Skip to main content
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2020 Sep 11;15(9):e0235818. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235818

Pneumonia remains a leading public health problem among under-five children in peri-urban areas of north-eastern Ethiopia

Awoke Keleb 1,#, Tadesse Sisay 1, Kassahun Alemu 2, Ayechew Ademas 1, Mistir Lingerew 1, Helmut Kloos 3, Tefera Chane Mekonnen 4, Atimen Derso 1, Metadel Adane 1,*,#
Editor: Ray Borrow5
PMCID: PMC7485761  PMID: 32915807

Abstract

Background

Pneumonia is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality among children under five years of age in developing countries, including Ethiopia. However, data on this serious illness among highly susceptible and vulnerable children living in local peri-urban areas are limited. Establishing the prevalence of pneumonia and identifying the associated factors are important for proper planning and intervention.

Methods

A community-based cross-sectional study was conducted among 560 systematically selected children under the age of five years in peri-urban areas of Dessie City from January through March 2019. Data were collected using a pretested structured questionnaire, physical examination of children and direct observation of housing conditions. Pneumonia was examined using World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines as the presence of the symptoms of fast breathing or indrawn chest with or without fast breathing during the two weeks prior to the study. A principal component analysis was used to construct a household wealth index. Data were analyzed using a binary logistic regression model at 95%CI (confidence interval). The analysis involved estimating the crude odds ratio (COR) using bivariate analysis, and adjusted odds ratio (AOR) using multivariable analysis. From the multivariable analysis, variables at p-value of less than 0.05 were declared statistically significant.

Main findings

The prevalence of pneumonia among children under five was 17.1% (95%CI: 13.9%-19.9%). Of the participating children, 113 (21.0%) had a cough, 92 (17.1%) had fast breathing, 76 (14.1%) had fever, and 40 (7.4%) of the children had chest indrawn. Domestic fuel was the most common source of cooking fuel 383 (71.1%). Majority 445 (82.6%) of children were fully vaccinated and 94 (17.4%) were not fully vaccinated. Most (481, 89.2%) of the children were got exclusive breastfeeding. Slightly more than half (284, 52.7%) of the under-five children had acute malnutrition and 27.1% of the children had a childhood history of ARI. The multivariable analysis showed using domestic fuel as the energy source for cooking (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 3.95, 95%CI: 1.47–10.62), cooking in the living room (AOR = 6.23; 95%CI: 1.80–21.68), overcrowding (AOR = 3.37, 95%CI: 1.56–7.27), child history of acute respiratory infection (ARI) (AOR = 6.12 95%CI: 2.77–13.53), family history of ARI (AOR = 4.69, 95%CI: 1.67–13.12) and acute malnutrition (AOR = 2.43, 95%CI: 1.18–5.04) were significantly associated with childhood pneumonia.

Conclusion

In this study, pneumonia remains a leading public health problem among under five children in the study area and higher than national averages. Domestic fuel as the energy source for cooking, cooking in the living room, overcrowding, child history of ARI, family history of ARI and acute malnutrition were predictors of pneumonia. Community-based interventions focusing on improving housing conditions, reduced use of domestic biofuels, adequate and balanced food intake, including exclusive breastfeeding of infants, and early treatment of ARIs.

Introduction

Pneumonia is a severe form of acute lower respiratory infection that is responsible for high morbidity and mortality rates among children under five; it poses a major threat to public health worldwide [1, 2]. Globally, pneumonia is the leading cause of child mortality, responsible for approximately 6.0% of the 5.9 million deaths in the under-five age group, killing around 900,000 children in 2015. It accounts for the loss of over 2,500 children’s lives every day, or over 100 every hour [3].

Pneumonia is highly prevalent in sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia; 50.0% of total deaths from pneumonia worldwide in 2015 occurred in six countries: India, Nigeria, Pakistan, Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), Ethiopia, and China [4]. More than 490,000 children under five died of pneumonia in 2016 in sub-Saharan Africa [3, 5]. Despite interventions and sustained efforts from a range of stakeholders in Ethiopia, pneumonia is still a leading single cause of under-five morbidity and mortality, constituting 18.0% of all causes of mortality and killing over 40,000 children in this age group in the country every year [4]. Amhara (where Dessie is located) is one of the most affected region, with pneumonia accounting for 8.0% of all acute respiratory infections (ARIs) among children under five; the national prevalence is 7.0% [6].

Previous studies have identified several common factors associated with pneumonia in children under-five, including overcrowding, several other environmental conditions, malnutrition and poverty, absence of ventilation, and indoor air pollution [7, 8]. However, the influence of these factors varies among different populations of children. For example, indoor air pollution tends to be worse in peri-urban communities where biomass fuels are more frequently used in cooking and heating due to lack of access to other forms of energy [9].

Peri-urbanization affects hundreds of millions of children worldwide who are being raised in overcrowded and unhygienic conditions and poor housing structures that characterize many peri-urban areas. Such conditions facilitate the transmission of pneumonia and other diseases, driving up child mortality [10, 11]. Evidence on the prevalence and determinants of pneumonia in children under five in peri-urban areas of Dessie City is scarce. Furthermore, children are more likely to develop pneumonia than other age groups. Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess the prevalence and associated factors of pneumonia among children under five in peri-urban areas of Dessie City Administration in north-eastern Ethiopia.

Methods and materials

Study design, period and setting

A community-based cross-sectional study design was conducted in six peri-urban kebeles of Dessie City Administration from January through March 2019. Dessie is located about 400 km northeast of Ethiopia’s capital city of Addis Ababa in Amhara Regional State. Dessie City Administration has 16 kebeles, 10 urban and 6 peri-urban kebeles (kebele is the smallest administrative unit in Ethiopia, each with around 5,000 people). Based on the national census, Dessie City Administration had a total population of 212,436 in 2014. Of the total, 34,748 (16.4%) lived in peri-urban kebeles [12]. Dessie City is located at an elevation above 2,400 meter above sea level. Most of the total area of the city is mountainous (60%) and 40% is a plateau [13].

The health facilities in Dessie City’s urban kebeles include 1 government referral hospital, 1 government general hospital, 3 private hospitals, 8 health centers, 33 private clinics, 5 wholesale pharmacies, 18 public pharmacies and 33 private pharmacies. The peri-urban kebeles have only 2 rural drug venders and 6 health posts [14].

Source population, and inclusion and exclusion criteria

The source populations for this study consists of mother/caregiver-child of under five years of age living in the six peri-urban kebeles of Dessie City. Children under five with mother/caregiver who were lived in the six peri-urban kebeles of Dessie City during the two weeks prior to data collection were included. However, those under-five children with mother/caregiver who were away during the two weeks prior to the survey but available during the data collection day were excluded since they may acquire pneumonia in that place where they stayed.

Sample size determination and sampling methods

The sample size was determined using the single population proportion formula [15] considering the assumptions of:

n=(za/2)2*p(1p)d2

Zα/2 is the standard normal variable value at (1-α) % confidence level (α is 0.05 with 95%CI [confidence interval], Zα/2 = 1.96), p is an estimate of the prevalence of pneumonia (33.3%), which is taken from a similar study conducted in Wondo Genet Town, southern Ethiopia [16] and d margin of error (4.0%). Adjusting for an anticipated 5.0% non-response rate, the final sample size was determined to be 560.

The 560 study participants were proportionally allocated for the six kebeles based on the number of children under five in each kebele. Systematic random sampling with an interval of 6 was used to select households in each kebele. The first household was selected using the lottery method. For those households with more than one child under five, one child was selected randomly. Households in which study participants were not available at the first visit were revisited once more the same day or the following day. If a participant was still not available, he/she was considered as a non-respondent.

Outcome and explanatory variables

The outcome variable was the presence or absence of pneumonia in a child under five. Explanatory variables were socio-economic and demographic variables, housing and environmental variables, nutritional and immunization variables and pre-existing medical conditions.

Operational definitions

Peri-urban area

Partly urbanized area of population located consolidated urban and rural regions [11, 17].

Pneumonia

Defined based on World Health Organization (WHO) classifications, children with fast breathing or indrawn chest with or without fast breathing during the two weeks prior to the study were classified as having pneumonia, whereas children with cough and colds who did not have fast breathing and had no indrawn chest during the two weeks prior to the study were classified as having no pneumonia [18].

Fast breathing

Defined as 60 or more breaths per minute for children less than 2 months old, 50 breaths or more per minute for those 2–12 months old, and 40 breaths or more per minute for those 12–59 months old [18].

Fever

Defined as elevated axillary body temperature of 37.5°C or above [19].

Family history of Acute Respiratory Infection (ARI)

A household with a history of pneumonia, bronchitis, ear infection, common cold, tonsillitis, or pharyngitis confirmed by a clinician during the 15 days prior to data collection.

Full or incomplete vaccination

Full vaccination includes all children who had obtained BCG (bacillus calmette–guérin vaccine) and OPV0 (oral polio vaccine) at birth, pentavalent 1 (DPT-hepB-Hib [diphtheria, pertussis, tetanus, hepatitis B and haemophilus influenzae type b]), OPV1, and PCV1 at 6 weeks; pentavalent 2, OPV2, PCV2 at 10 weeks; pentavalent 3, PCV3 at 14 weeks; and measles vaccine at 9 months; incomplete vaccination includes those children without up-to-date or only partial vaccination [6, 20].

Overcrowding

A house having an area per person of less than 75 square feet [17].

Data collection, management and quality assurance

A pretest and structured questionnaire used for this study by modifying the British Medical Research Council’s (BMRC) questionnaire for pneumonia [21] after validated in the context of the local culture, language and others. The questionnaire was adopted and was in English version, translated to Amharic (local language), and translated back to English to ensure consistency. A pre-test was conducted using a 5.0% sample size of the total study sample in peri-urban kebeles of Kombolcha Town (near Dessie City) to establish the validity and reliability of the questionnaire. The questionnaire was amended based on the findings of the pre-test.

The data collectors were trained focused on the survey instrument, physical examination, and measuring the mid-/upper-arm circumference. The data collectors were six female public health officers and administered face-to-face interviews with mothers and/or primary caregivers; observation of participants’ housing and environmental conditions and physical examination of the children.

First, mothers/caregivers were asked whether the child under observation had a cough with fast breathing and/or chest indrawn in the two weeks preceding the survey. Second, a physical examination was performed that entailed measuring axillary temperature and measuring respiratory rate using a timer. To confirm results, the respiratory rate count was repeated two to three times for each child and the count without disturbance was taken. Finally, nutritional status was determined by measuring mid-/upper-arm circumference using a standard measuring tape. The measurement was taken twice and the average value to the nearest 0.1cm was recorded. Supervision was performed for data quality control.

The completeness and consistency of the questionnaires was checked daily during data collection. Then, data were entered using EpiData version 3.1 and 10.0% of the questionnaires were randomly re-checked to identify data entry errors. Once the data entry was completed, the data was exported to the Statistical Package of the Social Science (SPSS) version 25.0 for data cleaning and analysis. Basic data quality assurance measures were taken, including data cleaning using browsing of data tables after sorting, graphical exploration of distributions using box plots, histograms, and scatter plots, frequency distributions and cross tabulations, summary statistics and statistical outlier detection using sorting were performed. Descriptive statistics were used for categorical variables and mean ±SD (standard deviations) and/or median (IQR, interquartile range) for continuous variables. Continuous variables were categorized using information from the literature and categorical variables were re-categorized accordingly.

Statistical analysis

A principal component analysis was used to construct a household wealth index (low, medium and high categories) after checking its assumptions for communality value > 0.5, KMO (sampling adequacy) > 0.5, which was 0.757 with p-value <0.001 and complex structure factor (eigenvalue) greater than 1. Bivariate (crude odds ratio [COR]) and multivariable (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]) values were calculated using logistic regression analysis with 95% confidence interval [CI]. From the bivariate analysis, variables with p < 0.25 were considered for multivariable analysis.

From the multivariable logistic regression analysis, variables with a significance level of p < 0.05 were taken as statistically significant and independently associated with under-five pneumonia. The presence of multi-collinearity among independent variables was checked using standard error at the cutoff value of 2, and we found a maximum standard error of 1.51, indicated no multi-collinearity. None of the covariates were collinear (Pearson’s correlation coefficient r > 0.7). Model fitness was checked using the Hosmer-Lemeshow test, which had a p-value 0.823.

Ethical consideration

The ethical approval letter was obtained from the Institutional Ethical Review Committee of the College of Medicine and Health Sciences of Wollo University. An informed consent was obtained from mothers/caregivers. Children who were sick during data collection were linked to the nearest health facility for further treatment. They were assured that their information would not be used for purposes other than scientific research and the participation was voluntary and that they could withdraw from the interview at any time for whatever reason. Confidentiality was maintained by avoiding possible identifiers.

Results

Socio-demographic and economic characteristics of participants

Of the 560 under-five children, 539 participated in the study (96.25% response rate). The wealth index 180 (33.4%) of the study participants were under economically medium, whereas 179 (33.2%) within low category. Nearly half 245 (45.5%) of the mothers/caregivers had primary education. One-fourth 136 (25.2%) of the households had five or more persons.

The mean age of mothers/caregivers was 29.56 ± 5.56 years and the median age of children aged 0–59 months was 20.0 (15.3 [IQR]) months, with 54.5% of the children younger than 24 months (Table 1).

Table 1. Bivariate analysis of the association of socio-demographic factors with pneumonia among children under five in peri-urban areas of Dessie City, north-eastern Ethiopia, January—March 2019.

Variable Frequency Pneumonia COR (95% CI) P-value
Yes No
n (%) n n
Age of mother/caregiver (years)*
15–19 22 (4.1) 8 14 2.41(0.90–6.42) 0.079
20–34 397 (73.6) 61 336 0.77(0.45–1.30) 0.324
35–49 120 (22.3) 23 97 Ref
Age of child (months)¥
0–11 152 (28.2) 24 128 0.87(0.39–1.90) 0.726
12–23 142 (26.3) 24 118 0.94(0.43–2.07) 0.884
24–35 99 (18.4) 12 87 0.64(0.26–1.55) 0.324
36–47 84 (15.6) 21 63 1.55(0.68–3.50) 0.297
48–59 62 (11.5) 11 51 Ref
Sex of child
Female 268 (49.7) 55 213 1.63(1.04–2.58) 0.035
Male 271 (50.3) 37 234 Ref
Religion
Christian 42 (7.8) 14 28 2.69(1.35–5.33) 0.005
Muslim 497 (92.2) 78 419 Ref
Birth order of child
First 168 (31.2) 25 143 Ref
Second 168 (31.2) 30 138 1.24(0.70–2.22) 0.462
Third 122 (22.6) 21 101 1.18(0.63–2.24) 0.592 0.333
Fourth or above 81(15.0) 16 65 1.41(0.70–2.81)
Mother’s/caregiver’s marital status
Unmarried 46 (8.5) 15 31 2.61(1.35–5.07) 0.004
Married 493 (91.5) 77 416 Ref
Mother’s/caregiver’s educational status
Cannot read and write 91(16.9) 20 71 0.93(0.35–2.47) 0.877
Read and write 39(7.2) 9 30 0.97(0.32–3.04) 0 .980
Primary level 245(45.5) 40 205 0.64(0.26–1.59) 0.339
Secondary level 134(24.9) 16 118 0.45(0.16–1.20) 0.111
Diploma or above 30(5.6) 7 23 Ref
Mother’s/caregiver’s occupational status
Housewife 346(64.2) 47 299 Ref
Civil servant 35(6.5) 12 23 3.32(1.55–7.12) 0.002
Day laborer 50(9.3) 14 36 2.47(1.24–4.93) 0.010
Merchant 57(10.6) 9 48 1.19(0.55–2.59) 0.656
Other 51(9.5) 10 41 1.55(0.73–3.31) 0.255
Father’s educational status
Cannot read and write 74 (15.0) 13 61 0.87(0.36–2.08) 0.754
Read and write 30 (6.1) 11 19 2.36(0.89–6.26) 0.084
Primary level 161 (32.7) 20 141 0.58(0.26–1.27) 0.173
Secondary level 167 (33.9) 21 146 0.59(0.27–1.28) 0.181
Diploma or above 61 (12.4) 12 49 Ref
Father’s occupational status
Unemployed 42 (8.5) 8 34 1.13(0.43–2.95) 0.809
Farmer 179 (36.3) 18 161 0.54(0.25–1.14) 0.104
Day laborer 116 (23.5) 24 92 1.25(0.60–2.59) 0.552
Merchant 75 (15.2) 14 62 1.01(0.44–2.30) 0.994
Civil servant 81 (16.4) 14 67 Ref
Household size (persons)
>5 136 (25.2) 26 110 1.21(0.73–1.99) 0.463
≤5 403 (74.8) 66 337 Ref
Economic wealth index
Low 179 (33.2) 25 154 0.49(0.28–0.84) 0.009
Medium 180 (33.4) 22 158 0.42(0.24–0.73) 0.002
High 180 (33.4) 45 135 Ref

Ref, Reference category.

*Mean age of mothers/caregivers was 29.56 ± 5.56 [SD] years.

¥Median age of children aged 0–59 months was 20.0 (15.3 [IQR]) months.

Housing and environmental characteristics

Of the 539 respondents, the majority 437 (81.1%) lived-in privately-owned houses. Domestic fuel (wood, charcoal or kerosene) 383 (71.1%) was the most common source of cooking fuel, and 289 (53.62%) of children were carried by mothers/caregivers during cooking. About 479 (88.9%) households had a separate room used as the kitchen; only 163 (34.0%) of these had a window. A total of 60 (11.1%) households used their living room for cooking. Other housing and environmental characteristics and the results of the bivariate analysis of their association with childhood pneumonia are summarized in Table 2.

Table 2. Bivariate analysis of the associations of housing and environmental factors with pneumonia among children under five in peri-urban areas of Dessie City, north-eastern Ethiopia, January—March 2019.

Variable Frequency Pneumonia COR (95% CI) P-value
Yes No
n (%) n n
House ownership
Rent 102 (18.9) 37 65 3.95(2.42–6.47) <0.001
Private ownership 437 (81.1) 55 382 Ref
Type of walls in home
Wood with mud 412 (76.4) 80 332 2.31(1.21–4.39) 0.011
Stone and mud cement/bricks 127 (23.6) 12 115 Ref
Type of floor in home
Earth 354 (65.7) 73 281 2.27(1.32–3.89) 0.003
Cement/ceramic 185 (34.3) 19 166 Ref
Does kitchen have a window
No 316 (66.0) 49 267 2.12(1.11–4.03) 0.022
Yes 163 (34.0) 13 150 Ref
Number of windows per house
≤2 windows 273 (50.6) 71 202 4.10(2.43–6.91) <0.001
>2 windows 266 (49.4) 21 245 Ref
Separate room used for kitchen
No 60 (11.1) 30 30 6.73(3.79–11.92) <0.001
Yes 479 (88.9) 62 417 Ref
Place of cooking
Living room 75 (13.9) 38 37 7.79(4.57–13.30) <0.001
Kitchen 464 (86.1) 54 410 Ref
Type of fuel used for cooking
Domestic fuel (wood, charcoal/kerosene) 383 (71.1) 81 302 3.54(1.83–6.84) <0.001
Electricity 156 (28.9) 11 145 Ref
Location of the child during cooking
Carried on mother’s/caregiver’s back 289 (53.6) 71 218 3.55(2.11–5.98) <0.001
Out of the cooking area 250 (46.4) 21 229 Ref
Family cigarette smoking
Yes 74 (13.7) 26 48 3.28(1.90–5.64) <0.001
No 465 (86.3) 66 399 Ref
Number of persons per room
>2 person per room 112 (20.8) 42 70 4.52(2.79–7.33) <0.001
≤2 person per room 427 (79.2) 50 377 Ref
Overcrowding status
Overcrowded 231 (42.9) 65 166 4.08(2.50–6.64) <0.001
Not overcrowded 308 (57.1) 27 281 Ref

Ref, Reference category.

Immunization and nutritional characteristics of participants

Of the 539 participating children, 445 (82.6%) were fully vaccinated and 94 (17.4%) were not fully vaccinated. Most 481 (89.2%) of their mothers/caregivers practiced exclusive breastfeeding in the first six months of the child’s life. Almost two-thirds (330, 61.2%) of the children received zinc supplementation and 841 (89.2%) of them received vitamin A supplements (Table 3).

Table 3. Bivariate analysis of the association of nutritional and immunization factors with pneumonia among children under five in peri-urban areas of Dessie City, north-eastern Ethiopia, January—March 2019.

Variable Frequency Pneumonia COR (95% CI) P-value
Yes No
n (%) n n
Vitamin A supplementation
No 58 (10.8) 23 35 3.92(2.18–7.04) <0.001
Yes 481 (89.2) 69 412 Ref
Zinc supplementation
No 209 (38.8) 51 158 2.28(1.44–3.58) <0.001
Yes 330 (61.2) 41 289 Ref
Pneumonia vaccination
No 47 (8.7) 17 30 3.15(1.65–5.99) <0.001
Yes 492 (91.3) 75 417 Ref
Vaccination status of child
Incomplete 94 (17.4) 30 64 2.89(1.74–4.82) <0.001
Fully vaccinated 445 (82.6) 62 383 Ref
Breastfeeding
Mixed feeding 58 (10.8) 29 29 6.64(3.72–11.84) <0.001
Exclusive feeding 481 (89.2) 63 418 Ref
Total months of breastfeeding
<12 months 192 (35.6) 37 155 1.27(0.80–2.01) 0.313
≥12 months 347 (64.4) 55 292 Ref

Ref, Reference category.

Pre-existing medical conditions

Nearly half (n = 255, 47.3%) of the children had normal nutritional status and 284 (52.7%) had acute malnutrition. ARI was the most common medical condition; 146 participants (27.1%) had a childhood history of ARI and 41 (7.6%) had a family history of ARI. The great majority of the children had no history of TB (tuberculosis) 525 (97.4%) and asthma 515 (95.5%) (Table 4).

Table 4. Bivariate analysis of the association of pre-existing medical conditions with pneumonia among children under five in peri-urban areas of Dessie City, north-eastern Ethiopia, January—March 2019.

Variables Frequency Pneumonia COR (95% CI) P-value
Yes No
n (%) n n
Child history of ARI
Yes 146 (27.1) 46 100 3.47(2.18–5.52) <0.001
No 393 (72.9) 46 347 Ref
Family history of ARI
Yes 41 (7.6) 22 19 7.08(3.65–13.75) <0.001
No 498 (92.4) 70 428 Ref
Child history of CHD
Yes 11 (2.0) 5 6 4.22(1.26–14.15) 0.019
No 528 (98.0) 87 441 Ref
Child history of HIV/AIDS
Yes 14 (2.6) 7 7 5.18(1.77–15.14) 0.003
No 525 (97.4) 85 440 Ref
Child history of TB
Yes 14 (2.6) 8 6 7.00(2.37–20.69) <0.001
No 525 (97.4) 84 441 Ref
Child history of asthma
Yes 24 (4.5) 12 12 5.44(2.36–12.53) <0.001
No 515 (95.5) 80 435 Ref
Nutritional status of child
Acute malnutrition 284 (52.7) 70 214 3.46(2.07–5.79) <0.001
Normal 255 (47.3) 22 233

1, Reference category; CHD, Congenital heart disease; ARI, Acute respiratory infection; HIV, Human immunodeficiency virus.

Prevalence, and signs and symptoms of pneumonia

The overall prevalence of pneumonia was 17.1% (95%CI: 13.9%-19.9%). Of the participating children, 113 (21.0%) had a cough, 92 (17.1%) had fast breathing, 76 (14.1%) had fever, and 40 (7.4%) of the children had chest indrawn (Fig 1).

Fig 1. Signs and symptoms of childhood pneumonia in peri-urban areas of Dessie City, north-eastern Ethiopia, January—March 2019.

Fig 1

Factors associated with pneumonia among children under five

After adjusting for confounding variables from multivariable logistic regression analysis, our results indicate that under-five children whose families cooked their food in the living room were 6.23 times more likely to develop childhood pneumonia (AOR = 6.23; 95%CI: 1.80–21.68) compared to than participants whose families cooked their food in the kitchen. The odds of pneumonia in children under five was 3.95 times (AOR = 3.95; 95%CI: 1.47–10.62) higher for participants whose families used domestic fuel such as wood, charcoal, and kerosene for cooking than those that used electricity (Table 5).

Table 5. Factors significantly associated with pneumonia among children under five from multivariable logistic regression analysis in peri-urban areas of Dessie City, north-eastern Ethiopia, January—March 2019.

Variable Pneumonia COR (95% CI) AOR (95% CI)
Yes No
n n
Place of cooking
Living room 38 37 7.79(4.57–13.30) 6.23(1.80–21.68)
Kitchen 54 410 Ref Ref
Type of fuel used for cooking
Domestic fuel (wood, charcoal/kerosene) 81 302 3.54(1.83–6.84) 3.95(1.47–10.62)
Electricity 11 145 Ref Ref
Overcrowding status
Overcrowded 65 166 4.08(2.50–6.64) 3.37(1.56–7.27)
Not overcrowded 27 281 Ref Ref
Child history of ARI
Yes 46 100 3.47(2.18–5.52) 6.12(2.77–13.53)
No 46 347 Ref Ref
Family history of ARI
Yes 22 19 7.08(3.65–13.75) 4.69(1.67–13.12)
No 70 428 Ref Ref
Nutritional status of child
Acute malnutrition 70 214 3.46(2.07–5.79) 2.43(1.18–5.04)
Normal 22 233 Ref Ref

Ref, Reference category.

*Variables adjusted for the multivariable analysis were: Age of mother/caregiver (years); child age (months); child gender; religion; mother’s/caregiver’s education and occupation; father’s education and occupation; economic status (wealth index); house ownership; wall material; floor material; number of windows per house; cooking location; type of fuel used; location of child during cooking; family cigarette smoking; persons per room; overcrowding status; vitamin A supplementation; zinc supplementation; child PCV; vaccination status; breastfeeding for 6 months; parent history of ARI; child history of ARI, CHD (Congenital heart disease), HIV, TB and asthma, and nutritional status.

The odds of pneumonia among children under five living in overcrowded conditions were 3.37 times higher than among participants not living in overcrowded spaces (AOR = 3.37; 95%CI: 1.56–7.27). Children with a history of ARI were 6.12 times more likely to develop pneumonia (AOR = 6.12; 95%CI: 2.77–13.53), and the odds for children with a family history of ARIs were 4.69 times (AOR = 4.69; 95%CI: 1.67–13.12) higher than for their counterparts without a family history of ARI. The odds of developing childhood pneumonia were 2.43 times higher in children with acute malnutrition than in children with normal nutritional status (AOR = 2.43; 95%CI: 1.18–5.04) (Table 5).

Discussion

In this community-based cross-sectional study, we investigated the prevalence of pneumonia and its associated factors among children under five in peri-urban areas of Dessie City. We found the prevalence of pneumonia to be 17.1%. The study also revealed using domestic fuel as the energy source for cooking, cooking in the living room, overcrowding, child history of ARI, family history of ARI and acute malnutrition were factors significantly associated with pneumonia among under-five children in peri-urban areas of Dessie City.

This rate of pneumonia in our study was almost twice as high as the prevalence of ARI (7.0%) among similar children reported by the 2016 Ethiopia Demographic and Health Survey (EDHS) [6]. This discrepancy might be because the national prevalence statistic is an aggregate of different acute upper and lower respiratory infections. However, this rate was lower than the prevalence of pneumonia reported by studies conducted in Jimma Zone (28.1%) [22] and Wondo Genet District (33.3%) in Ethiopia [16]. These differences might be due to differences in study settings, environmental factors, the basic infrastructure of study households, and socio-demographic characteristics of mothers/caregivers. Furthermore, the higher prevalence of pneumonia in our study than in the 2016 EDHS might have been due to the repeated history of ARI, overcrowding and higher levels of indoor air pollution from greater use of domestic biofuels.

The prevalence in this study is similar to the pneumonia prevalence (16.1%) reported by a community-based cross-sectional study conducted in Este Town of South Gondar Zone, Amhara Region, Ethiopia [23]. Our finding is also consistent with that of a community-based cross-sectional study in Dibrugarh Town, India (16.34%) [24]. These similarities may reflect similarities in study settings. In this study, a total of 492 children received the pneumonia vaccine at their recommended time; 75 (15.2%) of these children developed pneumonia. This may be due to the vaccine losing its potency because of poor vaccine stock management and poor vaccine handling.

Our multivariable logistic model indicated that cooking in the living room, using domestic fuel for cooking, overcrowding, a child’s history of ARI, a family history of ARI and acute malnutrition were significantly associated with pneumonia among children under five. Children living in households using the living room for cooking were more likely to have pneumonia than those households using a separate kitchen. This finding is consistent with results from worldwide systematic reviews and meta-analyses [2]. It suggests that cooking in the living room imposes a high level of indoor air pollution and suffocation that could increase the incidence of pneumonia among children under five. Therefore, cooking in a separate kitchen appears to be important for improving child survival.

In our findings, children living in households that used domestic fuel for cooking had higher odds of developing pneumonia than children from households that used electricity for cooking. This finding is supported by studies in Este Town in northwestern Ethiopia [23], Wolayta-Sodo in southern Ethiopia [25], and northeast Brazil [26]. The use of traditional cooking fuels increases indoor air pollution, and since children under five spend most of their time with their mothers/caregivers as they cook, the children are exposed to biomass fuel pollution, which increases the incidence of pneumonia.

In this study, household overcrowding was found to be a predictor of childhood pneumonia. This result supports findings from studies from northeast Brazil [27], Canada [28], and India [29, 30] that reported higher pneumonia rates in children living in overcrowded conditions. A systematic review revealed that household crowding has a uniform risk worldwide, with odds ratios between 1.9 and 2.3 in the low- middle- and high-income countries [27]; these ratio are lower than our findings (AOR = 3.37). The difference might be due to poorer housing conditions, smaller living spaces, and a larger number of families per household in our study.

In this study, a child’s history of ARI and a family history of ARI both predicted higher odds of a child having pneumonia compared to the absence of a child’s or family’s ARI. This finding is consistent with those of studies conducted in Oromia Zone, Ethiopia [31]; Kenya [32]; and India [33]. In all these studies, children who had concomitant infections may have had their immunity lowered, making them more susceptible to pneumonia; ARIs are very contagious and easily transmitted.

Our data revealed that acute malnutrition carried higher odds of pneumonia than good nutritional status. This result is concordant with earlier studies conducted in Kersa District, southwest Ethiopia [34]; Pakistan [35]; and India [29, 33]. A systematic reviews and meta-analyses study findings also revealed that children with malnutrition are more likely to develop pneumonia than children with normal nutritional status [27, 36]. The similar findings across studies might be due to similar low food security levels and inadequate feeding practices in the study areas.

Limitation of the study

This study was not used chest radiography and blood culture and/or culture of bronchi alveolar lavage to confirm pneumonia so that this study may not as strong as pneumonia confirmation using laboratory diagnostic tools. However; to overcome such limitation, we diagnosed pneumonia based on the 2014 standard clinical WHO and integrated management of new-born child illness classification of cases [18]. We also operationalized variables, used appropriate protocols and trained professional data collectors to assure data quality.

Our study may over report some behaviors due to social desirability bias during self-reporting. However, we tried to control social desirability bias by employing proxy data collectors because proxy subjects may yield reliable information about behavior of target persons. Furthermore, the level of accuracy of the measuring instrument was revised after pre-testing the questionnaire data collection tools. The findings of this study may not be representative of the peri-urban areas at the national level as the study was conducted only in peri-urban areas of Dessie City and establishing a temporal relationship between the risk factors and the outcome was also impossible.

Longitudinal studies covering different seasons may provide a better understanding of the occurrence of pneumonia in peri-urban areas of Dessie City and help to guide interventions. Further studies based on chest radiography and blood cultures and/or cultures of bronchi alveolar lavage to confirm the presence of pneumonia are highly encouraged.

Conclusion

This study found the prevalence of pneumonia in peri-urban areas of Dessie City to be higher than that of ARIs nationally and pneumonia to be a common disease among children under five in the study area. Cooking in the living room, using domestic fuel for cooking, overcrowding, a child’s history of ARI, a family’s history of ARI, and acute malnutrition were found to be factors significantly associated with pneumonia.

These findings provide strong evidence that pneumonia can be prevented through community-based interventions that achieve ventilated and improved housing conditions, separate kitchens, less use of domestic biofuels, adequate and balanced food intake, including exclusive breastfeeding of infants, and early treatment of ARIs. The high prevalence of pneumonia in our study might be a result of deficiencies of the community- based pneumonia care and prevention programs and failure to adequately cover peri-urban communities. We therefore recommend implementation of a comprehensive health care program at the community level in the study area.

Supporting information

S1 File. Household survey questionnaire in English version.

(DOCX)

S2 File. Household survey questionnaire in Amharic version.

(DOCX)

Acknowledgments

First and foremost, we thank Dessie City Administration Health Bureau and each peri-urban kebele administrator for allowing us to conduct the study and for providing information. We also appreciate and thank the data collectors and supervisors for their assistance and the mothers/caregivers for their cooperation during data collection.

Abbreviations

COR

crude odds ratio

AOR

adjusted odds ratio

ARI

acute respiratory infection

CI

confidence interval

EDHS

Ethiopia Demographic and Health Survey

SD

standard deviations

IQR

Interquartile range

WHO

World Health Organization

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

This study was funded by Wollo University. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Liu L, Oza S, Hogan D, Chu Y, Perin J, Zhu J, et al. Global, regional, and national causes of under-5 mortality in 2000–15: An updated systematic analysis with implications for the Sustainable Development Goals. The Lancet. 2016;388(10063):3027–35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Nair H, Simões EA, Rudan I, Gessner BD, Azziz-Baumgartner E, Zhang JSF, et al. Global and regional burden of hospital admissions for severe acute lower respiratory infections in young children in 2010: A systematic analysis. The Lancet. 2013;381(9875):1380–90. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.UNICEF. A fair chance for every child. United Nations Childrens Fund (UNICEF) 2015 Report. New York. 2016.
  • 4.UNICEF. Committing to child survival: A promise renewed: UNICEF progress report. New York. 2015.
  • 5.UNICEF. Pneumonia: The deadliest childhood disease. 2015. United Nations Childrens Fund (UNCEF). New York. 2016.
  • 6.CSA, ICF-International. Ethiopia Demographic and Health Survey 2016. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, and Calverton, Maryland, USA: Central Statistical Agency [Ethiopia] and ORC Macro2016.
  • 7.Bipin P, Nitiben T, Sonaliya K. A study on prevalence of acute respiratory tract infections (ARI) in under five children in urban and rural communities of Ahmedabad district, Gujarat, India. Natl J Community Med. 2011;2(2):255–9. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Rudan I, Boschi-Pinto C, Biloglav Z, Mulholland K, Campbell H. Epidemiology and etiology of childhood pneumonia. Bull World Health Organ. 2008;86(5):408–16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.UNICEF. The impact of air pollution on children. UNICEF 2016 report. New York. Geneva. 2016.
  • 10.WHO. Why urban health matters? World Health Day 2010. World Health Organization; Geneva: 2010. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.UNICEF. The state of world's children in 2012. Children in an urban world. United Nations Childrens Fund (UNCEF) New York: 2012. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.CSA. Population and housing census of Ethiopia. Administrative Report. Central Statistical Agency Amhara Part One, Ethiopia. 2014.
  • 13.Dessie City Adminstration. Annual Report of 2014. Dessie, Ethiopia 2014.
  • 14.Dessie City Administration, Health Office. 2018 Annual Report. Dessie. Ethiopia 2018.
  • 15.Kelsey JL, Whittemore AS, Evans AS, Thompson WD. Methods in observational epidemiology: Monographs in Epidemiology and Biostatistics. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1996. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Abuka T. Prevalence of pneumonia and factors associated among children 2–59 months old in Wondo Genet district, Sidama zone, SNNPR, Ethiopia. Curr Pediatr Res. 2017;21(1):19–25. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Gashu Adam A. Peri-urban land tenure in Ethiopia: KTH Royal Institute of Technology; 2014. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.WHO. Revised WHO classification and treatment of childhood pneumonia at health facilities. Geneva: WHO; 2014. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Mukanga DOD, Tiono AB, Anyorigiya T, Källander K, Konaté AT OA, Tibenderana JK, et al. Community case management of malaria and pneumonia in children. Stockholm: Karolinska Institute. Bajwa A, Khan M. Urban Housing Development in Pakistan. Pakistan Eng Congr. 2007;1–248. 2012.
  • 20.Ethiopia National expanded programme on immunization. Comprehensive plan 2016–2020. Federal Ministry of Health, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. 2015.
  • 21.British Medical Research Council’s. Questionnaire on respiratory symptoms. Med Res Counc Environ Occup Health. 1986;1:1–4. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Lema K, Murugan R, Tachbele E. Prevalence and associated factors of pneumonia among under-five children at public hospitals in Jimma zone, South West of Ethiopia, 2018. J Pulmonol Clin Res. 2018;2(1):25–31. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Fekadu GA, Terefe MW, Alemie GA. Prevalence of pneumonia among under-five children in Este Town and the surrounding rural Kebeles, Northwest Ethiopia: A community-based cross-sectional study. Sci J Public Heal. 2014;2(3):150–5. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Nirmolia N, Mahanta TG, Boruah M, Rasaily R, Kotoky RP, Bora R. Prevalence and risk factors of pneumonia in under five children living in slums of Dibrugarh town. Clin Epidemiol Glob Health. 2018;6(1):1–4. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Admasie A, Kumie A, Worku A. Children under five from houses of unclean fuel sources and poorly ventilated houses have higher odds of suffering from acute respiratory infection in Wolaita-Sodo, Southern Ethiopia: A case-control study. J Environ Public Health. 2018;2018:1–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Fonseca W, Kirkwood BR, Misago C. Factors related to child care increase the risk of pneumonia among children living in a poor community in northeast Brazil. J Trop Pediatr. 1997;43(2):123–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Jackson S, Mathews KH, Pulanić D, Falconer R, Rudan I, Campbell H, et al. Risk factors for severe acute lower respiratory infections in children–a systematic review and meta-analysis. Croat Med J. 2013;54(2):110–21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Banerji A, Greenberg D, White LF, Macdonald WA, Saxton A, Thomas E, et al. Risk factors and viruses associated with hospitalization due to lower respiratory tract infections in Canadian Inuit children: A case-control study. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2009;28(8):697–701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Savitha M, Nandeeshwara S, Kumar MP, Raju C. Modifiable risk factors for acute lower respiratory tract infections. Indian J Pediatr. 2007;74(5):477–82. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Goel K, Ahmad S, Agarwal G, Goel P. A cross sectional study on prevalence of acute respiratory infections (ARI) in under-five children of Meerut District. India Community Med Heal Educ. 2012;2(9):2–5. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Dadi AF, Kebede Y, Birhanu Z. Determinants of pneumonia in children aged two months to five years in urban areas of Oromia Zone, Amhara Region, Ethiopia. Open Access Libr J. 2014;1(1044):1–10. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Onyango D, Kikuvi G, Amukoye E, Omolo J. Risk factors of severe pneumonia among children aged 2–59 months in western Kenya: A case control study. Pan Afr Med J. 2012;13(1):1–13. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Bhat R, Manjunath N. Correlates of acute lower respiratory tract infections in children under 5 years of age in India. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2013;17(3):418–22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Geleta D, Tessema F, Ewnetu H. Determinants of community acquired pneumonia among children in Kersa District, Southwest Ethiopia: Facility based case control study. J Pediatr Neonatal Care. 2016;5(2):1–8. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Fatmi Z, White F. A comparison of ‘cough and cold’and pneumonia: risk factors for pneumonia in children under 5 years revisited. Int J Infect Dis. 2002;6(4):294–301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Sonego M, Pellegrin MC, Becker G, Lazzerini M. Risk factors for mortality from acute lower respiratory infections (ALRI) in children under five years of age in low and middle-income countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(1):e0116380. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Ray Borrow

20 Mar 2020

PONE-D-19-33652

Prevalence and associated factors of pneumonia among children under five in peri-urban areas of Dessie City, northeastern Ethiopia: A community-based cross-sectional study

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr Adane (PhD),

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the reviewers' points raised below during the review process.

We would appreciate receiving your revised manuscript by May 04 2020 11:59PM. When you are ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter.

To enhance the reproducibility of your results, we recommend that if applicable you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io, where a protocol can be assigned its own identifier (DOI) such that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). This letter should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. This file should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. This file should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Manuscript'.

Please note while forming your response, if your article is accepted, you may have the opportunity to make the peer review history publicly available. The record will include editor decision letters (with reviews) and your responses to reviewer comments. If eligible, we will contact you to opt in or out.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Ray Borrow, Ph.D., FRCPath

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements:

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at http://www.plosone.org/attachments/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and http://www.plosone.org/attachments/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. Please address the following:

- Please include additional information regarding the survey or questionnaire used in the study and ensure that you have provided sufficient details that others could replicate the analyses. For instance, if you developed a questionnaire as part of this study and it is not under a copyright more restrictive than CC-BY, please include a copy, in both the original language and English, as Supporting Information.

- Please provide additional details regarding participant consent. In the ethics statement in the Methods and online submission information, please ensure that you have specified how verbal consent was documented and witnessed.

3. Please ensure that you refer to Figure 2 and 4 in your text as, if accepted, production will need this reference to link the reader to the figure.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Partly

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: I Don't Know

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: Table 1 is missing.The serial starts from Table 2. However table 1 is referenced in the legend.To attach the table 1.

Justify how weaning period of 12 or more months is taken as reference category with WHO recommendations of weaning at 6 months of age.

Reviewer #2: The manuscript entitle ¨Prevalence and associated cactors of pneumonia among children under five in peri-urban areas of Dessie City, northeastern Ethiopia: A community-based cross sectional study¨ described by Kelleb A. et al., is very well written, interesting with values information about pneumonia. It is very difficult to perform a field study , moreover in Kebeles population. The authors accumulated an impressive data that should be used for others studies and diseases.

The questionnaire and analyses were intensely performed and the results and conclusions included all comments of the observational study.

In my opinion, the authors should develop more the subject about vaccination. It is a relevant thematic in the pneumonia domain and some information are missed, such us, the definition about fully vaccinated¨ and ¨not fully vaccinated. I am not aware about the vaccination system in Ethiopia.

Congratulations for this beautiful study.

Reviewer #3: The study is about children with clinical signs of pneumonia not confirmed cases of pneumonia since no microbological or radiological diagnosis done.

Table 1,2,3,4,5 and 6 tne first line and column 2 it is write (Pnrumonia N = 539) this is confusing, 539 is it the number of participant or number of children with pneumonia ? What are the meaning of yes and no of this colum ? What about presence and absence of pneumonia knowng that 92 children had pneumonia ?

Table 4 : the pneumonia vaccin and age at which it was administred was not mentionned in the study and out of 492 (75+417) children vaccinated against pneimonia 417 (yes) have pneumonia. Vaccination and occurence of pneumonia is an important point that should be discussed ?

The word Kebele have been used many times without giving the meaning.

Line 314-315 comparism of pneumonia prevalence of localised peri-urban area of Ethiopia to that of National level of Brazil done. What is the aim of this ?

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: Yes: Dr Gothankar J S

Reviewer #2: Yes: Glaucia Paranhos-Baccala

Reviewer #3: Yes: Ibrahim Dan Dano

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files to be viewed.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email us at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2020 Sep 11;15(9):e0235818. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235818.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


6 Jun 2020

Rebuttal letter

Response to the Journal Requirements Questions

Question #1: Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming.

Response: Thank you for this remark. We re-formatted the revised manuscript using the PLoS ONE format guidelines. The whole content of the manuscript, including the abstract, introduction, methods, discussion and reference are formatted using the guidelines (please see the revised version for each section).

Question #2. Please include additional information regarding the survey or questionnaire used in the study and ensure that you have provided sufficient details that others could replicate the analyses. For instance, if you developed a questionnaire as part of this study and it is not under a copyright more restrictive than CC-BY, please include a copy, in both the original language and English, as Supporting Information.

Response: We provided the questionnaire in original language and English version as supporting information S1 and S2.

Question #3. - Please provide additional details regarding participant consent. In the ethics statement in the Methods and online submission information, please ensure that you have specified how verbal consent was documented and witnessed.

Response: We provided all the ethical consideration sub-heading (please see page 10 from lines 245 to 250.

Question#4. Please ensure that you refer to Figure 2 and 4 in your text as, if accepted, production will need this reference to link the reader to the figure.

Response: We did the citation of Fig 1, 2 and 3 in the texts. One figure is reduced during the revision. Then the total figure becomes 3 not 4.

Line by line response to reviewers

Reviewer # 1

Question #1. Table 1 is missing. The serial starts from Table 2. However table 1 is referenced in the legend. To attach the table 1.

Response: Thank you for this comment and we included Table 1.

Question #2. Justify how weaning period of 12 or more months is taken as reference category with WHO recommendations of weaning at 6 months of age.

Response: Sorry for the confusion we did. We studied about the total months for breast feeding as less than 12 months and 12 months and above. Then using the 12 months as a reference category for analysis (See Table 4).

Reviewer #2

Reviewer #2: The manuscript entitle ¨Prevalence and associated cactors of pneumonia among children under five in peri-urban areas of Dessie City, northeastern Ethiopia: A community-based cross sectional study¨ described by Kelleb A. et al., is very well written, interesting with values information about pneumonia. It is very difficult to perform a field study, moreover in Kebeles population. The authors accumulated an impressive data that should be used for others studies and diseases. The questionnaire and analyses were intensely performed and the results and conclusions included all comments of the observational study. In my opinion, the authors should develop more the subject about vaccination.

Question #1 It is a relevant thematic in the pneumonia domain and some information are missed, such us, the definition about fully vaccinated¨ and ¨not fully vaccinated. I am not aware about the vaccination system in Ethiopia.

Response: Thank you for this pertinent comment. In Ethiopia, fully vaccination means the child received BCG and OPV0 at birth, pentavalent 1 (DPT-hib, he-b), OPV1, and PCV1 at 6 weeks, pentavalent 2, OPV2, PCV2 at 10 weeks, pentavalant 3, and PCV3 at 14th weeks and measles at 9 months, whereas incomplete vaccination includes those children in the status of up-to-date, partial and totally unvaccinated (See in page 8 from lines 186 to 190)

Reviewer #3

Reviewer #3: The study is about children with clinical signs of pneumonia not confirmed cases of pneumonia since no microbiological or radiological diagnosis done.

Question #1. Table 1,2,3,4,5 and 6 the first line and column 2 it is write (Pnrumonia N = 539) this is confusing, 539 is it the number of participant or number of children with pneumonia ? What are the meaning of yes and no of this column? What about presence and absence of pneumonia knowing that 92 children had pneumonia?

Response:

Thank you for these important questions. We made a correction for the columns of each table and we deleted N = 539. However, Yes or No in the column is about to indicate the number of pneumonia and no pneumonia among children under-five. Absence of pneumonia means “No” and presence of pneumonia means “Yes”. Please see the revised Tables 1-5.

Question # 2. Table 4 : the pneumonia vaccine and age at which it was administered was not mentioned in the study and out of 492 (75+417) children vaccinated against pneumonia 417 (yes) have pneumonia. Vaccination and occurrence of pneumonia is an important point that should be discussed?

Response: In this study, a total of 492 children took the pneumonia vaccine at their respective age, but from 492 only 75 children were developing pneumonia. This may due to vaccines losing their potency because of poor vaccine stock management, poor vaccine handling and storage at storage centers even if they were potent on arrival (please see the revised version in page 14 from lines 349 to 352).

Question # 3. The word Kebele have been used many times without giving the meaning.

Response: We defined kebele and please see the revised version page 5 from lines 121 to 122.

Question #4. Line 314-315 comparison of pneumonia prevalence of localized peri-urban area of Ethiopia to that of National level of Brazil done. What is the aim of this?

Response: We thank for this important question, and we accept the comment and deleted the comparison since our study setting in a small area where the Brazil is national survey.

We would like to thank the reviewers and editors for evaluating our manuscript. We have tried to address all the concerns in a proper way and believe that our paper has been improved considerably. We would be happy to make further corrections if necessary and look forward to hearing from you all soon.

I hope that the revised manuscript is accepted for publication in PLoS ONE.

Sincerely yours,

Metadel Adane (PhD)

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to reviwers.docx

Decision Letter 1

Ray Borrow

24 Jun 2020

Prevalence and associated factors of pneumonia among children under five in peri-urban areas of Dessie City, northeastern Ethiopia

PONE-D-19-33652R1

Dear Dr. Adane (PhD),

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Ray Borrow, Ph.D., FRCPath

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

Reviewer #2: All comments have been addressed

Reviewer #3: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: The revised manuscript is much more clear after inclusion of all comments suggested by the reviewers. All questions were answered and the revised manuscript is now ready to be accepted and published.

Pneumonia studies in children under 5 years of age are primordial in peri-urbans regions. The intrinsic conditions of life were the children are living was described and pointed out as a major indicator for pneumonia risk factors. Others risk factors such as malnutrition despite are known, it is relevant to be compared with urban area. The study design and study management were performed very well. This kind of study is very complex and in this study, it was conducted very seriously. It is important to have this date in Ethiopia since no major data was described until now from Ethiopian researchers.

Thank you very much to give me the opportunity to review this manuscript.

Reviewer #3: All my comments have been taken into account and I am satisfied with the corrections done. The article is well written and provide valus informations about pneumonie.

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: Yes: Dr Jayashree Gothankar

Reviewer #2: Yes: Gláucia Paranhos-Baccalà

Reviewer #3: Yes: Dan Dano Ibrahim

Acceptance letter

Ray Borrow

28 Jul 2020

PONE-D-19-33652R1

Pneumonia remains leading public health problem among under-five children in peri-urban areas of northeastern Ethiopia

Dear Dr. Adane (PhD):

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Prof. Ray Borrow

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 File. Household survey questionnaire in English version.

    (DOCX)

    S2 File. Household survey questionnaire in Amharic version.

    (DOCX)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to reviwers.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.


    Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES