Skip to main content
PMC home page
Oncogenesis logoLink to Oncogenesis
. 2020 Sep 11;9(9):81. doi: 10.1038/s41389-020-00265-z

Hypoxia induces an endometrial cancer stem-like cell phenotype via HIF-dependent demethylation of SOX2 mRNA

Guofang Chen 1,✉,#, Binya Liu 2,#, Shasha Yin 1, Shuangdi Li 2, Yu’e Guo 1, Mengfei Wang 1, Kai Wang 1,✉, Xiaoping Wan 2,✉
PMCID: PMC7484801  PMID: 32913192

Abstract

Endometrial cancer stem cells (ECSCs) are stem-like cells endowed with self-renewal and differentiation abilities, and these cells are essential for cancer progression in endometrial cancer (EC). As hallmarks of the tumour microenvironment (TME), hypoxia and hypoxia-inducing factors (HIFs) give rise to the dysregulation of tumour stemness genes, such as SOX2. Against this backdrop, we investigated the regulatory mechanisms regulated by HIFs and SOX2 in ECSCs during EC development. Here, ECSCs isolated from EC cell lines and tissues were found to express stemness genes (CD133 and aldehyde dehydrogenase, ALDH1) following the induction of their ECSC expansion. Notably, m6A methylation of RNA and HIF-1α/2α-dependent AlkB homologue 5 (ALKBH5) participate in the regulation of HIFs and SOX2 in EC, as confirmed by the observations that mRNA levels of m6A demethylases and ALKBH5 significantly increase under hypoxic conditions in ECSCs. Moreover, hypoxia and high ALKBH5 levels restore the stem-like state of differentiated ECSCs and increase the ECSC-like phenotype, whereas the knockdown of HIFs or ALKBH5 significantly reduces their tumour initiation capacity. In addition, our findings validate the role of ALKBH5 in promoting SOX2 transcription via mRNA demethylation, thereby maintaining the stem-like state and tumorigenicity potential of ECSCs. In conclusion, these observations demonstrate a critical role for m6A methylation-mediated regulation of the HIF-ALKBH5-SOX2 axis during ECSC expansion in hypoxic TMEs.

Subject terms: Cancer stem cells, Cell signalling

Introduction

Endometrial carcinoma (EC) is the most frequent gynaecological cancer in women, with an estimated 65,620 new cases and 12,590 deaths in the U.S. in 20201–3. As the fourth most common cancer in women in terms of new cases, EC incidences have been rapidly increasing over the last 10 years as a consequence of a higher overall prevalence of obesity and metabolic syndromes4,5. However, the pathogenesis of EC remains poorly characterised.

Recent studies support the notion that a small subpopulation of EC cells, cancer stem-like cells (CSCs) or tumour-initiating cells contribute to self-renewal and differentiation in the early development of EC6. CSCs can be induced to maintain a stem-like state or to differentiate and express specific surface markers (i.e., CD24, CD34, CD38, CD44, CD117, CD55, CD133 and aldehyde dehydrogenase, ALDH1)7–9, among which CD44, CD55, CD117, CD133 and ALDH1 are reported to be enriched in ECSCs6. To date, the role of ECSCs is controversial, and no universal markers specific for ECSCs have been confirmed10–12.

Hypoxia is a vital niche characteristic for CSCs13, accelerating stem cell growth and tumour progression14. As master mediators of hypoxia, hypoxia-inducible factors (HIFs), including HIF-1α and HIF-2α, are indispensable for CSC activation and self-renewal and have been tightly linked to tumour malignancy15. HIFs mediate adaptive metabolic responses and mitochondrial ROS production in breast cancer tumour stem cells (BCSCs), enhancing the CSC phenotype via ITGA6 and promoting ALKBH5 expression, which plays a critical role in tumour-initiating breast cancer cells16–18. In addition, in mesenchymal stem cells, hypoxia induces interleukin-10 secretion, which in turn promotes CSC characteristics and lymphoma growth19. Similarly, HIFs participate in stem-like maintenance in various cancers, such as glioma stem-like cells20, prostate cancer stem-like cells21, hepatocellular cancer stem cells22, and liver cancer stem cells23. Thus, the identification and subsequent targeting of the molecular mechanisms driving hypoxia during CSC self-renewal provides a rational clinical strategy for cancer therapy.

CSCs can endure hypoxic conditions by rescheduling various stem genes involved in cell pluripotency, differentiation and proliferation24. Regarding core pluripotency factors, enhanced NANOG expression is observed under hypoxic stimulation within BCSCs17, while conditional SRY-box2 (SOX2) deletion in mice significantly represses the formation of skin squamous-cell carcinoma as a result of tumour regression25. Alternatively, in ME180 cells, discernible increased expression of SOX2 messenger RNA (mRNA) was identified under hypoxic conditions26, which is consistent with the evidence that in prostate cancer cells, enhanced SOX2 expression and HIF-1α- or HIF-2α-related phenotypes depend on the duration of exposure to hypoxia27. All these observations extend our knowledge regarding the link between hypoxia, HIFs and SOX2. Moreover, recent publications have demonstrated that changes in mRNA stability interfere with the expression of these pluripotency factors17. N6-methyladenosine (m6A) is an mRNA modification, and its addition to mRNAs is catalysed by methyltransferase-like 3 (METTL3), METTL14 and Wilms tumour 1-associated protein (WTAP)28,29. In gliomas, the methyltransferase METTL3 participates in SOX2 methylation modification and enhances SOX2 stability by binding the 3ʹUTR, thereby promoting the stem cell phenotype30. As an RNA demethylase involved in m6A modification, ALKBH5 is induced under hypoxic conditions31,32. To explore the molecular mechanisms that regulate m6A demethylation of SOX2 in ECSCs, we investigated the function of HIFs and SOX2 in ECSCs and demonstrated that ALKBH5 was induced under hypoxic conditions, wherein it decreased m6A methylation of SOX2 mRNA and changed the fate of ECSCs. This research establishes a possible continuum between the ECSC phenotype and m6A RNA methylation, which lays a foundation for the understanding of EC early development.

Results

The isolation and identification of ECSCs

To obtain ECSCs from EC cell lines and tissues, a new method was established in which ECSCs were isolated from EC cell lines and tumour samples; a schematic representation for the method is shown in Fig. 1a. In our study, ECSCs isolated from ISK, ECC-1, RL95-2, HEC-1A and human samples were described as ECSCisk, ECSCecc, ECSCrl, ECSChec and ECSCHM, respectively. From day 1 to day 8, morphological changes in ECSCs were observed and recorded (Fig. 1b). On the first day, ECSCisk were dispersed and flattened, and then a few stem cell colonies appeared on the third day; microscopy revealed that the cells gradually developed a uniform shape on the fifth day, and the cells could be continually subcultured (Fig. 1b). ECSCs from other EC cell lines and samples showed similar morphological changes over time. On the eighth day, colony accumulation increased, and sphere formation revealed a significant increase in all ECSCs. As analysed in Fig. 1c, compared to other ECSCs, ECSCisk displayed the most spheres. To further confirm the characteristics of ECSCisk, the expression of stemness genes (NANOG, SOX2 and CD133) and pluripotency markers (ALDH1 and SOX2) was analysed by quantitative PCR (qPCR; (Fig. 1d)) and western blotting (Fig. 1e), respectively. As expected, the mRNA expression of NANOG, SOX2 and CD133 was significantly elevated over time, with the highest levels on day 8 in ECSCisk (Fig. 1d), while other ECSCs showed comparable qPCR data (Supplementary Fig. S1A). In addition, immunoblotting findings of ALDH1 and SOX2 presented a trend of increasing with time in ECSCisk (Fig. 1e). Since ECSCisk showed the highest proliferation efficiency and the most stem cell-like state of the cells tested, they were selected for most of the subsequent experiments.

Fig. 1. The isolation and identification of ECSCs by cell morphology and stemness gene analysis.

Fig. 1

Open in a new tab

a Schematic representation of the method of ECSC isolation. b Morphology of ECSCs isolated from different EC cell lines and human samples on days 1, 3, 5 and 8 (scale bar = 25 μm). c The numbers of spheres produced from different cells were analysed. d qRT-PCR analysis of stemness genes (NANOG, SOX2 and CD133) in ECSCisk. Data are shown as the mean ± SEM (N = 3). *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, and ***P < 0.001 vs. Day 1. e Immunoblotting findings of ALDH1 and SOX2 in ECSCisk on days 1, 2, 4, 5 and 8.

Characterising the phenotype and pluripotency of ECSCs in vitro and in vivo

To confirm the phenotype and pluripotency of ECSCs, confocal images of ALDH1 and SOX2 immunofluorescence staining revealed a uniform shape and phenotype of ECSCisk and ECSCecc (Fig. 2a). Consistently, FACS analysis showed markedly higher percentages of ALDH1 and CD133 in ECSCisk and ECSCecc than in ISK and ECC-1 cells (Fig. 2b). Alternatively, the mRNA levels of ALDH1, CD133, OCT4, SOX2 and NANOG exhibited a discernible increase in ECSCisk and ECSCecc, especially SOX2 in ECSCisk (Fig. 2c). Further immunoblotting data showed that SOX2 levels in different ECSCs were much higher than they were in control cells (Fig. 2d). Moreover, epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) occurs as the epithelial cell markers E-cadherin, EP-CAM, Ocln and Cldn3 decrease and the mesenchymal cell markers N-cadherin, Snail, Slug and Fn increase during long-term culture of ECSCisk (Fig. 2e). FACS data revealed that the percentages of cells with stemness markers ALDH1 and CD133 were 9.34% and 13.65% in ECSCHM1 and ECSCHM2, respectively, while as a positive control, 90.60% of ECSCisk were found to be positive for ALDH1 and CD133 (Fig. 2f). In addition, the percentage of CD133-positive cells was calculated to be higher in ECSCs than it was in ISK cells. Immunoblotting investigations into additional markers involved in ECSCisk under differentiation conditions (ECSC medium removed of growth factors) showed that the levels of all stemness genes (SOX2, NANOG and ALDH1) decreased over time, while E-cadherin and Vimentin apparently increased after long-term culturing (Supplementary Fig. S2A). Similarly, the immunostaining of NANOG and SOX2 in ECSCisk (Supplementary Fig. S2B) and ECSCecc (Supplementary Fig. S2C) was apparently reduced after differentiation for 4 days. Conclusively, these findings revealed that ECSCs might enhance stemness properties, spontaneously differentiating towards the epithelium in long-term culture and to develop the ECSC phenotype and pluripotency.

Fig. 2. The qualification of ECSC pluripotency.

Fig. 2

Open in a new tab

a Morphology of ECSCisk and ECSCecc and immunofluorescent staining of ALDH1 and SOX2. b FACS detection of ALDH1 and CD133 in ECSCisk and ECSCecc. c qRT-PCR analysis of stemness genes (ALDH1, CD133, OCT4, SOX2 and NANOG) in ECSCisk and ECSCecc. d SOX2 protein expression by western blot in different ECSCs and control cells (ISK). e EMT gene expression in ECSCisk. f FACS data of the percentages of cells positive for ALDH1 and CD133 in two human samples and ECSCisk. g Statistics of the percentage of CD133-positive cells in ECSCisk. Mean ± SEM (N = 3). */#P < 0.05, **/##P < 0.01, and ***/###P < 0.001.

To test the tumorigenicity of ECSCs, we introduced ECSCs and ISK cells into xenograft mice model in a cell count-dependent manner (Fig. 3a). For forming a xenograft tumour, 5 × 104 ISK cells for injection were needed, in contrast, only 1 × 102 ECSCisk cells were enough. The volumes of xenografts were visible on day 7 post ECSCisk injection, while detectable tumours were observed on day 14 post ISK injection, markedly slower than the ECSCisk group (Fig. 3b). The minimum required cell numbers of ISK and ECSCisk for grafts formation were recorded in the Fig. 3c. Of note, pluripotency markers (ALDH1, CD133, OCT4, SOX2 and NANOG) showed elevated mRNA levels xenografts in the ECSCisk group (Fig. 3d), with stronger CD133 and SOX2 immunostaining (Fig. 3e). To further explore the stemness properties of xenografts in both groups, tumours were collected and digested into cell suspension, then the numbers of primary spheres were analysed after exposure to hypoxia or normoxia for 72 h (Fig. 3f). Interestingly, in both groups, the primary spheres of tumour cells under hypoxia were discernibly more than those under normoxia (Fig. 3f). With the primary spheres incubated in normoxia for 1 week, we compared the differences of secondary spheres between ISK and ECSCisk xenografts, and similar results were obtained with the primary spheres (Fig. 3g). Consistently, under hypoxic conditions, both of ISK and ECSCisk xenografts displayed higher percentages of CD133-positive cells, in which more CD133 expression was observed in ECSCisk (Fig. 3h). Taken together, these results in vitro and in vivo support the notion that hypoxia plays a central role in the tumorigenicity of ECSCs.

Fig. 3. Characterisation of the increased stemness properties in ECSCs in vivo.

Fig. 3

Open in a new tab

a, b Tumorigenicity detected by the morphology (a) and volumes of xenografts (b) formed from ISK cells and ECSCisk. c Tumorigenicity initiating capacity of the minimum number of ISK cells and ECSCisk. d qRT-PCR analysis of the expression of ALDH1, CD133, OCT4, SOX2 and NANOG in the tumours of the two groups. e Immunostaining of CD133 and SOX2 in tumours by IHC. f, g The numbers of primary (f) and secondary (g) spheres formed from ISK cells and ECSCisk under hypoxic or normoxic conditions for 72 h. h FACS analysis of the percentages of CD133-positive cells in tumours from ISK cells and ECSCisk in hypoxic or normoxic conditions for 72 h. **P < 0.01, and ***/###P < 0.001.

Hypoxia promotes the stem-like state of ECSCs

The phenotype observed in ECSCisk was promoted by CoCl2, which is a signal inducer of HIFs, in a dose-dependent manner; moreover, the addition of the inhibitor KC7F2 impeded the phenotype and increased the proportion of differentiated clones (Fig. 4a, b). Following analysis of the morphology, the numbers of ECSCisk spheres were analysed upon activation of signal transduction via treatment with HIFs (Fig. 4b). In addition, the results of immunofluorescence staining in ECSCisk revealed that when cultured in ECSC media deprived of growth factors, hypoxia induced a stem-like state with more SOX2 expression than was observed in normoxic conditions (Fig. 4c). As expected, the number of spheres from ECSCisk was significantly increased in hypoxic conditions regardless of the presence or absence of HIF signal mediators (Fig. 4d). As shown in Fig. 4e, treatment with HIF signal inducers or hypoxia markedly reversed the expression of these pluripotency genes (ALDH1, CD133, OCT4, SOX2 and NANOG) in ECSCisk. It is clear that SOX2 is a core stemness transcription factor and mediates an early step in tumour initiation25. To determine the role of SOX2 in ECSCs, we explored variation in the stem-like phenotype in after changing SOX2 levels. After knockdown with RNA interference, SOX2 expression levels were confirmed by qPCR and western blot analysis (Fig. 4f, g) in ECSCisk. The images in Fig. 4h clearly show that the compacted colonial morphology disappeared by SOX2 inhibition when cultured in normoxia for 3 days. Additionally, more colonies were observed from ECSCisk grown under hypoxic than normoxic conditions, while fewer colonies were observed after SOX2 inhibition (Fig. 4i). Consistent with previous data, the numbers of primary and secondary spheres were dramatically decreased by SOX2 inhibition, even under hypoxic conditions (Supplementary Fig. S3A, B), which was similar to the trend of CD133-positive cells (Supplementary Fig. S3C). Taken together, our data demonstrate that SOX2 is crucial for the expansion of hypoxia-induced ECSCs.

Fig. 4. Hypoxia promotes a stem-like state in ECSCs.

Fig. 4

Open in a new tab

a, b Images showing the morphology (a) and sphere numbers (b) of ECSCisk supplemented with CoCl2 (30 and 100 µM) or KC7F2 (1 and 10 µM). c, d Images showing the morphology of ECSCisk, immunofluorescent staining of SOX2 (c) and the number of ECSCisk colonies (d) subjected to 2 or 21% O2 with or without growth factors. e mRNA expression analysis of HIF-1α and 2α and stemness genes (ALDH1, CD133, OCT4, SOX2 and NANOG) in ECSCisk treated with CoCl2 (100 µM) or KC7F2 (10 µM) under normoxic or hypoxic conditions for 3 days. f, g qPCR (f) and immunoblotting (g) analysis of SOX2 after transfection with an siRNA. h Morphology pictures of ECSCisk after 2 days of SOX2 inhibition in normoxic conditions (scale bar = 25 μm). i The ECSCisk spheres with different SOX2 levels in hypoxic or normoxic conditions. Mean ± SEM. */#P < 0.05, **/##P < 0.01, and ***/###P < 0.001.

HIFs are crucial for hypoxia-induced pluripotency in ECSCs

To further explore the molecular mechanisms of HIF signalling pathways involved in ECSC stemness, HIF-1α and HIF-2α were knocked down, and the efficiency was confirmed by siRNA and shRNA (Fig. 5a, b and Supplementary Fig. S4A, B). With HIF-1α or HIF-2α inhibition, ECSCisk lost the compact morphology of their colonies; in contrast, the corresponding control ECSCisk maintained stem-like morphology under normoxic conditions (Fig. 5c and Supplementary Fig. S4C). In addition, the reduced expression of pluripotency genes (ALDH1, CD133, OCT4, SOX2 and NANOG) and the elevated expression of lineage-specific genes (E-cadherin, Cytokeratin8, α-SMA, Vimentin and N-cadherin) were observed in both HIF-1α and HIF-2α knockdown ECSCisk (Fig. 5d, e). Under hypoxic conditions, the number of spheres decreased after HIF-1α or HIF-2α inhibition, and there was less complete loss of positive colonies, while the sphere numbers increased in the control groups (Fig. 5f, g). Subsequent confocal images also revealed that HIF knockdown gave rise to low levels of NANOG and SOX2, decreasing the stem state of ECSCs (Fig. 5h, i). Moreover, after HIF-1α or HIF-2α inhibition in ECSCisk, Western blot analysis showed that SOX2 and NANOG decreased and E-cadherin increased (Fig. 5j), and the percentage of CD133-positive cells decreased regardless of whether the conditions were hypoxic or normoxic (Fig. 5k). These observations reveal that HIFs are required for hypoxia-induced pluripotency and a stem-like state of ECSCs.

Fig. 5. HIFs are required for hypoxia-induced SOX2 expression.

Fig. 5

Open in a new tab

a, b Validation of the siRNAs targeting HIF-1α and HIF-2α by qRT-PCR (a) and western blot (b). c Images of ECSCisk morphology with low-HIF expression subjected to 2 or 21% O2. d, e qRT-PCR analysis of stemness genes (ALDH1, CD133, OCT4, SOX2 and NANOG) (d) and lineage-specific genes (E-cadherin, Cytokeratin8, α-SMA, Vimentin and N-cadherin) (e) in ECSCisk under different conditions, as shown in the panels. f The number of ECSCisk colonies was calculated after transfection with a HIF siRNA. g The number of ECSCisk colonies was calculated after transfection with a HIF shRNA. h, i Confocal images of SOX2 and NANOG in ECSCisk subjected to various treatments. j SOX2, NANOG and E-cadherin protein levels were detected in ECSCisk transfected with control and HIF siRNAs. k FACS analysis was used to determine the percentages of CD133-positive ECSCisk under hypoxic or normoxic conditions. Scale bar = 25 μm. *P < 0.05, **/##P < 0.01, and ***/### P < 0.001.

The effect of ALKBH5 on SOX2 expression and ECSC stemness

As mRNA methylation and stability regulate the expression of pluripotency factors, we investigated the levels of both methylases (METTL3/METTL14) and demethylases (FTO/ALKBH5) in ECSCs; these factors sustain the mRNA methylation and stability of pluripotency factors. In ECSCisk cells, ALKBH5 clearly increased from day 1 to day 8 during the culture, while there were no discernible changes in METTL14, while METTL3 and FTO were at low levels (Fig. 6a). qPCR analysis showed that ALKBH5 was obviously upregulated (nearly 4-fold) after 5 days, implying that ALKBH5 was the main demethylase involved in mRNA modification and stemness maintenance of pluripotency factors in ECSCs. In addition, during isolation and expansion of ECSCisk, both the mRNA and protein levels of ALKBH5 were markedly increased, which was consistent with HIF-1α and HIF-2α expression (Fig. 6b). The immunoblotting findings revealed that the ALKBH5 protein level was increased by HIF-1α or HIF-2α overexpression (Fig. 6c), while HIF knockdown decreased both the mRNA and protein levels of ALKBH5 (Fig. 6d, e). Additionally, knockdown of HIF-1α or HIF-2α significantly reduced the protein level of ALKBH5, which was reversed by ALKBH5 overexpression (Fig. 6f). ALKBH5 upregulation promoted SOX2 immunofluorescence staining regardless of HIF overexpression, which was consistent with the change in stemness morphology and sphere numbers of ECSCs, while ALKBH5 knockdown decreased SOX2 levels and stemness regardless of whether CoCl2 or KC7F2 were added (Fig. 6g, h). Moreover, as a potential mediator of ALKBH5, HIFs were found to be important for ECSCisk in maintaining a stem-like state, which was observed by the fact that inhibition of HIFs significantly repressed SOX2 expression and the formation of ECSC spheres (Fig. 6g, h). Interestingly, compared to normoxic conditions, hypoxia promoted greater maintenance of SOX2 expression after ALKBH5, HIF-1α or HIF-2α inhibition (Fig. 6i), implying that hypoxia-induced ALKBH5 mediated the expression of SOX2. Based on these results, we presume that hypoxia induced ALKBH5 expression in a HIF-dependent manner in ECSCs.

Fig. 6. Knockdown of ALKBH5 decreases the stem-like state of ECSCs.

Fig. 6

Open in a new tab

a, b qPCR (a) and immunoblotting (b) analysis of ALKBH5 expression in ECSCisk that were not passaged on days 1, 3, 5 and 8. The medium was changed every day. c, d After HIF overexpression or knockdown, the protein (c) and mRNA (d) levels of ALKBH5 were analysed. e ALKBH5 and HIF protein expression after ALKBH5, HIF-1α, or HIF-2α inhibition. f HIF-1α, HIF-2α, and ALKBH5 protein levels were detected in ECSCisk in different co-transfection groups. g Images show the morphology, and confocal images reveal SOX2 in cells treated with the indicated siRNA or shRNA, supplemented with CoCl2 (100 µM) or KC7F2 (100 µM), or transfected with vector that overexpressed ALKBH5 (scale bar = 25 μm). h ECSCs under different treatments as shown were exposed to 21 or 2% O2, and the number of spheres was determined. i Immunoblotting results for HIF-1α, HIF-2α, ALKBH5, and SOX2 in ECSCisk with ALKBH5, HIF-1α, or HIF-2α inhibition. Mean ± SEM (N = 3). **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001; #P < 0.05, and ###P < 0.001.

Hypoxia induces an ECSC stem-like state by demethylation of SOX2 mRNA

Here, we found that the hypoxia-induced demethylase ALKBH5 promoted SOX2 expression and the stem-like state of ECSCs. To further reveal the mechanisms of ALKBH5 and SOX2 in the modification of ECSCs, the m6A levels in total RNA were measured. With an m6A RNA methylation quantification kit, a significant decrease in m6A levels was observed under hypoxic conditions in control and ALKBH5 inhibited ECSCisk, while no obvious changes in HIF-1α or HIF-2α knockdown ECSCisk were observed (Fig. 7a, b). Then, an RNA-binding protein immunoprecipitation (RIP) assay was performed to further assess whether ALKBH5 affected levels of m6A RNA modification. The data in Fig. 7c show that hypoxia led to decreased m6A modification of SOX2 mRNA in ECSCisk, regardless of whether they were treated with CoCl2; the decrease was not seen when ECSCisk were treated with KC7F2 (Fig. 7c). In contrast, total SOX2 m6A levels significantly increased in ECSCisk under hypoxic conditions with CoCl2 or KC7F2 treatment (Fig. 7d). Interestingly, the m6A levels of SOX2 mRNA were elevated by ALKBH5 inhibition under hypoxic or normoxic conditions (Fig. 7e), which was opposite of the trend observed for total SOX2 RNA (Fig. 7f). Subsequently, the m6A SOX2 mRNA and the total SOX2 mRNA in HIF-knockdown ECSCisk were analysed, and the RIP results showed that ALKBH5 overexpression reversed the increase in m6A levels in SOX2 RNA caused by HIF knockdown under conditions with 2 or 21% O2 (Fig. 7g), while there was no significant change in total SOX2 RNA in HIF-knockdown ECSCisk exposed to 2% O2 (Fig. 7h). These findings indicated that in hypoxic conditions, SOX2 mRNA was subject to HIF- and ALKBH5-dependent m6A demethylation.

Fig. 7. Hypoxia induces an ECSC phenotype via demethylation of SOX2 mRNA.

Fig. 7

Open in a new tab

a, b Total m6A levels in ECSCisk after knockdown of HIFs or ALKBH5 were determined with an m6A RNA Methylation Quantification Kit. c RNA protein immunoprecipitation assays detected the level of m6A SOX2 mRNA in ECSCisk under normal or hypoxic conditions for 48 h treated with CoCl2 (100 µM) or KC7F2 (100 µM), respectively. d SOX2 mRNA levels in ECSCisk treated with CoCl2 (100 µM) or KC7F2 (100 µM) were determined by qPCR. e RNA protein immunoprecipitation assay detected the level of m6A SOX2 mRNA in ALKBH5 knockdown ECSCisk subjected to 21 or 2% O2 for 48 h. f SOX2 mRNA levels in shALK ECSCisk were measured by qPCR. g Determination of the level of m6A SOX2 mRNA in HIF knockdown ECSCisk with or without ALKBH5 overexpression that were also subjected to 21 or 2% O2 for 48 h. h qPCR analysis of SOX2 mRNA in Ctrl and shHIF ECSCisk under normoxic or hypoxic conditions for 48 h. Mean ± SEM (N = 3). **/##P < 0.01, and ***/###P < 0.001.

In conclusion, with isolated ECSCs, we found that hypoxia promotes the sustained stem-like state and that HIF-1α and HIF-2α activate the expression of ALKBH5, thereby increasing SOX2 levels by decreasing m6A levels through the demethylation of SOX2 mRNA. Additionally, ALKBH5 knockdown inhibited SOX2 expression and ECSC stemness, supporting the idea that HIF-dependent ALKBH5 expression regulates m6A demethylation in total cellular RNA from ECSCs, thus promoting the expression of SOX2 and the ECSC phenotype (Fig. 8).

Fig. 8. Graphical abstract of HIF-dependent demethylation of SOX2 mRNA in ECSCs.

Fig. 8

Open in a new tab

In ECSCs, HIF-1α and HIF-2α activate the expression of ALKBH5 under hypoxic conditions, facilitating SOX2 expression via demethylation of SOX2 mRNA. However, knockdown of HIF-1α and HIF-2α inhibits ALKBH5 and prevents the stem-like state of ECSCs, which is reversed by exposure to hypoxia or ALKBH5 overexpression. Blocking HIFs with KC7F2 inhibits the HIF/ALKBH5/SOX2 axis, which reduces the stemness of ECSCs, while activating HIFs with CoCl2 maintains an ECSC stem-like state. Collectively, hypoxia promotes the expression of the demethylase ALKBH5 and decreases m6A SOX2 by inducing demethylation of SOX2 mRNA, thus promoting the expression of SOX2 and the stemness of ECSCs.

Discussion

Our work resulted in establishing a method for isolating ECSCs from EC cell lines and primary human samples. It is quite remarkable that ECSCs undergo differentiation in vitro, and the maintenance of the ECSC phenotype relies on supplementation with many growth factors. Subsequent studies identified that hypoxia is the key extracellular stimulant in the TME that is required for the sustained phenotype and stem-like state of ECSCs. ECSC stemness can also be maintained via activation of the transcription factor SOX2. In addition, our findings demonstrate that m6A, the mRNA methylation modification mediated by methylases and demethylases, affects the maintenance of the ECSC state. This study uncovers a pivotal function of the demethylase ALKBH5 and provides valuable insights into the various roles of SOX2 m6A methylation in ECSCs. Thus, it is clear that HIF-dependent ALKBH5 expression influences ECSC expansion and stemness in hypoxic TMEs.

First, the ECSC isolation and cultivation method from previous studies that identified human mammary stems/progenitor cells was improved. The initial isolation methods have been developed to isolate different types of cancer stem cells from tissues, such as human breast cancer33, ovarian cancer34, choriocarcinoma35, head and neck squamous-cell carcinoma tumours36, colorectal cancer37, liver cancer38, and cervical cancer39. Some of the methods used for the isolation and identification of CSCs include primary extraction40,41, fluorescence activation42, magnetic activated cell sorting43,44, and side population selection45. Furthermore, serum-free suspension cultivation supplemented with growth factors is used to isolate CSCs46,47 from ovarian cancer48, glioma stem cells49, and cervical cancer50.

Second, our study identified that the ECSC phenotype and pluripotency are dramatically upregulated by hypoxia, which contributes to the characteristic stabilisation of HIFs in ECSCs. In various cancers, HIFs have been reported to enhance the CSC phenotype;51–54 on the other hand, hypoxia or HIFs enhance the dedifferentiation of CSCs55. Conversely, HIF-1α also promotes the differentiation of human or mouse embryonic stem cells (ESCs) into cardiac cells56,57. Moreover, hypoxia prevents vascular lineage differentiation through HIF1-mediated Oct4 suppression58. Our previous study demonstrated that hypoxia promotes the self-renewal of embryonic stem cells by activating HIF-1α and subsequently blocking VEGF secretion59. In addition, HIFs mediate ALKBH5 demethylation of NANOG mRNA and promote a BCSC phenotype17.

Third, our data demonstrated that the core stem gene SOX2 is the main target of HIF-dependent demethylase ALKBH5, which is involved in demethylation of downstream targets and further recruitment to m6A-modified sites. Our work in ECSCs revealed the relationship between HIFs and SOX2, which has been reported to be correlated with lymph node infiltration in EC60. In gastric cancer, SOX2 enhances HIF-1α promoter activity to regulate glucose metabolism61. Previous work on the crucial role of SOX2 in breast cancer cell migration showed that SOX2 upregulation in hypoxic conditions facilitated NEDD9 transcription and subsequent activation of HIF-1α expression62. This evidence extends our knowledge with regard to the diverse roles of SOX2 and HIFs in cancers.

In conclusion, our work improves the methods for isolation and cultivation of ECSCs from EC cell lines and human samples, characterising the stemness properties and facilitating xenograft tumour formation of ECSCs. We also uncovered a critical function of hypoxia and m6A methylation of SOX2 in EC. Activation of HIF signalling with CoCl2 or 2% O2 is capable of enhancing SOX2 transcription and maintaining ECSC behaviour in the ground state of pluripotency. Furthermore, HIF-dependent ALKBH5 expression increases in hypoxic TMEs, resulting in the demethylation of SOX2 mRNA and the maintenance of the ECSC phenotype; these data indicate that ECSCs maintain their stemness by activating the HIF/ALKBH5/SOX2 axis under hypoxic conditions. In the future, more delineation of the molecular mechanisms that regulate EC initiation and ECSC stemness is needed to better understand EC early development.

Materials and methods

Patients and tissue samples

EC specimens (N = 28) were collected from patients who underwent surgery or biopsy procedures at the Department of Gynecology of Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital affiliated with Tongji University School of Medicine from April 2016 to December 2017. Patients who were pregnant, had known immunosuppressive diseases or were receiving immunosuppressive therapy, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or other related antitumor therapies were excluded from the study. The patients’ information used are shown in Supplementary Table S1. The histology of all the specimens was confirmed by two independent pathologists. This study was approved by the Human Investigation Ethical Committee of Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, in accordance with the ethical standards as described in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Written informed consent was obtained from each participant after detailed explanations regarding the study objectives and procedures were provided.

Cell culture

ISK, RL95-2, HEC-1A cell lines, and primary EC cells were cultured in DMEM/F12 medium (11960–044, Gibco, Carlsbad, CA, USA) supplemented with 10% FBS (HyClone) and 1% penicillin/streptomycin (15140–122, Gibco), while ECC-1 cells were cultured in RPMI-1640 medium (22400–089, Gibco) containing 10% FBS and 1% penicillin/streptomycin. Short tandem repeat (STR) analysis was performed in all cell lines. ECSCs were grown in DMEM/F12 media containing 20 ng/mL EGF, 10 ng/mL FGF, 20 ng/mL insulin, 0.4% BSA, and 1% penicillin/streptomycin. Under normoxic conditions, cells were cultured in an incubator with 5% CO2 and 95% air (21% O2). Under hypoxic conditions, cells were seeded in a modular incubator chamber (Billups-Rothenberg) and flushed for 2 min at 2 psi with a gas mixture containing 2% O2, 5% CO2 and 94% N263. During culture, ECSCs were treated with CoCl2 (7646–79–9, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) or KC7F2 (HY-18777, MedChemExpress, Monmouth Junction, NJ, USA) as noted in the experiments.

Flow cytometry

ECSCs were isolated from the tumour sample, ISK, ECC-1, RL95-2, and HEC-1A cells. After 3 days of culture, primary spheres formed, and then the cell spheres were harvested and dissociated into single cells. Red blood cells were removed using red blood cell ACK lysis buffer (C3702, Beyotime). ECSCs blocked with 5% BSA in PBS before being suspended in a solution of 2% FBS in PBS, and then they were labelled with CD133 and ALDH1 antibodies. Intracellular staining was performed according to the instructions. The following antibodies were used: ALDH1A1 (#36671, 1:100, CST, Danvers, MA, USA), anti-rabbit IgG (H + L) (Alexa Fluor® 488 Conjugate) (#4412, 1:100, CST), CD133 (#60577, 1:50, CST), and anti-mouse IgG (H + L) (Alexa Fluor® 555 Conjugate) (#52286, 1:100, CST). Subsequent analysis was performed on a FACSCalibur cell analyser (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA) or a FACS AriaTM II cell sorter (BD) according to the manufacturers’ standard operating procedures.

Quantitative reverse transcription PC (qRT-PCR)

Total RNA was extracted using TRIzol® RNA Isolation Reagents (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Using SYBR green master mix (Takara, Dalian, Liaoning, PRC), mRNA expression analysis was detected on an ABI Prism 700 thermal cycler (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). All primers used are shown in Supplementary Table S2. The PCRs were performed in triplicate with at least three independent experiments.

Western blot assay

Total cell lysates were collected in modified RIPA lysis buffer. Primary antibodies were used as follows: HIF-1α (ab6489, 1:1000, Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA), HIF-2α (ab207607, 1:1000, Abcam), ALKBH5 (ab195377, 1:1000, Abcam), SOX2 (ab97959, 1:1000, Abcam), NANOG (ab109250, 1:1000, Abcam), ALDH1 (#36671, 1:1000, CST), E-cadherin (sc-21791, 1:1000, Santa Cruz), GAPDH (ab9485, 1:5000, Abcam) and ACTIN (AC026 1:5000, Abcam). HRP-conjugated anti-rabbit and anti-mouse antibodies were used, and chemiluminescent signals were detected with ECL Plus (Millipore).

Transduction

All siRNA products targeting HIF-1α, HIF-2α and ALKBH5 were purchased from RiboBio (Guangzhou, PRC). For HIF knockdown, lentiviral vector FG12 (Addgene, Watertown, MA, USA) and packaging plasmids pRSV/REV, pMDLG/pRRE and pHCMVG were used. Recombinant lentiviruses that expressed shRNAs against coding regions of HIFs were produced in HEK-293T cells.

Measurement of total m6A and m6A + SOX2 mRNA levels

Total RNA was extracted, and then m6A levels were determined. Using 200 μg aliquots of total RNA, an m6A RNA Methylation Quantification Kit (ab185912; Abcam) and an RNA-Binding Protein Immunoprecipitation Kit (17–700; Millipore, Burlington, MA, USA) were used according to the manufacturer’s instructions. To measure m6A + SOX2 mRNA levels, m6A immunoprecipitation was performed as described before64. A 1 μg aliquot of an m6A antibody was conjugated to a protein A-agarose slurry (Millipore) overnight at 4 °C. A 100 μg aliquot of total RNA was incubated with the antibody in immunoprecipitation buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, 750 mM NaCl, and 0.5% Igepal CA-630) supplemented with RNase inhibitor for 3 h at 4 °C. RNA was eluted from the beads by incubation in 300 μL of elution buffer (5 mM Tris-HCl, 1 mM EDTA, and 0.05% SDS) with 4.2 μL of proteinase K for 1.5 h at 50 °C, and m6A + RNA was purified by phenol/chloroform extraction before being analysed by qPCR.

Sphere assay

Cells were digested at 37 °C for 30 min to prepare single-cell suspensions, and then the cells were seeded in 6-well plates at a density of 5000 cells per well. After 3 days, the cells were photographed with an Olympus TH4-100 microscope, and primary and secondary spheres were counted.

Mouse xenograft assays

Protocols were approved by the Animal Care and Ethics Review Committee and were in accordance with the Tongji University Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. A method of randomisation was used to determine the experimental groups. In total, 78 female BALB/c nu/nu mice (4–6-week-old) were selected at random and were divided into different groups. A total of 5 × 106 ISK cells or 1 × 104 ECSCisk were suspended in 100 μL of PBS and then were injected into the mice. After 2 weeks, the presence of tumours was examined. ISK cells (5 × 106, 5 × 105, 5 × 104, 1 × 104, or 1 × 103) and ECSCisk (1 × 104, 1 × 103, 1 × 102, 10, or 1) were injected and analysed for their abilities to form xenograft tumours. After 4 weeks, subsequent experiments were performed.

Statistics

Values are reported as the mean ± SEM. P-values were calculated by Student’s t-test. All graphs are plotted with GraphPad Prism 5 software.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information (744.8KB, docx)

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81802960 to G.C., No. 81601247 to B.L., No. 81902874 to S.Y., No. 81672574 and No. 81972438 to X.W.), Shanghai Clinical Medicine Field Project of Science and Technology Innovation Action Programme (No. 17411951600 to X.W.) and Shanghai Municipal Medical and Health Discipline Construction Projects (No. 2017ZZ02015 to X.W.).

Author contributions

G.C., S.Y., and X.W. designed the research. G.C. and Y.G. performed all the experiments. G.C., B.L., S.Y., and K.W. contributed the reagents. G.C., Y.G., and M.W. performed the statistical analysis. G.C. and B.L. wrote the paper. K.W. and X.W. reviewed the paper.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

These authors contributed equally: Guofang Chen, Binya Liu

Contributor Information

Guofang Chen, Email: chenguofang@tongji.edu.cn.

Kai Wang, Email: kaiwangcn@yahoo.com.

Xiaoping Wan, Email: wanxiaoping@tongji.edu.cn.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information accompanies this paper at (10.1038/s41389-020-00265-z).

References

  • 1.Ferlay J, et al. Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008. Int. J. Cancer. 2010;127:2893–2917. doi: 10.1002/ijc.25516. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Morice P, Leary A, Creutzberg C, Abu-Rustum N, Darai E. Endometrial cancer. Lancet. 2016;387:1094–108. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00130-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2020. Cancer J. Clin. 2020;70:7–30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21590. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Ferlay J, et al. Cancer incidence and mortality patterns in Europe: Estimates for 40 countries and 25 major cancers in 2018. Eur. J. Cancer. 2018;103:356–387. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2018.07.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.McAlpine JN, Temkin SM, Mackay HJ. Endometrial cancer: Not your grandmother’s cancer. Cancer. 2016;122:2787–98. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30094. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Giannone G, et al. Endometrial cancer stem cells: role, characterization and therapeutic implications. Cancers. 2019;11:1820. doi: 10.3390/cancers11111820. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Jaggupilli A, Elkord E. Significance of CD44 and CD24 as cancer stem cell markers: an enduring ambiguity. Clin. Dev. Immunol. 2012;2012:708036. doi: 10.1155/2012/708036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Al-Hajj M, Wicha MS, Benito-Hernandez A, Morrison SJ, Clarke MF. Prospective identification of tumorigenic breast cancer cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2003;100:3983–3988. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0530291100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Lee SY, et al. Induction of metastasis, cancer stem cell phenotype, and oncogenic metabolism in cancer cells by ionizing radiation. Mol. Cancer. 2017;16:10. doi: 10.1186/s12943-016-0577-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Bertolini G, et al. Highly tumorigenic lung cancer CD133+ cells display stem-like features and are spared by cisplatin treatment. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2009;106:16281–16286. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0905653106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Li C, et al. Identification of pancreatic cancer stem cells. Cancer Res. 2007;67:1030–1037. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-2030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Jiang F, et al. Aldehyde dehydrogenase 1 is a tumor stem cell-associated marker in lung cancer. Mol. Cancer Res. 2009;7:330–338. doi: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-08-0393. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Najafi M, et al. Hypoxia in solid tumors: a key promoter of cancer stem cell (CSC) resistance. J. Cancer Res. Clin. Oncol. 2020;146:19–31. doi: 10.1007/s00432-019-03080-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Keith B, Simon MC. Hypoxia-inducible factors, stem cells, and cancer. Cell. 2007;129:465–472. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.04.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Semenza GL. Hypoxia-inducible factors: coupling glucose metabolism and redox regulation with induction of the breast cancer stem cell phenotype. EMBO J. 2017;36:252–259. doi: 10.15252/embj.201695204. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Brooks DL, et al. ITGA6 is directly regulated by hypoxia-inducible factors and enriches for cancer stem cell activity and invasion in metastatic breast cancer models. Mol. Cancer. 2016;15:26. doi: 10.1186/s12943-016-0510-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Zhang C, et al. Hypoxia induces the breast cancer stem cell phenotype by HIF-dependent and ALKBH5-mediated m(6)A-demethylation of NANOG mRNA. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2016;113:E2047–E2056. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1602883113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Schwab LP, et al. Hypoxia-inducible factor 1alpha promotes primary tumor growth and tumor-initiating cell activity in breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. 2012;14:R6. doi: 10.1186/bcr3087. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Xu L, et al. Hypoxia-induced secretion of IL-10 from adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cell promotes growth and cancer stem cell properties of Burkitt lymphoma. Tumour Biol. 2016;37:7835–42. doi: 10.1007/s13277-015-4664-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Colwell N, et al. Hypoxia in the glioblastoma microenvironment: shaping the phenotype of cancer stem-like cells. Neuro-Oncology. 2017;19:887–896. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/now258. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Kaneko S, et al. Suppressive effect of delta-tocotrienol on hypoxia adaptation of prostate cancer stem-like cells. Anticancer Res. 2018;38:1391–1399. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.12362. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Wang X, et al. HIF-2-dependent expression of stem cell factor promotes metastasis in hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Lett. 2017;393:113–124. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2017.01.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Lee JH, et al. ELK3 promotes the migration and invasion of liver cancer stem cells by targeting HIF-1alpha. Oncol. Rep. 2017;37:813–822. doi: 10.3892/or.2016.5293. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Fuchs Q, et al. Hypoxia inducible factors’ signaling in pediatric high-grade gliomas: role, modelization and innovative targeted approaches. Cancers. 2020;12:979. doi: 10.3390/cancers12040979. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Boumahdi S, et al. SOX2 controls tumour initiation and cancer stem-cell functions in squamous-cell carcinoma. Nature. 2014;511:246–250. doi: 10.1038/nature13305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Mathieu J, et al. HIF induces human embryonic stem cell markers in cancer cells. Cancer Res. 2011;71:4640–4652. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-3320. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Bae KM, Dai Y, Vieweg J, Siemann DW. Hypoxia regulates SOX2 expression to promote prostate cancer cell invasion and sphere formation. Am. J. Cancer Res. 2016;6:1078–88. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Dominissini D, et al. Topology of the human and mouse m6A RNA methylomes revealed by m6A-seq. Nature. 2012;485:201–206. doi: 10.1038/nature11112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Batista PJ, et al. m(6)A RNA modification controls cell fate transition in mammalian embryonic stem cells. Cell Stem Cell. 2014;15:707–719. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2014.09.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Cui Q, et al. m(6)A RNA methylation regulates the self-renewal and tumorigenesis of glioblastoma stem cells. Cell Rep. 2017;18:2622–2634. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.02.059. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Lee M, Kim B, Kim VN. Emerging roles of RNA modification: m(6)A and U-tail. Cell. 2014;158:980–987. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.08.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Thalhammer A, et al. Human AlkB homologue 5 is a nuclear 2-oxoglutarate dependent oxygenase and a direct target of hypoxia-inducible factor 1alpha (HIF-1alpha) PLoS ONE. 2011;6:e16210. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0016210. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Afzali M, Vatankhah M, Ostad SN. Investigation of simvastatin-induced apoptosis and cell cycle arrest in cancer stem cells of MCF-7. J. Cancer Res. Ther. 2016;12:725–730. doi: 10.4103/0973-1482.146127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Ruan Z, Liu J, Kuang Y. Isolation and characterization of side population cells from the human ovarian cancer cell line SK-OV-3. Exp. Ther. Med. 2015;10:2071–2078. doi: 10.3892/etm.2015.2836. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Cai J, et al. Isolation, culture and identification of choriocarcinoma stem-like cells from the human choriocarcinoma cell-line JEG-3. Cell. Physiol. Biochem. 2016;39:1421–1432. doi: 10.1159/000447845. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Kim HS, Pearson AT, Nor JE. Isolation and characterization of cancer stem cells from primary head and neck squamous cell carcinoma tumors. Methods Mol. Biol. 2016;1395:241–249. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-3347-1_14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Manhas J, et al. Characterization of cancer stem cells from different grades of human colorectal cancer. Tumour Biol. 2016;37:14069–14081. doi: 10.1007/s13277-016-5232-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Zhu CP, et al. Research progress and prospects of markers for liver cancer stem cells. World J. Gastroenterol. 2015;21:12190–12196. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i42.12190. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Zhang SL, et al. Isolation and characterization of cancer stem cells from cervical cancer HeLa cells. Cytotechnology. 2012;64:477–484. doi: 10.1007/s10616-012-9436-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Chen AX, et al. Germline genetic variants disturbing the Let-7/LIN28 double-negative feedback loop alter breast cancer susceptibility. PLoS Genet. 2011;7:e1002259. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002259. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Takahashi K, Yamanaka S. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic and adult fibroblast cultures by defined factors. Cell. 2006;126:663–76. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.07.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Chen W, et al. Conversion of peripheral CD4+CD25- naive T cells to CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells by TGF-beta induction of transcription factor Foxp3. The. J. Exp. Med. 2003;198:1875–1886. doi: 10.1084/jem.20030152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Dou J, et al. Decreasing lncRNA HOTAIR expression inhibits human colorectal cancer stem cells. Am. J. Transl. Res. 2016;8:98–108. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Kalomoiris S, Cicchetto AC, Lakatos K, Nolta JA, Fierro FA. Fibroblast growth factor 2 regulates high mobility group A2 expression in human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells. J. Cell. Biochem. 2016;117:2128–37. doi: 10.1002/jcb.25519. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Inoue H, et al. Cooperation of Sox4 with beta-catenin/p300 complex in transcriptional regulation of the Slug gene during divergent sarcomatous differentiation in uterine carcinosarcoma. BMC Cancer. 2016;16:53. doi: 10.1186/s12885-016-2090-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Lee J, et al. Tumor stem cells derived from glioblastomas cultured in bFGF and EGF more closely mirror the phenotype and genotype of primary tumors than do serum-cultured cell lines. Cancer Cell. 2006;9:391–403. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2006.03.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Reynolds BA, Weiss S. Generation of neurons and astrocytes from isolated cells of the adult mammalian central-nervous-system. Science. 1992;255:1707–10. doi: 10.1126/science.1553558. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Luo X, Dong Z, Chen Y, Yang L, Lai D. Enrichment of ovarian cancer stem-like cells is associated with epithelial to mesenchymal transition through an miRNA-activated AKT pathway. Cell Proliferat. 2013;46:436–46. doi: 10.1111/cpr.12038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Zheng J, et al. CRNDE affects the malignant biological characteristics of human glioma stem cells by negatively regulating miR-186. Oncotarget. 2015;6:25339–25355. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.4509. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Tyagi A, et al. Cervical cancer stem cells selectively overexpress HPV oncoprotein E6 that controls stemness and self-renewal through upregulation of HES1. Clin. Cancer Res. 2016;22:4170–4184. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-2574. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Cao L, et al. Osteopontin promotes a cancer stem cell-like phenotype in hepatocellular carcinoma cells via an integrin-NF-kappaB-HIF-1alpha pathway. Oncotarget. 2015;6:6627–6640. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.3113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Brooks DL, Seagroves TN. Fluorescence-activated cell sorting of murine mammary cancer stem-like cell subpopulations with HIF activity. Methods Mol. Biol. 2018;1742:247–63. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-7665-2_22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Balamurugan K, et al. C/EBPdelta links IL-6 and HIF-1 signaling to promote breast cancer stem cell-associated phenotypes. Oncogene. 2019;38:3765–3780. doi: 10.1038/s41388-018-0516-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Bai J, et al. HIF-2alpha regulates CD44 to promote cancer stem cell activation in triple-negative breast cancer via PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling. World J. Stem Cell. 2020;12:87–99. doi: 10.4252/wjsc.v12.i1.87. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Lee G, et al. Dedifferentiation of glioma cells to glioma stem-like cells by therapeutic stress-induced HIF Signaling in the recurrent GBM model. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2016;15:3064–3076. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-15-0675. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Ng KM, et al. Exogenous expression of HIF-1 alpha promotes cardiac differentiation of embryonic stem cells. J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol. 2010;48:1129–1137. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2010.01.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Ateghang B, Wartenberg M, Gassmann M, Sauer H. Regulation of cardiotrophin-1 expression in mouse embryonic stem cells by HIF-1alpha and intracellular reactive oxygen species. J. Cell Sci. 2006;119:1043–52. doi: 10.1242/jcs.02798. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Lee SW, et al. Hypoxic priming of mESCs accelerates vascular-lineage differentiation through HIF1-mediated inverse regulation of Oct4 and VEGF. EMBO Mol. Med. 2012;4:924–938. doi: 10.1002/emmm.201101107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Chen G, et al. Blocking autocrine VEGF signaling by sunitinib, an anti-cancer drug, promotes embryonic stem cell self-renewal and somatic cell reprogramming. Cell Res. 2014;24:1121–1136. doi: 10.1038/cr.2014.112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Lee CJ, et al. Crosstalk between SOX2 and cytokine signaling in endometrial carcinoma. Sci. Rep. 2018;8:17550. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-35592-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Gan L, et al. Extracellular matrix protein 1 promotes cell metastasis and glucose metabolism by inducing integrin beta4/FAK/SOX2/HIF-1alpha signaling pathway in gastric cancer. Oncogene. 2018;37:744–755. doi: 10.1038/onc.2017.363. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Wang Y, et al. SOX2 promotes hypoxia-induced breast cancer cell migration by inducing NEDD9 expression and subsequent activation of Rac1/HIF-1alpha signaling. Cell. Mol. Biol. Lett. 2019;24:55. doi: 10.1186/s11658-019-0180-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Kong FF, et al. Preliminary identification of endometrial cancer stem cells in vitro and in vivo. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2017;490:506–513. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2017.06.070. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Dominissini D, Moshitch-Moshkovitz S, Salmon-Divon M, Amariglio N, Rechavi G. Transcriptome-wide mapping of N(6)-methyladenosine by m(6)A-seq based on immunocapturing and massively parallel sequencing. Nat. Protoc. 2013;8:176–89. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2012.148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Information (744.8KB, docx)

Articles from Oncogenesis are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES