Skip to main content
BMC Biology logoLink to BMC Biology
. 2020 Sep 11;18:123. doi: 10.1186/s12915-020-00864-7

Correction to: The genome sequence of the grape phylloxera provides insights into the evolution, adaptation, and invasion routes of an iconic pest

Claude Rispe 1,✉,#, Fabrice Legeai 2,✉,#, Paul D Nabity 3, Rosa Fernández 4,5, Arinder K Arora 6, Patrice Baa-Puyoulet 7, Celeste R Banfill 8, Leticia Bao 9, Miquel Barberà 10, Maryem Bouallègue 11, Anthony Bretaudeau 2, Jennifer A Brisson 12, Federica Calevro 7, Pierre Capy 13, Olivier Catrice 14, Thomas Chertemps 15, Carole Couture 16, Laurent Delière 16, Angela E Douglas 6,17, Keith Dufault-Thompson 18, Paula Escuer 19, Honglin Feng 20,21, Astrid Forneck 22, Toni Gabaldón 4,23,24, Roderic Guigó 25,26, Frédérique Hilliou 27, Silvia Hinojosa-Alvarez 19, Yi-min Hsiao 28,29, Sylvie Hudaverdian 30, Emmanuelle Jacquin-Joly 31, Edward B James 8, Spencer Johnston 32, Benjamin Joubard 16, Gaëlle Le Goff 33, Gaël Le Trionnaire 30, Pablo Librado 34, Shanlin Liu 35,36,37, Eric Lombaert 38, Hsiao-ling Lu 39, Martine Maïbèche 15, Mohamed Makni 11, Marina Marcet-Houben 4, David Martínez-Torres 40, Camille Meslin 31, Nicolas Montagné 41, Nancy A Moran 42, Daciana Papura 16, Nicolas Parisot 7, Yvan Rahbé 43, Mélanie Ribeiro Lopes 7, Aida Ripoll-Cladellas 25, Stéphanie Robin 44, Céline Roques 45, Pascale Roux 16, Julio Rozas 19, Alejandro Sánchez-Gracia 19, Jose F Sánchez-Herrero 19, Didac Santesmasses 25,46, Iris Scatoni 47, Rémy-Félix Serre 45, Ming Tang 37, Wenhua Tian 3, Paul A Umina 48, Manuella van Munster 49, Carole Vincent-Monégat 7, Joshua Wemmer 3, Alex C C Wilson 8, Ying Zhang 18, Chaoyang Zhao 3, Jing Zhao 35,36, Serena Zhao 42, Xin Zhou 37, François Delmotte 16,✉,#, Denis Tagu 30,✉,#
PMCID: PMC7488435  PMID: 32917281

Correction to: BMC Biol 18, 90 (2020)

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12915-020-00820-5

Following publication of the original article [1], the authors identified an error in Fig. 4. The error was made in the x-axis labels of the three panels, which were noted as “pairwise dN/dS”. The figure represents distributions of dS, so the labels were corrected as “pairwise dS”. The correct Fig. 4 is given below.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Distribution of synonymous distances among paralogs for grape vine phylloxera (panel a, D. vitifoliae), pea aphid (panel b, A. pisum), and fruit fly (panel c, D. melanogaster). Paralogs were identified as RBH pairs, with an iterative approach allowing to cover both recent duplications (terminal nodes in gene families) and more ancient duplications (internal nodes). For readability, the y-axis (number of dS classes) is truncated to 1500 (numbers above that threshold are indicated on the figures). For both A. pisum and D. vitifoliae, an arrowhead indicates the median dS between orthologs (RBH genes between the two species), dS = 2.83: this metric, a proxy of the age of separation between the two species allows to distinguish duplications that are more recent (left of the arrow, lower dS values) *or more ancient (right of the arrowhead, higher dS) than the speciation event

Footnotes

Claude Rispe and Fabrice Legeai are co-first authors.

François Delmotte and Denis Tagu are co-last authors.

Contributor Information

Claude Rispe, Email: claude.rispe@inrae.fr.

Fabrice Legeai, Email: fabrice.legeai@inrae.fr.

François Delmotte, Email: francois.delmotte@inrae.fr.

Denis Tagu, Email: denis.tagu@inrae.fr.

Reference

  • 1.Rispe C, et al. The genome sequence of the grape phylloxera provides insights into the evolution, adaptation, and invasion routes of an iconic pest. BMC Biol. 2020;18:90. doi: 10.1186/s12915-020-00820-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from BMC Biology are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES