Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2020 Jun 30;41(9):1100–1102. doi: 10.1017/ice.2020.299

Clostridioides difficile Infections Complicating Combat-Injured Patients from Iraq and Afghanistan

Sarah E Schall 1, Ping Li 2,3, Timothy J Whitman 4, Joseph L Petfield 5, David R Tribble 2, Dana M Blyth 1
PMCID: PMC7494639  NIHMSID: NIHMS1602851  PMID: 32600498

INTRODUCTION

Clostridioides difficile-associated diarrhea (CDAD) is the most frequently reported healthcare-associated pathogen in the United States with an annual economic burden >$1 billion and up to 9% mortality and critically ill trauma patients may be uniquely at risk.14 Military trauma patients have multiple CDAD risk factors, including frequent broad-spectrum antimicrobial exposure, transient immunosuppression, and challenges related to infection control in the deployed environment and along the evacuation chain. We describe the epidemiology of wounded military personnel diagnosed with CDAD.

METHODS

Wounded military personnel (06/2009–02/2014) from the Trauma Infectious Disease Outcomes Study5 with a diagnosis of confirmed (laboratory supported) or presumptive (diarrhea with treatment for CDAD without lab confirmation) CDAD were examined. Inclusion criteria were active-duty or Department of Defense beneficiaries, ≥18 years, injured during deployment, requiring medevac to Germany followed by transfer to participating U.S. military hospitals. Infections were defined as previously described.5 CDAD diagnosis was based on a combination of clinical and laboratory findings suggesting CDAD and/or directed antimicrobial therapy against CDAD for ≥5 days.5 CDAD severity was defined per 2017 guidelines using highest creatinine and white blood cell values on day of diagnosis.6 The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Uniformed Services University.

RESULTS

Among 2,660 wounded military personnel, 23 patients with CDAD were identified (4 presumptive and 19 confirmed) with an incidence of 2.76/10,000 occupied bed days (OBD). Seven cases were confirmed by toxin enzyme immunoassay, 11 by polymerase chain reaction, and 1 by both methods. Patients were primarily young (median 24 years) men (96%) who sustained blast injuries (70%), resulting in critical injuries (median injury severity score [ISS]: 38) (Table). Prior to CDAD diagnosis, patients were hospitalized a median of 12 days, and 17 (74%) had ≥1 infection, most commonly pneumonia (47%) and skin and soft-tissue infections (SSTIs, 47%). Severe and fulminant CDAD was diagnosed in 8 (35%) and 6 (26%) patients, respectively. Nineteen (83%) patients were admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) and 74% were intubated prior to or at time of diagnosis.

Table.

Characteristics of Wounded Military Personnel with Clostridioides difficile-Associated Diarrhea (CDAD)

Patient Characteristics, No. (%) Patients
N=23
Age, years, median (IQR) 24 (23, 31)
Injury Severity Score, median (IQR) 38 (26, 47)
Mechanism of Injury
   Blast 16 (69.6)
   Gunshot wound 4 (17.4)
   Other 3 (13.0)
Days hospitalized prior to diagnosis, median (IQR) 12 (9.5, 34)
ICU admission prior to or at CDAD diagnosis 19 (82.6)
Intubated prior to or at CDAD diagnosis 17 (73.9)
Prior diagnosis of ≥1 infections 17 (73.9)
   Pneumonia 8 (34.8)
   Skin and soft-tissue infection 8 (34.8)
   Bloodstream infection 6 (26.1)
   Sepsis 4 (17.4)
   Osteomyelitis 2 (8.7)
   CNS infection 2 (8.7)
   Urinary tract infection 2 (8.7)
   Intraabdominal infection 1 (4.3)
   Tracheobronchitis 1 (4.3)
Antimicrobial exposure prior to CDAD diagnosis 22 (95.7)
   First generation cephalosporin 22 (95.7)
   Tetracycline 20 (87.0)
   Vancomycin 17 (73.9)
   Carbapenem 16 (69.6)
   Fluoroquinolone 13 (56.5)
   Clindamycin 5 (21.7)
Antimicrobial exposure by number of antibiotic classes prior to CDAD diagnosis
   ≥1 class 22 (96)
   ≥3 classes 20 (87)
   ≥5 classes 13 (57)
Days of antibiotic exposure prior to CDAD, median (IQR) 13 (9.25, 27.5)
Operating room visit prior to diagnosis 22 (95.6)
Intubated prior to CDAD diagnosis 17 (73.9)

ICU = intensive care unit, IQR = interquartile range, CNS = central nervous system

Nearly all patients (96%) received antibiotics prior to CDAD diagnosis: 96% had first generation cephalosporins, 87% tetracyclines (largely doxycycline for malaria chemoprophylaxis), 70% carbapenems, 57% fluoroquinolones, and 22% clindamycin. Comparatively, among 2,637 patients without CDAD, 91% received antimicrobials during their hospitalizations: 88% tetracyclines, 86% first generation cephalosporins, 70% carbapenems, 47% fluoroquinolones, and 16% clindamycin. Among CDAD patients, 87% and 57% were exposed to ≥3 and ≥5 antibiotic classes, respectively, with a median of 13 days of antibiotic exposure prior to CDAD diagnosis. During the study period, only Brooke Army Medical Center (6 CDAD patients) tracked CDAD rates, with concurrent annual incidence of 1.15/10,000 OBD in 2009, 0.78 in 2010, 1.9 in 2011, 2.7 in 2012, 4.7 in 2013, and 7.8 in 2014. Military hospitals in the National Capital Region only tracked incidences of healthcare-onset CDAD in 1 of the 2 admitting hospitals in 2013 and 2014, during which time, rates were 9.43 and 8.34/10,000 OBD, respectively.

Treatment included oral metronidazole alone in 15 patients, IV metronidazole alone in 2 patients, and combination of oral vancomycin, metronidazole, and IV metronidazole in 6 patients. No patients with CDAD died.

DISCUSSION

Prior civilian trauma population studies demonstrated similar incidences of CDAD to non-trauma critically-ill patients (1–3% and 4–5%, respectively) despite a lack of traditional risk factors.3,4 Despite widespread antimicrobial use in our military trauma population, CDAD rates were low (0.86%; 2.76/10,000 OBD). A study of cumulative antibiotic exposure in hospitalized patients showed a median of 14 antibiotic days in CDAD patients,7 similar to the median of 13 antibiotic days identified in our population. The same study identified a median of three antibiotic class exposures in the CDAD group, while our CDAD patients received a median of 6 antibiotic class exposures prior to diagnosis. Over half of patients were exposed to ≥5 antibiotic classes prior to CDAD diagnosis, which is consistent with literature suggesting higher CDAD risk with increased number of antibiotic class exposures.7 There was extensive tetracycline exposure in our population, largely driven by malaria prophylaxis. While studies have suggested tetracyclines are lower risk for CDAD compared with other antibiotics, given the high degree of broad antimicrobial class exposure, current data are insufficient to determine whether tetracycline exposure impacted our population.8

Similar to civilian trauma cohorts,3,4 our CDAD patients were severely injured and primarily admitted to the ICU, intubated prior to diagnosis, and diagnosed >1 week into their hospitalizations. This high injury severity is characteristic of the overall TIDOS population (64.5% with blast injuries; 38% with ISS ≥25; 52% admitted to the ICU; 33% mechanically ventilated).9 Of our CDAD patients, 74% were diagnosed with ≥1 preceding infection, while 34% of the overall TIDOS population had ≥1 infection, primarily SSTIs.9

Patients were primarily treated with metronidazole due to contemporary literature and guidelines during the study timeframe.2 Though CDAD was severe or fulminant in >50% of patients, there were no deaths. This differs dramatically from mortality rates in non-trauma patients (30–80% in severe cases), but is similar to that in civilian trauma studies, and may result from our population being mid-20s and healthy prior to trauma.3,4,10 While our study largely involved penetrating trauma (compared to blunt trauma in civilian studies),3,4 we were unable to evaluate certain CDAD risk factors (gastric acid suppression, enteral feeding, and intraabdominal surgery) and complications (toxic megacolon or colonic perforation). Further investigation is needed to determine if penetrating and blunt trauma populations have distinct risk factors for CDAD.

Acknowledgements.

We are indebted to the Infectious Disease Clinical Research TIDOS team of clinical coordinators, microbiology technicians, data managers, clinical site managers, and administrative support personnel for their support. Special thanks to Teresa Merritt for her assistance with data collection and Leigh Carson for her assistance in manuscript preparation.

Financial support. Support for this work (IDCRP-024) was provided by the Infectious Disease Clinical Research Program (IDCRP), a Department of Defense (DoD) program executed by the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences (USU) through a cooperative agreement with The Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Inc. (HJF). This project has been supported with federal funds from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health (NIH), under Inter-Agency Agreement Y1-AI-5072, the Defense Health Program, U.S. DoD, under award HU0001190002, and the Department of the Navy under the Wounded, Ill, and Injured Program under award HU0001-10-1-0014.

Footnotes

A portion of these data was presented at 2018 IDWeek, A Joint Meeting of IDSA, SHEA, HIVMA, and PIDS, 3–7 October 2018, San Francisco, CA

Potential conflict of interest. All authors report no conflicts of interest relevant to this article.

Publisher's Disclaimer: Disclaimer: The view(s) expressed are those of the authors and do not reflect the official views of the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Inc., the National Institutes of Health or the Department of Health and Human Services, Landstuhl Regional Medical Center, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Brooke Army Medical Center, the U.S. Army Medical Department, the U.S. Army Office of the Surgeon General, the Department of Defense, or the Departments of the Army, Navy or Air Force. Mention of trade names, commercial products, or organizations does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government.

References

  • 1.Lessa F, Mu Y, Bamberg W, et al. Burden of Clostridium difficile infection in the United States. N Engl J Med 2015;372:825–834. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Napolitano L, Edmiston C. Clostridium difficile disease: diagnosis, pathogenesis, and treatment update. Surgery: 2017;162:325–348 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Vanzant E, Ozrazgat-Baslanti T, Liu H, et al. Clostridium difficile infections after blunt trauma: a different patient population? Surg Infect (Larchmt) 2015;16:421–427. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Lumpkins K, Bochicchio, Joshi M, et al. Clostridium difficile infection in critically injured trauma patients. Surg Infect (Larchmt) 2008;9(5):497–501 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Tribble DR, Conger NG, Fraser S, et al. Infection-associated clinical outcomes in hospitalized medical evacuees after traumatic injury: Trauma Infectious Disease Outcome Study. J Trauma 2011;71:S33–S42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.McDonald LC, Gerding DN, Johnson S, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for Clostridium difficile infection in adults and children: 2017 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) and Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA). Clin Infect Dis 2018;66:e1–e48. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Stevens V, Dumyati G, Fine L, Fisher S, van Wijngaarden E. Cumulative antibiotic exposures over time and the risk of Clostridium difficile infection. Clin Infect Dis 2011;53:42–49 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Tariq R, Cho J, Kapoor S, et al. Low risk of primary Clostridium difficile infection with tetracyclines: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Clin Infect Dis 2018;66:514–522. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Campbell WR, Li P, Whitman TJ, et al. Multi-drug-resistant gram-negative infections in deployment-related trauma patients. Surg Infect (Larchmt) 2017;18:357–367. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Karas J, Enoch D, Aliyu S. A review of the mortality due to Clostridium difficile infection. J Infect 2010;61:1–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES