Skip to main content
Heliyon logoLink to Heliyon
. 2020 Sep 14;6(9):e04786. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04786

Complexity trees of the sequence of some nonahedral graphs generated by triangle

SN Daoud a,b,, Wedad Saleh a
PMCID: PMC7490826  PMID: 32964151

Abstract

Calculating the number of spanning trees of a graph is one of the widely studied graph problems since the Pioneer Gustav Kirchhoff (1847). In this work, using knowledge of difference equations we drive the explicit formulas for the number of spanning trees in the sequence of some Nonahedral (nine faced polyhedral) graphs generated by triangle using electrically equivalent transformations and rules of the weighted generating function. Finally, we evaluate the entropy of graphs in this manuscript with different studied graphs with an average degree being 4, 5 and 6.

Keywords: Mathematics, Number of spanning trees, Entropy, Electrically equivalent transformations


Mathematics; Number of spanning trees; Entropy; Electrically equivalent transformations.

1. Introduction

The trouble of counting spanning trees turns to be essential and more importantly, interesting. For instance, it has been shown that, if the graph represents an electrical community with each edge a unit resistor, the effective resistance of an edge is equal to the proportion of spanning trees that the edge is in. Also, the wide variety of spanning trees is used as an invariant for computing the entropy of certain networks related to physical processes. In addition, there are various applications of the wide variety of spanning trees within mathematics as well [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12].

A spanning tree of a connected graph is a subgraph that is a tree reaching all vertices.

There exist numerous strategies for finding the number of spanning trees τG of a graph G.

A classic technique called the matrix tree theorem, also called Kirchhoff''s matrix-tree theorem [13] which states that the number of nonidentical spanning trees of a graph G is same to any cofactor of its Laplacian matrix L=D-A, in which D is the degree matrix and Ais the adjacency matrix of the graph G.

Another method to count this number is using Laplacian eigenvalues. Kelmans and Chelnoknov [14] derived the following formula:

τG=1pi=1p1λi. (1.1)

in which G is a connected graph with pvertices and p=λ1λ2...λp=0 are the eigenvalues of the Laplacian matrix L.

One popular technique for finding the number of spanning tress, τG, is the deletion-contraction method. This technique is a reliable method which lets into enumerate the number of spanning trees of a multigraph G. This method makes use of the fact that

τG=τG-e+τG/e (1.2)

where Gedenotes the graph obtained by deleting an arbitrary edge e, and G/edenotes the graph obtained by contracting an arbitrary edge e [15, 16]. For more results, see [17, 18, 19, 20].

2. Electrically equivalent transformations

An electrical network is an interconnection of electrical components (e.g. inductors, capacitors, batteries, resistors, switches, etc).

Kirchhoff's motivation was studied of electrical networks: an edge-weighted graph can be regarded as an electrical network, where weights are the conductance of the respective edges. The effect conductance between two specific nodes u,vcan be written as the quotient of (weighted) number of spanning trees and the (weighted) number of so called thickets, i.e., spanning forests with exactly two components and property that each of the components contains precisely one of the nodes u,v[21, 22]. Next, we list the effect of some simple transformations on the number of spanning trees, suppose that G is an edge weighted graph, G'is the corresponding electrically equivalent graph and τGdenotes the weighted number of spanning trees of G.

  • i.

    Parallel edges: when two parallel edges with conductances uand v in G are merged into a single edge with conductances u+vin G', then τG'=τG.

  • ii.

    Serial edges: when two serial edges with conductances u and v in G are merged into a single edge with conductance uvu+v in G', then τG'=1u+vτG..

  • iii

    ΔYtransformation: when a triangle with conductances u,v and w in G is changed into an electrically equivalent star graph with conductances r=uv+vw+uwu,s=uv+vw+uwv and t=uv+vw+uww in G', then τG'=uv+vw+uw2uvwτG.

  • iv

    YΔ transformation: when a star graph with conductances u,v and win G is changed into an electrically equivalent triangle with conductances r=vwu+v+w,s=uwu+v+w and t=uvu+v+w in G', then τG'=1u+v+wτG.

3. Main results

In mathematics, one constantly attempts to get new structure from given once. This also applies to the realm of graphs, where one can generate many new graphs from given one.

In the following we take into account six nonahedral graphs generated by triangle and we derive the explicit formulas for the number of spanning trees of sequences of those graphs.

Consider the sequence of graphs G1=K3,G2,...,Gn formed as illustrated in Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Some sequences of the graph Gn.

According to this formation, the number of total vertices |VGn| and edges |EGn|are |VGn|=6n3,|EGn|=15n12,n=1,2, It is obvious that the average degree is convergently 5for a large n.

Theorem 1

The number of spanning trees in the sequence of the graph Gn , where n1, is given by

2n597+173321+1323295733n219333n33+3333+3319+333n23267829+533+32n329+57331n2

Proof: Let us be using the electrically equivalent transformation to transform Gi to Gi1. Figure 2 clarifies the transformation process from G2 to G1=K3.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

The transformations from G2 to G1.

By utilizing the properties that are given in section 2, the following the transformations are given:

τG1'=127τG2,τG2'=τG1',τG3'=9k2τG2',τG4'=39k2+83τG3',τG5'=τG4',τG6'=9k2+872k2τG5'andτG1=τG6'.

Merging these seven transformations, we get

τG2=89k2+82τG1. (3.1)

Moreover,

τGn=i=2n89ki+82τG1=3×8n1k12i=2n9ki+82 (3.2)

where ki1=11ki+89ki+8,i=2,3,...,n.

Its characteristic equation is 9x23x8=0 which has two roots x1=1336 and x2=1+336. Subtracting these two roots into both sides of ki1=11ki+89ki+8, we have

ki11336=11ki+89ki+81336=19+333.ki133629ki+8 (3.3)
ki11+336=11ki+89ki+81+336=19333.ki1+33629ki+8 (3.4)

Let hi=ki1336ki1+336. Then by Eqs. (3.3) and (3.4), we get hi1=329+573332hi and hi=329+573332nihn.

Thus ki=329+573332ni1+336hn1336329+573332nihn1. Therefore,

k1=329+573332n11+336hn1336329+573332n1hn1. (3.5)

Utilizing the expression kn1=11kn+89kn+8 and indicating the coefficients of 11kn+8 and 9kn+8 as an and bn, we obtain

9kn+8=a011kn+8+b09kn+8,9kn1+8=a111kn+8+b19kn+8a011kn+8+b09kn+8,9kn2+8=a211kn+8+b29kn+8a111kn+8+b19kn+8,9kni+8=ai11kn+8+bi9kn+8ai111kn+8+bi19kn+8, (3.6)
9kni+1+8=ai+111kn+8+bi+19kn+8ai11kn+8+bi9kn+8,9k2+8=an211kn+8+bn29kn+8an311kn+8+bn39kn+8, (3.7)

Thus, we get

τGn=3×8n1k12an211kn+8+bn29kn+82 (3.8)

where a0 = 0, b0 = 1 and a1 = 9, b1 = 8. By the expression kn1=11kn+89kn+8 and Eqs. (3.6) and (3.7), we obtain

ai+1=19ai16ai1;bi+1=19bi16bi1 (3.9)

The characteristic equation of Eq. (3.9) is y2-19y+16=0 which has two roots y1=19+3332 and y2=19-3332. The general solution of Eq. (3.9) are ai=λ1y1i+λ2y2i;bi=μ1y1i+μ2y2i.

Utilizing the initial conditions a0=0,b0=1 and a1=9,b1=8, yields

ai=331119+3332i3311193332i;bi=33336619+3332i+33+3366193332i (3.10)

If kn=1, yields Gn has no any electrically equivalent transformation. Substituting Eq. (3.10) into Eq. (3.8), we get

τGn=3×8n1k12561+97336619+3332n2+561973366193332n22,n2. (3.11)

When n=1, τG1=3 which verifies Eq. (3.11). Thus, the number of spanning trees in the sequence of the graphGn is given by

τGn=3×8n1k12561+97336619+3332n2+561973366193332n22,n1. (3.12)

Where

k1=329+573332n197+1733+21333329+573332n129+533+12,n1. (3.13)

Putting Eq. (3.13) into Eq. (3.12), the result is obtained.

Consider the sequence of graphs H1=K3,H2,...,Hn formed as illustrated in Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Some sequences of the graph Hn.

According to this formation, the number of total vertices |VHn|and edges |EHn|are |VHn|=6n3,|EHn|=12n9,n=1,2, It is obvious that the average degree is convergently 4for a large n.

Theorem 2

The number of spanning trees in the sequence of the graph Hn , where n1, is given as 3×2n338+37n161+617+49+1072024+7657n+9837n3458+130772499127+487+16+57127+487n2

Proof: The electrically equivalent transformation to transform Hi to Hi1 is using. Figure 4 clarifies the transformation process from H2 to H1=K3.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

The transformations from H2 to H1.

By utilizing the properties that are given in section 2, the following the transformations are given:

τH1'=9k2τH2,τH2'=13k2+13τH1',τH3'=3k2+19k2τH2',τH4'=τH3',τH5'=94k2+13k2+1τH4',τH6'=3k2+118k2+53τH5',τH7'=τH6',τH8'=18k2+572k2+18τH7'andτH1=τH8'.

Merging these nine transformations, we get

τH2=218k2+52τH1. (3.14)

Moreover,

τHn=i=2n218ki+52τH1=3×2n1k12i=2n18ki+52 (3.15)

where ki1=11ki+318ki+5,i=2,3,...,n.

Its characteristic equation is 6x22x1=0 which has two roots x1=176 and x2=1+76. Subtracting these two roots into both sides of ki1=11ki+318ki+5, we get

ki11-76=11ki+318ki+5176=8+37.ai17618ki+5 (3.16)
ki1-1+76=11ki+318ki+51+76=837.ki1+7618ki+5 (3.17)

Let hi=ki-176ki1+76. Then by Eqs. (3.16) and (317), we get hi-1=127+487hi and hi=127+487n-ihn.

Thus ki=127+487n-i1+76hn176127+487nihn1. Therefore,

k1=127+487n-117+773172127+487n116+5736. (3.18)

Utilizing the expression kn-1=11kn+318kn+5 and indicating the coefficients of 11kn+3 and 18kn+5 as an and bn, we obtain

18kn+5=a011kn+3+b018kn+5,18kn1+5=a111kn+3+b118kn+5a011an+3+b018kn+5,18kn2+5=a211kn+3+b218kn+5a111kn+3+b118kn+5,8kn-i+5=ai11kn+3+bi18kn+5ai111kn+3+bi118kn+5, (3.19)
18kni+1+5=ai+111kn+3+bi+118kn+5ai11kn+3+bi18kn+5,18k2+5=an211kn+3+bn218kn+5an311kn+3+bn318kn+5, (3.20)

Thus, we obtain

τHn=3×2n1k12an211kn+3+bn218kn+52 (3.21)

where a0=0,b0=1 and a1=18,b1=5. By the expression kn1=11kn+318kn+5 and Eqs. (3.19) and (3.20), we have

ai+1=16aiai1;bi+1=16bibi1 (3.22)

The characteristic equation of Eq. (3.22) is y2-16y+1=0 which has two roots y1=8+37 and y2=8-37. The general solution of Eq. (3.22) are ai=λ1y1i+λ2y2i;bi=μ1y1i+μ2y2i.

Utilizing the initial conditions a0=0,b0=1 and a1=18,b1=5, yields

ai=3778+37i377837i;bi=77148+37i+7+714837i (3.23)

If kn=1, yields Hn has no any electrically equivalent transformation. Substituting Eq. (3.23) into Eq. (3.21), we get

τHn=3×2n1k12161+617148+37n2+16161714837n22,n2. (3.24)

When n=1, τH1=3which verifies Eq. (3.24). Thus, the number of spanning trees in the sequence of the graph Hn is given by

τHn=3×2n1k12161+617148+37n2+16161714837n22,n1. (3.25)

where

k1=127+487n117+773172127+487n116+5736. (3.26)

Putting Eq. (3.26) into Eq. (3.25), we obtain the result.

Consider the sequence of graphs T1=K3,T2,...,Tnformed as illustrated in Figure 5.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Some sequences of the graph Tn.

According to this formation, the number of total vertices |VTn| and edges |ETn|are |VTn|=6n3, |ETn|=12n9,n=1,2,. It is obvious that the average degree is convergently 4 for a large n.

Theorem 3

The number of spanning trees in the sequence of the graph Tn , where n1, is given by 3×2n32(8+37n98+3773837n1897+7177+7+572024+7657n249381+1447+11+47127+487n2

Proof: The electrically equivalent transformation to transform Ti to Ti-1is using. Figure 6 clarifies the transformation process from T2 to T1=K3.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

The transformations from T2 to T1.

By utilizing the properties that are given in section 2, the following the transformations are given:

τT1'=9k2τT2,τT2'=13k2+23τT1',τT3'=τT2',τT4'=3k2+218k2τT3',τT5'=τT4',τT6'=18k2+93k2+23τT5',τT7'=3k2+29k2+53τT6',τT8'=9k2+518k2+9τT7'andτT1=τT8'.

Merging these nine transformations, we get

τT2=29k2+52τT1. (3.27)

Moreover,

τTn=i=2n29ki+52τT1=3×2n1k12i=2n9ki+52 (3.28)

where

ki1=11ki+69ki+5,i=2,3,...,n.

Its characteristic equation is 3x2-2x-2=0 which has two roots x1=1-73 and x2=1+73. Subtracting these two roots into both sides of ki1=11ki+69ki+5, we have

ki11-73=11ki+69ki+5173=8+37.ai1739ki+5 (3.29)
ki11+73=11ki+69ki+5-1+73=837.ki-1+739ki+5 (3.30)

Let hi=ki-173ki1+73. Then by Eqs. (3.29) and (3.30), we have hi-1=127+487hi and hi=127+487n-ihn.

Thus ki=127+487ni1+73hn173127+487nihn1. Therefore,

k1=127+487n-113+573+173127+487n111+473+1. (3.31)

Utilizing the expression kn-1=11kn+69kn+5 and indicating the coefficients of 11kn+6 and 9kn+5 as an and bn, we obtain

9kn+5=a011kn+6+b09kn+5,9kn1+5=a111kn+6+b19kn+5a011an+6+b09kn+5,9kn2+5=a211kn+6+b29kn+5a111kn+6+b19kn+5,9kni+5=ai11kn+6+bi9kn+5ai111kn+6+bi19kn+5, (3.32)
9kni+1+5=ai+111kn+6+bi+19kn+5ai11kn+6+bi9kn+5,9k2+5=an211kn+6+bn-29kn+5an311kn+6+bn39kn+5, (3.33)

Thus, we get

τTn=3×2n1k12an211kn+6+bn29kn+52 (3.34)

where a0=0,b0=1 and a1=9,b1=5. By the expression kn-1=11kn+69kn+5 and Eqs. (3.32) and (3.33), we obtain

ai+1=16aiai1;bi+1=16bibi1 (3.35)

The characteristic equation of Eq. (3.35) is y2-16y+1=0which has two roots y1=8+37 and y2=8-37. The general solution of Eq. (3.35) are ai=λ1y1i+λ2y2i;bi=μ1y1i+μ2y2i.

Utilizing the initial conditions a0=0,b0=1 and a1=9,b1=5, yields

ai=37148+37i3714837i;bi=77148+37i+7+714837i (3.36)

If kn=1, yieldsTn has no any electrically equivalent transformation. Substituting Eq. (3.36) into Eq. (3.34), we get

τTn=3×2n1k1298+377148+37n2+9837714837n22,n2. (3.37)

When n=1 , τT1=3 which verifies Eq. (3.37). Thus, the number of spanning trees in the sequence of the graph Hn is given by

τTn=3×2n1k1298+377148+37n2+9837714837n22,n1. (3.38)

where

k1=127+487n-113+573+173127+487n111+473+1. (3.39)

Putting Eq. (3.39) into Eq. (3.38), then the result is obtained.

Consider the sequence of graphs X1=K3,X2,...,Xn formed as illustrated in Figure 7.

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Some sequences of the graph Xn.

According to this formation, the number of total vertices |VXn| and edges |EXn|are |VXn|=6n-3,|EXn|=18n15,n=1,2,. It is obvious that the average degree is convergently 6 for a large n.

Theorem 4

The number of spanning trees in the sequence of the graph Xn , where n1, is given by

8n355-23514+65n+55+2351465n2192n29+135+41+25547+215n27519×2n47+215+42+8547+215n2

Proof: The electrically equivalent transformation to transform Xi to Xi-1is using. Figure 8 clarifies the transformation process from X2 to X1=K3.

Figure 8.

Figure 8

The transformations from X2 to X1.

By utilizing the properties that are given in section 2, the following the transformations are given:

τX1'=127τX2,τX2'=τX1',τX3'=9k2τX2',τX4'=39k2+83τX3',τX5'=τX4',τX6'=9k2+872k2τX5'andτX1=τX6'.

Merging these seven transformations, we get

τX2=89k2+82τ(X1. (3.40)

Moreover,

τXn=i=2n89ki+82τX1=3×8n1k12i=2n9ki+82 (3.41)

where

ki1=20ki+169ki+8,i=2,3,...,n.

Its characteristic equation is 9x2-12x16=0 which has two roots x1=2-253 and x2=2+253. Subtracting these two roots into both sides of ki1=20ki+169ki+8, we have

ki1-2253=20ki+169ki+82253=27+35.ai22539ki+8 (3.42)
ki12+253=20ki+169ki+8-2+253=2735.ki2+2539ki+8 (3.43)

Let hi=ki-2253ki2+253. Then by Eqs. (3.42) and (3.43), we get hi-1=47+2152hi and hi=47+2152n-ihn.

Thus ki=47+2152ni2+253hn-225347+2152nihn1. Therefore,

k1=247+2152n-141+25557+225347+2152n121+4519+1. (3.44)

Utilizing the expression kn-1=20kn+169kn+8 and indicating the coefficients of 20kn+16 and 9kn+8 as an and bn, we obtain

9kn+8=a020kn+16+b09kn+8,9kn1+8=a120kn+16+b19kn+8a020an+16+b09kn+8,9kn2+8=a220kn+16+b29kn+8a120kn+16+b19kn+8,9kn-i+8=ai20kn+16+bi9kn+8ai120kn+16+bi19kn+8,
9kn-i+8=ai20kn+16+bi9kn+8ai120kn+16+bi19kn+8, (3.45)
9kni+1+8=ai+120kn+16+bi+19kn+8ai20kn+16+bi9kn+8,9k2+8=an220kn+16+bn29kn+8an-320kn+16+bn39kn+8, (3.46)

Thus, we obtain

τXn=3×8n1k12an220kn+16+bn29kn+82 (3.47)

where a0=0,b0=1 and a1=9,b1=8. By the expression kn-1=20kn+169kn+8 and Eqs. (3.45) and (3.46), we get

ai+1=28ai-16ai1;bi+1=28bi16bi1 (3.48)

The characteristic equation of Eq. (3.48) is y2-28y+16=0which has two roots y1=14+65 and y2=14-65. The general solution of Eq. (3.48) are ai=λ1y1i+λ2y2i;bi=μ1y1i+μ2y2i.

Utilizing the initial conditions a0=0,b0=1 and a1=9,b1=8, yields

ai=352014+65i-35201465i;bi=551014+65i+5+5101465i (3.49)

If kn=1, yields Xn has no any electrically equivalent transformation. Substituting Eq. (3.49) into Eq. (3.47), we get

τXn=3×8n1k1285+3751014+65n2+85375101465n22,n2. (3.50)

When n=1 , τX1=3which verifies Eq. (3.50). Thus, the number of spanning trees in the sequence of the graphXn is given by

τXn=3×8n1k1285+3751014+65n2+85375101465n22,n1. (3.51)

where

k1=247+2152n-141+25557+225347+2152n121+4519+1. (3.52)

Putting Eq. (3.52) into Eq. (3.51), the result is obtained.

Consider the sequence of graphs Y1=K3,Y2,...,Yn formed as illustrated in Figure 9.

Figure 9.

Figure 9

Some sequences of the graph Yn.

According to this formation, the number of total vertices |VYn| and edges |EYn| are |VYn|=6n-3, |EYn|=15n-12,n=1,2,.It is obvious that the average degree is convergently 5 for a large n.

Theorem 5

The number of spanning trees in the sequence of the graph Yn , where n1, is given by

2n-510+7217122n+107217+122n21055+746211+82577+4082n23577+4082+3+22577+4082n2

Proof: The electrically equivalent transformation to transform Yi to Yi-1 is using. Figure 8 clarifies the transformation process from Y2 to Y1=K3. (see Figure 10).

Figure 10.

Figure 10

The transformations from Y2 to Y1.

By utilizing the properties that are given in section 2, the following the transformations are given:

τY1'=9k2τY2,τY2'=13k2+23τY1',τY3'=τY2',τY4'=3k2+218k2τY3',τY5'=τY4',τY6'=45k2+273k2+2τY5',τY7'=3k2+218k2+113τY6',τY8'=18k2+1145k2+27τY7'andτY1=τY8'.

Merging these nine transformations, we obtain

τY2=218k2+112τY1. (3.53)

Moreover,

τYn=i=2n218ki+112τY1=3×2n1k12i=2n18ki+112 (3.54)

where ki-1=23ki+1418ki+11,i=2,3,...,n.

Its characteristic equation is 9x26x-7=0 which has two roots x1=1-223 and x2=1+223. Subtracting these two roots into both sides of ki1=23ki+1418ki+11, we have

ki1-1223=23ki+1418ki+111223=17+122.ki122318ki+11 (3.55)
ki1-1+253=23ki+1418ki+111+223=17122.ki1+22318ki+11 (3.56)

Let hi=ki-1223ki1+223. Then by Eqs. (3.55) and (3.56), we have t hi-1=577+4082hi and hi=577+4082nihn.

Thus ki=577+4082n-i1+223hn1223577+4082nihn1. Therefore,

k1=577+4082n-111+823+1223577+4082n13+22+1. (3.57)

Utilizing the expression kn-1=23kn+1418kn+11 and indicating the coefficients of 23kn+14 and 18kn+11 as an and bn, we obtain

18kn+11=a023kn+14+b018kn+11,18kn1+11=a123kn+14+b118kn+11a023an+14+b018kn+11,18kn2+11=a223kn+14+b218kn+11a123kn+14+b118kn+11,18kni+11=ai23kn+14+bi18kn+11ai-123kn+14+bi118kn+11, (3.58)
18kni+1+11=ai+123kn+14+bi+118kn+11ai23kn+14+bi18kn+11,18k2+11=an-223kn+14+bn218kn+11an323kn+14+bn318kn+11, (3.59)

Thus, we have

τYn=3×2n1k12an223kn+14+bn218kn+112 (3.60)

where a0=0,b0=1and a1=18,b1=11. By the expression kn-1=23kn+1418kn+11 and Eqs. (3.58) and (3.59), we have

ai+1=34aiai1;bi+1=34bibi1 (3.61)

The characteristic equation of Eq. (3.61) is y2-34y+1=0which has two roots y1=17+122 and y2=17-125. The general solution of Eq. (3.61) are ai=λ1y1i+λ2y2i;bi=μ1y1i+μ2y2i.

Utilizing the initial conditions a0=0,b0=1 and a1=18,b1=11, yields

ai=32817+122i-32817122i;bi=42817+122i+4+2817122i (3.62)

If kn=1, yields Yn has no any electrically equivalent transformation. Substituting Eq. (3.62) into Eq. (3.60), we get

τYn=3×2n1k1258+412417+122n2+58412417122n22,n2. (3.63)

When n=1, τY1=3 which verifies Eq. (3.63). Thus, the number of spanning trees in the sequence of the graphYn is given by

τYn=3×2n1k1258+412417+122n2+58412417122n22,n1. (3.64)

where

k1=577+4082n-111+823+1223577+4082n13+22+1. (3.65)

Putting Eq. (3.65) into Eq. (3.64), then the result is obtained.

Consider the sequence of graphs Z1=K3,Z2,...,Znformed as illustrated in Figure 11.

Figure 11.

Figure 11

Some sequences of the graph Zn.

According to this formation, the number of total vertices |VZn| and edges |EZn| are |VZn|=6n-3, |EZn|=18n-15,n=1,2,. It is obvious that the average degree is convergently 6 for a large n.

Theorem 6

The number of spanning trees in the sequence of the graph Zn, where n1, is given by Gn , where n1, is given by 3(47+215)2n(2n+1(85+385)+(1575)(2207+9875)n+(88555+936035)(22079875)n)2100(2n(2207+9875)+(3+5)(2207+9875)n)2

Proof: Let us be using the electrically equivalent transformation to transform zi to zi1. Figure 2 clarifies the transformation process from z2to z1=K3.

Proof: The electrically equivalent transformation to transform Zito Zi-1is using. Figure 12 clarifies the transformation process from Z2to Z1=K3.

Figure 12.

Fig. 12

The transformations from Z2 to Z1.

By utilizing the properties that are given in section 2, the following the transformations are given:

τZ1'=9k2τZ2,τZ2'=13k2+23τZ1',τZ3'=τZ2',τZ4'=3k2+218k2τZ3',τZ5'=τZ4',τZ6'=95k2+33k2+2τZ5',τZ7'=3k2+221k2+133τZ6',τZ8'=τZ7',τZ9'=21k2+13910k2+6τZ8'andτZ1=τZ9'.

Merging these nine transformations, we obtain

τZ2=421k2+132τZ1. (3.66)

Moreover,

τZn=i=2n421ki+132τZ1=3×4n1k12i=2n21ki+132 (3.67)

where ki-1=34ki+2121ki+13,i=2,3,...,n.

Its characteristic equation is x2x-1=0 which has two roots x1=1-52 and x2=1+52. Subtracting these two roots into both sides of ki-1=34ki+2121ki+13, we have

ki1-152=34ki+2121ki+13152=47+215.ai152221ki+13 (3.68)
ki1-1+52=34ki+2121ki+131+52=47215.ki1+52221ki+13 (3.69)

Let hi=ki-2253ki2+253. Then by Eqs. (3.68) and (3.69), we have hi-1=2207+98752hi and hi=2207+98752n-ihn.

Thus ki=2207+98752n-i1+52hn1522207+98752nihn1. Therefore,

k1=2207+98752n-12+5+1522207+98752n13+52+1. (3.70)

Utilizing the expression kn-1=34kn+2121kn+13 and indicating the coefficients of 34kn+21 and 21kn+13 as an and bn , we obtain

21kn+13=a034kn+21+b021kn+13,21kn1+13=a134kn+21+b121kn+13a034an+21+b021kn+13,21kn2+13=a234kn+21+b221kn+13a134kn+21+b121kn+13,21kn-i+13=ai34kn+21+bi21kn+13ai134kn+21+bi121kn+13, (3.71)
21kni+1+13=ai+134kn+21+bi+121kn+13ai34kn+21+bi21kn+13,21k2+13=an-234kn+21+bn221kn+13an334kn+21+bn321kn+13, (3.72)

Thus, we get

τZn=3×4n1k12an234kn+21+bn221kn+132 (3.73)

where a0=0,b0=1and a1=21,b1=13. By the expression kn-1=34kn+2121kn+13 and Eqs. (3.71) and (3.72), we have

ai+1=47ai-ai1;bi+1=47bibi1 (3.74)

The characteristic equation of Eq. (3.74) is y2-47y+1=0 which has two roots y1=47+2152 and y2=47-2152. The general solution of Eq. (3.74) are ai=λ1y1i+λ2y2i;bi=μ1y1i+μ2y2i.

Utilizing the initial conditions a0=0,b0=1 and a1=21,b1=13, yields

ai=5547+2122i-55472152i;bi=551047+2152i+5+510472152i (3.75)

If kn=1, yields Zn has no any electrically equivalent transformation. Substituting Eq. (3.75) into Eq. (3.73), we get

τZn=3×4n1k1285+3851047+2152n2+8538510472152n22,n2. (3.76)

When n=1,τZ1=3 which verifies Eq. (3.76). Thus, the number of spanning trees in the sequence of the graph Zn is given by

τZn=3×4n1k1285+3851047+2152n2+8538510472152n22,n1. (3.77)

where

k1=2207+98752n-12+5+1522207+98752n13+52+1. (3.78)

Putting Eq. (3.77) into Eq. (3.78), hence the result is obtained.

4. Numerical results

Next tables illustrate some the values of the number of spanning trees in the graphs Gn,Hn,Tn,Xn,Yn and Zn.

n τGn τHn τTn
1 3 3 3
2 8664 1176 1734
3 22852800 596748 881292
4 60019201536 303141984 447690264
5 157597728780288 153993738288 227423130672
6 413814073710182400 78227606477184 115529159623776
n τXn τYn τZn
1 3 3 3
2 31104 8214 36300
3 188940288 18960588 320498688
4 1136394240000 43761009624 2829362006208
5 6833482751803392 101000334380592 24977602663502592
6 41091617468631220224 233108596706389344 220502231043611492352

5. Spanning tree entropy

After having explicit formulas for the number of spanning trees of the sequence of the six graphs Gn,Hn,Tn,Xn,Yn and Zn, we can calculate its spanning tree entropy Z which is a finite number and a very interesting quantity characterizing the network structure, defined in [23, 24] : for a graph G,

ZG=limnlnτG|VG|. (5.1)
ZGn=16ln2+2ln19+333=1.312187627,
ZHn=16ln22ln127+487+2ln2024+7657=1.038,
ZTn=16ln22ln127+487+2ln2024+7657=1.038,
ZXn=16ln8+2ln14+65=1.45,
ZYn=16ln2+2ln17+122=1.291,
ZZn=13ln47+215=1.514.

By comparing the value of entropy in our graphs with other graphs, we notice that the entropy of the graph Gn is larger than the entropy of the graph Yn of the same average degree 5. Also, the entropy of the graph Zn is larger than the entropy of the graph Xn of the same average degree 6. In addition the entropy of the graphs Hn and Tn of the same average degree 4 are equal and smaller than the entropy of the fractal scale-free lattice [25] which has the entropy 1.040, two dimensional Sierpinski gasket [26] which has the entropy 1.166 and the 3-prism graph [27] which has the entropy 1.0445 of the same averagre degree 4.

6. Conclusions

In this paper, we have calculated the number of spanning trees in the sequences of some nonahedral (polyhedral graphs having nine vertices) graphs generated by triangle using electrically equivalent transformations. The feature of this technique lies in the parry of strenuous computation of Laplacian spectra that is prerequisite for a generic method for determining spanning trees. Also, our results have been shown that entropy is related to the average degree of the graphs.

Declarations

Author contribution statement

S. Daoud, W. Saleh: Conceived and designed the experiments; Performed the experiments; Analyzed and interpreted the data; Contributed reagents, materials, analysis tools or data; Wrote the paper.

Funding statement

Authors were supported by Taibah University.

Competing interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

No additional information is available for this paper.

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to the anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments and suggestions for improving the original version of the paper.

References

  • 1.Applegate D.L., Bixby R.E.V., Chvátal, Cook W.J. Princeton University Press; 2006. The Traveling Salesman Problem: A Computational Study. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Cvetkoviĕ D., Doob M., Sachs H. third ed. Johann Ambrosius Barth; Heidelberg: 1995. Spectra of Graphs: Theory and Applications. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Kirby E.C., Klein D.J., Mallion R.B., Pollak P., Sachs H. A theorem for counting spanning trees in general chemical graphs and its particular application to toroidal fullerenes. Croat. Chem. Acta. 2004;77:263–278. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Boesch F.T., Salyanarayana A., Suffel C.L. A survey of some network reliability analysis and synthesis results. Networks. 2009;54:99–107. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Boesch F.T. On unreliability polynomials and graph connectivity in reliable network synthesis. J. Graph Theor. 1986;10:339–352. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Wu F.Y. Number of spanning trees on a Lattice. J. Phys. 1977;10:113–115. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Zhang F., Yong X. Asymptotic enumeration theorems for the number of spanning trees and Eulerian trail in circulant digraphs & graphs. Sci. China, Ser. A. 1999;43:264–271. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Chen G., Wu B., Zhang Z. Properties and applications of Laplacian spectra for Koch networks. J. Phys. Math. Theor. 2012;45 [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Atajan T., Inaba H. Network reliability analysis by counting the number of spanning trees, ISCIT 2004. IEEE Int. Symposium Communication Info. Technol. 2004;1:601–604. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Brown T.J.N., Mallion R.B., Pollak P., Roth A. Some methods for counting the spanning trees in labelled molecular graphs, examined in relation to certain fullerenes. Discrete Appl. Math. 1996;67:51–66. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Myrvold W., H Cheung K., Page L.B., Perry J.E. Uniformly-most reliable networks do not always exist. Networks. 1991;21:417–419. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Petingi L., Boesch F., Suffel C. On the characterization of graphs with maximum number of spanning trees, Discrete Appl. Math. 1998;179:155–166. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Kirchhoff G.G. Über die Auflösung der Gleichungen auf welche man bei der Untersucher der linearen Verteilung galuanischer Strome gefhrt wird. Ann. Phg. Chem. 1847;72:497–508. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Kelmans A.K., Chelnokov V.M. A certain polynomial of a graph and graphs with an extremal number of trees. J. Combin. Theor. B. 1974;16:197–214. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Biggs N.L. second ed. Cambridge Univ. Press; Cambridge: 1993. Algebraic Graph Theory; p. 205. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Daoud S.N. The deletion- contraction method for counting the number of spanning trees of graphs. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2015;130(10):1–14. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Daoud S.N. Complexity of graphs generated by wheel graph and their asymptotic limits. J. Egypt. Math. Soci. 2017;25(4):424–433. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Daoud S.N. Number of spanning trees in different products of complete and complete tripartite graphs. Ars Cmbinatoria. 2018;139:85–103. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Daoud S.N. Number of Spanning trees of cartesian and composition products of graphs and Chebyshev polynomials. IEEE AccessVol. 2019;7:71142–71157. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Liu Jia-Bao, Daoud S.N. Complexity of some of pyramid graphs created from a gear graph. Symmetry. 2018;10:689. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Teufl E., Wagner S. Determinant identities for Laplace matrices. Linear Algebra Appl. 2010;432:441–457. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Liu Jia-Bao, Daoud S.N. Vol. 2019. Hindawi Publ. Corp.; 2019. p. 22. (Number of Spanning Trees in the Sequence of Some Graphs, Complecity, Complexity). Article ID 4271783. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Wu F.Y. Number of spanning trees on a lattice. J. Phys. Math. Gen. 1977;10:113–115. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Lyons R. Asymptotic enumeration of spanning trees. Combinator. Probab. Comput. 2005;14:491–522. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Zhang Z., Liu H., Wu B., Zou T. Spanning trees in a fractal scale –free lattice. Phys. Rev. E. 2011;83 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.83.016116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Chang S., Chen L., Yang W. Spanning trees on the Sierpinski gasket. J. Stat. Phys. 2007;126:649–667. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Sun W., Wang S., Zhang J. Counting spanning trees in prism and anti-prism Graphs. J. Appl. Anal. And Comp. 2016;6:65–75. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Heliyon are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES