Graphical Abstract
The nitrogenase superfamily comprises homologous enzyme systems that carry out fundamentally important processes, including the reduction of N2 and CO, and the biosynthesis of bacteriochlorophyll and coenzyme F430. This special issue provides a cross-disciplinary overview of the ongoing research in this highly diverse and unique research area of metalloprotein biochemistry.

Keywords: Nitrogen Fixation, Nitrogenase, Bacteriochlorophyll, Coenzyme F430, Double-cubane cluster
One can’t help but wonder if Hellriegel, Wilfarth and Beijerinck expected that their discovery of biological nitrogen fixation in the late 18th century[1–2] would capture the attention of generations of scientists from a wide range of disciplines in the next 140 years to come? The progress in this area, however, was very slow early on due to the lack of appropriate methods and techniques to tackle the questions related to the complex process, which forced many scientist to leave this field and seek topics more amenable to the approaches available at this time. It took only more than half a century until 1942, when Burris provided conclusive evidence that ammonia (NH3) represented the key intermediate formed from the reduction of the atmospheric dinitrogen (N2) in this process,[3] and that NH3 was eventually incorporated into the proteins in the bacterial cells to provide the source of the essential element nitrogen for the entire global food chain.[4] It took another half a century until the intrinsic biochemical and structural beauty of nitrogenase, the complex metalloenzyme underlying the biological nitrogen fixation, truly unfolded.[5–12]
Driven by the realization that the Mo-dependent nitrogenase is a two-component system, and using proper anaerobic techniques to purify its iron (Fe) protein and molybdenum iron (MoFe) protein components, Thorneley and Lowe conducted a series of kinetic experiments of Mo-nitrogenase and postulated the classic mechanistic framework of N2 reduction by this nitrogenase.[5–8] Designated the Lowe-Thorneley model, this mechanistic proposal depicts the kinetics of the chemical transformations that occur on the Fe protein and MoFe protein components during nitrogenase catalysis, and the delivery of proton and electron equivalents to the catalytic MoFe protein component, where electrons and protons accumulate for the reduction of N2 (Figure 1). While this model has been updated over the years by others (most notably, by the team of Seefeldt, Hoffman and Dean[13]), it still represents the essence of how we think nitrogenase achieves its biological function today.
Figure 1.
The Lowe-Thorneley model of the Mo-nitrogenase. En depicts one αβ-dimer of the tetrameric MoFe protein component that has accumulated n electrons, with the resting-state MoFe protein designated as E0. The steps at which NH3 and H2 are released are indicated.
The other astonishing event in nitrogenase research occurred in 1992, when Douglas Rees reported the crystallographic analysis of the catalytic MoFe protein component of the Mo-nitrogenase and provided the first structural depiction of its two unique metallocofactors: the P-cluster ([Fe8S7]) and the active site M-cluster [(R-homocitrate)MoFe7S9] (Figure 2).[10,11] Arguably the most complex metalloclusters found in nature, the P- and M-clusters are biologically important and chemically unprecedented. In particular, the structure of the M-cluster is so unique that it took the nitrogenase community nearly two decades after the first structural depiction of the M-cluster to realize the presence of a carbide (C4−) atom in the center of this cluster, which led to an update of the stoichiometry of the M-cluster as [(R-homocitrate)MoFe7S9C].[14–16] Both the M- and P-clusters have evaded chemical synthesis so far, although topologs of these clusters have been successfully synthesized by Dick Holm and others,[17] which provided crucial insights into the structure-function relationship of these unique metalloclusters.
Figure 2.
Structures of the P-cluster (A) and the M-cluster (B) of the Mo-nitrogenase. Color code of atoms: Fe, orange; S, yellow; O, red; C, gray; Mo; cyan.
Still, the nitrogenase storybook proved to be far from completion with the discovery of the alternative vanadium (V)- and iron (Fe)-only nitrogenases.[18–20] The V- and Fe-only nitrogenases share high degrees of sequence and structural homologies with the Mo-nitrogenase.[21] However, other than the ability to reduce N2 to NH3, the alternative nitrogenases demonstrate the ability to reduce CO and/or CO2 to various hydrocarbons at considerably higher efficiencies than their classic, Mo counterpart.[22–25] While the physiological function of these reactions remain unclear, the observation of the capability of nitrogenase to convert CO to hydrocarbons, such as C3H8 and C4H10, is of significant importance, as it represents the first and the only biological process that mirrors the Fischer–Tropsch reaction[26] that is used for the industrial production of synthetic fuel from CO.
The recent decades witnessed a whole new development of the nitrogenase field as the community started to realize the wide distribution of nitrogenase homologs among bacteria and archaea, include surprising microbial hosts unable to perform biological nitrogen fixation.[27] Recent biochemical and structural studies revealed the involvement of these nitrogenase homologs in the biosynthesis of bacteriochlorophyll and coenzyme F430,[28–31] thereby establishing a nitrogenase superfamily comprising several homologous enzymatic systems in distinct phylogenetic clades (Figure 3).[32] An intriguing and complex class of metalloenzymes, the nitrogenase superfamily provides a whole new avenue for a highly diversified and cross-disciplinary research community.
Figure 3.
Overview of the phylogenetic groups of the nitrogenase superfamily. Shown is a simplified schematic presentation of a phylogenetic tree comprising the Fe protein and MoFe protein homologs found in the available microbial genomes.[32]
The intention of this special issue is to provide a quick glimpse of this newly emerged field, showcasing the breadth of methods applied to the investigations of the individual members of the nitrogenase superfamily while highlighting the intrinsic correlation between the various members of this homologous group of enzymes:
Emphasizing on the genetic and evolutionary aspects of this research area, Steven Mansoorabadi provides an overview of the members of the nitrogenase superfamily,[33] Patricia Dos Santos gives a detailed account of alternative nitrogenases among microbes,[34] and Sanfeng Chen discusses the advances in transferring the prokaryotic nitrogen fixation genes into non-diazotrophic prokaryotic and eukaryotic hosts.[35]
The topic of nitrogenase mechanism is discussed by Ian Dance, who uses computational approaches to probe this intriguing process;[36] whereas Shelley Minteer and Jenny Yang provide the experimental insights into the reactivties of nitrogenase by applying electrochemistry to the reactions catalyzed by the nitrogenase enzyme[37] and its extracted cofactors.[38]
The topic of nitrogenase biosynthesis is discussed by Brian Hales, who transfers the knowledge of nitrogenase assembly to nitrogenase catalysis to further our mechanistic understanding of the nitrogenase enzyme.[39] Yilin Hu demonstrates how a nitrogenase hybrid containing an unnatural M-cluster variant can be used to modulate nitrogenase reactivity and provide insights into the mechanism of this enzyme.[40] Gunhild Layer and Jürgen Moser illustrate what chimeric systems comprising components of different members of this enzyme superfamily can help us gain a better understanding of their mechanistic properties,[41] and Yuichi Fujita reports an unexpected reactivity of an enzyme involved in the biosynthesis of bacteriochlorophyll.[42]
Last but not least, Holger Dobbek further expands our horizon in this research area by reviewing an astounding enzyme family that does not show sequence homology to the nitrogenase enzyme, but contains a double-cubane [Fe8S9] cluster with similar catalytic features to those of the nitrogenase clusters.[43] It seems to be just a matter of time for more unexpected members of the nitrogenase enzyme superfamily to surface, the investigation of which will keep us busy for at least another 140 years.
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank all authors who contributed manuscripts to this special issue. We would also like to thank the funding agencies that support the work in our groups, including the NIH-NIGMS grant GM67626 (to M.W.R. and Y.H.), which funds research related to the assembly of nitrogenase; the Department of Energy grants DOE (BES) DE-SC0016510 (to Y.H. and M.W.R.) and DE-SC0014470 (to M.W.R. and Y.H.), which fund work related to the mechanistic investigation of ammonia and hydrocarbon formation, respectively, by nitrogenase and related variants; and the NSF grants CHE-1904131 (to M.W.R. and Y.H.) and CHE-1651398 (to Y.H.), which fund work related to CO and CO2 activation by nitrogenase and its Fe protein component, respectively.
Biography

Markus W. Ribbe received a B.S. degree in Biology, a M.S. degree in Microbiology, and a Ph.D. degree in Microbiology from the University of Bayreuth, Germany. He was a postdoctoral fellow at the University of California, Irvine, and is now Chancellor’s Professor at the same institute. During the past 25 years, he has been focusing on the mechanistic investigation of nitrogenase catalysis and biosynthesis using a combination of genetic, biochemical, spectroscopic and structural approaches.

Yilin Hu received a B.S. degree in Genetics from Fudan University, China, and a Ph.D. degree in Biochemistry from Loma Linda University, USA. She was a postdoctoral fellow at the University of California, Irvine, and is currently Associate Professor at the same institute. During the past 17 years, she has been focusing on the structural-functional studies of nitrogenase and homologous systems using genetic, biochemical, spectroscopic and structural approaches.
Footnotes
This editorial is part of a special Issue on nitrogenase and homologous systems.
References
- [1].Hellriegel H, Wilfarth H, Beilageheft zu der Zeitschrift des Vereins f. d. Rübenzuckerindustrie d. D. R 1888, 1–234. [Google Scholar]
- [2]a).Beijerinck MW, Bot. Ztg 1888, 46, 725–735;Beijerinck MW, Bot. Ztg 1888, 46, 741–750;Beijerinck MW, Bot. Ztg 1888, 46, 757–771;Beijerinck MW, Bot. Ztg 1888, 46, 781–790;Beijerinck MW, Bot. Ztg 1888, 46, 797–804.
- [3].Burris H, J. Biol. Chem 1942, 143, 509–517. [Google Scholar]
- [4].Burgess BK, Lowe DJ, Chem. Rev 1996, 96, 2983–3012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [5].Lowe DJ, Thorneley RNF, Biochem. J 1984, 224, 877–886. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [6].Lowe DJ, Thorneley RNF, Biochem. J 1984, 224, 895–901. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [7].Thorneley RNF, Lowe DJ, Biochem. J 1984, 224, 887–894. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [8].Thorneley RNF, Lowe DJ, Biochem. J 1984, 224, 903–909. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [9].Kim J, Rees DC, Nature 1992, 360, 553–560. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [10].Kim J, Rees DC, Science 1992, 257, 1677–1682. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [11].Georgiadis MM, Komiya H, Chakrabarti P, Woo D, Kornuc JJ, Rees DC, Science 1992, 257, 1653–1659. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [12].Schindelin H, Kisker C, Schlessman JL, Howard JB, Rees DC, Nature 1997, 387, 370–376. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [13].Hoffman BM, Lukoyanov D, Yang Z-Y, Dean DR, Seefeldt LC, Chem. Rev 2014, 114, 4041–4062. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [14].Lancaster KM, Roemelt M, Ettenhuber P, Hu Y, Ribbe MW, Neese F, Bergmann U, DeBeer S, Science 2011, 334, 974–977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [15].Spatzal T, Aksoyoglu M, Zhang L, Andrade SL, Schleicher E, Weber S, Rees DC, Einsle O, Science 2011, 334, 940. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [16].Wiig JA, Hu Y, Lee CC, Ribbe MW, Science 2012, 337, 1672–1675. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [17].Holm RH, Lo W, Chem. Rev 2016, 116, 13685–13713. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [18].Hales BJ, Case EE, Morningstar JE, Dzeda MF, Mauterer LA, Biochemistry 1986, 25, 7251725–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [19].Eady RR, Robson RL, Richardson TH, Miller RW, Hawkins M M, Biochem. J 1987, 244, 197–207 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [20].Chisnell JR, Premakumar R, Bishop PE, Bacteriol J. 1988, 170, 27–33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [21].Sippel D, Einsle O O, Nat. Chem. Biol 2017, 13, 956–960. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [22].Lee CC, Hu Y, Ribbe MW, Science 2010, 329, 642. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [23].Hu Y, Lee CC, Ribbe MW, Science 2011, 333, 753–755. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [24].Zheng Y, Harris DF, Yu Z, Fu Y, Poudel S, Ledbetter RN, Fixen KR, Yang ZY, Boyd ES, Lidstrom ME, Seefeldt LC, Harwood CS, Nat. Microbiol. 2018, 3, 281–286. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [25].Jasniewski AJ, Lee CC, Ribbe MW, Hu Y Y., Chem Rev. 2020, March 4. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00704 Online ahead of print. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [26].Rofer-DePoorter CK, Chem. Rev 1981, 81, 447–474. [Google Scholar]
- [27].Dos Santos PC, Fang Z, Mason SW, Setubal JC, Dixon R, BMC Genomics 2012, 13, 162. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [28].Muraki N, Nomata J, Ebata K, Mizoguchi T, Shiba T, Tamiaki H, Kurisu G, Fujita Y, Nature 2010, 465, 110–114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [29].Bröcker MJ, Schomburg S, Heinz DW, Jahn D, Schubert WD, Moser F, J. Biol. Chem 2010, 285, 27336–27445. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [30].Zheng K, Ngo PD, Owens VL, Yang XP, Mansoorabadi SO, Science 2016, 354, 339–342. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [31].Moore SJ, Sowa ST, Schuchardt C, Deery E, Lawrence AD, Ramos JV, Billig S, Birkemeyer C, Chivers PT, Howard MJ, Rigby SE, Layer G, Warren MJ, Nature 2017, 543, 78–82. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [32].Raymond J, Siefert JL, Staples CR, Blankenship RE, Mol. Biol. Evol 2004, 21, 541–554. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [33].Ghebreamlak SM, Mansoorabadi SO, Chembiochem 2020, March 16. doi: 10.1002/cbic.201900782 Online ahead of print. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [34].Addo MA, Dos Santos PC, Chembiochem 2020, March 22. doi: 10.1002/cbic.202000022 Online ahead of print. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [35].Li Q, Chen S, Chembiochem 2020, February 3. doi: 10.1002/cbic.201900784 Online ahead of print. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [36].Dance I, Chembiochem 2019, December 5. doi: 10.1002/cbic.201900636 Online ahead of print. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [37].Patel J, Cai R, Milton R, Chen H, Minteer SD, Chembiochem 2019, December 18. doi: 10.1002/cbic.201900697 Online ahead of print. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [38].Lydon BR, Lee CC, Tanifuji K, Sickerman NS, Newcomb MP, Hu Y, Ribbe MW, Yang JY, Chembiochem 2019, August 7. doi: 10.1002/cbic.201900425 Online ahead of print. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [39].Rupnik K, Tanifuji K, Rettberg L, Ribbe MW, Hu Y, Hales BJ, Chembiochem 2019, December 27. doi: 10.1002/cbic.201900681 Online ahead of print. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [40].Newcomb MP, Lee CC, Tanifuji K, Jasniewski AJ, Liedtke J, Ribbe MW, Hu Y, Chembiochem 2019, Nov 20. doi: 10.1002/cbic.201900654 Online ahead of print. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [41].Jasper J, Ramos JV, Trncik C, Jahn D, Einsle O, Layer G, Moser J, Chembiochem 2020, Jan 20. doi: 10.1002/cbic.201900759 Online ahead of print. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [42].Yamamoto H, Mizoguchi T, Tsukatani Y, Tamiaki H, Kurisu G, Fujita Y, Chembiochem 2020, March 16. doi: 10.1002/cbic.201900785 Online ahead of print. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [43].Jeoung JH, Martins BM, Dobbek H, Chembiochem 2020, March 18. doi: 10.1002/cbic.202000016 Online ahead of print. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]



