In the original article, there was a mistake in the legend for Figure 1. The Figure was adapted from two sources, which the authors neglected to mention. The correct legend appears below.
Figure 1.
A schematic representation of tick physiological processes and involved molecules tested as vaccine candidates [modified from (78, 103)].
The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.
References
- 78.de la Fuente J, Kopáček P, Lew-Tabor A, Maritz-Olivier C. Strategies for new and improved vaccines against ticks and tick-borne diseases. Parasite Immunol. (2016) 38:754–69. 10.1111/pim.12339 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.de la Fuente J, Antunes S, Bonnet S, Cabezas-Cruz A, Domingos AG, Estrada-Peña A, et al. Tick-pathogen interactions and vector competence: identification of molecular drivers for tick-borne diseases. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. (2017) 7:114. 10.3389/fcimb.2017.00114 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]