Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Wiley Open Access Collection logoLink to Wiley Open Access Collection
. 2020 Jul 8;46(9):1900–1906. doi: 10.1111/jog.14386

Fetus of 8q22.2q24.3 duplication and 13q33.2q34 deletion derived from a maternal balanced translocation

Tong Liu 1,†, Huihui Xie 1,†, Jingbo Zhang 1, Xia Wang 1, Jing Sha 1, Jingfang Zhai 1,✉
PMCID: PMC7496467  PMID: 32643293

Abstract

The concomitant occurrence of 8q duplication and 13q deletion is the first to be detected by noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) to date. Through case analysis, we could provide a clinical approach to pregnant women with chromosomal abnormalities revealed by NIPT. The combination of traditional karyotype and copy number variation sequencing (CNV‐seq) could better locate the abnormal chromosomal region and further identify the source of fetal chromosomal abnormalities. Simultaneously, we evaluated the fetal morphology by ultrasound examination. The karyotype of the fetus was 46,XY,der(13)t(8;13)(q22;q32)mat and CNV‐seq results showed that there was an approximately 45.26‐Mb duplication in 8q22.2‐q24.3 (101040001–146 300 000) and an approximately 9.54‐Mb deletion in 13q33.2‐q34 (105560001–115 100 000). Prenatal ultrasound revealed the fetal structural abnormalities presented with hypoplasia of the cerebellar vermis, a flat nose, echogenic bowel and absent gallbladder. Herein, we consider that combination detection of traditional karyotyping, CNV‐seq and ultrasonography provides a valuable method for pregnant women with abnormal NIPT.

Keywords: 13q deletion, 8q duplication, copy number variations sequencing, noninvasive prenatal testing, ultrasonography

Introduction

Recently, noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) has been increasingly applied to clinical practice and deserved further promotion due to the reduced price in China. However, the clinical application of NIPT in subchromosomal abnormalities is limited because the results of NIPT are affected by the mother, fetus and placenta, with false positive and inaccuracy. In a retrospective study of 117 pregnant women, the sensitivity and specificity of the conventional NIPT method for detecting copy number variations (CNV) larger than 1 Mb were 61.1% and 95.0%, respectively, with a false‐positive rate of 5.0%. 1 In another study, the sensitivity and specificity of CNVs over 6 Mb revealed by NIPT were 83% and 99.6%, respectively, while the positive‐predictive value was 55%. 2 Therefore, NIPT is a screening test and further diagnostic means is needed. Positive NIPT results indicate an increasing trend of abnormal karyotypes including different segments of duplication and deletion, which could discover the presence of a heterotopic chromosome in either of the parents. 3 , 4 , 5 Whether chromosomal abnormalities are inherited or mutated, fetuses with unbalanced genetic material may have adverse clinical outcomes. Therefore, genetic confirmation is necessary for such fetuses. The resolution of the traditional karyotype is low, but it can identify the balanced translocation and other specific chromosome structures at a low cost. In contrast, CNV sequencing (CNV‐seq) by next‐generation sequencing technology not only has a higher resolution and effectively detects microdeletion and microduplication of chromosome, but also possesses the advantages of high specificity and sensitivity，which can provide diagnostic support for the fetuses of structural abnormalities in prenatal ultrasound and positive NIPT results. For CNV larger than 100 kb, the specificity and sensitivity of CNV‐seq were > 99% and compared with chromosomal microarray analysis, the concordance rate of the two test results was 100%. 6 However, CNV‐seq fails to detect structural chromosomal abnormalities and low levels of chromosomal mosaicism. Therefore, the combined application of karyotype analysis and CNV‐seq can significantly analyze the nature and origin of chromosome abnormalities in prenatal diagnosis. Here, we report one case with abnormal NIPT by conventional chromosome analysis techniques and CNV‐seq. At the same time, according to the CNV‐seq results of molecular genetics, multiple abnormalities of ultrasound examination were analyzed.

Case Presentation

A 30‐year‐old healthy primigravida woman was referred to prenatal diagnosis medical center of Xuzhou Central Hospital. She had no history of adverse reproduction and drug usage with non‐consanguineous marriage. The result of NIPT indicated partial trisomy 8 and deletion in chromosome 13 at 18‐week gestation. The woman chose the amniocentesis for karyotype analysis and CNV‐seq in the following day. The fetal karyotype was 46,XY,add(13)(q31) (Fig. 1a). In addition, the result of CNV‐seq showed that there was an approximately 45.26‐Mb duplication in 8q22.2‐q24.3 (101040001–146300000) and an approximately 9.54‐Mb deletion in 13q33.2‐q34 (105560001–115100000) (Fig. 1b). Prenatal ultrasound at 21‐week gestation showed abnormal fetal structures presented with hypoplasia of the cerebellar vermis (Fig. 2a), a flat nose (Fig. 2b), echogenic bowel and absent gallbladder. Moreover, patient's peripheral blood lymphocytes were suggested to detect, mainly to further clarify the origin of the derived chromosome. The mother's karyotype revealed a balanced translocation between chromosomes 8 and 13, carrying the following karyotype 46,XX,t(8;13)(q22;q32) (Fig. 1c), while the father's was normal. Finally, the couple opted to terminate the pregnancy after being fully informed of the adverse pregnancy outcomes. Amniotic fluid of the fetus and peripheral blood of the parents were collected for karyotype analysis and CNV‐seq after informed consent. This study was approved by Xuzhou Central Hospital Ethics Committee.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

(a) The fetal karyotype was 46,XY,add(13)(q31) at the level of 300–400 bands. (b) The fetal results of copy number variation sequencing (CNV‐seq) showed a 45.26‐Mb duplication in 8q22.2‐q24.3 (101040001–146300000) and a 9.54‐Mb deletion in 13q33.2‐q34 (105560001–115100000). (c) The peripheral blood karyotype of pregnancy women was 46,XX,t(8;13)(q22;q32) at the level of 300–400 bands.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

The fetal ultrasound imaging showed hypoplasia of the cerebellar vermis (a) and a flat nose (b).

Discussion

Derivative chromosomes are often caused by unbalanced chromosome rearrangements that appear spontaneously or may be inherited from healthy parents carrying balanced reciprocal translocations. In this paper, we report the fetus with 8q duplication and 13q deletion resulting from a maternal balanced translocation. Therefore, the karyotype of the fetus is reassigned as 46,XY,der(13)t(8;13)(q22;q32)mat which appears to be responsible for the multiple abnormalities according to the reported literatures and a large amount of data. On the other hand, the result of CNV‐seq shows a terminal q22.2‐q24.3 (101040001–146300000) duplication of approximately 45.26‐Mb. Isolated duplication of 8q22.2‐q24.3 is responsible for dysmorphic features such as hypertelorism, microretrognathia, telecanthus, upturned and broad nose, cleft palate and a variable degree of intellectual disability, 7 however, the duplication of segment is not associated with fetal changes in our ultrasound imaging. Relatedly, a female fetus with absent gallbladder and other multiple congenital anomalies was found to have partial trisomy 8 chromosome on karyotype analysis via amniocentesis. 8 The region of q22.2‐q24.3 encompasses 47 morbid genes (https://decipher.sanger.ac.uk/browser) and no gene variants related to absent gallbladder have been found. Among these, TAF2(OMIM: 604912), KCNK9(OMIM: 605847), TRAPPC9(OMIM: 611966), and RECQL4(OMIM: 603780) have been linked to the intellectual disability, while other genes such as SAMD12(OMIM: 618073), KCNQ3(OMIM: 602232) and GPAA1(OMIM: 603048)have been associated with epilepsy. 9 , 10

Hence, we speculate that the various malformations of the fetus in ultrasound may be mainly the result of distal deletion in 13q, among which, the cerebellar vermis hypoplasia is a severe abnormality. The 13q terminal deletion is mainly characterized by intellectual disability, developmental delay and congenital anomalies of the brain, such as Dandy–Walker malformation (DWM), corpus callosum agenesis, encephalocele and holoprosencephaly; facial deformity and other disorders, such as bowel atresia and lung hypoplasia. 11 , 12 Within the 13q terminal area, 13q32.2q33.1 is a critical region for cerebellar dysgenesis that has been confirmed to be related to the haploinsufficiency of ZIC2 and ZIC5, located in 13q32.2‐q32.3. 11 , 13 The CNV that encompass many functional genes may give rise to the congenital malformation by regulating genes haploinsufficiency, changing gene regulation and other mechanism. Differently, distal 13q deletion can occur due to disruption of multiple genes, other than haploinsufficiency of ZIC2 and ZIC5. 14 Bellucco et al. described two patients with right cerebellar hypoplasia, carrying an 11.9‐Mb deletion in the 13q33.1‐q34 region and a 3.8‐Mb in 13q34, respectively. 15 Chen et al. also reported a fetus who carried a 13q33.3‐ter deletion had DWM based on 24‐week ultrasound. 16 Herein, We identify a 9.54 Mb (105560001–115100000) deletion of 13q33.2‐q34 region, which is consistent with these literatures. Therefore, we speculate that there are other important genes associated with cerebellar vermiform hypoplasia in the 13q33.2‐q34 region. Or the function of known genes related to cerebellar vermis dysplasia has not been found. To our knowledge, the 13q33.2‐q34 region contains many important genes (https://decipher.sanger.ac.uk/browser), which has no clear evidence connected with the cerebellar vermis hypoplasia in human currently. Of these genes, the genes with relevance to disease include EFNB2(OMIM: 600527), ARHGEF7(OMIM: 605477), CHAMP1(OMIM: 616327), COL4A1(OMIM: 120130) and COL4A2(OMIM: 120090). The gene EFNB2 located in 13q33.2 plays an important role in genital development and congenital eye malformations. As a candidate gene for genital malformations, loss of function variant in the EFNB2 gene exhibits hypospadias and ambiguous genitalia. 17 The gene ARHGEF7 mapped in 13q34 is suggested as a candidate gene for psychomotor developmental delay, whose haploinsufficiency can contribute to the epileptic phenotype. 18 In addition, CHAMP1 encodes a protein with a function in kinetochore‐microtubule attachment and in the regulation of chromosome segregation, both of which are known to be important for neurodevelopment. Variants in CHAMP1 will give rise to intellectual disability with severe speech impairment, motor developmental delay, muscular hypotonia and similar dysmorphic features including short philtrum and a tented upper and everted lover lip, which is related with the loss of important zinc‐finger domains. 19 COL4A1 and COL4A2 are present in almost all basement membranes. Allelic heterogeneity caused by COL4A1 and COL4A2 variants results in brain abnormalities manifesting with schizencephaly and severe neurological deficits including cerebral palsy, intellectual disability and focal epilepsy, 20 which has only been demonstrated in a series of mutant mouse lines. The parents finally terminated the pregnancy and refused to conduct an autopsy, so we could not appreciate the detailed characterizations and mental status.

The Published literatures found that there were two similar cases with accompanying the appearance of 8q duplication and 13q deletion derived from the maternal balanced translocation (Table 1). The first case showed partial trisomy 8q from a maternal carrier of a t(8;13)(q21;q34), and the phenotype was dominated by partial trisomy 8q. 21 This case did not describe the microdeletion of chromosome 13, lacking the molecular mapping of breakpoints and gene content that were limited to genomic techniques. The second case had de novo partial trisomy 8q (56.8 Mb from 8qter) and partial monosomy 13q (0.28 Mb from 13qter) from a der(13)t(8;13)(q21.3;q34). The congenital malformations might be mainly the result of trisomy 8q. 22 In this case, the genes in the duplication region of 8q21.3q24.3 were not mentioned. GRTP1(RefSeq: NM_024719), ADPRHL1(OMIM: 610620), DCUN1D2(RefSeq. ID: NM_018185), TMCO3(OMIM: 617134) and TFDP1(OMIM: 189902) genes in the deletion region of 13q34 were introduced briefly, disappointingly, which had no significant relationship with the described congenital malformations. In contrast, in our case, the deletion region of 13q was much larger. Despite there were similar duplication and deletion in our case, the clinical phenotypes were completely different and we thought a deletion might have more important influence than a duplication according to the theory of heredity, depending on the function of the genes in that region.

Table 1.

Review of case reports associated with the 8q duplication and 13q deletion

Diagnosis NIPT Karyotype Origin Gene content and coordinate Outcome Clinical findings
First case Abuelo, D Postnatal ND 46,XY,der (13),t(8;13) (q21;q34) Maternal balanced translocation NS Born and follow up to 11 months Ocular hypertelorism, exotropia, a double skin crease below the lower eyelid, small pinnae with posterior angulation, pugged nose and long philtrum, micrognathia, short neck, marrow pelvis, hypoplastic scrotum and occurring a generalized tonic seizure
Second case Sohn Y B Postnatal ND 46,XX, der(13)t(8;13)(q21.3;q34) Maternal balanced translocation del(13)(q34) 0.28 Mb (arr 113986985‐114 266 156) dup (8)(q21.3q24.3) 56.8 Mb (arr 88908177‐145 788 550) Born and follow up to 37 days Corpus callosum agenesis, crumpled ear, hypertelorism, micrognathia, cleft palate, and overlapping fingers/toes and congenital heart disease
Present case Prenatal Partial trisomy 8 and deletion in 13 chromosome 46,XY,der(13)t(8;13)(q22;q32) Maternal balanced translocation del (13)(q33.2q34) 9.54 Mb (arr 105560001–1151000000) dup (8)(q22.2q24.3) 45.26 Mb (arr 101040001–146300000) Termination of pregnancy at 21 weeks Ultrasound examination showed abnormal fetus presented with microcephalic, a depressed nasal bridge, echogenic bowel and absent gallbladder
Open in a new tab

ND, not done; NS, not stated.

In a sense, the woman was fortunate to find herself as a carrier of balanced translocation in the first pregnancy without experiencing adverse pregnancy outcomes such as spontaneous miscarriage, stillbirth, or congenital malformations in live‐born progeny, which had guiding significance for future pregnancy. In genetic counseling, we suggest that the couple may choose natural pregnancy, which might cause likely adverse pregnancy outcomes again. On the other hand, she may also opt for preimplantation genetic diagnosis to improve the likelihood of achieving a successful pregnancy.

In conclusion, we use traditional karyotype and CNV‐seq to analyze the patients with positive NIPT results, consisting of the exchange of the terminal chromosome segments. At the same time, ultrasonography can evaluate the malformations of the fetus timely. We believe the combination detection of traditional karyotyping, CNV‐seq and ultrasonography can become a key step in such cases, complementing valuable details that are useful for a more precise phenotype characterization of each individual and for estimating their prognosis, but also for expanding our knowledge regarding this rare disease.

Disclosure

None declared.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the family who participated in this study. We express our sincere gratitude to all staff of the genetics laboratory for their excellent work. The funds of the publication and molecular analyses of this research were supported by Jiangsu Province Maternal and Child Health Research Project (no. F201942) and Wu Jieping Medical Foundation (no. 320.6750.19089‐18).

References

  • 1. Li R, Wan J, Zhang Y et al Detection of fetal copy number variants by non‐invasive prenatal testing for common aneuploidies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2016; 47: 53–57. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Lo KK, Karampetsou E, Boustred C et al Limited clinical utility of non‐invasive prenatal testing for subchromosomal abnormalities. Am J Hum Genet 2016; 98: 34–44. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Chen JK, Liu P, Hu LQ, Xie Q, Huang QF, Liu HL. A foetus with 18p11.32‐q21.2 duplication and Xp22.33‐p11.1 deletion derived from a maternal reciprocal translocation t(X;18)(q13;q21.3). Mol Cytogenetj 2018; 11: 37. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Mei J, Wang H, Zhan L. 10p15.3p13 duplication inherited from paternal balance translocation (46,XY,t(5;10)(q35.1;p13)) identified on non‐invasive prenatal testing. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2017; 43: 1076–1079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Yu DY, Zhang K, Han MY et al Noninvasive prenatal testing for fetal subchromosomal copy number variations and chromosomal aneuploidy by low‐pass whole‐genome sequencing. Mol Genet Genomic Med 2019; 7: 674e1–674e11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Zhu X, Li J, Ru T et al Identification of copy number variations associated with congenital heart disease by chromosomal microarray analysis and next‐generation sequencing. Prenat Diagn 2016; 36: 321–327. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Concolino D, Iembo MA, Moricca MT et al A de novo 8q22.2‐24.3 duplication in a patient with mild phenotype. Eur J Med Genet 2012; 55: 67–70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Matheson JK, Matheson VA, McCorquodale M, Santolaya‐Forgas J. Prenatal diagnosis of double autosomal Mosaicism (47,XX,+8/47,XX,+14): Phenotype and molecular cytogenetic analysis on different tissues. Fetal Diagn Ther 2003; 18: 29–32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Nguyen TTM, Murakami Y, Sheridan E et al Mutations in, GPAA1, encoding a GPI Transamidase complex protein, cause developmental delay, epilepsy, cerebellar atrophy, and osteopenia. Am J Hum Genet 2017; 101: 856–865. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Bruni V, Roppa K, Scionti F et al A 46,XY female with a 9p24.3p24.1 deletion and a 8q24.11q24.3 duplication: A case report and review of the literature. Cytogenet Genome Res 2019; 158: 74–82. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Kirchhoff M, Bisgaard AM, Stoeva R et al Phenotype and 244k array‐CGH characterization of chromosome 13q deletions: An update of the phenotypic map of 13q21.1‐qter. Am J Med Genet 2009; 149A: 894–905. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Wang YP, Wang DJ, Niu ZB, Cui WT. Chromosome 13q deletion syndrome involving 13q31‐qter: A case report. Mol Med Rep 2017; 15: 3658–3664. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Mimaki M, Shiihara T, Watanabe M et al Holoprosencephaly with cerebellar vermis hypoplasia in 13q deletion syndrome: Critical region for cerebellar dysgenesis within 13q32.2q34. Brain Dev 2015; 37: 714–718. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Myers KA, Wallis MJ, Fitt GJ, Newton MR. Blake's pouch cyst in 13q deletion syndrome: Posterior fossa malformations may occur due to disruption of multiple genes. Am J Med Genet A 2017; 173: 2442–2445. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Bellucco FT, Rodrigues de Oliveira‐Júnior H, Santos Guilherme R et al Melaragno Maria I. deletion of chromosome 13 due to different rearrangements and impact on phenotype. Mol Syndromol 2019; 10: 139–146. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Chen CP, Chen M, Su YN et al Prenatal diagnosis and molecular cytogenetic characterization of de novo partial trisomy 7p (7p15.3‐>pter) and partial monosomy 13q (13q33.3‐>qter) associated with Dandy‐Walker malformation, abnormal skull development and microcephaly. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol 2010; 49: 320–326. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Andresen JH, Aftimos S, Doherty E, Love DR, Battin M. 13q33.2 deletion: A rare cause of ambiguous genitalia in a male newborn with growth restriction. Acta Paediatr 2010; 99: 784–786. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Orsini A, Bonuccelli A, Striano P et al Generalized epilepsy and mild intellectual disability associated with 13q34 deletion: A potential role for SOX1 and ARHGEF7. Seizure 2018; 59: 38–40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Hempel M, Cremer K, Ockeloen CW et al De novo mutations in CHAMP1 cause intellectual disability with severe speech impairment. Am J Hum Genet 2015; 97: 493–500. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Cavallin M, Mine M, Philbert M et al Further refinement of COL4A1 and COL4A2 related cortical malformations. Eur J Med Genet 2018; 61: 765–772. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Abuelo D, Perl DP, Henkle C, Richardson A. Partial trisomy 8 (trisomy 8q2106 leads to 8qter). J Med Genet 1977; 14: 463–466. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Sohn YB, Yun JN, Park SJ, Park MS, Kim SH, Lee JH. Clinical and cytogenetic features of a patient with partial trisomy 8q and partial Monosomy 13q delineated by Array comparative genomic hybridization. Ann Clin Lab Sci 2013; 43: 332–336. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES