Skip to main content
Elsevier - PMC COVID-19 Collection logoLink to Elsevier - PMC COVID-19 Collection
letter
. 2020 Sep 7;67:110039. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2020.110039

Intubation, mortality, and risk factors in critically ill Covid-19 patients: A pilot study

Mengqiang Luo a,1, Shumei Cao a,1, Liqun Wei a, Xu Zhao b, Feng Gao c, Shengqing Li d, Lingzhong Meng b,, Yingwei Wang a,⁎⁎
PMCID: PMC7476450  PMID: 32920347

More than 70% of the critically ill Covid-19 patients received intubation and invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) support [1,2]. Medical professionals throughout the world agree that intubation saves lives. However, there is no direct evidence attesting to the benefit of intubation and IMV in critically ill Covid-19 patients. On the contrary, a report revealed that of 32 Covid-19 patients who received intubation and IMV support, 31 (97%) died [3]. The poor outcome after intubation may be related to the timing of intubation [4]. The role of intubation and IMV amid the Covid-19 pandemic deserves investigation. As it is unethical to perform a randomized controlled trial comparing the outcomes between patients receiving and not receiving intubation and IMV, we conducted a single-center pilot study based on intubated critically ill Covid-19 patients to explore the risks factors associated with mortality.

Patients who received non-resuscitative intubation in the ICU on the Guanggu Campus of Tongji Hospital (Wuhan, China) between February 10, 2020 to March 30, 2020 were included. The ICU was managed by the medical team from Huashan Hospital due to the manpower re-deployment. All patients were diagnosed with Covid-19 and reached the endpoints of either death or survival. Patients who were intubated during resuscitation and did not survive for more than 2 h after resuscitation were excluded. The study was approved by the Internal Review Board of Huashan Hospital (#2020-655). The primary outcome was the rate of ICU mortality, the differences between survivors and non-survivors were investigated, and the risk factors associated with death in intubated critically ill Covid-19 patients were analyzed by means of univariable and multivariable logistic regression models.

A total of 75 critically ill Covid-19 patients were enrolled in this study. Of these 75 patients, 55 patients underwent intubation and received IMV support, 41 intubated patients met the inclusion criteria and were included in the final analysis. The median age of these 41 patients was 70 (60–81) years. 31 (76%) patients did not survive the ICU course, while 10 (24%) did; all three patients who received ECMO support survived. The median ages of non-survivors and survivors were 71 (66–82) and 59 (57–77) years. Of the non-survivors, 32% (10/31) were obese, while none of the survivors were obese (p = 0.039). 48% (15/31) of the non-survivors had three or more comorbidities, while none of the survivors had three or more comorbidities (p = 0.007).

Comparing with survivors, non-survivors had a lower pH (7.38 vs. 7.45; p = 0.010) and platelet count (120 vs. 181; p = 0.036), but a higher hs-TnI (77.3 vs. 15.7; p = 0.009), NT-proBNP (1959 vs. 337; p = 0.001), IL-6 (68.3 vs. 17.1; p < 0.001), INR (1.27 vs. 1.11; p = 0.007), SOFA score (9.0 vs. 3.0; p < 0.001), and APACHE II score (22.0 vs. 11.0; p < 0.001) at the time of IMV initiation (Table 1). There were no significant differences between survivors and non-survivors in PaO2/FiO2 and levels of PaCO2 at the time of intubation and during the early stage of IMV support; however, the differences became significant at the time of IMV weaning for survivals or death (Table 1). The univariable analysis revealed that the odds of ICU mortality were higher in patients with a higher NT-proBNP, INR, SOFA score, and APACHE II score at the time of IMV initiation. A higher SOFA score at the time of IMV initiation was independently associated with an increased risk of death in intubated Covid-19 patients based on multivariable analysis (Supplementary eTable 1).

Table 1.

Laboratory data, clinical scores, and timing and duration of invasive mechanical ventilation.

Total
(n = 41)
Non-survivor (n = 31) Survivor
(n = 10)
p value
Initiation of invasive mechanical ventilation
pH 7.40 (7.29–7.46) 7.38 (7.23–7.43) 7.45 (7.42–7.51) 0.010
Lactate, mmol/L 1.8 (1.3–2.3) 1.8 (1.3–2.4) 2.0 (1.2–2.3) 0.931
PaO2/FiO2, mmHg 105 (85–143) 102 (84–144) 117 (90–177) 0.347
PaCO2, mmHg 47.8 (37.1–60.3) 48.1 (37.5–65.3) 42.8 (31.1–52.6) 0.215
WBC, ×109/L 12.5 (8.7–14.7) 12.9 (9.8–14.9) 10.0 (7.7–15.0) 0.367
Neutrophils, utr9/L 11.0 (7.9–13.7) 11.9 (9.1–13.7) 9.1 (7.1–14.1) 0.434
Lymphocytes, ×109/L 0.51 (0.30–0.73) 0.46 (0.27–0.69) 0.57 (0.46–0.83) 0.141
hs-TnI, pg/mL 67.4 (16.5–355.9) 77.3 (24.5–451.6) 15.7 (10.4–67.9) 0.009
hs-TnI, > 28 pg/mL 26 (63%) 22 (71%) 4 (40%) 0.077
NT-proBNP, pg/mL 1290 (536–3175) 1959 (769–3339) 337 (129–1153) 0.001
IL-2R, unit/mL 922 (711–1497) 1215 (720–1532) 754 (580–1364) 0.275
IL-6, pg/mL 52.2 (19.2–167.6) 68.3 (34.8–278.1) 17.1 (9.8–26.0) <0.001
ALT, unit/L 32.0 (16.0–43.5) 31.0 (14.0–44.0) 34.0 (19.8–43.3) 0.486
Creatinine, μmol/L 85.0 (67.0–105.5) 85.0 (70.0–110.0) 80.0 (63.0–100.3) 0.714
Albumin, g/L 31.8 (31.0–33.7) 31.8 (31.0–33.7) 31.7 (31.0–34.3) 0.911
Haemoglobin, g/L 124 (111–136) 124 (107–133) 124 (115–140) 0.544
INR 1.22 (1.11–1.34) 1.27 (1.15–1.41) 1.11 (1.06–1.19) 0.007
Platelet, 109/L 148 (98–215) 120 (94–198) 181 (154–368) 0.036
Platelet, <100 109/L 11 (27%) 9 (29%) 2 (20%) 0.575
D-Dimer, μg/ML 6.2 (2.1–16.9) 6.2 (2.3–20.0) 3.0 (1.7–12.5) 0.302
SOFA score 7.0 (5.0–9.0) 9.0 (6.0–11.0) 3.0 (3.0–4.5) <0.001
APACHE II score 18.0 (14.0–24.5) 22.0 (16.0–28.0) 11.0 (4.8–14.8) <0.001
Time from ICU admission to IMV, days 2.0 (0.5–5.0) 3.0 (0–5.0) 1.5 (0.75–3.25) 0.284



Weaning of invasive mechanical ventilation or death
pH 7.26 (7.08–7.43) 7.14 (7.04–7.30) 7.48 (7.41–7.50) <0.001
Lactate, mmol/L 2.3 (1.2–3.9) 2.5 (1.5–4.7) 1.2 (0.8–1.6) <0.001
PaO2/FiO2, mmHg 72 (49–215) 59 (45–77) 336 (245–412) <0.001
PaCO2, mmHg 55.0 (42.9–102.8) 76.0 (52.8–112.9) 38.8 (31.0–45.9) <0.001
WBC, ×109/L 11.3 (7.5–15.7) 12.6 (8.4–18.2) 8.3 (6.6–11.6) 0.068
Neutrophils, utr9/L 9.8 (6.0–14.0) 11.0 (7.3–17.4) 6.5 (5.1–10.3) 0.038
Lymphocytes, ×109/L 0.59 (0.35–0.86) 0.44 (0.27–0.69) 0.89 (0.65–1.13) 0.002
hs-TnI, pg/mL 63.5 (23.0–446.4) 185.7 (38.6–523.5) 7.5 (5.6–39.4) <0.001
hs-TnI, >28 pg/mL 30 (73%) 27 (87%) 3 (30%) <0.001
NT-proBNP, pg/mL 4095 (879–8573) 6128 (1858–11,407) 377 (116–801) <0.001
IL-2R, unit/mL 1299 (861–3083) 2676 (1215–3360) 725 (604–1036) <0.001
IL-6, pg/mL 247.4 (62.1–2190) 398.2 (156.0–5000) 13.1 (9.6–69.7) <0.001
ALT, unit/L 139.1 (9.0–3959) 170.6 (9.0–3959) 41.5 (10.0–100) 0.569
Creatinine, μmol/L 105.0 (74.5–223.5) 145.0 (99.0–267.0) 66.0 (55.0–80.0) <0.001
Albumin, g/L 31.2 (26.2–35.3) 29.6 (25.1–32.7) 38.7 (35.4–44.9) <0.001
Haemoglobin, g/L 96.0 (82.5–107.0) 92.0 (79.0–110.0) 96.0 (89.0–103.8) 0.397
INR 1.30 (1.18–1.55) 1.34 (1.25–1.69) 1.17 (1.12–1.24) 0.001
Platelet, 109/L 126 (60–196) 108 (53–151) 196 (154–225) 0.003
Platelet, <100 109/L 15 (48%) 14 (45%) 1 (10%) 0.045
d-Dimer, μg/mL 5.1 (2.8–9.3) 5.5 (3.0–18.0) 4.3 (2.2–9.1) 0.414
SOFA score 15.0 (7.5–17.0) 15.0 (13.0–17.0) 2.0 (1.8–4.3) <0.001
APACHE II score 33.0 (17.0–37.5) 35.0 (30.0–39.0) 8.0 (6.0–10.0) <0.001
Length of IMV, days 8.0 (4.0–12.5) 6.0 (2.0–10.0) 13.5 (9.5–16.5) <0.001

PaO2 = arterial oxygen partial pressure; FiO2 = inspired oxygen fraction; PaCO2 = arterial carbon dioxide partial pressure; WBC = white blood cell; hs-TnI = high-sensitivity Troponin I; NT-proBNP = N-terminal pro b-type natriuretic peptide; IL-2R = interleukin-2 receptor; IL-6 = interleukin-6; ALT = alanine aminotransferase; INR = international normalized ratio; SOFA = sequential organ failure assessment; APACHE = acute physiologic assessment and chronic health evaluation; ICU = intensive care unit.

Data missing in 2 non-survivors.

Comparing with survivors, non-survivors had a lower pH (7.38 vs. 7.45; p = 0.010) and platelet count (120 vs. 181; p = 0.036), but a higher hs-TnI (77.3 vs. 15.7; p = 0.009), NT-proBNP (1959 vs. 337; p = 0.001), IL-6 (68.3 vs. 17.1; p < 0.001), INR (1.27 vs. 1.11; p = 0.007), SOFA score (9.0 vs. 3.0; p < 0.001), and APACHE II score (22.0 vs. 11.0; p < 0.001) at the time of IMV initiation (Table 1). There were no significant differences between survivors and non-survivors in PaO2/FiO2 and levels of PaCO2 at the time of intubation and during the early stage of IMV support; however, the differences became significant at the time of IMV weaning for survivals or death (Table 1). The univariable analysis revealed that the odds of ICU mortality were higher in patients with a higher NT-proBNP, INR, SOFA score, and APACHE II score at the time of IMV initiation. A higher SOFA score at the time of IMV initiation was independently associated with an increased risk of death in intubated Covid-19 patients based on multivariable analysis (Supplementary eTable 1).

In conclusion, 76% of critically ill Covid-19 patients died after non-resuscitative intubation and IMV support. Non-survivors had more comorbidities than survivors. Mortality after non-resuscitative intubation in critically ill Covid-19 patients is associated with the disease severity at the time of IMV initiation.

The following are the supplementary data related to this article.

Supplementary eTable 1

Risk factors associated with in-ICU death.

mmc1.docx (46.7KB, docx)

Supplementary data to this article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinane.2020.110039.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation, People's Republic of China (Grant Nos. 81730031 and 81671058 to Yingwei Wang).

Declaration of competing interest

None.

Acknowledgments

Acknowledgments

None.

Compliance with ethical standards

Yes.

Informed consent

Informed consent was waived by the Internal Review Board of Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.

References

  • 1.Myers L.C., Parodi S.M., Escobar G.J., Liu V.X. Characteristics of hospitalized adults with COVID-19 in an integrated health care system in California. Jama. 2020;323(21):2195–2198. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.7202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Grasselli G., Zangrillo A., Zanella A., Antonelli M., Cabrini L., Castelli A., et al. Baseline characteristics and outcomes of 1591 patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 admitted to ICUs of the Lombardy Region, Italy. Jama. 2020;323:1574–1581. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.5394. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Zhou F., Yu T., Du R., Fan G., Liu Y., Liu Z., et al. Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of adult inpatients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet. 2020;395(10229):1054–1062. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30566-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Meng L., Qiu H., Wan L., Ai Y., Xue Z., Guo Q., et al. Intubation and ventilation amid the COVID-19 outbreak: Wuhan’s experience. Anesthesiology. 2020;132(6):1317–1332. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000003296. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary eTable 1

Risk factors associated with in-ICU death.

mmc1.docx (46.7KB, docx)

Articles from Journal of Clinical Anesthesia are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES