Skip to main content
ACS AuthorChoice logoLink to ACS AuthorChoice
. 2020 Aug 5;63(17):9650–9659. doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.0c00781

Bioorthogonal Uncaging of Cytotoxic Paclitaxel through Pd Nanosheet–Hydrogel Frameworks

Ana M Pérez-López , Belén Rubio-Ruiz , Teresa Valero , Rafael Contreras-Montoya , Luis Álvarez de Cienfuegos , Víctor Sebastián ‡,, Jesús Santamaría ‡,, Asier Unciti-Broceta †,*
PMCID: PMC7497487  PMID: 32787091

Abstract

graphic file with name jm0c00781_0010.jpg

The promising potential of bioorthogonal catalysis in biomedicine is inspiring incremental efforts to design strategies that regulate drug activity in living systems. To achieve this, it is not only essential to develop customized inactive prodrugs and biocompatible metal catalysts but also the right physical environment for them to interact and enable drug production under spatial and/or temporal control. Toward this goal, here, we report the first inactive precursor of the potent broad-spectrum anticancer drug paclitaxel (a.k.a. Taxol) that is stable in cell culture and labile to Pd catalysts. This new prodrug is effectively uncaged in cancer cell culture by Pd nanosheets captured within agarose and alginate hydrogels, providing a biodegradable catalytic framework to achieve controlled release of one of the most important chemotherapy drugs in medical practice. The compatibility of bioorthogonal catalysis and physical hydrogels opens up new opportunities to administer and modulate the mobility of transition metal catalysts in living environs.

Introduction

Despite the growing impact of molecularly targeted therapies in cancer, chemotherapy still stands as the main pharmacotherapeutic choice to treat most kinds of solid malignancies.13 The third-generation cytotoxic drug paclitaxel (PTX) is one of the most widely used chemotherapeutics4,5 and the anticancer drug currently enrolled in more active clinical trials (>1100).6 First isolated from the bark of the Pacific yew tree, the initiation of PTX’s phase 2 trials in the 1980s raised ecological concerns over the impact on yew populations and sparked the renowned race to complete its total synthesis.5,7 Nowadays, PTX is produced by a semisynthetic protocol from sustainable sources7,8 and globally used, alone or in combination, in the treatment of many of the most prevalent types of cancers, including breast, ovarian, and lung cancers.4,5 There are, however, important dose-limiting adverse effects associated with PTX therapy (myelosuppression, peripheral neuropathy, and cardiac toxicity) that restrains its systemic anticancer efficacy. For this reason, over the last decades, much research on PTX has been steered toward developing efficient drug delivery systems that improve its clinical tolerability8,9 and low-toxicity prodrugs.10,11 Innovative methods to localize drug activity at the tumor site are still essential to maximize the clinical potential of PTX, not least because of its ever-growing role in chemotherapy regimens.

The catalytic scope of some of the transition metals most commonly used in chemistry labs has recently expanded from round-bottom flasks to cell culture plates and animals. Ruthenium-,1217 palladium-,1531 gold-,3234 copper-,35,36 or iron-based37,38 catalysts have demonstrated their compatibility with saline aqueous solutions and their capacity to mediate chemo-specific processes in complex biological systems. The emerging field of bioorthogonal catalysis has enriched the wealth of methods available to label biomolecules,20,21 release cytotoxic drugs,14,17,24,26,38 or modulate biological functions.15,16,23,31 In this context, our lab has contributed to the use of palladium (Pd) as a heterogeneous catalytic system to generate clinically approved anticancer drugs in living environs.24,25,3943 Such an approach aims to achieve increased control over when and where prodrugs are converted into active drugs by exploiting activation strategies that do not rely on metabolic reactions.44,45 To date, nondegradable materials have been used to capture Pd nanoparticles and protect them from the biological milieu, meaning that the devices will stay at the affected tissue even after completing their catalytic function.41 This situation is certainly useful for cancers that tend to relapse at the same location, but not quite as much for short-lived neoadjuvant therapies or patients with multiple tumor foci. Hence, it would also be desirable to develop implantable systems that securely host Pd nanoparticles to induce local prodrug activation for a limited period of time and, afterward, degrade and naturally eliminate from the organism.

Here, we report the development of a novel PTX precursor that exhibits up to 700-fold lower activity than the parent drug and incorporates a Pd-sensitive masking group (Scheme 1). In the presence of Pd catalysts, a rapid depropargylation reaction takes place to trigger the release of PTX. In addition, we report the first investigation on the use of physical hydrogels to capture Pd catalysts and their capacity to carry out bioorthogonal uncaging reactions under physiological conditions.

Scheme 1. Proposed Pd-Mediated Activation Strategy in Cell Culture (Left) and Synthesis of Pro-PTX (Right).

Scheme 1

Cell culture: Pd-mediated O-depropargylation of Pro-PTX is thermodynamically favored by the generation of CO2 and designed to trigger an intramolecular cyclization event that releases PTX and 1,3-dimethyl-2-imidazolidinone. The dealkylation step in water is expected to afford nontoxic 1-hydroxyacetone.24 Reaction byproducts could not be confirmed by LCMS. Chemistry lab: Carbamate-protected Pro-PTX is semisynthetically prepared from PTX in two steps by successive reactions with p-nitrophenyl chloroformate and N-(propargyloxycarbonyl)-N,N′-dimethylethylenediamine, 4.

Results and Discussion

Design and Synthesis of a Biochemically Stable Pd-Sensitive Prodrug of PTX

The structure–activity relationships of PTX and its analogues have been the subject of intensive research.46,10 It is well established that one of the essential groups for their bioactivity is the secondary alcohol at the C2′ position of the side chain. Masking of this aliphatic OH with various chemical groups (carbonates, esters, carbamates, etc.) has been used to develop PTX prodrugs for different purposes.47,10 In light of previous studies25 showing that carbamate-based masking groups exhibit significantly higher stability in cell culture than carbonate ones and the need to generate a prodrug that endures the cell metabolism, a biscarbamate group connected through an N,N′-dimethylethylenediamine spacer48 was used to mask the C2′-OH of PTX (Scheme 1). To provide sensitivity to Pd catalysis, an O-propargyl moiety was incorporated at the terminal carbamate that, after cleavage, triggers a self-immolative cascade resulting in the release of PTX.

Pro-PTX was prepared following the semisynthetic route described in Scheme 1 (see the synthetic procedure in the Experimental Section and NMR spectra in the Supporting Information). PTX was reacted with p-nitrophenyl chloroformate in the presence of pyridine to incorporate a reactive carbonate group at its C2′-OH position. The reaction of N-Boc-protected ethylenediamine 2 with propargyl chloroformate, followed by Boc deprotection under acidic conditions provided compound 4 in a high yield (90%, two steps). Finally, coupling of 1 and 4 in the presence of DIPEA generated Pro-PTX in a moderate yield (36%).

Cytotoxicity Study: PTX vs Pro-PTX

To evaluate the inactivation strategy, viability assays were performed in three cell lines: non-small-cell lung carcinoma A549 cells (cell model of human cancer clinically treated with PTX),4,5 human glioblastoma U87 cells (model of aggressive brain cancer),49 and human brain vascular pericytes (HBVPs, noncancerous cells that are critical components of the blood–brain barrier49 and similar to those found in peripheral nerves). Cells were treated with PTX and Pro-PTX at a range of concentrations (up to 10 μM) and viability measurements were carried out after 5 days of treatment. Results were normalized to the untreated cell control (1% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO)) and half-maximal effective concentration (EC50) values were calculated from the generated dose–response curves (see Figure 1). As expected, PTX treatment induced a very potent cytotoxic effect against the two cancer cell lines, with EC50 values in the range of 2–3 nM. In contrast, Pro-PTX did not show activity at most concentrations tested in these cell lines, with reduced cell viability only seen at doses ≥1 μM and exhibiting an EC50 value of 1.75 μM for A549 and 0.54 μM for U87 cells (Figure 1a,b). This vast drop of anticancer activity (200- to 700-fold lower than PTX) highlights the essential role of the C2′-OH of PTX for binding its target (lumenal side of microtubules)4,5 and the stability of the masking group to enzymatic cleavage and nucleophilic attacks by intracellular biomolecules. As expected, PTX and Pro-PTX displayed much lower cytotoxicity in low-proliferating HBVPs (Figure 1c). Under treatment with PTX, cell proliferation was reduced to 75% at concentrations ≥1 μM, with an EC50 value of 0.047 μM. The antiproliferative effect of Pro-PTX in HBVPs was negligible at most concentrations (EC50 = 4.4 μM), which is in agreement with an increased safety profile relative to its parent drug.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Nine-point semilog dose–response curves and calculated EC50 values for (a) A549 cells, (b) U87 cells, and (c) HBVPs after 5 days of treatment with PTX and Pro-PTX at concentrations ranging from 0.001 to 10 μM. Error bars: ±SEM from n = 3.

Prodrug-into-Drug Conversion Studies

Next, the sensitivity of the prodrug to Pd under biologically relevant conditions was tested by incubating Pro-PTX at 37 °C in PBS (pH = 7.4, isotonicity) with or without a polymer-supported Pd catalyst, 30 μm of Pd devices41 (which can be easily filtered off to facilitate the analysis of the reaction mixture). Reactions were monitored by MS. While the prodrug remained intact in the absence of Pd (Figure 2a), reaction analysis showed the complete disappearance of the prodrug after 10 h incubation with Pd devices and the formation of major mass peaks corresponding to PTX (Figure 2b). The observation of the [M2 + H]+ peak in the mass spectrum, which corresponds to the amino derivative 5 (highly ionizable pre-immolation intermediate), is in agreement with the proposed prodrug activation mechanism.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Pd-mediated conversion of Pro-PTX into PTX under biologically relevant conditions. (a) MS spectrum of Pro-PTX (100 μM) after 10 h incubation in PBS at 37 °C. (b) MS spectrum of Pro-PTX (100 μM) after 10 h incubation with Pd devices (2 mg/mL) in PBS at 37 °C.

Biodegradable Solid Supports for Pd Catalysts

Bidimensional Pd nanostructures—also called Pd nanosheets—have been reported to display good biocompatibility in culture and in vivo50 and, more recently, shown to catalyze bioorthogonal reactions when they are properly protected inside exosomes.30 Because of their minute size (<2 nm in thickness), these ultrathin metallic structures could be precisely injected at desired anatomical sites (e.g., inside small tumor lesions) and, in time, be eliminated from the organism by the renal and/or hepatobiliary routes,51 features that are optimal for short-lived therapeutic applications. However, such small dimensions also make them capable of permeating through most biological barriers, which would defeat the purpose of catalyzing bioorthogonal reactions exclusively at the point of implantation.

Hydrogels are insoluble porous networks with high water contents (up to 95%) that have been extensively used as drug reservoirs in controlled-release systems.52 However, the potential use of physical hydrogels as biocompatible scaffolds for bioorthogonal catalysts has never been tested before. Among the broad variety of gelling agents available, the FDA-approved natural polysaccharides agarose and alginate are especially attractive for medical and pharmaceutical applications because of their biodegradable and nonthrombogenic nature.53,54 Driven by the idea of creating implantable catalytic devices capable of uncaging Pro-PTX and feature the potential to gradually biodegrade over time, we decided to investigate the use of agarose- and alginate-based hydrogels as scaffolds for the immobilization of Pd nanosheets.

Pd nanosheets were prepared using a new method (adapted from previous work30,55,56) consisting of treating an aqueous solution of Na2PdCl4, poly(vinyl pyrrolidone), and KBr to a CO atmosphere in a high-pressure reactor (6 bar) at 80 °C for 40 min (see the full protocol in the Experimental Section). Low-toxicity reagents were used to increase the biocompatibility of the metallic nanostructures, whereas CO was used as a reductant and capping agent to control the shape and size of the nanoparticles.55,56 TEM analysis showed the planar and homogeneous shape of the resulting structures (Figure 3a,b), which displayed an average width and thickness of 12 ± 2.2 and 1.4 ± 0.1 nm, respectively, making them a priori good candidates to become trapped in polymeric fibrillar networks. Their planar morphology (which corresponds to less than nine atomic layers) further agrees with the capacity of the Pd nanosheets to absorb in the near-infrared range (Figure 3c).50

Figure 3.

Figure 3

(a, b) TEM images of freestanding Pd nanosheets at two magnifications. (c) UV–Vis absorption spectrum of Pd nanosheets.

A fluorogenic test was first used to determine the catalyst compatibility with physiological conditions. The reaction was performed by incubation in PBS at 37 °C with the Pd-labile off/on probe O-propargyl-resorufin (Pro-Res)30 at a range of concentrations of Pd nanosheets (5–40 μg/mL in Pd). Changes in fluorescence intensity were measured at 24 h with a spectrofluorometer (Ex/Em: 540/590 nm) and conversion rates were calculated using a standard curve of resorufin. Analysis revealed dose-dependent fluorescence increases, with conversion rates ranging from 46 to 94% (Figure S3, Supporting Information). To determine the fraction of Pd atoms that leaches from the Pd nanosheets under the reaction conditions, 20 and 40 μg/mL of Pd nanosheets were incubated in PBS at 37 °C during 24 h. The mixture was filtered off using StageTips to eliminate the solid nanostructures and the quantity of soluble Pd in the filtered solution was determined by ICP-OES. Analysis detected 8.337 (±3.049) and 16.675 ng/mL (±6.090) of Pd in the samples, respectively, indicating that just a very small fraction of Pd (approx. 0.042%) leaches from the freestanding Pd nanosheets over this period. Next, to test the inherent cytotoxicity of the nanodevices,57 A549 cells were treated with Pd nanosheets for 3 days at the previously tested range of concentrations. Cell viability results showed no signs of toxicity at 5 μg/mL of Pd nanosheets and good cell tolerability at 10 μg/mL (Figure S4, Supporting Information). Finally, a prodrug activation study was performed to corroborate the capacity of the nanodevices to dealkylate Pro-PTX. The reaction was performed as described above but using Pd nanosheets instead of Pd-functionalized microdevices. The Pd nanodevices were filtered off using StageTips before analyzing the samples by LCMS. Analysis showed the time-dependent disappearance of the prodrug and the formation of the peaks corresponding to PTX and the highly ionizable amino derivative 5 (Figure S5, Supporting Information).

Once the catalytic activity and the biocompatible dose range of the Pd nanosheets were confirmed, the use of hydrogels to immobilize these functional nanodevices was investigated. Two biopolymers, agarose and alginate, were tested to take advantage of their different gelling properties and to assess the scope of the capture strategy. Hydrogel formation in the presence of catalysts was first studied by dissolving agarose in warm biological-grade water at a range of concentrations, followed by mixing with a prewarmed suspension of Pd nanosheets. The mixture (60 μL) was then transferred to tissue culture inserts (0.4–8 μm pore) and allowed to cool down to room temperature to generate dark-colored hydrogel disks (Pd Agarose) ready to be tested in cell culture (Figure 4a). Optimal catalyst capture was obtained using 5 mg/mL of agarose and 0.4 mg/mL of Pd nanosheets.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

(a) Snapshots of the preparation of Pd Agarose and Pd Alginate catalytic hydrogels. (b) Representative SEM images of agarose hydrogel (secondary electron detector) and Pd Agarose (backscatter electron detector). Bright points observed in the Pd Agarose image indicate the presence of metallic Pd.

Next, the uncaging capabilities of the hydrogel-entrapped catalysts from the tissue culture inserts were evaluated by incubation with the off/on probe Pro-Res under physiological conditions. Notably, treatment of the probe with Pd Agarose (inserts of 1–8 μm pore size) resulted in an increase in the fluorescence intensity equivalent to that obtained by freestanding Pd nanosheets at the same concentration (Figure 5a). In agreement with the preservation of the catalytic activity, analysis of the hydrogel by SEM shows the apparent capture and homogeneous distribution of the metallic Pd onto the biopolymer fibers (Figure 4b). This indicates that gelification in the presence of a suspension of Pd nanosheets favors their trapping and distribution throughout the fibrillar network with little agglomeration,58,59 thus increasing the catalytic exposition area while minimizing the escape of the metal. The presence of Pd was further corroborated by energy-dispersive X-ray (Figure S6, Supporting Information).

Figure 5.

Figure 5

(a, b) Conversion of Pro-Res (100 μM) into resorufin by (a) Pd Agarose (40 μg/mL of Pd nanosheets placed in 0.4–8 μm pore size inserts) or (b) Pd Alginate (5–20 μg/mL of Pd nanosheets) after incubation in DMEM culture media (600 or 500 μL, respectively) for 16 h at 37 °C in a tissue culture incubator. Pro-Res (100 μM) with or without Pd nanosheets were used as negative and positive controls, respectively. The fluorescence signal was measured at λex/em 540/590 nm. Error bars: ±SEM from n = 3. (c, d) A549 cell viability study after treatment with (a) Pd Agarose and (b) Pd Alginate hydrogels at different concentrations. Pd nanosheets were included as controls. Cell viability was measured at day 3. Error bars: ±SEM from n = 3.

Next, because of the capacity of alginate to spontaneously form hydrogels in Ca2+ solutions and inspired by previous work by Fortin and co-workers60 on the “injection & capture” strategy to immobilize radioactive metal nanoparticles in tumors, the entrapment of Pd nanosheets was also tested in alginate hydrogels. A suspension of sodium alginate (20 mg/mL) and Pd nanosheets (0.3 mg/mL) was first prepared in warm biological-grade water. Then, hydrogels were simply made by dropwise addition of the mixture into PBS or culture media supplemented with 100 mM CaCl2, to generate spherical dark-colored hydrogels (Figure 4a and Movie S1). As before, treatment of the off–on Pd-labile probe Pro-Res with Pd Alginate spheres demonstrated the functional operativity of the catalytic hydrogel (Figure 5b). Remarkably, cell vitality studies showed that both Pd Agarose and Pd Alginate hydrogels were better tolerated by A549 cells than freestanding Pd nanosheets at equivalent metal concentrations (Figure 5c,d).

Encouraged by the catalytic properties and biocompatibility of the catalyst-loaded hydrogels, the capacity of Pro-PTX to enter and be activated by these novel catalytic systems was tested in A549 cells by incubation with Pro-PTX in the presence of Pd- or catalyst-free hydrogels. As shown in Figure 6, no reduction of cell proliferation was observed after separately treating A549 cells with either Pro-PTX or the catalytic hydrogels. In contrast, the combination of Pro-PTX and Pd Agarose disk/Pd Alginate spheres potently inhibited cancer cell proliferation, resulting in an anticancer activity equivalent to the direct treatment with the parent drug PTX. Equivalent results were obtained in the U87 cell line (Figure S7, Supporting Information). This study demonstrates that, despite its structural complexity, Pro-PTX is able to efficiently diffuse across the porous hydrogel network and react with Pd nanosheets to be converted into PTX, which then diffuses back through the hydrogel mesh into the culture media.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Prodrug activation assays with (a) Pd Agarose and (b) Pd Alginate. Experiments: 0.1% DMSO (untreated control, light gray), Pd Agarose or Pd Alginate (−ve control, dark gray), 0.75 μM of Pro-PTX (−ve control, blue), Pd Agarose or Pd Alginate + 0.75 μM of Pro-PTX (activation assay, pink), and 0.75 μM of PTX (+ve control, black). Cell viability was measured on day 3. Error bars: ±SEM, n = 3.

Finally, to corroborate that the mechanism of cell death mediated by the Pro-PTX/Pd hydrogel combination was analogous to that mediated by PTX, immunofluorescence studies were performed to image microtubule stabilization.4,5 Cells were fixed after 2 days treatment and incubated with an anti-α-tubulin IgG, cell nuclei DAPI stain, and TRITC-Phalloidin, and imaged by confocal microscopy (Olympus FV1000). As observed in Figure 7 (see additional control experiments in Figure S8, Supporting Information), whereas controls showed the tubulin signal (green channel) spread throughout the cytoplasm (panels a and b), microtubule accumulation was patently visible after PTX treatment (panel d). Importantly, microtubule stabilization was equally evident in cells treated with the Pro-PTX/Pd hydrogel combination (panel c), thereby proving that the anticancer effect mediated by that combination is a result of the in situ formation of PTX.

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Immunofluorescence study. Experiments: (a) Pd Alginate, (b) 0.75 μM of Pro-PTX + Alginate (no Pd), (c) Pd Alginate + 0.75 μM of Pro-PTX (prodrug activation experiment), and (d) 0.75 μM of PTX. Forty-eight hours after treatment, cells were fixed and stained with anti-α-tubulin IgG, TRITC-Phalloidin, and DAPI. Left panels: α-tubulin stain (green). Right panels: nuclei (cyan) and phalloidin (red). Scale bar = 20 μm.

Conclusions

In the exploration of new ways to improve the safety and efficacy of one of the most important anticancer drugs in clinical use, a new prodrug of PTX has been developed. This inactive drug precursor features excellent stability in cancer cell culture and high sensitivity to metallic Pd, thus enabling selective drug release in the presence of Pd catalysts. The biscarbamate chemical mask used to block the 2′-OH position of PTX provides optimal protection for aliphatic alcohols and metal sensitivity, representing a novel and useful addition to the current toolbox of bioorthogonal uncaging strategies. Moreover, a biocompatible catalytic system based on the immobilization of Pd catalysts in physical hydrogels has been developed for the first time. Entrapment of Pd nanosheets in agarose and alginate hydrogels exhibited equivalent catalytic properties as the free catalysts, and displayed the capacity to convert the inactive prodrug Pro-PTX into PTX in cancer cell culture. By capturing transition metal catalysts within an inherently biodegradable scaffold, this investigation provides a strategy to temporarily elicit localized biorthogonal uncaging of chemotherapeutics. As exemplified with alginate, the in situ gelling strategy in which a liquid suspension containing catalytic nanodevices solidifies in contact with environs rich in bivalent cations could offer a minimally invasive solution to locally administer and immobilize the catalyst at the disease site. Subsequent studies will focus on progressing these innovations into preclinical animal models.

Experimental Section

General Methods

Chemicals and solvents were purchased from Fisher Scientific, Sigma-Aldrich, VWR International Ltd., or TCI UK Ltd. PTX was purchased from Fluorochem UK. NMR spectra were recorded at ambient temperature on a 500 MHz Bruker Avance III spectrometer. Chemical shifts are reported in parts per million (ppm) relative to the solvent peak. Rf values were determined on Merck TLC Silica gel 60 F254 plates under a 254 nm UV source. Purifications were carried out by flash column chromatography using commercially available silica gel (220–440 mesh, Sigma-Aldrich) or via semipreparative TLC chromatography on Merck TLC Silica gel 60 F254 plates. High-resolution mass spectrometry was performed in a Bruker MicrOTOF II. The purity of PTX and Pro-PTX was >95% for cell studies, as measured by HPLC using an Agilent 1200 system. HPLC method: eluent A: water and formic acid (0.1%); eluent B: methanol and formic acid (0.1%); and A/B = 95:5 to 5:95 in 4 min and isocratic 2 min (flow = 1 mL/min). Prodrug-into-drug conversion experiments were conducted in an LCMS (Agilent 1200) using a micrOTOF II detector. Method A: eluent A: water and formic acid (0.1%); eluent B: acetonitrile and formic acid (0.1%); and A/B = 95:5 isocratic 0.5 min, 95:5 to 0:100 in 4.5 min, isocratic 2 min, 0:100 to 95:5 in 0.5 min, and isocratic 2.5 min (flow = 0.2 mL/min). Method B: A/B = 80:20 to 0:100 in 10 min, isocratic 3 min, and 0:100 to 80:20 in 5 min (flow = 0.3 mL/min). Stock solutions (100 mM) were prepared in DMSO. SEM images were obtained using an FEI Quanta 400 ESEM equipped with an EDX analytical system. A portion of hydrogel was supercritically dried and coated with a fine carbon layer. Afterward, the samples were examined by SEM using secondary and backscatter electron detectors. ICP-OES measurements were carried out in a Varian 715 ICP optical emission spectrometer.

Synthesis of 2′-(4-Nitrophenoxycarbonyl)paclitaxel (1)

2′-(4-Nitrophenoxycarbonyl)paclitaxel, 1, was synthesized according to the literature procedure.11

Synthesis of N-(Propargyloxycarbonyl)-N,N′-dimethylethylenediamine (4)

Tert-butyl methyl[2-(methylamino)ethyl]carbamate, 2 (284 mg, 1.5 mmol), and pyridine (275 μL, 3.4 mmol) were dissolved in a mix of H2O:1,4-dioxane (3:6, 9 mL). A solution of propargyl chloroformate (221 μL, 2.3 mmol) in 1,4-dioxane (1 mL) was then added dropwise to the mixture at room temperature and the reaction was stirred overnight. Subsequently, solvents were removed by rotary evaporation, the crude was dissolved in CH2Cl2 (20 mL), and the mixture was washed with an aqueous solution of 1 N HCl (2 × 15 mL) and water (2 × 15 mL). The organic phase was dried over anhydrous MgSO4 and concentrated by rotary evaporation. The crude residue was purified by flash chromatography with 2.5% MeOH in CH2Cl2 to give compound 3 as a pale oil. Rf = 0.48 (5% MeOH in CH2Cl2). Without further characterization, compound 3 was then dissolved in a 9:1 (v/v) mixture of TFA/water (5 mL) and the mixture was stirred at room temperature for 2 h. Solvents were removed by rotary evaporation and the addition of cold diethyl ether (10 mL) afforded pure compound 4 as a yellow solid (90% yield, two steps). Rf = 0.15 (5% MeOH in CH2Cl2). 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 8.48 (s, 1H), 4.68 (s, 2H), 3.55 (s, 1H), 3.50 (t, J = 6.0 Hz, 2H), 3.08 (t, J = 6.0 Hz, 2H), 2.87 (s, 3H), 2.58 (s, 3H). 13C NMR (126 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 155.8 (C), 79.5 (C), 78.0 (CH), 53.4 (CH2), 46.5 (CH2), 45.5 (CH2), 34.4 (CH3), 33.2 (CH3). HRMS (ESI) m/z [M + H]+ calcd for C8H15N2O2, 171.11280; found, 171.11360.

Synthesis of Pro-PTX

Compound 1 (14 mg, 14 μmol) was dissolved in dry DMF (1 mL) under a N2 atmosphere and cooled down to 0 °C. Compound 4 (7 mg, 42 μmol) and DIPEA (12 μL, 70 μmol) were dissolved in dry DMF (0.5 mL) and added dropwise to the solution and the mixture was allowed to reach room temperature and stirred overnight. The solvent was removed by rotary evaporation and the crude was purified via semipreparative TLC chromatography (2.5% MeOH in CH2Cl2) to yield a white solid (36% yield). Rf = 0.40 (5% MeOH in CH2Cl2). 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 9.17 (d, J = 8.9 Hz, 1H), 7.98–7.94 (m, 2H), 7.87–7.81 (m, 2H), 7.73 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.65 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 7.59–7.53 (m, 1H), 7.49 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 2H), 7.47–7.43 (m, 4H), 7.19–7.17 (m, 1H), 6.29 (s, 1H), 5.87–5.81 (m, 1H), 5.66–5.54 (m, 1H), 5.41 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H), 5.30–5.12 (m, 1H), 4.88 (dd, J = 14.5, 8.5 Hz, 2H), 4.62–4.52 (m, 2H), 4.13–4.08 (m, 1H), 4.03–3.97 (m, 2H), 3.58 (d, J = 7.1 Hz, 1H), 3.46 (d, J = 6.6 Hz, 1H), 3.40 (s, 1H), 2.88 (s, 1H), 2.85 (s, 1H), 2.81 (s, 1H), 2.77 (d, J = 6.9 Hz, 1H), 2.72 (d, J = 0.6 Hz, 2H), 2.35–2.20 (m, 4H), 2.10 (d, J = 1.5 Hz, 3H), 1.81–1.78 (m, 4H), 1.62 (t, J = 13.0 Hz, 2H), 1.49 (s, 4H), 1.34 (s, 1H), 1.22 (s, 2H), 1.01 (d, J = 7.4 Hz, 6H). 13C NMR (126 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 202.9, 170.1, 169.2, 167.0, 165.7, 155.1, 140.9, 140.4, 137.8, 134.7, 134.0, 131.9, 130.5, 130.1, 129.2, 128.8, 128.6, 128.2, 127.8, 126.8, 116.6, 84.1, 80.7, 79.6, 77.6, 77.2, 76.5, 75.8, 75.2, 75.0, 71.1, 70.9, 66.1, 65.5, 60.2, 57.8, 55.4, 54.5, 52.9, 46.6, 43.4, 37.0, 34.9, 33.7, 32.9, 26.8, 23.0, 21.9, 21.2, 21.1, 20.8, 19.3, 15.6, 14.6, 14.4, 10.2. HRMS (ESI) m/z [M + H]+ calcd for C56H64N3O17, 1050.42302; found, 1050.42120. Purity as measured by HPLC was >99%.

Synthesis of O-Propargyl-resorufin

Pro-Res was synthesized according to the literature procedure.30

Cell Viability Study: PTX vs Pro-PTX

A549 cells (a kind gift from Dr. Wilkinson) and U87 cells (a kind gift from Dr. Gammoh) were seeded in a 96-well plate format (at 1500 and 2000 cells/well, respectively) in DMEM supplemented with 10% of FBS and l-glutamine (2 mM) and incubated in a tissue culture incubator at 37 °C and 5% CO2 for 24 h before treatment. HBVPs (a kind gift from Dr. Caporali) were seeded at 10 000 cells (to reach confluency) in pericyte media (ScienCell Research Laboratories, Inc.) on gelatin (0.1%)/fibronectin (10 μg/mL)-precoated dishes. Each well was then replaced with fresh media, containing compounds PTX and Pro-PTX (0.001–10 μM). Untreated cells were incubated with DMSO (0.1% v/v). After 3 days of incubation, PrestoBlue cell viability reagent (10% v/v) was added to each well and the plate was incubated for 90 min. Fluorescence emission was detected using a PerkinElmer EnVision 2101 multilabel reader (Ex/Em: 540/590 nm). All conditions were normalized to the untreated cells (100%) and curves were fitted using GraphPad Prism using a sigmoidal variable slope curve. Experiments were performed in triplicate.

Prodrug-into-Drug Conversion Studies

Pro-PTX (100 μM) was dissolved in PBS (1 mL) with 2 mg of Pd devices (Pd-resin diameter size 30 μm, prepared as previously reported41) and incubated at 37 °C in a Thermomixer at 1200 rpm for 10 h. Reaction crudes were centrifuged (13 000 rpm, 5 min) to sediment the Pd devices and supernatants were analyzed by LCMS/MS (Agilent 1200) using a micrOTOF II detector. PTX (100 μM) was dissolved in PBS (1 mL) for 10 h and analyzed as a positive control.

Preparation of Pd Nanosheets

The synthesis of Pd nanosheets was based on previously reported protocols,30,55,56 but with modifications to avoid the use of toxic quaternary ammonium salts. The palladium growth solution was prepared by mixing 11 mg of Na2PdCl4, 30 mg of poly(vinyl pyrrolidone) (MW = 55 000), and 130 mg of KBr in Milli-Q water (400 μL). The resulting homogeneous red solution was mixed with 4 mL of DMF. The Pd nanosheet precursor solution was introduced into a high-pressure stainless-steel Teflon-lined reactor. CO gas was introduced into the high-pressure reactor to reduce the Pd precursor and control the anisotropic shape of the Pd nanostructures.55 The pressure inside the reactor was maintained at 6 bar and the reactor was placed in a heated water bath (80 °C for 40 min). The solution was gently stirred with a magnetic flea located on the high-pressure reactor. A dark blue colloid was obtained after the CO treatment. Pd nanosheets were collected by centrifugation (10 000 rpm, 10 min) by mixing the dark blue colloid and acetone in a volume ratio of 1 to 3. Finally, Pd nanosheets were dispersed in Milli-Q water and kept at 5 °C for further use. The Pd concentration was determined by MP-AES (Microwave Plasma-Atomic Emission Spectrometer 4100 Agilent Technologies) and the optical properties were analyzed by UV–VIS spectrophotometry (Jasco V-670). TEM (Tecnai FEI T20) was used to study the Pd nanosheet morphology by operating at an acceleration voltage of 200 kV with a LaB6 electron source fitted with a SuperTwin objective lens allowing a point-to-point resolution of 2.4 Å. TEM images showed that the Pd nanosheets tend to stack during the drying process of the TEM grid preparation. This effect enabled us to observe the ultrathin sheetlike morphology and made their direct thickness measurement easy. Leaching of Pd nanosheets after incubation for 24 h in PBS was studied by ICP-OES using a Varian 715 ICP optical emission spectrometer.

Preparation of Pd Agarose

Pd nanosheets were embedded in agarose hydrogels (5 mg/mL) with a Pd concentration of 0.4 mg/mL. Agarose powder (UltraPure Agarose, Thermo Fisher Scientific) was weighted in an Eppendorf tube and sterilized by UV radiation. Milli-Q water was filtered through a 0.22 μm mesh filter and was added to the agarose powder. The mixture was shaken and warmed at 80 °C for 5 min to achieve a complete solution. The solution obtained was added on a prewarmed Pd nanosheet suspension and was homogenized by pipetting up and down several times. Immediately after, 60 μL of the suspension was pipetted into tissue culture inserts (Corning Transwell), placed in a 24-well plate, and allowed to cool at room temperature for 1 h. Afterward, the 24-well plate was sterilized under UV radiation for 30 min before characterization and use in cell assays.

Preparation of Pd Alginate

Pd nanosheets were embedded in alginate hydrogels with a Pd nanosheet concentration of 0.3 mg/mL. Sodium alginate powder (Sigma Aldrich, W201502) was dissolved in sterile water and Pd nanosheets were added and vortexed until homogenization. The mixture was sterilized under UV for 15 min. The suspension was added dropwise into standard cell culture medium (DMEM, 10% FBS, 2 mM l-glutamine) supplemented with 100 mM CaCl2 dihydrate in 24-well plates to form dark alginate beads. Beads were washed twice with DMEM and transferred to the experimental wells (3 beads/500 μL, final concentration of Pd of approx. 20 μg/mL).

Cell Toxicity Studies: Pd Nanosheets vs Pd Hydrogels

A549 cells were cultured in DMEM supplemented with 10% of FBS and l-glutamine (2 mM) and incubated in a tissue culture incubator at 37 °C and 5% CO2. A549 cells were seeded in a 24-well plate format (at 9000 cells/well) and incubated for 24 h before treatment. For Pd nanosheets, each well was replaced with a suspension of Pd nanosheets in fresh culture media at 5, 10, 20, and 40 μg/mL of metal (600 μL final volume). For Pd Agarose, each well was replaced with fresh media (540 μL). Agarose hydrogels containing Pd nanosheets were prepared following the procedure previously described and placed in cell culture inserts with 1 μm pore size (60 μL, 5–40 μg/mL of metal concentration). For Pd Alginate, each well was replaced with fresh media (500 μL). Pd Alginate hydrogels were prepared as described above and added at 1–3 beads/well (5–20 μg/mL of metal concentration). After 3 days of incubation, PrestoBlue cell viability reagent (10% v/v) was added to each well and the plate was incubated for 180 min. Fluorescence emission was detected using a PerkinElmer EnVision 2101 multilabel reader (Ex/Em: 540/590 nm). Experiments were performed in triplicate.

Fluorogenic Assays: Pd Nanosheets vs Pd Hydrogels

Pro-Res (100 μM) was dissolved in DMEM culture media (in 540 μL for Pd Agarose hydrogels or in 500 μL for Pd Alginate hydrogels) in a 24-well plate format. For Pd Agarose, hydrogels containing Pd nanosheets at 40 μg/mL (60 μL) were prepared following the procedure described above and placed in cell culture inserts (0.4–8 μm pore size). For Pd Alginate, hydrogels containing Pd nanosheets at approximately 5–20 μg/mL (1–3 beads/well) were prepared following the procedure previously described. Pd nanosheets (20 and 40 μg/mL) were used as controls. Samples were incubated at 37 °C in a tissue culture incubator. Pd nanosheets were removed by centrifugation (13 000 rpm, 30 min). The fluorescence intensity of 100 μL of supernatants transferred to a 96-well plate format was measured in a PerkinElmer EnVision 2101 multilabel reader (Ex/Em: 540/590 nm). Samples were repeated in triplicate. The percentage of conversion was calculated based on the fluorescence signal of the positive control Resorufin at 100 μM.

Prodrug Activation Assays with Pd Hydrogels

A549 were seeded in a 24-well plate format (at 9000 cells/well) and incubated for 24 h before treatment. Each well was replaced with fresh culture media containing Pro-PTX or PTX (0.75 μM). Untreated cells were incubated with DMSO (0.1% v/v). Pd Agarose and Alginate hydrogels (40 μg/mL of metal and 20 μg/mL, respectively) were prepared following the procedure previously described. Pd Agarose hydrogels were placed in cell culture inserts with 1 μm pore size and Pd Alginate hydrogels were added at 3 beads/well. After 3 days of incubation, cell viability was determined as described above. Experiments were performed in triplicate.

Immunofluorescence Studies

A549 cells were seeded on 10 mm poly(l-lysine)-precoated coverslips in 24-well plates (5000 cells/well). After 24 h, cells were incubated in the presence or in the absence of alginate gels and/or Pro-PTX/PTX (0.75 μM) in 500 μL of DMEM in triplicate. After 48 h, cells were fixed with paraformaldehyde (4% v/v) for 10 min and washed three times with PBS every 5 min. Cells were permeabilized for 15 min with 0.3% Tween in PBS and washed three times with PBS every 5 min. Coverslips were incubated in blocking buffer (1× PBS, 5% goat serum, 0.3% Triton X-100) for 60 min. Anti-α-tubulin Rabbit mAb (Cell Signaling Technology) was incubated overnight at 4 °C in antibody dilution buffer (1× PBS, 1% BSA, 0.3% Triton X-100) at a dilution of 1:25. After washing three times with PBS, coverslips were incubated for 30 min in antibody dilution buffer (1× PBS, 1% BSA, 0.3% Triton X-100) with Alexa Fluor 488 Goat anti-Rabbit IgG (H + L) secondary antibody (Invitrogen) at a dilution of 1:400. Coverslips were washed three times with PBS and mounted on a slide with a 1:1 mixture of VECTASHIELD Hardset Antifade Mounting Medium with Phalloidin: VECTASHIELD Antifade Mounting Medium with DAPI. Cells were imaged using a scanning confocal inverted microscope Olympus FluoView FV1000 (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) with a 60× oil immersion objective. The images were acquired using the FV10-ASW program in a sequential mode using software preconfigured settings for Alexa Fluor 488 and TIRTC and analyzed with Image-J software to obtain maximal projections.

Acknowledgments

We thank EPSRC (Healthcare Technology Challenge Award, no. EP/N021134/1) and ERC (Advanced Grant CADENCE, no. ERC-2016-ADG-742684) for funding. B.R.-R. and T.V. thank the EC for an MSC Fellowship (H2020-MSCA-IF-2014-658833 and H2020-MSCA-IF-2016-749299, respectively). R.C.M. is grateful for the support of the Vicerrectorate of Research of University of Granada. R.C.-M. and L.A.C. thank Junta de Andalucía (Spain) for funding project P12-FQM-790. L.A.C. thanks the Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades, for a Salvador de Madariaga visiting professor fellowship (PRX18/00017) and the Agencia Estatal de Investigación (Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad) and the European Regional Development Fund for cofunding project FIS2017-85954-R. V.S. acknowledges the financial support from Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades, Programa Retos Investigación, Proyecto REF: RTI2018-099019-A-I00.

Glossary

List of Abbreviations

Boc

tert-butyloxycarbonyl

DAPI

4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole

DIPEA

N,N-diisopropylethylamine

DMF

dimethylformamide

DMEM

Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium

DMSO

dimethylsulfoxide

EC50

half-maximal effective concentration

FDA

Food and Drug Administration

ICP-OES

inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectroscopy

IgG

immunoglobulin G

MP-AES

microwave plasma-atomic emission spectrometer

MS

mass spectrometry

NSCLC

non-small-cell lung carcinoma

PBS

phosphate-buffered saline

Pd

palladium

ppm

parts per million

rt

room temperature

SEM

scanning electron microscopy

SEM

standard error of mean

TEM

transmission electron microscopy

TFA

trifluoroacetic acid

TLC

thin-layer chromatography

Supporting Information Available

The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.0c00781.

  • NMR for 4 and Pro-PTX, Figures S1–S8 (PDF)

  • Movie S1: Preparation of Pd Alginate (MP4)

  • Molecular formula strings (CSV)

Author Present Address

(A.M.P.-L.) Technische Universität Berlin, Institut für Biotechnologie, Aufgang 17-1, Level 4, Raum 472, Gustav-Meyer-Allee 25, 13355 Berlin, Germany.

Author Present Address

# (B.R.-R.) Pfizer-University of Granada-Andalusian Regional Government Centre for Genomics and Oncological Research (GENYO) and Department of Medicinal and Organic Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain.

Author Present Address

(R.C.-M.) Department of Chemistry, Durham University, South Road, Durham DH1 3LE, U.K.

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Supplementary Material

jm0c00781_si_001.pdf (1.3MB, pdf)
jm0c00781_si_002.mp4 (3.5MB, mp4)
jm0c00781_si_003.csv (504B, csv)

References

  1. DeVita V. T. Jr.; Chu E. A history of cancer chemotherapy. Cancer Res. 2008, 68, 8643–8653. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-6611. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Galmarini D.; Galmarini C. M.; Galmarini F. C. Cancer chemotherapy: a critical analysis of its 60 years of history. Crit. Rev. Oncol. Hematol. 2012, 84, 181–199. 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2012.03.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Savage P. Chemotherapy curable malignancies and cancer stem cells: a biological review and hypothesis. BMC Cancer 2016, 16, 906. 10.1186/s12885-016-2956-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Markman M.; Mekhail T. M. Paclitaxel in cancer therapy. Expert Opin. Pharmacother. 2002, 3, 755–766. 10.1517/14656566.3.6.755. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Weaver B. A. How Taxol/paclitaxel kills cancer cells. Mol. Biol. Cell 2014, 25, 2677–2681. 10.1091/mbc.e14-04-0916. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. www.clinicaltrials.org (accessed Mar 30, 2020).
  7. Liu W. C.; Gong T.; Zhu P. Advances in exploring alternative Taxol sources. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 48800–48809. 10.1039/C6RA06640B. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  8. Wang F.; Porter M.; Konstantopoulos A.; Zhang P.; Cui H. Preclinical development of drug delivery systems for paclitaxel-based cancer chemotherapy. J. Controlled Release 2017, 267, 100–118. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2017.09.026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Yang X.-C.; Samanta B.; Agasti S. S.; Jeong Y.; Zhu Z.-J.; Rana S.; Miranda O. R.; Rotello V. M. Drug delivery using nanoparticle-stabilized nanocapsules. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 477–481. 10.1002/anie.201005662. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Meng Z.; Lv Q.; Lu J.; Yao H.; Lv X.; Jiang F.; Lu A.; Zhang G. Prodrug strategies for paclitaxel. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2016, 17, 796. 10.3390/ijms17050796. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Dal Corso A.; Caruso M.; Belvisi L.; Arosio D.; Piarulli U.; Albanese C.; Gasparri F.; Marsiglio A.; Sola F.; Troiani S.; Valsasina B.; Pignataro L.; Donati D.; Gennari C. Synthesis and biological evaluation of RGD peptidomimetic-paclitaxel conjugates bearing lysosomally cleavable linkers. Chem. – Eur. J. 2015, 21, 6921–6929. 10.1002/chem.201500158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Streu C.; Meggers E. Ruthenium-induced allylcarbamate cleavage in living cells. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 5645–5648. 10.1002/anie.200601752. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Sánchez M. I.; Penas C.; Vázquez M. E.; Mascareñas J. L. Metal-catalyzed uncaging of DNA-binding agents in living cells. Chem. Sci. 2014, 5, 1901–1907. 10.1039/C3SC53317D. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Völker T.; Dempwolff F.; Graumann P. L.; Meggers E. Progress towards bioorthogonal catalysis with organometallic compounds. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 10536–10540. 10.1002/anie.201404547. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Tomás-Gamasa M.; Martínez-Calvo M.; Couceiro J. R.; Mascareñas J. L. Transition metal catalysis in the mitochondria of living cells. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 12538 10.1038/ncomms12538. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Okamoto Y.; Kojima R.; Schwizer F.; Bartolami E.; Heinisch T.; Matile S.; Fussenegger M.; Ward T. R. A cell-penetrating artificial metalloenzyme regulates a gene switch in a designer mammalian cell. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 1943 10.1038/s41467-018-04440-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Sabatino V.; Rebelein J. G.; Ward T. R. “Close-to-Release”: Spontaneous bioorthogonal uncaging resulting from ring-closing metathesis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 17048–17052. 10.1021/jacs.9b07193. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Yusop R. M.; Unciti-Broceta A.; Johansson E. M. V.; Sánchez-Martín R. M.; Bradley M. Palladium-mediated intracellular chemistry. Nat. Chem. 2011, 3, 239–243. 10.1038/nchem.981. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Unciti-Broceta A.; Johansson E. M. V.; Yusop R. M.; Sánchez-Martín R. M.; Bradley M. Synthesis of polystyrene microspheres and functionalization with Pd(0) nanoparticles to perform bioorthogonal organometallic chemistry in living cells. Nat. Protoc. 2012, 7, 1207–1218. 10.1038/nprot.2012.052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Li N.; Lim R. K.; Edwardraja S.; Lin Q. Copper-free sonogashira cross-coupling for functionalization of alkyne-encoded proteins in aqueous medium and in bacterial cells. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 15316–15319. 10.1021/ja2066913. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Spicer C. D.; Triemer T.; Davis B. G. Palladium-mediated cell-surface labeling. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 800–803. 10.1021/ja209352s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Tonga G. Y.; Jeong Y.; Duncan B.; Mizuhara T.; Mout R.; Das R.; Kim S. T.; Yeh Y. C.; Yan B.; Hou S.; Rotello V. M. Supramolecular regulation of bioorthogonal catalysis in cells using nanoparticle-embedded transition metal catalysts. Nat. Chem. 2015, 7, 597–603. 10.1038/nchem.2284. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Li J.; Yu J.; Zhao J.; Wang J.; Zheng S.; Lin S.; Chen L.; Yang M.; Jia S.; Zhang X.; Chen P. Palladium-triggered deprotection chemistry for protein activation in living cells. Nat. Chem. 2014, 6, 352–361. 10.1038/nchem.1887. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Weiss J. T.; Dawson J. C.; Macleod K. G.; Rybski W.; Fraser C.; Torres-Sánchez C.; Patton E. E.; Bradley M.; Carragher N. O.; Unciti-Broceta A. Extracellular palladium-catalysed dealkylation of 5-fluoro-1-propargyl-uracil as a bioorthogonally activated prodrug approach. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 3277 10.1038/ncomms4277. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Weiss J. T.; Dawson J. C.; Fraser C.; Rybski W.; Torres-Sánchez C.; Bradley M.; Patton E. E.; Carragher N. O.; Unciti-Broceta A. Development and bioorthogonal activation of palladium-labile prodrugs of gemcitabine. J. Med. Chem. 2014, 57, 5395–5404. 10.1021/jm500531z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Miller M. A.; Askevold B.; Mikula H.; Kohler R. H.; Pirovich D.; Weissleder R. Nano-palladium is a cellular catalyst for in vivo chemistry. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 15906 10.1038/ncomms15906. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Miller M. A.; Mikula H.; Luthria G.; Li R.; Kronister S.; Prytyskach M.; Kohler R. H.; Mitchison T.; Weissleder R. Modular nanoparticulate prodrug design enables efficient treatment of solid tumors using bioorthogonal activation. ACS Nano 2018, 12, 12814–12826. 10.1021/acsnano.8b07954. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Hoop M.; Ribeiro A. S.; Rösch D.; Weinand P.; Mendes N.; Mushtaq F.; Chen X.-Z.; Shen Y.; Pujante C. F.; Puigmartí-Luis J.; Paredes J.; Nelson B. J.; Pêgo A. P.; Pané S. Mobile magnetic nanocatalysts for bioorthogonal targeted cancer therapy. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2018, 28, 1705920 10.1002/adfm.201705920. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  29. Martínez-Calvo M.; Couceiro J. R.; Destito P.; Rodríguez J.; Mosquera J.; Mascareñas J. L. Intracellular deprotection reactions mediated by palladium complexes equipped with designed phosphine ligands. ACS Catal. 2018, 8, 6055–6061. 10.1021/acscatal.8b01606. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Sancho-Albero M.; Rubio-Ruiz B.; Pérez-López A. M.; Sebastián V.; Martín-Duque P.; Arruebo M.; Santamaría J.; Unciti-Broceta A. Cancer-derived exosomes loaded with ultrathin palladium nanosheets for targeted bioorthogonal catalysis. Nat. Catal. 2019, 2, 864–872. 10.1038/s41929-019-0333-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Plunk M. A.; Alaniz A.; Olademehin O. P.; Ellington T. L.; Shuford K. L.; Kane R. R. Design and catalyzed activation of Tak-242 prodrugs for localized inhibition of TLR4-induced inflammation. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. 2020, 11, 141–146. 10.1021/acsmedchemlett.9b00518. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Tsubokura K.; Vong K. K.; Pradipta A. R.; Ogura A.; Urano S.; Tahara T.; Nozaki S.; Onoe H.; Nakao Y.; Sibgatullina R.; Kurbangalieva A.; Watanabe Y.; Tanaka K. In vivo gold complex catalysis within live mice. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 3579–3584. 10.1002/anie.201610273. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Pérez-López A. M.; Rubio-Ruiz B.; Sebastián V.; Hamilton L.; Adam C.; Bray T. L.; Irusta S.; Brennan P. M.; Lloyd-Jones G.; Sieger D.; Santamaría J.; Unciti-Broceta A. Gold-triggered uncaging chemistry in living systems. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 12548–12552. 10.1002/anie.201705609. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Vidal C.; Tomás-Gamasa M.; Destito P.; López F.; Mascareñas J. L. Concurrent and orthogonal gold(I) and ruthenium(II) catalysis inside living cells. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 1913 10.1038/s41467-018-04314-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Miguel-Ávila J.; Tomás-Gamasa M.; Olmos A.; Pérez P. J.; Mascareñas J. L. Discrete Cu(I) complexes for azide–alkyne annulations of small molecules inside mammalian cells. Chem. Sci. 2018, 9, 1947–1952. 10.1039/C7SC04643J. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Liu Y.; Pujals S.; Stals P. J. M.; Paulöhrl T.; Presolski S. I.; Meijer E. W.; Albertazzi L.; Palmans A. R. A. Catalytically active single-chain polymeric nanoparticles: exploring their functions in complex biological media. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 3423–3433. 10.1021/jacs.8b00122. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Sasmal P. K.; Carregal-Romero S.; Han A. A.; Streu C. N.; Lin Z.; Namikawa K.; Elliott S. L.; Köster R. W.; Parak W. J.; Meggers E. Catalytic azide reduction in biological environments. Chembiochem 2012, 13, 1116–1120. 10.1002/cbic.201100719. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Cao-Milán R.; Gopalakrishnan S.; He L. D.; Huang R.; Wang Li-S.; Castellanos L.; Luther D. C.; Landis R. F.; Makabenta J. M. V.; Li C.-H.; Zhang X.; Scaletti F.; Vachet R. W.; Rotello V. M. Thermally gated bio-orthogonal nanozymes with supramolecularly confined porphyrin catalysts for antimicrobial uses. Chem 2020, 6, 1113–1124. 10.1016/j.chempr.2020.01.015. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  39. Weiss J. T.; Carragher N. O.; Unciti-Broceta A. Palladium-mediated dealkylation of n-propargyl-floxuridine as a bioorthogonal oxygen-independent prodrug strategy. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 9329 10.1038/srep09329. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Rubio-Ruiz B.; Weiss J. T.; Unciti-Broceta A. Efficient palladium-triggered release of vorinostat from a bioorthogonal precursor. J. Med. Chem. 2016, 59, 9974–9980. 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.6b01426. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Bray T. L.; Salji M.; Brombin A.; Pérez-López A. M.; Rubio-Ruiz B.; Galbraith L. C. A.; Patton E. E.; Leung H. Y.; Unciti-Broceta A. Bright insights into palladium-triggered local chemotherapy. Chem. Sci. 2018, 9, 7354–7361. 10.1039/C8SC02291G. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Adam C.; Pérez-López A. M.; Hamilton L.; Rubio-Ruiz B.; Bray T. L.; Sieger D.; Brennan P. M.; Unciti-Broceta A. Bioorthogonal uncaging of the active metabolite of irinotecan by palladium-functionalized microdevices. Chem. – Eur. J. 2018, 24, 16783–16790. 10.1002/chem.201803725. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Alonso-de Castro S.; Terenzi A.; Gurruchaga-Pereda J.; Salassa L. Catalysis concepts in medicinal inorganic chemistry. Chem. – Eur. J. 2019, 25, 6651–6660. 10.1002/chem.201806341. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Weiss J. T.; Fraser C.; Rubio-Ruiz B.; Myers S. H.; Crispin R.; Dawson J. C.; Brunton V. G.; Patton E. E.; Carragher N. O.; Unciti-Broceta A. N-alkynyl derivatives of 5-fluorouracil: susceptibility to palladium-mediated dealkylation and toxigenicity in cancer cell culture. Front. Chem. 2015, 2, 56. 10.3389/fchem.2014.00056. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Unciti-Broceta A. Bioorthogonal catalysis: Rise of the nanobots. Nat. Chem. 2015, 7, 538–539. 10.1038/nchem.2291. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Fang W. S.; Liang X. T. Recent progress in structure activity relationship and mechanistic studies of taxol analogues. Mini Rev. Med. Chem. 2005, 5, 1–12. 10.2174/1389557053402837. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Skwarczynski M.; Hayashi Y.; Kiso Y. Paclitaxel prodrugs: toward smarter delivery of anticancer agents. J. Med. Chem. 2006, 49, 7253–7269. 10.1021/jm0602155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Bouvier E.; Thirot S.; Schmidt F.; Monneret C. A new paclitaxel prodrug for use in ADEPT strategy. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2003, 1, 3343–3352. 10.1039/b306236h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Valero T.; Baillache D.; Fraser C.; Myers S. H.; Unciti-Broceta A. Pyrazolopyrimide library screening in glioma cells discovers highly potent antiproliferative leads that target the PI3K/mTOR pathway. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2020, 28, 115215 10.1016/j.bmc.2019.115215. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Huang X.; Tang S.; Mu X.; Dai Y.; Chen G.; Zhou Z.; Ruan F.; Yang Z.; Zheng N. Freestanding palladium nanosheets with plasmonic and catalytic properties. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2011, 6, 28–32. 10.1038/nnano.2010.235. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Poon W.; Zhang Y.-N.; Ouyang B.; Kingston B. R.; Wu J. L. Y.; Wilhelm S.; Chan W. C. W. Elimination pathways of nanoparticles. ACS Nano 2019, 13, 5785–5798. 10.1021/acsnano.9b01383. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Li J.; Mooney D. J. Designing hydrogels for controlled drug delivery. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2016, 1, 16071. 10.1038/natrevmats.2016.71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Alam M. T.; Parvez N.; Sharma P. K. FDA-approved natural polymers for fast dissolving tablets. J. Pharm. 2014, 952970 10.1155/2014/952970. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Ruvinov E.; Cohen S. Alginate biomaterial for the treatment of myocardial infarction: Progress, translational strategies, and clinical outlook: From ocean algae to patient bedside. Adv. Drug Delivery Rev. 2016, 96, 54–76. 10.1016/j.addr.2015.04.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Sebastian V.; Smith C. D.; Jensen K. F. Shape-controlled continuous synthesis of metal nanostructures. Nanoscale 2016, 8, 7534–7543. 10.1039/C5NR08531D. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Herrer L.; Sebastian V.; Martín S.; González-Orive A.; Pérez-Murano F.; Low P. J.; Serrano J. L.; Santamaría J.; Cea P. High surface coverage of a self-assembled monolayer by in situ synthesis of palladium nanodeposits. Nanoscale 2017, 9, 13281–13290. 10.1039/C7NR03365F. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Rubio-Ruiz B.; Pérez-López A. M.; Bray T. L.; Lee M.; Serrels A.; Prieto M.; Arruebo M.; Carragher N. O.; Sebastián V.; Unciti-Broceta A. High-precision photothermal ablation using biocompatible palladium nanoparticles and laser scanning microscopy. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10, 3341–3348. 10.1021/acsami.7b17282. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Contreras-Montoya R.; Bonhome-Espinosa A. B.; Orte A.; Miguel D.; Delgado-López J. M.; Duran J. D. G.; Cuerva J. M.; Lopez-Lopez M. T.; Álvarez de Cienfuegos L. Iron nanoparticles-based supramolecular hydrogels to originate anisotropic hybrid materials with enhanced mechanical strength. Mater. Chem. Front. 2018, 2, 686–699. 10.1039/C7QM00573C. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  59. Contreras-Montoya R.; Escolano G.; Roy S.; Lopez-Lopez M. T.; Delgado-López J. M.; Cuerva J. M.; Díaz-Mochón J. J.; Ashkenasy N.; Gavira J. A.; Álvarez de Cienfuegos L. Catalytic and electron conducting carbon nanotube-reinforced lysozyme crystals. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2019, 29, 1807351 10.1002/adfm.201807351. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  60. Laprise-Pelletier M.; Lagueux J.; Côté M. F.; LaGrange T.; Fortin M. A. Low-dose prostate cancer brachytherapy with radioactive palladium-gold nanoparticles. Adv. Healthcare Mater. 2017, 6, 1601120 10.1002/adhm.201601120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

jm0c00781_si_001.pdf (1.3MB, pdf)
jm0c00781_si_002.mp4 (3.5MB, mp4)
jm0c00781_si_003.csv (504B, csv)

Articles from Journal of Medicinal Chemistry are provided here courtesy of American Chemical Society

RESOURCES