Skip to main content
PLOS Genetics logoLink to PLOS Genetics
. 2020 Sep 8;16(9):e1009008. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1009008

Male-biased aganglionic megacolon in the TashT mouse model of Hirschsprung disease involves upregulation of p53 protein activity and Ddx3y gene expression

Tatiana Cardinal 1,2, Karl-Frédérik Bergeron 2,3, Rodolphe Soret 1,2, Ouliana Souchkova 1,2, Christophe Faure 2,4,5, Amélina Guillon 1, Nicolas Pilon 1,2,4,*
Editor: Michelle Southard-Smith6
PMCID: PMC7500598  PMID: 32898154

Abstract

Hirschsprung disease (HSCR) is a complex genetic disorder of neural crest development resulting in incomplete formation of the enteric nervous system (ENS). This life-threatening neurocristopathy affects 1/5000 live births, with a currently unexplained male-biased ratio. To address this lack of knowledge, we took advantage of the TashT mutant mouse line, which is the only HSCR model to display a robust male bias. Our prior work revealed that the TashT insertional mutation perturbs a Chr.10 silencer-enriched non-coding region, leading to transcriptional dysregulation of hundreds of genes in neural crest-derived ENS progenitors of both sexes. Here, through sex-stratified transcriptome analyses and targeted overexpression in ENS progenitors, we show that male-biased ENS malformation in TashT embryos is not due to upregulation of Sry–the murine ortholog of a candidate gene for the HSCR male bias in humans–but instead involves upregulation of another Y-linked gene, Ddx3y. This discovery might be clinically relevant since we further found that the DDX3Y protein is also expressed in the ENS of a subset of male HSCR patients. Mechanistically, other data including chromosome conformation captured-based assays and CRISPR/Cas9-mediated deletions suggest that Ddx3y upregulation in male TashT ENS progenitors is due to increased transactivation by p53, which appears especially active in these cells yet without triggering apoptosis. Accordingly, in utero treatment of TashT embryos with the p53 inhibitor pifithrin-α decreased Ddx3y expression and abolished the otherwise more severe ENS defect in TashT males. Our data thus highlight novel pathogenic roles for p53 and DDX3Y during ENS formation in mice, a finding that might help to explain the intriguing male bias of HSCR in humans.

Author summary

Hirschsprung disease (HSCR) is a life-threatening birth defect characterized by the lack of enteric neurons in the colon. HSCR is due to many gene defects, which are only partially understood. In particular, the reason why more boys than girls are affected by this condition is currently unknown. Yet, a better understanding of HSCR at the genetic/molecular level would help to develop more efficient therapies compared to current surgical approaches. Here, we identified a potential molecular cascade involving sequential upregulation of p53 and DDX3Y that, when inhibited, can eliminate the male bias in a HSCR mouse model. We found DDX3Y to be also specifically expressed in enteric neurons of a subset of male HSCR patients, suggesting that manipulation of the putative p53-DDX3Y pathway might eventually have therapeutic value in humans as well.

Introduction

Hirschsprung disease (HSCR), also known as aganglionic megacolon, is a severe male-biased congenital malformation where ganglia of the enteric nervous system (ENS) are missing from the rectum and over a variable length of the distal bowel [1, 2]. As the ENS normally controls patterns of smooth muscle contraction/relaxation along the entire gastrointestinal tract, the lack of ENS ganglia (aganglionosis) in the rectum and distal colon leads to functional obstruction and massive accumulation of fecal material in the proximal colon (megacolon). If left untreated, HSCR is lethal mostly because affected children eventually develop enterocolitis and sepsis [2]. Current treatment of HSCR is surgical removal of the distal aganglionic segment followed by anastomosis between a proximal region with ENS ganglia and the anal verge. Although this approach is usually life saving, there is a great need for alternative treatments since many of these children continue to have severe problems after surgery [3]. This calls for a better understanding of the pathogenic mechanisms underlying HSCR, which are not fully defined. The male bias of HSCR is especially poorly understood.

HSCR occurs because of incomplete colonization of the developing intestines by ENS progenitors–hereinafter named enteric neural crest cells (ENCCs) [46]. The vast majority of these progenitors are derived from neural crest cells of vagal origin [7, 8], with minor contingents also provided by neural crest cells of sacral origin [9] and by neural crest-derived Schwann cell precursors from extrinsic nerves [10]. In the mouse, ENCCs of vagal origin initially colonize the foregut around embryonic day (e) 9.5 and then migrate in the anteroposterior direction to reach the anal region by e14.5. From this stage onward, ENCCs of sacral and Schwann cell origin also enter the hindgut, but they cannot compensate for a lack of ENCCs of vagal origin [11]. For this reason, anything that perturbs colonization of the bowel by ENCCs of vagal origin results in aganglionosis over a varying length of the colon. Yet, for most HSCR patients, aganglionosis is restricted to the rectosigmoid colon [2]. This so-called short-segment form is also where the sex bias is more clearly observed, being about four times more common in boys than in girls [1].

The genetics of HSCR is complex, and far from being well understood. Numerous genes have been described to be involved, and most recent studies suggest that different combinations of rare and common variants in these genes are needed for the disease to occur [1215]. Among this constantly expanding set of genes, those that code for members of GDNF/RET and EDN3/EDNRB signaling pathways have caught attention the most. However, mutations in these genes or in any other previously reported HSCR-associated genes cannot currently explain the strong male sex bias observed in the clinic. Accordingly, this male sex bias has been historically poorly replicated in animal models. A weak male bias has only occasionally been detected in single and double mutant rodents bearing hypomorphic and/or dominant negative alleles of Ret and Ednrb [1620]. In these models, the male bias affects extent of aganglionosis and rarely impacts megacolon expressivity, with the exception of a modest male to female ratio of about 1.5:1 in short-segment aganglionosis [17, 18]. A potential mechanism underlying these observations in rodents could be that the EDNRB pathway is by default slightly less active in the developing male bowel because of reduced expression of both Edn3 and Ece1 genes [20].

Other mechanisms that might explain the male bias of HSCR include downregulation of an X-linked gene or upregulation of a Y-linked gene [4]. For instance, a subset of patients suffering from CRASH syndrome-associated loss-of-function mutations of the X-linked gene L1CAM are known to also display HSCR [2123]. However, the estimated incidence of HSCR among those patients is very low (~3%) and, in mouse models, L1cam has been shown to act as a modifier gene for aganglionosis-causing mutations of Sox10 but not for mutations of the major HSCR-associated genes Ret and Gdnf [24]. More recently, the Y-linked gene SRY also emerged as a possible candidate. Although this gene is best known as the key genetic switch for sex determination in the mammalian genital ridge [25], it is also believed to be involved in the etiology of diverse male-biased neurological disorders such as Parkinson’s disease and autism [26, 27]. In the context of HSCR, the regulatory sequences of human and pig SRY can drive reporter gene expression in the murine neural crest lineage [28, 29], and the SRY protein has been reported to be specifically expressed in the postnatal ENS from the proximal colon of a subset of male HSCR patients [30]. In vitro studies further revealed that human SRY can repress the RET promoter by preventing the formation of a SOX10-containing transcriptional complex [30]. However, transcriptome analyses of wild-type murine ENCCs show a complete absence of endogenous Sry expression [29, 31, 32]. Whether Sry/SRY expression may be upregulated in the developing ENS under certain circumstances, and whether such upregulation may play a causative pathological role in vivo both remain unanswered questions.

The TashT insertional mutant mouse line is a reliable model of short-segment HSCR that faithfully replicates key hallmarks of the human disease, such as partial penetrance of the megacolon phenotype [1, 29] and presence of an abnormal ENS (i.e., reduced neuronal density and increased proportion of nitrergic neurons) upstream of the aganglionic segment [33, 34]. Similar ENS defects are also observed in other models of short-segment HSCR like Ednrb-null and Holstein (a model for Trisomy 21 [Collagen VI]-associated HSCR) mouse lines [32, 35], and all three models show a similar dysbiotic gut microbiome profile mainly characterized by a robust increase of Proteobacteria at the expense of Firmicutes [3638]. Yet, the TashT line is the only model that displays a robust male bias, not only for extent of colonic aganglionosis but also for megacolon expressivity [29, 34, 37]. Aganglionosis occurs in homozygous TashTTg/Tg animals of both sexes due to slower migration of ENCCs [29]. This defect is slightly exaggerated in males, eventually culminating in a sex-associated difference of about 10–15% in length of ENS-covered colon that is clearly visible at birth [29]. In the end, megacolon is frequently observed in TashTTg/Tg males and rarely observed in TashTTg/Tg females, because more males than females fail to reach a threshold level of minimal intrinsic innervation of the colon, which is estimated to be around 80% of total colon length in the FVB/N genetic background [29, 37].

The TashT line has been obtained through an insertional mutagenesis screen for new genes important for neural crest development [39]. The TashT transgene insertion site is located in the vicinity of a block of three conserved silencer elements within the Hace1-Grik2 intergenic region on chromosome 10, resulting in massive dysregulation of the ENCC transcriptome [29]. More specifically, the mutagenic TashT insertion was found to disrupt a far-cis chromatin interaction normally occurring between this silencer-enriched region and Fam162b located at 3.6Mb away, presumably explaining why this poorly characterized gene is upregulated in TashTTg/Tg ENCCs [29]. However, neural crest-specific overexpression of Fam162b via transient transgenesis only had a modest negative impact on extent of ENCC colonization in the distal colon [29], suggesting that other gene(s) might also be primary target(s) of the TashT insertional mutation, and might thus also contribute to the TashTTg/Tg phenotype.

Here, we further analyzed TashTTg/Tg ENCCs as a function of animal sex, with the main goal of identifying the molecular cause of the TashT male bias. Mainly based on unbiased high-throughput approaches and new genetically-modified mouse models, this work led to the identification of the Y-linked gene Ddx3y as the likely causal gene of the TashT male bias. This work further suggests that sequential upregulation of p53 protein activity and Ddx3y gene expression is a reversible pathogenic mechanism in the TashT ENS, and correlative expression data show that such mechanism might also potentially be at work in human HSCR.

Results

Ddx3y is a prime candidate for explaining the male bias of aganglionic megacolon occurrence in TashT mice

To identify the molecular cause for the male bias in TashTTg/Tg animals, we first analyzed global gene expression in TashTTg/Tg ENCCs as a function of sex. As per our prior work [29], TashTTg/Tg ENCCs were recovered from e12.5 stomachs and small intestines by FACS (fluorescence-activated cell sorting) owing to the presence of a SRY promoter-driven fluorescent reporter (pSRYp[1.6kb]-YFP) that specifically labels neural crest derivatives [28]. Prior to cell sorting, embryos were sexed by visual inspection of the dimorphic developing gonads, which are easy to distinguish at e12.5 thanks to the presence of testis-specific features such as the coelomic vessel and testis cords. Pools of sexed ENCC samples were then processed for rRNA-depleted RNA-seq, and sequencing results were analyzed to detect differentially-expressed genes. Very interestingly, comparison of this novel [Male]TashTTg/Tg-vs-[Female]TashTTg/Tg dataset (8 genes differently expressed >1.5-fold at P≤0.05) with our previously described [29] unsexed TashTTg/Tg-vs-Control dataset (2075 genes differently expressed >1.5-fold at P≤0.05) identified the Y-linked Ddx3y as the only gene significantly dysregulated in both analyses (Fig 1A and 1B and S1 and S2 Datasets). This DEAD-box RNA helicase coding gene is upregulated in male TashTTg/Tg ENCCs, and together with three neighbour genes from the short arm of the Y chromosome (Kdm5d, Eif2s3y, and Uty) define the Y-linked gene expression signature of ENCCs [29]. Once again, Sry expression was not detected in this transcriptome analysis (S1 Dataset). We also noted apparently robust basal expression of Ddx3y, Eif2s3y, Uty and Kdm5d in the female TashTTg/Tg dataset (Fig 1B), most likely due to erroneous mapping of sequencing reads from their highly similar X-linked homologs (Ddx3x, Kdm5c, Eif2s3x and Utx). RT-qPCR validation of RNA-seq data in male e12.5 ENCCs recovered by FACS was thus performed using primer pairs specific to Y-linked homologs, which confirmed that Ddx3y, but not its neighbours Uty and Eif2s3y, is specifically upregulated in male TashTTg/Tg ENCCs in comparison to Gata4p-GFP control ENCCs [29, 40] of the same sex (Fig 1C and 1D). Although a fully sex-stratified RNA-seq approach (i.e., comparing TashTTg/Tg males and females to control males and females, respectively) might potentially have identified additional genes, all of the above gene expression data strongly suggest that specific upregulation of Ddx3y in male TashTTg/Tg ENCCs might contribute to the male bias in extent of aganglionosis, and megacolon expressivity subsequently observed in postnatal animals.

Fig 1. Ddx3y upregulation plays a role for the male bias of the TashT megacolon phenotype.

Fig 1

(A) Venn diagram highlighting that Ddx3y is the only gene dysregulated in both unsexed TashTTg/Tg-vs-Control (S1 Dataset) and [Male]TashTTg/Tg-vs-[Female]TashTTg/Tg (S2 Dataset) RNA-seq datasets, which were generated from FACS-recovered e12.5 ENCCs (>1.5-fold change; P≤0.05; minimum of 250 reads in at least one condition). (B) List of the 8 dysregulated genes from the [Male]TashTTg/Tg-vs-[Female]TashTTg/Tg dataset, with Ddx3y framed in red. (C) Psmd2-normalized RT-qPCR expression analysis of Ddx3y and its neighbour genes Eif2s3y and Uty in male e12.5 ENCCs recovered by FACS, showing specific upregulation of Ddx3y in male TashTTg/Tg cells compared to male Gata4p-GFP control cells. (D) Schematic view of the Ddx3y locus and its neighbour genes on the short arm of the murine Y chromosome (adapted from the UCSC genome browser; genome.ucsc.edu). (E-H) Sex-stratified quantitative analysis of the length of ENS-covered colon (in % of total colon length) in P18-P50 TashTTg/+ and TashTTg/Tg mice bearing or not a MycDdx3y transgenic allele (E-F) or a MycSry transgenic allele (G-H). The dashed lines show the previously described threshold level interval above which megacolon is less likely to occur in FVB/N mice [29]. Results shown in panel E are also independently displayed for each line in S1E Fig. Representative images of colon tissues stained for AChE activity are shown in S4 and S5 Figs. (* P≤0.05; Student’s t-test).

Overexpression of Ddx3y, but not Sry, plays a pathogenic role in male TashTTg/Tg ENCCs

To assess a potential pathogenic role for Ddx3y overexpression in ENCCs, we generated transgenic mice in which a Myc-tagged version of DDX3Y is expressed as part of a bicistronic construct also allowing expression of eGFP (enhanced green fluorescent protein). To direct expression of this MycDdx3y-IRES-eGFP cassette in ENCCs, we constructed a novel synthetic promoter consisting of fused Sox10 [41] and Ednrb [42] neural crest enhancers upstream of the Hsp68 minimal promoter [43]. Having previously used a similar Sox10-U3 enhancer-based system but with mitigated success [29, 31], we reasoned that adding the ENCC-specific Ednrb enhancer would increase expression levels and specificity (S1A and S1B Fig). Activity of this novel synthetic promoter and expression of the MycDdx3y-IRES-eGFP cassette were tested in neural crest-derived Neuro2a cells, which confirmed proper cytoplasmic enrichment of MycDDX3Y protein [44] and co-expression with eGFP (S1C Fig). Through standard transgenesis, three founder animals were then obtained and used to generate independent lines. For each line, intestines from e10.5–12.5 transgenic embryos were first screened for eGFP fluorescence, which was undetectable in all cases. Expression of the MycDdx3y-IRES-eGFP transgene in e12.5 ENCCs was nonetheless confirmed for all three lines via RT-qPCR, which further revealed variable levels of expression in each line (S1D Fig). Moreover, we confirmed expression of MycDDX3Y protein via anti-Myc tag immunofluorescence staining of freshly dissociated e12.5 intestines (see results for line #3 in S2 Fig). For each line, both heterozygous (MycDdx3yTg/+) and homozygous (MycDdx3yTg/Tg) transgenic animals were viable and fertile, without any sign of megacolon in rodents (e.g., hunched posture, lethargy, distended abdomen). Accordingly, staining of acetylcholinesterase (AChE) activity in the myenteric plexus revealed an overtly normal ENS structure in each line, regardless of animal sex (S3 Fig). However, in a TashTTg/Tg sensitized background, heterozygous presence of the MycDdx3y-IRES-eGFP transgene from any of the transgenic lines increased megacolon incidence in P18-P50 males (Fig 1E and S1E Fig). The proportion of affected animals reached 37.5% (3/8) for line#1, 75% (6/8) for line #2, and 60% (3/5) for line #3, collectively resulting in a 2.5-fold increase in megacolon incidence from 23% (3/13) of TashTTg/Tg males to 57% (12/21) of all male TashTTg/Tg;MycDdx3yTg/+ mice. This collective increase in megacolon incidence was associated with more extensive aganglionosis as assessed via staining of AChE activity in the myenteric plexus (Fig 1E). Each individual line showed an increase in the average extent of aganglionosis, although statistical significance was not reached for lines #1 and #3 most likely because of small sample size (S1E Fig). Nonetheless, extent of aganglionosis was in each case sufficient to markedly increase the proportion of animals not reaching the minimal length of intrinsic innervation necessary to avoid blockage (~80% in the FVB/N genetic background [29]; see dashed lines in Fig 1E and S1E Fig). Intriguingly, neither megacolon incidence nor extent of aganglionosis were affected by the presence of MycDDX3Y in female TashTTg/Tg animals (Fig 1F and S5 Fig).

Based on the results above, we reasoned that this approach would be ideal to also test the candidacy of Sry as another Y-linked gene potentially involved in the male bias of HSCR [30]. To address the lack of in vivo evidence about a causative pathogenic role for Sry in the developing ENS, we substituted MycDdx3y for MycSry in the bicistronic construct described above (S6A Fig) and tested the impact of its overexpression in the TashTTg/Tg sensitized background. As above, the MycSry-IRES-eGFP construct was first tested in Neuro2a cells, which confirmed proper nuclear localization of MycSRY protein [45] and co-expression with eGFP (S6B Fig). Standard transgenesis then yielded a single founder animal that was used to derive a stable line, in which we confirmed expression of the MycSry-IRES-eGFP cassette in the developing peripheral nervous system (including the ENS) by virtue of the presence of eGFP fluorescence in e11.5 embryos (S6C Fig). Again, neither MycSryTg/+ nor MycSryTg/Tg animals showed a megacolon phenotype. Furthermore, in contrast to our findings with the MycDdx3y-IRES-eGFP transgene, expression of the MycSry-IRES-eGFP construct in the TashTTg/Tg background had no impact on megacolon incidence, extent of aganglionosis or ENS patterning in P18-P50 mice, regardless of animal sex (Fig 1G and 1H and S3S5 Figs). This work thus suggests that MycSRY is unable to significantly affect murine ENS development in vivo, even when expressed in a sensitized genetic background and at higher levels than MycDDX3Y (based on detection of eGFP fluorescence, which further revealed extensive overlap with SOX10+ cells; S7 Fig). Another conclusion of these studies is that only a modest increase of DDX3Y amounts appears sufficient to impair male ENS development in a sensitized genetic background.

DDX3Y is expressed in human enteric neurons from a subset of male HSCR patients

To verify whether our findings in mice might be clinically relevant, we then evaluated whether the DDX3Y protein is expressed in colon tissues resected from human HSCR patients with short-segment aganglionosis. Although DDX3Y would be expected to have a pathogenic role before birth (i.e., during ENS formation), we reasoned that at least some residual expression might still be detectable in male HSCR tissues a few weeks/months after birth. DDX3Y expression was assessed by immunofluorescence in two distinct cohorts of HSCR patients, including one previously described [32]. A total of 16 tissues were analyzed (14 from boys and 2 from girls), focusing on the ENS-containing region in the intermediate zone just upstream of the aganglionic region, and using the pan-neuronal marker PGP9.5 to identify enteric neurons. As expected, DDX3Y was not detected in enteric neurons from female samples, which were used as negative controls (Fig 2 and Table 1). In marked contrast, variable levels of DDX3Y protein were detected in enteric neurons from half of male patients (Fig 2 and Table 1). Although a definitive answer about the exact proportion of male patients overexpressing DDX3Y would require an analysis of prenatal HSCR tissues (which is impracticable given that HSCR is diagnosed only after birth), these observations in postnatal tissues support the possibility that DDX3Y might play a pathogenic role in the male bias of human HSCR, as it does in the TashT mouse line.

Fig 2. The DDX3Y protein is present in enteric neurons from the intermediate zone in a subset of HSCR patients.

Fig 2

Representative confocal images of DDX3Y and PGP9.5 double immunofluorescence labeling of enteric neurons in sigmoid colon tissues resected from female (ID #H2) and male (ID #SJH2) HSCR patients. All displayed images represent a single focal plane and dashed outline marks area occupied by a single ganglion. Scale bar, 50μm.

Table 1. Overview of HSCR colon samples used for assessing DDX3Y expression.

Cohort ID Age at surgery (days) Sex DDX3Y expression
Soret et al. [32] H11 35 F -
H2 75 F -
H1 17 M -
H8 20 M +
H5 40 M -
H12 42 M -
H4 51 M +
H10 63 M -
H7 96 M +
H9 222 M +
H3 321 M -
H6 454 M -
Ste-Justine Hospital STH1 22 M +
STH2 36 M +
STH3 80 M -
STH4 349 M +

Ddx3y expression is not directly regulated by the Hace1-Grik2 silencer-enriched region in mice

Having discovered that Ddx3y upregulation is likely playing a role in the TashT megacolon male bias and that the corresponding protein might also potentially contribute to human HSCR, we next sought to determine the cause of this upregulation assuming that the TashT insertion site was somehow involved. This transgenic insertion is located within the Hace1-Grik2 intergenic region on chromosome 10, interfering with three conserved silencer elements [29]. As this silencer-enriched region can normally interact with remote genomic regions of chromosome 10 [29], we first hypothesized that they could also directly interact with the Ddx3y locus and thereby actively attenuate its expression during normal ENS formation in male embryos. A corollary of this hypothesis would be that the TashT transgenic insertion prevents this inter-chromosomic interaction, leading to relief of Ddx3y repression in male TashTTg/Tg ENCCs. To verify this possibility and potentially identify other relevant interactions with the Hace1-Grik2 silencer-enriched region, we turned to a circular chromatin conformation capture–high-throughput sequencing (4C-seq) approach [46]. PCR-based pilot assays were first performed in Neuro2a cells in order to test several potential bait sequences located within or around the silencer-enriched region (S8 Fig), from which we chose a 481bp region located between two silencer elements that fulfilled all selection criteria for 4C-seq [46]. To allow comparison with our prior RNA-seq data, the 4C-seq analysis was then performed on FACS-recovered e12.5 ENCCs pooled from either Gata4p-GFP control or TashTTg/Tg mutant embryos, again as a function of sex. Given that none of the dysregulated genes from TashTTg/Tg ENCCs is in the immediate vicinity of the Hace1-Grik2 intergenic region [29], analysis of captured sequences was focused on far-cis (>10kb) and trans interactions using a modified version of the W4Cseq pipeline [47]. This analysis did identify chromatin contacts between the Hace1-Grik2 silencer-enriched region and the Ddx3y locus (Fig 3A and S3 Dataset). However, such interactions appeared to be present in both Gata4p-GFP control and TashTTg/Tg ENCCs, irrespective of sex–most likely because of erroneous mapping of homologous sequences from the X chromosome as observed in sex-stratified RNA-seq data (Fig 1B). This result thus invalidated our primary hypothesis that Ddx3y upregulation in male TashTTg/Tg ENCCs could be caused by transgene insertion-mediated disruption of a direct functional interaction with the silencer-enriched region. Yet, many gains and losses of chromatin interactions were identified when comparing Gata4p-GFP control and TashTTg/Tg ENCCs as a function of sex (S4 Dataset), suggesting the possibility of an indirect regulatory mechanism.

Fig 3. Ddx3y expression is not directly regulated by the Hace1-Grik2 silencer-enriched region on mouse chromosome 10.

Fig 3

(A) Overview of sex-stratified 4C-seq analysis of far-cis (red) and trans (blue) interactions with the Chr.10 Hace1-Grik2 silencer-enriched region in e12.5 ENCCs, which were recovered by FACS from Gata4p-GFP control and TashTTg/Tg embryos. (B) Graphical view of part of the Hace1-Grik2 intergenic region showing the relative position of five evolutionary conserved elements (CE). Those that were previously shown to possess silencer activity [29] are highlighted in red. Genomic positions of the gRNAs used for CRISPR-mediated deletion of a 23kb fragment are indicated by dashed lines. Exact deletion size is indicated for each of the three founder animals that were used to derive independent mouse lines, which were named Hace1-Grik2ΔSER/ΔSER (ΔSER/ΔSER). Arrowheads (white, grey and black) indicate the position of PCR primers used for genotyping as shown in the lower left panel; the unmodified locus gives a 1000 bp band while the CRISPR-modified locus gives a 450 bp band. WT, wild type; Het, heterozygous; Ho, homozygous. (C) Representative images of control and ΔSER/ΔSER colon tissues stained for AChE activity. Higher magnification views are shown in S9A Fig. (for FVB/N wild-type controls, n = 7 males and 6 females; for ΔSER/ΔSER mutants, n = 16 males and 15 females). (D) Representative images of βIII-Tubulin immunofluorescence labeling of e12.5 ENCCs in intestines from unsexed WT and ΔSER/ΔSER embryos (n = 12 FVB/N controls and 13 ΔSER/ΔSER mutants). Quantitative analysis of extent of ENCC colonization is shown in S9B Fig. Dashed outlines delineate the cecum (ce) and colon (co). Scale bar, 1000 μm (C); 200 μm (D).

Deletion of the Hace1-Grik2 silencer-enriched region does not cause colonic aganglionosis in mice

Since our 4C-seq analysis identified many gains and losses of chromatin contacts with the Hace1-Grik2 silencer-enriched region, we surmised that the TashT transgene insertion event causing the megacolon phenotype interferes with normal chromatin interactions and/or triggers new ectopic interactions. To directly test if interaction losses contribute to the megacolon phenotype, we generated mice lacking a 23kb genomic fragment that spans the whole silencer-enriched region from the Hace1-Grik2 intergenic region (Fig 3B). Through CRISPR/Cas9 targeting, seven founder animals were obtained from which three were used to generate independent lines. In each case, mice homozygous for the deletion (Hace1-Grik2ΔSER/ΔSER) were viable and fertile. Hace1-Grik2ΔSER/ΔSER mice also displayed a normally formed ENS in both male and female animals, as assessed in adults via staining of AChE activity in the myenteric plexus (Fig 3C and S9A Fig) and in e12.5 embryos via βIII-Tubulin immunofluorescence staining of ENCCs (Fig 3D and S9B Fig). This negative result thus suggests that neither the TashT megacolon phenotype nor its male bias are caused by a transgenic insertion-induced loss of chromatin interaction. This further suggests that the TashT male-biased megacolon phenotype is instead due to a transgenic insertion-induced gain of chromatin interaction.

Ddx3y upregulation in male TashTTg/Tg ENCCs may be explained by a gain of interaction between the Hace1-Grik2 silencer-enriched region and the p53 phosphatase coding gene Dusp26

To explore the contribution of ectopic transgenic insertion-induced chromatin interactions to the male-biased TashT megacolon phenotype, we cross-compared our four 4C-seq datasets and focused our attention on 455 genes with which chromatin interaction gains were observed in male TashTTg/Tg ENCCs (Fig 4A). Further cross-comparison of this gene set (see tabs “Unique to M-TashT (317)” and “Common to M- & F-TashT (138)” in S4 Dataset) with our prior unsexed TashTTg/Tg-vs-Control RNA-seq dataset (S2 Dataset) identified 14 genes for which expression was downregulated in TashTTg/Tg ENCCs (Fig 4B and Table 2), as it would be expected from direct functional interaction with the Hace1-Grik2 silencer-enriched region. From these 14 genes, Dusp26 on chromosome 8 stood out as the best candidate (Fig 4C) based on its known phosphatase activity that inhibits p53 [4850] and the fact that p53 can activate the expression of DDX3X [51, 52], the X-linked homolog of DDX3Y. A direct interaction between the Dusp26 locus and the Hace1-Grik2 silencer-enriched region was independently validated to be TashT-specific using chromosome conformation capture (3C)-PCR assays, which further revealed that it can occur in both male and female TashTTg/Tg samples at e12.5 (Fig 4D).

Fig 4. Ddx3y upregulation may be explained by increased activity of p53 in TashTTg/Tg ENCCs.

Fig 4

(A) Venn diagram displaying all genes associated with the regions captured in the 4C-seq analysis (see Fig 3A). Shared and unique interactions are shown as a function of genotype (Gata4p-GFP control vs TashTTg/Tg) and sex (female vs male). The name of every involved gene is provided in S4 Dataset. (B) Venn diagram comparing the 1065 genes previously identified as being repressed in unsexed TashTTg/Tg ENCCs (S2 Dataset) with the 455 genes identified in the 4C-seq analysis as interacting with the Hace1-Grik2 silencer-enriched region in male TashTTg/Tg ENCCs (317 in males only, and 138 in males and females). The 14 genes common to both sets, including the p53 phosphatase-coding gene Dusp26, are listed in Table 2. (C) Genomic position of all sequences (small red boxes, named Site1 to 6) from the Dusp26 locus that were captured by 4C-seq (Diagram adapted from the UCSC genome browser; genome.ucsc.edu). The Site1-3 region (highlighted by a red dashed outline) was used as target sequence in the 3C-PCR experiment shown in D. (D) Representative 3C-PCR results showing inter-chromosomic interaction between the Hace1-Grik2 silencer-enriched region and the Dusp26 locus. 3C libraries (n = 3 for each condition) were made from whole e12.5 embryonic intestines dissected from sexed TashTTg/Tg embryos and unsexed Gata4p-GFP control embryos. Intra-chromosomic interaction at the Gapdh locus was used as library positive control, and non-crosslinked (-) cells were used as background control. (E) Representative confocal images of male e12.5 intestinal cells freshly dissociated from Gata4p-GFP control and TashTTg/Tg embryos, and immunolabeled for p53 (red). ENCCs are endogenously labeled with either GFP (in control) or YFP (in TashTTg/Tg), and those showing high levels of p53 are identified by white arrows. Scale bar, 20μm. (F) Sex-stratified quantitative analysis of ENCCs with high levels of p53 protein using images such as those displayed in E. The total number of counted cells is indicated in brackets. (G) RT-qPCR analysis of endogenous mRNA expression of Ddx3x, Ddx3y and p53 following siRNA-mediated p53 knockdown (relative to control siRNA) in P19, F9 and R1 embryonic cell lines. (H) ChIP-qPCR assays in R1 embryonic stem cells showing transfection stress-induced enrichment of p53 binding on Ddx3y, Ddx3x and Mdm2 promoters. Relative position of the primers used to amplify Ddx3x and Ddx3y promoter sequences that contain a p53 binding site are shown at the top. (* P≤0.05; ** P≤0.01; Student’s t-test).

Table 2. List of the 14 downregulated genes in TashTTg/Tg ENCCs also found in the male TashTTg/Tg 4C-seq analysis.

Gene Fold change TashT mean count Control mean count
Lrrn2 -2,84 113 321
Dusp26 -2,74 533 1462
Nfasc -2,72 1696 4613
Prox1 -2,56 142 365
Pnmal1 -2,56 228 583
Hoxd3 -2,24 2885 6454
Cntn2 -2,22 161 357
Rbp1 -2,21 6474 14329
Slc35e4 -2,16 250 539
Tspan7 -2,13 1359 2893
Bbc3 -1,98 135 267
Mvb12b -1,74 2755 4811
Pik3ip1 -1,66 687 1142
Prps2 -1,59 3779 6011

The discovery of a putative repressive interaction between the Hace1-Grik2 silencer-enriched region and the p53 phosphatase coding gene Dusp26 in TashTTg/Tg ENCCs prompted us to analyse p53 protein levels in these cells. As expected from the downregulation of a p53 inhibitor, immunofluorescence analyses revealed that the number of e12.5 ENCCs with high levels of p53 protein (a proxy for stabilized/activated p53 protein [53, 54]) is on average doubled in TashTTg/Tg embryos in comparison to Gata4p-GFP controls (Fig 4E). This increase seems specific to the p53 protein as Trp53 transcript levels remain grossly unaffected by the TashT mutation in unsexed e12.5 ENCCs (3222 read counts in TashTTg/Tg vs 3544 read counts in Gata4p-GFP controls; P = 0.69) [29]. The increase in p53 protein levels was present in both sexes, affecting about 9% of ENCCs in TashTTg/Tg embryos compared to about 3–5% in Gata4p-GFP controls (Fig 4F). Yet, a sex-specific difference was specifically noted in Gata4p-GFP controls, with male embryos having half the number of ENCCs with high levels of p53 protein in comparison to female embryos (Fig 4F).

We next sought to determine whether murine Ddx3x and Ddx3y, like human DDX3X [51], could be directly regulated by p53. An important sub-question we also wanted to address was whether Ddx3y could be more sensitive than Ddx3x to p53 regulation, as this would help to explain why Ddx3x expression in ENCCs is not affected by the TashT mutation [29]. To begin answering these questions, we analyzed the impact of p53 knockdown on the expression of both Ddx3x and Ddx3y in three male embryonic cell lines (R1 embryonic stem cells, F9 embryocarcinoma cells, and P19 embryocarcinoma cells) via RT-qPCR. Neural crest-derived Neuro2a cells were not included in these analyses because of their lack of a Y chromosome (S10 Fig). Interestingly, expression of Ddx3y appeared more affected than Ddx3x by siRNA-mediated knockdown of p53 in both R1 and F9 cells (Fig 4G). Accordingly, chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP)-qPCR analyses in R1 cells further revealed a trend toward a greater transfection stress-induced interaction of p53 with the Ddx3y promoter in comparison to the Ddx3x promoter, or even the Mdm2 promoter–a well known stress-induced p53 target [55] (Fig 4H). Collectively, these results thus support a model whereby increased p53 activation in TashTTg/Tg ENCCs leads to male-specific upregulation of the Y-linked gene Ddx3y, and not its X-linked homolog Ddx3x, because the Ddx3y promoter is more prompt to respond to p53.

Inhibition of p53 activity eliminates the male bias in TashTTg/Tg embryos

To directly test the predicted p53 contribution to the male-biased severity of the TashT ENCC colonization defect, we turned to a pharmacological approach that previously proved to be efficient in a mouse model of Treacher-Collins syndrome–a known p53-dependent neurocristopathy [56]. To this end, pregnant TashTTg/Tg dams were administered the synthetic p53 inhibitor pifithrin-α (2 mg/kg of body weight) or vehicle only (DMSO) via daily intraperitoneal injections for 7 consecutive days, from e8.5 to e14.5. The idea was to expose vagal-derived ENCCs during their entire migration phase, from the neural tube to the distal hindgut. Embryos were then collected at e15.5 and their colon was immediately analyzed for extent of ENCC colonization without fixation, taking advantage of the endogenous YFP labeling of these cells in TashT embryos [29]. In accordance with our prior observations in TashTTg/Tg newborns [29], a statistically significant difference of about 14.5% in extent of ENCC colonization was noted between male (59.5% ± 1.8%) and female (74.0% ± 2.8) TashTTg/Tg embryos of the vehicle-treated group (Fig 5A and 5B). Remarkably, this difference was completely eliminated by pifithrin-α treatment. In this group, the average extent of ENCC colonization in both male (73.1% ± 2.9%) and female (73.5% ± 4.4%) TashTTg/Tg embryos appeared very similar to what was observed in vehicle-treated female TashTTg/Tg embryos (Fig 5A and 5B).

Fig 5. In utero pifithrin-α treatment improves colon colonization by TashTTg/Tg ENCCs in a male-specific manner.

Fig 5

(A) Representative confocal images of YFP-labeled ENCCs in the colon of male and female e15.5 TashTTg/Tg embryos that were exposed to either pifithrin-α or only vehicle (DMSO). The white arrow indicates the migration front of vagal-derived ENCCs. Scale bar, 500 μm. (B) Sex-stratified quantitative analysis of vagal-derived ENCC colonization (in % of total colon length) using images such as those displayed in A. (C-D) RT-qPCR analysis of endogenous mRNA expression of Ddx3y (C) and Ddx3x (D) genes in TashTTg/Tg ENCCs recovered by FACS from male embryos exposed to pifithrin-α or only vehicle (DMSO), either during (e12.5) or after (e15.5) the treatment period. (E) Correlation between Ddx3y expression levels in ENCCs and extent of ENCC colonization in the colon for e15.5 male TashTTg/Tg embryos that were exposed to pifithrin-α. (R, Pearson’s correlation coefficient; *P≤0.05; *** P≤0.001; n.s., not significant; Student’s t-test).

To verify the potential involvement of Ddx3y in the response to pifithrin-α treatment, we evaluated its expression in male ENCCs recovered by FACS (owing to YFP fluorescence) from stomach and small intestine during the treatment period at e12.5. As observed upon siRNA-mediated knockdown of p53 expression in R1 and F9 cell lines (Fig 4G), RT-qPCR analysis revealed a significant decrease in Ddx3y gene expression upon pharmacological inhibition of p53 activity (Fig 5C). When we performed the same analysis using a subset of e15.5 embryos that were previously evaluated for ENCC colonization (Fig 5A and 5B), we also detected a trend toward decreased expression of Ddx3y (Fig 5C) which was further found to be inversely correlated with extent of colonization (Fig 5E). In marked contrast, analysis of Ddx3x gene expression in response to pifithrin-α treatment gave inconsistent results in this experimental setting, showing a downregulation during the treatment period at e12.5 and an upregulation after treatment termination at e15.5 (Fig 5D). All these in vivo data thus strengthen the idea that DDX3Y, but not DDX3X, is likely involved in a p53-regulated molecular cascade that is responsible for the increased severity of the TashT ENCC colonization defect in male embryos.

Discussion

The TashT mouse line is unique in being the only mouse model of HSCR that replicates the male bias observed in humans [29, 34, 37]. Here, we report that the male bias in TashTTg/Tg mice involves the upregulation of the Y-linked gene Ddx3y in ENCCs, and that the human DDX3Y protein is also expressed in the postnatal ENS of a substantial subset of HSCR patients. In the course of our studies, we also found that overexpression of the murine ortholog of SRY–another Y-linked candidate gene for the HSCR male bias–has no overt impact on ENS formation in mice. Our mechanistic studies further suggest that Ddx3y is a preferred target gene of p53, and that pharmacological inhibition of this transcription factor in utero is sufficient to eliminate the TashT male bias. This work thus identifies p53 and DDX3Y as new players in aganglionic megacolon pathogenesis in mice, a finding that might eventually be useful for the development of non-surgical therapies in humans.

Upregulation of the Y-linked SRY gene has been previously proposed as a pathogenic mechanism for the HSCR male bias [30]. However, this hypothesis was solely based on in vitro studies and protein expression data in HSCR colon tissues, without any functional assay in vivo. Moreover, no ENS defects were reported in mice with ubiquitous overexpression of human SRY, which die around two weeks of age due to multi-organ failure mainly affecting the heart, liver, lung and brain [57]. To validate the candidacy of SRY in the HSCR male bias, we thus decided to directly test whether mouse Sry can negatively impact ENS development in mice via targeted overexpression in the neural crest lineage (S6 Fig). Importantly, this work revealed no influence of Sry on ENS formation, even in a TashTTg/Tg sensitized background (Fig 1G and 1H and S3S5 Figs). Combined to the fact that Sry is not normally expressed in murine ENCCs when aganglionic megacolon develops (S1 Dataset), our negative finding thus suggests that the SRY protein is not involved in the HSCR male bias. Yet, it remains also possible that SRY only affects human and not murine ENS development. Moreover, these observations do not rule out a potential pathogenic role for SRY in the mature ENS, and the idea that Parkinson’s disease may originate from ENS dysfunctions that propagate to the brain is especially interesting in this regard [58]. Indeed, human SRY is expressed in both the postnatal ENS [30] and midbrain-associated dopaminergic neurons [59], and antisense oligonucleotide-mediated knockdown of Sry is neuroprotective in experimental Parkinson’s disease in rats [27].

In contrast to our negative results with mouse Sry, several lines of evidence suggest that upregulation of the DEAD-box RNA helicase coding gene DDX3Y might be involved in the HSCR male bias: 1) murine Ddx3y is normally expressed in ENCCs when aganglionic megacolon develops (S2 Dataset); 2) Ddx3y is specifically upregulated in TashTTg/Tg ENCCs (Fig 1A–1C and S1 Dataset); 3) neural crest-directed overexpression of Ddx3y worsens the TashT male bias in extent of aganglionosis and incidence of megacolon (Fig 1E and S1E Fig); 4) pifithrin-α-induced elimination of the TashT male bias in extent of aganglionosis is associated with decreased Ddx3y expression (Fig 5); and 5) the human DDX3Y protein is detected in enteric neurons of an important subset of HSCR patients (Fig 2 and Table 1). Of note, this latter observation challenges the view that the DDX3Y gene is widely transcribed, but that the protein is restricted to male germ cells [60]. However, it is important to point out that this conclusion was based on western blot analysis of only three male adult tissues (brain, kidney and testis). Since then, other groups have reported the presence of the DDX3Y protein in supplemental cell lineages, such as different types of myeloid and lymphoid hematopoietic cells [61, 62] and neurons derived from NTera2 embryocarcinoma cells [44].

The exact molecular mechanism by which DDX3Y may contribute to the development of aganglionic megacolon in a sensitized genetic background is currently unknown. The RNA helicase function of both DDX3Y and DDX3X (also known as DDX3) is believed to influence many aspects of RNA processing from transcription to translation, with an especially prominent role in the regulation of initiation of translation [63, 64]. Yet, although these proteins are highly similar (>90% sequence similarity), they are only partially redundant [6567], meaning that DDX3Y is expected to have its own set of target transcripts. However, very little is known about the specific molecular role of DDX3Y. This situation thus makes the analysis of DDX3Y function in NTera2-differentiated neurons especially interesting for predicting DDX3Y’s potential function in ENCCs. Indeed, as we observed in neural crest-derived Neuro2a cells (S1C Fig), the DDX3Y protein is enriched in the cytoplasm in NTera2-differentiated neurons, and knocking down DDX3Y in these cells impacts the translation of 71 proteins [44]. Interestingly, many of these proteins play various regulatory roles in cell migration (e.g., RAB5B, RAB5C, CNN2, IFITM1, COX2, PKM1, BCAT1, SMAP1, ENO1, RAP2A, ANP32A, and STMN1), which is the main cellular process affected in TashTTg/Tg ENCCs [29]. The fact that no transcripts other than Ddx3y are specifically dysregulated at the transcriptional level in male TashTTg/Tg ENCCs (Fig 1A) supports the idea that DDX3Y mainly influences translation of migration regulatory proteins in these cells as well. As observed in NTera2-differentiated neurons [44], it can further be hypothesized that an excess of DDX3Y might result in either an increase or a decrease in translation efficiency depending of the mRNA target. Identification of these post-transcriptionally regulated mRNA targets of DDX3Y in ENCCs will require further high-throughput experiments that are beyond the scope of the current study, such as proteomics-based studies combined to RNA-binding and ribosome profiling assays. This future work should also lead to a better understanding of the very intriguing observation that DDX3Y overexpression has no impact in a female TashTTg/Tg background. Different possibilities include the existence of either male-specific Y-linked mRNA target(s) or X-linked mRNA target(s) that escape X inactivation [68], which in both cases would make the encoded protein(s) more vulnerable to pathogenic perturbations in males. Another possibility would be that DDX3Y must act in concert with another male-specific Y-linked protein involved in initiation of translation, such as the EIF2 subunit EIF2S3Y [69, 70].

We put a lot of efforts on elucidating the molecular mechanism by which Ddx3y may be upregulated in male TashTTg/Tg ENCCs, reasoning that this might eventually be useful for therapeutic purposes. This work culminated on the identification of an apparently critical role for p53, which was previously reported as a key regulator of DDX3X transcription in lung cancer cells [51, 52]. Our data now show that Ddx3y transcription can similarly be regulated by p53 in male embryonic cell lines of mouse origin, and the magnitude of this regulation even appears to be more important than for Ddx3x (Fig 4G and 4H). This observation is in accordance with a previous study reporting differential regulation of the DDX3Y and DDX3X promoters in various human and hamster cell lines [65], and further suggests that the importance of p53 regulation for Ddx3x/DDX3X expression might be context-dependent (e.g., cell type- or stage-specific). In male ENCCs, p53 appears especially important for the regulation of Ddx3y expression, but not for the regulation of Ddx3x expression. Ddx3y expression levels always seem in phase with p53 activation levels in TashTTg/Tg ENCCs: both are upregulated when compared to basal levels in Gata4p-GFP control ENCCs (e.g., Fig 1C for Ddx3y gene expression and Fig 4E and 4F for p53 protein activity) and both are downregulated upon pifithrin-α treatment (Fig 5C). In contrast, Ddx3x expression levels appear either unaffected by the presence of the TashT mutation [29] or inconsistently modulated by pifithrin-α-mediated inhibition of p53 activity (Fig 5D). The close regulatory interaction between p53 and Ddx3y, combined to the detrimental impact that DDX3Y may have on colonization of male ENCCs (Fig 1E), might be one reason why p53 activity in control ENCCs appears to be lower in male than in female samples (Fig 4F). Such a safeguard mechanism would help reducing the risk that Ddx3y expression reaches pathogenic levels in male ENCCs.

Although we became interested in p53 because of the TashT mutation-mediated transcriptional downregulation of its inhibiting phosphatase DUSP26 (Fig 4B–4D and Table 2), our work does not rule out the possibility that other cellular stresses might also have contributed to the increased activation of p53 in ENCCs. Indeed, p53 can be activated by a plethora of cellular stresses [71], and increasing evidence points to inappropriate activation of p53 as the underlying cause of many developmental syndromes collectively referred to as p53-associated syndromes [72]. Most of these syndromes involve defective neural crest development [72], which appears to be due to the fact that this cell lineage is especially susceptible to p53 activation [73]. Accordingly, experimentally-induced moderate activation of p53 in either pre-migratory or migratory neural crest cells dramatically decreases their number, including those contributing to ENS formation [72]. This phenomenon appears mostly due to an increase in p53-induced apoptosis [72, 73]. However, ENCCs are known to become resistant to p53-induced apoptosis after their entry into the foregut [74], an observation that helps to explain why TashTTg/Tg ENCCs do not have any survival deficit [29] despite showing an increase in p53 activation (Fig 4E and 4F). Altogether these observations thus support a general model whereby many different HSCR-causing mutations might trigger p53 activation in ENCCs and lead to a preferential increase of DDX3Y expression in males (along with its detrimental effects on ENCC colonization), without affecting canonical apoptosis-associated p53 target genes. Although it remains challenging to test this gene defect-independent hypothesis with the relevant human cell type, this can now be envisaged thanks to recent methods for in vitro differentiation of ENS progenitors from pluripotent stem cells (using either ES or iPS cells) [75, 76].

If confirmed, the gene defect-independent and p53-dependent model mentioned above would explain why human genetic studies have constantly failed to identify gene variants specifically associated with the HSCR male bias [14]. Importantly, our finding that the negative impact of the putative p53-DDX3Y axis on ENCCs can be reversed by pharmacological means in mice also extends the list of potential mutation-independent preventive interventions for HSCR. Downregulating p53 activity during ENS development in utero might thus be considered an option for male fetuses in families with high genetic risk, just like the suggestion of avoiding nutritional deficiencies and high doses of specific medicines [77]. Considering that the vast majority of HSCR patients display aganglionosis over only a short segment of the distal colon [1, 2], such intervention might well be sufficient to prevent megacolon occurrence in many male individuals (up to 50% of them according to our human DDX3Y immunofluorescence data; Fig 2 and Table 1). While it is reasonable to believe that p53 inhibition increases tumorigenesis risk, this risk is minimized by the fact that such intervention would only need to be done over a relatively short period of time (i.e., for a maximum of 3–4 weeks, between weeks 4 to 7 of gestation). Alternatively, future work might help to identify a cellular stressor upstream of p53 that could also be pharmacologically targeted, as reported in a mouse model of Treacher-Collins syndrome [78].

Materials and methods

Ethics statement

Work with mice was approved by the Comité institutionnel de protection des animaux (CIPA reference #650 and #975) of Université du Québec à Montréal (UQAM), and performed in accordance with the guidelines of the Canadian Council on Animal Care (CCAC). For euthanasia, isoflurane-anesthetized mice were exposed to gradual-fill carbon dioxide.

Families of human participants provided written informed consent on studies, which were approved by the institutional human research ethics committees of the Université du Québec à Montréal (Comité institutionnel d’éthique de la recherche avec des êtres humains; protocol # 491) and the Centre hospitalier universitaire Sainte-Justine (Comité d’éthique à la recherche; protocol # 4172).

Animals

Heterozygous Gata4p-GFP and homozygous TashT transgenic lines were maintained and genotyped as previously described [29, 40]. MycDdx3y- or MycSry-overexpressing mice were generated via standard pronuclear microinjection [79] into FVB/N zygotes. In each case, a Tyrosinase minigene [31] was co-injected to allow visual identification of transgenic animals via rescue of pigmentation [80], and homozygous animals were confirmed by backcrossing with wild-type FVB/N mice. For both MycDdx3y and MycSry transgenes, relevant coding sequences were subcloned in frame with an N-terminal Myc tag into an in house-modified pIRES2-EGFP vector (Clontech), where the CMV promoter was replaced by a synthetic promoter composed of the Hsp68 minimal promoter [43] and neural crest-specific enhancers from Sox10 (U3) [41] and Ednrb [42]. Ddx3y coding sequences and Ednrb regulatory sequences were amplified by RT-PCR and PCR, respectively, using nucleic acids from an e12.5 male FVB/N embryo, and then cloned in pGEM-T vector and fully sequenced to confirm the absence of PCR-caused mutations. The domesticus Sry cDNA (ORF and partial 3’ UTR), Sox10 U3 enhancer, and Hsp68 minimal promoter were subcloned from vectors kindly provided by Dr Chris Lau (University of California San Diego, USA), Dr Michael Wegner (Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Germany) and Dr Rashmi Kothary (Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Canada), respectively.

For CRISPR/Cas9-mediated deletion at the Hace1-Grik2 locus, double-stranded DNA oligonucleotides coding for top-scoring sgRNAs (as determined using the crispr.mit.edu tool) that flank the silencer-enriched region were cloned into the pX330 vector (Addgene plasmid # 42230; gift from Dr Feng Zhang) [81], and resulting constructs were used for in vitro transcription as previously described [82]. A mixture of Cas9 mRNA (100 ng/μl) and both sgRNAs (50 ng/μl for each) was then prepared and used to microinject FVB/N zygotes, using conventional techniques [79]. Resulting Hace1-Grik2ΔSER mice were identified by PCR using primers located outside or within the deletion, and the exact nature of the deletion was determined by sequencing the amplicons generated with flanking primers. Details about all cloning and genotyping oligonucleotide primers can be found in S1 Table.

Embryos were obtained by timed pregnancies, with noon of the day of vaginal plug detection being considered e0.5. For in utero inhibition of p53, cyclic pifithrin-α hydrobromide (Sigma Cat.#P4236) was administered to pregnant TashTTg/Tg dams via intraperitoneal injections of a 0.4 mg/ml solution (in 2% DMSO-PBS) at a final concentration of 2 mg per kg of mouse body weight, as previously described [56]. Control animals were administered 2% DMSO-PBS only. Dams were treated once a day (around noon) for a period of 7 days between e8.5 and e14.5, and embryos were collected at e15.5 for analysis.

Sex-specific transcriptome profiling

Ribosomal RNA-depleted RNA-seq librairies were both generated (from 300ng of total RNA) and sequenced by McGill University and Génome Québec Innovation Centre using the HiSeq 2000 platform (Illumina). For both male and female TashTTg/Tg ENCCs, three biological replicates were generated from pools of e12.5 embryos, which were sexed based on morphological differences between male and female gonads. Cell dissociation of TashTTg/Tg bowel (stomach and small intestine), FACS-mediated recovery of ENCCs, and extraction of total RNA were all performed as previously described [29]. Paired-end sequences (100-bp in length; between 58–150 million reads per replicate) were mapped onto the mm10 Mus musculus reference genome, and analyzed for differential gene expression using DESeq and edgeR packages.

RT-qPCR

For quantitative RT-PCR analysis of ENCCs or transfected cell lines, cells of interest were recovered by FACS and their total RNA content was extracted as previously described [83]. Total RNA (100 ng per sample) was reverse transcribed using the Superscript III enzyme and a mixture of poly-dT18 and random primers, in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions (ThermoFisher Scientific). 2 μl of the resulting cDNA pool was then used for amplification of the desired target using specific primers. Expression levels of the housekeeping gene Psmd2 were used for normalization. The qPCR program consisted of 45 cycles of 10 s at 95°C and 30 s at 60°C, with a melting curve from 65°C to 95°C. Relative expression was calculated with the 2-ΔΔCt method that refers to the ratio of the target genes to the housekeeping gene [84]. Details about qPCR primers can be found in S1 Table.

Human studies

Human specimens of ENS-containing sigmoid colon (corresponding to the “transition” zone) were obtained from two different HSCR cohorts without genetic information. The first cohort is described in Soret et al. [32] as the HSCR case group (n = 12; 10 boys and 2 girls; aged between 17 and 454 days at the time of surgery). The second cohort was constituted from four patients (4 boys; aged between 22 and 349 days at the time of surgery) who underwent surgical resection at the Centre hospitalier universitaire Sainte-Justine (Montreal, Canada). Details for each analyzed tissue are displayed in Table 1. Tissues were processed for immunofluorescence as previously described [32], using mouse monoclonal anti-DDX3Y (Sigma Cat.#WH0008653M1; dilution factor 1/500) and guinea pig polyclonal anti-PGP9.5 (Neuromics Cat.#GP14104; dilution factor 1/100) antibodies.

4C-seq and 3C-PCR

4C-seq was performed essentially as previously described [46], with slight modifications to accommodate limited starting material (1x106 FACS-recovered ENCCs per sample) and a different sequencing platform for longer reads (Ion PGM; ThermoFisher Scientific). For each sample, captured chromatin fragments were reduced in size by sonication using an E220 Focused-ultrasonicator (Covaris) set with a peak power of 175, a duty factor of 10%, and 200 cycles for 45 seconds. Sequencing libraries were prepared using the Ion Xpress Plus Fragment Library Kit and the gDNA Fragment Library Preparation protocol (ThermoFisher Scientific Cat.#MAN0009847). Sequencing particles were generated with the Ion PGM Hi-Q Chef Kit (ThermoFisher Scientific Cat.#MAN0010919), and sequencing was performed on Ion 318 Barcoded chips adapted for sequencing fragments of 400 bp or less (ThermoFisher Scientific Cat.#4488146). The 4C-seq analysis was performed using two biological replicates per group. All data from both replicates were kept for further analysis, recognizing that chromatin contacts are often transitory [85] and most especially during development [86, 87]. Sequencing data were then analyzed using the w4Cseq pipeline [47], which was modified to accommodate long single reads instead of short paired-end reads. Genes associated with captured fragments were identified using the Table Browser tool from the UCSC Genome Browser (genome.ucsc.edu). 3C-PCR was performed as previously described [29], using primers listed in S1 Table.

Staining of developing and postnatal murine ENS

Staining of AChE activity in postnatal colon and whole-mount immunofluorescence staining of e12.5 bowel tissues were both performed using standard approaches, as previously described [32, 88]. Antibodies used for whole-mount immunofluorescence included mouse monoclonal anti-βIII-Tubulin clone 2G10 (Abcam Cat.#ab78078; dilution factor 1:500), rabbit polyclonal anti-GFP (Abcam Cat.#Ab290; dilution factor 1:500) and rat polyclonal anti-SOX10 (generated by MediMabs for the Pilon lab; dilution factor 1:500). Analysis of endogenous YFP fluorescence in unfixed freshly dissected e15.5 TashTTg/Tg colons was performed as previously described [29]. For p53 and Myc tag immunofluorescence in dissociated tissues, acute cultures of e12.5 bowel were prepared and stained essentially as previously described [83]. Briefly, for each tested embryo, dissected stomach and small intestine were dissociated in 100 μL of EMEM containing collagenase (0.4 mg/ml; Sigma Cat.#C2674), dispase II (1.3 mg/ml; ThermoFisher Scientific Cat.#17105–041) and DNAse I (0.5 mg/ml; Sigma Cat.#DN25) at 37°C. Cells were then centrifuged at 300g for 3 minutes, resuspended in 200 μl of EMEM with 10% FBS on a μ-slide 8-well Ibitreat plate (Ibidi 80826) coated with fibronectin (250 μg/ml; EMD Millipore Cat.#FC010), and incubated at 37°C with 5% CO2 for 4 to 6 hours. Cells were finally fixed for 10 minutes in 4% PFA on ice, and processed for immunofluorescence with mouse monoclonal anti-p53 (Cell Signaling Cat.#2524; dilution factor 1:250), rabbit polyclonal anti-GFP (Abcam Cat #Ab290; dilution factor 1:500), mouse monoclonal anti-Myc tag (In house hybridoma clone 9E10; dilution factor 1:100) and/or rat polyclonal anti-SOX10 (generated by MediMabs for the Pilon lab; dilution factor 1:500).

Cell culture and transfections

Neuro2a neuroblastoma cells, F9 embryocarcinoma cells, P19 embryocarcinoma cells, and R1 embryonic stem cells were maintained and propagated as previously described [89, 90]. To evaluate the activity of MycDdx3y-IRES-eGFP and MycSry-IRES-eGFP transgenic constructs, 3x105 Neuro2a cells were seeded in 6-well plates containing coverslips and transfected with Genejuice reagents (Novagen) in accordance with manufacturer’s instructions. Coverslips were then used to analyze transfected cells for co-expression of eGFP and Myc-tagged proteins via anti-Myc immunofluorescence (mouse monoclonal Myc tag antibody clone 9E10; in house hybridoma; dilution factor 1:100). To evaluate the importance of p53 in the regulation of Ddx3x and Ddx3y gene expression, male cell lines (F9, P19 and R1) were seeded in 100mm plates (1x106 to 2x106 cells) and transfected with either p53 (stealth siRNA Trp53; Cat.#1320001, MSS212108; ThermoFisher Scientific) or negative control (stealth RNAi siRNA negative control; Cat.#12935300 Med GC; ThermoFisher Scientific) siRNAs using jetPRIME reagents (Cat.#114–75; Polyplus transfection) in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions. Each siRNA (30nM) was co-transfected with empty pIRES2-EGFP plasmid (10μg; Clontech), and transfected cells (EGFP+) were then recovered by FACS 48h later and processed for RT-qPCR analysis of p53, Ddx3x and Ddx3y gene expression. Primer details can be found in S1 Table.

Image acquisition and processing

Images were acquired either with a Leica M205 FA stereomicroscope equipped with a Leica DFC 495 camera (for staining of AChE activity in postnatal colon tissues and fluorescence imaging in whole embryos) or a Nikon A1 laser scanning confocal microscope (for fluorescence imaging in general). Image processing and analysis was all done with the ImageJ software.

ChIP analysis

ChIP assays in R1 embryonic stem cells were performed as previously described [83], using a mouse monoclonal p53 antibody (Cell Signaling #2524; dilution factor 1:200). To activate p53, R1 cells were subjected to a transfection stress prior to ChIP, by transfecting the empty pIRES2-EGFP vector as described above for siRNA analyses. Occupation of p53 binding sites from Ddx3y, Ddx3x and Mdm2 promoters in control and stressed R1 cells was determined by qPCR, using the program described in the RT-qPCR section. ChIP efficiency was calculated by comparison of input-normalized values (in %) obtained with stressed vs control cells. PCR-amplified regions containing p53 binding sites were determined based on the literature [51] and a MatInspector analysis (www.genomatix.de) for the Ddx3x and Ddx3y promoters, or the literature only [55] for the Mdm2 promoter.

Statistics

Where applicable, data are presented as mean ± standard deviation, with the number of biological replicates indicated in figures and/or legends. Student’s t-test (two-tailed) was used to determine statistical significance, using 0.05 as cut-off value for P. Numerical data and statistics for all graphs can be found in S2 Table.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Characterization of the MycDdx3y transgenic mouse line.

(A) Complete sequence of the Ednrb-Sox10-Hsp68 synthetic promoter. Restriction sites used for cloning are in lowercase letters. (B) Schematic representation of the MycDdx3y-IRES-eGFP transgenic construct, with regulatory sequences in grey. (C) Immunofluorescence labeling of Neuro2a cells transfected with the MycDdx3y-IRES-eGFP transgenic construct and showing co-expression of MycDdx3y (red) and GFP (green) proteins. Scale bar, 10μm. (D) RT-qPCR analysis of MycDdx3y transgene expression in e12.5 TashT Tg/+;MycDdx3yTg/+ ENCCs recovered by FACS. (E) Detailed quantitative analysis of the length of ENS-covered colon (in % of total colon length) in P18-P50 TashTTg/Tg mice bearing or not a transgenic allele from each of the three MycDdx3y transgenic lines. Every MycDdx3y transgenic line is identified using the same color code as in Fig 1E and 1F. The dashed lines show the previously described threshold level interval above which megacolon is less likely to occur in FVB/N mice [29]. (* P≤0.05; ** P≤0.01; Student’s t-test).

(TIF)

S2 Fig. Detection of MycDDX3Y protein in e12.5 midgut cells dissociated from TashTTg/+;Ddx3yTg/+ embryos.

Representative confocal images of e12.5 midgut cells dissociated from TashTTg/+ control and TashTTg/+:MycDdx3yTg/+ (line 3) embryos, and immunolabeled for SOX10 (red) and Myc tag (grey). ENCCs are endogenously labeled with YFP owing to the pSRYp[1.6kb]-YFP transgene in the TashT line. Scale bar, 20 μm.

(TIF)

S3 Fig. Overexpression of either MycDdx3y or MycSry has no impact on ENS patterning.

Representative images of proximal colon tissues collected from P18-50 TashTTg/+ mice bearing or not MycDdx3y or MycSry transgenic constructs and stained for AChE activity. Scale bar, 1000 μm.

(TIF)

S4 Fig. Overexpression of MycDdx3y, but not MycSRY, worsens extent of aganglionosis in TashTTg/Tg males.

Representative images of P18-50 colon tissues collected from male mice and stained for AChE activity. Corresponding quantitative analyses are shown in Fig 1E and 1G. Scale bar, 1000 μm.

(TIF)

S5 Fig. Overexpression of either MycDdx3y or MycSRY has no impact on extent of aganglionosis in TashTTg/Tg females.

Representative images of P18-50 colon tissues collected from female mice and stained for AChE activity. Corresponding quantitative analyses are shown in Fig 1F and 1H. Scale bar, 1000 μm.

(TIF)

S6 Fig. Characterization of the MycSry transgenic mouse line.

(A) Schematic representation of the MycSry-IRES-eGFP transgenic construct, with regulatory sequences in grey. (B) Immunofluorescence labeling of Neuro2a cells transfected with the MycSry-IRES-eGFP transgenic construct and showing co-expression of MycSRY (red) and GFP (green) proteins. Scale bar, 10μm. (C) Representative image of GFP-labeled neural crest-derived cells in e11.5 MycSry-IRES-eGFP transgenic embryos (n = 12). Left panels show GFP labeling of cranial nerves and dorsal root ganglia. Right panel is a high magnification view of the gut, to show GFP labeling of ENCCs in the prospective stomach (St) and small intestine (SI). Scale bar, 1000 μm (left panel); 200 μm (Right panel).

(TIF)

S7 Fig. Activity of the Ednrb-Sox10U3-Hsp68 synthetic promoter in ENCCs.

(A-B) Representative confocal images of e12.5 midguts collected from MycSryTg/+ embryos and immunolabelled for SOX10 (red), βIII-Tubulin (grey), GFP (green) and DAPI (blue). High magnification views shown in B are delineated by dashed square in A. As evidenced on both x-y and x-z planes, GFP signal is mainly present in SOX10+ cells. (C) Quantification of the number of SOX10+ GFP+ double positive cells on the total number of SOX10+ cells. The total number of counted cells is indicated in brackets. Scale bar, 50 μm (A) and 20μM (B).

(TIF)

S8 Fig. Selection of the best primer pair for the 4C-seq analysis.

(A) Genomic representation of the Hace1-Grik2 intergenic region on chromosome 10, using the UCSC genome browser (genome.ucsc.edu) and its vertebrate Multiz Alignment & Conservation tract. Conserved elements (CE) are indicated by either black (neutral activity) or red (silencer activity) boxes, based on transcriptional activity in luciferase assays previously performed in Neuro2a and P19 cell lines [29]. Position of 4C-seq primer pairs is illustrated in blue (1), yellow (2), purple (3), green (4), and pink (5). (B) A test 4C-library was prepared using Neuro2a cells and used to evaluate efficiency of each primer pairs. The third pair (purple) was selected based on PCR profile and proximity to silencer elements.

(TIF)

S9 Fig. The colon of Hace1-Grik2ΔSER/ΔSER embryos is normally colonized by ENCCs.

(A) Representative images of P18-50 proximal colon tissues collected from wild-type (WT; FVB/N control) and Hace1-Grik2ΔSER / ΔSER (ΔSER / ΔSER) mice, and stained for AChE activity. Lower magnification images are displayed in Fig 3C. (B) Quantitative analysis of the extent of colon colonization by βIII-Tubulin+ ENCCs (in % of total colon length) in WT and Hace1-Grik2ΔSER/ΔSER e12.5 embryos, showing normal colonization in mutant animals. Representative images are shown is Fig 3D. Scale bar, 1000 μm.

(TIF)

S10 Fig. Sexing of Neuro2a cell line.

(A) PCR-based sexing of Neuro2a cells showing the presence of the X-linked gene SmcX (300 pb) but the absence of Y-linked genes Zfy (420 pb) and SmcY (280 pb). Genomic DNA from female (F) or male (M) mice was used as controls. (B) Relative expression of Psmd2 (autosomal gene), Ddx3x (X-linked gene) and Ddx3y (Y-linked gene) in Neuro2a compared to a known male mouse cell line (P19). Normalization to Psmd2 expression reveal the absence of Ddx3y expression.

(TIF)

S1 Table. List of all primers used in this study.

Full sequence of all oligonucleotides used in this study is shown in the 5’ to 3’ orientation. The purpose for which oligonucleotides were used is also mentioned.

(PDF)

S2 Table. Numerical data and statistics for all graphs.

Each graph has its own tab.

(XLSX)

S1 Dataset. Differential gene expression in male vs female TashTTg/Tg ENCCs (>1.5-fold change; P≤0.05; minimum of 250 reads in at least one condition).

(XLSX)

S2 Dataset. Differential gene expression in TashTTg/Tg vs Gata4p-GFP control ENCCs (>1.5-fold change; P≤0.05; minimum of 250 reads in at least one condition).

(XLSX)

S3 Dataset. List of all loci and associated genes captured by 4C-seq.

Each sample has its own tab.

(XLSX)

S4 Dataset. Lists of genes for all Venn diagram categories displayed in Fig 4A.

Each category has its own tab.

(XLSX)

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Normand Lapierre and Guillaume Bernas (Transgenesis core, CERMO-FC, UQAM) for the production of genetically-modified mice, Denis Flipo (Cellular analyses core, CERMO-FC, UQAM) for assistance with confocal imaging and cell sorting, Geneviève Bourret (Genomics core, CERMO-FC, UQAM) for assistance with preparation of 4C-seq libraries, Golrokh Kiani (Bioinformatics core, CERMO-FC, UQAM) for assistance with analysis of 4C-seq data, as well as Dr Ann Aspirot and Dr Natalie Patey for access to human samples (CHU Ste-Justine). The Massively parallel sequencing platform as well as the Bioinformatics platform of the McGill University and Génome Québec Innovation Center are also thanked for transcriptome sequencing and analyses of sequencing results, respectively. Likewise, the Genomics platform of the Centre de recherche du Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine as well as the Bioinformatics platform of the Institut de Recherches en immunologie et en cancérologie (IRIC) are thanked for sequencing and analyses of 4C-seq libraries, respectively. The Genomics core facility at the Sunnybrook research institute is also thanked for the second round of sequencing of 4C-seq libraries.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

This work was funded by a grant (#MOP-26037) from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research to NP (http://www.cihr-irsc.gc.ca). TC was supported by studentships from the Fonds de la recherche du Québec – Santé (http://www.frqs.gouv.qc.ca) and from the Fondation du grand défi Pierre Lavoie (https://www.fondationgdpl.com). NP is a Senior research scholar of the Fonds de la recherche du Québec – Santé (http://www.frqs.gouv.qc.ca) and the recipient of the UQAM Research Chair on rare genetic diseases (https://uqam.ca). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Amiel J, Sproat-Emison E, Garcia-Barcelo M, Lantieri F, Burzynski G, Borrego S, et al. Hirschsprung disease, associated syndromes and genetics: a review. J Med Genet. 2008;45(1):1–14. Epub 2007/10/30. jmg.2007.053959 [pii] 10.1136/jmg.2007.053959 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Heuckeroth RO. Hirschsprung disease—integrating basic science and clinical medicine to improve outcomes. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018;15(3):152–67. 10.1038/nrgastro.2017.149 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Pini Prato A, Gentilino V, Giunta C, Avanzini S, Mattioli G, Parodi S, et al. Hirschsprung disease: do risk factors of poor surgical outcome exist? J Pediatr Surg. 2008;43(4):612–9. Epub 2008/04/15. 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2007.10.007 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Bergeron KF, Silversides DW, Pilon N. The developmental genetics of Hirschsprung's disease. Clin Genet. 2013;83(1):15–22. Epub 2012/10/10. 10.1111/cge.12032 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Nagy N, Goldstein AM. Enteric nervous system development: A crest cell's journey from neural tube to colon. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2017;66:94–106. Epub 2017/01/15. 10.1016/j.semcdb.2017.01.006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Rao M, Gershon MD. Enteric nervous system development: what could possibly go wrong? Nat Rev Neurosci. 2018;19(9):552–65. Epub 2018/07/27. 10.1038/s41583-018-0041-0 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Yntema CL, Hammond WS. The origin of intrinsic ganglia of trunk viscera from vagal neural crest in the chick embryo. J Comp Neurol. 1954;101(2):515–41. Epub 1954/10/01. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Espinosa-Medina I, Jevans B, Boismoreau F, Chettouh Z, Enomoto H, Muller T, et al. Dual origin of enteric neurons in vagal Schwann cell precursors and the sympathetic neural crest. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017;114(45):11980–5. Epub 2017/10/29. 10.1073/pnas.1710308114 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Le Douarin NM, Teillet MA. The migration of neural crest cells to the wall of the digestive tract in avian embryo. Journal of embryology and experimental morphology. 1973;30(1):31–48. Epub 1973/08/01. . [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Uesaka T, Nagashimada M, Enomoto H. Neuronal Differentiation in Schwann Cell Lineage Underlies Postnatal Neurogenesis in the Enteric Nervous System. J Neurosci. 2015;35(27):9879–88. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1239-15.2015 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Burns AJ, Champeval D, Le Douarin NM. Sacral neural crest cells colonise aganglionic hindgut in vivo but fail to compensate for lack of enteric ganglia. Dev Biol. 2000;219(1):30–43. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Tang CSM, Zhuang X, Lam W-Y, Ngan ES-W, Hsu JS, Michelle YU, et al. Uncovering the genetic lesions underlying the most severe form of Hirschsprung disease by whole-genome sequencing. European Journal of Human Genetics. 2018;26(6):818–26. 10.1038/s41431-018-0129-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Tang CS-m, Li P, Lai FP-L, Fu AX, Lau S-T, So MT, et al. Identification of genes associated with Hirschsprung disease, based on whole-genome sequence analysis, and potential effects on enteric nervous system development. Gastroenterology. 2018;155(6):1908–22.e5. 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.09.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Tilghman JM, Ling AY, Turner TN, Sosa MX, Krumm N, Chatterjee S, et al. Molecular genetic anatomy and risk profile of Hirschsprung’s disease. New England Journal of Medicine. 2019;380(15):1421–32. 10.1056/NEJMoa1706594 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Gui H, Schriemer D, Cheng WW, Chauhan RK, Antiňolo G, Berrios C, et al. Whole exome sequencing coupled with unbiased functional analysis reveals new Hirschsprung disease genes. Genome Biology. 2017;18(1):48 10.1186/s13059-017-1174-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Cantrell VA, Owens SE, Chandler RL, Airey DC, Bradley KM, Smith JR, et al. Interactions between Sox10 and EdnrB modulate penetrance and severity of aganglionosis in the Sox10Dom mouse model of Hirschsprung disease. Hum Mol Genet. 2004;13(19):2289–301. 10.1093/hmg/ddh243 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Dang R, Torigoe D, Suzuki S, Kikkawa Y, Moritoh K, Sasaki N, et al. Genetic background strongly modifies the severity of symptoms of Hirschsprung disease, but not hearing loss in rats carrying Ednrb(sl) mutations. PLoS ONE. 2011;6(9):e24086 Epub 2011/09/15. 10.1371/journal.pone.0024086 PONE-D-11-10786 [pii]. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.McCallion AS, Stames E, Conlon RA, Chakravarti A. Phenotype variation in two-locus mouse models of Hirschsprung disease: tissue-specific interaction between Ret and Ednrb. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100(4):1826–31. . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Uesaka T, Nagashimada M, Yonemura S, Enomoto H. Diminished Ret expression compromises neuronal survival in the colon and causes intestinal aganglionosis in mice. J Clin Invest. 2008;118(5):1890–8. Epub 2008/04/17. 10.1172/JCI34425 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Vohra BP, Planer W, Armon J, Fu M, Jain S, Heuckeroth RO. Reduced endothelin converting enzyme-1 and endothelin-3 mRNA in the developing bowel of male mice may increase expressivity and penetrance of Hirschsprung disease-like distal intestinal aganglionosis. Dev Dyn. 2007;236(1):106–17. 10.1002/dvdy.21028 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Okamoto N, Del Maestro R, Valero R, Monros E, Poo P, Kanemura Y, et al. Hydrocephalus and Hirschsprung's disease with a mutation of L1CAM. J Hum Genet. 2004;49(6):334–7. Epub 2004/05/19. 10.1007/s10038-004-0153-4 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Parisi MA, Kapur RP, Neilson I, Hofstra RM, Holloway LW, Michaelis RC, et al. Hydrocephalus and intestinal aganglionosis: is L1CAM a modifier gene in Hirschsprung disease? Am J Med Genet. 2002;108(1):51–6. Epub 2002/02/22. 10.1002/ajmg.10185 [pii]. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Fransen E, Lemmon V, Van Camp G, Vits L, Coucke P, Willems PJ. CRASH syndrome: clinical spectrum of corpus callosum hypoplasia, retardation, adducted thumbs, spastic paraparesis and hydrocephalus due to mutations in one single gene, L1. Eur J Hum Genet. 1995;3(5):273–84. Epub 1995/01/01. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Wallace AS, Tan MX, Schachner M, Anderson RB. L1cam acts as a modifier gene for members of the endothelin signalling pathway during enteric nervous system development. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2011;23(11):e510–22. Epub 2011/03/15. 10.1111/j.1365-2982.2011.01692.x . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Koopman P, Gubbay J, Vivian N, Goodfellow P, Lovell-Badge R. Male development of chromosomally female mice transgenic for Sry. Nature. 1991;351(6322):117–21. Epub 1991/05/09. 10.1038/351117a0 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Lee J, Harley VR. The male fight-flight response: A result of SRY regulation of catecholamines? BioEssays. 2012;34(6):454–7. 10.1002/bies.201100159 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Lee J, Pinares-Garcia P, Loke H, Ham S, Vilain E, Harley VR. Sex-specific neuroprotection by inhibition of the Y-chromosome gene, SRY, in experimental Parkinson's disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019. Epub 2019/08/03. 10.1073/pnas.1900406116 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Boyer A, Pilon N, Raiwet DL, Lussier JG, Silversides DW. Human and pig SRY 5' flanking sequences can direct reporter transgene expression to the genital ridge and to migrating neural crest cells. Dev Dyn. 2006;235(3):623–32. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Bergeron KF, Cardinal T, Toure AM, Beland M, Raiwet DL, Silversides DW, et al. Male-Biased Aganglionic Megacolon in the TashT Mouse Line Due to Perturbation of Silencer Elements in a Large Gene Desert of Chromosome 10. PLoS Genet. 2015;11(3):e1005093 10.1371/journal.pgen.1005093 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Li Y, Kido T, Garcia-Barcelo MM, Tam PK, Tabatabai ZL, Lau YF. SRY interference of normal regulation of the RET gene suggests a potential role of the Y-chromosome gene in sexual dimorphism in Hirschsprung disease. Hum Mol Genet. 2015;24(3):685–97. 10.1093/hmg/ddu488 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Bergeron KF, Nguyen CM, Cardinal T, Charrier B, Silversides DW, Pilon N. Upregulation of the Nr2f1-A830082K12Rik gene pair in murine neural crest cells results in a complex phenotype reminiscent of waardenburg syndrome type 4. Disease models & mechanisms. 2016;9(11):1283–93. Epub Sep 1. 10.1242/dmm.026773 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Soret R, Mennetrey M, Bergeron KF, Dariel A, Neunlist M, Grunder F, et al. A collagen VI-dependent pathogenic mechanism for Hirschsprung's disease. J Clin Invest. 2015;125(12):4483–96. 10.1172/JCI83178 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Cheng LS, Schwartz DM, Hotta R, Graham HK, Goldstein AM. Bowel dysfunction following pullthrough surgery is associated with an overabundance of nitrergic neurons in Hirschsprung disease. J Pediatr Surg. 2016;51(11):1834–8. 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2016.08.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Toure AM, Charrier B, Pilon N. Male-specific colon motility dysfunction in the TashT mouse line. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2016;28(10):1494–507. 10.1111/nmo.12847 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Zaitoun I, Erickson CS, Barlow AJ, Klein TR, Heneghan AF, Pierre JF, et al. Altered neuronal density and neurotransmitter expression in the ganglionated region of Ednrb null mice: implications for Hirschsprung's disease. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2013;25(3):e233–44. 10.1111/nmo.12083 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Pierre JF, Barlow-Anacker AJ, Erickson CS, Heneghan AF, Leverson GE, Dowd SE, et al. Intestinal dysbiosis and bacterial enteroinvasion in a murine model of Hirschsprung's disease. J Pediatr Surg. 2014;49(8):1242–51. 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2014.01.060 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Toure AM, Landry M, Souchkova O, Kembel SW, Pilon N. Gut microbiota-mediated Gene-Environment interaction in the TashT mouse model of Hirschsprung disease. Scientific reports. 2019;9(1):492 Epub 2019/01/27. 10.1038/s41598-018-36967-z . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Ward NL, Pieretti A, Dowd SE, Cox SB, Goldstein AM. Intestinal aganglionosis is associated with early and sustained disruption of the colonic microbiome. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2012;24(9):874–e400. 10.1111/j.1365-2982.2012.01937.x . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Pilon N. Pigmentation-based insertional mutagenesis is a simple and potent screening approach for identifying neurocristopathy-associated genes in mice. Rare Diseases. 2016;4(1):e1156287. Epub 03 Mar 2016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Pilon N, Raiwet D, Viger RS, Silversides DW. Novel pre- and post-gastrulation expression of Gata4 within cells of the inner cell mass and migratory neural crest cells. Dev Dyn. 2008;237(4):1133–43. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Werner T, Hammer A, Wahlbuhl M, Bosl MR, Wegner M. Multiple conserved regulatory elements with overlapping functions determine Sox10 expression in mouse embryogenesis. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007;35(19):6526–38. . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Zhu L, Lee HO, Jordan CS, Cantrell VA, Southard-Smith EM, Shin MK. Spatiotemporal regulation of endothelin receptor-B by SOX10 in neural crest-derived enteric neuron precursors. Nat Genet. 2004;36(7):732–7. Epub 2004/06/01. 10.1038/ng1371 ng1371 [pii]. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Kothary R, Clapoff S, Darling S, Perry MD, Moran LA, Rossant J. Inducible expression of an hsp68-lacZ hybrid gene in transgenic mice. Development. 1989;105(4):707–14. Epub 1989/04/01. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Vakilian H, Mirzaei M, Sharifi Tabar M, Pooyan P, Habibi Rezaee L, Parker L, et al. DDX3Y, a Male-Specific Region of Y Chromosome Gene, May Modulate Neuronal Differentiation. Journal of proteome research. 2015;14(9):3474–83. Epub 2015/07/07. 10.1021/acs.jproteome.5b00512 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Poulat F, Girard F, Chevron MP, Goze C, Rebillard X, Calas B, et al. Nuclear localization of the testis determining gene product SRY. The Journal of cell biology. 1995;128(5):737–48. Epub 1995/03/01. 10.1083/jcb.128.5.737 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.van de Werken HJG, de Vree PJP, Splinter E, Holwerda SJB, Klous P, de Wit E, et al. Chapter four - 4C technology: Protocols and data analysis. In: Wu C, Allis CD, editors. Methods in Enzymology: Nucleosomes, Histones & Chromatin Part B. 513 USA, UK & The Netherlands: Academic Press; 2012. p. 89–112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Cai M, Gao F, Lu W, Wang K. w4CSeq: software and web application to analyze 4C-seq data. Bioinformatics 2016;32(21):3333–5. Epub 2016/07/04. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw408 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Shang X, Vasudevan SA, Yu Y, Ge N, Ludwig AD, Wesson CL, et al. Dual-specificity phosphatase 26 is a novel p53 phosphatase and inhibits p53 tumor suppressor functions in human neuroblastoma. Oncogene. 2010;29(35):4938–46. 10.1038/onc.2010.244 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Lokareddy RK, Bhardwaj A, Cingolani G. Atomic structure of dual-specificity phosphatase 26, a novel p53 phosphatase. Biochemistry. 2013;52(5):938–48. 10.1021/bi301476m [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Shi Y, Ma IT, Patel RH, Shang X, Chen Z, Zhao Y, et al. NSC-87877 inhibits DUSP26 function in neuroblastoma resulting in p53-mediated apoptosis. Cell Death Dis. 2015;6:e1841 Epub 2015/08/08. 10.1038/cddis.2015.207 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Wu DW, Liu WS, Wang J, Chen CY, Cheng YW, Lee H. Reduced p21(WAF1/CIP1) via alteration of p53-DDX3 pathway is associated with poor relapse-free survival in early-stage human papillomavirus-associated lung cancer. Clinical cancer research: an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research. 2011;17(7):1895–905. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-2316 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Wu DW, Lee MC, Wang J, Chen CY, Cheng YW, Lee H. DDX3 loss by p53 inactivation promotes tumor malignancy via the MDM2/Slug/E-cadherin pathway and poor patient outcome in non-small-cell lung cancer. Oncogene. 2014;33(12):1515–26. 10.1038/onc.2013.107 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Levine AJ. p53, the cellular gatekeeper for growth and division. Cell. 1997;88(3):323–31. Epub 1997/02/07. 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81871-1 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Brooks CL, Gu W. Ubiquitination, phosphorylation and acetylation: the molecular basis for p53 regulation. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2003;15(2):164–71. Epub 2003/03/22. 10.1016/s0955-0674(03)00003-6 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Mendrysa SM, Perry ME. The p53 tumor suppressor protein does not regulate expression of its own inhibitor, MDM2, except under conditions of stress. Mol Cell Biol. 2000;20(6):2023–30. Epub 2000/02/25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Jones NC, Lynn ML, Gaudenz K, Sakai D, Aoto K, Rey JP, et al. Prevention of the neurocristopathy Treacher Collins syndrome through inhibition of p53 function. Nat Med. 2008;14(2):125–33. Epub 2008/02/05. nm1725 [pii] 10.1038/nm1725 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Kido T, Sun Z, Lau YC. Aberrant activation of the human sex-determining gene in early embryonic development results in postnatal growth retardation and lethality in mice. Scientific reports. 2017;7(1):4113 Epub 2017/06/25. 10.1038/s41598-017-04117-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Santos SF, de Oliveira HL, Yamada ES, Neves BC, Pereira A Jr. The Gut and Parkinson's Disease-A Bidirectional Pathway. Front Neurol. 2019;10:574 Epub 2019/06/20. 10.3389/fneur.2019.00574 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Czech DP, Lee J, Sim H, Parish CL, Vilain E, Harley VR. The human testis-determining factor SRY localizes in midbrain dopamine neurons and regulates multiple components of catecholamine synthesis and metabolism. J Neurochem. 2012;122(2):260–71. Epub 2012/05/10. 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2012.07782.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Ditton HJ, Zimmer J, Kamp C, Rajpert-De Meyts E, Vogt PH. The AZFa gene DBY (DDX3Y) is widely transcribed but the protein is limited to the male germ cells by translation control. Hum Mol Genet. 2004;13(19):2333–41. Epub 2004/08/06. 10.1093/hmg/ddh240 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Rosinski KV, Fujii N, Mito JK, Koo KK, Xuereb SM, Sala-Torra O, et al. DDX3Y encodes a class I MHC-restricted H-Y antigen that is expressed in leukemic stem cells. Blood. 2008;111(9):4817–26. Epub 2008/02/27. 10.1182/blood-2007-06-096313 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Wang T, Birsoy K, Hughes NW, Krupczak KM, Post Y, Wei JJ, et al. Identification and characterization of essential genes in the human genome. Science. 2015;350(6264):1096–101. Epub 2015/10/17. 10.1126/science.aac7041 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Fuller-Pace FV. DEAD box RNA helicase functions in cancer. RNA biology. 2013;10(1):121–32. Epub 2013/01/29. 10.4161/rna.23312 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.He Y, Zhang D, Yang Y, Wang X, Zhao X, Zhang P, et al. A double-edged function of DDX3, as an oncogene or tumor suppressor, in cancer progression (Review). Oncol Rep. 2018;39(3):883–92. Epub 2018/01/13. 10.3892/or.2018.6203 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Sekiguchi T, Iida H, Fukumura J, Nishimoto T. Human DDX3Y, the Y-encoded isoform of RNA helicase DDX3, rescues a hamster temperature-sensitive ET24 mutant cell line with a DDX3X mutation. Experimental cell research. 2004;300(1):213–22. Epub 2004/09/24. 10.1016/j.yexcr.2004.07.005 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Szappanos D, Tschismarov R, Perlot T, Westermayer S, Fischer K, Platanitis E, et al. The RNA helicase DDX3X is an essential mediator of innate antimicrobial immunity. PLoS Pathog. 2018;14(11):e1007397 Epub 2018/11/27. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1007397 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Foresta C, Ferlin A, Moro E. Deletion and expression analysis of AZFa genes on the human Y chromosome revealed a major role for DBY in male infertility. Hum Mol Genet. 2000;9(8):1161–9. Epub 2000/04/18. 10.1093/hmg/9.8.1161 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Deng X, Berletch JB, Nguyen DK, Disteche CM. X chromosome regulation: diverse patterns in development, tissues and disease. Nat Rev Genet. 2014;15(6):367–78. 10.1038/nrg3687 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Geissler R, Golbik RP, Behrens SE. The DEAD-box helicase DDX3 supports the assembly of functional 80S ribosomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40(11):4998–5011. Epub 2012/02/11. 10.1093/nar/gks070 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Mazeyrat S, Saut N, Grigoriev V, Mahadevaiah SK, Ojarikre OA, Rattigan A, et al. A Y-encoded subunit of the translation initiation factor Eif2 is essential for mouse spermatogenesis. Nat Genet. 2001;29(1):49–53. Epub 2001/08/31. 10.1038/ng717 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Kastenhuber ER, Lowe SW. Putting p53 in Context. Cell. 2017;170(6):1062–78. Epub 2017/09/09. 10.1016/j.cell.2017.08.028 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Bowen ME, McClendon J, Long HK, Sorayya A, Van Nostrand JL, Wysocka J, et al. The Spatiotemporal Pattern and Intensity of p53 Activation Dictates Phenotypic Diversity in p53-Driven Developmental Syndromes. Dev Cell. 2019;50(2):212–28 e6. Epub 2019/06/11. 10.1016/j.devcel.2019.05.015 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Calo E, Gu B, Bowen ME, Aryan F, Zalc A, Liang J, et al. Tissue-selective effects of nucleolar stress and rDNA damage in developmental disorders. Nature. 2018;554(7690):112–7. 10.1038/nature25449 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Konstantinidou C, Taraviras S, Pachnis V. Geminin prevents DNA damage in vagal neural crest cells to ensure normal enteric neurogenesis. BMC biology. 2016;14(1):94 Epub 2016/10/26. 10.1186/s12915-016-0314-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Fattahi F, Steinbeck JA, Kriks S, Tchieu J, Zimmer B, Kishinevsky S, et al. Deriving human ENS lineages for cell therapy and drug discovery in Hirschsprung disease. Nature. 2016. 10.1038/nature16951 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Lai FP, Lau ST, Wong JK, Gui H, Wang RX, Zhou T, et al. Correction of Hirschsprung-Associated Mutations in Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells Via Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats/Cas9, Restores Neural Crest Cell Function. Gastroenterology. 2017;153(1):139–53 e8. Epub 2017/03/28. 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.03.014 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Heuckeroth RO, Schafer KH. Gene-environment interactions and the enteric nervous system: Neural plasticity and Hirschsprung disease prevention. Dev Biol. 2016;417(2):188–97. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2016.03.017 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Sakai D, Dixon J, Achilleos A, Dixon M, Trainor PA. Prevention of Treacher Collins syndrome craniofacial anomalies in mouse models via maternal antioxidant supplementation. Nature communications. 2016;7:10328 Epub 2016/01/23. 10.1038/ncomms10328 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Nagy A, Gertsenstein M, Vintersten K, Behringer R. Manipulating the mouse embryo, A laboratory manual, 3rd Edition Cold spring Harbor, New-York: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 2003. [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Methot D, Reudelhuber TL, Silversides DW. Evaluation of tyrosinase minigene co-injection as a marker for genetic manipulations in transgenic mice. Nucleic Acids Res. 1995;23(22):4551–6. . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Cong L, Ran FA, Cox D, Lin S, Barretto R, Habib N, et al. Multiplex genome engineering using CRISPR/Cas systems. Science. 2013;339(6121):819–23. Epub 2013/01/03. 10.1126/science.1231143 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Wang H, Yang H, Shivalila CS, Dawlaty MM, Cheng AW, Zhang F, et al. One-step generation of mice carrying mutations in multiple genes by CRISPR/Cas-mediated genome engineering. Cell. 2013;153(4):910–8. 10.1016/j.cell.2013.04.025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Belanger C, Berube-Simard FA, Leduc E, Bernas G, Campeau PM, Lalani SR, et al. Dysregulation of cotranscriptional alternative splicing underlies CHARGE syndrome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018;115(4):E620–E9. 10.1073/pnas.1715378115 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCT method. Methods. 2001;25(4):402–8. 10.1006/meth.2001.1262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Liu L, Shi G, Thirumalai D, Hyeon C. Chain organization of human interphase chromosome determines the spatiotemporal dynamics of chromatin loci. PLoS Computational Biology. 2018;14(12):e1006617 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006617 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Du Z, Zheng H, Huang B, Ma R, Wu J, Zhang X, et al. Allelic reprogramming of 3D chromatin architecture during early mammalian development. Nature. 2017;547(7662):232–5. Epub 2017/07/14. 10.1038/nature23263 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Ke Y, Xu Y, Chen X, Feng S, Liu Z, Sun Y, et al. 3D Chromatin Structures of Mature Gametes and Structural Reprogramming during Mammalian Embryogenesis. Cell. 2017;170(2):367–81 e20. Epub 2017/07/15. 10.1016/j.cell.2017.06.029 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Enomoto H, Araki T, Jackman A, Heuckeroth RO, Snider WD, Johnson EM Jr., et al. GFR alpha1-deficient mice have deficits in the enteric nervous system and kidneys. Neuron. 1998;21(2):317–24. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Sanchez-Ferras O, Coutaud B, Djavanbakht Samani T, Tremblay I, Souchkova O, Pilon N. Caudal-related homeobox (Cdx) protein-dependent integration of canonical Wnt signaling on paired-box 3 (Pax3) neural crest enhancer. J Biol Chem. 2012;287(20):16623–35. Epub 2012/03/30. M112.356394 [pii] 10.1074/jbc.M112.356394 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Silversides DW, Raiwet DL, Souchkova O, Viger RS, Pilon N. Transgenic mouse analysis of Sry expression during the pre- and peri-implantation stage. Dev Dyn. 2012;241(7):1192–204. Epub 2012/04/28. 10.1002/dvdy.23798 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Gregory S Barsh, Michelle Southard-Smith

23 Oct 2019

Dear Dr Pilon,

Thank you very much for submitting your Research Article entitled 'Male-biased aganglionic megacolon in the TashT mouse model of Hirschsprung disease is caused by upregulation of the p53-DDX3Y regulatory axis' to PLOS Genetics. Your manuscript was fully evaluated at the editorial level and by independent peer reviewers. The reviewers appreciated the attention to an important problem, but raised some substantial concerns about the current manuscript. In particular there were concerns by the reviewers and editorial members in several areas:

1 - regarding the expression analyses that led to selection of Ddx3y there needs to be normalization of mutants to sex specific controls and greater explanation provided regarding the observed over expression of mesenchymal markers.

2 - regarding the EdnrB/Sox10 enhancer construct, greater detail about this tool (including final sequence and expression relative to known ENS markers) needs to be provided to instill confidence in it's validity.

3 - regarding the MycDdx3y-IRES-eGFP transgene additional effort should be made to show that Ddx3y protein is made from this construct, that the construct does not alter the patterning or composition of the ENS in transgenic mice, and the detail of which transgenic line (1, 2, or 3) were used to generate the data in subsequent figures within the manuscript should be included in the body of the text. 

Based on the comments, we will not be able to accept this version of the manuscript, but we would be willing to review again a much-revised version. We cannot, of course, promise publication at that time.

Should you decide to revise the manuscript for further consideration here, your revisions should address the specific points made by each reviewer. We will also require a detailed list of your responses to the review comments and a description of the changes you have made in the manuscript.

If you decide to revise the manuscript for further consideration at PLOS Genetics, please aim to resubmit within the next 60 days, unless it will take extra time to address the concerns of the reviewers, in which case we would appreciate an expected resubmission date by email to plosgenetics@plos.org.

If present, accompanying reviewer attachments are included with this email; please notify the journal office if any appear to be missing. They will also be available for download from the link below. You can use this link to log into the system when you are ready to submit a revised version, having first consulted our Submission Checklist.

To enhance the reproducibility of your results, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io, where a protocol can be assigned its own identifier (DOI) such that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see our guidelines.

Please be aware that our data availability policy requires that all numerical data underlying graphs or summary statistics are included with the submission, and you will need to provide this upon resubmission if not already present. In addition, we do not permit the inclusion of phrases such as "data not shown" or "unpublished results" in manuscripts. All points should be backed up by data provided with the submission.

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool.  PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email us at figures@plos.org.

PLOS has incorporated Similarity Check, powered by iThenticate, into its journal-wide submission system in order to screen submitted content for originality before publication. Each PLOS journal undertakes screening on a proportion of submitted articles. You will be contacted if needed following the screening process.

To resubmit, use the link below and 'Revise Submission' in the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder.

[LINK]

We are sorry that we cannot be more positive about your manuscript at this stage. Please do not hesitate to contact us if you have any concerns or questions.

Yours sincerely,

Michelle Southard-Smith

Guest Editor

PLOS Genetics

Gregory Barsh

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Genetics

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Authors:

Please note here if the review is uploaded as an attachment.

Reviewer #1: In this manuscript, Cardinal et al. aim to determine molecular mechanisms underlying the male-biased “Hirschsprung disease”-like phenotype of the TashT mouse model. Hirschsprung disease (HSCR) is characterized by the lack of enteric neurons in a variable range of the colon, and has a male bias. Mouse models of currently known major risk genes do not replicate this particular feature. The authors have previously provided a HSCR model, TashT, where an insertional enhancer mutation results in Enteric Neural Crest transcriptome dysregulation. In the present manuscript, Ddx3y is identified as the only gene upregulated in both male-female; TashT-control comparisons. Authors provide a novel construct allowing efficient expression in ENCC; Ddx3y overexpression in TashT transgenic mice accentuates the phenotype. Ddx3y may be relevant in the human context as it is specifically expressed in enteric neurons of male HSCR patients, however, whether this expression differ from the general population of males is not addressed. Through a series of elegant experiments (high-throughput 4C-seq, elimination of TashT-locus, and siRNA-mediated knockdown and more) a new model for the male-sex-bias is presented. Improper TashT chromatin contacts lead to downregulation of a p53 phosphatase; the resulting increased p53 activity enhances Ddx3y expression.

The identification of Ddx3y as the causative male bias of HSCR in the TashT mouse model, may present a new target for future pharmacological prevention of HSCR in families with high genetic risk. The manuscript is overall well-written and organized. All conclusions are sound and appropriately discussed.

Major Issues:

The study presents a combined Ednr/Sox10 enhancer construct to drive expression in the developing ENS. As this construct is new and previously uncharacterized, please provide data showing its efficiency and specificity in the developing gut (as well comment on the expression elsewhere in the embryo). An attempt is made for the mycSRY-IRES-eGFP construct, but a correlation to ENCCs at a cellular level is needed. Please provide percentage of Sox10 cells expressing the transgene, and the level of specificity within the gut. A validated ENCC enhancer-construct for expression in mouse ENS will be appreciated in the field at large.

Minor issues:

Introduction (row 71-73): The description of HSCR as loss of ganglia from distal colon is simplified. Approximately 20% of HSCR patients display long-segment or total colonic aganglionosis. A small adjustment of this sentence is required to account for these cases.

Reviewer #2: PGENETICS-D-19-01494

In this manuscript, the authors report identification of P53 and DDX3Y as genes upregulated and potentially related to the male bias of HSCR. The goal of identification of genes/gene products that underlie the male bias in the genesis of HSCR is an important step in developing treatment strategies not dependent upon surgery. Identification of the Ddx3y, a Y-linked gene, as the causal gene for male bias in the TashT mouse line is potentially very significant. Of more interest, is the finding that p53-DDX3Y regulatory outcomes are reversible and possibly identifies the (a) pathogenic mechanism for male bias HSCR in the TashT line. The transcriptomic approach to identification of differentially expressed genes in male vs female is excellent. It should be noted that this manuscript is very well written and the data beautifully presented. Comments and/or concerns are listed below

1. The finding that DDX3Y protein was only detected in 50% of male HSCR patients is somewhat problematic. It is curious that methods, other than immunofluorescence were not used to try to detect this protein. What is the percentage of expression of DDX3Y in different lines of mice? This result needs a bit more attention in the discussion.

2. Although the studies designed to assess potential differences between Ddx3x and Ddx3y in their regulation by P53 are important, the use of the cell lines chosen makes interpretation of these data difficult. Gene regulation in each of these lines is not “normal.” Each of these lines has multiple issues related to gene expression especially of neural crest related genes. It would be interesting to repeat this experiment in sorted ENCCs which can be efficiently grown in culture and which are amenable to knock-down. Alternatively, ENS-derived ENCCs efficiently develop embryoid bodies in culture.

3. Inasmuch as all male mice did not develop HSCR in response to altered expression of Ddx3y, it is an overstatement that this gene is responsible for the male bias of HSCR in all mice; please tone this down.

Reviewer #3: This manuscript uses elegant and state-of-the-art techniques to elucidate the genetic basis for male-biased aganglionosis and megacolon in the TashT mouse model of HSCR. Building on their prior work, the authors identify a novel locus Ddx3y that is upregulated in male TashT mice and that this directly interferes with the p53 protein pathway.

However, the enthusiasm of this reviewer was dampened by some of the major issues identified in the analyses, experimental design and the resulting inference presented by the authors in this manuscript. These are as follows:

Major Issues:

1. The authors wrote the methods section that frequently required the reviewer to refer back to their earlier reports. Example: “Analyses of endogenous YFP fluorescence was performed as previously described.”. This required the reviewer to refer back to their earlier data and understand how the techniques that were central and crucial to understanding the experiments in this manuscript were performed.

2. On referring back to the earlier reports, the reviewer found that the YFP fluorescence in the TashT line in colon but not in small intestine is also expressed in the mesenchymal cells. Indeed the data presented in this manuscript shows that in the TashT vs Control gene expression differences from the YFP/GFP+ ENCC from small intestine and stomach (Dataset S2), the TashT transgenic animals have an overexpression of mesenchymal markers (Acta2, Actg2, Myh11) compared to controls. They also include genes such as Lumican and Col6a4 that are important for the normal migration of ENCC. Now this either means that the fidelity of the sort is compromised and that the TashT dataset contains contaminating genes from YFP- non-ENCC or that TashT causes some kind of fate-transition of these neural crest-derived cells towards a mesenchymal fate. In any case, this dataset is the basis of identification of the gene expression differences between normal and transgenic animals and these important issues have not been addressed adequately. The reviewer is careful not to critique the past reports and is confining himself/herself to this report where this data has been presented and is central to the identification of Ddx3y in the next screen.

3. The intriguing part of the datasets presented here and that have not been commented on is that the TashT animals have an overall increase in expression of Gdnf but an underexpression of Ret and Gfra1 as compared to controls.

4. In addition, the sex-biased TashT gene expression analyses has not been normalized each sex of mutant mice to their own controls. An ideal and correct experiment would be to perform TashT males vs Control males and TashT females vs Control females and then compare the significantly different genes between these two datasets. In the current experimental design and analyses, there would be an expected domination of X and Y linked genes and the study becomes underpowered and important genes that are present on autosomes and are differentially regulated between males and females do not get tested. The authors are advised to perform these analyses so that the transgenic associated sex-differences can be baselined correctly.

5. As a control for Ddx3y (Fig 1C), the authors chose Eif2s3y, a gene that is significantly upstream and is in the opposite direction. The authors do not provide any rationale for why this gene was chosen instead of the gene Uty that is immediately next to Ddx3y and is in the same direction.

6. The authors used three transgenic lines of Ddx3y overexpression in the TashT background and a cumulative analyses shows a significant male biased aganglionosis and megacolon (Fig 1 E, F). However, Fig S1 show that there are major variations between the three lines. While all three lines show significant differences compared to WT (Fig S1C), only the second line shows any significant difference in aganglionosis compared to the TashT background. The reviewer then wonders why the other lines were included in the main data analyses or why the Lines 1 and 3 that show a significant overexpression of Ddx3y fail to show significant increase in the length of aganglionosis (Fig S1D). This combined with the data that shows that overexpression of Ddx3y in females had no effect makes the reviewer wonder whether Ddx3y is really that central to the male bias.

7. The authors implicate sex-specific trans-activation of p53 is in the male-biased phenotype. However, the controls themselves show what seems to be a significant reduction in p53 expression (Fig 4F). This is very important but this is neither statistically tested by the authors nor the implications of this tested and discussed.

8. Fig 5 shows that the addition of a p53 inhibitor to the Ddx3y – TashT mice abrogates the male bias. However, the correct way of analyzing this would be to compare each drug-treatment to its own sex-specific control. Analyzing it in that manner shows that there is a large variation and that the drug treatment is either subclassifying the effect into two populations (where one population has an effect and other doesn’t) or that the drug dosage and timing isn’t optimized.

9. The authors should also present what the Ddx3y immunoreactivity in the aganglionic part of the murine and human gut look like.

Minor issues:

1. DataS4: the nomenclature of Unique to and Common to is confusing and doesn’t describe whether genes in those datasets are specific to one or other groups.

2. Line 185: The authors should say “associated with” rather than “responsible”

**********

Have all data underlying the figures and results presented in the manuscript been provided?

Large-scale datasets should be made available via a public repository as described in the PLOS Genetics data availability policy, and numerical data that underlies graphs or summary statistics should be provided in spreadsheet form as supporting information.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: Yes: Ulrika Marklund

Reviewer #2: No

Reviewer #3: No

Decision Letter 1

Gregory S Barsh, Michelle Southard-Smith

17 Jun 2020

Dear Dr Pilon,

Thank you very much for revising your prior submission of the Research Article titled 'Male-biased aganglionic megacolon in the TashT mouse model of Hirschsprung disease is caused by upregulation of the p53-DDX3Y regulatory axis' to PLOS Genetics. Your revised manuscript was fully evaluated at the editorial level and by three independent peer reviewers. The reviewers appreciated the effort you put into the revision the additional details that clarified multiple aspects, unfortunately some concerns remain to be addressed.

1 - As currently presented, the manuscript implies that DDX3Y is the only sex-associated transcript that exhibits differential expression. If the manuscript is to retain this stance, comparing the TashT males vs Control males and TashT females vs Control females is an important aspect that is should be done and incorporated. Please take this aspect into consideration when revising the manuscript. If current circumstances prevent this analysis, one alternative is to restructure your presentation in the text so that this statement is toned down.

2- As previously commented upon in the initial reviews the manuscript infers that there is a causal link between the change in DDX3Y expression on p53 inhibition and the reduction/absence in aganglionosis in the TashT mouse. Definitive support for this statement could be generated by showing that there is no change to aganglionosis when p53 is inhibited in the TashT-DDX3Y over expression mouse. Alternatively, you could revise the text and the paper title to remove this over-interpretation of current information and indicate that your results suggest an interaction that could be investigated in the future.

Should you decide to revise the manuscript for further consideration here, your revisions should address the specific points made by each reviewer. We will also require a detailed list of your responses to the review comments and a description of the changes you have made in the manuscript.

If you decide to revise the manuscript for further consideration at PLOS Genetics, please aim to resubmit within the next 60 days, unless it will take extra time to address the concerns of the reviewers, in which case we would appreciate an expected resubmission date by email to plosgenetics@plos.org.

If present, accompanying reviewer attachments are included with this email; please notify the journal office if any appear to be missing. They will also be available for download from the link below. You can use this link to log into the system when you are ready to submit a revised version, having first consulted our Submission Checklist.

To enhance the reproducibility of your results, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io, where a protocol can be assigned its own identifier (DOI) such that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see our guidelines.

Please be aware that our data availability policy requires that all numerical data underlying graphs or summary statistics are included with the submission, and you will need to provide this upon resubmission if not already present. In addition, we do not permit the inclusion of phrases such as "data not shown" or "unpublished results" in manuscripts. All points should be backed up by data provided with the submission.

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool.  PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email us at figures@plos.org.

PLOS has incorporated Similarity Check, powered by iThenticate, into its journal-wide submission system in order to screen submitted content for originality before publication. Each PLOS journal undertakes screening on a proportion of submitted articles. You will be contacted if needed following the screening process.

To resubmit, use the link below and 'Revise Submission' in the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder.

[LINK]

We are sorry that we cannot be more positive about your manuscript at this stage. Please do not hesitate to contact us if you have any concerns or questions.

Yours sincerely,

Michelle Southard-Smith

Guest Editor

PLOS Genetics

Gregory Barsh

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Genetics

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Authors:

Please note here if the review is uploaded as an attachment.

Reviewer #1: The revised version include the sequence of the EdnrB/Sox10 construct and quantification of the proportion of Sox10 cells where the construct is active. For transparency I only ask for two more details:

1) Please add the individual data-points in your bar-graph in Figure S7. Although not mentioned in the first review, it is highly advisable to include data-points in all graphs included in the manuscript.

2) Please add a picture of a transverse cut through the intestine showing the expression of YFP/SOX10/BIIITub to indicate the specificity of expression within the ENS.

Reviewer #2: This study provides strong evidence that the p53-DDX3Y regulatory axis is at least partially responsible for the male bias in Hirschsprung’s disease (HSCR). This is a very interesting and potentially important finding; the authors have identified a potential treatment target for subsets of patients with HSCR. This data are clearly presented and the studies are well controlled. The authors have done an excellent job of addressing all of the issues raised in the previous review. This manuscript will make a significant contribution to the ENS field in general and to those most interested in HSCR.

Reviewer #3: The authors in this revised manuscript have addressed many of the comments put forth by the reviewer in the prior review to varying degrees of satisfaction. The reviewer will address the remaining issues in order.

1. The reviewer thanks the authors for significantly re-writing the manuscript to put forth their point of how the sex-stratified analyses of TashT mice was done and how the identification of the gene DDX3Y could have been made even with the strategy suggested by this reviewer. While the reviewer does not disagree that DDX3Y could have been identified in the other manner as well, the reviewer would humbly suggest that the suggested strategy would provide more and clearer understanding of the genetic factors altered in the TashT mice that make male mice more susceptible to aganglionosis. The reviewer would refer the authors to their Fig 4f, which now shows that the expression of p53 gene is significantly different in an analyses of (female control to female TashT) and (male control to male TashT). As a result, with the analyses the reviewer suggested, the authors would have easily picked up p53 as a gene that is expressed more than 2 fold differently between the TashT mice of the two sexes. While the current analyses is fine for identification of DDX3Y, it gives an erroneous impression that only this gene is significantly different and hence is the only key gene implicated in male bias in TashT aganglionosis. Such an analyses also might hold the key to explaining why DDX3Y overexpression only causes aganglionosis in the TashT background, which is the question posed by the authors in their Discussion.

2. The reviewer congratulates the authors on showing strong data on the effect of p53 inhibition on aganglionosis in the TashT mouse line. However, the reviewer feels that the causal axis of p53 and DDX3Y proposed by the authors is tenuous, since the authors did not check what would happen with p53 inhibition to aganglionosis when DDX3Y is overexpressed. The experiment to really nail the inference that "Male-biased aganglionic megacolon in the TashT mouse model of Hirschsprung disease involves upregulation of the p53-DDX3Y regulatory axis" (which is the title of the manuscript) would require the authors to show that there is no change to aganglionosis when p53 is inhibited in the TashT-DDX3Y overexpression mouse. This would provide clear and unequivocal evidence that there is a p53-DDX3Y regulatory axis that is key to the male bias of HSCR associated aganglionosis.

3. As a minor point, the reviewer would advise the authors to streamline their manuscript to allow for a better and a more focused read.

**********

Have all data underlying the figures and results presented in the manuscript been provided?

Large-scale datasets should be made available via a public repository as described in the PLOS Genetics data availability policy, and numerical data that underlies graphs or summary statistics should be provided in spreadsheet form as supporting information.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

Reviewer #3: No

Decision Letter 2

Gregory S Barsh, Michelle Southard-Smith

23 Jul 2020

Dear Dr Pilon,

We are pleased to inform you that your manuscript entitled "Male-biased aganglionic megacolon in the TashT mouse model of Hirschsprung disease involves upregulation of p53 protein activity and Ddx3y gene expression" has been editorially accepted for publication in PLOS Genetics. Congratulations!

Before your submission can be formally accepted and sent to production you will need to complete our formatting changes, which you will receive in a follow up email. Please be aware that it may take several days for you to receive this email; during this time no action is required by you. Please note: the accept date on your published article will reflect the date of this provisional accept, but your manuscript will not be scheduled for publication until the required changes have been made.

Once your paper is formally accepted, an uncorrected proof of your manuscript will be published online ahead of the final version, unless you’ve already opted out via the online submission form. If, for any reason, you do not want an earlier version of your manuscript published online or are unsure if you have already indicated as such, please let the journal staff know immediately at plosgenetics@plos.org.

In the meantime, please log into Editorial Manager at https://www.editorialmanager.com/pgenetics/, click the "Update My Information" link at the top of the page, and update your user information to ensure an efficient production and billing process. Note that PLOS requires an ORCID iD for all corresponding authors. Therefore, please ensure that you have an ORCID iD and that it is validated in Editorial Manager. To do this, go to ‘Update my Information’ (in the upper left-hand corner of the main menu), and click on the Fetch/Validate link next to the ORCID field.  This will take you to the ORCID site and allow you to create a new iD or authenticate a pre-existing iD in Editorial Manager.

If you have a press-related query, or would like to know about one way to make your underlying data available (as you will be aware, this is required for publication), please see the end of this email. If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming article at this point, to enable them to help maximise its impact. Inform journal staff as soon as possible if you are preparing a press release for your article and need a publication date.

Thank you again for supporting open-access publishing; we are looking forward to publishing your work in PLOS Genetics!

Yours sincerely,

Michelle Southard-Smith

Guest Editor

PLOS Genetics

Gregory Barsh

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Genetics

www.plosgenetics.org

Twitter: @PLOSGenetics

----------------------------------------------------

Comments from the reviewers (if applicable):

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Authors:

Please note here if the review is uploaded as an attachment.

Reviewer #1: I am satisfied with the last editions. Congratulations to a nice manuscript.

Reviewer #3: The authors have responded satisfactorily to the reviewers comments.

**********

Have all data underlying the figures and results presented in the manuscript been provided?

Large-scale datasets should be made available via a public repository as described in the PLOS Genetics data availability policy, and numerical data that underlies graphs or summary statistics should be provided in spreadsheet form as supporting information.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #3: No

----------------------------------------------------

Data Deposition

If you have submitted a Research Article or Front Matter that has associated data that are not suitable for deposition in a subject-specific public repository (such as GenBank or ArrayExpress), one way to make that data available is to deposit it in the Dryad Digital Repository. As you may recall, we ask all authors to agree to make data available; this is one way to achieve that. A full list of recommended repositories can be found on our website.

The following link will take you to the Dryad record for your article, so you won't have to re‐enter its bibliographic information, and can upload your files directly: 

http://datadryad.org/submit?journalID=pgenetics&manu=PGENETICS-D-19-01494R2

More information about depositing data in Dryad is available at http://www.datadryad.org/depositing. If you experience any difficulties in submitting your data, please contact help@datadryad.org for support.

Additionally, please be aware that our data availability policy requires that all numerical data underlying display items are included with the submission, and you will need to provide this before we can formally accept your manuscript, if not already present.

----------------------------------------------------

Press Queries

If you or your institution will be preparing press materials for this manuscript, or if you need to know your paper's publication date for media purposes, please inform the journal staff as soon as possible so that your submission can be scheduled accordingly. Your manuscript will remain under a strict press embargo until the publication date and time. This means an early version of your manuscript will not be published ahead of your final version. PLOS Genetics may also choose to issue a press release for your article. If there's anything the journal should know or you'd like more information, please get in touch via plosgenetics@plos.org.

Acceptance letter

Gregory S Barsh, Michelle Southard-Smith

3 Sep 2020

PGENETICS-D-19-01494R2

Male-biased aganglionic megacolon in the TashT mouse model of Hirschsprung disease involves upregulation of p53 protein activity and Ddx3y gene expression

Dear Dr Pilon,

We are pleased to inform you that your manuscript entitled "Male-biased aganglionic megacolon in the TashT mouse model of Hirschsprung disease involves upregulation of p53 protein activity and Ddx3y gene expression" has been formally accepted for publication in PLOS Genetics! Your manuscript is now with our production department and you will be notified of the publication date in due course.

The corresponding author will soon be receiving a typeset proof for review, to ensure errors have not been introduced during production. Please review the PDF proof of your manuscript carefully, as this is the last chance to correct any errors. Please note that major changes, or those which affect the scientific understanding of the work, will likely cause delays to the publication date of your manuscript.

Soon after your final files are uploaded, unless you have opted out or your manuscript is a front-matter piece, the early version of your manuscript will be published online. The date of the early version will be your article's publication date. The final article will be published to the same URL, and all versions of the paper will be accessible to readers.

Thank you again for supporting PLOS Genetics and open-access publishing. We are looking forward to publishing your work!

With kind regards,

Jason Norris

PLOS Genetics

On behalf of:

The PLOS Genetics Team

Carlyle House, Carlyle Road, Cambridge CB4 3DN | United Kingdom

plosgenetics@plos.org | +44 (0) 1223-442823

plosgenetics.org | Twitter: @PLOSGenetics

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Fig. Characterization of the MycDdx3y transgenic mouse line.

    (A) Complete sequence of the Ednrb-Sox10-Hsp68 synthetic promoter. Restriction sites used for cloning are in lowercase letters. (B) Schematic representation of the MycDdx3y-IRES-eGFP transgenic construct, with regulatory sequences in grey. (C) Immunofluorescence labeling of Neuro2a cells transfected with the MycDdx3y-IRES-eGFP transgenic construct and showing co-expression of MycDdx3y (red) and GFP (green) proteins. Scale bar, 10μm. (D) RT-qPCR analysis of MycDdx3y transgene expression in e12.5 TashT Tg/+;MycDdx3yTg/+ ENCCs recovered by FACS. (E) Detailed quantitative analysis of the length of ENS-covered colon (in % of total colon length) in P18-P50 TashTTg/Tg mice bearing or not a transgenic allele from each of the three MycDdx3y transgenic lines. Every MycDdx3y transgenic line is identified using the same color code as in Fig 1E and 1F. The dashed lines show the previously described threshold level interval above which megacolon is less likely to occur in FVB/N mice [29]. (* P≤0.05; ** P≤0.01; Student’s t-test).

    (TIF)

    S2 Fig. Detection of MycDDX3Y protein in e12.5 midgut cells dissociated from TashTTg/+;Ddx3yTg/+ embryos.

    Representative confocal images of e12.5 midgut cells dissociated from TashTTg/+ control and TashTTg/+:MycDdx3yTg/+ (line 3) embryos, and immunolabeled for SOX10 (red) and Myc tag (grey). ENCCs are endogenously labeled with YFP owing to the pSRYp[1.6kb]-YFP transgene in the TashT line. Scale bar, 20 μm.

    (TIF)

    S3 Fig. Overexpression of either MycDdx3y or MycSry has no impact on ENS patterning.

    Representative images of proximal colon tissues collected from P18-50 TashTTg/+ mice bearing or not MycDdx3y or MycSry transgenic constructs and stained for AChE activity. Scale bar, 1000 μm.

    (TIF)

    S4 Fig. Overexpression of MycDdx3y, but not MycSRY, worsens extent of aganglionosis in TashTTg/Tg males.

    Representative images of P18-50 colon tissues collected from male mice and stained for AChE activity. Corresponding quantitative analyses are shown in Fig 1E and 1G. Scale bar, 1000 μm.

    (TIF)

    S5 Fig. Overexpression of either MycDdx3y or MycSRY has no impact on extent of aganglionosis in TashTTg/Tg females.

    Representative images of P18-50 colon tissues collected from female mice and stained for AChE activity. Corresponding quantitative analyses are shown in Fig 1F and 1H. Scale bar, 1000 μm.

    (TIF)

    S6 Fig. Characterization of the MycSry transgenic mouse line.

    (A) Schematic representation of the MycSry-IRES-eGFP transgenic construct, with regulatory sequences in grey. (B) Immunofluorescence labeling of Neuro2a cells transfected with the MycSry-IRES-eGFP transgenic construct and showing co-expression of MycSRY (red) and GFP (green) proteins. Scale bar, 10μm. (C) Representative image of GFP-labeled neural crest-derived cells in e11.5 MycSry-IRES-eGFP transgenic embryos (n = 12). Left panels show GFP labeling of cranial nerves and dorsal root ganglia. Right panel is a high magnification view of the gut, to show GFP labeling of ENCCs in the prospective stomach (St) and small intestine (SI). Scale bar, 1000 μm (left panel); 200 μm (Right panel).

    (TIF)

    S7 Fig. Activity of the Ednrb-Sox10U3-Hsp68 synthetic promoter in ENCCs.

    (A-B) Representative confocal images of e12.5 midguts collected from MycSryTg/+ embryos and immunolabelled for SOX10 (red), βIII-Tubulin (grey), GFP (green) and DAPI (blue). High magnification views shown in B are delineated by dashed square in A. As evidenced on both x-y and x-z planes, GFP signal is mainly present in SOX10+ cells. (C) Quantification of the number of SOX10+ GFP+ double positive cells on the total number of SOX10+ cells. The total number of counted cells is indicated in brackets. Scale bar, 50 μm (A) and 20μM (B).

    (TIF)

    S8 Fig. Selection of the best primer pair for the 4C-seq analysis.

    (A) Genomic representation of the Hace1-Grik2 intergenic region on chromosome 10, using the UCSC genome browser (genome.ucsc.edu) and its vertebrate Multiz Alignment & Conservation tract. Conserved elements (CE) are indicated by either black (neutral activity) or red (silencer activity) boxes, based on transcriptional activity in luciferase assays previously performed in Neuro2a and P19 cell lines [29]. Position of 4C-seq primer pairs is illustrated in blue (1), yellow (2), purple (3), green (4), and pink (5). (B) A test 4C-library was prepared using Neuro2a cells and used to evaluate efficiency of each primer pairs. The third pair (purple) was selected based on PCR profile and proximity to silencer elements.

    (TIF)

    S9 Fig. The colon of Hace1-Grik2ΔSER/ΔSER embryos is normally colonized by ENCCs.

    (A) Representative images of P18-50 proximal colon tissues collected from wild-type (WT; FVB/N control) and Hace1-Grik2ΔSER / ΔSER (ΔSER / ΔSER) mice, and stained for AChE activity. Lower magnification images are displayed in Fig 3C. (B) Quantitative analysis of the extent of colon colonization by βIII-Tubulin+ ENCCs (in % of total colon length) in WT and Hace1-Grik2ΔSER/ΔSER e12.5 embryos, showing normal colonization in mutant animals. Representative images are shown is Fig 3D. Scale bar, 1000 μm.

    (TIF)

    S10 Fig. Sexing of Neuro2a cell line.

    (A) PCR-based sexing of Neuro2a cells showing the presence of the X-linked gene SmcX (300 pb) but the absence of Y-linked genes Zfy (420 pb) and SmcY (280 pb). Genomic DNA from female (F) or male (M) mice was used as controls. (B) Relative expression of Psmd2 (autosomal gene), Ddx3x (X-linked gene) and Ddx3y (Y-linked gene) in Neuro2a compared to a known male mouse cell line (P19). Normalization to Psmd2 expression reveal the absence of Ddx3y expression.

    (TIF)

    S1 Table. List of all primers used in this study.

    Full sequence of all oligonucleotides used in this study is shown in the 5’ to 3’ orientation. The purpose for which oligonucleotides were used is also mentioned.

    (PDF)

    S2 Table. Numerical data and statistics for all graphs.

    Each graph has its own tab.

    (XLSX)

    S1 Dataset. Differential gene expression in male vs female TashTTg/Tg ENCCs (>1.5-fold change; P≤0.05; minimum of 250 reads in at least one condition).

    (XLSX)

    S2 Dataset. Differential gene expression in TashTTg/Tg vs Gata4p-GFP control ENCCs (>1.5-fold change; P≤0.05; minimum of 250 reads in at least one condition).

    (XLSX)

    S3 Dataset. List of all loci and associated genes captured by 4C-seq.

    Each sample has its own tab.

    (XLSX)

    S4 Dataset. Lists of genes for all Venn diagram categories displayed in Fig 4A.

    Each category has its own tab.

    (XLSX)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to reviewers.docx

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to reviewers_R2_FINAL.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.


    Articles from PLoS Genetics are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES