Skip to main content
Elsevier - PMC COVID-19 Collection logoLink to Elsevier - PMC COVID-19 Collection
. 2020 Sep 11;560:110017. doi: 10.1016/j.palaeo.2020.110017

Cyclostratigraphy and astrochronology: Case studies from China

Chunju Huang a,b, James G Ogg a,c,d,, David B Kemp a
PMCID: PMC7483128  PMID: 32934423

Abstract

A high-precision geologic time scale is the essential key for understanding the Earth’s evolutionary history and geologic processes. Astronomical tuning of orbitally forced stratigraphic records to construct high-resolution Astronomical Time Scales (ATS) has led to a progressive refinement of the geologic time scale over the past two decades. In turn, these studies provide new insights regarding the durations and rates of major Earth events, evolutionary processes, and climate changes, all of which provide a scientific basis for contextualizing and predicting future global change trends. South China hosts some of the best-exposed and well-dated Neoproterozoic through Mesozoic stratigraphic sections in the world; many of which are suitable for cyclostratigraphy and calibrating the geologic time scale. In North China, several Cenozoic oil-bearing basins have deep boreholes with continuous sampling and/or well logging that enable derivation of astronomically tuned time scales for an improved understanding of basin evolution and hydrocarbon generation. This Special Issue focuses on case studies of astrochronology and applied cyclostratigraphy research using reference sections within China. In this introductory overview, we: (1) summarize all existing astrochronology studies of the Neoproterozoic through Cenozoic sections within China that have been used to enhance the international geologic time scale, (2) examine briefly the astronomically forced paleoclimate information recorded in various depositional systems and the modern techniques employed to analyze the periodicity of these signals encoded within the sedimentary record, and (3) summarize the 20 contributions to this Special Issue of Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology on 'Cyclostratigraphy and Astrochronology: Case studies from China’.

Keywords: Milankovitch cycles, Orbital cycles, Climate change, Astronomical time scale, Sequences

1. Introduction

Astronomically induced variations in Earth’s precession and obliquity modulate seasonal insolation and drive climate changes in the Earth system (Hinnov, 2018). The Earth's seasons are caused by the obliquity (tilt) of its rotation axis relative to the Sun. The Earth's orbit around the Sun is slightly elliptical (= eccentricity); therefore, the relative average summer temperature in a hemisphere depends upon whether its summer occurs during the Earth's furthest distance from the Sun (aphelion; which is the current situation for the Northern Hemisphere) or during its closest approach (perihelion). The precession of the Earth's rotation axis relative to its orbit causes a ca. 20-kyr cycle in the relative warmth of a hemisphere's summer (and coldness of its winter) as it oscillates between aphelion to perihelion conditions. The eccentricity of the Earth's orbit is influenced by the gravitational attraction of other planets, and changes from nearly circular (the current situation with a relatively low importance of precession-induced climatic change) to a more elliptical orbit that causes greater seasonal contrasts. Eccentricity varies with a ca. 100-kyr oscillation that is further modulated by a 405-kyr cycle. Superimposed on the precession-eccentricity signal are ca. 40-kyr periodic variations of the obliquity of the Earth's axis; and these are especially important in influencing seasonal contrasts at higher latitudes.

Together, these variations in the relative differences in summer heat versus winter cooling are called "Milankovitch cycles" after Milutin Milanković, the Serbian mathematician who did the initial detailed numerical analysis of the effects on solar insolation at different latitudes (Milankovitch, 1930, Milankovitch, 1941). These long-term orbital-induced climate cycles are also manifested as changes in many different geographic and sedimentary processes, including average seasonal rainfall and fluvial runoff, ice cap size, global sea level, types and amount of vegetation, rates and styles of continental weathering, the position and intensity of wind belts, monsoon patterns, coastal currents, and the supply and recycling of nutrients within both marine and lacustrine waters. In turn, sediment influxes into all depositional systems, from continental lacustrine sediments to deep-sea deposits, undergo shifts in the relative ratios of coarse-to-fine siliciclastics and of terrigenous to biogenic components, and in the relative importance of storm and flood events. Consequently, the periodic climatic changes attributable to orbital forcing are readily encoded in stratigraphic successions, and cyclostratigraphers can measure chemical and physical proxies (e.g., elemental concentrations, grain size, magnetic susceptibility, etc.) that track these cycles in order to identify astronomical signals. One challenge to this endeavor is that the recording of Milankovitch cycles in the sedimentary record is superimposed upon a wide spectrum of non-periodic variability, and sedimentary systems are prone to shifts in accumulation rates and sediment composition induced by non-Milankovitch factors such as regional tectonics, temporally irregular shifting of fluvial-delta depocenters, and other trends.

The first published application of this cyclostratigraphic "clock in the rock" concept was by G.K. Gilbert (1895), who used it to estimate elapsed time in Upper Cretaceous deposits in North America. The discipline became more widely established after the seminal work by Hays et al. (1976), which demonstrated pervasive astronomial control on climate changes across the past ~0.5 million years. Since then, the astronomical theory has been widely studied and applied. During the past two decades in particular, astronomical calibration of stratigraphic successions has been successfully used to constrain the Cenozoic and Mesozoic geologic time scales, aided by the development of numerical solutions of Earth's orbit across the past ~50 million years by Jacques Laskar et al., 1993, Laskar et al., 2004, Laskar et al., 2011.

China hosts superb Neoproterozoic and Mesozoic stratigraphic sections in marine facies, as well as lacustrine deposits encompassing large portions of the Permian through Neogene, and thick accumulations of wind-blown loess spanning the Quaternary. Cyclostratigraphic analyses of proxy data from outcrops and boreholes within China have been important for calibrating the geologic time scale, understanding basin evolution and oil-forming mechanisms, and for unraveling the impacts of past glacial-interglacial climate oscillations. This special issue of Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology brings together 20 papers that highlight the importance of Chinese sections for cyclostratigraphy and time scales. The studies cover a wide range of stratigraphic records in marine and terrestrial deposits within China, and incorporate aspects of biostratigraphy, lithostratigraphy, chemostratigraphy, magnetostratigraphy, and radioisotopic dating.

In this introductory review paper, we present two summaries of cyclostratigraphy studies in China. We first summarize all the cyclostratigraphy studies of sections within China that present astronomical time scales that enable high-resolution enhancement of the geologic time scale (Ediacaran through Quaternary). Six of these are also part of this Special Issue (Fang et al., 2020; Lu et al., 2019; Ma et al., 2019; Ma et al., 2020a; Sui et al., 2019; Zhong et al., 2019b). The second group are those that apply cyclostratigraphy and astronomically tuned depositional rates to better understand basin development and Earth system evolution during portions of the Neoproterozoic through Cenozoic (Chu et al., 2020; Du et al., 2020; Gong et al., 2019; Li et al., 2020; Liu et al., 2020; Peng et al., 2020; Xu et al., 2019; Xu et al., 2020; Yao and Hinnov, 2019; Zhang et al., 2019a, Zhang et al., 2019b; Zhang et al., 2020; Zhang 2019; Zhao et al., 2019).

2. Geologic settings of the sedimentary records of China

The sedimentary history of regions within China were particularly conducive to recording climate cycles in relatively stable depositional settings. The South China Craton was a part of the Gondwana continental margin during the Cryogenian through Silurian; then, as a separate island mini-plate from the Devonian through middle Triassic, it accumulated a thick carbonate platform adjacent to eroding "oldlands". Consequently, South China hosts some of the best-exposed and well-dated Neoproterozoic, Paleozoic and Mesozoic stratigraphic sections in the world. The exceptional nature of these fossiliferous and well-preserved marine deposits is why South China hosts nearly a dozen GSSPs (Global Stratigraphic Section and Point) of stratigraphic boundaries for the Paleozoic and early Mesozoic geologic stages. Equally, these reference sections have provided cyclostratigraphic records for calibrating the durations of biozones and other events of the international geologic time scale.

Basins within other blocks that now comprise China contained large lakes at tropical to temperate latitudes. In addition to accumulating organic-rich deposits that became important oil and gas source rocks, these lacustrine deposits were particularly conducive to recording climate-induced fluctuations in the relative influx of clay and organic carbon. Cyclostratigraphic studies of these lacustrine deposits have often utilized records from deep boreholes and range from the Permian through Neogene. In particular, North China has several Cenozoic oil-bearing basins with deep boreholes that have been continuously sampled and/or well-logged for cyclostratigraphy studies.

During the Quaternary and continuing to the present, windblown dust from the arid interior regions of central Asia accumulated as thick loess deposits in the middle watershed of the Yellow River and elsewhere. During more humid intervals, such as major interglacial episodes, reddish soil horizons developed on these loess plains; and the resulting alternation of arid-climate loess and humid-climate soil has enabled astronomical calibration of Eurasia's glacial episodes.

3. Astronomical Time Scale studies using reference sections in China

As of July 2020, there have been over 30 cyclostratigraphy studies of marine, lacustrine or loess deposits that have direct application to enhancing the age model for the geologic time scale (Table 1 , Fig. 1 ). Studies of these are part of this Special Issue of Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, including contributions on the Ediacaran (Sui et al., 2019), Cambrian (Fang et al., 2020) and Ordovician-Silurian (Lu et al., 2019; Zhong et al., 2019b; Ma et al., 2020b; Ma et al., 2019). Only the Cenozoic and the Jurassic of China, for which there is a lack of extensive uplifted exposures of fossiliferous marine strata, have not yielded cyclostratigraphic studies that are directly applicable to improving the geologic time scale. However, the entire Cenozoic time scale and much of the Jurassic has been cycle-tuned based on ocean drilling boreholes, uplifted oceanic sediments in the Mediterranean region, and borehole and outcrop studies in Britain and other regions.

Table 1.

Summary of astrochronology studies on Chinese reference sections that are used to enhance the geologic time scale. Abbreviations: (1) Proxies – MS = magnetic susceptibility, GR = natural gamma-ray radiation, ARM = anhysteretic remanent magnetization, XRF = X-ray fluorescence; (2) Method – MTM = multi-taper method, Evol. spectra = evolutive spectra; (3) Cycles – E = long-eccentricity, e = short-eccentricity, O = obliquity, P = precession; (4) Other – U-Pb = uranium-lead dating (Ding et al., 1994, Lu et al., 1999, Heslop et al., 2000; Deng et al., 2019a; Deng et al., 2019b; Sun et al., 2006; Wu et al., 2014; Wang et al., 2016; Deng et al., 2013; Wang et al., 2016; Wu et al., 2009; Xi et al., 2019; Wu et al., 2013a; He et al., 2012; Wu et al., 2013b; Zhu et al., 2007a, Zhu et al., 2007b; Liu et al., 2017a, Liu et al., 2017b; Huang, 2019; Li et al., 2017; Tong et al., 2019; Zhang et al., 2015; Lehrmann et al., 2015; Li et al., 2016a, Li et al., 2016b; Li et al., 2007; Wu et al., 2012; Zhao et al., 2005; Wu et al., 2013c; Shen et al., 2011; Mundil et al., 2004; Yuan et al., 2019; Xue et al., 2015; Shen et al., 2019; Xue et al., 2015; Fang et al., 2017; Mei et al., 1994; Fang et al., 2015; Fang et al., 2012; Ueno et al., 2013; Wang et al., 2019a, Wang et al., 2019b; Zhang et al., 2019a, Zhang et al., 2019b, Zhang et al., 2019c, Zhang et al., 2019d, Zhang et al., 2019e, Zhang et al., 2019f; Ueno et al. (2013); Wu et al., 2018; Qi et al., 2014; Ross and Ross, 1988; Li et al., 1997; Rygel et al., 2008; Ueno et al., 2013; Bai, 1995b; Qie et al., 2019; Gong et al., 2001; Gong et al., 2005; Huang et al., 2016; Rong et al., 2019; Chen et al., 2018; Chen et al., 2011; Ma et al., 2019a; Wang et al., 2018; Ma et al., 2016; Ma et al., 2019b; Ma et al., 2019c; Peng et al., 2009; Chen et al., 2006; Zhu et al., 2019a, Zhu et al., 2019b; McFadden et al., 2008; Condon et al., 2005; Zhou et al., 2019;Bai et al., 1982; Bai et al., 1994; Li et al., 2009; Zhong et al., 2018; Bai, 1995a; Chen et al., 2015; Fang et al., 2019, Gong et al., 2017, Hu and Qi, 2017; Sui et al., 2018, Wang et al., 2009, Zhong et al., 2018).

3.

3.

3.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Locations of cyclostratigraphy studies in China that are relevant to enhanced calibration of the geologic time scale. The color of each location dot is the same as the color of the geologic epoch. Coloring of the bars for the span of each study (next to the geologic time scale) indicates the general depositional setting (blue = marine, green = lacustrine, tan = other terrestrial). For details on each study, see the corresponding number in Table 1. (For interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)

As expected from its geologic history, nearly all of the Ediacaran, Paleozoic and Triassic cyclostratigraphy studies have been undertaken on the South China Craton (Fig. 1). The exceptions are Ordovician studies in the Tarim Basin, which included the auxiliary GSSP for the Middle/Late Ordovician boundary (Sandbian GSSP), and in Hebei Province of North China. North China has cyclostratigraphy studies of Cretaceous terrestrial basins that helped to calibrate the evolution of feathered dinosaurs (Wu et al., 2013b) and of magnetic polarity chrons. The thick loess deposits in Shaanxi Province allowed calibration of the major Quaternary climate oscillations and the development of desert regions of eastern Asia (e.g., Ding et al., 2002).

Nearly all studies on pre-Cenozoic Chinese reference sections recognized the dominant 405-kyr long-eccentricity modulation of the precession cycle within marine or lacustrine deposits. In contrast to the theoretical lengthening of the periods for Earth's precession and obliquity through geologic time due to the influence of its Moon, the 405-kyr long-eccentricity cycle has had a stable period for at least the past half-billion years (e.g., Hinnov, 2018). This 405-kyr signal in the sedimentary record enables an "astronomical tuning" of a meter-scale record yielding a "floating" time scale. The resulting durations of geologic stages and of corresponding biozones, geochemical excursions, and magnetic polarity zones derived by these studies generally have a precision of ~0.1 Myr (i.e., one quarter of a long-eccentricity cycle). In the case of Songliao Basin borehole in northeastern China, radio-isotopic dating has enabled the 405-kyr cycles within the Upper Cretaceous record to be anchored in absolute time by tying these to the corresponding cycles in the numerical solution of astronomical forcing (Laskar et al., 2011). This assigns an age of 82.9 Ma to the base of magnetic polarity Chron C33r, which is the candidate marker for the base of the Campanian Stage (Wu et al., 2020). Several of these cycle-scaled durations of stages and of other geologic episodes have been incorporated into the period-level syntheses of the integrated stratigraphy and timescale of China (right-hand column in Table 1) and into Neoproterozoic and Phanerozoic time scales (e.g., Ogg et al., 2016; and chapters within Gradstein et al., 2020).

4. Applications of cyclostratigraphy within China

The 20 cyclostratigraphy studies in this Special Issue (Table 2 ) span the Ediacaran through Pleistocene (Table 2). Of these, 6 are directly applicable to enhancing the geologic time scale, and therefore were also included in Table 1. The locations range from the Tibetan Plateau near the Himalayas to offshore Guangdong in the South China Sea (Fig. 2 ).

Table 2.

4.

4.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Location of cyclostratigraphy studies in China in this Special Issue of Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology. The color of each location dot is the same as the color of the geologic epoch. Coloring of the bars for the span of each study (next to the geologic time scale) indicates the general depositional setting (blue = marine, green = lacustrine, tan = other terrestrial). For details on each study, see the corresponding number in Table 2. (For interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)

The majority of the 12 Mesozoic and Cenozoic studies in this Special Issue applied cyclostratigraphy to deposits in terrestrial basins, especially lacustrine and fluvial-delta sequences. Scientific questions include: establishing the relative timing of seismic horizons and the duration of oil- and gas-generating organic-rich source rocks (Du et al., 2020; Zhao et al., 2019; Xu et al., 2019; Peng et al., 2020; Liu et al., 2020; Chu et al., 2020; Zhang et al., 2019b), determining how glacial-interglacial oscillations influenced the influx of coarser-grained siliciclastics (Zhang et al., 2019a; Zhang et al., 2019a), and constraining the depositional history of deltas (Xu et al., 2020; Zhang et al., 2020). The biostratigraphic constraints in many of these deposits are limited to poorly age-calibrated terrestrial faunal and floral remains. As such, some of the floating astronomically tuned time scales are anchored using the "traditional" ages based on assigning certain seismic or other horizons to geologic stage boundaries. However, with the aid of the constraints on durations and relative timing of events from cyclostratigraphy, the widespread non-marine Mesozoic-Cenozoic facies of China have the potential to be tied to contemporaneous marine rocks elsewhere (and vice versa), emphasizing the utility of cyclostratigraphy for building timescales to correlate and understand climate evolution in terrestrial environments. In the future, it may be possible to improve those age models through recognition of longer-period astronomical cycles (so-called "grand cycles").

The eight Ediacaran and Paleozoic cyclostratigraphy studies in this Special Issue are on marine successions composed of carbonate, shale or chert. Scientific questions range from durations of graptolite, conodont and radiolarian zones (Yao and Hinnov, 2019; Lu et al., 2019; Zhong et al., 2019a; Ma et al., 2019; Fang et al., 2020) to the durations of carbon-isotope excursions (Ordovician GICE by Ma et al., 2020b; Ediacaran Shuram CIE by Gong et al., 2019, and Sui et al., 2019). The two studies on the Shuram CIE yielded quite different durations, estimated at ca. 9 Myr by Gong et al. (2019) versus ca. 20 Myr by Sui et al. (2019) (note: the shorter estimate was based on extrapolating a sedimentation rate from only a portion of the entire CIE).

5. General methods

5.1. Paleoclimatic proxies

Cyclostratigraphy is dependent on recognizing orbital cycles in climatically sensitive physical, chemical or biological proxies. In order to understand how paleoclimatic proxies can record astronomical signals, cyclostratigraphers need to know how the paleoclimate changed in response to astronomically forced insolation variations, how these paleoclimatic variations influenced climate-sensitive components of the sedimentary record, and how the recording of these climate-sensitive components in the resulting deposits are linked to different proxies. Due to the Earth’s rotation and its orbit around the Sun, the solar irradiance has strong daily, seasonal and annual cycles. Non-linear mechanisms rectify the seasonal modulation, thereby enhancing precessional-period and other Milankovitch cycle variability (Huybers and Wunsch, 2003). This seasonal-scale climatic transformation of the modulation of insolation forcing can amplify the astronomical frequencies and subsequently be preserved in stratigraphic records (Hinnov, 2018).

Paleoclimate proxies of widespread use in cyclostratigraphy include color, lithology, stable isotopes, rock magnetism, paleontology, gamma ray logs, elemental geochemistry, and organic carbon content (e.g., Hinnov, 2013; Li et al., 2019a). In this Special Issue, many types of paleoclimatic proxies were measured as a basis for analysis by spectral methods. Physical proxies include lithologic characteristics (i.e., chert-clay couplet coding, bed bundling, color), borehole well logs (i.e., resistivity, and natural gamma ray (GR) of Th, K and U contents), and magnetic parameters (i.e., magnetic susceptibility (MS), anhysteretic remanent magnetization (ARM), and hard Isothermal remanent magnetization/magnetic susceptibility (HIRM/χ)). Geochemical proxies include total organic carbon (TOC), carbon isotopes (δ13C), and XRF scanning data of elemental concentrations and ratios (Fe, Ca, Si, Ti, Rb/Sr, Sr/Al, Zr/Al, V/Cr, Ni/Ti, Cu/Ti, Fe/Ca).

In terrestrial or lacustrine settings, variations in some of these paleoclimate proxies are responses to astronomical-forced insolation changes in weathering, precipitation and temperature. In marine depositional settings, some of these paleoclimate proxies are records of variations in the relative productivity of carbonate organisms and variable fluxes of sediments derived from continental weathering and runoff (Li et al., 2019a).

5.2. Spectral analysis

Cyclostratigraphy requires the detection and separation of astronomical signals in paleoclimate proxy data (Hinnov and Hilgen, 2012). The most common procedures involve Fourier analysis of the proxy data to establish the frequency distribution of variance. High variance within a relatively narrow band of frequencies (i.e. spectral peaks) are used to identify likely cyclic signals within the dataset that represent the astronomical forcing. These spectral analysis methods are designed primarily to isolate signals in evenly-spaced time series. In contrast, proxy data measured through a stratigraphic record are in height/depth. Therefore, depending upon the type of deposit, well-defined, rapidly deposited event beds such as debris flows or turbidites are removed from the records. Methods such as evolutive harmonic analysis (EHA) and correlation coefficient (COCO) analysis (Meyers et al., 2001; Li et al., 2018b, Li et al., 2019b) can be performed to identify temporal changes in the potential dominant cyclic frequencies preserved in stratigraphic sections, to reconstruct variations in sedimentation rates, and to select a suite of subintervals to analyze separately using spectral analysis.

Associated methods of time-series analysis of paleoclimate proxies employed in cyclostratigraphy include interpolation, integral-sampling, smoothing, detrending, filtering, and demodulation, correlation and tuning (Hinnov and Ogg, 2007). Common software for such signal processing includes KaleidaGraph 4.0, Analyseries 2.0.8, and Acycle 2.0. In this Special Issue, most studies utilize the multi-taper method (MTM) of spectral analysis, which offers high-resolution and statistical estimates that are independent of spectral power (Ghil et al., 2002). The MTM method can provide a well-resolved spectrum of variance within a dataset, allowing clear distinction of peaks even with small amplitude oscillations. The results are often more optimized than those based on other, more-classical spectral methods (Thomson, 1982). The statistical significance of spectral peaks, and thus whether they are likely to have been caused by astronomical cycles or perhaps relate to some random process instead, can be determined by establishing by how much the peak exceeds the expected background red-noise spectrum for an absence of cycles (e.g., Mann and Lees, 1996).

Most studies in this Special Issue also apply evolutionary spectral methods in order to visualize the time-frequency landscapes of the stratigraphic signals (e.g., Sui et al., 2019; Xu et al., 2019; Zhang et al., 2019b). Such analyses can provide important information that guide recognition of Milankovitch cycles through a section, as well as track variable sedimentation rates and the presence of hiatuses.

5.3. Astronomical tuning and construction of floating astronomical time scales

The main components of astronomical parameters are Earth’s orbital cycles of precession, obliquity and eccentricity and their long-term modulation cycles. As noted above, Laskar et al., 1993, Laskar et al., 2004, Laskar et al., 2011 has progressively developed enhanced astronomical solutions (called La1993, La 2004, and La 2011, respectively) that now span from 250 Myr in the past to 250 Myr in the future. These numerical solutions provide an important astronomical time scale target and comparator to cyclostratigraphic results. Tuning of cyclostratigraphically identified cycles in proxy data to the astronomical solution allows for the construction of calibrated timescales anchored in absolute time. However, even the most recent solution of La2011 becomes uncertain for the high-frequency components of precession and obliquity beyond 50 Myr into the past, making any time-calibration of paleoclimatic proxy data to the Astronomical Time Scale difficult. Many stratigraphic records of paleoclimatic proxy series (e.g., Mediterranean sapropel sedimentary records, marine oxygen isotope and carbon isotope data, natural gamma ray (GR) logs, magnetic susceptibility, core-scanning XRF data, etc.) in the Cenozoic can be directly tuned to astronomical targets such as 65°N summer insolation, obliquity and eccentricity solutions (Ding et al., 2002; Lourens et al., 2004; Hilgen et al., 2012; Lisiecki and Raymo, 2005; Zachos et al., 2001).

Looking "backwards" in geologic time, Earth’s orbital precession and obliquity periods become shorter relative to the Present due a reduction of the Earth-Moon distance and tidal dissipation, which caused changes in Earth’s rotation rate and shape (Laskar et al., 2004). Therefore, for cyclostratigraphic analysis of deposits older than 50 Ma, the stable 405-kyr long-eccentricity cycles have emerged as the most prominent and stable orbital oscillation (Hinnov, 2018). This 405-kyr long-eccentricity cycle is caused by the combined interactions of the large mass of Jupiter and the perihelia of Venus and Jupiter on the Earth's orbit. Therefore, most cyclostratigraphy studies of Mesozoic and Paleozoic sediments tune their paleoclimatic proxy series to the 405-kyr long-eccentricity cycle (Bao et al., 2018; Boulila et al., 2014; De Vleeschouwer et al., 2015; Fang et al., 2018; Grippo et al., 2004; Huang et al., 2010a, Huang et al., 2010b; Husson et al., 2011; Li et al., 2016a, Li et al., 2016b, Li et al., 2018a; Pas et al., 2018; Ruhl et al., 2016; Wu et al., 2013c).

The predominant frequencies in rhythmic sedimentary stratigraphic records are observed from the power spectra and evolutionary spectral analysis results of paleoclimate proxies. Based on the estimates of variable sedimentation rates from methods such as COCO and EHA analyses, it is possible to determine whether the 405-kyr long-eccentricity, ~100-kyr short-eccentricity, or obliquity cycles are the dominant orbital parameter in high-resolution paleoclimatic proxy series. these cycles become the tuning term to convert the depth-domain signals into the time-domain, thereby enabling the construction of an astronomically tuned time scale. If the stratigraphic record of interest has a calibration based on a radio-isotopically dated horizon, or if the tuned-record of magnetic polarity zones can be matched to the calibrated geomagnetic polarity time scales (or similar types of age-control), then it is possible to apply cyclostratigraphy to generate a precise age model at every level within a stratigraphic succession.

In this Special Issue, nearly every study resolves a dominant 405-kyr long-eccentricity cycle and utilizes this term to construct floating astronomically tuned time scales. However, in some cases where multiple Milankovitch signals were identified, the tuning made use of the ~100-kyr short eccentricity cycle or obliquity cycle. This was the case for Quaternary fluvial-lake deposits (Zhang et al., 2019b), Cretaceous outer-shelf marine carbonates (Li et al., 2020), Middle Triassic lacustrine deposits (Chu et al., 2020), middle Permian deep-marine chert-shale couplets (Yao and Hinnov, 2019), and an Ediacaran marine carbonate succession (Gong et al., 2019).

5.4. Some caveats and challenges

Even though astronomically induced climate signals can be recognized in nearly every depositional setting in terrestrial and marine environments, the preservation and fidelity of that signal in the geologic record are influenced by many other natural processes. Strata do not accumulate steadily, and interruptions or disruptions in sediment accumulation can result in "missing cycles", time-averaging (e.g. bioturbation), and unstable sediment accumulation rates. Tectonics can cause fault-displaced records within an outcrop or borehole, and distortion of some types of paleoclimate proxies can occur through redox processes or diagenesis. In dynamic settings such as terrestrial and shallow-marine environments, non-cyclic fluvial-delta lobe switching and facies migration can occur, obfuscating astronomical signals. Most spectral analysis methods and bandpass separation of frequencies implicitly assume a semi-stable and continuous signal in the proxy being analyzed.

As a consequence of these issues, it is important to verify the interpretations from spectral-analysis, bandpass and tuning methods. If the methods are applied to more than one type of proxy, does one obtain the same results? Are each of the assigned cycles visibly present in the proxy records, and ideally also seen as features in the outcrop? Can the same cycles be resolved in an independent coeval section from another part of the basin? These types of verification and testing procedures have enabled development of a reliable astronomically tuned time scale for the Cenozoic and portions of the Mesozoic-Paleozoic. However, it is common for a study to concentrate on only a single reference section (e.g., over a third of the studies summarized in Table 1, Table 2), and these studies therefore await future verification. Confirmation of features in multiple sections is an issue that applies not only to cyclostratigraphic analyses, but also to many studies of geochemical excursions, magnetic polarity patterns, and impact horizons, more than a few of which were initially reported only from a single reference section.

It is also important for all studies to publish/archive their raw data and exact location information, so that future techniques can be reapplied to these datasets. In compiling our summaries, it was disturbing how many important studies, both legacy and current, did not provide the supporting raw data in an accessible form or indicate the exact geographic location of the sections with precise Google-Earth-verified latitude-longitude coordinates.

5.5. Outlook

A recent international collaborative effort within the cyclostratigraphic community (The Cyclostratigraphy Intercomparison Project, CIP) has sought to lay a foundation for standardization, both in terms of approach and reporting (Sinnesael et al., 2019). The CIP workshops explored how different approaches adopted for cyclostratigraphic analysis by the community can lead to different results, and thus this community-led approach has the specific aim of developing best practice protocols. A key outcome of the CIP work was the finding that cyclostratigraphy is a trainable skill. The rapid emergence of cyclostratigraphy and timescale development in China speaks to the importance of unifying the discipline in a way that ensures optimal, reproducible results that will add data and value to the geologic time scale.

Of particular note is the recent development of new software tools; in particular the Astrochron package for R (Meyers, 2014) and the Acycle code written for Matlab (Li et al., 2019b). Both packages provide a complete set of ready-to-use tools for cyclostratigraphic analysis of proxy data. The use of these tools helps to ensure reproducibility, eases communication of results, and also guides new researchers in cyclostratigraphy. We note that all but 3 of the papers in this Special Issue utilized either the Acycle or the Astrochron package. This emphasizes the clear demand and acceptance for these tools. Moreover, 12 studies utilize the COCO correlation coefficient method for constraining sedimentation rates recently introduced by Li et al. (2018b), which is integrated into the Acycle code. Although all workers must be wary of adopting ‘black box’ approaches in the statistical treatment and analysis of data (i.e., where the tools are used but not fully understood), the provision of these tools to the community means that integration and understanding of results should ultimately improve.

6. Future applications

In the near future, it should be possible to compile a global composite of Paleozoic-Mesozoic reference sections for a complete record of the 405-kyr "metronome" relative to the Present that encompasses all major biozones and is constrained by radioisotopic dates. This will extend the current Cenozoic astronomically tuned scale back to the Ediacaran. Such a preliminary "proof-of-concept" synthesis with standardized statistical processing of numerous overlapping sections was accomplished for the entire Mesozoic by Huang (2018), and the major 405-kyr "cyclothems" in the late Carboniferous through early Permian await a direct calibration to an enhanced astronomical solution.

There is also the exciting possibility of augmenting these compilations with the so-called "grand cycles" that modulate the amplitudes of the 405-kyr long-eccentricity cycles (ca. 1 to 2 Myr periodicities) and of obliquity (ca. 1.2 Myr periodicity). Such very-long-term cycles can act as additional time-scale and correlation constraints. It has already been shown that these modulations appear to influence global Phanerozoic sea level (e.g., Boulila et al., 2018) and govern the relative importance of obliquity versus eccentricity-precession cycles within basins (e.g., Li et al., 2016b). Some of these very-long-period modulations have been observed in longer sedimentary records within China (see the column with "other recorded cycles" in Table 1, Table 2). With constraints from radio-isotopic dates, it may be possible to bridge current gaps in the Mesozoic astronomically tuned time scale to begin a direct calibration of portions of Paleozoic time.

In turn, a verified master 405-kyr metronome may help to resolve the existing systematic "external uncertainty" of about 0.3 Myr or greater on most pre-Cenozoic radioisotopic dates. The analytical precision on such dates is often better than 0.1 Myr, but the added external uncertainty is a result of uncertainties in decay constants and of currently used "standards".

Looking further back in time, there is the challenge of analyzing pre-Cryogenian cyclostratigraphic successions. China hosts thick Mesoproterozoic deposits that appear to have cyclic characteristics; but studies are inhibited by the current lack of horizons that can be dated by radioisotopic methods to constrain sediment accumulation rates and the true nature of the cycles. This will probably be the next major frontier in China-hosted cyclostratigraphic studies, and it opens the possibility of understanding climate change in the pre-Cryogenian world.

Declaration of Competing Interest

None.

Acknowledgements

We thank Prof. Thomas Algeo, senior editor of Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, for inviting us to organize this Special Issue, as well as all of the contributing teams who shared their studies. The astrochronology summary table was partly enhanced by Huaichun Wu and Linda Hinnov, and we thank them for providing preprints of their 2020 publications. Gabi Ogg prepared the graphics for this overview. CJH was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 41772029) and the 111 Project of China (grant no. BP0820004). DBK acknowledges support from the National Recruitment Program for Young Professionals (P.R. China). Support for JGO at CUG-Wuhan was funded by the Overseas Distinguished Teacher Program of the Ministry of Education (MS2013ZGDZ[WH]028) and at Chengdu University of Technology by a visiting scholar fellowship (National Natural Science Foundation of China, No. 41672102, to Hou Mingcai).

References

  1. Bai S.L. Peking University Press; Beijing: 1995. High-resolution Correlation, Milankovitch Cyclicity, and Nickel Events; p. 62. [in Chinese] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bai S.L. Milankovitch cyclicity and time scale of the Middle and Upper Devonian. Int. Geol. Rev. 1995;37:1109–1114. doi: 10.1080/00206819509465442. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bai S.L., Jin S.Y., Ning Z.S. Peking University Press; Beijing: 1982. Devonian Biostratigraphy of Guangxi and Adjacent Area (in Chinese) p. 203. [in Chinese] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bai S.L., Bai Z.Q., Ma X.P., Wang D.R., Sun Y.L. Peking University Press; Beijing: 1994. Devonian Events and Biostratigraphy of South China; p. 348. in Chinese. [Google Scholar]
  5. Bao X.J., Zhang S.H., Jiang G.Q., Wu H.C., Wang X.Q., An Z.Z., Yang T.S. Cyclostratigraphic constraints on the duration of the Datangpo Formation and the onset age of the Nantuo (Marinoan) glaciation in South China. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 2018;483:52–63. doi: 10.1016/j.epsl.2017.12.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  6. Boulila S., Galbrun B., Huret E., Hinnov L.A., Rouget I., Gardin S., Bartolini A. Astronomical calibration of the Toarcian Stage: implications for sequence stratigraphy and duration of the early Toarcian OAE. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 2014;386:98–111. doi: 10.1016/j.epsl.2013.10.047. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  7. Boulila S., Laskar J., Haq B.U., Galbrun B., Hara N. Long-term cyclicities in Phanerozoic sea-level sedimentary record and their potential drivers. Glob. Planet. Chang. 2018;165:128–136. doi: 10.1016/j.gloplacha.2018.03.004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  8. Chen X., Zhang Y.D., Bergström S.M., Xu H.G. Upper Darriwilian graptolite and conodont zonation in the global stratotype section of the Darriwilian stage (Ordovician) at Huangnitang, Changshan, Zhejiang, China. Palaeoworld. 2006;15:150–170. doi: 10.1016/j.palwor.2006.07.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  9. Chen X., Bergstöm S.M., Zhang Y.D., Goldman D., Chen Q. Upper Ordovician (Sandbian-Katian) graptolite and conodont zonation in the Yangtze region, China. Earth Environ. Sci. 2011;101:111–134. doi: 10.1017/S1755691010009199. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  10. Chen X., Zhang Y.D., Wang Z.H., Goldman D., Bergström S.M., Fan J.X., Finney S.C., Chen Q. In: Darrivilian to Katian (Ordovician) Graptolites from Northwest China. Chen X., Zhang Y.D., Goldman D., Bergström S.M., Finney S.C., editors. Zhejiang University Press (also Elsevier, 2016); 2015. Biostratigraphy; pp. 7–38. ISBN-13: 978-0128009734. [Google Scholar]
  11. Chen X., Chen Q., Zhen Y.Y., Wang H.Y., Zhang L.N., Zhang J.P., Wang W.H., Xiao Z.H. Circumjacent distribution pattern of the Lungmachian graptolitic black shale (early Silurian) on the Yichang Uplift and its peripheral region. Sci. China Earth Sci. 2018;61:1195–1203. doi: 10.1007/s11430-017-9222-x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  12. Chu R.J., Wu H.C., Zhu R.K., Fang Q., Deng S.H., Cui J.W., Yang T.S., Li H.Y., Cao L.W., Zhang S.H. Orbitally forced Triassic monsoon activity in the Tethys realm and its involved internal feedback. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 2020;541 doi: 10.1016/j.palaeo.2019.109542. article #109542: 11 pp. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  13. Condon D., Zhu M.Y., Bowring S., Wang W., Yang A.H., Jin Y.G. U-Pb ages from the Neoproterozoic Doushantuo Formation, China. Science. 2005;308:95–98. doi: 10.1126/science.1107765. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. De Vleeschouwer D., Boulvain F., Da Silva A.-C., Pas D., Labaye C., Claeys P. In: Magnetic Susceptibility Application: A Window onto Ancient Environments and Climatic Variations. Da Silva A.C., Whalen M.T., Hladil J., Chadimova L., Chen D., Spassov S., Boulvain F., De Vleeschouwer X., editors. Vol. 414. Geological Society Special Publications of London; 2015. The astronomical calibration of the Givetian (Middle Devonian) timescale (Dinant Synclinorium, Belgium) pp. 245–256. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  15. Deng C.L., He H.Y., Pan Y.X., Zhu R.X. Chronology of the terrestrial Upper Cretaceous in the Songliao Basin, northeast Asia. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 2013;385:44–54. doi: 10.1016/j.palaeo.2012.07.028. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  16. Deng S.H., Lu Y.Z., Luo Z., Fan R., Li X., Zhao Y., Ma X.Y., Zhu R.K., Cui J.W. Subdivision and age of the Yanchang Formation and the Middle/Upper Triassic boundary in Ordos Basin, North China. Sci. China Earth Sci. 2018;61:1419–1439. https://doi. org/10.1007/s11430-017-9215-3. [Google Scholar]
  17. Deng C.J., Hao Q.Z., Guo Z.T., Zhu R.X. Quaternary integrative stratigraphy and timescale of China. Sci. China Earth Sci. 2019;62:324–348. doi: 10.1007/s11430-017-9195-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  18. Deng T., Hou S.K., Wang S.Q. Neogene integrative stratigraphy and timescale of China. Sci. China Earth Sci. 2019;62:310–323. doi: 10.1007/s11430-017-9155-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  19. Ding Z.L., Yu Z.W., Rutter N.W., Liu T.S. Towards an orbital time scale for Chinese loess deposits. Quat. Sci. Rev. 1994;13:39–70. doi: 10.1016/0277-3791(94)90124-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  20. Ding Z.L., Derbyshire E., Yang S.L., Yu Z.W., Xiong S.F., Liu T.S. Stacked 2.6-Ma grain size record from the Chinese loess based on five sections and correlation with the deep-sea δ18O record. Paleoceanography. 2002;17(3) doi: 10.1029/2001PA000725. article #1033: 5-1 to 5-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  21. Du W., Ji Y.L., Chen G., Wu H., Gao C.L., Li S.M., Zhang Y. Cyclostratigraphy and astronomical tuning during the Oligocene in the Jizhong Depression, Bohai Bay Basin, northeastern China. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 2020;554 doi: 10.1016/j.palaeo.2020.109803. article #109803: 14 pp. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  22. Fang Q., Jing X.C., Deng S.H., Wang X.L. Roadian–Wuchiapingian conodont biostratigraphy at the Shangsi section, northern Sichuan. J. Stratigr. 2012;36:692–699. (in Chinese with English abstract) [Google Scholar]
  23. Fang Q., Wu H.C., Hinnov L.A., Jing X.C., Wang X.L., Jiang Q.C. Geologic evidence for chaotic behavior of the planets and its constraints on the third-order eustatic sequences at the end of the late Paleozoic Ice Age. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 2015;440:848–859. doi: 10.1016/j.palaeo.2015.10.014. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  24. Fang Q., Wu H.C., Hinnov L.A., Jing X.C., Wang X.L., Yang T.S., Li H.Y., Zhang S.H. Astronomical cycles of Middle Permian Maokou Formation in South China and their implications for sequence stratigraphy and paleoclimate. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 2017;474:130–139. doi: 10.1016/j.palaeo.2016.07.037. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  25. Fang Q., Wu H.C., Wang X.L., Yang T.S., Li H.Y., Zhang S.H. Astronomical cycles in the Serpukhovian–Moscovian (Carboniferous) marine sequence, South China, and their implications for geochronology and icehouse dynamics. J. Asian Earth Sci. 2018;156:302–315. doi: 10.1016/j.jseaes.2018.02.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  26. Fang Q., Wu H.C., Wang X.L., Yang X.L., Li H.Y., Zhang S.H. An astronomically forced cooling event during the Middle Ordovician. Glob. Planet. Chang. 2019;173:96–108. doi: 10.1016/j.gloplacha.2018.12.010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  27. Fang J.C., Wu H.C., Fang Q., Shi M.N., Zhang S.H., Yang T.S., Li H.Y., Cao L.W. Cyclostratigraphy of the global stratotype section and point (GSSP) of the basal Guzhangian Stage of the Cambrian Period. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 2020;540 doi: 10.1016/j.palaeo.2019.109530. article #109530: 9 pp. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  28. Ghil M., Allen M.R., Dettinger M.D., Ide K., Kondrashov D., Mann M.E., Robertson A.W., Saunders A., Tian Y., Varadi F., Yiou P. Advanced spectral methods for climatic time series. Rev. Geophys. 2002;40(1) article #1003, 3-1–3-41. doi:10.1029/2000RG000092. [Google Scholar]
  29. Gilbert G.K. Sedimentary measurement of Cretaceous time. J. Geol. 1895;3:121–127. [Google Scholar]
  30. Gong Y.M., Li B.H., Wang C.Y., Wu Y. Orbital cyclostratigraphy of the Devonian Frasnian–Famennian transition in South China. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 2001;168:237–248. doi: 10.1016/S0031-0182(00)00257-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  31. Gong Y.M., Xu R., Tang Z.D., Li B.H. The Upper Devonian orbital cyclostratigraphy and numerical dating conodont zones from Guangxi. South China. Sci. China Series D Earth Sci. 2005;48:32–41. doi: 10.1360/03yd0025. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  32. Gong Z., Kodama K.P., Li Y.X. Rock magnetic cyclostratigraphy of the Doushantuo Formation, South China and its implications for the duration of the Shuram carbon isotope excursion. Precambrian Res. 2017;289:62–74. doi: 10.1016/j.precamres.2016.12.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  33. Gong Z., Kodama K.P., Li Y.X. Paleomagnetism and rock magnetic cyclostratigraphy of the Ediacaran Doushantuo Formation, South China: Constraints on the remagnetization mechanism and the encoding process of Milankovitch cycles. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 2019;528:232–246. doi: 10.1016/j.palaeo.2019.05.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  34. Gradstein F.M., Ogg J.G., Schmitz M.D., Ogg G.M., editors. The Geologic Time Scale 2020. 2 volumes. Elsevier Publ; 2020. (ca. 1400 pp.), in press. https://www.elsevier.com/books/geologic-time-scale-2020/gradstein/978-0-12-824360-2. [Google Scholar]
  35. Grippo A., Fischer A.G., Hinnov L.A., Herbert T.D., Premoli Silva I. Cyclostratigraphy and chronology of the Albian stage (Piobbico core, Italy). In: D’Argenio, B., Fischer, A.G., Premoli Silva, I., Weissert, H., and Ferreri, V. (eds.), Cyclostratigraphy: Approaches and Case Histories. SEPM Spec. Publ. 2004;81:57–81. doi: 10.2110/pec.04.81.0057. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  36. Hays J.D., Imbrie J., Shackleton N.J. Variations in the Earth's orbit: Pacemaker of the Ice Ages. Science. 1976;194:1121–1132. doi: 10.1126/science.194.4270.1121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. He H.Y., Deng C.L., Wang P.J., Pan Y.X., Zhu R.X. Toward age determination of the termination of the Cretaceous Normal Superchron. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 2012;13 article #Q02002: 20 pp. doi:10.1029/2011GC003901. [Google Scholar]
  38. Heslop D., Langereis C.G., Dekkers M.J. A new astronomical timescale for the loess deposits of Northern China. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 2000;184:125–139. doi: 10.1016/S0012-821X(00)00324-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  39. Hilgen F.J., Lourens L.J., Van Dam J.A. In: A Geologic Time Scale 2012. Gradstein F.M., Ogg J.G., Schmitz M.D., Ogg G.M., editors. Elsevier; Amsterdam: 2012. Chapter 29: The Neogene Period; pp. 923–978. [Google Scholar]
  40. Hinnov L.A. Cyclostratigraphy and its revolutionizing applications in the earth and planetary sciences. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 2013;125:1703–1734. doi: 10.1130/B30934.1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  41. Hinnov L.A. Chapter One - Cyclostratigraphy and astrochronology in 2018. In: Montenari, M. (ed.) Stratigr. Time Scales (Academic Press) 2018;3:1–80. doi: 10.1016/bs.sats.2018.08.004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  42. Hinnov L.A., Hilgen F.J. In: The Geologic Time Scale 2012. Gradstein F.M., Ogg J.G., Schmitz M., Ogg G.M., editors. Elsevier; Amsterdam: 2012. Cyclostratigraphy and astrochronology; pp. 63–83. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  43. Hinnov L.A., Ogg J.G. Cyclostratigraphy and the astronomical time scale. Stratigraphy. 2007;4:239–251. [Google Scholar]
  44. Hu K.Y., Qi Y.P. The Moscovian (Pennsylvanian) conodont genus Swadelina from Luodian, southern Guizhou, South China. Stratigraphy. 2017;14:197–215. doi: 10.29041/strat.14.1-4.197-215. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  45. Huang C.J. Chapter Two - Astronomical time scale for the Mesozoic. In: Montenari, M. (ed.) Stratigr. Time Scales (Academic Press) 2018;3:81–150. doi: 10.1016/bs.sats.2018.08.005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  46. Huang D. Jurassic integrative stratigraphy and timescale of China. Sci. China Earth Sci. 2019;62:223–255. doi: 10.1007/s11430-017-9268-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  47. Huang C.J., Hinnov L.A., Fischer A.G., Grippo A., Herbert T. Astronomical tuning of the Aptian stage from Italian reference sections. Geology. 2010;38:899–902. doi: 10.1130/G31177.1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  48. Huang C.J., Hesselbo S.P., Hinnov L.A. Astrochronology of the Late Jurassic Kimmeridge Clay (Dorset, England) and implications for Earth system processes. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 2010;289:242–255. doi: 10.1016/j.epsl.2009.11.013. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  49. Huang C.J., Deng S.H., Dong S.S., Hinnov L.A., Zhang R., Wang Z.X., Lu Y.Z., Li X. Geological Society of America Annual Meeting (Denver, Colo.), Paper 127-2. 2016. Astronomically forced cyclicity in the Late Ordovician-Early Silurian, Sichuan Basin, China.https://gsa.confex.com/gsa/2016AM/webprogram/Paper283308.html [Google Scholar]
  50. Husson D., Galbrun B., Laskar J., Hinnov L.A., Locklair R. Astronomical calibration of the Maastrichtian. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 2011;305:328–340. [Google Scholar]
  51. Huybers P., Wunsch C. Rectification and precession signals in the climate system. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2003;30(19) #2011: 4 pp. doi:10.1029/2003GL017875. [Google Scholar]
  52. Kametaka M., Nagai H., Zhu S.Z., Takebe M. Middle Permian radiolarians from Anmenkou, Chaohu, northeastern Yangtze Platform, China. Island Arc. 2009;18:108–125. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1738.2008.00649.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  53. Laskar J., Joutel F., Boudin F. Orbital, precessional and insolation quantities for the Earth from -20 Myr to +10 Myr. Astron. Astrophys. 1993;270:522–533. [Google Scholar]
  54. Laskar J., Robutel P., Joutel J., Gastineau M., Correia A.C.M., Levrard B. A numerical solution for the insolation quantities of the Earth. Astron. Astrophys. 2004;428:261–285. doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20041335. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  55. Laskar J., Fienga A., Gastineau M., Manche H. La2010: A new orbital solution for the long term motion of the Earth. Astron. Astrophys. 2011;532:A89. doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201116836. 15 pp. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  56. Lehrmann D.J., Stepchinski L., Altiner D., Orchard M.J., Montgomery P., Enos P., Ellwood B.B., Bowring S.A., Ramezani J., Wang H.M., Wei J.Y., Yu M.Y., Griffiths J.D., Minzoni M., Schaal E.K., Li X.W., Meyer K.M., Payne J.L. An integrated biostratigraphy (conodonts and foraminifers) and chronostratigraphy (paleomagnetic reversals, magnetic susceptibility, elemental chemistry, carbon isotopes and geochronology) for the Permian–Upper Triassic strata of Guandao section, Nanpanjiang Basin, south China. J. Asian Earth Sci. 2015;108:117–135. doi: 10.1016/j.jseaes.2015.04.030. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  57. Li R.F., Liu B.P., Zhao C.L. Correlation of Carboniferous depositional sequences on the Yangtze Plate with others on a global scale (in Chinese with English abstract) Acta Sedimentol. Sin. 1997;15:23–28. http://www.cjxb.ac.cn/EN/Y1997/V15/I3/23 [Google Scholar]
  58. Li S.Y., Tong J.N., Liu K.Y., Wang F.J., Huo Y.Y. The Lower Triassic cyclic deposition in Chaohu, Anhui Province, China. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 2007;252:188–199. doi: 10.1016/j.palaeo.2006.11.043. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  59. Li H., Tong J.N., Ren J.B., Zhang J.K. Early Triassic bivalve biostratigraphy and paleocommunities at Xiakou section in Xingshan, Hubei province. Earth Sci. (Journal of the China University of Geosciences) 2009;34:733–742. http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-DQKX200905005.htm (In Chinese with English abstract) [Google Scholar]
  60. Li M.S., Ogg J.G., Zhang Y., Huang C.J., Hinnov L.A., Chen Z.Q., Zou Z.Y. Astronomical tuning of the end-Permian extinction and the Early Triassic Epoch of South China and Germany. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 2016;441:10–25. doi: 10.1016/j.epsl.2016.02.017. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  61. Li M.S., Huang C.J., Hinnov L.A., Ogg J.G., Chen Z.-Q., Zhang Y. Obliquity-forced climate during the Early Triassic hothouse in China. Geology. 2016;44:623–626. doi: 10.1130/G37970.1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  62. Li M.S., Zhang Y., Huang C.J., Ogg J.G., Hinnov L.A., Wang Y.D., Zou Z.Y., Li L. Astronomical tuning and magnetostratigraphy of the Upper Triassic Xujiahe Fm. of South China and Newark Supergroup of North America: Implications for the Late Triassic time scale. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 2017;475:207–223. doi: 10.1016/j.epsl.2017.07.015. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  63. Li M.S., Hinnov L.A., Kump L. Acycle: Time-series analysis software for paleoclimate research and education. Comput. Geosci. 2019;127:12–22. [Available at www.mingsongli.com/Acycle] [Google Scholar]
  64. Li M.S., Huang C.J., Hinnov L.A., Chen W.Z., Ogg J.G., Tian W. Astrochronology of the Anisian Stage (Middle Triassic) at the Guandao reference section, South China. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 2018;482:591–606. doi: 10.1016/j.epsl.2017.11.042. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  65. Li M.S., Kump L.R., Hinnov L.A., Mann M.E. Tracking variable sedimentation rates and astronomical forcing in Phanerozoic paleoclimate proxy series with evolutionary correlation coefficients and hypothesis testing. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 2018;501:165–179. doi: 10.1016/j.epsl.2018.08.041. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  66. Li M.S., Huang C.J., Ogg J.G., Zhang Y., Hinnov L.A., Wu H.C., Chen Z.Q., Zou Z.Y. Paleoclimate proxies for cyclostratigraphy: comparative analysis using a Lower Triassic marine section in South China. Earth Sci. Rev. 2019;189:125–146. doi: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2019.01.011. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  67. Li Y.-X., Gill B., Montañez I.P., Ma L.F., LeRoy M., Kodama K.P. Obliquity driven redox fluctuations during Cretaceous Oceanic Anoxic Event 2 (OAE2) revealed by a mineral magnetic proxy. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 2020;538 article #109465: 10 pp. doi:10.1016/j.palaeo.2019.109465. [Google Scholar]
  68. Lisiecki L.E., Raymo M.E. A Pliocene-Pleistocene stack of 57 globally distributed benthic δ18O records. Paleoceanography. 2005;20 article #PA1003: 17 pp. doi:10.1029/2004PA001071. [Google Scholar]
  69. Liu Z.H., Huang C.J., Algeo T.J., Liu H.M., Hao Y.Q., Du X.B., Lu Y.C., Chen P., Guo L.Y., Peng L. High-resolution astrochronological record for the Paleocene-Oligocene (66–23 Ma) from the rapidly subsiding Bohai Bay Basin, northeastern China. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 2017;510:78–92. doi: 10.1016/j.palaeo.2017.10.030. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  70. Liu Z., Liu X.M., Huang S.P. Cyclostratigraphic analysis of magnetic records for orbital chronology of the Lower Cretaceous Xiagou Formation in Linze, northwestern China. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 2017;481:44–56. doi: 10.1016/j.palaeo.2017.05.022. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  71. Liu J., Jahandar R., Li L., Shang Q.H., Xu G.H., Wang Y.Q., Yang J.S. High-precision temporal calibration of Middle Triassic vertebrate biostratigraphy: U-Pb zircon constraints for the Sinokannemeyeria Fauna and Yonghesuchus. Vertebrata PalAsiatica. 2018;56:16–24. doi: 10.19615/j.cnki.1000-3118.170808. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  72. Liu W., Wu H.C., Hinnov L.A., Baddouh M., Wang P.J., Gao Y.F., Zhang S.H., Yang T.S., Li H.Y., Wang C.S. An 11 million-year-long record of astronomically forced fluvial-alluvial deposition and paleoclimate change in the Early Cretaceous Songliao synrift basin, China. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 2020;541 article #109555: 13 pp. doi:10.1016/j.palaeo.2019.109555. [Google Scholar]
  73. Lourens L.J., Hilgen F., Shackleton N.J., Laskar J., Wilson D. In: A Geologic Time Scale 2004. Gradstein F.M., Ogg J.G., Smith A., editors. Cambridge University Press; Cambridge, UK: 2004. The Neogene Period; pp. 400–440. [Google Scholar]
  74. Lu H.Y., Liu X.D., Zhang F.Q., An Z.S., Dodson J. Astronomical calibration of loess-paleosol deposits at Luochuan, central Chinese Loess Plateau. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 1999;154:237–246. doi: 10.1016/S0031-0182(99)00113-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  75. Lu Y.B., Huang C.J., Jiang S., Zhang J.Y., Lu Y.C., Liu Y. Cyclic late Katian through Hirnantian glacioeustasy and its controls on the development of the organic-rich Wufeng and Longmaxi shales, South China. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 2019;526:96–109. doi: 10.1016/j.palaeo.2019.04.012. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  76. Ma K.Y., Li R.C., Gong Y.M. Chemostratigraphy and cyclostratigraphy of the Ordovician Liangjiashan Section from Shimenzhai of Qinhuangdao in North China. Earth Sci. Front. 2016;23(6):268–286. [Google Scholar]
  77. Ma K.Y., Li R.C., Hinnov L.A., Gong Y.M. Conodont biostratigraphy and astronomical tuning of the Lower–Middle Ordovician Liangjiashan (North China) and Huanghuachang (South China) marine sections. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 2019;528:272–287. doi: 10.1016/j.palaeo.2019.05.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  78. Ma X.Y., Lu Y.Z., Zhong L., Fan R., Li X., Deng S.H. Carbon isotope characteristics of the Ordovician Pagoda Formation at the Sanquan Section in Nanchuan, Chongqing and its correlation. J. Stratigr. 2019;43(1):1–10. (in Chinese with English abstract) [Google Scholar]
  79. Ma X.Y., Fan R., Lu Y.Z., Luo Z., Deng S.H., Zhang F. Middle-Upper Ordovician conodont sequence and its geological significance in Nanchuan area, Chongqing. Acta Pet. Sin. 2019;40(5):577–586. (in Chinese with English abstract) [Google Scholar]
  80. Ma X.Y., Deng S.H., Lu Y.Z., Wu H.C., Luo Z., 628 Fan R., Li X., Fang Q. Astrochronology of the Upper Ordovician Pagoda Formation, South China and its geological implications. Earth Sci. Front. 2019;26(2):281–291. [Google Scholar]
  81. Ma K.Y., Hinnov L.A., Zhang X.S., Gong Y.M. Astronomical time calibration of the Upper Devonian Lali section, South China. Global Planet. Change. 2020;193 doi: 10.1016/j.gloplacha.2020.103267. article #103267: 12 pp. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  82. Ma X.Y., Ogg J.G., Lu Y.Z., Fan R., Huang C.J., Luo Z., Deng S.H. Cyclostratigraphy of the Upper Ordovician Pagoda Formation, South China: Implications for the duration and correlation of the Guttenberg δ13C excursion (GICE) Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 2020 In press. [Google Scholar]
  83. Mann M.E., Lees J.M. Robust estimation of background noise and signal detection in climatic time series. Clim. Chang. 1996;33:409–445. doi: 10.1007/BF00142586. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  84. McFadden K.F., Huang J., Chu X.L., Jiang G.Q., Kaufman A.J., Zhou C.M., Yuan X.L., Xiao S.H. Pulsed oxidation and biological evolution in the Ediacaran Doushantuo Formation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2008;105(9):3197–3202. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0708336105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Mei S.L., Jin Y.G., Wardlaw B.R. Succession of conodont zones from the Permian “Kuhfeng” formation, Xuanhan, Sichuan and its implication in global correlation. Acta Palaeontol. Sin. 1994;33:1–23. (in Chinese with English abstract) [Google Scholar]
  86. Meyers S.R. Astrochron: An R package for astrochronology. 2014. http://cran.r-project.org/package=astrochron Available at.
  87. Meyers S.R., Sageman B.B., Hinnov L.A. Integrated quantitative stratigraphy of the Cenomanian-Turonian Bridge Creek Limestone member using evolutive harmonic analysis and stratigraphic modeling. J. Sediment. Res. 2001;71:628–644. doi: 10.1306/012401710628. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  88. Milankovitch M. In: Handbuch der Klimatologie, Bd. 1: Allgemeine Klimalehre. Köppen W., Geiger R., editors. Borntraeger; Berlin: 1930. Mathematische Klimalehre und astronomische Theorie der Klimaschwankungen. [Google Scholar]
  89. Milankovitch, M., 1941. Kanon der Erdbestrahlung und seine Anwendung auf das Eiszeitenproblem. Académie royale serbe. Éditions speciales; 132 [vielm. 133]: XX, 633, Belgrad, 1941.
  90. Mundil R., Ludwig K.R., Metcalfe I., Renne P.R. Age and timing of the Permian mass extinctions: U/Pb dating of closed-system zircons. Science. 2004;305:1760–1763. doi: 10.1126/science.1101012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. Ogg J.G., Ogg G.M., Gradstein F.M. A Concise Geologic Time Scale 2016. Elsevier Publ; 2016. pp. 1–234. [Google Scholar]
  92. Pas D., Hinnov L.A., Day J., Kodama K., Sinnesael M., Liu W. Cyclostratigraphic calibration of the Famennian Stage (Late Devonian, Illinois Basin, USA) Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 2018;488:102–114. doi: 10.1016/j.epsl.2018.02.010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  93. Peng S.C., Babcock L.E., Zuo J.X., Lin H.L., Zhu X.J., Yang X.F., Robison R.A., Qi Y.P., Bagnoli G., Chen Y. The Global boundary Stratotype Section and Point of the Guzhangian Stage (Cambrian) in the Wuling Mountains, northwestern Hunan, China. Episodes. 2009;32(1):41–55. doi: 10.18814/epiiugs/2009/v32i1/006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  94. Peng C., Zou C.C., Zhang S.X., Wu H.C., Lu Q.T., Hou H.S., Wang C.S. Astronomically forced variations in multiresolution resistivity logs of lower Upper Cretaceous (Cenomanian-Coniacian) terrestrial formations from the Songliao Basin, northeastern China. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 2020;555 doi: 10.1016/j.palaeo.2020.109858. article #109858: 15 pp. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  95. Qi Y.P., Nemyrovska T.I., Wang X.D., Chen J.T., Wang Z.H., Lane H.R., Richards B.C., Hu K.Y., Wang Q.L. Late Visean–early Serpukhovian conodont succession at the Naqing (Nashui) section in Guizhou, South China. Geol. Mag. 2014;151:254–268. doi: 10.1017/S001675681300071X. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  96. Qie W.K., Ma X.P., Xu H.H., Qiao L., Liang K., Guo W., Song J.J., Chen B., Lu J.F. Devonian integrative stratigraphy and timescale of China. Sci. China Earth Sci. 2019;62:112–134. doi: 10.1007/s11430-017-9259-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  97. Qu X.J., Wang P.J., Gao Y.F., Wan X.Q. Chronostratigraphy of Huoshiling Formation in the Songliao Basin, NE China: an overview. Earth Sci. Front. 2014;21(2):234–250. (Chinese with English abstract) [Google Scholar]
  98. Rong J.Y., Wang Y., Zhan R.B., Fan J.X., Huang B., Tang P., Li Y., Zhang X.L., Wu R.C., Wang G.X., Wei X. Silurian integrative stratigraphy and timescale of China. Sci. China Earth Sci. 2019;62:89–111. doi: 10.1007/s11430-017-9258-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  99. Ross C.A., Ross J.R.P. In: Sea-level changes: An integrated approach. Wilgus C.K., Hastings B.S., Posamentier H., Van Wagoner J., Ross C.A., Kendall C.G.S.C., editors. Vol. 42. SEPM Special Publication; 1988. Late Paleozoic transgressive-regressive deposition; pp. 227–247. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  100. Ruhl M., Hesselbo S.P., Hinnov L.A., Jenkyns H.C., Xu W.M., Storm M., Riding J., Minisini D., Ullmann C.U., Leng M.J. Astronomical constraints on the duration of the Early Jurassic Pliensbachian stage and global climate fluctuations. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 2016;455:149–165. doi: 10.1016/j.epsl.2016.08.038. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  101. Rygel M.C., Fielding C.R., Frank T.D., Birgenheier L.P. The magnitude of Late Paleozoic glacioeustatic fluctuations: A synthesis. J. Sediment. Res. 2008;78:500–511. doi: 10.2110/jsr.2008.058. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  102. Shen S.Z., Crowley J.L., Wang Y., Bowring S.A., Erwin D.H., Sadler P.M., Cao C.Q., Rothman D.H., Henderson C.M., Ramezani J., Zhang H., Shen Y., Wang X.D., Wang W., Mu L., Li W.Z., Tang Y.G., Liu X.L., Liu L.J., Zeng Y., Jiang Y.F., Jin Y.G. Calibrating the end-Permian mass extinction. Science. 2011;334:1367–1372. doi: 10.1126/science.1213454. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  103. Shen S.Z., Zhang H., Zhang Y.C., Yuan D.X., Chen B., He W.H., Mu L., Lin W., Wang W.Q., Chen J., Wu Q., Cao C.Q., Wang Y., Wang X.D. Permian integrative stratigraphy and timescale of China. Sci. China Earth Sci. 2019;62:154–188. doi: 10.1007/s11430-017-9228-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  104. Sinnesael M., De Vleeschouwer D., Zeeden C., et al. (total of 31 authors) The Cyclostratigraphy Intercomparison Project (CIP): consistency, merits and pitfalls. Earth-Science Rev. 2019;199 article #102965: 16 pp. doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2019.102965. [Google Scholar]
  105. Sui Y., Huang C.J., Zhang R., Wang Z.X., Ogg J.G., Kemp D.B. Astronomical time scale for the lower Doushantuo Formation of early Ediacaran, South China. Sci. Bull. 2018;63:1485–1494. doi: 10.1016/j.scib.2018.10.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  106. Sui Y., Huang C.J., Zhang R., Wang Z.X., Ogg J.G. Astronomical time scale for the middle- upper Doushantuo Formation of Ediacaran in South China: implications for the duration of the Shuram/Wonoka negative δ13C excursion. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 2019;532 article #109273: 11 pp. doi:10.1016/j.palaeo.2019.109273. [Google Scholar]
  107. Sun Y.B., Clemens S.C., An Z.S., Yu Z.W. Astronomical timescale and palaeoclimatic implication of stacked 3.6-Myr monsoon records from the Chinese Loess Plateau. Quat. Sci. Rev. 2006;25:33–48. doi: 10.1016/j.quascirev.2005.07.005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  108. Tang P., Huang B., Wu R.C., Fan J.X., Yan K., Wang G.X., Liu J.B., Wang Y., Zhan R.B., Rong J.Y. On the upper Ordovician Daduhe Formation of the upper Yangtze region. J. Stratigr. 2017;41:119–133. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DCXZ201702001.htm (in Chinese with English abstract) [Google Scholar]
  109. Thomson D.J. Spectrum estimation and harmonic analysis. Proc. IEEE. 1982;70(9):1055–1096. doi: 10.1109/PROC.1982.12433. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  110. Tong J.N., Chu D.L., Liang L., Shu W.C., Song H.J., Song T., Song H.Y., Wu Y.Y. Triassic integrative stratigraphy and timescale of China. Sci. China Earth Sci. 2019;62:189–222. doi: 10.1007/s11430-018-9278-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  111. Ueno K., Hayakawa N., Nakazawa T., Wang Y., Wang X.D. In: Palaeozoic Climate Cycles: Their Evolutionary and Sedimentological Impact. Gasiewicz A., Slowakiewicz M., editors. Vol. 376. Geological Society, London Special Publications; 2013. Pennsylvanian-Early Permian cyclothemic succession on the Yangtze Carbonate Platform, South China; pp. 235–267. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  112. Wang X.F., Stouge S., Chen X.H., Li Z.H., Wang C.S., Finney C., Zeng Q.L., Zhou Z.Q., Chen H.M., Erdtmann B.D. The Global Stratotype Section and Point for the base of the Middle Ordovician Series and the Third Stage (Dapingian) Episodes. 2009;32(2):96–113. doi: 10.18814/epiiugs/2009/v32i2/003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  113. Wang T.T., Ramezani J., Wang C.S., Wu H.C., He H.Y., Bowring S.A. High-precision U-Pb geochronologic constraints on the Late Cretaceous terrestrial cyclostratigraphy and geomagnetic polarity from the Songliao Basin, Northeast China. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 2016;446:37–44. doi: 10.1016/j.epsl.2016.04.007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  114. Wang Z.H., Zhen Y.Y., Ma H., Zhang Y.D. Ordovician conodonts from the Kuniutan to Pagoda Formations at Chenjiahe and Zhenjin of Yichang, Hubei province, China and their stratigraphic significance. Acta Micropalaeotologica Sinica. 2018;35(1):13–29. (in Chinese with English abstract) [Google Scholar]
  115. Wang X.D., Hu K.Y., Qie W.K., Sheng Q.Y., Chen B., Lin W., Yao L., Wang Q.L., Qi Y.P., Chen J.T., Liao Z.T., Song J.J. Carboniferous integrative stratigraphy and time scale of China. Sci. China Earth Sci. 2019;62:135–153. doi: 10.1007/s11430-017-9253-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  116. Wang Y.Q., Li Q., Bai B., Jin X., Mao F.Y., Meng J. Paleogene integrative stratigraphy and timescale of China. Sci. China Earth Sci. 2019;62:287–309. doi: 10.1007/s11430-018-9305-y. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  117. Wu H.C., Zhang S.H., Jiang G.Q., Huang Q.H. The floating astronomical time scale for the terrestrial Late Cretaceous Qingshankou Formation from the Songliao Basin of Northeast China and its stratigraphic and paleoclimate implications. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 2009;278:308–323. doi: 10.1016/j.epsl.2008.12.016. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  118. Wu H.C., Zhang S.H., Feng Q.L., Jiang G.Q., Li H.Y., Yang T.S. Milankovitch and sub-Milankovitch cycles of the early Triassic Daye Formation, South China and their geochronological and paleoclimatic implications. Gondwana Res. 2012;22:748–759. doi: 10.1016/j.gr.2011.12.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  119. Wu H.C., Zhang S.H., Jiang G.Q., Hinnov L.A., Yang T.S., Li H.Y., Wan X.Q., Wang C.S. Astrochronology of the Early Turonian–Early Campanian terrestrial succession in the Songliao Basin, northeastern China and its implication for long-period behavior of the Solar System. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 2013;385:55–70. doi: 10.1016/j.palaeo.2012.09.004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  120. Wu H.C., Zhang S.H., Jiang G.Q., Yang T.S., Guo J.H., Li H.Y. Astrochronology for the Early Cretaceous Jehol Biota in northeastern China. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 2013;385:221–228. doi: 10.1016/j.palaeo.2013.05.017. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  121. Wu H.C., Zhang S.H., Hinnov L.A., Jiang G.Q., Feng Q.L., Li H.Y., Yang T.S. Time-calibrated Milankovitch cycles for the late Permian. Nat. Commun. 2013;4 doi: 10.1038/ncomms3452. article #2452: 8 pp. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  122. Wu H.C., Zhang S.H., Hinnov L.A., Jiang G.Q., Yang T.S., Li H.Y., Wan X.Q., Wang C.S. Cyclostratigraphy and orbital tuning of the terrestrial upper Santonian-Lower Danian in Songliao Basin, northeastern China. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 2014;407:82–95. doi: 10.1016/j.epsl.2014.09.038. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  123. Wu Q., Ramezani J., Zhang H., Wang T.T., Yuan D.X., Mu L., Zhang Y.C., Li X.H., Shen S.Z. Calibrating the Guadalupian series (Middle Permian) of South China. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 2017;466:361–372. doi: 10.1016/j.palaeo.2016.11.011. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  124. Wu H.C., Fang Q., Wang X.D., Hinnov L.A., Qi Y.P., Shen S.Z., Yang T.S., Li H.Y., Chen J.T., Zhang S.H. An ~34 m.y. astronomical time scale for the uppermost Mississippian through Pennsylvanian of the Carboniferous System of the Paleo-Tethyan realm. Geology. 2018;47:83–86. doi: 10.1130/G45461.1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  125. Wu H.C., Hinnov L.A., Zhang S.H., Jiang G.Q., Chu R., Yang T.S., Li H., Xi D., Wang C. Continental geological evidence for two Solar System chaotic events in the Late Cretaceous. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2020 (in press) [Google Scholar]
  126. Xi D.P., Wan X.Q., Li G.B., Li G. Cretaceous integrative stratigraphy and timescale of China. Sci. China Earth Sci. 2019;62:256–286. doi: 10.1007/s11430-017-9262-y. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  127. Xu K., Chen H.H., Huang C.J., Ogg J.G., Zhu J.X., Lin S.Q., Yang D.Q., Zhao P., Kong L.T. Astronomical time scale of the Paleogene lacustrine paleoclimate record from the Nanxiang Basin, central China. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 2019;532 doi: 10.1016/j.palaeo.2019.109253. article #109253: 19 pp. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  128. Xu Y.C., Jiang R., Deng Y.Z., Kemp D.B., Zhu Z.M., Yang Z.Y., Huang C.J. A robust geochronology of the Yangtze River Delta based on magnetostratigraphy and cyclostratigraphy of sediment core ZKA2. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 2020;541 article #109532: 14 pp. doi:10.1016/j.palaeo.2019.109532. [Google Scholar]
  129. Xue W.Q., Li B., Ellwood B.B., Tomkin J.H., Wang Y., Zhu Z.M. High-resolution floating point time scale (FPTS) of Permian Capitanian Stage in South China. Chin. J. Geophys. 2015;58(6):611–627. http://html.rhhz.net/Geophy_en/html/20150602.htm [Google Scholar]
  130. Yao X., Hinnov L.A. Advances in characterizing the cyclostratigraphy of binary chart-mudstone lithologic successions, Permian (Roadian-lower Capitanian), Chaohu, Lower Yangtze, South China. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 2019;539:258–271. [Google Scholar]
  131. Yuan D.X., Shen S.Z., Henderson C.M., Chen J., Zhang H., Zheng Q.F., Wu H.C. Integrative timescale for the Lopingian (Late Permian): A review and update from Shangsi, South China. Earth-Sci. Reviews. 2019;188:190–209. doi: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2018.11.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  132. Zachos J., Pagani M., Sloan L., Thomas E., Billups K. Trends, rhythms, and aberrations in global climate 65 Ma to present. Science. 2001;292:686–693. doi: 10.1126/science.1059412. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  133. Zhang Y., Li M.S., Ogg J.G., Montgomery P., Huang C.J., Shi Z.Q., Enos P., Lehrmann D. Cycle-calibrated magnetostratigraphy of middle Carnian from South China: Implications for Late Triassic time scale and termination of the Yangtze Platform. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 2015;146:135–166. doi: 10.1016/j.palaeo.2015.05.033. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  134. Zhang Y., Li L., Ogg J.G. Pliocene-Pleistocene magneto-cyclostratigraphy of IODP Site 1499 and implications for climate-driven sedimentation in the northern South China Sea. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 2019;527:118–132. doi: 10.1016/j.palaeo.2019.04.029. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  135. Zhang X.S., Over D.J., Ma K.Y., Gong Y.M. Upper Devonian conodont zonation, sea-level changes and bio-events in offshore carbonate facies Lali section, South China. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 2019;531 (Part A), article #109219 23 pp. doi:10.1016/j.palaeo.2019.05.041. [Google Scholar]
  136. Zhang B., Yao S.P., Wignall P.B., Hu W.X., Liu B., Ren Y.L. New timing and geochemical constraints on the Capitanian (Middle Permian) extinction and environmental changes in deep-water settings: Evidence from the lower Yangtze region of South China. J. Geol. Soc. 2019;176:588–608. doi: 10.1144/jgs2018-137. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  137. Zhang Y.D., Zhan R.B., Zhen Y.Y., Wang Z.H., Yuan W.W., Fang X., Ma X., Zhang J.P. Ordovician integrative stratigraphy and timescale of China. Sci. China Earth Sci. 2019;62:61–88. doi: 10.1007/s11430-017-9279-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  138. Zhang R., Jin Z.J., Liu Q.Y., Li P., Huang Z.K., Shi J.Y., Ge Y.J., Du K.F. Astronomical constraints on deposition of the Middle Triassic Chang 7 lacustrine shales in the Ordos Basin, Central China. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 2019;528:87–98. doi: 10.1016/j.palaeo.2019.04.030. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  139. Zhang R., Li L., Nai W.H., Gu Y.S., Huang C.J., Ogg J.G., Li Q.H., Lu C.X., Wang Z.X. Astronomical forcing of terrestrial climate recorded in the Pleistocene of the western Tarim Basin, NW China. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 2019;530:78–89. doi: 10.1016/j.palaeo.2019.05.039. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  140. Zhang T., Zhang C.M., Fan T.L., Zhu R., Zhang L., Tao J.Y., Gao Z.Q., Li M.S. Cyclostratigraphy of Lower Triassic terrestrial successions in the Junggar Basin, northwestern China. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 2020;539 doi: 10.1016/j.palaeo.2019.109493. article #109493: 14 pp. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  141. Zhao L.S., Xiong X.Q., Yang F.Q., Wang Z.P., He W.H. Conodonts from the Lower Triassic in the Nantuowan Section of Daxiakou, Xingshan County, Hubei Province. Albertiana. 2005;33:113–114. [Google Scholar]
  142. Zhao K., Du X.B., Lu Y.C., Xiong S.P., Wang Y. Are light-dark coupled laminae in lacustrine shale seasonally controlled? A case study using astronomical tuning from 42.2 to 45.4 Ma in the Dongying Depression, Bohai Bay Basin, eastern China. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 2019;528:35–49. doi: 10.1016/j.palaeo.2019.04.034. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  143. Zhen Y.Y., Wang Z.H., Zhang Y.D., Bergström S.M., Percival I.G., Cheng J.F. Middle to Late Ordovician (Darriwilian-Sandbian) conodonts from the Dawangou section, Kalpin area of the Tarim Basin, Northwestern China. Rec. Aust. Mus. 2011;63(3):203–266. doi: 10.3853/j.0067-1975.63.2011.1586. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  144. Zhong Y.Y., Wu H.C., Zhang Y.D., Zhang S.H., Yang T.S., Li H.Y., Cao L.W. Astronomical calibration of the Middle Ordovician of the Yangtze Block. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 2018;505:86–99. doi: 10.1016/j.palaeo.2018.05.030. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  145. Zhong Y.Y., Chen D.Y., Fan J.X., Wu H.C., Fang Q., Shi M.N. Cyclostratigraphic calibration of the Upper Ordovician (Sandbian-Katian) Pagoda and Linhsiang formations in the Yichang area, South China. Acta Geologica Sinica (English edition) 2019;93:177–180. doi: 10.1111/1755-6724.14282. supp.1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  146. Zhong Y.Y., Wu H.C., Fan J.X., Fang Q., Shi M.N., Zhang S.H., Yang T.S., Li H.Y., Cao L.W. Late Ordovician obliquity-forced glacio-eustasy recorded in the Yangtze Block, South China. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 2019;540 doi: 10.1016/j.palaeo.2019.109520. article #109520: 16 pp. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  147. Zhou C.M., Yuan X.L., Xiao S.H., Chen Z., Hua H. Ediacaran integrative stratigraphy and timescale of China. Sci. China Earth Sci. 2019;62:7–24. doi: 10.1007/s11430-017-9216-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  148. Zhu R.X., Pan Y.X., Shi R.P., Liu Q.S., Li D.M. Palaeomagnetic and 40Ar/39Ar dating constraints on the age of the Jehol Biota and the duration of deposition of the Sihetun fossil-bearing lake sediments, northeast China. Cretac. Res. 2007;28:171–176. doi: 10.1016/j.cretres.2006.06.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  149. Zhu M.Y., Zhang J.M., Yang A.H. Integrated Ediacaran (Sinian) chronostratigraphy of South China. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 2007;254(1):7–61. [Google Scholar]
  150. Zhu R.K., Cui J.W., Deng S.H., Luo Z., Lu Y.Z., Qiu Z. High-precision dating and geological significance of Chang 7 tuff zircon of the Triassic Yanchang Formation, Ordos Basin in central China. Acta Geologica Sinica-English Edition. 2019;93:1823–1834. doi: 10.1111/1755-6724.14329. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  151. Zhu M.Y., Yang A.H., Yuan J.L., Li G.X., Zhang J.M., Zhao F..C., Ahn S.Y., Miao L.Y. Cambrian integrative stratigraphy and timescale of China. Sci. China Earth Sci. 2019;62:25–60. doi: 10.1007/s11430-017-9291-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES