Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Orthop Res. 2020 Apr 6;38(10):2120–2130. doi: 10.1002/jor.24676

Evaluation of global gene expression in regenerate tissues during Masquelet treatment

Nishant Gohel 1, Rafael Senos 2, Steven A Goldstein 1, Kurt D Hankenson 1, Mark E Hake 1,*, Andrea I Alford 1,*
PMCID: PMC7494657  NIHMSID: NIHMS1608775  PMID: 32233004

Abstract

The Masquelet induced-membrane technique is indicated for large segmental bone defects. Attributes of the induced-membrane and local milieu that contribute to graft-to-bone union are unknown. Using a rat model, we compared global gene expression profiles in critically-sized femoral osteotomies managed using a cement spacer as per Masquelet to those left empty. At the end of the experiment, induced-membrane and bone adjacent to the spacer were collected from the Masquelet side. Non-union tissue in the defect and bone next to the empty defect were collected from the contralateral side. Tissues were subjected to RNA isolation, sequencing and differential expression analysis. Cell Type Enrichment Analysis suggested the induced-membrane and the bone next to the PMMA spacer were comparatively enriched for osteoblastic genes. The non-union environment was comparatively enriched for innate and adaptive immune cell markers, but only macrophages were evident in the Masquelet context. iPathway Guide was utilized to identify cell signaling pathways and protein interaction networks enriched in the Masquelet environment. For induced-membrane vs. non-union, false-discovery rate correction of p-values rendered overall pathway differences non-significant, and so only protein interaction networks are presented. For the bone comparison, substantial enrichment of pathways and networks known to contribute to osteogenic mechanisms were revealed. Our results suggest that the PMMA spacer affects the cut bone ends that are in contact with it and at the same time induces the foreign body reaction and formation of the induced-membrane. B-cells in the empty defect suggest a chronic inflammatory response to a large segmental osteotomy.

Introduction

Successful repair of critically sized (>5 cm) segmental bone injuries and established non-unions remains a significant surgical challenge 1. Available treatment options incur substantial patient burden due to the need for multiple, staged surgeries and the length of time required for successful healing. A promising treatment option is the Masquelet induced-membrane technique 2. This procedure involves two surgeries. First, the segmental defect is debrided of contamination and non-viable tissue. A PMMA cement spacer is then placed into the defect. Over the next month, a membrane forms around the cement spacer via the foreign body reaction 3. When medically and surgically appropriate, the patient is operated on a second time. The induced-membrane is carefully opened, the spacer is removed, the membrane is filled with bone graft and repaired such that it encases the graft material. Over 4–12 months, the graft consolidates and becomes functionally integrated with the patient’s skeleton4; 5.

Despite relatively high union rates 5; 6 and increasing popularity of the Masquelet technique among surgeons, it is still a staged-surgical procedure with significant variation. For example, emerging evidence suggests impaired membrane development might contribute to Masquelet failure7, but optimum biological characteristics of the induced-membrane and how they might impact consolidation at the second stage are not well understood. In rodent models of the Masquelet technique, researchers allow the membrane to develop for one month because early evidence suggested that induced-membrane BMP2 and TGFβ content peak at this time 8. Allowing the membrane to develop for longer intervals leads to ECM accumulation and thickening of the membrane in human patients 3. The negative implications of a fibrous induced-membrane are not well-described. While the membrane_does serve as a barrier to contain and protect bone graft within the osteotomy site, efforts to replace the induced-membrane with synthetic barrier membranes have not been fruitful 9. An induced-membrane that forms around a spacer placed into a bone defect contains osteoblasts and osteoclasts, thus reflecting the local environment 1013. Conversely, the induced-membrane that develops around a subcutaneously placed spacer does not contain osteoblasts or osteoclasts 14. This observation suggests that the cells present in bone contribute to the ability of the Masquelet induced-membrane to promote engraftment.

The purpose of this study was to assess the global gene expression landscape and cellular make up of osteotomies treated using Masquelet to those of a critical sized osteotomies left empty. In addition to the induced-membrane and non-union tissue, we also compared bone that was proximal to the PMMA spacer during membrane development to that next to the empty osteotomy and developing non-union. We hypothesized that the PMMA spacer would elicit local changes in gene expression that were distinct from those associated with a developing non-union. We used an unbiased RNA sequencing approach to address the fact that very little is known about the composition of an induced membrane that develops in a skeletal site. Our results suggest that the induced-membrane contains osteoblast lineage cells, osteoclasts and macrophages. The non-union tissue contained a variety of cells indicative of innate and adaptive immune responses to a chronic segmental bone defect. In addition, the PMMA spacer itself evoked changes in gene expression consistent with activation of osteogenic signaling pathways and ECM formation in adjacent bone cells.

Methods

Masquelet Surgery

The University of Michigan Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) approved all procedures and all animals were treated humanely according to national guidelines. We adapted a critical sized femoral defect model previously established in our lab 15 into a two-stage procedure similar to published rat Masquelet protocols 14,16. Our model employs 6-month old male retired breeder Sprague-Dawley rats weighing 460–540 grams (Envigo, Indianapolis, IN), and at this age a 5 mm osteotomy progresses to a non-union in virtually all cases 15. Sample size was selected based on the UM bioinformatics Core recommendation that we use a minimum of 4 biological replicates per group for RNAseq analysis. Surgeries (N=5 rats) were performed in the morning. Anesthesia was obtained using isoflurane. The femur was stabilized with a custom designed PEEK fracture fixation plate containing a 5 mm notch that serves as a guide for creating the osteotomy. Under continuous irrigation, a Hall Micro 100 oscillating saw fit with 2 blades spaced 5 mm apart was used to make the osteotomy. For the Masquelet side, a pre-formed polymethyl methacrylate spacer (PMMA Palacos-R+G (Zimmer-Biomet, Warsaw Indiana)) was placed into the defect. On the control side, the defect was left empty. With each surgery, we alternated placing the spacer into the right or left limb. Both limbs were stabilized with PEEK plates. Buprenorphine (0.05 mg/kg) was given pre-operatively and again 8 hours later. Carprofen (5 mg/kg) was given immediately post-operatively and again 24 hours later. Rats were housed in pairs under SPF conditions with a 12-hour light/dark cycle and they were monitored twice daily for 72 hours following the surgery and then daily for the 4-week healing period. Climbing implements were removed from the cages in order to prevent injury to the healing limbs.

Fracture fixation was maintained and no adverse consequences were noted during the study. All 5 rats were euthanized 4 weeks after surgery. The induced-membrane and the wound-bed tissue on the empty defect side (non-union tissue), as well as bone just proximal to the PMMA spacer and just proximal to the empty defect were collected into RNAlater. To collect the tissue, the whole femur was dissected with most of the muscle attached. Tissue was cleaned from the PEEK plate and the femur was rotated in order to visualize the defect set below the notch in the plate. A thin, pink membrane was evident around the PMMA spacer. This induced-membrane was collected by gently elevating it above the spacer using a fine forceps and cutting it away with a #15 scalpel blade. We avoided the muscle below the defect on the medial side of the femur. Similarly, the fibrous tissue that had formed between the cut bone ends was removed using forceps and a thin metal spatula. There was also fluid that had accumulated in the empty defect and this was not avoided. Approximately 1 mm of bone just proximal to the defect or the PMMA spacer was cut with a #10 scalpel blade.

Global gene expression analysis using RNA sequencing

IM and non-union tissue, as well as bone next to the PMMA and next to the empty defect were weighed, homogenized in Trizol and stored at -80°C before extraction of RNA and DNase treatment, as we have described previously 17. The RNA was subject to ammonium acetate precipitation to remove residual Trizol. RNA from 4 of the 5 animals was of sufficient quantity for RNA sequencing and these were submitted to the NextGen sequencing core at the University of Michigan for quality analysis. Table S1 summarizes RNA metrics for each tissue sample. PolyA-selected mRNA libraries were generated and 50 base, paired-end reads were conducted using the Illumina HS 4000 Platform. Data processing and analysis were conducted by the University of Michigan Bioinformatics core. Raw sequences were subject to an initial quality control protocol using FastQC v 0.113. Sequences were aligned to the Sprague-Dawley reference sequence and transcripts expressed differentially between induced-membrane vs. non-union tissue and bone next to PMMA vs. bone next to an empty defect were identified. Deseq2 (Bioconductor 18) was used for expression quantitation, normalization, and differential expression analysis. Genes with both fold-change ± 1.5 and an FDR corrected p value ≤ 0.05 were considered significantly different.

Cell type enrichment analysis

To estimate the cellular composition of each tissue type, we used CTen 19 (http://www.influenzax.org/~jshoemaker/cten). All genes detected by RNAseq were separated into 3 groups: those with increased expression in the Masquelet environment, those with decreased expression in the Masquelet environment, and those with similar expression levels in the Masquelet and non-union environments. The lists were imported into CTen to determine the dominant cell types enriched in each tissue type 20. To visualize the results, CTen enrichment scores (-log10(FDR corrected p-values)), were imported into Morpheus (https://software.broadinstitute.org/morpheus) to generate heat maps for each biologically relevant cell type identified. On the color scale, green indicates a particular cell type is relatively highly enriched in that tissue (figure 2). As per CTen recommendations, cell types with enrichment scores ≤2 were considered not present. In addition, since the CTen database contains global gene expression profiles from immune cells subjected to a variety of treatments, we present categories of immune cells (e.g. B cells). Overlap between our gene expression profiles and those of irrelevant cell lines or tissue-types are not presented.

Figure 2. The Masquelet and non-union healing environments have distinct cellular compositions.

Figure 2.

Heat maps of CTen enrichment scores for contextually relevant cells and tissues. Results from regenerate tissues (A) and from adjacent bone (B) are shown. Induced-membrane and bone next to the PMMA spacer were enriched for osteoblastic genes (blue boxes). Non-union tissue and bone next to the empty defect were enriched for a variety of immune cell markers (dashed boxes). The only immune cell genes significantly enriched in induced-membrane were macrophages (black box in panel A).

iPathway Guide

RNA sequences were subject to Advaita Bio's iPathwayGuide (https://www.advaitabio.com/ipathwayguide) to identify both canonical pathways and protein-protein interaction networks enriched in the Masquelet environment. First, iPathwayGuide was used to generate summary volcano plots of all differentially expressed genes for induced-membrane vs. non-union and for bone next to PMMA vs. bone next to an empty defect. Next, the “pathways” function of iPathway Guide was applied to the entire list of differentially expressed genes for each comparison. iPathway Guide identifies significantly enriched pathways using the Impact Analysis method, which is based on both over-representation of genes and their calculated cumulative effect on signaling in that pathway 21. Finally, the “networks” function of iPathway Guide 22 was applied to both the entire list of differentially expressed genes and to the components of significantly enriched signaling pathways. Protein interaction networks were exported from iPathwayGuide into Cytoscape v3.7.2 to generate diagrams with heat map scales representing log2fold-changes.

Results

Identification of differentially expressed genes

Post alignment QC plots showed that each tissue sample provided between ~20 million and 35 million quality aligned mRNA reads with alignment rates between ~45% and 60%. 13,204 genes were detected in induced-membrane and non-union. Of these, 271 were increased (table S2) and 195 were decreased (table S3) in induced-membrane compared to non-union (Fig. 1A). 12,939 genes were detected in the bone samples taken just proximal to the defect sites. Of these, 874 (Table S4) were increased and 489 were decreased (Table S5) in bone next to PMMA compared to that next to the empty defect (Fig. 1B).

Figure 1: The Masquelet and non-union healing environment display global differences in gene expression.

Figure 1:

Logarithmic volcano plots show FDR corrected p-value vs. fold change for differentially expressed genes identified in RNAseq analysis. A) Induced-membrane vs. Non-Union Tissue. B) Bone next to spacer vs. Bone next to empty defect.

CTen analysis reveals cellular make-up of regenerate tissues

RNAseq analysis can be used to discriminate cell types present in a tissue sample based on global gene expression profiles. To understand the cellular makeup of the defect site and tissues surrounding it, all genes detected by RNAseq were assigned to one of three groups: 1.) Enriched in Masquelet tissues 2.) Enriched in non-union tissues or 3.) Expressed equally in both injury environments. These lists were then imported into CTen8 (Cell Type Enrichment Analysis) and the top 3 most highly enriched cell/tissue types for each sample type were noted. Both the induced-membrane and the bone exposed to the PMMA spacer are highly enriched for osteoblast marker genes (table 1). The non-union tissue and the bone exposed to the empty defect are enriched for bone, bone marrow and B cell genes (table 2). Enrichment scores for cell/tissue types common to both osteotomy environments were relatively low (table 3).

Table 1: Top cells/tissues identified in the Masquelet environment.

Values are enrichment scores (Log10-FDR corrected p-values) obtained in CTen.

a.) Top 3 enrichment scores in IM
IM Non-union Common
Osteoblast Day 21 37.11 0.11 3.22
Osteoblast Day 14 37.72 0.44 2.68
Osteoblast Day 5 27.19 0.87 3.14
b.) Top 3 enrichment scores in bone next to PMMA
PMMA Empty Common
Osteoblast Day 14 146.46 0.00 0.00
Osteoblast Day 21 139.11 0.00 0.00
Osteoblast Day 5 122.62 0.01 0.00

Table 2: Top cells/tissues identified in the non-union environment.

Values are enrichment scores (Log10-FDR corrected p values) obtained in CTen.

a.) Top 3 enrichment scores in non-union
Non-union IM Common
Bone 17.71 0.86 0.05
B Cells Marginal Zone 14.46 0.02 0.00
Bone Marrow 12.63 0.05 0.76
b.) Top 3 enrichment scores in bone next to non-union
Empty PMMA Common
Follicular B Cells 73.17 0.00 0.00
Bone Marrow 68.74 0.00 0.00
Bone 62.54 0.04 0.00

Table 3: Top cells/tissues common to both osteotomy environments.

Values are enrichment scores (Log10-FDR corrected p values) obtained in CTen.

a.) Top 3 enrichment scores common to IM and non-union
Common Non-union IM
Microglia 8.63 0.31 2.28
Macrophage Bone marrow LPS 2 hours 8.48 0.04 1.56
Macrophage Bone marrow LPS 6 hours 7.99 0.42 0.79
b.) Top 3 enrichment scores common to bones ends adjacent to osteotomies
Common Empty PMMA
Macrophage Bone marrow LPS 6 hours 3.77 1.05 1.27
Microglia 3.26 3.95 3.63
Skeletal Muscle 3.17 1.05 6.15

Next, the CTen data were queried further to estimate additional, less abundant, yet biologically relevant cell types that might also be present in each osteotomy milieu. The list of cell/tissue types was manually filtered to remove cells and tissues with no known relevance to the critical-sized defect model, as well as those with enrichment scores ≤2.0. The select cell/tissue types and their corresponding enrichment scores were imported into Morpheus to create heat maps (Fig. 2). Again, Masquelet tissues were enriched with genes associated with osteoblast differentiation (Fig. 2a and b, blue boxes). The only immune cell category enriched in the induced-membrane was macrophages (Fig. 2a, solid black box). In contrast, all non-union tissues contained a variety of immune cell types (Fig. 2a and b dotted black boxes). The induced-membrane and non-union (Fig. 2A), as well as the bone next to the non-union (Fig. 2B) were enriched for macrophage genes, but the bone next to the PMMA spacer was not. Finally, genes associated with osteoclasts were equally represented in induced-membrane and non-union (Fig. 2a, last column), but enriched in bone next to a non-union (Fig. 2b, last column). Enrichment scores for each cell/tissue type shown in figure 2 are shown in tables 4 and 5.

Table 4.

Enrichment scores corresponding to heat map shown in figure 2A.

Non-union IM Common
Bone 17.71 0.86 0.05
Bone Marrow 12.63 0.05 0.76
Osteoblast Day 5 0.87 27.19 3.14
Osteoblast Day 14 0.44 32.72 2.68
Osteoblast Day 21 0.11 37.11 3.22
Skeletal Muscle 3.24 0.77 6.79
Microglia 0.31 2.28 8.63
Hematopoietic Stem Cell 7.21 0.36 0.00
Common Myeloid Progenitor 4.97 0.28 0.02
Megaerythrocyte progenitor 2.35 0.09 0.69
Mast Cells 5.22 1.5 2.31
Granulocytes 3.02 0.19 0.00
Lymph Nodes 8.62 3.03 0.11
Spleen 10.44 0.99 0.02
NK Cells 3.08 0.01 0.00
B cells Marginal Zone 14.46 0.02 0.00
Follicular B cells 9.51 0.03 0.00
CD8+ T cells 2.16 0.01 0.02
Macrophage Bone Marrow 0.11 1.42 5.04
Macrophage Peri 0.50 1.64 5.90
Osteoclasts 0.41 1.13 4.90

Table 5.

Enrichment scores corresponding to heat map shown in figure 2B.

Bone adjacent to non-union Bone adjacent to PMMA Common
Bone 62.54 0.04 0.00
Bone Marrow 68.74 0.00 0.00
Osteoblast Day 5 0.01 122.62 0.00
Osteoblast Day 14 0.00 146.46 0.00
Osteoblast Day 21 0.00 139.11 0.00
Skeletal Muscle 1.05 6.15 3.17
Hematopoietic Stem Cell 38.28 0.00 0.00
Common Myeloid Progenitor 33.19 0.00 0.00
Megaerythrocyte Progenitor 9.38 0.00 0.28
Mast Cells 17.56 0.80 0.35
Granulocytes 31.49 0.01 0.00
Lymph Nodes 49.72 0.97 0.00
Spleen 51.83 0.06 0.00
NK cells 24.66 0.00 0.00
B cells Marginal Zone 56.13 0.00 0.00
Follicular B cells 73.17 0.00 0.00
CD4+ T cells 27.97 0.00 0.00
CD8+ T cells 32.42 0.00 0.00
Macrophage Bone Marrow 8.62 1.58 1.04
Macrophage Peri 3.45 2.70 2.33
Osteoclast 8.21 1.04 1.36

iPathway Guide Analysis

RNA sequences were analyzed using iPathwayGuide to identify cell signaling pathways and protein interaction networks enriched in the Masquelet environment. For the induced-membrane vs. non-union comparison, the top 3 canonical pathways identified in iPathwayGuide were “Staphylococcus Aureus Infection,” “Systemic Lupus Erythematosus,” and “Complement and Coagulation Cascades.” However, false-discovery rate (FDR) correction of p-values rendered pathway enrichment differences between the induced-membrane and the nonunion non-significant. We examined each of these pathways manually and noted that a subset of 5 differentially expressed complement proteins was common to all three pathways (table 6). Since no canonical pathways were significantly enriched in induced-membrane vs. non-union, we examined all the protein-protein interaction networks identified by iPathway Guide. We focused on networks that displayed unidirectional changes in gene expression in induced-membrane compared to non-union, since we are comparing different tissue types rather than experimentally induced changes in one system. Figure 3 summarizes networks that were increased in induced-membrane compared to non-union. A small network of complement proteins was identified (Fig. 3a). Select AP1 transcription factor complex members were enriched in induced-membrane (Fig. 3b). The remaining AP1 complex members (c-fos, fra1, fra2 and cJun) were not detected in induced-membrane or non-union. A candidate network between a potassium gated ion channel (kcnj15), CXCR-7 (Ackr3) and intracellular guanine nucleotide binding proteins is shown in figure 3c. A candidate interaction between the GPI-anchored cell surface protein mesothelin (msln) and a fibronectin-based ECM network is shown in figure 3d. Twenty-five different collagen genes were sequenced in the induced-membrane vs. non-union experiment. Only the α3 chain of type V collagen was differentially expressed in the induced-membrane (Fig. 3e). Collagen α3(V) homotrimers are found in the pericellular space where they interact directly with cells under restricted conditions including cancer progression 23. No other components of type V collagen were elevated in induced-membrane. Finally, TNFα induced protein 6 (Tnfaip6) is consistent with activation of the innate immune system by the presence of the PMMA spacer (Fig. 3f).

Table 6.

Complement components differentially expressed in IM vs. non-union

Symbol Gene Description Log2 Fold Change Adjusted P Value
Cr2 Complement C3d receptor 2 −2.99 4.17E-05
C1r Complement C1r 0.95 3.48E-02
C1qb Complement C1q B chain 1.06 4.41E-03
C1qa Complement C1q A chain 1.19 5.69E-03
C1qc Complement C1q C chain 1.24 3.87-E03

Figure 3. Network summaries for induced-membrane.

Figure 3.

Biologically relevant protein-protein interaction networks identified in iPathway Guide as being enriched in induced membrane compared to non-union are shown. The heat map scale represents log2 fold changes.

In contrast to the induced-membrane vs. non-union comparison, there were significantly enriched canonical pathways discovered in the bone comparison. The top three most highly enriched cell signaling pathways in bone next to the spacer relative to bone next to the empty defect were “Pathways in Cancer” (p=0.0003) “ECM-receptor interaction” (p=0.0005) and “Hippo signaling pathway” (p=0.0007). Next, we examined the protein-protein interaction networks under each of these canonical pathways. Figure 4 summarizes the interaction networks identified under “Pathways in Cancer.” Genes marked with an asterisk were identified in the interaction networks under both “Pathways in Cancer” and” Hippo Signaling Pathway”. Note that genes in these networks are also known modulators of osteogenesis, including Wnt, TGFbeta, Hedgehog, and Notch signaling components. Finally, we examined all of the protein-protein interaction networks identified by iPathway Guide similar to the strategy we used for the induced-membrane vs. non-union comparison. This revealed enrichment of a relatively large predicted network of ECM constituents in bone next to the PMMA spacer (Fig. 5).

Figure 4. Networks under “Pathways in Cancer” that were enriched in Masquelet bone.

Figure 4.

“Pathways in Cancer” was the most significantly enriched pathway identified in iPathway Guide for the cut bone ends comparison. Biologically relevant protein-protein interactions that are part of this pathway are shown. * marks genes that are also part of the “Hippo Signaling” Pathway. The heat map scale represents log2 fold changes.

Figure 5. ECM protein-protein interaction networks suggest activation of ECM formation in Masquelet bone.

Figure 5.

Large and biologically relevant protein-protein interaction networks identified using the “networks” function in iPathway Guide are shown. The heat map scale represents log2 fold changes.

Networks that were uniformly decreased in the Masquelet environment are summarized in figure 6. We reason that these are candidate players in the non-union microenvironment. Both the non-union and the bone next to it appear to express a network of muscle proteins. Two small networks of immune cell markers were also identified.

Figure 6. Candidate mechanisms at play in the non-union environment.

Figure 6.

Protein-protein interactions networks that were uniformly decreased in Masquelet compared to non-union are shown. The heat map scale represents log2 fold changes.

Discussion

The Masquelet technique is a promising surgical approach to address volumetric bone loss due to acute trauma 24 and chronic fracture non-union 2. Even though median success rates are high, there is a significant amount of variation and the outcome for failed union after Masquelet treatment is often amputation. Infection is the most commonly reported complication in retrospective case series 24; 25 and the non-union rate is slightly higher in infected bones 26. Emerging data suggest that the ability to form an induced membrane varies among patients and that this correlates with successful graft-to-bone union after the second surgery 7; 25. Thus, identifying strategies to improve Masquelet success is vital to patients experiencing segmental bone loss. Here, we begin to address this clinical need by exploring the local milieu of two different osteotomies with the long term goal of identifying patterns of gene expression or cell populations in the induced membrane that help drive successful graft to bone consolidation. We used unbiased approaches and the cell types and genes identified help confirm existing literature 1013 and also identify potential novel mechanisms and cell profiles.

Here we compared local gene expression patterns in the Masquelet environment to those in a developing non-union. In 6-month old male rats, a 5 mm osteotomy that is left empty will develop into a non-union in virtually 100% of cases15. A visible induced-membrane that could be dissected off the PMMA spacer formed in all 5 animals. Fibrous tissue had also formed between the cut bone ends in the contralateral limbs, but RNA yield for one non-union was too low for RNA sequencing and so tissue from this rat was not included in the study. After completion of RNA sequencing, the first issue we addressed was the cellular composition of each tissue type. Cten revealed that the Masquelet and non-union wound environments had very little overlap in predicted cellular composition. This observation was true for both the “soft-tissue” components and the bone samples taken immediately proximal to the spacer and non-union. Induced-membrane was unique from all other tissues examined in that osteoblasts were the most significantly enriched cell type and macrophages were the only immune cell type identified. Enrichment scores for cells associated with adaptive and innate immunity were relatively high in bone next to the non-union compared to that next to the PMMA spacer. In fact, with the exception of “macrophage peri,” a cell type that originates in the spleen, enrichment scores for all immune cell types were less than 2.0 in bone next to the spacer. Importantly, Cten analysis does not distinguish between different macrophage subtypes, and so differences in macrophage composition cannot be discerned from this analysis. Similarly, the relative contributions of resident bone macrophages (osteomacs) versus inflammatory macrophages to induced-membrane development and regulation of bone anabolic processes in the context of Masquelet remain to be elucidated. Our results confirm and extend previous studies suggesting the presence of macrophages, osteoblasts and osteoclasts in the induced membrane 1014; 27.

The foreign body reaction to materials implanted subcutaneously is very well characterized (reviewed in28). Adsorption of serum proteins and neutrophils occur immediately, and these cells recruit additional innate effector cells including macrophages. Failure to clear the material triggers fusion of macrophages into foreign body giant cells and recruitment of fibroblasts, which deposit extracellular matrix and facilitate vascularization. The final outcome is a fibrous induced-membrane. Although they were not enriched in our Cten analysis of the induced-membrane, cells of the adaptive immune system are also recruited and activated during a typical foreign body reaction. This result may reflect the timing of our analysis, when the induced-membrane had all ready developed. Our data are also consistent with the premise that the induced-membrane that forms around an object placed into the bone microenvironment is a unique tissue relative to that which forms around a foreign-body placed subcutaneously.

In contrast to the variety of immune cell markers in the non-union environment, CTen analysis suggested that macrophages are the only immune cell type with significant presence in the induced-membrane. Macrophages are required for normal fracture healing and they impact MSC fate decisions and osteoblast differentiation in context dependent ways (reviewed in29). They make essential contributions to normal endochondral 30 and intramembraneous 31 fracture healing. In the context of endochondral healing, localized killing of macrophages (MAFIA mouse) at the time of fracture lead to a complete failure of hematoma maturation and soft callus formation 32. Systemic macrophage depletion 5 days after fracture, when the hematoma has formed completely, also lead to reductions in soft callus size that correlated with the degree of macrophage depletion32. Conversely, more robust cartilaginous callus formation occurred when macrophage numbers at the fracture site were enhanced 32. Thus, macrophages might bolster the osteogenic capacity of the induced membrane. In addition, macrophages might enhance the osteogenic capacity of graft placed into the defect at the second Masquelet surgery.

Others have compared the membrane that forms around PMMA placed into an osteotomy to the one that develops with subcutaneous placement13; 14, as well as to periosteum33 and mineralizing osteoblast cultures 12. To our knowledge, we are the first the compare the induced membrane to a developing non-union. Our motivation for using this approach is the potential to not only identify attributes of the membrane that drive successful graft-to-bone union but also to identify characteristics of a non-union that thwart healing. Genes associated with systemic activation of B cell pools (follicular B cells, lymph nodes and spleen) were enriched in the non-union tissues. Accordingly, recombination activating genes 1 and 2 (Rag 1 and 2) were among the top 5 most substantially decreased genes in induced-membrane compared to non-union (table S-2). This observation suggests that the inability to mount an effective healing response and adequate new bone formation might lead to a chronic adaptive immune response in the developing non-union. B cells and T cells are present in the hematoma and in the cartilaginous callus, but Rag1-/- mice display accelerated fracture healing and return to mechanical competence after fracture 34. If a chronic non-union represents an adaptive immune environment, one possible future outcome of our data would be the identification of indicators of non-union that could be monitored in at risk patients with any type of fracture. Indeed, systemic levels of inflammatory cytokines remain elevated up to 12 weeks after establishment of a non-union using the rat critical sized defect model 35.

Genes associated with CD4+ T cells were detected in bones next to both osteotomy environments, but they were not detected in induced-membrane or non-union (enrichment score ≤2). Cten analysis also suggested that CD8+ T cell were enriched in the non-union environment compared to the Masquelet environment. Patients with high intrinsic numbers of terminally differentiated memory T cells (CD8+) suffer delayed fracture healing 36. Accordingly, in a mouse model of anti-CD8 mediated T cell depletion, fracture healing was enhanced, while adoptive transfer of T cells thwarted bone regeneration 36. Similarly, genes expressed by CD8+ T cells (and macrophages) were enriched in fracture callus of geriatric rodents, which display impaired fracture healing 20.

Despite their evidently distinct cellular compositions, after false-discovery rate correction of p values, no canonical cell signaling pathways were significantly enriched in the induced membrane compared to non-union tissue. One possible explanation for this finding is that only a relatively small number of genes were enriched in each of the top three pathways identified and iPathway Guide predicted only modest impact of these genes on propagation of signaling. In addition, enriched genes are likely expressed by more than one cell type. Complement proteins, for example, were common to the top 3 pathways most enriched in induced membrane. These included all three chains of C1q, which activates the classical complement cascade 37. In addition to activating complement pathways, C1q also contributes to the resolution of inflammation and clearance of apoptotic cells 37. C1q can exacerbate inflammation in certain contexts. Complement proteins also contribute to osteoblast and osteoclast differentiation 38, fracture healing and the foreign body response. As such, complement proteins are likely at play in the chronic non-union as well as the developing induced-membrane. Indeed, an additional 27 complement components were present at equal levels in both induced-membrane and non-union tissue. The role of complement in membrane development is worth considering in future studies. The presence of complement components in the 4-week old induced-membrane might reflect the initial innate immune reaction to the PMMA spacer and activation of inflammatory cascades. S. Aureus and other pathogens that cause osteomyelitis also engage the complement system. The extent to which pre-activation of complement in a chronically infected non-union might influence induced-membrane formation during Masquelet treatment is an important clinical consideration.

To our surprise, changes in gene expression evoked in bone by the PMMA spacer were unique from and more substantial than those identified in the induced-membrane vs. non-union comparison. iPathway Guide analysis revealed “pathways in cancer”, “cell-ECM interactions” and “activation of Hippo signaling” in bone adjacent to the PMMA spacer. Many of the protein interaction networks identified under “pathways in cancer” are also known modulators of osteogenesis and bone healing. These included Wnt, Hippo, TGF-b and notch-delta signaling pathways. A rigid surface is known to promote osteoblast lineage progression of MSC 39, and so the rigid surface afforded by the PMMA spacer may provide pro-osteogenic cues to MSC present in the cut the bone ends. Alternatively, the spacer may promote more active bone healing and cortical vitality as a result of the mechanical pressure put onto the cut bone surfaces by the spacer. Indeed, during the second phase of Masquelet, bone formation appears to initiate from the cut bone ends and not from the center induced membrane 40. Thus, our results may suggest that the bone ends in the Masquelet are ‘primed’ for regeneration, and thus able to respond favorably to autograft when placed during the second stage. The PMMA spacer alone is not sufficient for consolidation after the second surgery, however, because dissecting away the induced membrane results in poorer healing 41.

Finally, in order to identify potential biological mechanisms at play in the non-union, we examined networks that were uniformly decreased in the Masquelet environment. We reasoned that these genes might be elevated in a non-union. The number of interactions identified using this approach was small, but the genes involved were consistent with the possibility of a chronic immune response to an un-resolving boney injury. A pre-B cell receptor (Igll1 also called CD179b) and a pre-B cell markers (Vpreb2 also called CD179a) were less abundant in the Masquelet environment. Mast Cell Expressed protein 1 (Mcemp1) is associated with innate immunity. CD177 is a GPI anchored cell surface protein that plays a role in neutrophil activation and extravasation. In addition, a small network of muscle genes (isoforms of troponin, myosin and actin) was less abundant in induced-membrane and bone next to the PMMA spacer. Although we were careful to avoid it, we cannot rule out the possibility that surrounding muscle tissue had collapsed into the osteotomy site and that we had collected some into our “non-union” samples.

Our gene expression analyses support and extend previous studies that sought to characterize the induced-membrane and its contribution to successful healing of critical-sized osteotomies. Osteoblasts are a component of an induced-membrane that forms around PMMA placed in bone, but not the membrane that forms around PMMA placed in a subcutaneous pocket 14. Accordingly, the induced-membrane contains markers of osteoblasts and bone regeneration including BMP2, TGFβ, RUNX2, VEGF, IL-6 and Stro-1 11; 12; 14; 40. The membrane also contains osteoclasts 10. Islands of calcification have been documented in the membrane induced in rodent models of Masquelet 10; 11; 40; 42 and in biopsies of induced-membrane harvested from human patients 3. Cellular and growth factor content of the induced-membrane diminish with time as it becomes more ECM-rich and fibrotic, however, the impact of this decrease on outcomes post stage second surgery is not known 3; 14.

Our study is limited primarily by small sample size and the fact that bulk RNA sequence data was used to estimate the cell types present and the signaling pathways at play in the Masquelet and non-union contexts. Validation and extension of our results at the protein level and by using more spatially informative methodologies like single cell RNA sequencing, as well as in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry of induced membranes are essential future experiments.

Together our data suggest that the PMMA spacer itself primes an osteogenic response during Masquelet surgery in both the bone and the membrane, and that activation of the adaptive immune system contributes to failed healing in a segmental defect that progresses to a chronic non-union.

Supplementary Material

table S-5
table S-3
table S-4
table S-2
table S-1

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge Anita B. Reddy and Bonnie Brooker-Nolan for excellent technical support. We acknowledge support from the Next Gen Sequencing and Bioinformatics Cores of the University of Michigan Medical School's Biomedical Research Core Facilities.

NIH P30 AR069620 pilot grant to AIA and MEH.

Literature Cited

  • 1.Hak DJ, Fitzpatrick D, Bishop JA, et al. 2014. Delayed union and nonunions: epidemiology, clinical issues, and financial aspects. Injury 45 Suppl 2:S3–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Masquelet AC, Begue T. 2010. The concept of induced membrane for reconstruction of long bone defects. Orthop Clin North Am 41:27–37; table of contents. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Aho OM, Lehenkari P, Ristiniemi J, et al. 2013. The mechanism of action of induced membranes in bone repair. The Journal of bone and joint surgery American volume 95:597–604. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Azi ML, Teixeira AA, Cotias RB, et al. 2016. Membrane Induced Osteogenesis in the Management of Posttraumatic Bone Defects. Journal of orthopaedic trauma 30:545–550. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Morelli I, Drago L, George DA, et al. 2016. Masquelet technique: myth or reality? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Injury 47 Suppl 6:S68–S76. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Yee MA, Mead MP, Alford AI, et al. 2017. Scientific Understanding of the Induced Membrane Technique: Current Status and Future Directions. Journal of orthopaedic trauma 31 Suppl 5:S3–S8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Durand M, Barbier L, Mathieu L, et al. 2020. Towards Understanding Therapeutic Failures in Masquelet Surgery: First Evidence that Defective Induced Membrane Properties are Associated with Clinical Failures. Journal of clinical medicine 9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Pelissier P, Masquelet AC, Bareille R, et al. 2004. Induced membranes secrete growth factors including vascular and osteoinductive factors and could stimulate bone regeneration. Journal of orthopaedic research: official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society 22:73–79. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Dimitriou R, Mataliotakis GI, Calori GM, et al. 2012. The role of barrier membranes for guided bone regeneration and restoration of large bone defects: current experimental and clinical evidence. BMC medicine 10:81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Gouron R, Petit L, Boudot C, et al. 2017. Osteoclasts and their precursors are present in the induced-membrane during bone reconstruction using the Masquelet technique. Journal of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine 11:382–389. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Gruber HE, Gettys FK, Montijo HE, et al. 2013. Genomewide molecular and biologic characterization of biomembrane formation adjacent to a methacrylate spacer in the rat femoral segmental defect model. Journal of orthopaedic trauma 27:290–297. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Gruber HE, Ode G, Hoelscher G, et al. 2016. Osteogenic, stem cell and molecular characterisation of the human induced membrane from extremity bone defects. Bone Joint Res 5:106–115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Gruber HE, Riley FE, Hoelscher GL, et al. 2012. Osteogenic and chondrogenic potential of biomembrane cells from the PMMA-segmental defect rat model. Journal of orthopaedic research: official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society 30:1198–1212. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Henrich D, Seebach C, Nau C, et al. 2016. Establishment and characterization of the Masquelet induced membrane technique in a rat femur critical-sized defect model. Journal of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine 10:E382–E396. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Filion TM, Li X, Mason-Savas A, et al. 2011. Elastomeric osteoconductive synthetic scaffolds with acquired osteoinductivity expedite the repair of critical femoral defects in rats. Tissue Eng Part A 17:503–511. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Bosemark P, Perdikouri C, Pelkonen M, et al. 2015. The masquelet induced membrane technique with BMP and a synthetic scaffold can heal a rat femoral critical size defect. Journal of orthopaedic research: official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society 33:488–495. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Alford AI, Reddy AB, Goldstein SA, et al. 2012. Two molecular weight species of thrombospondin-2 are present in bone and differentially modulated in fractured and nonfractured tibiae in a murine model of bone healing. Calcif Tissue Int 90:420–428. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Love MI, Huber W, Anders S. 2014. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNAseq data with DESeq2. Genome biology 15:550. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Shoemaker JE, Lopes TJ, Ghosh S, et al. 2012. CTen: a web-based platform for identifying enriched cell types from heterogeneous microarray data. BMC Genomics 13:460. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Hebb JH, Ashley JW, McDaniel L, et al. 2018. Bone healing in an aged murine fracture model is characterized by sustained callus inflammation and decreased cell proliferation. Journal of orthopaedic research: official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society 36:149–158. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Tarca AL, Draghici S, Khatri P, et al. 2009. A novel signaling pathway impact analysis. Bioinformatics 25:75–82. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Szklarczyk D, Gable AL, Lyon D, et al. 2019. STRING v11: protein-protein association networks with increased coverage, supporting functional discovery in genome-wide experimental datasets. Nucleic acids research 47:D607–D613. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Huang G, Ge G, Izzi V, et al. 2017. alpha3 Chains of type V collagen regulate breast tumour growth via glypican-1. Nature communications 8:14351. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Mathieu L, Bilichtin E, Durand M, et al. 2019. Masquelet technique for open tibia fractures in a military setting. European journal of trauma and emergency surgery: official publication of the European Trauma Society. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Morris R, Hossain M, Evans A, et al. 2017. Induced membrane technique for treating tibial defects gives mixed results. The bone & joint journal 99-B:680–685. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Raven TF, Moghaddam A, Ermisch C, et al. 2019. Use of Masquelet technique in treatment of septic and atrophic nonunion. Injury. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Leiblein M, Koch E, Winkenbach A, et al. 2019. Size matters: Effect of granule size of the bone graft substitute (Herafill(R)) on bone healing using Masqueleťs induced membrane in a critical size defect model in the raťs femur. Journal of biomedical materials research Part B, Applied biomaterials. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Chung L, Maestas DR Jr., Housseau F, et al. 2017. Key players in the immune response to biomaterial scaffolds for regenerative medicine. Advanced drug delivery reviews 114:184–192. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Pajarinen J, Lin T, Gibon E, et al. 2019. Mesenchymal stem cell-macrophage crosstalk and bone healing. Biomaterials 196:80–89. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Vi L, Baht GS, Whetstone H, et al. 2015. Macrophages promote osteoblastic differentiation in-vivo: implications in fracture repair and bone homeostasis. Journal of bone and mineral research: the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research 30:1090–1102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Alexander KA, Chang MK, Maylin ER, et al. 2011. Osteal macrophages promote in vivo intramembranous bone healing in a mouse tibial injury model. Journal of bone and mineral research: the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research 26:1517–1532. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Raggatt LJ, Wullschleger ME, Alexander KA, et al. 2014. Fracture healing via periosteal callus formation requires macrophages for both initiation and progression of early endochondral ossification. The American journal of pathology 184:3192–3204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Cuthbert RJ, Churchman SM, Tan HB, et al. 2013. Induced periosteum a complex cellular scaffold for the treatment of large bone defects. Bone 57:484–492. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Toben D, Schroeder I, El Khassawna T, et al. 2011. Fracture healing is accelerated in the absence of the adaptive immune system. Journal of bone and mineral research: the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research 26:113–124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Cheng A, Krishnan L, Pradhan P, et al. 2019. Impaired bone healing following treatment of established nonunion correlates with serum cytokine expression. Journal of orthopaedic research: official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society 37:299–307. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Reinke S, Geissler S, Taylor WR, et al. 2013. Terminally differentiated CD8(+) T cells negatively affect bone regeneration in humans. Science translational medicine 5:177ra136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Casals C, Garcia-Fojeda B, Minutti CM. 2019. Soluble defense collagens: Sweeping up immune threats. Molecular immunology 112:291–304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Modinger Y, Loffler B, Huber-Lang M, et al. 2018. Complement involvement in bone homeostasis and bone disorders. Seminars in immunology 37:53–65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Engler AJ, Sen S, Sweeney HL, et al. 2006. Matrix elasticity directs stem cell lineage specification. Cell 126:677–689. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Toth Z, Roi M, Evans E, et al. 2019. Masquelet Technique: Effects of Spacer Material and Micro-topography on Factor Expression and Bone Regeneration. Annals of biomedical engineering 47:174–189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Nau C, Simon S, Schaible A, et al. 2018. Influence of the induced membrane filled with syngeneic bone and regenerative cells on bone healing in a critical size defect model of the raťs femur. Injury 49:1721–1731. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.McBride-Gagyi S, Toth Z, Kim D, et al. 2018. Altering spacer material affects bone regeneration in the Masquelet technique in a rat femoral defect. Journal of orthopaedic research: official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

table S-5
table S-3
table S-4
table S-2
table S-1

RESOURCES