Skip to main content
ACS Omega logoLink to ACS Omega
. 2020 Sep 2;5(36):22914–22925. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.0c02282

Accessing the Ene–Imine Motif in 1H-Isoindole, Thienopyrrole, and Thienopyridine Building Blocks

Brandon C Fillmore 1, Jayden Price 1, Ryan Dean 1, Amy A Brown 1, Andreas Decken 1, Sara Eisler 1,*
PMCID: PMC7495751  PMID: 32954140

Abstract

graphic file with name ao0c02282_0009.jpg

A pathway to a range of diverse heterocycles was developed using a nucleophilic cyclization strategy. Lactams and ene-imines are accessed in a few steps from a common precursor, and these moieties are further elaborated to directly provide pyrroles or pyridines with extended conjugation. Reaction conditions are mild, and a broad range of structural types are available within a few steps.

Introduction

Molecular building blocks possessing discrete conjugated segments that can be combined with other conjugated molecular units in a facile manner are widely utilized in pharmaceuticals1 and organic electronics.2 Moieties such as diketopyrrolopyrrole 1 and isoindigo 2 are widely used in the latter field for the synthesis of conjugated small molecules and polymers.3,4 Despite the many advances using these and similar building blocks,5 the development of new heterocycles such as lactam 3 and thiophenium salts 4 is a critical factor in learning how to control the properties of organic materials.6,7 Building blocks containing the ene–imine moiety, as highlighted in Figure 1, are rarely encountered in the literature despite the importance of this fragment in porphyrins8 and other π-extended structures such as BODIPY 5.9

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Conjugated molecular building blocks.

Our group has an interest in investigating and fine-tuning the electronic properties of conjugated oligomers and small molecules featuring ene–imine conjugation pathways. Accessing heteroaryl building blocks represented by compound 6 would greatly facilitate the incorporation of this fragment into larger, π-extended structures. Our goals therefore include the determination of a facile synthetic pathway to molecular units containing the ene–imine–triflate sequence illustrated in structure 6, use of this unit to make conjugated building blocks with a convenient synthetic handle for further elaboration, and the use of this technology to make rare or unknown heterocyclic structures containing the ene–imine fragment.

Results and Discussion

Our strategy hinges on nucleophilic cyclization reactions between a nitrogen nucleophile and an alkynyl electrophile. For our initial target, isoindole 10a, o-alkynylamide 7a was used (Scheme 1).10 Incorporation of the triflate handle required first a 5-exo-dig cyclization to lactam 8a, followed by deprotonation and then trapping of the oxygen with a triflating reagent. Although there are a number of interesting metal-catalyzed methods to make the isoindolinone moiety,11 the cyclization can be carried out using our standard literature procedure,11f with a mild base, to provide methylene-isoindolinone 8a in excellent yield. In a similar manner, phenyl-appended isoindolinone 8b could also be accessed using this procedure. The 5-exo ring closure is dominant when using benzamides such as 7ab, with no competition from 6-endo cyclization.

Scheme 1. Synthesis of Building Blocks 10be.

Scheme 1

However, formation of the triflate synthetic handle in 9 did not proceed smoothly as it was realized that the appended functional group at the exocyclic alkene in isoindolinones 8ab has a significant influence on the outcome with respect to 1H-isoindoles 10ae. Attempts to form triflate 9a using NaH to deprotonate the amide and Comin’s reagent or NPhTf2 to trap the oxygen resulted in spot-to-spot conversion on thin-layer chromatography (TLC).12 In contrast, a number of attempts were made to form triflate 9b from isoindolinone 8b using the same triflation conditions, with little to no conversion in any of the trials. It was found that the use of a 1 M solution of Tf2O in dichloromethane (DCM) successfully resulted in the formation of triflate 9b. However, the reaction does not go to completion using these conditions, and the lactam starting material was always present in the reaction mixture. Triflate 9b was found to be highly susceptible to nucleophilic attack by water to cause reversion to the lactam 8b. Instead of purifying and isolating triflate 9b, it was proposed that the most efficient method to access 1H-isoindoles 10 was to cross-couple triflate 9b immediately after its formation from lactam 8b. However, the presence of unreacted lactam resulted in low yields of 10. The triflation was found to be highly solvent dependent, and after testing various solvents, it was discovered that almost complete conversion (90–100%) to the triflate occurred in Et2O. This result allowed access to a range of building blocks containing electron-withdrawing and electron-donating groups via reaction at the C–OTf bond.

We chose Sonogashira–Hagihara cross-coupling reactions to test our ability to extend conjugation on triflates 9ab. Unfortunately, conversion of lactam 8a to heterocycle 10a via triflate 9a was never successful and we cannot confirm that 9a is ever formed. On the other hand, coupling between triflate 9b and a range of arylacetylenes proceeded rapidly; the reactions were generally complete within 5 min.13 The ene–imine–alkynyl monomers 10be were thus formed in yields ranging from 24 to 52% over two steps from 8b. Although the yields were typically moderate, it is worth emphasizing that this methodology is procedurally quite simple. Under the described conditions, the process, including purification by flash chromatography, can be completed in 4–5 h. Ene–imine–alkynyl derivatives 10be are very stable in ambient conditions, lasting for months at room temperature with no signs of decomposition. The successful reaction of building block 9b to produce a range of derivatives with varied substitution patterns leads us to believe that other cross-coupling reactions are likely to proceed in as facile a manner.

Our next goal involved determining the generality of our procedure by altering the aryl group appended to the exocyclic olefin, Scheme 2. Cyano-substituted o-alkynylbenzamide 11a was therefore synthesized and cleanly cyclized to isoindolinone 12a. However, formation of the triflate 13a did not proceed as expected and only the starting material was isolated in this case. We theorized that the electron-withdrawing cyanobenzene on the vinyl moiety of 12a negatively affected the nucleophilicity of the oxygen. To test this theory, isoindolinone 12b, with an electron-donating methoxy group, was then synthesized.

Scheme 2. Synthesis of Push–Pull and Push–Push 1H-Isoindoles.

Scheme 2

This time the triflation proceeded successfully to give methoxy-substituted 13b in 5 min using the same conditions as for cyano-substituted 12a. This result further underlines the sensitivity of this system to small changes in electronics and the difficulty of accessing ene–imine motifs in general.

As push–pull and push–push motifs are frequently targeted in organic electronics,14 we decided to use methoxy-substituted 13b to make push–pull and electron-rich 1H-isoindoles. Cross-coupling of 13b with 4-ethynylbenzonitrile was successful, resulting in push–pull 1H-isoindole 14b in a 23% yield over 2 steps from 12b. Initial attempts to synthesize dimethoxy-substituted 14c using triflate 13b resulted in the formation of the desired product albeit in low yields. Another building block, tosylate 13c, was therefore targeted for this transformation.15 This building block exhibited greater stability than triflate 13b and the electron-rich 1H-isoindole 14c was successfully synthesized via a Sonogashira–Hagihara reaction between tosylate 13c and 4-ethynylanisole in 60% yield. Similarly to 1H-isoindoles 10be, derivatives 14bc are remarkably stable at ambient conditions.

Once we determined a general procedure for obtaining the isoindole derivatives using o-alkynylbenzamides, we set our sights on various pyridine and pyrrole building blocks, Scheme 3, to determine if we could access a broader range of heterocyclic structures. We chose a thiophene backbone, as in 1516, for this purpose as they are essential building blocks in organic electronics. In general, when switching from a benzene-annulated alkynylamide to a five-membered heterocyclic-annulated alkynylamide such as 15ab and 16ab, the 6-endo cyclization has been shown to be more favorable in radical as well as nucleophilic cyclizations.16 However, our group has recently established that three structural features can be used to control the cyclization process.17,18 For example, the phenyl substituent in alkynyl amides 16ab can shift the favorability of the ring-closing reaction toward the 5-exo pathway via a stereoelectronic effect to provide thienopyrrolones 20ab, which are unusual heterocyclic compounds that are difficult to access via available literature techniques. The amount of steric bulk on the N is the second important feature in controlling the cyclization pathway and could be used to promote formation of the 5-exo product.18a We propose that when the N is unsubstituted, 6-endo cyclization becomes strongly favored; as the size of the group on the N is increased, so is the likelihood of a 5-exo cyclization. This effect is due to steric interactions between the alkynyl and amide substituents in the transition state, which are more significant in the case of the 6-endo pathway. Further indications of the importance of steric interactions are also noticeable in the E/Z ratio of the isoindolinone, where Z isomers are formed when the N substituent is small; the percentage of the E-isomer increases as the size is increased.18bFigure S1 in the supporting information demonstrates these concepts. While our investigations of the stereoelectronic and steric effects on the reaction pathways of these cyclizations are ongoing,19 we decided to exploit this steric effect to try to access both 6-endo and 5-exo heterocyclic-annulated products in the present study.

Scheme 3. Synthesis of Thiophene Building Blocks 18ab, 21ab.

Scheme 3

We therefore synthesized t-butyl-substituted amides 15ab and unsubstituted amides 16ab using standard techniques. Base-induced cyclization of thiophenes 15ab successfully resulted in the exclusive formation of the E-isomer of the 5-exo products 19 for both thiophenes a and b in excellent yields. Removal of the t-butyl group using trifluoroacetic acid to give lactams 20ab proceeded smoothly in moderate to high yields and without the need for chromatography. The triflation/Sonogashira–Hagihara sequence was then implemented to provide the bicyclic thienopyrroles 21a and 21b in 44 and 42% yields over 2 steps from 20a and 20b, respectively.

To access thienopyridines, cyclization of unprotected 16b resulted in the almost exclusive formation of 6-endo product 17b, while for 16a, a 1:1 mixture of pyridinone 17a and lactam 20a was formed. This latter result reflects our previous study’s conclusions that the composition of the heterocyclic backbone is the third important factor in controlling the 5-exo vs 6-endo cyclization pathway. Regardless, isomers 17a and 20a were easily separated by column chromatography, and 17a and 17b were carried onto the triflation/Sonogoshira–Hagihara sequence. Pyridines 18ab were isolated in two steps in 58 and 53% yield, respectively.

Given the newfound availability of this isoindole building block, we decided to demonstrate its utility by employing it to access π-extended structures. Our initial experiments involved the isoindole 10b, Scheme 4. The silyl group was removed with tetrabutylammonium fluoride (TBAF) and the terminal alkyne carried on to either oxidative coupling or Sonogashira reactions. During these trials, it became clear that the alkynyl handle was not an effective way to incorporate the isoindole group into larger structures.

Scheme 4. Synthesis of Dimers 22 and 23.

Scheme 4

Decomposition of the deprotected alkyne 10b occurred in both of these preliminary experiments, with no evidence of the formation of extended structures. We found that using the triflate directly proved to be a much more efficient method and we targeted a few structural motifs using the isoindole building block 9b.

To access an ene–imine–ene system, a Sonogashira reaction between triflate 9b and 7c was carried out. Upon work-up and characterization, we were surprised to learn that cyclization to triene 22 had occurred under the conditions of the Sonogashira reaction. Interestingly, NMR spectroscopy shows that the N–H resonance appears at 12.4 ppm, indicating that a six-membered ring hydrogen bonding motif forms between the amide and the pyrrole nitrogen.20 Compound 22, which features an extended conjugation pathway from vinyl moiety to a lactam carbonyl, is surprisingly stable to photochemical isomerization and thermal decomposition.

Alternatively, an excess of triflate 9b was subjected to Sonogashira conditions in the presence of a 1,4-dialkynylbenzene, Scheme 4. Dimer 23 was formed as an orange-red solid, primarily as the Z,Z isomer. Although dimer 23 could not be purified completely, its identity was confirmed by X-ray crystallography. Remarkably, both extended structures 22 and 23 are stable under ambient conditions and have not been observed to undergo decomposition via reaction with oxygen to form a dioxetane, the primary decomposition pathway of related structures.21,22

Ultraviolet–visible (UV–vis) spectral analysis was performed for all monomers, Figures 2 and S2. Compounds 10b10d absorb strongly in the 350–425 nm region. Although the push–pull derivative 14b does show the expected bathochromic shift with a λmax of 430 nm, the molar absorptivity is greatly reduced for both 14b (ε = 4824 L mol–1 cm–1) and cyano-substituted 10emax = 399 nm, ε = 2869 L mol–1 cm–1). Interestingly, push–push 14cmax = 413 nm, ε = 27 840 L mol–1 cm–1) is also quite bathochromically shifted but has a large molar absorptivity. In comparison to TIPS-substituted 10bmax = 387 nm, ε = 31564 L mol–1 cm–1), absorption of thienopyridines 18a and 18b is markedly weaker and 18b is significantly hypsochromically shifted with a λmax of 337 nm (ε = 8796 L mol–1 cm–1). This blue-shift is likely due to the reduced conjugation in 18b between the alkyne and the thieno ring, due to the established aromaticity of the pyridine ring. In contrast, pyridine 18a is more highly conjugated due to the thiophene substitution pattern, resulting in a red-shift and a λmax of 386 nm (ε = 3176 L mol–1 cm–1). Dyes 21a and 21b possessing the thienopyrrole moiety exhibit similar levels of extended conjugation in comparison to 18a as well as 1H-isoindole monomers 10b10e. With respect to the emissive properties, the majority of the new compounds made in this study are not fluorescent; notable exceptions include thienopyridines 18ab and dimer 22, which are weakly emissive (see Figure S3). A full structure activity relationship investigation of the emissive properties of these compounds is ongoing.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

UV–visible spectra of building blocks (a) 10be, 14b, and 14c and (b) 10b, 18ab, and 21ab.

Solid-state structural data for the lactam, pyrrole, isoindole, and pyridinyl building blocks was sought out in this phase of our studies to identify intermolecular interactions that could be used to control the organization of organic electronic materials incorporating these building blocks. Fortunately, we obtained single crystals of three of the compounds as shown in Figure 3, using vapor diffusion (EtOAc/hexanes) at room temperature. Yellow crystals of pyrrol-one E-20b were grown. There are two crystallographically independent molecules in the asymmetric unit, although they differ primarily by small differences in the degree to which the vinylic phenyl ring is twisted out of plane, 35 and 40°. The fused thiophene and lactam rings are planar as expected, and similarly to other lactam building blocks such as DPP, intermolecular hydrogen-bonded interactions (N···O distance = 2.846(5)/2.863(5) Å; N···O–C angle = 116.2(3)/115.8(3)) are observed between the carbonyl and the N–H to form a dimer.23 Due to the thiophene ring, S···S contacts are also possible, and are observed in one of the molecules of 20b as shown in Figure 3a, with a S···S distance of 3.296(2) Å, conforming to a classic chalcogen···chalcogen interaction.24

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Single-crystal X-ray structures of (a) lactone 20b; (b) pyrrole 10c; (c) bis-pyrrole 23, single molecule; and (d) bis-pyrrole 23, packing.

Crystals of pyrrole 10c were grown, confirming the Z assignment.25 In contrast to the solid-state structure of pyrrol-one 20b, the entire structure is planar, except for some minor twisting of the phenyl moiety appended to the vinyl group. Two intermolecular C–H···π interactions are observed, as labeled in Figure 3b.26

The solid-state structure of dimer 23, grown as a red crystal, confirms the Z,Z assignment of the exocyclic double bonds. In addition, communication between the end-capping pyrrole units is uninterrupted due to the planarity of the primary conjugation pathway from the exocyclic double bond to the exocyclic double bond. The molecules of 23 are stacked in a herringbone arrangement, Figure 3d, although no π-stacking interactions are observed due to the large distance between the layers and slippage between the molecules in a stack.

Conclusions

In conclusion, we have developed an efficient two-step procedure for an ene–imine building block. This methodology provides access to a variety of heterocycles, including 1H-isoindoles, thienopyrroles, and thienopyridines, in good yields. Additionally, this strategy can also be used effectively and easily to make extended conjugated systems and can be used in a modular fashion to form repeat ene–imine units in large systems. Significantly, we have also shown that steric control of 5-exo vs 6-endo cyclization in thioalkynylamides can provide access to rare and unusual heterocyclic compounds.

Experimental Section

All commercially available reagents were purchased and used as received. All solvents were dried using a Grubbs apparatus prior to use. Tetrabutylammonium fluoride (TBAF) was used at a 1.0 mol L–1 concentration in tetrahydrofuran (THF). Sodium hydride (NaH) was used at a 60% dispersion in mineral oil (mass of dispersion used is reported, with moles of NaH). Trifluoromethanesulfonic anhydride (Tf2O) was used at a 1.0 mol L–1 concentration in dichloromethane (DCM). Sonogashira–Hagihara and triflation reactions were performed under N2. All other reactions were performed in air. TLC analysis was performed on glass-backed plates (60Å) and flash chromatography was performed on ultrapure flash silica (230–400 mesh size). When appropriate, silica was deactivated by adding triethylamine (3% by volume) to the appropriate eluent and stirring with silica at rt for 30 min prior to being used for column chromatography. NMR spectra were recorded using a Varian Inova 300 MHz (1H: 299.838 MHz, 13C: 75.402 MHz) or Varian Unity 400 MHz spectrometer (1H: 399.945 MHz, 13C: 100.577 MHz) with CDCl3 referenced at 7.26 ppm (1H) or 77.16 ppm (13C). X-ray diffraction data sets for compounds 10c, 20b, and 23 were collected on a Bruker AXS P4/SMART 1000 diffractometer. IR spectra were recorded using KBr discs on a Nicolet Nexus 470 FTIR spectrometer. UV–visible spectra were recorded on an Agilent 8453 spectrophotometer in CHCl3. Emission spectra were recorded at 298 K in CHCl3 using an Agilent Cary Eclipse Fluorimeter. High-resolution mass spectra were recorded on a Bruker Daltonics spectrometer using electrospray ionization (ESI). Starting materials 2-iodobenzoic acid, 4-bromothiophene-3-carboxylic acid, 3-bromothiophene-2-carboxylic acid, and 4-bromothiophene-3-carboxamide were all purchased from Sigma-Aldrich.

General Sonogashira–Hagihara Procedure (A)

One equivalent of aryl iodide was dissolved in a 3:1 mixture of anhydrous THF/Et3N. Pd(PPh3)2Cl2 (6–8 mol %) and CuI (6–8 mol %) were then added, and the solution was simultaneously degassed with nitrogen and heated to 55 °C. The terminal acetylene (2.5 equiv) was then added to the solution, and the reaction was allowed to stir at 55 °C until TLC or 1H NMR analysis indicated reaction completion. Saturated NH4Cl(aq) was added to the solution, and the organic phase was extracted with EtOAc, dried over MgSO4, filtered, and the solvent was removed under reduced pressure. The crude product was purified by column chromatography.

General Sonogashira–Hagihara Procedure (B)

One equiv. of aryl bromide was dissolved in a 1:1 mixture of anhydrous DMF:diisopropylamine. Pd(PPh3)2Cl2 (8 mol %) and CuI (8 mol %) were then added, and the solution was degassed with nitrogen and heated to 90 °C. The terminal acetylene (2.5 equiv) was then added to the solution, and the reaction was allowed to stir at 90 °C until TLC or 1H NMR analysis indicated reaction completion (5–12 h). Saturated NH4Cl(aq) was added to the solution, and the organic phase was extracted with EtOAc, dried over MgSO4, filtered, and the solvent was removed under reduced pressure. The crude product was purified by column chromatography.

General Cyclization Procedure (C)

One equivalent of alkynylamide was dissolved in anhydrous THF at rt. The solution was heated to the desired temperature. Tetrabutylammonium fluoride (1.1–3 equiv) was added and the reaction was allowed to stir at the corresponding temperature until TLC analysis indicated reaction completion (5 min–12 h). Saturated NH4Cl(aq) was added to the solution, and the organic phase was extracted with Et2O, dried over MgSO4, and filtered. The solvent was removed under reduced pressure. No further purification was necessary.

General tert-Butyl Removal Procedure (D)

One equivalent of tert-butyl-protected thienopyrrolone was dissolved in neat TFA at rt. The solution was stirred until TLC analysis indicated the reaction completion. CHCl3 was added to the solution, where saturated NaHCO3 was added until the evolution of CO2 gas subsided. The organic phase was dried over MgSO4, filtered, and solvent was removed under reduced pressure. No further purification was necessary.

General Triflation-Sonogashira–Hagihara Procedure (E)

Anhydrous Et2O was brought to reflux, followed by addition of one equiv. of lactam. NaH (2 equiv) was added, followed by the immediate addition of Tf2O (1.5 equiv). The reaction was monitored by TLC until no further conversion to triflate was observed (about 3 min). The reaction mixture was then extracted with Et2O, washed with saturated NaCl(aq), dried over MgSO4, and filtered directly into a two-neck flask containing Et3N, Pd(PPh3)2Cl2 (0.06 equiv), CuI (0.06 equiv), and LiCl (3 equiv) were then added. The solution was degassed with N2 and heated to 55 °C. The appropriate acetylene (2.5 equiv) was then added and the reaction was monitored by TLC analysis until all aryl triflate was consumed. Saturated NH4Cl(aq) was added to the solution, and the organic phase was extracted with EtOAc, dried over MgSO4, filtered, and the solvent was removed under reduced pressure. The crude product was purified by column chromatography.

General Tosylation-Sonogashira–Hagihara Procedure (F)

The lactam (1 equiv) and NaH (2 equiv) were added to a flame-dried and N2-backfilled RBF equipped with a magnetic stir bar. Anhydrous acetonitrile (ACN) was added via a syringe, and after 5 min, a solution of TsCl (1.5 equiv) dissolved in anhydrous ACN was added dropwise. The reaction was monitored by TLC analysis until no further conversion to the tosylate was observed (<5 min). The reaction was diluted with Et2O, transferred to a separatory funnel, and washed with saturated NaHCO3(aq) (3×). The organic layer was isolated, dried over Na2SO4, and filtered. The filtrate was concentrated to near dryness, diluted with a mixture of ACN/TEA (1:1 v/v), and transferred into a flame-dried and N2-backfilled RBF equipped with a magnetic stir bar, Pd(PPh3)2Cl2 (0.08 equiv), CuI (0.08 equiv), and condenser. The reaction was brought to reflux and the appropriate acetylene (2.5 equiv) was added via syringe. The reaction was monitored via TLC analysis until all of the tosylate was consumed. After completion, the crude was diluted with Et2O, transferred into a separatory funnel, and washed with NH4Cl (3×). The organic layer was isolated, dried over MgSO4, and filtered and solvent was removed under reduced pressure. The crude product was purified by column chromatography.

2-Iodobenzamide

2-Iodobenzoic acid (1.00 g, 4.03 mmol) was added to excess SOCl2 (10 mL) at rt. The solution was heated to reflux and the reaction was stirred for 3 h. Excess SOCl2 was removed and the solid residue was dissolved with anhydrous DCM (180 mL). Ammonia gas was then bubbled through the solution at rt for 20 min. The contents of the reaction flask were then concentrated under reduced pressure, followed by vacuum filtration using distilled H2O to obtain 2-iodobenzamide as a white solid (0.936 g, 94%). The 1H and 13C NMR spectra agreed with literature reports.27

4-Bromo-N-(tert-butyl)thiophene-3-carboxamide

4-Bromothiophene-3-carboxylic acid (1.00 g, 4.83 mmol) was added to excess SOCl2 (10 mL) at rt. The solution was heated to reflux and the reaction was stirred for 3 h. Excess SOCl2 was evaporated using N2 gas. The solid residue was dissolved with anhydrous DCM (180 mL). tert-Butylamine (3.04 mL, 28.9 mmol) was added to the reaction at room temperature and the reaction was stirred overnight at room temperature. Saturated NH4Cl was added to the reaction, and the organic phase was extracted with DCM, dried over MgSO4, filtered, and concentrated under reduced pressure to obtain 4-bromo-N-(tert-butyl)thiophene-3-carboxamide as an off-white solid (1.24 g, 98%). Mp: 71–73 °C; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.99 (d, J = 3.6 Hz, 1H), 7.30 (d, J = 3.6 Hz, 1H), 6.52 (b, 1H), 1.47 (s, 9H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 161.0, 137.1, 131.5, 125.4, 107.2, 52.1, 29.0; IR (film, KBr) 3295, 3104, 2967, 2926, 1648, 1540 cm–1; HRMS (ESI+): m/z calculated for C9H12NBrNaOS [M + Na]+: 283.9715, found 283.9705.

3-Bromo-N-(tert-butyl)thiophene-2-carboxamide

3-Bromothiophene-2-carboxylic acid (1.00 g, 4.83 mmol) was added to excess SOCl2 (10 mL) at rt. The solution was heated to reflux and the reaction was stirred for 3 h. Excess SOCl2 was evaporated using N2 gas. The solid residue was dissolved with anhydrous DCM (180 mL). tert-Butylamine (1.52 mL, 14.5 mmol) was added to the reaction at rt and the reaction was stirred overnight at rt. Saturated NH4Cl was added to the reaction, and the organic phase was extracted with DCM, dried over MgSO4, filtered, and concentrated under reduced pressure to obtain an off-white solid (1.19 g, 94%). The 1H and 13C NMR spectra agreed with literature reports.28

3-Bromothiophene-2-carboxamide

3-Bromothiophene-2-carboxylic acid (1.00 g, 4.83 mmol) was added to excess SOCl2 (10 mL) at rt. The solution was heated to reflux and the reaction was stirred for 3 h. Excess SOCl2 was removed and the solid residue was dissolved with anhydrous DCM (180 mL). Ammonia gas was then bubbled through the solution at rt for 20 min. Saturated NH4Cl(aq) was added to the solution, and the organic phase was extracted with DCM, dried over MgSO4, filtered, and concentrated under reduced pressure to obtain a white solid (0.955 g, 96%). The 1H and 13C NMR spectra agreed with literature reports.29

2-((Trimethylsilyl)ethynyl)benzamide (7a)

Prepared according to general procedure A using 2-iodobenzamide (0.200 g, 0.810 mmol), THF (10 mL), Et3N (2.5 mL), Pd(PPh3)2Cl2 (0.0341 g, 0.0485 mmol), CuI (0.0092 g, 0.048 mmol), and trimethylsilylacetylene (0.29 mL, 2.0 mmol). The crude product was purified by column chromatography (2:3 EtOAc/hexanes, v/v) on silica gel to obtain 7a as a beige solid (0.132 g, 75%). The 1H and 13C NMR spectra agreed with literature reports.30

2-(Phenylethynyl)benzamide (7b)

Prepared according to general procedure A using 2-iodobenzamide (0.200 g, 0.810 mmol), THF (10 mL), Et3N (2.5 mL), Pd(PPh3)2Cl2 (0.0341 g, 0.0485 mmol), CuI (0.0092 g, 0.048 mmol), and phenylacetylene (0.22 mL, 2.0 mmol). The crude product can be purified by column chromatography (1:1 EtOAc/hexanes, v/v) on silica gel, or by precipitation in diethyl ether, to obtain 7b as a white solid (0.157 g, 88%). The 1H and 13C NMR spectra agreed with literature reports.30

3-Methyleneisoindolin-1-one (8a)

Prepared according to general procedure C using alkynylamide 7a (0.200 g, 0.920 mmol), TBAF (2.3 mL, 2.3 mmol), and anhydrous THF (50 mL). Obtained as a yellow solid (0.107 g, 82%). The 1H and 13C NMR spectra agreed with literature reports.31

(Z)-3-Benzylideneisoindolin-1-one (8b)

Prepared according to general procedure C using alkynylamide 7b (0.100 g, 0.452 mmol), TBAF (0.5 mL, 0.500 mmol), and anhydrous THF (10 mL). Obtained as a yellow solid (0.080 g, 80%). The 1H and 13C NMR spectra agreed with literature reports.31

(Z)-1-Benzylidene-3-((triisopropylsilyl)ethynyl)-1H-isoindole (10b)

Prepared according to general procedure E using lactam 8b (0.0500 g, 0.226 mmol), NaH (0.0181 g, 0.452 mmol), Tf2O (0.34 mL, 0.34 mmol), Et2O (15 mL), Pd(PPh3)2Cl2 (0.0096 g, 0.014 mmol), CuI (0.0026 g, 0.014 mmol), LiCl (0.0285 g, 0.672 mmol), triisopropylsilyl acetylene (0.13 mL, 0.58 mmol), and Et3N (5 mL). The crude product was purified by column chromatography (hexanes) on deactivated silica gel to obtain 10b as a yellow oil (0.0427 g, 49%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.31–8.29 (m, 2H), 7.84–7.82 (m, 1H), 7.68–7.66 (m, 1H), 7.49–7.35 (m, 5H), 7.31 (s, 1H), 1.22 (s, 21H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 155.0, 149.9, 141.2, 138.8, 135.5, 132.9, 129.9, 128.9, 128.9, 128.6, 128.0, 121.1, 119.6, 104.5, 101.1, 18.9, 11.4; IR (film, KBr) 2943, 2890, 2865, 1626, 1571, 1478, 1463 cm–1; UV–vis (CHCl3): λmax = 387 nm; HRMS (ESI+): m/z calculated for C26H32NSi [M + H]+: 386.2299, found 386.2297.

(Z)-1-Benzylidene-3-(phenylethynyl)-1H-isoindole (10c)

Prepared according to general procedure E using lactam 8b (0.0539 g, 0.244 mmol), NaH (0.0195 g, 0.488 mmol), Tf2O (0.37 mL, 0.37 mmol), Et2O (15 mL), Pd(PPh3)2Cl2 (0.0103 g, 0.0147 mmol), CuI (0.0028 g, 0.015 mmol), LiCl (0.0307 g, 0.724 mmol), phenylacetylene (0.1 mL, 0.9 mmol), and Et3N (5 mL). The crude product was purified by column chromatography (1:8 EtOAc/hexanes, v/v) on deactivated silica gel to obtain 10c as a yellow solid (0.0387 g, 52%). Mp: 124–126 °C; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.34–8.31 (m, 2H), 7.87–7.85 (m, 1H), 7.80–7.77 (m, 1H), 7.74–7.72 (m, 2H), 7.52–7.36 (m, 8H), 7.34 (s, 1H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 155.1, 150.0, 141.3, 138.4, 135.5, 132.8, 132.7, 129.9, 129.9, 129.0, 128.9, 128.7, 128.3, 127.9, 122.0, 121.2, 119.6, 100.0, 84.6; IR (film, KBr) 2203, 1625, 1497 cm–1; UV–vis (CHCl3): λmax = 395 nm; HRMS (ESI+): m/z calculated for C23H16N [M + H]+: 306.1277, found 306.1291.

(Z)-1-Benzylidene-3-((4-methoxyphenyl)ethynyl)-1H-isoindole (10d)

Prepared according to general procedure E using lactam 8b (0.0250 g, 0.113 mmol), NaH (0.0091 g, 0.226 mmol), Tf2O (0.17 mL, 0.17 mmol), Et2O (10 mL), Pd(PPh3)2Cl2 (0.0048 g, 0.0068 mmol), CuI (0.0013 g, 0.068 mmol), LiCl (0.0143 g, 0.337 mmol), 1-ethynyl-4-methoxybenzene (0.0374 g, 0.283 mmol), and Et3N (5 mL). The crude product was purified by column chromatography (1:9 EtOAc/hexanes, v/v) on deactivated silica gel to obtain 10d as a yellow solid (0.0091 g, 24%). Mp: 106–107 °C; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.33–8.30 (m, 2H), 7.86–7.84 (m, 1H), 7.79–7.76 (m, 1H), 7.67 (d, J = 9.2 Hz, 2H), 7.51–7.43 (m, 4H), 7.39–7.35 (m, 1H), 7.31 (s, 1H), 6.95 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2H), 3.87 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 161.1, 155.3, 150.1, 141.3, 138.4, 135.6, 134.4, 132.7, 129.8, 128.9, 128.9, 127.9, 127.7, 121.2, 119.6, 114.4, 114.0, 100.8, 83.9, 55.6; IR (film, KBr) 2197, 1625, 1603, 1514 cm–1; UV–vis (CHCl3): λmax = 399 nm; HRMS (ESI+): m/z calculated for C24H18NO [M + H]+: 336.1383, found 336.1392.

(Z)-4-((1-Benzylidene-1H-isoindol-3-yl)ethynyl)benzonitrile (10e)

Prepared according to general procedure E using lactam 8b (0.0250 g, 0.113 mmol), NaH (0.0091 g, 0.228 mmol), Tf2O (0.17 mL, 0.17 mmol), Et2O (10 mL), Pd(PPh3)2Cl2 (0.0048 g, 0.0069 mmol), CuI (0.0013 g, 0.068 mmol), LiCl (0.0143 g, 0.337 mmol), and 4-ethynylbenzonitrile (0.0360 g, 0.283 mmol), Et3N (5 mL). The crude product was purified by column chromatography (1:7 THF/hexanes, v/v) on deactivated silica gel to obtain 10e as a yellow solid (0.0101 g, 27%). Mp: 181–183 °C; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.33–8.30 (m, 2H), 7.89–7.87 (m, 1H), 7.80 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 7.76–7.74 (m, 1H), 7.72 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H), 7.54–7.39 (m, 5H), 7.40 (s, 1H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 154.1, 149.9, 141.3, 138.1, 135.3, 133.0, 133.0, 132.4, 130.3, 129.7, 129.3, 129.0, 128.1, 126.8, 121.0, 119.8, 118.4, 113.2, 96.9, 88.1; IR (film, KBr) 3064, 2228, 1625, 1603, 1505 cm–1; UV–vis (CHCl3): λmax = 399 nm; HRMS (ESI+): m/z calculated for C24H15N2 [M + H]+: 331.1230, found 331.1237.

2-((4-Methoxyl)ethynyl)benzamide (11b)

Prepared according to general procedure A using 2-iodobenzamide (0.140 g, 0.567 mmol), THF (30 mL), Et3N (10 mL), Pd(PPh3)2Cl2 (0.0456 g, 0.0651 mmol), CuI (0.0086 g, 0.0452 mmol), and 1-ethynyl-4-methoxybenzene (0.187 g, 1.41 mmol). The crude product was purified by column chromatography (3:2 EtOAc/hexanes, v/v) on silica gel to obtain 11b as a light yellow solid (0.098 g, 69%). The 1H and 13C NMR spectra agreed with literature reports.30

(Z)-3-(4-Methoxybenzylidene)isoindolin-1-one (12b)

Prepared according to general procedure C using alkynylamide 11b (0.0981 g, 0.390 mmol), TBAF (0.45 mL, 0.45 mmol), and anhydrous THF (20 mL). Obtained as a yellow solid (0.084 g, 86%). The 1H and 13C NMR spectra agreed with literature reports.31

(Z)-4-((1-(4-Methoxybenzylidene)-1H-isoindol-3-yl)ethynyl)benzonitrile (14b)

Prepared according to general procedure E using lactam 12b (0.0250 g, 0.0995 mmol), NaH (0.0160 g, 0.400 mmol), Tf2O (0.15 mL, 0.15 mmol), Et2O (30 mL), Pd(PPh3)2Cl2 (0.0120 g, 0.0171 mmol), CuI (0.0030 g, 0.016 mmol), LiCl (0.0260 g, 0.613 mmol), 4-ethynylbenzonitrile (0.0316 g, 0.249 mmol), and Et3N (5 mL). The crude product was purified by column chromatography (1:9 EtOAc/hexanes, v/v) on deactivated silica gel to obtain 14b as an orange solid (0.0082 g, 23%). Mp: 181–183 °C; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.32 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2H), 7.87–7.84 (m, 1H), 7.80 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H), 7.76–7.74 (m, 1H), 7.72 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H), 7.49 (dt, J = 7.6, 1.2 Hz, 1H), 7.43 (dt, J = 7.6, 1.2 Hz, 1H), 7.36 (s, 1H), 7.00 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2H), 3.89 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 161.7, 152.5, 148.1, 141.4, 137.8, 135.0, 133.0, 132.4, 129.7, 128.9, 128.5, 127.5, 127.0, 120.9, 119.5, 118.4, 114.7, 113.0, 96.4, 88.5, 55.6; IR (KBr, film) 2962, 2919, 2850, 2228, 1627, 1599, 1509 cm–1; UV–vis (CHCl3): λmax = 430 nm; HRMS (ESI+): m/z calculated for C25H17N2O [M + H]+: 361.1335, found 361.1328.

(Z)-1-(4-Methoxybenzylidene)-3-((4-methoxyphenyl)ethynyl)-1H-isoindole (14c)

Prepared according to general procedure F using lactam 12b (0.093 g, 0.37 mmol), NaH (0.040 g, 1.0 mmol), TsCl (0.109 g, 0.572 mmol), ACN (10 mL) for the tosylation step, then Pd(PPh3)2Cl2 (0.016 g, 0.023 mmol), CuI (0.005 g, 0.03 mmol), 1-ethynyl-4-methoxybenzene (0.118 g, 0.895 mmol), ACN(10 mL), and Et3N (5 mL) for the subsequent Sonogashira–Hagihara reaction. The crude product was purified by column chromatography (1:3 EtOAc/hexanes v/v) on silica gel to obtain 14c as a brown solid (0.081 g, 60%). Mp: 110–112 °C; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.31 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 2H), 7.83 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H), 7.78 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H), 7.68 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 2H), 7.49–7.42 (m, 2H), 7.28 (s, 1H) 6.99 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 2H), 6.94 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 2H), 3.88 (s, 3H), 3.86 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 161.3, 160.9, 153.8, 148.2, 141.4, 138.2, 134.6, 134.3, 128.7, 128.6, 127.8, 127.4, 121.1, 119.3, 114.5, 114.4, 114.2, 100.2, 84.0, 55.5, 55.5; IR (film, KBr) 2962, 2919, 2850, 2198, 1627, 1599, 1509 cm–1; UV–vis (CHCl3): λmax = 413 nm; LRMS (API-ES): m/z calculated for C25H20NO2 [M + H]+: 366.1, found 366.1.

N-(tert-Butyl)-4-(phenylethynyl)thiophene-3-carboxamide (15a)

Prepared according to general procedure B using 4-bromo-N-(tert-butyl)thiophene-3-carboxamide (1.50 g, 5.72 mmol), DMF (20 mL), diisopropylamine (20 mL), Pd(PPh3)2Cl2 (0.321 g, 0.458 mmol), CuI (0.0870 g, 0.457 mmol), and phenylacetylene (1.58 mL, 14.3 mmol).The crude product was purified by column chromatography (1:5 EtOAc/hexanes, v/v) on silica gel to obtain 15a as an orange oil (1.18 g, 73%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.15 (d, J = 3.6 Hz, 1H), 7.58 (d, J = 3.6 Hz, 1H), 7.54–7.52 (m, 2H), 7.41–7.37 (m, 4H), 1.43 (s, 9H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 161.1, 137.9, 131.8, 131.7, 131.6, 129.3, 128.8, 122.0, 118.7, 93.7, 83.5, 51.6, 29.1; IR (film, KBr) 3389, 3107, 2965, 1660, 1538 cm–1; HRMS (ESI+): m/z calculated for C17H17NNaOS [M + Na]+: 306.0923, found 306.0919.

N-(tert-Butyl)-3-(phenylethynyl)thiophene-2-carboxamide (15b)

Prepared according to general procedure B using 3-bromo-N-(tert-butyl)thiophene-2-carboxamide (1.00 g, 3.81 mmol), DMF (20 mL), diisopropylamine (20 mL), Pd(PPh3)2Cl2 (0.214 g, 0.305 mmol), CuI (0.0580 g, 0.305 mmol), and phenylacetylene (1 mL, 9.56 mmol). The crude product was purified by column chromatography (1:5 EtOAc/hexanes, v/v) to obtain 15b as an orange solid (0.822 g, 76%). Mp: 96–97 °C; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.55–7.52 (m, 2H), 7.47 (bs, 1H), 7.42–7.38 (m, 3H), 7.40 (d, J = 5.2 Hz, 1H), 7.17 (d, J = 5.2 Hz, 1H), 1.45 (s, 9H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 160.5, 143.5, 131.7, 131.7, 129.5, 128.8, 128.8, 121.9, 119.2, 96.0. 83.6, 51.9, 29.1; IR (film, KBr) 3386, 2964, 2928, 2205, 1652, 1534 cm–1; HRMS (ESI+): m/z calculated for C17H17NNaOS [M + Na]+: 306.0923, found 306.0914.

4-(Phenylethynyl)thiophene-3-carboxamide (16a)

Prepared according to general procedure B using 4-bromothiophene-3-carboxamide (0.750 g, 3.64 mmol), DMF (20 mL), diisopropylamine (20 mL), Pd(PPh3)2Cl2 (0.204 g, 0.291 mmol), CuI (0.0553 g, 0.290 mmol), and phenylacetylene (1 mL, 9.10 mmol). The crude product was purified by column chromatography (2:3 EtOAc/hexanes, v/v) to obtain 16a as an off-white solid (0.500 g, 60%). Mp: 143–144 °C; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.24 (d, J = 3.6 Hz, 1H), 7.61 (d, J = 3.6 Hz, 1H), 7.53–7.50 (m, 2H), 7.43–7.36 (m, 4H), 5.95 (b, 1H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 163.5, 136.1, 133.3, 131.7, 131.6, 129.4, 128.8, 121.9, 119.4, 93.7, 83.4; IR (film, KBr) 3431, 3106, 1665, 1605 cm–1; HRMS (ESI+): m/z calculated for C13H9NNaOS [M + Na]+: 250.0297, found 250.0294.

3-(Phenylethynyl)thiophene-2-carboxamide (16b)

Prepared according to general procedure B using 3-bromothiophene-2-carboxamide (0.750 g, 3.64 mmol), DMF (20 mL), diisopropylamine (20 mL), Pd(PPh3)2Cl2 (0.204 g, 0.291 mmol), CuI (0.0554 g, 0.291 mmol), and phenylacetylene (1.00 mL, 9.11 mmol). The crude product was purified by column chromatography (2:3 EtOAc/hexanes, v/v) on silica gel to obtain a yellow solid (0.570 g, 76%). The 1H and 13C NMR spectra agreed with literature reports.32

6-Phenylthieno[3,4-c]pyridin-4(5H)-one (17a)

Prepared according to general procedure C at 45 °C using alkynylamide 16a (0.300 g, 1.32 mmol), TBAF (1.5 mL, 1.5 mmol), and THF (30 mL). Obtained as an off-white solid (0.086 g, 29%). Mp: 150–151 °C; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.39 (dd, J = 3.2 Hz, 0.8 Hz, 1H), 8.32 (b, 1H), 7.60–7.57 (m, 2H), 7.51–7.43 (m, 3H), 7.41 (d, J = 3.2 Hz, 1H), 6.66 (s, 1H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 160.0, 139.2, 137.6, 134.9, 130.7, 129.5, 129.4, 129.0, 125.9, 118.1, 99.8; IR (film, KBr) 3173, 1654, 1648 cm–1; HRMS (ESI+): m/z calculated for C13H9NNaOS [M + Na]+: 250.0297, found 250.0298.

5-Phenylthieno[2,3-c]pyridin-7(6H)-one (17b)

Prepared according to general procedure C using alkynylamide 16b (0.500 g, 2.20 mmol), TBAF (2.6 mL, 2.6 mmol), and anhydrous THF (50 mL). Obtained as a yellow solid (0.299 g, 60%). The 1H and 13C NMR spectra agreed with literature reports.32

6-Phenyl-4-((triisopropylsilyl)ethynyl)thieno[3,4-c]pyridine (18a)

Prepared according to general procedure E using lactam 17a (0.0300 g, 0.132 mmol), NaH (0.0106 g, 0.265 mmol), Tf2O (0.20 mL, 0.20 mmol), Et2O (30 mL), Pd(PPh3)2Cl2 (0.0056 g, 0.0080 mmol), CuI (0.0015 g, 0.079 mmol), LiCl (0.0167 g, 0.394 mmol), (triisopropylsilyl)acetylene (0.1 mL, 0.45 mmol), and Et3N (3.0 mL). The crude product was purified by column chromatography (1:9 EtOAc/hexanes) on silica gel to obtain 18a as a yellow oil (0.030 g, 58%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.20 (dd, J = 3.3, 1.1 Hz, 1H), 8.08–8.05 (m, 2H), 7.82 (d, J = 1.1 Hz, 1H), 7.75 (d, J = 3.3 Hz, 1H), 7.49–7.44 (m, 2H), 7.39–7.35 (m, 1H), 1.23 (s, 21H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 147.9, 140.4, 139.3, 139.1, 135.3, 128.8, 128.4, 127.1, 122.6, 118.0, 111.0, 104.0, 97.2, 18.9, 11.5; IR (film, KBr) 2961, 2923, 2865, 1588, 1577, 1474, 1384 cm–1; UV–vis (CHCl3): λmax = 386 nm; HRMS (ESI+): m/z calculated for C24H30NSSi [M + H]+: 392.1863, found 392.1865.

5-Phenyl-7-((triisopropylsilyl)ethynyl)thieno[2,3-c]pyridine (18b)

Prepared according to general procedure E using lactam 17b (0.0300 g, 0.132 mmol), NaH (0.0106 g, 0.266 mmol), Tf2O (0.20 mL, 0.20 mmol), Et2O (30 mL), Pd(PPh3)2Cl2 (0.0056 g, 0.0080 mmol), CuI (0.0015 g, 0.0079 mmol), LiCl (0.0167 g, 0.394 mmol), (triisopropylsilyl)acetylene (0.1 mL, 0.45 mmol), and Et3N (3 mL). The crude product was purified by column chromatography (1:19 EtOAc/hexanes, v/v) on silica gel to obtain 18b as a yellow oil (0.0274 g, 53%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.08–8.06 (m, 2H), 8.06 (s, 1H), 7.72 (d, J = 5.4 Hz, 1H), 7.51–7.47 (m, 2H), 7.42 (d, J = 5.4 Hz, 1H), 7.42–7.39 (m, 1H), 1.22 (s, 21H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 152.7, 145.9, 139.6, 139.2, 138.0, 132.9, 128.9, 128.7, 127.4, 123.9, 114.4, 104.1, 96.7, 18.9, 11.4; IR (film, KBr) 2961, 2923, 2865, 1574, 1461, 1384 cm–1; UV–vis (CHCl3): λmax = 337 nm; HRMS (ESI+): m/z calculated for C24H30NSSi [M + H]+: 392.1863, found 392.1875.

(E)-6-Benzylidene-5-(tert-butyl)-5,6-dihydro-4H-thieno[3,4-c]pyrrol-4-one (19a)

Prepared according to general procedure C at reflux using alkynylamide 15a (0.525 g, 1.85 mmol), TBAF (11.1 mL, 11.1 mmol), and THF (200 mL). Obtained as a yellow solid (0.389 g, 74%). Mp: 135–137 °C; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.58 (d, J = 2.4 Hz, 1H), 7.42–7.35 (m, 5H), 6.69 (s, 1H), 6.49 (d, J = 2.4 Hz, 1H), 1.81 (s, 9H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 162.9, 138.3, 137.7, 136.9, 134.7, 129.5, 128.9, 127.7, 121.3, 118.2, 112.0, 58.3, 30.4; Additional 13C shifts from trace amounts of Z isomer: 145.9, 138.8, 128.7, 127.4, 122.0, 112.7, 110.5, 60.4, 29.3; IR (film, KBr) 2974, 1705, 1630, 1496 cm–1; HRMS (ESI+): m/z calculated for C17H18NOS [M + H]+: 284.1104, found 284.1109.

(E)-4-Benzylidene-5-(tert-butyl)-4,5-dihydro-6H-thieno[2,3-c]pyrrol-6-one (19b)

Prepared according to general procedure C at reflux using alkynylamide 15b (0.500 g, 1.76 mmol), TBAF (5.3 mL, 5.3 mmol), and THF (105 mL). Obtained as a yellow solid (0.440 g, 88%). Mp: 135–137 °C; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.43–7.34 (m, 5H), 7.26 (d, J = 4.8 Hz, 1H), 6.90 (s, 1H), 6.32 (d, J = 4.8 Hz, 1H), 1.82 (s, 9H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 163.7, 146.0, 136.4, 136.1, 135.7, 133.0, 129.9, 128.6, 127.9, 122.3, 114.2, 58.4, 30.9; IR (film, KBr) 3095, 3080, 2982, 2936, 1693, 1626, 1443, 1397 cm–1; HRMS (ESI+): m/z calculated for C17H17NNaOS [M + Na]+: 306.0923, found 306.0911.

(Z)-6-Benzylidene-5,6-dihydro-4H-thieno[3,4-c]pyrrol-4-one (20a)

Prepared according to general procedure D using thienopyrrolone 19a (0.200 g, 0.706 mmol) and neat TFA (1.50 mL). Obtained as a yellow solid (0.089 g, 56%). Mp: 153–155 °C; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.92 (b, 1H), 7.82 (d, J = 2.3 Hz, 1H), 7.44 (d, J = 2.3 Hz, 1H), 7.42–7.39 (m, 2H), 7.37–7.34 (m, 2H), 7.31–7.27 (m, 1H), 6.28 (s, 1H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 162.9, 142.0, 135.4, 135.2, 129.6, 129.4, 128.2, 127.5, 123.6, 115.8, 104.8; IR (film, KBr) 3218, 2923, 1700 cm–1; HRMS (ESI+): m/z calculated for C13H9NOSNa [M + Na]+: 250.0297, found 250.0299.

(E)-4-Benzylidene-4H-thieno[2,3-c]pyrrol-6(5H)-one (20b)

Prepared according to general procedure D using thienopyrrolone 19b (0.250 g, 0.882 mmol) and neat TFA (2 mL). Obtained as a yellow solid (0.166 g, 83%). Mp: 119–121 °C; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.78 (b, 1H), 7.53 (dd, J = 4.9 Hz, 1.0 Hz, 1H), 7.48–7.33 (m, 5H), 7.06 (d, J = 4.9 Hz, 1H), 6.48 (s, 1H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 163.7, 146.4, 136.0, 135.1, 135.0, 132.5, 129.4, 128.7, 128.2, 122.0, 111.9; IR (film, KBr) 3211, 1686, 1447 cm–1; HRMS (ESI+): m/z calculated for C13H9NNaOS [M + Na]+: 250.0297, found 250.0302.

4-Benzylidene-6-((triisopropylsilyl)ethynyl)-4H-thieno[3,4-c]pyrrole (21a)

Prepared according to general procedure E using lactam 20a (0.0400 g, 0.176 mmol), NaH (0.0141 g, 0.353 mmol), Tf2O (0.27 mL, 0.27 mmol), Et2O (30 mL), Pd(PPh3)2Cl2 (0.0075 g, 0.011 mmol), CuI (0.0020 g, 0.011 mmol), LiCl (0.0222 g, 0.524 mmol), (triisopropylsilyl)acetylene (0.10 mL, 0.446 mmol), and Et3N (3 mL). The crude product was purified by column chromatography (1:9 EtOAc/hexanes, v/v) on deactivated silica gel to obtain 21a as a yellow oil (0.0303 g, 44%). Z/E ratio 3.5:1. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ Z isomer: 8.15–8.13 (m, 2H), 7.43–7.39 (m, 2H), 7.34–7.29 (m, 1H), 7.28 (d, J = 2.0 Hz, 1H), 7.25 (d, J = 2.0 Hz, 1H), 6.93 (s, 1H), 1.19 (s, 21H); E-isomer: 7.70–7.68 (m, 2H), 7.50 (d, J = 2.4 Hz, 1H), 7.48–7.42 (m, 2H), 7.35 (s, 1H), missing peaks due to overlap; 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ (Z-21a + E-21a resonances) 148.3, 147.5, 147.0, 143.6, 135.6, 132.0, 129.4, 129.1, 128.9, 128.7, 125.9, 115.1, 113.4, 103.7, 101.1, 18.8 (18.82), 18.8 (18.79), 11.4, 11.3; IR (film, KBr) 2921, 2865, 2247, 1459 cm–1; UV–vis (CHCl3): λmax = 288 nm; HRMS (ESI+): m/z calculated for C24H30NSSi [M + H]+: 392.1863, found 392.1862.

(Z)-4-Benzylidene-6-((triisopropylsilyl)ethynyl)-4H-thieno[2,3-c]pyrrole (21b)

Prepared according to general procedure E using lactam 20b (0.0500 g, 0.220 mmol), NaH (0.0176 g, 0.440 mmol), Tf2O (0.33 mL, 0.33 mmol), Et2O (30 mL), Pd(PPh3)2Cl2 (0.0093 g, 0.013 mmol), CuI (0.0025 g, 0.013 mmol), LiCl (0.0278 g, 0.656 mmol), (triisopropylsilyl)acetylene (0.12 mL, 0.548 mmol), and Et3N (5 mL). The crude product was purified by column chromatography (1:9 EtOAc/hexanes, v/v) on deactivated silica gel to obtain 21b as a yellow oil (0.0362 g, 42%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.26–8.24 (m, 2H), 7.47 (d, J = 4.8 Hz, 1H), 7.46–7.36 (m, 3H), 7.25 (d, J = 4.8 Hz, 1H), 7.16 (s, 1H), 1.19 (s, 21H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 153.3, 148.4, 146.3, 143.6, 135.3, 133.2, 132.8, 132.1, 130.4, 128.9, 118.6, 103.9, 101.3, 18.8, 11.4; IR (film, KBr) 2942, 2865, 2136, 1623, 1461, 1329 cm–1; UV–vis (CHCl3): λmax = 382 nm; HRMS (ESI+): m/z calculated for C24H30NSSi [M + H]+: 392.1863, found 392.1852.

3-((1-Benzylidene-1H-isoindol-3-yl)methylene)isoindolin-1-one (22)

Prepared according to general procedure E using lactam 8b (0.050 g, 0.226 mmol), NaH (0.0181 g, 0.453 mmol), Tf2O (0.34 mL, 0.34 mmol), Et2O (30 mL), Pd(PPh3)2Cl2 (0.009 g, 0.014 mmol), CuI (0.0026 g, 0.014 mmol), LiCl (0.029 g, 0.68 mmol), 2-ethynylbenzamide (0.0820 g, 0.565 mmol), and Et3N (10 mL). The crude product was purified by column chromatography (1:2 THF/hexanes, v/v) on deactivated silica gel to obtain 22 as an orange solid (0.042 g, 53%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 12.35 (bs, 1H), 7.95–7.93 (m, 1H), 7.87–7.79 (m, 3H), 7.70–7.50 (m, 8H), 7.36–7.32 (m, 1H), 6.69 (s, 1H), 6.56 (s, 1H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 187.6, 156.4, 144.4, 136.9, 136.3, 135.3, 134.5, 133.1, 132.6, 131.3, 130.6, 129.7, 129.0, 128.8, 128.6, 128.1, 122.0, 120.5, 118.7, 110.6, 108.0, 89.2. HRMS (ESI+): m/z calculated for C24H16N2NaO [M + Na]+: 371.1155, found 371.1148.

3,3’-((2,5-Dipropoxy-1,4-phenylene)bis(ethyne-2,1-diyl))bis(1-benzylidene-1H-isoindole) (23)

Prepared according to general procedure E using lactam 8b (0.100 g, 0.452 mmol), NaH (0.0361 g, 0.903 mmol), Tf2O (0.68 mL, 0.68 mmol), Et2O (30 mL), Pd(PPh3)2Cl2 (0.0190 g, 0.0271 mmol), CuI (0.0051 g, 0.027 mmol), LiCl (0.0571 g, 1.35 mmol), 1,4-diethynyl-2,5-dipropoxybenzene (0.0439 g, 0.181 mmol), and Et3N (10 mL). The crude product was isolated as a red-orange solid (0.038 g, 32%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.35–8.33 (m, 4H), 7.88–7.85 (m, 4H), 7.52–7.43 (m, 8H), 7.41–7.37 (m, 2H), 7.34 (s, 2H), 7.25 (s, 2H), 4.11 (t, J = 6.4 Hz, 4H), 2.01 (m, 4H), 1.19 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 6H). HRMS (ESI+): m/z calculated for C46H37N2O2 [M + H]+: 649.2850, found 649.2869.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the New Brunswick Innovation Foundation (NBIF) and the Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) for support of this work.

Supporting Information Available

The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsomega.0c02282.

  • Figures S1 and S2, 1H and 13C NMR spectra for all new compounds; crystallographic data for compound 10c (CCDC 1898484); crystallographic data for compound 20b (CCDC 1898482); crystallographic data for compound 23 (CCDC 1898483) (PDF)

Author Contributions

All authors have given approval to the final version of the manuscript.

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Supplementary Material

ao0c02282_si_001.pdf (4.9MB, pdf)

References

  1. a Almond-Thynne J.; Blakemore D. C.; Pryde D. C.; Spivey A. C. Site-selective Suzuki–Miyaura coupling of heteroaryl halides – understanding the trends for pharmaceutically important classes. Chem. Sci. 2017, 8, 40–62. 10.1039/C6SC02118B. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Sivanandan S. T.; Shaji A.; Ibnusaud I.; Johansson Seechurn C. C. C.; Colacot T. J. Palladium-Catalyzed α-Arylation Reactions in Total Synthesis. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2015, 2015, 38–49. 10.1002/ejoc.201403301. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  2. a Mercier L. G.; Mishra A.; Ishigaki Y.; Henne F.; Schulz G.; Bäuerle P. Acceptor–Donor–Acceptor Oligomers Containing Dithieno[3,2-b:2′,3′-d]pyrrole and Thieno[2,3-c]pyrrole-4,6-dione Units for Solution-Processed Organic Solar Cells. Org. Lett. 2014, 16, 2642–2645. 10.1021/ol500809e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Wang Y.; Michinobu T. Benzothiadiazole and its π-Extended, Heteroannulated Derivatives: Useful Acceptor Building Blocks for High-Performance Donor-Acceptor Polymers in Organic Electronics. J. Mater. Chem. C 2016, 4, 6200–6214. 10.1039/C6TC01860B. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; c Do T. T.; Rundel K.; Gu Q.; Gann E.; Manzhos S.; Feron K.; Bell J.; McNeill C. R.; Sonar P. 9-Fluorenone and 9,10-Anthraquinone Potential Fused Aromatic Building Blocks to Synthesize Electron Acceptors for Organic Solar Cells. New J. Chem. 2017, 41, 2899–2909. 10.1039/C6NJ03938C. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  3. a Patil Y.; Misra R. Diketopyrrolopyrrole-Based and Tetracyano-Bridged Small Molecules for Bulk Heterojunction Organic Solar Cells. Chem. Asian J. 2018, 13, 220–229. 10.1002/asia.201701493. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Yao J.; Yu C.; Liu Z.; Luo H.; Yang Y.; Zhang G.; Zhang D. Significant Improvement of Semiconducting Performance of the Diketopyrrolopyrrole-Quaterthiophene Conjugated Polymer through Side-Chain Engineering via Hydrogen-Bonding. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 173–185. 10.1021/jacs.5b09737. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c Li W.; Hendriks K. H.; Wienk M. M.; Janssen R. A. J. Diketopyrrolopyrrole Polymers for Organic Solar Cells. Acc. Chem. Res. 2016, 49, 78–85. 10.1021/acs.accounts.5b00334. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Stalder R.; Mei J.; Graham K. R.; Estrada L. A.; Reynolds J. R. Isoindigo, a Versatile Electron-Deficient Unit for High-Performance Organic Electronics. Chem. Mater. 2014, 26, 664–678. 10.1021/cm402219v. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  5. a Kroon R.; de Zerio Mendaza A. D.; Himmelberger S.; Bergqvist J.; Bäcke O.; Faria G. C.; Gao F.; Obaid A.; Zhuang W.; Gedefaw D.; Olsson E.; Inganäs O.; Salleo A.; Müller C.; Andersson M. R. A New Tetracyclic Lactam Building Block for Thick, Broad-Bandgap Photovoltaics. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 11578–11581. 10.1021/ja5051692. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Wu F.-P.; Un H.-L.; Li Y.; Hu H.; Yuan Y.; Yang B.; Xiao K.; Chen W.; Wang J.-Y.; Jiang Z.-Q.; Pei J.; Liao L.-S. An Imide-Based Pentacyclic Building Block for n-Type Organic Semiconductors. Chem. Eur. J. 2017, 23, 14723–14727. 10.1002/chem.201703415. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. a Cao J.; Zuo C.; Du B.; Qiu X.; Ding L. Hexacyclic Lactam Building Blocks for Highly Efficient Polymer Solar Cells. Chem. Commun. 2015, 51, 12122–12125. 10.1039/C5CC04375A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Nagahora N.; Takemoto I.; Fujii M.; Shioji K.; Okuma K. Stable 1H-Benzo[c]thio- and 1H-Benzo[c]selenophen-2-ium Tetrafluoroborates: Insight into Electronic Structures, Electrochemical Behavior, and Reactivity. Org. Lett. 2017, 19, 2110–2113. 10.1021/acs.orglett.7b00716. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c Yoon W. S.; Kim D. W.; Park J.-M.; Cho I.; Kwon O. K.; Whang D. R.; Kim J. H.; Park J.-H.; Park S. Y. A Novel Bis-Lactam Acceptor with Outstanding Molar Extinction Coefficieint and Structural Planarity for Donor-Acceptor Type Conjugated Polymer. Macromolecules 2016, 49, 8489–8497. 10.1021/acs.macromol.6b01680. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; d Chen J.; Zhang X.; Wang G.; Uddin M. A.; Tang Y.; Wang Y.; Liao Q.; Facchetti A.; Marks T. J.; Guo X. Dithienylbenzodiimide: A New Electron-Deficient Unit for n-Type Polymer Semiconductors. J. Mater. Chem. C 2017, 5, 9559–9569. 10.1039/C7TC02903A. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  7. a Hasegawa T.; Ashizawa M.; Aoyagi K.; Masunaga H.; Hikima T.; Matsumoto H. Thiadiazole-Fused Quinoxalineimide as an Electron-Deficient Building Block for N-Type Organic Semiconductors. Org. Lett. 2017, 19, 3275–3278. 10.1021/acs.orglett.7b01424. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b de Miguel G.; Camacho L.; Garcia-Frutos E. M. 7,7′-Diazaisoindigo: A Novel Building Block for Organic Electronics. J. Mater. Chem. C 2016, 4, 1208–1214. 10.1039/C5TC03464G. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; c Xin H.; Ge C.; Yang X.; Gao H.; Yang X.; Gao X. Biazulene Diimides: A New Building Block for Organic Electronic Materials. Chem. Sci. 2016, 7, 6701–6705. 10.1039/C6SC02504H. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Anguera G.; Sánchez-Garcia D. Porphycenes and Related Isomers: Synthetic Aspects. Chem. Rev. 2017, 117, 2481–2516. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00345. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. a Yu C.; Wu Q.; Wang J.; Wei Y.; Hao E.; Jiao L. Red to Near-Infrared Isoindole BODIPY Fluorophores: Synthesis, Crystal Structures, and Spectroscopic and Electrochemical Properties. J. Org. Chem. 2016, 81, 3761–3770. 10.1021/acs.joc.6b00414. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Figliola C.; Robertson K. N.; Greening S.; Thompson A. Asymmetric Dipyrrin and F-BODIPYs Conjugated to Terminal Alkynes and Alkenes. J. Org. Chem. 2017, 82, 7059–7064. 10.1021/acs.joc.7b01129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Chary R. G.; Dhananjaya G.; Vara Prasad K.; Vaishaly S.; Ganesh Y. S. S.; Dulla B.; Shiva Kumar K.; Pal M. A Simple Access to N-(Un)substituted Isoquinolin-1(2H)-ones: Unusual Formation of Regioisomeric Isoquinolin-1(4H)-ones. Chem. Commun. 2014, 50, 6797–6800. 10.1039/c4cc01580k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. a Lee W.-C.; Wang W.; Li J. J. Copper(II)-Mediated ortho-Selective C(sp2)–H Tandem Alkynylation/Annulation and ortho-Hydroxylation of Anilides with 2-Aminophenyl-1H-pyrazole as a Directing Group. J. Org. Chem. 2018, 83, 2382–2388. 10.1021/acs.joc.7b02893. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Youn S. W.; Ko T. Y.; Kim Y. H.; Kim Y. A. Pd(II)/Cu(II)-Catalyzed Regio- and Stereoselective Synthesis of (E)-3-Arylmethyleneisoindolin-1-ones Using Air as the Terminal Oxidant. Org. Lett. 2018, 20, 7869–7874. 10.1021/acs.orglett.8b03409. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c Hao X.-Q.; Du C.; Zhu X.; Li P.-X.; Zhang J.-H.; Niu J.-L.; Song M.-P. Cobalt(II)-Catalyzed Decarboxylative C–H Activation/Annulation Cascades: Regioselective Access to Isoquinolones and Isoindolinones. Org. Lett. 2016, 18, 3610–3613. 10.1021/acs.orglett.6b01632. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d Kundu N. G.; Khan M. W.; Mukhopadhyay R. Heteroannulation Through Combined Palladium Catalysed and Friedel-Crafts Reactions Strategy: Synthesis of 3-Alkylidene isoindolin-1-ones. Tetrahedron 1999, 55, 12361–12376. 10.1016/S0040-4020(99)00719-X. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; e Chen D.; Song G.; Jia A.; Li X. Gold- and Iodine-Mediated Internal Oxygen Transfer of Nitrone- and Sulfoxide-Functionalized Alkynes. J. Org. Chem. 2011, 76, 8488–8494. 10.1021/jo201347r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; f Bubar A.; Estey P.; Lawson M.; Eisler S. The Synthesis of Extended, π-Conjugated Isoindolin-1-ones. J. Org. Chem. 2012, 77, 1572–1578. 10.1021/jo2021345. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Grimm J. B.; Wilson K. J.; Witter D. J. A Divergent Approach to the Synthesis of 3-Substituted-2-pyrazolines: Suzuki Cross-Coupling of 3-Sulfonyloxy-2-pyrazolines. J. Org. Chem. 2009, 74, 6390–6393. 10.1021/jo9011859. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. a Akimori W. Palladium-catalyzed coupling reaction of an enol nonaflate with (vinyl)tributylstannanes and acetylenes: A highly stereoselective synthesis of 8,18-13C2-labeled retinal. Synthesis 2005, 10, 1581–1588. 10.1055/s-2005-865294. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; b Zhao Y.; Zhou Y.; Liu J.; Yang D.; Tao L.; Liu Y.; Dong X.; Liu J.; Qu J. Synthesis of (Z)-α-Trifluoromethyl Alkenyl Triflate: A Scaffold for Diverse Trifluoromethylated Species. J. Org. Chem. 2016, 81, 4797–4806. 10.1021/acs.joc.6b00855. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. a Malytskyi V.; Simon J.-J.; Patrone L.; Raimundo J.-M. Thiophene-based push–pull chromophores for small molecule organic solar cells (SMOSCs). RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 354–397. 10.1039/C4RA11664J. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; b Bureš F. Fundamental Aspects of Property Tuning in Push-Pull Molecules. RSC Adv. 2014, 4, 58826–58851. 10.1039/C4RA11264D. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; c Kivala M.; Diederich F. Acetylene-Derived Strong Organic Acceptors for Planar and Nonplanar Push–Pull Chromophores. Acc. Chem. Res. 2009, 42, 235–248. 10.1021/ar8001238. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d Dengiz C.; Breiten B.; Gisselbrecht J.-P.; Boudon C.; Trapp N.; Schweizer W. B.; Diederich F. Synthesis and Optoelectronic Properties of Janus-Dendrimer-Type Multivalent Donor–Acceptor Systems. J. Org. Chem. 2015, 80, 882–896. 10.1021/jo502367h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; e Reekie T. A.; Sekita M.; Urner L. M.; Bauroth S.; Ruhlmann L.; Gisselbrecht J.-P.; Boudon C.; Trapp N.; Clark T.; Guldi D. M.; Diederich F. Porphyrin Donor and Tunable Push–Pull Acceptor Conjugates—Experimental Investigation of Marcus Theory. Chem. - Eur. J. 2017, 23, 6357–6369. 10.1002/chem.201700043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; f Dufresne S.; Bourgeaux M.; Skene W. G. Tunable Spectroscopic and Electrochemical Properties of Conjugated Push–Push, Push–Pull and Pull–Pull Thiopheno Azomethines. J. Mater. Chem. 2007, 17, 1166–1177. 10.1039/B616379C. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; g Dhindsa J. S.; Jacobs B. F.; Lough A. J.; Foucher D. A. Push-Push and Push-Pull Polystannanes. Dalton Trans. 2018, 47, 14094–14100. 10.1039/C8DT03043J. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Benderitter P.; de Araújo J. X. Jr; Schmitt M.; Bourguignon J.-J. 2-Amino-6-iodo-4-tosyloxypyrimidine: A Versatile Key Intermediate for Regioselective Functionalization of 2-Aminopyrimidines in 4- and 6-Positions. Tetrahedron 2007, 63, 12465–12470. 10.1016/j.tet.2007.07.100. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  16. a Vasilevsky S. F.; Gold B.; Mikhailovskaya T. F.; Alabugin I. V. Strain Control in Nucleophilic Cyclizations: Reversal of Exo-Selectivity in Cyclizations of Hydrazides of Acetylenyl Carboxylic Acids by Annealing to a Pyrazole Scaffold. J. Phys. Org. Chem. 2012, 25, 998–1005. 10.1002/poc.2990. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; b Alabugin I. V.; Manoharan M. Thermodynamic and Strain Effects in the Competition between 5-Exo-dig and 6-Endo-dig Cyclizations of Vinyl and Aryl Radicals. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 12583–12594. 10.1021/ja052677y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c Vasilevsky S. F.; Mikhailovskaya T. F.; Mamatyuk V. I.; Salnikov G. E.; Bogdanchikov G. A.; Manoharan M.; Alabugin I. V. Tuning Selectivity of Anionic Cyclizations: Competition between 5-Exo and 6-Endo-dig Closures of Hydrazides of o-Acetylenyl Benzoic Acids and Base-Catalyzed Fragmentation/Recyclization of the Initial 5-Exo-dig Products. J. Org. Chem. 2009, 74, 8106–8117. 10.1021/jo901551g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Infante G.; Eisler S. Accessing Pyrrolones and Pyridinones: Controlling 5-Exo and 6-Endo Ring Closures in Heterocyclic Alkynylamides. Can. J. Chem. 2017, 95, 415–423. 10.1139/cjc-2016-0524. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  18. a Unpublished results from MSc thesis of Brandon Fillmore, 2019.; b The cyclized 5-exo-dig products in this paper and in reference 11a are generally isolated in the Z form. That 19a–b are isolated in the E isomers is a further indication of the importance of sterics in the transition state of the cyclization, affecting the stereochemistry as well as the regiochemistry. This feature will be explored in more depth in reference 18.
  19. Infante G.; Fillmore B.; Dean R.; Damoo D.; Eisler S. Manuscript in preparation.
  20. Yu C.; Jiao L.; Tan X.; Wang J.; Xu Y.; Wu Y.; Yang G.; Wang Z.; Hao E. Straightforward Acid-Catalyzed Synthesis of Pyrrolyl-dipyrromethenes. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 7688–7691. 10.1002/anie.201202850. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Estey P.; Bubar A.; Decken A.; Calhoun L.; Eisler S. Synthesis and Photochemical Isomerization of a Propeller-shaped Molecular Switch. Chem. - Eur. J. 2013, 19, 16204–16208. 10.1002/chem.201302879. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Celaje J. A.; Zhang D.; Guerrero A. M.; Selke M. Chemistry of trans-Resveratrol with Singlet Oxygen: [2 + 2] Addition, [4 + 2] Addition, and Formation of the Phytoalexin Moracin M. Org. Lett. 2011, 13, 4846–4849. 10.1021/ol201922u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Fu C.; Beldon P. J.; Perepichka D. F. H-Bonding Control of Supramolecular Ordering of Diketopyrrolopyrroles. Chem. Mater. 2017, 29, 2979–2987. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b05327. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  24. Bai M.; Thomas S. P.; Kottokkaran R.; Nayak S. K.; Ramamurthy P. C.; Guru Row T. N. A Donor-Acceptor-Donor Structured Organic Conductor with S···S Chalcogen Bonding. Cryst. Growth Des. 2014, 14, 459–466. 10.1021/cg401069y. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  25. The assignment of all Z and E isomers was also determined through NMR techniques. Please see Supporting Information.
  26. Karle I. L.; Butcher R. J.; Wolak M. A.; da Silva Filho D. A.; Uchida M.; Brédas J.-L.; Kafafi Z. H. Cooperative CH···π Interactions in the Crystal Structure of 2,5-Di(3-biphenyl)-1,1-dimethyl-3,4-diphenyl-silole and its Effect on its Electronic Properties. J. Phys. Chem. C 2007, 111, 9543–9547. 10.1021/jp072469n. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  27. Verma P. K.; Kumar N.; Sharma U.; Bala M.; Kumar V.; Singh B. Transition Metal-free Sodium Borohydride Promoted Controlled Hydration of Nitriles to Amides. Synth. Commun. 2013, 43, 2867–2875. 10.1080/00397911.2012.745566. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  28. Christophersen C.; Begtrup M.; Ebdrup S.; Petersen H.; Vedso P. Synthesis of 2,3-Substituted Thienylboronic Acids and Esters. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 9513–9516. 10.1021/jo034919n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Huddleston P. R.; Barker J. M.; Adamczewska Y. Z.; Wood M. L.; Holmes D. Synthesis and Chemistry of Some Thieno[3,2-d]-1,2,3-triazin-4(3H)-ones. J. Chem. Res. 1993, 2, 72–73. [Google Scholar]
  30. Long Y.; She Z.; Liu X.; Chen Y. Synthesis of 1-Aminoisoquinolines by Gold(III)-mediated Domino Reactions From 2-Alkynylbenzamides and Ammonium Acetate. J. Org. Chem. 2013, 78, 2579–2588. 10.1021/jo302794z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Irudayanathan F. M.; Noh J.; Choi J.; Lee S. Copper-catalyzed Selective Synthesis of Isoindolin-1-ones and Isoquinolin-1-ones from the Three-component Coupling of 2-Halobenzoic Acid, Alkynylcarboxylic Acid and Ammonium Acetate. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2014, 356, 3433–3442. 10.1002/adsc.201400451. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  32. Iaroshenko V. O.; Ali S.; Babar T. M.; Abbaso M. S. A.; Sosnovskikh V. Y.; Villinger A.; Tolmachev A.; Langer P. Efficient Synthesis of Novel Thieno[3,2-b]-, [2,3-c]- and [3,2-c]pyridines by Sonogashira Coupling of Bromothiophenes with Terminal Alkynes and Subsequent Intramolecular C-N Bond-forming Reaction. Tetrahedron 2013, 69, 3167–3181. 10.1016/j.tet.2013.02.069. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

ao0c02282_si_001.pdf (4.9MB, pdf)

Articles from ACS Omega are provided here courtesy of American Chemical Society

RESOURCES