Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Magn Reson. 2020 Jul 28;318:106797. doi: 10.1016/j.jmr.2020.106797

13C Isotope Enrichment of the Central Trityl Carbon Decreases Fluid Solution Electron Spin Relaxation Times

Whylder Moore a, Joseph E McPeak a, Martin Poncelet b, Benoit Driesschaert b, Sandra S Eaton a, Gareth R Eaton a
PMCID: PMC7492462  NIHMSID: NIHMS1619460  PMID: 32769018

Abstract

Electron spin relaxation times for perdeuterated Finland trityl 99% enriched in 13C at the central carbon (13C1-dFT) were measured in phosphate buffered saline (pH = 7.2) (PBS) solution at X-band. The anisotropic 13C1 hyperfine (Ax = Ay = 18±2, Az = 162 ±1 MHz) and g values (2.0033, 2.0032, 2.00275) in a 9:1 trehalose:sucrose glass at 293 K and in 1:1 PBS:glycerol at 160 K were determined by simulation of spectra at X-band and Q-band. In PBS at room temperature the tumbling correlation time, τR, is 0.29 ± 0.02 ns. The linewidths are broadened by incomplete motional averaging of the hyperfine anisotropy and T2 is 0.13 ± 0.02 μs, which is shorter than the T2 ~ 3.8 μs for natural abundance dFT at low concentration in PBS. T1 for 13C1-dFT in deoxygenated PBS is 5.9 ± 0.5 μs, which is shorter than for natural abundance dFT in PBS (16 μs) but much longer than in air-saturated solution (0.48 ± 0.04 μs). The tumbling dependence of T1 in PBS, 3:1 PBS:glycerol (τR = 0.80 ± 0.05 ns, T1 = 9.7 ± 0.7 μs) and 1:1 PBS:glycerol (τR = 3.4 ± 0.3 ns, T1 = 12.0 ± 1.0 μs) was modeled with contributions to the relaxation predominantly from modulation of hyperfine anisotropy and a local mode. The 1/T1 rate for the 1% 12C11-dFT in the predominantly 13C labeled sample is about a factor of 6 more strongly concentration dependent than for natural abundance 12C1-trityl, which reflects the importance of Heisenberg exchange with molecules with different resonance frequencies and faster relaxation rates. In glassy matrices at 160 K, T1 and Tm for 13C1-dFT are in good agreement with previously reported values for 12C1-dFT consistent with the expectation that modulation of nuclear hyperfine does not contribute to electron spin relaxation in a rigid lattice.

Graphical Abstract

graphic file with name nihms-1619460-f0001.jpg

Introduction

Triphenylmethyl radical, “an instance of trivalent carbon,” was discovered by Gomberg in 1900 [1]. Substituted triarylmethyl radicals were among the concentrated solid and dissolved radicals that Weissman and coworkers measured in early electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) studies of organic radicals [2]. Water-soluble triarylmethyl radicals (trityls, also called TAMs) have been synthesized with few nuclear spins at all positions where the unpaired electron probability is high, which results in narrow EPR lines and long electron spin relaxation times in fluid solution [3]. These radicals have been shown to be very useful for imaging experiments that monitor local oxygen concentrations in vivo [410]. Perdeuterated Finland trityl (dFT) is relatively lipophilic and has been shown to be toxic in mice at high concentrations used in dynamic nuclear polarization (DNP) [8]. Toxicity can be reduced by encapsulation in liposomes [11] or by replacing methyl groups with hydroxyethyls as in OX63 [8]. Pairs of trityl radicals have been attached to proteins or DNA for measurements of interspin distances by double electron-electron resonance [1216]. Trityl radicals have also been used as polarizing agents for dissolution DNP [17, 18]. Electron spin relaxation times play key roles in each of these applications so it is important to understand how the relaxation mechanisms are impacted by isotope substitution.

graphic file with name nihms-1619460-f0002.jpg

In dFT that is enriched with 13C at the central carbon ( 13C1-dFT) [19] there is substantial anisotropic coupling to a single I = 1/2 nucleus. The linewidths in the continuous wave (CW) EPR spectra of the isotopically labeled radical correlate with tumbling correlation times, which opens the opportunity to use trityls as probes of molecular motions in addition to oximetry [19]. This isotope substitution permits study of the effect of the 13C (I = 1/2) nucleus on electron spin relaxation, testing models that have been developed primarily for 14N (I = 1) and 15N (I = 1/2) nitroxides [2022]. The trityls differ importantly from nitroxides because the g anisotropy for the trityls is much smaller than for nitroxides [23] and therefore the anisotropy that is averaged by molecular tumbling is predominantly nuclear hyperfine anisotropy. The higher molecular weights of the trityls result in longer tumbling correlation times than for nitroxides in the same solvents, which alters the relative contributions from tumbling-dependent relaxation mechanisms. These studies also demonstrate that the T1 for 13C1-dFT is strongly dependent on oxygen concentration, as needed for oximetry.

The resolved 13C hyperfine couplings for isotopomers of trityls in fluid solution are summarized in Table 1. Since the natural abundance of 13C is 1.11%, the C3,3’ positions on the phenyl rings with a degeneracy of 6 have a combined probability of about 6.6%. Including all of the 28 carbons for which there is large enough spin density to give resolved hyperfine splittings there is about 30% probability that a trityl molecule will contain a 13C at one of these carbons. A very small fraction of the molecules contains two 13C, so most of the remaining 70% contain only 12C or have 13C hyperfine that is unresolved in the center 12C line. Thus, for the natural abundance trityls, the majority of collisions are with isotopomers that have very similar resonance frequencies. The hyperfine splitting from the 13C1 permits study of the impact on spin-spin relaxation from collisions with molecules with significantly different resonance frequencies. The 13C1-dFT sample that was studied was synthesized using the standard protocols developed for the synthesis of dFT starting from the commercially available methyl chloroformate (carbonyl-13C) with 99% 13C isotopic purity to label the central carbon of the trityl with 13C. Thus the 13C1-trityl contains about 1% 12C1-trityl [19], which is designated as the residual signal. For these residual 12C1-trityls most collisions are with 13C1-trityls that have resonance frequencies that are different than for 12C1-trityl because of the hyperfine splitting, which provides a T2 relaxation pathway.

Table 1.

13C Couplings (G) for trityl radicals in fluid solution

carbon Degeneracy Bowman [30] Kuzhelev [48] Trukhan [49]
C1 1 23.9 23.4 23.7 graphic file with name nihms-1619460-t0003.jpg
C2 3 11.3 11.1 11.2
C3,3’ 6 9.07 9.0 9.06
C4 6 2.4 2.4 2.37
C5 3 3.4 3.3 3.34
C7 3 1.3 1.3 1.28
C6,6’ 6 0.18 0.18

Materials and Methods

Preparation of samples.

13C1-dFT was prepared at West Virginia University as reported in ref. [19] and isolated as the tri-carboxylic acid. Natural abundance dFT was a gift from Prof. Howard Halpern, University of Chicago. Solutions were prepared with concentrations ranging from 0.1 to 1.9 mM in 50 mM sodium phosphate buffer containing 142 mM NaCl (PBS), pH = 7.2, and stored at 4°C. The relatively high buffer concentration was selected to ensure effective buffering over the full range of trityl concentrations studied. The PBS ensures essentially complete deprotonation of the carboxylate groups, which improves solubility relative to the protonated form and avoids the possibility that carboxylate protons might contribute to line broadening or enhanced electron spin relaxation. The 3:1 PBS:glycerol and 1:1 PBS:glycerol mixtures (v:v) were prepared as described previously [24]. A sample immobilized in 9:1 trehalose:sucrose was prepared using the previously reported procedure with a 2000:1 mole ratio of sugar to 13C1-dFT [25].

Samples for fluid solution spectroscopy at ambient temperature (~ 20°C) were contained in Zeus AW19 thin wall Teflon tubing with an internal diameter of about 0.97 mm and 0.05 mm wall thickness. Approximately 20 μL of sample was drawn into the tubing with a pipette. The open end of the tubing was plugged with tube sealant (Fisher brand) that was separated from the liquid by an air bubble. The tubing was folded over and supported in a 4 mm OD quartz tube such that two lengths of sample-containing tubing were in the active volume of the resonator. Nitrogen was purged through the 4 mm tube via an additional thin-wall Teflon tube that extended to the bottom of the EPR tube. O2 and N2 exchange through the wall of the tubing [22]. Before acquiring spectra the N2 purge was continued for at least 30 min, or until the spectral properties became time independent. Samples in trehalose:sucrose glasses at 293 K or in 1:1 buffer:glycerol at 160 K were in 4 mm OD quartz tubes (X-band) or 1.6 mm OD capillaries (Q-band). Buffer:glycerol samples were flash-frozen in liquid nitrogen to ensure glass formation, prior to insertion into a cold resonator (160 K).

EPR spectra

X-band CW spectra were obtained using a Bruker EMX spectrometer with an SHQE cavity. The frequency was measured with an external counter and the magnetic field was calibrated with DPPH using g = 2.0036. A modulation frequency of 100 kHz was used to characterize the 13C1-trityl signals. The linewidth of the signal from the residual 12C1-dFT was so narrow that it was necessary to use 10 kHz modulation frequency to avoid distortion. Modulation amplitudes for the 13C lines were less than 20% of the peak-to-peak linewidths. Q-band CW spectra were obtained on a Bruker E580 using an ER5107 dielectric resonator.

X-band relaxation measurements were performed on a Bruker E580 with an ER4118X-MS5 split ring resonator and a nominal 1 kW TWT amplifier. The resonator was overcoupled to Q ~ 180 to reduce the ringdown and deadtime. Tm values were measured by two-pulse electron spin echo with the pulse sequence π/2-τ-π-τ-echo and two-step phase cycling of the first pulse, followed by subtraction of the signals to cancel the FID and resonator ringdown. The value of τ was incremented to record the echo decay. To make the magnetic field less homogenous and thereby decrease the contribution of the free induction decay (FID) to the echo in fluid solution, a plastic-wrapped Allen wrench was positioned on the pole of the magnet, near the resonator. The pulse lengths were varied, with corresponding changes in power attenuation, to check that instantaneous diffusion did not contribute to the echo decays. Since instantaneous diffusion did not make a detectable contribution to the decay, data were acquired with π/2 pulse lengths of 40 ns which corresponds to a B1 of about 2.2 G. The time constant for spin echo dephasing is designated as Tm [26]. The spin echo dephasing times in fluid solution are close to the experimental deadtime (about 100 ns), which contributes to the uncertainty in the values. The deadtime is due primarily to resonator ringdown after the pulses and reflections from impedance mismatches in the system. For a molecule tumbling relatively rapidly in fluid solution Tm = T2 so in this paper the spin echo dephasing time constant is designated as T2 for fluid solution.

T1 was measured by 3-pulse inversion recovery and by FID-detected inversion recovery. The pulse sequence for inversion recovery was π-T-π/2-τ-π- τ -echo, with 2-step phase cycling of the first pulse, and the value of T was incremented to record the recovery curve. The constant τ value was 140 ns. The initial value of T was 360 ns and the step sizes were to 240 ns for 13C1-dFT or 12C1-dFT, respectively. The pulse sequence for the FID-detected experiment was π-T-π/2-FID with digitization of the FID, stepping of T, and analysis of the amplitude of the FID as a function of T. Without an Allen wrench in the field, the FID detection was preferred. The length of a π/2 pulse in the inversion recovery experiments and FID-detected experiments was 40 ns. T1 also was measured by long-pulse saturation recovery on a home-built digital saturation recovery spectrometer using a Bruker ER4118X-MS5 resonator [27]. For the saturation recovery experiments the length of the saturating pulse was 20 to 60 μs. Off-resonance data were used to subtract the resonator ring-down and switching artifacts. Values of T1 obtained by saturation recovery for selected samples were found to be in good agreement with values obtained by inversion recovery, within experimental uncertainty. Inversion recovery inherently provides higher signal-to-noise ratios (S/N) than saturation recovery, so it is the method of choice for T1 measurements of radicals in the fast motional regime [22], provided T2 is long enough to detect a spin echo. Comparison of inversion recovery and saturation recovery data is valuable to check for possible contributions to the recovery from spectral diffusion that are decreased in saturation recovery by the use of long low-power saturating pulses (B1 ~0.5 G). The SR observe B1 for 13C1-dFT was 1.7 mG, 0.8 mG, and 0.8 mG for samples in PBS, 25% glycerol, and 50% glycerol, respectively. For the sample in air-saturated PBS the observe B1 was 2.8 mG.

X-band field-swept 2-pulse echo detected spectra of a 0.1 mM 1:1 water: glycerol sample were recorded with 40 ns π/2 pulses and a fixed τ = 200 ns at 160 K. Q-band field-swept 2-pulse echo-detected spectra of 0.1 and 0.03 mM samples in 1:1 PBS:glycerol at 160 K and in trehalose:sucrose at 293 K were recorded with a range of pulse lengths and fixed τ values. The shapes of the echo-detected spectra were dependent on pulse lengths. Longer pulses are more selective and gave somewhat sharper features. However, the longer values of Tm obtained with shorter pulse lengths indicated that there is substantial spectral diffusion, that is more significant near the perpendicular plane. Although spectral diffusion impacts the lineshapes in the echo-detected spectra, it does not change the values of g and A that are obtained from the simulated spectra. The magnetic field at X-band was calibrated with DPPH using g = 2.0036. At Q-band the DPPH signal typically splits into several components, which is not useful for field calibration. A deoxygenated selected single crystal of lithium phthalocyanine that was found to have g = 2.0021 at X-band was used to calibrate the field at Q-band.

Data analysis

First derivative peak-to-peak linewidths in CW spectra were estimated using the cursor in the EMX software and confirmed by simulation with a Lorentzian lineshape. The CW spectra and the first-derivatives of the field-swept echo detected spectra were simulated using the ‘pepper’ function in EasySpin. Values obtained from these simulations were used in the determination of the tumbling correlation times in fluid solution, which were calculated using the ‘garlic’ function in EasySpin. To account for small differences between the observed giso and the average of rigid lattice values, all g values were shifted by the same amount in the first step of the simulation process, preserving g anisotropy. Small variations in Aiso were arbitrarily assigned to the much larger value of Az and the smaller values of Ax and Ay were held constant. The values of Az, the Gaussian contribution to the linewidths (about 0.05 G), and tumbling correlation time τR were varied in the iterative refinements of the simulations. The spin-echo decays in fluid solution and inversion recovery decays at all temperatures were fit with single exponentials or the sum of two exponentials using the Bruker Xepr software. The use of two exponentials did not improve the fit to the data, so results are reported for single exponential fits. The fits to some of the saturation recovery data were better for the sum of two exponentials. However, the signal-to-noise was not high enough to reliably define a second contribution to the relaxation. The spin-echo decays at 160 K were fit with stretched exponentials.

Modeling of T1

Values of 1/T1 were calculated as the sum of contributions from modulation of 13C hyperfine anisotropy 1T1A, a local mode 1T1local, spin rotation 1T1SR, and modulation of g anisotropy 1T1g as described by Eq. (1)(4). [22, 26, 28, 29]

1T1=1T1A+1T1local+1T1SR+1T1g (1)
1T1A=29I(I+1)i(AiAiso)2τR1+(ωτR)2 (2)

where I = 1/2 for 13C, Ai is a component of the 13C nuclear hyperfine in angular frequency units, Aiso is the average 13C hyperfine observed in fluid solution, ω is the angular frequency and τR is the tumbling correlation time. This contribution to T1 is proportional to the square of the anisotropy of the hyperfine interaction, (Ai - Aiso)2. Based on the ENDOR data for dFT [30] (Ai - Aiso)2 for the isotopomers with a 13C at phenyl C1 or for the ortho carbons are about 0.5% or 2.0%, respectively, of the values for 13C1 and even smaller for other isotopomers. These contributions are too small to have a detectable impact on relaxation times for 13C1-dFT and were not included in the modeling of T1.

1T1SR=i=13(gige)29τR (3)
1Tq=25(ωg)2((Δg)23+(δg)2)τR1+(ωτR)2 (4)

where Δg = gzz – 0.5(gxx+gyy), δg = 0.5(gxxgyy).

The value of 1T1local=6.6×104s1 at room temperature was determined previously for natural abundance 12C1-dFT and closely-related trityls including OX63 [28] in water solution. The fit to the experimental values of T1 was improved by increasing 1T1localto7.6×104s1 to 7.6×104 s−1. It is plausible that the ionic strength of the PBS buffer could impact this parameter.

Results and Discussion

CW spectra

The fluid solution X-band CW spectrum of 13C1-dFT in PBS (pH 7.2) is shown in Figure 1A. The doublet splitting due to the 13C hyperfine coupling of 23.4 G (65.5 MHz) is well resolved. For solutions with concentrations in the range of 0.1 to 0.3 mM the peak-to-peak linewidths for the low-field and high-field hyperfine lines are 0.58 and 0.64 G, respectively. The smaller sharper peak in the center of the spectrum is due to about 1% residual 12C1-dFT, which has a linewidth of 0.037 G when recorded with 10 kHz modulation frequency and modulation amplitude of 0.01 G. The much larger linewidths for the signals from 13C1-dFT than for 12C1-dFT are due to incomplete motional averaging of the anisotropy of the 13C hyperfine coupling. In a higher viscosity 3:1 PBS:glycerol solution (Figure 1B) the linewidths for the 13C1-trityl signal are 1.9 and 2.0 G, respectively, which is about a factor of three broader than in PBS. The increased linewidths reflect the tumbling dependence of the incomplete motional averaging. The linewidth for the 12C signal was independent of viscosity, which is consistent with prior results [3].

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

X-band spectra (black lines) of 13C1-dFT at 20°C (A) 0.2 mM in PBS and (B) 0.2 mM in 3:1 PBS:glycerol. Spectra were simulated (red dashed lines) using the garlic function of the EasySpin toolbox with g = [2.0032 2.0031 2.00265] and A = [17, 17, 162] MHz with τR = 0.29 ns, and 0.80 ns for PBS and 3:1 PBS:glycerol, respectively. The sharp signal in the center of the spectrum is from ~1% residual 12C1-dFT in the isotopically enriched sample.

Spectra in Figure 1 were acquired for samples equilibrated with N2. In samples equilibrated with air at Denver’s reduced atmospheric pressure the linewidths for the 13C signal increases by about 0.1 G, which is a small fractional change that is difficult to quantitate. By contrast, a change in the linewidth for the 12C signal by 0.1 G is about a factor of three, which is readily measured. Similarly, the linewidths for the 13C signals in a 1.0 mM solution are about 0.01 G greater than at 0.1 to 0.3 mM, which is a very small fraction change. For the same concentration change the linewidth for the 12C signal increases from 0.037 to 0.046 G, which is readily detectable. Although linewidth changes for 12C1-trityl are a convenient tool for measuring oxygen concentration [31], the weak dependence of the broader 13C1-trityl linewidths on oxygen concentration would be less effective for oximetry.

Hamiltonian parameters

At the cryogenic temperatures that are required to obtain well immobilized spectra in 1:1 buffer:glycerol, T1 for trityl radicals becomes very long [23], so it is difficult to acquire CW spectra that have lineshapes that are free of passage effects or admixtures of dispersion. Two approaches were taken to address this problem: (i) CW spectra were acquired in 9:1 trehalose:sucrose glass at 293 K (Figure 2), and (ii) field-swept echo-detected spectra were acquired in 1:1 buffer:glycerol at 160 K (Figure S1) The spectra with the narrowest linewidths and therefore the best resolution were the X-band CW spectra in 9:1 trehalose:sucrose (Figure 2A). On the wings of the extrema for both the parallel and perpendicular orientations there are weak sidebands that are assigned to isotopomers that have a second 13C, in addition to the 13C1. The sidebands on the parallel lines are highlighted in the insets in Figure 2A. The two small peaks in the center of the spectrum (about 3520 G) are sidebands on the perpendicular turning points. These sidebands are poorly resolved but were simulated with 10% of the radicals having 13C hyperfine of about 29 MHz and 10% having 13C hyperfine of about 14 MHz. The anisotropy of these couplings are small, but poorly defined because of the low resolution of the sidebands. The larger splitting is assigned to 13C2,3,3’ and the smaller splitting to 13C4,4’,5 on the phenyl rings based on the values summarized in Table 1. Linewidths are greater for the Q-band CW and first derivatives of echo-detected spectra than for the X-band CW spectrum so the contributions from the additional 13C sidebands were not resolved in these spectra, although they were included in the simulations. The Q-band spectra were analyzed primarily to define the g anisotropy. At Q-band the CW spectral lineshapes are slightly distorted because a higher than optimal power was needed to maintain the AFC lock. In the Q-band echo-detected spectrum the value of Tm depends on position in the spectrum which is not included in the simulations. There also are contributions to the lineshapes from spectral diffusion that were not included in the simulation. First derivatives of field-swept echo detected spectra at X-band and Q-band for a 1:1 buffer:glycerol sample at 160 K are shown in Figure S1. The major lines in the spectra are very similar to those in trehalose:sucrose. The lines are broader than for the CW spectra and sidebands due to molecules with a second 13C are not resolved, so these contributions were not included in the simulations. The extrema for the large Az are well defined at both X-band and Q-band, which clearly define the values of gz (2.00275 ± 0.0001) and Az (162 ± 1 MHz). The relatively narrow linewidths near the perpendicular plane require that anisotropy in the x,y-plane is small. Based on the X-band spectra it was concluded that Ax = Ay = 18 ± 2 MHz. Based on the Q-band spectra it was concluded that gx = 2.0033 and gy = 2.0032. The isotropic average of the rigid-lattice g values is 2.0031 ± 0.0001, which differs slightly from the average g value in PBS at room temperature of 2.0028 ± 0.0001. This difference suggests that the molecular conformation in frozen solution is different from that in fluid solution. The average of the anisotropic hyperfine values is 65.3 MHz (23.3 G), which is very similar to the value observed in fluid solution 65.5 MHz (23.4 G). This agreement indicates that the 13C hyperfine is not strongly temperature dependent. The g and A values are compared with literature values in Table 2. Even at W-band the g anisotropy in the spectrum of natural abundance 12C1-dFT is not resolved so the reported g values were obtained by simulation of the lineshape. For 13C1-dFT the anisotropy of the 13C hyperfine is useful in defining the anisotropy of both the g and A values because the centers of the parallel and perpendicular hyperfine patterns are clearly defined. The variation in reported g values is relatively small, and may be due in part to solvent effects on conformation. The 13C hyperfine values observed for 13C1-dFT in 1:1 PBS:glycerol are similar to values reported previously in methanol (Table 2).

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Spectra of 13C1-dFT in 9:1 trehalose:sucrose at 293 K. (A) X-band CW spectrum. The insets show y-axis amplitude multiplied x6.6 to highlight the contributions from isotopomers with a second 13C splitting. (B) Q-band CW spectrum. (C) First-derivative of field-swept echo-detected Q-band spectrum. Spectra were simulated with EasySpin using the parameters g = [2.0033 2.0032 2.00275] with A(C1) = [18.5 18.5 162] MHz 80% weighting; A(C1) = [18.5 18.5 162] MHz plus A(C2,3,3’) = [29 29 30] MHz 10% weighting; A(C1) = [18.5 18.5 162] MHz plus A(C4,4’,5) = [14 14 13] MHz 10% weighting (red line). The EasySpin Hstrain parameters for the 13C1 lines were [4.8 4.8 7.3], [ 8.5 8.5 11], and [10 10 11] for X-band CW, Q-band CW, and Q-band echo-detected, respectively. The weak signal from the ~1% 12C1-dFT makes negligible contribution.

Table 2.

g and A values for trityl radicals

radical Solvent gx gy gz giso Ax (MHz) Ay (MHz) Az (MHz) reference
13C1-dFT 9:1
trehalose:sucrose
2.0033 2.0032 2.00275 2.0031
(2.0028)a
18 18 162 This work
dFT 1:1
water:glycerol
2.0030 2.0027 2.0021 2.0026 [23]
dFT Methanol 2.0029 2.0029 2.0021 2.0026 20 20 159 [30, 49]b
Trityl-CH3 Ethanol 2.00345 2.00338 2.00254 2.00312 [17]
OX63 1:1
water:glycerol
2.0031 2.0027 2.0021 2.0025 [23]
OX63 1:1
water:glycerol
2.0032 2.0032 2.0026 2.0030 [50]
a

Value for fluid PBS solutions.

b

The paper lists g - g = 0.0008. The values shown in the table assume giso = 2.0026 [48].

Tumbling correlation times

The tumbling correlation times, τR, for 13C1-dFT were determined by simulating the CW spectra (Figure 1) using the ‘garlic’ function in EasySpin and the g and A values obtained from the simulations shown in Figure 2 (Table 2). At X-band (~ 9.85 GHz) the spread in g values (2.0033 to 2.00275) corresponds to only a difference of ~1.0 G. This very small g anisotropy is why the linewidth for the 12C1-dFT signal is approximately independent of tumbling. This small g anisotropy also means that small uncertainties in the anisotropic g values have little impact on the calculated values of τR for 13C1-dFT. The anisotropy that is averaged by the tumbling of 13C1-dFT is predominantly due to the anisotropy in the hyperfine interaction which is A - A ~144 MHz ~ 52 G. Incomplete motional averaging of the anisotropic hyperfine contributes equally to the linewidths of the mI = ±1/2 lines. This equal contribution to the two hyperfine lines is difficult to distinguish from broadening by oxygen, intermolecular collisions, or over-modulation. Therefore, to get the most accurate values of τR it is preferable to work with low-concentration deoxygenated samples and spectra acquired with modulation amplitudes that are small relative to linewidths. Alternatively, these contributions to the linewidths can be included in the EasySpin simulations. The value of τR in PBS was calculated as 0.29 ns ± 0.02 ns at 20°C. The uncertainty is based on the standard deviation for multiple measurements and the estimated uncertainties in the nuclear hyperfine values. This value of τR is in good agreement with τR = 0.29 ns for natural abundance 12C1-trityl-CH3 in water solution that was determined by analysis of the viscosity dependence of relaxation times at 250 MHz where modulation of electron-proton dipolar interaction dominates T1 [28]. This contribution to trityl relaxation is negligible at X-band. In 3:1 PBS:glycerol and 1:1 PBS:glycerol solutions τr was calculated as 0.80 ± 0.05 ns and 3.4 ± 0.2 ns, respectively.

The linewidths (and therefore tumbling correlation times) in water (data not shown) and PBS are similar. The molar mass of dFT assuming complete deprotonation at pH ~ 7.2 and assuming minimal ion pairing is 1035 g/mole. The impact of the 50 mM PBS on viscosity is small but was considered. The effect of electrolytes on viscosity can be modeled using Eq. [5]. [32]

ηη1=1+Ac+Bc=1+Bc [5]

where η1 is the viscosity of pure solvent, η is the viscosity of the electrolyte solution, c is the molarity of each ion, A can be calculated based on ionic charge, and B is an empirical parameter. The A√c term is much smaller than the Bc term and often is neglected. Using literature values of B [33, 34] the ηη1 ratio for 50 mM sodium phosphate buffer, containing 142 mM NaCl, was calculated as 1.044, of which about 75% of the effect is from the phosphate ions. This impact of ionic strength on viscosity is less than the uncertainties in τR, which also is consistent with the similarity in tumbling correlation times in water and in PBS

The Stokes-Einstein equation, τR=Vη/kT where V = molecular volume in m3, η = viscosity in poise, k = Boltzmann’s constant = 1.381×10−23 J/K and T = temperature in Kelvin, can be used to predict tumbling correlation times [35]. For 13C1-dFT in water, the value of τR predicted by the Stokes-Einstein model is 0.44 ns, based on T = 293 K, viscosity of water = 1 cP at 20°C and a molecular radius of 7.5 Å. The Stokes-Einstein model predicts τR more accurately for solute molecules that are much larger than the solvent than for smaller solutes [36]. For small solutes it has been suggested that the Stokes-Einstein equation should be modified by addition of a slip coefficient cslip, becoming τR=cslipVη/kT [37, 38], where smaller values of cslip reflect larger deviations from the model. For 13C1-dFT the ratio of the experimental τR (0.29 ns) to the Stokes -Einstein value gives cslip = 0.66. This value is in good agreement with values obtained for several trityls in water at 250 MHz [28]. The molar mass of 1035 g/mole for dFT is about 6 times larger than for simple nitroxides such as tempol (molar mass = 172 g/mole). The larger molar mass for 13C1-dFT predicts slower tumbling and longer τR than for tempol. For small nitroxides in water τR is in the range of 9 to 19 ps [22], which is more than a factor of 6 shorter than for 13C1-dFT. Slip coefficients for small nitroxides in water are about 0.1 to 0.2, with the larger values observed for nitroxide with polar substituents [24, 39]. The larger slip coefficient for 13C1-trityl than for small nitroxides is attributed to the larger size of the molecule and the polarity of the three carboxylate groups.

Fluid solution T2 for 13C1-dFT

Electron spin-spin relaxation times were measured for deoxygenated samples of 13C1-dFT with concentrations between 0.1 and 1.9 mM. In PBS solution T2 = 0.13 ± 0.02 μs and is independent of concentration, within experimental uncertainty. A typical two-pulse echo decay curve is shown in Figure 3A, along with the fit to a single exponential. Use of the sum of two exponentials did not improve the fit to the data. Differences between values of T2 for the low-field and high-field hyperfine lines were not statistically significant. This value of T2 is much shorter than observed for natural abundance 12C1-dFT in PBS (3.8 μs for 0.2 mM solution) because of incomplete motional average of the A anisotropy Figure 1. The corresponding value of ΔBpp for a Lorentzian line calculated using the expression ΔBpp(G) = 6.56 x10 −8/T2(s) is 0.50 ± 0.10 G which is in reasonable agreement with the experimental values (Table 3). The experimental linewidths include an additional contribution of about 0.05 G from unresolved nuclear hyperfine coupling. The variation in CW linewidths for 13C1-dFT with concentration is smaller than the estimated uncertainties in T2. For closely-related trityl OX63 in PBS, the T2 and CW linewidths have been shown to be dependent on trityl concentration with a slope of 0.165×106 s−1/mM trityl [4]. For OX63 in PBS this concentration dependence could be observed because T2 at low concentration is 6.3 μs [4]. Contributions to relaxation combine as the sum of reciprocals, so a similar concentration dependence of the much shorter T2 for 13C1-dFT would not be detectable.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

X-band measurements of electron spin relaxation times at 20°C for 13C1-dFT samples containing ~1% 12C1-dFT. Unless noted the data are for deoxygenated 1.0 mM solutions. A) Two-pulse echo decays for the high-field 13C hyperfine line (red) and the 12C line (black). Data were acquired with 256 shots per point and averaged for 100 scans. Single exponential fits (dashed black) were calculated with Tm = 0.13 μs for 13C and 1.1 μs for 12C. B) Three-pulse inversion recoveries for the high-field 13C hyperfine line (red) and the 12C line (black). Data were acquired with 256 shots per point and averaged for 3 scans for 12C and 2 scans for 13C. Single exponential fits (black dashed lines) were calculated with T1 = 6.0 μs for 13C and 9.1 μs for 12C. C) Long-pulse saturation recovery curves for the high-field 13C hyperfine line in PBS (red), 3:1 PBS:glycerol (blue), and 1:1 PBS:glycerol (pink). Data were averaged for 10 scans (30 min). Single exponential fits (black dashed lines) were calculated for T1 = 5.6 μs in PBS, 9.8 μs in 3:1 PBS: glycerol, and 12.0 μs for 1:1 PBS:glycerol. D) Long-pulse saturation recovery curves for the high-field 13C line in air saturated (orange) and deoxygenated (green) solutions. Data were averaged for 10 scans (30 min) for the deoxygenated sample and 5 scans (10 min) for the air saturated sample. Single exponential fits (black dashed lines) were calculated for T1 = 480 ns and 5.6 μs for the air saturated and deoxygenated samples, respectively. The signal for the deoxygenated sample had not fully recovered to equilibrium in the short time window displayed in the figure, and the fit line is based on a longer time window. The residuals for the fits to the experimental data in this figure are shown in Supplementary Material.

Table 3.

Impact of 13C nuclear spin on dFT linewidths and relaxation times (μs) in PBS at X-band at ca. 20°C.

13C1-dFT
in PBSa
12C1-dFT in
13C1-dFT in PBS
12C1-dFT in natural
abundance dFT
ΔBpp in PBS, deoxygenated (G) 0.58, 0.64b 0.037 ± 0.002 (0.1 mM)
0.047 ± 0.002 (1 mM)
ΔBpp in PBS, air saturated (G) 0.66, 0.75b 0.14 ±0.01 (1 mM)
T2 (μs), deoxygenated 0.13 ± 0.02 5.6 (0.2 mM, PBS)
2.4 (1 mM, PBS)
11 ± 1 (0.2 mM, water)c
3.8 (0.2 mM, PBS)
0.6 (2 mM PBS)
T1 (μs), deoxygenated 5.9 ± 0.5 11. (0.2 mM, PBS)
3.8 (1 mM, PBS)
17 ±1 (0.2 mM, water)c
16 ±1 (0.2 to 2 mM, PBS)
T1 (μs), air saturated 0.48 ± 0.04
a

For concentrations between about 0.1 and 1.5 mM.

b

Linewidths for low-field and high-field lines, respectively. Uncertainties are about 0.02 G.

c

Values from ref. [28] in water, 0.2 mM

Fluid solution T1 for 13C1-dFT

Values of T1 were measured by 3-pulse inversion recovery or FID-detected inversion recovery for 13C1-dFT concentrations between 0.1 and 1.0 mM in PBS. Differences in values of T1 obtained by the two methods were not statistically significant. Values of T1 measured by long-pulse saturation recovery for 0.2 to 1.9 mM samples also were in agreement with the echo and FID-detected experiments. From the three techniques, T1 in PBS was found to be 5.9 ± 0.5 μs (Figure 3B, 3C). In 3:1 PBS:glycerol, the CW linewidths are about 1.5 to 1.8 G, which corresponds to T2 of about 40 ns. When T2 is this short relative to the instrument deadtime it is difficult to detect a spin echo or FID with sufficient signal-to-noise to measure T1 by pulse methods. For the 3:1 and 1:1 PBS:glycerol samples T1 was measured by long pulse-saturation recovery for 1.0 mM solutions (Figure 3C). The resulting T1 values are 9.7 ± 0.7 μs and 12.0 ± 1.0 μs for the 3:1 and 1:1 PBS:glycerol solutions, respectively. The longer T1 in the more viscous glycerol-containing solutions demonstrates the importance of tumbling-dependent contributions to relaxation. This observation is in contrast to results for 12C1-dFT at X-band where T1 is independent of viscosity [28].

Equations (1)(4) were used to model T1 in PBS, 3:1 PBS:glycerol, and 1:1 PBS:glycerol. These expressions have been developed to model the tumbling dependence of T1 for nitroxides in fluid solution [2022]. The uncertainties in the calculated values of T1 (Table 4) are based on uncertainties in τR, which is estimated to be the parameter with the most uncertainty in the calculation. The calculated values of T1 are within estimated uncertainties of the experimental values. In PBS the magnitude of the contributions decreases in the following order: modulation of hyperfine anisotropy > local mode >> spin rotation > modulation of g anisotropy, which emphasizes the importance of the hyperfine anisotropy. For the slower tumbling in 3:1 and 1:1 PBS:glycerol solutions the contribution from modulation of hyperfine anisotropy is much smaller than in PBS, and it becomes less than the contribution from the local mode.

Table 4.

Contributions to calculated T1 in deoxygenated solution

Calculated with ᴦr = 0.29 ± 0.02 ns (PBS) Calculated with ᴦr = 0.80 ± 0.05 ns (3:1 PBS: glycerol) Calculated with ᴦr = 3.4 ± 0.3 ns (1:1 PBS: glycerol)
1T1A(s1) (8.3±0.5) ×104 (3.0 ± 0.2) ×104 (0.70±0.6) ×104
1T1local(s1)a 7.6×104 7.6×104 7.6×104
1T1SR(s1) (4.6±0.3) ×102 170±10 40±4
1T1g(s1) 104 ± 7 38±3 9.0±0.8
Calc.1T1(s1) (1.59 ± 0.1) ×105 (1.06 ± 0.03) ×105 (0.83 ± 0.02) ×105
Calc T1 (μs) (6.3 ± 0.4) ×10−6 (9.4 ± 0.3) ×10−6 (12.0 ± 0.2) ×10−6
Exper. T1 (μs) (5.9 ± 0.5) ×10−6 (9.7 ± 0.7) ×10−6 (12.0 ± 1.0) ×10−6
a

Adjusted to fit the experimental values of T1.

When the 13C1-dFT sample is air saturated, T1 decreases to 0.48 μs (Table 3). This very strong dependence of T1 on oxygen concentration (Figure 3D) is analogous to what has been reported for closely-related trityl OX63, which is the basis for pulsed oximetry at 250 MHz [4, 40]. The strong dependence of T1 for 13C1-dFT on oxygen concentration means that 13C1-dFT can be used as an oximetric probe analogous to what has been demonstrated for OX63 [4], although shorter T2 values for 13C1-dFT compared to OX63 will require shorter interpulse spacing when performing inversion recovery oximetry experiments.

Relaxation for 13C-dFT at 160 K in 1:1 PBS:glycerol.

Electron spin relaxation times were measured for the same 0.1 mM sample in 1:1 PBS:glycerol for which the echo-detected field-swept spectrum is shown in Figure S2. At 160 K T1 for the 13C1-dFT lines at X-band and Q-band (140 to 173 μs, depending on position in the line) was similar to the T1 = 150 μs of the residual 12C1-dFT line. These values also are in good agreement with the previously reported value for natural abundance dFT in 1:1 water:glycerol [28]. The absence of an effect of the 13C nuclear hyperfine on T1 for the immobilized sample of 13C1-dFT is consistent with previous reports that nuclear hyperfine does not contribute to T1 for organic radicals in a rigid lattice [26, 41]. Values of Tm, obtained by fitting data with a stretched exponential, for both the 12C and the 13C lines of 13C1-dFT at X-band and Q-band, were 3.0 to 3.5 μs with stretch parameters of 1.5 to 1.7, depending on position in the spectrum. These values also are in good agreement with values for natural abundance dFT reported previously for 1:1 water:glycerol solutions [28].

Relaxation times for the residual 1% 12C1-trityl

For the residual 12C1-dFT signal in the predominantly 13C1-dFT sample T1 and T2 are strongly concentration dependent as shown in Figure 4. The plot for 1/T1 as a function of trityl concentration was fit with 0.18×106 s−1/mM [trityl] + 0.055×106 s−1 , which gives a slope that is about a factor of 5 larger than was observed for OX63 in PBS (0.36×105 s−1/mM [trityl]+0.16×106 s−1) [4]. It has been proposed that the relatively weak concentration dependence of T1 for OX63 is due to the fact that most of the collisions are with molecules with approximately the same resonance frequencies [42]. In the solution that contains predominantly 13C1-dFT, most of the collisions of residual 12C1-trityl are with 13C1-trityls that have different resonance frequencies and faster relaxation rates which provides an increasingly effective relaxation pathway as concentration is increased. Isotopomers containing a second 13C have different resonant frequencies than that of the dominant lines in the spectrum. However the Heisenberg exchange in these low concentration solutions is in the ‘slow exchange’ regime where the impact of a collision on T2 (or linewidth) is independent of the energy difference between the colliding species [43], so the various isotopomers have similar Heisenberg exchange effects.

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Dependence of 1/T1 (blue circles) and 1/T2 (black squares) of the residual 1% 12C in 13C1-dFT in 50 mM PBS on the total trityl concentration. The dashed lines are the least squares fit lines: 0.18×106 s−1 /mM [trityl]+0.055×106 s−1 for 1/T1 and 0.35×106 s−1/mM [trityl]+0.1×105 s−1 for 1/T2.

Even at low concentration the value of T2 for the residual 12C1-dFT (5.6 μs) is much shorter than the 11 μs observed previously for 0.2 mM natural abundance 12C1-dFT in water at X-band [28], indicating a greater impact of collisions. In water the three negative charges on the carboxylates may decrease the collision frequencies. Ion pairing of the carboxylates with Na+ in the high ionic-strength PBS solutions is expected to be small, based on negligible association of sodium benzoate [44] and limited data from sea water [45]. Ionic strength may decrease collision frequencies of the trityls analogous to what has been observed for nitroxides [46]. Most of the decrease in T2 is attributed collisions with the faster relaxing 13C1-dFT. The plot of 1/T2 for residual 12C1-dFT as a function of total trityl concentration was fit with 0.35×106 s−1/mM [trityl]+0.1×105 s−1, which is a slope that is about a factor of 2 larger than for OX63 in PBS (0.165×106 s−1/mM [trityl]+0.16×105 s−1) [4]. Since these data are in the same buffer, interaction with buffer cations is not a factor. About 30% of the greater concentration dependence of T2 for residual 12C1-dFT (1035 g/mol) than for OX63 (1358 g/mol) is attributed to the smaller molar mass and resulting increase in translational diffusion. Hydrogen bonding to the OH groups of OX63 also may decrease translational diffusion, accounting for some of the difference between 12C1-dFT and OX63 [47]. The remaining contributions to the stronger concentration dependence for residual 12C1-dFT in predominantly 13C1-dFT than for OX63 reflects the fact that most of the collisions are with the faster relaxing 13C1-dFT.

Comparison with relaxation of nitroxides in fluid solution

T1 for small nitroxides in water at X-band are about 1 μs [22], which raises the question why T1 is so much shorter for nitroxides than for 13C1-dFT. The typical anisotropic hyperfine couplings for 15N nitroxides are 21.6, 24.6 and 141 MHz [22]. The anisotropy of these values is similar to that observed for 13C1-dFT so the contributions to 1/T1 from modulation of the I = 1/2 nuclear hyperfine coupling are expected to be of the same magnitude if τR is similar. However, the much shorter τR for nitroxides than for trityls in water or PBS solution makes the contributions to T1 from modulation of hyperfine anisotropy much larger for nitroxides than for trityls. The g anisotropy for typical nitroxides in water (2.0092, 2.0061, 2.0022) is much larger than for trityls [29]. The larger g anisotropy and shorter τR makes the contribution from spin rotation larger for nitroxides than for trityls. Thus, the slower tumbling of the trityls is a major factor in the longer values of T1 for trityls than for low molecular weight nitroxides in solution. By contrast values of T2 for nitroxides in water are about 0.5 μs [29], which is significantly longer than the 0.13 μs for 13C1-dFT. The slower tumbling of the trityl results in less complete motional averaging of the anisotropic hyperfine interaction than occurs for small nitroxides, leading to broader lines and shorter T2 for the 13C1-trityl than for nitroxides.

Conclusions

As a result of the longer τR and smaller g anisotropy for the trityls than for small nitroxides, values of T1 for trityls at ambient temperature in PBS solution are longer than for nitroxides. The spin lattice relaxation is dominated by contributions from modulation of A anisotropy and a local mode. Although the 13C hyperfine anisotropy for trityls is similar to that for 15N-nitroxides, T2 for 13C1-dFT in solution is shorter than for low molecular weight nitroxides because of longer τR. The anisotropic 13C hyperfine in 13C1-dFT provides a tool for measuring tumbling correlation times. The strong dependence of T1 for 13C1-dFT on oxygen concentration implies that this one probe can be used to measure both molecular tumbling and oxygen concentration. The much stronger dependence of T1 on concentration for residual 12C1-dFT in a solution containing predominantly 13C1-dFT than in a solution containing predominantly 12C1-dFT confirms the importance of collisions and Heisenberg exchange with molecules that have different resonance frequencies and faster relaxation.

Supplementary Material

1

Research Highlights.

  • The T1 relaxation mechanisms for fluid solution trityls are proven.

  • Heisenberg exchange T2 relaxation in solution is due to 13C coupling.

  • 13C hyperfine coupling does not impact relaxation in the solid state.

Acknowledgements

Natural abundance dFT was graciously provided by Prof. Howard Halpern (University of Chicago). Partial support from NIH NCI AIP grant CA177744 (GRE) and NIH EB023990 (BD) is gratefully acknowledged. The development of the digital SR spectrometer was supported by NSF grant CHE-1117992.

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

Appendix A: Supplementary material

Supplementary material accompanying this article can be found online at doi:10.1016/j.jmr.2020.106797

Declaration of interests

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References

  • [1].Gomberg M, An instance of trivalent carbon, J. Amer. Chem. Soc 22 (1900) 757–771. [Google Scholar]
  • [2].Weissman SI and Sowden JC, Electron distribution in triphenylmethyl: Hyperfine structure of the paramagnetic resonance absorption of (C6H5)3C13, J. Amer. Chem. Soc 75 (1953) 503. [Google Scholar]
  • [3].Ardenkjaer-Larsen JH, Laursen I, Leunbach I, Ehnholm G, Wistrand L-G, Petersson JS, and Golman K, EPR and DNP properties of certain novel single electron contrast agents intended for oximetric imaging, J. Magn. Reson 133 (1998) 1–12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [4].Epel B, Bowman MK, Mailer C, and Halpern HJ, Absolute Oxygen R1e Imaging in vivo with pulse electron paramagnetic resonance, Magn. Reson. Med 72 (2014) 362–368 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [5].Epel B and Halpern HJ, EPR Imaging, eMagRes 6 (2017) 149–160. [Google Scholar]
  • [6].Chen N-T, Barth ED, Lee T-H, Epel B, Halpern HJ, and Lo L-W, Highly sensitive electron paramagnetic resonance nanoradicals for quantitative intracellular tumor oximetry images, Int. J. Nanomedicine 14 (2019) 2963–2971. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [7].Krishna MC, Matsumoto S, Yasui H, Saito K, Devasahayam N, Subramanian S, and Mitchell JB, Electron Paramagnetic Resonance Imaging of Tumor pO2, Radiation Res. 177 (2012) 376–386. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [8].Lampp L, Rogozhnikova OY, Trukhin DV, Tormyshev VM, Bowman MK, Devasahayam N, Krishna MC, Mader K, and Imming P, A radical containing injectable in-situ-oleogel and emulgel for prolonged in-vivo oxygen measurements with CW EPR, Free Rad. Biol Med 130 (2019) 120–127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [9].Matsumoto K-I, Hyodo F, Mitchell JB, and Krishna MC, Effect of Body Temperature on the Pharmacokinetics of a Triarylmethyl-Type Paramagnetic Contrast Agent Used in EPR Oximetry, Magn. Reson. Med 79 (2018) 1212–1218 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [10].Epel B and Halpern HJ, Comparison of pulse sequences for R1-based electron paramagnetic resonance oxygen imaging, J. Magn. Reson 254 (2015) 56–61 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [11].Wang X, Peng C, He K, Tan X, Han G, Liu Y, and Song Y, Intracellular delivery of liposome-encapsulated Finland trityl radicals for EPR oximetry Analyst 145 (2020) 4964–4971. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [12].Yang Z, Liu Y, Borbat P, Zweier JL, Freed JH, and Hubbell WL, Pulsed ESR dipolar spectroscopy for distance measurements in immobilized spin labeled proteins in liquid solution J. Amer. Chem. Soc 134 (2012) 9950–9952. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [13].Yang Z, Bridges MD, Lopez CJ, Rogozhnikova OY, Trukhin DV, Brooks EK, Tormyshev V, Halpern HJ, and Hubbell WL, A triarylmethyl spin label for long-range distance measurement at physiological temperatures using T1 relaxation enhancement, J. Magn. Reson 269 (2016) 50–54. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [14].Shevelev GY, Krumkacheva OA, Lomzov AA, Kushelev AA, Rogozhnikova OY, Trukhin DV, Troitskaya TI, Tormyshev VM, Fedin MV, Pyshnyi DV, and Bagryanskaya EG, Physiological-temperature distance measurement in nucleic acid using triarylmethyl-based spin labels and pulsed dipolar EPR spectroscopy J. Amer. Chem. Soc 136 (2014) 9874–9877 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [15].Shevelev GY, Krumkacheva OA, Lomzov AA, Kuzhelev AA, Trukhin DV, Rogozhnikova OY, Tormyshev VM, Pyshnyi DV, Fedin MV, and Bagryanskaya EG, Triarylmethyl Labels: Toward Improving the Accuracy of EPR Nanoscale Distance Measurements in DNAs, J. Phys. Chem. B 119 (2015) 13641–13648 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [16].Krumkacheva O and Bagryanskaya E, EPR-Based distance measurements at ambient temperature, J. Magn. Reson 280 (2017) 117–126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [17].Keshari KR and Wilson DM, Chemistry and biochemistry of C-13 hyperpolarized magnetic resonance using dynamic nuclear polarization, Chem. Soc. Rev 43 (2014) 1627–1659. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [18].Kurhanewicz J, Vigneron DB, Ardenkjaer-Larsen JH, Bankson JA, Brindle K, Cunningham CH, Gallagher FA, Keshari KR, Kjaer A, Laustsen C, Mankoff DA, Merritt ME, Nelson SJ, Pauly JM, Lee P, Ronen S, Tyler DJ, Rajan SS, Spielman DM, Wald L, Zhang X, Malloy CR, and Rizi R, Hyperpolarized (13)C MRI: Path to Clinical Translation in Oncology, Neoplasia 21 (2019) 1–16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [19].Poncelet M and Driesschaert B, A 13C-labeled triarylmethyl radical as EPR spin probe highly sensitive to molecular tumbling, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. in press (2020) doi: 10.1002/ange.202006591. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [20].Mailer C, Nielsen RD, and Robinson BH, Explanation of Spin-Lattice Relaxation Rates of Spin Labels Obtained with Multifrequency Saturation Recovery EPR, J. Phys. Chem. A 109 (2005) 4049–4061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [21].Robinson BH, Mailer C, and Reese AW, Linewidth analysis of spin labels in liquids. I. Theory and data analysis, J. Magn. Reson 138 (1999) 199–209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [22].Biller JR, Elajaili H, Meyer V, Rosen GM, Eaton SS, and Eaton GR, Electron Spin Lattice Relaxation Mechanisms of Rapidly-Tumbling Nitroxide Radicals, J. Magn. Reson 236 (2013) 47–56. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [23].Fielding AJ, Carl PJ, Eaton GR, and Eaton SS, Multifrequency EPR of Four Triarylmethyl Radicals, Appl. Magn. Reson 28 (2005) 231–238. [Google Scholar]
  • [24].Clark A, Sedhom J, Elajaili H, Eaton GR, and Eaton SS, Dependence of Electron Paramagnetic Resonance Spectral Lineshapes on Molecular Tumbling: Nitroxide Radical in Water:glycerol Mixtures, Concepts Magn. Reson. A 45A (2017) doi.1001/cmr.a.21423. [Google Scholar]
  • [25].Huang S, Paletta JT, Elajaili H, Huber K, Pink M, Rajca S, Eaton GR, Eaton SS, and Rajca A, Synthesis and Electron Spin Relaxation of Tetra-Carboxylate Pyrroline Nitroxides J. Org. Chem 82 (2017) 1538–1544. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [26].Eaton SS and Eaton GR, Relaxation times of organic radicals and transition metal ions, Biol. Magn. Reson 19 (2000) 29–154. [Google Scholar]
  • [27].McPeak JE, Quine RW, Eaton SS, and Eaton GR, An X-band Saturation Recovery EPR Spectrometer Based on an Arbitrary Waveform Generator, Rev. Sci. Instrum 90 (2019) 024102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [28].Owenius R, Eaton GR, and Eaton SS, Frequency (250 MHz to 9.2 GHz) and Viscosity Dependence of Electron Spin Relaxation of Triarylmethyl Radicals at Room Temperature, J. Magn. Reson 172 (2005) 168–175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [29].Biller JR, Meyer V, Elajaili H, Rosen GM, Kao JPY, Eaton SS, and Eaton GR, Relaxation Times and Line Widths of Isotopically-Substituted Nitroxides in Aqueous Solution at X-band, J. Magn. Reson 212 (2011) 370–377. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [30].Bowman MK, Mailer C, and Halpern HJ, The solution conformation of triarylmethyl radicals, J. Magn. Reson 172 (2005) 254–267 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [31].Epel B, Sundramoorthy SV, Barth ED, Mailer C, and Halpern HJ, Comparison of 250 MHz electron spin echo and continuous wave oxygen EPR imaging methods for in vivo applications, Medical Physics 38 (2011) 2045–2052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [32].Anzai K, Saito K, Takeshita K, Takahashi S, Miyazaki H, Shoji H, Lee M-C-I, Masumizu T, and Ozawa T, Assessment of the ESR-CT imaging by comparison with autoradiography for the distribution of a blood-brain-barrier permeable spin probe, MC-PROXYL, to rodent brain, Magn. Reson. Imag 21 (2003) 765–772. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [33].Jenkins HDB and Marcus Y, Viscosity B-Coefficients of Ions in Solution, Chem. Rev 95 (1995) 2695–2724. [Google Scholar]
  • [34].Marcus Y, Ions in Solution and their Solvation John Wiley, N. Y. , 2015. [Google Scholar]
  • [35].Atkins PW and dePaula J, Physical Chemistry Freeman, New York: 2010. [Google Scholar]
  • [36].Percival PW and Hyde JS, Saturation-recovery measurements of the spin-lattice relaxation times of some nitroxides in solution, J. Magn. Reson 23 (1976) 249–257. [Google Scholar]
  • [37].Kivelson D and Madden P, Light scattering studies of molecular liquids, Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem 31 (1980) 523–558. [Google Scholar]
  • [38].McClung RED and Kivelson D, ESR Linewidths in Solution. V. Studies of Spin–Rotational Effects Not Described by Rotational Diffusion Theory, J. Chem. Phys 49 (1968) 3380–3391. [Google Scholar]
  • [39].Sato H, Kathirvelu V, Fielding AJ, Bottle SE, Blinco JP, Micallef AS, Eaton SS, and Eaton GR, Impact of molecular size on electron spin relaxation rates of nitroxyl radicals in glassy solvents between 100 and 300 K, Mol. Phys 105 (2007) 2137–2151. [Google Scholar]
  • [40].Epel B and Halpern HJ, in Vivo pO2 imaging of tumors: oxymetry with very low frequency electron paramagnetic resonance, Meth. Enzymol 254 (2016) 501–527. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [41].Sato H, Bottle SE, Blinco JP, Micallef AS, Eaton GR, and Eaton SS, Electron spin-lattice relaxation of nitroxyl radicals in temperature ranges that span glassy solutions to low-viscosity liquids, J. Magn. Reson 191 (2008) 66–77. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [42].Shi Y, Quine RW, Rinard GA, Buchanan L, Eaton SS, Eaton GR, Epel B, Seagle SW, and Halpern HJ, Triarylmethyl Radical: EPR Signal to Noise at Frequencies between 250 MHz and 1.5 GHz and Dependence of Relaxation on Radical and Salt Concentration and on Frequency, Z. Physik. Chem 85 (2016) 57–63. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [43].Salikhov KM, Fundamentals of Spin Exchange: Story of a Paramagnetic Shift, Springer, Switzerland, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  • [44].Bester-Rogac M, Sodium Salts of Benzoic, m-Salicylic, and p-Salicylic Acid: A Conductivity Study of Diluted Aqueous Solutions J. Chem. Eng. Data 56 (2011) 4965–4971 [Google Scholar]
  • [45].deRobertis A, deStafano C, Foti C, Gianguzza A, Piazzese D, and Sammartano S, Protonation Constants and Association of Polycarboxylic Ligand with the Major Components of Seawater, J. Chem. Eng. Data 45 (2000) 996–1000. [Google Scholar]
  • [46].Bales BL, Experimental Method to Measure the Effect of Charge on Bimolecular Collision Rates in Electrolyte Solutions J. Phys. Chem 115 (2011) 10903–10910. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [47].Salikhov AK, Mambetov AY, Bakirov MM, Khairuzhdinov IT, Galeev RT, Zaripov RB, and Bales BL, Spin Exchange Between Charged Paramagnetic Particles in Dilute Solution Appl. Magn. Reson 45 (2014) 911–940. [Google Scholar]
  • [48].Kuzhelev AA, Tormyshev VM, Rogozhnikova OY, Trukhin DV, Troitskaya TI, Strizhakov RK, Krumkacheva OA, Fedin MV, and Bagryanskaya EG, Triarylmethyl Radicals: An EPR Study of 13C Hyperfine Coupling Constants, Z. Phys. Chem 231 (2017) 777–794. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [49].Trukhan SN, Yudanov VF, Rogozhnikova O, Trukhin D, Bowman MK, Krzyaniak MD, Chen H, and Martyanov ON, Hyperfine Interactions of Narrow-line Trityl Radicals with Solvent Molecules, J. Magn. Reson 233 (2013) 29–36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [50].Lumata L, Kovacs Z, Sherry AD, Malloy C, Hill S, vanTol J, Yu L, Song L, and Merritt E, Electron spin resonance studies of trityl OX063 at a concentration optimal for DNP, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys 15 (2013) 9800–9807. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

1

RESOURCES