Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2020 Sep 17;15(9):e0239093. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239093

Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) tuber-root modeling method based on physical properties

Ping Zhao 1, Yue Tian 1, Yongkui Li 1, Guofa Xu 1, Subo Tian 1,*, Zichen Huang 2,*
Editor: Moumita Gangopadhyay3
PMCID: PMC7498077  PMID: 32941480

Abstract

The development of tuber-root models based on the physical properties of the root system of a plant is a prominent but complicated task. In this paper, a method for the construction of a 3D model of a potato tuber-root system is proposed, based on determining the characterization parameters of the potato tuber-root model. Three early maturing potato varieties, widely planted in Northeast China, were selected as the research objects. Their topological and geometric structures were analyzed to determine the model parameters. By actually digging potatoes in the field, field data measurement and statistical analysis of the parameters were performed, and a model parameter database was established. Based on the measured data, the root trajectory points were obtained by simulating the growth of the root tips. Then MATLAB was used to develop a system that would complete the construction of the potato tuber-root 3D visualization model. Finally, the accuracy of the model was verified experimentally. Case studies for the three different types indicated an acceptable performance of the proposed model, with a relative root mean square error of 6.81% and 15.32%, for the minimum and maximum values, respectively. The research results can be used to explore the interaction between the soil-tuber-root aggregates and the digging components, and provide a reference for the construction of root models of other tuber crops.

Introduction

The root system supplies water and minerals for a plant, in addition to anchoring the plant in the soil [1]. A visualized root system model is particularly important for mechanical component system dynamics that require modern agricultural machinery with high precision, high quality, strong adaptability, and the development of computer-aided design [2, 3]. Therefore, the development of on modeling methods based on the physical properties of the root system of a plant has become a popular though complicated topic in virtual plant research. The key to a model’s success is closely related to the selection and determination of the model parameters. An effective method to determine model parameters is through measured data [4].

Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) is the fourth largest crop in terms of production, and the most important non-grain food crop in the world [57]. The total potato production worldwide is approximately 400 million tons per year; the most important potato producers are China, India, Russia, and the United States [8]. In this production chain, the stage of harvesting requires the greatest labor intensity. Damage to tubers during harvesting is one of the main causes of reduced potato quality and value [9], as well as tuber diseases during storage [10, 11]. Hence, the potato harvester has an important role in reducing labor intensity and tuber diseases during storage, and ensuring potato quality and value. The design of the digging components of the potato harvester directly influences the performance of the entire machine, and the interaction between the soil-tuber-root aggregates and the digging components is the theoretical basis for the design of the digging components. Therefore, it is extremely important to research and understand this interaction to establish a three-dimensional(3D) model construction of the potato tuber root system. Moreover, understanding the development of the potato root system has the potential to increase yield, optimize agricultural land use [7], and promote the genetic improvement of crops [12]. It also provides a reference for the stem-root model construction of other block, root, and bulb crops.

To date, there have been several studies on the root system model, including those for rice (Oryza sativa) [1315], wheat (Triticum) [1618], maize (Zea mays) [1921], soybean (Glycine max) [22, 23], and other crops and plants[24]. These studies have focused on the tap or fibrous root system, which is composed of roots with a relatively simple configuration. Other researches regarding tuber-root models has simply focused on the yield and ignored the physical structure of tuber-root plants, such as cassava (Manihot esculenta) [24] and potato [25]. Although reference [26] established a tuber-root model regarding potatoes based on physical structure, the measured data of the physical structure of tuber-root were not from the same plant at different stage. Research [27] regarding the physical structure of the linear shape of yams (Dioscorea spp.) is difficult to use for describing the potato. Moreover, the true architecture of a root system, especially the rooting depth, has frequently been neglected [28].

In this research, three typical early-maturing potato varieties in Northeast China are selected as the research object, and a tuber-root modeling method based on the physical properties gathered during the potato-harvesting period is studied. The characterization parameters are determined according to the biological characteristics of the potato tuber-root system, measured in the field during the harvest period, and the root locus points are obtained by simulating the growth of the root tip. A visual system of the potato tuber-root system model is established using MATLAB. Because the structure description and parameter measurement of the root system are based on the natural growth state of the soil, and the parameter description is based on the statistical theory, the description of the objective growth law is more scientific. The topology is based on the standard algorithm design of data structure, which is more conducive to later algorithm development.

Materials and methods

Materials

The research object of the virtual crop was the potato tuber-root system. Fujin, Zaodabai, and Helanshiwu are early-maturing potato varieties widely grown in Northeast China and were selected as examples in this research. These potatoes were cultivated in late April and harvested in July. The field data measurement time was the potato harvesting period. The test tools for tuber-root characterization parameter testing included a shovel, brush, ruler (1 mm accuracy), vernier caliper (0.01 mm accuracy), protractor (1°accuracy), camera (Canon EOS 70D), and computer. The software for the data processing was SPSS (Statistical Product and Service Solutions, Version 22.0), and for visual modeling was MATLAB (2018b, student version).

Methods

To begin with, based on an analysis of the growth characteristics of the potato tuber-root system, the model characterization parameters were analyzed and determined from two aspects: the topological and geometric structure. The model parameter database was developed using the measuring, counting, analyzing, and digging methods in the field. Then, according to the growth structure characteristics of the tuber-root system, which can be divided into three categories: seed-root, seed-tuber-underground stem-stolon-tuber, and underground stem-stolon root, the data structure and storage structure were established. The single root was formed based on the measured data, and the locus point of the root was obtained by stimulating the growth of the root tip. The model building system was designed in order to complete the construction of the potato tuber root 3D visualization model in MATLAB. Finally, the root depths of the three kinds of object simulation and measurement values were compared and analyzed. The accuracy and effectiveness of the model were verified by relative root mean square error (RRMSE) and the scatter diagram of the relationship between the simulation and measurement values.

Determination and acquisition of characterization parameters of potato tuber-root model

Structure of potato tuber-root model

The potato tuber-root system is developed from a seed potato. The seed potato grows downward in its seminal roots which absorb and deliver nutrition, and repair the plant. The seed potato grows upward in its underground stem (main stem) that breaks through the soil to form the plant. Creeping roots and stoloniferous stems originate from underground stems. Two sided lateral roots (fibrous roots) grow on the creeping and seed roots. The end of the creeping stem expands to form a tuber. The potato tuber-root system (Fig 1) consists of an underground stem, creeping stem, seed potato, seminal root, fibrous root, tuber and creeping roots. When a potato tuber-root model is established, we ignore the fibrous roots because they are overly slim and unlikely to influence the interaction force between the digging part of the potato and soil-tuber-root system.

Fig 1. Potato root organization.

Fig 1

a: Underground stem; b: Creeping stem; c: Seed potato; d: Seminal root; e: Fibrous root; f: Tuber; g: Creeping root.

Determining characterization parameters of potato tuber-root model

The characterization parameters of a model provide the basis for digitizing the potato rhizome entities into a computer model. They have a decisive role in the root morphology and are important parameters necessary to ensure the accuracy of the model. This paper determined the characterization parameters of the model from two aspects, the topology and geometric structures.

Potato tuber-root topology

Topological structure considers only the positional relationship among objects, and not their shape and size. To achieve the modeling requirements, the geometric center of the seed potato is used as the coordinate origin to establish a Cartesian 3D coordinate system XY plane. This allows the simplification of the potato tuber-root topology (Fig 2).

Fig 2. Schematic diagram of potato tuber-root topology.

Fig 2

A: Seed potato; B: Underground stem; G: Tuber; G’: Tuber projection; r1: Root 1; r2: Root 2; r1: Root 1 projection; r2: Root 2 projection.

It can be observed from Fig 2, that the characterization parameters of the potato root topology are the axial angle θ (angle between the root or stem i, and underground stem), radial angle η (angle between the projection of the root or creeping stem i on the XY plane and Y-axis), distance h (between the seed potato and rooting point of the root or creeping stem i), and the number of tubers. Because the root system is curved under natural conditions, the axial and radial angles of the root system are taken from the root as the initial angles during the measurement.

Geometric structure of potato tuber-root system

The tuber-root system of potatoes can be divided into roots, main stem, and tubers according to the geometric structure. The roots include seminal roots, creeping roots, and creeping stems. As indicated in the geometric structure (Fig 3), the characterization parameters of the root geometric structure are initial radius rg0, root tip radius rg1, soil depth d, root length l, and total deflection angle Ф.

Fig 3. Root geometry diagram.

Fig 3

The main stem refers to the underground stalk of the potato plant (Fig 4). The main characterization parameters are bottom radius rj0, top radius rj1, and height hj. Tubers include mainly seed potatoes and tubers. Tubers include mainly seed potatoes and tubers. To reduce the simulation complexity, this study assumes that the surface of the tubers is uniform, and that its structural shape can be divided into spherical, ellipsoid and elongated. The geometric parameters of the tubers are length L, width W, and Highly H.

Fig 4. Schematic diagram of the main stem geometry.

Fig 4

In summary, the characterization parameters of the potato tuber-root system model are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1. Characterization parameters of potato tuber-root model.
Model category Roots Tubers Main stems
Characterization parameters Axial angle (θ) Length (L) Bottom radius (rj0)
Radial angle (η) Width(W) Top radius (rj1)
Initial radius (rg0) Height (H) Height (hj)
Root tip radius(rg1) Number (Nk) -
Root length (l) - -
Root depth (d) - -
Total deflection angle (Ф) - -
Number (Ng) - -
Distance to seed potatoes (hg) - -

Measurement and analysis of characterization parameters of potato tuber-root system model

Measuring parameters of model characterization

The experiment was conducted at the potato-planting base in Jianping County, Chaoyang City, Liaoning Province, PR China. This is the main potato production area in Liaoning Province. The test field area was 2000 m2. The test objects were the representative early maturing varieties Fujin, Zaodabai and the Helanshiwu.

During the potato-harvesting period, a field experiment was undertaken to measure the characterization parameters. To ensure that the test results were more coordinated with the actual situation, based on statistical theory, each plant was randomly selected from 50 plants with an acceptable growth condition, as a measurement sample. In this experiment, the excavation method was used. First, the stems and leaves above the ground were excised. Based on the exploration experience, trenches were made at a distance of 0.3 m from the plant (ditch width 0.1 m, depth 0.9 m, length 0.3 m). Then, gentle digging was initiated downward from the topsoil. When approaching the uppermost root system, the soil was brushed in a direction parallel to the rhizome until the soil profile of the root system was exposed (Fig 5). The roots were labeled and the original parameters measured, including the axial angle (the actual measurement was the supplementary angle of the axial angle), depth of the soil, length, axial deflection angle Ф, radial deflection angle, root radius, and tip radius (used to calculate the radius change coefficient). Then, grooves of the same size were dug on the other three sides. After removing and cleaning the entire root system (Fig 6) with a brush, the parameters of the tubers and roots were measured, including the number of roots, stems, and tubers, the distance from each root and stem node to the seed potatoes, and the geometric dimensions of the underground stems and tubers. Each angle was measured with a steel ruler and protractor. The depth of the soil was measured with two steel rulers. The length was measured with a soft ruler. The geometric size of the underground stem was measured with a steel ruler and a digital Vernier caliper. The tuber size was measured by a machine vision system [29].

Fig 5. Open root system.

Fig 5

Fig 6. Complete Zaodabai root system.

Fig 6

Data processing and analysis

The statistical analysis was analyzed using SPSS software to determine the distribution model or distribution range of each parameter by descriptive statistics, comparing means, correlation analysis, regression analysis, and non-parametric tests.

The pre-analysis indicated that certain characterization parameters of potato tuber-root have significant distribution characteristics, and others have a non-significant distribution. To facilitate the use of these parameters in modeling, the normal random function (NORMRND) was used to express the parameters with significant normal distribution characteristics. For parameters without significant distribution characteristics, the probability distribution function was used to express the parameters. For example, the probability distributions of the initial axial angle of the creeping Zaodabai root were calculated as follows. The corresponding distributed probability P of the initial axial angle APz in the range of [70°, 85°], [86°, 100°], [101°, 115°], [116°, 130°], [131°, 145°], and [146°, 160°] were 0.12, 0.36, 0.14, 0.16, 0.16, and 0.06, respectively. To calculate the initial axial angle APz, a random value between [0, 1], P = rand (1) was generated; if P was in [sum (0: Pi-1), sum (0: Pi)], the initial axial angle APz = unifrnd (ai, bi) (i = 1, 2,…, n and P0 = 0).

According to the above method, all the parameters of the root systems of the three potato varieties were organized and summarized, and all characterization parameter databases were established for modeling. There were sufficient root class samples because each plant included more than one root. Therefore, 50 samples of each root type (seed root, creeping root, creeping stem) were used for the model verification experiments.

3D modeling of potato tuber-root system

Data structure and algorithm

Data and storage structure

To begin, the root and tube types of a single potato tuber-root system model is defined as follows:

Seed potato: A, A = {a};

Underground stem: B, B = {b};

Seminal root: C, C = {c1, c2, c3, …, cn};

Creeping stem: D, D = {d1, d2, d3, …, dn}; and

Creeping root: E, E = {e1, e2, e3, …, en};

Tuber: F, F = {f1, f2, f3, …, fn}.

To conform to the basic model of root growth and truly reflect the topological structure of different potato rhizomes, this study established the overall logical structure and corresponding storage structure (Fig 7) of the potato tuber-root model based on the rules of potato root growth.

Fig 7. Overall structure of potato tuber-root model.

Fig 7

(a) Logical structure; (b) Storage structure.

According to the growth structure of the different roots and stems of the potatoes, the root-tuber system of potatoes can be divided into three parts, namely: (1) seed potato-seminal root; (2) seed potato-underground stem-creeping stem-tuber; and (3) underground stem-creeping root. The growth of the root system has a clear grading phenomenon. Hence, this paper used a tree structure to represent the relationship among the rhizomes. Since the seed potato-seminal root and underground stem-creeping root parts have the same structure when the morphology, geometric characteristics, and other factors are not considered, they can be modeled according to the secondary structure (Fig 8(A)). The seed tube-underground stem-creeping stem-tuber part was designed separately as a four-level structure (Fig 8(B)) for modeling.

Fig 8. Logical structure among rhizomes.

Fig 8

(a)Two level; (b) Four level.

Each node in Fig 8 represents a stem or a root. Using Fig 8(A) as an example, the seed potato used as the root node forms the first level, while the n seed roots M1, M2 … Mn form the second level. All nodes in the second level are sibling nodes, and are the child nodes of the potato (M represents the series; n represents the degree of the node). To facilitate the coverage of all root systems and avoid subsequent cumbersome procedures for obtaining root data, the storage structure adopted in this study is a child chain notation, as displayed in Fig 9(B).

Fig 9. Storage structure of relationships among rhizomes.

Fig 9

(a) Two level; (b) Four level.

A single root or stem can be regarded as a linear table structure connected by N growth units. Using a seed root as an example, its logical structure and corresponding storage structure are displayed in Fig 10.

Fig 10. Structure of single seed root.

Fig 10

(a) Logical structure; (b) Storage structure.

Algorithms for generating root and stem models

According to the geometric characteristics of each component of the potato tuber-root system, the model is divided into four categories: root, seed potato, underground stem, and tuber.

  • 1

    Root generation algorithm. In the process of potato root growth, the spatial position coordinate of the seed potato is set as (0, 0, z0), which is the starting node of the underground stems and seminal roots, where z0 is the buried depth of the seed potatoes. According to the topological structure, creeping roots and creeping stems are derived from underground stems. Hence, the starting nodes of the creeping roots and creeping stems are on the root axis of the underground stems, and the specific location is determined by the measured distance from each root node to the seed tube. The starting node of the tuber is at the terminal node of the creeping stems.

Influenced by several factors, including geotropism, growth randomness, and soil resistance, the direction of the potato root growth can deflect at any time, making the growth trajectory curved, as indicated in Fig 11.

Fig 11. Root growth direction.

Fig 11

Suppose that the starting node of a root is A(x1, y1, z1), and the original growth trajectory is to grow a unit length l along the Y-axis to the point B(x1, y1 + l, z1), as indicated in Fig 12. Considering the deflection under the influence of different factors and adding rotation γ° around the Z axis and θ° around the X axis, the actual growth point C (x2, y2, z2) can be obtained by the following equation,

[x2,y2,z2,1]=[x1,y1,z1,1][1000010000100l01][cosγsinγ00cosθ×sinγcosθ×cosγsinθ0sinθ×sinγsinθ×cosγcosθ00001] (1)
Fig 12. Root growth trajectory.

Fig 12

In the actual simulation, the smaller the value of the root growth unit length l, the more realistic the model. The radial deflection angle γ and axial deflection angle θ are selected from the established database.

From the above method of simulating the growth of the root tips, as long as the starting node of the root system and the termination conditions of growth can be determined, the growth trajectory of the root tip can be simulated. In this paper, the length of the root system was used as the termination condition, and variable data was used as the storage address to store the cyclically updated coordinates of the root tip. When the growth length was satisfied and the growth is stopped, the entire root axis was rotated by the initial axial angle and initial radial angle, and the final root axis coordinates were stored by setting storage unit N. Finally, the 3D root axis graph was drawn by plot3 (MATLAB function). The required parameters included the initial position PP, initial axial angle AP, initial radial angle JP, length LP, axial deflection angle aP and radial deflection angle jP.

  • 2

    Seed potato generation algorithm. Seed potatoes are the seeds of the potatoes. Seed potatoes at maturity can be approximated as a semi-ellipsoid shape, achieved by the three parameters of length LS, width WS, and height HS in the model construction.

  • 3

    Underground stem generation algorithm. Underground stems are shaped similar to a round table with a uniformly varying radius; however, in reality the surface of underground potato stems is rough and grows irregularly. To be closer to reality, this paper used the method of round table stitching to construct the underground stem model; that is, the round tables whose centers were not on a straight line were spliced together to simulate the effect of a rough surface. The required function here is the Cone function, and the required parameters include height HD, initial position (the origin by default), initial radius RD, and radius change rate rD.

  • 4

    Tuber generation algorithm. Tubers are divided into three shapes: elongated, ellipsoidal, and spherical, depending on the aspect ratio of the tubers. They can be represented by the Ellipsoid function with the required parameters including the center point PK, length LK, width WK and height HK. Simulated tubers of different shapes are displayed in Fig 13.

Fig 13. Tubers of different shapes.

Fig 13

(a) Long potato; (b) Spherical potato; and (c) Ellipsoid potato.

Program design of potato tuber-root system model construction

System design

According to object-oriented programming theory, this study used inheritance to organize different model types with the common attribute of the components of a complete model being the variety. Therefore, an abstract base class root system was established. Subclasses included seed potatoes, seminal roots, underground stems, creeping roots, creeping stems, and tubers. Different types of unified modeling language (UML) are displayed in Fig 14.

Fig 14. Different types of organizational structure.

Fig 14

Process design

According to the data structure designed by the structure of the potato tuber-root model, the overall flow chart of the model construction is displayed in Fig 15. Each class of the model has its own modeling program, the principle is the same; however, the parameters are marginally different. Using creeping roots as an example, the construction process for all creeping roots in a potato root model is displayed in Fig 16. To improve the accuracy of the program identification, the potato varieties are replaced with numbers: 1- Zaodabai; 2-Helanshiwu; 3-Fujin.

Fig 15. Flowchart of building models.

Fig 15

Fig 16. Flow chart of multiple creeping root model construction.

Fig 16

Case reconstruction and model verification

Instance refactoring

To facilitate the retrieval of the models, a graphical user interface (GUI) was designed using MATLAB. Users are only required to input the variety code to construct a 3D model of the potato tuber-root system. According to the method proposed in this study, examples of the three varieties of Zaodabai (Fig 17(A)), Helanshiwu (Fig 17(B)), and Fujin (Fig 17(C)) of the potato tuber-root model are displayed in Fig 17.

Fig 17. Visualization of different potato models.

Fig 17

(a) Zaodabai; (b) Helanshiwu; and (c) Fujin.

Model validation

In this paper, the root depth measured in “Determination and acquisition of characterization parameters of potato tuber-root model” was used to validate the consistency of the simulated values of the measured seminal roots, creeping roots, and creeping root depths of the three varieties with the measured values. Considering a relatively large distribution range of the root depth, RRMSE was used to test the accuracy of the model. The calculation equation is.

RRMSE=1ni=1n(OBSiSIMi)21ni=1nOBSi (2)

where OBSi is the measured value, SIMi is the simulation, and n is a sample amount. The smaller the RRMSE value, the closer the measured value is to the simulation value. The evaluation standard of the RRMSE value for the simulation accuracy of the model can divide the simulation accuracy into four levels [30]. When RRMSE is less than 10%, it indicates that the consistency between the simulated and measured values is extremely significant. When RRMSE is between 10% and 20%, the consistency is significant. When RRMSE is between 20% and 30%, the simulation effect is general. When RRMSE is greater than 30%, it means that the deviation between the simulated and measured values is large, and the simulation effect is poor.

Results and discussion

The actual measured value of the tuber-root models was determined using the reserved data of 50 samples. The simulated root depth of the tuber-root models was calculated by Eq (1). These are summarized in Table 2.

Table 2. Simulated and measured root depth.

Species Sample No. Seminal root Creeping root Creeping stem
Measured value (mm) Simulated value (mm) Measured value (mm) Simulated value (mm) Measured value (mm) Simulated value (mm)
Zaodabai 1 94 96.87 35 33.42 40 36.36
2 98 90.52 180 190.47 30 33.96
3 133 127.64 96 93.21 68 60.45
50 80 86.38 140 144.18 60 50.36
Helanshiwu 1 142 124.87 210 188.67 30 27.85
2 104 100.22 170 177.56 84 80.47
3 86 78.47 80 85.49 38 48.39
50 130 110.94 210 209.46 48 45.26
Fujin 1 78 77.23 96 90.86 47 52.48
2 124 136.85 140 132.23 80 90.27
3 86 94.81 200 204.98 93 100.46
50 103 108.45 146 144.48 60 58.46

To verify the accuracy of the simulated model, a comparison of measured and simulated root depth was performed and is displayed in Figs 1820.

Fig 18. Comparison of measured and simulated values of Zaodabai.

Fig 18

Fig 20. Comparison of measured and simulated values of Fujin.

Fig 20

Fig 19. Comparison of measured and simulated values of Helanshiwu.

Fig 19

An acceptable coherence between the measurements and simulations was found for these root depths. The Helanshiwu demonstrated superior global consistency compared to Fujin and Zaodabai. It can be observed from Table 3 that the RRMSE values of the three root systems of the three varieties were generally distributed between 6.81% and 15.32%, which indicates that the simulated values were consistent with the measured values, and that the simulation results were acceptable. To analyze the cause of deviations, the growth structure of the potato tuber-root system in soil is complicated, which made the measurement difficult and resulted in certain discrepancies. In addition, the bending of the root system is regarded as a uniform change because of the complexity and diversity of the root geometry. Overall, the tuber-root model of the potato constructed by this research scheme is reliable and accurate. This research can form the basis for future studies evaluating the behavior of different root systems. It is recommended that future studies include accurately described root morphology.

Table 3. RRMSE results.

Variety RRMSE (%)
Seminal root Creeping root Creeping stem
Zaodabai 13.14 15.32 13.88
Helanshiwu 8.78 6.81 13.92
Fujin 14.23 6.84 11.37

Conclusion

In this paper, a 3D model of the tuber-root system of potatoes based on physical properties was developed. The characterization parameters of the potato tuber-root model at harvesting period were determined. Using three early-maturing potato varieties widely planted in Northeast China as examples, field measurements were performed for the characterization parameters, and a model parameter database was established based on statistical analysis. A 3D visual model of the tuber-root system was constructed and verified by experiments. The results of the comparative analysis and RRMSE between the measured and simulated values confirmed that the model demonstrated high accuracy and reliability.

Compared with existing modeling methods, the method presented in this paper has the following advantages:

  1. The geometric structure description and parameter measurement of the root system were simulated based on the natural growth state of the soil. Moreover, the parameters were determined based on statistical theory, and it was observed that the model was closer to the actual situation and could be applied to the simulation analysis of the interaction between the harvester and soil-tuber-root aggregates.

  2. Designing the topological structure based on a standard computer data structure algorithm was conducive to later algorithm development.

  3. The simulation method can be applied to the roots of other tuber and rhizome plants such as peanuts and sweet potatoes. It isn’t limited to potatoes. It has the characteristics of strong versatility.

To address meet the demands of potato production, the representative parameter databases of the common potato varieties will be established in the future. The method described neglected the fiber root because it aimed only at the analysis of the interaction between the fiber and machine tool. Thus, to simulate the actual growth model of the potato more accurately, the next step would be to establish the characteristic parameters of the fiber root in the model.

Supporting information

S1 Table. Parameters table of tuber-root model for three varieties of potatoes.

(DOCX)

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

The present work is financially supported the National Natural Science Foundationof China(NSFC) of Zhao Ping, and the grant mumber is 51505305. Zhao Ping had an important role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, and preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Khan MA, Gemenet DC, Villordon A. Root System Architecture and Abiotic Stress Tolerance: Current Knowledge in Root and Tuber Crops. Front Plant Sci. 2016;7 10.3389/fpls.2016.01584 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Schwarz M, Cohen D, Or D. Root-soil mechanical interactions during pullout and failure of root bundles. J Geophys Res. 2010;115: F04035 10.1029/2009JF001603 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Ammer Ch, Wagner S. An approach for modelling the mean fine-root biomass of Norway spruce stands. Trees. 2005;19: 145–153. 10.1007/s00468-004-0373-4 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Natsupakpong S, Cenk Çavuşoğlu M. Determination of elasticity parameters in lumped element (mass-spring) models of deformable objects. Graphical Models. 2010;72: 61–73. 10.1016/j.gmod.2010.10.001 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Zhang H, Xu F, Wu Y, Hu H, Dai X. Progress of potato staple food research and industry development in China. Journal of Integrative Agriculture. 2017;16: 2924–2932. 10.1016/S2095-3119(17)61736-2 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ezekiel R, Singh N, Sharma S, Kaur A. Beneficial phytochemicals in potato—a review. Food Research International. 2013;50: 487–496. 10.1016/j.foodres.2011.04.025 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Joshi M, Fogelman E, Belausov E, Ginzberg I. Potato root system development and factors that determine its architecture. Journal of Plant Physiology. 2016;205: 113–123. 10.1016/j.jplph.2016.08.014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Celik HK, Cinar R, Yilmaz D, Ulmeanu M, Rennie AEW, Akinci I. Mechanical collision simulation of potato tubers. J Food Process Eng. 2019;42: 1–7. 10.1111/jfpe.13078 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Bentini M, Caprara C, Martelli R. Harvesting Damage to Potato Tubers by Analysis of Impacts recorded with an Instrumented Sphere. Biosystems Engineering. 2006;94: 75–85. 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2006.02.007 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Peters R. Damage of potato tubers, a review. Potato Res. 1996;39: 479–484. 10.1007/BF02358463 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Rymuza K, Bombik A, Stopa D, Pawlonka Z. The Effect of Potato Ridge Height and Harvest Date on Tuber Injuries. Journal of Plant Protection Research. 2014;54: 225–230. 10.2478/jppr-2014-0034 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Dorlodot S de, Forster B, Pagès L, Price A, Tuberosa R, Draye X. Root system architecture: opportunities and constraints for genetic improvement of crops. Trends in Plant Science. 2007;12: 474–481. 10.1016/j.tplants.2007.08.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Yan D, Zhu Y, Wang S, Cao W. A Quantitative Knowledge-based Model for Designing Suitable Growth Dynamics in Rice. Plant Production Science. 2006;9: 93–105. 10.1626/pps.9.93 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Fang S, Yan X, Liao H. 3D reconstruction and dynamic modeling of root architecture in situ and its application to crop phosphorus research: 3D dynamic modeling of root architecture in situ. The Plant Journal. 2009;60: 1096–1108. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2009.04009.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Yang L, Peng J, Shao P. Modeling and Visualization of Rice Roots Based on Morphological Parameters. IEEE Access. 2020;8: 23407–23416. 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2970161 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Adeleke E, Millas R, McNeal W, Faris J, Taheri A. Variation Analysis of Root System Development in Wheat Seedlings Using Root Phenotyping System. Agronomy. 2020;10: 206 10.3390/agronomy10020206 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Bingham IJ, Wu L. Simulation of wheat growth using the 3D root architecture model SPACSYS: Validation and sensitivity analysis. European Journal of Agronomy. 2011;34: 181–189. 10.1016/j.eja.2011.01.003 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Zhang BG, Reffye PD, Liu L, Kang MZ, Li BG. Plant Growth Modeling and Applications. China: Springer and Tsinghua University Press; 2003. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Yang HS, Dobermann A, Lindquist JL, Walters DT, Arkebauer TJ, Cassman KG. Hybrid-maize—a maize simulation model that combines two crop modeling approaches. Field Crops Research. 2004;87: 131–154. 10.1016/j.fcr.2003.10.003 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Wu J, Pagès L, Wu Q, Yang B, Guo Y. Three-dimensional architecture of axile roots of field-grown maize. Plant Soil. 2015;387: 363–377. 10.1007/s11104-014-2307-2 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Pagès L, Jordan MO, Picard D. A simulation model of the three-dimensional architecture of the maize root system. Plant Soil. 1989;119: 147–154. 10.1007/BF02370279 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Heeraman DA, Hopmans JW, Clausnitzer V. Three dimensional imaging of plant roots in situ with X-ray Computed Tomography. Plant and Soil. 1997;189: 167–179. 10.1023/B:PLSO.0000009694.64377.6f [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Jia Y, Su Z, Sun H. Research on the model construction of soybean root system based on L-system. 2010 World Automation Congress. Kobe, Japan; 2010. pp. 195–199.
  • 24.El-Sharkawy MA. Cassava biology and physiology. Plant Mol Biol. 2004;56: 481–501. 10.1007/s11103-005-2270-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Wishart J, George TS, Brown LK, Ramsay G, Bradshaw JE, White PJ, et al. Measuring variation in potato roots in both field and glasshouse: the search for useful yield predictors and a simple screen for root traits. Plant Soil. 2013;368: 231–249. 10.1007/s11104-012-1483-1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Xie J. Simulation of Potato and Its Root Growth. Master thesis, Kunming University of Science and Technology. 2009.
  • 27.Charles-Dominique T, Mangenet T, Rey H, Jourdan C, Edelin C. Architectural analysis of root system of sexually vs. vegetatively propagated yam (Dioscorea rotundata Poir.), a tuber monocot. Plant Soil. 2009;317: 61–77. 10.1007/s11104-008-9788-9 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Fourcaud T, Zhang X, Stokes A, Lambers H, Korner C. Plant Growth Modelling and Applications: The Increasing Importance of Plant Architecture in Growth Models. Annals of Botany. 2007;101: 1053–1063. 10.1093/aob/mcn050 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Tian Y, Zhao P, Li Y. Measurement and Analysis of Physical Parameters of Five Early Maturing Potato Varieties in Northeast China. Journal of Shenyang Agricultural University. 2017;48: 737–744. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Despotovic M, Nedic V, Despotovic D, Cvetanovic S. Evaluation of empirical models for predicting monthly mean horizontal diffuse solar radiation. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2016;56: 246–260. 10.1016/j.rser.2015.11.058 [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Moumita Gangopadhyay

17 Jul 2020

PONE-D-20-16069

Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) Tuber-Root Modeling method Based on Physical Property

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Subo Tian,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Aug 31 2020 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Moumita Gangopadhyay

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments:

Dear Professor Subo Tian,

Reviewers have now commented on your paper. The paper contains interesting predictive model on potato tuber-root system and very important field of research and here authors have written the paper in an intelligent fashion. However, after reviewing the reviewer’s comments, I make this decision that this paper is not accepted in current form. If the authors are prepared to undertaken the revision required to satisfy all of these following comments, I would be pleased to reconsider my decision:

1. This manuscript needs extensively checking for English language and grammar improvement. It needs your careful reading to be certain that the meaning remained unchanged.

2. Double check all citations against the references list and vice versa with particular attention to matching publication year.

3. In section “3.3.2. Data processing and analysis”, although the method was described clearly, only the result of distributed probability P of initial axial angle APz in the range were given in this paper, others are established with characterization parameter databases. Please do the needful and format your paper according to the template and policy of PLOS.

Journal requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. We note that you have indicated that data from this study are available upon request. PLOS only allows data to be available upon request if there are legal or ethical restrictions on sharing data publicly. For more information on unacceptable data access restrictions, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-unacceptable-data-access-restrictions.

In your revised cover letter, please address the following prompts:

a) If there are ethical or legal restrictions on sharing a de-identified data set, please explain them in detail (e.g., data contain potentially sensitive information, data are owned by a third-party organization, etc.) and who has imposed them (e.g., an ethics committee). Please also provide contact information for a data access committee, ethics committee, or other institutional body to which data requests may be sent.

b) If there are no restrictions, please upload the minimal anonymized data set necessary to replicate your study findings as either Supporting Information files or to a stable, public repository and provide us with the relevant URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers. For a list of acceptable repositories, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-recommended-repositories.

We will update your Data Availability statement on your behalf to reflect the information you provide.

3. Thank you for stating the following in the Acknowledgments Section of your manuscript:

'The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support provided by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC)(51505305).'

We note that you have provided funding information that is not currently declared in your Funding Statement. However, funding information should not appear in the Acknowledgments section or other areas of your manuscript. We will only publish funding information present in the Funding Statement section of the online submission form.

a. Please remove any funding-related text from the manuscript and let us know how you would like to update your Funding Statement. Currently, your Funding Statement reads as follows: 'No'

b. Please include your amended statements within your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: The paper contains interesting predictive model on potato tuber-root system.

The quality of the research work presented in the paper is very good.

The paper is scientifically sound.

However, In conclusion part explanation of the result obtain in model validation will be much appreciated.

Reviewer #2: Tuber root modelling studies are very important field of research and here authors have written the paper in an intelligent fashion. also the data furnished are sufficient.Hence this paper can be accepted.

Reviewer #3: This paper mainly studied a method of 3D model construction of the potato tuber root system based on physical properties, which is important and difficult. So, this research is  relatively innovative. Experiment results show that the proposed method has good performance. The research work is suggestive and the point of view is worthy of researching. Data and analysis are enough to support conclusions. However, for the benefit of reader, some revisions are needed in this paper, there are given below.

First, some sentences contain grammatical and spelling mistakes, such as the title ”........Physical Property”, I think that “Property” should be “Properties”, et al . in addition, the same expression should be consistent, such as “early maturing” in abstract and “early-maturing” in text. Please check and correct carefully at revision, and pay more attention to English grammar and sentence structure.

Second, in section “3.3.2. Data processing and analysis” , although the method was described clearly, only the result of distributed probability P of initial axial angle APz in the range were given in this paper, others are established with characterization parameter databases. But the characterization parameter databases weren’t provide as appendix table, Add or not, please according to the editor's request. I think the data are full and perfect, because you(the authors ) said “The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request” when you submit the manuscript.

Finally, There are errors in writing, such as , in row 235th and 236th, A (x1, y1, z1) should be A(x1, y1, z1), B (x1, y1 + l, z1) should be B(x1, y1+l, z1), et al. Please check and correct carefully at revision.

Format your paper according to the template and policy of PLOS.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: Yes: Arpita Das

Reviewer #2: No

Reviewer #3: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2020 Sep 17;15(9):e0239093. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239093.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


14 Aug 2020

Dear editor and reviewers:

Thank you for your comments concerning our manuscript entitled “Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) tuber-root modeling method based on physical properties”. (ID: PONE-D-20-16069). Those comments are all valuable and extremely helpful for revising and improving our paper. We studied the comments carefully, and made corrections and improvement which we hope meet with approval. The main changes are in the manuscript and the responses to the reviewers’ comments are as follows.

Additional Editor Comments:

1. This manuscript needs extensively checking for English language and grammar improvement. It needs your careful reading to be certain that the meaning remained unchanged.

Response1:We extensively checking for English language and grammar improvement with the help of Editage (www.editage.cn), and meaning remained unchanged.

2.Double check all citations against the references list and vice versa with particular attention to matching publication year.

Response2:We modified the reference using Zotero, and checked citations with the format on webpage (https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines).

3. In section “3.3.2. Data processing and analysis”, although the method was described clearly, only the result of distributed probability P of initial axial angle APz in the range were given in this paper, others are established with characterization parameter databases. Please do the needful and format your paper according to the template and policy of PLOS.

Response3:We provided the other characterization parameters in Supporting Information file.

Journal requirements:

1.Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming.

Response1:We revised the manuscript’s style according to the PLOS ONE style templates.

2.We note that you have indicated that data from this study are available upon request. PLOS only allows data to be available upon request if there are legal or ethical restrictions on sharing data publicly. For more information on unacceptable data access restrictions, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-unacceptable-data-access-restrictions.

In your revised cover letter, please address the following prompts:

a) If there are ethical or legal restrictions on sharing a de-identified data set, please explain them in detail (e.g., data contain potentially sensitive information, data are owned by a third-party organization, etc.) and who has imposed them (e.g., an ethics committee). Please also provide contact information for a data access committee, ethics committee, or other institutional body to which data requests may be sent.

b) If there are no restrictions, please upload the minimal anonymized data set necessary to replicate your study findings as either Supporting Information files or to a stable, public repository and provide us with the relevant URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers. For a list of acceptable repositories, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-recommended-repositories.

We will update your Data Availability statement on your behalf to reflect the information you provide.

Response2:We are very sorry for our wrong input (“No-some restirictions will apply”) when we submitted the manuscript. The reason is that we didn’t understanding the explanations well.

We should input as follow:

Yes - all data are fully available without restriction.

As well as we provide the supporting data according to the requirement of the “Additional Editor Comments” as Supporting information file. Please you decide Whether the data is published in the manuscript as an appendix.

3.Thank you for stating the following in the Acknowledgments Section of your manuscript:

'The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support provided by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC)(51505305).'

We note that you have provided funding information that is not currently declared in your Funding Statement. However, funding information should not appear in the Acknowledgments section or other areas of your manuscript. We will only publish funding information present in the Funding Statement section of the online submission form.

a. Please remove any funding-related text from the manuscript and let us know how you would like to update your Funding Statement. Currently, your Funding Statement reads as follows: 'No'

b. Please include your amended statements within your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

Response3:We removed the funding-related text from the manuscript.

We would like to update our funding statement on the webpage. Our Funding Statement should be “Yes”. Please help us to change the online submission as follow.

4.Financial Disclosure. Enter a financial disclosure statement that describes the sources of funding for the work included in this submission. Review the submission guidelines for detailed requirements. View published research articles from PLOS ONE for specific examples.

This statement is required for submission and will appear in the published article if the submission is accepted. Please make sure it is accurate.

Response4:The present work is financially supported the National Natural Science Foundationof China(NSFC) of Zhao Ping, and the grant mumber is 51505305. Zhao Ping had an important role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, and preparation of the manuscript.

Reviewer #1:

1.The paper contains interesting predictive model on potato tuber-root system.The quality of the research work presented in the paper is very good.

The paper is scientifically sound.

Response1:We appreciate the reviewer’s view of the article.

2.However, In conclusion part explanation of the result obtain in model validation will be much appreciated.

Response2:We supplemented some explanation of the result in section “Conclusion”, and marked in red in the file named “Revised Manuscript with Track Changes”.

Reviewer #2:

1.Tuber root modelling studies are very important field of research and here authors have written the paper in an intelligent fashion. also the data furnished are sufficient. Hence this paper can be accepted.

Response1:We appreciate the reviewer’s view of the article.

Reviewer #3:

1.This paper mainly studied a method of 3D model construction of the potato tuber root system based on physical properties, which is important and difficult. So, this research is relatively innovative. Experiment results show that the proposed method has good performance. The research work is suggestive and the point of view is worthy of researching. Data and analysis are enough to support conclusions. However, for the benefit of reader, some revisions are needed in this paper, there are given below.

Response1:We appreciate the reviewer’s view of the article.

2.First, some sentences contain grammatical and spelling mistakes, such as the title ”........Physical Property”, I think that “Property” should be “Properties”, et al . in addition, the same expression should be consistent, such as “early maturing” in abstract and “early-maturing” in text. Please check and correct carefully at revision, and pay more attention to English grammar and sentence structure.

Response2:We replaced “Property” with “Properties”,and replaced “early-maturing” with “early maturing”. in addition, we extensively checked English language and grammar and revised them.

3.Second, in section “3.3.2. Data processing and analysis” , although the method was described clearly, only the result of distributed probability P of initial axial angle APz in the range were given in this paper, others are established with characterization parameter databases. But the characterization parameter databases weren’t provide as appendix table, Add or not, please according to the editor's request. I think the data are full and perfect, because you(the authors ) said “The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request” when you submit the manuscript.

Response3:We provided all the characterization parameter data as a supporting information file. We obey the editor's arrangement, data are fully available without any restriction, and we would like to make the data public.

4.Finally, There are errors in writing, such as , in row 235th and 236th, A (x1, y1, z1) should be A(x1, y1, z1), B (x1, y1 + l, z1) should be B(x1, y1+l, z1), et al. Please check and correct carefully at revision.

Response4:We modified as “Supposing that the starting node of a root is A(x1, y1, z1), and the original growth trajectory is to grow a unit length l along the Y axis to the point of B(x1, y1 + l, z1)…” and checked carefully all the text and corrected the errors in writing.

5.Format your paper according to the template and policy of PLOS.

Response5:We already format our paper according to the given template and policy of PLOS.

We tried our best to improve the manuscript and made some changes in the manuscript. These changes will not influence the content and framework of the paper. And here we did not list the changes but marked in red in revised paper.

We appreciate for Editors/Reviewers’ warm work earnestly, and hope that the correction will meet with approval.

Once again, thank you very much for your comments and suggestions.

Thank you and best regards.

Yours sincerely, Professor Subo Tian

tiansubo@syau.edu.cn

College of Engineering, Shenyang Agricultural University

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers(PONE-D-20-16069).docx

Decision Letter 1

Moumita Gangopadhyay

31 Aug 2020

Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) tuber-root modeling method based on physical properties

PONE-D-20-16069R1

Dear Dr. Tian,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Moumita Gangopadhyay

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Thank you very much for answering all the comments made by the reviewers. The necessary modifications of the manuscript now seem appropriate in terms of scientific means and also English language corrections. Therefore, I am happy to inform you that this paper can be accepted in the current form for publications. Thank you again for choosing this journal for your valuable manuscripts.

Reviewers' comments:

Acceptance letter

Moumita Gangopadhyay

8 Sep 2020

PONE-D-20-16069R1

Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) tuber-root modeling method based on physical properties

Dear Dr. Tian:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Moumita Gangopadhyay

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Table. Parameters table of tuber-root model for three varieties of potatoes.

    (DOCX)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers(PONE-D-20-16069).docx

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.


    Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES