We read with interest the articles “Telemedicine Evaluation and Techniques in Hand Surgery”1 and “A Call to Arms: Emergency Hand and Upper-Extremity Operations During the COVID-19 Pandemic.”2 The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic has catapulted us into the digital health services era and accelerated the growth of telemedicine,3 and there has been increased interest in virtual clinical services for hand surgery.4 However, both articles fall short in elaborating the use of digital technology for physical and occupational therapy in hand surgery. This letter aims to highlight the potential of virtual clinical services to complement rehabilitation in hand surgery, while acknowledging its limitations.
Virtual services in rehabilitation were previously found to be effective. In their study, Lade et al5 reported substantial agreement between conventional face-to-face and telerehabilitation physiotherapy assessment. In addition, Worboys et al6 reported good outcomes in delivering therapy services to rural and remote patients. With increased patient willingness for telemedicine, we believe there is now an unprecedented opportunity for the development of digital tools for rehabilitation in hand surgery. This can include one-way delivery of information for therapeutic education such as therapy exercise videos or the use of an app to enhance patient compliance to therapy,7 as well as interactive videoconferencing for teleconsultations with occupational and physiotherapists.
Although the potential application of digital technology in rehabilitation is promising, challenges of digital security and data protection remain. Information shared over video-conferencing tools needs to be transmitted over secured platforms to maintain patient confidentiality. Digital infrastructure is required to ensure reliable delivery of quality diagnostic images and audio. Reimbursement for virtual clinical services should be sufficient to address related equipment and expertise costs while remaining affordable and reasonable for patients. Furthermore, virtual clinical services will not be able to replace traditional rehabilitation, because certain services such as the fabrication of orthoses and controlled mobilization would still require physical contact.
There is a paucity of discussion regarding the use of digital technology for rehabilitation in hand surgery. Telerehabilitation was previously reported to have success and good efficacy for stroke survivors8 and the management of other musculoskeletal conditions.9 We are encountering a new era of digital technology for clinical services, and more can be done to harness its potential to complement traditional face-to-face rehabilitation in hand surgery.
Footnotes
Declaration of interests: No benefits in any form have been received or will be received related directly or indirectly to the subject of this article.
References
- 1.Van Nest D.S., Ilyas A.M., Rivlin M. Telemedicine evaluation and techniques in hand surgery. J Hand Surg Glob Online. 2020;2(4):240–245. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsg.2020.05.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Diamond S., Lundy J.B., Weber E.L., et al. A call to arms: emergency hand and upper-extremity operations during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Hand Surg Glob Online. 2020;2(4):175–181. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsg.2020.05.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Kapur V, Boulton A. Covid-19 accelerates the adoption of telemedicine in Asia-Pacific countries. Vol 2020. Bain & Company. 2020. Available at: https://www.bain.com/insights/covid-19-accelerates-the-adoption-of-telemedicine-in-asia-pacific-countries/. Accessed September 25, 2020.
- 4.Little M., Huntley D., Morris J., Jozsa F., Hardman J., Anakwe R.E. The virtual fracture clinic improves quality of care for patients with hand and wrist injuries: an assessment of 3709 patients. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2020;45(7):748–753. doi: 10.1177/1753193420930610. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Lade H., McKenzie S., Steele L., Russell T.G. Validity and reliability of the assessment and diagnosis of musculoskeletal elbow disorders using telerehabilitation. J Telemed Telecare. 2012;18(7):413–418. doi: 10.1258/jtt.2012.120501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Worboys T., Brassington M., Ward E.C., Cornwell P.L. Delivering occupational therapy hand assessment and treatment sessions via telehealth. J Telemed Telecare. 2018;24(3):185–192. doi: 10.1177/1357633X17691861. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Lambert T.E., Harvey L.A., Avdalis C., et al. An app with remote support achieves better adherence to home exercise programs than paper handouts in people with musculoskeletal conditions: a randomised trial. J Physiother. 2017;63(3):161–167. doi: 10.1016/j.jphys.2017.05.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Tchero H., Tabue Teguo M., Lannuzel A., Rusch E. Telerehabilitation for stroke survivors: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2018;20(10) doi: 10.2196/10867. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Grona S.L., Bath B., Busch A., Rotter T., Trask C., Harrison E. Use of videoconferencing for physical therapy in people with musculoskeletal conditions: a systematic review. J Telemed Telecare. 2018;24(5):341–355. doi: 10.1177/1357633X17700781. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]