Skip to main content
Wellcome Open Research logoLink to Wellcome Open Research
. 2020 May 19;5:97. [Version 1] doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15729.1

Changes in nano-mechanical properties of human epidermal cornified cells in children with atopic dermatitis

Marek Haftek 1, Maeve A McAleer 2,3, Ivone Jakasa 4, WH Irwin McLean 5, Sanja Kezic 6, Alan D Irvine 2,3,7,a
PMCID: PMC7477645  PMID: 32954014

Abstract

Background: Impaired skin barrier is an important etiological factor in atopic dermatitis (AD). The structural protein filaggrin (FLG) plays a major role in maintenance of the competent skin barrier and its deficiency is associated with enhanced susceptibility to mechanical injury. Here we examined biomechanical characteristics of the corneocytes in children with AD and healthy controls.

Methods: We recruited 20 children with AD and 7 healthy children. They were genotyped for filaggrin gene ( FLG) loss-of-function mutations. Stratum corneum was collected from clinically unaffected skin by adhesive tapes. Cell stiffness (apparent elastic modulus, Ea) was determined by atomic force microscopy and filaggrin degradation products (NMF) by liquid chromatography. Skin barrier function was assessed through trans-epidermal water loss (TEWL) and disease severity by the SCORing Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) tool.

Results:  Corneocytes collected from AD patients showed a decreased elastic modulus which was strongly correlated with NMF and TEWL, but not with SCORAD. As compared with healthy controls, AD patients had reduced TEWL and NMF levels regardless of FLG mutations. NMF was strongly correlated with TEWL.

Conclusion: Our findings demonstrate that AD patients have decreased corneocyte stiffness which correlates with reduced levels of filaggrin degradation products, NMF and skin barrier function. Altered mechanical properties of the corneocytes likely contribute to the loss of mechanical integrity of the SC and to reduced skin barrier function in AD.

Keywords: Atopic dermatitis, filaggrin, corneocyte stiffness, elastic modulus, Atomic Force Microscopy, Natural Moisturizing Factor

Introduction

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a common inflammatory skin disease, with a lifetime prevalence up to 20% ( Drislane & Irvine, 2020; Weidinger et al., 2018). Impaired skin permeability barrier, which is largely provided by the stratum corneum (SC), is an important etiological factor in AD ( Elias & Schmuth, 2009; Kezic et al., 2014). SC, the outermost skin layer is comprised of terminally differentiated, anucleated keratinocytes, called corneocytes, embedded in a layered extracellular lipid matrix. Corneocytes are delimited by cornified envelopes (CE) - insoluble 10 nm thick structures composed of highly crosslinked proteins covalently bound to a 5 nm thick monolayer of ceramides replacing cell membranes of viable keratinocytes. They are joined together by modified desmosomes immobilized by cross-linking to the CE and attached to the keratin cytoskeleton filling the cell interior ( Elias, 2008).

Intrinsic or acquired deficiency of an epidermal protein filaggrin is regarded as a major contributor to the compromised skin barrier function in AD ( McAleer & Irvine, 2013; O’Regan et al., 2009). Filaggrin has multiple roles in maintenance of the mechanical integrity of the SC barrier. It aligns keratin filaments within the corneocytes and contributes to the composition and structure of CE, thus likely affecting the mechanical properties of the corneocytes. Indirectly, filaggrin influences the SC mechanical integrity through its degradation products, which contribute to a pool of hygroscopic molecules collectively called natural moisturizing factors (NMF). NMF regulate SC hydration, crucial for the plasticity of the skin, its pH and activity of enzymes involved in key homeostatic processes in the SC including lipid synthesis, maturation of CE and desquamation ( Guneri et al., 2019; Rawlings, 2014). Therefore, deficiency of filaggrin will likely affect mechanical stability of the SC and its resistance to cracking and chapping, common hallmarks of AD skin.

Recently, we have demonstrated in mouse models that filaggrin and/or NMF deficiency lead to altered topography of the corneocyte surface and to its decreased elastic modulus ( Thyssen et al., 2019). In the present study, we investigated whether mechanical properties of the corneocytes are affected in AD developed by humans and how they correlate with FLG genotype, NMF levels and permeability barrier function measured by trans-epidermal water loss (TEWL) in clinically non-affected skin of the patients.

Methods

Study population

Children with AD ( n = 20) were recruited in a dedicated AD clinic in Children’s Health Ireland at Crumlin, Dublin between Jan 2013 and July 2013. Individuals were identified from a cohort of children attending this clinic, sequential patients who attended the clinic and who met the inclusion/exclusion criteria were invited to attend. Severity of disease was determined by a Scoring Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) score. All patients were treatment naive, apart from the use of emollients and hydrocortisone 1% cream or ointment. All patients were asked not to use any topical agents for 24 h prior to assessment. As controls, seven children were recruited when attending for elective procedures under general anesthesia. Inclusion criteria for the control group were not having AD, any history suggestive of AD or any other inflammatory skin disease. As this was an explorative study with no prior data to guide us as to effect size, we were not able to calculate power estimates prior to the study commencement. In order to be certain that we fully understood the FLG status of participants we only included children with 4 Irish grandparents. Children who had previously used topical corticosteroids stronger than 1% hydrocortisone or who had used topical tacrolimus were excluded. There were no other exclusion criteria. The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the research ethics committee of Our Lady’s Children’s Hospital, Dublin. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients’ parents.

Stratum corneum trans-epidermal water loss measurement

TEWL measurements were performed under standardized conditions (room temperature of 22–25 °C and humidity levels of 30–35%). Patients were acclimatized for a minimum of 10 min. prior to measurement. TEWL was assessed on the clinically unaffected skin on the volar forearm using the Tewameter 300 (Courage + Khazaka electronic GmbH, Cologne, Germany).

Sampling of the stratum corneum by tape stripping

The SC was collected using the previously described method ( McAleer et al., 2018; McAleer et al., 2019) using circular adhesive tape strips (3·8 cm 2, D-Squame; Monaderm, Monaco) and a D-Squame pressure instrument D500 (CuDerm, Dallas, TX, U.S.A.). The adhesive tape was placed on the skin, 2 cm away from the lesion, and pressed for 10 seconds with a pressure of 225 g cm 2 using a D-Squame pressure instrument. Sequentially, eight consecutive tape strips were sampled from the same site and immediately stored at −80 °C. For the NMF analysis the 4 th tape was used, and for AFM analysis the 7 th tape.

Atomic force microscopy (AFM)

The detailed description of the AFM approach employed for measuring corneocyte stiffness at various cell depths has been recently published ( Milani et al., 2018). The experimental setting is schematized in Figure 1. Briefly, tape strips were thawed, let equilibrate in the

Figure 1. Stiffness tomography study of the mechanical properties (resistance) of a corneocyte (Level L7).

Figure 1.

The method consists in extracting the elastic modulus at different indentation depths, in intervals of 5 nm, as presented on the force curve (F; in nN, to the right). A representative fitting curve is drawn for three different segments. The surface zone of two 5 nm intervals covers here the lipid envelope. Follow the deeper parts composed of the next two 5 nm intervals representing the cornified envelope and the keratin-rich cell interior recorded at 20 and 50 nm, respectively. A tomographic representation of the obtained stiffness measurements is presented (middle of the panel). The red colour corresponds to high rigidity and the green to a softer material (see the colour scale at the bottom). The heterogeneous mechanical properties can be observed. The lipid envelope is relatively flexible when compared with the corneocyte interior composed of the keratin -rich matrix. The cornified envelope shows an intermediate stiffness. A transmission electron microscopy image of the intermediate part of SC demonstrates the relative narrowness of the lipid and cornified envelopes visualized at the corneocyte periphery, next to the corneodesmosomes (arrows), when compared with the whole cell breadth. (From Milani et al., 2018) , copyright held by M Haftek. SC: stratum corneum.

“tape strips were thawed and let equilibrate for 30 minutes in the controlled atmosphere of the AFM facility (relative humidity = 45%; temperature = 24°C) and a small piece of each sample was stuck onto glass slides. AFM indentation experiments were carried out with a Catalyst Bioscope (Bruker Nano Surface, Santa Barbara, CA, USA) that was mounted on an optical macroscope (MacroFluo, Leica, Germany) equipped with a x10 objective. A Nanoscope V controller and Nanoscope software versions 8.15 were utilized. All quantitative measurements were performed using standard pyramidal tips (MPP-21100, Bruker AFM probes, Inc.). The tip radius given by the manufacturer was 8–12 nm. Each AFM experiment consisted in acquiring a topographic image of the centre of a cell (10 × 10 µm) and a square matrix of force curves (21–126 readings, mean readings =100; at 1µm steps in the imaged area). For each tape-strip, the study was conducted on 9–10 individual cells (except in case of two AD patients with one FLG mutation and one AD patient wild type for FLG mutations, 5 and 4 cells were used, respectively) using PeakForce QNM AFM mode at a low frequency (0.5 kHz) with the maximum applied force of 150 nN. Force curves analysis permitted extraction of the quantitative data of the elastic modulus by applying the Hertz–Sneddon model for an indentation ranging from 0 to 50 nm.

FLG genotyping

All patients were screened for the nine most common filaggrin mutations found in the Irish population (R501X, 2282del4, R2447X, S1010X, G1139X, R3419X, 3702delG, &209xA and S3247X), by either restriction digest or direct Sanger sequencing, Full details including primers sequences and PCR cycling conditions are listed in Table 1. PCR amplification reactions were performed on a Biometra T3000 Thermocycler (Göttingen, Germany).

Table 1. Screening for FLG mutations: PCR, Restriction digest and/or sequencing conditions.

Mutation Primers Cycling
conditions
Restriction digest or sequencing strategy
501X F 5’ CAC GGA AAG GCT GGG CTG A 3’
R 5’ ACC TGA GTG TCC AGA CCT ATT 3’
94°C 5min (x1)
94°C 30sec
57°C 30sec
72°C 1min (x35)
72°C 5min (x1)
R501X was screened by restriction digest of a
312bp product
R501X introduces a NlaIII restriction site. To
determine presence of the R501X mutation digest
PCR product with NlaIII:
Run digests on a 3% (w/v) agarose gel.
Wildtype allele cuts to give fragments of 182bp,
109bp and 21bp.
Mutant allele cuts to give fragments of 127bp,
109bp, 55bp and 21bp.
2282del4 F 5’ AAT AGG TCT GGA CAC TCA GGT 3’
R 5’ GGG AGG ACT CAG ACT GTT T 3’
94°C 5min (x1)
94°C 30sec
57°C 30sec
72°C 1min (x35)
72°C 5min (x1
2282del4was screened by restriction digest of a
811bp product
2282del4 introduces a DraIII restriction site.
To determine presence of the 2282del4 mutation
digest PCR product with DraIII:
Run digests on a 2% (w/v) agarose gel.
Wildtype allele 811bp.
Mutant allele cuts to give fragments of 671bp and
140bp
R2447X F 5’ CCA CAC GTG GCC GGT CAG CA 3’
R 5’ GTC CTG ACC CTC TTG GGA CGT 3’
94°C 5min (x1)
94°C 30sec
64°C 30sec
72°C 1min (x35)
72°C 5min (x1
R2447X was screened by restriction digest of a
185bp product.
R2447X introduces a NlaIII restriction site.
To determine presence of the R2447X mutation
digest PCR product with NlaIII:
Run digests on a 10% TBE polyacrylamide gel.
Wildtype allele cuts to give fragments of 95bp,
69bp and 21bp.
Mutant allele cuts to give fragments of 69bp, 55bp,
40bp and 21bp.
S1040X F 5’ CCAGACAATCAGGAACTCC 3’
R 5’ ATGAGTGCTCACCTGGTAGAT 3’
94°C 3 min (x1)
94°C 30sec
62°C 30sec
72°C 1 min (x34)
72°C for 5 min
S1040X was screened by restriction digest of a
375bp PCR product.
S1040X creates a BtsI site, digestion with this
enzyme yields fragments of 251bp and 124bp
(mutant allele) whereas the wildtype allele is uncut
(375bp).
G1139X F 5’ CCAGACAATCAGGAACTCC 3
R 5’ ATGAGTGCTCACCTGGTAGAT 3
94°C 3 min
94°C 30sec
62°C 30sec
72°C 1 min (x34)
72°C 5 min
G1139X was screened by restriction digest of a
653bp PCR product.
G1139X abolishes a TspRI site, digestion with this
enzyme yields fragments of 393bp, 157bp, 51bp,
31bp, 15bp and 6bp (wildtype allele) whereas the
mutant allele generates fragments of 550bp, 51bp,
31bp, 15bp and 6bp
R3419X F 5’GCCCATGGGCGGACCAGGA 3’
R 5’GCTTCATGGTGATGCGACCA 3’
94°C 3 min
94°C 30sec
61°C 30sec
72°C 1 min(x34)
72°C 5 min
R3419X was screened by restriction digest of a
332bp PCR product
R3419X creates a NlaIII site and digestion with
this enzyme yields fragments of 307bp, 14bp, 7bp
and 4bp (wildtype allele) whereas the mutant allele
produces fragments of 252bp, 55bp, 14bp, 7bp
and 4bp
3702delG F 5’ GCA AGC AGA CAA ACT CGT AAG 3’
R 5’CAG ACA ACC TCT CGG AGT CG 3’’
94°C 3 min
94°C 30sec
62°C 30sec
72°C 1 min (x34)
72°C 5 min
3702delG was screened by direct sequencing of
a ~217bp PCR product. Use reverse primer as the
sequencing primer.
Sequenced on Applied Biosystems (Waltham,
Massachusetts, USA) 3100 DNA sequencer
Y2092X F 5’ CA CAG TCA GTG TCA GCA CAG 3’
R 5’ GGC TAA CAC TGG ATC CCC GGG 3’
94°C 3 min
94°C 30sec
62°C 30sec
72°C 1 min (x34)
72°C 5 min
Y2092X was screened by direct sequencing
of a 574bp PCR product. Use forward primer a
sequencing primer
Sequenced on Applied Biosystems (Waltham,
Massachusetts, USA) 3100 DNA sequencer
S3247X F 5’ GTA ATG AGG AAC AAT CAG GAG ACA 3’
R 5’ CTG GGG TGT CTG GAG CCG TGC 3
94°C 5min
94°C 30sec
64°C 30sec
72°C 45sec (x34)
72°C 5min
S3247X was screened by direct amplification of a
268bp product. Use forward primer a sequencing
primer
Sequenced on Applied Biosystems (Waltham,
Massachusetts, USA) 3100 DNA sequencer

Determination of filaggrin breakdown products in the stratum corneum

Natural moisturizing factor (NMF) component analysis (histidine, pyrrolidone carboxylic acid, trans- and cis-urocanic acid) and proteins was performed on the fourth consecutive strip according to the method previously described ( McAleer et al., 2019). NMF components were extracted with 500 μL 25% (w/w) ammonia solution (Merck Milllipore, The Netherlands, cat. Nr 105432), reconstituted in 500 μL water after evaporating ammonia and analysed by UV high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). The column used was a 250 × 3 mm reversed-phase Synergi 4 mm Polar-RP 80A column (Phenomenex, Torrance, CA, USA; catalogue number OOG-4336-Y0) at flow rate of 0.4 mL/min, delivered by Jasco PU-980 HPLC pump (Jasco, Tokyo, Japan). Isocratic elution was performed with a mobile phase, consisting of 4.3 mM hydrochloric acid (Merck Millipore, The Netherlands, catalogue number 6871317), 0.1 mM sodium octane-1-sulfonate (Merck Millipore, catalogue number 1.1830070025), and 2% acetonitrile (Biosolve, The Netherlands, catalogue number 001207802bs). To compensate for variable amount of stratum corneum on the tape, NMF concentrations were normalized for protein concentration. Proteins were determined with a Pierce Micro BCA protein assay kit (Thermo Fischer Scientific, Rockford, IL, USA; catalogue number 687131723235.

Statistics

Calculations were performed by using Prism 7 software (GraphPad, San Diego, CA). Difference in TEWL, Ea and NMF between AD patients and healthy controls was tested by 2-tailed Student’ or Welch’s t-test in the case of non-equal variance. Differences in Ea and NMF between AD patients with and without FLG mutations and the healthy controls wild-type for FLG mutations were tested by 2-tailed Student’ and Welch’s t-test, respectively. Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient was used to test the strength of the relationship between NMF, Ea, SCORAD and TEWL. Distribution of data was tested by Shapiro-Wilks normality test. P-value < 0.05 was considered significant.

Results

Clinical data

Summary of demographic details of the investigated population is given in Table 2 (individual values are available as underlying data ( Irvine, 2020)). Most of AD children had moderate to severe disease (SCORAD > 25) ( Kunz et al., 1997). At least one FLG mutation was found to be carried in 15 children, while in the healthy controls there were two heterozygous carriers of FLG mutations. The skin barrier function, as assessed by TEWL on non-involved skin of the volar forearm, was significantly lower in AD patients when compared to healthy controls ( P<0.01).

Table 2. Demographic details of the study participants.

Patients ( n = 20) Controls ( n = 7)
Gender a 12 males 5 males
Age (months) (Average,
range)
16.8 (3-92) 8.5 (3-12)
SCORAD (Average, range) 47.2 (9.7-70.5) n.a.
TEWL (Average, range) b, * 24.7 (9.4-43.1) 9.6 (4.0-13.1)
FLG status:
    Wild-type
    Heterozygous LOF mutation
    Homozygous/compound
heterozygous LOF mutations

5
10
5

5
2
0

afor two AD patients no gender was noted

b for one healthy control no TEWL was noted

*Difference between patients and healthy controls, P<0.01; n.a.: not applicable

TEWL: Transepidermal Water Loss

SCORAD: (SCORing Atopic Dermatitis) tool

LOF: Loss-of-function

FLG: filaggrin gene

Cell topography

Corneocytes obtained with the seventh tape strip from the non-involved forearm skin were examined and their lower surface was recorded using AFM topography mode. Representative AFM images regarding disease status and FLG genotype are shown in Figure 2 (individual images are provided as underlying data ( Irvine, 2020)). Clear-cut differences in cell surface morphology characterised by presence of numerous micro-protrusions were observed in AD patients, compared to healthy subjects. The slight variation between images recorded within the healthy and AD groups was also noted, according to the FLG genotype, but these differences were not quantified in the present study. Of note, cells from subjects that are heterozygous carriers of FLG-loss of function (LOF) mutations but did not develop AD, remained free of the surface alteration observed in AD.

Figure 2. Representative examples of morphological modifications of corneocyte surface in AD compared to healthy controls.

Figure 2.

Cell surface topography of cells harvested with the 7th consecutive tape strip in healthy subjects and AD patients presenting various FLG genotypes. Corneocytes from AD patients show numerous micro-protrusions uniformly distributed at the cell surface.

Statistical comparisons between AD and healthy groups with regard to the barrier function, corneocyte stiffness and NMF contents

As shown in Figure 3A, AD patients had significantly lower elastic moduli (Ea) of corneocytes as compared to healthy controls. A similar pattern has been observed for NMF ( Figure 3B). The values of Ea in AD patients were significantly lower as compared to the healthy controls, irrespective of the presence of FLG mutations (P<0.01 and P<0.0001, for the non-carriers and FLG mutations carriers, respectively). The same pattern has been observed for NMF (P<0.05 and P<0.01, for the non-carriers and FLG mutations carriers, respectively). AD patients had reduced skin barrier function as assessed by TEWL ( Fig. 3C).

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Elastic modulus (Ea) ( A); natural moisturizing factors (NMF) ( B) and transepidermal water loss (TEWL) ( C) in healthy controls and patients. In the figures A and B, FLG genotype is given for each subject using different symbols, as indicated in panel A. Differences in Ea, NMF and TEWL between AD patients and controls were tested by a 2-way Student t-test. ** P<0.01, **** P<0.0001.

The values of apparent elastic moduli (Ea) were strongly and positively correlated with NMF and negatively with TEWL ( Figure 4). In contrast, there was no significant association of Ea with disease severity as assessed by SCORAD. The values of TEWL were negatively correlated with NMF, indicating higher water permeability of SC presenting lower water holding capacity. However, there was no significant association between TEWL and SCORAD ( Figure 4).

Figure 4. Relationships between investigated parameters.

Figure 4.

A) Regression analysis between Young elastic modulus (Ea) and natural moisturizing factors (NMF). R 2: determination coefficient. B) Heat-map showing relationships between NMF, Ea, SCORAD and TEWL and corresponding levels of significance (P: Spearman correlation coefficient). *** P<0.001; **** P<0.0001.

Discussion

According to the “brick and mortar” concept of the SC permeability barrier, cellular elements sealed by intercellular lipids constitute a largely hydrophobic “wall” responsible for the protective functions of the outermost epidermal layer ( Elias, 1983). In AD, these structural elements are or become deficient, leading to an increased transepidermal penetration of environmental antigens and development of immune inflammatory responses ( Elias et al., 2008; Elias & Schmuth, 2009).

In a substantial proportion of AD patients, especially those of the North European origin, loss-of-function mutations in the filaggrin gene ( FLG) have been incriminated in the pathogenesis of AD ( Drislane & Irvine, 2020; O'Regan et al., 2009). Homozygous occurrence of such mutations additionally leads to hyperkeratosis, presenting clinically in the form of Ichthyosis vulgaris ( Thyssen et al., 2013), what may be an attempt to compensate for the leaky barrier. The exact mechanism through which filaggrin deficiency leads to insufficient barrier function is not yet fully understood, but there are several lines of evidence demonstrating that not only filaggrin but also its degradation products play a role ( Thyssen & Kezic, 2014). Filaggrin participates in compaction of the keratins within corneocytes, and is the principal source of NMF which is indispensable for correct SC hydration and plasticity, and becomes integrated into the cornified envelopes – the structural scaffolds for organisation of the intercellular lipid layers. We hypothesised that physical proprieties of corneocytes in AD patients would be altered contributing to impaired skin barrier. Indeed, in the present study, we showed that AD patients had significantly softer corneocytes compared to their healthy counterparts of similar age-range and of the same geographic origin, and that their elastic modulus was inversely associated with TEWL, a marker for disordered skin barrier function. Interestingly, a lower elastic modulus was also found in non-involved skin of AD patients irrespective of the presence of FLG mutations. The role of inflammation with paracrine diffusion of pro-inflammatory chemokines, cytokines and histamine should be considered as a potential source of systemic subclinical effects on non-involved skin of AD ( Danso et al., 2017; Elias et al., 2008; Gschwandtner et al., 2013; Sawada et al., 2012). Several studies convincingly showed that FLG expression is downregulated by local Th2 cytokine milieu in AD ( Howell et al., 2007; Kezic et al., 2011). A recent report incriminated one of the catalytic enzymes from the NMF production cascade in regulation of the inflammatory response. Specifically, deficient expression of keratinocyte bleomycin hydrolase resulted, in addition to the decreased degradation of filaggrin monomers into free amino acids, in an increased release of pro-inflammatory chemokines that are upregulated in skin of AD patients compared to healthy individuals ( Riise et al., 2019). Because FLG mutations remain the principal determinant of filaggrin expression and its downstream processing cascade, we quantified the levels of filaggrin breakdown products in the tape-stripped corneocytes. In agreement with previous studies, we found that, in comparison with healthy controls, AD patients had reduced NMF levels even in absence of FLG mutations. Furthermore, NMF levels were strongly associated with a reduced elastic modulus, indicating that filaggrin breakdown products contribute to the corneocyte mechanical strength. Consistently, in our recent study carried out in mouse models of filaggrin and/or NMF processing, we showed that NMF was strongly correlated with cell stiffness and affected corneocyte topography ( Thyssen et al., 2019). Of note, in the present study there was no inverse correlation of SCORAD with the corneocyte elastic modulus. Also this fits very well with data obtained in mouse models of filaggrin and/or NMF deficiency, where softer SC cells and increased TEWL occurred in the absence of macroscopically observable inflammation ( Thyssen et al., 2019). This together strongly suggests that inflammation as such is not required for abrogation of the mechanical properties of the corneocytes.

The AFM images of the corneocyte surface in clinically non-involved skin of AD patients showed presence of numerous protrusions, which is in agreement with our previous investigation ( Riethmuller et al., 2015). Notably, in that latter study the protrusions showed a dense distribution, co-existing with surface expression of corneodesmosin, suggesting that weakness of the cornified envelope due to imperfect corneocyte maturation was the reason for altered corneocyte surface texture in AD. Cornified cell envelopes undergo progressive maturation within the SC that results in increase of the cell stiffness ( Michel et al., 1988; Milani et al., 2018). This process appears to rely largely on hydration-dependent activities of transglutaminase 1 and 12R-lipoxygenase ( Guneri et al., 2019). It is, therefore, not surprising that in AD, characterized by low NMF content and, consequently, reduced hydration, expression of mRNA and the corresponding proteins composing CE is decreased ( Trzeciak et al., 2017).

Various AFM studies of human SC have been previously performed to examine differences in corneocyte morphology and/or stiffness, mostly according to the anatomic localization of the sampled area and to the cell position within the SC depth ( Fredonnet et al., 2014; Milani et al., 2018). Based on our previous work and the present study, it may be concluded that the apparent elastic modulus (Ea) represents a valid measure of the SC maturity, with all the functional consequences related to a given status. In line with this, the present report confirms that defective permeability barrier function (increased TEWL) in AD correlates with both low NMF values and relative immaturity of corneocytes.

The strength of the present study is homogeneity of the samples regarding SC depth, body location and of the age and ethnic origin of the study population, factors known to influence skin barrier ( Bensaci et al., 2015; Fluhr et al., 2014; Liu et al., 2018; McAleer et al., 2018). The main limitation of the study was the small number of healthy subjects with FLG mutations which constitute an interesting subgroup for further studies. The number of intragenic copies within the FLG gene is known to influence susceptibility to the disease ( Brown et al., 2012). This factor could be one more element helpful in dissecting the studied population into subgroups with different clinical outcomes. Furthermore, our findings do not exclude a possible impact of alterations of the corneocyte surface topography, resulting from CE immaturity, on the organisation of extracellular lipid bi-layers – the principal element of waterproofness of the SC barrier ( Elias, 2008; van Smeden & Bouwstra, 2016).

Data availability

Underlying data

Open Science Framework: Wellcome Open Access F1KR00CDE. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/N4H7F ( Irvine, 2020)

This project contains the following underlying data:

  • -

    DATA File_1 Wellcome open_DATA_06.03.2020.pdf (pdf version of individual demographic details of study participants)

  • -

    DATA file_Wellcome open_individual DATA_12.04.2020..xlsx (Excel version of individual demographic details of study participants)

  • -

    DATA file_Wellcome open_individual DATA_AFM.xlsx (Excel version of all raw Elastic modulus data)

  • -

    Haftek et al Feb 2020 Individual-AFM-images_20.02.2020._JPEG.zip (Individual images of AFM images)

  • -

    Working file_7_DATA file_1_Wellcome open_individual DATA_06.03.2020._corr file.docx (Word Doc version of individual demographic details of study participants)

Data are available under the terms of the Creative Commons Zero "No rights reserved" data waiver (CC0 1.0 Public domain dedication).

Acknowledgements

AFM imaging, force curve processing and analysis followed by extraction of the elastic moduli (Ea) were performed by Dr. Pascale Milani at BioMeca SAS, ENS Lyon, 46 Allée d’Italie, 69007 Lyon, France.

Funding Statement

This work was supported by the Wellcome Trust through a Strategic Award to WHIMcL [098439] and a BioResource Grant to ADI and WHIMcL [090066].

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

[version 1; peer review: 2 approved with reservations]

References

  1. Bensaci J, Chen ZY, Mack MC, et al. : Geometrical and topological analysis of in vivo confocal microscopy images reveals dynamic maturation of epidermal structures during the first years of life. J Biomed Opt. 2015;20(9):095004. 10.1117/1.JBO.20.9.095004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Brown SJ, Kroboth K, Sandilands A, et al. : Intragenic copy number variation within filaggrin contributes to the risk of atopic dermatitis with a dose-dependent effect. J Invest Dermatol. 2012;132(1):98–104. 10.1038/jid.2011.342 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Danso M, Boiten W, van Drongelen V, et al. : Altered expression of epidermal lipid bio-synthesis enzymes in atopic dermatitis skin is accompanied by changes in stratum corneum lipid composition. J Dermatol Sci. 2017;88(1):57–66. 10.1016/j.jdermsci.2017.05.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Drislane C, Irvine AD: The role of filaggrin in atopic dermatitis and allergic disease. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2020;124(1):36–43. 10.1016/j.anai.2019.10.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Elias PM: Epidermal lipids, barrier function, and desquamation. J Invest Dermatol. 1983;80(1 Suppl):44s–9s. 10.1038/jid.1983.12 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Elias PM: Skin barrier function. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2008;8(4):299–305. 10.1007/s11882-008-0048-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Elias PM, Hatano Y, Williams ML: Basis for the barrier abnormality in atopic dermatitis: outside-inside-outside pathogenic mechanisms. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2008;121(6):1337–43. 10.1016/j.jaci.2008.01.022 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Elias PM, Schmuth M: Abnormal skin barrier in the etiopathogenesis of atopic dermatitis. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2009;9(4):265–72. 10.1007/s11882-009-0037-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Fluhr JW, Lachmann N, Baudouin C, et al. : Development and organization of human stratum corneum after birth: electron microscopy isotropy score and immunocytochemical corneocyte labelling as epidermal maturation's markers in infancy. Br J Dermatol. 2014;171(5):978–86. 10.1111/bjd.12880 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Fredonnet J, Gasc G, Serre G, et al. : Topographical and nano-mechanical characterization of native corneocytes using atomic force microscopy. J Dermatol Sci. 2014;75(1):63–5. 10.1016/j.jdermsci.2014.04.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Gschwandtner M, Mildner M, Mlitz V, et al. : Histamine suppresses epidermal keratinocyte differentiation and impairs skin barrier function in a human skin model. Allergy. 2013;68(1):37–47. 10.1111/all.12051 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Guneri D, Voegeli R, Doppler S, et al. : The importance of 12R-lipoxygenase and transglutaminase activities in the hydration-dependent ex vivo maturation of corneocyte envelopes. Int J Cosmet Sci. 2019;41(6):563–578. 10.1111/ics.12574 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Howell MD, Kim BE, Gao P, et al. : Cytokine modulation of atopic dermatitis filaggrin skin expression. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2007;120(3 Suppl 2):R7–R12. 10.1016/j.jaci.2009.07.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Irvine A: Wellcome Open Access F1KR00CDE.2020. 10.17605/OSF.IO/N4H7F [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kezic S, Novak N, Jakasa I, et al. : Skin barrier in atopic dermatitis. Front Biosci (Landmark Ed). 2014;19:542–56. 10.2741/4225 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Kezic S, O'Regan GM, Yau N, et al. : Levels of filaggrin degradation products are influenced by both filaggrin genotype and atopic dermatitis severity. Allergy. 2011;66(7):934–40. 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2010.02540.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Kunz B, Oranje AP, Labrèze L, et al. : Clinical validation and guidelines for the SCORAD index: consensus report of the European Task Force on Atopic Dermatitis. Dermatology. 1997;195(1):10–9. 10.1159/000245677 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Liu Q, Zhang Y, Danby SG, et al. : Infant Skin Barrier, Structure, and Enzymatic Activity Differ from Those of Adult in an East Asian Cohort. Biomed Res Int. 2018;2018:1302465. 10.1155/2018/1302465 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. McAleer MA, Irvine AD: The multifunctional role of filaggrin in allergic skin disease. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2013;131(2):280–91. 10.1016/j.jaci.2012.12.668 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. McAleer MA, Jakasa I, Hurault G, et al. : Systemic and stratum corneum biomarkers of severity in infant atopic dermatitis include markers of innate and T helper cell-related immunity and angiogenesis. Br J Dermatol. 2019;180(3):586–596. 10.1111/bjd.17088 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. McAleer MA, Jakasa I, Raj N, et al. : Early-life regional and temporal variation in filaggrin-derived natural moisturizing factor, filaggrin-processing enzyme activity, corneocyte phenotypes and plasmin activity: implications for atopic dermatitis. Br J Dermatol. 2018;179(2):431–441. 10.1111/bjd.16691 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Michel S, Schmidt R, Shroot B, et al. : Morphological and biochemical characterization of the cornified envelopes from human epidermal keratinocytes of different origin. J Invest Dermatol. 1988;91(1):11–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Milani P, Chlasta J, Abdayem R, et al. : Changes in nano-mechanical properties of human epidermal cornified cells depending on their proximity to the skin surface. J Mol Recognit. 2018;31(9):e2722. 10.1002/jmr.2722 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. O'Regan GM, Sandilands A, McLean WH, et al. : Filaggrin in atopic dermatitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2009;124(3 Suppl 2):R2–6. 10.1016/j.jaci.2009.07.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Rawlings AV: Molecular basis for stratum corneum maturation and moisturization. Br J Dermatol. 2014;171(Suppl 3):19–28. 10.1111/bjd.13303 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Riethmuller C, McAleer MA, Koppes SA, et al. : Filaggrin breakdown products determine corneocyte conformation in patients with atopic dermatitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2015;136(6):1573–1580.e2. 10.1016/j.jaci.2015.04.042 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Riise R, Odqvist L, Mattsson J, et al. : Bleomycin hydrolase regulates the release of chemokines important for inflammation and wound healing by keratinocytes. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):20407. 10.1038/s41598-019-56667-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Sawada E, Yoshida N, Sugiura A, et al. : Th1 cytokines accentuate but Th2 cytokines attenuate ceramide production in the stratum corneum of human epidermal equivalents: an implication for the disrupted barrier mechanism in atopic dermatitis. J Dermatol Sci. 2012;68(1):25–35. 10.1016/j.jdermsci.2012.07.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Thyssen JP, Godoy-Gijon E, Elias PM: Ichthyosis vulgaris: the filaggrin mutation disease. Br J Dermatol. 2013;168(6):1155–66. 10.1111/bjd.12219 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Thyssen JP, Jakasa I, Riethmüller C, et al. : Filaggrin Expression and Processing Deficiencies Impair Corneocyte Surface Texture and Stiffness in Mice. J Invest Dermatol. 2019. 10.1016/j.jid.2019.07.716 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Thyssen JP, Kezic S: Causes of epidermal filaggrin reduction and their role in the pathogenesis of atopic dermatitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2014;134(4):792–9. 10.1016/j.jaci.2014.06.014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Trzeciak M, Sakowicz-Burkiewicz M, Wesserling M, et al. : Expression of Cornified Envelope Proteins in Skin and Its Relationship with Atopic Dermatitis Phenotype. Acta Derm Venereol. 2017;97(1):36–41. 10.2340/00015555-2482 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. van Smeden J, Bouwstra JA: Stratum Corneum Lipids: Their Role for the Skin Barrier Function in Healthy Subjects and Atopic Dermatitis Patients. Curr Probl Dermatol. 2016;49:8–26. 10.1159/000441540 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Weidinger S, Beck LA, Bieber T, et al. : Atopic dermatitis. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2018;4(1):1. 10.1038/s41572-018-0001-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Wellcome Open Res. 2020 Jun 8. doi: 10.21956/wellcomeopenres.17242.r38765

Reviewer response for version 1

Ellen van den Bogaard 2, Jos Smits 1

This manuscript by Haftek et al. describes the changes in nano-mechanical properties found in cornified keratinocytes of children with atopic dermatitis. The authors study the skin of twenty AD patients and seven healthy children. Using adhesive tapes, cell stiffness and filaggrin degradation products named natural moisturizing factors were analyzed. In addition, transepidermal water loss (TEWL) was measured and disease severity was assessed using the SCORAD index. This data was complemented with FLG genotyping for the nine most common FLG mutations. The authors report that cellular stiffness is significantly lower in AD patients compared to healthy volunteers, which is in line with lowered NMF levels and heightened TEWL values. The manuscript is well written and easy to read. The data is convincingly presented and investigated parameters (such as cell stiffness, NMF component concentration, and epidermal water loss) nicely correlate with each other.

Main remarks:

  1. The authors state that they tape-stripped the volunteers and measured NMF content on the 4 th strip, and cell topography on the 7 th strip for each and every volunteer, regardless of the skin type (healthy vs. atopic dermatitis). The authors do not present data or explain their choice to use the 4 th and 7 th strip. Healthy skin and AD skin (even non-involved skin) can be distinct based on stratum corneum thickness, adhesiveness, water loss, water content, protein degradation product quantity, plasticity, and more. This could directly influence the efficiency of the tape-stripping procedure, and at which stratum corneum layers the investigated parameters can be most effectively measured. Although the method of tape-stripping is widely accepted and used, and non-lesional skin was studied, the authors should explain that the chosen strips are indeed comparable between patients vs controls.

  2. The authors sampled non-lesional skin, at 2 cm distance from the lesional sites. It could well be that the skin at this 2 cm distance is affected by the inflammation at the lesional sites (e.g via diffusion of inflammatory molecules or migration of inflammatory cells). Since the non-lesional skin sites were not investigated by tissue morphology (which is understandable given the pediatric population), the authors conclusions that “inflammation as such is not required for abrogation of the mechanical properties of the corneocytes” may therefore be overstated. Could it be that more distant uninvolved skin (e.g. at a different body location) would render a different study outcome? In line with this comment, were any local disease severity parameters assessed (e.g. SUM score), besides the overall SCORAD, to better define the non-lesional skin?   

Minor remarks:

  • Methods section, “Atomic force microscopy (AFM)”: The third sentence repeats itself partly.

  • Methods section, “ FLG genotyping”: ‘&209xA’ should be ‘Y2092X’

Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?

Yes

If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?

Yes

Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?

Yes

Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?

Yes

Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?

Yes

Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?

Yes

Reviewer Expertise:

Experimental dermatology, skin inflammation, skin barrier, keratinocyte biology

We confirm that we have read this submission and believe that we have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however we have significant reservations, as outlined above.

Wellcome Open Res. 2020 Jun 8. doi: 10.21956/wellcomeopenres.17242.r38766

Reviewer response for version 1

Matthias Schmuth 1

This manuscript describes biophysical properties of corneocytes collected by D-squame tape strips from patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) as compared to those harvested from healthy control subjects. The research question is interesting, the study design is clear. Some of the measurements (NMF, AFM) were reported in prior independent investigations in skin samples, i.e. citations Riethmuller et al. 2015; and Thyssen et al. 2019. In the present manuscript, the authors confirm structural corneocyte alterations in AD and they provide additional evidence about decreased corneocyte stiffness calculated as elastic modulus. Decreased corneocyte stiffness positively correlates with levels of natural moisturizing factor (NMF) and negatively correlates with transepidermal water loss (TEWL).

Specific details as to how the authors can address any criticisms and improve the work:

Table 1: May be moved to supplements.

Table 2: Available information on gender should be listed not only as number of males – the footnote may be overlooked, this may be misleading.

Table 2: The information on age suggests that groups are not comparable (upper limit of range and average age are very different). Thus, the authors should avoid stressing similar age range in the discussion on pages 8 and 9. The mean should be shown rather than the average (or both).

Methods: Please add a more succinct description of how Ea is determined by stiffness tomography.

Figure 1: The transmission electron microscopy image shown in this figure depicts multiple corneodesmosomes. The figure legend states the narrowness of lipid cornified envelopes next to corneodesmosomes. To what degree does Ea depend on corneodesmosome density?

Figure 1: It should be checked, if reproducing this figure (previously published in Milani et al. in 2018, figure 2) is in concordance with journal policies.

Figure 3: Can the TEWL data in figures 3C be shown to include genotype information (as in figures 3A and B)?

Results/ Discussion: The increased presence of micro-protrusions should be discussed in more detail. What is the structural and biochemical basis for micro-protrusions? Since the authors state that decreased cornified envelope stiffness in AD may be linked to imperfect corneocyte maturation, data on corneocyte maturation, related enzymes (e.g. transglutaminase-1, 12R-lipoxygenase), and presence of mediators of inflammation (e.g. cytokines) would be helpful, if available (not required).

Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?

Yes

If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?

Yes

Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?

Yes

Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?

Yes

Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?

Yes

Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?

Partly

Reviewer Expertise:

Dermatology

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however I have significant reservations, as outlined above.

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Data Availability Statement

    Underlying data

    Open Science Framework: Wellcome Open Access F1KR00CDE. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/N4H7F ( Irvine, 2020)

    This project contains the following underlying data:

    • -

      DATA File_1 Wellcome open_DATA_06.03.2020.pdf (pdf version of individual demographic details of study participants)

    • -

      DATA file_Wellcome open_individual DATA_12.04.2020..xlsx (Excel version of individual demographic details of study participants)

    • -

      DATA file_Wellcome open_individual DATA_AFM.xlsx (Excel version of all raw Elastic modulus data)

    • -

      Haftek et al Feb 2020 Individual-AFM-images_20.02.2020._JPEG.zip (Individual images of AFM images)

    • -

      Working file_7_DATA file_1_Wellcome open_individual DATA_06.03.2020._corr file.docx (Word Doc version of individual demographic details of study participants)

    Data are available under the terms of the Creative Commons Zero "No rights reserved" data waiver (CC0 1.0 Public domain dedication).


    Articles from Wellcome Open Research are provided here courtesy of The Wellcome Trust

    RESOURCES