Skip to main content
iScience logoLink to iScience
. 2020 Aug 15;23(9):101466. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2020.101466

Modeling Membrane Morphological Change during Autophagosome Formation

Yuji Sakai 1,2,, Ikuko Koyama-Honda 1, Masashi Tachikawa 2,3, Roland L Knorr 1,4,5, Noboru Mizushima 1,6,∗∗
PMCID: PMC7479497  PMID: 32891055

Summary

Autophagy is an intracellular degradation process that is mediated by de novo formation of autophagosomes. Autophagosome formation involves dynamic morphological changes; a disk-shaped membrane cisterna grows, bends to become a cup-shaped structure, and finally develops into a spherical autophagosome. We have constructed a theoretical model that integrates the membrane morphological change and entropic partitioning of putative curvature generators, which we have used to investigate the autophagosome formation process quantitatively. We show that the membrane curvature and the distribution of the curvature generators stabilize disk- and cup-shaped intermediate structures during autophagosome formation, which is quantitatively consistent with in vivo observations. These results suggest that various autophagy proteins with membrane curvature-sensing properties control morphological change by stabilizing these intermediate structures. Our model provides a framework for understanding autophagosome formation.

Subject Areas: Biophysics, Cell Biology, Molecular Biology, Membrane Architecture

Graphical Abstract

graphic file with name fx1.jpg

Highlights

  • A model of morphological transition during autophagosome formation is established

  • A dynamic distribution of curvature generators stabilizes cup-shaped intermediates

  • An abundance of curvature generators regulates the size of autophagosomes

  • The model is quantitively consistent with in vivo observations


Biophysics; Cell Biology; Molecular Biology; Membrane Architecture

Introduction

Membrane-bound organelles compartmentalize eukaryotic cells and adopt various characteristic shapes such as disk-shaped cisternae, tubules, spherical vesicles, and their intermediate structures. Organellar morphology is regulated by protein and lipid compositions. Because organellar shape directly relates to organellar function, it is important to understand the mechanisms regulating organelle morphology.

All intracellular membranes are in a fluid state. Because membranes are extremely thin (approximately 5 nm thick), they can be considered quasi-two-dimensional surfaces with morphologies that are governed primarily by two elastic parameters, bending elasticity and spontaneous curvature (Helfrich, 1973). Bending elasticity corresponds to the strength of the membrane to resist bending, and spontaneous curvature corresponds to the curvature that an unconstrained membrane would adopt. Because quantitative comparisons between experimentally observed and theoretically calculated shapes have confirmed mesoscopic descriptions, the mechanisms by which intracellular force-generating machines drive remodeling of membrane-bound organelles have been explored (Bassereau et al., 2018; Lipowsky, 1991; Ramakrishnan et al., 2018).

Macroautophagy, simply referred to as autophagy hereafter, is a membrane-mediated bulk degradation process. In this process, a portion of the cytoplasm is engulfed by an organelle termed the autophagosome, which has a spherical double-membrane structure with a typical diameter of 0.5–1.0 μm (Mizushima et al., 2011). Autophagosomes then fuse with lysosomes to degrade the engulfed materials. Autophagosomes are generated de novo in the cytoplasm by the expansion of disk-shaped membrane cisternae termed phagophores (or isolation membranes). As they increase in size, the morphologies of phagophores change from disk-to cup-shaped. Eventually, they develop into double-membraned spherical structures (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Schematic Representation of Autophagosome Formation

Each shape represents an axially symmetric membrane vesicle. As surface area increases, a phagophore proceeds to transition in its shape from an initial disk to a cup-shaped intermediate to a spherical stomatocyte. The regions a, b, and c indicate the inner membrane, the outer membrane, and the rim, respectively.

Although approaches from molecular biology and genetics have been introduced to the study of this subject, the mechanism underlying these characteristic morphological changes remains largely unknown (Mizushima, 2018). In the meantime, physical and mathematical modeling approaches have begun to be used. The phagophore has three distinct regions with different membrane curvatures: two closely juxtaposed sheets, the inner (a in Figure 1) and outer (b in Figure 1) membranes, and the connecting rim (c in Figure 1). The distance between the outer and inner membranes is considered to be less than 30 nm, with a rim that is not swollen (note that the intermembrane space, which is often observed widened by electron microscopy, is actually very thin if it is appropriately fixed) (Hayashi-Nishino et al., 2009; Uemura et al., 2014; Ylä-Anttila et al., 2009), making the rim highly curved and energetically expensive (Nguyen et al., 2017). The bending energy minimization principle (Seifert et al., 1991) indicates that a disk-shaped membrane that is larger than a certain area should bend into a closed spherical structure (stomatocyte) so as to reduce the bending energy at the rim. The rim energy is proportional to the rim length, which is shortened by disk bending. This mechanism was recently proposed to be important for understanding autophagosome formation (Knorr et al., 2012) and the curling of the Golgi cisternae (Campelo et al., 2017). However, the process of autophagosome formation in vivo does not fit this simple model in two respects. First, the model predicts that the autophagosomes would be considerably smaller; a disk will be closed when its radius is only five times larger than that of the rim (r). If the length of the intermembrane space (2r) is < 30 nm, the final size of an autophagosome (2R) would be < 75 nm, which is much smaller than regular autophagosomes, which are 0.5–1.0 μm. Second, because intermediate cup-shaped structures are energetically unstable (Knorr et al., 2012), they would abruptly transform into spherical structures, which is inconsistent with in vivo observations of cup-shaped structures existing for several minutes (Tsuboyama et al., 2016). The first issue can be resolved because if the rim curvature is stabilized by its spontaneous curvature, the disk shape will be more stable, and thus, autophagosomes can become larger (Knorr et al., 2012). However, regarding the second issue, the mechanism behind the unexpected stability of the intermediate structures remains unknown. Thus, it is desired to understand the dynamics of the continuous membrane morphological transition during the whole process of autophagosome formation and to reveal the mechanism regulating the membrane curvature, particularly in the intermediate structures.

In this study, we investigated the dynamics of the continuous membrane morphological transition during autophagosome formation. We hypothesized that the morphological change is governed by the spatiotemporal regulation of putative curvature generators. Curvature generators can be various biomolecules, including proteins with partially inserted or wedge-shaped membrane domains and conical lipids (McMahon and Boucrot, 2015). Indeed, many autophagy-related (ATG) proteins contain curvature-generating (or sensing) domains (Nguyen et al., 2017). Heterogeneous distributions of autophagosomal proteins may regulate membrane curvature and stabilize autophagosome intermediates. The morphology is determined by minimizing the total energy, comprising both the bending energy of the phagophore and the partitioning entropic energy of the curvature generators. We show that this feedback effect between the membrane shape and the distribution of curvature generators can stabilize all the structures appearing during autophagosome formation: disks, cup-shaped intermediates, and spherical structures. The results obtained from this model are quantitatively consistent with observations of in vivo experiments. Furthermore, our model predicts that curvature generator abundance is positively correlated with the resulting autophagosome size, which should be helpful for identifying curvature generators experimentally.

Results

Modeling Phagophore Morphological Changes

Here, we present a model to evaluate the membrane morphological change and the distribution of curvature generators during autophagosome formation. The former is captured by the elastic bending energy of the membrane, Fbend, and the latter is captured by the partitioning entropic energy of curvature generators, Fpart. The total free energy of a membrane structure, Ftot, consists of the two parts:

Ftot=Fbend+Fpart. (Equation 1)

We assume that the membrane morphology and the distribution of curvature generators are equilibrated and can be obtained by minimizing the total free energy for a given membrane area A and area Aϕ occupied by the curvature generators. Hereafter, the area of curvature generators, Aϕ, is referred to as the abundance. Specifically, the mechanical relaxation time of biological membranes is τmech=1ms (Campelo et al., 2017), whereas the time required for autophagosome formation is τflux=10min (Tsuboyama et al., 2016). Because τmechτflux, the system should be mechanically equilibrated.

The elastic bending energy of a membrane is associated with the deviation of total curvature from the spontaneous curvature over the entire membrane and is proportional to the bending rigidity of the membrane,

Fbend=i=±,rκ2(JiJi¯)2dAi, (Equation 2)

where κ is the rigidity and Ji, Ji¯, and Ai are the total curvature, spontaneous curvature, and area, respectively, of region i (Helfrich, 1973). The geometry of the phagophore consists of three distinct regions with different curvatures (Figure 2), and the summation over index i includes the outer (+), inner (−), and rim (r) membranes. Based on our previous observations (Tsuboyama et al., 2016), we modeled the geometry of the outer and inner membranes as part of an ellipsoid structure with a bending angle α (Figure 2). The distance between the outer and inner membranes (2r) is much smaller than that of the lateral dimension (2R) and is assumed to be constant based on observations made via electron microscopy (Hayashi-Nishino et al., 2009; Uemura et al., 2014; Ylä-Anttila et al., 2009). There should be some mechanism to keep the rim radius constant but that is not known. The rim geometry is modeled as part of a torus with a fixed minor radius r=10nm. The total curvature Ji and the surface element dAi of the region i in Equation 2 are determined from the geometric parameters, such as the bending angle α, the lateral radius R, the aspect ratio γ, and the rim radius r. The complete definitions of total curvature and surface element are given in the Supplemental Information.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Description of the Phagophore Geometry Model

(A) Membrane morphology.

(B) Enlarged view of the rim and the area around it.

(C) Correspondence of the bending angle and the morphology.

We consider the curvature generators distributed on the membrane. The curvature generators induce spontaneous membrane curvature and stabilize highly curved regions by decreasing the bending energy. Proteins that are partially inserted into membranes, such as those containing amphipathic helixes, create various curvatures in a concentration-dependent manner (Campelo et al., 2008). The membrane spontaneous curvature J¯i in Equation 2 is assumed to be proportional to the area fraction ϕi of the curvature generators at region i,

J¯i=ζ2ϕi, (Equation 3)

where ζ is a proportionality coefficient (Campelo et al., 2008). The area fraction of curvature generators is uniform in each region. The curvature generators possess the partitioning entropic energy:

Fpart=-kBTi=±,rϕilnϕi+1-ϕiln1-ϕiAiaϕ, (Equation 4)

where kB, T, and aϕ are the Boltzmann constant, temperature, and surface area of a curvature generator, respectively. The surface area Ai of the region i is given in the Supplemental Information. Maldistribution of curvature generators increases the partitioning entropic energy. The balance between the bending energy Fbend and the partitioning entropic energy Fpart determines the membrane morphology and distribution of curvature generators. The model parameters are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1.

The Parameter Values of the Model

Membrane Value Curvature Generators Value
Rim radius r 10nm Spontaneous curvature ζ 0.5nm-1
Rigidity κ 20kBT Effective size aϕ 50nm2

The parameters, r, κ, and ζ are taken from Nguyen et al. (2017), Helfrich, (1973), and Campelo et al. (2008), respectively.

Stabilized Morphology Predicted by the Model

First, we determined the change in membrane morphology of a thin cisterna as the area increases. Figure 3 shows a cross-section of stable membrane structures for different total areas A in the cases with no curvature generators (Figure 3A) and with the fixed curvature generators Aϕ=0.1μm2 (Figure 3B). The line colors indicate the area fraction of the curvature generators in each region. The membrane morphology and the distribution of curvature generators are obtained by minimizing the free energy Ftot for each membrane area A. In the absence of curvature generators, a disk-shaped structure becomes a closed structure at A=0.001μm2 and there is no stable cup-shaped intermediate structure (Figure S1). In the presence of curvature generators, a disk-shaped structure stays stable at A<2.5μm2 and then transforms into a cup-shaped structure at A=2.5μm2, which continuously bends and is eventually closed at A=3.1μm2. This means that the curvature generators make the disk size larger, as predicted previously (Knorr et al., 2012), while stabilizing the intermediate cup shape. The diameter of typical autophagosomes is 0.5–1.0 μm, corresponding to an area of 2–10 μm2. This suggests the necessity of curvature generators in stabilizing the phagophore morphology observed in vivo.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Progression of the Morphological Changes as Membrane Area A Increases

The case with (A) no curvature generator and (B) a fixed area of curvature generators (i.e., abundance) with Aϕ=0.1μm2. In (B), the color represents the area fraction of curvature generators on a log scale. Each inset depicts an enlarged view of the rim.

The stability of each membrane shape is analyzed from the potential energy surface. Figure 4A shows the total free energy as a function of the bending angle α for different membrane areas A with a fixed abundance of curvature generators. The potential is minimized when α=0 and απ for small A (blue curve) and large A (green curve), respectively. This means the disk and the closed shape are stable for small and large A, respectively. The potential has double minima when α=0 and α0.4π for intermediate A (red curve). The minimum energy levels correspond to a disk- and cup-shaped structure, and they are separated by the potential barrier with kBT (Figure 4A, inset), which is comparable with the thermal fluctuation.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Relationship between the Bending Angle and the Total Membrane Area

(A) The total free energy as a function of the bending angle α for the membrane area A=2.00,2.49(Ad), and 3.10μm2 with a fixed abundance of curvature generators Aϕ=0.1μm2. The other internal variables, aspect ratio γ and area fraction ϕ±,r, are taken to minimize the free energy at each α. The minima are marked by × symbols. The inset shows an enlarged view of the free energy at A=Ad.

(B) The bending angle (solid) and the aspect ratio (dashed) as a function of the membrane area A for Aϕ=0.1 (red), 0.15 (green), and 0.2μm2 (blue). The transition points (Ad) are marked by ● symbols.

The continuous membrane morphological change is calculated with increasing membrane area. Figure 4B shows the bending angle α and the aspect ratio γ as the membrane area A increases for fixed Aϕ=0.1,0.15, and 0.2μm2. For all Aϕ, the bending angle α remains 0 until the area reaches a critical size (Ad, the maximum disk area) and jumps to α0.5π at Ad. Then, it increases gradually and finally reaches π. This represents a membrane morphological change from a disk (α=0) to a cup-shaped vesicle (0<α<π), and eventually to a closed structure (απ). The maximum disk area Ad increases with Aϕ because a larger stable disk shape requires more curvature generators in order to stabilize the curvature of its larger rim region.

The aspect ratio γ takes the maximum value immediately after the start of bending at Ad. Thus, the cup-shaped structures are elliptically deformed during intermediate stages. As the membrane area A>Ad is increased further, α gradually increases, whereas γ gradually decreases. Under such conditions, the elliptic intermediates become spherical. Considering a cup-shaped structure, an elongated (elliptic) spheroid has a smaller rim area and is more stable compared with a complete sphere. However, when the rim area becomes very small immediately before closure, an elongated spheroid has a larger curved surface and is less stable than a sphere. Thus, there is a transition from the elliptic cup shape to the complete sphere. This tendency does not depend on the abundance of curvature generators. Intermediate cup-shaped structures are also stabilized for A>Ad even for spherical geometry with fixed γ=1 (Figure S2).

Stabilization of Autophagosomal Intermediates by Redistribution of Curvature Generators

Next, we determined the redistribution of curvature generators as the membrane area increases. Figure 5A shows the average total curvature Ji=JidAi/Ai of the region i, whereas Figure 5B shows the spontaneous curvature J¯i generated by the curvature generators for curvature generators with Aϕ=0.1μm2. For a small membrane area A<Ad2.5μm2, where the membrane adopts a disk shape, the rim has a very high average curvature (Jr1/r), whereas the flat part (later becoming the outer and inner membranes) has zero curvature (J±0). The fraction of area with curvature generators on the rim ϕr is much higher than ϕ± while ϕ+=ϕ-. The rim spontaneous curvature is comparable with the average curvature, J¯rJr (with a deviation of only a few percent), and then stabilizes the rim curvature. As the membrane area increases, the rim area fraction ϕr decreases and the difference between the average curvature and the spontaneous curvature increases. The deviation becomes approximately 10% at A=Ad. The deviation raises the rim bending energy and drives the morphological transition to the cup shape.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Relationship between the Membrane Curvature of Each of the Three Parts (i.e., the Inner Membrane, Outer Membrane, and Rim) and the Total Membrane Area

(A and B) (A) Average membrane total curvature and (B) spontaneous curvature generated by curvature generators as a function of the membrane area A at Aϕ=0.1μm2.

Each vertical dotted line represents the transition point from the disk to the cup shape.

To stabilize a highly curved rim, the area fraction of the curvature generator on the rim ϕr must be twenty times higher than ϕ±. This biased distribution of the curvature generators raises the partitioning entropic energy. The entropic effect increases with membrane area (Figure S3A). There are two competitive flows of curvature generators; one is the entropy-induced flow from the rim to the inner and outer membranes, and the other is the curvature-induced flow in the opposite direction for rim stabilization. For A<Ad, the curvature-induced flow surpasses the entropy-induced flow. However, as the area increases, the entropic effect becomes stronger, and the entropy-induced flow overcomes the curvature-induced flow for AAd (Figure S3B). The curvature generators flow from the rim to the outer membrane. If all the curvature generators at the rim move to the outer membrane when the transition occurs, the outer spontaneous curvature becomes higher than the membrane total curvature, which increases the bending energy. Thus, some amount of curvature generators stay at the rim, and the distribution of curvature generators settles down to a proper value.

For A>Ad, the outer and inner membranes have positive and negative curvatures, respectively, leading to an asymmetric distribution of the curvature generators. The asymmetric distribution induces a spontaneous curvature difference between the outer and inner membranes and stabilizes the cup-shaped intermediate structures. A decrease in the rim area, along with morphological transition, maintains the mobilization of the curvature generators from the rim to the outer membrane and induces a further increase in the spontaneous curvature and bending of the outer membrane.

Controls of the Autophagosome Size by Curvature Generators

Figure 6 shows the heatmap of the bending angle α in two-dimensional parameter space with Aϕ, the abundance of curvature generators, and A, the total membrane area, as x and y axes, respectively. The heatmap is divided into three regions by the boundary formed by A=Ad and A=As, where the boundary A=As is defined at α=0.97π. For A<Ad, α=0 and the membrane takes a disk shape. For Ad<A<As, the membrane takes a cup shape (0<α<π), where α increases with A and the membrane is gradually closing. The boundary A=Ad is the first-order shape transition line. For A>As with απ, the membrane takes a closed structure. The transition from a cup to a closed shape is continuous.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Heatmap of the Bending Angle on the Plane Defined by the Area (i.e., Abundance) of Curvature Generators, Aϕ and Total Membrane Area, A

The region Aϕ>A is shown in white. The white and black dashed lines show the boundary Ad (between disk and cup shapes) and As (between cup and closed shapes). Changes in the abundance of the curvature generators Aϕ as a function of the membrane area A when the chemical potential is constant, μ=κ, (green dotted line) and proportional to the membrane curvature, μ=κJ, (green dashed line) are shown. The in vivo curve is determined by fitting the experimental data (see Figure S6).

The phase boundaries Ad and As linearly increase with the area (i.e., the abundance) of curvature generators, Aϕ. This indicates that the maximum disk area Ad and the closed area As are positively correlated with each other, suggesting that both sizes are controlled by the abundance of curvature generators. Indeed, Ad and As demonstrate a positive linear correlation As1.3Ad (see Figure 7C, dotted line).

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Comparison of the Model Predictions with In Vivo Experiments

(A) Time-lapse imaging of mouse embryonic fibroblasts expressing mRuby3-LC3B and GFP-ATG2A under starvation conditions; scale bar, 1 μm. Video S1 shows a video of this process.

(B) The bending angle α as a function of the membrane area A normalized by the closed area As. The solid curve shows the model result in which the abundance of curvature generators changes according to the fitting A¯ϕ. Images ae in (A) were taken at points ae in experiment 1 in (B). The error bars indicate the standard deviation.

(C) Relationship between the maximum disk area Ad and the closed spherical area As during autophagosome formation. The experimental data were obtained from 89 autophagic structures in starved mouse embryonic fibroblast (MEFs; red dots). The results of the models are shown as dotted and solid lines where the abundance of curvature generator is fixed and changes according to the fitting A¯ϕ, respectively.

Regulation of the Abundance of Curvature Generators

The abundance of the curvature generators Aϕ has been assumed to be fixed so far, but it can be variable during autophagosome formation. Curvature generators can be dynamically recruited from the cytosol. When the cytosol has a sufficient abundance of curvature generators and the exchange between the membrane and the cytosol is rapid enough, their abundance is equilibrated. The abundance Aϕ is obtained by minimizing the grand potential:

Ω=Ftot-μϕidAi/aϕ, (Equation 5)

for a given total membrane area A. The chemical potential μ defines the binding affinity of the curvature generators to the membrane and may increase with the membrane curvature such that μJ.

White arrows in Figure 6 indicate the relationship between the abundance of the curvature generators Aϕ and the membrane area A when the chemical potential μ is constant (dashed line) or proportional to the membrane curvature (dotted line). If the chemical potential μ is positively constant, the abundance of the curvature generator, Aϕ, increases with the membrane area A. According to the phase diagram in Figure 6, only the disk shape is stable and neither the cup nor the closed shape appears because the abundance of curvature generators is sufficient to stabilize the rim of the disk (Figure 6, the dashed line). This is also the case if the chemical potential is proportional to the membrane curvature (Figure 6, dotted line). These results are not consistent with in vivo observations (Figure 6, solid line), where the change in GFP-ATG2A intensity is shown (see the next section). These results suggest that the abundance of curvature generators is not simply determined by the equilibrium between the membrane and the cytosol. The supply of curvature generators may be limited or controlled by outside factors. Indeed, it is known that the amount of many ATG proteins increases during membrane elongation but decreases before closure (Koyama-Honda et al., 2013). The binding affinity of the curvature generators may also be regulated by the post-translational modification of membrane molecules, such as phosphorylation by ULK1 and dephosphorylation of PI3P.

Morphological Changes during In Vivo Autophagosome Formation

We compare morpho-dynamics between our model and in vivo experimental observations. Figure 7A shows time-lapse frames of live-cell imaging of autophagosome formation in starved mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) (Video S1). Microtubule-associated protein 1 light chain 3B (LC3B), one of the Atg8 homologs in mammals, is conjugated to the lipid phosphatidylethanolamine in autophagosomal membranes, and mRuby3-fused LC3B (mRuby3-LC3B) is uniformly distributed on the autophagosomal membrane (Kabeya et al., 2000; Tsuboyama et al., 2016). Among ATG proteins, we found that green fluorescent protein-fused ATG2A (GFP-ATG2A) is present primarily on the highly curved rim of autophagosome intermediates (Figure 7A). Although GFP-ATG2A is overexpressed, this localization pattern does not change when it is expressed at a level comparable with or even lower than that of endogenous ATG2A (data not shown).

Video S1. Time-Lapse Imaging of mRuby3-LC3B (Red) and GFP-ATG2A (Green), Related to Figure 7

Representative time frame images are shown in Figure 7A; scale bar, 1 μm

Download video file (1.4MB, flv)

The abundance of autophagy-related proteins on autophagosomes is regulated temporally during autophagosome formation (Koyama-Honda et al., 2013; Suzuki et al., 2013). As previously reported (Koyama-Honda et al., 2013), the intensity of the mRuby3-LC3B signal increases and plateaus during autophagosome formation (Figures S4 and S5). In contrast, the GFP-ATG2A signal intensity increases, reaches a peak, and decreases (Figures S4 and S5). Although a fixed abundance of curvature generators is used in the above theoretical analysis, it is logical to consider that this changes along with membrane growth as the abundance of many ATG proteins also change (Koyama-Honda et al., 2013). Because of the similarity in the behaviors between the observed GFP-ATG2A signal and supposed curvature generators, it is assumed that the intensities of mRuby-LC3B and GFP-ATG2A are proportional to the total membrane area A and the area of the rim (and thus the abundance of curvature generators Aϕ) based on their localization (Figure 7A). The intensities of mRuby-LC3B and GFP-ATG2A are positively correlated during the initial phase, when they increase (Figure S6). The correlation can be fitted with a second polynomial and obtained as

A¯ϕ=aA¯+1-aA¯2, (Equation 6)

with a=1.5, A¯ϕ=Aϕ/Aϕ0, and A¯=A/A0, where Aϕ0 and A0 are each normalization factors. The case with Aϕ0=0.3μm2 and A0=10μm2 is shown as the in vivo curve in Figure 6 and solid curve in Figure 7B.

Figure 7B shows a comparison of the bending angle α between the experiment and the above-mentioned model results. The dots show experimental data extracted from seven independent autophagosomes in vivo. For each step during autophagosome formation, the membrane area A and the bending angle α are extracted by fitting the fluorescence images with part of an ellipsoid (Figure S7). The solid line in Figure 7B shows the model result with Aϕ0=0.3μm2 and A0=10μm2. The experimental data show that the morphological transition from a disk (α0) to a cup-shaped structure (α>0) occurs at Ad0.6As, after which the cup-shaped structure is gradually closed (απ) at As. The model indeed shows that the morphological transition occurs at Ad0.6As and a cup-shaped structure is continuously closed thereafter. Therefore, our model quantitatively predicts the experimental data.

Size Scaling Law of the Phagophore and Autophagosome

As shown in Figure 6, our model suggests that the abundance of the curvature generators regulates both the maximum disk area Ad and the closed spherical area As, as these areas are well correlated. Figure 7C shows the relationship between Ad and As experimentally taken from 89 autophagic structures in starved MEFs (red dots), with a positive correlation between Ad and As. The quantitative relationship between the two variables can be expressed as As1.8Ad, which has a slightly higher slope than that obtained from the model with a fixed abundance of curvature generators, that is, As1.3Ad (shown as the dotted line in Figure 7C). This discrepancy can be resolved if the abundance of curvature generators changes during autophagosome formation according to the fitting A¯ϕ. With the normalization factor A0=40Aϕ0, the slope becomes steeper (Figure 7C, solid line) and consistent with the experimental result, that is, As1.8Ad.

Effects of Two Different Types of Curvature Generators

Thus far, the distribution of a single curvature generator has been considered for simplicity. However, multiple autophagy-related proteins are known to be present on autophagosomal membranes. Notably, most of them (e.g., ATG12, ATG5, and ATG16L1) are present on the outer autophagosomal membrane rather than the inner membrane and the rim (Mizushima et al., 2011). In addition, the autophagic membrane contains negative curvature generators such as phosphatidylethanolamine, which has a negative spontaneous curvature (Kamal et al., 2009). These proteins and lipid compositions could also produce spontaneous curvature. Thus, two types of curvature generators with different spontaneous curvatures are considered in the model. The effects of the spontaneous curvature and partitioning energy of two different types of curvature generators are incorporated into the model (Supplemental Information). Curvature generators with a positive (negative) spontaneous curvature are referred to as positive (negative) curvature generators. Here, the curvature generator used in the previous model (Figure 4B) is referred to as a strongly positive curvature generator. The addition of weakly positive curvature generators stabilizes both disk- and cup-shaped structures. The morphological transition in this situation is similar to the case with only the strongly positive curvature generator (Figure 8A, red curve). The weakly positive curvature generators are distributed uniformly on the membrane, whereas strongly positive curvature generators are localized mainly to the highly curved rim (Figure 8B). Negative curvature generators stabilize the negatively curved inner membrane of cup-shaped structures, but they cannot stabilize disk-shaped structures or the positively curved rim. Thus, a disk starts bending at a smaller A and becomes a smaller spherical structure (blue curve in Figure 8A). The negative spontaneous curvatures tend to be distributed on the inner membrane but not the positively curved rim (Figure 8C).

Figure 8.

Figure 8

Effects of Two Types of Curvature Generators with Spontaneous Curvatures ζ1 and ζ2

(A–C) (A) The bending angle α as a function of the membrane area A for three cases: only one type of positive curvature generator, ζ1=0.5nm-1,Aϕ1=0.10μm2 (also shown in Figure 4B) (posi); positive and weakly positive curvature generators combined, ζ1=5ζ2=0.5nm1 and Aϕ1=Aϕ2=0.10μm2 (posi + posi); and positive and negative curvature generators, ζ1=2.5ζ2=0.5nm1 and Aϕ1=Aϕ2=0.10μm2 (posi + nega). The area fraction ϕi,j of the type-j curvature generators in area i is shown for (B) the posi + posi case and (C) the posi + nega case.

Discussion

We hypothesized that morphological change in the phagophore membrane is governed by the spatiotemporal regulation of putative curvature generators. The morphology is determined by minimizing the total energy, which comprises the bending energy of the membrane and the partitioning entropic energy of the curvature generators. In order to investigate how curvature generators regulate and stabilize the overall morphology of autophagosome intermediates, we constructed a simple model considering changes in phagophore morphology and partitioning of curvature generators. This model allows the curvature generators to localize at the highly curved rim and stabilize it. As a result, the disk shape is stabilized until a certain membrane size is reached. When the disk size exceeds a critical threshold value, the partitioning effect causes a shape transition from a disk to a spherical stomatocyte. At the onset of the transition, the curvature symmetry between the inner and outer membranes is broken, which is accompanied by an asymmetric distribution of the curvature generators, thus stabilizing cup-shaped intermediate structures. At this point, the majority of curvature generators are still present at the rim (Figure 5). Accordingly, we conclude that intermediate structures that appear during autophagosome formation can be stable at each time point. Furthermore, our model predicts that the abundance of curvature generators is positively correlated with the resulting autophagosome size. This prediction would help identify the actual curvature generators experimentally in future research.

The exact identity of the curvature generators for autophagosomes remains unknown. The shapes of autophagosomes could be spatiotemporally regulated by proteins and lipids (Nguyen et al., 2017). Many autophagy-related proteins demonstrate characteristic spatiotemporal distributions during autophagosome formation and contain curvature-sensing domains (Nguyen et al., 2017). In yeast cells, Atg2, Atg9, and Atg18 localize to the edge, whereas Atg1, Atg8, and the Atg12–Atg5–Atg16 complex are present on the surface membrane (Suzuki et al., 2013). In contrast to mammalian ATG2, yeast Atg2 localizes to two or three punctate structures at the edge of forming autophagosomes, which correspond to the contact sites between the phagophore and ER exit sites (Graef et al., 2013; Suzuki et al., 2013). Thus, yeast Atg2 may not be involved in rim stabilization. In contrast, yeast Atg20 and Snx4/Atg24 have BAR domains that are capable of inducing membrane curvature (Popelka et al., 2017). Although mammalian ATGs do not contain functional counterparts of Atg20 and Snx4/Atg24, these molecules can be candidate autophagosomal curvature generators, at least in yeasts. Indeed, yeast cells lacking both Atg20 and Snx4/Atg24 produce smaller autophagosomes and are defective in selective autophagy (Zhao et al., 2016). In mammalian cells, most ATG proteins are present on the convex-facing outer membrane, LC3/GABARAP family proteins are present on both outer and inner membranes, and DFCP1 is present near the rim of growing phagophores (Axe et al., 2008; Koyama-Honda et al., 2013; Mizushima et al., 2011). In the present study, we found that ATG2A is present on the rim in mammalian cells as well. Although we have not yet obtained conclusive evidence, ATG2 could be a candidate autophagosomal curvature generator based on the following features. ATG2 has a conserved amphipathic helix region that is required for localization to autophagosomes and lipid droplets (Chowdhury et al., 2018; Kotani et al., 2018; Tamura et al., 2017; Zheng et al., 2017). Cells with reduced ATG2A/B levels produce small autophagosome-like structures (Kishi-Itakura et al., 2014). Recently, structural and biochemical evidence has suggested that ATG2 has ER-to-autophagosome lipid-transfer activity (Maeda et al., 2019; Osawa et al., 2019; Valverde et al., 2019), which might also contribute to the regulation of autophagosomal size. However, the lipid transfer rate of ATG2 appears to be very slow (∼0.017 lipid/s) (Maeda et al., 2019), which is much slower than the lipid mechanical relaxation time (Campelo et al., 2017). Recently it was proposed that ATG2 may have a faster lipid transfer rate (∼100 lipid/s). Therefore, the membrane shape should be equilibrated at each time point during autophagosome formation irrespective of its expansion rate. However, another recent report suggests that the lipid transfer activity of ATG2 is much higher than the experimental estimate, ∼100 lipid/s (Bülow and von Hummer, 2020), which is comparable with the lipid mechanical relaxation time and could produce non-equilibrium effects. Even in this case, a mechanism to stabilize the shape of intermediate structures is required under non-equilibrium fluctuation. Lipid transfer from the ER to the outer leaflet of autophagosomal membranes may give rise to an asymmetric distribution of lipid molecules between the outer and inner leaflets. Such an asymmetry could induce a prolate deformation of a vesicle (Seifert et al., 1991). However, this is not observed during the formation of typical autophagosomes. The asymmetry may be resolved by putative lipid scrambling activity. In any case, it is important to differentiate a curvature-stabilizing effect from lipid-transfer activity in expanding the autophagosomal membrane.

Limitations of the Study

In this study, we investigated the effect of putative curvature generators on morphological change in membranes during autophagosome formation. A limitation of this study is that we have not yet identified the autophagosomal curvature generator(s) experimentally. Although ATG2 is a good candidate because it is present primarily at the highly curved rim and has an amphipathic helix region, we are still working to determine whether this is a primary curvature generator. Another remaining question is how the abundance of these curvature generators on the autophagosomal membrane is regulated. In this study, we propose that it is not simply determined by membrane morphology and the distribution of the curvature generators. We speculate that it is regulated by biochemical mechanisms such as protein phosphorylation rather than a physical mechanism. In our model, the membrane morphology is considered as only a part of an ellipse. It would be valuable to extend the model to deal with various shapes. We also assume the membrane morphology and the distribution of curvature generators are equilibrated at a given membrane area. It would be valuable to consider lipid transfer activity during membrane elongation.

Resource Availability

Lead Contact

Further information and requests for resources and reagents should be directed to and will be fulfilled by the Lead Contact, Noboru Mizushima (nmizu@m.u-tokyo.ac.jp).

Materials Availability

All unique reagents generated in this study are available from the Lead Contact with a completed Materials Transfer Agreement.

Date and Code Availability

This study did not generate new datasets.

Methods

All methods can be found in the accompanying Transparent Methods supplemental file.

Acknowledgments

We thank Drs. Atsushi Mochizuki and Takashi Taniguchi (Kyoto University) for helpful discussions. This work was supported by a Research Fellowship for Young Scientists (grant number JP18K14693) from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) (to Y.S.) and Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research (18H04874) from JSPS (to M.T.) and Exploratory Research for Advanced Technology (ERATO; grant number JPMJER1702) from the Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST) (to N.M.). The numerical computations have been performed with the RIKEN supercomputer system (HOKUSAI).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.S., I.K-H., M.T., R.L.K., and N.M.; Methodology, Y.S., I.K-H., M.T., and N.M.; Investigation, Y.S., I.K-H., and N.M.; Formal analysis, Y.S. and I.K-H.; Writing, Y.S. and N.M.; Visualization, Y.S. and I. K-H; Funding acquisition, Y.S., I.K-H., M.T., and N.M.; Resources, Y.S., I.K-H., and N.M.; Supervision, Y.S. and N.M.

Declaration of Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Published: September 25, 2020

Footnotes

Supplemental Information can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2020.101466.

Contributor Information

Yuji Sakai, Email: yuji-sakai@m.u-tokyo.ac.jp.

Noboru Mizushima, Email: nmizu@m.utokyo.ac.jp.

Supplemental Information

Document S1. Transparent Methods and Figures S1–S7
mmc1.pdf (489.9KB, pdf)

References

  1. Axe E.L., Walker S.A., Manifava M., Chandra P., Roderick H.L., Habermann A., Griffiths G., Ktistakis N.T. Autophagosome formation from membrane compartments enriched in phosphatidylinositol 3-phosphate and dynamically connected to the endoplasmic reticulum. J. Cell Biol. 2008;182:685–701. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200803137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bassereau P., Jin R., Baumgart T., Deserno M., Dimova R., Frolov V.A., Bashkirov P.V., Grubmüller H., Jahn R., Risselada H.J. The 2018 biomembrane curvature and remodeling roadmap. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2018;51:343001. doi: 10.1088/1361-6463/aacb98. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bülow S., von Hummer G. Kinetics of Atg2-mediated lipid transfer from the ER can account for phagophore expansion. bioRxiv. 2020 doi: 10.1101/2020.05.12.090977. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  4. Campelo F., McMahon H.T., Kozlov M.M. The hydrophobic insertion mechanism of membrane curvature generation by proteins. Biophys. J. 2008;95:2325–2339. doi: 10.1529/biophysj.108.133173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Campelo F., van Galen J., Turacchio G., Parashuraman S., Kozlov M.M., García-Parajo M.F., Malhotra V. Sphingomyelin metabolism controls the shape and function of the golgi cisternae. Elife. 2017;6:e24603. doi: 10.7554/eLife.24603. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Chowdhury S., Otomo C., Leitner A., Ohashi K., Aebersold R., Lander G.C., Otomo T. Insights into autophagosome biogenesis from structural and biochemical analyses of the ATG2A-WIPI4 complex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A. 2018;16:E9792–E9801. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1811874115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Graef M., Friedman J.R., Graham C., Babu M., Nunnari J. ER exit sites are physical and functional core autophagosome biogenesis components. Mol. Biol. Cell. 2013;24:2918–2931. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E13-07-0381. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hayashi-Nishino M., Fujita N., Noda T., Yamaguchi A., Yoshimori T., Yamamoto A. A subdomain of the endoplasmic reticulum forms a cradle for autophagosome formation. Nat. Cell Biol. 2009;11:1433–1437. doi: 10.1038/ncb1991. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Helfrich W. Elastic properties of lipid bilayers: theory and possible experiments. Z. Naturforsch. C. 1973;28:693–703. doi: 10.1515/znc-1973-11-1209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kabeya Y., Mizushima N., Ueno T., Yamamoto A., Kirisako T., Noda T., Kominami E., Ohsumi Y., Yoshimori T. LC3, a mammalian homologue of yeast Apg8p, is localized in autophagosome membranes after processing. EMBO J. 2000;19:5720–5728. doi: 10.1093/emboj/19.21.5720. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Kamal M.M., Mills D., Grzybek M., Howard J. Measurement of the membrane curvature preference of phospholipids reveals only weak coupling between lipid shape and leaflet curvature. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A. 2009;106:22245–22250. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0907354106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Kishi-Itakura C., Koyama-Honda I., Itakura E., Mizushima N. Ultrastructural analysis of autophagosome organization using mammalian autophagy-deficient cells. J. Cell Sci. 2014;127(Pt 18):4089–4102. doi: 10.1242/jcs.156034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Knorr R.L., Dimova R., Lipowsky R. Curvature of double-membrane organelles generated by changes in membrane size and composition. PLoS One. 2012;7:e32753. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0032753. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kotani T., Kirisako H., Koizumi M., Ohsumi Y., Nakatogawa H. The Atg2-Atg18 complex tethers pre-autophagosomal membranes to the endoplasmic reticulum for autophagosome formation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A. 2018;115:10363–10368. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1806727115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Koyama-Honda I., Itakura E., Fujiwara T.K., Mizushima N. Temporal analysis of recruitment of mammalian ATG proteins to the autophagosome formation site. Autophagy. 2013;9:1491–1499. doi: 10.4161/auto.25529. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Lipowsky R. The conformation of membranes. Nature. 1991;349:475–481. doi: 10.1038/349475a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Maeda S., Otomo C., Otomo T. The autophagic membrane tether ATG2A transfers lipids between membranes. Elife. 2019;8:e45777. doi: 10.7554/eLife.45777. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. McMahon H.T., Boucrot E. Membrane curvature at a glance. J. Cell Sci. 2015;128:1065–1070. doi: 10.1242/jcs.114454. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Mizushima N. A brief history of autophagy from cell biology to physiology and disease. Nat. Cell Biol. 2018;20:521–527. doi: 10.1038/s41556-018-0092-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Mizushima N., Yoshimori T., Ohsumi Y. The role of Atg proteins in autophagosome formation. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 2011;27:107–132. doi: 10.1146/annurev-cellbio-092910-154005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Nguyen N., Shteyn V., Melia T.J. Sensing membrane curvature in macroautophagy. J. Mol. Biol. 2017;429:457–472. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2017.01.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Osawa T., Kotani T., Kawaoka T., Hirata E., Suzuki K., Nakatogawa H., Ohsumi Y., Noda N.N. Atg2 mediates direct lipid transfer between membranes for autophagosome formation. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2019;26:281–288. doi: 10.1038/s41594-019-0203-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Popelka H., Damasio A., Hinshaw J.E., Klionsky D.J., Ragusa M.J. Structure and function of yeast Atg20, a sorting nexin that facilitates autophagy induction. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A. 2017;114:E10112–E10121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1708367114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Ramakrishnan N., Bradley R.P., Tourdot R.W., Radhakrishnan R. Biophysics of membrane curvature remodeling at molecular and mesoscopic lengthscales. J. Phys. Condens. Matter. 2018;30:273001. doi: 10.1088/1361-648X/aac702. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Seifert U., Berndl K., Lipowsky R. Shape transformations of vesicles: phase diagram for spontaneous- curvature and bilayer-coupling models. Phys. Rev. A. 1991;44:1182–1202. doi: 10.1103/physreva.44.1182. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Suzuki K., Akioka M., Kondo-Kakuta C., Yamamoto H., Ohsumi Y. Fine mapping of autophagy-related proteins during autophagosome formation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Cell Sci. 2013;126(Pt 11):2534–2544. doi: 10.1242/jcs.122960. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Tamura N., Nishimura T., Sakamaki Y., Koyama-Honda I., Yamamoto H., Mizushima N. Differential requirement for ATG2A domains for localization to autophagic membranes and lipid droplets. FEBS Lett. 2017;591:3819–3830. doi: 10.1002/1873-3468.12901. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Tsuboyama K., Koyama-Honda I., Sakamaki Y., Koike M., Morishita H., Mizushima N. The ATG conjugation systems are important for degradation of the inner autophagosomal membrane. Science. 2016;354:1036–1041. doi: 10.1126/science.aaf6136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Uemura T., Yamamoto M., Kametaka A., Sou Y., Yabashi A., Yamada A., Annoh H., Kametaka S., Komatsu M., Waguri S. A cluster of thin tubular structures mediates transformation of the endoplasmic reticulum to autophagic isolation membrane. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2014;34:1695–1706. doi: 10.1128/MCB.01327-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Valverde D.P., Yu S., Boggavarapu V., Kumar N., Lees J.A., Walz T., Reinisch K.M., Melia T.J. ATG2 transports lipids to promote autophagosome biogenesis. J. Cell Biol. 2019;218:1787–1798. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201811139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Ylä-Anttila P., Vihinen H., Jokitalo E., Eskelinen E.L. 3D tomography reveals connections between the phagophore and endoplasmic reticulum. Autophagy. 2009;5:1180–1185. doi: 10.4161/auto.5.8.10274. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Zhao D., Liu X.M., Yu Z.Q., Sun L.L., Xiong X., Dong M.Q., Du L.L. Atg20- and Atg24-family proteins promote organelle autophagy in fission yeast. J. Cell Sci. 2016;129:4289–4304. doi: 10.1242/jcs.194373. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Zheng J.X., Li Y., Ding Y.H., Liu J.J., Zhang M.J., Dong M.Q., Wang H.W., Yu L. Architecture of the ATG2B-WDR45 complex and an aromatic Y/HF motif crucial for complex formation. Autophagy. 2017;13:1870–1883. doi: 10.1080/15548627.2017.1359381. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Video S1. Time-Lapse Imaging of mRuby3-LC3B (Red) and GFP-ATG2A (Green), Related to Figure 7

Representative time frame images are shown in Figure 7A; scale bar, 1 μm

Download video file (1.4MB, flv)
Document S1. Transparent Methods and Figures S1–S7
mmc1.pdf (489.9KB, pdf)

Articles from iScience are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES