Skip to main content
World Psychiatry logoLink to World Psychiatry
letter
. 2020 Sep 15;19(3):396–397. doi: 10.1002/wps.20796

Managing dual disorders: a statement by the Informal Scientific Network, UN Commission on Narcotic Drugs

Nora D Volkow 1, Marta Torrens 2, Vladimir Poznyak 3, Elizabeth Sáenz 4, Anja Busse 4, Wataru Kashino 4, Dzmitry Krupchanka 3, Devora Kestel 3, Giovanna Campello 4, Gilberto Gerra 4
PMCID: PMC7491611  PMID: 32931124

Since 2015, the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) – World Health Organization (WHO) Informal Scientific Network has strived to bring the voice of science as it pertains to drug use disorder treatment and care, to inform critical discussions at the Commission on Narcotic Drugs, the policy‐making body of the United Nations (UN) with prime responsibility for drug control matters. In recent years, the public health dimensions of the world drug problem, including prevention and treatment of drug use disorders, have become prominent in policy debates within the UN system 1 .

Drug use disorders can have devastating consequences for affected individuals, their families and communities. They are associated with lost productivity, security challenges, crime, and myriad negative health and social consequences. Caring for and treating individuals with drug use disorders exacts a heavy toll on the public health networks of UN Member States. Availability of effective treatments for these disorders is very limited, and far from achieving the universal health coverage target set in the Sustainable Development Goals 2030.

This situation is further exacerbated by the frequent co‐‐occur‐rence of drug use disorders with other mental health conditions (dual disorders) 2 , a phenomenon associated with increases in emergency department admissions 3 and psychiatric hospitalizations 4 , higher risk of relapse to drug use 5 , and increased likelihood of premature deaths 6 , including those resulting from suicide 7 . The individual, social and public health impact of dual disorders is very high, and a multidisciplinary and comprehensive response to the needs of persons with these disorders is required. Unfortunately, there are many gaps in the global system, which is ill prepared to meet this challenge.

Lack of attention is driven in part by lack of training of clinicians on how to diagnose and treat dual disorders, as well as by the structural differentiation and lack of coordination, in many countries, between programs to treat drug use disorders and those to treat mental illnesses. Other contributing factors include “diagnostic overshadowing” 8 , whereby individuals suffering from a drug use disorder and a comorbid mental illness have their morbidity frequently attributed to the former, potentially neglecting the contribution from mental health (and somatic) conditions. Such neglect is partly due to the implicit bias and discrimination towards drug use disorders and the lack of familiarity of the provider with the condition that receives the attribution.

Another contributing factor is the “wrong door syndrome” 9 , which connotes the difficulty not only for treating but also for diagnosing drug use disorders among mental and medical treatment services and vice versa. Furthermore, people with dual disorders are often excluded from studies on effectiveness of treatment interventions, which hampers the development of evidence‐based recommendations for treatment of these patients.

The examples highlighted above are just some of the many systemic challenges that the Informal Scientific Network considered during its recent discussions to craft evidence‐based guidance for national health systems interested in developing coordinated, multiple system‐level interventions to address the unmet needs of people affected by dual disorders.

The following recommendations reflect the unanimous consensus reached by the Network membership during those discussions:

  • Dual disorders must be addressed as an integral part of universal health coverage.

  • Policy‐makers should devise strategies to address the common biopsychosocial factors that are associated with the development of dual disorders.

  • The high prevalence and related disability of dual disorders require active intervention from policy‐makers at a systems level and active advocacy from health professionals.

  • Service providers should be trained in the management of dual disorders and sufficient financial support should be granted for this purpose.

  • Systematic screening for other mental disorders through validated instruments by trained health service providers is an essential component of adequate care for people with drug use disorders.

  • Availability of and accessibility to adequate treatment should be provided, regardless of the entry point to care systems, in line with the principle of “no wrong door”.

  • Sex‐ and gender‐based knowledge and a stigma‐free approach are required in the effective management of dual disorders.

  • Age‐specific interventions are required across the lifespan, especially for minors and the elderly.

  • Science‐informed prevention interventions that address common risk factors, such as early life adversity, should be available to children living with parents and/or caregivers with dual disorders.

  • Attention should also be given to other at‐risk and vulnerable populations, in accordance with local needs.

  • Access to services for dual disorders in the criminal justice system, particularly in prison settings, youth detention or correctional centres, should be secured.

  • Collection and analysis of data to monitor the magnitude of the problem, the quality of care and the outcomes of policies and interventions should be encouraged.

  • Implementation and scale up of effective and efficient interventions, with consideration of cultural and country specificities, is a priority.

  • Finally, the Informal Scientific Network urges UN Member States to further support scientific research on new and enhanced interventions to effectively prevent and treat psychiatric comorbidities in people with drug use disorders.

V. Poznyak, D. Krupchanka and D. Kestel are staff members of the WHO. E. Sáenz, A. Busse, W. Kashino, G. Campello and G. Gerra are staff members of UNODC. The authors alone are responsible for the views expressed in this letter and they do not necessarily represent the decisions or policies of the WHO and UNODC.

References

  • 1. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime . Outcome document of the 2016 United Nations General Assembly special session on the world drug problem. Vienna: United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, 2016.
  • 2. National Institute on Drug Abuse . Comorbidity: addiction and other mental illnesses. Bethesda: National Institute on Drug Abuse, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Schmoll S, Boyer L, Henry JM et al. Encephale 2015;41:123‐9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Stahler GJ, Mennis J, Cotlar R et al. Am J Psychiatry 2009;166:1258‐68. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Samet S, Fenton MC, Nunes E et al. Addiction 2013;108:115‐23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Fridell M, Backstrom M, Hesse M et al. BMC Psychiatry 2019;19:150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Szerman N, Lopez‐Castroman J, Arias F et al. Subst Use Misuse 2012;47:383‐9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Stoklosa H, MacGibbon M, Stoklosa J. AMA J Ethics 2017;19:23‐34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Szerman N, Martínez‐Raga J, Baler R et al. Salud Mental 2017;40:245‐7. [Google Scholar]

Articles from World Psychiatry are provided here courtesy of The World Psychiatric Association

RESOURCES