Skip to main content
Brain Connectivity logoLink to Brain Connectivity
. 2020 Sep 16;10(7):331–354. doi: 10.1089/brain.2020.0749

Dissecting the Fornix in Basic Memory Processes and Neuropsychiatric Disease: A Review

Susan L Benear 1, Chi T Ngo 2, Ingrid R Olson 1,
PMCID: PMC7495920  PMID: 32567331

Abstract

Background: The fornix is the primary axonal tract of the hippocampus, connecting it to modulatory subcortical structures. This review reveals that fornix damage causes cognitive deficits that closely mirror those resulting from hippocampal lesions.

Methods: We reviewed the literature on the fornix, spanning non-human animal lesion research, clinical case studies of human patients with fornix damage, as well as diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) work that evaluates fornix microstructure in vivo.

Results: The fornix is essential for memory formation because it serves as the conduit for theta rhythms and acetylcholine, as well as providing mnemonic representations to deep brain structures that guide motivated behavior, such as when and where to eat. In rodents and non-human primates, fornix lesions lead to deficits in conditioning, reversal learning, and navigation. In humans, damage to the fornix manifests as anterograde amnesia. DWI research reveals that the fornix plays a key role in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's Disease, and can potentially predict conversion from the former to the latter. Emerging DWI findings link perturbations in this structure to schizophrenia, mood disorders, and eating disorders. Cutting-edge research has investigated how deep brain stimulation of the fornix can potentially attenuate memory loss, control epileptic seizures, and even improve mood.

Conclusions: The fornix is essential to a fully functioning memory system and is implicated in nearly all neurological functions that rely on the hippocampus. Future research needs to use optimized DWI methods to study the fornix in vivo, which we discuss, given the difficult nature of fornix reconstruction.

Impact Statement

The fornix is a white matter tract that connects the hippocampus to several subcortical brain regions and is pivotal for episodic memory functioning. Functionally, the fornix transmits essential neurotransmitters, as well as theta rhythms, to the hippocampus. In addition, it is the conduit by which memories guide decisions. The fornix is biomedically important because lesions to this tract result in irreversible anterograde amnesia. Research using in vivo imaging methods has linked fornix pathology to cognitive aging, mild cognitive impairment, psychosis, epilepsy, and, importantly, Alzheimer's Disease.

Keywords: fornix, white matter, episodic memory, diffusion imaging, hippocampus, Alzheimer's disease

Introduction

Seminal work showing that bilateral damage to the hippocampus causes anterograde amnesia (Milner and Scoville, 1957) focused the lens of episodic memory research on the hippocampus, often to the exclusion of other connected brain regions. However, anterograde amnesia can arise from focal damage to other parts of the brain. For instance, prolonged deficiencies in thiamine can cause diencephalic amnesia, which is associated with destruction of the mammillary bodies and/or portions of the thalamus (Gudden, 1896). Anterograde amnesia can also appear after discrete lesions to the basal forebrain (Abe et al., 1998). All of these brain regions are linked together by a C-shaped white matter pathway called the fornix. Importantly, fornix damage alone can cause severe and unremitting anterograde amnesia.

However, fornix damage in humans is exceedingly rare. Until recently, it was difficult to know whether the wealth of findings about the fornix from rodents and nonhuman primates extended to humans. We can now use noninvasive imaging techniques—for example, diffusion weighted imaging (DWI)—to gain insight into the functional properties and pathological processes that are associated with various white matter tracts. The goal of this review is to provide a detailed summary of the functions and processes supported by the fornix to help researchers interpret their results and plan hypothesis-driven DWI research. To achieve this goal, we describe the anatomy of this tract and detail the effects of fornix lesions on memory and other cognitive domains in both humans and animals. In addition, we review the small diffusion imaging literature (keywords used to find studies: fornix, structural connectivity, white matter, white matter connectivity, diffusion imaging, diffusion tensor imaging, DWI, memory, episodic memory, amnesia, Alzheimer's disease [AD], mild cognitive impairment [MCI]), discuss the potential information transmission properties of this white matter tract in episodic memory, and point out future directions.

Anatomy of the Fornix

The fornix, illustrated in Figure 1, constitutes the primary efferent and afferent pathway of the hippocampus and is a central component of the Papez Circuit (Amaral and Lavenex, 2007). As an efferent pathway, the fornix begins as the fimbria, the attached white matter of the hippocampus; then, it becomes a detached bundle, forming the fornical crus. The two crura join beneath the splenium of the corpus collosum to form the body of the fornix (Catani et al., 2002; Douet and Chang, 2015). These fibers descend into the forebrain to become the columns of the fornix, which split around the anterior commissure. The columns then split further into the precommissural fibers—which innervate the septal nuclei, diagonal band of Broca, and the nucleus accumbens—and the postcommissural fibers—which extend to the mammillary bodies of the diencephalon. The postcommissural fibers divide into two smaller bundles—one that innervates several anterior hypothalamic areas, and one that carries fibers to the anterior thalamic nuclei (Amaral and Lavenex, 2007).

FIG. 1.

FIG. 1.

Anatomy of the human fornix. (A) A schematic depiction of the fornix connecting the hippocampus to other subcortical regions. Reproduced and adapted with permission from Shi and Toga (2017). (B) The fornix reconstructed by using diffusion-weighted imaging techniques in a human. Reproduced with permission from Yeh et al. (2018). Color images are available online.

The fornix is bidirectional—it also contains fibers leading from these subcortical regions to the hippocampus. Most external modulators of the products of hippocampal processing—namely the septal nuclei/diagonal band of Broca, locus coeruleus, and raphe nuclei (the latter two regions synapse onto the septal nuclei before progressing to the hippocampus)—enter the hippocampal formation via the fornix (Amaral and Lavenex, 2007).

There is some disagreement about whether the hippocampus projects to the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) via the fornix. Studies using histological techniques, which are superior to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques in their level of granularity and should be considered the “ground truth,” report that axons from CA1/subiculum project directly to the orbitofrontal cortex/mPFC through the fimbria/fornix, but these axons do not constitute the fornix proper. Instead, these axons constitute a structure called the hippocampal-to-prefrontal cortex (PFC) pathway (Godsil et al., 2013). This pathway has primarily been studied in rodents; it awaits further elucidation in humans. We note that a recent study by Aggleton and colleagues (2015) performed histology and reported findings that differ from the older histology findings. Nevertheless, the classic findings and definitions of the fornix, as well as the atlases, do not provide any evidence that the fornix connects the hippocampus to the mPFC.

Putative Functions of the Fornix

Episodic memory

The literature on the fornix consistently and overwhelmingly links it to long-term forms of memory. In the next sections, we review the relevant literature on nonhuman animals and humans.

Lesions of the fornix in nonhuman animals

There is a long history of creating lesions in the fornix of rodents and nonhuman primates to investigate the causal role of the fornix in long-term forms of memory. In these studies, animals are first trained on a task to a learning criterion, after which they undergo a surgical procedure to sever the fornix, while leaving the hippocampal formation intact. After a period of recovery, the animals are sometimes retested on the previously learned task to test for retrograde amnesia. They are then taught a new task, after which they are tested to determine whether they were able to acquire new learning, or whether they are inhibited by anterograde amnesia. The memory tasks used in nonhuman primates and rodents are generally spatial or navigational in nature, although some are simply visual recognition tasks. Spatial and navigational tasks require the encoding and retrieval of spatiotemporal context and, therefore, serve as a proxy for episodic memory.

Do fornix lesions in nonhuman animals cause deficits on traditional “hippocampally-dependent” tasks? A rich intellectual history links trace conditioning, contextual fear conditioning, reversal learning, and spatial tasks to hippocampal processing. Performance on all of these tasks is severely affected by lesions to the fornix (detailed in Table 1). For instance, one study found that fornix lesions disrupted rabbits' ability to learn a conditioned-unconditioned stimulus association when there was a delay in a trace conditioning paradigm (Oswald et al., 2007). Another study used a contextual fear conditioning paradigm and found that rats with fornix lesions do not exhibit freezing behavior on being returned to the cage in which the conditioned and unconditioned stimuli were initially paired (Maren and Fanselow, 1997; Phillips and LeDoux, 1995) nor they do exhibit context-dependent freezing behavior that was previously extinguished (Ji and Maren, 2008).

Table 1.

Relationship Between the Fornix and Cognitive Performance

Tasks Summary of findings References
Trace and contextual fear conditioning • Reliable deficits in nonhuman species.
• No studies in humans.
Ji and Maren, 2008; Maren and Fanselow, 1997; Oswald et al., 2007; Phillips and LeDoux, 1995
Reversal learning • Reliable deficits in nonhuman species.
• No studies in humans.
Hirsh and Segal, 1972; Wiig et al., 1996; Wilson et al., 2007
Spatial memory and spatial navigation • Reliable deficits in nonhuman species. Aggleton et al., 1992; Bussey et al., 2000; Buckley et al., 2004, 2008; De Bruin et al., 2001; Easton et al., 2002; Ennaceur et al., 1996; Ennaceur and Aggleton, 1997; Gaffan, 1994; Hirsh and Segal, 1972; Kwok, 2006; Kwok and Buckley, 2010; Kwok et al., 2015; Markowska et al., 1989; Murray et al., 1989; O'Keefe et al., 1975; Parker and Gaffan, 1997; Walker and Olton, 1979; Whishaw and Tomie, 1997
Traditional episodic memory tasks, for example, WMS, CVLT, etc. • Reliable anterograde amnesia for all materials after fornix damage. D'Esposito et al., 1995; Gaffan et al., 1991; Hodges and Carpenter, 1991; Moudgil et al., 2000; Park et al., 2000; Poreh et al., 2006; Tsivilis et al., 2008
Remote episodic memory/autobiographical memory • Intact memory for preoperative learning in nonhuman primates.
• Emerging evidence for link between the fornix and remote episodic, but not semantic, memory in humans.
Buckley et al., 2004; Buckley et al., 2008; Gaffan et al., 2001; Gilboa et al., 2006; Hodges and Carpenter, 1991; Poreh et al., 2006; Tsivilis et al., 2008
Object and scene perception/recognition tasks: (delayed)-(non)-matching-to-sample, spontaneous object recognition, object face, or scene discrimination • Mixed findings. Fornix transection does not produce an impairment in simple object perception or recognition tasks.
• Emerging evidence that the fornix is implicated in some types of complex visuospatial processing.
Deficits: Bachevalier et al., 1985; Browning et al., 2010; Easton et al., 2002; Gaffan, 1994; Wilson et al., 2008
No deficits: Bussey et al., 2000; D'Esposito et al., 1995; Ennaceur et al., 1996; Ennaceur and Aggleton, 1997; Gaffan et al., 1991; Gaffan, 1992; Markowska et al., 1989; Wilson et al., 2007

This table includes findings from nonhuman animals and lesion studies in humans. For findings from diffusion imaging studies in humans, see Table 2.

CVLT, California Verbal Learning Task; WMS, Weschler Memory Scale.

Animals with fornix transections can learn simple associations when they are repeated many times, but struggle to learn the reversal or reassignments, taking far longer to reach a criterion than control animals (Hirsh and Segal, 1972; Wiig et al., 1996; Wilson et al., 2007). The largest literature of all shows that fornix transection consistently leads to robust impairments in learning new routes and spatial locations, both in nonhuman primates (Kwok and Buckley, 2006; Murray et al., 1989) and in rodents (De Bruin et al., 2001; Ennaceur and Aggleton, 1997; Hirsh and Segal, 1972; O'Keefe et al., 1975; Walker and Olton, 1979; Whishaw and Tomie, 1997) (Fig. 2).

FIG. 2.

FIG. 2.

The effect of fornix transection on navigation in nonhuman primates. Compared with controls, rodents with fornix lesions perform significantly worse on navigational tasks at various delays. Reproduced with permission from Bussey et al. (2000).

Crucially, there is robust evidence that fornix lesions do not lead to deficits in nonspatial memory tasks such as object recognition in animals (Bussey et al., 2000; Ennaceur and Aggleton, 1997; Ennaceur et al., 1996; Gaffan, 1992; Markowska et al., 1989; Wilson et al., 2007). Simple object recognition is believed to be subserved by the perirhinal cortex rather than the hippocampus; however, there is some evidence to the contrary (Bachevalier et al., 1985; Browning et al., 2010; Gaffan, 1994), although the authors in these cases admit to “small and unreliable” effects, or use complex stimuli more akin to “scenes” than objects. Generally, simple object recognition is not impaired by fornix lesions, but once a spatial or contextual component is added to the task, there are consistent and robust deficits in performance.

Lesions of the human fornix

Humans rarely incur damage exclusive to the fornix. When it does occur, it is typically in the context of a colloid cyst of the third ventricle (Gaffan et al., 1991; Hodges and Carpenter, 1991; Poreh et al., 2006; Tsivilis et al., 2008), bilateral infarct of the subcallosal artery (Moudgil et al., 2000; Park et al., 2000), or traumatic brain injury (D'Esposito et al., 1995). Findings from this small clinical literature have documented that fornix lesions give rise to a persistent anterograde amnesia that is best described as a disconnection syndrome (Table 1). This memory deficit occurs against the backdrop of intact intellect and the absence of anosognosia. Working memory, procedural memory, and executive and language functioning (except for slightly reduced verbal IQ) (Hodges and Carpenter, 1991; Park et al., 2000) are generally in the normal range.

When the fornix is completely transected, memory deficits are stimulus invariant, such that they are observed for all types of visual and verbal materials. Even partial damage results in severe decrements, especially if the insult is incurred to the left fornix, given the lateralization of language abilities and the import of language to adequate functioning. There is some material specificity in the expected direction, with left fornix damage tending to lead to verbal memory deficits and right fornix damage being more associated with visual memory deficits (Gaffan et al., 1991; McMackin et al., 1995). However, it is worth noting that the extent of damage is more predictive of deficits than the lesion location for both verbal and visual tasks (Korematsu et al., 2010; Sara et al., 2004 for an animal model).

In fornix lesion cases, the episodic memory deficits are generally more profound for recall than for recognition (Calabrese et al., 1995; Tsivilis et al., 2008), although there are deficits in recognition memory as well (Calabrese et al., 1995; D'Esposito et al., 1995; Gaffan et al., 1991). The clinical profile does not typically include confabulation, distinguishing this form of amnesia from the diencephalic variant. Nevertheless, the episodic memory deficits after fornix lesions in humans are profound, unremitting, and bear an uncanny resemblance to the episodic memory deficits observed after focal bilateral hippocampal lesions.

The multi-trace theory of memory proposes that retrieving past experiences, even remote ones from childhood, necessitates the involvement of the hippocampus (Nadel et al., 2000). Interestingly, there is some evidence that fornix damage causes problems recollecting the far past—deficits in recalling preoperative learning in animals (Squire et al., 2001; Wiig et al., 1996; Winocur et al., 2001) and retrograde amnesia in humans (D'Esposito et al., 1995; Hodges and Carpenter, 1991; Poreh et al., 2006). We note that a few studies have tested this in humans, but those that have examined it have reported that the retrograde amnesia is primarily for episodic aspects of remote memory, not semantic aspects—thus, it is most commonly observed in autobiographical recollection (Hodges and Carpenter, 1991; Poreh et al., 2006). However, other studies find normal levels of preoperative memory in animals (Buckley et al., 2004, 2008; Gaffan et al., 2001) or no retrograde amnesia in humans (Park et al., 2000). In sum, the role of the fornix in accessing remote memories is under-developed, but potentially quite interesting.

How to measure the fornix in humans: DWI and volumetry

Lesion evidence provides strong inferential power about a region's function. However, because fornix lesions are so rare in humans, other means must be sought after to elucidate the role of the fornix in cognitive function. DWI has emerged as a powerful tool to measure the microstructure of brain white matter. This technique uses Brownian motion to create contrast in MRI images—in other words, it tracks the rate and direction that water molecules move in the brain. There are several indices of water diffusivity, with two of the most commonly used being fractional anisotropy (FA) and mean diffusivity (MD). The interpretation of these indices is not always straightforward, and there is not a one-to-one correspondence between any measure and any particular characteristic of white matter.

FA is a composite measure of the degree of anisotropy—asymmetry of water movement—in a given voxel, and it ranges from 0 (totally isotropic) to 1 (totally anisotropic). It is taken to indicate the degree of directional restriction of water diffusivity within a voxel. MD, on the other hand, is a measure of overall diffusivity (mean of three eigenvalues of the diffusion tensor) in a given voxel, with lower values indicating less diffusivity.

DWI has some known limitations. It is inferior to invasive histology methods used in nonhuman animals, because it cannot reveal the direction of information flow, and it cannot distinguish between the different fibers that constitute a pathway (e.g., excitatory vs. inhibitory, originating in the lateral septum vs. medial septum, etc.). DWI also cannot tell you the biological reason underlying differences in microstructure ( Filley and Fields, 2016; see Assaf et al., 2017; Jones et al., 2013; O'Donnell and Pasternak, 2015).

Another way to quantify the fornix is to use high-resolution T1 and T2 images and manually extract the macrostructure—or volume—of the fornix. A recent study used this method and found that fornix volume was associated with spatial memory and olfactory identification in young adults (Dahmani et al., 2020). Volumetric measurements are a less popular method than DWI, although they can provide useful insights, especially in certain clinical populations such as those with AD, where there is usually cell loss in the hippocampus and concomitant volume loss in the fornix. Researchers conducting hippocampal segmentation studies may wish to consider conducting volumetry of the greater fornix, given that the same MRI data and conceptually similar methods are used as in DWI. Mapping methods are described by Amaral and colleagues (2016)—the authors hand-segmented hippocampal subfields as well as the fornix and other neighboring structures on a subset of participants and then generated an atlas to use for automated segmentation of the entire dataset.

Much of the fornix is located in the third ventricle, inferior (and perpendicular) to the corpus callosum, and, as such, is completely surrounded by cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). This location makes the fornix particularly difficult to image due to ever-present susceptibility artifacts (Gunbey et al., 2014; Hodgetts et al., 2017, 2020; Oishi and Lyketsos, 2014; Sullivan et al., 2010). We discuss this issue and potential solutions in Box 1.

Box 1.

How to Measure the Fornix with Diffusion-Weighted Imaging

1. It is important to collect many diffusion directions (>30), because the fornix is highly curved and small relative to voxel size.
2. You must account for the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) in the third ventricle surrounding the fornix to get accurate measurements. The diffusion properties of CSF differ greatly from that of white matter—namely, diffusion is completely free in CSF. CSF may inadvertently be included in the voxels identified as part of the fornix, and there is also the problem of pulsatile motion in CSF (Gunbey et al., 2014; Hodgetts et al., 2017; Sullivan et al., 2010). It is, therefore, paramount that researchers account for this in their analyses that involve the fornix. Kaufmann and colleagues (2017) proposed the following strategies for CSF remediation: During acquisition, fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) prepulses can be used (Cheng et al., 2011). Alternatively, during analysis, two steps can be taken. First, ventricular volume should be regressed out. Second, free-water elimination methods should be used (Pasternak et al., 2009). These strategies are essential when conducting a between-subject designs since ventricular alterations may correlate with age or certain disease states. For instance, it is known that neurologically normal older adults have relatively larger ventricles than younger adults (Apostolova et al., 2012). In addition, individuals with mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's Disease (Apostolova et al., 2012), multiple sclerosis (Dalton et al., 2006), anorexia nervosa (Kaufmann et al., 2017), and schizophrenia (Sayo et al., 2012) commonly have ventricular enlargement relative to matched controls.
3. Table 2 shows that most studies on the fornix have used an FMRIB Software Library package called tract-based spatial statistics (TBSS), which is appropriate for some, but not all analyses, and has known pitfalls (Bach et al., 2014). Although TBSS is lauded for its ability to correct for misregistration/misalignment of white matter maps (Oishi and Lyketsos, 2014), this benefit is not applicable to thin, circular tracts such as the fornix. Bach and colleagues (2014) critique this method and provide recommendations for how to use this technique. In the absence of using TBSS, investigators are left with tractography (note that the fornix is absent from many automated diffusion imaging toolboxes such as AFQ and TRACULA). Some laboratories have successfully employed probabilistic fiber tracking techniques by using seed, waypoint, and target masks to reconstruct the fornix (e.g., Bennett et al., 2015; Ngo et al., 2017). Propelled by the need for a reliable fornix template, one group chose to create one by using probabilistic tractography across all participants (n = 120), registering them to standard space, then merging them to create a template (Brown et al., 2017). Other groups have employed streamline tractography to reconstruct the fornix bundle in each individual's native space (Perea et al., 2018; Rabin et al., 2019).
4. Finally, before getting started, it is important to understand common diffusion-weighted imaging pitfalls. Jones and Cercignani (2010) provide an excellent discussion.

DWI of the fornix in development of episodic memory

The fornix is one of the first major white matter tracts to reach maturity. It can be identified in the fetal brain within the second trimester, and the entire fornical trajectory—the topology—is developed at 19 gestational weeks (Huang, 2010), setting the stage for its developmental course in the first years of life.

A small literature describes the development of the fornix and the relationship of DWI metrics to memory performance. Although it has been shown that fornix macrostructure is established by the time a human fetus reaches 19 gestational weeks (Huang, 2010), it is less clear when the microstructure reaches maturity. When looking at children beginning at 2 years of age, researchers found a relationship between age and increased FA in the fornix (Reynolds et al., 2019), suggesting that fornix microstructure is still developing in these very young children (Fig. 3). However, no relationship between age and fornix FA was found in studies of children in whom the youngest participants were 4 years old (Ngo et al., 2017), 5.6 years old (Lebel et al., 2008), and 7 years old (Wendelken et al., 2015), which suggests that fornix microstructure reaches maturity before age 4.

FIG. 3.

FIG. 3.

Fornix microstructure in development and aging. (A) In early childhood, FA increases with age in both boys (in blue) and girls (in red). Reproduced with permission from Reynolds et al. (2019). (B) Increasing age is correlated with decreasing FA in the fornix. FA, fractional anisotropy. Reproduced with permission from Stadlbauer et al. (2008). Color images are available online.

Relationships between age and fornix MD during development are conflicting, with some evidence suggesting decreased MD in the fornix in children with increasing age (Lebel et al., 2008), whereas other studies show no relationship between age and MD (Reynolds et al., 2019). This discrepancy could be due to the different age ranges and developmental stages of children included in these studies. Wendelken and colleagues (2015) also found a relationship between fornix FA and memory performance in adults, but not in children. This finding is surprising but potentially explained by issues surrounding imaging of the fornix (Box 1).

DWI of the fornix in adult episodic memory

The small diffusion imaging literature in healthy young adults has consistently reported that lower fornix FA and/or higher MD correlates with worse episodic memory performance on scene memory and virtual navigation tasks (Hodgetts et al., 2015, 2020; Rudebeck et al., 2009) and worse recall of autobiographical memories (Hodgetts et al., 2017) (Table 2). In some studies, only the hippocampal portion of the fornix—the fimbria—was examined.

Table 2.

Empirical Papers Using Diffusion-Weighted Imaging Methods that Reported Effects in the Fornix

Authors Year Method (white matter indices) Episodic memory assessment
Healthy adults
 Antonenko et al. 2016 Voxelwise ROI-based (FA, MD) Visuospatial recall*
 Charlton et al. 2013 TBSS (FA, MD) Verbal recall
 Doxey and Kirwan 2015 TBSS (FA) Verbal recognition
 Foster et al. 2019 Tractography (FA, MD) Verbal and visual item and associative* recall
 Gunbey et al. 2014 Tractography (FA, ADC)
 Henson et al. 2016 Voxelwise ROI-based (FA) Visual recall and recognition*
 Hodgetts et al. 2017 Tractography (FA, MD) Verbal recall *
 Hodgetts et al. 2020 Tractography (FA, MD) Spatial navigation*
 Jang et al. 2011 Tractography (FA, ADC)
 Kantarci et al. 2011 Voxelwise ROI-based (FA, MD) Visual and verbal recall
 Lebel et al. 2012 Tractography (FA, MD)
 Lebel et al. 2008 Tractography (FA, MD)
 Ly et al. 2016 Voxelwise ROI-based Visual recognition*
 Metzler-Baddeley et al. 2011 Tractography (FA, MD) Verbal and visual recall, recognition*
 Pelletier et al. 2013 TBSS (FA)
 Rabin et al. 2019 Tractography (FA, MD, RD, AxD) Verbal recall*
 Reynolds et al. 2019 Tractography (FA, MD, RD, AxD)
 Rudebeck et al. 2009 TBSS (FA) Verbal and visual recognition*
 Sboto-Frankenstein et al. 2014 TBSS (FA)
 Stadlbauer et al. 2008 Tractography (FA, MD, eigenvalues)
 Sullivan et al. 2010 Tractography (FA, ADC)
 Wendelken et al. 2015 Voxelwise ROI-based (FA) Visual recognition* (adults only)
 Zahr et al. 2009 Tractography (FA, ADC)
Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment
 Fletcher et al. 2014 Voxelwise ROI-based (FA) Unspecified*
 Fletcher et al. 2013 Manual segmentation, ROI-based (FA) Verbal and visuospatial recall*
 Gilligan et al. 2019 Tractography (MD)
 Gyebnár et al. 2018 Voxelwise ROI-based (FA, MD) Verbal recall*
 Jin et al. 2017 Novel 3D Method (MD)
 Kantarci et al. 2014 Voxelwise ROI-based (FA) Unspecified*
 Li et al. 2016 TBSS (FA, MD, AxD) Visual recognition*
 Li et al. 2014 TBSS (FA, MD, RD, AxD) Verbal recall
 Liu et al. 2011 TBSS (FA)
 Mayo et al. 2016 TBSS (FA, MD)
 Mielke et al. 2012 Voxelwise ROI-based (FA, MD, RD, AxD) Verbal recall, recognition*
 O'Dwyer et al. 2011 TBSS (FA, MD, AxD)
 Ray et al. 2015 Tractography (FA, MD, RD, AxD) Verbal recall, recognition*
 Rémy et al. 2015 TBSS (FA, MD, RD, AxD) Verbal and visual recall, recognition
 Van Bruggen et al. 2012 TBSS (FA, RD)
 Yu and Lee 2019 Voxelwise ROI-based (FA, MD) Verbal recall, recognition*
 Zhuang et al. 2010 TBSS (FA)
 Zhuang et al. 2012 TBSS (FA) Verbal recall
 Zhuang et al. 2013 Tractography (FA, MD, RD, AxD) Verbal recall*
Autoimmune disorders (multiple sclerosis and lupus)
 Emmer et al. 2010 TBSS (FA)
 Batista et al. 2017 TBSS (FA, MD)
 Kern et al. 2012 TBSS (FA) Verbal recall*
 Meijer et al. 2016 TBSS (FA, MD, RD, AxD) Verbal and visual recall, recognition*
Borderline personality disorder
 Gan et al. 2016 Tractography (FA, RD)
 Maier-Hein et al. 2014 TBSS (FA)
 Whalley et al. 2015 TBSS (FA)
Conduct disorder and psychopathic traits
 Lindner et al. 2017 TBSS (FA, RD, AxD)
 Puzzo et al. 2018 TBSS (FA, MD, RD, AxD)
Eating disorders
 Nagahara et al. 2014 TBSS (FA, MD)
 Phillipou et al. 2018 TBSS (FA, MD)
 Von Schwanenflug et al. 2019 TBSS (FA)
Parkinson's and other movement disorders
 Canu et al. 2013 TBSS (FA, RD, AxD)
 Chen et al. 2017 TBSS (FA)
 Guimarães et al. 2018 TBSS (FA, RD, AxD)
 Kim et al. 2013 TBSS (FA, MD)
 Knake et al. 2010 TBSS (FA, RD, AxD)
 Li et al. 2018 TBSS (FA)
 Della Nave et al. 2010 TBSS (FA, RD, lambda)
Schizophrenia and bipolar disorder
 Alves et al. 2018 TBSS (FA) Verbal recall and recognition
 Barnea-Goraly et al. 2009 TBSS (FA, AxD), avg. diffusivity)
 Fitzsimmons et al. 2009 Manual segmentation, ROI-based (FA) Verbal and visual recall and recognition*
 Green et al. 2016 TBSS (FA, MD, RD, AxD) Verbal recall*
 Guo et al. 2012 TBSS (FA)
 Kurumanji et al. 2017 TBSS (FA, RD, AxD)
 Lee et al. 2020 TBSS (FA, MD, RD, AxD)
 Lee et al. 2013 TBSS (FA, MD, RD, AxD)
 Nestor et al. 2007 Manual segmentation, ROI-based (FA) Verbal and visual recall, recognition*
 Nickle-Jockschat et al. 2012 TBSS (FA)
 Oertel-Knöchel et al. 2014 TBSS (FA, MD, RD, AxD) Verbal recall, recognition*
 Sun et al. 2016 TBSS (FA)
 Zhuo et al. 2016 TBSS (FA, RD, local diffusion)
TBI or other brain damage
 Alhilali et al. 2017 TBSS (FA, MD, RD, AxD) Visual memory*
 Chang et al. 2010 Manual segmentation, ROI-based (FA, ADC) Verbal recall, recognition* (patient group only)
 Jang et al. 2018 Tractography (FA) Verbal and visual recall, recognition*
 Nguyen et al. 2011 TBSS (FA, MD)
 Palacios et al. 2011 TBSS (FA) Verbal and visual recall*
 Raikes et al. 2018 TBSS (FA, MD, RD)
Other disordered populations/exposure to environmental insult (e.g., general anesthesia)
 Bateman et al. 2019 Voxelwise, ROI-based (FA) Verbal memory
 Choi et al. 2009 TBSS (FA)
 Drew et al. 2017 TBSS (FA)
 Hu et al. 2017 TBSS (FA, MD)
 Lee et al. 2012 TBSS (FA)
 Liu et al. 2018 TBSS (FA, MD, RD, AxD)
 Monnig et al. 2013 TBSS (FA)
 Monnig et al. 2014 TBSS (FA)
 Onnink et al. 2015 TBSS (FA, MD, RD, AxD)
 Qi et al. 2013 TBSS (FA, MD)
 Tan et al. 2016 TBSS (FA, MD, AxD)
 Wang et al. 2018 TBSS (FA, MD, RD, AxD)
 Zhuo et al. 2019 TBSS (FA, MD)

Papers are grouped by population(s) tested, then listed alphabetically. Disorders for which there were less than three studies are listed under the subheading “Other.” We identified relevant publications by searching PubMed with the following combinations of search terms: (1) fornix and memory and diffusion; (2) fornix and TBSS; (3) fornix and tractography; and (4) fornix and structural connectivity. Publications that were reviews, methods papers, written in a language other than English, or used a neonatal sample were excluded.

The primary analysis method is listed for each paper, as well as the white matter indices are evaluated. The type of episodic memory assessed is listed, if applicable. An asterisk (*) denotes studies in which episodic memory was significantly associated with one or more diffusion metrics.

AxD, axial diffusivity; ADC, apparent diffusion coefficient; FA, fractional anisotropy; MD, mean diffusivity; RD, radial diffusivity; ROI, region of interest; TBI, traumatic brain injury; TBSS, tract-based spatial statistics.

For instance, Wendelken et al. (2015) had young adult participants attend to some scenes but not others; then, they later tested old/new recognition and confidence ratings. They reported a correlation between the fimbria and memory performance. In another study, participants were required to remember the location of a particular face; performance on this task correlated with FA in the fimbria (Schwarb et al., 2019). One study that examined participants aged 18–88 found decreases in performance on item and associative memory tasks across the lifespan, as well as decreased FA in the fornix across the lifespan that accelerated in old age (Henson et al., 2016).

A larger literature has accrued in healthy older adults. There is a reliable relationship between chronological age and decreased FA and/or increased MD in the fornix, indicating that the fornix is generally compromised in older adults (Bennett et al., 2015; Bennett and Stark, 2016; Gunbey et al., 2014; Henson et al., 2016; Jang et al., 2011; Metzler-Baddeley et al., 2011; Metzler-Baddeley et al., 2011; Pelletier et al., 2013; Stadlbauer et al., 2008; Zahr et al., 2009; Zhuang et al., 2012, 2013) (Fig. 3).

Importantly, most studies that have tested memory have found that reduced episodic memory performance in older adults correlates with decreased fornix microstructure across a range of tasks and procedures; for instance, object-location relational tasks (Antonenko et al., 2016), “pattern separation” tasks (old-new-similar object recognition task, word list recall) (Bennett et al., 2015), the mnemonic similarity task (which is an old-new-similar object recognition task) (Bennett and Stark, 2016), verbal and visual recognition as measured by the Mayo Clinic neuropsychological task battery (Kantarci et al., 2014), verbal and visual recall (Doors and People, Free and Cued Selective Reminding Test) (Metzler-Baddeley et al., 2011; Metzler-Baddeley et al., 2011; Ray et al., 2015), and delayed verbal recall (Logical Memory delayed recall, the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test) (Zhuang et al., 2013).

Increases in MD have also been linked to decreases in episodic memory performance in older adults in some of the studies cited earlier (Antonenko et al., 2016; Bennett et al., 2015; Zhuang et al., 2013). There are also reduced fornix fiber counts found with increasing age (Stadlbauer et al., 2008). However, a few investigators (all using tract-based spatial statistics [TBSS] methods) did not find a relationship between FA/MD and episodic memory (Table 2).

Summary of findings on episodic memory

Findings from the reviewed studies consistently and overwhelmingly converge on the idea that the fornix is essential for memory tasks that are traditionally thought of as “hippocampal.” Fornix damage in rodents or monkeys causes deficits across a range of tasks, including trace conditioning, contextual fear conditioning, spatial navigation, object-location pairing, and other visuospatial tasks. Moreover, fornix lesions in nonhuman primates lead to deficits that mirror the temporality of amnesia observed in humans suffering from bilateral hippocampal lesions—anterograde, but limited retrograde, amnesia.

After transection of the fornix, primates demonstrate accurate memory for preoperative learning in many studies, but they show an inability to learn new tasks postoperatively (Buckley et al., 2004, 2008; Gaffan et al., 2001). In humans, fornix damage causes anterograde amnesia that is worse for recall as compared with recognition. The clinical profile is more similar to medial temporal lobe (MTL) amnesia than it is to diencephalic amnesia, due to the absence of confabulation. Are the deficits after fornix lesions of the same duration and of the same magnitude as that observed after hippocampal lesions in nonhuman animals? Most studies suggest that the deficits are virtually identical (e.g., Aggleton et al., 1992; Maren and Fanselow, 1997).

Recent findings using noninvasive methods to examine the fornix such as DWI converge on a similar narrative, showing a correlation between diffusion metrics and episodic memory performance across a range of age groups and tasks. The tasks range from well-validated standardized neuropsychological tests of memory such as Doors and People (Baddeley et al., 1994), to novel laboratory tasks that require remembering lists of words or similar-looking objects. What is not known is whether the fornix is involved in a broader array of tasks, since most studies only examine episodic memory. In addition, plasticity of the fornix is relatively unexplored but of great importance (see Plasticity section), given that fornix microstructure degrades with age (Fig. 3).

The DWI methods have greatly improved since the inception of this technique more than 20 years ago. Therefore, older studies, which use only a small number of gradient directions and rarely control for the effects of CSF on diffusion metrics, are likely less reliable than those conducted more recently. Further studies employing state-of-the art diffusion imaging techniques are recommended to get more reliable and specific measures of diffusion properties in the fornix going forward (Table 2 and Box 1).

Is the role of the fornix in humans exclusive to spatial memory?

A putative role for the fornix in cognition is that it plays a key role in spatial memory (e.g., navigation) and spatial perception, with decades of evidence from the animal literature supporting this theory (see Lesions of the Fornix in Nonhuman Animals section). This view has led to a controversial model that the hippocampus plays a material-specific role in cognition: that it is essential for perceiving and remembering scenes and locations; whereas another MTL region—the perirhinal cortex—plays an essential role in face/object perception (reviewed in Graham et al., 2010). Because the fornix innervates the hippocampus, but not perirhinal cortex, these findings would suggest that fornix transection could cause spatial memory and perception deficits, but not object/face memory and perception deficits.

Supporting this view, the literature shows that in nonhuman primates, memory for objects and faces is usually spared, whereas spatial memory is impaired, after fornix transection (Browning et al., 2010; Bussey et al., 2000; Ennaceur and Aggleton, 1997; Ennaceur et al., 1996; Gaffan, 1992; Kwok and Buckley, 2009, 2010; Markowska et al., 1989; Wilson et al., 2007; but see Bachevalier et al., 1985; Gaffan, 1994). In addition, Graham and colleagues used DWI in young healthy participants and found that higher fornix FA correlated with better performance on spatial memory measures but did not correlate with performance on object memory measures (Hodgetts et al., 2015, 2017; Rudebeck et al., 2009).

As compelling as these findings are, it must be remembered that humans differ from rats and monkeys in several small ways, but also in one major way: We have language. Language, much like flight, is a species game-changer. Although the only way to tap into “episodic-like” memory in nonhuman animals is through spatial tasks, tasks such as verbal recall are regularly used in human studies as an index of episodic memory—because humans have language, we can simply ask study participants what they remember. The ability to remember someone's name, to communicate instructions, or to follow the narrative of a story is essential for human interactions. Humans with fornix damage fail to remember words and conversations, consistent with global amnesia (Calabrese et al., 1995; D'Esposito et al., 1995). A quick look at Table 1 shows that nearly every study of individuals with fornix damage reported verbal memory impairments. Thus, evidence from humans does not support the claim that the fornix is solely involved in spatial memory.

As for the claim regarding the role of the fornix in visual perception (as opposed to memory), there is evidence from nonhuman primates that fornix transection impairs the ability to discriminate between pictures of complex scenes, while leaving the ability to discriminate between pictures of objects intact (Browning et al., 2010; Gaffan, 1992, 1994; Easton et al., 2002; Wilson et al., 2008). The tiny literature from humans with fornix lesions is mixed (D'Esposito et al., 1995; Gaffan et al., 1991), whereas the only DWI study found evidence for a material-specific role such that fornix microstructure correlated with the perception of scenes (Postans et al., 2014).

Working memory, curiosity, and other aspects of cognition

Some researchers have conducted diffusion imaging studies on healthy participants and found associations between working memory performance and higher FA (Zahr et al., 2009) and lower longitudinal and transverse diffusivity in the fornix (measures similar to MD) (Sullivan et al., 2010). Higher fornix FA is related to better performance on measures of working memory and motor control among older adults (Zahr et al., 2009). However, studies of patients with fornix lesions find that they have typical working memory capacities (Calabrese et al., 1995; Gaffan et al., 1991; Hodges and Carpenter, 1991; Park et al., 2000; Poreh et al., 2006; Tsivilis et al., 2008). One case report detailed a patient with deficits in working memory, but this patient sustained a gunshot wound, and the authors speculate that her working memory deficit was a result of damage by the bullet to the left posterior parietal lobe (D'Esposito et al., 1995). In sum, evidence for the fornix playing an essential role in working memory is weak.

Recently, a DWI study linked variation in fornix microstructure to the traits of novelty seeking and curiosity (Valji et al., 2019). These findings make sense in light of a large literature showing that the hippocampus is extremely sensitive to novelty, containing a comparator mechanism that allows incoming information to be compared with stored representations (Lisman and Grace, 2005).

Summary

To summarize, the fornix is critical for all forms of episodic memory, not just spatial memory. In addition, the literature linking the fornix to spatial perception is small and findings are mixed, and these are potentially confounded by demands placed on transsaccadic memory [e.g., the limited capacity visual memory system that knits together the visual world over multiple saccades (Irwin and Gordon, 1998)]. Future research should investigate whether transsaccadic memory as well as other forms of working and short-term memory rely on the fornix. Other aspects of cognition—reasoning, attention, language, mathematical abilities, and conceptual knowledge, for instance—do not appear to rely on the fornix, although, admittedly, the literature on this is almost nonexistent.

Mechanistic Role of the Fornix

The reviewed empirical literature strongly indicates that the fornix plays an essential role in episodic forms of memory. Here we ask, what is the mechanistic role of the fornix? Rigorous investigations in rodents have identified several types of information transmitted through the fornix, which are reviewed next.

Transmission from basal forebrain to the hippocampus: acetylcholine and theta

A key role of the fornix is to transmit an essential neurotransmitter—acetylcholine—from the basal forebrain to the hippocampus. Cells in the medial septum (a region in the basal forebrain, which, in turn, receives input from the hypothalamus and several brainstem areas) (Khakpai et al., 2013) are the brain's primary source for acetylcholine, which is transmitted to the hippocampus via the fornix. Thus, damage or deterioration of the fornix diminishes acetylcholine delivery to the hippocampus (Blaker et al., 1988; Rawlins et al., 1979). We know that acetylcholine plays an essential role in memory based on decades of findings showing, for instance, that depletion of basal forebrain acetylcholine precedes AD (Muir, 1997), that blocking acetylcholine in rodents using scopolamine inhibits episodic memory formation (Dixon et al., 1996), and that supplementing acetylcholine can improve episodic memory (Oswald et al., 2007).

Mechanistically, acetylcholine upregulates memory encoding while simultaneously downregulating memory retrieval/consolidation (Hasselmo, 1999). In other words, acetylcholine acts like a switch, shifting the function of hippocampal circuits from an internal, auto-associative phase to an externally oriented encoding phase. This helps to explain why older adults, who commonly have diminished cholinergic tone, show a “retrieval bias” on memory tasks (Wilson et al., 2006). We note that these findings predict that altered fornix macro- or microstructure, regardless of age, should correlate with poor cholinergic tone, and relatively poor memory encoding, especially on pattern separation tasks. It is, thus, possible that the observed memory impairments after fornix damage can be completely explained by harkening to essential neurotransmitter depletion. However, there is an orthogonal explanation regarding theta rhythms.

Theta rhythms are found throughout the brain and dominate the local field potential in the hippocampus. There is mounting evidence that hippocampal theta rhythms (4–12 Hz) play an important role in episodic memory (e.g., Hsieh and Ranganath, 2014) and spatial navigation (Buzsáki, 2005). Theta power at encoding correlates with subsequent word recall (Klimesch et al., 1996) and memory for word-video associations (Staudigl and Hanslmayr, 2013). Further, greater theta band coherence compared with baseline for MTL-PFC interaction has been found during memory recall (Anderson et al., 2010).

Theta may also play some role in memory binding—remembering the co-occurrence of multiple elements within an event (Buzsáki and Draguhn, 2004; Hanslmayr et al., 2016). Corroborating this view, several studies have found that hippocampal theta-gamma coupling is linked to item-context binding processes (Backus et al., 2016; Lega et al., 2012; Staudigl and Hanslmayr, 2013; Tort et al., 2009). The GABAergic neurons in the medial septum serve as a generator and pacemaker for theta. These cells burst at theta frequencies in vivo, and destruction of the medial septum halts whole-brain theta rhythms, whereas destruction of the fornix halts hippocampal theta rhythms (Rawlins et al., 1979), resulting in episodic memory impairments (Cassel, 1997; Lipponen et al., 2012). There is also evidence that acetylcholine modulates theta power (Zhang et al., 2010).

Transmission from the hippocampus to the basal forebrain

The mechanisms we just described only explain one direction of fornix information flow; they do not explain how hippocampal outflow via the fornix modulates subcortical structures. The literature relevant to this question is surprisingly small. However, a few recent studies suggest that this flow of information may be essential for modulating motivated behavior. For instance, a recent study reported that the hippocampus regulates social attack via a circuit from CA2→lateral septum→ventromedial hypothalamus. It is possible that a decision to engage in social attack requires retrieval of memories of past social encounters that allow a prediction to be made about the possible win–lose outcome of aggressive behavior (Pagani et al., 2015). Using similar logic, we speculate that the hippocampus, via the fornix, also regulates the decision to engage in sexual behavior, based on older findings showing that direct electrical stimulation of the human septum elicited subjective pleasure and sexual arousal (Heath, 1964, 1972; Olds and Milner, 1954)

Other studies have reported that a circuit from CA3→lateral septum modulates food intake by regulating learned or emotional aspects of food intake, such as how much time has elapsed since the last meal (Sweeney and Yang, 2015). This finding harkens to studies showing that individuals with anterograde amnesia are unable to recall recent eating and will consume multiple meals in quick succession (Hebben et al., 1985; Higgs et al., 2008). It also helps to explain new DWI findings linking fornix microstructure to body mass index (BMI) (Metzler-Baddeley et al., 2013).

The fornix also provides a direct connection between the hippocampus and the nucleus accumbens and there is evidence that this circuit allows memories of reward-predicting environments to guide where animals look for food (Trouche et al., 2019). Taken together, these findings suggest that the fornix transmits mnemonic information that shapes and guides motivated behaviors. Evidence about this role is only beginning to emerge in the literature. It is entirely possible that the third role is broader than our description; the fornix may transmit mnemonic information that guides decision making in all shapes and forms.

Summary

The reviewed findings suggest three mechanistic functions of the fornix in episodic memory. One role is in transmitting acetylcholine, which switches the hippocampus from a baseline consolidation state to an encoding state. A second potential role is in transmitting theta, which may serve a binding role in episodic memory. A third role is in transmitting mnemonic information that shapes decisions about where to forage, when to feed, and who to fight. Although we have highlighted these three functions, it is entirely possible that the fornix is involved in the transmission of mnemonic information that guides reasoning, creativity, and other aspects of human cognition that are shaped by our experience.

The reviewed findings and mechanisms allow us to conjecture which brain disorders might be linked to fornix dysfunction. Disorders in which there is a prominent episodic memory component such as MCI and AD should show fornix pathology. In addition, there are disorders with subtle, but consistent episodic memory impairments, such as schizophrenia and major depression, which may involve the fornix (along with other white matter tracts). Last, disorders linked to aberrant reward-seeking behavior, such as obesity or substance abuse, may involve the fornix. These disorders are reviewed next. Studies are listed in Table 2.

The Involvement of the Fornix in Neuropsychiatric Disorders

The DWI literature linking the fornix to various clinical disorders has been reviewed in some detail recently by Douet and Chang (2015). These authors reviewed studies linking fornix changes to Parkinson's disease, multiple sclerosis, frontotemporal dementia, and MTL epilepsy (see Douet and Chang, 2015). Other authors have reported changes in the fornix in rare disorders such as idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (Hattori et al., 2011; Oishi and Lyketsos, 2014). Most of these literatures are very small, and findings tend to be inconsistent. In the next sections, we review larger literatures linking changes in the fornix to MCI, AD, schizophrenia and psychosis, mood disorders, and eating disorders.

The fornix in MCI and AD

The “MCI” is a term used to conceptualize the cognitive abilities of older adults whose mental faculties are compromised beyond what would be expected in normal aging. It can be divided into two subtypes: nonamnestic (naMCI) and amnestic (aMCI), with the latter including a memory impairment that exceeds what would be expected in typical aging, but that does not reach the level of dementia (reviewed in Yu et al., 2017a). The DWI is particularly useful for examining changes in the early stages of cognitive impairment, as it is sensitive to subtle white matter alterations that would not be evident by using traditional MRI (Moseley, 2002). Of particular relevance to pathology of the fornix is the amnestic variant of MCI, as the memory impairments specific to aMCI should be related to fornix microstructural changes.

Individuals with aMCI have relatively decreased FA in the fornix compared with healthy, age-matched controls (Bozoki et al., 2012; Kantarci et al., 2014; Rémy et al., 2015; Zhuang et al., 2012, 2013). Changes in fornix FA or MD appear to precede conversion to AD, making this a potent biomarker for pathological memory profile (Fletcher et al., 2013, 2014; Yu et al., 2017a; Zhuang et al., 2013), especially since around 40 percent of patients with aMCI will eventually convert to AD (reviewed in Douet and Chang, 2015). It has even been proposed that the “fornix sign,” a discoloration of the fornix in color-coded FA maps of the fornix, can be used to predict conversion to AD (Oishi et al., 2012) (Fig. 4). Several findings indicate that white matter alterations in limbic tracts may precede gray matter degeneration in the hippocampus as well as secondary loss of white matter volume due to neuronal loss (Fletcher et al., 2013; Zhuang et al., 2013). Some researchers have suggested that using models that incorporate both gray matter volume changes and white matter microstructural changes together are optimal for detecting the early signs of MCI (Douaud et al., 2013). Importantly, in a study of older adults with MCI, including fornical crus FA in a logistic regression improved the ability of the model to distinguish aMCI from naMCI participants (Gyebnár et al., 2018). These findings underscore the importance of fornix microstructure in understanding the degradation of memory capacity in senescence.

FIG. 4.

FIG. 4.

The “fornix sign.” The colors on FA maps in people with white matter degeneration indicate decreased FA in the fornix, one of the early signs of cognitive decline. (A) FA map of a healthy 80-year-old woman without a fornix sign (FA 0.6–0.8). (B) FA map of an 80-year-old woman with Alzheimer's disease with the fornix sign (FA <0.5). Reproduced with permission from Oishi et al. (2012). Color images are available online.

A meta-analysis by Yu et al. (2017a) indicated that the white matter tracts most consistently linked to aMCI were the three major limbic pathways: the fornix, uncinate, and parahippocampal portions of the cingulum bundle. Further, their region of interest (ROI)-based analyses showed a consistent relationship between aMCI and fornix FA, but not MD. The authors note that the inconsistency of free water correction across studies not only might explain the heterogeneity of results for MD and a lack of significant findings for this metric, but also might lead to an overestimation of the association between fornix FA and aMCI pathology (Yu et al., 2017a).

Indeed, other studies have found the opposite pattern—that increased fornix MD is more strongly associated with MCI pathology than is FA (Nir et al., 2013; Nowrangi et al., 2013; Tang et al., 2017), whereas still another found that both fornix FA and MD are effective individual predictors of longitudinal cognitive decline in MCI patients (Mielke et al., 2012). It is worth noting, however, that many of these studies do not distinguish between aMCI and naMCI, which may affect the results, as individuals with naMCI do not always have the memory impairments associated with AD and fornix degradation.

Although this review is focused on the fornix, it is worth mentioning that it is not the only tract implicated in mnemonic impairment and cognitive decline. The literature on MCI indicates that changes in the microstructure of the fornix as well as the cingulum bundle can be important predictors of memory impairment and of eventual conversion to AD (Bozoki et al., 2012; Gyebnár et al., 2018; Nir et al., 2013; Nowrangi et al., 2013; Yu et al., 2017a). Future diffusion imaging studies should focus on tracking older adults longitudinally to better elucidate which diffusion measures are most sensitive to white matter changes and, as such, are the best predictors of cognitive decline.

The AD is characterized by the presence of beta-amyloid plaques and neurofibrillary tangles in the brain that often appear first in the MTL before spreading to the cortex. An early symptom is significant decline in episodic memory performance, and hippocampal atrophy is commonly linked to this condition (Apostolova et al., 2012). Widespread white matter changes are observed in AD, but changes in the fornix are especially interesting since such changes accord with essential limbic pathology and are consistently observed across different samples and methodologies (Oishi and Lyketsos, 2014).

Fornix pathology will necessarily impair cholinergic transmission to the hippocampus. Indeed, it has been known for decades that AD is accompanied by loss of this transmission (Coyle et al., 1983). Similar to MCI, AD pathology is associated with decreased FA/increased MD in the fornix (Agosta et al., 2011; Bozoki et al., 2012; Kantarci et al., 2017; Mayo et al., 2016; Mielke et al., 2012; Nir et al., 2013; Nowrangi et al., 2013; Tang et al., 2017). There is some inconsistency in whether any given study finds a change in FA or MD; however, the fornix is consistently implicated, regardless of the diffusion parameter showing changes. In addition, fornix diffusivity metrics are consistently linked to worse performance on memory tasks for patients with both MCI and AD (reviewed in Douet and Chang, 2015), highlighting the specific connection between fornix pathology and memory impairment.

One of the most important findings regarding the fornix is that white matter abnormalities may precede the gray matter degradation in the MTL that is typical of Alzheimer's pathology (Agosta et al., 2011; Fletcher et al., 2013, 2014; Zhuang et al., 2013; reviewed in Douet and Chang, 2015), and they are often present in patients with aMCI before they convert to AD. This has led to the controversial suggestion that early white matter disruption (especially in the fornix) triggers an adaptive response of deposition of amyloid and tau along with deficits in cholinergic transmission (Bartzokis, 2011). The change in cholinergic transmission leads to the behavioral manifestation—memory problems—whereas the accumulation of amyloid and tau potentially causes the secondary deterioration of hippocampal gray matter. This would explain why traumatic brain injury and cerebro-vascular disease, which are both associated with diffuse axonal injury and damage to myelin, are also strong risk factors for AD (Filley and Fields, 2016).

Clinicians are interested in predicting AD in vivo, so tracking changes in white matter diffusion properties could be an effective method for projecting future amnestic symptoms and cognitive decline in older adults. Volume loss and microstructural changes in the fornix have been found to be predictive of conversion from normal cognition to MCI and AD (Fletcher et al., 2014). In addition, there is some evidence that acetylcholinesterase inhibitors, which are commonly prescribed for the treatment of AD, can have a positive effect on myelination (Bartzokis, 2007).

In sum, there is strong evidence that fornix pathology is tightly associated with aMCI and the development of AD. Tracking fornix pathology by using diffusion imaging can be an effective way to predict cognitive decline and memory impairment in older adults at risk for developing AD.

The fornix in schizophrenia, psychosis, and mood disorders

The diffusion imaging literature on schizophrenia is quite large due to long-standing theories about disrupted circuitry in this disorder (Andreasen et al., 1998). In addition, schizophrenia is often accompanied by widespread cognitive alterations, including changes in relational memory (Jung and Lee, 2016), which provides a theoretical justification for looking at the fornix in this disorder. Some studies have reported changes in fornix microstructure in schizophrenia, whereas others have not (reviewed by Douet and Chang, 2015; see also Baumann et al., 2016). However, postmortem studies of individuals with schizophrenia have not found that the fornix is altered (reviewed by Douet and Chang, 2015) and case reports on humans with fornix damage do not report that they suffer from any of the cardinal position or negative symptoms of schizophrenia.

Explanations for inconsistent findings include enlarged ventricles in individuals with schizophrenia (Sayo et al., 2012), which can bias the diffusion metrics in the fornix (see Box 1), and heterogeneous etiologies in the sample population. Nevertheless, this remains an interesting tract to target in this population, by using optimized imaging methods.

A stronger case can be made for the fornix in mood disorders. It has been hypothesized that the fornix plays an important role in the mediation of fear and anxiety (Degroot and Treit, 2004) as well as daily stress, as the conduit of glucocorticoids to the hippocampus (Savransky et al., 2017). Alterations to the fornix microstructure may cause affective dysregulation, which is observed in many mood disorders. For example, variations in the microstructural properties of the fornix body have been associated with early trauma and with symptom severity in individuals with panic disorder (Yu et al., 2017b).

Adolescents with bipolar disorder had lower fornix FA compared with age-matched controls, suggesting that alterations in this white matter pathway are present early in the course of the disease (Barnea-Goraly et al., 2009). Another study reported that unmedicated patients with bipolar disorder had reduced fimbria volume compared with medicated patients and controls (Elvsåshagen et al., 2012). A recent pilot study reported that deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the fornix improved mood in individuals with AD (Mao et al., 2018). These results corroborate findings in healthy controls, showing a correlation between individual differences in sub-clinical anxiety and fornix microstructure (Modi et al., 2013).

Although the findings we described are a mixed lot of clinical disorders and methods (Table 2), they hint that the fornix may play a role in affect regulation, which would not be surprising since the subcortical nuclei at the anterior end of the fornix are involved in many essential limbic functions, including reward signaling. Future research should examine whether the fornix is demyelinated or atrophied in stress-related disorders such as post-traumatic stress disorder.

The fornix in aberrant reward-seeking: eating disorders and substance abuse

Decisions about when to eat and where to optimally forage for food rely on long-term memories (see Transmission from the Hippocampus to the Basal Forebrain section). Thus, it is possible that alterations in fornix microstructure account for pathology in eating behavior. Some studies report that in humans, variation in fornix microstructure correlates with BMI (Metzler-Baddeley et al., 2013; Xu et al., 2013; reviewed in Kullmann et al., 2015). These studies generally show that higher BMI is associated with lower FA, higher MD, or both. In addition to degraded fornix microstructure in those who are overweight or obese, there is a similar pattern in those with eating disorders of food restriction, such as anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa. Several studies have investigated this relationship and found decreased FA values, increased MD values, or both in participants with anorexia nervosa (Frank et al., 2013; Kazlouski et al., 2011; Monzon et al., 2016; Phillipou et al., 2018) and bulimia nervosa (Kazlouski et al., 2011; Mettler et al., 2013).

This pattern across participants who are both over- and underweight suggests that the fornix may be integral in circuitry related to eating behaviors. However, many of these studies found microstructural changes in tracts other than the fornix, indicating that very high or low BMI (or perhaps frequent vacillations in body weight related to disordered eating patterns) may lead to widespread white matter changes across the brain that are not constrained to the fornix. This is complemented by findings that indicate no group differences in white matter microstructure between women who have recovered from anorexia nervosa and normal controls (Bang et al., 2018), suggesting that the white matter abnormalities found in patients with anorexia nervosa may be a result of eating disorder pathology rather than a cause.

One review suggests that such white matter degradation in the brain is related to increased inflammation in the body due to poor physical health, which can, in turn, impact neurons' myelin sheaths (Porter et al., 2018). More work is needed to elucidate whether there is a particular role of the fornix in eating behaviors or if, instead, having a BMI outside what is considered the normal range is related to nonspecific white matter degradation across the brain. Since abnormal eating behaviors are often related to restriction, binging, or both, there is a component of cognitive control and reward seeking inherently tied to disordered eating. Perhaps it is these behaviors that are tied to the altered fornix microstructure in people who are over- or underweight.

Substance abuse is a classic model of reward seeking gone awry. We recently reviewed the diffusion imaging literature on substance abuse (Hampton et al., 2019) and found that the literature was highly inconsistent, even when restricted to a particular substance such as cocaine. The fornix was mentioned as being affected in only a single study of adolescents with alcohol use disorder (Cardenas et al., 2013). The absence of findings should not be weighted too heavily, as this literature suffers from many methodological problems such as imaging methods with poor signal-to-noise ratios, reliance on whole-brain TBSS analyses, and absence of hypotheses that might point toward a specific tract or brain region. Future research should closely examine the fornix, especially in substance use disorders where pleasurable memories may be especially important in driving behavior (e.g., opioids).

At the Cutting Edge: DBS of the Fornix

There is currently great interest in electrically stimulating the fornix to potentially improve memory in MCI and AD. This idea has its genesis in a now-classic study by Hamani and colleagues, in which the goal was to use DBS of the hypothalamus to help with weight control in a patient who was morbidly obese (Hamani et al., 2008). The DBS functions therapeutically in humans at frequencies between 80 and 185 Hz and with a stimulation current between 1 and 10 mA (Vedam-Mai et al., 2012). The effects of DBS on neuronal function can be excitatory or inhibitory, depending on the stimulation site. In Hamani and colleagues' study (2008), they inadvertently stimulated the fornix (due to the proximity of the fornix to the hypothalamus), which caused the patient to recount extremely detailed autobiographical memories during the surgery, as well as leading to increased activity in the hippocampus and parahippocampal cortex. The patient continued to demonstrate increased performance on verbal recognition and spatial memory assessments after 3 weeks of continuous stimulation (Hamani et al., 2008).

This compelling finding helped launch a small industry of fornix DBS studies. Studies in rats showed that DBS of the fornix can activate the hippocampus (Gondard et al., 2015) and can reset hippocampal theta, promoting optimal memory encoding (Williams and Givens, 2003). The DBS of the fornix in rats also improves performance on hippocampal-dependent spatial memory tasks (Hescham et al., 2013; Zhang et al., 2015). In addition, it can reverse Alzheimer's-type memory impairments in these rats (Hescham et al., 2013), but it does not appear to have an effect on the presence of Alzheimer's-related proteins such as beta-amyloid or tau (Gondard et al., 2015).

The benefits to memory in rats with impairments mimicking Alzheimer's deficits raise the question of whether this would translate to humans. Several studies have revealed optimistic findings: Fornix DBS in humans can drive neural activity in the entorhinal cortex and hippocampus to reverse impaired glucose utilization in the temporal and parietal lobes (Laxton et al., 2010) and increase metabolism in the MTLs (Fontaine et al., 2013). In addition, patients with AD who were receiving DBS to the fornix showed slowed hippocampal atrophy relative to AD controls who did not receive stimulation (Sankar et al., 2015).

Case studies have also shown that patients whose memory was declining before fornix stimulation stabilized after DBS (Fontaine et al., 2013; Laxton et al., 2010), and that even patients with severe AD showed some improvements in mood, memory, and language ability, as reported by caregivers (Mao et al., 2018). Intriguingly, a recent report described how 48% of AD patients in a clinical trial who received DBS to the fornix experienced vivid flashbacks. Most of these flashbacks had elaborate spatiotemporal details and the details and clarity of the recollection increased as the voltage was increased (Deeb et al., 2019).

In general, the memory improvements in DBS studies are modest, and it has been proposed that more robust results would be obtained if studies employed closed-loop stimulation rather than open-loop stimulation, as closed-loop formats allow stimulation to optimally target memory-related activity in the brain (Senova et al., 2018). Open-loop stimulation refers to the most common type of DBS in which a constant stimulation, at a constant frequency, is applied. In closed-loop protocols, stimulation is done in targeted intervals at specific frequencies that align with brain activity occurring during either encoding or retrieval periods. Another possibility that can be explored is to use rhythmic DBS of the fornix to pace or re-pace potentially aberrant hippocampal theta rhythms.

Although the benefits of DBS of the fornix on memory in MCI and AD remain inconclusive, there is some evidence that fornix DBS may have an unexpected benefit for epilepsy. Koubeissi and colleagues (2013) found modest benefits of fornix stimulation on memory recall in epilepsy. More robust was the 92 percent decrease in seizure occurrence, suggesting clinical benefits of fornix stimulation beyond memory improvements (Koubeissi et al., 2013).

Plasticity

Only a few studies have looked at plasticity in the fornix, but those that have done so suggest that interventions may have an effect on fornix microstructure. There is some evidence, in both humans and rats, that only 2 h of training gives rise to measurable microstructure changes in the adult fornix (Hofstetter et al., 2013). In one study, a group of healthy older adults trained on an object-location task designed to index episodic memory. The FA increased and MD decreased in the fornix from pre- to post-training, and increased FA across training was related to better recall—but not recognition—performance at post-test (Antonenko et al., 2016).

A range of environmental factors can also have longlasting effects on episodic memory. Chronic sleep disturbances, long-term use of anti-cholinergic medications (e.g., Benadryl), and hypoxia (while mountain climbing, deep sea diving, or even from being on a ventilator) can all impair episodic memory. In contrast, socializing and aerobic exercise improve episodic memory, especially in aged populations (Blondell et al., 2014; James et al., 2011; but see also Sabia et al., 2017). Burzynska and colleagues (2017) found that older adults randomized to participate in a dance intervention (as compared with walking, walking and nutrition, and active control groups) showed increased FA and decreased MD and RD in the fornix, whereas the other groups showed the opposite pattern across the intervention period. This improvement in the dance intervention group was specific to the fornix—in other brain regions; WM indices reflected patterns of decline regardless of group. These results suggest that for older adults, participating in physical and social activities may help to alleviate the detrimental effects of aging on the fornix. Future studies should assess the longevity of these effects, whether they extend to other sample populations, and whether microstructural changes in white matter and gray matter happen in conjunction.

Conclusions

Our review of the fornix literature reveals that this white matter tract plays an essential role in episodic forms of memory across species and tasks. We were surprised to find that the effects of fornix damage on memory are nearly indistinguishable from the deficits observed after focal hippocampal lesions. Classic linkages and functional divisions in the literature on the hippocampus such as episodic versus semantic memory, recall versus recognition, and explicit versus implicit are mimicked in the literature on the fornix, supporting an older idea that damage to any part of the “extended hippocampal memory system” would cause similar memory deficits (e.g., Aggleton and Brown, 1999; Warrington and Weiskrantz, 1982).

The mechanistic role of the fornix is, of course, quite different than the computational role of the hippocampus in episodic memory. The fornix is the conduit by which the neurotransmitter acetylcholine—which is crucial for memory encoding—is sent from the medial septum/diagonal band of Broca to the hippocampus. In addition, the GABAergic neurons in the septal nuclei generate theta rhythms that are transmitted through the fornix to the hippocampus. In the absence of these external modulators, the hippocampus is radically dysfunctional.

Without an intact fornix, hippocampal neurons do not have a direct pathway to the basal forebrain or diencephalon, although it retains intact communication with MTL regions such as the entorhinal cortex, amygdala, and retrosplenial cortex (Aggleton et al., 2015). It has been suggested that fornix pathology in MCI and AD should lead to a greater reliance on alternative MTL pathways, perhaps via the cingulum bundle (Metzler-Baddeley et al., 2012) or uncinate fasciculus. The uncinate fasciculus clearly plays a role in learning and memory (Alm et al., 2015, 2016; Von Der Heide et al., 2013), whereas the cingulum bundle does not appear to play an essential role in episodic memory (Bubb et al., 2018).

The findings in the lesion literature are mirrored in the newer diffusion imaging literature. Microstructural properties of the fornix, especially FA, decrease with advanced age, correlate with age-related memory impairments, and decrease in disease states defined clinically by episodic memory problems (aMCI and AD). In fact, it has been suggested that fornix pathology precedes gray matter degeneration in the hippocampus as well as secondary loss of white matter volume due to neuronal loss (Fletcher et al., 2013; Zhuang et al., 2013). The “fornix sign,” a discoloration of the fornix in color-coded FA maps of the fornix, has been used to predict conversion from MCI to AD (Oishi et al., 2012) (Fig. 4).

It is increasingly recognized that brain rhythms are essential for normal cognition. A simple way to perturb a brain rhythm is to alter myelination of the connecting fibers. There are many avenues to myelin disruption—exposure to toxic reagents, metabolic problems, inflammation, infection, and the list goes on (Filley and Fields, 2016). It is possible that myelin disturbances may cause network disruptions that ultimately lead to neuropsychiatric disorders. The DWI literature has linked changes in the fornix to different psychiatric disorders, including schizophrenia and psychosis, bipolar disorder, and eating disorders. We note that in all of these cases, the fornix is not selectively altered, but rather is one of the many affected white matter tracts.

Unlike the episodic memory literature, the psychosis literature is decidedly mixed on whether or not the fornix plays an important role in the pathophysiology of this disease, potentially due to small and heterogeneous sample populations, and difficulties encountered in imaging the fornix. The literature on bipolar disorder is more promising, and the literature on eating disorders is very small but is beginning to show interesting relationships between fornix microstructure and eating behavior. We suggest that future researchers interested in psychosis and/or bipolar disorder should measure episodic memory performance (preferably using a task with relational and spatial processing demands) as well as stress and allostatic load, and we correlate these measures with fornix microstructure, rather than clinical diagnosis per se. In addition, they should use optimized imaging methods as described in Box 1.

Our review exposed several gaps in the literature that we detail in Box 2. We note that the human literature on the fornix would benefit by drawing from the rich literature on the rodent fornix. For instance, lesion and DWI studies of humans should use tasks that depend on an intact fornix in rodents and monkeys (Table 1). Using tasks such as reversal learning or trace conditioning in humans would allow for greater cross-species comparison. In addition, delineating the contributions of each MTL subregion has been the primary focus of most memory models in terms of their distinct computational properties (Montaldi and Mayes, 2010; Norman and O'Reilly, 2003) and representation-specific processes (Davachi, 2006; Ranganath, 2010).

Box 2.

Big Questions for Future Research

1. Does fornix degradation in hippocampal or diencephalic amnesia account for some of the deficits in episodic memory? One of the only studies to look at this found that an individual with developmental amnesia had a fornix that was partially missing (Rosenbaum et al., 2014). Given the principle of wallerian degeneration, it is nearly certain that the fornix is abnormal in any individual with hippocampal lesions.
2. Is myelin damage in the fornix the catalyst for amyloid and tau deposition, and for later hippocampal cell loss observed in Alzheimer's disease?
3. How does inflammation affect fornix myelination and what are the downstream effects on brain rhythms such as theta, acetylcholine transmission, and cognitive state?
4. Is the fornix damaged by chronic stress? There is evidence that the hippocampus is acutely sensitive to stress and that oligodendrocytes are also sensitive to stress (McEwen, 2017). Unfortunately, this literature has evolved along a separate axis from the literature on episodic memory. However, when taken together, these findings raise the possibility that socioeconomic deprivation, a potent stressor, may damage fornix myelin.
5. Do alterations in fornix microstructure account for pathological eating behavior? The fornix is the conduit by which memories are used to guide decisions; it is part of the interface between the limbic system and action. At least one study has reported that in humans, variation in fornix microstructure correlates with body mass index (Metzler-Baddeley et al., 2013). This relationship deserves further attention.
6. Does a diet high in omega-3 fatty acids, which helps form myelin, improve fornix microstructure and episodic memory? One study found this to be true (Zamroziewicz et al., 2017), but more evidence is needed.
7. How do changes in fornix microstructure relate to episodic memory and other cognitive faculties in young children? Fornix macrostructure is fully developed by age 2, but episodic memory continues to develop for several years beyond that (Ngo et al., 2019). Future investigators should examine whether variation in fornix microstructure relates to the maturity of memory ability in young children.
8. Is the fornix involved in cognitive domains beyond episodic memory? Most studies have focused on episodic memory (Table 2). However, the fornix likely plays an essential role in navigation and memory-guided decision making.

Much controversy surrounds the functional divisions among the MTL gray matter subregions, most notably the hippocampus and MTL cortex including the perirhinal cortex, parahippocampal cortex, and entorhinal cortex. Given the crucial role of the fornix in the multitude of mnemonic processes outlined in this review, integrating this major white matter pathway in these existing theories would generate novel predictions about complex memory capacities expressed as products of an inter-connected circuitry.

In the future, quantitative DWI of the fornix may be able to reliably diagnose AD and predict conversion from MCI to AD. In addition, imaging of the fornix may be able to provide a differential diagnosis of AD, which is important, given that disorders such as depression can have a clinical presentation of memory impairments in the elderly. Apart from imaging the fornix, the effectiveness of treating neuropsychiatric disorders with DBS of the fornix has been modest thus far, but it has the potential for added benefit with modifications, such as employing closed-loop formats. Closed-loop stimulation of the fornix could even be used to pace or replace potentially aberrant hippocampal theta rhythms in AD (see optogenetic study by Giovannetti et al., 2018) and potentially improve mood, not only in AD but also in other disorders such as unipolar depression (see Mao et al., 2018). There is emerging evidence that scalp EEG can record theta oscillations (Crivelli-Decker et al., 2018), opening the door to future research that uses a noninvasive form of brain stimulation, rather than DBS, to modulate theta rhythms.

More research is needed to uncover the specific role of the fornix in neuropsychiatric disorders and to discover how best to target this tract for potentially alleviating symptoms or delaying onset of the disorders.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank David Waxler for helpful comments. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institute of Mental Health or the National Institutes of Health.

Author Disclosure Statement

No competing financial interests exist for any of the authors of this article.

Funding Information

This work was supported by National Institute of Health grants to I. Olson [R01 MH091113 and R21 HD098509].

References

  1. Abe K, Inokawa M, Kashiwagi A, Yanagihara T. 1998. Amnesia after a discrete basal forebrain lesion. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 65:126–130 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Aggleton JP, Brown MW. 1999. Episodic memory, amnesia, and the hippocampal–anterior thalamic axis. Behav Brain Sci 22:425–489 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Aggleton JP, Keith AB, Rawlins JNP, Hunt PR, Sahgal A. 1992. Removal of the hippocampus and transection of the fornix produce comparable deficits on delayed non-matching to position by rats. Behav Brain Res 52:61–71 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Aggleton JP, Wright NF, Rosene DL, Saunders RC. 2015. Complementary patterns of direct amygdala and hippocampal projections to the macaque prefrontal cortex. Cereb Cortex 25:4351–4373 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Agosta F, Pievani M, Sala S, Geroldi C, Galluzzi S, Frisoni GB, Filippi M. 2011. White matter damage in Alzheimer disease and its relationship to gray matter atrophy. Radiology 258:853–863 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Alhilali LM, Delic J, Fakhran S. 2017. Differences in callosal and forniceal diffusion between patients with and without postconcussive migraine. Am J Neuroradiol 38:391–395 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Alm KH, Rolheiser T, Mohamed FB, Olson IR. 2015. Fronto-temporal white matter connectivity predicts reversal learning errors. Front Hum Neurosci 9:343. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Alm KH, Rolheiser T, Olson IR. 2016. Inter-individual variation in fronto-temporal connectivity predicts the ability to learn different types of associations. Neuroimage 132:213–224 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Alves GS, Knöchel C, Paulitsch MA, Reinke B, Carvalho AF, Feddern R, et al. 2018. White matter microstructural changes and episodic memory disturbances in late-onset bipolar disorder. Front Psychiatry 9:480. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Amaral D, Lavenex P. 2007. Hippocampal neuroanatomy. In: Andersen P, Morris R, Amaral D, Bliss T, O'Keefe J (eds.) The Hippocampus Book. New York: Oxford Univ. Press; pp. 37–114 [Google Scholar]
  11. Amaral RSC, Park MTM, Devenyi GA, Lynn V, Pipitone J, Winterburn J, et al. 2016. Manual segmentation of the fornix, fimbria, and alveus on high-resolution 3T MRI: application via fully-automated mapping of the human memory circuit white and grey matter in healthy and pathological aging. Neuroimage 170:132–150 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Anderson KL, Rajagovindan R, Ghacibeh GA, Meador KJ, Ding M. 2010. Theta oscillations mediate interaction between prefrontal cortex and medial temporal lobe in human memory. Cereb Cortex 20:1604–1612 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Andreasen NC, Paradiso S, O'Leary DS. 1998. “Cognitive dysmetria” as an integrative theory of schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull 24:203–218 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Antonenko D, Külzow N, Cesarz ME, Schindler K, Grittner U, Flöel A. 2016. Hippocampal pathway plasticity is associated with the ability to form novel memories in older adults. Front Aging Neurosci 8:61. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Apostolova LG, Green AE, Babakchanian S, Hwang KS, Chou Y-Y, Woga AW, Thompson PM. 2012. Hippocampal atrophy and ventricular enlargement in normal aging, mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord 26:17–27 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Assaf Y, Johansen-Berg H, Thiebaut de Schotten M. 2017. The role of diffusion MRI in neuroscience. NMR Biomed 32:e3762. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Bach M, Laun FB, Leemans A, Tax CMW, Biessels GJ, Stieltjes B, Maier-Hein KH. 2014. Methodological considerations on tract-based spatial statistics (TBSS). Neuroimage 100:358–369 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Bachevalier J, Parkinson JK, Mishkin M. 1985. Visual recognition in monkeys: effects of separate vs. combined transection of fornix and amygdalofugal pathways. Exp Brain Res 57:554–561 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Backus AR, Schoffelen JM, Szebényi S, Hanslmayr S, Doeller CF. 2016. Hippocampal-prefrontal theta oscillations support memory integration. Curr Biol 26:450–457 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Baddeley AD, Emslie H, Nimmo-Smith I. 1994. Doors and People: A Test of Visual and Verbal Recall and Recognition. Bury St. Edmunds, United Kingdom: Thames Valley Test Company [Google Scholar]
  21. Bang L, Rø Ø, Endestad T. 2018. Normal white matter microstructure in women long-term recovered from anorexia nervosa: a diffusion tensor imaging study. Int J Eat Disord 51:46–52 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Barnea-Goraly N, Chang KD, Karchemskiy A, Howe M, Reiss AL. 2009. Limbic and corpus callosum aberrations in adolescents with bipolar disorder: a tract-based spatial statistics analysis. Biol Psychiatry 66:238–244 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Bartzokis G. 2007. Acetylcholinesterase inhibitors may improve myelin integrity. Biol Psychiatry 62:294–301 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Bartzokis G. 2011. Alzheimer's disease as homeostatic responses to age-related myelin breakdown. Neurobiol Aging 32:1341–1371 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Bateman JR, Filley CM, Kaplan RI, Heffernan KS, Bettcher BM. 2019. Lifetime surgical exposure, episodic memory, and forniceal microstructure in older adults. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 41:1048–1059 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Batista S, Alves C, D'Almeida OC, Afonso A, Félix-Morais R, Pereira J, et al. 2017. Disconnection as a mechanism for social cognition impairment in multiple sclerosis. Neurology 89:38–45 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Baumann PS, Griffa A, Fournier M, Golay P, Ferrari C, Alameda L, et al. 2016. Impaired fornix-hippocampus integrity is linked to peripheral glutathione peroxidase in early psychosis. Transl Psychiatry 6:e859. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Bennett IJ, Huffman DJ, Stark CEL. 2015. Limbic tract integrity contributes to pattern separation performance across the lifespan. Cereb Cortex 25:2988–2999 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Bennett IJ, Stark CEL. 2016. Mnemonic discrimination relates to perforant path integrity: an ultra-high resolution diffusion tensor imaging study. Neurobiol Learn Mem 129:107–112 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Blaker SN, Armstrong DM, Gage FH. 1988. Cholinergic neurons within the rat hippocampus: response to fimbria-fornix transaction. J Comp Neurol 272:127–138 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Blondell SJ, Hammersley-Mather R, Veerman JL. 2014. Does physical activity prevent cognitive decline and dementia?: a systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. BMC Public Health 14:510. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Bozoki AC, Korolev IO, Davis NC, Hoisington LA, Berger KL. 2012. Disruption of limbic white matter pathways in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease: a DTI/FDG-PET Study. Hum Brain Mapp 33:1792–1802 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Brown CA, Johnson NF, Anderson-Mooney AJ, Jicha GA, Shaw LM, Trojanowski JQ, et al. 2017. Development, validation and application of a new fornix template for studies of aging and preclinical Alzheimer's disease. Neuroimage Clin 13:106–115 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Browning PGF, Gaffan D, Croxson PL, Baxter MG. 2010. Severe scene learning impairment, but intact recognition memory, after cholinergic depletion of inferotemporal cortex followed by fornix transection. Cereb Cortex 20:282–293 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Bubb EJ, Metzler-Baddeley C, Aggleton JP. 2018. The cingulum bundle: anatomy, function, and dysfunction. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 92:104–127 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Buckley MJ, Charles DP, Browning PGF, Gaffan D. 2004. Learning and retrieval of concurrently presented spatial discrimination tasks: role of the fornix. Behav Neurosci 118:138–149 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Buckley MJ, Wilson CRE, Gaffan D. 2008. Fornix transection impairs visuospatial memory acquisition more than retrieval. Behav Neurosci 122:44–53 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Burzynska AZ, Jiao Y, Knecht AM, Fanning J, Awick EA, Chen T, et al. 2017. White matter integrity declined over 6-months, but dance intervention improved integrity of the fornix of older adults. Front Aging Neurosci 9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Bussey TJ, Duck J, Muir JL, Aggleton JP. 2000. Distinct patterns of behavioural impairments resulting from fornix transection or neurotoxic lesions of the perirhinal and postrhinal cortices in the rat. Behav Brain Res 111:187–202 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Buzsáki G. 2005. Theta rhythm of navigation: link between path integration and landmark navigation, episodic and semantic memory. Hippocampus 15:827–840 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Buzsáki G, Draguhn A. 2004. Neuroscience neuronal oscillations in cortical networks. Science 304:1926–1938 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Calabrese P, Markowitsch HJ, Harders AG, Scholz M, Gehlen W. 1995. Fornix damage and memory: a case report. Cortex 31:555–564 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Canu E, Agosta F, Galantucci S, Chiò A, Riva N, Silani V, et al. 2013. Extramotor damage is associated with cognition in primary lateral sclerosis patients. PLoS One 8:e82017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Cardenas VA, Greenstein D, Fouche JP, Ferrett H, Cuzen N, Stein DJ, Fein G. 2013. Not lesser but Greater fractional anisotropy in adolescents with alcohol use disorders. Neuroimage Clin 2:804–809 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Cassel JC. 1997. The fimbria-fornix/cingular bundle pathways: a review of neurochemical and behavioral approaches using lesions and transplantation techniques. Prog Neurobiol 51:663–716 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Catani M, Howard RJ, Pajevic S, Jones DK. 2002. Virtual in vivo interactive dissection of white matter fasciculi in the human brain. Neuroimage 17:77–94 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Chang MC, Kim SH, Kim OL, Bai DS, Jang SH. 2010. The relation between fornix injury and memory impairment in patients with diffuse axonal injury: a diffusion tensor imaging study. NeuroRehabilitation 26:347–353 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Charlton RA, Barrick TR, Markus HS, Morris RG. 2013. Verbal working and long-term episodic memory associations with white matter microstructure in normal aging investigated using tract-based spatial statistics. Psychol Aging 28:768–777 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Chen B, Fan G, Sun W, Shang X, Shi S, Wang S, et al. 2017. Usefulness of diffusion-tensor MRI in the diagnosis of Parkinson variant of multiple system atrophy and Parkinson's disease: a valuable tool to differentiate between them? Clin Radiol 72:610.e9–610.e15 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Cheng YW, Chung HW, Chen CY, Chou MC. 2011. Diffusion tensor imaging with cerebrospinal fluid suppression and signal-to-noise preservation using acquisition combining fluid-attenuated inversion recovery and conventional imaging: comparison of fiber tracking. Eur J Radiol 79:113–117 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Choi J, Jeong B, Rohan ML, Polcari AM, Teicher MH. 2009. Preliminary evidence for white matter tract abnormalities in young adults exposed to parental verbal abuse. Biol Psychiatry 65:227–234 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Coyle JT, Price DL, Delong MR. 1983. Alzheimer's disease: a disorder of cortical cholinergic innervation. Science 219:1184–1190 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Crivelli-Decker J, Hsieh LT, Clarke A, Ranganath C. 2018. Theta oscillations promote temporal sequence learning. Neurobiol Learn Mem 153:92–103 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Dahmani L, Courcot B, Near J, Patel R, Amaral RSC, Chakravarty MM, Bohbot VD. 2020. Fimbria-fornix volume is associated with spatial memory and olfactory identification in humans. Front Syst Neurosci 13:87. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Dalton CM, Miszkiel KA, O'Connor PW, Plant GT, Rice GPA, Miller DH. 2006. Ventricular enlargement in MS: one-year change at various stages of disease. Neurology 66:693–698 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Davachi L. 2006. Item, context and relational episodic encoding in humans. Curr Opin Neurobiol 16:693–700 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. De Bruin JPC, Moita MP, De Brabander HM, Joosten RNJMA. 2001. Place and response learning of rats in a Morris water maze: differential effects of fimbria fornix and medial prefrontal cortex lesions. Neurobiol Learn Mem 75:164–178 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Deeb W, Salvato B, Almeida L, Foote KD, Amaral R, Germann J, et al. 2019. Fornix-region deep brain stimulation–induced memory flashbacks in alzheimer's disease. N Engl J Med 381:783–785 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Degroot A, Treit D. 2004. Anxiety is functionally segregated within the septo-hippocampal system. Brain Res 1001:60–71 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Della Nave R, Ginestroni A, Tessa C, Giannelli M, Piacentini S, Filippi M, Mascalchi M. 2010. Regional distribution and clinical correlates of white matter structural damage in Huntington disease: a tract-based spatial statistics study. Am J Neuroradiol 31:1675–1681 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. D'Esposito M, Verfaellie M, Alexander MP, Katz DI. 1995. Amnesia following traumatic bilateral fornix transection. Neurology 45:1546–1550 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Dixon CE, Bao J, Long DA, Hayes RL. 1996. Reduced evoked release of acetylcholine in the rodent hippocampus following traumatic brain injury. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 53:679–686 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Douaud G, Menke RAL, Gass A, Monsch AU, Rao A, Whitcher B, et al. 2013. Brain microstructure reveals early abnormalities more than two years prior to clinical progression from mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer's disease. J Neurosci 33:2147–2155 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Douet V, Chang L. 2015. Fornix as an imaging marker for episodic memory deficits in healthy aging and in various neurological disorders. Front Aging Neurosci 6:343. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Doxey CR, Kirwan BC. 2015. Structural and functional correlates of behavioral pattern separation in the hippocampus and medial temporal lobe. Hippocampus 25:524–533 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Drew DA, Koo BB, Bhadelia R, Weiner DE, Duncan S, De La Garza MM, et al. 2017. White matter damage in maintenance hemodialysis patients: a diffusion tensor imaging study. BMC Nephrol 18:213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Easton A, Ridley RM, Baker HF, Gaffan D. 2002. Unilateral lesions of the cholinergic basal forebrain and fornix in one hemisphere and inferior temporal cortex in the opposite hemisphere produce severe learning impairments in rhesus monkeys. Cereb Cortex 12:729–736 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Elvsåshagen T, Moberget T, Bøen E, Boye B, Englin NOA, Pedersen P, et al. 2012. Evidence for impaired neocortical synaptic plasticity in bipolar II disorder. Biol Psychiatry 71:68–74 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Emmer BJ, Veer IM, Steup-Beekman GM, Huizinga TWJ, Van Der Grond J, Van Buchem MA. 2010. Tract-based spatial statistics on diffusion tensor imaging in systemic lupus erythematosus reveals localized involvement of white matter tracts. Arthritis Care Res 62:3716–3721 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Ennaceur A, Aggleton JP. 1997. The effects of neurotoxic lesions of the perirhinal cortex combined to fornix transection on object recognition memory in the rat. Behav Brain Res 88:181–193 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Ennaceur A, Neave N, Aggleton JP. 1996. Neurotoxic lesions of the perirhinal cortex do not mimic the behavioural effects of fornix transection in the rat. Behav Brain Res 80:9–25 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Filley CM, Fields RD. 2016. White matter and cognition: making the connection. J Neurophysiol 116:2093–2104 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Fitzsimmons J, Kubicki M, Smith K, Bushell BA, Estepar RSJ, Westin C-F, et al. 2009. Diffusion tractography of the fornix in schizophrenia. Schizophr Res 107:39–46 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Fletcher E, Carmichael O, Pasternak O, Maier-Hein KH, DeCarli C. 2014. Early brain loss in circuits affected by Alzheimer's disease is predicted by fornix microstructure but may be independent of gray matter. Front Aging Neurosci 6:106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Fletcher E, Raman M, Huebner P, Liu A, Mungas D, Carmichael O, DeCarli C. 2013. Loss of fornix white matter volume as a predictor of cognitive impairment in cognitively normal elderly individuals. JAMA Neurol 70:1389–1395 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Fontaine D, Deudon A, Lemaire JJ, Razzouk M, Viau P, Darcourt J, Robert P. 2013. Symptomatic treatment of memory decline in Alzheimer's disease by deep brain stimulation: a feasibility study. J Alzheimers Dis 34:315–323 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Foster CM, Kennedy KM, Hoagey DA, Rodrigue KM. 2019. The role of hippocampal subfield volume and fornix microstructure in episodic memory across the lifespan. Hippocampus 29:1206–1223 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Frank GKW, Shott ME, Hagman JO, Yang TT. 2013. Localized brain volume and white matter integrity alterations in adolescent anorexia nervosa. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 52:1066–1075.e5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Gaffan D. 1992. Amnesia for complex naturalistic scenes and for objects following fornix transection in the rhesus monkey. Eur J Neurosci 4:381–388 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Gaffan D. 1994. Dissociated effects of perirhinal cortex ablation, fornix transection and amygdalectomy: evidence for multiple memory systems in the primate temporal lobe. Exp Brain Res 99:411–422 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Gaffan D, Parker A, Easton A. 2001. Dense amnesia in the monkey after transection of fornix, amygdala and anterior temporal stem. Neuropsychologia 39:51–70 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Gaffan EA, Gaffan D, Hodges JR. 1991. Amnesia following damage to the left fornix and to other sites. Brain 114:1297–1313 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Gan J, Yi J, Zhong M, Cao X, Jin X, Liu W, Zhu X. 2016. Abnormal white matter structural connectivity in treatment-naïve young adults with borderline personality disorder. Acta Psychiatr Scand 134:494–503 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Gilboa A, Winocur G, Rosenbaum RS, Poreh A, Gao F, Black SE, et al. 2006. Hippocampal contributions to recollection in retrograde and anterograde amnesia. Hippocampus 16:966–980 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Gilligan TM, Sibilia F, Farrell D, Lyons D, Kennelly SP, Bokde ALW. 2019. No relationship between fornix and cingulum degradation and within-network decreases in functional connectivity in prodromal Alzheimer's disease. PLoS One 14:e0222977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Giovannetti EA, Poll S, Justus D, Kaneko H, Fuhrmann F, Steffen J, et al. Restoring memory by optogenetic synchronization of hippocampal oscillations in an Alzheimer's disease mouse model. BioRxiv 363820 [Preprint]. 2018. Available from: 10.1101/363820 [DOI]
  87. Godsil BP, Kiss JP, Spedding M, Jay TM. 2013. The hippocampal-prefrontal pathway: the weak link in psychiatric disorders? Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 23:1165–1181 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Gondard E, Chau HN, Mann A, Tierney TS, Hamani C, Kalia SK, Lozano AM. 2015. Rapid modulation of protein expression in the rat hippocampus following deep brain stimulation of the fornix. Brain Stimul 8:1058–1064 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. Graham KS, Barense MD, Lee ACH. 2010. Going beyond LTM in the MTL: a synthesis of neuropsychological and neuroimaging findings on the role of the medial temporal lobe in memory and perception. Neuropsychologia 48:831–853 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Green AE, Croft RJ, Maller JJ, Fitzgerald PB. 2016. White matter correlates of episodic memory encoding and retrieval in schizophrenia. Psychiatry Res Neuroimaging 254:188–198 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. Gudden H. 1896. Klinische und anatomische Beiträge zur Kenntniss der multiplen Alkoholneuritis nebst Bemerkungen über die Regenerationsvorgänge im peripheren Nervensystem. Arch Psychiatr Nervenkr 28:643–741 [Google Scholar]
  92. Guimarães RP, Campos BM, de Rezende TJ, Piovesana L, Azevedo PC, Amato-Filho AC, et al. 2018. Is diffusion tensor imaging a good biomarker for early Parkinson's disease? Front Neurol 9:626. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  93. Gunbey HP, Ercan K, Findikoglu AS, Bulut HT, Karaoglanoglu M, Arslan H. 2014. The limbic degradation of aging brain: a quantitative analysis with diffusion tensor imaging. ScientificWorldJournal 2014:196513. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  94. Guo W, Liu F, Liu Z, Gao K, Xiao C, Chen H, Zhao J. 2012. Right lateralized white matter abnormalities in first-episode, drug-naive paranoid schizophrenia. Neurosci Lett 531:5–9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  95. Gyebnár G, Szabó Á, Sirály E, Fodor Z, Sákovics A, Salacz P, et al. 2018. What can DTI tell about early cognitive impairment?—Differentiation between MCI subtypes and healthy controls by diffusion tensor imaging. Psychiatry Res Neuroimaging 272:46–57 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  96. Hamani C, McAndrews MP, Cohn M, Oh M, Zumsteg D, Shapiro CM, et al. 2008. Memory enhancement induced by hypothalamic/fornix deep brain stimulation. Ann Neurol 63:119–123 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  97. Hampton WH, Hanik IM, Olson IR. 2019. Substance abuse and white matter: findings, limitations, and future of diffusion tensor imaging research. Drug Alcohol Depend 197:288–298 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  98. Hanslmayr S, Staresina BP, Bowman H. 2016. Oscillations and episodic memory: addressing the synchronization/desynchronization conundrum. Trends Neurosci 39:16–25 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  99. Hasselmo ME. 1999. Neuromodulation: acetylcholine and memory consolidation. Trends Cogn Sci 101:162–183 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  100. Hattori T, Yuasa T, Aoki S, Sato R, Sawaura H, Mori T, Mizusawa H. 2011. Altered microstructure in corticospinal tract in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: comparison with Alzheimer disease and Parkinson disease with dementia. Am J Neuroradiol 32:1681–1687 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  101. Heath RG. 1964. Pleasure response of human subjects to direct stimulation of the brain: physiologic and psychodynamic considerations. In: Heath RG, ed. The Role of Pleasure in Behavior. New York: Harper & Row; pp. 219–243 [Google Scholar]
  102. Heath RG. 1972. Pleasure and brain activity in man: deep and surface electroencephalograms during orgasm. J Nerv Ment Dis 154:3–18 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  103. Hebben N, Corkin S, Eichenbaum H, Shedlack K. 1985. Diminished ability to interpret and report internal states after bilateral medial temporal resection: case H.M. Behav Neurosci 99:1031–1039 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  104. Henson RN, Campbell KL, Davis SW, Taylor JR, Emery T, Erzinclioglu S, et al. 2016. Multiple determinants of lifespan memory differences. Sci Rep 6:32527. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  105. Hescham S, Lim LW, Jahanshahi A, Steinbusch HWM, Prickaerts J, Blokland A, Temel Y. 2013. Deep brain stimulation of the forniceal area enhances memory functions in experimental dementia: the role of stimulation parameters. Brain Stimul 6:72–77 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  106. Higgs S, Williamson AC, Rotshtein P, Humphreys GW. 2008. Sensory-specific satiety is intact in amnesics who eat multiple meals. Psychol Sci 19:623–628 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  107. Hirsh R, Segal M. 1972. Complete transection of the fornix and reversal of position habit in the rat. Physiol Behav 8:1051–1054 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  108. Hodges JR, Carpenter K. 1991. Anterograde amnesia with fornix damage following removal of IIIrd ventricle colloid cyst. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 54:633–638 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  109. Hodgetts CJ, Postans M, Shine JP, Jones DK, Lawrence AD, Graham KS. 2015. Dissociable roles of the inferior longitudinal fasciculus and fornix in face and place perception. Elife 4:e07902. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  110. Hodgetts CJ, Postans M, Warne N, Varnava A, Lawrence AD, Graham KS. 2017. Distinct contributions of the fornix and inferior longitudinal fasciculus to episodic and semantic autobiographical memory. Cortex 94:1–14 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  111. Hodgetts CJ, Stefani M, Williams AN, Kolarik BS, Yonelinas AP, Ekstrom AD, et al. 2020. The role of the fornix in human navigational learning. Cortex 124:97–110 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  112. Hofstetter S, Tavor I, Tzur Moryosef S, Assaf Y. 2013. Short-term learning induces white matter plasticity in the fornix. J Neurosci 33:12844–12850 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  113. Hsieh LT, Ranganath C. 2014. Frontal midline theta oscillations during working memory maintenance and episodic encoding and retrieval. Neuroimage 85:721–729 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  114. Hu Y, Long X, Lyu H, Zhou Y, Chen J. 2017. Alterations in white matter integrity in young adults with smartphone dependence. Front Hum Neurosci 11:532. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  115. Huang H. 2010. Delineating neural structures of developmental human brains with diffusion tensor imaging. ScientificWorldJournal 10:135–144 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  116. Irwin DE, Gordon RD. 1998. Eye movements, attention and trans-saccadic memory. Vis Cogn 5:127–155 [Google Scholar]
  117. James BD, Wilson RS, Barnes LL, Bennett DA. 2011. Late-life social activity and cognitive decline in old age. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 17:998–1005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  118. Jang SH, Cho SH, Chang MC. 2011. Age-related degeneration of the fornix in the human brain: a diffusion tensor imaging study. Int J Neurosci 121:94–100 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  119. Jang SH, Kim SH, Lee HD. 2018. Relation between memory impairment and the fornix injury in patients with mild traumatic brain injury: a diffusion tensor tractography study. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 97:892–896 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  120. Ji J, Maren S. 2008. Lesions of the entorhinal cortex or fornix disrupt the context-dependence of fear extinction in rats. Behav Brain Res 194:201–206 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  121. Jin Y, Huang C, Daianu M, Zhan L, Dennis EL, Reid RI, et al. 2017. 3D tract-specific local and global analysis of white matter integrity in Alzheimer's disease. Hum Brain Mapp 38:1191–1207 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  122. Jones DK, Cercignani M. 2010. Twenty-five pitfalls in the analysis of diffusion MRI data. NMR Biomed 23:803–820 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  123. Jones DK, Knösche TR, Turner R. 2013. White matter integrity, fiber count, and other fallacies: the do's and don'ts of diffusion MRI. Neuroimage 73:239–254 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  124. Jung W, Lee S-H. 2016. Memory deficit in patients with schizophrenia and posttraumatic stress disorder: relational vs item-specific memory. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat 12:1157–1166 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  125. Kantarci K, Murray ME, Schwarz CG, Reid RI, Przybelski SA, Lesnick T, et al. 2017. White-matter integrity on DTI and the pathologic staging of Alzheimer's disease. Neurobiol Aging 56:172–179 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  126. Kantarci K, Schwarz CG, Reid RI, Przybelski SA, Lesnick TG, Zuk SM, et al. 2014. White matter integrity determined with diffusion tensor imaging in older adults without dementia: influence of amyloid load and neurodegeneration. JAMA Neurol 71:1547–1554 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  127. Kantarci K, Senjem ML, Avula R, Zhang B, Samikoglu AR, Weigand SD, et al. 2011. Diffusion tensor imaging and cognitive function in older adults with no dementia. Neurology 77:26–34 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  128. Kaufmann LK, Baur V, Hänggi J, Jäncke L, Piccirelli M, Kollias S, et al. 2017. Fornix under water? Ventricular enlargement biases forniceal diffusion magnetic resonance imaging indices in anorexia nervosa. Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging 2:430–437 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  129. Kazlouski D, Rollin MDH, Tregellas J, Shott ME, Jappe LM, Hagman JO, et al. 2011. Altered fimbria-fornix white matter integrity in anorexia nervosa predicts harm avoidance. Psychiatry Res Neuroimaging 192:109–116 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  130. Kern KC, Ekstrom AD, Suthana NA, Giesser BS, Montag M, Arshanapalli A, et al. 2012. Fornix damage limits verbal memory functional compensation in multiple sclerosis. Neuroimage 59:2932–2940 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  131. Khakpai F, Nasehi M, Haeri-Rohani A, Eidi A, Zarrindast MR. 2013. Septo-hippocampo-septal loop and memory formation. Basic Clin Neurosci 4:5–23 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  132. Kim HJ, Kim SJ, Kim HS, Choi CG, Kim N, Han S, et al. 2013. Alterations of mean diffusivity in brain white matter and deep gray matter in Parkinson's disease. Neurosci Lett 550:64–68 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  133. Klimesch W, Doppelmayr D, Russegger H, Pachinger T. 1996. Theta band power in human scalp EEG and encoding of new information. Neuroreport 7:1235–1240 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  134. Knake S, Belke M, Menzler K, Pilatus U, Eggert KM, Oertel WH, et al. 2010. In vivo demonstration of microstructural brain pathology in progressive supranuclear palsy: a DTI study using TBSS. Mov Disord 25:1232–1238 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  135. Korematsu K, Hori T, Morioka M, Kuratsu J-i. 2010. Memory impairment due to a small unilateral infarction of the fornix. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 112:164–166 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  136. Koubeissi MZ, Kahriman E, Syed TU, Miller J, Durand DM. 2013. Low-frequency electrical stimulation of a fiber tract in temporal lobe epilepsy. Ann Neurol 74:223–231 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  137. Kullmann S, Schweizer F, Veit R, Fritsche A, Preissl H. 2015. Compromised white matter integrity in obesity. Obes Rev 16:273–281 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  138. Kurumaji A, Itasaka M, Uezato A, Takiguchi K, Jitoku D, Hobo M, Nishikawa T. 2017. A distinctive abnormality of diffusion tensor imaging parameters in the fornix of patients with bipolar II disorder. Psychiatry Res Neuroimaging 266:66–72 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  139. Kwok SC, Buckley MJ. 2006. Fornix transection impairs exploration but not locomotion in ambulatory macaque monkeys. Hippocampus 16:655–663 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  140. Kwok SC, Buckley MJ. 2009. Fornix transected macaques make fewer perseverative errors than controls during the early stages of learning conditional visuospatial discriminations. Behav Brain Res 205:207–213 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  141. Kwok SC, Buckley MJ. 2010. Long-term visuospatial retention unaffected by fornix transection. Hippocampus 20:889–893 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  142. Kwok SC, Mitchell AS, Buckley MJ. 2015. Adaptability to changes in temporal structure is fornix-dependent. Learn Mem 22:354–359 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  143. Laxton AW, Tang-Wai DF, McAndrews MP, Zumsteg D, Wennberg R, Keren R, et al. 2010. A phase I trial of deep brain stimulation of memory circuits in Alzheimer's disease. Ann Neurol 68:521–534 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  144. Lebel C, Gee M, Camicioli R, Wieler M, Martin W, Beaulieu C. 2012. Diffusion tensor imaging of white matter tract evolution over the lifespan. Neuroimage 60:340–352 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  145. Lebel C, Walker L, Leemans A, Phillips L, Beaulieu C. 2008. Microstructural maturation of the human brain from childhood to adulthood. Neuroimage 40:1044–1055 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  146. Lee DK, Lee H, Park K, Joh E, Kim CE, Ryu S. 2020. Common gray and white matter abnormalities in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. PLoS One 15:e0232826. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  147. Lee H, Cohen OS, Rosenmann H, Hoffmann C, Kingsley PB, Korczyn AD. 2012. Cerebral white matter disruption in Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. Am J Neuroradiol 33:1945–1950 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  148. Lee SH, Kubicki M, Asami T, Seidman LJ, Goldstein JM, Mesholam-Gately RI, et al. 2013. Extensive white matter abnormalities in patients with first-episode schizophrenia: a diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) study. Schizophr Res 143:231–238 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  149. Lega BC, Jacobs J, Kahana M. 2012. Human hippocampal theta oscillations and the formation of episodic memories. Hippocampus 22:748–761 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  150. Li W, Muftuler LT, Chen G, Ward BD, Budde MD, Jones JL, et al. 2014. Effects of the coexistence of late-life depression and mild cognitive impairment of white matter microstructure. J Neurol Sci 338:46–56 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  151. Li X, Wang H, Tian Y, Zhou S, Li X, Wang K, Yu Y. 2016. Impaired white matter connections of the limbic system networks associated with impaired emotional memory in Alzheimer's disease. Front Aging Neurosci 8:250. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  152. Li XR, De Ren Y, Cao B, Huang XL. 2018. Analysis of white matter characteristics with tract-based spatial statistics according to diffusion tensor imaging in early Parkinson's disease. Neurosci Lett 675:127–132 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  153. Lindner P, Budhiraja M, Westerman J, Savic I, Jokinen J, Tiihonen J, Hodgins S. 2017. White matter correlates of psychopathic traits in a female community sample. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci 12:1500–1510 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  154. Lipponen A, Woldemichael BT, Gurevicius K, Tanila H. 2012. Artificial theta stimulation impairs encoding of contextual fear memory. PLoS One 7:e48506. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  155. Lisman JE, Grace AA. 2005. The hippocampal-VTA loop: controlling the entry of information into long-term memory. Neuron 46:703–713 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  156. Liu J, Zhu J, Yuan F, Zhang X, Zhang Q. 2018. Abnormal brain white matter in patients with right trigeminal neuralgia: a diffusion tensor imaging study. J Headache Pain 19:46. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  157. Liu Y, Spulber G, Lehtimäki KK, Könönen M, Hallikainen I, Gröhn H, et al. 2011. Diffusion tensor imaging and tract-based spatial statistics in Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment. Neurobiol Aging 32:1558–1571 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  158. Ly M, Adluru N, Destiche DJ, Lu SY, Oh JM, Hoscheidt SM, et al. 2016. With altered neural connectivity during episodic recognition. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 22:191–204 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  159. Maier-Hein KH, Brunner R, Lutz K, Henze R, Parzer P, Feigl N, et al. 2014. Disorder-specific white matter alterations in adolescent borderline personality disorder. Biol Psychiatry 75:81–88 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  160. Mao ZQ, Wang X, Xu X, Cui ZQ, Pan LS, Ning XJ, et al. 2018. Partial improvement in performance of patients with severe Alzheimer's disease at an early stage of fornix deep brain stimulation. Neural Regen Res 13:2164–2172 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  161. Maren S, Fanselow MS. 1997. Electrolytic lesions of the fimbria/fornix, dorsal hippocampus, or entorhinal cortex produce anterograde deficits in contextual fear conditioning in rats. Neurobiol Learn Mem 67:142–149 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  162. Markowska AL, Olton DS, Murray EA, Gaffan D. 1989. A comparative analysis of the role of fornix and cingulate cortex in memory: rats. Exp Brain Res 74:187–201 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  163. Mayo CD, Mazerolle EL, Ritchie L, Fisk JD, Gawryluk JR. 2016. Longitudinal changes in microstructural white matter metrics in Alzheimer's disease. Neuroimage Clin 13:330–338 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  164. McEwen BS. 2017. Neurobiological and systemic effects of chronic stress. Chronic Stress 1:2470547017692328. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  165. McMackin D, Cockburn J, Anslow P, Gaffan D. 1995. Correlation of fornix damage with memory impairment in six cases of colloid cyst removal. Acta Neurochir 135:12–18 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  166. Meijer KA, Muhlert N, Cercignani M, Sethi V, Ron MA, Thompson AJ, et al. 2016. White matter tract abnormalities are associated with cognitive dysfunction in econdary progressive multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 22:1429–1437 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  167. Mettler LN, Shott ME, Pryor T, Yang TT, Frank GKW. 2013. White matter integrity is reduced in bulimia nervosa. Int J Eat Disord 46:264–273 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  168. Metzler-Baddeley C, Baddeley RJ, Jones DK, Aggleton JP, O'Sullivan MJ. 2013. Individual differences in fornix microstructure and body mass index. PLoS One 8:e59849. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  169. Metzler-Baddeley C, Hunt S, Jones DK, Leemans A, Aggleton JP, O'Sullivan MJ. 2012. Temporal association tracts and the breakdown of episodic memory in mild cognitive impairment. Neurology 79:2233–2240 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  170. Metzler-Baddeley C, O'Sullivan MJ, Belaroussi B, Aggleton JP, Jones DK. 2011. Frontotemporal connections in episodic memory and aging: a diffusion MRI tractography study. J Neurosci 31:13236–13245 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  171. Mielke MM, Okonkwo OC, Oishi K, Mori S, Tighe S, Miller MI, et al. 2012. Fornix integrity and hippocampal volume predict memory decline and progression to Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimers Dement 8:105–113 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  172. Milner B, Scoville WB. 1957. Loss of recent memory after bilateral hippocampal lesions. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 20:11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  173. Modi S, Trivedi R, Singh K, Kumar P, Rathore R, Tripathy RP, Khushu S. 2013. Individual differences in trait anxiety are associated with white matter tract integrity in fornix and uncinate fasciculus: preliminary evidence from a DTI based tractography study. Behav Brain Res 238:188–192 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  174. Monnig MA, Caprihan A, Yeo RA, Gasparovic C, Ruhl DA, Lysne P, et al. 2013. Diffusion tensor imaging of white matter networks in individuals with current and remitted alcohol use disorders and comorbid conditions. Psychol Addict Behav 27:455–465 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  175. Monnig MA, Thayer RE, Caprihan A, Claus ED, Yeo RA, Calhoun VD, Hutchison KE. 2014. White matter integrity is associated with alcohol cue reactivity in heavy drinkers. Brain Behav 4:158–170 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  176. Montaldi D, Mayes AR. 2010. The role of recollection and familiarity in the functional differentiation of the medial temporal lobes. Hippocampus 20:1291–1314 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  177. Monzon BM, Hay P, Foroughi N, Touyz S. 2016. White matter alterations in anorexia nervosa: a systematic review of diffusion tensor imaging studies. World J Psychiatry 6:177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  178. Moseley M. 2002. Diffusion tensor imaging and aging—a review. NMR Biomed 15:553–560 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  179. Moudgil SS, Azzouz M, Al-Azzaz A, Haut M, Gutmann L. 2000. Amnesia due to fornix infarction. Stroke 31:1418–1419 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  180. Muir JL. 1997. Acetylcholine, aging, and Alzheimer's disease. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 56:687–696 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  181. Murray EA, Davidson M, Gaffan D, Olton DS, Suomi S. 1989. Effects of fornix transection and cingulate cortical ablation on spatial memory in rhesus monkeys. Exp Brain Res 74:173–186 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  182. Nadel L, Samsonovich A, Ryan L, Moscovitch M. 2000. Multiple trace theory of human memory: computational, neuroimaging, and neuropsychological results. Hippocampus 10:352–368 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  183. Nagahara Y, Nakamae T, Nishizawa S, Mizuhara Y, Moritoki Y, Wada Y, et al. 2014. A tract-based spatial statistics study in anorexia nervosa: abnormality in the fornix and the cerebellum. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 51:72–77 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  184. Nestor PG, Kubicki M, Kuroki N, Gurrera RJ, Niznikiewicz M, Shenton M E, McCarley RW. 2007. Episodic memory and neuroimaging of hippocampus and fornix in chronic schizophrenia. Psychiatry Res Neuroimaging 155:21–28 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  185. Ngo CT, Alm KH, Metoki A, Hampton W, Riggins TR, Newcombe NS, Olson IR. 2017. White matter structural connectivity and episodic memory in early childhood. Dev Cogn Neurosci 28:41–53 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  186. Ngo CT, Lin Y, Newcombe NS, Olson IR. 2019. Building up and wearing down episodic memory: mnemonic discrimination and relational binding. J Exp Psychol Gen 148:1463–1479 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  187. Nguyen D, Vargas MI, Khaw N, Seeck M, Delavelle J, Lovblad KO, Haller S. 2011. Diffusion tensor imaging analysis with tract-based spatial statistics of the white matter abnormalities after epilepsy surgery. Epilepsy Res 94:189–197 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  188. Nickl-Jockschat T, Stöcker T, Markov V, Krug A, Huang R, Schneider F, et al. 2012. The impact of a Dysbindin schizophrenia susceptibility variant on fiber tract integrity in healthy individuals: a TBSS-based diffusion tensor imaging study. Neuroimage 60:847–853 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  189. Nir TM, Jahanshad N, Villalon-Reina JE, Toga AW, Jack CR, Weiner MW, Thompson PM. 2013. Effectiveness of regional DTI measures in distinguishing Alzheimer's disease, MCI, and normal aging. Neuroimage Clin 3:180–195 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  190. Norman KA, O'Reilly RC. 2003. Modeling hippocampal and neocortical contributions to recognition memory: a complimentary learning systems approach. Psychol Rev 110:611–646 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  191. Nowrangi MA, Lyketsos CG, Leoutsakos JMS, Oishi K, Albert M, Mori S, Mielke MM. 2013. Longitudinal, region-specific course of diffusion tensor imaging measures in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimers Dement 9:519–528 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  192. O'Donnell LJ, Pasternak O. 2015. Does diffusion MRI tell us anything about the white matter? An overview of methods and pitfalls. Schizophr Res 161:133–141 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  193. O'Dwyer L, Lamberton F, Bokde ALW, Ewers M, Faluyi YO, Tanner C, et al. 2011. Multiple indices of diffusion identifies white matter damage in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease. PLoS One 6:e21745. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  194. Oertel-Knöchel V, Reinke B, Alves G, Jurcoane A, Wenzler S, Prvulovic D, et al. 2014. Frontal white matter alterations are associated with executive cognitive function in euthymic bipolar patients. J Affect Disord 155:223–233 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  195. Oishi K, Lyketsos CG. 2014. Alzheimer's disease and the fornix. Front Aging Neurosci 6:241. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  196. Oishi K, Mielke MM, Albert M, Lyketsos CG, Mori S. 2012. The fornix sign: a potential sign for Alzheimer's disease based on diffusion tensor imaging. J Neuroimaging 22:365–374 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  197. O'Keefe J, Nadel L, Keightley S, Kill D. 1975. Lesions selectively abolish place learning in the rat. Exp Neurol 48:152–166 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  198. Olds J, Milner P. 1954. Positive reinforcement produced by electrical stimulation of septal area and other regions of rat brain. J Comp Physiol Psychol 47:419–427 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  199. Onnink AMH, Zwiers MP, Hoogman M, Mostert JC, Dammers J, Kan CC, et al. 2015. Deviant white matter structure in adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder points to aberrant myelination and affects neuropsychological performance. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 63:14–22 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  200. Oswald BB, Maddox SA, Powell DA. 2007. Impairments in trace EB conditioning by knife-cut lesions to the fornix in rabbits: reversal by galantamine. Neurobiol Learn Mem 88:369–380 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  201. Pagani JH, Zhao M, Cui Z, Williams Avram SK, Caruana DA, Dudek SM, Young WS. 2015. Role of the vasopressin 1b receptor in rodent aggressive behavior and synaptic plasticity in hippocampal area CA2. Mol Psychiatry 20:490–499 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  202. Palacios EM, Fernandez-Espejo D, Junque C, Sanchez-Carrion R, Roig T, Tormos JM, et al. 2011. Diffusion tensor imaging differences relate to memory deficits in diffuse traumatic brain injury. BMC Neurol 11:24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  203. Park SA, Hahn JH, Kim JI, Na DL, Huh K. 2000. Memory deficits after bilateral anterior fornix infarction. Neurology 54:1379–1382 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  204. Parker A, Gaffan D. 1997. Madary body lesions in monkeys impair object-in-place memory: functional unity of the fornix-madary system. J Cogn Neurosci 94:512–521 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  205. Pasternak O, Sochen N, Gur Y, Intrator N, Assaf Y. 2009. Free water elimination and mapping from diffusion MRI. Magn Reson Med 62:717–730 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  206. Pelletier A, Periot O, Dilharreguy B, Hiba B, Bordessoules M, Pérès K, et al. 2013. Structural hippocampal network alterations during healthy aging: a multi-modal MRI study. Front Aging Neurosci 5:84. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  207. Perea RD, Rabin JS, Fujiyoshi MG, Neal TE, Smith EE, Van Dijk KRA, Hedden T. 2018. Connectome-derived diffusion characteristics of the fornix in Alzheimer's disease. Neuroimage Clin 19:331–342 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  208. Phillipou A, Carruthers SP, Di Biase MA, Zalesky A, Abel LA, Castle DJ, et al. 2018. White matter microstructure in anorexia nervosa. Hum Brain Mapp 39:4385–4392 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  209. Phillips RG, LeDoux JE. 1995. Lesions of the fornix but not the entorhinal or perirhinal cortex interfere with contextual fear conditioning. J Neurosci 15:5308–5315 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  210. Poreh A, Winocur G, Moscovitch M, Backon M, Goshen E, Ram Z, Feldman Z. 2006. Anterograde and retrograde amnesia in a person with bilateral fornix lesions following removal of a colloid cyst. Neuropsychologia 44:2241–2248 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  211. Porter A, Leckie R, Verstynen T. 2018. White matter pathways as both a target and mediator of health behaviors. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1428:71–88 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  212. Postans M, Hodgetts CJ, Mundy ME, Jones DK, Lawrence AD, Graham KS. 2014. Interindividual variation in fornix microstructure and macrostructure is related to visual discrimination accuracy for scenes but not faces. J Neurosci 34:12121–12126 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  213. Puzzo I, Seunarine K, Sully K, Darekar A, Clark C, Sonuga-Barke EJS, Fairchild G. 2018. Altered white-matter microstructure in conduct disorder is specifically associated with elevated callous-unemotional traits. J Abnorm Child Psychol 46:1451–1466 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  214. Qi R, Zhang LJ, Zhong J, Zhu T, Zhang Z, Xu C, et al. 2013. Grey and white matter abnormalities in minimal hepatic encephalopathy: a study combining voxel-based morphometry and tract-based spatial statistics. Eur Radiol 23:3370–3378 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  215. Rabin JS, Perea RD, Buckley RF, Johnson KA, Sperling RA, Hedden T. 2019. Synergism between fornix microstructure and beta amyloid accelerates memory decline in clinically normal older adults. Neurobiol Aging 81:38–46 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  216. Raikes AC, Bajaj S, Dailey NS, Smith RS, Alkozei A, Satterfield BC, Killgore WDS. 2018. Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI) correlates of self-reported sleep quality and depression following mild traumatic brain injury. Front Neurol 9:468. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  217. Ranganath C. 2010. A unified framework for the functional organization of the medial temporal lobes and the phenomenology of episodic memory. Hippocampus 20:1263–1290 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  218. Rawlins JNP, Feldon J, Gray JA. 1979. Septo-hippocampal connections and the hippocampal theta rhythm. Exp Brain Res 37:49–63 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  219. Ray NJ, Metzler-Baddeley C, Khondoker MR, Grothe MJ, Teipel S, Wright P, et al. 2015. Cholinergic basal forebrain structure influences the reconfiguration of white matter connections to support residual memory in mild cognitive impairment. J Neurosci 35:739–747 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  220. Rémy F, Vayssière N, Saint-Aubert L, Barbeau E, Pariente J. 2015. White matter disruption at the prodromal stage of Alzheimer's disease: relationships with hippocampal atrophy and episodic memory performance. Neuroimage Clin 7:482–492 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  221. Reynolds JE, Grohs MN, Dewey D, Lebel C. 2019. Global and regional white matter development in early childhood. Neuroimage 196:49–58 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  222. Rosenbaum RS, Gao F, Honjo K, Raybaud C, Olsen RK, Palombo DJ, et al. 2014. Congenital absence of the mammillary bodies: a novel finding in a well-studied case of developmental amnesia. Neuropsychologia 65:82–87 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  223. Rudebeck SR, Scholz J, Millington R, Rohenkohl G, Johansen-Berg H, Lee ACH. 2009. Fornix microstructure correlates with recollection but not familiarity memory. J Neurosci 29:14987–14992 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  224. Sabia S, Dugravot A, Dartigues JF, Abell J, Elbaz A, Kivimäki M, Singh-Manoux A. 2017. Physical activity, cognitive decline, and risk of dementia: 28 year follow-up of Whitehall II cohort study. BMJ 357:j2709. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  225. Sankar T, Chakravarty MM, Bescos A, Lara M, Obuchi T, Laxton AW, et al. 2015. Deep brain stimulation influences brain structure in Alzheimer's disease. Brain Stimul 8:645–654 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  226. Sara SJ, Dyon-Laurent C, Guibert B, Leviel V. 2004. Noradrenergic hyperactivity after partial fornix section: role in cholinergic dependent memory performance. Exp Brain Res 89:125–132 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  227. Savransky A, Chiappelli J, Rowland LM, Wisner K, Shukla DK, Kochunov O, Hong LE. 2017. Fornix structural connectivity and allostatic load: empirical evidence from schizophrenia patients and healthy controls. Psychosom Med 79:770–776 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  228. Sayo A, Jennings RG, Van Horn JD. 2012. Study factors influencing ventricular enlargement in schizophrenia: a 20 year follow-up meta-analysis. Neuroimage 59:154–167 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  229. Sboto-Frankenstein UN, Lazar T, Bolster RB, Thind S, De Gervai PD, Gruwel MLH, et al. 2014. Symmetry of the fornix using diffusion tensor imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 40:929–936 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  230. Schwarb H, Johnson CL, Dulas MR, McGarry MDJ, Holtrop JL, Watson PD, et al. 2019. Structural and functional MRI evidence for distinct medial temporal and prefrontal roles in context-dependent relational memory. J Cogn Neurosci 31:1857–1872 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  231. Senova S, Chaillet A, Lozano AM. 2018. Fornical closed-loop stimulation for Alzheimer's disease. Trends Neurosci 41:418–428 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  232. Shi Y, Toga AW. 2017. Connectome imaging for mapping human brain pathways. Mol Psychiatry 22:1230–1240 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  233. Squire LR, Clark RE, Knowlton BJ. 2001. Retrograde amnesia. Hippocampus 11:50–55 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  234. Stadlbauer A, Salomonowitz E, Strunk G, Hammen T, Ganslandt O. 2008. Quantitative diffusion tensor fiber tracking of age-related changes in the limbic system. Eur Radiol 18:130–137 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  235. Staudigl T, Hanslmayr S. 2013. Theta oscillations at encoding mediate the context-dependent nature of human episodic memory. Curr Biol 23:1101–1106 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  236. Sullivan EV, Rohlfing T, Pfefferbaum A. 2010. Quantitative fiber tracking of lateral and interhemispheric white matter systems in normal aging: relations to timed performance. Neurobiol Aging 31:464–481 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  237. Sun Y, Zhang L, Ancharaz SS, Cheng S, Sun W, Wang H, Sun Y. 2016. Decreased fractional anisotropy values in two clusters of white matter in patients with schizotypal personality disorder: a DTI study. Behav Brain Res 310:68–75 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  238. Sweeney P, Yang Y. 2015. An excitatory ventral hippocampus to lateral septum circuit that suppresses feeding. Nat Commun 6:10188. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  239. Tan X, Fang P, An J, Lin H, Liang Y, Shen W, et al. 2016. Micro-structural white matter abnormalities in type 2 diabetic patients: a DTI study using TBSS analysis. Neuroradiology 58:1209–1216 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  240. Tang SX, Dai JP, Feng QL, Duan S, Shan BC. 2017. Diffusion characteristics of the fornix in patients with Alzheimer's disease. Psychiatry Res Neuroimaging 265:72–76 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  241. Tort ABL, Komorowski RW, Manns JR, Kopell NJ, Eichenbaum H. 2009. Theta-gamma coupling increases during the learning of item-context associations. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106:20942–20947 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  242. Trouche S, Koren V, Doig NM, Ellender TJ, El-Gaby M, Lopes-dos-Santos V, et al. 2019. A hippocampus-accumbens tripartite neuronal motif guides appetitive memory in space. Cell 176:1393–1406 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  243. Tsivilis D, Vann SD, Denby C, Roberts N, Mayes AR, Montaldi D, et al. 2008. A disproportionate role for the fornix and mammillary bodies in recall versus recognition memory. Nat Neurosci 11:834–842 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  244. Valji A, Priemysheva A, Hodgetts CJ, Costigan AG, Parker GD, Graham KS, et al. Curious connections: white matter pathways supporting individual differences in epistemic and perceptual curiosity. BioRxiv [Preprint]. 2019. Available from: 10.1101/642165 [DOI]
  245. van Bruggen T, Stieltjes B, Thomann PA, Parzer P, Meinzer HP, Fritzsche KH. 2012. Do Alzheimer-specific microstructural changes in mild cognitive impairment predict conversion? Psychiatry Res Neuroimaging 203:184–193 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  246. Vedam-Mai V, Van Battum EY, Kamphuis W, Feenstra MGP, Denys D, Reynolds BA, et al. 2012. Deep brain stimulation and the role of astrocytes. Mol Psychiatry 17:124–131 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  247. Von Der Heide RJ, Skipper LM, Klobusicky E, Olson IR. 2013. Dissecting the uncinate fasciculus: disorders, controversies and a hypothesis. Brain 136:1692–1707 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  248. Von Schwanenflug N, Müller DK, King JA, Ritschel F, Bernardoni F, Mohammadi S, et al. 2019. Dynamic changes in white matter microstructure in anorexia nervosa: findings from a longitudinal study. Psychol Med 49:1555–1564 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  249. Walker JA, Olton DS. 1979. Spatial memory deficit following fimbria-fornix lesions: independent of time for stimulus processing. Physiol Behav 23:11–15 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  250. Wang L, Yang Y, Chen S, Ge M, He J, Yang Z, et al. 2018. White matter integrity correlates with residual consciousness in patients with severe brain injury. Brain Imaging Behav 12:669–1677 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  251. Warrington EK, Weiskrantz L. 1982. Amnesia: a disconnection syndrome? Neuropsychologia 20:233–248 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  252. Wendelken C, Lee JK, Pospisil J, Sastre M, Ross JM, Bunge SA, Ghetti S. 2015. White matter tracts connected to the medial temporal lobe support the development of mnemonic control. Cereb Cortex 25:2574–2583 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  253. Whalley HC, Nickson T, Pope M, Nicol K, Romaniuk L, Bastin ME, et al. 2015. White matter integrity and its association with affective and interpersonal symptoms in borderline personality disorder. Neuroimage Clin 7:476–481 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  254. Whishaw IQ, Tomie JA. 1997. Piloting and dead reckoning dissociated by fimbria-fornix lesions in a rat food carrying task. Behav Brain Res 89:87–97 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  255. Wiig KA, Cooper LN, Bear MF. 1996. Temporally graded retrograde amnesia following separate and combined lesions of the perirhinal cortex and fornix in the rat. Learn Mem 3:313–325 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  256. Williams JM, Givens B. 2003. Stimulation-induced reset of hippocampal theta in the freely performing rat. Hippocampus 13:109–116 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  257. Wilson CRE, Baxter MG, Easton A, Gaffan D. 2008. Addition of fornix transection to frontal-temporal disconnection increases the impairment in object-in-place memory in macaque monkeys. Eur J Neurosci 27:1814–1822 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  258. Wilson CRE, Charles DP, Buckley MJ, Gaffan D. 2007. Fornix transection impairs learning of randomly changing object discriminations. J Neurosci 27:12868–12873 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  259. Wilson IA, Gallagher M, Eichenbaum H, Tanila H. 2006. Neurocognitive aging: prior memories hinder new hippocampal encoding. Trends Neurosci 29:662–670 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  260. Winocur G, McDonald RM, Moscovitch M. 2001. Anterograde and retrograde amnesia in rats with large hippocampal lesions. Hippocampus 11:18–26 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  261. Xu J, Li Y, Lin H, Sinha R, Potenza MN. 2013. Body mass index correlates negatively with white matter integrity in the fornix and corpus callosum: a diffusion tensor imaging study. Hum Brain Mapp 34:1044–1052 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  262. Yeh F-C, Panesar S, Fernandes D, Meola A, Yoshino M, Fernandez-Miranda JC, et al. 2018. Population-averaged atlas of the macroscale human structural connectome and its network topology. Neuroimage 178:57–68 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  263. Yu J, Lam CLM, Lee TMC. 2017a. White matter microstructural abnormalities in amnestic mild cognitive impairment: a meta-analysis of whole-brain and ROI-based studies. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 83:405–416 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  264. Yu J, Lee TMC. 2019. Verbal memory and hippocampal volume predict subsequent fornix microstructure in those at risk for Alzheimer's disease. Brain Imaging Behav [Epub ahead of print]; DOI: 10.1007/s11682-019-00183-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  265. Yu ST, Lee KS, Lee SH. 2017b. Fornix microalterations associated with early trauma in panic disorder. J Affect Disord 220:139–146 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  266. Zahr NM, Rohlfing T, Pfefferbaum A, Sullivan EV. 2009. Problem solving, working memory, and motor correlates of association and commissural fiber bundles in normal aging: a quantitative fiber tracking study. Neuroimage 44:1050–1062 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  267. Zamroziewicz MK, Paul EJ, Zwilling CE, Barbey AK. 2017. Predictors of memory in healthy aging: polyunsaturated fatty acid balance and fornix white matter integrity. Aging Dis 8:372–383 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  268. Zhang C, Hu WH, Wu DL, Zhang K, Zhang JG. 2015. Behavioral effects of deep brain stimulation of the anterior nucleus of thalamus, entorhinal cortex and fornix in a rat model of Alzheimer's disease. Chin Med J 128:1190–1195 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  269. Zhang H, Lin S-C, Nicolelis MAL. 2010. Spatiotemporal coupling between hippocampal acetylcholine release and theta oscillations in vivo. J Neurosci 30:13431–13440 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  270. Zhuang L, Sachdev PS, Trollor JN, Kochan NA, Reppermund S, Brodaty H, Wen W. 2012. Microstructural white matter changes in cognitively normal individuals at risk of amnestic MCI. Neurology 79:748–754 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  271. Zhuang L, Sachdev PS, Trollor JN, Reppermund S, Kochan NA, Brodaty H, Wen W. 2013. Microstructural white matter changes, not hippocampal atrophy, detect early amnestic mild cognitive impairment. PLoS One 8:e58887. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  272. Zhuang L, Wen W, Zhu W, Trollor J, Kochan N, Crawford J, et al. 2010. White matter integrity in mild cognitive impairment: a tract-based spatial statistics study. Neuroimage 53:16–25 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  273. Zhuo C, Ma X, Qu H, Wang L, Jia F, Wang C. 2016. Schizophrenia patients demonstrate both inter-voxel level and intra-voxel level white matter alterations. PLoS One 11:8–15 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  274. Zhuo Y, Fang F, Lu L, Li T, Lian J, Xiong Y, et al. 2019. White matter impairment in type 2 diabetes mellitus with and without microvascular disease. Neuroimage Clin 24:101945. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Brain Connectivity are provided here courtesy of Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.

RESOURCES