Abstract
The novel virus, Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) caused the Corona Virus Disease-2019 (COVID-19) outbreak in Wuhan, Hubei province of China. This virus disseminated rapidly and reached to an unprecedented pandemic proportion in more than 213 nations with a large number of fatalities. The hypersecretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines is the main cause of mortality and morbidity due to COVID-19, therefore strategies that avert the cytokine storm may play a crucial role in abating the severity of COVID-19. This review highlights the minute details of SARS-CoV-2, its genomic organization, genomic variations within structural and non-structural proteins and viral progression mechanism in human beings. The approaches like antiviral strategies are discussed, including drugs that obstruct viral propagation and suppress the pro-inflammatory cytokines. This compilation emphasizes Mesenchymal Stem Cells (MSCs) based therapy alone or in combination with other therapeutics as an attractive curative approach for COVID-19 pandemic. The MSCs and its secretome, including antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) have various capabilities, for instance, immunomodulation, regeneration, antimicrobial properties, potential for attenuating the cytokine storm and bare minimum chances of being infected with SARS-CoV-2 virus. The immunomodulatory property of MSCs affects inflammatory state and regulates immune response during SARS-CoV-2 infection. However, as of now, there is no WHO-approved MSCs based therapy for the treatment of COVID-19 infection.
Keywords: SARS-CoV-2, Cytokine storm, Repurposed drugs, MSCs transplantation, Antimicrobial peptides
Introduction
The term coronavirus (Latin: corona, crown) is coined due to presence of spikes glycoproteins on the surface that gives this virus a crown-like appearance. Coronaviruses belong to the family Coronaviridae and the order Nidovirales [1], broadly distributed in humans and other mammals, having a large positive-sense RNA encapsulated within a protein coat. Coronaviruses majorly affect animals and display zoonotic transmission from animals to humans. They have been classified into four groups, namely, alpha (α), beta (β), gamma (γ) and delta (δ), causing illness ranging from mild fever and cold to severe diseases, like the Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS) and Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS). Most of the human coronaviruses cause mild infection but in the past two decades coronaviruses of beta family viz. Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus (SARS-CoV) and the Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus (MERS-CoV), have resulted in more than 10,000 cumulative cases and had a fatality rate of 10% and 37% respectively [2, 3]. Recently, a new member of the beta group of coronaviruses, SARS-CoV-2 has been identified, which has caused a pandemic disease (COVID-19) across the globe. Similar to SARS-CoV, the SARS-CoV-2 also affects the lower respiratory system to cause viral pneumonia. Furthermore, many reports suggest a disturbance in gastrointestinal system, heart, kidney, liver and central nervous system that ultimately lead to multiple organ failure. The SARS-CoV-2 virus stimulates a profusion of cytokines such as IL-2, IL-6, IL-7, G-SCF, IP10, MCP1, MIP1A, and TNFα. This inflammatory response is known as cytokines storm. It is followed by edema, dysfunction of air exchange, acute respiratory distress syndrome, acute cardiac injury and secondary infections. Sometimes cytokines storm becomes extraordinary, resulting in multiple organ failure and death [4, 5]. Therefore strategies that circumvent the cytokine storm may play a pivotal role in the COVID-19 treatment. MSCs possess immunomodulatory properties, secrete various AMPs and have a minimum probability of being contaminated with SARS-CoV-2 virus due to absence of ACE-2 receptor [4]. In this review, we have concisely discussed COVID-19 infection, its genome organization, structural and non-structural proteins, and all the information that would make readers cognizant about this viral disease. We have also reviewed the immunomodulatory and antimicrobial properties of MSCs to combat this viral pandemic.
Comparative Analysis of Commencement and Dispersion of Coronaviruses
In the year 2003, people of Guangdong province of China were infected by a virus that led to SARS. It was found to be a member of the beta coronaviruses and named SARS-CoV. The infected population exhibited pneumonia-like symptoms with a diffused alveolar injury that causes acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). This disease disseminated all around the globe in a short span of time and infected more than 8000 people and resulted in 800 deaths with 10% mortality rate. After a decade, in the year 2012, another member of the coronavirus family was identified and its zone of infection was majorly confined to the Arabian Peninsula and consequently, the virus was named as MERS-CoV. This outbreak had 2260 confirmed cases and 803 reported deaths. It targets the upper respiratory tract and causes severe respiratory distress [1]. At present, the whole world is experiencing an outbreak due to a novel strain of coronavirus named as SARS-CoV-2 and the resultant disease called as COVID-19. This outbreak was commenced in Wuhan, Hubei province of China, on December 2019, from seafood and live animal shopping market as shopping and feeding of animals like bats, frogs and snakes are permissible in China. The exact role of bats in the zoonotic origin of SARS-CoV-2 is not clear but scientists isolated SARS-CoV-2 from the infected patients for genomic sequencing and the subsequent studies suggested that this virus has 96.2% sequence similarity to bat CoV RaTG13 genome sequence {reproductive number (R0) of SARS-CoV-2 virus is 2.2–2.5}. This revealed that SARS-CoV-2 is most closely related to the viruses originated from bats [6, 7]. Its progression is detrimental to respiratory organs that lead to their malfunction. From Wuhan, this pandemic spilled over to more than 213 countries having 22,341,273 confirmed cases and 785,103 deaths till August 19th, 2020 [8]. The virus transmission took place from bats to the human community. Due to close contact with aerosols generated during coughing and sneezing, the disease spread rapidly among humans. The SARS-CoV-2 remains stable for many hours to days, depending upon the medium, for example, in aerosols it will survive up to 3 h, on copper for 4 h, and on cardboard up to 24 h, whereas on plastic and stainless steel it remains alive for 2–3 days [9]. On comparing SARS-CoV-2 with other viruses, such as influenza virus, SARS-CoV, MERS-CoV, it shows maximum mortality (Table 1).
Table 1.
Virus | Origin | Size | Outer protein | Cognate receptor | Affected area | Number of Cases |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Influenza (flu) | Enveloped, single-strand RNA (ssRNA) isolated in 1933. The core nucleoprotein is used to distinguish A, B, and C types of human influenza. | About 80-120 nm. Elliptical in shape. | Abundant surface protein is hemagglutinin (HA) and neuraminidase (N). | As the outer protein is hemagglutinin, it will bind to any cell receptor containing sialic acid, thus have a multi-step entry. | All over Asia, highly contagious. | 10 million |
SARS-CoV | Identified in 2003 as an animal virus, transmitted through bats. | Ranging from 80 to 90 nm. | The viral envelope consists of a lipid bilayer with M, E, and S proteins. | The spike protein in the virus binds to the cellular transmembrane ACE2 receptor. | A large number of countries. | 8000 |
MERS-CoV | Discovered in 2012 in humans. Phylogenetic studies suggest bats as origin; camel and then humans as a host. | In between 80 and 90 nm. | Spikes that form a crown structure with outer proteins M and E. | Spike protein binds to dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP4) as a functional receptor. | Mostly in Arabian Peninsula. | 2260 |
SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) | From Wuhan, China. Most possible origin is bat. | About 80-160 nm. | The viral envelope consists of a lipid bilayer with M, E, and S proteins. | ACE-2 receptor and cellular serine protease TMPRSS2 is essential for entry. | 213 countries and territories around the world (Ongoing). | 22,341,273 confirmed cases till August 19th 2020 (Ongoing). |
Genomic Organization of SARS-CoV-2
The comprehensive erudition about virus genetics and phenotypic traits play a key role in developing drugs and vaccine against SARS-CoV-2. It is a single-stranded positive-sense RNA, enveloping the largest genome (approximately 30 kb) among all the RNA viruses [10]. The orientation of genomic RNA of β-coronaviridae is from 5′-to-3’direction; it is interspersed with 6 open reading frames (ORF) and structural protein-coding genes. Most of the virion replicase genes are encoded by the 5′ end and it covers about two-third (266 to 21,552 bp) of the SARS-CoV-2 genome (Fig. 1a). The genome includes two overlapping ORF, named as ORF1a (13442-to-12,468 bp) and ORF1b (13407-to-16,236 bp), followed by helicase (16237-to-18,039 bp), 3′-to-5′ exonuclease (18040-to-19,620 bp), endoRNase (19,621 to 20,658 bp) and o-ribosomal methyltransferase (20,659 to 21,552 bp) genes [11]. These genes are translated by a ribosome upstream of the ORF1a stop codon. Translation of both ORFs in the cytoplasm of infected cells results in synthesis of two polyproteins, pp1a and pp1ab. These proteins are processed by two viral proteinases to yield 16 functional non-structural proteins (nsps) and the orientation of these nsps is from 5′ to 3′ end of the RNA genome. The nsps are the components of the membrane-anchored replication–transcription complex. Among all the nsps, the largest non-structural protein (nsp) of SARS-COV-2 is nsp3 that acts as a multifunctional protein. It is an interferon antagonist (because of papain-like protease domain) having deubiquitinating deISGylation activity that could be involved in inhibition of interferon responses [12]. The genes encoding for structural protein are present at the 3′ end of the RNA genome and the order of the genes is, spike protein (S) (21563-to-25,384 bp), envelope protein (E) (26245-to-26,472 bp), structural membrane glycoprotein protein (M) (26523-to-27,191 bp), ORF6 protein (27202-to-27,387 bp), ORF7a (27394-to-27,759 bp), ORF7b (27756-to-27,557 bp), ORF8 (27894-to-28,259 bp), nucleocapsid (N) (28274–29,533 bp), ORF10 (29558-to-29,674 bp), followed by 3’UTR region [11].
Genomic Variations in SARS-CoV-2
The viruses of the Coronaviridae family have acquired some variations in their genetics and pathogenicity. The SARS-CoV (79%) and MERS-CoV (50%) [13] are genetically similar to SARS-CoV-2. Both 5’ UTR and 3’ UTR are involved in various processes like inter- and intra-molecular interactions, binding of viral and cellular proteins. Pb1ab gene is the first ORF present at the 5′ end, encoding nsps of size around 1.9kbp in SARS-CoV-2, 2.9kbp in SARS-CoV and 30kbp in MERS-CoV. Some variations were also spotted in the spike protein sequence at the 3′ ends. Spike protein consists of 1273 amino acids, 21,493 amino acid, and 1270 amino acids in SARS-CoV-2, SARS-CoV, and MERS-CoV, respectively.
Structural Proteins of SARS-CoV-2
Spike Glycoprotein (S Protein)
The SARS-CoV-2 infection takes place when S protein interacts with ACE-2 receptor of the host cell. The size of S protein is about 20 to 40 nm and it consists of two functional subunits S1 and S2 (Fig. 1b), bounded by non-covalent perfusion conformation. S1 subunit is responsible for the binding of SARS-CoV-2 with the host cell while S2 subunit mediates viral fusion with the host cell membrane. This is followed by delivery of viral genome into the cytoplasm. The S2 subunit also forms complex surface projections surrounding the periphery of the SARS-CoV-2 particles [6, 14].
Envelope Protein (E)
This is a 76 amino acids long, small integral membrane protein with a short hydrophilic chain at amino-terminus followed by a long hydrophobic region and a hydrophilic carboxy-terminus. It contains at least one α-helix transmembrane domain. During viral replication, it is present in high concentration inside the infected host cell to participate in viral assembly, budding, envelope formation and virulence [15–17].
Nucleocapsid Protein (N)
Nucleocapsid protein of SARS-CoV-2 functions in enveloping the entire virus RNA genome. It helps in interaction of the genome with other structural proteins for virus particle assembly and release into the host. The well-known mechanism of viral spread into the host is still unknown but interaction of N protein and cyclophilin A (CyA) might provide a new hint for the SARS-CoV-2 infection pathway in human cells [18]. Sequence alignment indicates that a segment of N protein is homologous to human immunodeficiency virus-1 capsid protein with identity of 25.1% and a similarity of 36.7%. The studies indicate that CyA is important in infection of SARS-CoV-2 and this could be a novel target for COVID-19 therapy [19].
Membrane Glycoprotein (M)
The gene for membrane glycoproteins of β-coronavirus is located at the 3′ end of genomic RNA. The M and E proteins have a vital role in the assembly of virus inside the host cells. Especially, M protein promotes assembly of viral genome through its interaction with ribonucleoprotein and S protein facilitates networking of M–M, M–E, M–N, M–S, M–RNA and N–RNA. These interactions are mediated by palmitin. Finally, the assembled packets of virion are moved out of the host cell via secretory pathways [17, 19].
Non-structural Proteins (Nsps)
The genes of nsps are located at the 5′ end of the viral genome, encoding various nsps which help in replication and transcription of viral genome within the host cell. The viral protease is one of the nsps which activates functional polypeptide by an extensive proteolytic cleavage. For example, 3CL-pro cleaves the polypeptide at 11 conserved sites containing Leu, Gln, Ser, Ala, and Gly amino acids. This process is initiated by the enzyme’s autolytic cleavage from pp1a and pp1ab, this cleavage pattern remains conserved in the SARS-CoV-2 [20].
Mechanism of Viral Progression
The virus specifically recognizes the host’s ACE-2 receptor and transmembrane protease serine 2 protein (TMPRSS2) by its spike protein. The ACE-2 receptors are immensely present on the surface of many human cells, especially the alveolar type II cells and capillary endothelium. However, ACE-2 receptors are consistently absent in bone marrow, lymph nodes, thymus, spleen, and immune cell such as T and B lymphocytes, and macrophages. The viral genome also contains genes for other nsps like RNA dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp), papain-like protease (PLpro) and coronavirus cysteine protease (3CLpro), also known as the main protease. Once the virus has entered the cell, it releases its genomic RNA and hijacks the protein synthesis mechanism of host cell. Replication and transcription of RNA genome of the virus are catalysed by RdRp. Its genome is located at the C-terminal part of nsp12 [21]. RdRp is a core catalytic subunit for the production of the positive and negative-strand RNA, thus it can serve as an important target for design of diagnostic RT-PCR probes and antiviral drugs [15]. The positive-strand RNA is translated into polyproteins. These polyproteins are than cleaved by PLpro and 3CLpro to form effector proteins. Further, deubiquitination of interferon factor 3 and NF-kB by PLpro (behaves like a deubiquitinase) suppresses the host immunity. The synthesized negative-strand RNA is utilized to produce more number of the viral genome.
COVID-19 Manifestation
The common sign and symptoms of COVID-19 are fever, fatigue, dry cough, and shortness of breath. Some patients may also experience headache, runny nose, sore throat, or diarrhea. Initially, these symptoms are mild, the severity begins gradually with an increase in infection that culminates into systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) and multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS) due to hyperimmune response also known as cytokines storm [22]. Various procedures are employed for the direct detection of COVID-19, these are based on either identifying the viral genome through RT-PCR or antibody detection (Fig. 2). Nearly one in six people who contract COVID-19 are very sick and has difficulty in breathing. Several studies have suggested that the probability of COVID-19 prognosis is worse in patients older than 60 years and constitute more than 73% of total recorded deaths. Patients with comorbidities like high blood pressure, heart surgeries, and diabetes, also have a higher probability of getting infected [23–26].
Immune Response during SARS-CoV-2 Infection
The innate immune response against viral infection majorly depends on interferon (IFN) type I protein and its downstream signalling. During an antiviral response, the viral RNA is served as a pathogen-associated molecular pattern molecule (PAMP) and recognized by endosomal RNA receptor (TLR-3 and TLR-7) and cytosolic RNA sensor RIG-I/MDA5. This activates NF-kB and interferon regulatory transcription factor-3 (IRF-3), which translocate into the nucleus. Here they induce expression of IFN type I along with some pro-inflammatory cytokines, this initial response constructs a first-line defence against the viral entry. Furthermore, with the help of Interferon-α/ẞ receptor (IFNAR), IFN type I activates JAK-STAT pathway. In downstream signalling, JAK1 and TYK2 kinases activate STAT1 and STAT2, subsequently forming a complex with IRF 9 [27]. This complex translocates inside the nucleus and activates the IFN-stimulated genes. The IFN type I response is essential for viral suppression, however during SARS-CoV-2 infection, this response is suppressed. The active viral replication further causes delayed IFN type I response, this heralds an influx of neutrophils and macrophages (a major source of pro-inflammatory cytokines). Sometimes patients are asymptomatic due to early delayed response of the innate immunity [28].
The Th1 immune response has a decisive role during the adaptive response. The activity of T cells is regulated by antigen-presenting cells (APCs) via engendering the cytokine environment. The overall adaptive response by T helper cells activates the humoral immune retaliation, which acts as an immune shield along with neutralizing antibody. Simultaneously, the cytotoxic T cells start clearance of viral cells. A strong T cell response was noted in case of SARS-CoV-2 infection in correlation with higher amount of neutralizing antibodies and Th2 cytokines such as IL-4, IL-5 and IL-10 [28, 29].
Cytokine Release Syndrome (CRS)
The CRS is caused by hypersecretion of a large number of proinflammatory cytokines (peptides) such as IL-2, IL-6, IL-7, G-CSF, IP-10 and TNF-α [4, 27, 30]. It is commonly observed in immune-related diseases or immune therapies such as chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy (CAR-T), organ transplantation, sepsis, etc. The pro-inflammatory peptides enhance the vascular permeability, as a result, enormous amount of blood and fluid accumulate in lungs, especially in alveoli, that leads to respiratory failure. A similar condition is also observed in COVID-19 patients (Fig. 3). The CRS actuates viral sepsis and aggrandizes production of the proinflammatory cytokines causing pneumonia and acute respiratory disease syndrome (ARDS). In severe cases, respiratory and multiple organ failure is the main cause of COVID-19 related fatalities (Fig. 3b) [22, 31].
Approaches to Combat COVID-19
Even after rigorous studies performed on SARS-CoV-2, there is no potential therapeutic agent available against this virus. Many therapies have been recommended for its treatment, for instance, the use of ACE-2 and TMPRSS2 inhibitors, plasma containing antibodies, drugs that obstruct the advancement of viral transmission and infection. Several existing antiviral agents are also being repurposed as potential therapeutic agents against SARS-CoV-2. Here we have discussed all the treatments being tested for COVID-19.
Blocking the Interaction between ACE-2 Receptor and Spike Protein Via Anti-ACE-2 Antibody
Both SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2 display S protein, this binds to the host cells via cell surface protein receptor ACE-2. It is the sole receptor used by SARS-CoV-2 while other receptors like, aminopeptidase N and dipeptidyl peptidase, are exploited by many coronaviruses for their entry into the host. The study by Hoffmann et al. [32] showed that anti-ACE-2 antibody could block the entry of Vesicular Stomatitis Virus pseudotype (VSV) expressing the S protein of SARS-CoV-2.
Inhibition of TMPRSS2 Activity
For the invasion of SARS-CoV-2, S protein needs to be cleaved at two distinct positions by serine protease TMPRSS2, a process called as S protein priming. It is essential for interaction between the host cellular membrane and coronavirus [33]. Camostat mesilate is an inhibitor of TMPRSS2, the treatment of SARS-CoV-2 infected lung cells with this inhibitor prevents the viral entry into the cell [32].
By Introducing a Soluble Form of ACE-2
If an excess of ACE-2 is introduced in the soluble form, it competitively binds to S protein of SARS-CoV-2. This approach exerts dual function, firstly it neutralizes viral cells present in the host, secondly, it rescues the cellular activity of ACE-2 and protects lungs from injury [34].
Anti-Viral Approaches
The advancement of SARS-CoV-2 into the host cell is facilitated by both structural and non-structural proteins but, the main machinery for viral replication and progression is encoded by the genes located at the 5′ end of the genome. After virus entry, transcription is mediated by nsps genes present in ORF1a and ORF1b, which express enzymes and proteins required for viral proliferation. The viral progression can be restrained if an antagonist of these genes can be developed (Table 2). Some anti-viral drugs have also been shown to block post-endosomal infection by inhibiting the endosome level in host cells and thereby inhibiting viral replication [35, 36].
Table 2.
S. No. | Antiviral drugs | Mechanism of action |
---|---|---|
1 | Cathepsin L inhibitors | Block viral entry or inhibits in-vitro infection. |
2 | Amiodarone | Inhibits virus infection at a post-endosomal level. |
3 | Tetra-O-galloyl-beta-D-glucose | Blocks SARS-CoV-2 or SARS-CoV pseudovirus entry. |
4 | Luteolin | Blocks SARS-CoV-2 or SARS-CoV pseudovirus entry. |
5 | VE607 | Restrains S protein–ACE-2 mediated viral entry. |
6 | siSC2–5 | Targets the S protein and ORF1b. |
7 | Hexamethylene amiloride | Hinders ion channel activity and viral replication. |
Repurposed Drugs
Many anti-viral drugs are being repurposed for COVID-19 treatment. Drugs like Remdesivir, Chloroquine, Lopinavir and Ritonavir (Table 3) are clinically employed antivirals. They impede viral replication, premature termination and prevent viral infection by increasing pH of endosome.
Table 3.
Drug | Indications | Mechanism of action | Possible action on SARS-CoV-2 |
---|---|---|---|
Chloroquine |
1. Malarial parasite infection and amebicide. 2. Rheumatoid arthritis. |
Elevates endosomal pH and interferes with ACE-2 glycosylation. |
1. It is known to block receptors of SARS- CoV-2. 2. It has an immune-modulating activity and targets the endosome/ACE-2 receptor [37, 38]. |
Remdesivir (RDV) |
1. Ebola 2. SARS-CoV 3. MERS-CoV |
A nucleotide analogue that blocks viral nucleotide synthesis to stop viral replication. The likely mechanism of action is delayed RNA chain termination. | It can inhibit replication of a wide variety of coronaviruses by blocking the RNA dependent RNA polymerase required for replication [39–41]. |
Hydroxychloroquine |
1. Malaria 2. Rheumatoid arthritis 3. Discoid, or systemic lupus and erythematosus. |
It is a disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug. It regulates activity of immune system, which may be overactive in some conditions. | It can modify underlying disease process, rather than simply treating the symptoms [42, 43]. |
Ritonavir |
1. Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) 2. SARS-CoV-2 |
It prevents cleavage of the gag-pol polyprotein, which results in non-infectious, immature viral particles. It is a potent inhibitor of cytochrome P450, and CYP3A4 isoenzyme, found in the intestinal tract and liver. It is a type II ligand that perfectly fits into the CYP3A4 active site cavity and irreversibly binds to heme iron via thiazole nitrogen, which decreases redox potential of protein and averts its reduction with the redox partner, cytochrome P450 reductase. |
It can inhibit the viral protease and activates the nuclear receptor subfamily-1 [44, 45]. |
Chlorpheniramine | 1. A histamine H1 antagonist used in allergic reactions, hay fever, rhinitis, urticaria, and asthma. Also used in veterinary applications. One of the most widely used classical antihistaminic. | It can bind to the histamine H1 receptor. This blocks the action of endogenous histamine, which leads to temporary relief from the negative symptoms of histamine. | It works by blocking the action of histamine, a substance in the body that causes allergic reactions likely to reduce inflammation. [46–49]. |
Lopinavir–Ritonavir | 1. Usually prescribed with HIV medication to boost immunity of a patient. | Both Lopinavir and Ritonavir belong to a class of drugs known as HIV protease inhibitors. Ritonavir boosts the levels of Lopinavir. | The randomized trial found that Lopinavir-Ritonavir treatment added to standard supportive care was not associated with clinical improvement or mortality in seriously ill patients with COVID-19 infection as compared to standard care alone [50, 51]. |
Oseltamivir | 1. Influenza viruses A (including pandemic H1N1) and B. | It inhibits activity of the viral neuraminidase enzyme found on the surface of virus, which prevents budding from the host cell, viral replication, and infectivity. | It has been recommended by WHO for people at high risk of infection before or after exposure to pandemic influenza. May reduce COVID-19 transmission [52]. |
Lopinavir | 1. Approved drug combination for HIV. | It is a protease inhibitor that may inhibit the viral proteases 3CLpro or PLpro. | It is currently under investigation in combination with Ritonavir for the treatment of COVID-19 treatment [53–55]. |
Rifampin | 1. A semisynthetic antibiotic produced from Streptomyces mediterranei. It has a broad antibacterial spectrum, including activity against several forms of Mycobacterium. | It inhibits DNA-dependent RNA polymerase, leading to suppression of RNA synthesis and cell death. | It suppresses initiation of RNA synthesis. It is bactericidal and acts on both intracellular and extracellular organisms. Under trail for COVID-19 [56–59]. |
Baricitinib | 1. Rheumatoid arthritis | Blocks action of JAK1/2, and disrupts activation of downstream signalling molecules and pro-inflammatory mediators. | It inhibits tyrosine-protein kinase JAK1, JAK2, JAK3, protein-tyrosine kinase 2-beta, which can interfere with inflammatory process [60, 61]. |
Darunavir |
1. HIV 2. SARS-CoV-2 (under clinical trials) |
It is an HIV protease inhibitor, prevents HIV replication by binding to the enzyme, stops the dimerization and catalytic activity of HIV-1 protease. In particular, it inhibits cleavage of HIV encoded Gag-Pol proteins in cells that have been infected with the virus, halting formation of mature virus particles. Primary active site amino acids (Asp-29 and Asp-30) on the protease likely contribute to its potency and efficacy against resistant variants of HIV-1. | It is being studied as a possible treatment for SARS-CoV-2 due to in vitro evidence supporting its ability to combat this infection. Clinical trials are underway and are expected to conclude by August 2020 [62]. |
Favipiravir (also known as Avifavir) | 1. Influenza A virus (strain A/Silky Chicken/Hong Kong/SF189/2001 H5N1 genotype A) | The active Favipiravir-RTP selectively inhibits RNA polymerase and prevents replication of viral genome. | It has been investigated for treatment of life-threatening pathogens such as Ebola virus, Lassa virus, and now SARS-CoV-2. It is recently approved by the Russian government for COVID-19 treatment [63–65]. |
Galidesivir |
1. Ebola 2. Marburg 3. Yellow Fever 4. Zika viruses |
It works by inhibiting the nucleotides binding site on viral RNA polymerase, leading to a structural change in the enzyme due to altered electrostatic interactions. Disruption of viral RNA polymerase activity results in premature termination of the elongating RNA strand. | It inhibits the “RNA-directed RNA polymerase L” action [66]. |
Umifenovir |
1. Herpes simplex virus 2. Hepatitis B virus 3. Hepatitis C Virus 4. SARS-CoV-2 5. Zika virus 6. Lassa mammarenavirus 7. Chikungunya virus 8. Coxsackievirus B5 9. Reovirus species 10. Hantaan orthohantvirus 11. Ebola virus |
It is considered as direct-acting antiviral due to virucidal effects and a host-targeting agent due to effects on one or multiple stages of the viral life cycle (e.g. attachment, internalization). It targets the S protein and the ACE2 receptor. |
It is being investigated as a potential treatment and prophylactic agent for COVID-19 in combination with both currently available and investigational HIV therapies [67–70]. |
Nitazoxanide |
1. Anti-Helminthic 2. Anti-Protozoal 3. Viral infection-induced diarrhoea |
It induces lesions in cell membrane and depolarizes mitochondrial membrane by inhibiting quinone oxidoreductase (NQO1), nitroreductase-1 and protein disulphide isomerase enzymes. | A drug that may inhibit viral protein expression [73]. |
Emerging Mesenchymal Stem Cells (MSCs) Therapy against COVID-19
In the past few decades, scientists have started showing tremendous interest in MSCs based therapies in a wide variety of biomedical disciplines due to their immunomodulatory, antimicrobial and paracrine properties including secretion of extracellular vesicles, regulatory miRNA, and multiple bioactive proteins. These cells, also known as multipotent stromal cells due to their ability to differentiate into a limited number of cell types, are characterized by fibroblast-like morphology. MSCs can develop into cells of the three different germ layers[71, 72]. Besides bone marrow (BM), MSCs can be extracted from a wide number of sources like adipose tissues, fetal liver, cord blood, mobilized peripheral blood, fetal lung, placenta, umbilical cord, dental pulp, synovial membrane, endometrium, trabecular and compact bone [74–77]. Utilization of different methods for their isolation, expansion and characterization, influence the post-MSCs-transplantation clinical outcome. To overcome this problem, Mesenchymal and Tissue Stem Cell Committee of the International Society for Cellular Therapy, has proposed three golden standards for characterizing human MSCs. First, MSCs is an adherent cell line and having plastic-adherent nature. These cells attach to the culture plate in standard culture conditions. Second, during flow cytometry analysis, it has been observed that >95% MSCs population express CD105 {known as endoglin and originally recognized by the monoclonal antibody (MAb SH2)}, CD73 (known as ecto-5′-nucleotidase and originally recognized by the MAb SH3 and SH4) and CD 90 (also known as Thy-1) cell surface markers. Moreover, MSCs lack the expression of CD45 (leukocyte antigen), CD34 (hematopoietic progenitors and endothelial cells marker), CD14 (monocytes antigen) or CD11b (macrophages marker), CD79a or CD19 (B cells antigen) and HLA class II markers. Finally, one special property that is unique to MSCs is the ability to differentiate into osteoblasts (stained with Alizarin Red or von Kossa staining), adipocytes (identified using Oil Red O) and chondroblasts (coloured with Alcian blue) under the standard culture conditions [78, 79]. As these cells are in surplus with anti-microbial activity and immunomodulatory effects, MSCs can be served as an attractive target for cell-based therapy of COVID-19. Additionally, MSCs lack the ACE-2 receptor, which is an important entry point for SARS-CoV-2 into a human host [4].
The Restorative Power of MSCs
MSCs are currently investigated in various animal models and clinical trials for their immunotherapeutic potential. As COVID-19 pandemic was initiated in China, most of the studies are performed in association with Chinese institute [80–82] but as this pandemic escalated to other parts of the world, recently some nations, for instance, United State of America, Jordon, Brazil, and Spain, have started exploring the immunomodulatory potential of MSCs in clinical trials (Table 4) [83, 84, 86]. Zikuan Leng and co-workers [4] have performed a study on SARS-CoV-2 infected patients to investigate the potential of MSCs transplantation. A total of seven patients were assessed for 14 days. After intravenous injection of MSCs, all the clinical after-effects, such as changes in immune function and inflammatory level were recorded periodically. It was observed that this treatment significantly enhanced the immune level and pulmonary function without adverse effects. Among those seven patients, one was critically serious but discharged within 10 days. During the treatment, MSCs reduced rapid surge of macrophages and activated a high number of regulatory dendritic cells in SARS-CoV-2 infected tissue. MSCs based therapy has shown promising results in the treatment of ARDS in lipopolysaccharide (E. coli derived) induced sepsis animal model. MSCs attenuated the incoming neutrophils in lungs and reduced the level of TNFα (a pro-inflammatory cytokine) in immune cells residing in lungs through IL-10 secretion. Furthermore, MSCs treatment repaired the alveolar- epithelial barrier that is disrupted in ARDS and regenerated alveolar type II cells. This also prevented apoptosis of endothelial cells by producing keratinocyte growth factor (KGF), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEFG), and hepatocyte growth factor (HGF). Alongside pro-resolving mediator lipoxin A4 (LXA4), MSCs decreased the ongoing inflammation and pulmonary edema. Due to MSCs immunosuppressant properties, inflammation, and the level of pro-inflammatory cytokines in the patient’s serum decreased dramatically [87]. These reports suggest that MSCs could be one of the best alternatives to suppress the CRS in pulmonary region. So, by harnessing the regenerative potential and immunomodulatory properties, MSCs based therapy would likely to serve as a crucial antidote for combating the COVID-19 pandemic.
Table 4.
Clinical Trial number | Title | Study phase | Status | Responsible Party | Country |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
NCT04299152 | Stem cell educator therapy treat the viral inflammation in COVID-19 | Phase 2 | Not yet recruiting | Tianhe Stem Cell Biotechnologies Inc. | United States of America |
NCT04355728 | Umbilical cord-derived MSCs for COVID-19 patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). | Phase 1 and Phase 2 | Active, not recruiting | Camillo Ricordi, University of Miami | Miami, Florida, United States of America |
NCT04313322 | Treatment of COVID-19 patients using Wharton’s jelly MSCs. | Phase 1 | Recruiting | Adeeb Al Zoubi, Stem Cell Arabia, | Aman, Jordon |
NCT04315987 | Exploratory clinical study to assess the efficacy of NestaCell® MSCs to treat patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia. | Phase 2 | Not yet recruiting | Azidus | São Paulo, Brazil |
NCT04302519 | Clinical study of novel coronavirus induced severe pneumonia treated by dental pulp MSCs. | Early Phase 1 | Not yet recruiting | CAR-T (Shanghai) Biotechnology Co., Ltd. | China |
NCT04288102 | Treatment with human umbilical cord-derived MSCs for severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). | Phase 2 | Active, not Recruiting | Fu-Sheng Wang, Beijing 302 Hospital | Wuhan, Hubei, China |
NCT04269525 | Umbilical cord (UC)-derived MSCs treatment for the 2019-novel Coronavirus (COV) pneumonia. | Phase 2 | Recruiting | ZhiYong Peng, Zhongnan Hospital | Wuhan, Hubei, China |
NCT04276987 | A pilot clinical study on inhalation of MSCs exosomes treating severe novel coronavirus pneumonia. | Phase 1 | Enrolling by invitation | Ruijin Hospital | Shanghai, China |
NCT04293692 | Therapy for pneumonia patients infected by 2019 novel coronavirus | Not applicable | Withdrawn | Puren hospital affiliated to Wuhan University of Science and Technology | Wuhan, Hubei, China |
NCT04456361 | Use of MSCs in acute respiratory distress syndrome caused by COVID-19. | Early Phase 1 | Active, not recruiting | Instituto de Medicina Regenerativa | Tijuana, Baja California, Mexico |
NCT04366323 | Phase I/II clinical trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of allogenic adipose tissue-derived MSCs expanded in patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia. |
Phase 1 Phase 2 |
Recruiting | Hospital Universitario de Jerez de la Frontera | Spain |
MSCs Regulate the Cytokines Storm during Severe SARS-CoV-2 Infection
MSCs have been reported to control the immune homeostasis, as these cells possess many immunomodulatory abilities [88]. MSCs modulate the adaptive and innate immune response by suppression of T cells, maturation of dendritic cells, reducing B cell activation and proliferation, inhibiting proliferation and cytotoxicity of NK cells, and promoting generation of regulatory T cells via soluble factors (paracrine) or cell-cell contact (juxtacrine) mechanism [88, 89]. MSCs exert both pro- and anti-inflammatory effects. Toll-like receptors (TLR, mainly TLR3 and TLR4) present on MSCs dictate the fate of MSCs as pro-inflammatory or anti-inflammatory. TLR receptors present on MSCs are triggered by pathogen-associated molecular pattern (PAMP), like in RNA viruses [90]. TLR3 activation by a microbial molecule is associated with anti-inflammation. MSCs secrete chemokines like MIP-1α and MIP-1β, RANTES, CXCL9, CXCL10, and CXCL11 after activation of TLR4 by microbial molecules. These chemokines recruit lymphocytes at the sites of infection and further activate T cells as inflammatory cytokines are present in low concentration. However, to weaken inflammatory response [90], MSCs switch to TLR3 activation leading to anti-inflammatory response during a severe immune retaliation caused by a high level of inflammatory cytokines. Similar kind of cytokines storm has been observed in severely infected COVID-19 patients. In COVID-19, hypersecretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-2, IL-6, IL-7, G-SCF, IP10, MCP1, MIP1A, and TNFα has been observed (Table 5). This reactive environment influences MSCs to secrete anti-inflammatory molecules like IL-10. Moreover, MSCs also release soluble factors (immunosuppressive molecules) like transforming growth factor-β1 (TGF-β1), prostaglandin E2 (PGE2), hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), indoleamine-pyrrole 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO), and nitric oxide (NO) [88, 90]. MSCs diminish the inflammation caused by T cells through secretion of these soluble factors. The soluble factors, TGF-β, and PGE2, reduce the number of IL-2 receptors and cause a decrease in the proliferation of activated T cells. Another factor, NO, represses the phosphorylation of signal transducers and transcription of STAT-5 in T cells, leading to the cell cycle arrest. The secretion of IDO by MSCs induces apoptosis of activated T cells and conversion of tryptophan into kynurenine, this suppresses proliferation of effector T cells.
Table 5.
Major cytokines released during severe infection of SARS-CoV-2 | Role of MSCs |
---|---|
IL-2 | Inhibition of IL-2 via induction of IL-10 and TGFβ [91]. |
IL-6 | Secrete PGE2 (immunomodulator) under high IL-6 level [92]. |
TNFα | Inhibit T cells response through NO pathway when TNFα is in excess [93]. |
MIP1A (CCL3) | Express receptors of chemokine CCL3 to migrate at the site of injury [94]. |
IP10 (CXCL10) | Secrete CXCL10 that inhibits T cells via IDO upregulation [95]. |
GM-CSF | MSCs recruitment through CXCR-4 at the site of injury [96]. |
IL-10 | High level of TNFα causes induction of IL-10 and TGFβ [97]. |
IL-8 | Suppress IL-8 through Wnt signalling [98]. |
IL-1α | Downregulate IL-1α through Wnt signalling [98]. |
IFNγ | Repress T cell response under the influence of IFN γ, which induces IDO [99]. |
In a study, Li and colleague, have observed that inflammatory cytokines like IL-1α, IL-6, TNF-α, and IFN-γ, were reduced in mice when treated with MSCs in H9N2 viral infection [100] and IL- 10 level was elevated (an anti-inflammatory cytokine). Studies suggest that Wnt signalling pathway have a pivotal role in regulating the immunomodulatory properties of MSCs. Inhibition of GSK-3β, a negative regulator of Wnt signalling, suppresses various cytokines and chemokines involved in the immune response. Lithium chloride (LiCl) is a potent inhibitor of GSK-3β, microarray data analysis of lithium stimulated human MSCs have shown significant downregulation in IL-8 and CXCL12 (stromal-derived factor-1) level, which are chemoattractants to neutrophils and T cells respectively. Expression of other chemokines like CXCL1, CXCL20 and CXCL2, which attract lymphocytes, neutrophils, and monocytes, was also reduced upon LiCl priming. Apart from this, repression in inflammatory cytokines like IL-6 and IL-1a has also been observed with LiCl treatment. These results suggest a role of LiCl in MSCs mediated hypoimmunomoduation [98] (Table 5).
Innate immunity is the first line of defence against any kind of infection. MSCs also regulate the innate immune response. Macrophages are the main players in the innate immunity. Engulfment and removal of foreign particles or defective (infected) cells is the main objective of macrophage. Upon interaction with MSCs, macrophages polarize to M2 macrophages (anti-inflammatory). Similarly, upon activation with pro-inflammatory cytokines like TNF-α, MSCs elevate the level of cyclooxygenase 2 (COX2), IDO, IL-6 and PGE2, resulting in monocytes (M0) polarization towards M2 macrophages. Further, M2 macrophage produces IL-10 (anti-inflammatory) to maintain homeostasis. However, when the level of IFN-γ and TNF-α are low, MSCs polarize the M2 to M1 macrophage that produces IFN-γ and TNF-α to stimulate T cells in a feedback loop manner. Due to these attributes, MSCs may have beneficial effects in attenuating the cytokine storm by secreting powerful anti-inflammatory factors and halt the excessive immune response, while restoring the immune response in the absence of inflammatory environment [4, 5]. Under the influence of IL-10 and TGFβ, M2 macrophage exhibits enhanced production of human leucocyte antigen (HLA-G5) in MSCs, thereby promoting production and proliferation of Treg cells [101]. Treg cells are the subpopulation of T cells that have immune-suppressive properties.
Apart from this, MSCs also function as antigen-presenting cells and express MHC-II complex (major histocompatibility complex class- II) [102]. During antigen presentation, the level of IFN-γ increases leading to a subdued expression of MHC-II on MSCs, as a consequence MSCs revert back to an immunosuppressive phenotype and prevent prolonged inflammation [102, 103]. Many studies suggest that culture system has direct cell-cell contact which is another factor involved in the immunomodulatory effects of MSCs. It has been observed that BM-MSCs inhibit proliferation of T cells whereas they promote proliferation of Treg cells in a contact-dependent manner [104]. This study is substantiated by other studies in which direct contact between MSCs population and T cell population is shown to be required for Treg induction [105]. Besides the role of IFN-γ in immunomodulation, it also upregulates cell adhesion molecules like vascular cell adhesion molecule-1, galectin-1, PD-L1 and CD274. These molecules support cell-cell contact and immunomodulation indicating cellular contact can be one of the mechanisms for immune regulation [88].
Antimicrobial Potential of MSCs
During pathogenic infection, MSCs constitutively express some AMPs, which exert a powerful antimicrobial effect through a direct-indirect mechanism and immunostimulation [106, 107]. The AMPs are endogenous, positively charged peptides that build a first-line defence to protect a host from various viral infections [108]. The molecular targets of human AMPs are both extracellular and intracellular, as a result, they disrupt membrane integrity, inhibit DNA, RNA and protein synthesis. In recent studies, it was found that MSCs constitutively express different types of AMPs viz. human β-defensin, (hBD), hepcidin and cathelicidin LL-37. Among all the AMPs, hBD and cathelicidin LL-37 are well studied for their antimicrobial role.
β-Defensin is a cysteine-rich protein consisting of 18 to 145 amino acid, assists to build an immune shield against pathogenic infection. β-Defensins like hBD-1, hBD-2, and hBD-3 are secreted by MSCs, many epithelial cells, and granulocytes [109, 110]. The curative role of defensin is well documented in various viral diseases such as HIV, influenza A virus (IAV), human adenovirus (HAdV), severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARSC), papillomavirus (HPV), respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), and herpes simplex virus (HSV). It affects viruses by blocking multiple steps in viral cycle like viral entry and viral trafficking within host cells, subsequently triggering immune system against the viral infection by augmenting and recruiting the immune cells like T-cells, macrophage and dendritic cells in tissue [111, 112]. It also inhibits apoptosis process by suppressing the cascape enzyme signalling around the site of infection. Another peptide, LL-37, is encoded by a human cathelicidin antimicrobial peptide gene (CAMP). This peptide has antiviral properties against a wide variety of virus-like HIV-1, IAV, RSV, rhinovirus (HRV), hepatitis C virus (HCV) [113, 114]. It works by inhibiting the replication and inflammation at the site of action. Recent studies also suggested that these AMPs also obstruct ARDS and facilitate bacterial clearance during MSCs treatment [115, 116].
Complications of MSCs Therapy in Clinical Trials
In the past decade, scientists have shown interest in MSCs based therapies due to their potential use in autologous transplantation. A large number of clinical trials using MSCs are either accomplished or under examination. These studies have explored immunomodulatory and paracrine effects of these cells including secretion of extracellular vesicles, regulatory miRNA, and multiple bioactive proteins. Despite the beneficial effects of MSCs, there are potential risks associated with their use that should be considered before starting MSCs based therapies. The safety and efficacy of transplanted MSCs in the attenuation of inflammatory lung diseases seem to be reasonably proven in experimental models. However, results obtained in already conducted clinical trials pointed at several challenges which have to be addressed before MSCs will be routinely used in clinical settings. For example, bone marrow (BM) MSCs have putative profibrogenic potential, their transplantation have been shown to cause liver fibrosis [117]. Some studies also report issues like tumour growth in a colon cancer model, breast cancer, colorectal cancer, and ovarian, prostate, lung, and gastric carcinoma. MSCs share many features with cancer stem cells (CSCs) like high rate of proliferation, high viability, suppressing antitumor immunity and resistance to apoptosis. Moreover, they also stimulate angiogenesis through secretion of proangiogenic factors, viz. VEGF, HGF, platelet-derived growth factor, angiopoietin-1, and placental growth factor. Therefore therapies utilizing MSCs should require long-term follow-up of patient to observe tumour-inducing effects of MSCs [118–120]. According to a clinical trial performed by Ning and its colleague, patients who received hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) and MSCs transplantation (isolated from bone marrow) had a higher probability of severe infection including interstitial pneumonia and/or fungal infection as compared to the control group not receiving MSCs [119, 121]. A similar study by Muroi and coworkers showed that during phase II/III clinical trials BM-MSCs failed to protect patients from chronic graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) [122]. Multiple studies are performed for evaluating effects of MSCs administration in various neurological disorders, a clinical trial showed the absence of salutary effects after MSCs transplantation. As per a study by Karussis and coworkers, administration of BM-MSCs in patients suffering from amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), did not lead to any positive effect [123]. The complications observed during MSCs treatment suggested that the regenerative potential of these cells may not be as effective as previously considered. Several exogenous factors interfere with both biological and therapeutic abilities of MSCs. These complications should be considered pragmatically by the scientific community before application of MSCs in COVID-19 and other pathologies.
Conclusion
The severity of COVID-19 pandemic is increasing rapidly, resulting in a serious healthcare crisis all over the globe. Still, there is no tested method for its cure, therefore a better understanding of this disease is need of the hour. This review presents a detailed description of the genomic organization structure, replication mechanism, and transmission. The roles of drugs and therapies inhibiting viral infection have been described further. During replication in humans, SARS-CoV-2 hyperstimulates the immune system to secrete pro-inflammatory cytokines which cause serious health issues such as pneumonia and ARDS and in severe cases leading to respiratory and multiple organ failure. The pre-clinical and clinical trials suggest that MSCs have immunomodulatory, anti-inflammatory and antimicrobial properties that impede the hyperimmune response, therefore infusion of MSCs in the infected patient is likely to play a key role in encountering the cytokines storm (Fig. 4). During intravenous infusion, most of the MSCs get accumulated in lungs, which is the most affected organ during SARS-CoV-2 infection. Hence, by employing MSCs alone or in combination with other discussed antiviral approaches can make an ideal therapy for treating critically ill patients under the standard protocols of the World Health Organisation (WHO). Nevertheless, no MSCs based therapy is approved for COVID-19 treatment likely due to post-MSCs transplantation complications that can be reduced with experience being obtained during clinical trials.
Acknowledgements
We thank Director, INMAS, for his continuous support. This work was funded by the Defence Research Development Organisation, India, project no. S&T/18-19/INM-323. Images are created with BioRender.com.
Abbreviations
- SARS
Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome
- MERS
Middle East Respiratory Syndrome
- SARS-CoV-2
Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus
- MSCs
Mesenchymal Stem Cells
- BM- MSCs
Bone marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cells
- AMPS
Antimicrobial peptides
- IL
Interleukin
- GSCF
Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor
- IP10
Interferon gamma-induced protein 10
- MCP1
Monocyte chemoattractant protein-1
- MIP1A
Macrophage inflammatory protein 1 A
- TNFα
Tumor necrosis factor-alpha
- ARDS
Acute respiratory distress syndrome
- ORF
Open reading frame
- UTR
Untranslated region
- HA
Hemagglutinin
- DPP4
Dipeptidyl peptidase 4
- ACE-2
Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2
- CyA
Cyclophilin A
- TMPRSS2
Transmembrane serine protease 2
- RdRp
RNA-dependent RNA polymerase
- PLpro
Papain-like protease
- 3CLpro
Coronavirus main protease
- NF- kB
Nuclear Factor kappa-B
- CTD
Carboxy terminal domain
- NTD
N-terminal domain
- SIRS
Systemic inflammatory response syndrome
- MODS
Multiple organ dysfunction syndromes
- PAMP
Pathogen-associated molecular pattern
- TLRs
Toll-like receptors
- IFN
Interferon
- IRF
IFN regulatory factor
- IFNAR
Interferon-α/β receptor
- JAK
Janus kinase
- TYK
Tyrosine-protein kinase
- STAT
Signal transducer and activator of transcription
- APCs
Antigen-presenting cells
- CRS
Cytokine release syndrome
- VSV
Vesicular Stomatitis Virus
- VEFG
Vascular endothelial growth factor
- HGF
Hepatocyte growth factor
- LXA4
Lipoxin A4
- RANTES
Regulated on activation, normal T cell expressed and secreted
- PGE2
Prostaglandin E2
- TGF-β1
Transforming growth factor-beta 1
- IDO
Indoleamine-pyrrole 2,3-dioxygenase
- NO
Nitric oxide
- GM-CSF
Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor
- GSK
Glycogen synthase kinase
- COX2
Cyclooxygenase-2
- HLA-G5
Human leukocyte antigen-G molecules
- MHC
Major histocompatibility complex
- PD-L1
Programmed death-ligand 1
- CD
Cluster of differentiation
- hBD
human β-defensin
Authors’ Contributions
All authors participated equally in designing the study, drafting, writing, editing the manuscript, and approving it for submission.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
We have no conflicts of interest.
Research Involving Human Participants and/or Animals
Not applicable.
Informed Consent
Not applicable.
Footnotes
This article belongs to the Topical Collection: Special Issue on COVID-19 Pandemic and Stem Cells Guest Editor: Mariusz Z. Ratajczak
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Yogesh Kumar Verma, Ranjan Verma, Nishant Tyagi, Amanpreet Behl and Subodh Kumar contributed equally to this work.
References
- 1.Banerjee A, Kulcsar K, Misra V, Frieman M, Mossman K. Bats and coronaviruses. Viruses. 2019;11(1):7–9. doi: 10.3390/v11010041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.WHO | Summary of probable SARS cases with onset of illness from 1 November 2002 to 31 July 2003. (2015). WHO.
- 3.WHO | Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV). (2020). WHO.
