Skip to main content
Applied and Environmental Microbiology logoLink to Applied and Environmental Microbiology
. 2020 Sep 1;86(18):e01249-20. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01249-20

Vaginal Tampon Colonization by Staphylococcus aureus in Healthy Women

Myriam Chiaruzzi a, Alexia Barbry a,b, Anaëlle Muggeo b, Anne Tristan a,b, Isaline Jacquemond a,c, Cedric Badiou a, Laurence Cluzeau a, Sabine Bourdeau a, Thibaut Durand b, Astrid Engelmann b, Dorian Bosquet b, Michèle Bes a,b, Claire Prigent-Combaret c, Jean Thioulouse d, Daniel Muller c, Gérard Lina a,b,
Editor: Donald W Schaffnere
PMCID: PMC7480393  PMID: 32680868

Menstrual toxic shock syndrome (MTSS) is an uncommon severe acute disease that occurs in healthy menstruating women colonized by TSST-1-producing S. aureus who use intravaginal protection, such as tampons and menstrual cups. The catamenial product collected by the protection serves as a growth medium for S. aureus and allows TSST-1 production. Previous studies evaluated the prevalence of genital colonization by S. aureus by vaginal swabbing, but they did not examine tampon colonization. This study demonstrated a high prevalence of tampon colonization by S. aureus and the presence of the CC30 TSST-1 S. aureus clone responsible for MTSS in tampons from healthy women. The results support the vaginal carriage of this lineage in healthy women. In addition, the higher prevalence of S. aureus within tampons that do not require an applicator indicates a crucial role for handwashing before tampon handling to decrease the risk of tampon contamination.

KEYWORDS: Staphylococcus aureus, colonization, healthy women, menstruation, vagina

ABSTRACT

Tampons recovered from a cohort of 737 healthy women (median age, 32 years) were analyzed for the presence of Staphylococcus aureus. A total of 198 tampons (27%) were colonized by S. aureus, 28 (4%) by a strain producing toxic shock syndrome toxin 1 (TSST-1). S. aureus was detected more frequently in tampons that did not require an applicator for their insertion (74/233 [32%] versus 90/381 [24%]; odds ratio [OR] = 1.51 [95% confidence interval, 1.04 to 2.17]) and in women who used an intrauterine device for contraception (53/155 [34%] versus 145/572 [27%]; OR = 1.53 [95% confidence interval, 1.05 to 2.24]). The S. aureus strains isolated from tampons belonged to 22 different clonal complexes (CCs). The most prevalent CC was CC398 agr1 (n = 57 [27%]), a clone that does not produce superantigenic toxins, followed by CC30 agr3 (n = 27, 13%), producing TSST-1 (24/27 [89%]), the principal clone of S. aureus involved in menstrual toxic shock syndrome (MTSS).

IMPORTANCE Menstrual toxic shock syndrome (MTSS) is an uncommon severe acute disease that occurs in healthy menstruating women colonized by TSST-1-producing S. aureus who use intravaginal protection, such as tampons and menstrual cups. The catamenial product collected by the protection serves as a growth medium for S. aureus and allows TSST-1 production. Previous studies evaluated the prevalence of genital colonization by S. aureus by vaginal swabbing, but they did not examine tampon colonization. This study demonstrated a high prevalence of tampon colonization by S. aureus and the presence of the CC30 TSST-1 S. aureus clone responsible for MTSS in tampons from healthy women. The results support the vaginal carriage of this lineage in healthy women. In addition, the higher prevalence of S. aureus within tampons that do not require an applicator indicates a crucial role for handwashing before tampon handling to decrease the risk of tampon contamination.

INTRODUCTION

Menstrual toxic shock syndrome (MTSS) is an uncommon severe acute disease characterized by fever, hypotension, and multiorgan failure (1). It occurs in healthy menstruating women colonized by Staphylococcus aureus that produces the toxic shock syndrome toxin 1 (TSST-1) who have no protective antibodies against this toxin and use intravaginal protection, such as tampons or menstrual cups (13). The catamenial products collected by the intravaginal protection serve as a growth medium, allowing S. aureus proliferation and TSST-1 production (4). TSST-1 then gains access to the bloodstream and induces systemic illness (5). Vaginal carriage of S. aureus with a TSST-1-producing isolate represents the main risk factor for the development of MTSS in susceptible women (3).

S. aureus is an opportunistic pathogen that expresses a variety of virulence factors. Among them, TSST-1 and staphylococcal enterotoxins (SEs) belong to the family of superantigens (6). These toxins are able to corrupt the immune response by triggering aberrant T-cell activation with massive cytokine release, which is responsible for the shock observed in both MTSS and non-MTSS (1, 2, 6). The majority of human isolates of S. aureus are capable of producing at least one of these superantigens (6). However, only a portion of S. aureus isolates carry the TSST-1 gene (tst). tst is carried by mobile genetic islands, staphylococcal pathogenicity islands, inserted in the S. aureus chromosome (7). tst has been found in at least eight different S. aureus genetic lineages, the clonal complexes (CCs): CC1, CC5, CC8, CC12, CC22, CC30, CC45, and CC59 (813).

Interestingly, since the description of MTSS, most of the clinical isolates recovered from MTSS have been of the CC30 S. aureus lineage, initially described as bacteriophage lytic group I (8, 14). The origin of the epidemiological link between the TSST-1-producing CC30 S. aureus lineage and MTSS remains to be determined, but it may reflect the prevalence of vaginal carriage in healthy women who use tampons.

The aim of the present study was to determine, from tampons recovered from healthy women, the rate of tampon colonization by S. aureus, the factors contributing to S. aureus tampon colonization, and the characterization of the genetic lineages and toxin gene contents of the S. aureus isolates.

RESULTS

Cohort description.

Of the 746 female volunteers who participated, 9 reported being hospitalized in the past for complications occurring during the use of periodic tampons or menstrual cups that could potentially correspond to MTSS. In the absence of additional information about the clinical episode, they were considered ineligible for the study. The 737 remaining women included in this study are described in Table 1. Only one volunteer had a history of salpingitis. Antibiotic treatment within the 15 days prior to sampling included beta-lactam antibiotics (n = 13 amoxicillin, n = 4 amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, n = 1 cefuroxime, n = 1 cefpodoxime, n = 1 pivmecillinam), cyclines (n = 4 doxycycline, n = 3 vibramycin, n = 2 tetracycline, n = 1 physiomycine), fosfomycin (n = 4), fluoroquinolones (n = 1 ciprofloxacin, n = 1 ofloxacin, n = 1 norfloxacin), azithromycin (n = 1), spiramycin plus metronidazole (n = 1), and mupirocin (n = 1). A total of 728 participants noted the tampon brand. Tampax was the most commonly used tampon brand, followed by Nett, tampons marketed by the supermarket Carrefour, and Doulys from the supermarket Leclerc (Table 1). Other brands represented less than 5% of the collected tampons. Tampon absorbencies were predominantly between 2 and 4 droplets (515/734 [70%]).

TABLE 1.

Clinical characteristics of the healthy female volunteers (n = 737; 2011 to 2017)

Characteristic Valuea
Median age, yrs (IQR) 32 (12)
History of salpingitis 1/727 (0.1)
Antibiotics within the last 15 days 39/727 (5)
Contraception
    None 327/723 (45)
    Estroprogestative pills 243/723 (34)
    Intrauterine devices 153/737 (21)
Sexual intercourse within the last 5 days 212/728 (29)
Tampon brands 728 (99)
    Tampax 309 (42)
    Nett 199 (27)
    Carrefour 44 (6)
    Doulys 34 (5)
    Natracare 20 (3)
    OB 17 (2)
    Labell 15 (2)
    Casino 12 (2)
    Auchan 11 (2)
    U 11 (2)
    Siempre 10 (1)
    Othersb 36 (5)
Tampon absorbencies
    1 droplet 12/583 (2)
    2 droplets 149/583 (26)
    3 droplets 237/583 (41)
    4 droplets 125/583 (21)
    5 droplets 26/583 (4)
    6 droplets 34/583 (6)
Tampon with applicator 381/614 (62)
Tampon carrying time, median (IQR) 4 h 5 min (2 h)
Tampon colonized by S. aureus 198/737 (27)
Detection of one S. aureus strain 191/737 (26)
Detection of two different S. aureus strains 7/737 (1)
a

Data are given as no./total (percent) or no. (percent) unless otherwise noted.

b

Only tampon brands used by  ≥10 participants are reported.

S. aureus detection in tampons.

S. aureus was detected in 198 tampons (27% [Table 1]). Factors that impacted S. aureus tampon colonization are summarized in Table 2. The rate of S. aureus colonization was increased in women who used a tampon without an applicator (74/233 [32%]) versus women who used tampons with an applicator {90/381 (24%); odds ratio (OR = 1.51 [95% confidence interval, 1.04 to 2.17]; P = 0.031} and in women who use intrauterine devices (IUDs) for contraception (53/155 [34%] versus 145/572 [27%]; OR = 1.53 [95% confidence interval, 1.05 to 2.24]; P = 0.033). Women with IUDs were significantly older than the other women {median age, 34 years (interquartile range [IQR], 29 to 40 years) versus 31 years (IQR, 25 to 37 years); P < 0.001}.

TABLE 2.

Factors that influence S. aureus tampon colonization

Characteristic Value for healthy women volunteersa
P
S. aureus positive (n = 205) S. aureus negative (n = 532)
Median age, yrs (IQR) 31 (12) 32 (11) 0.1
Tampon carrying time, median (IQR) 4 h 0 min (2 h 50 min) 4 h 20 min (3 h 0 min) 0.3
Tampon brands
    Tampax 79/309 (26) 230/309 (74) 0.6
    Nett 59/197 (28) 138/197 (72)
    Otherb 60/216 (28) 156/216 (72)
Tampon with applicator 90/164 (55) 291/450 (65) 0.031
Absorbencies 0.96
    1 and 2 droplets 33/157 (21) 128/426 (30)
    3 and 4 droplets 106/157 (68) 256/426 (60)
    5 and 6 droplets 18/157 (11) 42/426 (10)
Antibiotics within the last 15 days 7/197 (4) 38/529 (7) 0.08
Contraception
    None 78/327 (24) 249/327 (76) 0.07
    Estroprogestative pills 67/196 (34) 176/527 (33) 0.9
    Intrauterine devices 53/198 (28) 102/529 (19) 0.033
Sexual intercourse within the last 5 days 62/194 (32) 150/524 (29) 0.4
a

Data are given as no./total (percent) unless otherwise noted.

b

Brands of tampon other than Tampax and Nett were clustered into one group for the statistical analysis.

S. aureus detection from tampons was not significantly impacted by the women’s age (P = 0.2), tampon carrying time (P = 0.3), tampon brand (P = 0.6), tampon absorbency (P = 0.96), contraception (P = 0.07), antibiotic treatment within the last 15 days (P = 0.08), contraception with estroprogestative pills (P = 0.9), or sexual intercourse within the last 5 days (P = 0.4).

S. aureus characteristics.

Based on colony morphology, only one S. aureus strain was isolated per tampon for 191 tampons, whereas two different S. aureus strains were coisolated from 7 tampons (Table 1). The 205 S. aureus strains were genotyped by DNA microarrays. CC, agr type, mecA, and the superantigen gene contents of all strains are described in Table 3. The S. aureus strains belonged to 22 different CCs. The most prevalent CC was CC398 (n = 56 [27%]), followed by CC30 (n = 27 [13%]), CC8 (n = 24 [12%]), CC5 and CC45 (n = 19 [9%]), and CC15 (n = 15 [7%]). The other CCs represented less than 5% of the CCs. One hundred twenty-eight strains were agr1 (62%), 39 agr2 (19%), 34 agr3 (17%), and 4 agr4 (2%). Only six strains were mecA positive, four belonged to CC5 agr2, and two belonged to CC8 agr2. A total of 108/205 (53%) vaginal strains contained at least one gene encoding one of the superantigens. Twenty-eight strains (14%) were tst positive: 24 were CC30 (86%), 2 were CC5 (7%), 1 was CC8 (4%), and 1 was CC22 (4%). Concerning the other superantigen genes, sea was detected in 32 strains (16%), seb in 10 strains (5%), sec and sel in 20 strains (10%), sed, sej, and ser in 12 strains (6%), the enterotoxin gene cluster egc (containing seg, sei, sem, and sen and/or seo) in 87 strains (42%), seh in 9 strains (4%), and sek and seq in 7 strains (3%). tst was significantly associated with the detection of sea (18/28 [64%] versus 14/177 [8%], P < 0.001), egc (27/28 [96%] versus 60/177 [34%], P < 0.001) and seh (4/28 [14%] versus 5/177 [3%], P = 0.022). tst was associated with agr3 (24/28 [86%] versus 4/177 [2%], P < 0.001). tst, sea, egc, and seh were significantly associated with CC30 (24/27 [89%] versus 3/178 [2%]; 21/27 [78%] versus 12/178 [7%], P < 0.001; 27/27 [100%] versus 61/178 [34%], P < 0.001; 4/27 [15%] versus 5/178 [3%], P = 0.02). Of the seven tampons with two strains, four were colonized with tst-positive CC30. In six tampons, including those four, the agr types of the strains codetected in the tampons were different (Table 4).

TABLE 3.

Characteristics of S. aureus strainsa

Clonal complex agr type Superantigen gene(s) Presence of mecA No. of strains (n = 205)
CC1 agr3 sea, seb, seh, sek, seq 2
sea, seh, sek, seq 2
seh, sek 1
CC5 agr2 tst, sec, sel, sed, sej, ser, egc Yes 1
tst, sed, sej, ser, egc Yes 1
sea, egc 1
sed, sej, ser, egc Yes 1
sed, sej, ser, egc Yes 1
sed, sej, ser, egc 1
sed, sej, ser, egc 4
egc, sep 1
egc 8
CC6 agr1 sea 3
CC7 agr1 6
CC8 agr1 tst 1
sea, sed, sej, ser Yes 2
sea 1
seb 1
sec, sel, egc 1
sed, sej, ser 1
egc 1
16
CC9 agr2 egc 4
CC12 agr2 seb, sep 1
CC15 agr2 seb 1
14
CC20 agr1 seb, egc 1
sec, sel, egc 1
CC22 agr1 tst, sec, sel, egc 1
egc 7
CC25 agr1 egc 2
CC30 agr3 tst, sea, seb, seh, sek, egc 1
tst, sea, seh, egc 3
tst, sea egc 14
tst, egc 6
sea, egc 3
CC45 agr1 sec, sel, egc 14
egc 4
CC45 agr4 egc 1
CC59 agr1 seb, seb, sek, seq 3
CC88 agr3 sec, sel 1
1
CC97 agr1 sec, sel 1
2
CC101 agr1 1
CC121 agr4 egc 3
CC182 agr1 egc 1
CC188 agr1 1
CC398 agr1 56
a

CC, clonal complex; agr, accessory gene regulator; tst, TSST-1 gene; sea to ser, staphylococcal enterotoxin A to R genes; egc, enterotoxin gene cluster including seg, sei, sem, and sen and/or seo; mecA, methicillin resistance gene A; —, no detection.

TABLE 4.

Characteristics of S. aureus strains codetected in tampons

Participant no. Clonal complex agr type Superantigen gene(s)
96 CC25 agr1 egc
CC30 agr3 tst, sea, egc
126 CC22 agr1 egc
CC398 agr1
137 CC15 agr2 tst, sed, sej, ser, egc
CC25 agr1 egc
256 CC15 agr2
CC30 agr3 tst, sea, egc
273 CC5 agr2 egc
CC398 agr1
291 CC22 agr1 egc
CC30 agr3 tst, sea, egc
650 CC121 agr4 seb, egc
CC30 agr3 tst, sea, egc

Among the subset of women with tampons colonized by S. aureus, those who declared sexual intercourse within the last 5 days were less frequently tst positive than the others (3/62 [4%] versus 22/132 [17%], P = 0.022; OR = 0.25 [95% confidence interval, 0.07 to 0.88]). No other characteristics listed in Tables 1 and 2 had an impact on S. aureus tst positivity.

DISCUSSION

In addition to the use of intravaginal protection, vaginal colonization with TSST-1-producing organisms combined with the absence of protective antibodies against TSST-1 represents the major risk factor for the development of MTSS in susceptible women (3). Due to the low incidence of the disease (1/100,000), factors that are associated with an increased risk of MTSS are mainly investigated individually in healthy women (3, 1520). Using this strategy, we examined the factors that concur with vaginal colonization by S. aureus in tampon users.

Few published studies have examined the factors that influence vaginal colonization by S. aureus. In these studies, the vaginal sampling was done by swabbing (1620), whereas we recently showed that using the vaginal tampon for sampling maximizes the detection of vaginal colonization, especially during menstruation (15). In addition, with regard to MTSS, determination of tampon colonization by S. aureus appears to be more relevant than vaginal swabs because TSST-1 is preferentially produced by S. aureus in the tampon (21, 22).

In this study, we examined factors that contribute to tampon colonization by S. aureus in women, with special attention on TSST-1-producing isolates. Only tampons from women without a history of MTSS were included in the study to exclude overrepresentation of the TSST1-producing S. aureus strains (1). Using this procedure, we found in the large cohort of 737 women aged 14 to 52 years that 27% of them carried tampons colonized by S. aureus. This is consistent with our previous observation that 26% of used tampons from healthy women are colonized by S. aureus (15). Community profiling has shown that healthy vaginal microbial communities are usually dominated by bacteria from the gut and perineum (15). Interestingly, the percentage of tampons colonized by S. aureus was 50% higher for tampons that do not require an applicator. This finding is in agreement with a previous observation (16). As the rate of hand colonization by S. aureus is approximately 27% (23), we suspect that the observed difference is related to manual contamination of the tampon during handling for its insertion in the absence of an applicator. Unfortunately, the current design of the study did not include an investigation of S. aureus colonization at other body sites, such as the nose, hand, and perineum, to confirm our hypothesis. However, our observation supports the importance of handwashing before and after tampon handling to decrease the risk of tampon contamination and the advantage of an applicator for hygiene during tampon handling. The other factors associated with a higher rate of tampon colonization by S. aureus were IUDs for contraception. IUDs were associated with a 50% increase in S. aureus detection, as previously suggested in a small survey (16). The reason for this greater vaginal colonization remains unclear. Our hypothesis is that the IUD itself or its string in the vagina could favor S. aureus colonization. Supporting this hypothesis, S. aureus is known to be a cause of IUD infection, sometimes with non-MTSS as a complication (2426). However, IUDs are used as contraception in older women, whereas MTSS predominantly occurs in young women (3).

No other significant relationships with tampon colonization by S. aureus were observed in our survey. A history of genital herpes simplex virus infection and socioeconomic status have previously been identified as potential risk factors for vaginal colonization by S. aureus but were not investigated in this study (1618).

Over half of the S. aureus isolates were shown to carry at least one enterotoxin gene or tst detected by our DNA array. The predominant clone, CC398 agr1, representing 27% of the isolates, did not carry superantigen genes. None of our CC398 isolates were methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA), suggesting that these isolates belonged to the human CC398 lineage and not to the livestock-associated CC398 methicillin-resistant clones (27, 28). This clone is increasingly detected in Europe and identified as highly transmissible among humans (2729). The predominance of this clone in humans without superantigen genes suggests that superantigens detected by our DNA array are not mandatory for human colonization.

Interestingly, the second most prevalent CC detected in tampons was the CC30 agr3 clone. This CC is epidemiologically associated with MTSS (8, 14). CC30 agr3 was predominantly tst positive (89%). However, the CC30 agr3 clone is not restricted to vaginal colonization and is also found in nasal colonization (28).

We also detected other CCs already described to harbor tst: CC1, CC5, CC8, CC12, CC22, CC45, and CC59 (813). However, tst was detected in only a few isolates of these non-CC30 CCs (7% CC5 and 4% CC8 and CC22). Furthermore, these CCs represented only 14% of the tst-positive strains. Regardless of the genetic background of the strain, tst was significantly associated with sea, egc, and seh, as described previously (12, 2932). Our observation confirms that CC30 is the more prevalent genetic background of tst-positive vaginal S. aureus isolates, as observed in MTSS (3, 814, 32). The epidemiological link between the TSST-1 CC30 S. aureus lineage and MTSS seems to be related to the prevalence of the clone in the vagina.

Interestingly, tst was not the more prevalent superantigen gene detected in tampon isolates. egc, a cluster including five different superantigen genes (seg, sei, sem, sen, and seo), and sea were more frequently detected than tst (42% and 16%, respectively). In contrast, superantigen genes seb, sec and sel, and sed, sej, and ser were detected less frequently than tst (5%, 10%, and 6%, respectively). All of these toxins have been involved in non-MTSS (33, 34). The specific involvement of TSST-1 in MTSS is not explained by the simple prevalence of tst among vaginal isolates. The current model involves a specific interaction of TSST-1 with the vaginal mucosa and TSST-1 passage, not efficient with other superantigen toxins (35).

Among women carrying tampons colonized by S. aureus, we observed a dramatic decrease in tst-positive strains in women who declared sexual intercourse within the last 5 days, with no obvious explanation. The importance of this observation should be moderated by the fact that we did not observe a specific correlation between vaginal colonization by TSST-1-producing strains and any information about the women’s health and tampon characteristics or use.

In conclusion, the results from this study confirm the high rate of tampon colonization by S. aureus and support the notion that the origin of the epidemiological link between the TSST-1 CC30 S. aureus lineage and MTSS is explained by the prevalence of vaginal carriage of this lineage in healthy women. Furthermore, the increased rate of S. aureus colonization of tampons that are handled without an applicator supports the importance of handwashing before and after tampon handling to decrease the risk of tampon contamination.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ethical review of the study.

This study was reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee (CPP Sud Est IV, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France, no. L16-176). Written consent was obtained from all participants or from the parents/guardians of participants under 18 years of age.

Subjects.

Menstruating volunteers were recruited from March 2014 to June 2017 by the National Reference Center for Staphylococci (NRCS) though the gynecology departments of Hospices Civil de Lyon and a national call on social networks and advertising via media. The only inclusion criterion was the use of tampons during menses, regardless of brand, and absence of a potential history of MTSS. Among the volunteers, 76 corresponded to healthy women who participated in a study analyzing the tampon microbiota (15). When multiple tampons were sent to the laboratory by the same woman, only the first tampon received was considered for this study.

Sample collection.

For the national tampon collection by autosampling, women were asked to place the tampon in a sterile bag and to send it to the NRCS via express shipping (2-day shipping during business days). Each tampon was accompanied by an information form about the woman’s health (i.e., age, history of salpingitis, history of hospitalization for complications occurring during the use of periodic tampons or menstrual cups that could correspond with MTSS, antibiotic use within the last 15 days, contraception methods, and sexual intercourse within the last 5 days) and about the tampon (brand, use of applicator, carrying time).

Menstrual fluid extraction and microbiological analysis.

Menstrual fluid was extracted from the tampon by suspending the tampon in 15 ml of sterile distilled water and then pressing it as described previously (15). Fifty microliters of menstrual fluid was spread on a chromogenic plate selective for S. aureus (chromID S. aureus; bioMérieux, Marcy l’Étoile, France) and incubated at 35°C for 18 to 24 h under aerobic conditions. Suspicious colonies (pink to light pink) were identified by matrix-associated laser desorption ionization–time of flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry (15). All S. aureus strains were genotyped using identibac S. aureus genotyping (Alere) DNA microarrays as described previously (36), with special regard for accessory gene regulator (agr) type, the presence of methicillin resistance gene A (mecA), and genes encoding superantigens (tst and enterotoxin genes sea to ser). Isolates were assigned to CCs by comparing the hybridization profiles with those previously characterized by multilocus sequence typing reference strains (12, 36).

Statistical analysis.

The data were analyzed using SPSS Statistics version 21. The results were reported as median and interquartile range (IQR) for nonnormally distributed quantitative variables and as numbers and relative frequencies for categorical variables. Groups were compared using the nonparametric Wilcoxon test for quantitative variables and Fisher’s exact test for categorical variables.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Myriam Chiaruzzi was supported by a research grant from the Regional Council of Picardie. This work was supported by the LABEX ECOFECT (ANR-11-LABX-0048) of the University of Lyon within the program Investissements d’Avenir (ANR-11-IDEX-0007), operated by the French National Research Agency (ANR) and the FINOVI foundation.

We are grateful to the members of the Staphylococcus National Reference Center, especially François Vandenesch and Frédéric Laurent, as well as Gery Lamblin, and Pierre Adrien Bolze for fruitful comments and technical help.

We declare no conflict of interest.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Davis JP, Chesney PJ, Wand PJ, LaVenture M, the Investigation and Laboratory Team. 1980. Toxic-shock syndrome: epidemiologic features, recurrence, risk factors, and prevention. N Engl J Med 303:1429–1435. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198012183032501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Hajjeh RA, Reingold A, Weil A, Shutt K, Schuchat A, Perkins BA. 1999. Toxic shock syndrome in the United States: surveillance update, 1979–1996. Emerg Infect Dis 5:807–810. doi: 10.3201/eid0506.990611. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Berger S, Kunerl A, Wasmuth S, Tierno P, Wagner K, Brügger J. 2019. Menstrual toxic shock syndrome: case report and systematic review of the literature. Lancet Infect Dis 19:e313. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(19)30041-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Melish M, Murata S, Fukunaga C, Frogner K, McKissick C. 1989. Vaginal tampon model for toxic shock syndrome. Rev Infect Dis 11:S238–S246. doi: 10.1093/clinids/11.Supplement_1.S238. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Davis C, Kremer M, Schlievert P, Squier C. 2003. Penetration of toxic shock syndrome toxin-1 across porcine vaginal mucosa ex vivo: permeability characteristics, toxin distribution, and tissue damage. Am J Obstet Gynecol 189:1785–1791. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(03)00873-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Thomas D, Chou S, Dauwalder O, Lina G. 2007. Diversity in Staphylococcus aureus enterotoxins. Chem Immunol Allergy 93:24–41. doi: 10.1159/000100856. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Lindsay JA, Ruzin A, Ross HF, Kurepina N, Novick RP. 1998. The gene for toxic shock toxin is carried by a family of mobile pathogenicity islands in Staphylococcus aureus. Mol Microbiol 29:527–543. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1998.00947.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Sharma H, Smith D, Turner CE, Game L, Pichon B, Hope R, Hill R, Kearns A, Sriskandan S. 2018. Clinical and molecular epidemiology of staphylococcal toxic shock syndrome in the United Kingdom. Emerg Infect Dis 24:258–266. doi: 10.3201/eid2402.170606. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Roetzer A, Haller G, Beyerly J, Geier CB, Wolf HM, Gruener CS, Model N, Eibl MM. 2016. Genotypic and phenotypic analysis of clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus revealed production patterns and hemolytic potentials unlinked to gene profiles and source. BMC Microbiol 16:13. doi: 10.1186/s12866-016-0630-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Al Laham N, Mediavilla JR, Chen L, Abdelateef N, Elamreen FA, Ginocchio CC, Pierard D, Becker K, Kreiswirth BN. 2015. MRSA clonal complex 22 strains harboring toxic shock syndrome toxin (TSST-1) are endemic in the primary hospital in Gaza, Palestine. PLoS One 10:e0120008. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0120008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.McGavin MJ, Arsic B, Nickerson NN. 2012. Evolutionary blueprint for host- and niche-adaptation in Staphylococcus aureus clonal complex CC30. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 2:48. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2012.00048. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Monecke S, Luedicke C, Slickers P, Ehricht R. 2009. Molecular epidemiology of Staphylococcus aureus in asymptomatic carriers. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 28:1159–1165. doi: 10.1007/s10096-009-0752-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Dauwalder O, Lina G, Durand G, Bes M, Meugnier H, Jarlier V, Coignard B, Vandenesch F, Etienne J, Laurent F. 2008. Epidemiology of invasive methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus clones collected in France in 2006 and 2007. J Clin Microbiol 46:3454–3458. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01050-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Musser JM, Schlievert PM, Chow AW, Ewan P, Kreiswirth BN, Rosdahl VT, Naidu AS, Witte W, Selander RK. 1990. A single clone of Staphylococcus aureus causes the majority of cases of toxic shock syndrome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 87:225–229. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.1.225. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Jacquemond I, Muggeo A, Lamblin G, Tristan A, Gillet Y, Bolze PA, Bes M, Gustave CA, Rasigade JP, Golfier F, Ferry T, Dubost A, Abrouk D, Barreto S, Prigent-Combaret C, Thioulouse J, Lina G, Muller D. 2018. Complex ecological interactions of Staphylococcus aureus in tampons during menstruation. Sci Rep 8:9942. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-28116-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Guinan ME, Dan BB, Guidotti RJ, Reingold AL, Schmid GP, Bettoli EJ, Lossick JG, Shands KN, Kramer MA, Hargrett NT, Anderson RL, Broome CV. 1982. Vaginal colonization with Staphylococcus aureus in healthy women: a review of four studies. Ann Intern Med 96:944–947. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-96-6-944. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Smith CB, Noble V, Bensch R, Ahlin PA, Jacobson JA, Latham RH. 1982. Bacterial flora of the vagina during the menstrual cycle: findings in users of tampons, napkins, and sea sponges. Ann Intern Med 96:948–951. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-96-6-948. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Linnemann CC Jr, Staneck JL, Hornstein S, Barden TP, Rauh JL, Bonventre PF, Buncher CR, Beiting A. 1982. The epidemiology of genital colonization with Staphylococcus aureus. Ann Intern Med 96:940–944. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-96-6-940. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Lansdell LW, Taplin D, Aldrich TE. 1984. Recovery of Staphylococcus aureus from multiple body sites in menstruating women. J Clin Microbiol 20:307–310. doi: 10.1128/JCM.20.3.307-310.1984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Morris CA, Morris DF. 1967. Normal vaginal microbiology of women of childbearing age in relation to the use of oral contraceptives and vaginal tampons. J Clin Pathol 20:636–640. doi: 10.1136/jcp.20.4.636. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Schlievert P, Nemeth K, Davis C, Peterson M, Jones B. 2010. Staphylococcus aureus exotoxins are present in vivo in tampons. Clin Vaccine Immunol 17:722–727. doi: 10.1128/CVI.00483-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Nonfoux L, Chiaruzzi M, Badiou C, Baude J, Tristan A, Thioulouse J, Muller D, Prigent-Combaret C, Lina G. 2018. Impact of currently marketed tampons and menstrual cups on Staphylococcus aureus growth and toxic shock syndrome toxin 1 production in vitro. Appl Environ Microbiol 84:e00351-18. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00351-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Wertheim HF, Melles DC, Vos MC, van Leeuwen W, van Belkum A, Verbrugh HA, Nouwen JL. 2005. The role of nasal carriage in Staphylococcus aureus infections. Lancet Infect Dis 5:751–762. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(05)70295-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Pruthi V, Al-Janabi A, Pereira BM. 2003. Characterization of biofilm formed on intrauterine devices. Indian J Med Microbiol 21:161–165. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Wolf AS, Krieger D. 1986. Bacterial colonization of intrauterine devices (IUDs). Arch Gynecol 239:31–37. doi: 10.1007/BF02134286. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Klug CD, Keay CR, Ginde AA. 2009. Fatal toxic shock syndrome from an intrauterine device. Ann Emerg Med 54:701–703. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2009.05.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Smith TC, Wardyn SE. 2015. Human Infections with Staphylococcus aureus CC398. Curr Environ Health Rep 2:41–51. doi: 10.1007/s40572-014-0034-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Conceição T, Martins H, Rodrigues S, de Lencastre H, Aires-de-Sousa M. 2019. Staphylococcus aureus nasal carriage among homeless population in Lisbon, Portugal. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 38:2037–2044. doi: 10.1007/s10096-019-03638-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Uhlemann AC, Porcella SF, Trivedi S, Sullivan SB, Hafer C, Kennedy AD, Barbian KD, McCarthy AJ, Street C, Hirschberg DL, Lipkin WI, Lindsay JA, DeLeo FR, Lowy FD. 2012. Identification of a highly transmissible animal-independent Staphylococcus aureus ST398 clone with distinct genomic and cell adhesion properties. mBio 3:e00027-12. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00027-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Valour F, Tasse J, Trouillet-Assant S, Rasigade JP, Lamy B, Chanard E, Verhoeven P, Decousser JW, Marchandin H, Bes M, Chidiac C, Vandenesch F, Ferry T, Laurent F, Lyon B. 2014. Joint Infection study group. Methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus clonal complex 398: high prevalence and geographical heterogeneity in bone and joint infection and nasal carriage. Clin Microbiol Infect 20:772–775. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Collery MM, Smyth DS, Twohig JM, Shore AC, Coleman DC, Smyth CJ. 2008. Molecular typing of nasal carriage isolates of Staphylococcus aureus from an Irish university student population based on toxin gene PCR, agr locus types and multiple locus, variable number tandem repeat analysis. J Med Microbiol 57:348–358. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.47734-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Billon A, Gustin M-P, Tristan A, Bénet T, Berthiller J, Gustave C-A, Vanhems P, Lina G. 2020. Association of characteristics of tampon use with menstrual toxic shock syndrome in France. EClinicalMedicine 21:100308. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100308. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Jarraud S, Mougel C, Thioulouse J, Lina G, Meugnier H, Forey F, Nesme X, Etienne J, Vandenesch F. 2002. Relationships between Staphylococcus aureus genetic background, virulence factors, Agr groups (alleles), and human disease. Infect Immun 70:631–641. doi: 10.1128/iai.70.2.631-641.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Descloux E, Perpoint T, Ferry T, Lina G, Bes M, Vandenesch F, Mohammedi I, Etienne J. 2007. One in five mortality in non-menstrual toxic shock syndrome versus no mortality in menstrual cases in a balanced French series of 55 cases. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 27:37–43. doi: 10.1007/s10096-007-0405-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Breshears LM, Gillman AN, Stach CS, Schlievert PM, Peterson ML. 2016. Local epidermal growth factor receptor signaling mediates the systemic pathogenic effects of Staphylococcus aureus toxic shock syndrome. PLoS One 11:e0158969. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0158969. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Patot S, Imbert PR, Baude J, Martins Simões P, Campergue JB, Louche A, Nijland R, Bès M, Tristan A, Laurent F, Fischer A, Schrenzel J, Vandenesch F, Salcedo SP, François P, Lina G. 2017. The TIR homologue lies near resistance genes in Staphylococcus aureus, coupling modulation of virulence and antimicrobial susceptibility. PLoS Pathog 13:e1006092. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1006092. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Applied and Environmental Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES