Abstract
Purpose
Chemotherapy is a comprehensive therapy for breast cancer; nevertheless, its associated adverse effects are drawing increasing attention with the continuous improvement of the efficacy. The changes in serum lipids of breast cancer patients caused by chemotherapy have been reported by previous studies, whereby the former increase the incidence rate of cardiovascular disorders. However, the variations in the changes of serum lipids with different chemotherapy regimens have seldom been reported.
Methods
From January 2011 to December 2017, 1740 breast cancer patients treated with chemotherapy were recruited at the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University. The chemotherapy regimens included anthracycline-based, taxane-based, and anthracycline-plus-taxane-based regimens, dose-dense and standard-interval regimens. Lipid profiles that contained TG (triglyceride), TC (total cholesterol), HDL-C (high-density lipoprotein cholesterol), LDL-C (low-density lipoprotein cholesterol) and Lpa (lipoprotein a) levels were collected prior to the first, second and last cycles of chemotherapy. The changes of serum lipids with the same or different chemotherapy regimens were analyzed and compared.
Results
It was observed that the levels of TG, TC, LDL-C and Lpa increased significantly while that of HDL-C decreased after adjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients (P<0.05). Besides, dose-dense regimens had more influence in TG and HDL-C and less influence in TC and LDL-C than standard-interval regimens. HDL-C was more sensitive to anthracycline-based regimens than taxane-based regimens. The level of TG with anthracycline-plus-taxane-based regimens was higher than that with only anthracycline-based or taxane-based regimens, and the level of HDL-C with anthracycline-plus-taxane-based regimen showed lower than that with taxane-based regimen.
Conclusion
In summary, this study proposed that dyslipidemia was strongly associated with chemotherapy in Chinese breast cancer patients after operative treatment. Furthermore, the changes in levels of serum lipids varied among patients with different chemotherapy regimens and taxane had less effect on dyslipidemia than anthracycline.
Keywords: breast cancer, serum lipids, dyslipidemia, chemotherapy, treatment
Introduction
Breast cancer is the most generally diagnosed cancer and also the most common cause of cancer-related deaths in women globally.1–3 The mortality rate of breast cancer has decreased dramatically due to the improvements in screening and adjuvant therapies.4 Numerous treatments are channeled into improving both disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in breast cancer patients, among which adjuvant chemotherapy plays an important role.5,6 With the great progress made in the positive effects of chemotherapy, the side effects gradually receive increasing attention, which may also affect the survival and prognosis of breast cancer patients.7 The common side effects of breast cancer chemotherapy include bone marrow suppression, anaphylaxis and gastrointestinal reactions, etc. Meanwhile, cardiac toxicity has also been a long-term problem for patients.8 Many studies have indicated that the levels of blood lipid and lipoprotein in breast cancer patients changed during chemotherapy.9,10 The unbalanced distribution of lipid and lipoprotein has been proved to be the established risk factor for cardiovascular diseases.11,12 Therefore, chemotherapy can promote the occurrence and development of cardiovascular diseases in breast cancer patients by inducing dyslipidemia.
Patients with breast cancer receiving adjuvant chemotherapy had a crucial correlation with cardiovascular disease because dyslipidemia is accompanied by high total cholesterol (TC), triglycerides (TG), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), lipoprotein a (Lpa) and low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C). Xin et al analyzed the serum lipid levels of 394 breast cancer patients before and after receiving adjuvant chemotherapy, and observed that TC, TG and LDL-C levels of patients after chemotherapy showed significantly higher than those before chemotherapy, and HDL-C levels were significantly lower.13 In addition, Grazia et al reported that chemotherapy increased the risk of dyslipidemia in premenopausal and postmenopausal breast cancer patients.14
Several studies had revealed that dyslipidemia could be caused by chemotherapy and increased the risks of breast cancer death, recurrence and metastasis.15,16 Thus, understanding the potentially detrimental effects of chemotherapy on serum lipid levels is critical to enhance the life quality of breast cancer patients in the future, including the improvement of survival, prognosis and reduction of the incidence of complications. However, few studies have been proceeded on the differences in the changes of serum lipids with different chemotherapy regimens in breast cancer patients.17
Therefore, the aim of our study is to investigate the association between serum lipids and chemotherapy in Chinese breast cancer patients, and explore the variations of the changes in different chemotherapy regimens.
Methods
Patients
From January 2011 to December 2017, 1740 patients diagnosed with breast cancer were recruited at the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China, which were selected based on the following eligibility criteria: (1) diagnosed as breast cancer by histopathological examination; (2) stage I–III breast cancer; and (3) treated with surgery followed by chemotherapy. The exclusion criteria were listed for: (1) lack of laboratory data; (2) receiving neo-adjuvant therapy; (3) abnormal cardiopulmonary, liver or kidney function; (4) preexisting primary tumors; (5) patients with related diseases affecting serum lipids; (6) taking related drugs that affect serum lipids; (7) male breast cancer patients. All patients provided informed consent for their clinical data to be reviewed by us. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University and the Helsinki Declaration.
Evaluate Parameters
This study compares the status of lipids and apolipoproteins in 1740 breast cancer patients at different stages in the chemotherapy process. The laboratory parameters relevant to dyslipidemia TC, TG, HDL-C, LDL-C, and Lpa were recorded before chemotherapy, after the first cycle (equal to before the second cycle) and before the last cycle of chemotherapy. The result report was provided by hematology analyzer Sysmex - 800i (Sysmex Corporation, Kobe, Japan). Dyslipidemia was taken into consideration when one of the followings was observed: TC ≥ 5.2 mmol/L, TG ≥ 1.7 mmol/L, LDL-C ≥ 3.4 mmol/L, HDL-C < 1 mmol/L or non-HDL-C ≥ 4.1 mmol/L according to Guidelines for Prevention and Treatment of Dyslipidemia in Chinese Adults in 2016. This non-randomized study also collected other clinical information including age, menopausal status, tumor size, nodal stage, histological grade, hormone receptor status, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), Ki67, molecular subtype and weight. The clinical staging adopted TNM (Tumor Node Metastasis) staging of malignant tumors released by the United States Joint Cancer Committee. Pathological information, including estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), Her-2, and Ki67, were obtained through immunohistochemical (IHC) analysis. Molecular typing was confirmed by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines.
Treatment
Adjuvant chemotherapy regimens and dose were determined in accordance with guidelines of the Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology (CSCO) breast cancer, which included: (1) Epirubicin plus Cyclophosphamide (E: 90 mg/m2, C: 600 mg/m2) every 3 weeks for four cycles; (2) Docetaxel plus Cyclophosphamide (T: 75 mg/m2, C: 600 mg/m2) every 3 weeks for four or six cycles; (3) Epirubicin plus Cyclophosphamide (E: 90 mg/m2, C: 600 mg/m2), followed by paclitaxel (P: 175 mg/m2) every 2 weeks for four cycles; (4) Epirubicin plus Cyclophosphamide (E: 90 mg/m2, C: 600 mg/m2), followed by docetaxel (D: 80 mg/m2) every 3 weeks for four cycles; (5) Docetaxel plus Epirubicin and Cyclophosphamide (T: 75 mg/m2, E: 90 mg/m2, C: 500 mg/m2) every 3 weeks for six cycles. Additionally, there were some other chemotherapy regimens. It was recommended that patients with Her-2 amplification should receive biological targeted therapy with trastuzumab for a full year.
Statistical Analysis
The Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS, Inc, Chicago, IL, USA) software version 22.0 was adopted to analyze the data. Mean and standard deviation (SD) were assessed by performing an independent sample t-test. Chi-square test was conducted to acquire the predictive factors for dyslipidemia from the clinicopathological factors in the univariate analysis. Multivariate binary logistic regression was channeled into identifying the factors that were independently related to dyslipidemia. Median and comparison of levels of serum lipids and apolipoproteins during the same chemotherapy regimens were determined by using random-effects GLS regression. Two-sample Wilcoxon rank-sum (Mann–Whitney) test was used to compare the levels of serum lipids and apolipoproteins in dose-dense with standard-interval chemotherapy regimens. The levels of serum lipids and apolipoproteins among anthracycline-based, taxane-based and anthracycline-plus-taxane-based regimens were compared by using Kruskal–Wallis equality-of-populations rank test. P<0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.
Results
A total of 1740 patients were diagnosed with breast cancer by histopathological examination, which includes 149 patients with EC regimen, 139 patients with TC regimen, 53 with TEC regimen, 534 patients with EC-D regimen and 385 patients with EC-P regimen, and the rest of the patients receiving other chemotherapy regimens. Additionally, 194 patients were treated with Trastuzumab and 32 patients with Capecitabine. The average age of these patients was 48.12±9.43 years (range, 21–78 years). Nine hundred and sixty-three patients had dyslipidemia before chemotherapy. ER of 67.18% patients and HER-2 of 26.55% patients were positive. The characteristics of patients are shown in Table 1.
Table 1.
Baseline Characteristics of the Study Population
| Characteristics | N | % |
|---|---|---|
| Age | ||
| ≤45 | 707 | 40.63 |
| 45–60 | 843 | 48.45 |
| >60 | 190 | 10.92 |
| Menopausal status | ||
| Premenopausal period | 1016 | 58.39 |
| Perimenopausal period | 93 | 5.35 |
| Postmenopausal period | 627 | 36.03 |
| Missing | 4 | 0.23 |
| Tumor size | ||
| T1 | 750 | 43.11 |
| T2 | 798 | 45.86 |
| T3 | 47 | 2.70 |
| Missing | 145 | 8.33 |
| Nodal stage | ||
| N0 | 949 | 54.54 |
| N1 | 429 | 24.66 |
| N2 | 177 | 10.17 |
| N3 | 109 | 6.26 |
| Missing | 76 | 4.37 |
| Histological grade | ||
| I | 20 | 1.15 |
| II | 649 | 37.30 |
| III | 868 | 49.88 |
| Missing | 203 | 11.67 |
| ER | ||
| Positive | 1169 | 67.18 |
| Negative | 480 | 27.59 |
| Missing | 91 | 5.23 |
| PR | ||
| Positive | 990 | 56.90 |
| Negative | 659 | 37.87 |
| Missing | 91 | 5.23 |
| HER-2 | ||
| Positive | 462 | 26.55 |
| Negative | 1153 | 66.27 |
| Missing | 125 | 7.18 |
| Ki67 | ||
| ≤14% | 284 | 16.32 |
| >14% | 1344 | 77.24 |
| Missing | 112 | 6.44 |
| Molecular subtype | ||
| Luminal A | 160 | 9.19 |
| Luminal B | 1006 | 57.82 |
| HER-2 | 181 | 10.40 |
| Triple negative | 266 | 15.29 |
| Missing | 127 | 7.30 |
| Weight (kg) | ||
| ≤60 | 1015 | 58.33 |
| >60 | 709 | 40.75 |
| Missing | 16 | 0.92 |
The relationship between clinicopathological factors and dyslipidemia before chemotherapy is indicated in Tables 2 and 3. In the univariate analysis, age (P<0.05), menopausal status (P<0.05), PR status (P<0.05) and weight (P<0.05) were significantly correlated with the occurrence of dyslipidemia. When age, menopausal status, PR status and weight were included into the multivariate analysis, it was observed that age was remained as an independent predictor of dyslipidemia with odds ratio (OR) of 1.796 (95% CI:1.402–2.302, P<0.05) and 2.976 (95% CI:1.889–4.688, P<0.05), along with menopausal status (OR: 2.143, 95% CI:1.636–2.808, P<0.05) and weight (OR:1.407, 95% CI:1.140–1.737, P<0.05). However, multivariate analysis showed that PR status (P>0.05) had no predictive value for dyslipidemia.
Table 2.
Predictive Factors for Dyslipidemia in Univariate Analyses
| Variables | Total (N) | Normal Group (N) | Dyslipidemia Group (N) |
pa |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age | <0.05 | |||
| ≦45 | 707 | 425 | 282 | |
| 45–60 | 843 | 309 | 534 | |
| >60 | 190 | 43 | 147 | |
| Menopausal status | <0.05 | |||
| Premenopausal period | 1016 | 563 | 453 | |
| Perimenopausal period | 93 | 38 | 55 | |
| Postmenopausal period | 627 | 175 | 452 | |
| Missing | 4 | 1 | 3 | |
| Tumor size | 0.056 | |||
| T1 | 751 | 340 | 411 | |
| T2 | 798 | 332 | 466 | |
| T3 | 47 | 27 | 20 | |
| Missing | 144 | 78 | 66 | |
| Nodal stage | 0.081 | |||
| N0 | 949 | 430 | 519 | |
| N1 | 429 | 169 | 260 | |
| N2 | 177 | 86 | 91 | |
| N3 | 109 | 53 | 56 | |
| Missing | 76 | 39 | 37 | |
| Histological grade | 0.519 | |||
| I | 20 | 11 | 9 | |
| II | 650 | 295 | 355 | |
| III | 867 | 379 | 488 | |
| Missing | 203 | 92 | 111 | |
| ER | 0.077 | |||
| Positive | 1169 | 538 | 631 | |
| Negative | 480 | 198 | 282 | |
| Missing | 91 | 41 | 50 | |
| PR | <0.05 | |||
| Positive | 988 | 472 | 516 | |
| Negative | 661 | 264 | 397 | |
| Missing | 91 | 41 | 50 | |
| HER-2 | 0.319 | |||
| Positive | 463 | 215 | 248 | |
| Negative | 1153 | 504 | 649 | |
| Missing | 124 | 58 | 66 | |
| Ki67 | 0.482 | |||
| ≦14% | 284 | 132 | 152 | |
| >14% | 1344 | 594 | 750 | |
| Missing | 112 | 51 | 61 | |
| Molecular subtype | 0.199 | |||
| Luminal A | 160 | 77 | 83 | |
| Luminal B | 1006 | 459 | 547 | |
| HER-2 | 181 | 74 | 107 | |
| Triple negative | 266 | 106 | 160 | |
| Missing | 127 | 61 | 66 | |
| Weight (kg) | <0.05 | |||
| ≦60 | 1015 | 496 | 519 | |
| >60 | 709 | 272 | 437 | |
| Missing | 16 | 9 | 7 |
Note: aCalculated by chi-square test as univariate analyses.
Table 3.
Predictive Factors for Dyslipidemia in Multivariate Analyses
| Variables | Multivariate OR (95% CI)a | pa |
|---|---|---|
| Age | <0.05 | |
| ≦45 | ||
| 45–60 | 1.796 (1.402–2.302) | <0.05 |
| >60 | 2.976 (1.889–4.688) | <0.05 |
| Menopausal status | <0.05 | |
| Premenopausal period | ||
| Perimenopausal period | 0.229 | |
| Postmenopausal period | 2.143 (1.636–2.808) | <0.05 |
| Missing | ||
| PR | 0.192 | |
| Positive | ||
| Negative | ||
| Missing | ||
| Weight (kg) | <0.05 | |
| ≦60 | ||
| >60 | 1.407(1.140–1.737) | |
| Missing |
Note: aCalculated by multivariate binary logistic regression analysis.
Abbreviations: OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.
The alterations in the levels of serum lipids and apolipoproteins of 1740 patients during chemotherapy are displayed in Figure 1. The levels of TG for the patients receiving chemotherapy gradually increased (P<0.05) and HDL-C gradually decreased (P<0.05) during the treatment (P<0.05). Compared with those before chemotherapy, the levels of TC and LDL-C reduced after the first cycle, but which significantly increased before the last cycle and showed higher (P<0.05). No significant difference was observed in Lpa before and after the first cycle of chemotherapy (P>0.05), but it did increase before the last cycle (P<0.05).
Figure 1.
Changes of levels of serum lipids in 1740 patients during chemotherapy. P<0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. All changes were statistically significant except Lpa prior to first and second, second and last cycles of chemotherapy.
Comparison of the Levels of Serum Lipids in the Same Regimens
Three hundred and eighty-five breast cancer patients accepted the dose-dense chemotherapy regimens (a) with EC-P every 2 weeks and 502 patients received the standard-interval chemotherapy regimens (b) including EC-D every 3 weeks (Figure 2). The TG levels increased (P<0.05) while the HDL-C levels decreased (P<0.05) during the treatment of these two regimens. In the previous regimen, TC, LDL-C and Lpa reduced after the first cycle but increased before the last cycle of chemotherapy (P<0.05); however, no difference was observed between the levels of before chemotherapy and before the last cycle of chemotherapy in LDL-C and Lpa (P>0.05). In the latter regimen, TC, LDL-C and Lpa increased before the last cycle in contrast to those before and after the first cycle (P<0.05).
Figure 2.
Changes of levels of serum lipids during dose-dense (a) and standard-interval (b) chemotherapy. P<0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. All changes were statistically significant except HDL-C prior to second and last, LDL-C and Lpa prior to first and last cycles in dose-dense chemotherapy and TC, LDL-C and Lpa prior to first and second cycles in standard-interval chemotherapy.
Then, the anthracycline-based chemotherapy regimens (A) containing anthracycline were selected, which involved 683 breast cancer patients who received EC and the first four times of the cycles of EC-D. One hundred and thirty-nine patients received the taxane-based chemotherapy regimens (B) containing taxane, which consisted of TC every 3 weeks for four or six cycles. Seven hundred and eighty-one patients obtained the anthracycline-plus-taxane-based chemotherapy regimens (C) containing anthracycline and taxane, which included EC-D without Trastuzumab or Capecitabine, EC-P without Trastuzumab and TEC (Figure 3). It was found that TG gradually increased and HDL-C decreased during the treatment (P<0.05) of these three regimens. Compared with the values before the first cycle of chemotherapy in A, TC, LDL-C and Lpa levels significantly increased before the last cycle (P<0.05). In B, TC, LDL-C and Lpa increased after the first cycle (P<0.05) but no difference was demonstrated between their respective levels after the first cycle and before the last cycle of chemotherapy (P>0.05). In C, TC, LDL-C and Lpa decreased after the first cycle but increased before the last cycle of chemotherapy (P<0.05); however, no statistical difference was revealed between the levels of Lpa before chemotherapy and before the last cycle of chemotherapy (P>0.05).
Figure 3.
Changes of levels of serum lipids during anthracycline-based (A), taxane-based (B) and anthracycline-plus-taxane-based (C) chemotherapy. All changes were statistically significant except TC, LDL-C and Lpa prior to first and second, Lpa prior to second and last cycles in A, HDL-C prior to first and second, TC, LDL-C and Lpa prior to second and last cycles in B, and Lpa prior to first and last cycles in C.
Comparison of the Levels of Serum Lipids in Different Regimens
The levels of serum lipids and apolipoproteins of breast cancer patients treated with dose-dense chemotherapy regimens and standard-interval ones were compared (Figure 4). All data showed that there were no statistical differences between the two chemotherapy regimens before chemotherapy. The level of TG with the standard-interval chemotherapy regimens showed higher than the level with the dose-dense ones after the first cycle of chemotherapy (P<0.05), but the status was reversed before the last cycle (P<0.05). TC, HDL-C and LDL-C with the standard-interval chemotherapy regimens were higher than those with the dose-dense ones after the first and before the last cycles of chemotherapy (P<0.05). No statistical difference in Lpa existed between the two chemotherapy groups (P>0.05).
Figure 4.
Comparison between the dose-dense and standard-interval regimens. P<0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. There was statistical difference in TG-second, TG-last, TC-second, TC-last, HDL-C-second, HDL-C-last, LDL-C-second and LDL-C-last between dose-dense and standard-interval regimens.
The levels of serum lipids and apolipoproteins with anthracycline-based regimens (A), taxane-based regimens (B) and anthracycline-plus-taxane-based regimens (C) were compared, whose results are shown in Figure 5. Comparisons of the levels of serum lipids among the three chemotherapy regimens were made, whose adjusted p-value for significance was 0.008333. No statistical difference was shown in serum lipids and apolipoproteins among the three chemotherapy regimens before chemotherapy (P>0.05). Comparing the serum lipids of A to B, TG showed higher (P<0.008333), but TC and LDL-C were lower after the first cycle (P<0.008333), and HDL-C was also lower after the first and before the last cycles of chemotherapy (P<0.008333). Comparing the serum lipids of A to C, TG demonstrated lower before the last cycle, but TC and LDL-C were higher after the first cycle of chemotherapy (P<0.008333). Comparing the serum lipids of B to C, TG displayed lower and HDL-C was higher after the first and before the last cycles (P<0.008333), TC and LDL-C were higher after the first cycle of chemotherapy (P<0.008333).
Figure 5.
Comparison among anthracycline-based regimens (A), taxane-based regimens (B) and anthracycline-plus-taxane-based regimens (C). The adjusted p-value for significance was 0.008333. There was statistical difference in TG-second, TC-second, HDL-C-second, HDL-C-last and LDL-C-second between A and B, TG-last, TC-second and LDL-C-second between A and C, TG-second, TG-last, TC-second, HDL-C-second, HDL-C-last and LDL-C-second between B and C.
Discussion
The predictive factors of dyslipidemia in breast cancer patients before chemotherapy were founded through univariate and multivariate analysis in the retrospective cohort study. In accordance with previous studies, the age, menopausal status and weight of the patients were closely related to dyslipidemias,18,19 which suggested that breast cancer patients were more prone to have dyslipidemias with the increases of age and weight.20 Furthermore, postmenopausal patients had a higher risk of dyslipidemia than premenopausal and perimenopausal patients.21
Recently, adjuvant chemotherapy has improved the disease-free survival and overall survival of breast cancer patients; however, the detrimental effects caused by chemotherapy remain unclear.22–25 We specifically assessed the changes of serum lipids and apolipoproteins following the administration of chemotherapy in breast cancer patients. When the postoperative patients received chemotherapy, their levels of TC and LDL-C reduced after the first cycle because cancer drugs needed cholesterol depletion to cross the cell membranes.26 However, the TG, TC, LDL-C and Lpa were significantly increased and HDL-C was decreased before the last cycle, which was consistent with previous research results,27,28 and further confirmed that chemotherapy had adverse effects on postoperative serum lipids of breast cancer patients. The mechanism could be as follows: chemotherapy directly led to endothelial dysfunction and changes in cytokines; chemotherapy caused lipid peroxidation by enhancing systemic oxidative stress to affect the function of liver cells; Meanwhile, chemotherapy affected lipid metabolism by changing the plasma adiponectin level resulting in changes in serum lipid levels.29–31 Previous studies had revealed that dyslipidemias could also be triggered by endocrine therapy and lipid-lowering therapy was a very successful strategy to prevent cardiovascular events.32,33 Additionally, dyslipidemias in lung cancer had been proved to increase the activity of tumor cells and reduce their sensitivity to chemotherapy, while its effects on chemotherapy in breast cancer could not be ruled out yet.34 Thus, it is essential to take certain interventional measures against dyslipidemias in the process of breast cancer treatment.
The interval between chemotherapy cycles was regarded as one of the key factors affecting the efficacy of chemotherapy in breast cancer.35 Many studies reported that the efficacy of dose-dense chemotherapy showed better than that of standard-interval chemotherapy, but few studies compared the differences in their effects on serum lipid levels.36,37 Previous studies suggested that dose-dense and standard-interval regimens had a similar incidence of myelosuppression,38 while the results for dyslipidemias were different. After dose-dense chemotherapy, increases in TG and TC, decreases in HDL-C and no significant change in LDL-C and Lpa were observed. TG, TC, LDL-C and Lpa increased but HDL-C reduced after standard-interval chemotherapy. Due to the same number of chemotherapy cycles, the interval between cycles and the total time of standard-interval regimens were longer than that of dose-dense regimens, and the standard-interval regimens included docetaxel and the dose-dense regimens included paclitaxel. Therefore, the use of docetaxel and the extension of chemotherapy time may cause changes in LDL-C and Lpa. Comparing the two regimens, it was found that TC, HDL-C and LDL-C with standard-interval regimens were higher than those with dose-dense ones. TG with standard-interval regimens was higher than that with dose-dense ones after the first cycle of chemotherapy, but lower before the last cycle of chemotherapy. Obviously, the changes of TC and LDL-C increased with the extension of the total time of chemotherapy and the use of docetaxel, and the changes of TG and HDL-C increased with the increase of the frequency of chemotherapy and the use of paclitaxel, which was related to the inactivation of cholesterol biosynthesis pathway following paclitaxel treatment.39 Since there was no difference in drugs, dose and frequency between the two chemotherapy regimens for the first cycle, the difference in serum lipid levels after the first cycle of chemotherapy might be attributed to the deviations from the clinician’s chemotherapy regimen based on the clinicopathological information of the patients. Whether there is an increase of TG, TC and LDL-C or a decrease of HDL-C in elderly, postmenopausal and less tumor-bearing patients after chemotherapy, we need more prospective studies to prove it.
It is well known that anthracycline is the cornerstone of breast cancer chemotherapy; Meanwhile, taxane has been widely adopted in the treatment of breast cancer patients.40–42 Many clinical trials had found that the taxane incorporated into anthracycline-based chemotherapy regimens could prolonge the disease-free survival and overall survival of breast cancer patients.42–44 This study observed that the levels of TG, TC, LDL-C and Lpa in breast cancer patients increased significantly, while the levels of HDL-C obviously decreased after anthracycline-based chemotherapy, which was consistent with previous findings.45 Some studies proposed that anthracyclines affected hepatocytes metabolism of serum lipids and lipoproteins by reducing the efficiency of mitochondrial respiration and the content of cytoplasmic adenosine triphosphate.46 Previous studies confirmed taxanes increased the risk of dyslipidemias by inhibiting TC from entering cells, reducing the level of LDL-C receptor protein and promoting the degradation of HDL-C.47 This study found that TG, TC, LDL-C and Lpa increased rapidly after patients received the first cycle of taxane-based chemotherapy, while HDL-C as a protective factor for cardiovascular disease did not decrease until the last cycle of chemotherapy. However, studies by Panis et al indicated that the levels of HDL-C, LDL-C and lipoprotein in breast cancer patients injected with short-term single-dose paclitaxel in the first cycle of chemotherapy were significantly lower than those without chemotherapy.31 It was believed that this variation could be related to the difference in the time of obtaining blood samples after the first chemotherapy, which was 3 weeks after chemotherapy in this study, whereas it was 3 h after chemotherapy in C. Panis’ study. In addition, this study disclosed that the levels of TG, TC and LDL-C increased significantly and HDL-C obviously decreased in breast cancer patients after anthracycline-plus-taxane-based chemotherapy regimens. This result was basically consistent with the results of Bicakli et al, but they found that although the LDL-C of the patients increased, it did not reach the statistical significance.9 It can be seen that regardless of whether the chemotherapy regimen of breast cancer patients use anthracyclines, taxanes or anthracyclines plus taxanes, abnormalities in serum lipids are almost inevitable. In view of the widespread use of anthracyclines and taxanes in breast cancer chemotherapy, it is conceivable that chemotherapy can lead to dyslipidemias.
In this study, the different effects of anthracycline-based, taxane-based and anthracycline-plus-taxane-based chemotherapy regimens on serum lipids and lipoprotein levels of postoperative breast cancer patients were compared for the first time. In contrast to taxanes, anthracyclines had a greater effect on TG and HDL-C but had a less impact on TC and LDL-C after the first cycle of chemotherapy. Previous studies pointed out that anthracyclines altered TG levels by promoting apoptosis of vascular endothelial cells.48 Except for HDL-C, the other parameters of the two groups were not statistically significant before the last chemotherapy cycle. Anthracyclines were more likely to cause dyslipidemias than taxanes because of their effect on HDL-C.47 Compared with anthracycline-plus-taxane-based regimens, TG with anthracycline-based regimens showed lower before the last cycle of chemotherapy, while TC and LDL-C were higher after the first cycle of chemotherapy. Although the short-term effect of anthracyclines plus taxanes on serum lipids was less than that of anthracyclines, the long-term effect was greater than that of anthracyclines, which could be associated with the greater number of chemotherapy cycles. Considering that there was no difference in drugs, dose and frequency between the two first cycles of chemotherapy, it seemed that TC and LDL-C increased more in elderly patients, postmenopausal patients and patients with low tumor load after chemotherapy, which was consistent with our previous speculation. Compared with the anthracycline-plus-taxane-based regimens, patients with taxane-based regimens indicated lower TG levels and higher HDL-C levels after the first cycle and before the last cycle of chemotherapy, but higher TC and LDL-C levels after the first cycle of chemotherapy. Anthracycline plus taxanes had a greater impact on serum lipids than taxanes.49 It was obvious that anthracyclines plus taxanes were more likely to cause dyslipidemias than anthracyclines, which was more likely to cause dyslipidemias than taxanes. Anthracyclines had a greater effect on TG and HDL-C, while taxanes had a greater effect on TC and LDL-C. Therefore, this result could provide evidence for the selection of lipid-lowering drugs during chemotherapy, and proved that taxanes could be used as the chemotherapy options for patients with high-risk cardiovascular events like hyperlipidemia.
Despite the positive results, the study had some limitations. First of all, as a retrospective study, some relevant influencing factors could not be completely excluded. Secondly, even though the timepoint “after the last chemotherapy” better indicated the effect of chemotherapy on serum lipids, we still selected the timepoint “before the last cycle of chemotherapy” to avoid interference with radiotherapy or endocrine therapy. So our results were still required to be supplemented through rigorous prospective studies. Lastly, our study only evaluated the changes in serum lipids before and during chemotherapy, but lacked the prognostic value of later follow-up. Obviously, the improvement of this part has been carried out.
Conclusion
In conclusion, it was found that chemotherapy resulted in high levels of TG, TC, LDL-C and Lpa and low levels of HDL-C, which could lead to a higher risk of dyslipidemias. Moreover, a significant difference in the changes in levels of serum lipids existed in patients with different chemotherapy regimens. Patients with high TC and LDL-C were more suitable for dose-dense chemotherapy, while patients with high TG and low HDL-C were more suitable for standard-interval one. Furthermore, compared with anthracycline and anthracycline plus taxane regimens, taxane was more suitable for patients with dyslipidemias. As chemotherapy-related side effects are gradually attracting more and more attention, the results can provide guidance for the chemotherapy regimens, as well as the intervention measures and appropriate timing to control the dyslipidemias before and during chemotherapy.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 81572602).
Disclosure
The authors declare no conflict of interests for this work.
References
- 1.DeSantis CE, Ma J, Gaudet MM, et al. Breast cancer statistics, 2019. CA Cancer J Clin. 2019;69:438–451. doi: 10.3322/caac.21583 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL, Ferlay J, Lortet-Tieulent J, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin. 2015;65:87–108. doi: 10.3322/caac.21262 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Hong W, Dong E. The past, present and future of breast cancer research in China. Cancer Lett. 2014;351:1–5. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2014.04.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Sankatsing VDV, van Ravesteyn NT, Heijnsdijk EAM, et al. The effect of population-based mammography screening in Dutch municipalities on breast cancer mortality: 20 years of follow-up. Int J Cancer. 2017;141:671–677. doi: 10.1002/ijc.30754 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Donald A, Berry PD, Kathleen AC, et al., for the Cancer Intervention and Surveillance Modeling Network (CISNET) Collaborators*. Effect of screening and adjuvant therapy on mortality from breast cancer.pdf. The New England. J Med. 2005;353:1784–1792. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Anampa J, Makower D, Sparano JA. Progress in adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer: an overview. BMC Med. 2015;13:195. doi: 10.1186/s12916-015-0439-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Shachar SS, Deal AM, Weinberg M, et al. Body composition as a predictor of toxicity in patients receiving anthracycline and taxane-based chemotherapy for early-stage breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2017;23:3537–3543. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-2266 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Beusterien K, Grinspan J, Kuchuk I, et al. Use of conjoint analysis to assess breast cancer patient preferences for chemotherapy side effects. Oncologist. 2014;19:127–134. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2013-0359 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Bicakli DH, Varol U, Degirmenci M, et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy may contribute to an increased risk for metabolic syndrome in patients with breast cancer. J Oncol Pharm Pract. 2016;22:46–53. doi: 10.1177/1078155214551315 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Rzymowska J. Effect of cytotoxic chemotherapy on serum lipid levels in breast cancer patients.pdf. Pathobiology. 1999;67:129–132. doi: 10.1159/000028062 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Rachel Huxley DP, Sarah Lewington D, Robert C. Cholesterol, coronary heart disease and stroke- a review of published evidence from observational studies and randomized controlled trials.pdf. Semin Vasc Med. 2002;2:315–323. doi: 10.1055/s-2002-35402 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Averina M, Nilssen O, Brenn T, Brox J, Arkhipovsky VL, Kalinin AG. Factors behind the increase in cardiovascular mortality in Russia: apolipoprotein AI and B distribution in the Arkhangelsk study 2000. Clin Chem. 2004;50:346–354. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2003.023853 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Li X, Liu ZL, Wu YT, et al. Status of lipid and lipoprotein in female breast cancer patients at initial diagnosis and during chemotherapy. Lipids Health Dis. 2018;17:91. doi: 10.1186/s12944-018-0745-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Arpino G, De Angelis C, Buono G, et al. Metabolic and anthropometric changes in early breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant therapy. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2015;154:127–132. doi: 10.1007/s10549-015-3586-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Feola A, Ricci S, Kouidhi S, et al. Multifaceted breast cancer: the molecular connection with obesity. J Cell Physiol. 2017;232:69–77. doi: 10.1002/jcp.25475 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Martin LJ, Melnichouk O, Huszti E, et al. Serum lipids, lipoproteins, and risk of breast cancer: a nested case-control study using multiple time points. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015;107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Yeo W, Mo FKF, Pang E, et al. Profiles of lipids, blood pressure and weight changes among premenopausal Chinese breast cancer patients after adjuvant chemotherapy. BMC Womens Health. 2017;17:55. doi: 10.1186/s12905-017-0409-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Bulut T, Demirel F, Metin A. The prevalence of dyslipidemia and associated factors in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 2017;30:181–187. doi: 10.1515/jpem-2016-0111 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Choi Y, Chang Y, Kim BK, et al. Menopausal stages and serum lipid and lipoprotein abnormalities in middle-aged women. Maturitas. 2015;80:399–405. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2014.12.016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Pan L, Yang Z, Wu Y, et al.; China National Survey of Chronic Kidney Disease Working G. The prevalence, awareness, treatment and control of dyslipidemia among adults in China. Atherosclerosis. 2016;248:2–9. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2016.02.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Shilpa S, Shende MVB, apte IC, ViShaKha VM, harShal PN. Study of lipid profile and c reactive protein in pre-and post-menopausal women.pdf. J Clin Diagnostic Res. 2011;5:1544–1547. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Harbeck N. Advances in targeting HER2-positive breast cancer. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2018;30:55–59. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0000000000000431 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Robert Havard NLH. Integrating clinicopathologic and genomic tools in chemotherapy decision-making for early stage breast cancer. Pdf Future Oncol. 2017;13:2507–2510. doi: 10.2217/fon-2017-0452 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Ladwa R, Sanmugarajah J. The feasibility and tolerability of newer chemotherapy regimens in the adjuvant setting in older patients with breast cancer. Breast J. 2016;22:244–246. doi: 10.1111/tbj.12559 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Koga C, Akiyoshi S, Ishida M, Nakamura Y, Ohno S, Tokunaga E. Chemotherapy-induced amenorrhea and the resumption of menstruation in premenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive early breast cancer. Breast Cancer. 2017;24:714–719. doi: 10.1007/s12282-017-0764-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Zhang L, Bennett WF, Zheng T, et al. Effect of cholesterol on cellular uptake of cancer drugs pirarubicin and ellipticine. J Phys Chem B. 2016;120:3148–3156. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.5b12337 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Alexopoulos SP CG, Vaslamatzis M, Avgerinos A, Raptis S. Changes in serum lipids and lipoproteins in cancer patients during chemotherapy.pdf. Cancer Chemother Pharmaco. 1992;30:412–416. doi: 10.1007/BF00689971 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Dieli-Conwright CM, Wong L, Waliany S, Bernstein L, Salehian B, Mortimer JE. An observational study to examine changes in metabolic syndrome components in patients with breast cancer receiving neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy. Cancer. 2016;122:2646–2653. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30104 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Panis C, Herrera A, Aranome AMF, et al. Clinical insights from adiponectin analysis in breast cancer patients reveal its anti-inflammatory properties in non-obese women. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2014;382:190–196. doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2013.09.030 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Vehmanen L, Saarto T, Blomqvist C, Taskinen MR, Elomaa I. Tamoxifen treatment reverses the adverse effects of chemotherapy-induced ovarian failure on serum lipids. Br J Cancer. 2004;91:476–481. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6601979 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Panis C, Binato R, Correa S, et al. Short infusion of paclitaxel imbalances plasmatic lipid metabolism and correlates with cardiac markers of acute damage in patients with breast cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2017;80:469–478. doi: 10.1007/s00280-017-3384-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Hozumi Y, Suemasu K, Takei H, et al. The effect of exemestane, anastrozole, and tamoxifen on lipid profiles in Japanese postmenopausal early breast cancer patients: final results of National Surgical Adjuvant Study BC 04, the TEAM Japan sub-study. Ann Oncol. 2011;22:1777–1782. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdq707 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Parhofer KG. New approaches to address dyslipidemia. Curr Opin Lipidol. 2017;28:452–457. doi: 10.1097/MOL.0000000000000456 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Wu Y, Si R, Tang H, et al. Cholesterol reduces the sensitivity to platinum-based chemotherapy via upregulating ABCG2 in lung adenocarcinoma. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2015;457:614–620. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2015.01.035 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Matikas A, Foukakis T, Bergh J. Dose intense, dose dense and tailored dose adjuvant chemotherapy for early breast cancer: an evolution of concepts. Acta Oncol. 2017;56:1143–1151. doi: 10.1080/0284186X.2017.1329593 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Foukakis T, von Minckwitz G, Bengtsson NO, et al.; Swedish Breast Cancer Group tGBG, the Austrian B and Colorectal Cancer Study G. Effect of tailored dose-dense chemotherapy vs standard 3-weekly adjuvant chemotherapy on recurrence-free survival among women with high-risk early breast cancer: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2016;316:1888–1896. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.15865 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Bonilla L, Ben-Aharon I, Vidal L, Gafter-Gvili A, Leibovici L, Stemmer SM. Dose-dense chemotherapy in nonmetastatic breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010;102:1845–1854. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djq409 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Delarue R, Tilly H, Mounier N, et al. Dose-dense rituximab-CHOP compared with standard rituximab-CHOP in elderly patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (the LNH03-6B study): a randomised Phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2013;14:525–533. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70122-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Cheng-Zhi Xu R-JS, Dong C, Yi-Yuan S, Qing-Wei W, Tao W, Pei-Hua W. Potential biomarkers for paclitaxel sensitivity in hypopharynx cancer cell.pdf. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2013;6:2745–2756. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Turner N, Biganzoli L, Di Leo A. Continued value of adjuvant anthracyclines as treatment for early breast cancer. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16:e362–e369. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00079-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Gianni L, Norton L, Wolmark N, Suter TM, Bonadonna G, Hortobagyi GN. Role of anthracyclines in the treatment of early breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:4798–4808. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.21.4791 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Tan QW, Luo T, Zheng H, et al. Weekly taxane-anthracycline combination regimen versus tri-weekly anthracycline-based regimen for the treatment of locally advanced breast cancer: a randomized controlled trial. Chin J Cancer. 2017;36:27. doi: 10.1186/s40880-017-0196-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Mamounas EP, Bryant J, Lembersky B, et al. Paclitaxel after doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide as adjuvant chemotherapy for node-positive breast cancer: results from NSABP B-28. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:3686–3696. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.10.517 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Mackey JR, Martin M, Pienkowski T, et al. Adjuvant docetaxel, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide in node-positive breast cancer: 10-year follow-up of the phase 3 randomised BCIRG 001 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2013;14:72–80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Kalabova H, Melichar B, Ungermann L, et al. Intima-media thickness, myocardial perfusion and laboratory risk factors of atherosclerosis in patients with breast cancer treated with anthracycline-based chemotherapy. Med Oncol. 2011;28:1281–1287. doi: 10.1007/s12032-010-9593-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Hiona A, Lee AS, Nagendran J, et al. Pretreatment with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor improves doxorubicin-induced cardiomyopathy via preservation of mitochondrial function. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011;142:396–403 e393. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2010.07.097 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Sharma M, Tuaine J, McLaren B, et al. Chemotherapy agents alter plasma lipids in breast cancer patients and show differential effects on lipid metabolism genes in liver cells. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0148049. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0148049 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Jenei Z, Bardi E, Magyar MT, Horvath A, Paragh G, Kiss C. Anthracycline causes impaired vascular endothelial function and aortic stiffness in long term survivors of childhood cancer. Pathol Oncol Res. 2013;19:375–383. doi: 10.1007/s12253-012-9589-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Kim SB, Kok YT, Thuan TV, Chao TY, Shen ZZ. Safety results of docetaxel-(taxotere (R))-based chemotherapy in early breast cancer patients of asia-pacific region: asia-pacific breast initiative II. J Breast Cancer. 2015;18:356–364. doi: 10.4048/jbc.2015.18.4.356 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]