Skip to main content
Access Microbiology logoLink to Access Microbiology
. 2020 Mar 16;2(6):acmi000114. doi: 10.1099/acmi.0.000114

Does salinity affect lifestyle switching in the plant pathogen Fusarium solani?

Louise Eydoux 1,2,*, Emily C Farrer 1
PMCID: PMC7494197  PMID: 32974582

Abstract

Symbiotic microbes that live within plant hosts can exhibit a range in function from mutualistic to pathogenic, but the reason for this lifestyle switching remains largely unknown. Here we tested whether environmental stress, specifically salinity, is a factor that can trigger lifestyle switching in a fungus mainly known as a pathogen, Fusarium solani. F. solani was isolated from roots of Phragmites australis (common reed) in saline coastal marshes of Louisiana, USA, and we used Oryza sativa (rice) as a model organism from wetland environments to test the symbiont lifestyle. We plated rice seeds on control plates or plates with F. solani at three levels of salinity (0, 8 and 16 p.p.t.), then assessed germination and seedling growth after 20 days. Salinity strongly reduced percentage germination, slowed the timing of germination and reduced growth of rice. F. solani slowed germination, and it also caused a minor increase in root growth at medium salinity and a minor decrease in root growth at high salinity. Overall, despite being a common pathogen in other crop species (peas, beans, potatoes and many types of cucurbits), we found little evidence that F. solani has a strong pathogenic lifestyle in rice and we found weak evidence that pathogenicity may increase slightly with elevated salinity. These results have implications for both crops and native plant health in the future as soil salinization increases worldwide.

Keywords: endophytes, mutualism, salinity stress, rice, Oryza sativa

Introduction

Symbiotic microbes that live within plant hosts are often classified as mutualistic, parasitic or pathogenic, but these strict categories belie the dynamic nature of plant–microbe interactions [1]. It is becoming increasingly recognized that microbes can exhibit a range in function from mutualistic to pathogenic/parasitic [2–4]; this change in the nature of the interaction is known as lifestyle switching. However, we still lack many case studies demonstrating lifestyle switching in different microbial taxa, and the underlying causes of lifestyle switching remain largely untested.

Environmental variability is one factor that has been found to cause a lifestyle switch in microbial symbionts. It is well known that mycorrhizal fungi often experience a switch from mutualistic at low soil nutrient levels to parasitic in fertilized soils [2]. The dark septate endophyte Periconia macrospinos also shifts from mutualistic to parasitic with increasing shade [4]. These switches in lifestyle are probably triggered by the nutritional costs and benefits of the fungi for the plant; when plants have ample nutrients or low carbon the benefits of the fungi do not outweigh the costs. In other cases, the lifestyle switching may not depend on plant nutritional status. For example, the mutualistic effect of the fungus Curvularia has been found to increase with thermal stress [5]. In addition, the fungus Diplodia mutila switches from symbiotic to pathogenic in high light conditions due to light-induced toxin production [6].

Here we test whether salinity can induce lifestyle switching in a fungus isolated from a saltmarsh in Louisiana, USA. Salinity stress is highly important to both natural and agricultural systems. In natural systems, in particular, salinity stress is predicted to increase in the future with sea-level rise and an increase in hurricanes and storms that cause saltwater intrusion into freshwater and brackish areas. Microbial symbionts are well known to promote salinity tolerance of the plant host [7–10]. On the other hand, weakened plant condition due to salinity stress may allow pathogens to express more virulent lifesyles [11]. We isolated the common pathogen Fusarium solani from asymptomatic Phragmites australis (common reed) plants from a Louisiana saltmarsh. F. solani is known for its pathogenicity in many crop systems including peas, beans, potatoes and curbutis [12, 13]. We use Oryza sativa (rice) as a model plant from wetland environments [7] to test the effect of salinity on symbiont lifestyle switching.

Methods

Isolation and identification of symbiont

The fungal symbiont was isolated from Phragmites australis (common reed) growing in a saltmarsh at the Louisiana Marine Consortium (LUMCON, 29.25° N 90.66° W), in the Louisiana Gulf coast. It was identified with Sanger sequencing of the ITS–LSU region with primers ITS1F/LR3 [14], with a 99.82 % match to F. solani in NCBI blast (GenBank accession number MN644607). The isolate was vouchered and archived in the Farrer Lab at Tulane University (culture collection accession number 203) and was regrown from voucher for this experiment.

The fungal isolate was plated on Malt Extract Agar (MEA - 10g of Difco Malt Extract, 10g of Fisherbrand Agar Powder and 500mL of DI water) and incubated at 26 °C for 10 days. Then it was plated on five plates each of MEA agar amended with a certain amount of NaCl (0 as low salinity, 8 g l–1 as medium salinity, 16 g l–1 as high salinity) (15 plates in total). We chose these salinities because they represent realistic conditions in coastal marshes: low represents freshwater marsh (0 p.p.t.), medium represents brackish marsh (8 p.p.t.) and high represents saltmarsh (16 p.p.t.) [15]. These cultures were allowed to grow for 20 days until the fungus covered the plate.

Symbiont inoculation and plant growth

Rice (O. sativa L., variety Rex, purchased from Seed Ranch) was chosen as a model organism from wetland systems that represents how the host Phragmites australis may respond to inoculation. Phragmites australis seed from populations in Louisiana are often sterile (E. C. Farrer, unpublished data), and it is difficult to remove their native seed-borne microbes [16]. Phragmites australis and rice have similar responses in extreme conditions (including against pollutants and anoxic conditions) [17, 18], and rice has been used as a model organism in other studies testing the microbial effects on Phragmites australis [16], making rice an appropriate model organism in this case.

To surface-sterilize rice seeds, they were soaked in an 95 % ethanol solution for 3 min, dipped in 0.825 % sodium hypochlorite solution for 30 min and then rinsed with sterile water. More stringent sterilization procedures resulted in seed inviability. Some seeds were pressed on MEA agar and incubated (26 °C) for 1 week. As nothing grew, it confirmed the lack of fungi and bacteria on the surface of seeds.

To inoculate rice seeds with the symbiont, nine surface-sterilized seeds were placed on each culture plate containing the fungus (45 seeds per salinity level, 135 seeds in total). As a control, nine surface-sterilized seeds were placed on plates without the fungus as well (45 seeds per salinty level, 135 seeds in total) [19]. Plates were then placed in a growth chamber (40 % humidity, 12 h daily light exposure, 24 °C). Each day, seeds were checked and germination rates were documented. They were left to grow for a period of 20 days. Plants in vitro were then collected and the lengths of the stem and the longest root were recorded.

While seeds were successfully surface-sterilized (as shown above), the experiment found that they actually contained a seed endophyte. An unidentified fungus was present growing on the control (non-Fusarium) plates at the end of the experiment. As this seed endophyte was present in all seeds (all seeds in the control plates had colonies growing near them), we do not believe this detracts from our experimental results because all seeds had the same starting conditions prior to plating (see Discussion).

To determine the effect of Fusarium on germination, we calculated two variables: germination after 20 days and time to 10 % germination. We used a logistic regression (function glm) with a type III ANOVA in R [20] to test the effect of the presence of Fusarium, salinity level and their interaction on germination after 20 days. We used a linear model accounting for heterogeneous variances (function gls in package nlme) with type III ANOVA to test the effect of Fusarium, salinity level and their interaction on time to 10 % germination.

To test the effect of Fusarium, salinity and their interaction on stem and root length, we used linear models accounting for heterogeneous variances (function gls) and a type III ANOVA. We then used post-hoc tests in the multcomp package to determine which treatments were significantly different from one another.

Results

Germination

Salinity strongly reduced germination, with 31.1 % germination at high salinity versus 91.1 % at medium and 93.3 % at low salinity (Fig. 1, χ2=105.1, P<0.001). There was a nearly significant trend that Fusarium affected per cent germination differently in the different salinity treatments, suggesting lifestyle switching (χ2=6.0, P=0.0503): Fusarium reduced per cent germination most at medium salinity (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Germination over time at low (blue), medium (green) and high (red) salinity, without Fusarium (solid lines) and with Fusarium (dashed lines). We used 270 seeds in total, 45 per line (nine seeds per plate, five plates per line). Statistical results shown are from a logistic regression: †P<0.1, *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001, NS non-significant.

Seeds at higher salinity germinated more slowly (Fig. 2, F 2,24=16.8, P<0.001), and the presence of Fusarium also slowed the speed of germination (Fig. 2, F 1,24=4.32, P=0.049), but there was no evidence of lifestyle switching.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

The effect of salinity and Fusarium solani on the time (days) it took for 10 % of the seeds to germinate. Error bars represent +/- 1 standard error of the mean. Statistical results shown are from an ANOVA: †P<0.1, *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001, NS non-significant.

Plant growth

Salinity had strong negative effects on stem length (F 2,264=290.2, P<0.001) and root length (F 2,251=173.2, P<0.001) (Fig. 3). Fusarium did not significantly affect stem length, but for root length the effect of Fusarium depended on salinity level, indicating lifestyle switching (significant Fusarium × salinity interaction, F 2,251=4.86, P=0.009): Fusarium had a positive effect on root length at medium salinity and a negative effect at high salinity (Fig. 3b).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

The effect of salinity and Fusarium solani on seedling stem length (a) and root length (b). Error bars represent +/- 1 standard error of the mean. Statistical results shown are from ANOVAs: †P<0.1, *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001, NS non-significant. Letters above the bars indicate significant differences among treatments based on a Tukey post hoc test (alpha=0.05).

Discussion

This study reports on the effect of salinity on the lifestyle of F. solani, a fungus mainly known as a plant pathogen, which was isolated from the roots of a wetland plant (Phragmites australis) in Louisiana. Seeds of O. sativa, a model wetland plant, were inoculated with this fungus. We show that, surprisingly, F. solani does not seem to have strong pathogenic effects across differents levels of salinity. It does slow germination, and it shows weak evidence of lifestyle switching, such that it is a weak mutualist promoting root growth at medium salinity, and a weak pathogen at high salinity.

Effect of salinity on germination and growth of rice seeds

Salinity is a well-known stressor of plants. The ionic and osmotic stress as well as the associated reduction in water and nutrient availability can result in stunted growth and reduced yield [21] and inhibition of root development and germination of seeds [22–24]. Therefore, it is not surprising that, in our experiment, salinity reduced germination by 67 %, slowed time to germination, and strongly reduced both stem and root growth. Because soil salinzation is currently affecting large tracts of both natural and agricultural areas and its impacts are projected to increase steeply in the future [25–27], it is important to assess whether microbial symbionts may ameliorate or exacerbate these detrimental effects of salinity.

Effect of Fusarium on germination and growth and evidence for lifestyle switching

Despite the fact that F. solani is known be a virulent pathogen in many crop species [28, 29], we found little evidence that it was highly pathogenic in rice. The only consistent negative effect it had on rice across all salinity treatments was that it slowed the germination rate of rice seeds. While F. solani has been isolated from a large number of grasses, it has been suggested that it is not pathogenic in grasses [30]; however, it has been shown to be highly virulant to ryegrass (Lolium) [31, 32].

We detected weak evidence of lifestyle switching in F. solani in rice. F. solani had no effect on root growth at low salinity, promoted root growth under conditions of medium salinity and inhibited growth at high salinity. There was also a nearly significant trend that it reduced germination rate at medium salinity, but not at low or high salinity. Endophytes, including Fusarium spp., have been found to confer salinity tolerance to rice plants grown under moderate to high salinity [33]. Furthermore, consistent with our results, one Fusarium species has been shown to be most pathogenic to maize under stressful conditions [11], suggesting that high-salinity conditions may trigger pathogenicity of F. solani in rice.

Limitations

One important limitation of this study was that while the rice seeds used were surface-sterilized, they were found to contain an endophyte. The endophyte was observed growing out of all rice seeds plated on control (non-Fusarium) plates. It was not observed growing in the Fusarium plates, probably because Fusarium itself was so dense on those plates, but we assume that the seeds contained the endophyte because it was so prevalent in the control plates and because all seeds came from the same batch. We do not think that the presence of the endophyte detracts from our experiment, because seeds in both treatments were infected with the endophyte and thus were consistent. Because this endophyte was naturally present in the seeds, our study actually might be quite biologically relevant in terms of testing how F. solani affects rice plants that are typically used for food production (which are not endophyte-free). However, this means that our ‘controls’ measure the germination and growth of rice with the endophyte, and our ‘Fusarium’ treatment represents germination and growth with both the endophyte and Fusarium. This result can be used to inform future work with commercial rice seeds: methods to remove seed endophytes, such as soaking seeds in fungicide, should be applied.

In conclusion, our study shows that salinity stress can cause lifestyle switching of F. solani in rice: it ranged from having no effect at low salinity, a positive growth effect at medium salinity, to a negative effect at high salinity. As endophytes play a key role for stress adaptation of plants in both natural and agricultural systems [8–10, 34], it is critical to understand which environmental conditions may trigger an endophytic lifestyle switch. We recommend that future research focuses on understanding the effect of salinity on lifestyle switching in F. solani in terrestrial crops, as their responses may be different from those observed here. Furthermore, endophytes are one potential tool that can be developed to promote plant growth and stress tolerance in soil that is increasingly affected by salinization [8, 33], and thus more research is necessary to understand how their effects on plants might shift over salinity gradients.

Funding information

Funding was provided by the Louisiana State Board of Regents grant LEQSF(2017–20)-RD-A-14.

Acknowledgements

We thank Danielle Kulick and Hannah Newsom for collection and isolation of F. soliani, and we thank Susannah Halbrook and Carolyn Schroeder for help with laboratory work.

Author contributions

L.E. and E.F. conceptualized the study design. L.E. carried out the investigation, performed data analysis, and wrote the manuscript. E.F. revised and edited the manuscript.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

Footnotes

Abbreviations: ANOVA, analysis of variance; BLAST, Basic Local Alignment Search Tool; DI, deionized; ITS, internal transcribed spacer; LSU, large subunit; LUMCON, Louisiana Marine Consortium; MEA, malt extract agar; NCBI, National Center for Biotechnology Information; NS, non-significant.

Repositories: GenBank accession number MN644607.

References

  • 1.Newton AC, Fitt BDL, Atkins SD, Walters DR, Daniell TJ. Pathogenesis, parasitism and mutualism in the trophic space of microbe–plant interactions. Trends Microbiol. 2010;18:365–373. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2010.06.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Johnson NC, Graham JH, Smith FA. Functioning of mycorrhizal associations along the mutualism-parasitism continuum. New Phytol. 1997;135:575–585. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-8137.1997.00729.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Redman RS, Dunigan DD, Rodriguez RJ. Fungal symbiosis from mutualism to parasitism: who controls the outcome, host or invader? New Phytologist. 2001;151:705–716. doi: 10.1046/j.0028-646x.2001.00210.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Mandyam KG, Jumpponen A. Mutualism-parasitism paradigm synthesized from results of root-endophyte models. Front Microbiol. 2014;5:776. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00776. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Redman RS, Sheehan KB, Stout RG, Rodriguez RJ, Henson JM. Thermotolerance generated by plant/fungal symbiosis. Science. 2002;298:1581. doi: 10.1126/science.1072191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Álvarez-Loayza P, White JF, Torres MS, Balslev H, Kristiansen T, et al. Light converts endosymbiotic fungus to pathogen, influencing seedling survival and Niche-Space filling of a common tropical tree, Iriartea deltoidea. PLoS One. 2011;6:16386. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0016386. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Soares MA, Li H-Y, Kowalski KP, Bergen M, Torres MS, et al. Evaluation of the functional roles of fungal endophytes of Phragmites australis from high saline and low saline habitats. Biol Invasions. 2016;18:2689. doi: 10.1007/s10530-016-1160-z. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Rodriguez RJ, Henson J, Van Volkenburgh E, Hoy M, Wright L, et al. Stress tolerance in plants via habitat-adapted symbiosis. ISME J. 2008;2:404–416. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2007.106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Waller F, Achatz B, Baltruschat H, Fodor J, Becker K, et al. The endophytic fungus Piriformospora indica reprograms barley to salt-stress tolerance, disease resistance, and higher yield. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102:13386–13391. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0504423102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Lata R, Chowdhury S, Gond SK, White JF. Induction of abiotic stress tolerance in plants by endophytic microbes. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2018;66:268–276. doi: 10.1111/lam.12855. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Kuldau GA, Yates IE. Evidence for Fusarium endophytes in cultivated and wild plants. In: Bacon CW, White JF, editors. Microbial Endophytes. New York: Marcel Dekker, Basel Pages; 2000. pp. 85–120. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Rupe JC. Frequency and pathogenicity of Fusarium solani recovered from soybeans with sudden death syndrome. Plant Dis. 1989;73:581–584. doi: 10.1094/PD-73-0581. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Chakraborty U, Chakraborty BN. Interaction of Rhizobium leguminosarum and Fusarium solani f.sp. pisi on pea affecting disease development and phytoalexin production. Can J Bot. 1989;67:1698–1701. doi: 10.1139/b89-214. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Higgins KL, Coley PD, Kursar TA, Arnold AE. Culturing and direct PCR suggest prevalent host generalism among diverse fungal endophytes of tropical forest grasses. Mycologia. 2011;103:247–260. doi: 10.3852/09-158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Keddy PA. Water, Earth, Fire. Xlibris: Loiusiana’s Natural Heritage; 2008. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Fischer MS, Rodriguez RJ. Fungal endophytes of invasive Phagramites australis populations vary in species composition and fungicide susceptibility. Symbiosis. 2013;61:55–62. doi: 10.1007/s13199-013-0261-z. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Chu WK, Wong MH, Zhang J, Accumulation ZJ. Accumulation, distribution and transformation of DDT and PCBs by Phragmites australis and Oryza sativa L.: I. whole plant study. Environ Geochem Health. 2006;28:159–168. doi: 10.1007/s10653-005-9027-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Armstrong J, Armstrong W, Rice AW. Rice and Phragmites: effects of organic acids on growth, root permeability, and radial oxygen loss to the rhizosphere. Am J Bot. 2001;88:1359–1370. doi: 10.2307/3558443. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Billingsley Tobias T, Farrer EC, Rosales A, Sinsabaugh RL, Suding KN, et al. Seed-associated fungi in the alpine tundra: both mutualists and pathogens could impact plant recruitment. Fungal Ecol. 2017;30:10–18. doi: 10.1016/j.funeco.2017.08.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.R Core Team R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R foundation for statistical computing. 2019.
  • 21.Todaka D, Shinozaki K, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K. Recent advances in the dissection of drought-stress regulatory networks and strategies for development of drought-tolerant transgenic rice plants. Front Plant Sci. 2015;6:84. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2015.00084. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Smith AP, Chen D, Chalk PM. N2 fixation by faba bean (Vicia faba L.) in a gypsum-amended sodic soil. Biol Fertil Soils. 2009;45:329–333. doi: 10.1007/s00374-008-0347-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Läuchli A, Grattan S. plant growth and development under salinity stress. In: Jenks MA, Hasegawa PM, Jain SM, editors. Advances in Molecular Breeding Toward Drought and Salt Tolerant Crops. Dordrecht: Springer; 2007. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Flowers TS, Yeo AR. Effects of Salinity on Plant Growth and Crop Yields. In: Cherry JH, editor. Environmental Stress in Plants. Vol. 19. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer; 1989. editor. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Shahid SA. Developments in soil salinity assessment, modeling, mapping, and monitoring from regional to submicroscopic scales. In: Shahid SA, Adbdelfattah MA, Taha FK, editors. Developments in Soil Salinity Assessment and Reclamation: Innovative Thinking and Use of Marginal Soil and Water Resources in Irrigated Agriculture. Dordrecht: Springer; 2013. pp. 3–44. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Herbert ER, Boon P, Burgin AJ, Neubauer SC, Franklin RB, et al. A global perspective on wetland salinization: ecological consequences of a growing threat to freshwater wetlands. Ecosphere. 2015;6:art206. doi: 10.1890/ES14-00534.1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Smith P, House JI, Bustamante M, Sobocká J, Harper R, et al. Global change pressures on soils from land use and management. Glob Chang Biol. 2016;22:1008–1028. doi: 10.1111/gcb.13068. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Zargar MY, Beigh GM. Biocontrol of fusarium root rot in the common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) by using symbiotic glomus mosseae and Rhizobium leguminosarum . Microb Ecol. 1997;34:74–80. doi: 10.1007/s002489900036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Lozovaya VV, Lygin AV, Zernova OV, Li S, Hartman GL, et al. Isoflavonoid accumulation in soybean hairy roots upon treatment with Fusarium solani. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2004;42:671–679. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2004.06.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Siti Nordahliawate MS, Azliza N, I, Salleh B. Distribution and diversity of Fusarium species associated with grasses in ten states throughout Peninsular Malaysia. Biotropica. 2009;16:55–64. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Falloon RE. Fungi pathogenic to ryegrass seedlings. Plant Soil. 1985;86:79–86. doi: 10.1007/BF02185027. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Tian P, Nan Z, Li C, Spangenberg G. Effect of the endophyte Neotyphodium lolii on susceptibility and host physiological response of perennial ryegrass to fungal pathogens. Eur J Plant Pathol. 2008;122:593–602. doi: 10.1007/s10658-008-9329-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Redman RS, Kim YO, Woodward CJDA, Greer C, Espino L, et al. Increased fitness of rice plants to abiotic stress via habitat adapted symbiosis: a strategy for mitigating impacts of climate change. PLoS One. 2011;6:14823. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0014823. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.González-Teuber M, Urzúa A, Plaza P, Bascuñán-Godoy L, et al. Effects of root endophytic fungi on response of Chenopodium quinoa to drought stress. Plant Ecol. 2018;219:231–240. doi: 10.1007/s11258-017-0791-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Access Microbiology are provided here courtesy of Microbiology Society

RESOURCES