Abstract
Tumorigenesis and metastasis depend on intricate interactions between genetically altered tumor cells and their surrounding microenvironment. It is, however, unclear regarding the molecular mechanisms underlying the progress and metastasis of human clear-cell renal cell carcinoma in the microenvironment with fibroblasts. In this work, we investigated the effect of normal fibroblasts on the metastasis of renal cancer and the relevant signaling pathways. We isolated normal fibroblasts from normal renal tissues and used normal fibroblast-conditioned medium culture renal cancer cells. The CCK-8 and transwell assays showed that normal fibroblasts conditioned medium significantly enhanced ccRCC cell migration. IL6 mediated the cross talk between normal fibroblasts and the cancer cells, and promoted tumor cell migration through the STAT3 pathway. In contrast, GATA3 was downregulated at both mRNA and protein levels in the normal fibroblast-conditioned medium treated with renal cancer cells, but upregulated in adjacent normal tissues. GATA3 overexpression significantly reduced STAT3 phosphorylation and attenuated the migration in both renal cancer cell and IL6-stimulated renal cancer cell. Taken together, our findings suggest that the IL6/STAT3 pathway plays a crucial role in the normal fibroblast-enhanced clear-cell renal cell carcinoma metastasis, while GATA3 may mitigate this effect by inhibiting IL6/STAT3 signaling.
Subject terms: Cancer microenvironment, Gene expression, Metastasis
Introduction
Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is the most common type of cancer of the urinary tract, constituting 2–3% of human cancers, and its proportion is increasing worldwide over the past decade [1, 2]. Among them, ccRCC is the most frequent type, accounting for 70–80% of all cases [3]. Treatment for localized RCC is mainly surgical resection. Although it generally has a good prognosis, 25–30% of patients have already developed metastatic disease at the time point of diagnosis and the 5-year survival of advanced RCC is still around only 20% [4]. Thus, discovery of new molecular targets and new treatment strategies for RCC are urgently required.
Tumors consist of cancer cells and stromal cells, including fibroblasts, immune cells, and endothelial cells. In fact, the main cellular constituents of solid tumors are stromal fibroblasts, which are proofed by histological examinations of human tumors [5–7]. Indeed, fibroblasts are important for cancer progression and the most abundant stromal cell type in epithelial tumors [8, 9]. Accumulating evidence has suggested that malignant cells themselves are not sufficient to maintain tumor growth and progression. They are highly dependent on complex dynamic interactions between tumor cells and tumor stroma, mediated by direct cell–cell contact and secreted growth factors and cytokines [10]. Cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) differ from normal fibroblasts (NFs) that are in close contact with tumor cells, in order to adapt to the tumor microenvironment and co-evolve with tumor cells to foster malignancy [11, 12]. Many studies have showed that CAFs isolated from various cancers, including breast, ovarian, and prostate cancers, could promote genomic instability, induce epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT), and promote tumor growth and metastasis. These findings confirm that CAFs are intimately involved in almost every step of tumor progression, from initiation to metastasis [13–15]. However, what and how NFs work in the development of renal neoplasms are not well understood yet.
GATA3 is a member of the GATA family of zinc finger nuclear transcription factors, which binds to G-A-T-A nucleotide sequences in the promoter regions of target genes, thereby activating or suppressing the function of these genes [16]. It plays an essential role in the development, proliferation, and differentiation of several types of tissues and cells [17–21]. Initial studies suggested that GATA3 is relatively sensitive and specific for tumors of breast or urothelial origin, and the downregulation of GATA3 has also been found to be associated with a poor prognosis of breast cancer. The significance of this transcription factor, especially for the inhibition of cancer cell metastasis, has been discussed in recent reports [22, 23]. However, how does GATA3 participate in ccRCC development and metastasis is still unknown.
In this work, we explored the influence of normal fibroblasts on the growth and metastasis of ccRCC cells and then conducted mechanistic study on the role of GATA3 in this event. Our novel data suggest that the IL6/ STAT3 signaling pathway enhances the effect of NFs on ccRCC cell metastasis, while GATA3 binds to the −1710~−1530 region of STAT3 promoter and inhibits the IL6-induced STAT3 activation by repressing its transcription.
Materials and methods
Isolation and culture of human normal renal fibroblasts
NFs were isolated from human normal renal cortical tissues. These tissues were obtained from five patients who had diagnosed as ccRCC at The Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University (Changzhou, Jiangsu, China). These patients had not been treated with chemotherapy before surgery. The collection and the using of specimens were approved by the Institutional Review Board of TMUGH, and the informed consent was obtained from all patients. The specimens were initially soaked in 95% ethanol to protect them from contamination, then washed in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) with 1% penicillin/streptomycin. We used scissors to cut the specimens into sections, which were then digested with collagenase IV (Invitrogen, CA, USA) and 25 mg/mL trypsin at 37 °C for 40 min. Then the mixture was strained through a strainer, and the cells were collected and cultured in the RPIM 1640 containing 20% fetal bovine serum (FBS; Gibco, USA) and 1% penicillin/streptomycin. The culture medium was renewed every 2 days after seeding. The cells were digested with 0.25% trypsin, when cell confluence reached 70%. The digested cells were cultured in the RPIM 1640 with 10% FBS and 1% penicillin/streptomycin.
To prepare the normal fibroblast-conditioned medium (NF-CM), NFs were cultured for 72 h, the conditioned medium (CM) were collected and centrifuged for 10 min at 3000 rpm to remove cell debris.
Cell lines and reagents
We obtained human clear-cell renal cancer cells (786-O, 769-P, ACHN, and Caki-1) from the American Type Culture Collection. All these cells, except Caki-1, were incubated in the RPIM 1640 (Invitrogen, CA, USA) with 10% FBS and 1% penicillin/streptomycin at 37 °C in a humidified 5% CO2 atmosphere, while Caki-1 cells were maintained in 5 A medium (Invitrogen, CA, USA) containing 10% FBS.
Human anti-IL6 antibody was purchased from R&D Systems (Minneapolis, MN, USA). Anti-STAT3, anti-phosphospecific STAT3 (p-STAT3; Tyr705), anti-MMP2, anti-MMP9, anti-GAPDH, anti-E-cadherin, anti-α-SMA antibodies were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology (Beverly, MA, USA).
Cell proliferation assay
Cells were seeded onto a 96-well plate at a density of 3 × 103. At 24 h post seeding, CM was added and cultured for 3 days, and the cell culture medium (RPIM 1640) was used as control. Cell proliferation was determined by the Cell Counting Kit-8 (Dojindo, Kumamoto, Japan) following the manufacturer’s instruction.
Transwell assay
Transwell chamber inserts with uncoated matrigel (migration) was used for cell migration assays. The cells (6 × 103 cells) were seeded into the upper chamber of the 24-well culture inserts coated with 200 µL of serum-free medium. In total, 500 µL of complete medium supplemented with 10% FBS was added to the bottom of the inserts, allowing cells to migrate for 48 h. After incubation, the cells on the upper surface of the membrane were removed, whereas those on the lower filter surfaces were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 10 min, stained with crystal violet, and counted in ten random fields from each membrane under a microscope at x200 magnification.
Quantitative real-time PCR
The total RNA was extracted from cells or tissues using Trizol (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA), and cDNA was synthesized using the PrimerScript RT reagent Kit (Takara, Japan). The expression of genes was measured by quantitative PCR (qPCR) using Power SYBR Green Master Mix (ABI, Foster City, CA, USA) on an ABI 7500 real-time system. All primers were designed by Primer 5.0 software and synthesized by SBS Genetech (Beijing, China). We used the following specific primer pairs to quantify the expression of the genes that encode the proteins indicated:
α-SMA-F: CACTGCCGCATCCTCATC
α-SMA-R: TGCTGTTGTAGGTGGTTTCAT
E-cadherin-F: ATTTTTCCCTCGACACCCGAT
E-cadherin-R: TCCCAGGCGTAGACCAAGA
GAPDH-F: GAGAGACCCTCACTGCTG
GAPDH-R: GATGGTACATGACAAGGTGC
GATA3-F: CGAGATGGCACGGGACACTA
GATA3-R: TGGTCTGACAGTTCGCACAGG
The expression levels of genes were calculated based on the cycle threshold (Ct) values. The results were calculated as 2−ΔΔCt by comparing the Ct values of target genes with the Ct values of the reference gene (GAPDH).
Western blotting
Western blotting was carried out according to the standard protocols. Briefly, harvested cells or tissues were lysed with RIPA buffer containing protease inhibitor (Sigma, Aldrich). The proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE and transferred to a PVDF membrane (Millipore, Bedford, MA, USA). The membranes were blocked with 5% nonfat milk in Tris-buffered saline containing 0.5% Tween-20 (TBS-T) for 1 h at room temperature, then probed with primary antibodies for GAPDH, α-SMA, p-STAT3 (Tyr705), STAT3, E-cadherin, MMP2, MMP9 in TBS-T containing 5% BSA at 4 °C overnight. After washing, the membranes were probed with the HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies. The protein bands were detected with enhanced Chemiluminescence (ECL) (Millipore, Bedford, MA, USA).
Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay
Renal cancer cells were cultured with or without NF-CM for indicated times, the supernatants were collected for IL6, VEGF, CXCL12, IL1β detection using human ELISA kits (eBioscience, San Diego, CA, USA), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Culture supernatants were diluted 10 (VEGF, CXCL12, IL1β) or 20 (IL6). Briefly, immunoassay plates were precoated with the capture antibody at 4 °C overnight. After blocked for 1 h, supernatants or standard factor were added and incubated for 2 h. The plates were washed and incubated with biotin-labeled factor antibody for 2 h, then with streptavidin–HRP complex. After 30 min incubation, tetramethylbenzidine (TMB) color-substrate solution was added and incubated for 15 min The plates were read on a microplate reader (BioTek Instruments Inc., Winooski, VT, USA) at 450 nm. Levels of each growth factor were assayed in three independent sets of each type of conditioned medium, and normalized to the total cellular protein content.
Immunofluorescence
Cells were seeded on the cover-slips in 24-well plates and cultured overnight, then fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 20 min. After washing with PBS, cells were permeabilised in 0.25% Triton X-100 for 15 min, washed with PBS, and blocked with 5% BSA for 60 min. Then cells were incubated with α-SMA antibody (Abcam, USA; 1:100), E-cadherin antibody (Sigma, USA; 1:100) overnight at 4 °C. After washing with PBS, cells were incubated with an Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated anti-mouse IgG F(abʹ)2 fragment (Invitrogen, USA; 1:200) or an Alexa Fluor 549-conjugated anti-mouse IgG F(abʹ)2 fragment (Invitrogen, USA; 1:200) at room temperature in the dark. The cells were observed using a fluorescence microscope (Nikon, Tokyo, Japan).
Clinical tissue samples
Thirty pairs of ccRCC and adjacent normal tissues were collected from patients who underwent curative surgery without radiotherapy or chemotherapy at the Department of Urinary Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University (Jiangsu, China) between 2012 and 2017. The pathological nature was confirmed by examination with hematoxylin and eosin staining. Each pair of ccRCC and adjacent tissue were stored at −80 °C before use. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of The Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University. Informed consent was obtained from all the patients.
Cell transfection
Human ccRCC cells (786-O, 769-P, ACHN, and Caki-1), were transfected with vectors or GATA3 overexpression plasmid according to the standard protocols.
Statistical analysis
All experiments were repeated in independent sets of work for at least three times (n = 3 or more). The results are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Groups and among-group comparisons were conducted using the Student’s t test and analysis of variance, respectively. Differences were regarded as statistically significant when the P-value was <0.05.
Results
A-SMA and vimentin were expressed in the NFs isolated from different patients
We isolated NFs from five normal renal cortical tissues (>6 cm apart from renal cancer tissues) named as NF170829, NF170831, NF170923, NF171006, NF171130, respectively. After passaging the primary cultured cells, the cells displayed a thin and spindle-like appearance. In order to identify whether the cultivated cells were NFs, we examined the expressions of fibroblasts markers α-SMA and vimentin by immunofluorescent staining. As shown in Fig. 1, all the cells were positive for α-SMA and vimentin, suggesting that all these isolated cells were NFs.
NFs significantly weakened the proliferation, but enhanced the migration of ccRCC cells with no effect on EMT
To determine whether NFs have a significant impact on the proliferation and migration of renal cancer cells, we examined 786-O, 769-P, ACHN, and Caki-1 cells in the presence or absence of NF-CM. NF-CM was collected from RPIM 1640 culturing NFs for 72 h. We first evaluated the effect of different NF-CMs (NF170829, NF170831, NF170923, NF171006, and NF171130) on the growth of ccRCC cells by CCK-8 assay. Figure 2a showed that five different NF-CMs attenuated ccRCC cells proliferation to a significantly greater degree than control 1640 medium (P < 0.05). The effects of NF-CMs on cell migration were examined by transwell assay. As shown in Fig. 2b, all NF-CMs largely boosted the migration ability of ccRCC cells as compared with the control 1640 medium (P < 0.05).
Some previous studies suggest that NFs can stimulate EMT, which confers metastatic and self-renewal potential to cancer cells during tumorigenesis. However, we did not found any appreciable influence of NFs on the EMT of ccRCC cells. We treated ccRCC cells with five different NF-CMs and detected the expression of epithelial marker E-cadherin and mesenchymal marker α-SMA using western blotting and qRT-PCR. All the ccRCC cells cultivated with these NF-CMs had no significant changes in protein levels of E-cadherin and α-SMA (Fig. 2c), which was further confirmed at the mRNA level through our quantitative PCR assays (Fig. 2d).
Taken together, these results demonstrate that NFs can attenuate the proliferation and enhance the migration potential of renal cancer cells with no appreciable effect on EMT programming.
NF-CM promoted IL6 secretion and activated STAT3 signaling in ccRCC cells
To address the effects of NFs on cytokines potentially involved in renal cancer progression, we examined, with ELISA assay, some relevant cytokines, such as IL6, VEGF, CXCL12, and IL1β, in medium with the presence or absence of NF-CM after 72 h. Figure 3a shows that IL6 secretion was significantly increased in all ccRCC cells culturing with five NF-CMs, especially 769-P and ACHN cells. In fact, IL6 was upregulated by more than four fold (P < 0.001) in 769-P and ACHN cells. In contrast, CXCL12 was increased by only one fold (P < 0.001) in 786-O and 769-P cells, and VEGF was statistically increased two fold (P < 0.001) only in ACHN cells. On the opposite side, the secretion of IL1β was decreased to 60% (P < 0.001) and 75% (P < 0.001) in 786-O and 769-P cells, comparing with the control (the RPIM 1640 medium). These data suggest that IL6 is a major player in all ccRCC cells in response to NF-CM stimulation.
Furthermore, we therefore investigated the effect of NFs on STAT3 signaling. As shown in Fig. 3b, the phosphorylated STAT3 (p-STAT3) was increased by onefold to fourfold (P < 0.001) in 769-P and ACHN cells with the presence of NF-CM, while total STAT3 level had no changes at all.
These results suggest that NFs may stimulate renal cancer cells to secret IL6 and activate the STAT3 signaling pathway.
The IL6/STAT3 pathway mediated the effect of NFs on ccRCC cell migration
To further elucidate the role of the IL6/STAT3 pathway in the NF-promoted ccRCC cell migration, we added 200 µg/ml of human recombinant IL6 to normal medium cultured 769-P and ACHN cells, or 50 μg/ml of IL6 neutralizing antibody (anti-IL6 antibody) to NF-CM cultured 769-P and ACHN cells, and the performed transwell assay to evaluate ccRCC cells migration. Compared with the control, IL6 addition largely enhanced the ccRCC cell migration (P < 0.005), especially in 769-P cells (P < 0.001) (Fig. 4a). This result was further conformed by the results of anti-IL6 antibody treatment. As shown in Fig. 4a, anti-IL6 antibody almost abolished the effect of NF-CM on the cells migration (P < 0.001).
Next, we investigated the effect of IL6 on STAT3 activation and metastasis-related genes MMP2 and MMP9. Western blotting results (Fig. 4b) showed that IL6 addition dramatically increased the level of p-STAT3 by more than two fold (P < 0.005) and MMP2 more than one fold (P < 0.005) at the protein level, while it had no effect on MMP9. Moreover, anti-IL6 blocked the NF-CM induced increase in p-STAT3 (P < 0.005) and MMP2 (P < 0.05), which could be effectively blocked by the addition of anti-IL6 antibody, suggesting that IL6 is crucial to this process. Collectively, these results indicate that the IL6-increased STAT3 activation and MMP2 expression in renal cancer cells can be antagonized by concomitant administration of anti-IL6 antibody.
GATA3 is downregulated in ccRCC tissues and cells
To investigate the GATA3 expression in ccRCC, we collected 30 pairs of tumor tissue samples and adjacent normal tissue samples from ccRCC patients. The expression of GATA3 was detected by qRT-PCR and western blotting. As shown in Figs 5a, c, both mRNA (P < 0.001) and protein levels of GATA3 were significantly downregulated in tumor tissue samples. Interestingly, marked overexpression of the GATA3 protein, as compared with the ccRCC tissues, was detected in the normal tissue specimens by IHC (Fig. 5b). In agreement with the results obtained in the above tissues, GATA3 was also downregulated dramatically in several ccRCC cell lines, such as 786-O, 769-P, ACHN, and Caki-1 in comparison with normal human renal cell line HK-2. As shown in Fig. 5d, in 786-O, 769-P, ACHN, and Caki-1 cells, GATA3 was decreased to 45% (P < 0.005), 40% (P < 0.005), 20% (P < 0.001), and 39% (P < 0.005) in comparison with HK-2 cells, respectively.
Overexpression of GATA3 suppressed ccRCC cell migration
To explore the effect of GATA3 on the migration of ccRCC cells, four different ccRCC cell lines, i.e., 786-O, 769-P, ACHN, and Caki-1 cells, were transfected with GATA3 overexpression plasmid or control vector, respectively, and then the cell migration ability was determined by transwell assay. As seen in Fig. 6a, GATA3 protein expression was markedly raised by 1–2-fold in 769-P/GATA3 and ACHN/GATA3 cells (769-P and ACHN cells transfected with GATA3 overexpression plasmid) (P < 0.005) when compared with that of 769-P/vector and ACHN/vector (the cells transfected with vector) cells. In sharp contrast to the control group, the transwell results (Fig. 6b) showed that migratory behavior of 769-P/GATA3 and ACHN/GATA3 cells was largely reduced to 25% (P < 0.005) and 45% (P < 0.05), respectively.
GATA3 inhibits the activation of STAT3 induced by IL6 in ccRCC cells
Since GATA3 bound to the −1710~−1530 region of STAT3 promoter and repressed its transcription [24], we determined whether GATA3 regulated STAT3 activation in ccRCC cells. Figure 7a showed that the levels of p-STAT3 in 769-P/GATA3 and ACHN/GATA3 cells were significantly decreased to 47% (P < 0.05) and 45% (P < 0.05) of the control levels when compared with those of 769-P/vector and ACHN/vector cells.
Furthermore, we explored the influence of GATA3 on IL6-mediated activation of STAT3. We incubated 796-P/vector, 769-P/GATA3, ACHN/vector, and ACHN/GATA3 cells with 200 μg/ml IL-6 alone for 48 h, and then detected the levels of p-STAT3 in these cells. As shown in Fig. 7b, the level of p-STAT3 was attenuated in 769-P/GATA3 (P < 0.05) and ACHN/GATA3 cells (P < 0.01).
These results suggest that GATA3 can significantly inhibit the IL6-induced STAT3 activation.
Discussion
We have made two novel findings in this study: (1) NFs largely enhanced ccRCC cell migration through the IL6/STAT3 pathway and (2) GATA3 suppressed such migration by inhibiting IL6-induced activation of STAT3.
Renal cancer is one of the most common and malignant types of cancer with a rapid progression and distant metastasis. It is generally recognized that cancer metastasis is not merely a local problem and it is also controlled by the tumor microenvironment (TME) [25–27], in which fibroblasts are the main component and play extensive roles in regulating multiple tumor metastases, including gastric cancer [28], lung cancer [29], and breast cancer [30]. This study provides the first evidence regarding the effect of normal fibroblasts on renal cancer cells and shows that IL6 can promotes the migration of all four renal cancer cells tested (786-O, 769-P, ACHN, and Caki-1), suggesting an increased ability of metastasis.
EMT has been previously proposed to be essential for tumor metastasis [31–34], and CAFs can induce EMT and promote cancer cell motility in gastric cancer [35], breast cancers [36], and pancreatic cancer [37]. However, some investigators have recently challenged the conceptual framework that EMT promotes metastasis, and demonstrated that EMT was dispensable for metastasis [38–41]. Moreover, it is unclear whether NF-CM affects renal cancer cell metastasis through EMT. We therefore detected epithelial marker E-cadherin and mesenchymal marker α-SMA in this study to address this important issue. Our result showed that NF-CM did not change the expressions of E-cadherin and α-SMA, suggesting that EMT might not happen in the process of the NF-CM enhanced metastasis in renal cancer cells.
Tumor metastasis is usually associated with abnormal expression of cytokines, especially CXCL12 [42–46], VEGF [47, 48], IL1β [49, 50], and IL6 [51, 52], while CAFs can promote tumor growth and invasion via a plethora of active factors [53]. We therefore checked these specific cytokines in different cancer cells with the presence or absence of different NF-CMs. Interestingly, we found that IL6 was enormously increased in all renal cancer cells, while other three cytokines only slightly increased or decreased in one/two kinds of the renal cancer cells. Furthermore, we found that IL6 could markedly stimulate 769-P and ACHN cell migration, while the anti-IL6 antibody could neutralize such effect. Therefore, it is likely that IL6 plays an important role in renal cancer metastasis as in the lungs, in which IL6 promotes lung adenocarcinoma progression and metastasis. Since several lines of evidence [54–56] have shown that IL6 and STAT are involved in tumor metastasis in some types of cancers, we asked if IL6 relies on STAT for renal cell metastasis. We chose 769-P and ACHN cells to examine the expression of phosphorylated STAT3 and metastasis-related genes MMP2 and MMP9 and found that IL6 increased the activation of STAT3 and MMP2 in both cell types, and the IL6 effect was partially attenuated by the anti-IL6 antibody, implying that the IL6/STAT3/MMP2 pathway plays a significant role in the promotion of metastasis in renal cancer.
GATA3 has been reported as a sensitive and specific marker for urothelial and breast carcinomas in tissue sections [53]. However, it may have differential impacts on different organs [57]. In fact, it remains unclear regarding its role in renal carcinoma. We analyzed the differential gene expression between ccRCC tissues and normal tissues in three Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) datasets (GSE16449, GSE53757 and GSE66272) (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo) and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) (https://cancergenome.nih.gov/) database (534 tumor tissues and 72 normal tissues). The results show that GATA3 was remarkably decreased in ccRCC tissues (Fig. 8). Moreover, our explorations into TCGA database further suggest the relevance of GATA3 expression to the tumor size, distant metastasis, and pathologic stage in ccRCC patients (Table 1). Taken together, our present study renders us confident for that GATA3 functions to inhibit IL6-induced STAT3 activation in the microenvironment with fibroblasts. GATA3 is a strong inhibitor of ccRCC metastasis, because GATA3 was largely downregulated in the ccRCC tissues and cells, while the overexpression of GATA3 suppressed ccRCC cell migration.
Table 1.
Variables | Number (total n = 534) | GATA3 expression | P-value | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Low | High | |||
Age (yr) | 0.3867 | |||
≤60 | 264 (49.44%) | 137 | 127 | |
>60 | 270 (50.56%) | 130 | 140 | |
Gender | 0.1029 | |||
Male | 346 (64.79%) | 164 | 182 | |
Female | 188 (35.21%) | 103 | 85 | |
Tumor size | 0.0122* | |||
T1 | 273 (51.12%) | 153 | 120 | |
T2 | 69 (12.92%) | 35 | 34 | |
T3 | 181 (33.90%) | 76 | 105 | |
T4 | 11 (2.06%) | 3 | 8 | |
Lymph nodes metastasis | 0.8696* | |||
N0 | 240 (44.94%) | 117 | 123 | |
N1 | 16 (3.00%) | 8 | 8 | |
N/A | 278 (52.06%) | 142 | 136 | |
Distant metastasis | 0.0112* | |||
M0 | 424 (79.40%) | 212 | 212 | |
M1 | 80 (14.98%) | 33 | 47 | |
N/A | 30 (5.62%) | 22 | 8 | |
Stage | 0.0204* | |||
I | 269 (50.38%) | 151 | 118 | |
II | 57 (10.67%) | 29 | 28 | |
III | 123 (23.03%) | 50 | 73 | |
IV | 85 (15.92%) | 37 | 48 |
N/A not available
All data of the 534 patients with ccRCC were collected from TCGA database. Low GATA3 expression: lower than the median level of GATA3 expression of total patients. High GATA3 expression: higher than the median level of GATA3 expression of total patients. The patients’ number in each district was counted and analyzed by chi-square test. The statistical results suggest that the expression of GATA3 was significantly correlated with the tumor size, distant metastasis, and pathologic stage. However, there is no significant association between GATA3 expression and patients’ age, gender, and lymph nodes metastasis
*P < 0.05
In conclusion, our new findings clarify a fundamental mechanism for renal cancer cell metastasis. NFs have a profound impact on ccRCC migration and accelerate the cancer invasion and metastasis, which was mainly through a IL6-induced STAT3 activation. On the other side, GATA3 serves as a strong inhibitor of STAT3 activation and thus attenuates the metastasis. Their mechanistic interaction is schematically illustrated in Fig. 9. Taken together, inhibiting the IL6/STAT3 signaling pathway and promoting GATA3 signals may be a therapeutic intervention for the treatment of renal cancer cell metastasis.
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
This work was partially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81873361, 81802880) and Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality (18401970100).
Author contributions
Design of strategy: QS and YX. Experimental methodology in detail: QS, RX, GS, HL, DX, and XH. Acquisition of key data through studies: QS and XH. Writing: QS and YX.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Change history
2/9/2021
A Correction to this paper has been published: 10.1038/s41417-020-00229-w
Contributor Information
Xiaozhou He, Email: czyyhxz2017@163.com.
Ying Xia, Email: Y55738088@gmail.com.
Supplementary information
The online version of this article (10.1038/s41417-019-0146-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
References
- 1.Scelo G, Larose TL. Epidemiology and risk factors for kidney cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2018; JCO2018791905. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 2.Patard JJ, Pignot G, Escudier B, Eisen T, Bex A, Sternberg C, et al. ICUD-EAU International Consultation on Kidney Cancer 2010: treatment of metastatic disease. Eur Urol. 2011;60:684–90. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.06.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Ljungberg B, Bensalah K, Canfield S, Dabestani S, Hofmann F, Hora M, et al. EAU guidelines on renal cell carcinoma: 2014 update. Eur Urol. 2015;67:913–24. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.01.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Hsieh JJ, Purdue MP, Signoretti S, Swanton C, Albiges L, Schmidinger M, et al. Renal cell carcinoma. Nat Rev Dis. 2017;3:17009. doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2017.9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Wu X, Zahari MS, Renuse S, Sahasrabuddhe NA, Chaerkady R, Kim MS, et al. Quantitative phosphoproteomic analysis reveals reciprocal activation of receptor tyrosine kinases between cancer epithelial cells and stromal fibroblasts. Clin Proteomics. 2018;15:21. doi: 10.1186/s12014-018-9197-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Dekker TJ, van de Velde CJ, van Pelt GW, Kroep JR, Julien JP, Smit VT, et al. Prognostic significance of the tumor-stroma ratio: validation study in node-negative premenopausal breast cancer patients from the EORTC perioperative chemotherapy (POP) trial (10854) Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2013;139:371–9. doi: 10.1007/s10549-013-2571-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Gujam FJ, Edwards J, Mohammed ZM, Going JJ, McMillan DC. The relationship between the tumour stroma percentage, clinicopathological characteristics and outcome in patients with operable ductal breast cancer. Br J Cancer. 2014;111:157–65. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2014.279. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Pinto MP, Dye WW, Jacobsen BM, Horwitz KB. Malignant stroma increases luminal breast cancer cell proliferation and angiogenesis through platelet-derived growth factor signaling. BMC Cancer. 2014;14:735. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-14-735. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Kalluri R. The biology and function of fibroblasts in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2016;16:582–98. doi: 10.1038/nrc.2016.73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Qin X, Yan M, Wang X, Xu Q, Wang X, Zhu X, et al. Cancer-associated fibroblast-derived IL-6 promotes head and neck cancer progression via the osteopontin-NF-kappa B signaling pathway. Theranostics. 2018;8:921–40. doi: 10.7150/thno.22182. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Li P, Shan JX, Chen XH, Zhang D, Su LP, Huang XY, et al. Epigenetic silencing of microRNA-149 in cancer-associated fibroblasts mediates prostaglandin E2/interleukin-6 signaling in the tumor microenvironment. Cell Res. 2015;25:588–603. doi: 10.1038/cr.2015.51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Nagasaki T, Hara M, Nakanishi H, Takahashi H, Sato M, Takeyama H. Interleukin-6 released by colon cancer-associated fibroblasts is critical for tumour angiogenesis: anti-interleukin-6 receptor antibody suppressed angiogenesis and inhibited tumour-stroma interaction. Br J Cancer. 2014;110:469–78. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2013.748. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Orimo A, Gupta PB, Sgroi DC, Arenzana-Seisdedos F, Delaunay T, Naeem R, et al. Stromal fibroblasts present in invasive human breast carcinomas promote tumor growth and angiogenesis through elevated SDF-1/CXCL12 secretion. Cell. 2005;121:335–48. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2005.02.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Radisky DC, Levy DD, Littlepage LE, Liu H, Nelson CM, Fata JE, et al. Rac1b and reactive oxygen species mediate MMP-3-induced EMT and genomic instability. Nature. 2005;436:123–7. doi: 10.1038/nature03688. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.McAllister SS, Gifford AM, Greiner AL, Kelleher SP, Saelzler MP, Ince TA, et al. Systemic endocrine instigation of indolent tumor growth requires osteopontin. Cell. 2008;133:994–1005. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2008.04.045. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Zheng R, Blobel GA. GATA transcription factors and cancer. Genes Cancer. 2010;1:1178–88. doi: 10.1177/1947601911404223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Kouros-Mehr H, Slorach EM, Sternlicht MD, Werb Z. GATA-3 maintains the differentiation of the luminal cell fate in the mammary gland. Cell. 2006;127:1041–55. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.09.048. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Grote D, Souabni A, Busslinger M, Bouchard M. Pax 2/8-regulated Gata 3 expression is necessary for morphogenesis and guidance of the nephric duct in the developing kidney. Development. 2006;133:53–61. doi: 10.1242/dev.02184. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Pai SY, Truitt ML, Ting CN, Leiden JM, Glimcher LH, Ho IC. Critical roles for transcription factor GATA-3 in thymocyte development. Immunity. 2003;19:863–75. doi: 10.1016/s1074-7613(03)00328-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Tsarovina K, Pattyn A, Stubbusch J, Muller F, van der Wees J, Schneider C, et al. Essential role of Gata transcription factors in sympathetic neuron development. Development. 2004;131:4775–86. doi: 10.1242/dev.01370. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Cimino-Mathews A, Subhawong AP, Illei PB, Sharma R, Halushka MK, Vang R, et al. GATA3 expression in breast carcinoma: utility in triple-negative, sarcomatoid, and metastatic carcinomas. Hum Pathol. 2013;44:1341–9. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2012.11.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Kutasovic JR, McCart Reed AE, Males R, Sim S, Saunus JM, Dalley A, et al. Breast cancer metastasis to gynaecological organs: a clinico-pathological and molecular profiling study. J Pathol Clin Res. 2019;5:25–39. doi: 10.1002/cjp2.118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Lin HY, Liang YK, Dou XW, Chen CF, Wei XL, Zeng, et al. Notch3 inhibits epithelial-mesenchymal transition in breast cancer via a novel mechanism, upregulation of GATA-3 expression. Oncogenesis. 2018;7:59. doi: 10.1038/s41389-018-0069-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Yang Z, He L, Lin K, Zhang Y, Deng A, Liang Y, et al. The KMT1A-GATA3-STAT3 circuit is a novel self-renewal signaling of human bladder cancer stem cells. Clin Cancer Res. 2017;23:6673–85. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-0882. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Quail DF, Joyce JA. Microenvironmental regulation of tumor progression and metastasis. Nat Med. 2013;19:1423–37. doi: 10.1038/nm.3394. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Balkwill FR, Capasso M, Hagemann T. The tumor microenvironment at a glance. J Cell Sci. 2012;125:5591–6. doi: 10.1242/jcs.116392. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Karakasheva TA, Lin EW, Tang Q, Qiao E, Waldron TJ, Soni M, et al. IL-6 mediates cross-talk between tumor cells and activated fibroblasts in the tumor microenvironment. Cancer Res. 2018;78:4957–70. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-17-2268. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Miki Y, Yashiro M, Okuno T, Kitayama K, Masuda G, Hirakawa K, et al. CD9-positive exosomes from cancer-associated fibroblasts stimulate the migration ability of scirrhous-type gastric cancer cells. Br J Cancer. 2018;118:867–77. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2017.487. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Zhang W, Bouchard G, Yu A, Shafiq M, Jamali M, Shrager JB, et al. GFPT2-expressing cancer-associated fibroblasts mediate metabolic reprogramming in human lung adenocarcinoma. Cancer Res. 2018;78:3445–57. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-17-2928. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Barone I, Vircillo V, Giordano C, Gelsomino L, Gyorffy B, Tarallo R, et al. Activation of farnesoid X receptor impairs the tumor-promoting function of breast cancer-associated fibroblasts. Cancer Lett. 2018;437:89–99. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2018.08.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Tsai JH, Donaher JL, Murphy DA, Chau S, Yang J. Spatiotemporal regulation of epithelial-mesenchymal transition is essential for squamous cell carcinoma metastasis. Cancer Cell. 2012;22:725–36. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2012.09.022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Feng YX, Sokol ES, Del Vecchio CA, Sanduja S, Claessen JH, Proia TA, et al. Epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition activates PERK-eIF2alpha and sensitizes cells to endoplasmic reticulum stress. Cancer Discov. 2014;4:702–15. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-13-0945. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Nieto MA. Epithelial plasticity: a common theme in embryonic and cancer cells. Science. 2013;342:1234850. doi: 10.1126/science.1234850. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Baulida J. Epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition transcription factors in cancer-associated fibroblasts. Mol Oncol. 2017;11:847–59. doi: 10.1002/1878-0261.12080. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Hong HN, Won YJ, Shim JH, Kim HJ, Han SH, Kim BS, et al. Cancer-associated fibroblasts promote gastric tumorigenesis through EphA2 activation in a ligand-independent manner. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2018;144:1649–63. doi: 10.1007/s00432-018-2683-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Chen Y, Zeng C, Zhan Y, Wang H, Jiang X, Li W. Aberrant low expression of p85alpha in stromal fibroblasts promotes breast cancer cell metastasis through exosome-mediated paracrine Wnt10b. Oncogene. 2017;36:4692–705. doi: 10.1038/onc.2017.100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Wang L, Wu H, Wang L, Zhang H, Lu J, Liang Z, et al. Asporin promotes pancreatic cancer cell invasion and migration by regulating the epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) through both autocrine and paracrine mechanisms. Cancer Lett. 2017;398:24–36. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2017.04.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Fischer KR, Durrans A, Lee S, Sheng J, Li F, Wong ST, et al. Epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition is not required for lung metastasis but contributes to chemoresistance. Nature. 2015;527:472–6. doi: 10.1038/nature15748. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Zheng X, Carstens JL, Kim J, Scheible M, Kaye J, Sugimoto H, et al. Epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition is dispensable for metastasis but induces chemoresistance in pancreatic cancer. Nature. 2015;527:525–30. doi: 10.1038/nature16064. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Christiansen JJ, Rajasekaran AK. Reassessing epithelial to mesenchymal transition as a prerequisite for carcinoma invasion and metastasis. Cancer Res. 2006;66:8319–26. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-0410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Chui MH. Insights into cancer metastasis from a clinicopathologic perspective: epithelial-mesenchymal transition is not a necessary step. Int J Cancer. 2013;132:1487–95. doi: 10.1002/ijc.27745. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Pan Y, Zhong LJ, Zhou H, Wang X, Chen K, Yang HP, et al. Roles of vimentin and 14-3-3 zeta/delta in the inhibitory effects of heparin on PC-3M cell proliferation and B16-F10-luc-G5 cells metastasis. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2012;33:798–808. doi: 10.1038/aps.2012.42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Haider C, Hnat J, Wagner R, Huber H, Timelthaler G, Grubinger M, et al. Transforming growth factor-beta and Axl induce CXCL5 and neutrophil recruitment in hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology. 2019;69:222–36. doi: 10.1002/hep.30166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Waning DL, Mohammad KS, Reiken S, Xie W, Andersson DC, John S, et al. Excess TGF-beta mediates muscle weakness associated with bone metastases in mice. Nat Med. 2015;21:1262–71. doi: 10.1038/nm.3961. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Zhang Z, Fan Y, Xie F, Zhou H, Jin K, Shao L, et al. Breast cancer metastasis suppressor OTUD1 deubiquitinates SMAD7. Nature communications. 2017;8:2116. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-02029-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Tang X, Shi L, Xie N, Liu Z, Qian M, Meng F, et al. SIRT7 antagonizes TGF-beta signaling and inhibits breast cancer metastasis. Nature communications. 2017;8:318. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-00396-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Fankhauser M, Broggi MAS, Potin L, Bordry N, Jeanbart L, Lund AW, et al. Tumor lymphangiogenesis promotes T cell infiltration and potentiates immunotherapy in melanoma. Sci Transl Med 2017; 9:eaal4712. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 48.Rahbari NN, Kedrin D, Incio J, Liu H, Ho WW, Nia HT, et al. Anti-VEGF therapy induces ECM remodeling and mechanical barriers to therapy in colorectal cancer liver metastases. Sci Transl Med. 2016;8:360ra135. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aaf5219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Weichand B, Popp R, Dziumbla S, Mora J, Strack E, Elwakeel E, et al. S1PR1 on tumor-associated macrophages promotes lymphangiogenesis and metastasis via NLRP3/IL-1beta. J Exp Med. 2017;214:2695–713. doi: 10.1084/jem.20160392. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Su B, Luo T, Zhu J, Fu J, Zhao X, Chen L, et al. Interleukin-1beta/Iinterleukin-1 receptor-associated kinase 1 inflammatory signaling contributes to persistent Gankyrin activation during hepatocarcinogenesis. Hepatology. 2015;61:585–97. doi: 10.1002/hep.27551. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Wu JB, Yin L, Shi C, Li Q, Duan P, Huang JM, et al. MAOA-dependent activation of Shh-IL6-RANKL signaling network promotes prostate cancer metastasis by engaging tumor-stromal cell interactions. Cancer Cell. 2017;31:368–82. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2017.02.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Bonapace L, Coissieux MM, Wyckoff J, Mertz KD, Varga Z, Junt T, et al. Cessation of CCL2 inhibition accelerates breast cancer metastasis by promoting angiogenesis. Nature. 2014;515:130–3. doi: 10.1038/nature13862. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Sun Q, Zhang B, Hu Q, Qin Y, Xu W, Liu W, et al. The impact of cancer-associated fibroblasts on major hallmarks of pancreatic cancer. Theranostics. 2018;8:5072–87. doi: 10.7150/thno.26546. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Yang X, Liang L, Zhang XF, Jia HL, Qin Y, Zhu XC, et al. MicroRNA-26a suppresses tumor growth and metastasis of human hepatocellular carcinoma by targeting interleukin-6-Stat3 pathway. Hepatology. 2013;58:158–70. doi: 10.1002/hep.26305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Li M, Yue GG, Song LH, Huang MB, Lee JK, Tsui SK, et al. Natural small molecule bigelovin suppresses orthotopic colorectal tumor growth and inhibits colorectal cancer metastasis via IL6/STAT3 pathway. Biochem Pharmacol. 2018;150:191–201. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2018.02.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Chang YC, Su CY, Chen MH, Chen WS, Chen CL, Hsiao M. Secretory RAB GTPase 3C modulates IL6-STAT3 pathway to promote colon cancer metastasis and is associated with poor prognosis. Mol Cancer. 2017;16:135. doi: 10.1186/s12943-017-0687-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Chen HJ, Huang RL, Liew PL, Su PH, Chen LY, Weng YC, et al. GATA3 as a master regulator and therapeutic target in ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma stem cells. Int J Cancer. 2018;143:3106–19. doi: 10.1002/ijc.31750. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.