Abstract
Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is the most aggressive and fatal sub-type of breast cancer. This study aimed to identify metastasis-associated genes that could serve as biomarkers for TNBC diagnosis and prognosis. RNA-seq data and clinical information on TNBC from the Cancer Genome Atlas were used to conduct analyses. Expression data were used to establish co-expression modules using average linkage hierarchical clustering. We used weighted gene co-expression network analysis to explore the associations between gene sets and clinical features and to identify metastasis-associated candidate biomarkers. The K-M plotter website was used to explore the association between the expression of candidate biomarkers and patient survival. In addition, receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to illustrate the diagnostic performance of candidate genes. The pale turquoise module was significantly associated with the occurrence of metastasis. In this module, 64 genes were identified, and its functional enrichment analysis revealed that they were mainly associated with transcriptional misregulation in cancer, microRNAs in cancer, and negative regulation of angiogenesis. Further, 4 genes, IGSF10, RUNX1T1, XIST, and TSHZ2, which were negatively associated with relapse-free survival and have seldom been reported before in TNBC, were selected. In addition, the mRNA expression levels of the 4 candidate genes were significantly lower in TNBC tumor tissues compared with healthy tissues. Based on the K-M plotter, these 4 genes were correlated with poor prognosis of TNBC. The area under the curve of IGSF10, RUNX1T1, TSHZ2, and XIST was 0.918, 0.957, 0.977, and 0.749. These findings provide new insight into TNBC metastasis. IGSF10, RUNX1T1, TSHZ2, and XIST could be used as candidate biomarkers for the diagnosis and prognosis of TNBC metastasis.
Keywords: Triple negative breast neoplasms, WGCNA, neoplasm metastasis, genes, biomarker
Introduction
Breast cancer is the second most commonly diagnosed cancer, and it accounts for ~11.6% of all cancer cases.1 According to the expression of receptor proteins and genes, breast cancer can be categorized into 4 subtypes. Among these subtypes, triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC),2 which comprises ~15% to 20% of breast cancer is generally defined as being ER-negative, PR-negative, or HER2 negative. A previous study reported that TNBC has a high risk of metastases and typically behaves more aggressively, which increases the poor prognosis of patients.3 Its metastases at distant sites are also the primary cause of cancer-related death in patients. Due to the lack of gene targets for metastases, available therapies are largely unsuccessful in treating metastases.4 The treatment of metastases is more dependent on the estrogen, progesterone, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 status of the patient. Since TNBC lacks these molecular targets, few new agents have been approved for treating the subset of patients with metastases.5
Metastasis is an evolutionary process.6 Multiple competing subclones can emerge in primary tumors, culminating in the formation of metastases.7 Genetic and epigenetic alterations in primary tumor cells contribute to the evolutionary process.6 Nearly 12% of breast cancer cases eventually become metastatic cases, and after diagnosis with metastatic breast cancer, the 5-year survival rate is 26%.8 When compared with their metastatic breast cancer counterparts, patients with metastatic TNBC have a higher death rate.9 Since metastatic breast cancer is incurable, especially metastatic TNBC, there has been substantial interest in understanding changes in metastasis-associated genes. In addition, it is necessary to explore new metastasis-associated biomarkers to determine their utility in diagnosis and predicting prognosis. Also, biomarkers detected need robustness and stability. A recent study reported that a novel network-based approach can identify the biomarkers of breast cancer survivability.10
We identified genes involved in metastatic TNBC through a comprehensive analysis of the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) gene expression data. Weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) is a systems biology method to describe the patterns in correlations of genes among samples. It has been proven to be a reliable tool for identifying candidate biomarkers,11 and it has been used to identify biologically meaningful modules related to metastatic breast cancer in our study. Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) and gene ontology (GO) analysis was performed to explore functions and pathways related to genes within key modules and identify their biological meaning. We identified 4 candidate genes, IGSF10, RUNX1T1, XIST, and TSHZ2, from the related module that were associated with TNBC prognosis. These candidate genes could serve as candidate biomarkers of metastatic TNBC and contribute to understanding TNBC progression.
Materials and Methods
Data analyses were performed, as indicated in Figure 1.
Figure 1.

Study workflow.
Abbreviations: TCGA, the Cancer Genome Atlas; TNBC, triple-negative breast cancer; WGCNA, weighted gene co-expression network analysis; GO, gene ontology; KEGG, Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes.
Data sources
Breast tissue RNA sequence data (HTseq-counts) and clinical features were accessed from TCGA (https://cancergenome.nih.gov/; accession date: 14 September 2018). Of the available data, 140 TNBC and 13 adjacent healthy tissue samples were selected for analysis. These data are publicly accessible, and no further ethical approval was required from the Ethics Committee.
Weighted gene co-expression network analysis
The WGCNA package in R was used to construct the gene co-expression network. Data were normalized using edgeR,12 and then we screened the genes in the top 25% of the variance. All 13 845 genes from the 140 TNBC samples were used to establish co-expression modules. An interaction coefficient was calculated between genes. The adjacency matrix was converted to a topological overlap matrix (TOM), and then genes were divided into different gene modules according to the TOM-based heterogeneity measure. The soft-thresholding power was 8. Gene modules were constructed using a dynamic tree cut algorithm, and the minimum number of genes was set as 30 to obtain more reliable results. A module eigenvalue distance threshold was set as 0.25 to merge highly similar modules. The module that had the highest correlation and was significantly related to metastasis was selected and used for further analysis. Modules with a P-value <.05 were identified as clinical trait-related modules.
Function-enrichment analyses of metastasis-associated modules
Gene Ontology (GO) annotation and KEGG pathway enrichment were used to analyze genes using the Database for Annotation, Visualization, and Integration Discovery (http://david.abcc.ncifcrf.gov/) to explore the biological functions of genes in metastasis-associated modules.13 The threshold of significance was set as P < .05.
Survival analysis of candidate genes
The K-M plotter website (http://www.kmplot.com) was used to analyze the association between the expression of hub genes and the survival of patients.14 The threshold was adjusted to P < .05.
Expression of genes critical in triple-negative breast cancer and healthy tissues
Samples of 140 TNBC tissues and 13 corresponding healthy tissues were used to explore the expression of candidate genes. Differences in gene expression between the 2 groups were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U test in SPSS Statistics version 20.0 software (IBM Corp.). Data were visualized using GraphPad Prism 7.0 (GraphPad Software Inc, CA, USA). A P-value of <.05 was considered to be statistically significant.
Statistical analysis of clinical covariates
We separated the TNBC cases into metastatic and non-metastatic cases. Then, we calculated the significant differences between different ages, T, N, and stages between groups. A Chi-square test was used to compare binary variables, and continuous variables were analyzed using t-tests. A P-value of <.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results
Expression value analysis of mRNA-seq data of triple-negative breast cancer
A total of 140 TNBC samples were obtained from TCGA. Clinical information for TNBC patients is shown in Table 1. We transformed the RNA-seq data to gene expression information. Genes with missing and negative values were eliminated. As a result, 25% of the genes before the variance were obtained. A total of 13 845 expression values of genes were selected for analysis using the WGCNA package.
Table 1.
Tumor characteristics for TNBC patients in the present study.
| Characteristics | Information | Sample number n = 140 |
|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 55.90 ± 12.50 | |
| T | ||
| T1-T2 | 122 (87.1%) | |
| T3-T4 | 18 (12.9%) | |
| N | ||
| No | 88 (62.8%) | |
| Yes | 52 (37.1%) | |
| M | ||
| No | 128 (91.4%) | |
| Yes | 12 (8.6%) | |
| Stage | ||
| Stage I-II | 117 (83.6%) | |
| Stage III-IV | 23 (16.4%) | |
Construction of the co-expression module and identification of the key module of triple-negative breast cancer
The WGCNA algorithm was used to construct the co-expression modules most associated with the TNBC clinical traits (Figure 2). Clinical information of the TNBC samples such as age, TNM, and the stage was retrieved from TCGA (Figure 2A). Age was expressed as the mean ± standard deviation and T, N, and stage were binary variables, for which a Chi-square test was used to analyze differences. Our results show that there was no difference in the mean age of the metastatic and non-metastatic groups, while there were significant differences in T, N, and stage between the 2 groups (Supplemental Table 1). We set the soft-thresholding power as 8 for further analysis and set the cut height as 0.25, and we eventually constructed 39 modules (Figure 2B-D).
Figure 2.
Weighted gene co-expression network analysis to construct the co-expression module network. (A) Clustering dendrograms of genes. Color intensity varies with age, T, N, M, and stage. (B) Scale-free fit index (left) and the mean connectivity (right) for soft-thresholding powers. (C) Clustering of module eigengenes. The height of the red line is 0.25. (D) Clustering dendrograms of all genes. As a result, 39 co-expression modules were constructed and highlighted with different colors.
Metastasis-associated module analysis
Using the module-trait correlations heatmap, we identified that the pale turquoise module was the most highly related to the characteristic of metastasis (correlation coefficient = 0.26, P = 0.002; Figure 3). The pale turquoise module contained a total of 64 genes (Figure 4A, correlation coefficient = 0.67, P = 1.4e-09 of MM in pale turquoise). All 64 genes in the pale turquoise module were subjected to further analysis. We performed GO and KEGG enrichment analyses to reveal potential biological functions of the genes in the pale turquoise module. As presented in Figure 4B, KEGG pathway analyses showed that genes were primarily enriched in the pathways of hsa05202 (transcriptional misregulation in cancer), hsa05206 (microRNAs in cancer), and hsa04360 (axon guidance). As shown in Figure 4C, the enriched base-pair terms of GO in the pale turquoise module were mainly about the GO:0016525 (negative regulation of angiogenesis), GO:0060021 (palate development), and GO:0035988 (chondrocyte proliferation). The enriched CC terms of GO in genes were functional at GO:0031012 (extracellular matrix) and GO:0005576 (extracellular region). The enriched MF terms of GO in the key module were mainly about GO:0008201 (heparin binding) and GO:0001078 (transcriptional repressor activity, RNA polymerase II core promoter proximal region sequence-specific binding). The detailed results of the GO and KEGG analyses are illustrated in Table 2.
Figure 3.
Heatmap of the correlation between clinical traits and eigengenes of triple-negative breast cancer. Each module contains a correlation coefficient and P-value.
Figure 4.
Metastasis-related module analyses and functional annotation. (A) Scatterplot of genes in the pale turquoise module. (B) Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) analysis for genes in the pale turquoise module. (C) Gene ontology (GO) analysis for genes in the pale turquoise module.
Table 2.
The GO and KEGG analysis of key module.
| Category | Term | Involved in | P |
|---|---|---|---|
| GO | |||
| GOTERM_BP_DIRECT | GO:0016525 | Negative regulation of angiogenesis | .009 |
| GOTERM_BP_DIRECT | GO:0060021 | Palate development | .014 |
| GOTERM_BP_DIRECT | GO:0035988 | Chondrocyte proliferation | .021 |
| GOTERM_BP_DIRECT | GO:0001886 | Endothelial cell morphogenesis | .025 |
| GOTERM_BP_DIRECT | GO:0035909 | Aorta morphogenesis | .030 |
| GOTERM_BP_DIRECT | GO:0021591 | Ventricular system development | .032 |
| GOTERM_BP_DIRECT | GO:0007275 | Multicellular organism development | .034 |
| GOTERM_CC_DIRECT | GO:0031012 | Extracellular matrix | .036 |
| GOTERM_CC_DIRECT | GO:0005576 | Extracellular region | .041 |
| GOTERM_MF_DIRECT | GO:0008201 | Heparin binding | .004 |
| GOTERM_MF_DIRECT | GO:0001078 | Transcriptional repressor activity, RNA polymerase II core promoter proximal region sequence-specific binding | .02 |
| KEGG | |||
| KEGG_PATHWAY | hsa05202 | Transcriptional misregulation in cancer | .001 |
| KEGG_PATHWAY | hsa05206 | MicroRNAs in cancer | .006 |
| KEGG_PATHWAY | hsa04360 | Axon guidance | .013 |
Novel candidate genes analysis in metastasis-associated module
Among the 30 top genes in the pale turquoise module based on intramodule connectivity and by setting MM at >0.85 and gene significance (GS) at >0.15, 26 genes with high connectivity in the pale turquoise module were identified as hub genes. Among these genes, IGSF10, RUNX1T1, XIST, and TSHZ2 were negatively associated with relapse-free survival and have seldom been reported before in TNBC. As shown in Figure 5, we found that all of the genes were significantly downregulated (P < .05) in 140 TNBC samples compared with 13 adjacent healthy samples. Furthermore, the Kaplan–Meier curve and the log-rank test were used to assess relapse-free survival in patients. Kaplan–Meier curves showed that the lower the expression of these genes correlated significantly with poor relapse-free survival (Figure 6). Detailed HR and the log-rank P-values are presented in Table 3. Notably, 4 novel candidate genes in the pale turquoise module showed good prognostic values.
Figure 5.
The mRNA expression levels of candidate genes in triple-negative breast cancer and corresponding healthy tissues based on the Cancer Genome Atlas dataset. (A) Messenger RNA expression of IGSF10. (B) Messenger RNA expression of RUNX1T1. (C) Messenger RNA expression of XIST, (D) Messenger RNA expression of TSHZ2.
*P < .05, **P < .01, and ***P < .001.
Figure 6.
Associated candidate gene expression and recurrence-free survival time using the K-M plotter online platform. (A) Kaplan–Meier curves for IGSF10. (B) Kaplan–Meier curves for RUNX1T1. (C) Kaplan–Meier curves for XIST. (D) Kaplan–Meier curves for TSHZ2.
Table 3.
The survival analysis of candidate genes.
| Gene | Full name | Probe | High expression | Low expression | HR | Logrank P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IGSF10 | Immunoglobulin superfamily member 10 | 1556579_s_at | 180 | 180 | 0.61 (0.44-0.84) | .0026 |
| RUNX1T1 | RUNX1 partner transcriptional co-repressor 1 | 205528_s_at | 305 | 313 | 0.72 (0.56-0.92) | .0095 |
| XIST | X inactive specific transcript | 224589_at | 180 | 180 | 0.72 (0.52-0.99) | .043 |
| TSHZ2 | Teashirt zinc finger homeobox 2 | 244521_at | 177 | 183 | 0.73 (0.53-1.01) | .055 |
In addition, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to evaluate the capacity of candidate genes to the diagnosis of TNBC (Figure 7). Area under the ROC curve values for 4 novel candidate genes are presented in Table 4.
Figure 7.

Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis of candidate genes. These curves were used to evaluate the capacity of candidate genes in the diagnosis of triple-negative breast cancer.
Table 4.
The AUC of candidate genes.
| Gene | AUC | 95% CI (lower) | 95% CI (upper) | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IGSF10 | 0.918 | 0.857 | 0.979 | .000 |
| RUNX1T1 | 0.957 | 0.920 | 0.994 | .000 |
| TSHZ2 | 0.977 | 0.954 | 1.000 | .000 |
| XIST | 0.749 | 0.585 | 0.913 | .003 |
Abbreviations: AUC, area under the curve; CI, confidence interval.
Discussion
Breast cancer is a complex and heterogeneous disease at the tumor genetics and patient’s prognosis levels. Compared with other breast cancers subtypes, TNBC behaves more aggressively and those patients with TNBC have higher death rates.15 What is worse is that metastasis is the vital tab in cancer. Patients with metastasis TNBC have an additional challenge to finding targets and treatments. In the current study, we aimed to explore the prognosis biomarker of metastasis associated TNBC using WGCNA. We downloaded gene expression profiles from TCGA to construct a co-expression network and identified metastasis-associated candidate genes. After setting GS > 0.15 and MM > 0.85, we eventually obtained 26 hub genes. Some of them have been demonstrated to exert vital roles in breast cancer.16 Among these genes, we chose 4 genes that have seldom been reported in TNBC metastasis, namely IGSF10, RUNX1T1, XIST, and TSHZ2, to further explore their prognostic and diagnosis value.
IGSF10, namely immunoglobulin superfamily member 10, is related to differentiation and developmental processes, and IGSF10 is the genetic basis of delayed puberty and disorders of neuronal development.17 Previous studies have reported that IGSF10 is possibly involved in radiation-induced rat osteosarcomas.18 However, the IGSF10 gene has rarely been associated with cancer. One study showed that mutation in IGSF10 might be associated with gastric and rectal cancer.19 Whole-exome sequencing of 14 endometrial cancer tissue samples showed that IGSF10 was the potential cancer-related gene.20
RUNX1T1 is a member of the transcriptional corepressors of the MTG family. It has been demonstrated that it is closely involved in the pathogenesis of acute leukemia.21 An RNA sequencing study revealed that RUNX1T1 was upregulated in clear renal cell carcinoma, which suggests that this gene is vital for tumorigenesis.22 RUNX1T1 has also been reported in other cancer types. Nasir et al23 revealed that RUNX1T1 might be a novel biomarker for the prediction of liver metastasis in primary pancreatic endocrine tumors. Since the dysregulated of TGFb/SMAD4 signaling may result in epigenetic silencing of RUNX1T1, this suggests that RUNX1T1 is crucial for ovarian carcinogenesis.24
XIST is involved in the inactivation of the X chromosome, which is a non-coding RNA. It has been demonstrated that its expression has been dysregulated in numerous cancers, especially in breast cancer. BRCA1, which interacts with XIST RNA, takes part in the correct inactive X chromosome heterochromatin superstructure.25 The loss of Xi might present more aggressively in breast cancer. This might suggest that XIST performs a vital role in the regulation of cancer-related pathways in breast cancer.26
TSHZ2 is a member of the TSHZ family, which includes TSHZ1, TSHZ2, and TSHZ3. It has been demonstrated that the silence of the TSHZ2 gene may play a critical role in carcinogenesis. The expression of TSHZ2 is downregulated in some cancers. This suggests that it might function as a tumor-suppressor gene.27 However, the underlying molecular mechanism is not fully understood. A study reported that TSHZ2 participated in mammary tumorigenesis via activation of GLI1.28
However, our present study has some limitations. First, the candidate genes should have been validated using samples from our institution via quantitative PCR or western blots. Thus, we will collect tissue samples for further investigation. Second, the biological molecular mechanisms of candidate genes in TNBC requires further exploration.
In summary, this study focused on metastasis-associated genes in TNBC. By combining WGCNA and other bioinformatics tools, we identified significant gene modules related to metastasis in TNBC. Four candidate genes, IGSF10, RUNX1T1, XIST, and TSHZ2, were strongly downregulated in TNBC tissues. Further survival analysis suggested that these genes have significant prognostic and diagnosis values in TNBC.
Supplemental Material
Supplemental material, Supplementary_Table_1_xyz46022cbac58b1 for Identification of Metastasis-Associated Genes in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Using Weighted Gene Co-expression Network Analysis by Wenting Xie, Zhongshi Du, Yijie Chen, Naxiang Liu, Zhaoming Zhong, Youhong Shen and Lina Tang in Evolutionary Bioinformatics
Footnotes
Funding:The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: The present study was supported by the Startup Fund for scientific research, Fujian Medical University (grant number: 2019QH1194) and Fujian Province Science and Technology Plan Guided Project fund (grant number: 2017Y0021).
Declaration of conflicting interests:The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Author Contributions: LNT designed the study. WTX and ZSD wrote the main manuscript. YJC and NXL collected the data. ZMZ and YHS analyzed the data. WTX and ZSD contributed equally.
Supplemental Material: Supplemental material for this article is available online.
References
- 1. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68:394-424. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Hong HC, Chuang CH, Huang WC, et al. A panel of eight microRNAs is a good predictive parameter for triple-negative breast cancer relapse. Theranostics. 2020;10:8771-8789. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Neophytou C, Boutsikos P, Papageorgis P. Molecular mechanisms and emerging therapeutic targets of triple-negative breast cancer metastasis. Front Oncol. 2018;8:31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Hwang SY, Park S, Kwon Y. Recent therapeutic trends and promising targets in triple negative breast cancer. Pharmacol Ther 2019;199:30-57. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Gogate A, Rotter JS, Trogdon JG, et al. An updated systematic review of the cost-effectiveness of therapies for metastatic breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2019;174:343-355. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Turajlic S, Swanton C. Metastasis as an evolutionary process. Science. 2016;352:169-175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Gundem G, Van Loo P, Kremeyer B, et al. The evolutionary history of lethal metastatic prostate cancer. Nature. 2015;520:353-357. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Peart O. Metastatic breast cancer. Radiol Technol. 2017;88:519m-539m. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Zeichner SB, Terawaki H, Gogineni K. A review of systemic treatment in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer. Breast Cancer (Auckl). 2016;10:25-36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Jubair S, Alkhateeb A, Tabl AA, et al. A novel approach to identify subtype-specific network biomarkers of breast cancer survivability. Netw Model Anal Health Inform Bioinform. 2020;9:43. [Google Scholar]
- 11. Langfelder P, Horvath S. WGCNA: an R package for weighted correlation network analysis. BMC Bioinformatics. 2008;9:559. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Pizzollo J, Nielsen WJ, Shibata Y, et al. Comparative serum challenges show divergent patterns of gene expression and open chromatin in human and chimpanzee. Genome Biol Evol 2018;10:826-839. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Huang da W, Sherman BT, Lempicki RA. Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources. Nat Protoc. 2009;4:44-57. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Nagy A, Lanczky A, Menyhart O, et al. Validation of miRNA prognostic power in hepatocellular carcinoma using expression data of independent datasets. Sci Rep 2018;8:9227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Li X, Yang J, Peng L, et al. Triple-negative breast cancer has worse overall survival and cause-specific survival than non-triple-negative breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2017;161:279-287. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Zhang W, Shi S, Jiang J, et al. LncRNA MEG3 inhibits cell epithelial-mesenchymal transition by sponging miR-421 targeting E-cadherin in breast cancer. Biomed Pharmacother. 2017;91:312-319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Howard SR. The genetic basis of delayed puberty. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2019;10:423. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Daino K, Ugolin N, Altmeyer-Morel S, et al. Gene expression profiling of alpha-radiation-induced rat osteosarcomas: identification of dysregulated genes involved in radiation-induced tumorigenesis of bone. Int J Cancer. 2009;125:612-620. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Thutkawkorapin J, Picelli S, Kontham V, et al. Exome sequencing in one family with gastric- and rectal cancer. BMC Genet. 2016;17:41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Chang YS, Huang HD, Yeh KT, et al. Identification of novel mutations in endometrial cancer patients by whole-exome sequencing. Int J Oncol. 2017;50:1778-1784. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Qin YZ, Wang Y, Xu LP, et al. The dynamics of RUNX1-RUNX1T1 transcript levels after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation predict relapse in patients with t(8;21) acute myeloid leukemia. J Hematol Oncol. 2017;10:44. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Xiong Z, Yu H, Ding Y, et al. RNA sequencing reveals upregulation of RUNX1-RUNX1T1 gene signatures in clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:450621. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Nasir A, Helm J, Turner L, et al. RUNX1T1: a novel predictor of liver metastasis in primary pancreatic endocrine neoplasms. Pancreas. 2011;40:627-633. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Guo YH, Li YN, Zhao JR, et al. HBc binds to the CpG islands of HBV cccDNA and promotes an epigenetic permissive state. Epigenetics. 2011;6:720-726. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Ganesan S, Silver DP, Drapkin R, et al. Association of BRCA1 with the inactive X chromosome and XIST RNA. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2004;359:123-128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Soudyab M, Iranpour M, Ghafouri-Fard S. The role of long non-coding RNAs in breast cancer. Arch Iran Med. 2016;19:508-517. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Yamamoto M, Cid E, Bru S, et al. Rare and frequent promoter methylation, respectively, of TSHZ2 and 3 genes that are both downregulated in expression in breast and prostate cancers. PLoS ONE. 2011;6:e17149. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Riku M, Inaguma S, Ito H, Tsunoda T, Ikeda H, Kasai K. Down-regulation of the zinc-finger homeobox protein TSHZ2 releases GLI1 from the nuclear repressor complex to restore its transcriptional activity during mammary tumorigenesis. Oncotarget. 2016;7:5690-5701. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Supplemental material, Supplementary_Table_1_xyz46022cbac58b1 for Identification of Metastasis-Associated Genes in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Using Weighted Gene Co-expression Network Analysis by Wenting Xie, Zhongshi Du, Yijie Chen, Naxiang Liu, Zhaoming Zhong, Youhong Shen and Lina Tang in Evolutionary Bioinformatics





