Abstract
The porcine ischemia-reperfusion model is one of the most commonly used for cardiology research and for testing interventions for myocardial regeneration. In creating ischemic reperfusion injury, the anesthetic protocol is important for assuring hemodynamic stability of the animal during the induction of the experimental lesion and may affect its postoperative survival. This paper reviews the many drugs and anesthetic protocols used in recent studies involving porcine models of ischemia-reperfusion injury. The paper also summarizes the most important characteristics of some commonly used anesthetic drugs. Literature was selected for inclusion in this review if the authors described the anesthetic protocol used and also reported the mortality rate attributed to the creation of the model. This information is an important consideration because the anesthetic protocol can influence hemodynamic stability during the experimental induction of an acute myocardial infarction, thereby impacting the survival rate and affecting the number of animals needed for each study.
In the past 20 y, many animal models of human diseases have been developed for cardiovascular research19,54,96 to investigate therapies for myocardial regeneration. 7,27 The porcine model of ischemia-reperfusion is one of the most commonly used models.50 The swine (Sus scrofa domestica) heart is anatomically similar to the human heart,2,41 and the lesion induced by ischemia-reperfusion is representative of the type of injury that occurs in patients who have suffered an acute myocardial infarct.16,20,48,86,87
In swine, the lesion is created by introducing an angioplasty balloon through the femoral artery and occluding the second branch of the anterior descending coronary artery for different periods of time.15,25,45,60 The use of efficacious and balanced anesthetic protocols during the induction of the lesion promotes hemodynamic stability of the animal, during both the creation of the experimental injury and the postoperative period. An appropriate anesthesia plan is an essential component of the animal use protocol.56
Selecting an anesthesia protocol that has minimal influence on infarct size is also crucial. Previous studies postulated that using volatile anesthetic agents such as halogenated gases such as sevoflurane, or opioids such as remifentanil may protect against ischemia-reperfusion injury.4,18,49,73 Therefore, the use of those agents in this model of cardiac injury remains controversial. The need to create an experimentally adequate infarct size that is compatible with life highlights the importance of selecting an appropriate anesthetic protocol.73 Other studies have described and evaluated the effects of anesthetic drugs, particularly halogenated gases, on the outcomes of various experimental models.33,69 However, to our knowledge, no reviews specifically compare the impact of different anesthetic protocols on production of porcine ischemia-reperfusion injury.50,102
The goal of this review is to compare anesthetic protocols reported in the literature and to review and categorize the main characteristics and cardiovascular effects of commonly used drugs in this area of research. To identify original papers relevant to the porcine ischemia-reperfusion model, we searched the Web of Science (WoS) database, using the search terms “myocardial infarct” and reperfus * and porcine or swine model and not human. An additional search was performed with OVID and MEDLINE databases to retrieve other works published by the same authors as well as by other research groups. After screening titles for possible relevance, papers were added to the Mendeley Library. All abstracts were screened, and when deemed relevant, the paper's full text was obtained. References lists were reviewed to identify other relevant studies.
The inclusion criteria are listed in Figure 1. The targeted model of interest is the specific porcine infarction model in which the experimental lesion is induced by occlusion of the left anterior descending coronary artery using an angioplasty balloon. The duration of ischemia in these types of investigations is typically between 40 to 150 min. Papers published between 2008 and 2018 were considered. Study inclusion required providing the mortality rate due to model creation alone, without any experimental treatment or subsequent intervention. The diversity of these studies complicates distinguishing between the percentage of mortality that can be attributed to the anesthetic protocol as opposed to that associated with the experimental treatment or intervention after the infarct has been created.
We identified a total of 16 research papers that met the inclusion criteria; these are summarized in Table 1. All studies consulted and included in this review had been approved by an ethics and animal welfare committee endorsed by the competent authority of each institution. Each research group used similar but individualized methods of preparation and conditioning of the animals. In general, animals were maintained in stable animal housing with controlled environmental conditions of temperature, light, and humidity. Before each study, they underwent an isolation period during which they received vaccinations and deworming to comply with facility standards. This period also served to acclimatize the animals to the conditions of the center. The research groups used a variety of breeds of pigs, which are included in Table 1. Among the most common breeds are the Large White, Yorkshire, and Göttingen.
Table 1.
Drugs administered (dose and route) | Date of occlusion | Mortality | |||||||||||||||
Publication | N,Breed, sex | Ketamine | Midazolam | Atropine | Thiopental | Sufentanil | Pancuronium | Amiodarone | Xylaxine | Isoflurane | Etomidate | Cistracurium | Fentanyl | Acepromazine | Lidocaine | Min | % |
Gathier et al., 201828 | Large White females, 15 | 10–15 mg/kg IM | 0.7 mg/kg IM | 0.5 mg/kg IM | 4 mg/kg IV | 10 μg/kg/h IV | mg/kg/h IV | 300 mg/h IV CRI | 25 | ||||||||
Baranyai et al., 20175 | Large White females, 60 | 12 mg/kg IM | 0.04 mg/kg IM | 300 mg/h IV CRI | 1 mg/kg IM | 2 to 2.5% | 12 | ||||||||||
Collantes et al., 201712 | Göttingen females, 6 | 15 mg/kg IM | 3% | 5 mg/kg IV | 0.03 mg/kg IV | mg/kg/h IV CRI | 0 | ||||||||||
Do et al., 201821 | Yorkshire females, 15 | 30 mg/kg IM | 0.04 mg/kg IM | 60 | |||||||||||||
Fernández-Jiménez et al., 201526 | Large White neutered males, 25 | 20 mg/kg IM | 0.002 mg/kg/h IV CRI | 300 mg/h IV CRI | 2 mg/kg IM | 20 | |||||||||||
Jansen of Lorkeers et al., 201535 | Landrance females, 19 | 10 mg/kg IM | mg/kg IM + 0.05mg/kg/h IV CRI | 2.5 µg/kg/ h IV CRI | 0.1 mg/kg/h IV CRI | 16 | |||||||||||
Gomez-Mauricio et al., 201630 | Large White females, 14 | 20 mg/ kg IM + 0.5 mg/kg/h IV CRI | 20 | ||||||||||||||
Kodstaal et al., 201444 | Landrace females, 18 | 10 mg/kg IM | 0.5 mg/kg IM + 0.7 mg/kg/h IV CRI | 0.04 mg/kg IM | 6 µg/kg/h IV CRI | 160 mg / 30 min IV CRI | |||||||||||
Saeed et al., 201375 | Large White males, 28 | 20 mg/kg IM | 2–5% | 0.5mg/kg IM | 10mg/ kg IV | 33 | |||||||||||
Uitterdijket al., 201394 | Large White, either sex, 14 | 20mg/kg IM | mg/kg | 600 mg IV + 15 mg/kg/h IV CRI | 10 | ||||||||||||
Williams et al., 2013100 | Yorkshire swine, either sex, 20 | 33 mg/kg IM | 2–4% | 26 | |||||||||||||
Mazo et al., 201253 | Gottingen minipigs, either sex, 28 | 15 mg/kg + 2mg /kg azaperone IM | 3% | 5 mg/kg IV | 0.03mg/kg IV | 0.05 mg/kg /h IV CRI | 28 | ||||||||||
Ellison et al., 201124 | Large White females, 26 | 20 mg/kg IM | 0.05 mg/ kg IM | 5 mg/kg IV | 50–200 mg IV bolus | 1–2% | 0.25 mg/kg IM | 30 | |||||||||
Schuleri et al., 201173 | Gottingen minipig females, 22 | 35 mg/kg IM | Pentobarbital 20–60 mg/kg IV | 1–2% | 33 | ||||||||||||
Baks et al., 20063 | Large White females, 10 | 20 mg/kg IM | 1mg/kg IM | Pentobarbital 12 mg/kg IV | 0.6–0.8 % | 12.5 µ/kg/h IV CRI | 10 | ||||||||||
Krombach et al., 200545 | Large White females, 44 | 10 mg/kg + Azaperone 4mg/10kg IM | 0.05 mg/ 10kg IM | Pentobarbital 10 mg/kg/h IV CRI | 23 |
In relation to the anesthetic protocol, no breed has been specifically associated with a higher mortality. However, a need for higher doses of ketamine and midazolam for sedation in the Yucatan breed as compared with the Yorkshire breed has been reported.51 Commonly animals undergoing this surgery are kept intubated under general anesthesia throughout the procedure and variables such as heart rate, respiratory rate, invasive blood pressure, pulse oximetry, and capnography are monitored on a scheduled basis. Likewise, animals used in infarct models receive adjuvant medication, usually composed of anticoagulants such as clopidogrel or aspirin, broad-spectrum antibiotics, and antiarrhythmic drugs such as amiodarone.25,102
Premedication, Sedation, And Analgesia
Ketamine.
Ketamine is an antagonist of N-methyl-D aspartate (NMDA) receptors that are traditionally used as a dissociative anesthetic. Ketamine is highly liposoluble and has a large volume of distribution. It is rapidly redistributed to peripheral tissues, with an onset of action less than 1 min after intravenous administration and 5 to 10 min when administered intramuscularly. In swine and other species, this drug has a cumulative effect. As resistance gradually develops after repeated administration, the dose administered on consecutive days must be increased to achieve the same level of sedation.47,66
Ketamine was used as a sedative for anesthetic premedication in most anesthetic protocols reviewed herein. It can be used at doses of 5 to 30 mg/kg intramuscularly, alone or combined with other drugs, and is commonly combined with benzodiazepines such as diazepam or midazolam.29,51 These drug combinations prevent or counteract the potential muscle stiffness caused by ketamine; this effect is, however, minimal in the porcine species compared with other species.68 Other adverse effects include potential muscle stiffness or hypersalivation; therefore, ketamine is combined with atropine in premedication. However, atropine may increase the oxygen demand of cardiomyocytes, which may lead to an effect that interferes with the subsequent modeling process.66
Normally, the sedative and analgesic effects of ketamine appear 10 min after administration and last between 20 and 25 min. Ketamine can also be combined with other sedatives such as α2 agonists (for example xylazine, medetomidine or dexmedetomidine) to extend the duration of its sedative effect to approximately one hour and improve its sedative and analgesic effects in animals that are difficult to manage.74,95 Ketamine in combination with opioids such as buprenorphine or methadone has been used in pigs, leading to better analgesics effects.76,78
At high doses above 25 to 30 mg/kg, ketamine can cause tachycardia and sensitize the myocardium to the action of endogenous catecholamines.9,42 Although this effect has been described in dogs, a study in rats administered a high dose of ketamine revealed good hemodynamic stability and reduced ischemia-reperfusion injury.46,83 In pigs, a high dose of ketamine appears safer for sedation than are α2 agonists, but it causes more respiratory depression and more prolonged recovery times.8,42,47,74
Tiletamine-Zolazepam.
Tiletamine-zolazepam is chemically similar to a combination of ketamine and a benzodiazepine, Tiletamine-zolazepam is administered in a 1:1 ratio (250 mg zolazepam, 250 mg tiletamine) at a dose of 20 to 25 mg/kg intramuscularly. The sedative effect appears 5 min after administration and lasts longer than that of ketamine. The initial sedative effect of tiletamine is faster than ketamine; however, it seems to produce greater respiratory depression and leads to longer anesthetic recovery times.17 In pigs, it can produce an initial state of excitement. Effects at the cardiovascular level are more pronounced than those of ketamine, especially with regard to increasing the heart rate and therefore myocardial oxygen consumption.17 It has been used in several studies of the porcine model of acute ischemia-reperfusion myocardial infarct, but seems to be associated with higher mortality rates.32,53
Midazolam.
Midazolam is a short-acting benzodiazepine that exerts its action by stimulating the receptor γ-amino butyric acid (GABA). It is administered at 0.3–0.5 mg/kg intramuscularly or intravenously. Midazolam was found to be used in several studies assessed in this review, either as a sedative or as a continuous infusion.35 However, it can prolong recovery times.20 In some animals, midazolam may lead to a period of excitement if used alone. Therefore, it is administered to previously sedated animals.55
Midazolam is mainly used as an adjunct due to its limited effects on the cardiovascular and respiratory systems. It provides a good degree of hypnosis and muscle relaxation, allowing a reduction in the doses of other drugs used at induction and also reducing the necessary minimal alveolar concentration (MAC) of inhalational anesthetics such as sevoflurane or isoflurane by up to 50%.51,61,62 Good analgesia can be obtained when midazolam is combined with an opioid.36,70
Fentanyl and Remifentanil.
Fentanyl and remifentanil are pure agonists of μ-opioid receptors. They provide an excellent analgesic effect, and due to their rapid onset of action, they can be used as “rescue” analgesics. Fentanyl and remifentanil have minimal effects at the cardiovascular level, but they cause dose-dependent respiratory depression. Therefore, we recommend that they are used with mechanical ventilation or ventilatory support.13,99
Fentanyl can be administered at a dose of 5 to 10 µg/kg as an intravenous bolus or continuous infusion rate at a dose of 0.005–0.01 mg/kg/h. Although multiple formulations are employed, injectable fentanyl is among those that are mainly used. Transdermal patches are also used in the postoperative period because fentanyl's action commences 24 h after its application.2,33 Fentanyl and remifentanil potentiate the effects of other drugs such as α 2 agonists and benzodiazepines as they can reduce their doses by 40 to 70 %.46 Remifentanil has an ultra-rapid onset of action and a shorter duration than fentanyl, with no cumulative effect, because it is rapidly inactivated by plasma esterases.72 Remifentanil is used in continuous infusion at a dose of 0.25–0.3 µg/kg/min without loading dose.13,34 As an adjuvant drug with inhaled anesthetics, it seems to cause a greater decline in mean arterial pressure and greater bradycardia than benzodiazepines such as midazolam.84 In turn, improvement and ischemic conditioning of remifentanil have been postulated in myocardial ischemia cases.34,64 Its prolonged use at high doses can increase peripheral vascular resistance due to the release of vasopressin. At high doses, it can increase mean arterial pressure and reduce cardiac output.23 Hyperalgesia has also been postulated at high doses.82
Alpha 2 Agonists.
Alpha 2 agonists act on α-adrenergic receptors. At the central level, they reduce the recapture and release of noradrenaline; at the peripheral level, they bind to the α 2 receptors, causing vasoconstriction.97 At low doses, these drugs can be useful as sedatives and analgesics when administered just before the infarct modeling process. Pigs are sensitive to these drugs.89 Because of their hemodynamic characteristics, these drugs might be dangerous after infarct creation. However, with adequate monitoring and the use of selective drugs such as dexmedetomidine at low doses of 1 to 2 µg/kg, a good analgesic level can be achieved.78 This might be accompanied by a lower heart rate and partial hypotension.77,97
At the cardiovascular level, an initial phase of peripheral vasoconstriction occurs in which vascular resistance increases. This effect is more pronounced in pulmonary vascular resistance, with elevated blood pressure and increased afterload. These changes lead to a compensatory decrease in the heart rate, ultimately producing a certain degree of bradycardia. After the first 3 to 5 min, either hypertension normalizes or hypotension develops.17,77,78,97
Xylazine is less selective than other drugs of the same family, such as medetomidine and dexmedetomidine. This family of drugs act by inhibiting the release of noradrenaline at the presynaptic level, leading to sedative, analgesic, and dose-dependent muscle relaxation effects. Dexmedetomidine could reduce MAC and the dose requirements of other anesthetics and provide a moderate analgesia and sedation. These effects have been described in dogs,63,93 but pigs may show similar effects.77,78 The effects of xylazine can be reversed with atipamezole.89,91 At high doses, xylazine can sensitize the myocardium to the action of the endogenous catecholamines, resulting in arrhythmias.31
Acepromazine.
Acepromazine is a phenothiazine that has neuroleptic action. It exerts its activity by blocking the dopaminergic receptors as well as the peripheral α-adrenergic receptor, causing peripheral vasodilation and the appearance of relative hypotension. It can be administered at doses of 0.01–0.2 mg/kg. Pigs are commonly treated intramuscularly. Maximal sedation appears at 30 to 40 min after administration, is dose-dependent, and may last 3 to 4 h. Depending on the dose administered and the characteristics of the animal, its action may last for 8 h after administration.51
Due to peripheral vasodilation, acepromazine also improves the afterload, making it a safe drug for the sedation of patients with moderate myocardial insufficiency. However, its use is discouraged in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy as it can produce marked hypotension because of the heart's inability to compensate this situation with an increase in stroke volume. Acepromazine has a poor analgesic effect that can be compensated by jointly administering opioids.10,61 In the swine model, acepromazine administered with ketamine was associated with a poor quality of recovery and an increase in the heart rate; a dose of 1 mg/kg was associated with seizures and vomiting in one animal.51
Induction
Propofol.
Propofol is a hypnotic agent that exerts its action on GABA A receptors. Due to its high lipid solubility, it has an ultra-fast effect with a short duration of 3 to 5 min. Propofol is mainly used for anesthetic induction prior to intubation at doses of 4 to 6mg/kg intravenously (IV) without previous sedation, or 1 to 3 mg/kg depending on the sedation used. Administration of propofol with a benzodiazepine and an opioid is a common combination.22,59
Propofol can be used for short-term sedation in the form of an intraoperative rescue bolus or continuous infusion for the maintenance of total intravenous anesthesia protocols at a dose of 0.1–0.5mg/kg/min. As has been described in other species, propofol produces a severe depression in breathing, causing periods of apnea mainly after rapid administration as a bolus or at high doses.65 Thus, the use of mechanical ventilation is recommended.58
In pediatric human patients, the so-called propofol infusion syndrome has been described after continued administration for periods that exceed 48 h at doses greater than 4 mg/kg/h.37 Acidosis, refractory bradycardia, myocardial failure, rhabdomyolysis, asystole, and death are also associated with this syndrome. Although this syndrome might be induced by prolonged and repeated administration, it has not been described in swine.11,88
At the cardiovascular level, hypotension results from a reduction in peripheral vascular resistance and blockade of the baroreceptors, preventing the increase in compensatory heart rate during the first 2 min after administration. This can cause mild or moderate bradycardia, resulting in a decrease in oxygen consumption and myocardial blood flow. The use of propofol in cardiac surgery has been questioned due to its depressant effect on vascular resistance and myocardial contractility.11,43 However, greater hemodynamic stability has been observed compared with induction or maintenance with thiopental.80 Propofol has been used as principal anesthetic for creation of acute myocardial infarcts to avoid the possible cardioprotective effect of halogenated gases.46,85
Thiopental.
Thiopental is a thiobarbiturate that acts on the GABA receptors. It is primarily used for anesthetic induction prior to endotracheal intubation due to its rapid action at doses of 15 to 20 mg/kg in animals without premedication and 7 to 12 mg/kg in previously sedated animals, or as a rescue hypnotic bolus. It is administered intravenously because of the irritation and muscular necrosis caused by its alkaline pH. Thiopental also results in dose-dependent respiratory depression.17 As it has a poor analgesic effect, combination with opioids or benzodiazepines is recommended.16 It is stored in the fatty tissue and has a cumulative dose-dependent effect, which discourage its use for total intravenous anesthesia. However, some published articles have reported the use of a similar agent such as pentobarbital in acute myocardial infarct model.3,23,27,42,81,94 Thiopental is less expensive than agents such as propofol or halogenated gases. In the United States, this drug is a controlled substance, which complicates obtaining and using it.
At the cardiovascular level, thiopental and drugs from the same group (e.g., pentobarbital) decrease arterial pressure,98 producing compensatory tachycardia, which increases myocardial oxygen consumption. As a compensatory effect, it also decreases coronary vascular resistance and increases myocardial blood flow, potentially leading to ventricular arrhythmias.43 In swine used for cardiology research, thiopental may interact with drugs used as premedication (for example, amiodarone), resulting in refractory hypotension.65
Maintenance
Halogenated Gases.
Isoflurane and Sevoflurane.
Isoflurane and sevoflurane are fluorinated ethers that are administered in a volatile form. They provide greater safety and control of the anesthetic plane than drugs used in total intravenous anesthesia because of the ability to rapidly change their concentration in blood and their faster transfer to the central nervous system.
The blood concentration of these drugs depends on blood/gas solubility, cardiac output, and the difference in the drug's partial pressure between the alveoli and blood. The blood/gas solubility is a measure of the velocity of induction, recovery, and changes in the levels of anesthesia. Therefore, a lower coefficient leads to a higher rate of drug concentration change. The isoflurane coefficient at 37 °C is 1.4 compared with that a coefficient of 0.63 to 0.69 for sevoflurane. This means that the necessary amount of the latter drug is greater than that of the former, leading to a higher economic cost. However, the degree of control of the anesthetic level is better with sevoflurane because its concentration in blood can be varied faster, making it a relatively safer anesthetic.33
Administering these drugs to animals that have not been previously sedated can cause agitation, nervousness, apnea, and hypoxemia. Furthermore, high concentrations of isoflurane irritate the airways and produce cough. Although induction with sevoflurane is smoother and less irritating, it is still only recommended for use in depressed animals or when vascular access is not available.
Several experimental and clinical studies have described the cardioprotective properties of halogenated gases,18 suggesting protective properties or improvement of conditioning in myocardial acute ischemia. These properties are attributed to several mechanisms.92 They help to preserve the reserves of ATP in the cardiomyocytes, decrease the number of free radicals, improve the afterload, and decrease the heart rate, ultimately reducing oxygen demand of the myocardium and its metabolism.47,64 On the other hand, a lower incidence of arrhythmias is observed relative to when an intravenous anesthetic is employed.7,42 This has been explained by some authors85 as the ability of halogenated gases to maintain calcium homeostasis, causing an antiarrhythmic effect similar to drugs such as verapamil.
In the porcine model of acute myocardial infarction of the ischemia reperfusion type, sevoflurane maintenance produced better hemodynamic stability than did isoflurane, based on mean arterial pressure.70 Frequency of ventricular fibrillation was 81% in swine anesthetized with isoflurane compared with 52% in pigs anesthetized with sevoflurane70 The survival rate in this study was 96% in the sevoflurane group compared with 75% in the isoflurane group.70
A cause of anesthetic mortality to consider in pigs is malignant hyperthermia. This condition is a recessive monogenic inherited disease characterized by a neuromuscular disorder with a unique autosomal locus, initially called the halothane gene HAL and currently called the ryanodine receptor gene Ryr1. It is characterized by the disturbance of calcium homeostasis in skeletal muscle. The most common form of malignant hyperthermia can be triggered by volatile anesthetic agents and can be fatal if not quickly treated.71 However, most vendors that provide research swine guarantee that the animals are free of the gene that predisposes to this anesthetic complication.
Antiarrhythmic adjuvants
When creating myocardial infarcts in pigs, antiarrhythmics are usually used to prevent ventricular arrhythmias, with lidocaine and amiodarone the most commonly used drugs. When administered together, these drugs seem to have a synergistic effect. As both decrease the heart rate, their use facilitates the performance of catheterization. Also, oxygenation of myocytes during diastole is greater and does not decrease cardiac output.
Lidocaine.
Lidocaine is a local amide-type anesthetic that blocks voltage-dependent sodium channels and when present in large concentrations, blocks potassium channels. Lidocaine has an antiarrhythmic effect at the ventricular level at a dose of 2 mg/kg and at a continuous infusion of 200 µg-1 mg/kg/h.52
In continuous infusion, lidocaine was found to decrease MAC, thereby decreasing the need for inhalational anesthetics.68 Lidocaine exerts anti-inflammatory and analgesic effects in species such as dogs, cats, and horses. However, despite having an antiarrhythmic effect in pigs, lidocaine does not appear to decrease the MAC of halogenated anesthetics and its analgesic effect is much lower.68
Amiodarone.
Amiodarone is a class III antiarrhythmic that exerts its effect on sodium and potassium channels, prolonging the action potential and refractory period and slowing the intracardiac conduction of the action potential.57,67 Because it has far fewer adverse effects than are reported for other antiarrhythmic agents,38,39 it is used to treat ventricular arrhythmias of unknown origin or patients who are refractory to other treatments. A dose of 5 mg/kg administered as a slow intravenous bolus can be administered in continuous infusion at 150 to 300 mg/h.
In a swine model of ventricular fibrillation, administration of amiodarone with adrenaline did not improve defibrillation efficacy and caused hypotensive effects.39 However, the study reported minor arrhythmic effects during the recovery period after ventricular fibrillation.39 The administration of continuous infusion of amiodarone in swine at 24 h after the ischemic event is described in the literature.79 The effect of amiodarone in an intravenous bolus lasts approximately 15 min.57
Extravasation of injectable drug formulation produces tissue necrosis while oral administration of high doses before the procedure can lead to greater hypotension and predispose patients to arrhythmias during the induction period. This occurs despite the absence of adverse effects in a porcine model of ischemic cardiomyopathy after long-term amiodarone administration.38,39,79,101
Discussion
This review revealed the scarcity of articles that specifically report the anesthesia-related mortality that occurs in association with creating ischemia-reperfusion myocardial infarcts in pigs. The articles that were identified showed high heterogeneity in their anesthesia protocols. In many studies, animals that die during the model development process are replaced and therefore are not counted as experimental deaths. In these studies, the mortality rate is determined only at the end of the study.
In the studies we included (Table 1), the average mortality rates associated with the creation of the model ranged from 10% to 60%. Furthermore, nearly all studies used female swine. Hormonal influences on the evolution of acute myocardial infarction in human clinical cases has been described14,102 and may be present in the porcine model.
The mortality rate of the model can be influenced by anesthetic reactions such as malignant hyperthermia, which is more frequent in swine than other species but is nonetheless rare. Another possible cause of mortality in this model that is not directly associated with anesthesia protocol is the individual variability of coronary anatomy, specifically the existence and distribution of collateral branches of the left anterior descending coronary artery. The duration of the ischemic period may also be related to the mortality rate. This relationship could indirectly be due to a longer duration of anesthesia, which is associated with a higher risk of complications, another factor that can influence the mortality rate in the period after the creation of the defect is the stress that animals may experience during subsequent handling, as pigs are easily stressed.16
The main limitation of this study is the difficulty of carrying out an exhaustive review in light of the great variety of studies that use ischemia-reperfusion injury and the difficulty of finding publications that report mortality rates during the creation of the infarct, prior to carrying out experimental procedures or other interventions. Furthermore, studies that include the mortality rate associated with creation of the infarction vary widely in the anesthetic protocols used.
Studies included in this review and those consulted in the references used ketamine or one of its derivatives, such as tiletamine, in combination with benzodiazepine as a sedative in anesthetic premedication. In the literature review, the authors found that tiletamine displays more acute cardiovascular effects than those observed after ketamine administration;28 a higher mortality rate has been reported when tiletamine is used for preanesthetic sedation.32,17 On the other hand, mortality rates vary among groups that use different antiarrhythmics such as amiodarone and lidocaine prior to the creation of the model and during the procedure. In addition, the mortality rate also varies among studies that use inhaled isoflurane or total intravenous anesthesia for anesthetic maintenance. Among the studies selected in this review, 3 had a slightly higher mortality (33%); these studies used tiletamine-zolazepam, pentobarbital or thiopental.76,82,89 Pentobarbital depresses myocardial contractility and accentuates hypotensive effects, and the combination tiletamine zolazepam seems to cause more hemodynamic instability than similar combinations such as ketamine midazolam. However, the studies we reviewed did not show an increase in mortality rate due to induction time of myocardial ischemia. A possible future project could be a multicenter comparison of centers around the world that use different anesthetic protocols to create infarcts and verify the mortality rate associated with each anesthetic protocol.
A recommended balanced anesthetic protocol could include premedication with 10 to 30 mg/kg ketamine in combination with an opioid and benzodiazepine to obtain an adequate sedation plane.8 Propofol might provide stable cardiovascular induction. After the induction period, a low dose of a selective α2 agonist such as dexmedetomidine (0.5 to 1 µg/kg) may be useful to decrease heart rate and compensate for the relative hypotension induced by propofol. However, the animal should be monitored for bradycardia. Although maintenance with sevoflurane could increase cardiovascular stability, further studies are needed to determine the effect of these drugs on infarct size. In addition, the halogenated dose may be reduced with a continuous infusion of midazolam, causing a more neutral effect at the level of the myocardium and a lower cardioprotective effect. Continuous infusion of antiarrhythmics such as lidocaine or amiodarone can also effectively prevent the occurrence of ventricular arrhythmias.
Conclusions
The choice and design of an adequate anesthetic protocol can provide hemodynamic stability in the creation of the acute myocardial infarction model, as reflected by a higher survival rate that ultimately contributes to reducing the number of animals used. More reviews and studies comparing different anesthetic agents that are specifically used to construct this type of model could be useful in the area of cardiovascular research, especially with regard to identifying drugs that influence amount of damage and to balance achieving the desired infarct size with maintaining a low mortality rate.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by Ministry of education and employment of Extremadura, regional government, through the project “TE-0008-18” and co-funded by the European Social Fund (“Investing in your future”).
This study was partially supported by the health institute Carlos III through the projectPI16/0117 and by Extremadura regional government, through the project IB16201 (Co-funded by European Regional Development BlancoFund).
References
- 1.Baez C, Blanco V, Sanchez-Margallo FM, Bayes A, Gonzalez I, Abad A, Steendam R, Franssen O, Palacios I, Sanchez B, Galvez C, Crisostomo V. 2020. Microencapsulated insulin-like growth factor-1 therapy improves cardiac function and reduces fibrosis in a porcine acute myocardial infarction model. Sci Rep 10:7166 10.1038/s41598-020-64097-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Baez C, Crisostomo V, Abad L, Nunes V, Palacios I, Garcia-Lindo M, Gonzalez M, Sun F, GomezMauricio G, Garcia-Casado J, Sanchez-Margallo FM. 2012. Intracoronary administration of porcine cardiac stem cells in a porcine model of acute myocardial infartion: A preclinical safety evaluation. Abstract presented European Society of Gene and Cell Therapy French Society of Cell and Gene Therapy Collaborative Congress 2012. 25–29 October 2012. Palais des Congres de Versailles. Versailles, France. Hum Gene Ther 23:A1–173. 10.1089/hum.2012.2519. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Baks T, Cademartiri F, Moelker AD, Weustink AC, van Geuns RJ, Mollet NR, Krestin GP, Duncker DJ, de Feyter PJ. 2006. Multislice computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for the assessment of reperfused acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 48:144–152. 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.02.059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Ballester M, Llorens J, Garcia-De-La-Asuncion J, J Perez-Griera J, Tebar J, Martinez-Leon E, Juan Belda J, Juez M. 2011. Myocardial oxidative stress protection by sevoflurane vs. propofol: A randomised controlled study in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Eur J Anaesthesiol 28:874–881. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Baranyai T, Giricz Z, Varga ZV, Koncsos G, Lukovic D, Makkos A, Sárközy M, Pávó N, Jakab A, Czimbalmos C, Vágó H, Russa Z, Tóth L, Garamvölgy R, Merkely B, Schulz R, Gyöngyösi M, Ferdinandy P. 2017. In vivo MRI and ex vivo histological assessment of the cardioprotection induced by ischemic preconditioning, postconditioning and remote conditioning in a closed-chest porcine model of reperfused acute myocardial infarction: Importance of microvasculature. J Transl Med 15:1–13. 10.1186/s12967-017-1166-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Blázquez R, Sánchez-Margallo FM, Crisóstomo V, Báez C, Maestre J, García-Lindo M, Usón A, Álvarez V, Casado JG. 2015. Intrapericardial administration of mesenchymal stem cells in a large animal model: A bio-distribution analysis. PLoS One 10:1–19. 10.1371/journal.pone.0122377. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Bolli R, Ghafghazi S. 2015. Cell therapy needs rigorous translational studies in large animal model. J Am Coll Cardiol 66:2000–2004. 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.09.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Boschert K, Flecknell PA, Fosse RT, Framstad T, Ganter M, Sjøstrand U, Stevens J, Thurmon J. 1996. Ketamine and its use in the pig: Recommendations of the consensus meeting on ketamine anaesthesia in pigs. Lab Anim 30:209–219. 10.1258/002367796780684863. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Bovill JG. 2006. Intravenous anestesia for the patient with left ventricular dysfunction. Semin Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 10:43–48. 10.1177/108925320601000108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Calzetta L, Rossi P, Bove P, Alfonsi P, Bonizzi L, Roncada P, Bernardini R, Ricciardi E, Montuori M, Pistocchini E, Mauti P, Mattei MA. 2014. Novel and effective balanced intravenous—inhalant anaesthetic protocol in swine by using unrestricted drugs. Exp Anim 63:423–433. 10.1538/expanim.14-0011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Caracci B, Aranda F. 2018. Propofol infusion syndrome. Revista Chilena de Anestesia 47:189–195. 10.25237/revchilanestv47n03.05. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Collantes M, Pelacho B, García-Velloso MJ, Gavira JJ, Abizanda G, Palacios I, Rodriguez-Borlado L, Álvarez V, Prieto E, Ecay M, Larequi E, Peñuelas I, Prósper F. 2017. Non-invasive in vivo imaging of cardiac stem/progenitor cell biodistribution and retention after intracoronary and intramyocardial delivery in a swine model of chronic ischemia reperfusion injury. J Transl Med 15:1–11. 10.1186/s12967-017-1157-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Criado AB, Segura IAG. 2003. Reduction of isoflurane MAC by fentanyl or remifentanil in rats. Vet Anaesth Analg 30:250–256. 10.1046/j.1467-2995.2003.00123.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Crisóstomo V, Sun F, Maynar M, Báez-Díaz C, Blanco V, Garcia-Lindo M, Usón J, Sánchez-Margallo FM. 2016. Common swine models of cardiovascular disease for research and training. Lab Anim (NY) 45:67–74. 10.1038/laban.935. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Crisostomo V, Baez-Diaz C, Maestre J, Garcia-Lindo M, Sun F, Casado JG, Blazquez R, Abad JL, Palacios I, Rodriguez-Borlado L, Sanchez-Margallo FM. 2015. Delayed administration of allogeneic cardiac stem cell therapy for acute myocardial infarction could ameliorate adverse remodeling: experimental study in swine. J Transl Med 13:1–16. 10.1186/s12967-015-0512-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Crisostomo V, Baez C, Abad JL, Sanchez B, Alvarez V, Rosado R, Gómez-Mauricio G, Gheysens O, Blanco-Blazquez V, Blazquez R, Torán JL, Casado JG, Aguilar S, Janssens S, Sánchez-Margallo FM, Rodriguez-Borlado L, Bernad A, Palacios I. 2019. Dose-dependent improvement of cardiac function in a swine model of acute myocardial infarction after intracoronary administration of allogeneic heart-derived cells. Stem Cell Res Ther 10:1–17. 10.1186/s13287-019-1237-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.De Monte V, Staffieri F, Di Meo A, Vannucci J, Bufalari A. 2015. Comparison of ketamine-dexmedetomidine-methadone and tiletamine-zolazepam-methadone combinations for short-term anaesthesia in domestic pigs. Vet J 205:364–368. 10.1016/j.tvjl.2015.05.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.de Ruijter W, Musters RJP, Boer C, Stienen GJM, Simonides WS, De Lange JJ. 2003. The cardioprotective effect of sevoflurane depends on protein kinase c activation, opening of mitochondrial K+ATP channels, and the production of reactive oxygen species. Anesth Analg 97:1370–1376. 10.1213/01.ANE.0000081786.74722.DA. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.DiVincenti L, Westcott R, Lee C. 2014. Sheep (Ovis aries) as a model for cardiovascular surgery and management before, during, and after cardiopulmonary bypass. J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci 53:439–448. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Dixon JA, Spinale FG. 2009. Large animal models of heart failure; A critical link in the translation of basic science to clinical practice. Circ Heart Fail 2:262–271. 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.108.814459. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Do HP, Ramanan V, Qi X, Barry J, Wright GA, Ghugre NR, Nayak KS.2018. Non-contrast assessment of microvascular integrity using arterial spin labeled cardiovascular magnetic resonance in a porcine model of acute myocardial infarction. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 20:45 10.1186/s12968-018-0468-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Dzikiti BT, Stegmann FG, Dzikiti LN, Hellebrekers LJ. 2010. Total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA) with propofol-fentanyl and propofol-midazolam combinations in spontaneously-breathing goats. Vet Anaesth Analg 37:519–525. 10.1111/j.1467-2995.2010.00568.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Elliott P, O'Hare R, Bill KM, Phillips AS, Gibson FM, Mirakhur RK. 2000. Severe cardiovascular depression with Remifentanil. Anesth Analg 91:58–61. 10.1213/00000539-200007000-00011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Ellison GM, Torella D, Dellegrottaglie S, Perez-Martinez C, Perez De Prado A, Vicinanza C, Purushothaman S, Galuppo V, Iaconetti C, Waring CD, Smith A, Torella M, Cuellas C, Gonzalo-Orden JM, Agosti V, Indolfi C, Galiñanes M, Fernandez-Vazquez F, Nadal-Ginard B. 2011. Endogenous cardiac stem cell activation by insulin-like growth factor-1/hepatocyte growth factor intracoronary injection fosters survival and regeneration of the infarcted pig heart. J Am Coll Cardiol 58:977–986. 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.05.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Falcão-Pires I, Leite-Moreira AF. 2015. Animal models of cardiovascular disease, p 335–369. In: Cokkinos DV, editor. Introduction to translational cardiovascular research. Springer International Publishing. 10.1007/978-3-319-08798-6_19 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Fernández-Jiménez R, Sánchez-González J, Agüero J, Garcia-Prieto J, López-Martín GJ, García-Ruiz JM, Molina-Iracheta A, Rosselló X, Fernández-Friera L, Pizarro G, García-Álvarez A, Dall'Armellina E, Macaya C, Choudhury RP, Fuster V, Ibáñez B. 2015. Myocardial edema after ischemia/reperfusion is not stable and follows a bimodal pattern. J Am Coll Cardiol 65:315–323. 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.11.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Gandolfi F, Vanelli A, Pennarossa G, Rahaman M, Acocella F, Brevini TAL. 2011. Large animal models for cardiac stem cell therapies. Theriogenology 75:1416–1425. 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2011.01.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Gathier WA, van Ginkel DJ, van der Naald M, van Slochteren FJ, Doevendans PA, Chamuleau SAJ. 2018. Retrograde coronary venous infusion as a delivery strategy in regenerative cardiac therapy: an overview of preclinical and clinical data. J Cardiovasc Transl Res 11:173–181. 10.1007/s12265-018-9785-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Geovanini GR, Pinna FR, Prado FAP, Tamaki WT, Marques E. 2008. Padronização da anestesia em suínos para procedimentos cirúrgicos cardiovasculares experimentais. Rev Bras Anestesiol 58:363–370. 10.1590/S0034-70942008000400005. [Article in English, Portuguese]. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Gómez-Mauricio G, Moscoso I, Martín-Cancho MF, Crisóstomo V, Prat-Vidal C, Báez-Díaz C, Sánchez-Margallo FM, Bernad A. 2016. Combined administration of mesenchymal stem cells overexpressing IGF-1 and HGF enhances neovascularization but moderately improves cardiac regeneration in a porcine model. Stem Cell Res Ther 7:1–18. 10.1186/s13287-016-0350-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Gross DR. 2009. General principles of animal selection and normal physiological values. p 1–15. Animal models in cardiovascular research. New York (NY): Springer. 10.1007/978-0-387-95962-7_1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Hellyer P, Muir WW, 3rd, Hubbell JA, Sally J. 1989. Cardiorespiratory effects of the intravenous administration of tiletamine-zolazepam to dogs. Vet Surg 18:160–165. 10.1111/j.1532-950X.1989.tb01063.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Hodgson DS. 2007. Comparison of isoflurane and sevoflurane for short-term anesthesia in piglets. Vet Anaesth Analg 34:117–124. 10.1111/j.1467-2995.2006.00309.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Irwin MG, Wrong G. 2015. Remifentanil and opioid-induced cardioprotection. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 29:S23–S26. 10.1053/j.jvca.2015.01.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Jansen of Lorkeers SJ, Gho JMIH, Koudstaal S, van Hout GPJ, Zwetsloot PPM, van Oorschot JWM, van Eeuwijk ECM, Leiner T, Hoefer IE, Goumans MJ, Doevendans PA, Sluijter PG, Chamuleau AJ. 2015. Xenotransplantation of human cardiomyocyte progenitor cells does not improve cardiac function in a porcine model of chronic ischemic heart failure. Results from a randomized, blinded, placebo controlled trial. PLoS One 10:1–19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Jerath A, Panckhurst J, Parotto M, Lightfoot N, Wasowicz M, Ferguson ND, Steel A, Beattie WS. 2017. Safety and efficacy of volatile anesthetic agents compared with standard intravenous midazolam/propofol sedation in ventilated critical care patients: A meta-analysis and systematic review of prospective trials. Anesth Analg 124:1190–1199. 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001634. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Kam P, Cardone D. 2007. Propofol infusion syndrome. Anaesthesia 62:690–701. http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/j.1365-2044.2007.05055.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Karlis G, Iacovidou N, Lelovas P, Niforopoulou P, Papalois A, Siafaka I, Mentzelopoulos S, Xanthos T. 2015. Nifekalant versus amiodarone in the treatment of cardiac arrest : an experimental study in a swine model of prolonged ventricular fibrillation. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther 29:425–431. 10.1007/s10557-015-6604-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Karlis G, Iacovidou N, Lelovas P, Niforopoulou P, Zacharioudaki A, Papalois A, Sunde K, Steen PA, Xanthos T. 2013. Effects of early amiodarone administration during and immediately after cardiopulmonary resuscitation in a swine model. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 58:114–122. 10.1111/aas.12226. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Kirschner R, Varga-Szemes A, Brott BC, Litovsky S, Elgavish A, Elgavish GA, Simor T. 2011. Quantification of myocardial viability distribution with Gd(DTPA) bolus-enhanced, signal intensity-based percent infarct mapping. Magn Reson Imaging 29:650–658. 10.1016/j.mri.2011.02.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Klocke R, Tian W, Kuhlmann MT, Nikol S. 2007. Surgical animal models of heart failure related to coronary heart disease. Cardiovasc Res 74:29–38. 10.1016/j.cardiores.2006.11.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Ko JC, Barletta M, Sen I, Weil AB, Krimins RA, Payton ME, Constable P.2013. Influence of ketamine on the cardiopulmonary effects of intramuscular administration of dexmedetomidine-buprenorphine with subsequent reversal with atipamezole in dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc 242:339–345. 10.2460/javma.242.3.339. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Kolh P, Lambermont B, Ghuysen A, Tchana-Sato V, Dogné JM, D'Orio V, Gerard P, Larbuisson R, Limet R. 2004. Comparison of the effects of propofol and pentobarbital on left ventricular adaptation to an increased afterload. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 44:294–301. 10.1097/01.fjc.0000133050.11105.c2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Koudstaal S, Bastings MM, Feyen DA, Waring CD, van Slochteren FJ, Dankers PY, Torella D, Sluijter JP, Nadal-Ginard B, Doevendans PA, Ellison GM, Chamuleau SA. 2014. Sustained delivery of insulin-like growth factor-1/hepatocyte growth factor stimulates endogenous cardiac repair in the chronic infarcted pig heart. J Cardiovasc Transl Res 7:232–241. 10.1007/s12265-013-9518-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Krombach GA, Kinzel S, Mahnken AH, Günther RW, Buecker A. 2005. Minimally invasive close-chest method for creating reperfused or occlusive myocardial infarction in swine. Invest Radiol 40:14–18. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Lairez O, Lonjaret L, Ruiz S, Marchal P, Franchitto N, Calise D, Fourcade O, Mialet-Perez J, Parini A, Minville V. 2013. Anesthetic regimen for cardiac function evaluation by echocardiography in mice: Comparison between ketamine, etomidate and isoflurane versus conscious state. Lab Anim 47:284–290. 10.1177/0023677213496236. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Larsen JR, Sivesgaard K, Christensen SD, Hønge JL, Hasenkam JM. 2011. Heart rate limitation and cardiac unloading in sevoflurane post-conditioning. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 56:57–65. 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2011.02580.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Lelovas PP, Kostomitsopoulos NG, Xanthos TT. 2014. A comparative anatomic and physiologic overview of the porcine heart. J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci 53:432–438. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Lin E, Symons J. 2010. Volatile anaesthetic myocardial protection: a review of the current literature. HSR Proc Intensive Care Cardiovasc Anesth 2:105–109. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Lindsey ML, Bolli R, Canty JM, Du XJ, Frangogiannis NG, Frantz S, Gourdie RG, Holmes JW, Jones SP, Kloner RA, Lefer DJ, Liao R, Murphy E, Ping P, Przyklenk K, Recchia FA, Schwartz Longacre L, Ripplinger CM, Van Eyk JE, Heusch G. 2018. Guidelines for experimental models of myocardial ischemia and infarction. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 314:H812–H838. 10.1152/ajpheart.00335.2017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Linkenhoker JR, Burkholder TH, Linton CG, Walden A, Abusakran-Monday KA, Rosero AP, Foltz CJ. 2010. Effective and safe anesthesia for Yorkshire and Yucatan swine with and without cardiovascular injury and intervention. J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci 49:344–351. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Malavasi LM, Greene SA, Gay JM, Grubb TL. 2016. Cardiopulmonary effects of constant-rate infusion of lidocaine for anesthesia during abdominal surgery in goats. J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci 55:431–435. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Mazo M, Hernández S, Gavira JJ, Abizanda G, Araña M, López-Martínez T, Moreno C, Merino J, Martino-Rodríguez A, Uixeira A, García de Jalón JA, Pastrana J, Martínez-Caro D, Prósper F. 2012. Treatment of reperfused ischemia with adipose-derived stem cells in a preclinical swine model of myocardial infarction. Cell Transplant 21:2723–2733. 10.3727/096368912X638847. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.McZenzie J. 1996. Swine as a model in cardiovascular research. p 7–17. In: Schook LB, Tumbleson ME, editors. Advances in swine in biomedical research. New York (NY): Plenum press. [Google Scholar]
- 55.Minghella E, Auckburally A, Pawson P, Scott ME, Flaherty D. 2016. Clinical effects of midazolam or lidocaine co-induction with a propofol target-controlled infusion (TCI) in dogs. Vet Anaesth Analg 43:472–481. 10.1111/vaa.12336. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Monnet E, Chachques JC. 2005. Animal models of heart failure: What is new? Ann Thorac Surg 79:1445–1453. 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2004.04.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Mori K, Saito T, Masuda Y, Nakaya H. 1996. Effects of class III antiarrhythmic drugs on the Na+ -activated K+ channels in guinea-pig ventricular cells. Br J Pharmacol 119:133–141. 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1996.tb15686.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Muir WW, 3rd, Gadawski JE. 1998. Respiratory depression and apnea induced by propofol in dogs. Am J Vet Res 59:157–161. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Murrell J. 2016. Pre-anaesthetics medication and sedation. p 170–188. In: Duke-Novakovski T, de Vries M, Seymour C. editors. BSAVA manual of canine and feline anaesthesia and analgesia, third edition. BSAVA printed. [Google Scholar]
- 60.Nãslund U, Häggmark S, Johansson S, Marklund G, Reiz S. 1992. A closed-chest myocardial occlusion-reperfusion model in the pig: techniques, morbidity and mortality. Eur Heart J 13:1282–1289. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a060350. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Nishimura R, Kim H, Matsunaga S, Hayashi K, Sasaki N, Takeuchi A, Tamura H. 1993. Comparison of sedative and analgesic/anesthetic effects induced by medetomidine, acepromazine, azaperone, droperidol and midazolam in laboratory pigs. J Vet Med Sci 55:687–690. 10.1292/jvms.55.687. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Nishimura R, Kim H, Matsunaga S, Hayashi K, Sasaki N, Tamura H, Takeuchi A. 1993. Sedative effect induced by a combination of medetomidine and midazolam in pigs. J Vet Med Sci 55:717–722. 10.1292/jvms.55.717. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Pascoe PJ, Raekallio M, Kuusela E, McKusick B, Granholm M. 2006. Changes in the minimum alveolar concentration of isoflurane and some cardiopulmonary measurements during three continuous infusion rates of dexmedetomidine in dogs. Vet Anaesth Analg 33:97–103. 10.1111/j.1467-2995.2005.00236.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Patel HH, Ludwig LM, Fryer RM, Hsu AK, Warltier DC, Gross G. 2002. Delta opioid agonists and volatile anesthetics facilitate cardioprotection via potentiation of K (ATP) channel opening. FASEB J 16:1468–1470. 10.1096/fj.02-0170fje. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Peck TE, Hill SA. 2014. General anaesthetics agents. p 93–97. Chapter 9. In: Peck TE, Hill SA, editors. Pharmacology for anaesthesia and intensive care, section II, 4th ed. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
- 66.Peltoniemi MA, Hagelberg NM, Olkkola KT, Saari TI. 2016. Ketamine: a review of clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in anesthesia and pain therapy. Clin Pharmacokinet 55:1059–1077. 10.1007/s40262-016-0383-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Pugsley MK. 2002. Antiarrhythmic drug development: Historical review and future perspective. Drug Dev Res 55:3–16. 10.1002/ddr.10036. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Re M, Canfran S, Largo C, de Segura IA. 2016. Effect of lidocaine-ketamine infusions combined with morphine or fentanyl in sevoflurane-anesthetized pigs. J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci 55:317–320. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Regueiro M, Fernandez F, Perez de Prado A, Altonaga JR, Cuellas C, Ajenjo JM, Orden A, Gonzalo JM. 2011. Ventricular arrhythmias and mortality associated with isoflurane and sevoflurane in a porcine model of myocardial infarction. J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci 50:73–78. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Rigby-Jones AE, Priston MJ, Sneyd JR, McCabe AP, Davis GI, Tooley MA, Thorne GC, Wolf AR. 2007. Remifentanil-midazolam sedation for paediatric patients receiving mechanical ventilation after cardiac surgery. Br J Anaesth 99:252–261. 10.1093/bja/aem135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Rosenberg H, Pollock N, Schiemann A, Bulger T, Stowell K. 2015. Malignant hyperthermia: a review. Orphanet J Rare Dis 10:1–19. 10.1186/s13023-015-0310-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Ross AK, Davis PJ, Dear Gd, Ginsberg B, McGowan FX, Stiller RD, Henson LG, Huffman C, Muir KT. 2001. Pharmacokinetics of remifentanil in anesthetized pediatric patients undergoing elective surgery or diagnostic procedures. Anesth Analg 93:1393–1401. 10.1097/00000539-200112000-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Ross S, Foëx P. 1999. Protective effects of anaesthetics in reversible and irreversible ischaemia-reperfusion injury. Br J Anaesth 82:622–632. 10.1093/bja/82.4.622. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Sabatini CF, O'Sullivan ML, Valcour JE, Sears W, Johnson RJ. 2013. Effects of injectable anesthetic combinations on left ventricular function and cardiac morphology in Sprague–Dawley rats. J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci 52:34–43. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Saeed M, Hetts SW, Do L, Sullivan SM, Wilson MW. 2012. Mri quantification of left ventricular function in microinfarct versus large infarct in swine model. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 29:159–168. 10.1007/s10554-012-0076-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Sakaguchi M, Nishimura R, Sasaki N, Ishiguro T, Tamura H, Takeuchi A. 1996. Anesthesia induced in pigs by use of a combination of medetomidine, butorphanol, and ketamine and its reversal by administration of atipamezole. Am J Vet Res 57:529–534. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Sano H, Doi M, Mimuro S, Yu S, Kurita T, Sato S. 2010. Evaluation of the hypnotic and hemodynamic effects of dexmedetomidine on propofol-sedated swine. Exp Anim 59:199–205. 10.1538/expanim.59.199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Santos M, Bertrán de Lis BT, Tendillo FJ. 2016. Effects of intramuscular dexmedetomidine in combination with ketamine or alfaxalone in swine. Vet Anaesth Analg 43:81–85. 10.1111/vaa.12259. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Sattler SM, Lubberding AF, Skibsbye L, Jabbari R, Wakili R, Jespersen T, Tfelt-Hansen J. 2019. Amiodarone treatment in the early phase of acute myocardial infarction protects against ventricular fibrillation in a porcine model. J Cardiovasc Transl Res 12:321–330. 10.1007/s12265-018-9861-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Sayin MM, Özatamer O, Taşöz R, Kilinç K, Ünal N. 2002. Propofol attenuates myocardial lipid peroxidation during coronary artery bypass grafting surgery. Br J Anaesth 89:242–246. 10.1093/bja/aef173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Schuleri KH, Centola M, Choi SH, Evers KS, Dawoud F, George RT, Lima JAC, Lardo AC. 2011. CT for evaluation of myocardial cell therapy in heart failure: A comparison with CMR imaging. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 4:1284–1293. 10.1016/j.jcmg.2011.09.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Singler B, Tröster A, Manering N, Schüttler J, Koppert W. 2007. Modulation of remifentanil—induced postinfusion hyperalgesia by propofol. Anesth Analg 104:1397–1403. 10.1213/01.ane.0000261305.22324.f3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Sloan RC, Rosenbaum M, O'Rourke D, Oppelt K, Frasier CR, Waston CA, Allan AG, Brown DA. 2011. High doses of ketamine-xylazine anesthesia reduce cardiac ischemia-reperfusion injury in guinea pigs. J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci 50:349–354. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Søfteland E, Framstad T, Thorsen T, Holmsen H. 1995. Evaluation of thiopentone-midazolam-fentanyl anaesthesia in pigs. Lab Anim 29:269–275. 10.1258/002367795781088171. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Soro M, Gallego L, Silva V, Ballester MT, Lloréns J, Alvariño A, García-Perez ML, Pastor E, Aguilar G, Martí FJ, Carratala A, Belda F. 2012. Cardioprotective effect of sevoflurane and propofol during anaesthesia and the postoperative period in coronary bypass graft surgery: A double-blind randomised study. Eur J Anaesthesiol 29:561–569. 10.1097/EJA.0b013e3283560aea. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Suzuki Y, Yeung AC, Ikeno F. 2009. The pre-clinical animal model in the translational research of interventional cardiology. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2:373–383. 10.1016/j.jcin.2009.03.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Templin C, Zweigerdt R, Schwanke K, Olmer R, Ghadri J, Emmert M, Müller E, Küest S, Cohrs S, Schibli R, Kronen P, Hilbe M, Reinisch A, Strunk D, Haverich A, Hoerstrup S, Lüscher T, Kaufmann P, Landmesser U, Martin U. 2012. Transplantation and tracking of human-induced pluripotent stem cells in a pig model of myocardial infarction. Circulation 126:430–439. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.087684. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Tendillo FJ, Mascías A, Santos M, de Segura IA, Castillo-Olivares JL. 1996. Cardiorespiratory and analgesic effects of continuous infusion of propofol in swine as experimental animals. Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim 43:126–129. [Article in Spanish]. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Tendillo FJ, Mascías A, Santos M, Segura IA, San Román F, Castillo-Olivares JL. 1996. Cardiopulmonary and analgesic effects of xylazine, detomidine, medetomidine, and the antagonist atipamezole in isoflurane-anesthetized swine. Lab Anim Sci 46:215–219. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Terris JM. 1986. Swine as a model in renal physiology and nephrology: an overview, p 1673–1690. In: Tumbleson ME, editor. Advances in swine in biomedical research. New York (NY): Plenum Press. [Google Scholar]
- 91.Thurmon JC, Tranquilli WJ, Benson GJ. 1986. Cardiopulmonary responses of swine to intravenous infusion of guaifenesin, ketamine, and xylazine. Am J Vet Res 47:2138–2140. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Toller WG, Kersten JR, Pagel PS, Hettrick DA, Warltier DC. 1999. Sevoflurane reduces myocardial infarct size and decreases the time threshold for ischemic preconditioning in dogs. Anesthesiology 91:1437–1446. 10.1097/00000542-199911000-00037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Uilenreef JJ, Murrell JC, McKusick BC, Hellebrekers LJ. 2008. Dexmedetomidine continuous rate infusion during isoflurane anaesthesia in canine surgical patients. Vet Anaesth Analg 35:1–12. 10.1111/j.1467-2995.2007.00344.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Uitterdijk A, Sneep S, van Duin RWB, Krabbendam-Peters I, Gorsse-Bakker C, Duncker DJ, van der Giessen WJ, van Beusekom HMM. 2013. Serial measurement of hFABP and high-sensitivity troponin I post-PCI in STEMI: how fast and accurate can myocardial infarct size and no-reflow be predicted? Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 305:H1104–H1110. 10.1152/ajpheart.00447.2013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Vainio OM, Bloor BC, Kim C. 1992. Cardiovascular effects of a ketamine-medetomidine combination that produces deep sedation in Yucatan mini swine. Lab Anim Sci 42:582–588. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.van der Spoel T, Jansen Of Lorkeers S, Agostoni P, van Belle E, Gyongyosi M, Sluijter J, Cramer M, Doevendans P, Chamuleau S. 2011. Human relevance of pre-clinical studies in stem cell therapy: systematic review and meta-analysis of large animal models os ischaemic heart disease. Cardiovasc Res 91:649–658. 10.1093/cvr/cvr113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Weerink MAS, Struys MMRF, Hannivoort LN, Barends CRM, Absalom AR, Colin P. 2017. Clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of dexmedetomidine. Clin Pharmacokinet 56:893–913. 10.1007/s40262-017-0507-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Weiskopf RB, Bogetz MS, Roizen MF, Reid IA. 1984. Cardiovascular and metabolic sequelae of inducing anesthesia with ketamine or thiopental in hypovolemic swine. Anesthesiology 60:214–219. 10.1097/00000542-198403000-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Westmoreland C, Sebel PS, Gropper A, Hug CC. 2006. Reduction of isoflurane Mac By fentanyl or alfentanil. Anesthesiology 77 Supplement:A394 10.1097/00000542-199209001-00394. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Williams AR, Hatzistergos KE, Addicott B, McCall F, Carvalho D, Suncion V, Morales A, Da Silva J, Sussman M, Heldman A, Hare J. 2013. Enhanced effect of combining human cardiac stem cells and bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells to reduce infarct size and to restore cardiac function after myocardial infarction. Circulation 127:213–223. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.131110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Zagorianou A, Marougkas M, Drakos SG, Diakos N, Konstantopoulos P, Perrea DN, Nana MA, Malliaras K. 2016. The effect of long-term amiodarone administration on myocardial fibrosis and evolution of left ventricular remodeling in a porcine model of ischemic cardiomyopathy. Springerplus 5:1–5. 10.1186/s40064-016-3249-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Zwetsloot P, Kouwenberg L, Sena E, Eding J, Den Ruijter H, Sluijter J, Pasterkamp G, Doevendans P, Hoefer I, Chamuleau S, Van Hout G, Jansen Lorkeers S. 2017. Optimization of large animal MI models; A systematic analysis of control groups from preclinical studies. Sci Rep 7:1–11. 10.1038/s41598-017-14294-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]