Skip to main content
Clinical Case Reports logoLink to Clinical Case Reports
. 2020 Jun 8;8(9):1845–1846. doi: 10.1002/ccr3.2965

Intraoperative detection of second inferior vena cava during para‐aortic lymphadenectomy for advanced‐staged ovarian cancer: Lessons to be learned

Stamatios Petousis 1,2,, Chrysoula Margioula‐Siarkou 1,2, Beatriz Navarro 1, George Mavromatidis 2, Konstantinos Dinas 2, Frederic Guyon 1
PMCID: PMC7495822  PMID: 32983514

Abstract

As the presence of second inferior vena cava may alter the extent of para‐aortic lymphadenectomy, early preoperative imaging diagnosis is of great significance to avoid intraoperative difficulties.

Keywords: left renal vein, ovarian cancer, para‐aortic lymphadenectomy, preoperative imaging, Second inferior vena cava


As the presence of second inferior vena cava may alter the extent of para‐aortic lymphadenectomy, early preoperative imaging diagnosis is of great significance to avoid intraoperative difficulties.

graphic file with name CCR3-8-1845-g002.jpg

1. INTRODUCTION

The presence of second (additional) vena cava is a described yet rare anatomic variation. 1 , 2 As such a variation may alter the level of left renal vein which is the upper limit of para‐aortic lymphadenectomy in advanced‐stage ovarian cancer, it worth highlights the significance of preoperative acknowledge of such an alteration in order to achieve uncomplicated completion of para‐aortic lymphadenectomy.

2. CLINICAL IMAGE PRESENTATION

A 61‐year‐old patient was admitted for interval debulking after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for high‐grade serous ovarian cancer. Preoperative imaging indicated the presence of bulky nodes, therefore necessitating para‐aortic lymphadenectomy, while posed no suspicion for anatomic variations regarding inferior vena cava. The inability of finding left renal vein, which presents the upper surgical limit, posed the suspicion of its potential posterior origin from inferior vena cava. Cautious preparation of tissues leads finally to the discovery of an additional inferior vena cava from which left renal vein was originated, much lower that the anticipated surgical limit (Figure 1). Persistence of surgical preparation permitted the successful completion of para‐aortic lymphadenectomy, which was extended lower than initially expected. Cautious preoperative imaging evaluation of great vessels is of remarkable significance in order to optimize surgery and avoid unnecessary extension of lymphadenectomy that may lead to severe intraoperative complications.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Second inferior vena cava randomly discovered during para‐aortic lymphadenectomy

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

None declared.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

Stamatios Petousis, Chrysoula Margioula‐Siarkou, and Frederic Guyon wrote the initial draft. Stamatios Petousis and Beatriz Navarro have edited the clinical image. Stamatios Petousis, Chrysoula Margioula‐Siarkou, Beatriz Navarro, and Frederic Guyon performed the surgical operation. George Mavromatidis and Konstantinos Dinas significantly revised the draft.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Published with written consent of the patient.

Petousis S, Margioula‐Siarkou C, Navarro B, Mavromatidis G, Dinas K, Guyon F. Intraoperative detection of second inferior vena cava during para‐aortic lymphadenectomy for advanced‐staged ovarian cancer: Lessons to be learned. Clin Case Rep. 2020;8:1845–1846. 10.1002/ccr3.2965

REFERENCES

  • 1. Chiarugi M, Fregoli L, Iacconi P. Inferior vena cava duplication. Updates Surg. 2015;67:325‐327. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Mazengenya P. Multiple variations of the renal and testicular vessels: possible embryological basis and clinical importance. Surg Radiol Anat. 2016;38:729‐733. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Clinical Case Reports are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES