This study addressed a knowledge gap about longitudinal changes in the gut microbiome metabolites during animal pairing. This research in the laboratory common marmoset can control for the confounding factors such as diet and other environmental conditions. Phascolarctobacterium showed the highest contribution to the sex-biased transmission of the female to the male after pairing. Here, we observed the sex difference in the increase in short-chain fatty acid concentration in the feces of newly paired marmosets, which may be caused by the sex-biased gut microbiome transmission after pairing.
KEYWORDS: common marmosets, cohabitation and social contact, short-chain fatty acids, sex difference
ABSTRACT
The role by which the gut microbiome influences host health (e.g., energy equilibrium and immune system) may be partly mediated by short-chain fatty acids, which are bacterial fermentation products from the dietary fibers. However, little is known about longitudinal changes in gut microbiome metabolites during cohabitation alongside social contact. In common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus), the gut microbiome community is influenced by social contact, as newly paired males and females develop convergent microbial profiles. Here, we monitored the dynamics of short-chain fatty acid concentrations in common marmoset feces from the prepairing (PRE) to postpairing (POST) stages. In males, we observed that the concentrations of acetate, propionate, isobutyrate, and isovalerate significantly increased in the POST stage compared to the PRE stage. However, no significant changes were found in females. We further found that the propionate concentration was significantly positively correlated with the abundance of Phascolarctobacterium in the male feces. Thus, the sex difference in the changes in the concentrations of short-chain fatty acids might be related to sex-biased gut microbiome transmission after pairing. We suggest that the significant changes in the gut microbiomes and some short-chain fatty acids of the common marmoset during cohabitation may contribute to physiological homeostasis during pairing.
IMPORTANCE This study addressed a knowledge gap about longitudinal changes in the gut microbiome metabolites during animal pairing. This research in the laboratory common marmoset can control for the confounding factors such as diet and other environmental conditions. Phascolarctobacterium showed the highest contribution to the sex-biased transmission of the female to the male after pairing. Here, we observed the sex difference in the increase in short-chain fatty acid concentration in the feces of newly paired marmosets, which may be caused by the sex-biased gut microbiome transmission after pairing.
OBSERVATION
Marmosets (Callithrix jacchus) are family-living primates, with groups consisting of adult males and females, who form long-term socially monogamous and cooperative breeding relationships, and their offspring. The principal bacteria in the marmoset gut microbiome include Firmicutes (∼39%), Bacteroidetes (∼29%), and Actinobacteria (∼27%) (1). We have previously reported that newly paired marmosets displayed a significant convergence in their gut microbiomes during the first 8 weeks of cohabitation: significantly increase in the abundance of five genera (Phascolarctobacterium, Alloprevotella, Anaerobiospirillum, Sutterella, and Coprobacter) in both male and female feces after pairing (1). This finding may be associated with their social contact and affiliative behavior (e.g., social grooming, genital investigation, social approach, and mounts and copulations) (2–4). In addition, considering the pairing experiment performed at the same time, the unknown factors other than pairing could also have affected gut microbiome changes.
Phascolarctobacterium showed the highest contribution in the gut microbiome transmission in the newly paired marmosets, and this microbiome group exhibited the highest contribution to the sex-biased transmission pattern of the female to the male (1). Some studies have suggested that the transmitted gut microbiome within primate social groups may be beneficial to the host health, but with no direct evidence (5, 6).
The gut microbiome plays an important role in host immune development and health (7, 8). Short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) are the end products of fermentation of dietary fibers and protein by the gut microbiome (9–12). SCFAs (including acetate [ACE], propionate [PA], butyrate [BUTY], isobutyrate [ISOB], and isovalerate [ISOV]) have a key role in the maintenance of intestinal homeostasis and help maintain energy equilibrium, immune system function, and health (9–12). For example, PA can increase host serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine) biosynthesis in the intestine and affect gut motility and hemostasis (10). PA also reduces host inflammation, enhances tissue insulin sensitivity, maintains homeostasis of glucose, and induces hormone release (e.g., of leptin) (11, 12).
Phascolarctobacterium can produce short-chain fatty acids, such as propionate (PA) (13). Based on the significant elevation in Phascolarctobacterium following social pairing in marmosets, we hypothesized that these changes in gut microbiome community following pairing would result in significant increases in production of SCFAs, especially PA.
We measured the concentration of five SCFAs (acetate [ACE], propionate [PA], butyrate [BUTY], isobutyrate [ISOB], and isovalerate [ISOV]) from 228 fecal samples. The main SCFAs in these samples were ACE (mean: 44.91 ± 1.369 μmol/g), PA (mean: 10.86 ± 0.331 μmol/g), and BUTY (mean: 2.75 ± 0.151 μmol/g). The concentrations of the other two SCFAs were very low (ISOB: 0.35 ± 0.298 μmol/g; ISOC: 0.41 ± 0.341 μmol/g). We compared the SCFA concentration from prepairing (PRE) to postpairing (POST) for each sex. In males, we observed that the concentrations of ACE, PA, ISOB, and ISOV significantly increased in the POST stage compared to the PRE stage. No significant changes were found in female fecal samples after pairing, but the changes in PA after pairing were at the marginally significant level (Table 1, Benjamini-Hochberg [B-H] correction). Although there were significant increases in the abundance of five genera (Phascolarctobacterium, Alloprevotella, Anaerobiospirillum, Sutterella, and Coprobacter) in fecal samples from both males and females, the PA concentration was significantly associated only with the abundance of Phascolarctobacterium in fecal samples from male marmosets (Fig. 1, B-H correction). Therefore, we speculated that the highest contribution of Phascolarctobacterium to the sex-biased transmission pattern of the female to the male after pairing might result in the sex differences in the abundance changes of some SCFA concentrations.
TABLE 1.
Average concentrations of the main short-chain fatty acids between PRE and POST stagesa
| Stage | Female |
Male |
||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pair | Avg concn (μmol/g) of SCFA: |
Pair | Avg concn (μmol/g) of SCFA: |
|||||||||
| ACE | PA | BUTY | ISOB | ISOV | ACE | PA | BUTY | ISOB | ISOV | |||
| PRE | P1 | 32.276 | 6.589 | 2.521 | 0.372 | 0.511 | P1 | 43.541 | 8.295 | 2.583 | 0.405 | 0.574 |
| P2 | 33.776 | 11.238 | 1.110 | 0.229 | 0.301 | P2 | 38.163 | 10.448 | 4.359 | 0.044 | 0.106 | |
| P3 | 30.114 | 9.722 | 1.059 | 0.673 | 0.730 | P3 | 41.156 | 14.046 | 3.994 | 0.547 | 0.596 | |
| P4 | 32.658 | 8.962 | 0.618 | 0.062 | 0.019 | P4 | 41.897 | 11.548 | 1.786 | 0.283 | 0.283 | |
| P6 | 47.386 | 10.619 | 4.511 | 0.256 | 0.383 | P6 | 30.623 | 6.957 | 0.849 | 0.099 | 0.123 | |
| P7 | 39.489 | 9.689 | 2.639 | 0.273 | 0.323 | P7 | 39.194 | 8.065 | 1.515 | 0.376 | 0.211 | |
| P8 | 44.570 | 6.651 | 3.818 | 0.153 | 0.361 | P8 | 35.155 | 8.191 | 0.810 | 0.126 | 0.098 | |
| P9 | 40.672 | 7.107 | 2.040 | 0.000 | 0.043 | P9 | 38.607 | 2.172 | 2.871 | 0.000 | 0.027 | |
| POST | P1 | 35.469 | 12.332 | 1.768 | 0.607 | 0.644 | P1 | 50.912 | 10.543 | 2.908 | 0.520 | 0.662 |
| P2 | 43.088 | 13.829 | 2.903 | 0.248 | 0.288 | P2 | 55.097 | 10.527 | 3.417 | 0.345 | 0.532 | |
| P3 | 20.327 | 8.337 | 0.928 | 0.158 | 0.195 | P3 | 54.263 | 18.076 | 3.102 | 0.479 | 0.510 | |
| P4 | 41.029 | 11.197 | 2.116 | 0.605 | 0.657 | P4 | 48.224 | 13.614 | 3.638 | 0.384 | 0.476 | |
| P6 | 73.356 | 15.450 | 7.412 | 0.400 | 0.459 | P6 | 49.268 | 11.374 | 2.276 | 0.495 | 0.224 | |
| P7 | 50.789 | 12.073 | 3.576 | 0.546 | 0.660 | P7 | 38.472 | 11.733 | 1.148 | 0.501 | 0.538 | |
| P8 | 59.063 | 12.432 | 5.889 | 0.142 | 0.370 | P8 | 33.851 | 11.686 | 2.135 | 0.469 | 0.513 | |
| P9 | 47.334 | 12.822 | 2.552 | 0.517 | 0.616 | P9 | 54.085 | 7.554 | 3.210 | 0.313 | 0.489 | |
| Wilcoxon paired test |
0.078NS | 0.016NS | 0.055NS | 0.148NS | 0.195NS | 0.039* | 0.008* | 0.461NS | 0.016* | 0.016* | ||
The main short-chain fatty acids in this study include acetate (ACE), propionate (PA), butyrate (BUTY), isobutyrate (ISOB), and isovalerate (ISOV). Wilcoxon paired test, uncorrected P value based on Wilcoxon paired test. *, significance after Benjamini-Hochberg correction (α = 0.05) within each sex. NS, nonsignificance after Benjamini-Hochberg correction (α > 0.05) within each sex.
FIG 1.
Concentrations of propionate (μmol/g, y axis) and the relative abundance of five genera (Phascolarctobacterium, Alloprevotella, Anaerobiospirillum, Sutterella, and Coprobacter). Dashed line, significant correlation based on the uncorrected P value. Solid line, nonsignificant correlation based on the uncorrected P value. The propionate concentration was significantly associated only with the abundance of Phascolarctobacterium in fecal samples from males after Benjamini-Hochberg correction (α = 0.05).
Phascolarctobacterium bacteria are Gram-negative, obligately anaerobic, and non-spore-forming environmental microorganisms and have been found in soil, water, and some mammal feces (e.g., koala, human, and nonhuman primate) (1, 13–15). One of the main end products of the fermentation in Phascolarctobacterium is PA (13), which may have beneficial effects on the host (10–12, 16–18). For example, Phascolarctobacterium is positively correlated with the human positive mood (17), and Phascolarctobacterium has beneficial effects on host health and putatively decreases susceptibility to hepatic steatosis based on a rat model of nonalcoholic fatty liver (18). Moreover, PA is the essential mediator in the link between host nutrition, symbiotic gut microbiomes, and host physiology (19, 20). The purpose of physiological homeostasis is to neutralize or repair disturbance and to maintain stability (e.g., blood glucose level and blood pressure) (21). In addition, several diseases in humans (e.g., diabetes, obesity, and autoimmune disorders) are associated with reduced SCFA production in the gut (22–25).
Interestingly, the establishment of social bonds within pairmates (e.g., pair bonding) is important for maintaining physiological homeostasis (26). The data presented here extend these findings to the sex difference in changes in the fermentation metabolites of the gut microbiome during pair formation. Although the fecal SCFAs do not entirely reflect the total intestinal production (19, 20), examining SCFAs in common marmoset feces is a possible way (noninvasive method) to show SCFA metabolism in the intestine indirectly. We suggest that the gut microbiome metabolites in marmosets may have effects on the host physiology after pairing. Therefore, this study provides the new insight that one of the putative mechanisms between social bonding and physiological homeostasis in humans and nonhuman primates might involve microbial transmission in the gut and the associated metabolites under the condition of sex difference.
Newly paired marmoset experiment.
We examined fecal short-chain fatty acid concentrations in eight adult common marmoset pairs (eight females and eight males, aged 1.5 to 7.5 years). Baseline fecal samples (PRE; 59 fecal samples) were collected during a 2-week period prior to pairing (PRE), during which marmosets resided with an opposite-sex partner or in a family group (1). Marmosets were then rehoused in a new enclosure with a new opposite-sex partner who was a previously unfamiliar and unrelated marmoset. Fecal samples were collected in the postpairing phase (POST; 169 fecal samples) for an 8-week period following pairing. During both phases, marmosets were fed a consistent diet (commercial marmoset diet [Zupreem; Science Diet], Tenebrio larvae, scrambled eggs, fruits [red apple and cantaloupe], and gum arabic [Mazuri]). Fresh fecal samples were collected from marmosets in sterilized aluminum pans immediately after the light-on phase of the photoperiod. Samples were snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80°C. Most of these fecal samples were used in the previous gut microbiome study (1). This study was performed following the guidelines of the University of Nebraska Medical Center and the University of Nebraska at Omaha Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. The protocol was approved by the University of Nebraska Medical Center/University of Nebraska at Omaha Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (16-104).
SCFA measurement.
Fecal samples were taken from the −80°C freezer and thawed at room temperature. Fecal samples (0.21 g) were homogenized with 1 ml sterile phosphate-buffered saline and then centrifuged (10,000 × g, 5 min). Next, 0.4 ml of supernatant from each sample was mixed with 0.1 ml of internal standard (7 mM 2-ethylbutyrate) followed by acidification, extraction into diethyl ether, and quantification by gas chromatography (Clarus 580; PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA, USA) based on the standard protocol (27). For each pair, we estimated two single average points, one from the PRE stage, the other from the POST stage (days after pairing: from 29 to 55). Wilcoxon paired tests were used to calculate the P value from these two groups (PRE versus POST) within each sex. The relationships between the abundance of the five gut microbiome genera (significantly increased in both females and males after pairing) and the concentration of PA were tested via linear and quadratic models. The better model was selected according to the lower value of Akaike’s information criterion (28). False discovery rates were addressed by the Benjamini-Hochberg procedure (B-H correction, α = 0.05) for multiple-comparison testing within each sex (29). The above statistical analysis and plotting were conducted in R software (30).
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We are grateful to members of the French lab for helping with sample collection and providing feedback during manuscript preparation. We are grateful to Qibin Gao and Wenqian Zhao for helping with the statistics analysis during manuscript revision.
The Callitrichid Research Center is supported in part by the NIH (HD089147).
L.Z., A.C.M., D.J.R., A.K.B., and J.A.F. designed the research. H.R.H. collected the fecal samples. L.Z., M.J.S.V.H., and C.S. carried out the experiment. L.Z. performed the data analysis. L.Z., A.C.M., and J.A.F. wrote the manuscript. Each author contributed to the discussion.
The authors declared no conflicts of interest relevant to this paper.
REFERENCES
- 1.Zhu L, Clayton JB, Suhr Van Haute MJ, Yang Q, Hassenstab HR, Mustoe AC, Knights D, Benson AK, French JA. 2020. Sex bias in gut microbiome transmission in newly paired marmosets (Callithrix jacchus). mSystems 5:e00910-19. doi: 10.1128/mSystems.00910-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Evans S, Poole T. 1983. Pair-bond formation and breeding success in the common marmoset Callithrix jacchus jacchus. Int J Primatol 4:83–97. doi: 10.1007/BF02739361. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Schaffner CM, Shepherd RE, Santos CV, French JA. 1995. Development of heterosexual relationships in wied’s black tufted‐ear marmosets (Callithrix kuhli). Am J Primatol 36:185–200. doi: 10.1002/ajp.1350360303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Evans S. 1983. The pair-bond of the common marmoset, Callithrix jacchus jacchus: an experimental investigation. Anim Behav 31:651–658. doi: 10.1016/S0003-3472(83)80220-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Amato KR, Van Belle S, Di Fiore A, Estrada A, Stumpf R, White B, Nelson KE, Knight R, Leigh SR. 2017. Patterns in gut microbiota similarity associated with degree of sociality among sex classes of a neotropical primate. Microb Ecol 74:250–258. doi: 10.1007/s00248-017-0938-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Raulo A, Ruokolainen L, Lane A, Amato K, Knight R, Leigh S, Stumpf R, White B, Nelson KE, Baden AL, Tecot SR. 2018. Social behaviour and gut microbiota in red‐bellied lemurs (Eulemur rubriventer): in search of the role of immunity in the evolution of sociality. J Anim Ecol 87:388–399. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.12781. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Yatsunenko T, Rey FE, Manary MJ, Trehan I, Dominguez-Bello MG, Contreras M, Magris M, Hidalgo G, Baldassano RN, Anokhin AP, Heath AC, Warner B, Reeder J, Kuczynski J, Caporaso JG, Lozupone CA, Lauber C, Clemente JC, Knights D, Knight R, Gordon JI. 2012. Human gut microbiome viewed across age and geography. Nature 486:222–227. doi: 10.1038/nature11053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Gilbert JA, Blaser MJ, Caporaso JG, Jansson JK, Lynch SV, Knight R. 2018. Current understanding of the human microbiome. Nat Med 24:392–400. doi: 10.1038/nm.4517. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Corrêa‐Oliveira R, Fachi JL, Vieira A, Sato FT, Vinolo MAR. 2016. Regulation of immune cell function by short‐chain fatty acids. Clin Transl Immunol 5:e73. doi: 10.1038/cti.2016.17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Yano JM, Yu K, Donaldson GP, Shastri GG, Ann P, Ma L, Nagler CR, Ismagilov RF, Mazmanian SK, Hsiao EY. 2015. Indigenous bacteria from the gut microbiota regulate host serotonin biosynthesis. Cell 161:264–276. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.02.047. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Xiong Y, Miyamoto N, Shibata K, Valasek MA, Motoike T, Kedzierski RM, Yanagisawa M. 2004. Short-chain fatty acids stimulate leptin production in adipocytes through the G protein-coupled receptor GPR41. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101:1045–1050. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2637002100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Puddu A, Sanguineti R, Montecucco F, Viviani GL. 2014. Evidence for the gut microbiota short-chain fatty acids as key pathophysiological molecules improving diabetes. Mediators Inflamm 2014:162021. doi: 10.1155/2014/162021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Watanabe Y, Nagai F, Morotomi M. 2012. Characterization of Phascolarctobacterium succinatutens sp. nov., an asaccharolytic, succinate-utilizing bacterium isolated from human feces. Appl Environ Microbiol 78:511–518. doi: 10.1128/AEM.06035-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Wu F, Guo X, Zhang J, Zhang M, Ou Z, Peng Y. 2017. Phascolarctobacterium faecium abundant colonization in human gastrointestinal tract. Exp Ther Med 14:3122–3126. doi: 10.3892/etm.2017.4878. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Rieke EL, Soupir ML, Moorman TB, Yang F, Howe A. 2018. Temporal dynamics of bacterial communities in soil and leachate water after swine manure application. Front Microbiol 9:3197. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.03197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Zhang X, Zhao Y, Xu J, Xue Z, Zhang M, Pang X, Zhang X, Zhao L. 2015. Modulation of gut microbiota by berberine and metformin during the treatment of high-fat diet-induced obesity in rats. Sci Rep 5:14405. doi: 10.1038/srep14405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Li L, Su Q, Xie B, Duan L, Zhao W, Hu D, Wu R, Liu H. 2016. Gut microbes in correlation with mood: case study in a closed experimental human life support system. Neurogastroenterol Motil 28:1233–1240. doi: 10.1111/nmo.12822. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Panasevich MR, Morris EM, Chintapalli SV, Wankhade UD, Shankar K, Britton SL, Koch LG, Thyfault JP, Rector RS. 2016. Gut microbiota are linked to increased susceptibility to hepatic steatosis in low-aerobic-capacity rats fed an acute high-fat diet. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 311:G166–G179. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00065.2016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.den Besten G, van Eunen K, Groen AK, Venema K, Reijngoud D-J, Bakker BM. 2013. The role of short-chain fatty acids in the interplay between diet, gut microbiota and host energy metabolism. J Lipid Res 54:2325–2340. doi: 10.1194/jlr.R036012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Al-Lahham SH, Peppelenbosch MP, Roelofsen H, Vonk RJ, Venema K. 2010. Biological effects of propionic acid in humans; metabolism, potential applications and underlying mechanisms. Biochim Biophys Acta 1801:1175–1183. doi: 10.1016/j.bbalip.2010.07.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Cannon WB. 1929. Organization for physiological homeostasis. Physiol Rev 9:399–431. doi: 10.1152/physrev.1929.9.3.399. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Bhutia YD, Ganapathy V. 2015. Short, but smart: SCFAs train T cells in the gut to fight autoimmunity in the brain. Immunity 43:629–631. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2015.09.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Sun M, Wu W, Liu Z, Cong Y. 2017. Microbiota metabolite short chain fatty acids, GPCR, and inflammatory bowel diseases. J Gastroenterol 52:1–8. doi: 10.1007/s00535-016-1242-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Kimura I, Inoue D, Hirano K, Tsujimoto G. 2014. The SCFA receptor GPR43 and energy metabolism. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 5:85. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2014.00085. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Priyadarshini M, Wicksteed B, Schiltz GE, Gilchrist A, Layden BT. 2016. SCFA receptors in pancreatic β cells: novel diabetes targets? Trends Endocrinol Metab 27:653–664. doi: 10.1016/j.tem.2016.03.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Gerber P, Anzenberger G, Schnell CR. 2002. Behavioral and cardiophysiological responses of common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus) to social and environmental changes. Primates 43:201–216. doi: 10.1007/BF02629648. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Hartzell AL, Maldonado-Gómez MX, Hutkins RW, Rose DJ. 2013. Synthesis and in vitro digestion and fermentation of acylated inulin. Bioact Carbohydr Diet Fibre 1:81–88. doi: 10.1016/j.bcdf.2013.01.004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Yamaoka K, Nakagawa T, Uno T. 1978. Application of Akaike’s information criterion (AIC) in the evaluation of linear pharmacokinetic equations. J Pharmacokinet Biopharm 6:165–175. doi: 10.1007/BF01117450. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. 1995. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc Series B Methodol 57:289–300. doi: 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Ihaka R, Gentleman R. 1996. R: a language for data analysis and graphics. J Comput Graph Stat 5:299–314. doi: 10.2307/1390807. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

