To the Editor: Drastic adjustments to medical education during the COVID-19 pandemic have left medical students concerned about changes to the residency application process. Elimination of in-person away rotations, delayed or cancelled sub-internships, and the transition to virtual interviews are among the difficulties faced by dermatology applicants this cycle. Statements released by the Association of Professors of Dermatology (APD) in April and June 2020 addressed student concerns and suggested modifications to the application process (Table I ).1 , 2 To complement these statements, the Dermatology Interest Group Association (DIGA) hosted a webinar for dermatology residency hopefuls. Similar webinars have been held by national specialty organizations in orthopedic surgery, ophthalmology, and emergency medicine.3 , 4
Table I.
Recommended changes to the residency application process from the Association of Professors of Dermatology consensus statement
|
DIGA is a national student-run organization composed of 120 medical school chapters that serves as a forum for the exchange of information among students interested in dermatology. With support from the APD, a webinar titled “The Shifting Landscape of the 2020-2021 Dermatology Application Cycle in the Era of the COVID-19 Pandemic” was developed. Six US residency program director panelists participated in the event.
A total of 996 viewers attended the webinar. An optional poll was administered; only medical students were asked to respond. Of 679 respondents, 62% were fourth year students, 19% were third year, 14% were preclinical, and 4% identified as other. Minorities underrepresented in medicine accounted for 31% of respondents; 25% of respondents reported attending an institution not affiliated with a dermatology residency program. During the webinar, panelists collectively addressed this year's residency application process via questions prompted by physician moderators (Table II ). These questions had been collected from medical students via Google questionnaires administered by DIGA in the weeks before the event. Additional real-time questions from viewers were answered both verbally and in written form in Zoom's (San Jose, CA) question-and-answer and chat functions.
Table II.
Questions directed to 6 dermatology residency program director panelists during the webinar
| Demonstrating interest in programs |
| How should students express interest in specific programs given most dermatology away rotations are cancelled? |
| Who should students contact in the department/division? (Program director? Chief resident?) How do we find contact information? |
| Should mentors advocate for students by making calls or sending emails on their behalf? |
| Should students tailor their personal statements to specific programs? |
| Should students have a region-specific strategy? |
| How should students without a home dermatology program approach away rotations? |
| Residency applications this year |
| Are test scores weighted differently this year and if so, how? |
| How will different application components be weighted (eg, letters of recommendation, personal statement, clerkship grades)? |
| How can students strengthen their applications (especially those with weaker test scores and those who have had opportunities cancelled)? |
| How should students address “red flags” on applications (eg, low Step 1 score, personal leave of absence, repeating clinical rotations)? |
| Virtual interviews |
| How should applicants prepare for virtual interviews? |
| Are programs going to coordinate virtual interview dates? |
| How should applicants get the best feel for programs now that in-person meet-and-greets, away rotations, and interviews are cancelled? |
| Research |
| Is it beneficial to take a year off to do research in dermatology? |
| How should students include research experiences and projects that have been delayed or cancelled on their applications? |
| International medical students |
| How can international medical students strengthen their applications this year? |
| Will virtual rotations accept international medical students? |
Program director panelists also presented highlights from the APD consensus statement,2 such as promoting application to fewer programs to allow for holistic review. Panelists emphasized that one recommendation letter may be written by any faculty member with whom a student has worked closely, regardless of specialty. This is important given that one quarter of our attendees interested in dermatology do not have a home program. Virtual away rotations were described as opportunities to learn more about specific programs but should not be perceived as necessary to match into dermatology. The webinar was recorded and is freely available for reference.5
The COVID-19 pandemic has presented significant challenges for graduate medical education. Fortunately, the broad adoption of video conference communication has translated into unique opportunities for medical students to stay informed on issues of significant value to them. The large number of webinar viewers suggests acute interest in this format, and discussions for a future webinar on virtual interviews have begun. Underrepresented minorities and students without home dermatology programs constituted a significant portion of the webinar audience, demonstrating the need and opportunity to fill gaps in recruitment and mentorship for these groups. Beyond COVID-19 and the resumption of the traditional residency application process, large-scale webinars may continue to be invaluable resources for dermatology applicants.
Footnotes
Funding sources: None.
Disclosure: Dr Brodell serves as the national Dermatology Interest Group Association mentor. Dr Rosman is the dermatology residency program director at Washington University School of Medicine and coleads the Association of Professors of Dermatology program director task force; her opinions are her own. Authors Brumfiel, Jefferson, Wu, Strunck, Veerabagu, and Lin have no conflicts of interest to declare.
IRB approval status: Not applicable.
Reprints not available from the authors.
References
- 1.Rosman I.S., Schadt C.R., Samimi S.S., Rosenbach M. Approaching the dermatology residency application process during a pandemic. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020;83:e351–e352. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2020.07.066. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Dermatology residency program director consensus statement on 2020-2021 application cycle. 2020. https://aamc-orange.global.ssl.fastly.net/production/media/filer_public/0f/7b/0f7b547e-65b5-4d93-8247-951206e7f726/updated_dermatology_program_director_statement_on_2020-21_application_cycle_.pdf Available at:
- 3.Levine W., Aiyer A., Varacallo M., Kaplan J., Cipriano C., Mulcahey M. Navigating the residency application process amid the COVID-19 crisis. 2020. https://medium.com/@orthomentor/navigating-the-residency-application-process-amid-the-covid-crisis-4a30c0b7db25 Available at:
- 4.American Academy of Ophthalmology 2020 advice for the ophthalmology residency match season. https://www.aao.org/2020-match-webinar-questions Available at:
- 5.APD DIGA webinar: The shifting landscape of the 2020-2021 dermatology application cycle. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0exADjYyJu4&feature=youtu.be Available at: