Skip to main content
Cureus logoLink to Cureus
. 2020 Aug 18;12(8):e9844. doi: 10.7759/cureus.9844

The Tumbling Bullet: Subacute Intestinal Obstruction due to a Retained Bullet

Anupam K Gupta 1,, Blake Edwards 2
Editors: Alexander Muacevic, John R Adler
PMCID: PMC7497767  PMID: 32953351

Abstract

A 29-year-old female presented with multiple gunshot wounds to the back and bilateral lower extremities. The patient underwent an exploratory laparotomy with small-bowel resection of two segments with primary stapled anastomosis and partial nephrectomy. The postoperative course showed prolonged intermittent bowel obstruction secondary to the bullet, which lodged in the distal ileum. The patient eventually passed the bullet; it, however, led to a delay in recovery.

Keywords: gunshot injury to abdomen, damage control surgery, impacted bullet, gall stone ileus, intermittent obstruction

Introduction

In trauma, penetrating injury in the form of a stab or gunshot is common, with the most common organ affected being small bowel (50%) [1]. In intraperitoneal injury, the patient undergoes an emergency exploratory laparotomy to control life-threatening injuries like bleeding, and restore bowel continuity [2-6]. Exploratory laparotomy for gunshot wounds of the abdomen does not prioritize the removal of the foreign body projectile unless it is directly in the field or causing life-threatening hemorrhage [6-10]. We report an unusual case of a bullet left inside, which caused prolonged intermittent obstruction postoperatively.

Case presentation

A 29-year-old lady with no medical history presented after multiple gunshot wounds to the back, abdomen, and bilateral lower extremities. On arrival to the emergency room, the patient was on hardboard with a cervical collar, and the Glasgow coma score was 8 (eye opening in response to pain, the verbal response being incomprehensible, the motor response being flexion, and withdrawal from pain). Vital signs were significant for tachycardia to 115 beats/min, sinus rhythm, and blood pressure of 100/60 mm Hg, saturation 95% on room air. Under the primary survey, the patient was intubated and resuscitated with blood. In the secondary survey, there were gunshot wounds to the back and bilateral lower limbs. Bilateral lower limb,vascular examination showed palpable pulses with no hemorrhage. Once stabilized, the patient had a computed tomography study of the head, chest, abdomen, pelvis, and spine. Computed tomography was positive for the presence of the bullet in the left upper quadrant of the abdomen with pneumoperitoneum (Figure 1).

Figure 1. Bullet fragment in the left upper quadrant.

Figure 1

The patient underwent midline exploratory laparotomy. Significant injuries were several small bowel defects and left kidney lower pole injury. The patient underwent jejunal and ileal bowel resection with primary stapled anastomosis, and a partial nephrectomy of the left lower pole of the kidney was performed. The bullet fragment was not actively looked for and, at the time, assumed to be buried in retroperitoneum. The wounds on the limbs involved soft tissue and were treated with debridement and dressing.

Postoperatively, once resuscitated, the patient had a return of neurological function with stabilization of base deficit on postoperative day 1. The patient had a high nasogastric tube bilious output with bloating despite passing flatus until postoperative day 3. A plain abdominal x-ray showed evidence of a bullet fragment within dilated loops of bowel. On the next day, the patient had bowel movement and relief of bloating only to reoccur the day after. Over the subsequent seven days, intermittent abdominal films showed a gradual progression of the bullet (Figures 2-5). During this time, we also performed an oral Gastrografin study; however, the patient had bowel movement only to have later bloating with vomiting. The abdominal films revealed that the patient had the bullet fragment in the right lower quadrant for approximately four days (Figure 4). On postoperative day 11, patient was able to pass the bullet and then have subsequent relief of her symptoms. There was no recurrence of symptoms after the passage of the bullet in the stool. The rest of the wounds healed appropriately with wound care.

Figure 2. Left upper quadrant position of the bullet.

Figure 2

Figure 3. Progression in the position of the bullet, postoperative day 5.

Figure 3

Figure 4. Bullet in the right lower quadrant for approximately four days.

Figure 4

Figure 5. Progression in the position of the bullet, postoperative day 8.

Figure 5

Discussion

In trauma, gunshot wounds are one of the most common trauma injuries to present to the emergency rooms [2]. In any trauma, a rapid systematic assessment of the patient with a primary survey concentrating on the airway, breathing, and circulation is needed [2-4]. For gunshot injuries to the back, a triple-phase computed tomography allows identifying if the injury is limited to retroperitoneum or is also involving intraperitoneal organs [2,3]. Intraperitoneal injuries identified on imaging mandate emergent exploratory laparotomy [1-4].

During exploratory laparotomy, it is essential to be cognizant of the lethal triad of hypothermia, acidosis, and coagulopathy [1-4]. Damage control surgery prioritizes handling the lethal triad by an abbreviated initial laparotomy and the subsequent definitive repair after achieving homeostasis [5-7]. Damage control laparotomy has shown to improve survival in patients [5-9]. A disadvantage is that it reduces the intraoperative time for the surgeon [5-9]. While there is evidence to support the extraction of foreign body bullets related to contamination of the colon to reduce infection postoperatively, most surgeons do not prioritize this in damage control emergency [10-13].

A foreign body fragment, if in a difficult location or not, causing immediate pressure effect doesn't need to be actively sought to save surgery time. Irrigation of wound with foreign bodies can help reduce infection [10-14].

In certain situations, as seen with our patient, a bullet fragment of a significant size can mimic the symptoms of gallstone ileus. Gallstones larger than 2.5 cm in size have shown to cause obstruction by getting lodged near the terminal ileum [15,16]. Gallstone ileus shows intermittent phases of abdominal pain, obstruction, resolution, and then obstruction again [15,16]. It needs an enterotomy to remove the mechanical obstruction at the distal ileum [16].

In this situation, the large bullet fragment mimicked her gallstone ileus by getting lodged in the distal ileum for approximately four days with intermittent obstruction. Here, it eventually passed; however, if the bullet had not passed, the patient would have needed a repeat laparotomy. Once the gallstone/foreign body is in the colon, it usually passes out with bowel movement [16].

Conclusions

A large bullet left in the bowel loop can cause intraluminal obstruction by lodging in the bowel loops. The bullet fragment in this situation behaved like a gallstone ileus causing intermittent obstruction with relief. Whenever possible, bullet fragments should be extracted to avoid rare complications like in this case.

The content published in Cureus is the result of clinical experience and/or research by independent individuals or organizations. Cureus is not responsible for the scientific accuracy or reliability of data or conclusions published herein. All content published within Cureus is intended only for educational, research and reference purposes. Additionally, articles published within Cureus should not be deemed a suitable substitute for the advice of a qualified health care professional. Do not disregard or avoid professional medical advice due to content published within Cureus.

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Human Ethics

Consent was obtained or waived by all participants in this study

References

  • 1.Lotfollahzadeh S, Burns B. StatPearls Publishing. Treasure Island, FL: StatPearls Publishing; 2019. Penetrating Abdominal Trauma. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Evaluation and management of abdominal gunshot wounds: a Western Trauma Association critical decisions algorithm. Martin MJ, Brown CVR, Shatz DV, et al. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2019;87:1220–1227. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Management of the open abdomen: a national study of clinical outcome and safety of negative pressure wound therapy. Carlson GL, Patrick H, Amin AI, et al. Ann Surg. 2013;257:1154–1159. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31828b8bc8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.How do external factors contribute to the hypocoagulative state in trauma-induced coagulopathy? - In vitro analysis of the lethal triad in trauma. Caspers M, Schäfer N, Fröhlich M, Bauerfeind U, Bouillon B, Mutschler M, Maegele M. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2018;26:66. doi: 10.1186/s13049-018-0536-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Damage control: concept and implementation. Malgras B, Prunet B, Lesaffre X, et al. J Visc Surg. 2017;154:19–29. doi: 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2017.08.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Damage control surgery in the era of damage control resuscitation. Lamb CM, MacGoey P, Navarro AP, Brooks AJ. Br J Anaesth. 2014;113:242–249. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeu233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Damage control resuscitation: a practical approach for severely hemorrhagic patients and its effects on trauma surgery. Mizobata Y. J Intensive Care. 2017;5:4. doi: 10.1186/s40560-016-0197-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Opinions of practicing surgeons on the appropriateness of published indications for use of damage control surgery in trauma patients: an international cross-sectional survey. Roberts DJ, Zygun DA, Faris PD, et al. J Am Coll Surg. 2016;223:515–529. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2016.06.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Indications for bullet removal: overview of the literature, and clinical practice guidelines for European trauma surgeons. Dienstknecht T, Horst K, Sellei R, Berner A, Nerlich M, Hardcastle T. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2012;38:89–93. doi: 10.1007/s00068-011-0170-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Management of gunshot pelvic fractures with bowel injury: is fracture debridement necessary? Rehman S, Slemenda C, Kestner C, Joglekar S. J Trauma. 2011;71:577–581. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181f6f2ff. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.The role of debridement and antibiotics in gunshot wounds to the spine. Quigley KJ, Place HM. J Trauma. 2006;60:814–820. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000195472.99198.71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Infection in minor gunshot wounds. Ordog GJ, Sheppard GF, Wasserberger JS, Balasubramanium S, Shoemaker WC. J Trauma. 1993;34:358–365. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199303000-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Resolution of gallstone ileus with spontaneous evacuation of gallstone. Farooq A, Memon B, Memon MA. Emerg Radiol. 2007;14:421–423. doi: 10.1007/s10140-007-0624-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.A typical gallstone ileus: clinical, radiological and operational findings. Sertkaya M, Emre A, Akbulut S, Vicdan H, Şanlı AN. Turk J Gastroenterol. 2019;4:377–380. doi: 10.5152/tjg.2018.18347. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Gallstone ileus: an overview of the literature [El íleo biliar: una revisión de la literatura médica] Ploneda-Valencia CF, Gallo-Morales M, Rinchon C, et al. Rev Gastroenterol Mex. 2017;82:248–254. doi: 10.1016/j.rgmx.2016.07.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.A systematic review of gallstone sigmoid ileus management. Farkas N, Kaur V, Shanmuganandan A, Black J, Redon C, Frampton AE, West N. Ann Med Surg. 2018;27:32–39. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2018.01.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Cureus are provided here courtesy of Cureus Inc.

RESOURCES