Abstract
Cardiac arrest has a high rate of morbidity and mortality. Several advances in post‐cardiac arrest management can improve outcome, but are time‐dependent, placing the emergency physician in a critical role to both recognize the need for and initiate therapy. We present a novel perspective of both the workup and therapeutic interventions geared toward the emergency physician during the first few hours of care. We describe how the immediate care of a post‐cardiac arrest patient is resource intensive and requires simultaneous evaluation for the underlying cause and intensive management to prevent further end organ damage, particularly of the central nervous system. The goal of the initial focused assessment is to rapidly determine if any reversible causes of cardiac arrest are present and to intervene when possible. Interventions performed in this acute period are aimed at preventing additional brain injury through optimizing hemodynamics, providing ventilatory support, and by using therapeutic hypothermia when indicated. After the initial phase of care, disposition is guided by available resources and the clinician's judgment. Transfer to a specialized cardiac arrest center is prudent in centers that do not have significant support or experience in the care of these patients.
Keywords: coma, critical care, emergency treatment, heart arrest, hypothermia, outcomes, resuscitation
1. INTRODUCTION
Cardiac arrest accounts for over 500,000 deaths per year in the United States and leads to significant functional disability in those who survive. 1 Advances in cardiac resuscitation and the care of post‐cardiac arrest patients have decreased mortality. 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 These developments include targeted temperature management (TTM), therapeutic hypothermia, and a focus on preventing secondary organ injury.
The emergency physician is ideally positioned to initiate these time‐dependent therapies; thus, recognizing the necessary steps in caring for the post‐cardiac arrest patient is critical. This review will explore the key actions that need to take place in the first few hours of care to assess and manage the post‐cardiac arrest patient.
2. GENERAL GOALS AND CONSIDERATIONS
The immediate care after achieving return of spontaneous circulation is complex, requiring focused assessments to determine the etiology of arrest while providing intensive care to mitigate end‐organ damage. Along with these physiologic considerations, disposition planning should begin when the patient arrives. This ensures timely definitive care (eg, catheter lab is activated if STEMI is evident or outside facility is contacted early for initiation of transfer if required).
Rapid recognition and management of these factors is crucial in the first minutes to hours of care. Failure to awaken due to brain injury is the most common cause of death following resuscitation from cardiac arrest. 7 Thus, preventing additional brain injury directs many of the interventions emergency physicians will institute in the first few hours. The post‐return of spontaneous circulation patient is at high risk of hemodynamic instability and may require hemodynamic support to prevent secondary end‐organ damage from hypoperfusion. Preventing hypotension is a critical first step in the post‐return of spontaneous circulation care bundle. Similarly, preventing hypoxemia and maintaining normocarbia is required to prevent secondary injury. Post‐return of spontaneous circulation patients who remain comatose after resuscitation should receive targeted temperature management to prevent additional neuronal injury. 8 Although the ideal temperature is debated, either cooling to between 32°C and 34°C or 36°C is recommended by both US and international guidelines.
As these above interventions are started, the emergency physician should consider potential etiologies of the arrest and initiating any applicable therapies. The following sections will discuss each of these in more detail.
3. DETERMINING THE ETIOLOGY
During and after resuscitation, it is critical to begin evaluating the patient for the cause of the cardiac arrest and to start treatment of any actionable causes. Although acute coronary syndrome is a common etiology, it is wise to adapt a wide differential. 9 Most cardiac arrest victims have a medical etiology for the arrest. However, even in patients who have sustained trauma along with cardiac arrest, medical causes should still be considered as cardiac arrest may be antecedent to the trauma. Reversible causes of cardiac arrest should be rapidly investigated to prevent relapse. Ensure the patient's vital signs are being accurately monitored and that reliable vascular access has been obtained. Table 1 lists key reversible conditions to consider and their possible etiologies.
TABLE 1.
Potential etiologies of cardiac arrest
Cardiac | Acute coronary syndrome; primary arrhythmia; congenital/structural heart disease; secondary arrhythmia or cardiomyopathy; cardiogenic shock; pulmonary hypertension; right ventricular failure |
Pulmonary | Large airway obstruction; pulmonary failure (ie, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma) |
Infectious | Distributive shock from sepsis |
Central nervous system | Intracranial hemorrhage; seizure |
Bleeding | Trauma or non‐traumatic exsanguination |
Metabolic | Diabetic ketoacidosis |
Electrolyte | Hypokalemia; hyperkalemia; hypomagnesemia |
Mechanical | Pericardial tamponade; pulmonary embolus; tension pneumothorax |
Environmental | Electrocution injury; hypothermia; anaphylaxis |
Toxicological | Overdose or poisoning |
3.1. History and examination
A direct history from the patient of the events leading up to the cardiac arrest is generally not possible given most are comatose after resuscitation. Even if conscious and alert, patients often experience a degree of retrograde amnesia after resuscitation. If the patient is unable to participate, a history should be obtained from the emergency responders, family, or any witnesses. Important factors to try to elucidate are past medical history, social history, medications, recent changes in health, and the circumstances and events leading up to the cardiac arrest. Also inquire about any workup and/or treatment started en route to the emergency department. This information will help to organize the differential and provide a foundation for further workup and treatment.
As with all critically ill patients, the clinical examination begins with evaluation of the airway, breathing, and circulation. Compromise of any of these can rapidly lead to re‐arrest. Table 2 provides an overview of physical exam findings and potential etiologies associated with the finding.
TABLE 2.
Examination findings and potential cardiac arrest etiology
Organ system | Clinical finding | Potential etiology |
---|---|---|
Pulmonary | Diminished breath sounds |
Unilateral: Pneumothorax; right mainstem intubation Bilateral: Pulmonary edema |
Cardiovascular | New murmur | Papillary muscle rupture or other anatomic abnormality |
Bradycardia | Toxidrome; hypoxia; metabolic/electrolyte abnormalities | |
Unequal pulses or blood pressure 10 | Aortic dissection | |
Extremity | Unilateral swelling/erythema | Pulmonary embolism |
Hemodialysis fistula | Hyperkalemia | |
Abdomen | Distention/rigidity | Hemorrhage; inflammatory process |
Pulsatile mass | Aortic aneurism rupture | |
Skin | Cyanosis | Hypoxia; methemoglobinemia; sulfhemoglobinemia |
Mottling; slow capillary refill | Septic shock; hemorrhagic shock | |
IV injection sites | Opioid overdose | |
Open wounds/cellulitis | Septic shock | |
Diffuse urticaria | Anaphylactic shock | |
Neurologic | Focal motor deficits | Cerebrovascular accident |
Global motor deficits | Toxidrome; hypoxic/anoxic brain injury |
3.2. Neurologic examination
A thorough neurologic exam is crucial. It rarely identifies the etiology of arrest, but can be used to provide a baseline of illness severity, which informs not only prognosis but also informs intervention strategy. 11 , 12 This examination should be performed in the absence of sedative or paralytic agents. Acidosis and hypotension are common in the post‐arrest patient, and should be corrected. Assessing both motor findings (ie, Glasgow Coma Scale or Full Outline of UnResponsiveness [FOUR]) and brainstem reflexes (eg, pupillary, corneal, oculocephalic, gag, and cough) is required to adequately describe the severity of brain injury in the post‐arrest patient. 13 , 14 , 15 A patient with no motor response and absent brainstem reflexes has a worse prognosis than a patient with no motor response but intact brainstem responses. 11 , 12
Assessment of other organ system dysfunction can be accomplished using the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score. This can be assessed serially during the hospital course and can be obtained rapidly during the initial ED evaluation. Layering the neurologic and cardiopulmonary subscores of the SOFA allows the clinician to determine the Pittsburgh Cardiac Arrest Category of the patient. This validated scale is associated with survival, development of multi‐organ failure, and neurologic outcome. 11 , 12 Moreover, it can be used to guide other interventions including neuroimaging, coronary angiography, and guide the temperature set point for the patient. 16 , 17 Potential benefits of deeper cooling include a decrease in metabolic demand, decreased intracranial pressure, and suppression of seizure activity. 18 For example, patients with devastating neurologic injury have not been shown to benefit from early coronary angiography. 16 However, those with mild to moderate coma derive benefit from early coronary angiography even if STEMI is not present on the initial EKG. Recent data suggest that depth of coma may be used to determine optimal goal temperature (described below). 17
3.3. Initial phase of care
As with other critically ill patients, a point‐of‐care blood glucose can provide a reversible cause (Figure 1). An ECG can diagnose STEMI—a common and reversible etiology of arrest. 19 Coronary angiography can lead to additional cardiovascular interventions such as the placement of an intra‐aortic balloon pump, Impella device, or transition to extra‐corporeal membrane oxygenation. There should be a low threshold to activate the cardiac catheterization lab in the post‐arrest setting, because evidence shows that early coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention, if indicated, increases survival and decreases morbidity. 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 A recent randomized controlled trial demonstrated no difference in outcome between patients receiving early or late percutaneous coronary intervention, but was confounded by a low rate of coronary artery disease and unclear inclusion criteria. 24 Some evidence suggests that patients without ST‐elevation benefit from cardiac catherization. 25 , 26 Thus, guidelines recommend that coma is not a reason to withhold percutaneous coronary intervention in this population. 27 QTc prolongation should prompt investigation into the patient's medications and possible toxidromes. Less common but likely to recur causes of cardiac arrest include Brugada syndrome, Wolf‐Parkinson‐White Syndrome, and hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy. 28
FIGURE 1.
Temporal diagram of initial post resuscitation care. The initial phase is resource‐intensive and requires several team members to provide care similar to a trauma activation. The goal in this phase is stabilization. Once the patient is stabilized, intensive care with fewer team members at the bedside may be accomplished
The general laboratory workup includes electrolytes, renal function, liver function, arterial blood gas with co‐oximetry, toxicology (eg, illicit drugs, ETOH, salicylates, acetaminophen), and CBC. Opiate overdose is a common etiology of arrest. 28 , 29 Electrolyte abnormalities should be corrected, especially potassium and magnesium derangements. These are common following resuscitation from cardiac arrest and predispose to arrhythmia. If hypokalemia is found on testing, empiric magnesium should be given as well. 9 Blood gas will reveal metabolic abnormalities as well as possible hemoglobin abnormalities (eg, carboxyhemoglobinemia, methemoglobinemia). Renal and liver function tests help with determining the extent of end‐organ damage and involvement. A CBC is to mainly assess for severe anemia requiring transfusion. Other labs should be obtained based on the history and presentation of the patient.
Chest radiography is useful to evaluate both clinical interventions (central line placement, endotracheal tube placement) and potential etiologies and sequelae of the resuscitation (pneumonia or pneumothorax). If there is suspicion of a pulmonary embolism, a computed tomography (CT) angiogram of the chest is the best modality to assess for this. D‐dimer elevation is common following resuscitation from cardiac arrest, and elevated levels have been associated with poor outcome. 30 It has not been used to risk stratify for pulmonary embolism in this high‐risk cohort. Intracranial hemorrhage is found in up to 5% of CT imaging in this cohort, and CT of the brain should be obtained in all comatose post‐arrest patients. 31 CT of the brain can also diagnose cerebral edema, which has been associated with poor outcome. 31 Bedside ultrasonography, including the eFAST and rapid ultrasound for shock and hypotension exams, can also be used to evaluate for intraabdominal bleeding, cardiac tamponade, or pneumothorax. General cardiac function can also be assessed. Increase in right heart volume or right ventricular hypokinesis can be signs of increased pulmonary pressure secondary to a pulmonary embolism. Significant fluid in the pericardium may be a sign of cardiac tamponade.
3.3.1. Neuroprotective strategies and considerations
Neurologic damage is the leading cause of mortality in patients that experienced out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest and is associated with increased mortality in the setting of in‐hospital cardiac arrest as well. 7 Hyperthermia after cardiac arrest is associated with poor neurologic outcomes, and thus, is to be avoided. Elevated core temperature (temperature >37°C) during the initial 48 hours after cardiac arrest is associated with increased mortality. 32
The current data demonstrate improved neurologic outcomes with the use of therapeutic hypothermia and targeted temperature management. 6 , 33 , 34 , 35 We define therapeutic hypothermia as a core body temperature of 32°C to 34°C and targeted temperature management a core body temperature of <36°C. One meta‐analysis of 11 studies, 3 of which were randomized trials, demonstrated lower mortality (odds ratio [OR], 0.51; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.41–0.64) as well as improved neurologic outcome (OR, 2.48; 95% CI, 1.91–3.22) in patients who underwent either therapeutic hypothermia or targeted temperature management after cardiac arrest compared to those who did not. 36 The optimal core temperature is not known; thus, guidelines target a range between 32°C and 36°C. 2 , 37 The majority of these trials predominantly enrolled patients with shockable primary rhythms, witnessed status, and bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). These cohorts reflect the minority of patients resuscitated from cardiac arrest. The recently published HYPERION trial demonstrated improved neurologic outcomes at 90 days for patients with a non‐shockable primary rhythm of arrest receiving 33°C as their target temperature. 34 Recent work has also demonstrated improved outcomes with a lower targeted temperature in patients with more severe illness severity on hospital arrival. 17
In one small retrospective study, the goal temperature in post‐cardiac arrest patients was changed from 33°C (n = 24) to 36°C (n = 52). In the 36°C group, there was significantly less utilization of active cooling (100% in the 33°C group vs 70% in the 36°C group), less time spent at the target temperature (87% in the 33°C group vs 50% in the 36°C group), and an increase in rates of fever (0% in the 33°C group vs 19% in the 36°C group). 38 The data showed a trend toward worse neurologic outcomes in the 36°C group. Regardless of the goal temperature selected, devices with active temperature control and a feedback loop should be used to minimize deviations from goal temperature.
3.4. Populations
Contraindications for temperature control after cardiac arrest are advanced medical directives stating the patient does not want aggressive measures or if the clinical situation does not merit such intervention. Otherwise, patients who are unable to follow commands should have temperature management initiated immediately. Choice of goal temperature should be chosen based on the clinical presentation. For example, therapeutic hypothermia may not be optimal in a patient with active noncompressable bleeding, but targeted temperature management is safe and reasonable in this scenario. Both therapeutic hypothermia and targeted temperature management can be used in pregnant patients, hemodynamically unstable, and/or undergoing coronary catheterization or receiving thrombolytics, though therapeutic hypothermia may increase risk of bleeding in the latter 2 groups. 23 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 Most importantly, preventing fever is critical in all post‐cardiac arrest patients. It is unacceptable to neither monitor nor maintain temperature in the post‐arrest patient.
3.5. Initiation, goals, and duration of therapy
Active management of the post‐cardiac arrest patient's core body temperature should be initiated as soon as possible and maintained for at least 48 hours. 6 , 32 , 37 , 44 , 45 The optimal timing of initiation of therapeutic hypothermia or targeted temperature management is unclear. Randomized trials have not shown improvement of outcomes with prehospital initiation of therapeutic hypothermia. 46 , 47 One trial demonstrated worse outcomes in those arriving at goal temperature rapidly while others have demonstrated improved outcomes. 48 , 49 , 50 Unfortunately, none of these trials have stratified enrollment based on initial neurologic injury, limiting the use of their results.
One approach would be to maintain 36°C for 24 hours in patients with moderate coma (intact brainstem responses) or shockable primary rhythm. 17 , 37 In patients with non‐shockable primary rhythm or more severe coma (loss of brainstem reflexes), consider 33°C for 24 hours. 17 , 34 Potential benefits of deeper cooling include a decrease in metabolic demand, decreased intracranial pressure, and suppression of seizure activity. 51 , 52 , 53 , 54
In one study of 355 patients randomized to either 24 or 48 hours of therapeutic hypothermia, survival in the 48‐hour group was 69%, whereas survival in the 24‐hour group was 64% (absolute difference 4.9%; 95% CI, −5% to 14.8%). This did not meet their specified goal of a survival difference of 15%. 55 The recently funded Influence of Cooling Duration on Efficacy in Cardiac Arrest Patients (ICECAP trial) will randomize subjects to different duration of therapeutic hypothermia and may provide additional data on optimal cooling duration.
3.6. Induction of therapeutic hypothermia
The predominant methods used to induce therapeutic hypothermia or targeted temperature management are intravascular and surface cooling. The former is in the form of cold intravenous fluids and venous catheters, whereas the latter involves direct application of a cooling blanket, gel adhesive, ice, or cold fluid to facilitate cooling. Although the rate of cooling may differ, there have not been differences in neurologic outcome when comparing the methods. 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 Importantly, patients are often mildly hypothermic post‐cardiac arrest because of the cooled peripheral circulation returning to the core. 33 Monitoring temperature is critical before induction of therapeutic hypothermia or targeted temperature management. These data are fed back to the cooling device, facilitating a consistent temperature. 34 Recent work in traumatic brain injury cohorts has shown that variation in temperature regulation has been associated with worse neurologic outcome. 33
Intravenous administration of 30 mL/kg of cold (4°C [39°F]) isotonic saline with the assistance of a pressure bag is shown to lower core temperature by >2°C per hour. 46 , 60 , 61 A single liter of cold saline administered over 15 minutes can result in a 1°C reduction in core temperature. These rates are similar to those seen with commercially available cooling devices. However, this approach may not be optimal in patients with known heart failure, advanced renal disease, or evidence of acute pulmonary edema.
Surface cooling strategies and/or endovascular cooling devices should be implemented. Surface cooling uses items such as cooling blankets, ice packs, and cooling vests to decrease the core body temperature via conduction. If ice packs are used, they should be applied to the neck, groin, and axillae next to major vascular bundles. Adjuvant measures include cool water baths or cool water with fans to increase evaporative cooling. Alternatively, intravascular cooling catheters circulate coolant fluid inside of a catheter in the superior or inferior vena cava, resulting in a cooling rate of up to 2°C/h. 56
3.7. Temperature monitoring
It is crucial to continuously monitor core body temperature during therapeutic hypothermia and targeted temperature management as it closely correlates with brain temperature. 69 Measurement of the central venous temperature is considered the gold standard. Esophageal or bladder temperature correlates closely with central venous temperature and follows changes in temperature. 70 , 71 Rectal temperature may trail behind rapid core temperature changes by up to 1.5°C. 70 Axillary, oral, and tympanic temperature are poor surrogates during therapeutic hypothermia and should be avoided.
3.8. Rewarming
It is unlikely that rewarming will be done in the ED. However, if rewarming is required, most clinicians choose a rate of 0.25°C to 0.5°C per hour. 4 , 72 Preclinical studies involving traumatic brain injury demonstrated loss of the benefits of therapeutic hypothermia when the rate of rewarming surpassed 0.5°C per hour. 73 , 74 , 75
Devices that automatically monitor and regulate temperature during the entire therapeutic hypothermia process (induction, maintenance, and rewarming phases) reduce the risk of excessive rates of temperature change during rewarming. 76 , 77 If these devices are not readily accessible, manual rewarming can be used with close monitoring of the patient's temperature.
3.9. Potential complications
Although therapeutic hypothermia and targeted temperature management improve outcomes after resuscitation from cardiac arrest, side effects are common. Existing data suggest that these sequelae represent the critical illness of the patient rather than a sequelae of therapeutic hypothermia or targeted temperature management therapy. Clotting is an enzymatically mediated process. In vitro studies show core temperatures below 35°C impede the clotting cascade and platelet function, though this has not been demonstrated by in vivo studies. 78 , 79 , 80 , 81 Studies specific to therapeutic hypothermia have not shown a significant difference in the incidence of bleeding in post‐cardiac arrest patients receiving therapeutic hypothermia versus those who remain normothermic. 6 , 37 , 44 , 82 If a therapeutic hypothermia patient develops significant non‐compressible bleeding, the patient should be actively rewarmed to a core temperature of 36°C. Therapeutic hypothermia has been shown to disrupt leukocyte function, but data do not demonstrate more infections in those receiving therapeutic hypothermia or targeted temperature management or increased mortality in those infected. 37 , 39 , 44 , 83
Shivering is a natural response to hypothermia designed to increase core body temperature. Suppression of this is crucial during therapeutic hypothermia or targeted temperature management. 60 , 62 , 63 Multiple strategies have been explored. A continuous infusion of propofol at 20 µg/kg/min with titration up to 50 µg/kg/min may be used. If the response is inadequate with propofol alone, a bolus of fentanyl at 0.5–1.0 µg/kg can be added or a continuous infusion of fentanyl starting at 25–100 µg/h may be used. Addition of intermittent administration of a benzodiazepine such as midazolam is reasonable as well. Continuous infusion of midazolam at 2–10 mg/h instead of propofol is reasonable in hypotensive patients but may confound the neurologic examination. Although midazolam infusion can result in deposition in adipose tissue, therapeutic hypothermia also reduces clearance and excretion of midazolam. 64 Dexmedetomidine is also effective in the reduction of shivering, but its side effects of hypotension and bradycardia can limit its desirability in this patient population. 65 Short‐acting medications such as remifentanil have also been shown to effectively suppress shivering and have been associated with shorter ICU length of stay. 66
Neuromuscular blocking agents are highly effective at preventing shivering but confound the neurologic examination and may mask seizure movement. Electroencephalogram monitoring is recommended because of the high risk of seizures post‐cardiac arrest. 67 , 68
Hypothermia slows cardiac conduction leading to bradycardia and QT prolongation. 84 , 85 Bradycardia is common in patients undergoing therapeutic hypothermia and does not generally necessitate intervention. If ventricular tachyarrhythmias occur such as ventricular fibrillation, studies on animal models report comparable results with defibrillation during hypothermia as normothermia. 86 , 87 The use of therapeutic hypothermia has not correlated with increased need for vasopressor support regardless of whether the patient required vasopressor support prior to induction of therapeutic hypothermia. 88 , 89
Induction of therapeutic hypothermia results in diuresis, potentially leading to electrolyte abnormalities, including hypokalemia, hypomagnesaemia, and hypophosphatemia. 90 Potassium shifts into the intracellular space during induction of therapeutic hypothermia, also decreasing serum levels. 90 , 91 , 92 Consequently, serum electrolytes should be frequently monitored and replaced during therapeutic hypothermia and targeted temperature management. Total body potassium may not be low; thus, conservative replacement is recommended.
Patients undergoing therapeutic hypothermia can become insulin resistant. 84 , 93 Therapeutic hypothermia decreases CYP3A4 metabolism, potentially altering serum levels of other medications. 94 , 95 , 96 To our knowledge, there are no studies illustrating how to guide titration of medication based on serum levels during therapeutic hypothermia or targeted temperature management.
4. RESPIRATORY AND HEMODYNAMICS
4.1. Respiratory management and considerations
Airway compromise can lead to re‐arrest. Immediately following return of spontaneous circulation, it is critical to confirm that the airway is secure with a definitive airway (ie, endotracheal intubation), and the patient is adequately ventilated to prevent recurrent arrest. Gastric insufflation is common during CPR; thus, a gastric tube should be placed to decompress the stomach.
Based on the current data, the targets for patients undergoing mechanical ventilation include a PaCO2 of 40 mm Hg (or an end‐tidal CO2 of 35 mm Hg) and an oxygen saturation (SpO2) >94%. A normal PaCO2 (35–45 mm Hg) is shown to correlate with improved outcomes when compared to hypercapnia or hypocapnia. 97 , 98 , 99 , 100 Hypocapnia may lead to hypocapnia‐induced cerebral vasoconstriction and, in turn, cerebral hypoperfusion. Thus, hyperventilation should be avoided when possible. Hyperventilation can also reduce preload and compromise cardiac output and coronary perfusion pressure. 101 Hypoventilation can lead to hypercapnia, potentially increasing cerebral blood flow, cerebral edema, and exacerbation of neuronal injury.
The goal when titrating oxygen concentration in the post arrest patient is to avoid any episode of hypoxia while avoiding prolonged hyperoxia (defined as a PaO2 >300). Prolonged periods of hyperoxia have been linked to worse outcomes in multiple studies. 102 , 103 Titrating FiO2 to the lowest rate that supports an SpO2 ≥94% (or a PaO2 of ≈100 mm Hg) is reasonable. Most arterial blood gas measurements do not account for the effect of therapeutic hypothermia or targeted temperature management on PaO2 concentrations. The reported PaO2 may be artificially higher than the actual value, meaning the patient's actual PaO2 may be lower than reported. Recent data suggest a slightly higher PaO2 (around 100–120 mm Hg) is reasonable in patients undergoing therapeutic hypothermia or targeted temperature management. 100
4.2. Hemodynamic management and considerations
Ensuring adequate blood pressure post‐cardiac arrest is crucial in minimizing secondary damage. In the comatose post‐arrest patient, a mean arterial pressure (MAP) of ≥65 mm Hg may be inadequate. Cerebral autoregulation is impaired after return of spontaneous circulation and an MAP goal of 80–100 mm Hg may be targeted. 104 , 105 , 106 Additional goals that indicate adequate perfusion are maintaining central venous pressure at 8–12 mm Hg and urinary output of >0.5 mL/kg/h. Intravenous fluids, either normal saline or lactated ringers, are to be used to achieve and/or maintain the central venous pressure goal of 8–12 mm Hg. If large volumes are required, lactated ringers may prevent the hyperchloremic metabolic acidosis that can develop in patients given large amounts of normal saline. Continuous blood pressure monitoring with an arterial line is helpful when titrating vasopressors and inotropes.
Vasopressors and/or inotropes are often required in the 24–48‐hour period after resuscitation because of depressed myocardial function secondary to the cardiac arrest. 107 , 108 Frequently used vasopressors include dopamine, norepinephrine, and epinephrine. However, norepinephrine may be safer to use in the setting of cardiogenic shock given the increased risk of arrhythmias when using dopamine. 109 In cardiogenic shock, dobutamine and milrinone are potentially useful for inotropic support. However, both agents are vasodilators that may cause hypotension. Dobutamine can precipitate tachyarrhythmias as well, likely because of its chronotropic effects.
Although coronary angiography provides anatomic information and may yield the etiology of arrest, additional interventions to provide cardiovascular support such as ventricular assist devices or intra‐aortic balloon pumps may also be placed. Several sites are exploring the use of extra corporeal membrane oxygenation placement in the cardiac catheterization lab for post arrest patients with good neurologic outcomes. 110
5. GENERAL SUPPORTIVE MEASURES
Standard critical care measures should be implemented in the post‐cardiac arrest patient population. This includes deep vein thrombosis prophylaxis, stress ulcer prophylaxis, and early physical and occupational therapy. Elevation of the head of the bed to 30° can help reduce intracranial pressure and reduce the chance of aspiration.
5.1. Role of antibiotics
Pneumonia is common, occurring in 50% to 70% of patients. 111 , 112 However, existing data have not demonstrated a mortality difference between those with and without pneumonia. A recent randomized, controlled trial demonstrated a lower incidence of pneumonia in patients treated with 2 days of amoxicillin‐clavulanate rather than placebo. There was no difference in mortality, length of stay, or ventilator‐free days between the groups. 113
6. DISPOSITION
Care for post‐cardiac arrest patients is resource intensive and requires coordination from multiple specialties. Facilities that manage over 50 post‐cardiac arrest patients per year have better outcomes when compared to those that care for fewer. 114 , 115 , 116 , 117 Centers that have cardiac catheterization capabilities demonstrate better outcomes in this population. 114 , 115 Regional cardiac arrest centers may concentrate these resources and improve long‐term outcomes. 118 Thus, it is reasonable to transfer a post‐cardiac arrest patient to a tertiary care facility that has access to advanced resources and is experienced in managing these patients.
7. CONCLUSIONS
Bundles of care that include aggressive resuscitation of cardiopulmonary dysfunction, neuroprotective care such as therapeutic hypothermia and targeted temperature management, and delayed neuroprognostication have improved outcomes in the patient successfully resuscitated from cardiac arrest. The emergency physician plays a critical role in evaluating, stabilizing, and implementing these therapies to optimize outcomes. In facilities that do not routinely provide comprehensive care to the post arrest patient, consideration of transfer to a cardiac arrest center should be considered.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors have no conflict of interest to disclose.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
JR received research support from Hibernaid, LLC (novel cooling drug) and BrainCool, LLC (surface cooling device).
Biography
Jon C. Rittenberger, MD, MS, is an Associate Professor at the Geisinger Commonwealth Medical College and Director of Residency Research at the Guthrie‐Robert Packer Hospital Emergency Medicine Residency Program in Sayre, PA.
Sonnier M, Rittenberger JC. State‐of‐the‐art considerations in post‐arrest care. JACEP Open 2020;1:107–116. 10.1002/emp2.12022
Supervising Editor: Nicholas M. Mohr, MD, MS
Funding and support: By JACEP Open policy, all authors are required to disclose any and all commercial, financial, and other relationships in any way related to the subject of this article as per ICMJE conflict of interest guidelines (see www.icmje.org). The authors have stated that no such relationships exist.
REFERENCES
- 1. Benjamin EJ, Muntner P, Alonso A, et al. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics—2019 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2019;139(10):e56‐e528. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Arrich J, Holzer M, Havel C, et al. Hypothermia for neuroprotection in adults after cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;2016(2). 10.1002/14651858.CD004128.pub4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Sunde K, Pytte M, Jacobsen D, et al. Implementation of a standardised treatment protocol for post resuscitation care after out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. 2007;73(1):29‐39. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Rittenberger JC, Guyette FX, Tisherman SA, et al. Outcomes of a hospital‐wide plan to improve care of comatose survivors of cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. 2008;79(2):198‐204. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Tagami T, Hirata K, Takeshige T, et al. Implementation of the fifth link of the chain of survival concept for out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest. Circulation. 2012;126(5):589‐597. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Bernard SA, Jones BM. Treatment of comatose survivors of out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest with induced hypothermia. N Engl J Med. 2002:7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Laver S, Farrow C, Turner D, et al. Mode of death after admission to an intensive care unit following cardiac arrest. Intensive Care Med. 2004;30(11):2126‐2128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Callaway CW, Soar J, Aibiki M, et al. Part 4: advanced life support: 2015 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science with Treatment Recommendations. Circulation. 2015;132(16 Suppl 1):S84‐S145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Eisenberg MS, Mengert TJ. Cardiac resuscitation. N Engl J Med. 2001;344(17):1304‐1313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Um SW, Ohle R, Perry JJ. Bilateral blood pressure differential as a clinical marker for acute aortic dissection in the emergency department. Emerg Med J. 2018;35(9):556‐558. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Rittenberger JC, Tisherman SA, Holm MB, et al. An early, novel illness severity score to predict outcome after cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. 2011;82(11):1399‐1404. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Coppler PJ, Elmer J, Calderon L, et al. Validation of the Pittsburgh cardiac arrest category illness severity score. Resuscitation. 2015;89:86‐92. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Wijdicks EFM, Bamlet WR, Maramattom BV, et al. Validation of a new coma scale: The FOUR score. Ann Neurol. 2005;58(4):585‐593. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Wijdicks EFM, Rabinstein AA, Bamlet WR, et al. FOUR score and Glasgow Coma Scale in predicting outcome of comatose patients: a pooled analysis. Neurology. 2011;77(1):84‐85. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Kramer AA, Wijdicks EFM, Snavely VL, et al. A multicenter prospective study of interobserver agreement using the Full Outline of Unresponsiveness score coma scale in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med. 2012;40(9):2671‐2676. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Reynolds JC, Rittenberger JC, Toma C, et al. Risk‐adjusted outcome prediction with initial post‐cardiac arrest illness severity: implications for cardiac arrest survivors being considered for early invasive strategy. Resuscitation. 2014;85(9):1232‐1239. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Callaway C, Dezfulian C, Doshi A, et al. Phenotypes of severe post‐CPR brain injury. Resuscitation. 2019;142:e1. [Google Scholar]
- 18. Youn CS, Callaway CW, Rittenberger JC. Combination of initial neurologic examination, quantitative brain imaging and electroencephalography to predict outcome after cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. 2017;110:120‐125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jaffe AS, et al. Fourth universal definition of myocardial infarction (2018). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;72(18):2231‐2264. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Dumas F, Cariou A, Manzo‐Silberman S, et al. Immediate percutaneous coronary intervention is associated with better survival after out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest: insights from the PROCAT (Parisian Region Out of Hospital Cardiac Arrest) registry. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2010;3(3):200‐207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Jentzer JC, Scutella M, Pike F, et al. Early coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention are associated with improved outcomes after out of hospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. 2018;123:15‐21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Spaulding CM, Weber SN. Immediate coronary angiography in survivors of out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest. N Engl J Med. 1997:5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Reynolds JC, Callaway CW, El Khoudary SR, et al. Coronary angiography predicts improved outcome following cardiac arrest: propensity‐adjusted analysis. J Intensive Care Med. 2009;24(3):179‐186. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Lemkes JS, Janssens GN, van der Hoeven NW, et al. Coronary angiography after cardiac arrest without ST‐segment elevation. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(15):1397‐1407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Kumar K, Lotun K. The role of coronary catheterization laboratory in post‐resuscitation care of patients without ST elevation myocardial infarction. Curr Cardiol Rev. 2018;14(2):92‐96. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Millin MG, Comer AC, Nable JV, et al. Patients without ST elevation after return of spontaneous circulation may benefit from emergent percutaneous intervention: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Resuscitation. 2016;108:54‐60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Neumar RW, Shuster M, Callaway CW, et al. Part 1: executive summary: 2015 American Heart Association guidelines update for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Circulation. 2015;132(18 suppl 2):S315‐S367. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Chen N, Callaway CW, Guyette FX, et al. Arrest etiology among patients resuscitated from cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. 2018;130:33‐40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Elmer J, Lynch MJ, Kristan J, et al. Recreational drug overdose‐related cardiac arrests: break on through to the other side. Resuscitation. 2015;89:177‐181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Park JH, Wee JH, Choi SP, et al. Assessment of serum biomarkers and coagulation/fibrinolysis markers for prediction of neurological outcomes of out of cardiac arrest patients treated with therapeutic hypothermia. Clin Exp Emerg Med. 2019;6(1):9‐18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Metter RB, Rittenberger JC, Guyette FX, et al. Association between a quantitative CT scan measure of brain edema and outcome after cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. 2011;82(9):1180‐1185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Zeiner A, Holzer M, Sterz F, et al. Hyperthermia after cardiac arrest is associated with an unfavorable neurologic outcome. Arch Intern Med. 2001;161(16):2007‐2012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Abu‐Arafeh A, Rodriguez A, Paterson RL, et al. Temperature variability in a modern targeted temperature management trial. Crit Care Med. 2018;46(2):223‐228. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Lascarrou J‐B, Merdji H, Le Gouge A, et al. Targeted temperature management for cardiac arrest with nonshockable rhythm. N Engl J Med. 2019;381(24):2327‐2337. NEJMoa1906661. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Hypothermia after Cardiac Arrest Study Group . Mild therapeutic hypothermia to improve the neurologic outcome after cardiac arrest. N Engl J Med. 2002;346(8):549‐556. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Schenone AL, Cohen A, Patarroyo G, et al. Therapeutic hypothermia after cardiac arrest: a systematic review/meta‐analysis exploring the impact of expanded criteria and targeted temperature. Resuscitation. 2016;108:102‐110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Nielsen N, Wetterslev J, Cronberg T, et al. Targeted temperature management at 33°C versus 36°C after cardiac arrest. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(23):2197‐2206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Bray JE, Stub D, Bloom JE, et al. Changing target temperature from 33°C to 36°C in the ICU management of out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest: a before and after study. Resuscitation. 2017;113:39‐43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Nielsen N, Hovdenes J, Nilsson F, et al. Outcome, timing and adverse events in therapeutic hypothermia after out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2009;53(7):926‐934. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Hovdenes J, Laake JH, Aaberge L, et al. Therapeutic hypothermia after out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest: experiences with patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention and cardiogenic shock. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2007;51(2):137‐142. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Skulec R, Kovarnik T, Dostalova G, et al. Induction of mild hypothermia in cardiac arrest survivors presenting with cardiogenic shock syndrome. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2008;52(2):188‐194. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Chauhan A, Musunuru H, Donnino M, et al. The use of therapeutic hypothermia after cardiac arrest in a pregnant patient. Ann Emerg Med. 2012;60(6):786‐789. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Rittenberger JC, Kelly E, Jang D, et al. Successful outcome utilizing hypothermia after cardiac arrest in pregnancy: a case report. Crit Care Med. 2008;36(4):1354‐1356. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Mild therapeutic hypothermia to improve the neurologic outcome after cardiac arrest. N Engl J Med. 2002:8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Gebhardt K, Guyette FX, Doshi AA, et al. Prevalence and effect of fever on outcome following resuscitation from cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. 2013;84(8):1062‐1067. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Bernard SA, Smith K, Cameron P, et al. Induction of therapeutic hypothermia by paramedics after resuscitation from out‐of‐hospital ventricular fibrillation cardiac arrest: a randomized controlled trial. Circulation. 2010;122(7):737‐742. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Scales DC, Cheskes S, Verbeek PR, et al. Prehospital cooling to improve successful targeted temperature management after cardiac arrest: a randomized controlled trial. Resuscitation. 2017;121:187‐194. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Perman SM, Ellenberg JH, Grossestreuer AV, et al. Shorter time to target temperature is associated with poor neurologic outcome in post‐arrest patients treated with targeted temperature management. Resuscitation. 2015;88:114‐119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Schock RB, Janata A, Peacock WF, et al. Time to cooling is associated with resuscitation outcomes. Ther Hypothermia Temp Manag. 2016;6(4):208‐217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Lee BK, Jeung KW, Jung YH, et al. Relationship between timing of cooling and outcomes in adult comatose cardiac arrest patients treated with targeted temperature management. Resuscitation. 2017;113:135‐141. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Seule MA, Muroi C, Mink S, et al. Therapeutic hypothermia in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage, refractory intracranial hypertension, or cerebral vasospasm. Neurosurgery. 2009;64(1):86‐92; discussion 92–93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Sadaka F, Veremakis C. Therapeutic hypothermia for the management of intracranial hypertension in severe traumatic brain injury: a systematic review. Brain Inj. 2012;26(7‐8):899‐908. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Stravitz RT, Larsen FS. Therapeutic hypothermia for acute liver failure. Crit Care Med. 2009;37(7 Suppl):S258‐S264. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Schwab S, Schwarz S, Spranger M, et al. Moderate hypothermia in the treatment of patients with severe middle cerebral artery infarction. Stroke. 1998;29(12):2461‐2466. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Kirkegaard H, Søreide E, de Haas I, et al. Targeted temperature management for 48 vs 24 hours and neurologic outcome after out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2017;318(4):341. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Sonder P, Janssens GN, Beishuizen A, et al. Efficacy of different cooling technologies for therapeutic temperature management: a prospective intervention study. Resuscitation. 2018;124:14‐20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Gaieski DF, Band RA, Abella BS, et al. Early goal‐directed hemodynamic optimization combined with therapeutic hypothermia in comatose survivors of out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. 2009;80(4):418‐424. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Ø Tømte, T Drægni, Mangschau A, et al. A comparison of intravascular and surface cooling techniques in comatose cardiac arrest survivors. Crit Care Med. 2011;39(3):443‐449. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Kim KH, Shin SD, Song KJ, et al. Cooling methods of targeted temperature management and neurological recovery after out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest: a nationwide multicenter multi‐level analysis. Resuscitation. 2018;125:56‐65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Kim F, Olsufka M, Longstreth WT, et al. Pilot randomized clinical trial of prehospital induction of mild hypothermia in out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest patients with a rapid infusion of 4 degrees C normal saline. Circulation. 2007;115(24):3064‐3070. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Kliegel A, Losert H, Sterz F, et al. Cold simple intravenous infusions preceding special endovascular cooling for faster induction of mild hypothermia after cardiac arrest–a feasibility study. Resuscitation. 2005;64(3):347‐351. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Moore TM, Callaway CW, Hostler D. Core temperature cooling in healthy volunteers after rapid intravenous infusion of cold and room temperature saline solution. Ann Emerg Med. 2008;51(2):153‐159. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63. Hostler D, Northington WE, Callaway CW. High‐dose diazepam facilitates core cooling during cold saline infusion in healthy volunteers. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2009;34(4):582‐586. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64. Hostler D, Zhou J, Tortorici MA, et al. Mild hypothermia alters midazolam pharmacokinetics in normal healthy volunteers. Drug Metab Dispos. 2010;38(5):781‐788. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65. Callaway CW, Elmer J, Guyette FX, et al. Dexmedetomidine reduces shivering during mild hypothermia in waking subjects. PLoS One. 2015;10(8):e0129709. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66. Paul M, Bougouin W, Dumas F, et al. Comparison of two sedation regimens during targeted temperature management after cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. 2018;128:204‐210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67. Rittenberger JC, Popescu A, Brenner RP, et al. Frequency and timing of nonconvulsive status epilepticus in comatose post‐cardiac arrest subjects treated with hypothermia. Neurocrit Care. 2012;16(1):114‐122. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68. Cloostermans MC, van Meulen FB, Eertman CJ, et al. Continuous electroencephalography monitoring for early prediction of neurological outcome in postanoxic patients after cardiac arrest: a prospective cohort study. Crit Care Med. 2012;40(10):2867‐2875. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69. Coppler PJ, Marill KA, Okonkwo DO, et al. Concordance of brain and core temperature in comatose patients after cardiac arrest. Ther Hypothermia Temp Manag. 2016;6(4):194‐197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70. Robinson J, Charlton J, Seal R, et al. Oesophageal, rectal, axillary, tympanic and pulmonary artery temperatures during cardiac surgery. Can J Anaesth. 1998;45(4):317‐323. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71. Erickson R, Kirklin S. Comparison of ear‐based, bladder, oral, and axillary methods for core temperature measurement. Crit Care Med. 1993;21(10):1528‐1534. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72. Badjatia N, Strongilis E, Gordon E, et al. Metabolic impact of shivering during therapeutic temperature modulation: the Bedside Shivering Assessment Scale. Stroke. 2008;39(12):3242‐3247. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73. Suehiro E, Povlishock JT. Exacerbation of traumatically induced axonal injury by rapid posthypothermic rewarming and attenuation of axonal change by cyclosporin A. J Neurosurg. 2001;94(3):493‐498. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74. Suehiro E, Singleton RH, Stone JR, et al. The immunophilin ligand FK506 attenuates the axonal damage associated with rapid rewarming following posttraumatic hypothermia. Exp Neurol. 2001;172(1):199‐210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75. Suehiro E, Ueda Y, Wei EP, et al. Posttraumatic hypothermia followed by slow rewarming protects the cerebral microcirculation. J Neurotrauma. 2003;20(4):381‐390. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76. Heard KJ, Peberdy MA, Sayre MR, et al. A randomized controlled trial comparing the Arctic Sun to standard cooling for induction of hypothermia after cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. 2010;81(1):9‐14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77. Pichon N, Amiel JB, François B, et al. Efficacy of and tolerance to mild induced hypothermia after out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest using an endovascular cooling system. Crit Care. 2007;11(3):R71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78. Michelson AD, MacGregor H, Barnard MR, et al. Reversible inhibition of human platelet activation by hypothermia in vivo and in vitro. Thromb Haemost. 1994;71(5):633‐640. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79. Reed RL, Bracey AW, Hudson JD, et al. Hypothermia and blood coagulation: dissociation between enzyme activity and clotting factor levels. Circ Shock. 1990;32(2):141‐152. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80. Valeri CR, Feingold H, Cassidy G, et al. Hypothermia‐induced reversible platelet dysfunction. Ann Surg. 1987;205(2):175‐181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81. Jeppesen AN, Hvas A‐M, Duez CHV, et al. Prolonged targeted temperature management compromises thrombin generation: a randomised clinical trial. Resuscitation. 2017;118:126‐132. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82. Stockmann H, Krannich A, Schroeder T, et al. Therapeutic temperature management after cardiac arrest and the risk of bleeding: systematic review and meta‐analysis. Resuscitation. 2014;85(11):1494‐1503. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83. Perbet S, Mongardon N, Dumas F, et al. Early‐onset pneumonia after cardiac arrest. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2011;184(9):1048‐1054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84. Polderman KH, Herold I. Therapeutic hypothermia and controlled normothermia in the intensive care unit: practical considerations, side effects, and cooling methods. Crit Care Med. 2009;37(3):1101‐1120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85. Salinas P, Lopez‐de‐Sa E, Pena‐Conde L, et al. Electrocardiographic changes during induced therapeutic hypothermia in comatose survivors after cardiac arrest. World J Cardiol. 2015;7(7):423‐430. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86. Rhee BJ, Zhang Y, Boddicker KA, et al. Effect of hypothermia on transthoracic defibrillation in a swine model. Resuscitation. 2005;65(1):79‐85. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87. Boddicker KA, Zhang Y, Zimmerman MB, et al. Hypothermia improves defibrillation success and resuscitation outcomes from ventricular fibrillation. Circulation. 2005;111(24):3195‐3201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88. Huynh N, Kloke J, Gu C, et al. The effect of hypothermia “dose” on vasopressor requirements and outcome after cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. 2013;84(2):189‐193. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89. Roberts BW, Kilgannon JH, Chansky ME, et al. Therapeutic hypothermia and vasopressor dependency after cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. 2013;84(3):331‐336. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90. Polderman KH, Peerdeman SM, Girbes AR. Hypophosphatemia and hypomagnesemia induced by cooling in patients with severe head injury. J Neurosurg. 2001;94(5):697‐705. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91. Clifton GL, Miller ER, Choi SC, et al. Fluid thresholds and outcome from severe brain injury. Crit Care Med. 2002;30(4):739‐745. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92. Aibiki M, Kawaguchi S, Maekawa N. Reversible hypophosphatemia during moderate hypothermia therapy for brain‐injured patients. Crit Care Med. 2001;29(9):1726‐1730. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93. Cueni‐Villoz N, Devigili A, Delodder F, et al. Increased blood glucose variability during therapeutic hypothermia and outcome after cardiac arrest. Crit Care Med. 2011;39(10):2225‐2231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94. van den Broek MPH, Groenendaal F, Egberts ACG, et al. Effects of hypothermia on pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics: a systematic review of preclinical and clinical studies. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2010;49(5):277‐294. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95. Tortorici MA, Kochanek PM, Poloyac SM. Effects of hypothermia on drug disposition, metabolism, and response: a focus of hypothermia‐mediated alterations on the cytochrome P450 enzyme system. Crit Care Med. 2007;35(9):2196‐2204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96. Zhou J, Poloyac SM. The effect of therapeutic hypothermia on drug metabolism and response: cellular mechanisms to organ function. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol. 2011;7(7):803‐816. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97. McKenzie N, Williams TA, Tohira H, et al. A systematic review and meta‐analysis of the association between arterial carbon dioxide tension and outcomes after cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. 2017;111:116‐126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98. Buunk G, van der Hoeven JG, Meinders AE, et al. Cerebral vasoconstriction in comatose patients resuscitated from a cardiac arrest? Intensive Care Med. 1996;22(11):1191‐1196. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99. Buunk G, van der Hoeven JG, Meinders AE. Cerebrovascular reactivity in comatose patients resuscitated from a cardiac arrest. Stroke. 1997;28(8):1569‐1573. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100. Jakkula P, Reinikainen M, Hästbacka J, et al. Targeting two different levels of both arterial carbon dioxide and arterial oxygen after cardiac arrest and resuscitation: a randomised pilot trial. Intensive Care Med. 2018;44(12):2112‐2121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101. Aufderheide TP, Lurie KG. Death by hyperventilation: a common and life‐threatening problem during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Crit Care Med. 2004;32(9 Suppl):S345‐S351. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102. Wang C‐H, Chang W‐T, Huang C‐H, et al. The effect of hyperoxia on survival following adult cardiac arrest: a systematic review and meta‐analysis of observational studies. Resuscitation. 2014;85(9):1142‐1148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103. Kilgannon JH, Jones AE, Shapiro NI, et al. Association between arterial hyperoxia following resuscitation from cardiac arrest and in‐hospital mortality. JAMA. 2010;303(21):2165‐2171. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104. Nishizawa H, Kudoh I. Cerebral autoregulation is impaired in patients resuscitated after cardiac arrest. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1996;40(9):1149‐1153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105. Sundgreen C, Larsen FS, Herzog TM, et al. Autoregulation of cerebral blood flow in patients resuscitated from cardiac arrest. Stroke. 2001;32(1):128‐132. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106. van den Brule JMD, van der Hoeven JG, Hoedemaekers CWE. Cerebral perfusion and cerebral autoregulation after cardiac arrest. Biomed Res Int. 2018;2018:4143636. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107. Laurent I, Monchi M, Chiche J‐D, et al. Reversible myocardial dysfunction in survivors of out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;40(12):2110‐2116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108. Ruiz‐Bailén M, Aguayo de Hoyos E, Ruiz‐Navarro S, et al. Reversible myocardial dysfunction after cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Resuscitation. 2005;66(2):175‐181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109. De Backer D, Biston P, Devriendt J, et al. Comparison of dopamine and norepinephrine in the treatment of shock. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(9):779‐789. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110. Yannopoulos D, Bartos JA, Aufderheide TP, et al. The evolving role of the cardiac catheterization laboratory in the management of patients with out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2019;139(12):e530‐e552. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111. Hellenkamp K, Onimischewski S, Kruppa J, et al. Early pneumonia and timing of antibiotic therapy in patients after nontraumatic out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest. Crit Care. 2015;20(1):31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112. Mongardon N, Perbet S, Lemiale V, et al. Infectious complications in out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest patients in the therapeutic hypothermia era*. Crit Care Med. 2011;39(6):1359‐1364. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113. François B, Cariou A, Clere‐Jehl R, et al. Prevention of early ventilator‐associated pneumonia after cardiac arrest. N Engl J Med. 2019;381(19):1831‐1842. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114. Callaway CW, Schmicker R, Kampmeyer M, et al. Receiving hospital characteristics associated with survival after out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. 2010;81(5):524‐529. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115. Carr BG, Kahn JM, Merchant RM, et al. Inter‐hospital variability in post‐cardiac arrest mortality. Resuscitation. 2009;80(1):30‐34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116. Elmer J, Rittenberger JC, Coppler PJ, et al. Long‐term survival benefit from treatment at a specialty center after cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. 2016;108:48‐53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117. Schober A, Sterz F, Laggner AN, et al. Admission of out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest victims to a high volumecardiac arrest center is linked to improved outcome. Resuscitation. 2016;106:42‐48. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118. Elmer J, Callaway CW, Chang C‐CH, et al. Long‐term outcomes of out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest care at regionalized centers. Ann Emerg Med. 2019;73(1):29‐39. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]