Skip to main content
JAMA Network logoLink to JAMA Network
. 2020 Sep 14;77(11):1453. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2020.3470

Errors in Figures and Reference List

PMCID: PMC7490739  PMID: 32926076

In the Original Investigation titled “Expanded Clinical Phenotype, Oncological Associations, and Immunopathologic Insights of Paraneoplastic Kelch-like Protein-11 Encephalitis,”1 published online August 3, 2020, there were errors in Figures 2, 3, and 4. In Figure 2B, the heading for the middle graph should read “CD8+,” the first x-axis label should read “KLHL11+,” and the y-axis label should read “Increase in frequency of CD69-expressing CD8+ cells, %”; and the heading for the rightmost graph should read “CD4+,” the first x-axis label should read “KLHL11+,” and the y-axis label should read “Increase in frequency of CD69-expressing CD8+ cells, %.” In Figure 3F, there should be no arrowhead, and in Figure 3I, the label should read “CD3 staining showing KLHL11-IgG binding to cytoplasm of seminomatous cells.” In Figure 4A, both instances of “KLHL11-IgG seropositive” should read “testicular cancer detected,” and both instances of “KLHL11-IgG seronegative” should read “no testicular cancer detected.” In Figure 4B, the label should read “KLHL11-IgG vs Ma2 IgG seropositive,” the gray line should read “KLHL11-IgG seropositive,” the orange line should read “Ma2 IgG seropositive,” and the second line of “No. at risk” should read “Ma2 IgG seropositive.” This article was corrected online.

Reference

  • 1.Dubey D, Wilson MR, Clarkson B, et al. Expanded clinical phenotype, oncological associations, and immunopathologic insights of paraneoplastic Kelch-like protein-11 encephalitis. JAMA Neurol. Published online August 3, 2020. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2020.2231 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from JAMA Neurology are provided here courtesy of American Medical Association

RESOURCES