- 4.Leng, Z., Zhu, R., Hou, W., Feng, Y., Yang, Y., Han, Q., … Zhao, R. C. (2020). Transplantation of ACE2- Mesenchymal Stem Cells Improves the Outcome of Patients with COVID-19 Pneumonia. Aging and disease, 11(2), 216. 10.14336/ad.2020.0228 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 5.Bari E, Ferrarotti I, Saracino L, Perteghella S, Torre ML, Corsico AG. Mesenchymal Stromal Cell Secretome for Severe COVID-19 Infections: Premises for the Therapeutic Use. Cells. 2020;9(4):5–10. doi: 10.3390/cells9040924. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Shereen MA, Khan S, Kazmi A, Bashir N, Siddique R. COVID-19 infection: Origin, transmission, and characteristics of human coronaviruses. Journal of Advanced Research. 2020;24:91–98. doi: 10.1016/j.jare.2020.03.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Zhang YZ, Holmes EC. A Genomic Perspective on the Origin and Emergence of SARS-CoV-2. Cell. 2020;181(2):223–227. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.03.035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Worldometer. (2020). Coronavirus Cases. Worldometer. 10.1101/2020.01.23.20018549V2
- 9.van Doremalen, N., et al. (n.d.). Aerosol and surface stability of HCoV-19 (SARS-CoV-2) compared to SARS-CoV-1. The New England Journal of Medicine. 10.1056/NEJMc2004973. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 10.Thiel, V., Ivanov, K. A., Putics, Á., Hertzig, T., Schelle, B., Bayer, S., … Ziebuhr, J. (2003). Mechanisms and enzymes involved in SARS coronavirus genome expression. Journal of General Virology. 10.1099/vir.0.19424-0 [DOI] [PubMed]
- 11.Wu F, Zhao S, Yu B, Chen YM, Wang W, Song ZG, et al. A new coronavirus associated with human respiratory disease in China. Nature. 2020;579(7798):265–269. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2008-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Mielech, A. M., Kilianski, A., Baez-Santos, Y. M., Mesecar, A. D., & Baker, S. C. (2014). MERS-CoV papain-like protease has deISGylating and deubiquitinating activities. Virology, 450–451, 64–70. 10.1016/j.virol.2013.11.040 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 13.Mousavizadeh, L., & Ghasemi, S. (2020). Genotype and phenotype of COVID-19: Their roles in pathogenesis. Journal of Microbiology, Immunology and Infection, (xxxx), 0–4. 10.1016/j.jmii.2020.03.022 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 14.Walls, A. C., Park, Y.-J., Tortorici, M. A., Wall, A., Mcguire, A. T., & Correspondence, D. V. (2020). Structure, Function, and Antigenicity of the SARS-CoV-2 Spike Glycoprotein. 10.1016/j.cell.2020.02.058 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 15.Álvarez E, DeDiego ML, Nieto-Torres JL, Jiménez-Guardeño JM, Marcos-Villar L, Enjuanes L. The envelope protein of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus interacts with the non-structural protein 3 and is ubiquitinated. Virology. 2010;402(2):281–291. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2010.03.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Pervushin, K., Tan, E., Parthasarathy, K., Lin, X., Jiang, F. L., Yu, D., … Torres, J. (2009). Structure and inhibition of the SARS coronavirus envelope protein ion channel. PLoS Pathogens, 5(7). 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000511 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 17.Schoeman, D., & Fielding, B. C. (2019). Coronavirus envelope protein: Current knowledge. Virology Journal. BioMed Central Ltd. 10.1186/s12985-019-1182-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 18.Luo, C., Luo, H., Zheng, S., Gui, C., Yue, L., Yu, C., … Jiang, H. (2004). Nucleocapsid protein of SARS coronavirus tightly binds to human cyclophilin A. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 321(3), 557–565. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2004.07.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 19.Neuman, B. W., Kiss, G., Kunding, A. H., Bhella, D., Baksh, M. F., Connelly, S., … Buchmeier, M. J. (2011). A structural analysis of M protein in coronavirus assembly and morphology. Journal of Structural Biology, 174(1), 11–22. 10.1016/j.jsb.2010.11.021 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 20.Anand K, Ziebuhr J, Wadhwani P, Mesters JR, Hilgenfeld R. Coronavirus main proteinase (3CLpro) Structure: Basis for design of anti-SARS drugs. Science. 2003;300(5626):1763–1767. doi: 10.1126/science.1085658. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Wang, Q., Wu, J., Wang, H., Gao, Y., Liu, Q., Mu, A., … Rao, Z. (2020). Structural Basis for RNA Replication by the SARS-CoV-2 Polymerase. Cell, 182, 417–428. 10.1016/j.cell.2020.05.034 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 22.Khan, F. A., Asif, M., Ahmad, A., & Aljuaid, H. (2020). MODS AND SIRS. Sustainable Cities and Society, 102018. 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102018
- 23.Coronavirus Age, Sex, Demographics (COVID-19) - Worldometer. (n.d.). Retrieved July 11, 2020, from https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/coronavirus-age-sex-demographics/
- 24.Verity, R., Okell, L. C., Dorigatti, I., Winskill, P., Whittaker, C., Imai, N., … Ferguson, N. M. (2020). Estimates of the severity of coronavirus disease 2019: a model-based analysis. The Lancet Infectious Diseases, 20(6), 669–677. 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30243-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 25.Liu, Y., Mao, B., Liang, S., Yang, J. W., Lu, H. W., Chai, Y. H., … Xu, J. F. (2020). Association between age and clinical characteristics and outcomes of COVID-19. The European respiratory journal. NLM (Medline). 10.1183/13993003.01112-2020 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 26.Mallapaty, S. (2020). How deadly is the coronavirus? Scientists are close to an answer. Nature. NLM (Medline). 10.1038/d41586-020-01738-2 [DOI] [PubMed]
- 27.Zhang, C., Wu, Z., Li, J.-W., Zhao, H., & Wang, G.-Q. (2020). The cytokine release syndrome (CRS) of severe COVID-19 and Interleukin-6 receptor (IL-6R) antagonist Tocilizumab may be the key to reduce the mortality. International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents, 105954. 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2020.105954 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 28.Prompetchara, E., Ketloy, C., & Palaga, T. (2020). Immune responses in COVID-19 and potential vaccines: Lessons learned from SARS and MERS epidemic. Asian Pacific journal of allergy and immunology. NLM (Medline). 10.12932/AP-200220-0772 [DOI] [PubMed]
- 29.Liu, W., Fontanet, A., Zhang, P., Zhan, L., Xin, Z., Baril, L., … Cao, W. (2006). Two-Year Prospective Study of the Humoral Immune Response of Patients with Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome. The Journal of Infectious Diseases, 193(6), 792–795. 10.1086/500469 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 30.Huang, C., Wang, Y., Li, X., Ren, L., Zhao, J., Hu, Y., … Cao, B. (2020). Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. The Lancet, 395(10223), 497–506. 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30183-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 31.Zhu, N., Zhang, D., Wang, W., Li, X., Yang, B., Song, J., … Tan, W. (2020). A novel coronavirus from patients with pneumonia in China, 2019. New England Journal of Medicine, 382(8), 727–733. 10.1056/NEJMoa2001017 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 32.Hoffmann, M., Kleine-Weber, H., Schroeder, S., Krüger, N., Herrler, T., Erichsen, S., … Pöhlmann, S. (2020). SARS-CoV-2 Cell Entry Depends on ACE2 and TMPRSS2 and Is Blocked by a Clinically Proven Protease Inhibitor. Cell, 181(2), 271–280.e8. 10.1016/j.cell.2020.02.052 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 33.Glowacka, I., Bertram, S., Muller, M. A., Allen, P., Soilleux, E., Pfefferle, S., … Pohlmann, S. (2011). Evidence that TMPRSS2 Activates the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus Spike Protein for Membrane Fusion and Reduces Viral Control by the Humoral Immune Response. Journal of Virology, 85(9), 4122–4134. 10.1128/jvi.02232-10 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 34.Imai, Y., Kuba, K., Rao, S., Huan, Y., Guo, F., Guan, B., … Penninger, J. M. (2005). Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 protects from severe acute lung failure. Nature, 436(7047), 112–116. 10.1038/nature03712 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 35.Stadler, K., Ha, H. R., Ciminale, V., Spirli, C., Saletti, G., Schiavon, M., … Baritussio, A. (2008). Amiodarone alters late endosomes and inhibits SARS coronavirus infection at a post-endosomal level. American Journal of Respiratory Cell and Molecular Biology, 39(2), 142–149. 10.1165/rcmb.2007-0217OC [DOI] [PubMed]
- 36.Wilson L, Gage P, Ewart G. Hexamethylene amiloride blocks E protein ion channels and inhibits coronavirus replication. Virology. 2006;353(2):294–306. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2006.05.028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Li, C., Zhu, X., Ji, X., Quanquin, N., Deng, Y. Q., Tian, M., … Cheng, G. (2017). Chloroquine, a FDA-approved Drug, Prevents Zika Virus Infection and its Associated Congenital Microcephaly in Mice. EBioMedicine, 24, 189–194. 10.1016/j.ebiom.2017.09.034 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 38.Gao, J., Tian, Z., & Yang, X. (2020). Breakthrough: Chloroquine phosphate has shown apparent efficacy in treatment of COVID-19 associated pneumonia in clinical studies. BioScience Trends. International Advancement Center for Medicine and Health Research Co., Ltd. 10.5582/BST.2020.01047 [DOI] [PubMed]
- 39.Warren, T. K., Jordan, R., Lo, M. K., Ray, A. S., Mackman, R. L., Soloveva, V., … Bavari, S. (2016). Therapeutic efficacy of the small molecule GS-5734 against Ebola virus in rhesus monkeys. Nature, 531(7594), 381–385. 10.1038/nature17180 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 40.Sheahan, T. P., Sims, A. C., Graham, R. L., Menachery, V. D., Gralinski, L. E., Case, J. B., … Baric, R. S. (2017). Broad-spectrum antiviral GS-5734 inhibits both epidemic and zoonotic coronaviruses. Science Translational Medicine, 9(396). 10.1126/scitranslmed.aal3653 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 41.de Wit, E., Feldmann, F., Cronin, J., Jordan, R., Okumura, A., Thomas, T., … Feldmann, H. (2020). Prophylactic and therapeutic remdesivir (GS-5734) treatment in the rhesus macaque model of MERS-CoV infection. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 117(12), 6771–6776. 10.1073/pnas.1922083117 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 42.Shippey EA, Wagler VD, Collamer AN. Hydroxychloroquine: An old drug with new relevance. Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine. 2018;85(6):459–467. doi: 10.3949/ccjm.85a.17034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Devaux, C. A., Rolain, J.-M., Colson, P., & Raoult, D. (2020). New insights on the antiviral effects of chloroquine against coronavirus: what to expect for COVID-19? International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents, 105938. 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2020.105938 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 44.Hull MW, Montaner JSG. Ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitors in HIV therapy. Annals of Medicine. 2011;43(5):375–388. doi: 10.3109/07853890.2011.572905. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Das A, Hosur MV. X-Ray Structure of HIV-1 Protease Tethered Dimer Complexed to Ritonavir. Protein & Peptide Letters. 2010;14(6):565–568. doi: 10.2174/092986607780989930. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Genovese, M. C., Kremer, J., Zamani, O., Ludivico, C., Krogulec, M., Xie, L., … Smolen, J. S. (2016). Baricitinib in patients with refractory rheumatoid arthritis. New England Journal of Medicine, 374(13), 1243–1252. 10.1056/NEJMoa1507247 [DOI] [PubMed]
- 47.Kuriya, B., Cohen, M. D., & Keystone, E. (2017). Baricitinib in rheumatoid arthritis: evidence-to-date and clinical potential. Therapeutic Advances in Musculoskeletal Disease. SAGE Publications Ltd. 10.1177/1759720X16687481 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 48.Han Ni, S. M. K. T. M. A. H. (2013). Oral Janus Kinase Inhibitor for the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis: Tofacitinib - PubMed. Retrieved April 23, 2020, from https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23970975/ [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 49.O’Shea, J. J., Kontzias, A., Yamaoka, K., Tanaka, Y., & Laurence, A. (2013). Janus kinase inhibitors in autoimmune diseases. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 72(SUPPL. 2). 10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-202576. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 50.Baden, L. R., & Rubin, E. J. (2020). Covid-19 — The Search for Effective Therapy. The New England Journal of Medicine. 10.1056/nejme2005477. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 51.Siddiqi, H. K., & Mehra, M. R. (2020). COVID-19 Illness in Native and Immunosuppressed States: A Clinical-Therapeutic Staging Proposal. The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation. 10.1016/j.healun.2020.03.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 52.Louie, J. K., Yang, S., Acosta, M., Yen, C., Samuel, M. C., Schechter, R., … Uyeki, T. M. (2009). Treatment With Neuraminidase Inhibitors for Critically Ill Patients With Influenza A (H1N1) pdm09. 10.1093/cid/cis636 [DOI] [PubMed]
- 53.Sundquist, W. I., & Kräusslich, H. G. (2012). HIV-1 assembly, budding, and maturation. Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Medicine. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press. 10.1101/cshperspect.a006924 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 54.De Clercq, E. (2009). Anti-HIV drugs: 25 compounds approved within 25 years after the discovery of HIV. International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents. Elsevier. 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2008.10.010 [DOI] [PubMed]
- 55.Kumar, G. N., Jayanti, V., Lee, R. D., Whittern, D. N., Uchic, J., Thomas, S., … Denissen, J. F. (1999). In Vitro Metabolism of the HIV-1 Protease Inhibitor ABT-378: Species Comparison and Metabolite Identification. Drug Metabolism and Disposition, 27(1). [PubMed]
- 56.Villain-Guillot, P., Bastide, L., Gualtieri, M., & Leonetti, J. P. (2007). Progress in targeting bacterial transcription. Drug Discovery Today. Drug Discov Today. 10.1016/j.drudis.2007.01.005 [DOI] [PubMed]
- 57.White RJ, Lancini GC, Silvestri LG. Mechanism of action of rifampin on Mycobacterium smegmatis. Journal of Bacteriology. 1971;108(2):737–741. doi: 10.1128/jb.108.2.737-741.1971. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Tupin, A., Gualtieri, M., Roquet-Banères, F., Morichaud, Z., Brodolin, K., & Leonetti, J. P. (2010). Resistance to rifampicin: At the crossroads between ecological, genomic and medical concerns. International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents. 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2009.12.017 [DOI] [PubMed]
- 59.Campbell EA, Korzheva N, Mustaev A, Murakami K, Nair S, Goldfarb A, Darst SA. Structural mechanism for rifampicin inhibition of bacterial RNA polymerase. Cell. 2001;104(6):901–912. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00286-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Tremblay, C. L. (2008). Combating HIV resistance - Focus on darunavir. Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management. 10.2147/TCRM.S1709 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 61.De Meyer, S., Azijn, H., Surleraux, D., Jochmans, D., Tahri, A., Pauwels, R., … De Béthune, M. P. (2005). TMC114, a novel human immunodeficiency virus type 1 protease inhibitor active against protease inhibitor-resistant viruses, including a broad range of clinical isolates. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 49(6), 2314–2321. 10.1128/AAC.49.6.2314-2321.2005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 62.Hayden, F. G., & Shindo, N. (2019). Influenza virus polymerase inhibitors in clinical development. Current Opinion in Infectious Diseases. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. 10.1097/QCO.0000000000000532 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 63.Furuta, Y., Komeno, T., & Nakamura, T. (2017). Favipiravir (T-705), a broad spectrum inhibitor of viral RNA polymerase. Proceedings of the Japan Academy Series B: Physical and Biological Sciences. Japan Academy. 10.2183/pjab.93.027 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 64.Venkataraman, S., Prasad, B. V. L. S., & Selvarajan, R. (2018). RNA dependent RNA polymerases: Insights from structure, function and evolution. Viruses. MDPI AG. 10.3390/v10020076 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 65.Russia approves first drug for Covid-19 treatment – Public Radio of Armenia. (n.d.). Retrieved June 1, 2020, from https://en.armradio.am/2020/05/30/russia-approves-first-drug-for-covid-19-treatment/
- 66.Westover, J. B., Mathis, A., Taylor, R., Wandersee, L., Bailey, K. W., Sefing, E. J., … Gowen, B. B. (2018). Galidesivir limits Rift Valley fever virus infection and disease in Syrian golden hamsters. Antiviral Research, 156, 38–45. 10.1016/j.antiviral.2018.05.013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 67.Lu, H. (2020). Drug treatment options for the 2019-new coronavirus (2019-nCoV). Bioscience Trends, 14(1). 10.5582/BST.2020.01020. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 68.Blaising, J., Polyak, S. J., & Pécheur, E. I. (2014). Arbidol as a broad-spectrum antiviral: An update. Antiviral Research. Elsevier. 10.1016/j.antiviral.2014.04.006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 69.Deng P, Zhong D, Yu K, Zhang Y, Wang T, Chen X. Pharmacokinetics, metabolism, and excretion of the antiviral drug arbidol in humans. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. 2013;57(4):1743–1755. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02282-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Wang, Z., Chen, X., Lu, Y., Chen, F., & Zhang, W. (2020). Clinical characteristics and therapeutic procedure for four cases with 2019 novel coronavirus pneumonia receiving combined Chinese and Western medicine treatment. Bioscience Trends, 14(1). 10.5582/BST.2020.01030. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 71.Sanchez-Ramos, J., Song, S., Cardozo-Pelaez, F., Hazzi, C., Stedeford, T., Willing, A., … Sanberg, P. R. (2000). Adult bone marrow stromal cells differentiate into neural cells in vitro. Experimental Neurology, 164(2), 247–256. 10.1006/exnr.2000.7389 [DOI] [PubMed]
- 72.Ullah, I., Subbarao, R. B., & Rho, G. J. (2015). Human mesenchymal stem cells - Current trends and future prospective. Bioscience Reports, 35. 10.1042/BSR20150025 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 73.Balamurugan, K., & Said, H. M. (2006). Role of reduced folate carrier in intestinal folate uptake. American Journal of Physiology - Cell Physiology, 291(1). 10.1152/ajpcell.00594.2005. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 74.Carapagnoli, C., Fisk, N. M., Kumar, S., Bellantuono, L., Bennett, P. R., & Roberts, I. A. G. (2000). Identification of mesenchymal stem cells in human first trimester fetal blood, liver and bone marrow. Blood, 96(11 PART I), 2396–2402. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 75.Jones, E. A., Kinsey, S. E., English, A., Jones, R. A., Straszynski, L., Meredith, D. M., … McGonagle, D. (2002). Isolation and characterization of bone marrow multipotential mesenchymal progenitor cells. Arthritis and Rheumatism, 46(12), 3349–3360. 10.1002/art.10696 [DOI] [PubMed]
- 76.Zhang, Y., Li, C., Jiang, X., Zhang, S., Wu, Y., Liu, B., … Mao, N. (2004). Human placenta-derived mesenchymal progenitor cells support culture expansion of long-term culture-initiating cells from cord blood CD34+ cells. Experimental Hematology, 32(7), 657–664. 10.1016/j.exphem.2004.04.001 [DOI] [PubMed]
- 77.Gang EJ. S tem C Skeletal Myogenic Differentiation of Mesenchymal Stem Cells Isolated from Human Umbilical Cord Bloodells. Stem Cells. 2004;22:617–624. doi: 10.1634/stemcells.22-4-617. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Dominici, M., Le Blanc, K., Mueller, I., Slaper-Cortenbach, I., Marini, F. C., Krause, D. S., … Horwitz, E. M. (2006). Minimal criteria for defining multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells. The International Society for Cellular Therapy position statement. Cytotherapy, 8(4), 315–317. 10.1080/14653240600855905 [DOI] [PubMed]
- 79.Horwitz, E. M., Le Blanc, K., Dominici, M., Mueller, I., Slaper-Cortenbach, I., Marini, F. C., … Keating, A. (2005). Clarification of the nomenclature for MSC: The International Society for Cellular Therapy position statement. Cytotherapy, 7(5), 393–395. 10.1080/14653240500319234 [DOI] [PubMed]
- 80.Liang, B., Chen, J., Li, T., Wu, H., Yang, W., Li, Y., … Hu, M. (2020). Clinical remission of a critically ill COVID-19 patient treated by human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells. ChinaXiv. 10.3969/j.issn.2095-4344.2012.49.011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 81.Shetty AK. Mesenchymal stem cell infusion shows promise for combating coronavirus (COVID-19)-induced pneumonia. Aging and Disease. 2020;11(2):462–464. doi: 10.14336/AD.2020.0301. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Atluri S, Manchikanti L, Hirsch JA. Expanded Umbilical Cord Mesenchymal Stem Cells (UC-MSCs) as a Therapeutic Strategy in Managing Critically Ill COVID-19 Patients: The Case for Compassionate Use. Pain Physician. 2020;23(2):E71–E83. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Basiri, A., Pazhouhnia, Z., Beheshtizadeh, N., Hoseinpour, M., Saghazadeh, A., & Rezaei, N. (2020). Regenerative Medicine in COVID-19 Treatment: Real Opportunities and Range of Promises. Stem Cell Reviews and Reports. 10.1007/s12015-020-09994-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 84.Golchin, A., Seyedjafari, E., & Ardeshirylajimi, A. (2020). Mesenchymal Stem Cell Therapy for COVID-19: Present or Future. Stem Cell Reviews and Reports. 10.1007/s12015-020-09973-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 85.Home - ClinicalTrials.gov. (n.d.). Retrieved July 17, 2020, from https://clinicaltrials.gov/
- 86.Raza, S. S., Seth, P., & Khan, M. A. (2020). ‘Primed’ Mesenchymal Stem Cells: a Potential Novel Therapeutic for COVID19 Patients. Stem Cell Reviews and Reports. 10.1007/s12015-020-09999-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 87.de Witte, S. F. H., Luk, F., Sierra Parraga, J. M., Gargesha, M., Merino, A., Korevaar, S. S., … Hoogduijn, M. J. (2018). Immunomodulation By Therapeutic Mesenchymal Stromal Cells (MSC) Is Triggered Through Phagocytosis of MSC By Monocytic Cells. Stem Cells, 36(4), 602–615. 10.1002/stem.2779 [DOI] [PubMed]
- 88.Gao, F., Chiu, S. M., Motan, D. A. L., Zhang, Z., Chen, L., Ji, H. L., … Lian, Q. (2016). Mesenchymal stem cells and immunomodulation: Current status and future prospects. Cell Death and Disease, 7(1). 10.1038/cddis.2015.327 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 89.Yagi H, Soto-Gutierrez A, Parekkadan B, Kitagawa Y, Tompkins RG, Kobayashi N, Yarmush ML. Mesenchymal stem cells: Mechanisms of immunomodulation and homing. Cell Transplantation. 2010;19(6–7):667–679. doi: 10.3727/096368910X508762. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Regmi, S., Pathak, S., Kim, J. O., Yong, C. S., & Jeong, J. H. (2019). Mesenchymal stem cell therapy for the treatment of inflammatory diseases: Challenges, opportunities, and future perspectives. European Journal of Cell Biology, 98(5–8), 0–1. 10.1016/j.ejcb.2019.04.002 [DOI] [PubMed]
- 91.Jorgensen C. Mesenchymal stem cells immunosuppressive properties: Is it specific to bone marrow-derived cells? Stem Cell Research & Therapy. 2010;1(2):15. doi: 10.1186/scrt15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Bouffi C, Bony C, Courties G, Jorgensen C, Noël D. IL-6-Dependent PGE2 Secretion by Mesenchymal Stem Cells Inhibits Local Inflammation in Experimental Arthritis. PLoS One. 2010;5(12):e14247. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0014247. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Putra, A., Ridwan, F. B., Putridewi, A. I., Kustiyah, A. R., Wirastuti, K., Sadyah, N. A. C., … Munir, D. (2018). The role of tnf-α induced mscs on suppressive inflammation by increasing tgf-β and il-10. Open Access Macedonian Journal of Medical Sciences, 6(10), 1779–1783. 10.3889/oamjms.2018.404 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 94.Takano, T., Li, Y. J., Kukita, A., Yamaza, T., Ayukawa, Y., Moriyama, K., … Kukita, T. (2014). Mesenchymal stem cells markedly suppress inflammatory bone destruction in rats with adjuvant-induced arthritis. Laboratory Investigation, 94(3), 286–296. 10.1038/labinvest.2013.152 [DOI] [PubMed]
- 95.Podestà, M. A., Remuzzi, G., & Casiraghi, F. (2019). Mesenchymal stromal cells for transplant tolerance. Frontiers in Immunology. Frontiers Media S.A. 10.3389/fimmu.2019.01287 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 96.Kim J, Kim NK, Park SR, Choi BH. GM-CSF Enhances Mobilization of Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cells via a CXCR4-Medicated Mechanism. Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine. 2019;16(1):59–68. doi: 10.1007/s13770-018-0163-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Kitani A, Fuss I, Nakamura K, Kumaki F, Usui T, Strober W. Transforming Growth Factor (TGF)-β1-producing Regulatory T Cells Induce Smad-mediated Interleukin 10 Secretion That Facilitates Coordinated Immunoregulatory Activity and Amelioration of TGF-β1-mediated Fibrosis. Journal of Experimental Medicine. 2003;198(8):1179–1188. doi: 10.1084/jem.20030917. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Gangenahalli, G., Satija, N., Afrin, F., & Tripathi, R. P. (2011). High-Throughput Transcriptome Profiling Of Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells Reveals A Role For Wnt/GSK-3 Signaling In Their Hypoimmunomodulation. Nature Precedings, 1–1. 10.1038/npre.2011.5512.1
- 99.Takeshita, K., Motoike, S., Kajiya, M., Komatsu, N., Takewaki, M., Ouhara, K., … Kurihara, H. (2017). Xenotransplantation of interferon-gamma-pretreated clumps of a human mesenchymal stem cell/extracellular matrix complex induces mouse calvarial bone regeneration. Stem Cell Research and Therapy, 8(1), 101. 10.1186/s13287-017-0550-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 100.Li, Y., Xu, J., Shi, W., Chen, C., Shao, Y., Zhu, L., … Han, X. D. (2016). Mesenchymal stromal cell treatment prevents H9N2 avian influenza virus-induced acute lung injury in mice. Stem Cell Research and Therapy, 7(1), 1–11. 10.1186/s13287-016-0395-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 101.Li, H., Shen, S., Fu, H., Wang, Z., Li, X., Sui, X., … Guo, Q. (2019). Immunomodulatory functions of mesenchymal stem cells in tissue engineering. Stem Cells International, 2019. 10.1155/2019/9671206 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 102.Chan JL, Tang KC, Patel AP, Bonilla LM, Pierobon N, Ponzio NM, Rameshwar P. Antigen-presenting property of mesenchymal stem cells occurs during a narrow window at low levels of interferon-γ. Blood. 2006;107(12):4817–4824. doi: 10.1182/blood-2006-01-0057. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Aggarwal S, Pittenger MF. Human mesenchymal stem cells modulate allogeneic immune cell responses. Blood. 2005;105(4):1815–1822. doi: 10.1182/blood-2004-04-1559. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Han KH, Ro H, Hong JH, Lee EM, Cho B, Yeom HJ, et al. Immunosuppressive mechanisms of embryonic stem cells and mesenchymal stem cells in alloimmune response. Transplant Immunology. 2011;25(1):7–15. doi: 10.1016/j.trim.2011.05.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.English K, Ryan JM, Tobin L, Murphy MJ, Barry FP, Mahon BP. Cell contact, prostaglandin E2 and transforming growth factor beta 1 play non-redundant roles in human mesenchymal stem cell induction of CD4+CD25Highforkhead box P3+ regulatory T cells. Clinical and Experimental Immunology. 2009;156(1):149–160. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2249.2009.03874.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Esfandiyari, R., Halabian, R., Behzadi, E., Sedighian, H., Jafari, R., & Imani Fooladi, A. A. (2019). Performance evaluation of antimicrobial peptide ll-37 and hepcidin and β-defensin-2 secreted by mesenchymal stem cells. Heliyon. Elsevier Ltd. 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02652 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 107.Hsieh I-N, Hartshorn K. The Role of Antimicrobial Peptides in Influenza Virus Infection and Their Potential as Antiviral and Immunomodulatory Therapy. Pharmaceuticals. 2016;9(3):53. doi: 10.3390/ph9030053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Zhang, L. J., & Gallo, R. L. (2016). Antimicrobial peptides. Current Biology. Cell Press. 10.1016/j.cub.2015.11.017 [DOI] [PubMed]
- 109.Kim JM. Antimicrobial Proteins in Intestine and Inflammatory Bowel Diseases. Intestinal Research. 2014;12(1):20. doi: 10.5217/ir.2014.12.1.20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Sung DK, Chang YS, Sung SI, Yoo HS, Ahn SY, Park WS. Antibacterial effect of mesenchymal stem cells against Escherichia coli is mediated by secretion of beta- defensin- 2 via toll- like receptor 4 signalling. Cellular Microbiology. 2016;18(3):424–436. doi: 10.1111/cmi.12522. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Pachón-Ibáñez, M. E., Smani, Y., Pachón, J., Sánchez-Céspedes, J. (2017). Perspectives for clinical use of engineered human host defense antimicrobial peptides. FEMS Microbiology Reviews, 012, 323–342. 10.1093/femsre/fux012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 112.Castañeda-Sánchez, J. I., Domínguez-Martínez, D. A., Olivar-Espinosa, N., García-Pérez, B. E., Loroño-Pino, M. A., Luna-Herrera, J., Salazar, M. I. (2016). Expression of Antimicrobial Peptides in Human Monocytic Cells and Neutrophils in Response to Dengue Virus Type 2. 10.1159/000446282 [DOI] [PubMed]
- 113.Matsumura, T., Sugiyama, N., Murayama, A., Yamada, N., Shiina, M., Asabe, S., … Kato, T. (2016). Antimicrobial peptide LL-37 attenuates infection of hepatitis C virus. Hepatology Research, 46(9), 924–932. 10.1111/hepr.12627 [DOI] [PubMed]
- 114.Currie, S. M., Findlay, E. G., McHugh, B. J., Mackellar, A., Man, T., Macmillan, D., … Davidson, D. J. (2013). The Human Cathelicidin LL-37 Has Antiviral Activity against Respiratory Syncytial Virus. PLoS ONE, 8(8), e73659. 10.1371/journal.pone.0073659 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 115.Lee JW, Krasnodembskaya A, McKenna DH, Song Y, Abbott J, Matthay MA. Therapeutic effects of human mesenchymal stem cells in ex vivo human lungs injured with live bacteria. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. 2013;187(7):751–760. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201206-0990OC. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Alcayaga-Miranda, F., Cuenca, J., & Khoury, M. (2017). Antimicrobial activity of mesenchymal stem cells: Current status and new perspectives of antimicrobial peptide-based therapies. Frontiers in Immunology. Frontiers Media S.A. 10.3389/fimmu.2017.00339 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 117.Lee SH. The advantages and limitations of mesenchymal stem cells in clinical application for treating human diseases. Osteoporosis and Sarcopenia. 2018;4(4):150. doi: 10.1016/j.afos.2018.11.083. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Musiał-Wysocka A, Kot M, Majka M. The Pros and Cons of Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Based Therapies. Cell Transplantation. 2019;28(7):801–812. doi: 10.1177/0963689719837897. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Lukomska, B., Stanaszek, L., Zuba-Surma, E., Legosz, P., Sarzynska, S., & Drela, K. (2019). Challenges and Controversies in Human Mesenchymal Stem Cell Therapy. Stem Cells International, 2019. 10.1155/2019/9628536 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 120.Volarevic, V., Markovic, B. S., Gazdic, M., Volarevic, A., Jovicic, N., Arsenijevic, N., … Stojkovic, M. (2018). Ethical and safety issues of stem cell-based therapy. International Journal of Medical Sciences. Ivyspring International Publisher. 10.7150/ijms.21666 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 121.Ning, H., Yang, F., Jiang, M., Hu, L., Feng, K., Zhang, J., … Chen, H. (2008). The correlation between cotransplantation of mesenchymal stem cells and higher recurrence rate in hematologic malignancy patients: Outcome of a pilot clinical study. Leukemia, 22(3), 593–599. 10.1038/sj.leu.2405090 [DOI] [PubMed]
- 122.Muroi, K., Miyamura, K., Okada, M., Yamashita, T., Murata, M., Ishikawa, T., … Ozawa, K. (2016). Bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (JR-031) for steroid-refractory grade III or IV acute graft-versus-host disease: a phase II/III study. International Journal of Hematology, 103(2), 243–250. 10.1007/s12185-015-1915-9 [DOI] [PubMed]
- 123.Karussis, D., Karageorgiou, C., Vaknin-Dembinsky, A., Gowda-Kurkalli, B., Gomori, J. M., Kassis, I., … Slavin, S. (2010). Safety and immunological effects of mesenchymal stem cell transplantation in patients with multiple sclerosis and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Archives of Neurology, 67(10), 1187–1194. 10.1001/archneurol.2010.248 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]