Skip to main content
ACS AuthorChoice logoLink to ACS AuthorChoice
. 2020 Aug 5;142(34):14437–14442. doi: 10.1021/jacs.0c05669

Functional Constitutional Dynamic Networks Revealing Evolutionary Reproduction/Variation/Selection Principles

Liang Yue 1, Shan Wang 1, Itamar Willner 1,*
PMCID: PMC7498142  PMID: 32787246

Abstract

graphic file with name ja0c05669_0006.jpg

Within the broad research efforts to engineer chemical pathways to yield high-throughput evolutionary synthesis of genes and their screening for dictated functionalities, we introduce the evolution of nucleic-acid-based constitutional dynamic networks (CDNs) that follow reproduction/variation/selection principles. These fundamental principles are demonstrated by assembling a library of nucleic-acid strands and hairpins as functional modules for evolving networks. Primary T1-initiated selection of components from the library assembles a parent CDN X, where the evolved constituents exhibit catalytic properties to cleave the hairpins in the library. Cleavage of the hairpins yields fragments, which reproduces T1 to replicate CDN X, whereas the other fragments T2 and T3 select other components to evolve two other CDNs, Y and Z (variation). By applying appropriate counter triggers, we demonstrate the guided selection of networks from the evolved CDNs. By integrating additional hairpin substrates into the system, CDN-dictated emergent catalytic transformations are accomplished. The study provides pathways to construct evolutionary dynamic networks revealing enhanced gated and cascaded functions.


Genome engineering by evolutionary pathways, e.g., CRISPR-Cas9,1 PCR-based mutagenesis,2 or compartmentalized self-replication,3 is attracting growing interest as a means to yield high-throughput evolutionary synthesis of genes and their screening for improved functions, e.g., synthesis of novel proteins or ribozymes.4 These evolution concepts require the development of amplified synthetic pathways of mutated gene libraries (diversity), selection of desired strands, ability to reproduce the selected gene(s), and utilization of the selected strand(s) for targeted functionalities.5 Beyond the development of genetically engineered machineries, the design of evolutionary gene regulating networks is challenging.6 In fact, constitutional regulating networks play central roles in living systems.7 For example, the expansion of genes and their adaptive functions lead to the emergence and divergence of genetic networks.8 Recently, we introduced DNA-based constitutional dynamic networks (CDNs) as functional modules mimicking the functions of native networks. The simplest CDN includes four equilibrated constituents, AA′, AB′, BA′, and BB′.9 The triggered stabilization of one of the constituents, e.g., AA′, reconfigures the network, where AA′ and BB′ are upregulated while AB′ and BA′ are downregulated. Different triggers were used to reversibly reconfigure CDNs, e.g., the formation/dissociation of G-quadruplexes9 or triplexes,10 strand displacement,11 or light.12 These mechanisms were applied to construct DNA-based CDNs of enhanced complexities.11,1315 A key question in systems biology relates, however, to the evolutionary pathways leading to the emergence of complex networks in the living systems. Thus, one of the challenges in systems chemistry is an attempt to provide biomimetic pathways for evolving networks and specifically to demonstrate the emergence of networks from a component library, revealing intrinsic reproduction/variation/selection functions (fundamental principles of chemical evolutions16). In this context, we argued that nucleic acids could be an ideal versatile material to construct evolutionary networks mimicking natural systems: (i) The base sequences of nucleic acids provide an infinite set of supramolecular structures (library), e.g., duplexes, triplexes, or hairpins. (ii) Nucleic acids comprising the library may reveal recognition properties (aptamers17) or catalytic functions (ribozymes18 or DNAzymes19). (iii) The collection of nucleic acids may lead to intermolecular transformations, e.g., hairpin-opening or strand displacement, to yield DNA structures of enhanced complexity.20 (Note that we use terms and materials developed recently21 and applied in DNA nanotechnology22 and assume their coincidental existence in a nucleic-acid library.) Indeed, in a preliminary report,23 we demonstrated the emergence of DNA-based CDNs by the rewiring mechanism. In the present study, we introduce a nucleic-acid library for the evolution of networks following reproduction/variation/selection principles. Beyond demonstrating the combined features of evolution, we highlight that evolutionary pathways allow the emergence of CDN-guided catalytic functions.

Figure 1 outlines the principle to construct a library leading to the reproduction, variation, and selection of CDNs. The library consists of a set of components A–F′ and hairpins H1–H3. Its interaction with initiator T1 generates a parent CDN X including the T1-stabilized constituents AA′, AB′, BA′, and BB′. Cleavage of H1 by BA′ yields fragment T1, which is identical to initiator T1 generating the parent CDN X and, thus, reactivates the selection of A, A′, B, and B′ to replicate CDN X. Cleavage of H2 by BB′ yields fragment T2, which interacts with C, C′, D, and D′ to generate CDN Y consisting of T2-stabilized CC′, CD′, DC′, and DD′. Similarly, cleavage of H3 by AB′ yields fragment T3 to assemble CDN Z composed of the T3-stabilized EE′, EF′, FE′, and FF′. Thus, the primary interaction of the library with initiator T1 leads to the reproduction of CDN X and the concomitant diversification of the system by the emergence of two additional CDNs, Y and Z. Furthermore, subjecting the evolved CDN mixture to the counter triggers T2′/T3′ displaces the stabilizing strands from the constituents comprising CDNs Y and Z (forming T2T2′ and T3T3′, respectively), resulting in their depletion and the survival of CDN X. Similarly, treatment of the CDN mixture with T1′/T3′ or T1′/T2′ leads to the selection of CDN Y or Z. It should be noted that Figure 1 outlines schematically the structural and functional requisites to follow the reproduction/variation/selection principles. For the specific constraints associated with the nucleic-acid structures that follow this figure, see Figure 2 and the accompanying discussion.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Schematic of triggered reproduction, variation, and selection of CDNs from a component library.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Schematic composition of a nucleic-acid library for the triggered formation of a parent DNAzyme-functionalized CDN X, including the functional information to reproduce itself and to guide the emergence of two other CDNs, Y and Z (reproduction/variation features). The resulting CDN mixture undergoes the triggered selection of target CDNs (selection feature). Insets: (I) Integrated Mg2+-ion-dependent DNAzyme reporters provide catalytic paths to quantify the contents of the constituents. (II) Schematic of triggered formation/dissociation of CDN constituents (taking constituent BA′ as an example).

Figure 2 depicts the schematic structures of the nucleic-acid library used to assemble the evolutionary reproduction/variation/selection CDN systems. The library includes nucleic acids revealing the following features: (i) triggered assembly of the constituents in different CDNs through Ti-stabilized T-A·T triplexes. (ii) Each of the assembled constituents includes a Mg2+-ion-dependent DNAzyme that provides a probe to quantitatively report on the concentrations of the constituents. By following the DNAzyme-catalyzed cleavage of the respective fluorophore/quencher (Fi/Qi)-modified substrates, inset I, and using appropriate calibration curves corresponding to the fluorescence changes generated by different concentrations of intact constituents, the concentrations of the CDN constituents can be assessed. (iii) Beside the DNAzyme reporters, the constituents in CDN X include additional Mg2+-ion-dependent DNAzyme activators (marked with a magenta frame) to cleave hairpins H1–H3 in the library, to stimulate the reproduction/diversification events. (iv) Each trigger Ti includes a toehold tether that allows its displacement by the counter trigger Ti′ to yield TiTi′, inset II, leading to the depletion of the respective constituents for the selection event. It should be noted that, upon designing the nucleic-acid library composed of components A–F′ and hairpins H1–H3, we ensured a lack of the undesirable cross-interactions between the different structures. In addition, we programmed the “arm” sequences of the Mg2+-ion-dependent DNAzyme units to specifically cleave the respective substrates or hairpins.24 Also, each of the triggers Ti is designed to selectively bind to the components by controlling the sequences and stabilities of the resulting T-A·T triplexes.25 The specificity of the strand displacement processes was controlled by the base sequences of the respective duplexes and their relative energetic stabilization.20c,26

Figure 3A shows the catalytic activities of the CDN constituents before (curves i) and after subjecting the library to initiator T1 for 24 h (curves ii). No constituents are present in the absence of T1, yet interaction of the library with T1 leads to the emergence of all constituents in CDNs X, Y, and Z. Using appropriate calibration curves, Figures S1–S3, we quantified the composition of the system, Table S1 and Figure 3B. The concentrations of the constituents in CDN X are 0.4–0.5 μM. To reach such concentrations, the concentration of T1 has to be ca. 1.8 μM. The initiator T1 concentration was, however, only 0.4 μM. Thus, there must be a source to generate T1, consistent with the reproduction principle where BA′ in CDN X cleaves H1 to generate fragment T1 for replicating CDN X. These results demonstrate that T1 is replicated ca. 4.5 times during this process. Control experiments reveal that exclusion of H2/H3 from the library evolves CDN X only (Figure S4), and exclusion of H1/H2/H3 prohibits the reproduction of all CDNs (Figure S5). These results demonstrate the T1-initiated replication of CDN X and CDN X-induced reproduction of two other CDNs (variation). Furthermore, we probed the kinetics of the emergence of the CDNs by following the time-dependent concentration changes of AA′ (of CDN X), CC′ (of CDN Y), and EE′ (of CDN Z), Figure S6. The emergence process, using initiator T1 at 0.4 μM, reached saturation after ca. 12 h. This process is, however, affected by the concentration of T1. Decreasing it to 0.2 μM decelerates the reproduction of CDN X, reaching the same saturation after ca. 24 h, Figure S7. In view of the complexity of the number of constituents and the limited number of fluorophore/quencher pairs, we adopted a sequential set of sample measurements to characterize the contents of the constituents in CDNs. For a detailed procedure, see Supporting Information and Figure S8.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

(A) Time-dependent fluorescence changes generated by the DNAzyme reporters and (B) quantified concentrations of the constituents: (i) after the incubation of the library for 24 h, in the absence of initiator T1; (ii) after subjecting the library to T1 and allowing it to incubate for 24 h.

The selection principle within the evolved CDNs, X, Y, and Z, is demonstrated in Figures 4, S9, and S10. Figure 4A shows the catalytic activities of the CDN constituents before (curves i) and after subjecting the CDN mixture to the counter trigger T2′ (curves ii), and subsequently to T3′ (curves iii). After subjecting the CDN mixture to T2′, the fluorescence signals of CDN Y are almost depleted, while those of CDNs X and Z are unchanged. Applying T3′ on the surviving CDNs X and Z depletes the fluorescence signals of CDN Z, while those of CDN X are still unchanged. By using the calibration curves (Figures S1–S3), these signals were translated into the constituent concentrations, Table S1 and Figure 4B. These results demonstrate the triggered sequential selection of the evolved CDNs, where CDNs X and Z are selected by T2′, followed by T3′-guided selection of CDN X from the surviving CDNs X and Z. Similarly, treatment of the CDN mixture with T1′/T3′ or T1′/T2′ selects CDN Y or Z, Figures S9 and S10 and Table S1. The results demonstrate the trigger-guided selection of any desired CDN from the diversified CDNs. It should be noted that under the experimental conditions, the evolved CDNs consumed the respective components and hairpins comprising the library. Nonetheless, further reproduction of the selected CDNs is possible by readding a supply of the respective components and hairpins.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

(A) Catalytic activities of the DNAzyme reporters and (B) quantified contents of the constituents in (i) the evolved CDNs X, Y, and Z; (ii) T2′-selected CDNs Y and Z from the CDN mixture; (iii) T3′-selected CDN X from the surviving CDNs X and Z.

In the next step, we applied the evolutionary networks for the guided control over emerging catalytic functions of the system, Figures 5 and S11. Toward this goal, we introduced into the library yielding the reproduction/variation/selection processes six additional hairpins, Hj–Ho, as substrates for the DNAzyme reporters in the constituents, and a bis-hairpin P. AB′ and BA′ in CDN X select and cleave Hj and Hk, respectively. The resulting fragmented strands Hj-1 and Hk-2 self-assemble, in the presence of hemin, into a K+-ion-stabilized hemin/G-quadruplex, DNAzyme 1, catalyzing the oxidation of Amplex Red to fluorescent Resorufin by H2O2. CC′ and DD′ in CDN Y cleave Hl and Hm to yield fragments Hl-1 and Hm-2. They interact with P to self-assemble into a Pb2+-ion-dependent DNAzyme, DNAzyme 2, cleaving fluorophore/quencher-functionalized substrate S1 to yield the fluorescence output signal. In addition, cleavage of Hn and Ho by EF′ and FE′ in CDN Z yields fragments Hn-1 and Ho-2, assembling into a Mg2+-ion-dependent DNAzyme, DNAzyme 3, which cleaves fluorophore/quencher-modified substrate S2 to provide the readout signal. That is, while all DNAzymes should be active in the diversified CDN mixture, the selection of targeted CDNs by T1′, T2′, and/or T3′ is anticipated to select the specific catalytic functions guided by the surviving networks. Figure 5B, curves (i), show the output signals of all DNAzymes in the diversified CDNs X, Y, and Z. The T2′/T3′-induced selection of CDN X from the CDN mixture selects DNAzyme 1, while it switches-off DNAzymes 2 and 3, curves (ii). Similarly, the selection of CDN Y or Z by using T1′/T3′ or T1′/T2′ results in the survival of DNAzyme 2, curves (iii), or DNAzyme 3, curves (iv). For further support of the formation of the structures of DNAzymes 13 by gel electrophoresis experiments, see Figures S12–S14 and the accompanying discussion.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

(A) Emerging catalytic functions dictated by the evolutionary CDNs. Upon subjecting the diversified and selected CDNs to the hairpin pool, each CDN selects and cleaves the respective hairpins to generate a catalytic DNAzyme. (B) Catalytic activities of emerging DNAzymes 1, 2, and 3 in (i) the evolved CDNs X, Y, and Z; (ii) T2′/T3′-selected CDN X; (iii) T1′/T3′-selected CDN Y; (iv) T1′/T2′-selected CDN Z.

In conclusion, the study has introduced the amplified emergent evolution of dynamic gene networks revealing reproduction/variation/selection principles and the ability to guide functionalities of the evolved networks. These principles were demonstrated by introducing a functional nucleic-acid library for the formation and replication of an initial network, diversification of networks guided by the initially evolved network, and selective selection of any desired networks from the evolved mixture. The success to duplicate these principles by the nucleic-acid library originates from the rich “tool-box” of information-encoded nucleic acids, e.g., programmed stabilities of constituents, and integration of cleavable hairpins and catalytic nucleic acids to dictate the reproduction/variation processes. Needless to state, the present library leading to the emergence of three networks included a limited number of components and hairpins, yet increasing the number of components and hairpins in the library is anticipated to yield diversified networks of higher complexity. In addition, the flexibility of reversible switching motives of nucleic acids may lead to versatile means to design evolutionary network platforms. Furthermore, the diversified and selective emerging functions dictated by the evolved networks were demonstrated, accompanied by the generation of “unused” strands. These waste strands may be used with other strands in the library as inputs for the operation of catalytic cascaded “gates”, leading to evolutionary networks of enhanced complexities.27

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the Israel Science Foundation and by the Minerva Center for Biohybrid Complex Systems.

Supporting Information Available

The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/jacs.0c05669.

  • Materials, measurements, methods, calibration curves, kinetic profiles of the production/variation events, gel electrophoresis results, and additional results (PDF)

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Supplementary Material

ja0c05669_si_001.pdf (1.1MB, pdf)

