Skip to main content
Science Advances logoLink to Science Advances
. 2020 Sep 11;6(37):eabb1611. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abb1611

Dimorphism in cryptophytes—The case of Teleaulax amphioxeia/Plagioselmis prolonga and its ecological implications

A Altenburger 1,*,, H E Blossom 2, L Garcia-Cuetos 3, H H Jakobsen 4, J Carstensen 4, N Lundholm 3, P J Hansen 5, Ø Moestrup 6, L Haraguchi 4,*,†,
PMCID: PMC7486100  PMID: 32917704

Microscopic algae have sex too, and it is an important aspect of their ecological success.

Abstract

Growing evidence suggests that sexual reproduction might be common in unicellular organisms, but observations are sparse. Limited knowledge of sexual reproduction constrains understanding of protist ecology. Although Teleaulax amphioxeia and Plagioselmis prolonga are common marine cryptophytes worldwide, and are also important plastid donors for some kleptoplastic ciliates and dinoflagellates, the ecology and development of these protists are poorly known. We demonstrate that P. prolonga is the haploid form of the diploid T. amphioxeia and describe the seasonal dynamics of these two life stages. The diploid T. amphioxeia dominates during periods of high dissolved inorganic nitrogen (DIN) and low irradiance, temperature, and grazing (winter and early spring), whereas the haploid P. prolonga becomes more abundant during the summer, when DIN is low and irradiance, temperature, and grazing are high. Dimorphic sexual life cycles might explain the success of this species by fostering high genetic diversity and enabling endurance in adverse conditions.

INTRODUCTION

Cryptophytes are important unicellular primary producers and ubiquitous components of plankton assemblages. Cryptophytes are nontoxic and considered good quality food for other protists. Their small size, varying between 4 and 50 μm, puts them at the base of the food web, consumed by a wide variety of organisms. Knowledge of the relative importance of cryptophytes within marine phytoplankton communities is still scarce. This knowledge gap has persisted because of difficulties in identifying cryptophytes to species level by light microscopy and because the delicacy of their cell structures makes it difficult to fix these cells with standard methods (1). It is well established , however, that some cryptophytes are important plastid donors for kleptoplastidic dinoflagellates and ciliates in the plankton (2).

The cryptophyte Teleaulax amphioxeia occurs worldwide and serves as plastid donor to the ciliates Mesodinium major and Mesodinium rubrum (3). Very little is known about M. major, but M. rubrum is an important food source and a plastid donor for the dinoflagellates Amylax triacantha and Amylax buxus (4, 5) and at least six species of Dinophysis [reviewed in (6)]. The cryptophyte species T. amphioxeia is a particularly important food source in nature, as investigations on natural populations have shown that chloroplasts found in M. rubrum (7) and Dinophysis acuminata (8) were predominantly from T. amphioxeia. It has been demonstrated that the cosmopolitan M. rubrum can use chloroplasts from different species of Teleaulax but are unable to use chloroplasts from other cryptophyte genera (3, 7). Thus, the coupling of taxonomy and ecology is essential to gain a better understanding of the role of cryptophytes in aquatic ecosystems.

Traditionally, cryptophyte systematics has been based on biliprotein types and various morphological traits, such as position of the nucleomorph, ultrastructural characteristics of the flagellar root apparatus, variations in the furrow/gullet complex, the inner periplast component (IPC; consisting of either polygonal plates or a continuous sheet), and the surface periplast component (SPC) (9). Following advances in molecular tools, recent research has revealed that biliprotein type seems to be congruent with molecular phylogenies, but the traditionally definitive morphological trait of IPC structure is not, thus reducing its taxonomic importance (10). In molecular studies on cryptophytes, several clades consisting of species complexes stand out as not congruent with their morphological, ultrastructural characteristics, such as Chroomonas/Komma, Rhodomonas/Rhinomonas/Storeatula, Guillardia theta/Hanusia phi, and Geminigera/Plagioselmis/Teleaulax (11).

An increasing number of phytoplankton species, including cryptophytes, are reported to have complex life cycles that involve more than one morphotype, and in some cases, they have previously been identified as different species (12, 13). Proteomonas sulcata was the first example of a cryptophyte species in which a dimorphic life cycle was described, and the two forms can be distinguished by size, periplast structure, the configuration of the flagellar apparatus, and the quantity of nuclear DNA (12). Previously established cryptophyte genera have also been suggested to be part of a potential dimorphic life cycle as Campylomonas and Cryptomonas, which have identical 18S ribosomal DNA (rDNA) sequences but differ by having a sheet-like or a plated periplast, respectively (14). Whether or not these two forms also represent haploid and diploid stages of the life cycle is unknown. The authors called the form with plated periplast “cryptomorph” and the one with sheet-like periplast “campylomorph” (14). On the basis of similarities in DNA sequences, it has been suggested that dimorphism could be a common trait among the cryptophytes (10) and that each species has a form with plated periplast and an alternate form with sheet-like periplast. Therefore, dimorphism provides a potential explanation for the incongruence of the periplast structure of cryptophytes in molecular phylogenies found in and among different studies (15). A description of life cycle stages should hence involve investigations of ploidy and a careful taxonomical review in addition to the comparison of DNA sequences, especially when two formerly distinct genera are involved. Ecological aspects of the dimorphic life cycles remain understudied, limiting our interpretation of the significance of those strategies in nature.

This is the first study that links dimorphic life cycles and ecology in cryptophytes. We found a significant correlation between the distribution of two species and dissolved inorganic nitrogen (DIN) in environmental samples. It turned out that these species were two life cycle stages of the same species. Life cycle stage changes were observed in cultures under constant light and temperature regime. To elucidate the long-suspected dimorphism of T. amphioxeia and Plagioselmis prolonga (14, 16) and its ecological implications we (i) assessed potential dimorphism by analyzing a time series of the abundance of these cryptophytes in a temperate mesohaline shallow estuary (Roskilde Fjord, Denmark), (ii) investigated similarities in the 18S rDNA of species in the Plagioselmis/Teleaulax/Geminigera clade, (iii) investigated the occurrence of nuclear phase changes by comparing the amount of DNA in P. prolonga and T. amphioxeia, and (iv) compared the morphology of P. prolonga and T. amphioxeia using scanning electron and light microscopy to address the taxonomic revision of the two species.

RESULTS

In situ dynamics

Overall, the two populations, P. prolonga and T. amphioxeia, co-occurred and displayed similar seasonal dynamics in Roskilde Fjord (Fig. 1A). Both populations were present in all observations, with the highest abundances in March (early spring) in both years (Fig. 1A). The lowest abundances were observed in June to July 2016 and April to May 2017 (Fig. 1A). During winter and early spring, the abundance of T. amphioxeia was higher than P. prolonga (Fig. 1A). For the rest of the year, the cell numbers of the two populations were similar but with higher cell numbers of P. prolonga compared to T. amphioxeia in May to October 2016, April to May 2017, and July to August 2017 (Fig. 1A).

Fig. 1. Dynamics of Plagioselmis prolonga and Teleaulax amphioxeia.

Fig. 1

(A) Dynamics of cell abundance of P. prolonga (blue circles) and T. amphioxeia (pink triangles) in Roskilde Fjord from March 2016 to November 2017. (B) Dynamics of Rcrypto, the ratio between P. prolonga to T. amphioxeia (red triangles), DIN (black circles), and DIP (gray circles) concentration for the same period depicted in (A). (C and D) Trajectory dynamics between Rcrypto and DIN concentrations in 2016 (C) and 2017 (D). In (A) and (B), symbols are the observations, and lines are the 10 days moving average. In (C) and (D), dots represent the observations, colored thick lines represent the time trajectories estimated from the GAM, and the thick black lines represent the linear relationship between DIN and Rcrypto. Trajectories for the 2 years are shown separately for better visualizing the idiosyncrasy.

During spring, inorganic nutrients (both nitrogen and phosphorus) are depleted simultaneously (Fig. 1B). DIN and the ratio between cell abundances of P. prolonga and T. amphioxeia (Rcrypto) exhibited almost inverse patterns as the ratio increased with decreasing DIN and vice versa (Fig. 1B). This was not observed for dissolved inorganic phosphorus (DIP) (Fig. 1B and fig. S1). The generalized additive model (GAM) analysis revealed a significant linear relationship with DIN (P < 0.0001) and significant time departures (P < 0.0001) from this relationship (Fig. 1, C and D). The time trajectories generally followed the DIN relationship with idiosyncratic departures typically lasting 1 to 2 months. The estimated relationship to DIN indicated that P. prolonga on average would be more abundant than T. amphioxeia when DIN is <1.6 μM.

Phylogeny

The genera Teleaulax, Plagioselmis, and Geminigera form one clade with maximum support in the phylogenetic analysis (Fig. 2 and fig. S2). A sister group to this clade is formed by H. phi and G. theta. Within the Teleaulax/Plagioselmis/Geminigera clade, T. amphioxeia clusters with P. prolonga, supporting the hypothesis that these are different life cycle stages of the same species. Sister group to T. amphioxeia is Teleaulax acuta. Geminigera cryophila clusters together with Plagioselmis nannoplanctica. Teleaulax gracilis and Teleaulax minuta are also part of this clade.

Fig. 2. Phylogeny of cryptophytes analyzed by Bayesian inference of 18S rDNA sequences.

Fig. 2

Numbers at nodes represent the posterior probability of Bayesian analysis/bootstrap values of maximum likelihood out of 1000 replicates/bootstrap values of neighbor-joining out of 10,000 replicates. Not resolved branches and branches with support values below 50% are marked with a minus sign (−). The scale bar corresponds to three substitutions per 100 nucleotide positions. Colors correspond to absorption maxima (i.e., PE545 = green). Branches for freshwater species are blue, marine and brackish species are black. Newly sequenced strains are in bold. Drawings of cells are not to scale.

Ploidy

P. prolonga cultures were denser than T. amphioxeia, as reflected by the higher nuclei counts (Fig. 3). Optical profiles of P. prolonga were characterized by a fluorescence peak of 885 ± 114 mV (means ± SD, n = 479) and total fluorescence of 8888 ± 810 mV, whereas T. amphioxeia nuclei profiles exhibited a fluorescence peak of 1700 ± 248 mV (n = 176) and total fluorescence of 18475 ± 1703 mV. The total fluorescence of T. amphioxeia nuclei is 2.08 times the mean total fluorescence found in P. prolonga nuclei (Fig. 3), supporting the hypothesis that P. prolonga is haploid and T. amphioxeia is diploid.

Fig. 3. Nuclei fluorescence of P. prolonga and T. amphioxeia.

Fig. 3

Histograms showing the nuclei counts in different classes of total yellow fluorescence (FLY) (proxy for amount of DNA) in extracted nuclei of P. prolonga (blue) and T. amphioxeia (pink) cultures stained with SYBR green dye. An example of an optical profile for the nuclei of each species is also provided, showing the high FLY and low SWS signal (characteristic for the nuclei) and differences in the FLY intensity between the two forms.

Morphology

Color variation has been observed in cells of both the diploid and haploid forms, with live cells varying from reddish brown to olive green (Figs. 4, A and B, and 5, A and B). Cell shape varies from elongated to more rounded (Figs. 4, A and B, and 5, A and B). During exponential growth, the elongated and reddish cells are most prominent, whereas more rounded cells and, occasionally, the greenish color appear during stationary phase.

Fig. 4. P. prolonga morphology.

Fig. 4

(A) Lateral view of P. prolonga with the tail (t), nucleus (nu), ejectosomes (ej), pyrenoid (py), and flagellum (fl). (B) Lateral view of P. prolonga without the tail, with chloroplast (chl), ejectosomes, and flagella. (C) Drawings of P. prolonga cell with the tail (left) and without the tail (right). (D) Lateral view with part of the surface periplast component (SPC). (E) Lateral view showing the inner periplast component (IPC) and tail; note the hexagonal periplast plates of the IPC and the ventral flagellum (vfl), which is shorter than the dorsal flagellum (dfl). (F) Ventral view of a cell without tail. The furrow (fu), IPC, flagella, and the mid-ventral band (mvb) are visible. (G) Closeup of (C) with detail of the mid-ventral band that bifurcates at the base of the furrow. (H) The mid-ventral band terminates before reaching the furrow and does not bifurcate. (I) Detail of the posterior end of a cell without tail. There are no hexagonal plates at the posterior end, and the mid-ventral band extends onto the dorsal side of the cell (arrow). (J) Detailed view of the periplast; the particles are probably part of the SPC. (K) Detailed view of the IPC. Scale bars are 10 μm (light microscopy) and 1 μm [scanning electron microscopy (SEM)]. Anterior of all cell oriented upwards.

Fig. 5. T. amphioxeia morphology.

Fig. 5

(A) Lateral view of elongated T. amphioxeia cell with olive-brown color with chloroplast, refractosome (rf), pyrenoid, and ejectosomes. (B) Lateral view of a more round T. amphioxeia cell, more reddish in color with chloroplast and refractosome. (C) Drawing of T. amphioxeia surface characters. (D) Ventral and lateral view of cells with intact SPC with a papillate structure (fixation with Lugol’s solution), furrow, and mid-ventral band that is almost lateral at the antapical end. (E) View from lateroposterior on the cell with SPC showing the short mid-ventral band. (F) Dorsal view of the cell with sheet-like IPC (fixation with OsO4). (G) Ventral view showing the furrow and ventral flagellum that is longer than the dorsal flagellum. (H) Detail of the antapical end with the mid-ventral band, which is short and curved and does not extend to the furrow. (I) Detail of the cell surface SPC visible in fixation with Lugol’s solution. (J) Detail of the cell surface IPC in fixation with OsO4. Scale bars are 10 μm (light microscopy) and 1 μm (SEM). Anterior of all cell oriented upwards.

Cells of the haploid P. prolonga stage are 6 to 8 μm long and 3 to 5 μm wide (Fig. 4, D and E). Two cell types could be found within the cultures, both having an acute antapical end. In one cell type, the antapical end is more elongated, resembling a tail (Fig. 4, A, C, and D), while in the other, the antapical end is shorter (Fig. 4, B, C, and E). All cells bear a prominent ventral furrow (Fig. 4F). The two flagella are inserted in a cavity at the right side of the apical end of the furrow (Fig. 4F), the dorsal flagellum being longer than the ventral. The cell surface is covered by pentagonal or—more commonly—hexagonal plates and cover the entire cell surface apart from the antapical end, which lacks plates (Fig. 4, G and H). The surface of the antapical end is somewhat uneven, with small knobs that indicate ejectosome openings (Fig. 4H). Small extrusomes are released from the narrow “sutures” between the plates, often at a junction of three plates. Holes in the sides of the furrow probably mark points where large ejectosomes have been discharged (Fig. 4F). The periplast plates are generally slightly smaller along the furrow, the flagellar insertion, and anteriorly. The plates appear to be arranged on the right-hand side in five to six irregular, oblique horizontal rows (Fig. 4E). On the left-hand side of the cell, the plates extend over the cell apex without being interrupted by the flagellar canal, in seven to eight rows. A prominent longitudinal band extends from the region of the antapical end of the furrow to the cell antapex [the so-called mid-ventral band of Hill and Wetherbee (12)], typically about 4 μm in length. The mid-ventral band often terminates a short distance before the furrow (Fig. 4H); in other cells, it extends for a very short distance along the left side of the furrow, and in other cells again, the band dichotomizes at the base of the furrow and extends for a short distance along the two sides of the furrow (Fig. 4G). It also extends onto the dorsal side but only for about 1 μm (Fig. 4I).

The diploid T. amphioxeia stage is very different. The cells are 8 to 13 μm long and 4 to 6 μm wide (Fig. 5, D and E). The flagella insert near the anterior end of the right-hand side of the furrow as in the Plagioselmis stage. The two flagella, however, show reversed relative lengths, the ventral flagellum being longer than the dorsal (Fig. 5G). The inner periplast is a sheet-like periplast and does not show any sign of plates. The surface periplast is papillate. The only other feature of the Teleaulax stage that deserves mentioning is the presence of a short, curved, mid-ventral band (Fig. 5H). In Teleaulax, in contrast to the Plagioselmis stage, the mid-ventral band passes in an oblique direction from the antapex and measures only ca. 2.5 μm in length. In short, the two stages of the life cycle differ in size, relative flagellar length, periplast structure, and in the paths and lengths of the mid-ventral band (for a summary, see table S1).

DISCUSSION

The taxa P. prolonga and T. amphioxeia represent different life stages of the same species. This conclusion is based on our observations on laboratory-grown cultures, congruence of 18S rDNA sequences, and different ploidy of the two taxa. We provide evidence that P. prolonga is the haploid stage and T. amphioxeia the diploid stage of the same life cycle, and most importantly, that these two stages show distinct ecological preferences.

Taxonomic considerations

The genus Plagioselmis was originally described by Butcher in 1967 (17) to comprise two species. His description was not valid, as he failed to designate one of the species as type [International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants; ICN, Shenzhen Code, Art. 7 (18)]. In 1990, Chrétiennot-Dinet (19) designated P. prolonga as type species but failed to give a full reference to Butcher’s description, and her designation is therefore also invalid (ICN. Art. 41.5). The first valid description of the Plagioselmis genus was in 1994 by Novarino et al. (20), who provided a discussion of the species known at the time.

Teleaulax was described in 1991 by Hill (21) with T. acuta as type species. This generic name is, therefore, older than the first valid publication of the genus Plagioselmis from 1994. After finding that P. prolonga is the haploid stage of the life cycle of T. amphioxeia, the correct name for the species is T. amphioxeia, and P. prolonga is a synonym. T. amphioxeia is thus composed of two morphotypes, the diploid stage (T. amphioxeia) and the haploid stage, which we suggest calling the Plagioselmis stage of T. amphioxeia.

Dimorphism in the cryptophytes

Hill and Wetherbee (12) were the first to show, in P. sulcata, a cryptomonad life cycle comprising two morphologically different stages. One morphotype was larger (9 to 14 μm), with a sheet-like periplast, and the other was slightly smaller (7.5 to 10.5 μm), with a periplast consisting of hexagonal plates. The DNA content of the larger morphotype was twice that of the smaller morphotype, indicating that the two morphotypes, one diploid and one haploid, were different life stages of a complex life history.

On the basis of identical molecular sequences, Hoef-Emden et al. (14) found another dimorphism in species of what used to be considered two separate genera, Cryptomonas and Campylomonas. Like the two morphotypes of P. sulcata, the authors found that one morphotype had an IPC consisting of hexagonal plates (Cryptomonas-like, termed cryptomorph), while the other had a sheet-like IPC (Campylomonas-like, termed campylomorph). Although not investigated, it is likely that the two morphotypes of the same species also involve a nuclear phase change.

Here, we provide a third example of a true dimorphism in the cryptomonads. Similar to both P. sulcata and the species in the genus Cryptomonas, one morphotype of T. amphioxeia is larger with a sheet-like IPC, and the other is smaller with an IPC consisting of hexagonal plates (Figs. 4 and 5). Consistent with the case of P. sulcata, the larger stage has twice the DNA of the smaller stage (Fig. 3) and is thus the diploid morphotype, and the smaller is the haploid “Plagioselmis stage.”

Recently, another cryptophyte with a suspected dimorphism (Baffinella frigida) was described from the Arctic by Daugbjerg et al. (22). This species was covered by hexagonal plates. Another strain (CCMP-2293) had identical small subunit DNA sequences but twice as much DNA as B. frigida. It was speculated that this other strain is a diploid stage which, based on the other examples of dimorphism, may have a sheet-like IPC, but this was not examined.

By extrapolation of the four cases of cryptomonads with dimorphic life cycles above, one may speculate that other genera described with a sheet-like periplast not divided into plates, such as G. cryophila, H. phi, and Storeatula major, are likewise diploid stages. Genera with plates include Cryptomonas, Rhodomonas, Rhinomonas, Chroomonas, Komma, Falcomonas, and Hemiselmis. Judging from pigmentation, the haploid stage of Storeatula may belong to Rhinomonas, as suggested by Majaneva et al. (15), as it resembles Rhinomonas in pigmentation and lack of a furrow. The haploid stage of Geminigera could perhaps be another species of Plagioselmis, since both have three thylakoid lamellae in the chloroplasts. In our phylogenetic analysis, P. nannoplanctica clusters together with G. cryophila. However, P. nannoplanctica is a freshwater species found in the Northern Hemisphere, while G. cryophila is a marine species from Antarctica. Thus, they seem unlikely to be two forms of the same life cycle. The haploid stage of H. phi may be a yet undiscovered form of the genus Guillardia, as the two genera consistently form a clade in molecular trees (10).

Cryptophyte life cycle

In our laboratory cultures, the change from T. amphioxeia to P. prolonga (meiosis) was observed twice in the Roskilde strains. The change from P. prolonga to T. amphioxeia (fusion) was never observed in culture, but gamete fusion in cryptophytes has been observed for Cryptomonas sp. (23, 24) and Chroomonas acuta (25). The authors noted that fusion could start when caudal tips of two cells touch, but usually plasmogamy starts when the posterior tip of one cell touches the mid-central region of another cell—that is at the furrow. Notably, the described and putative haploid forms (P. prolonga and B. frigida) have two cell types, one with a short antapical end and the other with a prolonged antapical end (sometimes called a tail). If one assumes that the process of fusion, as described by Kugrens and Lee (25), is universal among cryptophytes, one can speculate that the cells with the tail are “+ cells,” and cells with short ends function as “− cells” during the fusion process. The mid-ventral band, as well as the batteries of ejectosomes at the posterior end, might have a function in the fusion process. When studied in thin sections, this antapical area of the Plagioselmis stage was found to be packed with ejectosomes (20). The mid-ventral band is a feature that has been described for cryptophyte species with plated IPCs (as P. prolonga). The band is much less developed or even absent in the Teleaulax genus (16), similarly to P. sulcata, in which the mid-ventral band is featured only in the haplomorph (12). Those observations corroborate a potential role of the mid-ventral band during fusion of cells.

The ecological context of the cryptophyte life stages

Sexual reproduction is common in eukaryotes and likely evolved only once in the last common ancestor to all eukaryotes (26). However, for many taxa, sexual reproduction has never been reported, and it is generally assumed that sexual reproduction is more costly than asexual reproduction (27). Thus, it is a conundrum as to why sex persists in stable environments where the adaptive advantages of sex are not obvious (28). Many single-celled organisms shift to sexual reproduction when starved or stressed (29). This could explain why sexual reproduction and life cycle changes are rare under culture conditions and why the trigger from one stage to another has not been determined yet in the laboratory.

Both the haploid Plagioselmis stage and the diploid Teleaulax stage in this study reproduce mitotically in culture. The life cycle is haplodiplontic, and in contrast to what was believed until recently, the same has now been found to apply to many haptophytes and choanoflagellates (13, 30, 31). Overall, haplodiplontic life cycles are generalized as an adaptation to a variable environment and would allow a species to occupy more than one niche (32). In coccolithophores, haploid and diploid phases are associated with different calcification modes (13), and changes in the life phase can be induced depending on the magnitude of stressors (i.e., changes in nutrient and temperature regimes) to which cells are exposed (33). In Phaeocystis globosa, flagellate cells (haploid) are more prone to grazing but are better competitors for nutrients than the colonial forms (diploid). This correlation is reflected in the distribution patterns of the two morphotypes, with the flagellate form occurring in waters poorer in nutrients than the colonial ones (31).

Until now, the interaction between the two life cycle stages of cryptophytes in nature has remained unknown. In natural populations of Roskilde Fjord, both the haploid Plagioselmis stage and the diploid Teleaulax stage of T. amphioxeia are observed year round; however, the relative importance of the two forms changes throughout the year. The diploid form dominates during winter, when DIN concentrations are high and grazing is reduced, while the haploid form increases in relative abundance during late spring and summer, when DIN decreases to potential limiting concentrations and grazing pressure is high [Fig. 1; (34)]. Although other factors (i.e., temperature and irradiance) also change during the same period, it is important to highlight that the changes from T. amphioxeia to P. prolonga observed in cultures occurred in cells kept under constant temperature and light. Therefore, we speculate that either nutrient limitation or an increase in pH due to CO2 limitation could trigger the changes in life cycle stages. Considering that the changes in cultures were observed a while after maximum cell abundances were reached (when pH is the highest), we believe that nutrient depletion was likely more significant than an effect of pH. In addition, the cultures lost their typical reddish coloration, and a reduction of cell size was observed, consistent with previously reported effects of N-limitation on cryptophytes (35). In addition to the fact that the relative proportion of haploid and diploid stages in the field did show a significant correlation to DIN but not to DIP (Fig. 1B and fig. S1), evidence suggests that N-limitation could be a trigger for changing life cycle stages in those organisms.

Changes in the predominant life form might be an ecological strategy to cope with resource availability and grazing pressure, as the smaller Plagioselmis form has a higher surface-to-volume ratio, optimizing nutrient uptake, and shows a faster growth rate than the diploid form, thus possibly enabling this stage to cope more effectively with intense grazing. The fact that both haploid and diploid populations coexist throughout the year indicates that sexual reproduction might occur frequently. In addition to this work, the co-occurrence of P. prolonga and T. amphioxeia has been reported in other studies as well. Hill (36) reports both forms in all seasons in the western Baltic Sea (Belt Sea and Kattegat), with P. prolonga abundant in all seasons except in winter. T. amphioxeia was less abundant, but it was also observed in the Gulf of Finland. In the Gulf of Naples, P. prolonga was reported as one of the main cryptophyte species, occurring all year round at low cell densities but also, on one occasion, forming a spring bloom (1).

The occurrence of T. amphioxeia in all seasons might be because of their production of phycobiliproteins (PE545) combined with the haplodiplontic life cycle. Phycobiliproteins function as light-harvesting complexes, capturing light energy and transferring it onto the chlorophylls during photosynthesis (37). This allows the organisms to thrive in the temperate winter, when light levels limit the growth of most species. During this time, inorganic nutrients are abundant, and grazing is low (38). For B. frigida, PE545 (phycoerythrin 545) was produced when cells were exposed to low light intensities, whereas under higher light intensity, the cells were green and did not show the PE545 peak (22), illustrating the advantages of PE545 under low light. Furthermore, PE545 is also hypothesized to be a N reservoir, as the molecule is N-rich. When cells are N-limited, PE545 is consumed, causing cells to change color from reddish to a more greenish tone (35). We hypothesize that the haplodiplontic life cycle provides the flexibility to endure adversity (nutrient limitation, high grazing, and changes in temperature and light) by changes in cell size and by always ensuring genetic flexibility in the population. This partly explains the species habitat range, spanning over a wide range of temperatures, salinities, and nutrient availability (e.g., Baltic and Mediterranean Sea). The Plagioselmis form seems to predominate in nutrient-poor waters (Gulf of Naples; Kattegat) in contrast to areas where inorganic nutrients are seasonally abundant (Roskilde Fjord and Gulf of Finland) and T. amphioxeia might be more important. This ecological flexibility could also explain why specialist grazers such as M. rubrum rely on Teleaulax as prey, which will often be present despite their usually low relative abundance in the natural environment.

We conclude that P. prolonga is the haploid life cycle stage of the cryptophyte species T. amphioxeia and should thus be referred to as the Plagioselmis stage of T. amphioxeia. We determined the two taxa to be the same species because of a change of morphology in culture and congruent 18S rDNA sequences. We conclude that one is the haploid form of the other because the Plagioselmis stage contains half the DNA of T. amphioxeia. As more dimorphisms are found in both known and still-undescribed species, future studies are likely to synonymize more species. The frequency and role of sexual reproduction in protists remain enigmatic, especially in natural environments. Here, we provide an ecological perspective to the change between forms. The dimorphic life cycle of T. amphioxeia may explain its persistence and success, as the smaller haploid form appears to dominate during periods of increased grazing pressure and lower nutrients. In future studies, ecological perspectives like the one presented here may provide valuable knowledge on the frequency and role of sexual reproduction in protists in their natural environments, something that is presently poorly understood.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Experimental design

Environmental water samples (2 liters) were taken approximately daily between February 2016 and November 2017 at the surface of a fixed station (55°41′30.19″N, 12°04′55.24″E) located in Roskilde Fjord, Denmark. Samples were brought to the laboratory shortly after sampling (10 to 20 min.), where live samples of phytoplankton were analyzed by a pulse-recording flow cytometer CytoSense (CytoBuoy, The Netherlands). Samples were also analyzed weekly for DIN and DIP (PO43−) on a Scan++ Continuous Flow Analyzer (Skalar Analytical B.V., Breda, The Netherlands) following the methodology described in (39). DIN was calculated as the sum of measured NO2, NO3, and NH4+.

For phytoplankton enumeration, 500 to 1000 μl of live samples were analyzed with CytoSense [at a flow rate of 8 μl s−1 and a trigger level of 30 mV for the FLR (red fluorescence) sensor]. For each particle, signals are acquired from multiple detectors as the particle or cell travels through the laser beam focus, originating an optical profile. Optical profiles were obtained by the software CytoUSB (cytobuoy.com) and used to identify populations with similar optical properties (clusters). Here, we focused on the cryptophyte clusters [characterized by high orange fluorescence (FLO) relative to FLR] identified as T. amphioxeia and P. prolonga. They were further distinguished from each other by lower intensities of FLR, FLO, and FWS (forward scatter, indicating smaller size) of P. prolonga compared to T. amphioxeia and by their distinct optical profile shapes: a pronounced shoulder on the scattering signal for T. amphioxeia while more regular in P. prolonga (fig. S3). Identification of the clusters was confirmed by pictures taken by CytoSense and by periodic sample observation in the light microscope.

In those samples, cryptophytes were always present and dominated total phytoplankton biomass in different periods (34). Cultures were established for species identification. For one T. amphioxeia isolate, a change in morphology was observed when cultures were left undisturbed for an extended period (approximately 1.5 months), with cells losing the characteristic reddish coloration, decreasing in size, and becoming more rounded. After culture replication, cells recovered their typical color and hyaline tail but did not recover in size. After close inspection under the light microscope, it was confirmed that the morphology had changed from T. amphioxeia to P. prolonga. Life form change in our cultures was also indicated by an increase in growth rates, as under the same conditions, P. prolonga cultures needed to be transferred more often than T. amphioxeia. In addition, P. prolonga cultures sustained higher cell densities without signs of stress (i.e., change in coloration) for longer periods than T. amphioxeia. The life form change was observed twice, indicating that T. amphioxeia and P. prolonga are not two distinct species but different life cycle stages of the same species. This potential dimorphism was verified by sequencing of rDNA and investigating cell morphology and ploidy. Detailed information on the methods used for DNA extraction, polymerase chain reaction, sequencing, ploidy determination and morphology studies, and CytoSense specifications can be found in Table 1, Supplementary Materials and Methods, and table S2.

Table 1. Accession numbers of newly sequenced strains.

Species Strain Gene Length (bp) Accession number
Teleaulax amphioxeia SCCAP:K-1837 18S partial 1218 MK956825
ITS1, 5.8S, ITS2 648 MT420722
Teleaulax amphioxeia Roskilde March 18S partial 1651 MK956196
Plagioselmis prolonga Roskilde December 18S partial 1173 MK956143
ITS1, 5.8S, ITS2 726 MT420721
Teleaulax acuta SCCAP:K-1486 18S partial 1201 MK956814
Geminigera cryophila RCC5152 18S partial 1745 MK956818
Teleaulax amphioxeia SCCAP:K-0434 5.8S partial, ITS2, 28S partial 687 JN584173

Statistical analysis

To examine the hypothesized relationship of life-cycle stage to DIN, a semi-parametric GAM was used to determine the abundance ratio between P. prolonga and T. amphioxeia (40). The GAM included a linear relationship to DIN and a nonparametric smoother for the departure from this relationship over time. For visualizing the time trajectory, a smoothed version of the DIN time trend was scored with the GAM. Both DIN and abundance ratios were log-transformed before analysis to address the inherent scale dependency in the data, and results from the GAM approach were back-transformed for visualization. Note that only data on cell abundances (cells per milliliter), rather than biomass, were compared in this study, as the larger size of T. amphioxeia would inflate their relative importance and mask dynamics of P. prolonga.

Supplementary Material

abb1611_SM.pdf
abb1611_SM.pdf (970.9KB, pdf)

Acknowledgments

Funding: L.H. was supported by a grant from the Brazilian program Science without Borders/CAPES (grant no. 13581-13-9). This study is a contribution from the BONUS COCOA project (grant agreement 2112932-1) supported by Innovation Fund Denmark and the European Union. A.A., N.L., and P.J.H. were supported by a grant from The Danish Council for Independent Research to P.J.H. (grant no. 4181-00484). The publication charges for this article have been funded by a grant from the publication fund of UiT The Arctic University of Norway. N.L. acknowledges support from the Villum Foundation under grant no. 00023065. Author contributions: L.H. and A.A. conceived the taxonomical part of the study; J.C., H.H.J., and L.H. conceived the ecological part of the study. H.E.B., L.H., and A.A. did molecular work; L.H., L.G.-C, and Ø.M. performed SEM. A.A., L.H., and H.E.B. drafted the manuscript. All authors contributed to writing the manuscript and read and approved the final version of the manuscript. Competing interests: The authors declare that they have no competing interests. Data and materials availability: All data needed to evaluate the conclusions in the paper are present in the paper and/or the Supplementary Materials. Additional data related to this paper may be requested from the authors.

SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIALS

Supplementary material for this article is available at http://advances.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/6/37/eabb1611/DC1

REFERENCES AND NOTES

  • 1.Cerino F., Zingone A., A survey of cryptomonad diversity and seasonality at a coastal Mediterranean site. Eur. J. Phycol. 41, 363–378 (2006). [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Gustafson D. E., Stoecker D. K., Johnson M. D., Van Heukelem W. F., Sneider K., Cryptophyte algae are robbed of their organelles by the marine ciliate Mesodinium rubrum. Nature 405, 1049–1052 (2000). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Hansen P. J., Moldrup M., Tarangkoon W., Garcia-Cuetos L., Moestrup Ø., Direct evidence for symbiont sequestration in the marine red tide ciliate Mesodinium rubrum. Aquat. Microb. Ecol. 66, 63–75 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Koike K., Takishita K., Anucleated cryptophyte vestiges in the gonyaulacalean dinoflagellates Amylax buxus and Amylax triacantha (Dinophyceae). Phycol. Res. 56, 301–311 (2008). [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Park M. G., Kim M., Kang M., A dinoflagellate Amylax triacantha with plastids of the cryptophyte origin: phylogeny, feeding mechanism, and growth and grazing responses. J. Eukaryot. Microbiol. 60, 363–376 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Hansen P. J., Nielsen L. T., Johnson M., Berge T., Flynn K. J., Acquired phototrophy in Mesodinium and Dinophysis - A review of cellular organization, prey selectivity, nutrient uptake and bioenergetics. Harmful Algae 28, 126–139 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Peltomaa E., Johnson M. D., Mesodinium rubrum exhibits genus-level but not species-level cryptophyte prey selection. Aquat. Microb. Ecol. 78, 147–159 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Rial P., Laza-Martinez A., Reguera B., Raho N., Rodriguez F., Origin of cryptophyte plastids in Dinophysis from Galician waters: results from field and culture experiments. Aquat. Microb. Ecol. 76, 163–174 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Clay B. L., Kugrens P., Lee R. E., A revised classification of Cryptophyta. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 131, 131–151 (1999). [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Hoef-Emden K., Marin B., Melkonian M., Nuclear and nucleomorph SSU rDNA phylogeny in the Cryptophyta and the evolution of cryptophyte diversity. J. Mol. Evol. 55, 161–179 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Hoef-Emden K., Molecular phylogeny of phycocyanin-containing cryptophytes: Evolution of biliproteins and geographical distribution. J. Phycol. 44, 985–993 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Hill D. R. A., Wetherbee R., Proteomonas sulcata gen. et sp. nov. (Cryptophyceae), a cryptomonad with two morphologically distinct and alternating forms. Phycologia 25, 521–543 (1986). [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Houdan A., Billard C., Marie D., Not F., Sáez A. G., Young J. R., Probert I., Holococcolithophore-heterococcolithophore (Haptophyta) life cycles: Flow cytometric analysis of relative ploidy levels. Syst. Biodivers. 1, 453–465 (2004). [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Hoef-Emden K., Melkonian M., Revision of the genus Cryptomonas (Cryptophyceae): a combination of molecular phylogeny and morphology provides insights into a long-hidden dimorphism. Protist 154, 371–409 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Majaneva M., Remonen I., Rintala J.-M., Belevich I., Kremp A., Setälä O., Jokitalo E., Blomster J., Rhinomonas nottbecki n. sp. (Cryptomonadales) and molecular phylogeny of the family Pyrenomonadaceae. J. Eukaryot. Microbiol. 61, 480–492 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Laza-Martinez A., Arluzea J., Miguel I., Orive E., Morphological and molecular characterization of Teleaulax gracilis sp. nov. and T. minuta sp. nov. (Cryptophyceae). Phycologia 51, 649–661 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  • 17.R. W. Butcher, An introductory account of the smaller algae of British coastal waters. Part IV: Cryptophyceae, in Fishery Investigations, Series IV (Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, 1967), pp. 1–54. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.N. J. Turland et al., International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants (Shenzhen Code) adopted by the Nineteenth International Botanical Congress Shenzhen, China, July 2017 (Koeltz Botanical Books, Glashütten, 2018). [Google Scholar]
  • 19.M.-J. Chrétiennot-Dinet, Chlorarachnophycées, Chlorophycées, Chrysophycées, Cryptophycées, Euglénophycées, Eustigmatophycées, Prasinophycées, Prymnesiophycées, Rhodophycées et Tribophycées (Atlas du phytoplancton marin, Éditions du CNRS, 1990) vol. 3. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Novarino G., Lucas I. A. N., Morrall S., Observations on the genus Plagioselmis (Cryptophyceae). Cryptogam. Algol. 15, 87–107 (1994). [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Hill D. R. A., A revised circumscription of Cryptomonas (Cryptophyceae) based on examination of Australian strains. Phycologia 30, 170–188 (1991). [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Daugbjerg N., Norlin A., Lovejoy C., Baffinella frigidus gen. et sp. nov. (Baffinellaceae fam. nov., Cryptophyceae) from Baffin Bay: Morphology, pigment profile, phylogeny, and growth rate response to three abiotic factors. J. Phycol. 54, 665–680 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Wawrik F., Sexualität bei Cryptomonas sp. und Chlorogonium maximum. Nova Hedwigia 8, 283–292 (1969). [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Wawrik F., Eisschluß- und Eisbruchvegetationen in den Teichen des nördlichen Waldviertels 1977/1978. Arch. Protistenkd. 122, 247–266 (1979). [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Kugrens P., Lee R. E., Ultrastructure of fertilization in a cryptomonad. J. Phycol. 24, 385–393 (1988). [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Goodenough U., Heitman J., Origins of eukaryotic sexual reproduction. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 6, a016154 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Speijer D., Lukes J., Elias M., Sex is a ubiquitous, ancient, and inherent attribute of eukaryotic life. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 112, 8827–8834 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Brandeis M., New-age ideas about age-old sex: separating meiosis from mating could solve a century-old conundrum. Biol. Rev. 93, 801–810 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Ram Y., Hadany L., Condition-dependent sex: who does it, when and why? Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 371, 1–8 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Thomsen H. A., Østergaard J. B., Circumstantial evidence of life history events in loricate choanoflagellates. Eur. J. Protistol. 58, 26–34 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Peperzak L., Colijn F., Vrieling E. G., Gieskes W. W. C., Peeters J. C. H., Observations of flagellates in colonies of Phaeocystis globosa (Prymnesiophyceae); a hypothesis for their position in the life cycle. J. Plankton Res. 22, 2181–2203 (2000). [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Valero M., Richerd S., Perrot V., Destombe C., Evolution of alternation of haploid and diploid phases in life cycles. Trends Ecol. Evol. 7, 25–29 (1992). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Nöel M.-H., Kawachi M., Inouye I., Induced Dimorphic Life Cycle of a Coccolithophorid, Calyptrosphaera sphaeroidea (Prymnesiophyceae, Haptophyta). J. Phycol. 40, 112–129 (2004). [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Haraguchi L., Jakobsen H. H., Lundholm N., Carstensen J., Phytoplankton community dynamic: A driver for ciliate trophic strategies. Front. Mar. Sci. 5, 1–16 (2018).29552559 [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Lewitus A. J., Caron D. A., Relative effects of nitrogen or phosphorus depletion and light intensity on the pigmentation, chemical composition, and volume of Pyrenomonas salina (Cryptophyceae). Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 61, 171–181 (1990). [Google Scholar]
  • 36.D. R. A. Hill, Teleaulax amphioxeia Conrad (Hill), comb. nov. (Cryptophyceae). Baltic Sea Identification Sheet No. 13. Ann. Bot. Fennici., 175–176 (1992).
  • 37.Spear-Bernstein L., Miller K. R., Unique location of the phycobiliprotein light-harvesting pigment in the Cryptophyceae. J. Phycol. 25, 412–419 (1989). [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Walter B., Peters J., van Beusekom J. E. E., The effect of constant darkness and short light periods on the survival and physiological fitness of two phytoplankton species and their growth potential after re-illumination. Aquat. Ecol. 51, 591–603 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  • 39.K. Grasshof, Methods of Seawater Analysis (Verlag Chemie, 1976). [Google Scholar]
  • 40.J. Carstensen, in Application of Threshold Concepts in Natural Resource Decision Making, G. R. Guntenspergen, Ed. (Springer, 2014), pp. 255–272. [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Loeblich A. R. III, Smith V. E., Chloroplast pigments of the marine dinoflagellate Gyrodinium resplendens. Lipids 3, 5–13 (1968). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Richlen M. L., Barber P. H., A technique for the rapid extraction of microalgal DNA from single live and preserved cells. Mol. Ecol. Notes 5, 688–691 (2005). [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Landan G., Graur D., Local reliability measures from sets of co-optimal multiple sequence alignments. Pac. Symp. Biocomput. 13, 15–24 (2008). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Sela I., Ashkenazy H., Katoh K., Pupko T., GUIDANCE2: accurate detection of unreliable alignment regions accounting for the uncertainty of multiple parameters. Nucleic Acids Res. 43, W7–W14 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Guindon S., Dufayard J.-F., Lefort V., Anisimova M., Hordijk W., Gascuel O., New algorithms and methods to estimate maximum-likelihood phylogenies: assessing the performance of PhyML 3.0. Syst. Biol. 59, 307–321 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Lefort V., Longueville J. E., Gascuel O., SMS: Smart Model Selection in PhyML. Mol. Biol. Evol. 34, 2422–2424 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Huelsenbeck J. P., Ronquist F., MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 17, 754–755 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Nabbi A., Riabowol K., Rapid isolation of nuclei from cells in vitro. Cold Spring Harb Protoc 2015, 769–772 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Marie D., Partensky F., Jacquet S., Vaulot D., Enumeration and cell cycle analysis of natural populations of marine picoplankton by flow cytometry using the nucleic acid stain SYBR Green I. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 63, 186–193 (1997). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Dubelaar G. B., Geerders P. J., Jonker R. R., High frequency monitoring reveals phytoplankton dynamics. J. Environ. Monit. 6, 946–952 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Thyssen M., Alvain S., Lefèbvre A., Dessailly D., Rijkeboer M., Guiselin N., Creach V., Artigas L.-F., High-resolution analysis of a North Sea phytoplankton community structure based on in situ flow cytometry observations and potential implication for remote sensing. Biogeosciences 12, 4051–4066 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Takano Y., Horiguchi T., Surface ultrastructure and molecular phylogenetics of four unarmored heterotrophic dinoflagellates, including the type species of the genus Gyrodinium (Dinophyceae). Phycol. Res. 52, 107–116 (2004). [Google Scholar]
  • 53.T. J. White, T. Bruns, S. Lee, J. Taylor, in PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications, M. A. Innis, J. J. Gelfand, J. J. Sninsky, T. J. White, Eds. (Academic Press, 1990), pp. 315–322. [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Yamaguchi A., Horiguchi T., Molecular phylogenetic study of the heterotrophic dinoflagellate genus Protoperidinium (Dinophyceae) inferred from small subunit rRNA gene sequences. Phycol. Res. 53, 30–42 (2005). [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Medlin L., Elwood H. J., Stickel S., Sogin M. L., The characterization of enzymatically amplified eukaryotic 16S-like rRNA-coding regions. Gene 71, 491–499 (1988). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

abb1611_SM.pdf
abb1611_SM.pdf (970.9KB, pdf)

Supplementary material for this article is available at http://advances.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/6/37/eabb1611/DC1


Articles from Science Advances are provided here courtesy of American Association for the Advancement of Science

RESOURCES