Skip to main content
Data in Brief logoLink to Data in Brief
. 2020 Sep 5;32:106277. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2020.106277

Data on attitudes, religious perspectives, and practices towards COVID-19 among Indonesian residents: a quick online cross-sectional survey

Zulvikar Syambani Ulhaq 1,, Risma Aprinda Kristanti 1, Achmad Arief Hidayatullah 1, Lailia Nur Rachma 1, Nurlaili Susanti 1, Aulanni'am Aulanni'am 2,
PMCID: PMC7494484  PMID: 32984470

Abstract

Although previously large-scale social restrictions were implemented by the Indonesian government, the total number of coronavirus cases is overcome China in the global ranking per July 18th, 2020, implying a higher infection rate among Indonesian residents. The surge of new coronavirus cases started since the loosening of large-scale social restrictions, thereby implicating that public gathering (including religious gathering) evidently increases transmission [1]. It has been reported that Indonesia's coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) mortality rate is the second-highest among Southeast Asian Nations, which may be associated with several health determinants, including biochemical factors and health comorbidity [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7]. Because people's adherence to control measures is affected by their attitudes, religious perspectives, and practices (ARP) towards COVID-19. Hence, the information regarding Indonesian's ARP towards COVID-19 post-large-scale social restrictions is required. The data were collected via an online questionnaire, including demographic information (7 items), attitude and practice (5 items), and religious perspective and practice (5 items), from July 11 – 18, 2020, collecting a total of 1,345 respondents. Although our data collection did not provide other precautionary measures (e.g., adequate ventilation). It is notable that most of the religious venues are having a close ventilation system. Hence, this may contribute to the propagation of SARS-CoV-2 transmission [8]. Altogether, these data will help in determining non-health-related factors to prevent the spread of COVID-19.

Keywords: Survey data, Online questionnaire, Cross-sectional, COVID-19, Indonesian residents, Attitude, Religious perspective, Practice

Specifications Table

Subject Public health
Specific subject area Health psychology, Social psychology
Type of data Primary data, tables
How data were acquired Data were collated utilizing an online survey platform (Google forms)
Data format Raw and analyzed
Parameters for data collection The survey data was obtained from 1,354 respondents of Indonesian residents with internet access.
Description of data collection The data was conducted through an online questionnaire. Relying on the authors’ network, one-page recruitment information was posted/reposted via Whatsapp.
Data source location Region: Asia; Country: Indonesia
Data accessibility Data is accessible at Mendeley Repository https://data.mendeley.com/datasets/nswtwm7j8k/1

Value of Data

  • This data describes the attitude, religious perspective, and practice among Indonesian residents toward COVID-19.

  • This data is useful for researchers who want to compare similar studies regarding attitude, religious perspective, and practice toward COVID-19 in the different populations.

  • This data may help the leaders and policymakers to evaluate and prevent non-health-related factors associated with the spread of COVID-19.

1. Data Description

A total of 1,354 participants completed the questionnaire on attitude, religious perspective, and practice among Indonesian residents toward COVID-19 (Table 1), which then was divided according to demographic characteristics (Table 2). The detailed responses on attitude, religious perspective, and practice toward COVID-19 by participants are presented in Table 34. Factors associated with attitude, religious perspective, and practice toward COVID-19 are depicted in Table 5.

Table 1.

Questionnaire of attitude, religious perspective, and practice towards COVID-19

Questions Options
Attitude and practice
A1. Do you think physical distancing effectively cut the spread of SARS-CoV-2 infection? Yes, not sure, no
A2. Do you feel anxious about getting infected with SARS-CoV-2? Yes, not sure, no
A3. Do you think it is necessary to perform more radical control such as “comprehensive large-scale social restriction or lockdown” one more time as the new cases growing rapidly in the last few days? Yes, not sure, no
AP1. Have you applied health protocol regarding COVID-19 prevention (worn mask, washed hands) when you were outside home and in a crowded place? Always, occasionally, never
AP2. Have you applied health protocol regarding COVID-19 prevention (worn mask, washed hands) when you were home after traveling/working outside? Always, occasionally, never
Religious perspective and practice
R1. Do you think it is possible to pray and gather in the place of worship during the pandemic? Yes, not sure, no
R2. Are the place of worship conducted COVID-19 prevention control correctly? Yes, not sure, no
R3. Does social distancing in the place of worship make you feel safe from SARS-CoV-2 infection? Yes, not sure, no
RP1. In the recent days, have you prayed in the place of worship other than in your home? Yes, no
RP2. How often did you pray and gather in the place of worship during “new normal or post large-scale social restrictions” was implemented? Always, occasionally, never

Table 2.

Demographic characteristics of participants (n = 1,354)

Characteristics Number of participants (%)
Gender Male 368 (27.18)
Female 986 (72.82)
Age group (years) < 30 939 (69.35)
≥ 30 415 (30.65)
Last education High school 437 (32.27)
Associate degree 222 (16.40)
Bachelor degree 499 (36.85)
Master degree 149 (11.00)
Doctoral degree 47 (3.48)
Majors of current education or major of education Medicine related science 1,044 (77.10)
Science and technology 195 (14.40)
Social science and humanities 115 (8.50)
Occupation Students 664 (49.03)
Teachers 168 (12.41)
Health practitioners 382 (28.21)
Government and administration related job 33 (2.89)
Others 107 (7.90)
Religion Islam 1,167 (86.19)
Protestantism 89 (6.57)
Roman Catholicism 55 (4.06)
Hinduism 33 (2.44)
Buddhism 9 (0.66)
Confucianism 1 (0.08)
Place of current residence City 943 (69.65)
Rural 411 (30.35)

Table 3.

Attitude and practice towards COVID-19 by demographic variables*

Characteristic
Attitudes and practice, n (%)
A1: physical distancing cut the spread of SARS-CoV-2
A2: feeling anxious being infected with SARS-CoV-2
A3: large-scale social restriction need to be re-implemented
AP1: COVID-19 prevention in a crowded place
AP2: COVID-19 prevention after traveling or working outside
Y NS N Y NS N Y NS N A O NV A O NV
Gender Male 338 27 3 262 57 49 268 66 34 320 35 13 323 36 9
(91.85) (7.34) (0.81) (71.20) (15.49) (13.31) (72.83) (17.93) (9.24) (86.96) (9.51) (3.53) (87.77) (9.78) (2.45)
Female 931 51 4 773 135 78 775 165 46 926 46 14 935 42 9
(94.42) (5.17) (0.41) (78.40) (13.69) (7.91) (78.60) (16.73) (4.67) (93.91) (4.67) (1.42) (94.83) (4.26) (0.91)
Age group (years) < 30 878 59 2 712 146 81 708 178 53 860 57 22 875 53 11
(93.50) (6.28) (0.22) (75.83) (15.55) (8.62) (75.40) (18.96) (5.64) (91.59) (6.07) (2.34) (93.18) (5.65) (1.17)
≥ 30 391 19 5 323 46 46 335 53 27 386 24 5 383 25 7
(94.22) (4.58) (1.20) (77.84) (11.08) (11.08) (80.72) (12.77) (6.51) (93.02) (5.78) (1.20) (92.29) (6.02) (1.69)
Last education High school 401 33 3 325 76 36 325 85 27 403 24 10 410 24 3
(91.76) (7.55) (0.69) (74.37) (17.39) (8.24) (74.37) (19.45) (6.18) (92.22) (5.49) (2.29) (93.82) (5.49) (0.69)
Associate degree 218 4 0 176 22 24 196 17 9 197 16 9 202 12 8
(98.20) (1.80) (0.00) (79.28) (9.91) (10.81) (88.29) (7.66) (4.05) (88.74) (7.21) (4.05) (90.99) (5.41) (3.60)
Bachelor degree 469 29 1 391 61 47 372 100 27 462 31 6 465 29 5
(93.99) (5.81) (0.20) (78.36) (12.22) (9.42) (74.55) (20.04) (5.41) (92.59) (6.21) (1.20) (93.19) (5.81) (1.00)
Master degree 136 11 2 110 24 15 119 19 11 141 7 1 139 8 2
(91.28) (7.38) (1.34) (73.83) (16.11) (10.07) (79.87) (12.75) (7.38) (94.63) (4.70) (0.67) (93.29) (5.37) (1.34)
Doctoral degree 45 1 1 33 9 5 31 10 6 43 3 1 42 5 0
(95.74) (2.13) (2.13) (70.21) (19.15) (10.64) (65.96) (21.28) (12.77) (91.49) (6.38) (2.13) (89.36) (10.64) (0.00)
Major of education Medicine related science 987 52 5 795 148 101 824 166 54 963 58 23 981 48 15
(94.54) (4.98) (0.48) (76.15) (14.18) (9.67) (78.93) (15.90) (5.17) (92.24) (5.56) (2.20) (93.97) (4.60) (1.44)
Science and technology 178 17 0 153 33 9 137 41 17 176 16 3 171 21 3
(91.28) (8.72) (0.00) (78.46) (16.92) (4.62) (70.26) (21.03) (8.72) (90.26) (8.21) (1.54) (87.69) (10.77) (1.54)
Social science and humanities 104 9 2 87 11 17 82 24 9 107 7 1 106 9 0
(90.43) (7.83) (1.74) (75.65) (9.57) (14.78) (71.30) (20.87) (7.83) (93.04) (6.09) (0.87) (92.17) (7.83) (0.00)
Occupation Students 617 45 2 498 117 49 480 146 38 607 42 15 617 40 7
(92.92) (6.78) (0.30) (75.00) (17.62) (7.38) (72.29) (21.99) (5.72) (91.41) (6.33) (2.26) (92.92) (6.02) (1.06)
Teachers 158 7 3 128 23 17 125 30 13 157 9 2 152 13 3
(94.05) (4.17) (1.79) (76.19) (13.69) (10.12) (74.40) (17.86) (7.74) (93.45) (5.36) (1.19) (90.48) (7.74) (1.79)
Health practitioners 370 10 2 298 38 46 328 35 19 354 22 6 358 18 6
(96.86) (2.62) (0.52) (78.01) (9.95) (12.04) (85.87) (9.16) (4.97) (92.67) (5.76) (1.57) (93.72) (4.71) (1.57)
Government and administration related job 33 0 0 28 2 3 30 2 1 29 2 2 31 2 0
(100) (0.00) (0.00) (84.85) (6.06) (9.09) (90.91) (6.06) (3.03) (87.88) (6.06) (6.06) (93.94) (6.06) (0.00)
Others 91 16 0 83 12 12 80 18 9 99 6 2 100 5 2
(85.05) (14.95) (0.00) (77.58) (11.21) (11.21) (74.77) (16.82) (8.41) (92.52) (5.61) (1.87) (93.46) (4.67) (1.87)
Place of current residence City 881 55 7 746 116 81 721 153 60 877 48 18 885 48 10
(93.43) (5.83) (0.74) (79.11) (12.30) (8.59) (77.19) (16.38) (6.42) (93.00) (5.09) (1.91) (93.85) (5.09) (1.06)
Rural 388 23 0 289 76 46 313 78 20 369 33 9 373 30 8
(94.40) (5.60) (0.00) (70.32) (18.49) (11.19) (76.16) (18.98) (4.87) (89.78) (8.03) (2.19) (90.75) (7.30) (1.95)

Religion was not included; A, always; N, no; NS, not sure; NV, never; O, occasionally; Y, yes.

Table 4.

Religious perspective and practice towards COVID-19 by demographic variables*

Characteristic Religious perspective and practice, n (%)
R1: possiblity to pray and gather during the pandemic
R2: the place of worship conducted COVID-19 prevention control correctly
R3: social distancing in the place of worship make you feel safe from SARS-CoV-2 infection
RP1: pray in the place of worship other than home
RP2: how often did you pray and gather in the place of worship during “new normal”
Y NS N Y NS N Y NS N Y N A O NV
Gender Male 178 122 68 253 78 37 237 97 34 255 113 77 214 77
(48.37) (33.15) (18.48) (68.75) (21.20) (10.05) (64.40) (26.36) (9.24) (69.29) (30.71) (20.92) (58.16) (20.92)
Female 280 466 240 648 227 111 629 289 68 278 708 46 360 580
(28.40) (47.26) (24.34) (65.72) (23.02) (11.26) (63.79) (29.31) (6.90) (28.19) (71.81) 4.67 36.51 58.82
Age group < 30 302 452 185 614 222 103 599 277 63 345 594 71 393 475
(32.16) (48.14) (19.70) (65.39) (23.64) (10.97) (63.79) (29.50) (6.71) (36.74) (63.26) (7.56) (41.85) (50.59)
≥ 30 156 136 123 287 83 45 267 109 39 188 227 52 181 182
(37.59) (32.77) (29.64) (69.16) (20.00) (10.84) (64.34) (26.27) (9.40) (45.30) (54.70) (12.53) (43.61) (43.86)
Last education High school 125 227 85 288 106 43 274 137 26 153 284 32 171 234
(28.60) (51.95) (19.45) (65.90) (24.26) (9.84) (62.70) (31.35) (5.95) (35.01) (64.99) (7.32) (39.13) (53.55)
Associate 93 90 39 181 26 15 163 48 11 102 120 30 104 88
degree (41.89) (40.54) (17.57) (81.53) (11.71) (6.76) (73.42) (21.62) (4.95) (45.95) (54.05) (13.51) (46.85) (39.64)
Bachelor 169 211 119 304 123 72 314 143 42 190 309 40 219 240
degree (33.87) (42.28) (23.85) (60.92) (24.65) (14.43) (62.93) (28.66) (8.42) (38.08) (61.92) (8.02) (43.89) (48.10)
Master 53 50 46 99 35 15 87 46 16 65 84 17 58 74
degree (35.57) (33.56) (30.87) (66.44) (23.49) (10.07) (58.39) (30.87) (10.74) (43.62) (56.38) (11.41) (38.93) (49.66)
Doctoral 18 10 19 29 15 3 28 12 7 23 24 4 22 21
degree (38.30) (21.28) (40.43) (61.70) (31.91) (6.38) (59.57) (25.53) (14.89) (48.94) (51.06) (8.51) (46.81) (44.68)
Major of education Medicine related science 338 475 231 702 233 109 684 290 70 400 644 88 438 518
(32.38) (45.50) (22.13) (67.24) (22.32) (10.44) (65.52) (27.78) (6.70) (38.31) (61.69) (8.43) (41.95) (49.62)
Science and technology 77 77 41 126 45 24 117 62 16 83 112 25 81 89
(39.49) (39.49) (21.03) (64.62) (23.08) (12.31) (60.00) (31.79) (8.21) (42.56) (57.44) (12.82) (41.54) (45.64)
Social science and humanities 43 36 36 73 27 15 65 34 16 50 65 10 55 50
(37.39) (31.30) (31.30) (63.48) (23.48) (13.04) (56.52) (29.57) (13.91) (43.48) (56.52) (8.70) (47.83) (43.48)
Occupation Students 200 340 124 429 170 65 424 204 36 239 425 46 262 356
(30.12) (51.20) (18.68) (64.61) (25.60) (9.79) (63.86) (30.72) (5.42) (35.99) (64.01) (6.93) (39.46) (53.61)
Teacher 52 58 58 102 44 22 101 49 18 79 89 22 64 82
(30.95) (34.52) (34.52) (60.71) (26.19) (13.10) (60.12) (29.17) (10.71) (47.02) (52.98) (13.10) (38.10) (48.81)
Health 151 142 89 289 60 33 259 94 29 161 221 45 185 152
practitioners (39.53) (37.17) (23.30) (75.65) (15.71) (8.64) (67.80) (24.61) (7.59) (42.15) (57.85) (11.78) (48.43) (39.79)
Government and administration related job 14 9 10 23 7 3 23 7 3 8 25 5 8 20
(42.42) (27.27) (30.30) (69.70) (21.21) (9.09) (69.70) (21.21) (9.09) (24.24) (75.76) (15.15) (24.24) (60.61)
Others 41 39 27 58 24 25 59 32 16 46 61 5 55 47
(38.32) (36.45) (25.23) (54.21) (22.43) (23.36) (55.14) (29.91) (14.95) (42.99) (57.01) (4.67) (51.40) (43.93)
Place of current residence City 293 412 238 647 207 89 602 267 74 346 597 87 354 502
(31.07) (43.69) (25.24) (68.61) (21.95) (9.44) (63.84) (28.31) (7.85) (36.69) (63.31) (9.23) (37.54) (53.23)
Rural 165 176 70 254 98 59 264 119 28 187 224 36 220 155
(40.15) (42.82) (17.03) (61.80) (23.84) (14.36) (64.23) (28.95) (6.81) (45.50) (54.50) (8.76) (53.53) (37.71)

Religion was not included; A, always; N, no; NS, not sure; NV, never; O, occasionally; Y, yes.

Table 5.

Results of multiple binary logistic regression analysis on factors significantly associated with attitudes, religious perspectives, and practice toward COVID-19

Variable OR (95% CI) P
Attitude and practice
A1: not sure if physical distancing is able to cut the spread of SARS-CoV-2 (vs. yes)
 Gender (female vs. male) 0.60 (0.36 – 0.99) 0.047
 Occupation (government and administration related job vs. teacher) 0.20 (0.08 – 0.49) 0.000
 Occupation (government and administration related job vs. student) 0.19 (0.06 – 0.58) 0.003
 Occupation (government and administration related job vs. other) 0.35 (0.15 – 0.81) 0.014
A2: not feeling anxious if being infected with SARS-CoV-2 (vs. yes)
 Gender (female vs. male) 0.54 (0.36 – 0.81) 0.003
Major of education (medicine related science vs. social science and humanities) 0.29 (0.12 – 0.69) 0.005
A2: not sure to feel anxious if being infected with SARS-CoV-2 (vs. yes)
 Last education (high school vs. associate degree) 0.29 (0.09 – 0.88) 0.029
 Last education (high school vs. undergraduate degree) 0.26 (0.08 – 0.79) 0.018
 Last education (high school vs. master degree) 0.28 (0.10 – 0.80) 0.017
 Place of current residence (city vs. rural) 0.56 (0.41 – 0.78) 0.001
A3: large-scale social restriction need to be re-implemented (vs. no)
Gender (female vs. male) 0.48 (0.30 – 0.78) 0.003
AP1: always performing COVID-19 prevention in a crowded place (vs. no)
 Gender (female vs. male) 0.30 (0.14 – 0.67) 0.003
AP1: always performing COVID-19 prevention in a crowded place (vs. occasionally)
 Gender (female vs. male) 0.45 (0.28 – 0.72) 0.001
 Place of current residence (city vs. rural) 0.62 (0.39 – 0.99) 0.044
AP2: always performing COVID-19 prevention after traveling or working outside (vs. never)
 Gender (female vs. male) 0.32 (0.12 – 0.84) 0.020
AP2: always performing COVID-19 prevention after traveling or working outside (vs. occasionally)
 Gender (female vs. male) 0.43 (0.26 – 0.69) 0.001
Religious perspective and practice
R1: it is not possible to pray and gather during the pandemic (vs. yes)
 Gender (female vs. male) 2.41 (1.70 – 3.42) 0.000
 Place of current residence (city vs. rural) 1.84 (1.31 – 2.59) 0.000
R1: not sure whether it is possible to pray and gather during the pandemic (vs. yes)
 Gender (female vs. male) 2.15 (1.61 – 2.86) 0.000
 Major of education (medicine related science vs. science and technology) 1.65 (1.00 – 2.73) 0.049
 Place of current residence (city vs. rural) 1.38 (1.05 – 1.82) 0.020
R2: the place of worship is not conducted COVID-19 prevention control correctly (vs. yes)
 Last education (high school vs. master degree) 4.49 (1.11 – 18.20) 0.035
 Occupation (government and administration related job vs. teacher) 0.26 (0.13 – 0.49) 0.000
 Occupation (government and administration related job vs. other) 0.28 (0.14 – 0.55) 0.000
 Place of current residence (city vs. rural) 0.56 (0.39 – 0.82) 0.003
R2: not sure whether the place of worship conducted COVID-19 prevention control correctly (vs. yes)
 Last education (high school vs. undergraduate degree) 0.31 (0.12 – 0.79) 0.014
 Occupation (government and administration related job vs. teacher) 0.53 (0.29 – 0.97) 0.039
R3: social distancing in the place of worship make you feel safe from SARS-CoV-2 infection (vs. no)
 Occupation (government and administration related job vs. others) 0.26 (0.11 – 0.62) 0.002
RP1: not going to pray in the place of worship other than home (vs. yes)
 Gender (female vs. male) 5.88 (4.48 – 7.72) 0.000
 Occupation (government and administration related job vs. health practitioners) 2.78 (1.06 – 7.24) 0.037
 Place of current residence (city vs. rural) 1.54 (1.19 – 1.99) 0.001
RP2: never going to pray and gather in the place of worship during “new normal” (vs. always)
 Gender (female vs. male) 13.75 (8.64 – 21.87) 0.000
 Occupation (government and administration related job vs. teacher) 0.15 (0.03 – 0.65) 0.012
RP2: never going to pray and gather in the place of worship during “new normal” (vs. occasionally)
 Gender (female vs. male) 4.52 (3.33 – 6.14) 0.000
 Occupation (government and administration related job vs. health practitioners) 2.74 (1.06 – 7.08) 0.038
 Place of current residence (city vs. rural) 2.11 (1.63 – 2.75) 0.000

2. Experimental Design, Materials and Methods

2.1. Participants

This cross-sectional survey was conducted from July 11 – 18, 2020. Data collection relied on the authors’ network; one-page recruitment information was posted/reposted via Whatsapp. This information contained a brief introduction about the survey, voluntary nature of participation, declarations of anonymity and confidentiality, and the link of the online questionnaire. Persons who were of Indonesian nationality, aged 16 years or more, and willing to participate were directed to complete the survey.

2.2. Measures

The questionnaire consisted of three parts: demographics, attitudes and practices, and religious perspectives and practices. Demographic variables included age, gender, last education, major of education or current education, occupation, place of current residence (city vs. rural), and religion. Attitudes and practices toward COVID-19 were evaluated by questions A1 – A3 and AP1 – 2 (Table 1), while religious perspectives and practices were measured by questions R1 – R3 and RP1 – 2 (Table 1).

2.3. Statistical analysis

Frequencies of attitudes, religious perspectives, and practices were tabulated. Attitudes, religious perspectives, and practices of different persons according to demographic characteristics (excluding religion) were compared with the Chi-square test. The binary logistic regression method was used to identify factors associated with attitudes, religious perspectives, and practices. Data analyses were conducted with SPSS version 25 for Mac. A p-value of less than 0.05 (two-sided) was considered significant.

2.4. Ethical statement

This survey was approved by the Ethics Committee of Brawijaya University, Malang-Indonesia, with reference No. 062-KEP-UB-2020.

Funding

This survey did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors

Declaration of Competing Interest

None to declare.

Footnotes

Supplementary material associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at doi:10.1016/j.dib.2020.106277.

Contributor Information

Zulvikar Syambani Ulhaq, Email: zulhaq@kedokteran.uin-malang.ac.id.

Aulanni'am Aulanni'am, Email: aulani@ub.ac.id.

Appendix. Supplementary materials

mmc1.xml (1.2KB, xml)

References

  • 1.Quadri SA. COVID-19 and religious congregations: implications for spread of novel pathogens. Int J Infect Dis. 2020;96:219–221. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.05.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Ulhaq ZS, Soraya GV. Interleukin-6 as a potential biomarker of COVID-19 progression. Med Mal Infect. 2020;50(4):382–383. doi: 10.1016/j.medmal.2020.04.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Ulhaq ZS, Soraya GV. The prevalence of ophthalmic manifestations in COVID-19 and the diagnostic value of ocular tissue/fluid. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2020;258(6):1351–1352. doi: 10.1007/s00417-020-04695-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Soraya GV, Ulhaq ZS. Crucial laboratory parameters in COVID-19 diagnosis and prognosis: an updated meta-analysis. Med Clin (Engl Ed) 2020;155(4):143–151. doi: 10.1016/j.medcle.2020.05.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Soraya GV, Ulhaq ZS. Interleukin-6 levels in children developing SARS-CoV-2 infection. Pediatr Neonatol. 2020;61(3):253–254. doi: 10.1016/j.pedneo.2020.04.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ulhaq ZS, Soraya GV. Anti-IL-6 receptor antibody treatment for severe COVID-19 and the potential implication of IL-6 gene polymorphisms in novel coronavirus pneumonia [Tratamiento con anticuerpos anti-receptor de IL-6 para COVID-19 grave y la posible implicación de polimorfismos del gen IL-6 en la nueva neumonía por coronavirus] Med Clin (Barc) 2020 doi: 10.1016/j.medcli.2020.07.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Ulhaq ZS, Soraya GV, Fauziah FA. Test ARN para SARS-CoV-2 positivos recurrentes en pacientes recuperados y dados de alta hospitalaria [recurrent positive SARS-CoV-2 RNA tests in recovered and discharged patients] Rev Clin Esp. 2020 doi: 10.1016/j.rce.2020.06.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Correia G, Rodrigues L, Gameiro da Silva M, Gonçalves T. Airborne route and bad use of ventilation systems as non-negligible factors in SARS-CoV-2 transmission. Med Hypotheses. 2020;141 doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2020.109781. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

mmc1.xml (1.2KB, xml)

Articles from Data in Brief are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES