Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2020 Jul 23;40(9):1990–2001. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.120.314037

Metabolic reprogramming in immune response and tissue inflammation

Lizhe Sun 1,2, Xiaofeng Yang 2,3, Zuyi Yuan 1, Hong Wang 2,3
PMCID: PMC7484156  NIHMSID: NIHMS1606596  PMID: 32698683

Abstract

Innate and adaptive immunity participate in and regulate numerous human diseases. Increasing evidence implies that metabolic reprogramming mediates immune cell functional change during immune responses. In this review, we present and discuss our current understanding of metabolic regulation in different immune cells and their subsets in response to pathological stimuli. An interactive biochemical and molecular model was established to characterize metabolic reprogramming and their functional implication in anti-inflammatory, immune resolution and pro-inflammatory responses. We summarize two major features of metabolic reprogramming in inflammatory stages in innate and adaptive immune cells, 1) energy production and biosynthesis reprogramming, including increased glycolysis and decreased oxidative phosphorylation, in order to secure faster ATP production and biosynthesis for defense response and damage repair, and 2) epigenetic reprogramming, including enhanced histone acetylation and suppressed DNA methylation, due to altered accessibility of acetyl/methyl group donor and metabolite-modulated enzymatic activity. Finally, we discuss current strategies of metabolic and epigenetic therapy in cardiovascular disease and recommend cell-specific metabolic and gene-targeted site-specific epigenetic alterations for future therapies.

Keywords: Metabolic reprogramming, immune response, inflammatory disease

Graphical Abstract

graphic file with name nihms-1606596-f0001.jpg

Introduction

Atherosclerosis is characterized by chronic inflammation and increased infiltration of innate and adaptive immune cells in the arterial wall1. It is well-established that immune cells undergo phenotypical and functional changes in response to various stimuli and micro-environmental changes in cardiovascular diseases25. We have published updated molecular processes in innate and adaptive immune response and immune cell subsets differentiation recently57. Of note, emerging evidence has shown that alteration of cellular metabolic processes can fuel and regulate functional changes in immune cells, ranging from proliferation, differentiation, to effector function, by regulating the balance between energy generation and utilization and macromolecules breaking down and biosynthesis, redox hemostasis, epigenetic landscape, and signal transduction810. Therefore, unraveling the role and underling mechanisms of metabolic reprogramming during an immune response and tissue inflammation holds the promise of novel therapeutic strategies for atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases and other chronic inflammatory diseases.

In Figure 1, we depict the general interplay between immune response and metabolic reprogramming. Innate immunity is characterized by activation of innate immune cells by pathogen/danger-associated molecular pattern or metabolite-associated danger signal via pattern recognition receptors or metabolic sensor to facilitate the downstream signaling cascade to initiate an immune response. In contrast, adaptive immunity is composed of cell-mediated and humoral-mediated immunity which are both antigen-specific processes of activating T and B cells involving in several signals (signal 1 antigen recognition, signal 2 immune checkpoint, signal 3 cytokine stimulation, signal 4 metabolite-associated danger signal recognition)6. Metabolic reprogramming happens during all these immune responses, in which various cellular metabolic processes in immune cells are altered to achieve an adequate function. Moreover, this process is so dynamic and intricate that 2749 metabolic pathways in 3067 different organisms (477 in human), as identified from the MetaCyc database (https://metacyc.org, Ver. 23.1), may be involved and finally lead to a metabolic optimization in which distinct metabolic signature determines specific inflammatory or anti-inflammatory immune cell subset differentiation.

Fig. 1. Metabolic reprogramming in innate and adaptive immune responses.

Fig. 1.

Innate immunity is characterized by activation of innate immune cells by pathogen/danger associated-molecular pattern (PAMP/DAMP) or metabolite-associated danger signal (MADS) via pattern recognition receptors (PRR) or metabolic sensor (MS) to facilitate the downstream signaling cascade to initiate an immune response. In contrast, adaptive immunity is composed of cell-mediated and humoral-mediated immunity, which are both antigen-specific processes of activating T and B cells involving in several signals (signal 1 antigen recognition, signal 2 immune checkpoint, signal 3 cytokine stimulation, signal 4 MADS recognition). Metabolic reprogramming participates in both innate and adaptive immune response to regulate immune cell functions, which includes up to 2749 metabolic pathways from 3067 different organisms and 477 human metabolic pathways as identified from the MetaCyc database (https://metacyc.org Ver. 23.1). Metabolic reprogramming may be a dynamic process in which glucose, fatty acid and amino acid metabolism are the most described ones, and finally lead to a metabolic optimization in which distinct metabolic signature determines specific inflammatory or anti-inflammatory immune cell subset differentiation. APC indicates antigen-presenting cell; PAMP, pathogen-associated molecular pattern; DAMP, danger-associated molecular pattern; MADS, metabolites-associated danger signal; MS, metabolic sensor; PRR, pattern recognition receptor; *, MetaCyc database (https://metacyc.org, Ver. 23.1),

In this review, we will summarize an updated understanding of metabolic reprogramming in different immune cells and their subsets during different inflammatory stages and the process of tissue inflammation and in particular explore the potential therapeutic targets for chronic inflammatory diseases, with a focus on cardiovascular disease.

Metabolic reprogramming in innate and adaptive immune cells

In this section, we will elucidate the contribution of metabolic reprogramming in several immune cells and their subsets, including monocyte, macrophage, dendritic cell (DC), T cell, and B cell, to tissue inflammation (Table 1).

Table 1.

Metabolic reprogramming in immune cells

Cell type: subset Stimuli (status) Metabolic change Functional change Signal molecules PMID
Monocyte:
CD14+ LPS ↑Glycolysis, ↓OXPHOS ↑Inflammatory cytokines (TNF-a. IL6, IL1β, IL10), ↑Phagocytosis TLR4 27991883
P3C ↑Glycolysis, ↑OXPHOS TLR2 27991883
Fungi Candida ↑Glycolysis, ↑OXPHOS, ↑Glutaminolysis ↑Inflammatory cytokine (TNFα. IL6, IL1β), ↑ROS C-type lectin 28922415
CD14++CD16 NA ↑Glycolysis, ↑PPP Defense response NA 24671955
CD14+CD16++ NA ↑OXPHOS Anti-inflammatory NA 24671955
CD14+CD40+ Hcy (CKD) ↑HCY, ↑SAH, ↑SAM/SAH ↓DNA methylation, ↑Inflammatory cytokine, chemokines ↓DNMT1-↑CD40 27992360
Macrophage:
M1 LPS/IFNγ ↑Glycolysis, ↑PPP Pro-inflammatory AKT/mTOR/HIF1α 29777212
M2 IL4 ↑FAO, ↑OXPHOS↓PPP Anti-inflammatory STAT6-AMPK 29777212
MOX OxPL ↓Glycolysis, ↑Glutaminolysis Anti-oxidant activity, anti-inflammatory TLR2-Syk 29891687
Dendritic cell:
BM-derived DC No stimuli ↑lipid β-oxidation/OXPHOS Antagonize DC activation AMPK 20351312
BM-derived DC LPS/Zymosan/curdlan ↑Glycolysis, ↓OXPHOS ↑Maturation, motility,migration PI3K/AKT 20351312
BM-derived DC CCL21/19 ↑Glycolysis ↑Migration, trafficking to draining lymph node CCR7-HIF1α 30824325
CD1c+ mDC TLR agonists ↑Glycolysis, ↑Mitophagy ↓OXPHOS Activation TLR7/8-BNIP3 30455688
pDC TLR agonists ↑OXPHOS,↑Glutaminolysis Activation TLR7/8-BNIP3 30455688
Tolerogenic DC Dexamethason & vitamin D3 ↑OXPHOS,↑FAO Tolerogenic, ↑ROS NA 25917094
T cell:
Naïve NA OXPHOS, FAO Homestasis TSC1-mTOR1 29677474
Th1 NA ↑Glycolysis ↑Inflammatory cytokine(IFNƔ) LDHA, histone acetylation of Ifng 27708054
Th17 NA ↑Glycolysis Pro-inflammatory HIF1 21871655
Treg NA ↑OXPHOS Anti-inflammatory Myc 28416194
Memory CD8+ T cell NA ↑OXPHOS, FAO Longevity, quick response NA 22889213
B cell:
Mouse splenic B cell BCR engagement ↑Glycolysis ↑Proliferation/growth PI3K/Akt/mTOR 16449529
IL-4 ↑Glycolysis ↑Survival STAT6 17911579
Peripheral blood B cell anti-IgM/LPS ↑Glycolysis, ↑OXPHOS ↑Proliferation and antibody production HIF1α,cMyc 24616478
Memory B cell NA ↑OXPHOS Durable antibody production Mpc2 27396958

Metabolic changes in different immune cells and subsets in response to different stimuli obtained through literature searching. Immune cell functional changes associated with metabolic reprogramming and related signal molecules are presented. LPS indicates lipopolysaccharides; Hcy, homocysteine; OXPHOS, oxidative phosphorylation; TLR, toll-like receptor; BCR, B cell receptor; DC, dendritic cell; PPP, pentose phosphate pathway; OxPL, oxidized phospholipids; CKD, chronic kidney disease; BM, bone-marrow; FAO, fatty acid oxidation.

Monocyte — Monocytes are innate immune cells that monitor environmental changes and replenish the pool of tissue macrophages and dendritic cells7. In response to lipopolysaccharides (LPS), human CD14+ monocytes favor glycolysis over oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) to enable a quick host defense mechanism by inflammatory cytokine (TNFα. IL6, IL1β) production and phagocytosis11, which is similar to the Warburg effect observed in cancer cells12, 13. In glucose deprivation condition, monocytes could perform pro-inflammatory functions by increasing fatty acid oxidation (FAO), fueling OXPHOS compensating for the Warburg effect to meet the increased energy demand during LPS stimulation14. However, unlike LPS, synthetic bacterial lipopeptide P3C or Candida albicans enhanced both glycolysis and OXPHOS with increased pro-inflammatory cytokine production and reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation through toll-like receptor 2 or C-type lectin-signaling pathways15. These findings suggested that although increased glycolysis is one of the hall marks of an activated monocyte, it may be accompanied by or compensated with oxidative processes.

It is well accepted that monocytes are highly heterogenic. At least three monocyte subsets are defined in mice (CD11b+Ly6Chigh, CD11b+Ly6Cmiddle and CD11b+Ly6Clow) and human (classical CD14++CD16, intermediate CD14++CD16+, and non-classical CD14+CD16++)7. Transcription profiling confirmed distinct functions of the human monocyte subsets and demonstrated that they had distinct metabolic signatures16. Human CD14++CD16 classical monocytes were associated with defense response and expressed higher levels of genes involved in glycolysis and pentose phosphate pathway (PPP), such as hexokinase 2, glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase, phosphofructokinase, lactate dehydrogenase B and glucose 6-phosphate dehydrogenase, priming them for anaerobic energy production16. In contrast, CD14+CD16++ patrolling non-classical monocytes was associated with increased expression of protein metabolism genes and OXPHOS genes encoding components of complex I, II, III, and V of the mitochondrial respiratory chain16. CD40+ monocyte is a new monocyte subset we recently discovered, which had a stronger inflammatory feature than CD14+CD16+ inflammatory intermediate monocytes and was an effective biomarker for chronic kidney disease severity17. CD40+ monocytes from chronic kidney disease patients or derived by homocysteine treated splenocytes exhibited increased intracellular levels of homocysteine and S-adenosylhomocysteine (SAH), reduced S-adenosylmethionine (SAM)/SAH ratio, and suppressed DNA methylation on NF-kB consensus element in CD40 core promoter which is associated with DNA methyltransferase 1 inhibition17.

Macrophage — Macrophages play a central role in atherogenesis through their diverse roles in cholesterol metabolism and immune response18. Animal and human studies indicate that both the quantity of macrophage and the balance of inflammatory and anti-inflammatory subsets influence plaque fate3, 19. LPS/interferon gamma (IFNγ)-induced M1 macrophages play an important role in host defense and tissue inflammation by inflammatory cytokine secretion, ROS generation, and Th1 response amplification20, 21. M1 macrophage has enhanced glycolysis and PPP coincident with impaired OXPHOS and reduced ATP production in mitochondria via a broken tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle, which is controlled by Akt/mTOR/ HIF1α22. The broken TCA cycle in M1 macrophages leads to the accumulation of intermediates succinate and citrate, which are involved in the formation and elimination of ROS, epigenetic regulation and signal transduction22, 23. However, IL4-induced M2 macrophages rely on FAO and OXPHOS for their survival and anti-inflammatory role in immune resolution24. M2 macrophage polarization and the increased mitochondria oxidative are associated with signal transducer and activator of transcription 6 signaling22. In response to oxidized phospholipids, macrophage could differentiate to Mox and exert anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidant activities25. Recent studies found that compared with M1 and M2, Mox macrophages had a different metabolic profile, which was characterized by suppressed aerobic glycolysis and increased glutathione production, via toll-like receptor 2-Syk driven mechanism26.

Dendritic cell — Evidence from mice and human proves that DC, a professional antigen-presenting cell, contribute to atherosclerotic vascular disease by various pathogenic and protective mechanisms, such as early foam cell formation, lipid metabolism regulation, and adaptive immunity stimulation4. Recent studies suggest that metabolic reprogramming accompanies DC development, activation and differentiation27, 28. Resting DC predominantly uses lipid β-oxidation and OXPHOS for energy generation27. AMP-activated protein kinase is a central regulator of these metabolisms27. Upon activation by different toll-like receptor agonists, DC metabolism would switch from mitochondrial oxidation to glycolytic metabolism to support their motility, migration and pro-inflammatory phenotypes which are associated with increased HIF1α activation and AKT/TBK/mTOR signaling pathways2830. However, although DCs displayed increased mitochondrial OXPHOS to maintain ATP production when culturing DCs without glucose or with 2-deoxy-D-glucose (glycolytic inhibitor), this metabolic compensation is not sufficient to support DC shape and motility31.

Several DC subsets have been identified, including conventional/myeloid DC, plasmacytoid DC, regulatory DC, and monocyte-derived DC32, 33. It was found that CD1c+ myeloid DCs increased glycolysis and mitophagy in response to a toll-like receptor agonist, whereas plasmacytoid DCs relied on glutaminolysis and OXPHOS for energy production34. Cellular metabolism also determines tolerogenic DC differentiation, which promotes immune tolerance through the secretion of immunosuppressive cytokines IL-10 and regulation of Treg polarization35. Compared to activate immunogenic DC, tolerogenic DC displayed higher mitochondrial OXPHOS activity and more abundant electron transport chain complexes with increased ROS production4.

T cell — It is appreciated that metabolic reprogramming regulates lymphocyte differentiation, activation and effector functions36, 37. Peripheral naïve T cells use OXPHOS as a major source of ATP production to maintain weak T cell receptor interactions with self-peptides presented on MHC molecules for survival and homeostatic proliferation21,37. T cells are activated when encountering antigens on an antigen-presenting cell along with costimulatory signals and cytokine stimulation6. Recent studies suggested that anaerobic glycolysis is an important metabolic hallmark of activated effector T cell even though sufficient oxygen is present to support glucose catabolism via the TCA cycle and OXPHOS38. In activated Th1 cells, lactate dehydrogenase A was induced to support aerobic glycolysis and promote expression of IFNγ via maintaining high levels of acetyl-CoA to enhance histone acetylation and transcription of Ifnγ39. T cell-specific ablation of Ldha could protect mice from immunopathology triggered by excessive IFNγ expression39. Another study pointed out that glycolysis is specifically required for the effector function of activated T cells, such as pro-inflammatory cytokine IFNγ production. However, OXPHOS, but not glycolysis, was essential for the proliferation and survival of these cells40. By contrast, Treg had suppressed glycolysis and enhanced OXPHOS, which might allow a metabolic advantage in low glucose, lactate rich environment by resisting lactate mediated suppression of T cell function and proliferation41, 42.

B cell — Increased glycolysis after activation, like in activated T cell, was also found in B cells following B cell receptor engagement or cytokine stimulation43, 44. In these cases, glycolysis supports B cell growth through PI3K signaling or protect B cell from apoptosis via signal transducer and activator of transcription 6 signaling43, 44. A recent study examining the metabolic reprogramming of purified B and T cells upon antigen challenging found that activated B cells increased both oxygen consumption rate as well as the rate of glycolysis reflected by the extracellular acidification rate, and maintained a balanced oxygen consumption rate/ extracellular acidification rate ratio45. In contrast, activated T cells shifted to a more glycolytic metabolism45. This study also suggested that increased glycolysis is essential for B cell proliferation and antibody production, whereas glycolysis inhibition by Glut1-depletion or dichloroacetate (a pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase inhibitor) sharply suppressed B cell proliferation and antibody secretion45. We know that short-lived plasma cells would differentiate to long-lived memory B cells for durable antibody production. Metabolic studies revealed that long-lived memory B cells rely on increased mitochondrial respiratory capacity, which was attribute to increased respiratory substrates such as pyruvate, although they uptake more glucose than short-lived plasma cells46. Because a large amount of the cellular glucose is used for antibody glycosylation, inhibition of pyruvate import by knocking down Mpc1 or Mpc2 (pyruvate transporter) would significantly reduce long-lived memory B cells numbers and antibody secreting46, 47.

In general, in response to the stimulation of various danger signals, dynamic balance of pro- and anti-inflammatory metabolic reprograming determines the direction of immune cell responses. Anti-inflammatory immune cell subsets, such as CD14+CD16++ monocyte subsets, M2 macrophage and Treg, favor oxidative metabolism (FAO and OXPHOS) for efficient energy production to maintain metabolic/cellular function homeostasis and achieve immune resolution or anti-inflammatory function (Figure 2A, left panel). However, in a pro-inflammatory immune response, most of the immune cells, including CD14++CD16 monocyte, M1 macrophage and Th1/Th2/Th17 cells, switch toward enhanced glycolysis and PPP activity to prompt an activation and proliferation status and adopt the pro-inflammatory effector functions (Figure 2A, right panel).

Fig. 2. Models of metabolic reprogramming in immune response.

Fig. 2

A. Metabolic reprogramming in anti- and pro-inflammatory immune response. In response to the stimulation of various danger signals, dynamic balance of pro- and anti- inflammatory metabolic reprograming determines the direction of immune cell responses. In physiological condition or anti-inflammatory response (left panel), immune cells favor oxidative metabolism, including fatty acid oxidation (FAO) and mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS), for energy production and homeostasis of metabolic/cellular function. During pro-inflammatory response (right panel), immune cells switch to active glycolysis and biosynthesis (fatty acid and nucleotide synthesis) for quick energy production and regeneration, whereas, FAO and OXPHOS are suppressed. This metabolic reprogramming produces high levels of cytosolic ROS and mitochondrial ROS. Words and arrows in red indicate activate intermediates or process, whereas the blue color depicts the suppressed ones. B. Metabolic switch in innate and adaptive immune cells according to the inflammatory stage. Innate and adaptive immune cells undergo similar metabolic reprogramming in the early inflammatory stage but switch to different metabolic statuses during the memory stage. In general, upon activation, immune cells switch from OXPHOS to glycolysis for quick ATP production. In the memory stage, innate immune cell relies on glycolytic activity, but adaptive immune cell can switch back to more efficient mitochondrial OXPHOS for long-term survival. Biosynthetic and proliferative activities are increased in the activate stage and memory stage in innate immune cell, whereas may be reduced in memory stage in adaptive immune cell. Methylation status is suppressed in the active stage and may maintain as such in the memory stage of innate and adaptive immune cells. Acetylation-mediated epigenetic reprogramming is potentially upregulated due to increased acetyl CoA production and metabolite-modulated enzymatic regulation. Solid lines represent metabolic changes established. Dashed lines represent metabolic changes that remain to be confirmed. PAMP indicates pathogen-associated molecular pattern; DAMP, danger-associated molecular pattern; MADS, metabolite-associated danger signal; G6P, glucose 6-phosphate; R5P, ribose 5-phosphate; PPP, pentose phosphate pathway; NAD, nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide; NADPH, nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate; ROS, reactive oxygen species; mtROS, mitochondrial ROS; CH, cholesterol; TG, triacylglycerol; FA, fatty acid; FAO, fatty acid oxidation; FAS, fatty acid synthesis; α-KG, alpha-ketoglutarate; TCA cycle, citric acid cycle; OXPHOS, oxidative phosphorylation; SAM, S-adenosylmethionine; SAH, S-adenosylhomocysteine; Met, methione; Hcy, homocysteine.

Model of metabolic reprogramming in immune response — connection between metabolic change and inflammatory feature

In hemostasis situation (Figure 2A, left panel), immune cells most likely perform anti-inflammatory and immune resolution functions. Glucose enters the cells via glucose transporters (such as Glut1) and is catabolized to pyruvate along with ATP and nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NADH) production in the cytosol via glycolysis48. Pyruvate is primarily transported to the mitochondria and decarboxylated to acetyl-CoA, which acts as fuel for the TCA cycle49. Additionally, acetyl-CoA from increased FAO and alpha-ketoglutarate from increased glutaminolysis also replenishes the TCA cycle to generate the reducing equivalent NADH and Flavin adenine dinucleotide (FADH2)50. In further reactions, NADH and FADH2 donate electrons to O2 via the electron transport chain and results in an electron chemical gradient across the mitochondrial inner membrane to drive increased ATP synthesis in the OXPHOS process.

In contrast, in an activated situation (Figure 2A, left panel) immune cells exhibit pro-inflammatory functions. Glucose uptake and glycolytic rate are significantly increased partially by inducing the expression of the glucose transporter and multiple glycolytic enzymes in an inflammatory response51, 52. Pyruvate is preferentially converted to lactate in the cytosol instead of fully oxidized in the mitochondrial, even in normal O2 environments. Since glycolysis (2 ATP per molecule glucose) is a less efficient but more rapid way for ATP production than OXPHOS (30–32 ATP per molecule glucose), these pro-inflammatory cells rely on glycolysis to meet their demand for quick ATP generation and increased lipid, protein and nucleotide biosynthesis, which is critical for rapid cell proliferation and effector molecular production53. PPP, a branch of glycolysis starting from glucose 6-phosphate, is also increased in pro-inflammatory immune cells and supports immune cell survival and proliferation by providing ribulose 5-phosphate for nucleotide synthesis and NADPH54, 55, which is further used for fatty acid synthesis (FAS) and redox homeostasis. The PPP is a principal source of cytosolic ROS, which is a powerful antimicrobial weapon in innate immunity. However, excessive ROS production also results in oxidative stress, which may cause damage to lipids, proteins and DNA and contribute to various diseases, including atherosclerosis.

Mitochondria play a key regulatory role during an immune response to coordinate the production of energy and mitochondrial ROS, fatty acid biosynthesis, acetylation and methylation56, 57. It has been shown that pro-inflammatory immune cells repurpose their mitochondria to increased ROS generation instead of ATP production, which can further shutdown mitochondrial energy production by inducing mitochondrial DNA mutations and mitochondrial respiratory chain damage58. Besides, although mitochondrial oxidation, FAO and OXPHOS, is impaired in pro-inflammatory cells59, the TCA cycle is not entirely shut down and it is reported that several intermediates, such as citrate, succinate and itaconate, in the TCA cycle are increased in the M1 macrophage due to the inactivating of enzymes catalyzing the corresponding reactions60, 61. The accumulation of these metabolites either supply biosynthesis pathways to support immune cell proliferation or serve as signaling molecules affecting other metabolic and functional pathways. Moreover, the increased citrate can be catabolized to acetyl-CoA, which is an important precursor for both FAS and acetylation after exported from the mitochondria to the cytosol via citrate-carriers.

In summary, anti-inflammatory immune cells rely on OXPHOS for more prolonged survival and homeostasis. Whereas pro-inflammatory immune cells show increased glycolysis that is connected with fast ATP generation and activated PPP that is related to increased nucleotide synthesis and NADPH production. These metabolic changes support rapid cell proliferation fulfilling the demand for defense response and damage repair. In addition, cytosolic and mitochondrial ROS are increased in pro-inflammatory immune cells due to NADPH production and remodeled mitochondrial respiratory chain. Although mitochondrial oxidation (FAO and OXPHOS) are impaired, TCA cycle intermediates are increased to support immune cell proliferation or serve as signaling molecules affecting other metabolic and functional pathways in pro-inflammatory immune cells.

Metabolic reprogramming in immune memory cells

After activation, most of the effector T cell and plasma B cell are eliminated under apoptosis, and only a small number of them become memory cells which stay in a resting state and respond immediately to re-challenge from the same antigen62, 63. Current knowledge supports the view that memory T and B cells are more resistant to apoptosis than the activated cells and switch back to a catabolic metabolism breaking down nutrients to fuel TCA cycle and efficiently generate ATP via OXPHOS for long-term survival47, 64.

In the past few years, emerging evidence has suggested that innate immune cells also display immunological memory function by the observation that stimulation of innate immune cells with certain pathogens or stimuli enables them an augmented response to a re-stimulation65, 66, 67. Compared to adaptive immune memory, the process of trained immunity is a less specific and short-lived phenomenon (last from 1 week to several months)67. Importantly, atherogenic stimuli, like oxidized low-density lipoprotein, has been shown to induce trained immunity in innate immune cells68, 69, and the prolonged activated phenotype of trained innate immune cells was proposed as a novel mechanism linking non-resolving inflammation and atherosclerosis70.

Similar to immune cell activation, immune cells rely on elevated glycolysis for trained immunity as well71, and Akt-mTOR-HIF-1α pathway was responsible for the metabolic shift from OXPHOS to glycolysis. Increased glutaminolysis72 and mevalonate pathway72, 73 are also critical for trained immunity. Subsequently, the cellular metabolic pathway changes can in part regulate gene expression and contribute to a trained phenotype by modulating epigenetic landscapes, especially at the level of histone methylation and acetylation72, 74, 75.

Metabolic switch according to inflammatory stage

Innate and adaptive inflammatory responses are described as three stages, quiescent/naive, activation and trained immunity/immune memory (Figure 2B). Collectively, innate and adaptive immune cells undergo a metabolic switch between glycolysis and OXPHOS and change their biosynthesis status. Upon activation, glycolysis and macromolecular biosynthesis are increased, whereas OXPHOS is impaired for rapid cell proliferation in both innate and adaptive immune cells. However, switching from OXPHOS to glycolysis does not always happen in an immune response. For example, B cells displayed a balanced increase in both lactate production (glycolysis) and oxygen consumption rate (OXPHOS) following LPS or B cell receptor stimulation45. During the memory stage, innate immune cells still rely on active glycolysis, whereas the adaptive immune cells switch back to more efficient mitochondrial OXPHOS for long-term survival. Moreover, biosynthetic pathways return to a less active status in adaptive memory immune cells, which is likely to be induced and associated with the induction of trained immunity in innate immune cells72.

Connection between epigenetic reprogramming, metabolic reprogramming and inflammatory stage

Epigenetic reprogramming, predominantly methylation and acetylation, is crucial for immune cell development and differentiation by regulating gene transcription through altering DNA accessibility and chromatin structure.

Metabolic reprogramming mostly impacts epigenetic modifications by modulating the production and availability of methyl group donor SAM and acetyl group donor acetyl-CoA. SAM is generated in the homocysteine-methionine cycle and is converted to SAH, a competitive methyltransferase inhibitor, after the donation of its methyl group76,77 (Fig. 2A). Through database mining, we have established that homocysteine-methionine cycle is a metabolic sensor system, and that its suppression determines histone hypomethylation, most frequently on H3K4 and H3K9, in autoimmune and cardiovascular diseases76. In chronic kidney disease patients, suppressed homocysteine-methionine cycle-mediated homocysteine and SAH elevation mediates inflammatory CD40+ monocyte differentiation and is associated with DNA hypomethylation on NF-kB consensus element in CD40 core promoter17. Similarly, DNA hypomethylation is also coupled to B cell activation, proliferation, and memory cell differentiation78. However, during effector CD8+ T cell differentiation in acute infection, DNA methylation is globally dynamic that hypermethylation is responsible for the repression of naïve T cell and hypomethylation is to drive differentiation and effector functions79. Although the activation of CD4+ T cell has been shown to require the supply of methionine for the production of SAM to provide methyl group for DNA and histone methylation80, genome-wide DNA methylation profiles revealed that most of the differentially methylated regions were hypermethylated in the naive phase, intermediately methylated in the effector phase, and hypomethylated in the memory phase during the process of T cell differentiation81.

Since acetyl-CoA cannot cross the mitochondria membrane, the acetyl-CoA accessible for histone modification is generated in the nucleo-cytoplasmic compartment from citrate and pyruvate (Fig. 2A). Citrate exported from the mitochondria utilizing fatty acid (FAO) and glucose (TCA cycle) has long been recognized as the predominant source for nuclear acetyl-CoA generation82. Moreover, it has been shown that all the subunits of the mitochondrial pyruvate dehydrogenase complex that convert pyruvate to acetyl-CoA are present and functional in the nucleus of mammalian cells and contribute to the de novo synthesis of acetyl-CoA and histones acetylation83. Enhanced histone acetylation has been found during both innate and adaptive immune cell activation partially mediated by the increased availability of acetyl-CoA through increased glucose uptake and citrate accumulation84, 85. For instance, increased glucose uptake and aerobic glycolysis are hallmarks of activated T cells. A recent study demonstrated that this metabolic change could promote Th1 activation via enhanced histone acetylation on H3K939.

In addition, several metabolites serve as activators or inhibitors for epigenetic enzymes and modulate epigenetic modifications. For instance, alpha-ketoglutarate is a cofactor for Jumonji C-terminal domain containing lysine demethylases. Increased alpha-ketoglutarate via glutaminolysis has been shown to support M2 macrophage activation through the Jmjd3-dependent demethylation of H3K2786. However, fumarate and succinate are competitive antagonists of this reaction87. The class III histone deacetylases, Sirtuin, are linked to decreased glycolysis by suppressing the expression of multiple glycolytic genes via deacetylation of H3K9 and require NAD+ as a cofactor to support their deacetylation activities88. It was demonstrated that NAD+ levels were decreased in aging and metabolic diseases, including obesity, diabetes and cardiovascular diseases89.

Taken together, metabolic reprogramming in immune cells modulate epigenetic reprogramming in response to inflammatory stimulation by three major mechanisms: 1) Increased glucose uptake and glycolysis lead enhanced histone acetylation by elevating the accessibility of acetyl group donor acetyl CoA, 2) impaired homocysteine-methionine cycle, a metabolic sensor system, results in suppressed SAM/SAH-dependent DNA/histone hypomethylation due to decreased methyl group donor SAM, increased methyltransferases inhibitor SAH and reduced SAM/SAH ratio, 3) accumulation of intermediate metabolites from altered TCA cycle regulate the activity of epigenetic enzymes, including methyltransferases, demethylases, acetyltransferase, and deacetylases. Current evidence supports a model that methylation is suppressed due to impaired homocysteine-methionine cycle and metabolite-modulated methylation enzyme activity, and acetylation is elevated due to increased acetyl CoA and metabolite-modulated enzymatic regulation upon immune cell activation during innate and adaptive immune responses (Fig. 2B).

Metabolic reprogramming in cardiovascular disease

Inflammation has long been characterized as a key factor of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease in which a wide range of infiltrated and residential immune cells are activated, including macrophages, monocytes, dendritic cells, T cells, and B cells. A recent study performing serum metabolic profiling of over 3000 patients with subclinical atherosclerosis in carotid and coronary arteries demonstrated a strong association between metabolites and incidence of atherosclerosis and coronary artery disease. Energy metabolism, TCA cycle and glycolysis were identified as central pathways associated with atherosclerosis90.

Extensive evidence demonstrates that monocyte and macrophage are the major populations in atherosclerotic lesion in metabolic disorders7, 17, 19, 91, 92. It has been shown that monocyte and macrophage from patients with coronary artery disease were hyper-inflammatory with increased production of IL-6, IL-1β and TNFα. These inflammatory features were associated with increased glucose uptake, glycolysis, ROS production and histone demethylation93,94. The metabolic switch from FAO and OXPHOS to glycolysis was also found in the pro-inflammatory macrophages stimulated by oxidized low-density lipoprotein95. Of note, a recent study found that lipoprotein(a) activated aortic endothelial cells by enhancing PFKFB3-mediated glycolysis and lead to increased trans-endothelial migration of monocyte96. Inhibition of glycolysis could reverse this pro-inflammatory and pro-adhesive state of aortic endothelial cells96. In summary, immunometabolism plays important roles in accelerating tissue inflammation and cardiovascular diseases.

Potential metabolic therapeutic strategies for cardiovascular disease

With the increasing understanding of the crosstalk between metabolic reprogramming and immune cell activation in cardiovascular diseases, new therapeutic targets by altering the intracellular metabolism of immune cells are emerging. Some metabolic-targeting drugs have already been used in the treatment of inflammatory and autoimmune diseases, such as metformin, dimethyl fumarate, methotrexate and rapamycin, by regulating glucose, fatty acid and nucleotide metabolism55. For instance, metformin, an oral antidiabetic medicine, has been shown to display an anti-inflammatory role by inhibiting ROS generation through reverse electron transport at Complex I97 and inducing FAO in an AMP-activated protein kinase-dependent manner98.

As outlined above, pro- and anti-inflammatory immune cells have different metabolic signatures. Therefore, manipulating specific metabolic targets would be beneficial to control inflammation in cardiovascular disease. For example, limiting the rate of glycolysis by inhibiting glucose transporter and key glycolytic enzymes, such as Glut1, HK2, PKM2 and GAPDH, can shift cellular metabolism in pro-inflammatory immune cells and repolarize them to an anti-inflammatory phenotype. Moreover, the transcription factor HIF-1α has been known to be one of the master regulators of the metabolic shift from OXPHOS to glycolysis in hypoxic or normorxic cells in inflammation99, 100 and also associated with initiation and progression of human and mouse atherosclerotic plaques100102. Recently, a study showed that HIF-1α activation by LPS/IFNγ in inflammatory macrophages was accompanied by upregulation of miR-210 and downregulation of miR-388 which contributed to necrotic core formation in atherosclerosis by reducing OXPHOS and energy depletion100, 103. This indicates that microRNA may also be a promising approach of metabolic therapy for diseases.

In addition, metabolism-mediated epigenetic reprogramming is another promising target for cardiovascular diseases. DNA methyltransferase inhibitors and histone deacetylase inhibitors have been studied in several clinical trials. However, these inhibitors modified gene expression in a non-specific manner. If we take the hypomethylation status described above and in Fig. 2B in activated immune cells into consideration, DNA methyltransferase inhibitor therapy may not be a logical therapeutic strategy. Future studies should identify cell-specific metabolic alteration and gene-targeted site-specific epigenetic therapies.

Conclusion

This review discussed current understanding of metabolic reprogramming during the innate and adaptive immune cell responses, and established models of metabolic interplay in anti- and pro-inflammatory responses. Further studies to explore molecular and biochemical basis governing the metabolic reprogramming in immune responses would lead to the identification of novel therapies for human disease.

Acknowledgments

Source of Funding

This work was supported in part by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) grants HL82774, HL-110764, HL130233, HL131460, DK104114, DK113775 and HL131460 to HW.

Nonstandard Abbreviations and Acronyms

DC

Dendritic cell

FADH2

Flavin adenine dinucleotide

FAO

Fatty acid oxidation

FAS

Fatty acid synthesis

IFNγ

Interferon gamma

LPS

Lipopolysaccharides

NADH

Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide

OXPHOS

Oxidative phosphorylation

PPP

Pentose phosphate pathway

ROS

Reactive oxygen species

SAH

S-adenosylhomocysteine

SAM

S-adenosylmethionine

TCA Cycle

Tricarboxylic acid cycle

Footnotes

Disclosures

None.

References

  • 1.Back M, Yurdagul A Jr, Tabas I, Oorni K, Kovanen PT. Inflammation and its resolution in atherosclerosis: Mediators and therapeutic opportunities. Nature reviews. Cardiology. 2019;16:389–406 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Kratofil RM, Kubes P, Deniset JF. Monocyte conversion during inflammation and injury. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2017;37:35–42 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Davis FM, Gallagher KA. Epigenetic mechanisms in monocytes/macrophages regulate inflammation in cardiometabolic and vascular disease. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2019;39:623–634 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Zernecke A Dendritic cells in atherosclerosis: Evidence in mice and humans. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2015;35:763–770 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Fang P, Li X, Dai J, Cole L, Camacho JA, Zhang Y, Ji Y, Wang J, Yang XF, Wang H. Immune cell subset differentiation and tissue inflammation. J Hematol Oncol. 2018;11:97. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Dai J, Fang P, Saredy J, Xi H, Ramon C, Yang W, Choi ET, Ji Y, Mao W, Yang X, Wang H. Metabolism-associated danger signal-induced immune response and reverse immune checkpoint-activated cd40(+) monocyte differentiation. J Hematol Oncol. 2017;10:141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Yang J, Zhang L, Yu C, Yang XF, Wang H. Monocyte and macrophage differentiation: Circulation inflammatory monocyte as biomarker for inflammatory diseases. Biomarker research. 2014;2:1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.O’Neill LA, Kishton RJ, Rathmell J. A guide to immunometabolism for immunologists. Nature reviews. Immunology. 2016;16:553–565 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Murray PJ, Rathmell J, Pearce E. Snapshot: Immunometabolism. Cell Metab. 2015;22:190–190 e191 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Zarzour A, Kim HW, Weintraub NL. Epigenetic regulation of vascular diseases. Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology. 2019;39:984–990 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Lachmandas E, Boutens L, Ratter JM, Hijmans A, Hooiveld GJ, Joosten LA, Rodenburg RJ, Fransen JA, Houtkooper RH, van Crevel R, Netea MG, Stienstra R. Microbial stimulation of different toll-like receptor signalling pathways induces diverse metabolic programmes in human monocytes. Nature microbiology. 2016;2:16246. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Liberti MV, Locasale JW. The warburg effect: How does it benefit cancer cells? Trends in biochemical sciences. 2016;41:211–218 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Vander Heiden MG, Cantley LC, Thompson CB. Understanding the warburg effect: The metabolic requirements of cell proliferation. Science. 2009;324:1029–1033 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Raulien N, Friedrich K, Strobel S, Rubner S, Baumann S, von Bergen M, Korner A, Krueger M, Rossol M, Wagner U. Fatty acid oxidation compensates for lipopolysaccharide-induced warburg effect in glucose-deprived monocytes. Front Immunol 2017;8:609. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Dominguez-Andres J, Arts RJW, Ter Horst R, Gresnigt MS, Smeekens SP, Ratter JM, Lachmandas E, Boutens L, van de Veerdonk FL, Joosten LAB, Notebaart RA, Ardavin C, Netea MG. Rewiring monocyte glucose metabolism via c-type lectin signaling protects against disseminated candidiasis. PLoS Pathog. 2017;13:e1006632. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Schmidl C, Renner K, Peter K, Eder R, Lassmann T, Balwierz PJ, Itoh M, Nagao-Sato S, Kawaji H, Carninci P, Suzuki H, Hayashizaki Y, Andreesen R, Hume DA, Hoffmann P, Forrest AR, Kreutz MP, Edinger M, Rehli M, consortium F. Transcription and enhancer profiling in human monocyte subsets. Blood. 2014;123:e90–99 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Yang J, Fang P, Yu D, Zhang L, Zhang D, Jiang X, Yang WY, Bottiglieri T, Kunapuli SP, Yu J, Choi ET, Ji Y, Yang X, Wang H. Chronic kidney disease induces inflammatory cd40+ monocyte differentiation via homocysteine elevation and DNA hypomethylation. Circulation research. 2016;119:1226–1241 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Macrophages Mallat Z. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2017;37:e92–e98 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Hilgendorf I, Swirski FK, Robbins CS. Monocyte fate in atherosclerosis. Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology. 2015;35:272–279 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Laskin DL, Sunil VR, Gardner CR, Laskin JD. Macrophages and tissue injury: Agents of defense or destruction? Annual review of pharmacology and toxicology. 2011;51:267–288 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Barrett TJ. Macrophages in atherosclerosis regression. Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology. 2020;40:20–33 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Koelwyn GJ, Corr EM, Erbay E, Moore KJ. Regulation of macrophage immunometabolism in atherosclerosis. Nature immunology. 2018;19:526–537 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Williams NC, O’Neill LAJ. A role for the krebs cycle intermediate citrate in metabolic reprogramming in innate immunity and inflammation. Frontiers in immunology. 2018;9:141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Mehta MM, Weinberg SE, Chandel NS. Mitochondrial control of immunity: Beyond atp. Nat Rev Immunol. 2017;17:608–620 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Kadl A, Meher AK, Sharma PR, Lee MY, Doran AC, Johnstone SR, Elliott MR, Gruber F, Han J, Chen W, Kensler T, Ravichandran KS, Isakson BE, Wamhoff BR, Leitinger N. Identification of a novel macrophage phenotype that develops in response to atherogenic phospholipids via nrf2. Circ Res. 2010;107:737–746 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Serbulea V, Upchurch CM, Ahern KW, Bories G, Voigt P, DeWeese DE, Meher AK, Harris TE, Leitinger N. Macrophages sensing oxidized damps reprogram their metabolism to support redox homeostasis and inflammation through a tlr2-syk-ceramide dependent mechanism. Mol Metab 2018;7:23–34 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Krawczyk CM, Holowka T, Sun J, Blagih J, Amiel E, DeBerardinis RJ, Cross JR, Jung E, Thompson CB, Jones RG, Pearce EJ. Toll-like receptor-induced changes in glycolytic metabolism regulate dendritic cell activation. Blood. 2010;115:4742–4749 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.He Z, Zhu X, Shi Z, Wu T, Wu L. Metabolic regulation of dendritic cell differentiation. Front Immunol. 2019;10:410. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Everts B, Amiel E, Huang SC, Smith AM, Chang CH, Lam WY, Redmann V, Freitas TC, Blagih J, van der Windt GJ, Artyomov MN, Jones RG, Pearce EL, Pearce EJ. Tlr-driven early glycolytic reprogramming via the kinases tbk1-ikkvarepsilon supports the anabolic demands of dendritic cell activation. Nat Immunol. 2014;15:323–332 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Liu J, Zhang X, Chen K, Cheng Y, Liu S, Xia M, Chen Y, Zhu H, Li Z, Cao X. Ccr7 chemokine receptor-inducible lnc-dpf3 restrains dendritic cell migration by inhibiting hif-1alpha-mediated glycolysis. Immunity. 2019;50:600–615 e615 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Guak H, Al Habyan S, Ma EH, Aldossary H, Al-Masri M, Won SY, Ying T, Fixman ED, Jones RG, McCaffrey LM, Krawczyk CM. Glycolytic metabolism is essential for ccr7 oligomerization and dendritic cell migration. Nat Commun. 2018;9:2463. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Eisenbarth SC. Dendritic cell subsets in t cell programming: Location dictates function. Nat Rev Immunol. 2019;19:89–103 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Macri C, Pang ES, Patton T, O’Keeffe M. Dendritic cell subsets. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2018;84:11–21 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Basit F, Mathan T, Sancho D, de Vries IJM. Human dendritic cell subsets undergo distinct metabolic reprogramming for immune response. Front Immunol. 2018;9:2489. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Malinarich F, Duan K, Hamid RA, Bijin A, Lin WX, Poidinger M, Fairhurst AM, Connolly JE. High mitochondrial respiration and glycolytic capacity represent a metabolic phenotype of human tolerogenic dendritic cells. Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950). 2015;194:5174–5186 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Buck MD, O’Sullivan D, Pearce EL. T cell metabolism drives immunity. J Exp Med. 2015;212:1345–1360 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Geltink RIK, Kyle RL, Pearce EL. Unraveling the complex interplay between t cell metabolism and function. Annual review of immunology. 2018;36:461–488 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Michalek RD, Gerriets VA, Jacobs SR, Macintyre AN, MacIver NJ, Mason EF, Sullivan SA, Nichols AG, Rathmell JC. Cutting edge: Distinct glycolytic and lipid oxidative metabolic programs are essential for effector and regulatory cd4+ t cell subsets. J Immunol. 2011;186:3299–3303 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Peng M, Yin N, Chhangawala S, Xu K, Leslie CS, Li MO. Aerobic glycolysis promotes t helper 1 cell differentiation through an epigenetic mechanism. Science. 2016;354:481–484 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Chang CH, Curtis JD, Maggi LB Jr, Faubert B, Villarino AV, O’Sullivan D, Huang SC, van der Windt GJ, Blagih J, Qiu J, Weber JD, Pearce EJ, Jones RG, Pearce EL. Posttranscriptional control of t cell effector function by aerobic glycolysis. Cell. 2013;153:1239–1251 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Galgani M, De Rosa V, La Cava A, Matarese G. Role of metabolism in the immunobiology of regulatory t cells. J Immunol. 2016;197:2567–2575 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Newton R, Priyadharshini B, Turka LA. Immunometabolism of regulatory t cells. Nat Immunol. 2016;17:618–625 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Doughty CA, Bleiman BF, Wagner DJ, Dufort FJ, Mataraza JM, Roberts MF, Chiles TC. Antigen receptor-mediated changes in glucose metabolism in b lymphocytes: Role of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase signaling in the glycolytic control of growth. Blood. 2006;107:4458–4465 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Dufort FJ, Bleiman BF, Gumina MR, Blair D, Wagner DJ, Roberts MF, Abu-Amer Y, Chiles TC. Cutting edge: Il-4-mediated protection of primary b lymphocytes from apoptosis via stat6-dependent regulation of glycolytic metabolism. J Immunol. 2007;179:4953–4957 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Caro-Maldonado A, Wang R, Nichols AG, Kuraoka M, Milasta S, Sun LD, Gavin AL, Abel ED, Kelsoe G, Green DR, Rathmell JC. Metabolic reprogramming is required for antibody production that is suppressed in anergic but exaggerated in chronically baff-exposed b cells. Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950). 2014;192:3626–3636 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Lam WY, Becker AM, Kennerly KM, Wong R, Curtis JD, Llufrio EM, McCommis KS, Fahrmann J, Pizzato HA, Nunley RM, Lee J, Wolfgang MJ, Patti GJ, Finck BN, Pearce EL, Bhattacharya D. Mitochondrial pyruvate import promotes long-term survival of antibody-secreting plasma cells. Immunity. 2016;45:60–73 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Corcoran LM, Nutt SL. Long-lived plasma cells have a sweet tooth. Immunity. 2016;45:3–5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.DeBerardinis RJ, Thompson CB. Cellular metabolism and disease: What do metabolic outliers teach us? Cell. 2012;148:1132–1144 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Ganeshan K, Chawla A. Metabolic regulation of immune responses. Annual review of immunology. 2014;32:609–634 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Meiser J, Kramer L, Sapcariu SC, Battello N, Ghelfi J, D’Herouel AF, Skupin A, Hiller K. Pro-inflammatory macrophages sustain pyruvate oxidation through pyruvate dehydrogenase for the synthesis of itaconate and to enable cytokine expression. The Journal of biological chemistry. 2016;291:3932–3946 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Freemerman AJ, Johnson AR, Sacks GN, Milner JJ, Kirk EL, Troester MA, Macintyre AN, Goraksha-Hicks P, Rathmell JC, Makowski L. Metabolic reprogramming of macrophages: Glucose transporter 1 (glut1)-mediated glucose metabolism drives a proinflammatory phenotype. The Journal of biological chemistry. 2014;289:7884–7896 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Macintyre AN, Gerriets VA, Nichols AG, Michalek RD, Rudolph MC, Deoliveira D, Anderson SM, Abel ED, Chen BJ, Hale LP, Rathmell JC. The glucose transporter glut1 is selectively essential for cd4 t cell activation and effector function. Cell metabolism. 2014;20:61–72 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Lunt SY, Vander Heiden MG. Aerobic glycolysis: Meeting the metabolic requirements of cell proliferation. Annual review of cell and developmental biology. 2011;27:441–464 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Peiro C, Romacho T, Azcutia V, Villalobos L, Fernandez E, Bolanos JP, Moncada S, Sanchez-Ferrer CF. Inflammation, glucose, and vascular cell damage: The role of the pentose phosphate pathway. Cardiovascular diabetology. 2016;15:82. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Weyand CM, Goronzy JJ. Immunometabolism in the development of rheumatoid arthritis. Immunological reviews. 2020;294:177–187 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Mills EL, Kelly B, O’Neill LAJ. Mitochondria are the powerhouses of immunity. Nature immunology. 2017;18:488–498 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Li X, Shao Y, Sha X, Fang P, Kuo YM, Andrews AJ, Li Y, Yang WY, Maddaloni M, Pascual DW, Luo JJ, Jiang X, Wang H, Yang X. Il-35 (interleukin-35) suppresses endothelial cell activation by inhibiting mitochondrial reactive oxygen species-mediated site-specific acetylation of h3k14 (histone 3 lysine 14). Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology. 2018;38:599–609 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Mills EL, Kelly B, Logan A, Costa ASH, Varma M, Bryant CE, Tourlomousis P, Dabritz JHM, Gottlieb E, Latorre I, Corr SC, McManus G, Ryan D, Jacobs HT, Szibor M, Xavier RJ, Braun T, Frezza C, Murphy MP, O’Neill LA. Succinate dehydrogenase supports metabolic repurposing of mitochondria to drive inflammatory macrophages. Cell. 2016;167:457–470 e413 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Griffiths HR, Gao D, Pararasa C. Redox regulation in metabolic programming and inflammation. Redox biology. 2017;12:50–57 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Jha AK, Huang SC, Sergushichev A, Lampropoulou V, Ivanova Y, Loginicheva E, Chmielewski K, Stewart KM, Ashall J, Everts B, Pearce EJ, Driggers EM, Artyomov MN. Network integration of parallel metabolic and transcriptional data reveals metabolic modules that regulate macrophage polarization. Immunity. 2015;42:419–430 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.O’Neill LA. A broken krebs cycle in macrophages. Immunity. 2015;42:393–394 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Chu VT, Berek C. The establishment of the plasma cell survival niche in the bone marrow. Immunological reviews. 2013;251:177–188 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Tanel A, Fonseca SG, Yassine-Diab B, Bordi R, Zeidan J, Shi Y, Benne C, Sekaly RP. Cellular and molecular mechanisms of memory t-cell survival. Expert review of vaccines. 2009;8:299–312 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.van der Windt GJ, Pearce EL. Metabolic switching and fuel choice during t-cell differentiation and memory development. Immunological reviews. 2012;249:27–42 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Netea MG, Joosten LA, Latz E, Mills KH, Natoli G, Stunnenberg HG, O’Neill LA, Xavier RJ. Trained immunity: A program of innate immune memory in health and disease. Science. 2016;352:aaf1098. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Hamada A, Torre C, Drancourt M, Ghigo E. Trained immunity carried by non-immune cells. Frontiers in microbiology. 2018;9:3225. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Netea MG, Quintin J, van der Meer JW. Trained immunity: A memory for innate host defense. Cell host & microbe. 2011;9:355–361 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.van der Valk FM, Bekkering S, Kroon J, Yeang C, Van den Bossche J, van Buul JD, Ravandi A, Nederveen AJ, Verberne HJ, Scipione C, Nieuwdorp M, Joosten LA, Netea MG, Koschinsky ML, Witztum JL, Tsimikas S, Riksen NP, Stroes ES. Oxidized phospholipids on lipoprotein(a) elicit arterial wall inflammation and an inflammatory monocyte response in humans. Circulation. 2016;134:611–624 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Bekkering S, Quintin J, Joosten LA, van der Meer JW, Netea MG, Riksen NP. Oxidized low-density lipoprotein induces long-term proinflammatory cytokine production and foam cell formation via epigenetic reprogramming of monocytes. Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology. 2014;34:1731–1738 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Leentjens J, Bekkering S, Joosten LAB, Netea MG, Burgner DP, Riksen NP. Trained innate immunity as a novel mechanism linking infection and the development of atherosclerosis. Circulation research. 2018;122:664–669 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Cheng SC, Quintin J, Cramer RA, Shepardson KM, Saeed S, Kumar V, Giamarellos-Bourboulis EJ, Martens JH, Rao NA, Aghajanirefah A, Manjeri GR, Li Y, Ifrim DC, Arts RJ, van der Veer BM, Deen PM, Logie C, O’Neill LA, Willems P, van de Veerdonk FL, van der Meer JW, Ng A, Joosten LA, Wijmenga C, Stunnenberg HG, Xavier RJ, Netea MG. Mtor- and hif-1alpha-mediated aerobic glycolysis as metabolic basis for trained immunity. Science. 2014;345:1250684. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Arts RJ, Novakovic B, Ter Horst R, Carvalho A, Bekkering S, Lachmandas E, Rodrigues F, Silvestre R, Cheng SC, Wang SY, Habibi E, Goncalves LG, Mesquita I, Cunha C, van Laarhoven A, van de Veerdonk FL, Williams DL, van der Meer JW, Logie C, O’Neill LA, Dinarello CA, Riksen NP, van Crevel R, Clish C, Notebaart RA, Joosten LA, Stunnenberg HG, Xavier RJ, Netea MG. Glutaminolysis and fumarate accumulation integrate immunometabolic and epigenetic programs in trained immunity. Cell metabolism. 2016;24:807–819 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Bekkering S, Arts RJW, Novakovic B, Kourtzelis I, van der Heijden C, Li Y, Popa CD, Ter Horst R, van Tuijl J, Netea-Maier RT, van de Veerdonk FL, Chavakis T, Joosten LAB, van der Meer JWM, Stunnenberg H, Riksen NP, Netea MG. Metabolic induction of trained immunity through the mevalonate pathway. Cell. 2018;172:135–146 e139 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Saeed S, Quintin J, Kerstens HH, Rao NA, Aghajanirefah A, Matarese F, Cheng SC, Ratter J, Berentsen K, van der Ent MA, Sharifi N, Janssen-Megens EM, Ter Huurne M, Mandoli A, van Schaik T, Ng A, Burden F, Downes K, Frontini M, Kumar V, Giamarellos-Bourboulis EJ, Ouwehand WH, van der Meer JW, Joosten LA, Wijmenga C, Martens JH, Xavier RJ, Logie C, Netea MG, Stunnenberg HG. Epigenetic programming of monocyte-to-macrophage differentiation and trained innate immunity. Science. 2014;345:1251086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Donohoe DR, Bultman SJ. Metaboloepigenetics: Interrelationships between energy metabolism and epigenetic control of gene expression. Journal of cellular physiology. 2012;227:3169–3177 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Shen W, Gao C, Cueto R, Liu L, Fu H, Shao Y, Yang WY, Fang P, Choi ET, Wu Q, Yang X, Wang H. Homocysteine-methionine cycle is a metabolic sensor system controlling methylation-regulated pathological signaling. Redox biology. 2020;28:101322. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Blom HJ, Smulders Y. Overview of homocysteine and folate metabolism. With special references to cardiovascular disease and neural tube defects. Journal of inherited metabolic disease. 2011;34:75–81 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Lai AY, Mav D, Shah R, Grimm SA, Phadke D, Hatzi K, Melnick A, Geigerman C, Sobol SE, Jaye DL, Wade PA. DNA methylation profiling in human b cells reveals immune regulatory elements and epigenetic plasticity at alu elements during b-cell activation. Genome research. 2013;23:2030–2041 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Scharer CD, Barwick BG, Youngblood BA, Ahmed R, Boss JM. Global DNA methylation remodeling accompanies cd8 t cell effector function. Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950). 2013;191:3419–3429 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Klein Geltink RI, Pearce EL. The importance of methionine metabolism. eLife. 2019;8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Hashimoto S, Ogoshi K, Sasaki A, Abe J, Qu W, Nakatani Y, Ahsan B, Oshima K, Shand FH, Ametani A, Suzuki Y, Kaneko S, Wada T, Hattori M, Sugano S, Morishita S, Matsushima K. Coordinated changes in DNA methylation in antigen-specific memory cd4 t cells. Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950). 2013;190:4076–4091 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Sidoli S, Trefely S, Garcia BA, Carrer A. Integrated analysis of acetyl-coa and histone modification via mass spectrometry to investigate metabolically driven acetylation. Methods in molecular biology. 2019;1928:125–147 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Tripathi SK, Lahesmaa R. Transcriptional and epigenetic regulation of t-helper lineage specification. Immunological reviews. 2014;261:62–83 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Cameron AM, Lawless SJ, Pearce EJ. Metabolism and acetylation in innate immune cell function and fate. Seminars in immunology. 2016;28:408–416 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Phan AT, Goldrath AW, Glass CK. Metabolic and epigenetic coordination of t cell and macrophage immunity. Immunity. 2017;46:714–729 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Liu PS, Wang H, Li X, Chao T, Teav T, Christen S, Di Conza G, Cheng WC, Chou CH, Vavakova M, Muret C, Debackere K, Mazzone M, Huang HD, Fendt SM, Ivanisevic J, Ho PC. Alpha-ketoglutarate orchestrates macrophage activation through metabolic and epigenetic reprogramming. Nature immunology. 2017;18:985–994 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Xiao M, Yang H, Xu W, Ma S, Lin H, Zhu H, Liu L, Liu Y, Yang C, Xu Y, Zhao S, Ye D, Xiong Y, Guan KL. Inhibition of alpha-kg-dependent histone and DNA demethylases by fumarate and succinate that are accumulated in mutations of fh and sdh tumor suppressors. Genes & development. 2012;26:1326–1338 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Zhong L, D’Urso A, Toiber D, Sebastian C, Henry RE, Vadysirisack DD, Guimaraes A, Marinelli B, Wikstrom JD, Nir T, Clish CB, Vaitheesvaran B, Iliopoulos O, Kurland I, Dor Y, Weissleder R, Shirihai OS, Ellisen LW, Espinosa JM, Mostoslavsky R. The histone deacetylase sirt6 regulates glucose homeostasis via hif1alpha. Cell. 2010;140:280–293 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Elhassan YS, Philp AA, Lavery GG. Targeting nad+ in metabolic disease: New insights into an old molecule. Journal of the Endocrine Society. 2017;1:816–835 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Tzoulaki I, Castagne R, Boulange CL, Karaman I, Chekmeneva E, Evangelou E, Ebbels TMD, Kaluarachchi MR, Chadeau-Hyam M, Mosen D, Dehghan A, Moayyeri A, Ferreira DLS, Guo X, Rotter JI, Taylor KD, Kavousi M, de Vries PS, Lehne B, Loh M, Hofman A, Nicholson JK, Chambers J, Gieger C, Holmes E, Tracy R, Kooner J, Greenland P, Franco OH, Herrington D, Lindon JC, Elliott P. Serum metabolic signatures of coronary and carotid atherosclerosis and subsequent cardiovascular disease. European heart journal. 2019;40:2883–2896 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Fang P, Zhang D, Cheng Z, Yan C, Jiang X, Kruger WD, Meng S, Arning E, Bottiglieri T, Choi ET, Han Y, Yang XF, Wang H. Hyperhomocysteinemia potentiates hyperglycemia-induced inflammatory monocyte differentiation and atherosclerosis. Diabetes. 2014;63:4275–4290 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Fang P, Li X, Shan H, Saredy JJ, Cueto R, Xia J, Jiang X, Yang XF, Wang H. Ly6c(+) inflammatory monocyte differentiation partially mediates hyperhomocysteinemia-induced vascular dysfunction in type 2 diabetic db/db mice. Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology. 2019;39:2097–2119 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Bekkering S, van den Munckhof I, Nielen T, Lamfers E, Dinarello C, Rutten J, de Graaf J, Joosten LA, Netea MG, Gomes ME, Riksen NP. Innate immune cell activation and epigenetic remodeling in symptomatic and asymptomatic atherosclerosis in humans in vivo. Atherosclerosis. 2016;254:228–236 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Shirai T, Nazarewicz RR, Wallis BB, Yanes RE, Watanabe R, Hilhorst M, Tian L, Harrison DG, Giacomini JC, Assimes TL, Goronzy JJ, Weyand CM. The glycolytic enzyme pkm2 bridges metabolic and inflammatory dysfunction in coronary artery disease. The Journal of experimental medicine. 2016;213:337–354 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Chen Y, Yang M, Huang W, Chen W, Zhao Y, Schulte ML, Volberding P, Gerbec Z, Zimmermann MT, Zeighami A, Demos W, Zhang J, Knaack DA, Smith BC, Cui W, Malarkannan S, Sodhi K, Shapiro JI, Xie Z, Sahoo D, Silverstein RL. Mitochondrial metabolic reprogramming by cd36 signaling drives macrophage inflammatory responses. Circulation research. 2019;125:1087–1102 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Schnitzler JG, Hoogeveen RM, Ali L, Prange KH, Waissi F, van Weeghel M, Bachmann JC, Versloot M, Borrelli MJ, Yeang C, de Kleijn D, Houtkooper RH, Koschinsky M, de Winther MP, Groen AK, Witztum JL, Tsimikas S, Stroes ESG, Kroon J. Atherogenic lipoprotein(a) increases vascular glycolysis, thereby facilitating inflammation and leukocyte extravasation. Circulation research. 2020 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Kelly B, Tannahill GM, Murphy MP, O’Neill LA. Metformin inhibits the production of reactive oxygen species from nadh:Ubiquinone oxidoreductase to limit induction of interleukin-1beta (il-1beta) and boosts interleukin-10 (il-10) in lipopolysaccharide (lps)-activated macrophages. The Journal of biological chemistry. 2015;290:20348–20359 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Tokubuchi I, Tajiri Y, Iwata S, Hara K, Wada N, Hashinaga T, Nakayama H, Mifune H, Yamada K. Beneficial effects of metformin on energy metabolism and visceral fat volume through a possible mechanism of fatty acid oxidation in human subjects and rats. PloS one. 2017;12:e0171293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Corcoran SE, O’Neill LA. Hif1alpha and metabolic reprogramming in inflammation. The Journal of clinical investigation. 2016;126:3699–3707 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Wei Y, Schober A. Microrna regulation of macrophages in human pathologies. Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS. 2016;73:3473–3495 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Vink A, Schoneveld AH, Lamers D, Houben AJ, van der Groep P, van Diest PJ, Pasterkamp G. Hif-1 alpha expression is associated with an atheromatous inflammatory plaque phenotype and upregulated in activated macrophages. Atherosclerosis. 2007;195:e69–75 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Aarup A, Pedersen TX, Junker N, Christoffersen C, Bartels ED, Madsen M, Nielsen CH, Nielsen LB. Hypoxia-inducible factor-1alpha expression in macrophages promotes development of atherosclerosis. Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology. 2016;36:1782–1790 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Karshovska E, Wei Y, Subramanian P, Mohibullah R, Geissler C, Baatsch I, Popal A, Corbalan Campos J, Exner N, Schober A. Hif-1alpha (hypoxia-inducible factor-1alpha) promotes macrophage necroptosis by regulating mir-210 and mir-383. Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology. 2020;40:583–596 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES