfer to another hospital | 4 (1.6) |
ICU: Intensive care unit, ED: Emergency department
DISCUSSION
Although demographics, injury patterns, and outcomes of falls have been studied, this is the first to describe, in detail, fall injury mechanisms in elderly patients in Lebanon.
Females were predominant in our study. This has been previously reported, especially in elderly. Activities leading to falls are mostly regular day-to-day ones, resulting in fractures in women with postmenopausal lack of estrogen and osteoporosis.[7]
Home injuries were most common, consistent with studies showing that falls at home increase with age.[7] This was expected because of the homebound lifestyle associated with that age.
Most patients arrived at the hospital through private transport, similar to a study in Germany where those who fell below 3 meters presented to the ED by private transportation.[8] A study from Lebanon reported that functional screening or requiring full assistance was a strong predictor for emergency medical services (EMS) utilization.[9] Injuries resulting in inability to walk were not common in our study with <18% requiring surgical procedures, explaining low rate of EMS use (14.2%).
Imaging was mostly selective for extremity X-ray and head/cervical spine CT. Pan-scan imaging of elderly sustaining falls from ground level has been studied. Although there was decrease in-hospital stay, no significant association was found with mortality.[10]
The initial head impact was the most common, consistent with another study where 37% of elderly who fell in long-term care had a head impact.[11] Moreover, 47.8% of our patients were on antiplatelet/anticoagulation therapy. Elderly patients who are taking Vitamin K antagonists have twice the risk of intracranial hemorrhage, even with a therapeutic international normalized ratio.[12] This can result in increase in admission rate, resource utilization, and poor outcome.
Mortality was 2%, higher than the rate of 61.6/100,000 for US residents over 65 years.[13] Reasons for increased mortality in the developing world include rapid aging from health neglect and lack of expertise to treat predisposing conditions and complications.[14] Furthermore, the risk of mortality after hip fractures was found to be elevated even years after injury.[15] In our study, 11.5% of the patients required a surgical procedure to repair a pelvic/hip fracture, accounting for 63% of all patients admitted to the operating room.
Patients at risk of falls can be identified through history taking and physical examination. A screening method entitled “Timed Up and Go Test” can be used to measure the time taken to stand up from a chair, walk 3 meters, and sit down.[16] Moreover, guidelines for fall prevention can include a partnership with professionals for exercise, safety assessment, and patient education with a successful implementation of such programs in the US through workshops by trained leaders and physical therapists.[17]
Limitations are due to the study's retrospective nature, including incomplete charting and description of sustained injuries. Since inclusion criteria were based on chief complaints, patients who presented with “decreased level of consciousness” due to earlier fall were likely missed. Specific details of the injuries were not reported. Data were collected from one institution because of the absence of a national trauma registry and although others might report different experiences with falls, the American University of Beirut Medical Center is the largest tertiary care center with referrals from most hospitals in the country. An initiative to launch a trauma registry to examine the impact of injuries on different subsets of the population in Lebanon is needed. This study highlights in detail injuries related to fall in elderly patients in Lebanon and can serve as a baseline for future fall prevention programs.
CONCLUSIONS
Falls have a high impact on the elderly in Lebanon with most occurring at home, resulting in pelvic/hip injuries and mortality of 2%. Public awareness is needed. Prevention programs can be multifaceted and address the safety of environment at home, medications and screening for risk of fall using validated tools.
Financial support and sponsorship
Nil.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
REFERENCES
- 1.Murray CJ, Atkinson C, Bhalla K, Birbeck G, Burstein R, Chou D, et al. The state of US health 1990-2010: Burden of diseases, injuries, and risk factors. J Am Med Assoc. 2013;310:591–608. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.13805. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Musharrafieh U, Rahi AC, Taha A, Shamseddine W, Steitieh S, Jamali F, et al. Profile of injured patients presenting to a tertiary hospital in a developing country. J Med Liban. 2011;59:191–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Terroso M, Rosa N, Marques AT, Simoes R. Physical consequences of falls in the elderly: A literature review from 1995 to 2010. Eur Rev Aging Phys Act. 2013;11:51–9. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Stevens JA, Corso PS, Finkelstein EA, Miller TR. The costs of fatal and non-fatal falls among older adults. Inj Prev. 2006;12:290–5. doi: 10.1136/ip.2005.011015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Içer M, Güloǧlu C, Orak M, Ustündaǧ M. Factors affecting mortality caused by falls from height. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2013;19:529–35. doi: 10.5505/tjtes.2013.77535. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Forjuoh SN, Gyebi-Ofosu E. Injury surveillance: Should it be a concern to developing countries? J Public Health Policy. 1993;14:355–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Talbot LA, Musiol RJ, Witham EK, Metter EJ. Falls in young, middle-aged and older community dwelling adults: Perceived cause, environmental factors and injury. BMC Public Health. 2005;5:86. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-5-86. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Huber S, Crönlein M, von Matthey F, Hanschen M, Seidl F, Kirchhoff C, et al. Effect of private versus emergency medical systems transportation in trauma patients in a mostly physician based system – A retrospective multicenter study based on the traumaregister DGU®. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2016;24:60. doi: 10.1186/s13049-016-0252-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.El Sayed M, Tamim H, Chehadeh AA, Kazzi AA. Emergency medical services utilization in EMS priority conditions in Beirut, Lebanon. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2016;31:621–7. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X16000972. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Dwyer CR, Scifres AM, Stahlfeld KR, Corcos AC, Ziembicki JA, Summers JI, et al. Radiographic assessment of ground-level falls in elderly patients: Is the “PAN-SCAN” overdoing it? Surgery. 2013;154:816–20. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2013.07.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Schonnop R, Yang Y, Feldman F, Robinson E, Loughin M, Robinovitch SN. Prevalence of and factors associated with head impact during falls in older adults in long-term care. Can Med Assoc J. 2013;185:E803–10. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.130498. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Hart RG, Boop BS, Anderson DC. Oral anticoagulants and intracranial hemorrhage. Facts and hypotheses. Stroke. 1995;26:1471–7. doi: 10.1161/01.str.26.8.1471. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Burns E, Kakara R. Deaths from falls among persons aged≥65 years – United States, 2007-2016. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2018;67:509–14. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6718a1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.World Health Organization. Switzerland: World Health Organization; c2007. [Last accessed on 2019 May 1]. Available From: http://wwwwhoint/ageing/publications/Falls_prevention7Marchpdf/ [Google Scholar]
- 15.Abrahamsen B, van Staa T, Ariely R, Olson M, Cooper C. Excess mortality following hip fracture: A systematic epidemiological review. Osteoporos Int. 2009;20:1633–50. doi: 10.1007/s00198-009-0920-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Lee A, Lee KW, Khang P. Preventing falls in the geriatric population. Perm J. 2013;17:37–9. doi: 10.7812/TPP/12-119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. [Last accessed on 2019 May 13]. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/homeandrecreationalsafety/pdf/falls/fallpreventionguide-2015-a.pdf/