References

  1. a Cong L.; Ran F. A.; Cox D.; Lin S.; Barretto R.; Habib N.; Hsu P. D.; Wu X.; Jiang W.; Marraffini L. A.; Zhang F. Multiplex genome engineering using CRISPR/Cas systems. Science 2013, 339, 819. 10.1126/science.1231143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Doudna J. A.; Charpentier E. The new frontier of genome engineering with CRISPR-Cas9. Science 2014, 346, 1258096. 10.1126/science.1258096. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c Wright A. V.; Nuñez J. K.; Doudna J. A. Biology and applications of CRISPR systems: harnessing nature’s toolbox for genome engineering. Cell 2016, 164, 29. 10.1016/j.cell.2015.12.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d Halperin S. O.; Tou C. J.; Wong E. B.; Modavi C.; Schaffer D. V.; Dueber J. E. CRISPR-guided DNA polymerases enable diversification of all nucleotides in a tunable window. Nature 2018, 560, 248. 10.1038/s41586-018-0384-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Cadwell R. C.; Joyce G. F. Randomization of genes by PCR mutagenesis. Genome Res. 1992, 2, 28. 10.1101/gr.2.1.28. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. a Ghadessy F. J.; Ong J. L.; Holliger P. Directed evolution of polymerase function by compartmentalized self-replication. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2001, 98, 4552. 10.1073/pnas.071052198. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Williams R.; Peisajovich S. G.; Miller O. J.; Magdassi S.; Tawfik D. S.; Griffiths A. D. Amplifcation of complex gene libraries by emulsion PCR. Nat. Methods 2006, 3, 545. 10.1038/nmeth896. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c Ellefson J. W.; Ellefson J. W.; Meyer A. J.; Hughes R. A.; Cannon J. R.; Brodbelt J. S.; Ellington A. D. Directed evolution of genetic parts and circuits by compartmentalized partnered replication. Nat. Biotechnol. 2014, 32, 97. 10.1038/nbt.2714. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. a Wilson D. S.; Szostak J. W. In vitro selection of functional nucleic acids. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 1999, 68, 611. 10.1146/annurev.biochem.68.1.611. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Bloom J. D.; Meyer M. M.; Meinhold P.; Otey C. R.; MacMillan D.; Arnold F. H. Evolving strategies for enzyme engineering. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2005, 15, 447. 10.1016/j.sbi.2005.06.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Simon A. J.; d’Oelsnitz S.; Ellington A. D. Synthetic evolution. Nat. Biotechnol. 2019, 37, 730. 10.1038/s41587-019-0157-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. a Gu X.; Zhang Z.; Huang W. Rapid evolution of expression and regulatory divergences after yeast gene duplication. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2005, 102, 707. 10.1073/pnas.0409186102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Thompson D. A.; Roy S.; Chan M.; Styczynski M. P.; Pfiffner J.; French C.; Socha A.; Thielke A.; Napolitano S.; Muller P.; Kellis M.; Konieczka J. H.; Wapinski I.; Regev A. Evolutionary principles of modular gene regulation in yeasts. eLife 2013, 2, e00603 10.7554/eLife.00603. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c Weirauch M. T.; Yang A.; Albu M.; Cote A. G.; Montenegro-Montero A.; Drewe P.; Najafabadi H. S.; Lambert S. A.; Mann I.; Cook K.; Zheng H.; Goity A.; van Bakel H.; Lozano J.-C.; Galli M.; Lewsey M. G.; Huang E.; Mukherjee T.; Chen X.; ReeceHoyes J. S.; Govindarajan S.; Shaulsky G.; Walhout A. J. M.; Bouget F.-Y.; Ratsch G.; Larrondo L. F.; Ecker J. R.; Hughes T. R. Determination and inference of eukaryotic transcription factor sequence specificity. Cell 2014, 158, 1431. 10.1016/j.cell.2014.08.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. a Jaenisch R.; Bird A. Epigenetic regulation of gene expression: how the genome integrates intrinsic and environmental signals. Nat. Genet. 2003, 33, 245. 10.1038/ng1089. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Barabasi A. L.; Oltvai Z. N. Network biology: understanding the cell’s functional organization. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2004, 5, 101. 10.1038/nrg1272. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c Babu M. M.; Luscombe N. M.; Aravind L.; Gerstein M.; Teichmann S. A. Structure and evolution of transcriptional regulatory networks. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2004, 14, 283. 10.1016/j.sbi.2004.05.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d Prud’Qhomme B.; Gompel N.; Carroll S. B. Emerging principles of regulatory evolution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2007, 104, 8605. 10.1073/pnas.0700488104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; e Vogel C.; Marcotte E. M. Insights into the regulation of protein abundance from proteomic and transcriptomic analyses. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2012, 13, 227. 10.1038/nrg3185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. a Lee T. I.; Rinaldi N. J.; Robert F.; Odom D. T.; Bar-Joseph Z.; Gerber G. K.; Hannett N. M.; Harbison C. T.; Thompson C. M.; Simon I.; Zeitlinger J.; Jennings E. G.; Murray H. L.; Gordon D. B.; Ren B.; Wyrick J. J.; Tagne J.-B.; Volkert T. L.; Fraenkel E.; Gifford D. K.; Young R. A. Transcriptional regulatory networks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Science 2002, 298, 799. 10.1126/science.1075090. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Teichmann S. A.; Babu M. M. Gene regulatory network growth by duplication. Nat. Genet. 2004, 36, 492. 10.1038/ng1340. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c Voordeckers K.; Pougach K.; Verstrepen K. J. How do regulatory networks evolve and expand throughout evolution?. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2015, 34, 180. 10.1016/j.copbio.2015.02.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Wang S.; Yue L.; Shpilt Z.; Cecconello A.; Kahn J. S.; Lehn J.-M.; Willner I. Controlling the catalytic functions of DNAzymes within constitutional dynamic networks of DNA nanostructures. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 9662. 10.1021/jacs.7b04531. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Yue L.; Wang S.; Cecconello A.; Lehn J.-M.; Willner I. Orthogonal operation of constitutional dynamic networks consisting of DNA-tweezer machines. ACS Nano 2017, 11, 12027. 10.1021/acsnano.7b04557. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Yue L.; Wang S.; Willner I. Triggered reversible substitution of adaptive constitutional dynamic networks dictates programmed catalytic functions. Sci. Adv. 2019, 5, eaav5564 10.1126/sciadv.aav5564. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Wang S.; Yue L.; Li Z.-Y.; Zhang J.; Tian H.; Willner I. Light-induced reversible reconfiguration of DNA-based constitutional dynamic networks: application to switchable catalysis. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 8105. 10.1002/anie.201803371. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Yue L.; Wang S.; Wulf V.; Lilienthal S.; Remacle F.; Levine R. D.; Willner I. Consecutive feedback-driven constitutional dynamic networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2019, 116, 2843. 10.1073/pnas.1816670116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Yue L.; Wang S.; Lilienthal S.; Wulf V.; Remacle F.; Levine R. D.; Willner I. Intercommunication of DNA-based constitutional dynamic networks. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 8721. 10.1021/jacs.8b03450. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Zhou Z.; Yue L.; Wang S.; Lehn J.-M.; Willner I. DNA-based multiconstituent dynamic networks: hierarchical adaptive control over the composition and cooperative catalytic functions of the systems. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 12077. 10.1021/jacs.8b06546. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. a Darwin C.; Wallace A. On the tendency of species to form varieties; and on the perpetuation of varieties and species by natural means of selection. Proc. Linn. Soc. London 1858, 3, 45. 10.1111/j.1096-3642.1858.tb02500.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; b Berg J. M.; Tymoczko J. L.; Stryer L.. Biochemistry, 5th ed.; W. H. Freeman and Company: New York, 2002; Section 2.2. [Google Scholar]; c Saladino R.; Šponer J. E.; Šponer J.; Costanzo G.; Pino S.; Mauro E. D. Chemomimesis and molecular darwinism in action: from abiotic generation of nucleobases to nucleosides and RNA. Life 2018, 8, 24. 10.3390/life8020024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d Danger G.; d’Hendecourt L. L. S.; Pascal R. On the conditions for mimicking natural selection in chemical systems. Nat. Rev. Chem. 2020, 4, 102. 10.1038/s41570-019-0155-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. a Osborne S. E.; Matsumura I.; Ellington A. D. Aptamers as therapeutic and diagnostic reagents: problems and prospects. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 1997, 1, 5. 10.1016/S1367-5931(97)80102-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Willner I.; Zayats M. Electronic aptamer-based sensors. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 6408. 10.1002/anie.200604524. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c Goulko A. A.; Li F.; Le X. C. Bioanalytical applications of aptamer and molecular-beacon probes in fluorescence-affinity assays. TrAC, Trends Anal. Chem. 2009, 28, 878. 10.1016/j.trac.2009.03.014. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  18. a Felletti M.; Hartig J. S. Ligand-dependent ribozymes. WIREs RNA 2017, 8, e1395 10.1002/wrna.1395. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Park S. V.; Yang J.-S.; Jo H.; Kang B.; Oh S. S.; Jung G. Y. Catalytic RNA, ribozyme, and its applications in synthetic biology. Biotechnol. Adv. 2019, 37, 107452. 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2019.107452. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. a Breaker R. R.; Joyce G. F. A DNA enzyme that cleaves RNA. Chem. Biol. 1994, 1, 223. 10.1016/1074-5521(94)90014-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Joyce G. F. Directed evolution of nucleic acid enzymes. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2004, 73, 791. 10.1146/annurev.biochem.73.011303.073717. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. a Yurke B.; Mills A. P. Using DNA to power nanostructures. Genet. Program. Evol. M. 2003, 4, 111. 10.1023/A:1023928811651. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; b Soloveichik D.; Seelig G.; Winfree E. DNA as a universal substrate for chemical kinetics. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2010, 107, 5393. 10.1073/pnas.0909380107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c Zhang D. Y.; Seelig G. Dynamic DNA nanotechnology using strand-displacement reactions. Nat. Chem. 2011, 3, 103. 10.1038/nchem.957. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. a Wilson D. S.; Szostak J. K. In vitro selection of functional nucleic acids. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 1999, 68, 611. 10.1146/annurev.biochem.68.1.611. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Keefe A. D.; Pai S.; Ellington A. Aptamers as therapeutics. Nat. Rev. Drug Discovery 2010, 9, 537. 10.1038/nrd3141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. a Seeman N. C. DNA nanotechnology: novel DNA constructions. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 1998, 27, 225. 10.1146/annurev.biophys.27.1.225. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Seeman N. C. An overview of structural DNA nanotechnology. Mol. Biotechnol. 2007, 37, 246. 10.1007/s12033-007-0059-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c Aldaye F. A.; Palmer A. L.; Sleiman H. F. Assembling materials with DNA as the guide. Science 2008, 321, 1795. 10.1126/science.1154533. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d Lu C.-H.; Willner B.; Willner I. DNA nanotechnology: from sensing and DNA machines to drug-delivery systems. ACS Nano 2013, 7, 8320. 10.1021/nn404613v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Yue L.; Wulf V.; Wang S.; Willner I. Evolution of nucleic-acid-based constitutional dynamic networks revealing adaptive and emergent functions. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2019, 58, 12238. 10.1002/anie.201905235. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. a Kolpashchikov D. M. A binary deoxyribozyme for nucleic acid analysis. ChemBioChem 2007, 8, 2039. 10.1002/cbic.200700384. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Elbaz J.; Lioubashevski O.; Wang F.; Remacle F.; Levine R. D.; Willner I. DNA computing circuits using libraries of DNAzyme subunits. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2010, 5, 417. 10.1038/nnano.2010.88. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. a Idili A.; Vallée-Bélisle A.; Ricci F. Programmable pH-triggered DNA nanoswitches. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 5836. 10.1021/ja500619w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Hu Y.; Cecconello A.; Idili A.; Ricci F.; Willner I. Triplex DNA nanostructures: from basic properties to applications. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 15210. 10.1002/anie.201701868. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Simmel F. C.; Yurke B.; Singh H. R. Principles and applications of nucleic acid strand displacement reactions. Chem. Rev. 2019, 119, 6326. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00580. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Wilner O. I.; Weizmann Y.; Gill R.; Lioubashevski O.; Freeman R.; Willner I. Enzyme cascades activated on topologically programmed DNA scaffolds. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2009, 4, 249. 10.1038/nnano.2009.50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

ja0c05669_si_001.pdf (1.1MB, pdf)

Articles from Journal of the American Chemical Society are provided here courtesy of American Chemical Society

RESOURCES