Abstract
Natural-abundance 17O NMR experiments are used to investigate the hydrated water in magnetically alligned synthetic polymer based lipid-nanodiscs. Residual quadrupole couplings (RQCs) measured from the observed five 17O (central and satellite) transitions, and molecular dynamics simulations, are used to probe the ordering of water moecules across the lipid bilayer.
Graphical Abstract
Water is central to all life, and crucial for the structure and function of all biological systems. Study of hydration dynamics can provide valuable insights into the role of water in the function of such biological systems including protein, RNA and biomaterials.1, 2 For example, water significantly influence the structure, dynamics and the variety of functional properties of the cell membrane.2, 3 However, there are numerous challenges for high-resolution probing of the structure and dynamics of water molecules in a membrane environment. Herein, we demonstrate the use of natural-abundance 17O NMR spectroscopy to investigate the interaction of water molecules with lipid-nanodiscs.
While the very low-abundance (~0.037%) and a small gyromagnetic ratio (~1/7th of 1H) render 17O NMR to be insensitive, magic angle spinning (MAS) studies on solids well utilized the large chemical shift span and quadrupolar interaction of 17O.4, 5 17O quadrupole central transition has also been used to study chemical and biological macromolecules in solution as reported in the literature.4, 6–9 In this study, polymer nanodiscs are used as membrane mimetics to investigate the interaction of water with lipid bilayer using natural-abundance 17O NMR spectroscopy. Polymer nanodiscs consists of a planar lipid bilayer encased by the polymer belt (Fig.1A).10, 11 Lipid nanodiscs technology is increasingly used for the structure and functional studies of membrane proteins.12, 13 While isotropic nanodiscs are used in solution NMR studies, the magnetic-alignment properties of polymer nanodiscs (diameter >20 nm) have been shown to be unique in enabling the application of solid-state NMR experiments to study lipids and membrane proteins, and to measure RDCs (residual dipolar couplings) using solution NMR studies.14–17 Natural-abundance 17O NMR spectra of magnetically-aligned and flipped nanodiscs are remarkable in showing all the five transitions for the spin 5/2 system, and the exciting feasibility of using the experimentally measured residual quadrupolar couplings (RQCs) to determine the orientation of the water molecules in the lipid bilayer. A combination of NMR and molecular dynamic simulation presented here reveals the molecular level ordering of water molecules across the lipid bilayer.
Nanodiscs were prepared by the addition of a synthetic polymer (styrene maleimide quaternary ammonium (SMA-QA); synthesis, purification and characterization can be found elsewhere15) and DMPC (1,2-dimyristoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine) lipids as described in the Supporting Information, and characterized using biophysical experiments as reported previously.18 The polymer nanodiscs prepared in various concentrations and their ability to magnetically align in the presence of an external magnetic field were confirmed using 31P NMR as reported previously.16, 18 In addition, TEM images were used to confirm the approximate size and shape of the nanodiscs (see Figure 1B). 17O NMR experiments on varying concentrations of SMA-QA-DMPC nanodiscs were performed at 310 K, and the acquired spectra are shown in Figure 1(C). At a low lipid concertation (10 % w/v), a single peak corresponding to the isotropic chemical shift frequency of water was observed. The scalar coupling between 17O and 1H resulting in a triplet for isotropic water is not observed for water in the nanodiscs sample as the observed line is broader (line width is ~167 Hz) than the scalar coupling (~78 Hz). When the lipid concertation was increased to 20% w/v, the line-width of the observed 17O peak increased to ~606 Hz and also showed a triplet pattern. Further increase in the concentration of nanodiscs to 30% w/v showed a well-resolved pentet pattern as shown in Fig.1C. Motion of water molecules in the nanodiscs sample averaged the 17O quadrupole coupling to a smaller value (called RQCs) such that all the five (one central and four satellite) transitions observed in the form of a pentet pattern. The RQC values are obtained by measuring the frequency difference between any of the two adjacent peaks from the pentet signal; a value of ~492 Hz is measured for 30% w/v nanodiscs. These results suggest that water in magnetically-aligned nanodiscs is partially aligned.
To measure the effect of temperature on the alignment of water molecules in nanodiscs, 17O spectra were recorded as a function of temperature (Fig.1D). As demonstrated using 31P and 14N NMR experiments, the nanodiscs are isotropic at temperatures below the main gel to liquid crystalline phase transition temperature of DMPC (Tm ~24 °C) and magnetically align above Tm.16 It is remarkable that 17O RQC values observed for water in nanodiscs reveal the magnetic-alignment of nanodiscs as shown in Fig.1D. 17O spectra show an isotropic peak below Tm at 295 and 300 K with line-widths <200 Hz, while increasing temperature resulted in line-broadening near Tm (see the spectrum at 305 with line-width ~508 Hz) exhibiting a poorly resolved splitting from the motionally-averaged RQC from nanodsics. On the other hand, a multiplet pattern is observed above Tm as shown for the spectrum at 310 K with an RQC of ~492 Hz. Further increase in the temperature to 315 K, increased the observed quadrupolar coupling to ~556 Hz. These observations clearly demonstrate the use of 17O NMR spectra to probe the water molecules ordering using magnetic-alignment of nanodiscs. To gain further insights into the dynamics of water, we measured the longitudinal relaxation (T1) times for all five 17O peaks observed (Figure 3). The T1 values for water molecules in the nanodiscs are in the range of 4 ms, and much smaller than that for bulk water (~9 ms, Fig.S2), suggesting the restricted motion of water molecules in nanodiscs under these conditions.
Since the observed RQC depends on the order parameter as well as on the orientation of bilayer-associated water molecules, a single 17O RQC value obtained from aligned nanodiscs is not sufficient to completely describe the alignment of water molecules. A complete description of the alignment of water molecules requires RDC values measured under different alignment conditions. To measure the RQCs of 17O under different alignment conditions, we used a paramagnetic salt, YbCl3, to flip the orientation of magnetically-aligned nanodiscs as described in our previous study.16 31P and 14N NMR experiments were used to confirm the flipping of the aligned nanodiscs upon the addition of YbCl3. The effect of different paramagnetic salts on the NMR spectra and relaxation parameters of nanodiscs is reported in our previous study.19 The observed chemical shift for 31P (from −13.6 ± 0.5 ppm to ~22.7 ± 3.7 ppm upon flipping) and doubling of 14N RQC (from ~8.9 ± 0.6 kHz to ~16.8 ± 0.7 kHz upon flipping) confirmed the 90° flipping of nanodiscs to result in a parallel orientation of the lipid bilayer normal to the external magnetic field direction (Figure 2). 17O NMR spectra of water in the flipped nanodiscs showed a significant increase in the RQC value: from 492 Hz to 690 Hz upon flipping as shown in Figure 2(A and B). 17O NMR spectra of varying concentrations of flipped and unflipped nanodiscs are shown in Fig.S1 along with deconvoluted spectra illustrating the multiplet pattern and RQC values. While it is remarkable that the motionally averaged water RQCs are sensitive to the alignment of nanodiscs, the 90° flipping of aligned nanodiscs did not follow (3cos2ϕ−1) for the observed 17O RQCs unlike 31P and 14N spectra; where ϕ is the angle between the bilayer normal and the magnetic field axis. The observed changes for 31P and 14N are because the axis of motional averaging for lipids (collinear with the bilayer normal) is oriented perpendicular (Figure 2E) and parallel (2J) to the magnetic field axis. On the other hand, the bilayer-associated water molecules are in exchange with the free water molecules and are randomly oriented with respect to the bilayer normal. Even though the bilayer-associated water molecules prefer to orient with their symmetry (or the bisector) axes collinear with the bilayer normal as reported for zwitterionic lipids,20 the observed RQC values indicate that the motional averaging of the 17O quadrupolar coupling is different in flipped and unflipped nanodiscs, which is more pronounced when the concentration decreases (Fig.S1). Therefore, 17O RQCs can be useful to probe the molecular events at the membrane-water interface.
To explore the origins of an increase in the quadrupolar coupling upon 90° flipping of the nanodiscs, we used MD simulation using DMPC and water as a system (Fig.4A); additional details are given in the supporting information. The main axis of the 17O quadrupolar coupling tensor is perpendicular to the molecular plane of water as reported elsewhere.21 To obtain the relative orientations and average RQCs for the quadrupole coupling tensor across the lipid bilayer, cosθ values were calculated. MD simulations show a gradual decrease in water density across the bilayer (i.e. along the z-axis) and becomes zero in the hydrophobic core of the bilayer (Fig.4B). With the DMPC bilayer placed along the xy-plane, space and time-averaged <3cos2θ−1> values were calculated (Fig.4C). The resulting <3cos2θ−1> values are positive along the z-axis and negative along x and y axes. The larger <3cos2θ−1> magnitude along the z-axis suggest that the motional averaging along x and y axes more effectively reduces the RQCs than that along the z-axis. These results are in agreement with the observed larger RQC values for the flipped-nanodiscs, which have the bilayer-normal (i.e. the z-axis in Fig.4) along the magnetic field axis (Fig.2J). Thus, the measured 17O RQCs can be used to probe the ordering and dynamics of water molecules associated with a lipid bilayer.
In conclusion, we have demonstrated that natural-abundance 17O NMR is an useful technique to study the magnetic-alignment of lipid-nanodiscs and also to probe membrane water interaction. At optimum hydration levels under the magnetic-alignment of nanodiscs, all five transitions of 17O nuclei are observed. The measured RQCs are explained based on the orientation preference of bilayer-associated water molecules. Overall, the reported results clearly indicate the molecular level ordering of water across the bilayer, and a combination of 17O NMR and MD simulation can be used to further probe water-membrane interactions. The reported 17O NMR experiments can also be used to investigate other aligned samples such as other types of nanodsics22, 23, bicelles24–28, and other alignment media used in NMR studies29. We also expect the reported approach and results to be useful in the investigation of the role of ordered water in many biological processes including protein folding, misfolding, amyloid aggregation, and biomineralization process.30–32 The use of dynamic nuclear polarization experiments,33, 34 to enhance 17O NMR sensitivity for studies on aligned samples35, 36 would be exciting.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgment
This study was supported by NIH (GM084018 to AR). We thank Dr. Ganapathy, a visiting researcher in the Ramamoorthy lab, for help with initial 17O NMR experiments.
Footnotes
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts to declare.
Electronic Supplementary Information (ESI) available: [details of any supplementary information available should be included here].
Notes and references
- 1.Ball P, Chem Rev, 2008, 108, 74–108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Chaplin M, Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol, 2006, 7, 861–866. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Disalvo EA, Lairion F, Martini F, Tymczyszyn E, Frias M, Almaleck H and Gordillo GJ, Biochim Biophys Acta, 2008, 1778, 2655–2670. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Castiglione F, Mele A and Raos G, in Annual Reports on NMR Spectroscopy, ed. Webb GA, Academic Press, 2015, vol. 85, pp. 143–193. [Google Scholar]
- 5.McMahon MT, deDios AC, Godbout N, Salzmann R, Laws DD, Le H, Havlin RH and Oldfield E, Journal of the American Chemical Society, 1998, 120, 4784–4797. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Keeler EG, Michaelis VK, Wilson CB, Hung I, Wang X, Gan Z and Griffin RG, J Phys Chem B, 2019, 123, 3061–3067. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Wu G, Prog Nucl Magn Reson Spectrosc, 2019, 114–115, 135–191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Kouril K, Meier B, Alom S, Whitby RJ and Levitt MH, Faraday Discuss, 2018, 212, 517–532. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Rezaei-Ghaleh N, Munari F, Becker S, Assfalg M and Griesinger C, Chem Commun (Camb), 2019, 55, 12404–12407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Ravula T, Hardin NZ and Ramamoorthy A, Chem Phys Lipids, 2019, 219, 45–49. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Orwick MC, Judge PJ, Procek J, Lindholm L, Graziadei A, Engel A, Grobner G and Watts A, Angew Chem Int Ed Engl, 2012, 51, 4653–4657. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Dorr JM, Koorengevel MC, Schafer M, Prokofyev AV, Scheidelaar S, van der Cruijsen EA, Dafforn TR, Baldus M and Killian JA, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2014, 111, 18607–18612. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Lee SC, Knowles TJ, Postis VL, Jamshad M, Parslow RA, Lin YP, Goldman A, Sridhar P, Overduin M, Muench SP and Dafforn TR, Nat Protoc, 2016, 11, 1149–1162. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Ravula T and Ramamoorthy A, Angew Chem Int Ed Engl, 2019, 58, 14925–14928. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Ravula T, Hardin NZ, Ramadugu SK, Cox SJ and Ramamoorthy A, Angew Chem Int Ed Engl, 2018, 57, 1342–1345. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Research Misconduct Found]
- 16.Ravula T, Kim J, Lee DK and Ramamoorthy A, Langmuir, 2020, 36, 1258–1265. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Radoicic J, Park SH and Opella SJ, Biophys J, 2018, 115, 22–25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Ravula T, Ramadugu SK, Di Mauro G and Ramamoorthy A, Angew Chem Int Ed Engl, 2017, 56, 11466–11470. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Research Misconduct Found]
- 19.Di Mauro GM, Hardin NZ and Ramamoorthy A, Biochim Biophys Acta Biomembr, 2020, 1862, 183332. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Cheng JX, Pautot S, Weitz DA and Xie XS, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2003, 100, 9826–9830. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Yazyev OV and Helm L, J Chem Phys, 2006, 125, 054503. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Nasr ML, Baptista D, Strauss M, Sun ZJ, Grigoriu S, Huser S, Pluckthun A, Hagn F, Walz T, Hogle JM and Wagner G, Nat Methods, 2017, 14, 49–52. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Denisov IG and Sligar SG, Chem Rev, 2017, 117, 4669–4713. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Lange OF, Lakomek NA, Fares C, Schroder GF, Walter KF, Becker S, Meiler J, Grubmuller H, Griesinger C and de Groot BL, Science, 2008, 320, 1471–1475. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Sanders CR, Hare BJ, Howard KP and Prestegard JH, Progress in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy, 1994, 26, 421–444. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Tjandra N and Bax A, Science, 1997, 278, 1111–1114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Prestegard JH, Bougault CM and Kishore AI, Chem Rev, 2004, 104, 3519–3540. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Stelzer AC, Frank AT, Bailor MH, Andricioaei I and Al-Hashimi HM, Methods, 2009, 49, 167–173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Chen K and Tjandra N, in NMR of Proteins and Small Biomolecules, ed. Zhu G, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2012, DOI: 10.1007/128_2011_215, pp. 47–67. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Wang T, Jo H, DeGrado WF and Hong M, J Am Chem Soc, 2017, 139, 6242–6252. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Thirumalai D, Reddy G and Straub JE, Acc.Chem Res, 2012, 45, 83–92. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Rodriguez Camargo DC, Korshavn KJ, Jussupow A, Raltchev K, Goricanec D, Fleisch M, Sarkar R, Xue K, Aichler M, Mettenleiter G, Walch AK, Camilloni C, Hagn F, Reif B and Ramamoorthy A, Elife, 2017, 6, e31226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Su Y, Andreas L and Griffin RG, Annu Rev Biochem, 2015, 84, 465–497. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Carnahan SL, Lampkin BJ, Naik P, Hanrahan MP, Slowing II, VanVeller B, Wu G and Rossini AJ, J Am Chem Soc, 2019, 141, 441–450. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Salnikov E, Rosay M, Pawsey S, Ouari O, Tordo P and Bechinger B, J Am Chem Soc, 2010, 132, 5940–5941. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Jakdetchai O, Denysenkov V, Becker-Baldus J, Dutagaci B, Prisner TF and Glaubitz C, J Am Chem Soc, 2014, 136, 15533–15536. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.